Article Type
Changed
Fri, 01/18/2019 - 00:09
Display Headline
Lab Tests Catch Infection Risk in Febrile Infants

HONOLULU — A few simple, inexpensive laboratory tests conducted in the outpatient setting could have identified which febrile infants were likely to have serious bacterial infections and should have been considered for hospital admission, according to the results of a retrospective study of febrile infants.

Dr. Eric W. Glissmeyer and his associates examined the records of 10,316 febrile infant visits to hospitals and emergency clinics and found that in about half of cases (5,221), the infants were evaluated and sent home.

Of those, 63 (1%) were admitted within 3 days of discharge, 23 of them for serious, culture-confirmed bacterial infections, Dr. Glissmeyer said at the annual meeting of the Pediatric Academic Societies.

Bacteremia (10 cases), urinary tract infection (7 cases), bacterial meningitis (5 cases), and salmonella gastroenteritis (1 case) were among the missed cases. Most of the cases were life threatening, he said.

Among the 23 cases, just 1 infant had received a complete blood count and a urinalysis with results within normal limits at the initial presentation, conferring a low risk of a serious bacterial infection, reported Dr. Glissmeyer, who was at the University of Utah, Salt Lake City, at the time of the study.

Another 12 (52%) of these 23 infants were discharged home despite being at high risk for a serious bacterial infection. Risk was based on laboratory results and was considered high if an infant had a white blood cell count of fewer than 5,000 cells/mcL or more than 15,000 cells/mcL; an absolute band count of greater than 1,500/mm

Infants with laboratory results meeting these high-risk criteria had more than a twofold increased likelihood of being readmitted within 3 days for any reason, and for a serious bacterial infection specifically.

No laboratory tests were performed in 10 febrile infants who went on to be hospitalized with a serious bacterial infection within 3 days, said Dr. Glissmeyer, now at Children's Hospital in Boston.

Consensus guidelines issued in 1993 for the management of febrile infants (Ann. Emerg. Med. 22:1198–210) and criteria developed by several institutions on the basis of prospective studies routinely recommend a CBC and a urinalysis to detect high-risk infants aged between 1 and 90 days.

Many institutions routinely admit all febrile infants younger than 28 days because clinical appearance alone is a poor determinant of risk for serious bacterial infection for febrile infants, said Dr. Glissmeyer.

“Febrile infants with a missed serious bacterial infection are at risk for serious morbidity and mortality,” he added. “Simple laboratory testing, including a CBC and a urinalysis, should be obtained before the decision is made to manage [a febrile infant] as an outpatient.”

Article PDF
Author and Disclosure Information

Publications
Topics
Author and Disclosure Information

Author and Disclosure Information

Article PDF
Article PDF

HONOLULU — A few simple, inexpensive laboratory tests conducted in the outpatient setting could have identified which febrile infants were likely to have serious bacterial infections and should have been considered for hospital admission, according to the results of a retrospective study of febrile infants.

Dr. Eric W. Glissmeyer and his associates examined the records of 10,316 febrile infant visits to hospitals and emergency clinics and found that in about half of cases (5,221), the infants were evaluated and sent home.

Of those, 63 (1%) were admitted within 3 days of discharge, 23 of them for serious, culture-confirmed bacterial infections, Dr. Glissmeyer said at the annual meeting of the Pediatric Academic Societies.

Bacteremia (10 cases), urinary tract infection (7 cases), bacterial meningitis (5 cases), and salmonella gastroenteritis (1 case) were among the missed cases. Most of the cases were life threatening, he said.

Among the 23 cases, just 1 infant had received a complete blood count and a urinalysis with results within normal limits at the initial presentation, conferring a low risk of a serious bacterial infection, reported Dr. Glissmeyer, who was at the University of Utah, Salt Lake City, at the time of the study.

