User login
Take-Home Points
- Prevalence of the medial oblique meniscomeniscal ligament is 1% to 4%.
- It is important to distinguish this ligament from a meniscus tear on MRI.
- The functional characteristics of this ligament are not well understood.
- What may appear to be a meniscal tear in a younger patient could be a medial oblique meniscomeniscal ligament.
- Dr. Flanigan recommends leaving the ligament intact unless resection is needed to provide better visualization.
We report a case of aberrant meniscus attachment in the setting of anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injury. An anomalous cordlike attachment ran from the anterior horn of the medial meniscus to the posterior horn of the lateral meniscus through the intercondylar notch. This attachment was previously named the medial oblique meniscomeniscal ligament1 but has seldom been reported in the literature. Prevalence is 1% to 4%.1,2 This case was treated at Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center in Columbus. The patient provided written informed consent for print and electronic publication of this case report.
Case Report
An 18-year-old man presented with left knee pain after sustaining 2 injuries to the knee. The first injury occurred during a dodgeball game—when the knee buckled on landing from a jump. A “pop” was felt, and the knee swelled immediately. The second injury occurred about 3 months later, during soccer play. The patient was running when his foot slipped and caused the knee to buckle. Again, a “pop” was felt, and there was swelling. Mechanical symptoms of clicking then started. The patient reported no instability episodes. His medical history and family history were otherwise unremarkable. The patient was healthy and had a body mass index of 23.05 kg/m2.
Physical examination revealed no effusion, erythema, or warmth in the left knee. Range of motion was 0° to 135° in the left knee and 0° to 140° in the right knee. There was no pain on hyperextension of the knee or medial or lateral joint-line tenderness, but there was pain on hyperflexion, and the McMurray test was positive. Ligament examination was negative except for positive anterior drawer, Lachman, and pivot-shift tests.
Radiographs taken the day of the first clinic visit showed no acute osseous abnormality. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) showed complete disruption of the proximal fibers of the ACL (Figures 1, 2). 
Also observed was a small oblique tear of the body of the lateral meniscus with slight blunting of the anterior horn of the medial meniscus, which may have been related to a small tear. A pivot-shift contusion pattern with impaction fracture of the lateral femoral condyle was also appreciated. There were no definite cartilage defects identified.
Discussion
The medial and lateral menisci typically are separate fibrocartilaginous structures acting as a cushion for the knee, but normal variant connections between the structures have been described. These connections include the anterior transverse meniscal ligament, the posterior transverse meniscal ligament, and the medial and lateral oblique meniscomeniscal ligaments.3 In the present case, a medial oblique meniscomeniscal ligament was identified. Its path between menisci was traceable on coronal and axial views. Video taken during arthroscopy also clearly showed its path and its relationship to other structures in the knee. To Dr. Flanigan’s knowledge, this ligament was not previously described with video. It is important to distinguish this ligament from a horizontal tear of the meniscus, given the potential for misinterpretation on MRI. A horizontal tear is a degenerative change that often occurs in older patients. Our patient was 18 years old at time of injury. In addition, the surface of his lower meniscus was smooth, whereas in a tear the edge is irregular and discontinuous. Dr. Flanigan prefers to leave this ligament intact unless resection would provide better visualization during arthroscopy. His reasoning is that the functional characteristics of the ligament are not well understood.
There are few reports on the medial oblique meniscomeniscal ligament.1 Sanders and colleagues1 found 3 cases of this normal variant. In the first, the ligament was interpreted as a flap tear on MRI; in the other 2 cases, the ligament was correctly identified. Kim and Laor2 and Dervin and Paterson4 also described this variant in case reports.
There are many abnormalities of the meniscus. In our literature review, we found reports on various anomalies, including discoid meniscus,5 ring-shape meniscus,6,7 accessory meniscus,8 double-layer meniscus,9-12 abnormal band formation,13,14 hypoplasia,15 Wrisberg meniscus,6 and congenital absence of meniscus.16 These variations have multifactorial causes, including congenital and developmental influences.
In a recent case report, Giordano and Goldblatt14 described an abnormal band of lateral meniscus extending from the posterior horn to the anterior-mid portion of the same meniscus. Lee and Min13 described the same band earlier, in a 2-patient case report.13 One patient presented symptomatically, nontraumatically, and the other with a posterior cruciate ligament tear. Each case was deemed congenital given the characteristic appearance and bilaterality of the anomaly.
In an 11-patient case series in Finland, Rainio and colleagues17 described an attachment from the anterior horn of the medial meniscus inserting into the ACL—a crescent band from the upper surface of the anterior horn that attached along the upper two thirds of the ACL.
