Three Anomalies and a Complication: Ruptured Noncoronary Sinus of Valsalva Aneurysm, Atrial Septal Aneurysm, and Patent Foramen Ovale

Article Type
Changed
Thu, 04/26/2018 - 09:02
The confluence of atrial septal aneurysm and patent foramen ovale in noncoronary sinus of Valsalva has not been previously documented in the literature.

A 53 year-old white male with a past medical history of hypertension, hyperlipidemia, and former tobacco use was referred to the Dayton VAMC in Ohio for symptoms that included shortness of breath and a recent abnormal stress test. The patient reported no history of known coronary artery disease (CAD), congestive heart failure, or other cardiovascular diseases. The patient also reported no recent fever, bacterial blood infection, syphilis infection, recreational drug use, or chest trauma.

A physical examination was remarkable for grade 3/6 continuous murmur at the 5th interspace to the left of the sternum and a loud “pistol shot” sound heard over the femoral artery. The patient had jugular venous distension and 2+ leg edema bilaterally. His vital signs were normal, and laboratory blood tests showed normal hemoglobin level and kidney function.

An electrocardiogram showed nonspecific ST segment changes and a transthoracic echocardiogram (TTE) revealed a high-velocity jet in the right atrium (RA) above the tricuspid valve concerning for sinus of Valsalva aneurysm (SVA).

fed03406033_f1.png
A transesophageal echocardiogram (TEE) showed a “windsock” appearance of the noncoronary SVA with possible rupture into the RA (Figure 1) and atrial septal aneurysm (ASA) with more than 2-cm displacement beyond the plane of the atrial septum and a 2-mm patent foramen ovale (PFO) (Figure 2).
fed03406033_f2.png
fed03406033_f3.png

 

Right heart catheterization revealed elevated RA pressures with positive shunt study showing oxygen saturation step-up in the RA (Figure 3). Left heart hemodynamic measurement from an aortic approach to the distal part of the noncoronary cusp SVA revealed an RA pressure-tracing pattern consistent with rupture of the noncoronary SVA into the RA (Figure 4).

fed03406033_f4.png
Coronary angiography revealed single vessel CAD involving the proximal right coronary artery.

The primary diagnosis was of acute heart failure secondary to ruptured aneurysm of the noncoronary SVA into RA. The patient also received a secondary diagnosis of atrial septal aneurysm and PFO.

[embed:render:related:node:128884]

Treatment & Outcome

The patient was treated with aggressive diuresis and responded well to therapy. Considering the high mortality rate associated with a ruptured SVA, the patient was referred to a tertiary care center for surgical evaluation. He underwent repair of aorto-right atrial communication with a Cormatrix patch (Roswell, GA) from the aortic side and with primary closure from the right atrial side with resection of the windsock tract; coronary artery bypass graft x1 with right internal mammary artery to the right coronary artery; closure of the PFO with the Cormatrix patch.

The postoperative TEE confirmed preserved LV and RV function, no shunts, no aortic or tricuspid insufficiency. Biopsy of the tissue resected showed intimal fibroplasia. A TTE completed 1 year after surgery showed normal valvular function and without any structural abnormalities. The patient had improvement in symptoms and an uneventful year after surgical intervention followed by 24 session of cardiac rehabilitation.

 

 

Discussion

Sinus of Valsalva aneurysm is a dilation of the aortic wall between the aortic valve and the sinotubular junction that is caused by the lack of continuity between the middle layer of the aortic wall and the aortic valve.1 Cases of SVA are rare cardiac anomalies with prevalence of 1% in patients undergoing open-heart surgery.2 Between 65% and 85% of SVA cases originate from the right coronary sinus, 10% to 20% from the noncoronary sinus, and < 5% from the left coronary sinus.3

[embed:render:related:node:106996]

Sinus of Valsalva aneurysm is usually congenital, although cases associated with syphilis, bacterial endocarditis, trauma, Behçet disease, and aortic dissection have been reported. Structural defects associated with congenital SVAs include ventricular septal defect, bicuspid aortic valve, and aortic regurgitation. It is less commonly associated with pulmonary stenosis, coarctation of the aorta, patent ductus arteriosus, tricuspid regurgitation, and atrial septal defects.

The most common complication of the SVA is rupture into another cardiac chamber, frequently the right ventricle (60%) or RA (29%) and less frequently into left atrium (6%), left ventricle (4%), or pericardium (1%).1 Patients with ruptured SVA mainly develop dyspnea and chest pain, but cough, fatigue, peripheral edema, and continuous murmur have been reported.1

Atrial septal aneurysm is an uncommon finding in adults, with an incidence of 2.2 % in the general population, and it is often associated with atrial septal defect and PFO.1,4 Although ASA formation can be secondary to interatrial differences in pressures, it can be a primary malformation involving the region of the fossa ovalis or the entire atrial septum.4 Atrial septal aneurysm may be an isolated anomaly, but often is found in association with other structural cardiac anomalies, including SVA and PFO.4,5

Conclusion

Although coexistence of SVA and ASA has been reported previously, the case reported here, a ruptured noncoronary SVA that was associated with a large ASA and a PFO, has not been previously documented in the English literature. This patient’s anomalies are most likely congenital in origin. Progressive dyspnea and chest pain in the presence of a continuous loud murmur should raise the suspicion of ruptured sinus of Valsalva. Although no significant aortic regurgitation was noted on echocardiography, the pistol shot sound heard over the femoral artery was believed to be due to the rapid diastolic runoff into the RA through the ruptured SVA.

The significant increase in the RA pressure made the ASA and PFO more prominent. A TEE, left and right heart catheterizations with shunt study are vital for the diagnosis of SVA. If left untreated, SVA has an ominous prognosis. Surgical repair of ruptured SVA has an accepted risk and good prognosis with 10-year survival rate of 90%, whereas the mean survival of untreated ruptured SVA is about 4 years.6,7 Hence, the patient in this study was referred to a tertiary care center for surgical intervention.

[embed:render:related:node:134882]

References

1. Galicia-Tornell MM, Marín-Solís B, Mercado-Astorga O, Espinoza-Anguiano S, Martínez-Martínez M, Villalpando-Mendoza E. Sinus of Valsalva aneurysm with rupture. Case report and literature review. Cir Cir. 2009;77(6):441-445.

2. Takach TJ, Reul GJ, Duncan JM, et al. Sinus of Valsalva aneurysm or fistula: management and outcome. Ann Thorac Surg. 1999;68(5):1573-1577.

3. Meier JH, Seward JB, Miller FA Jr, Oh JK, Enriquez-Sarano M. Aneurysms in the left ventricular outflow tract: clinical presentation, causes, and echocardiographic features. J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 1998;11(7):729-745.

4. Mügge A, Daniel WG, Angermann C et al. Atrial septal aneurysm in adult patients: a multicenter study using transthoracic and transesophageal echocardiography. Circulation. 1995;91(11):2785-2792.

5. Silver MD, Dorsey JS. Aneurysms of the septum primum in adults. Arch Pathol Lab Med. 1978;102(2):62-65.

6. Wang ZJ, Zou CW, Li DC, et al. Surgical repair of sinus of Valsalva aneurysm in Asian patients. Ann Thorac Surg. 2007;84(1):156-160.

