Article Type
Changed
Wed, 08/16/2017 - 00:04
Display Headline
Lenalidomide maintenance prolongs PFS, OS in MM

Lenalidomide (Revlimid) Photo courtesy of Celgene
Photo courtesy of Celgene
Lenalidomide (Revlimid)

Lenalidomide maintenance can be considered a standard of care for multiple myeloma (MM) patients who have undergone hematopoietic stem cell transplant (HSCT), according to researchers.

A meta-analysis of data from 3 trials showed that lenalidomide maintenance extended both progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) in these patients.

Philip L. McCarthy, MD, of Roswell Park Cancer Institute in Buffalo, New York, and his colleagues reported results of the analysis in the Journal of Clinical Oncology.

The researchers analyzed data from 3 large, randomized trials conducted in the US, France, and Italy. The studies included patients with newly diagnosed MM who underwent autologous HSCT and then received continuous lenalidomide (n=605) or no maintenance/placebo (n=603).

Patient demographics and disease-related characteristics were generally balanced between the treatment groups.

The mean duration of maintenance was 28 months (range, 0-108) in the lenalidomide group and 22 months (range, 0-86) in the control group.

Fewer patients in the lenalidomide group (52.6%) started second-line anti-MM therapy than patients in the control group (70.8%). And the time to second-line anti-MM treatment was longer with lenalidomide than with control (hazard ratio [HR]=0.57; 95% CI, 0.49 to 0.66).

PFS and OS

Patients who received lenalidomide maintenance had significantly longer PFS and OS than patients in the control group.

The median PFS was 52.8 months and 23.5 months, respectively (HR=0.48; 95% CI, 0.41 to 0.55).

The median OS was not reached in the lenalidomide group and was 86.0 months in the control group (HR=0.75; 95% CI, 0.63 to 0.90; P=0.001),

At a median follow-up of 79.5 months, the OS rate was 64% in the lenalidomide group and 54% in the control group. The 7-year OS rates were 62% and 50%, respectively.

Safety

Safety data were not available for the Italian study. In the other 2 studies, 29.1% of patients in the lenalidomide group had treatment-emergent adverse events that led to discontinuation, as did 12.2% of patients in the control group.

Treatment-emergent adverse events leading to treatment discontinuation (in the lenalidomide and control groups, respectively) included neutropenia (2.3% vs 0.2%), thrombocytopenia (1.7% vs 1.1%), general disorders and administration site conditions (4.7% vs 1.5%), neoplasms (4.3% vs 1.0%), skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders (3.4% vs 1.9%), nervous system disorders (3.4% vs 1.7%), gastrointestinal disorders (3.4% vs 0.2%), infections and infestations (1.7% vs 0.8%), and musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders (1.1% and 1.3%).

There was a higher frequency of second primary malignancies (SPMs) in the lenalidomide group than in the control group.

The incidence of hematologic SPMs occurring before disease progression was 5.3% and 0.8%, respectively. The incidence before and after progression was 6.1% and 2.8%, respectively.

The incidence of solid tumor SPMs occurring before disease progression was 5.8% and 2.0%, respectively. The incidence before and after progression was 7.3% and 4.2%, respectively.

“With this complete and mature data from 3 large, multinational studies, we now have clear evidence that ongoing treatment with lenalidomide can prevent disease progression and extend survival in patients with multiple myeloma who’ve received a stem cell transplant,” Dr McCarthy said.

“All the investigators wish to express enormous gratitude to the patients who took part in these trials. Many others will benefit from their role in this research.”

Publications
Topics

Lenalidomide (Revlimid) Photo courtesy of Celgene
Photo courtesy of Celgene
Lenalidomide (Revlimid)

Lenalidomide maintenance can be considered a standard of care for multiple myeloma (MM) patients who have undergone hematopoietic stem cell transplant (HSCT), according to researchers.

A meta-analysis of data from 3 trials showed that lenalidomide maintenance extended both progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) in these patients.

Philip L. McCarthy, MD, of Roswell Park Cancer Institute in Buffalo, New York, and his colleagues reported results of the analysis in the Journal of Clinical Oncology.

The researchers analyzed data from 3 large, randomized trials conducted in the US, France, and Italy. The studies included patients with newly diagnosed MM who underwent autologous HSCT and then received continuous lenalidomide (n=605) or no maintenance/placebo (n=603).

Patient demographics and disease-related characteristics were generally balanced between the treatment groups.

The mean duration of maintenance was 28 months (range, 0-108) in the lenalidomide group and 22 months (range, 0-86) in the control group.

Fewer patients in the lenalidomide group (52.6%) started second-line anti-MM therapy than patients in the control group (70.8%). And the time to second-line anti-MM treatment was longer with lenalidomide than with control (hazard ratio [HR]=0.57; 95% CI, 0.49 to 0.66).

PFS and OS

Patients who received lenalidomide maintenance had significantly longer PFS and OS than patients in the control group.

The median PFS was 52.8 months and 23.5 months, respectively (HR=0.48; 95% CI, 0.41 to 0.55).

The median OS was not reached in the lenalidomide group and was 86.0 months in the control group (HR=0.75; 95% CI, 0.63 to 0.90; P=0.001),

At a median follow-up of 79.5 months, the OS rate was 64% in the lenalidomide group and 54% in the control group. The 7-year OS rates were 62% and 50%, respectively.