At 2-year follow-up, our patient was doing well with rehabilitation and experienced only minimal symptoms. Radiologists and surgeons should be able to identify such variants. Knowing the common and rare variants, radiologists can help surgeons by identifying normal anatomy from pathology and providing a more clinically relevant report. Surgeons should be aware of the anatomical variability in the knee in order to provide the best care for their patients.
1. Sanders TG, Linares RC, Lawhorn KW, Tirman PF, Houser C. Oblique meniscomeniscal ligament: another potential pitfall for a meniscal tear—anatomic description and appearance at MR imaging in three cases. Radiology. 1999;213(1):213-216.
2. Kim HK, Laor T. Oblique meniscomeniscal ligament: a normal variant. Pediatr Radiol. 2009;39(6):634.
3. Chan CM, Goldblatt JP. Unilateral meniscomeniscal ligament. Orthopedics. 2012;35(12):e1815-e1817.
4. Dervin GF, Paterson RS. Oblique menisco-meniscal ligament of the knee. Arthroscopy. 1997;13(3):363-365.
5. Sun Y, Jiang Q. Review of discoid meniscus. Orthop Surg. 2011;3(4):219-223.
6. Kim YG, Ihn JC, Park SK, Kyung HS. An arthroscopic analysis of lateral meniscal variants and a comparison with MRI findings. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2006;14(1):20-26.
7. Kim SJ, Jeon CH, Koh CH. A ring-shaped lateral meniscus. Arthroscopy. 1995;11(6):738-739.
8. Karahan M, Erol B. Accessory lateral meniscus: a case report. Am J Sports Med. 2004;32(8):1973-1976.
9. Okahashi K, Sugimoto K, Iwai M, Oshima M, Fujisawa Y, Takakura Y. Double-layered lateral meniscus. J Orthop Sci. 2005;10(6):661-664.
10. Karataglis D, Dramis A, Learmonth DJ. Double-layered lateral meniscus. A rare anatomical aberration. Knee. 2006;13(5):415-416.
11. Takayama K, Kuroda R, Matsumoto T, et al. Bilateral double-layered lateral meniscus: a report of two cases. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2009;17(11):1336-1339.
12. Wang Q, Liu XM, Liu SB, Bai Y. Double-layered lateral meniscus. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2011;19(12):2050-2051.
13. Lee BI, Min KD. Abnormal band of the lateral meniscus of the knee. Arthroscopy. 2000;16(6):11.
14. Giordano B, Goldblatt J. Abnormal band of lateral meniscus. Orthopedics. 2009;32(1):51.
15. Ohana N, Plotquin D, Atar D. Bilateral hypoplastic lateral meniscus. Arthroscopy. 1995;11(6):740-742.
16. Tolo VT. Congenital absence of the menisci and cruciate ligaments of the knee. A case report. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1981;63(6):1022-1024.
17. Rainio P, Sarimo J, Rantanen J, Alanen J, Orava S. Observation of anomalous insertion of the medial meniscus on the anterior cruciate ligament. Arthroscopy. 2002;18(2):E9.
Take-Home Points
- Prevalence of the medial oblique meniscomeniscal ligament is 1% to 4%.
- It is important to distinguish this ligament from a meniscus tear on MRI.
- The functional characteristics of this ligament are not well understood.
- What may appear to be a meniscal tear in a younger patient could be a medial oblique meniscomeniscal ligament.
- Dr. Flanigan recommends leaving the ligament intact unless resection is needed to provide better visualization.
We report a case of aberrant meniscus attachment in the setting of anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injury. An anomalous cordlike attachment ran from the anterior horn of the medial meniscus to the posterior horn of the lateral meniscus through the intercondylar notch. This attachment was previously named the medial oblique meniscomeniscal ligament1 but has seldom been reported in the literature. Prevalence is 1% to 4%.1,2 This case was treated at Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center in Columbus. The patient provided written informed consent for print and electronic publication of this case report.
Case Report
An 18-year-old man presented with left knee pain after sustaining 2 injuries to the knee. The first injury occurred during a dodgeball game—when the knee buckled on landing from a jump. A “pop” was felt, and the knee swelled immediately. The second injury occurred about 3 months later, during soccer play. The patient was running when his foot slipped and caused the knee to buckle. Again, a “pop” was felt, and there was swelling. Mechanical symptoms of clicking then started. The patient reported no instability episodes. His medical history and family history were otherwise unremarkable. The patient was healthy and had a body mass index of 23.05 kg/m2.