7. Yan F, Huo Q, Qiao J, Murat V, Ma SF. Surgery for sinus of valsalva aneurysm: 27-year experience with 100 patients. Asian Cardiovasc Thorac Ann. 2008;16(5):361-365.

Article PDF
Author and Disclosure Information

Dr. Khattak is a cardiologist at Kettering Medical Center. Dr. Patel is an internal medicine resident and Dr. Al-Zubaidi is cardiology fellow, both at Wright State University. Dr. Tivakaran is a cardiologist at Dayton VAMC; all located in Dayton, Ohio.

Author disclosures
The authors report no actual or potential conflicts of interest with regard to this article.

Disclaimer
The opinions expressed herein are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect those of
Federal Practitioner, Frontline Medical Communications Inc., the U.S. Government, or any of its agencies. This article may discuss unlabeled or investigational use of certain drugs. Please review the complete prescribing information for specific drugs or drug combinations—including indications, contraindications, warnings, and adverse effects—before administering pharmacologic therapy to patients.

Issue
Federal Practitioner - 34(6)
Publications
Topics
Page Number
33-35
Sections
Author and Disclosure Information

Dr. Khattak is a cardiologist at Kettering Medical Center. Dr. Patel is an internal medicine resident and Dr. Al-Zubaidi is cardiology fellow, both at Wright State University. Dr. Tivakaran is a cardiologist at Dayton VAMC; all located in Dayton, Ohio.

Author disclosures
The authors report no actual or potential conflicts of interest with regard to this article.

Disclaimer
The opinions expressed herein are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect those of
Federal Practitioner, Frontline Medical Communications Inc., the U.S. Government, or any of its agencies. This article may discuss unlabeled or investigational use of certain drugs. Please review the complete prescribing information for specific drugs or drug combinations—including indications, contraindications, warnings, and adverse effects—before administering pharmacologic therapy to patients.

Author and Disclosure Information

Dr. Khattak is a cardiologist at Kettering Medical Center. Dr. Patel is an internal medicine resident and Dr. Al-Zubaidi is cardiology fellow, both at Wright State University. Dr. Tivakaran is a cardiologist at Dayton VAMC; all located in Dayton, Ohio.

Author disclosures
The authors report no actual or potential conflicts of interest with regard to this article.

Disclaimer
The opinions expressed herein are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect those of
Federal Practitioner, Frontline Medical Communications Inc., the U.S. Government, or any of its agencies. This article may discuss unlabeled or investigational use of certain drugs. Please review the complete prescribing information for specific drugs or drug combinations—including indications, contraindications, warnings, and adverse effects—before administering pharmacologic therapy to patients.

Article PDF
Article PDF
Related Articles
The confluence of atrial septal aneurysm and patent foramen ovale in noncoronary sinus of Valsalva has not been previously documented in the literature.
The confluence of atrial septal aneurysm and patent foramen ovale in noncoronary sinus of Valsalva has not been previously documented in the literature.

A 53 year-old white male with a past medical history of hypertension, hyperlipidemia, and former tobacco use was referred to the Dayton VAMC in Ohio for symptoms that included shortness of breath and a recent abnormal stress test. The patient reported no history of known coronary artery disease (CAD), congestive heart failure, or other cardiovascular diseases. The patient also reported no recent fever, bacterial blood infection, syphilis infection, recreational drug use, or chest trauma.

A physical examination was remarkable for grade 3/6 continuous murmur at the 5th interspace to the left of the sternum and a loud “pistol shot” sound heard over the femoral artery. The patient had jugular venous distension and 2+ leg edema bilaterally. His vital signs were normal, and laboratory blood tests showed normal hemoglobin level and kidney function.

An electrocardiogram showed nonspecific ST segment changes and a transthoracic echocardiogram (TTE) revealed a high-velocity jet in the right atrium (RA) above the tricuspid valve concerning for sinus of Valsalva aneurysm (SVA).

fed03406033_f1.png
A transesophageal echocardiogram (TEE) showed a “windsock” appearance of the noncoronary SVA with possible rupture into the RA (Figure 1) and atrial septal aneurysm (ASA) with more than 2-cm displacement beyond the plane of the atrial septum and a 2-mm patent foramen ovale (PFO) (Figure 2).
fed03406033_f2.png
fed03406033_f3.png

 

Right heart catheterization revealed elevated RA pressures with positive shunt study showing oxygen saturation step-up in the RA (Figure 3). Left heart hemodynamic measurement from an aortic approach to the distal part of the noncoronary cusp SVA revealed an RA pressure-tracing pattern consistent with rupture of the noncoronary SVA into the RA (Figure 4).

fed03406033_f4.png
Coronary angiography revealed single vessel CAD involving the proximal right coronary artery.

The primary diagnosis was of acute heart failure secondary to ruptured aneurysm of the noncoronary SVA into RA. The patient also received a secondary diagnosis of atrial septal aneurysm and PFO.

[embed:render:related:node:128884]

Treatment & Outcome

The patient was treated with aggressive diuresis and responded well to therapy. Considering the high mortality rate associated with a ruptured SVA, the patient was referred to a tertiary care center for surgical evaluation. He underwent repair of aorto-right atrial communication with a Cormatrix patch (Roswell, GA) from the aortic side and with primary closure from the right atrial side with resection of the windsock tract; coronary artery bypass graft x1 with right internal mammary artery to the right coronary artery; closure of the PFO with the Cormatrix patch.

The postoperative TEE confirmed preserved LV and RV function, no shunts, no aortic or tricuspid insufficiency. Biopsy of the tissue resected showed intimal fibroplasia. A TTE completed 1 year after surgery showed normal valvular function and without any structural abnormalities. The patient had improvement in symptoms and an uneventful year after surgical intervention followed by 24 session of cardiac rehabilitation.

 

 

Discussion

Sinus of Valsalva aneurysm is a dilation of the aortic wall between the aortic valve and the sinotubular junction that is caused by the lack of continuity between the middle layer of the aortic wall and the aortic valve.1 Cases of SVA are rare cardiac anomalies with prevalence of 1% in patients undergoing open-heart surgery.2 Between 65% and 85% of SVA cases originate from the right coronary sinus, 10% to 20% from the noncoronary sinus, and < 5% from the left coronary sinus.3

[embed:render:related:node:106996]

Sinus of Valsalva aneurysm is usually congenital, although cases associated with syphilis, bacterial endocarditis, trauma, Behçet disease, and aortic dissection have been reported. Structural defects associated with congenital SVAs include ventricular septal defect, bicuspid aortic valve, and aortic regurgitation. It is less commonly associated with pulmonary stenosis, coarctation of the aorta, patent ductus arteriosus, tricuspid regurgitation, and atrial septal defects.