Another 12 (52%) of these 23 infants were discharged home despite being at high risk for a serious bacterial infection. Risk was based on laboratory results and was considered high if an infant had a white blood cell count of fewer than 5,000 cells/mcL or more than 15,000 cells/mcL; an absolute band count of greater than 1,500/mm

Infants with laboratory results meeting these high-risk criteria had more than a twofold increased likelihood of being readmitted within 3 days for any reason, and for a serious bacterial infection specifically.

No laboratory tests were performed in 10 febrile infants who went on to be hospitalized with a serious bacterial infection within 3 days, said Dr. Glissmeyer, now at Children's Hospital in Boston.

Consensus guidelines issued in 1993 for the management of febrile infants (Ann. Emerg. Med. 22:1198–210) and criteria developed by several institutions on the basis of prospective studies routinely recommend a CBC and a urinalysis to detect high-risk infants aged between 1 and 90 days.

Many institutions routinely admit all febrile infants younger than 28 days because clinical appearance alone is a poor determinant of risk for serious bacterial infection for febrile infants, said Dr. Glissmeyer.

“Febrile infants with a missed serious bacterial infection are at risk for serious morbidity and mortality,” he added. “Simple laboratory testing, including a CBC and a urinalysis, should be obtained before the decision is made to manage [a febrile infant] as an outpatient.”

HONOLULU — A few simple, inexpensive laboratory tests conducted in the outpatient setting could have identified which febrile infants were likely to have serious bacterial infections and should have been considered for hospital admission, according to the results of a retrospective study of febrile infants.

Dr. Eric W. Glissmeyer and his associates examined the records of 10,316 febrile infant visits to hospitals and emergency clinics and found that in about half of cases (5,221), the infants were evaluated and sent home.

Of those, 63 (1%) were admitted within 3 days of discharge, 23 of them for serious, culture-confirmed bacterial infections, Dr. Glissmeyer said at the annual meeting of the Pediatric Academic Societies.

Bacteremia (10 cases), urinary tract infection (7 cases), bacterial meningitis (5 cases), and salmonella gastroenteritis (1 case) were among the missed cases. Most of the cases were life threatening, he said.

Among the 23 cases, just 1 infant had received a complete blood count and a urinalysis with results within normal limits at the initial presentation, conferring a low risk of a serious bacterial infection, reported Dr. Glissmeyer, who was at the University of Utah, Salt Lake City, at the time of the study.

Another 12 (52%) of these 23 infants were discharged home despite being at high risk for a serious bacterial infection. Risk was based on laboratory results and was considered high if an infant had a white blood cell count of fewer than 5,000 cells/mcL or more than 15,000 cells/mcL; an absolute band count of greater than 1,500/mm

Infants with laboratory results meeting these high-risk criteria had more than a twofold increased likelihood of being readmitted within 3 days for any reason, and for a serious bacterial infection specifically.

No laboratory tests were performed in 10 febrile infants who went on to be hospitalized with a serious bacterial infection within 3 days, said Dr. Glissmeyer, now at Children's Hospital in Boston.

Consensus guidelines issued in 1993 for the management of febrile infants (Ann. Emerg. Med. 22:1198–210) and criteria developed by several institutions on the basis of prospective studies routinely recommend a CBC and a urinalysis to detect high-risk infants aged between 1 and 90 days.

Many institutions routinely admit all febrile infants younger than 28 days because clinical appearance alone is a poor determinant of risk for serious bacterial infection for febrile infants, said Dr. Glissmeyer.

“Febrile infants with a missed serious bacterial infection are at risk for serious morbidity and mortality,” he added. “Simple laboratory testing, including a CBC and a urinalysis, should be obtained before the decision is made to manage [a febrile infant] as an outpatient.”

Publications
Publications
Topics
Article Type
Display Headline
Lab Tests Catch Infection Risk in Febrile Infants
Display Headline
Lab Tests Catch Infection Risk in Febrile Infants
Article Source

PURLs Copyright

Inside the Article

Article PDF Media