Physical examination revealed no effusion, erythema, or warmth in the left knee. Range of motion was 0° to 135° in the left knee and 0° to 140° in the right knee. There was no pain on hyperextension of the knee or medial or lateral joint-line tenderness, but there was pain on hyperflexion, and the McMurray test was positive. Ligament examination was negative except for positive anterior drawer, Lachman, and pivot-shift tests.
Radiographs taken the day of the first clinic visit showed no acute osseous abnormality. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) showed complete disruption of the proximal fibers of the ACL (Figures 1, 2).
Also observed was a small oblique tear of the body of the lateral meniscus with slight blunting of the anterior horn of the medial meniscus, which may have been related to a small tear. A pivot-shift contusion pattern with impaction fracture of the lateral femoral condyle was also appreciated. There were no definite cartilage defects identified.
Discussion
The medial and lateral menisci typically are separate fibrocartilaginous structures acting as a cushion for the knee, but normal variant connections between the structures have been described. These connections include the anterior transverse meniscal ligament, the posterior transverse meniscal ligament, and the medial and lateral oblique meniscomeniscal ligaments.3 In the present case, a medial oblique meniscomeniscal ligament was identified. Its path between menisci was traceable on coronal and axial views. Video taken during arthroscopy also clearly showed its path and its relationship to other structures in the knee. To Dr. Flanigan’s knowledge, this ligament was not previously described with video. It is important to distinguish this ligament from a horizontal tear of the meniscus, given the potential for misinterpretation on MRI. A horizontal tear is a degenerative change that often occurs in older patients. Our patient was 18 years old at time of injury. In addition, the surface of his lower meniscus was smooth, whereas in a tear the edge is irregular and discontinuous. Dr. Flanigan prefers to leave this ligament intact unless resection would provide better visualization during arthroscopy. His reasoning is that the functional characteristics of the ligament are not well understood.
There are few reports on the medial oblique meniscomeniscal ligament.1 Sanders and colleagues1 found 3 cases of this normal variant. In the first, the ligament was interpreted as a flap tear on MRI; in the other 2 cases, the ligament was correctly identified. Kim and Laor2 and Dervin and Paterson4 also described this variant in case reports.
There are many abnormalities of the meniscus. In our literature review, we found reports on various anomalies, including discoid meniscus,5 ring-shape meniscus,6,7 accessory meniscus,8 double-layer meniscus,9-12 abnormal band formation,13,14 hypoplasia,15 Wrisberg meniscus,6 and congenital absence of meniscus.16 These variations have multifactorial causes, including congenital and developmental influences.
In a recent case report, Giordano and Goldblatt14 described an abnormal band of lateral meniscus extending from the posterior horn to the anterior-mid portion of the same meniscus. Lee and Min13 described the same band earlier, in a 2-patient case report.13 One patient presented symptomatically, nontraumatically, and the other with a posterior cruciate ligament tear. Each case was deemed congenital given the characteristic appearance and bilaterality of the anomaly.
In an 11-patient case series in Finland, Rainio and colleagues17 described an attachment from the anterior horn of the medial meniscus inserting into the ACL—a crescent band from the upper surface of the anterior horn that attached along the upper two thirds of the ACL.
At 2-year follow-up, our patient was doing well with rehabilitation and experienced only minimal symptoms. Radiologists and surgeons should be able to identify such variants. Knowing the common and rare variants, radiologists can help surgeons by identifying normal anatomy from pathology and providing a more clinically relevant report. Surgeons should be aware of the anatomical variability in the knee in order to provide the best care for their patients.
Take-Home Points
- Prevalence of the medial oblique meniscomeniscal ligament is 1% to 4%.
- It is important to distinguish this ligament from a meniscus tear on MRI.
- The functional characteristics of this ligament are not well understood.
- What may appear to be a meniscal tear in a younger patient could be a medial oblique meniscomeniscal ligament.
- Dr. Flanigan recommends leaving the ligament intact unless resection is needed to provide better visualization.
We report a case of aberrant meniscus attachment in the setting of anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injury. An anomalous cordlike attachment ran from the anterior horn of the medial meniscus to the posterior horn of the lateral meniscus through the intercondylar notch. This attachment was previously named the medial oblique meniscomeniscal ligament1 but has seldom been reported in the literature. Prevalence is 1% to 4%.1,2 This case was treated at Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center in Columbus. The patient provided written informed consent for print and electronic publication of this case report.
Case Report
An 18-year-old man presented with left knee pain after sustaining 2 injuries to the knee. The first injury occurred during a dodgeball game—when the knee buckled on landing from a jump. A “pop” was felt, and the knee swelled immediately. The second injury occurred about 3 months later, during soccer play. The patient was running when his foot slipped and caused the knee to buckle. Again, a “pop” was felt, and there was swelling. Mechanical symptoms of clicking then started. The patient reported no instability episodes. His medical history and family history were otherwise unremarkable. The patient was healthy and had a body mass index of 23.05 kg/m2.