The most common complication of the SVA is rupture into another cardiac chamber, frequently the right ventricle (60%) or RA (29%) and less frequently into left atrium (6%), left ventricle (4%), or pericardium (1%).1 Patients with ruptured SVA mainly develop dyspnea and chest pain, but cough, fatigue, peripheral edema, and continuous murmur have been reported.1

Atrial septal aneurysm is an uncommon finding in adults, with an incidence of 2.2 % in the general population, and it is often associated with atrial septal defect and PFO.1,4 Although ASA formation can be secondary to interatrial differences in pressures, it can be a primary malformation involving the region of the fossa ovalis or the entire atrial septum.4 Atrial septal aneurysm may be an isolated anomaly, but often is found in association with other structural cardiac anomalies, including SVA and PFO.4,5

Conclusion

Although coexistence of SVA and ASA has been reported previously, the case reported here, a ruptured noncoronary SVA that was associated with a large ASA and a PFO, has not been previously documented in the English literature. This patient’s anomalies are most likely congenital in origin. Progressive dyspnea and chest pain in the presence of a continuous loud murmur should raise the suspicion of ruptured sinus of Valsalva. Although no significant aortic regurgitation was noted on echocardiography, the pistol shot sound heard over the femoral artery was believed to be due to the rapid diastolic runoff into the RA through the ruptured SVA.

The significant increase in the RA pressure made the ASA and PFO more prominent. A TEE, left and right heart catheterizations with shunt study are vital for the diagnosis of SVA. If left untreated, SVA has an ominous prognosis. Surgical repair of ruptured SVA has an accepted risk and good prognosis with 10-year survival rate of 90%, whereas the mean survival of untreated ruptured SVA is about 4 years.6,7 Hence, the patient in this study was referred to a tertiary care center for surgical intervention.

[embed:render:related:node:134882]

A 53 year-old white male with a past medical history of hypertension, hyperlipidemia, and former tobacco use was referred to the Dayton VAMC in Ohio for symptoms that included shortness of breath and a recent abnormal stress test. The patient reported no history of known coronary artery disease (CAD), congestive heart failure, or other cardiovascular diseases. The patient also reported no recent fever, bacterial blood infection, syphilis infection, recreational drug use, or chest trauma.

A physical examination was remarkable for grade 3/6 continuous murmur at the 5th interspace to the left of the sternum and a loud “pistol shot” sound heard over the femoral artery. The patient had jugular venous distension and 2+ leg edema bilaterally. His vital signs were normal, and laboratory blood tests showed normal hemoglobin level and kidney function.

An electrocardiogram showed nonspecific ST segment changes and a transthoracic echocardiogram (TTE) revealed a high-velocity jet in the right atrium (RA) above the tricuspid valve concerning for sinus of Valsalva aneurysm (SVA).

fed03406033_f1.png
A transesophageal echocardiogram (TEE) showed a “windsock” appearance of the noncoronary SVA with possible rupture into the RA (Figure 1) and atrial septal aneurysm (ASA) with more than 2-cm displacement beyond the plane of the atrial septum and a 2-mm patent foramen ovale (PFO) (Figure 2).
fed03406033_f2.png
fed03406033_f3.png

 

Right heart catheterization revealed elevated RA pressures with positive shunt study showing oxygen saturation step-up in the RA (Figure 3). Left heart hemodynamic measurement from an aortic approach to the distal part of the noncoronary cusp SVA revealed an RA pressure-tracing pattern consistent with rupture of the noncoronary SVA into the RA (Figure 4).

fed03406033_f4.png
Coronary angiography revealed single vessel CAD involving the proximal right coronary artery.

The primary diagnosis was of acute heart failure secondary to ruptured aneurysm of the noncoronary SVA into RA. The patient also received a secondary diagnosis of atrial septal aneurysm and PFO.

[embed:render:related:node:128884]

Treatment & Outcome

The patient was treated with aggressive diuresis and responded well to therapy. Considering the high mortality rate associated with a ruptured SVA, the patient was referred to a tertiary care center for surgical evaluation. He underwent repair of aorto-right atrial communication with a Cormatrix patch (Roswell, GA) from the aortic side and with primary closure from the right atrial side with resection of the windsock tract; coronary artery bypass graft x1 with right internal mammary artery to the right coronary artery; closure of the PFO with the Cormatrix patch.

The postoperative TEE confirmed preserved LV and RV function, no shunts, no aortic or tricuspid insufficiency. Biopsy of the tissue resected showed intimal fibroplasia. A TTE completed 1 year after surgery showed normal valvular function and without any structural abnormalities. The patient had improvement in symptoms and an uneventful year after surgical intervention followed by 24 session of cardiac rehabilitation.

 

 

Discussion

Sinus of Valsalva aneurysm is a dilation of the aortic wall between the aortic valve and the sinotubular junction that is caused by the lack of continuity between the middle layer of the aortic wall and the aortic valve.1 Cases of SVA are rare cardiac anomalies with prevalence of 1% in patients undergoing open-heart surgery.2 Between 65% and 85% of SVA cases originate from the right coronary sinus, 10% to 20% from the noncoronary sinus, and < 5% from the left coronary sinus.3

[embed:render:related:node:106996]

Sinus of Valsalva aneurysm is usually congenital, although cases associated with syphilis, bacterial endocarditis, trauma, Behçet disease, and aortic dissection have been reported. Structural defects associated with congenital SVAs include ventricular septal defect, bicuspid aortic valve, and aortic regurgitation. It is less commonly associated with pulmonary stenosis, coarctation of the aorta, patent ductus arteriosus, tricuspid regurgitation, and atrial septal defects.

The most common complication of the SVA is rupture into another cardiac chamber, frequently the right ventricle (60%) or RA (29%) and less frequently into left atrium (6%), left ventricle (4%), or pericardium (1%).1 Patients with ruptured SVA mainly develop dyspnea and chest pain, but cough, fatigue, peripheral edema, and continuous murmur have been reported.1

Atrial septal aneurysm is an uncommon finding in adults, with an incidence of 2.2 % in the general population, and it is often associated with atrial septal defect and PFO.1,4 Although ASA formation can be secondary to interatrial differences in pressures, it can be a primary malformation involving the region of the fossa ovalis or the entire atrial septum.4 Atrial septal aneurysm may be an isolated anomaly, but often is found in association with other structural cardiac anomalies, including SVA and PFO.4,5

Conclusion

Although coexistence of SVA and ASA has been reported previously, the case reported here, a ruptured noncoronary SVA that was associated with a large ASA and a PFO, has not been previously documented in the English literature. This patient’s anomalies are most likely congenital in origin. Progressive dyspnea and chest pain in the presence of a continuous loud murmur should raise the suspicion of ruptured sinus of Valsalva. Although no significant aortic regurgitation was noted on echocardiography, the pistol shot sound heard over the femoral artery was believed to be due to the rapid diastolic runoff into the RA through the ruptured SVA.

The significant increase in the RA pressure made the ASA and PFO more prominent. A TEE, left and right heart catheterizations with shunt study are vital for the diagnosis of SVA. If left untreated, SVA has an ominous prognosis. Surgical repair of ruptured SVA has an accepted risk and good prognosis with 10-year survival rate of 90%, whereas the mean survival of untreated ruptured SVA is about 4 years.6,7 Hence, the patient in this study was referred to a tertiary care center for surgical intervention.