Safety

Safety data were not available for the Italian study. In the other 2 studies, 29.1% of patients in the lenalidomide group had treatment-emergent adverse events that led to discontinuation, as did 12.2% of patients in the control group.

Treatment-emergent adverse events leading to treatment discontinuation (in the lenalidomide and control groups, respectively) included neutropenia (2.3% vs 0.2%), thrombocytopenia (1.7% vs 1.1%), general disorders and administration site conditions (4.7% vs 1.5%), neoplasms (4.3% vs 1.0%), skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders (3.4% vs 1.9%), nervous system disorders (3.4% vs 1.7%), gastrointestinal disorders (3.4% vs 0.2%), infections and infestations (1.7% vs 0.8%), and musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders (1.1% and 1.3%).

There was a higher frequency of second primary malignancies (SPMs) in the lenalidomide group than in the control group.

The incidence of hematologic SPMs occurring before disease progression was 5.3% and 0.8%, respectively. The incidence before and after progression was 6.1% and 2.8%, respectively.

The incidence of solid tumor SPMs occurring before disease progression was 5.8% and 2.0%, respectively. The incidence before and after progression was 7.3% and 4.2%, respectively.

“With this complete and mature data from 3 large, multinational studies, we now have clear evidence that ongoing treatment with lenalidomide can prevent disease progression and extend survival in patients with multiple myeloma who’ve received a stem cell transplant,” Dr McCarthy said.

“All the investigators wish to express enormous gratitude to the patients who took part in these trials. Many others will benefit from their role in this research.”

Lenalidomide (Revlimid) Photo courtesy of Celgene
Photo courtesy of Celgene
Lenalidomide (Revlimid)

Lenalidomide maintenance can be considered a standard of care for multiple myeloma (MM) patients who have undergone hematopoietic stem cell transplant (HSCT), according to researchers.

A meta-analysis of data from 3 trials showed that lenalidomide maintenance extended both progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) in these patients.

Philip L. McCarthy, MD, of Roswell Park Cancer Institute in Buffalo, New York, and his colleagues reported results of the analysis in the Journal of Clinical Oncology.

The researchers analyzed data from 3 large, randomized trials conducted in the US, France, and Italy. The studies included patients with newly diagnosed MM who underwent autologous HSCT and then received continuous lenalidomide (n=605) or no maintenance/placebo (n=603).

Patient demographics and disease-related characteristics were generally balanced between the treatment groups.

The mean duration of maintenance was 28 months (range, 0-108) in the lenalidomide group and 22 months (range, 0-86) in the control group.

Fewer patients in the lenalidomide group (52.6%) started second-line anti-MM therapy than patients in the control group (70.8%). And the time to second-line anti-MM treatment was longer with lenalidomide than with control (hazard ratio [HR]=0.57; 95% CI, 0.49 to 0.66).

PFS and OS

Patients who received lenalidomide maintenance had significantly longer PFS and OS than patients in the control group.

The median PFS was 52.8 months and 23.5 months, respectively (HR=0.48; 95% CI, 0.41 to 0.55).

The median OS was not reached in the lenalidomide group and was 86.0 months in the control group (HR=0.75; 95% CI, 0.63 to 0.90; P=0.001),

At a median follow-up of 79.5 months, the OS rate was 64% in the lenalidomide group and 54% in the control group. The 7-year OS rates were 62% and 50%, respectively.

Safety

Safety data were not available for the Italian study. In the other 2 studies, 29.1% of patients in the lenalidomide group had treatment-emergent adverse events that led to discontinuation, as did 12.2% of patients in the control group.

Treatment-emergent adverse events leading to treatment discontinuation (in the lenalidomide and control groups, respectively) included neutropenia (2.3% vs 0.2%), thrombocytopenia (1.7% vs 1.1%), general disorders and administration site conditions (4.7% vs 1.5%), neoplasms (4.3% vs 1.0%), skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders (3.4% vs 1.9%), nervous system disorders (3.4% vs 1.7%), gastrointestinal disorders (3.4% vs 0.2%), infections and infestations (1.7% vs 0.8%), and musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders (1.1% and 1.3%).

There was a higher frequency of second primary malignancies (SPMs) in the lenalidomide group than in the control group.

The incidence of hematologic SPMs occurring before disease progression was 5.3% and 0.8%, respectively. The incidence before and after progression was 6.1% and 2.8%, respectively.

The incidence of solid tumor SPMs occurring before disease progression was 5.8% and 2.0%, respectively. The incidence before and after progression was 7.3% and 4.2%, respectively.

“With this complete and mature data from 3 large, multinational studies, we now have clear evidence that ongoing treatment with lenalidomide can prevent disease progression and extend survival in patients with multiple myeloma who’ve received a stem cell transplant,” Dr McCarthy said.

“All the investigators wish to express enormous gratitude to the patients who took part in these trials. Many others will benefit from their role in this research.”

Publications
Publications
Topics
Article Type
Display Headline
Lenalidomide maintenance prolongs PFS, OS in MM
Display Headline
Lenalidomide maintenance prolongs PFS, OS in MM
Disallow All Ads
Content Gating
No Gating (article Unlocked/Free)
Alternative CME
Disqus Comments
Default
Use ProPublica