Physical examination revealed no effusion, erythema, or warmth in the left knee. Range of motion was 0° to 135° in the left knee and 0° to 140° in the right knee. There was no pain on hyperextension of the knee or medial or lateral joint-line tenderness, but there was pain on hyperflexion, and the McMurray test was positive. Ligament examination was negative except for positive anterior drawer, Lachman, and pivot-shift tests.
Radiographs taken the day of the first clinic visit showed no acute osseous abnormality. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) showed complete disruption of the proximal fibers of the ACL (Figures 1, 2).
Also observed was a small oblique tear of the body of the lateral meniscus with slight blunting of the anterior horn of the medial meniscus, which may have been related to a small tear. A pivot-shift contusion pattern with impaction fracture of the lateral femoral condyle was also appreciated. There were no definite cartilage defects identified.
Discussion
The medial and lateral menisci typically are separate fibrocartilaginous structures acting as a cushion for the knee, but normal variant connections between the structures have been described. These connections include the anterior transverse meniscal ligament, the posterior transverse meniscal ligament, and the medial and lateral oblique meniscomeniscal ligaments.3 In the present case, a medial oblique meniscomeniscal ligament was identified. Its path between menisci was traceable on coronal and axial views. Video taken during arthroscopy also clearly showed its path and its relationship to other structures in the knee. To Dr. Flanigan’s knowledge, this ligament was not previously described with video. It is important to distinguish this ligament from a horizontal tear of the meniscus, given the potential for misinterpretation on MRI. A horizontal tear is a degenerative change that often occurs in older patients. Our patient was 18 years old at time of injury. In addition, the surface of his lower meniscus was smooth, whereas in a tear the edge is irregular and discontinuous. Dr. Flanigan prefers to leave this ligament intact unless resection would provide better visualization during arthroscopy. His reasoning is that the functional characteristics of the ligament are not well understood.
There are few reports on the medial oblique meniscomeniscal ligament.1 Sanders and colleagues1 found 3 cases of this normal variant. In the first, the ligament was interpreted as a flap tear on MRI; in the other 2 cases, the ligament was correctly identified. Kim and Laor2 and Dervin and Paterson4 also described this variant in case reports.
There are many abnormalities of the meniscus. In our literature review, we found reports on various anomalies, including discoid meniscus,5 ring-shape meniscus,6,7 accessory meniscus,8 double-layer meniscus,9-12 abnormal band formation,13,14 hypoplasia,15 Wrisberg meniscus,6 and congenital absence of meniscus.16 These variations have multifactorial causes, including congenital and developmental influences.
In a recent case report, Giordano and Goldblatt14 described an abnormal band of lateral meniscus extending from the posterior horn to the anterior-mid portion of the same meniscus. Lee and Min13 described the same band earlier, in a 2-patient case report.13 One patient presented symptomatically, nontraumatically, and the other with a posterior cruciate ligament tear. Each case was deemed congenital given the characteristic appearance and bilaterality of the anomaly.
In an 11-patient case series in Finland, Rainio and colleagues17 described an attachment from the anterior horn of the medial meniscus inserting into the ACL—a crescent band from the upper surface of the anterior horn that attached along the upper two thirds of the ACL.
At 2-year follow-up, our patient was doing well with rehabilitation and experienced only minimal symptoms. Radiologists and surgeons should be able to identify such variants. Knowing the common and rare variants, radiologists can help surgeons by identifying normal anatomy from pathology and providing a more clinically relevant report. Surgeons should be aware of the anatomical variability in the knee in order to provide the best care for their patients.
1. Sanders TG, Linares RC, Lawhorn KW, Tirman PF, Houser C. Oblique meniscomeniscal ligament: another potential pitfall for a meniscal tear—anatomic description and appearance at MR imaging in three cases. Radiology. 1999;213(1):213-216.
2. Kim HK, Laor T. Oblique meniscomeniscal ligament: a normal variant. Pediatr Radiol. 2009;39(6):634.
3. Chan CM, Goldblatt JP. Unilateral meniscomeniscal ligament. Orthopedics. 2012;35(12):e1815-e1817.
4. Dervin GF, Paterson RS. Oblique menisco-meniscal ligament of the knee. Arthroscopy. 1997;13(3):363-365.
5. Sun Y, Jiang Q. Review of discoid meniscus. Orthop Surg. 2011;3(4):219-223.
6. Kim YG, Ihn JC, Park SK, Kyung HS. An arthroscopic analysis of lateral meniscal variants and a comparison with MRI findings. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2006;14(1):20-26.