[embed:render:related:node:134882]

References

1. Galicia-Tornell MM, Marín-Solís B, Mercado-Astorga O, Espinoza-Anguiano S, Martínez-Martínez M, Villalpando-Mendoza E. Sinus of Valsalva aneurysm with rupture. Case report and literature review. Cir Cir. 2009;77(6):441-445.

2. Takach TJ, Reul GJ, Duncan JM, et al. Sinus of Valsalva aneurysm or fistula: management and outcome. Ann Thorac Surg. 1999;68(5):1573-1577.

3. Meier JH, Seward JB, Miller FA Jr, Oh JK, Enriquez-Sarano M. Aneurysms in the left ventricular outflow tract: clinical presentation, causes, and echocardiographic features. J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 1998;11(7):729-745.

4. Mügge A, Daniel WG, Angermann C et al. Atrial septal aneurysm in adult patients: a multicenter study using transthoracic and transesophageal echocardiography. Circulation. 1995;91(11):2785-2792.

5. Silver MD, Dorsey JS. Aneurysms of the septum primum in adults. Arch Pathol Lab Med. 1978;102(2):62-65.

6. Wang ZJ, Zou CW, Li DC, et al. Surgical repair of sinus of Valsalva aneurysm in Asian patients. Ann Thorac Surg. 2007;84(1):156-160.

7. Yan F, Huo Q, Qiao J, Murat V, Ma SF. Surgery for sinus of valsalva aneurysm: 27-year experience with 100 patients. Asian Cardiovasc Thorac Ann. 2008;16(5):361-365.

References

1. Galicia-Tornell MM, Marín-Solís B, Mercado-Astorga O, Espinoza-Anguiano S, Martínez-Martínez M, Villalpando-Mendoza E. Sinus of Valsalva aneurysm with rupture. Case report and literature review. Cir Cir. 2009;77(6):441-445.

2. Takach TJ, Reul GJ, Duncan JM, et al. Sinus of Valsalva aneurysm or fistula: management and outcome. Ann Thorac Surg. 1999;68(5):1573-1577.

3. Meier JH, Seward JB, Miller FA Jr, Oh JK, Enriquez-Sarano M. Aneurysms in the left ventricular outflow tract: clinical presentation, causes, and echocardiographic features. J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 1998;11(7):729-745.

4. Mügge A, Daniel WG, Angermann C et al. Atrial septal aneurysm in adult patients: a multicenter study using transthoracic and transesophageal echocardiography. Circulation. 1995;91(11):2785-2792.

5. Silver MD, Dorsey JS. Aneurysms of the septum primum in adults. Arch Pathol Lab Med. 1978;102(2):62-65.

6. Wang ZJ, Zou CW, Li DC, et al. Surgical repair of sinus of Valsalva aneurysm in Asian patients. Ann Thorac Surg. 2007;84(1):156-160.

7. Yan F, Huo Q, Qiao J, Murat V, Ma SF. Surgery for sinus of valsalva aneurysm: 27-year experience with 100 patients. Asian Cardiovasc Thorac Ann. 2008;16(5):361-365.

Issue
Federal Practitioner - 34(6)
Issue
Federal Practitioner - 34(6)
Page Number
33-35
Page Number
33-35
Publications
Publications
Topics
Article Type
Sections
Disallow All Ads
Content Gating
No Gating (article Unlocked/Free)
Alternative CME
Use ProPublica
Article PDF Media
Image
Disable zoom
Off
Media Folder

Uncommon Locations for Brain Herniations Into Arachnoid Granulations: 5 Cases and Literature Review

Article Type
Changed
Fri, 06/21/2024 - 11:19

The circulation of cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) is crucial for maintaining homeostasis for the optimal functioning of the multiple complex activities of the brain and spinal cord, including the disposal of metabolic waste products of brain and spinal cord activity into the cerebral venous drainage. Throughout the brain, the arachnoid mater forms small outpouchings or diverticula that penetrate the dura mater and communicate with the dural venous sinuses. These outpuchings are called arachnoid granulations or arachnoid villi, and most are found within the dural sinuses, primarily in the transverse sinuses and superior sagittal sinus, but can occasionally be seen extending into the inner table of the calvarium.1,2

wekituuistec

The amount of arachnoid granulations seen in bone, particularly around the superior sagittal sinus, may increase with age.2 Arachnoid granulations are generally small but the largest ones can be seen on gross examination during intracranial procedures or autopsy.3 Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) can detect arachnoid granulations, which are characterized as T1 hypointense and T2 hyperintense (CSF isointense), well-circumscribed, small, nonenhancing masses within the dural sinuses or in the diploic space (Figure 1). Even small arachnoid granulations < 1 mm in length can be detected.2

Smaller arachnoid granulations have been described histologically as entirely covered by a dural membrane, thus creating a subdural space that separates the body of the arachnoid granulation from the lumen of the accompanying venous sinus.4 However, larger arachnoid granulations may not be completely covered by a dural membrane, thus creating a point of contact between the arachnoid granulation and the venous sinus.4 Larger arachnoid granulations are normally filled with CSF, and their signal characteristics are similar to CSF on imaging.5,6 Arachnoid granulations also often contain vessels draining into the adjacent venous sinus.5,6

When larger arachnoid granulations are present, they may permit the protrusion of herniated brain tissue. There has been an increasing number of reports of these brain herniations into arachnoid granulations (BHAGs) in the literature.7-10 While these herniations have been associated with nonspecific neurologic symptoms like tinnitus and idiopathic intracranial hypertension, their true clinical significance remains undetermined.10,11 This article presents 5 cases of BHAG, discusses their clinical presentations and image findings, and reviews the current literature.

 

 

Case 1

A 30-year-old male with a history of multiple traumatic brain injuries presented for evaluation of seizures. The patient described the semiology of the seizures as a bright, colorful light in his right visual field, followed by loss of vision, then loss of awareness and full body convulsion. The semiology of this patient’s seizures was consistent with left temporo-occipital lobe seizure. The only abnormality seen in the brain MRI was the herniation of brain parenchyma originating from the occipital lobe into the transverse sinus, presumably through an arachnoid granulation (Figure 1). An electroencephalogram (EEG) was unremarkable, though the semiology of the seizure historically described by the patient was localized to the area of BHAG. The patient is currently taking antiseizure medications and has experienced no additional seizures.

Case 2

spuuujirenauocrecebresheclospemiwatecleticlalacrofrefranebriswamafrowiga

A male aged 53 years with a history of peripheral artery disease presented with a 6-month history of headaches and dizziness. The patient reported the onset of visual aura to his right visual field, starting as a fingernail-sized scintillating kaleidoscope light that would gradually increase in size to a round shape with fading kaleidoscope colors. This episode would last for a few minutes and was immediately followed by a headache. There was no alteration of consciousness during visual aura, although sometimes the patient would have right-sided scalp tingling. These episodes were often unprovoked, but occasionally triggered by bright lights. A single routine EEG was unremarkable. The patient reported headaches without aura, but not aura without headaches, which made occipital lobe seizure less likely. MRI demonstrated a small herniation of brain parenchyma into the inner table of the left occipital bone (Figure 2). The patient was diagnosed with migraine with aura, and the semiology of the visual aura corresponded to the location of the herniation in the left occipital region.

Case 3

thegohubauososwotisibawridawegogihinechubroniwelashipheketauamamokubreketushithavephijibrujotobrelolaprohuthusovasweboclo

A 77-year-old male with a history of left ear diving injury presented with left-sided asymmetric hearing loss and word recognition difficulty for several years. MRI obtained as part of his work-up to evaluate for possible schwannoma of the eighth left cranial nerve instead demonstrated an incidental right cerebellar herniation within an arachnoid granulation into the diploic space of the occipital bone (Figure 3). The BHAG for this patient appeared to be an incidental finding unrelated to his asymmetric hearing loss.

Case 4

hekispanophikishuleclopamigicrutacraprewihusiphogestilepapuchislufrinuvacospatuvubewremitoswahotrobritrodri

A male aged 62 years with a history of metastatic esophageal cancer, substance abuse, and a prior presumed alcohol withdrawal seizure underwent an MRI for evaluation of brain metastasis after presenting to the hospital with confusion 1 day after starting chemotherapy (Figure 4). Nine years prior, the patient had an isolated generalized tonic-clonic seizure approximately 72 hours following a period of alcohol cessation. The MRI demonstrated an incidental left parasagittal herniation of left parietal lobe tissue through an arachnoid granulation into the superior sagittal sinus, in addition to metastatic brain lesions. An EEG showed mild encephalopathy without evidence of seizures. It was determined that the patient's confusion was most likely due to toxic-metabolic encephalopathy from chemotherapy.

 

Case 5

gebretaspauicrosaslukogokephatrushophispiswustupuswisluvibroshodr

A 51-year-old male presented with worsening headache severity and frequency. He had a history of chronic headaches for about 20 years that occurred annually, but were now occurring twice weekly. The headaches often started with a left eye visual aura followed by pressure in the left eye, left frontal region, and left ear, with at times a cervicogenic component. No cervical spine imaging was available. An MRI revealed 2 small adjacent areas of cerebellar herniation into arachnoid granulations in the left occipital bone (Figure 5).

 

 

Discussion

Arachnoid granulations appear very early in life, although they are uncommon before age 2 years.2 Classically, they have been understood to act as 1-way valves permitting the outflow of CSF from the subarachnoid space to the dural venous sinuses. However, increasing evidence shows they may only play a minor role in that process.12 The structure of arachnoid granulations is being reexamined. A recent microscopy study demonstrated structural heterogeneity with a fine, porous lining that permits flow.13 Additionally, associated immune components in the microenvironment suggests that arachnoid granulations may function similarly to lymph nodes as part of a central nervous system lymphatic network.13 Evidence is lacking for arachnoid granulations being the primary route of CSF outflow, and newer models include CSF exit pathways along the cranial nerves and drainage through lymphatics within the dura mater.12

New MRI systems have demonstrated that the prevalence of arachnoid granulations increases with age. One study found that all subjects in the aged 40 years cohort had detectable arachnoid granulations on images obtained with a 3T MRI system, with the main site being the superior sagittal sinus.2 The prevalence increased until age 40 years and then noticeably decreased. Not only did the prevalence increase in this pattern, but the total number of detectable arachnoid granulations followed a similar pattern.2 In addition, the detectable arachnoid granulations tend to be larger in older patients. Arachnoid granulations are very common in adults, but little is known about when and why brain tissue herniates through these structures.

This case series illustrates how a small amount of adult cerebral or cerebellar matter in large arachnoid granulations can herniate into the dural sinuses and diploic space. Although arachnoid granulations extending into the dural sinuses and diploic space are a relatively common finding on MRI,BHAGs are rare in these locations.1,2,8 Improved spatial resolution afforded by newer high-field scanners with thinner sections, such as very thin (1 mm) T1- and heavily T2-weighted 3 dimensional sequences may lead to increased detection of BHAG. Some of these herniations are small and may be easily missed or confused for normal arachnoid granulations on 3 to 5 mm thickness MRIs.

Despite increased recognition, it is still uncertain to what degree these herniations contribute to the clinical presentations. Associated neurologic symptoms may include seizures, headaches, tinnitus, syncope, and increased intracranial pressure.7-10

Three cases presented in this article demonstrated abnormal signals adjacent to the herniated brain, presumably due to dysplasia of gliotic tissue. In 1 study, parenchymal signal and structural changes occurred in about one-half of the reported BHAG, all of which were cerebellar herniations.7 In Case 1, the herniation and adjacent abnormal MRI signal corresponded to localization of the seizure semiology as obtained from patient history, strongly suggesting the BHAG played a role in the presentation. Signal abnormality accompanying an adjacent BHAG may suggest a higher likelihood that the BHAG has clinical relevance. However, the patient in Case 2 had a visual aura that corresponded to the BHAG location, so a signal abnormality may not be necessary for a patient to develop symptoms. Case 1 also included a history of documented traumatic brain injuries, suggesting that perhaps head trauma may facilitate BHAG development. Regardless, there is likely also a congenital component to their formation, as BHAG has been observed in the pediatric population.14

The patient's asymmetric left-sided hearing loss in Case 3 appeared unrelated to the BHAG as its location was in the contralateral cerebellar region and did not correspond to the patient’s clinical findings. The patient in Case 4 had a limited history regarding localization details of their prior presumed alcohol withdrawal seizure, such as head movements, eye deviation, or lateralized onset of convulsions. Given this limited data, it is unclear whether their prior seizure could have been related to BHAG or not. The patient in case 5 reported worsening headaches on the left side of his head, which corresponded to BHAG occurring on the left side. However, given that the increased T2 signal occurred in the left cerebellar hemisphere with BHAG in the left occipital bone, the occipital cortex was not involved. In this case, the BHAG would not explain the patient’s visual aura as such a lesion would have been expected in the right occipital cortex rather than its actual location in this patient’s left cerebellar hemisphere.

 

 

CONCLUSIONS

Understanding the clinical impact of brain herniations is important because they are probably more common than previously thought. Improved MRI capabilities suggest that more BHAG will be detected moving forward as radiologists interpret images with higher resolution and thinner slices. Until its significance is fully understood, BHAG will continue to complicate the diagnosis of patients with neurologic complaints whose brain MRIs and EEGs are otherwise unremarkable.

drophawulusateluwuphuslospaneueslerawrorujap

There have been no cases of surgical BHAG intervention and pathology analysis that would help determine their clinical significance. A related entity, temporal lobe encephalocele, has been linked to focal temporal lobe epilepsy, which has demonstrated significant symptom improvement following surgical correction.15 However, encephaloceles have been distinguished from BHAG in part because they do not necessarily herniate through an arachnoid granulation.8 BHAG has only begun to be characterized in detail over the last decade, so more research is needed to understand how it develops and what clinical significance it truly holds.