7. Kim SJ, Jeon CH, Koh CH. A ring-shaped lateral meniscus. Arthroscopy. 1995;11(6):738-739.
8. Karahan M, Erol B. Accessory lateral meniscus: a case report. Am J Sports Med. 2004;32(8):1973-1976.
9. Okahashi K, Sugimoto K, Iwai M, Oshima M, Fujisawa Y, Takakura Y. Double-layered lateral meniscus. J Orthop Sci. 2005;10(6):661-664.
10. Karataglis D, Dramis A, Learmonth DJ. Double-layered lateral meniscus. A rare anatomical aberration. Knee. 2006;13(5):415-416.
11. Takayama K, Kuroda R, Matsumoto T, et al. Bilateral double-layered lateral meniscus: a report of two cases. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2009;17(11):1336-1339.
12. Wang Q, Liu XM, Liu SB, Bai Y. Double-layered lateral meniscus. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2011;19(12):2050-2051.
13. Lee BI, Min KD. Abnormal band of the lateral meniscus of the knee. Arthroscopy. 2000;16(6):11.
14. Giordano B, Goldblatt J. Abnormal band of lateral meniscus. Orthopedics. 2009;32(1):51.
15. Ohana N, Plotquin D, Atar D. Bilateral hypoplastic lateral meniscus. Arthroscopy. 1995;11(6):740-742.
16. Tolo VT. Congenital absence of the menisci and cruciate ligaments of the knee. A case report. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1981;63(6):1022-1024.
17. Rainio P, Sarimo J, Rantanen J, Alanen J, Orava S. Observation of anomalous insertion of the medial meniscus on the anterior cruciate ligament. Arthroscopy. 2002;18(2):E9.
1. Sanders TG, Linares RC, Lawhorn KW, Tirman PF, Houser C. Oblique meniscomeniscal ligament: another potential pitfall for a meniscal tear—anatomic description and appearance at MR imaging in three cases. Radiology. 1999;213(1):213-216.
2. Kim HK, Laor T. Oblique meniscomeniscal ligament: a normal variant. Pediatr Radiol. 2009;39(6):634.
3. Chan CM, Goldblatt JP. Unilateral meniscomeniscal ligament. Orthopedics. 2012;35(12):e1815-e1817.
4. Dervin GF, Paterson RS. Oblique menisco-meniscal ligament of the knee. Arthroscopy. 1997;13(3):363-365.
5. Sun Y, Jiang Q. Review of discoid meniscus. Orthop Surg. 2011;3(4):219-223.
6. Kim YG, Ihn JC, Park SK, Kyung HS. An arthroscopic analysis of lateral meniscal variants and a comparison with MRI findings. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2006;14(1):20-26.
7. Kim SJ, Jeon CH, Koh CH. A ring-shaped lateral meniscus. Arthroscopy. 1995;11(6):738-739.
8. Karahan M, Erol B. Accessory lateral meniscus: a case report. Am J Sports Med. 2004;32(8):1973-1976.
9. Okahashi K, Sugimoto K, Iwai M, Oshima M, Fujisawa Y, Takakura Y. Double-layered lateral meniscus. J Orthop Sci. 2005;10(6):661-664.
10. Karataglis D, Dramis A, Learmonth DJ. Double-layered lateral meniscus. A rare anatomical aberration. Knee. 2006;13(5):415-416.
11. Takayama K, Kuroda R, Matsumoto T, et al. Bilateral double-layered lateral meniscus: a report of two cases. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2009;17(11):1336-1339.
12. Wang Q, Liu XM, Liu SB, Bai Y. Double-layered lateral meniscus. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2011;19(12):2050-2051.
13. Lee BI, Min KD. Abnormal band of the lateral meniscus of the knee. Arthroscopy. 2000;16(6):11.
14. Giordano B, Goldblatt J. Abnormal band of lateral meniscus. Orthopedics. 2009;32(1):51.
15. Ohana N, Plotquin D, Atar D. Bilateral hypoplastic lateral meniscus. Arthroscopy. 1995;11(6):740-742.
16. Tolo VT. Congenital absence of the menisci and cruciate ligaments of the knee. A case report. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1981;63(6):1022-1024.
17. Rainio P, Sarimo J, Rantanen J, Alanen J, Orava S. Observation of anomalous insertion of the medial meniscus on the anterior cruciate ligament. Arthroscopy. 2002;18(2):E9.