 

References

1. Ikushima I, Korogi Y, Makita O, et al. MRI of arachnoid granulations within the dural sinuses using a FLAIR pulse sequence. Br J Radiol. 1999;72(863):1046-1051. doi:10.1259/bjr.72.863.10700819

2. Rados M, Zivko M, Perisa A, Oreskovic D, Klarica M. No arachnoid granulations-no problems: number, size, and distribution of arachnoid granulations from birth to 80 years of age. Front Aging Neurosci. 2021;13:698865. doi:10.3389/fnagi.2021.698865

3. Grossman CB, Potts DG. Arachnoid granulations: radiology and anatomy. Radiology. 1974;113(1):95-100. doi:10.1148/113.1.95

4. Wolpow ER, Schaumburg HH. Structure of the human arachnoid granulation. J Neurosurg. 1972;37(6):724-727. doi:10.3171/jns.1972.37.6.0724

5. Leach JL, Jones BV, Tomsick TA, Stewart CA, Balko MG. Normal appearance of arachnoid granulations on contrast-enhanced CT and MR of the brain: differentiation from dural sinus disease. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 1996;17(8):1523-1532.

6. Roche J, Warner D. Arachnoid granulations in the transverse and sigmoid sinuses: CT, MR, and MR angiographic appearance of a normal anatomic variation. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 1996;17(4):677-683.

7. Malekzadehlashkariani S, Wanke I, Rufenacht DA, San Millan D. Brain herniations into arachnoid granulations: about 68 cases in 38 patients and review of the literature. Neuroradiology. 2016;58(5):443-457. doi:10.1007/s00234-016-1662-5

8. Battal B, Castillo M. Brain herniations into the dural venous sinuses or calvarium: MRI of a recently recognized entity. Neuroradiol J. 2014;27(1):55-62. doi:10.15274/NRJ-2014-10006

9. Liebo GB, Lane JJ, Van Gompel JJ, Eckel LJ, Schwartz KM, Lehman VT. Brain herniation into arachnoid granulations: clinical and neuroimaging features. J Neuroimaging. 2016;26(6):592-598. doi:10.1111/jon.12366

10. Smith ER, Caton MT, Villanueva-Meyer JE, et al. Brain herniation (encephalocele) into arachnoid granulations: Prevalence and association with pulsatile tinnitus and idiopathic intracranial hypertension. Neuroradiology. 2022;64(9):1747-1754.

11. Battal B, Hamcan S, Akgun V, et al. Brain herniations into the dural venous sinus or calvarium: MRI findings, possible causes and clinical significance. Eur Radiol. 2016;26(6):1723-1731.

12. Proulx ST. Cerebrospinal fluid outflow: A review of the historical and contemporary evidence for arachnoid villi, perineural routes, and dural lymphatics. Cell Mol Life Sci. 2021;78(6):2429-2457.

13. Shah T, Leurgans SE, Mehta RI, et al. Arachnoid granulations are lymphatic conduits that communicate with bone marrow and dura-arachnoid stroma. J Exp Med. 2023;220(2).

14. Sade R, Ogul H, Polat G, Pirimoglu B, Kantarci M. Brain herniation into the transverse sinuses’ arachnoid granulations in the pediatric population investigated with 3 T MRI. Acta Neurol Belg. 2019;119(2):225-231.

15. Saavalainen T, Jutila L, Mervaala E, Kalviainen R, Vanninen R, Immonen A. Temporal anteroinferior encephalocele: An underrecognized etiology of temporal lobe epilepsy? Neurology. 2015;85(17):1467-1474.

Article PDF
Author and Disclosure Information

Noah Gafen, MDa; Igor Sirotkin MDb; Amanda Pennington, MD, PhDb; Brittany Rea, MDc; Carlos R. Martinez, MDb

Correspondence: Noah Gafen (ngafen@gmail.com)

aUniversity of Central Florida College of Medicine, Orlando

bBay Pines Veteran Affairs Healthcare System, Florida

cUniversity of South Florida Health, Tampa

Author disclosures

The authors report no actual or potential conflicts of interest with regard to this article.

Disclaimer

The opinions expressed herein are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect those of Federal Practitioner, Frontline Medical Communications Inc., the US Government, or any of its agencies.

Ethics and consent

This study was reviewed and approved by the Bay Pines VA Institutional Review Board research office and Bay Pines VA privacy office.

Publications
Topics
Sections
Author and Disclosure Information

Noah Gafen, MDa; Igor Sirotkin MDb; Amanda Pennington, MD, PhDb; Brittany Rea, MDc; Carlos R. Martinez, MDb

Correspondence: Noah Gafen (ngafen@gmail.com)

aUniversity of Central Florida College of Medicine, Orlando

bBay Pines Veteran Affairs Healthcare System, Florida

cUniversity of South Florida Health, Tampa

Author disclosures

The authors report no actual or potential conflicts of interest with regard to this article.

Disclaimer

The opinions expressed herein are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect those of Federal Practitioner, Frontline Medical Communications Inc., the US Government, or any of its agencies.

Ethics and consent

This study was reviewed and approved by the Bay Pines VA Institutional Review Board research office and Bay Pines VA privacy office.

Author and Disclosure Information

Noah Gafen, MDa; Igor Sirotkin MDb; Amanda Pennington, MD, PhDb; Brittany Rea, MDc; Carlos R. Martinez, MDb

Correspondence: Noah Gafen (ngafen@gmail.com)

aUniversity of Central Florida College of Medicine, Orlando

bBay Pines Veteran Affairs Healthcare System, Florida

cUniversity of South Florida Health, Tampa

Author disclosures

The authors report no actual or potential conflicts of interest with regard to this article.

Disclaimer

The opinions expressed herein are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect those of Federal Practitioner, Frontline Medical Communications Inc., the US Government, or any of its agencies.

Ethics and consent

This study was reviewed and approved by the Bay Pines VA Institutional Review Board research office and Bay Pines VA privacy office.

Article PDF
Article PDF

The circulation of cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) is crucial for maintaining homeostasis for the optimal functioning of the multiple complex activities of the brain and spinal cord, including the disposal of metabolic waste products of brain and spinal cord activity into the cerebral venous drainage. Throughout the brain, the arachnoid mater forms small outpouchings or diverticula that penetrate the dura mater and communicate with the dural venous sinuses. These outpuchings are called arachnoid granulations or arachnoid villi, and most are found within the dural sinuses, primarily in the transverse sinuses and superior sagittal sinus, but can occasionally be seen extending into the inner table of the calvarium.1,2

wekituuistec

The amount of arachnoid granulations seen in bone, particularly around the superior sagittal sinus, may increase with age.2 Arachnoid granulations are generally small but the largest ones can be seen on gross examination during intracranial procedures or autopsy.3 Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) can detect arachnoid granulations, which are characterized as T1 hypointense and T2 hyperintense (CSF isointense), well-circumscribed, small, nonenhancing masses within the dural sinuses or in the diploic space (Figure 1). Even small arachnoid granulations < 1 mm in length can be detected.2

Smaller arachnoid granulations have been described histologically as entirely covered by a dural membrane, thus creating a subdural space that separates the body of the arachnoid granulation from the lumen of the accompanying venous sinus.4 However, larger arachnoid granulations may not be completely covered by a dural membrane, thus creating a point of contact between the arachnoid granulation and the venous sinus.4 Larger arachnoid granulations are normally filled with CSF, and their signal characteristics are similar to CSF on imaging.5,6 Arachnoid granulations also often contain vessels draining into the adjacent venous sinus.5,6

When larger arachnoid granulations are present, they may permit the protrusion of herniated brain tissue. There has been an increasing number of reports of these brain herniations into arachnoid granulations (BHAGs) in the literature.7-10 While these herniations have been associated with nonspecific neurologic symptoms like tinnitus and idiopathic intracranial hypertension, their true clinical significance remains undetermined.10,11 This article presents 5 cases of BHAG, discusses their clinical presentations and image findings, and reviews the current literature.

 

 

Case 1

A 30-year-old male with a history of multiple traumatic brain injuries presented for evaluation of seizures. The patient described the semiology of the seizures as a bright, colorful light in his right visual field, followed by loss of vision, then loss of awareness and full body convulsion. The semiology of this patient’s seizures was consistent with left temporo-occipital lobe seizure. The only abnormality seen in the brain MRI was the herniation of brain parenchyma originating from the occipital lobe into the transverse sinus, presumably through an arachnoid granulation (Figure 1). An electroencephalogram (EEG) was unremarkable, though the semiology of the seizure historically described by the patient was localized to the area of BHAG. The patient is currently taking antiseizure medications and has experienced no additional seizures.

Case 2

spuuujirenauocrecebresheclospemiwatecleticlalacrofrefranebriswamafrowiga

A male aged 53 years with a history of peripheral artery disease presented with a 6-month history of headaches and dizziness. The patient reported the onset of visual aura to his right visual field, starting as a fingernail-sized scintillating kaleidoscope light that would gradually increase in size to a round shape with fading kaleidoscope colors. This episode would last for a few minutes and was immediately followed by a headache. There was no alteration of consciousness during visual aura, although sometimes the patient would have right-sided scalp tingling. These episodes were often unprovoked, but occasionally triggered by bright lights. A single routine EEG was unremarkable. The patient reported headaches without aura, but not aura without headaches, which made occipital lobe seizure less likely. MRI demonstrated a small herniation of brain parenchyma into the inner table of the left occipital bone (Figure 2). The patient was diagnosed with migraine with aura, and the semiology of the visual aura corresponded to the location of the herniation in the left occipital region.

Case 3

thegohubauososwotisibawridawegogihinechubroniwelashipheketauamamokubreketushithavephijibrujotobrelolaprohuthusovasweboclo

A 77-year-old male with a history of left ear diving injury presented with left-sided asymmetric hearing loss and word recognition difficulty for several years. MRI obtained as part of his work-up to evaluate for possible schwannoma of the eighth left cranial nerve instead demonstrated an incidental right cerebellar herniation within an arachnoid granulation into the diploic space of the occipital bone (Figure 3). The BHAG for this patient appeared to be an incidental finding unrelated to his asymmetric hearing loss.

Case 4

hekispanophikishuleclopamigicrutacraprewihusiphogestilepapuchislufrinuvacospatuvubewremitoswahotrobritrodri

A male aged 62 years with a history of metastatic esophageal cancer, substance abuse, and a prior presumed alcohol withdrawal seizure underwent an MRI for evaluation of brain metastasis after presenting to the hospital with confusion 1 day after starting chemotherapy (Figure 4). Nine years prior, the patient had an isolated generalized tonic-clonic seizure approximately 72 hours following a period of alcohol cessation. The MRI demonstrated an incidental left parasagittal herniation of left parietal lobe tissue through an arachnoid granulation into the superior sagittal sinus, in addition to metastatic brain lesions. An EEG showed mild encephalopathy without evidence of seizures. It was determined that the patient's confusion was most likely due to toxic-metabolic encephalopathy from chemotherapy.

 

Case 5

gebretaspauicrosaslukogokephatrushophispiswustupuswisluvibroshodr

A 51-year-old male presented with worsening headache severity and frequency. He had a history of chronic headaches for about 20 years that occurred annually, but were now occurring twice weekly. The headaches often started with a left eye visual aura followed by pressure in the left eye, left frontal region, and left ear, with at times a cervicogenic component. No cervical spine imaging was available. An MRI revealed 2 small adjacent areas of cerebellar herniation into arachnoid granulations in the left occipital bone (Figure 5).

 

 

Discussion

Arachnoid granulations appear very early in life, although they are uncommon before age 2 years.2 Classically, they have been understood to act as 1-way valves permitting the outflow of CSF from the subarachnoid space to the dural venous sinuses. However, increasing evidence shows they may only play a minor role in that process.12 The structure of arachnoid granulations is being reexamined. A recent microscopy study demonstrated structural heterogeneity with a fine, porous lining that permits flow.13 Additionally, associated immune components in the microenvironment suggests that arachnoid granulations may function similarly to lymph nodes as part of a central nervous system lymphatic network.13 Evidence is lacking for arachnoid granulations being the primary route of CSF outflow, and newer models include CSF exit pathways along the cranial nerves and drainage through lymphatics within the dura mater.12

New MRI systems have demonstrated that the prevalence of arachnoid granulations increases with age. One study found that all subjects in the aged 40 years cohort had detectable arachnoid granulations on images obtained with a 3T MRI system, with the main site being the superior sagittal sinus.2 The prevalence increased until age 40 years and then noticeably decreased. Not only did the prevalence increase in this pattern, but the total number of detectable arachnoid granulations followed a similar pattern.2 In addition, the detectable arachnoid granulations tend to be larger in older patients. Arachnoid granulations are very common in adults, but little is known about when and why brain tissue herniates through these structures.

This case series illustrates how a small amount of adult cerebral or cerebellar matter in large arachnoid granulations can herniate into the dural sinuses and diploic space. Although arachnoid granulations extending into the dural sinuses and diploic space are a relatively common finding on MRI,BHAGs are rare in these locations.1,2,8 Improved spatial resolution afforded by newer high-field scanners with thinner sections, such as very thin (1 mm) T1- and heavily T2-weighted 3 dimensional sequences may lead to increased detection of BHAG. Some of these herniations are small and may be easily missed or confused for normal arachnoid granulations on 3 to 5 mm thickness MRIs.

Despite increased recognition, it is still uncertain to what degree these herniations contribute to the clinical presentations. Associated neurologic symptoms may include seizures, headaches, tinnitus, syncope, and increased intracranial pressure.7-10

Three cases presented in this article demonstrated abnormal signals adjacent to the herniated brain, presumably due to dysplasia of gliotic tissue. In 1 study, parenchymal signal and structural changes occurred in about one-half of the reported BHAG, all of which were cerebellar herniations.7 In Case 1, the herniation and adjacent abnormal MRI signal corresponded to localization of the seizure semiology as obtained from patient history, strongly suggesting the BHAG played a role in the presentation. Signal abnormality accompanying an adjacent BHAG may suggest a higher likelihood that the BHAG has clinical relevance. However, the patient in Case 2 had a visual aura that corresponded to the BHAG location, so a signal abnormality may not be necessary for a patient to develop symptoms. Case 1 also included a history of documented traumatic brain injuries, suggesting that perhaps head trauma may facilitate BHAG development. Regardless, there is likely also a congenital component to their formation, as BHAG has been observed in the pediatric population.14

The patient's asymmetric left-sided hearing loss in Case 3 appeared unrelated to the BHAG as its location was in the contralateral cerebellar region and did not correspond to the patient’s clinical findings. The patient in Case 4 had a limited history regarding localization details of their prior presumed alcohol withdrawal seizure, such as head movements, eye deviation, or lateralized onset of convulsions. Given this limited data, it is unclear whether their prior seizure could have been related to BHAG or not. The patient in case 5 reported worsening headaches on the left side of his head, which corresponded to BHAG occurring on the left side. However, given that the increased T2 signal occurred in the left cerebellar hemisphere with BHAG in the left occipital bone, the occipital cortex was not involved. In this case, the BHAG would not explain the patient’s visual aura as such a lesion would have been expected in the right occipital cortex rather than its actual location in this patient’s left cerebellar hemisphere.

 

 

CONCLUSIONS

Understanding the clinical impact of brain herniations is important because they are probably more common than previously thought. Improved MRI capabilities suggest that more BHAG will be detected moving forward as radiologists interpret images with higher resolution and thinner slices. Until its significance is fully understood, BHAG will continue to complicate the diagnosis of patients with neurologic complaints whose brain MRIs and EEGs are otherwise unremarkable.

drophawulusateluwuphuslospaneueslerawrorujap

There have been no cases of surgical BHAG intervention and pathology analysis that would help determine their clinical significance. A related entity, temporal lobe encephalocele, has been linked to focal temporal lobe epilepsy, which has demonstrated significant symptom improvement following surgical correction.15 However, encephaloceles have been distinguished from BHAG in part because they do not necessarily herniate through an arachnoid granulation.8 BHAG has only begun to be characterized in detail over the last decade, so more research is needed to understand how it develops and what clinical significance it truly holds.

 

The circulation of cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) is crucial for maintaining homeostasis for the optimal functioning of the multiple complex activities of the brain and spinal cord, including the disposal of metabolic waste products of brain and spinal cord activity into the cerebral venous drainage. Throughout the brain, the arachnoid mater forms small outpouchings or diverticula that penetrate the dura mater and communicate with the dural venous sinuses. These outpuchings are called arachnoid granulations or arachnoid villi, and most are found within the dural sinuses, primarily in the transverse sinuses and superior sagittal sinus, but can occasionally be seen extending into the inner table of the calvarium.1,2

wekituuistec

The amount of arachnoid granulations seen in bone, particularly around the superior sagittal sinus, may increase with age.2 Arachnoid granulations are generally small but the largest ones can be seen on gross examination during intracranial procedures or autopsy.3 Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) can detect arachnoid granulations, which are characterized as T1 hypointense and T2 hyperintense (CSF isointense), well-circumscribed, small, nonenhancing masses within the dural sinuses or in the diploic space (Figure 1). Even small arachnoid granulations < 1 mm in length can be detected.2

Smaller arachnoid granulations have been described histologically as entirely covered by a dural membrane, thus creating a subdural space that separates the body of the arachnoid granulation from the lumen of the accompanying venous sinus.4 However, larger arachnoid granulations may not be completely covered by a dural membrane, thus creating a point of contact between the arachnoid granulation and the venous sinus.4 Larger arachnoid granulations are normally filled with CSF, and their signal characteristics are similar to CSF on imaging.5,6 Arachnoid granulations also often contain vessels draining into the adjacent venous sinus.5,6

When larger arachnoid granulations are present, they may permit the protrusion of herniated brain tissue. There has been an increasing number of reports of these brain herniations into arachnoid granulations (BHAGs) in the literature.7-10 While these herniations have been associated with nonspecific neurologic symptoms like tinnitus and idiopathic intracranial hypertension, their true clinical significance remains undetermined.10,11 This article presents 5 cases of BHAG, discusses their clinical presentations and image findings, and reviews the current literature.

 

 

Case 1

A 30-year-old male with a history of multiple traumatic brain injuries presented for evaluation of seizures. The patient described the semiology of the seizures as a bright, colorful light in his right visual field, followed by loss of vision, then loss of awareness and full body convulsion. The semiology of this patient’s seizures was consistent with left temporo-occipital lobe seizure. The only abnormality seen in the brain MRI was the herniation of brain parenchyma originating from the occipital lobe into the transverse sinus, presumably through an arachnoid granulation (Figure 1). An electroencephalogram (EEG) was unremarkable, though the semiology of the seizure historically described by the patient was localized to the area of BHAG. The patient is currently taking antiseizure medications and has experienced no additional seizures.

Case 2

spuuujirenauocrecebresheclospemiwatecleticlalacrofrefranebriswamafrowiga

A male aged 53 years with a history of peripheral artery disease presented with a 6-month history of headaches and dizziness. The patient reported the onset of visual aura to his right visual field, starting as a fingernail-sized scintillating kaleidoscope light that would gradually increase in size to a round shape with fading kaleidoscope colors. This episode would last for a few minutes and was immediately followed by a headache. There was no alteration of consciousness during visual aura, although sometimes the patient would have right-sided scalp tingling. These episodes were often unprovoked, but occasionally triggered by bright lights. A single routine EEG was unremarkable. The patient reported headaches without aura, but not aura without headaches, which made occipital lobe seizure less likely. MRI demonstrated a small herniation of brain parenchyma into the inner table of the left occipital bone (Figure 2). The patient was diagnosed with migraine with aura, and the semiology of the visual aura corresponded to the location of the herniation in the left occipital region.

Case 3

thegohubauososwotisibawridawegogihinechubroniwelashipheketauamamokubreketushithavephijibrujotobrelolaprohuthusovasweboclo

A 77-year-old male with a history of left ear diving injury presented with left-sided asymmetric hearing loss and word recognition difficulty for several years. MRI obtained as part of his work-up to evaluate for possible schwannoma of the eighth left cranial nerve instead demonstrated an incidental right cerebellar herniation within an arachnoid granulation into the diploic space of the occipital bone (Figure 3). The BHAG for this patient appeared to be an incidental finding unrelated to his asymmetric hearing loss.

Case 4

hekispanophikishuleclopamigicrutacraprewihusiphogestilepapuchislufrinuvacospatuvubewremitoswahotrobritrodri

A male aged 62 years with a history of metastatic esophageal cancer, substance abuse, and a prior presumed alcohol withdrawal seizure underwent an MRI for evaluation of brain metastasis after presenting to the hospital with confusion 1 day after starting chemotherapy (Figure 4). Nine years prior, the patient had an isolated generalized tonic-clonic seizure approximately 72 hours following a period of alcohol cessation. The MRI demonstrated an incidental left parasagittal herniation of left parietal lobe tissue through an arachnoid granulation into the superior sagittal sinus, in addition to metastatic brain lesions. An EEG showed mild encephalopathy without evidence of seizures. It was determined that the patient's confusion was most likely due to toxic-metabolic encephalopathy from chemotherapy.

 

Case 5

gebretaspauicrosaslukogokephatrushophispiswustupuswisluvibroshodr

A 51-year-old male presented with worsening headache severity and frequency. He had a history of chronic headaches for about 20 years that occurred annually, but were now occurring twice weekly. The headaches often started with a left eye visual aura followed by pressure in the left eye, left frontal region, and left ear, with at times a cervicogenic component. No cervical spine imaging was available. An MRI revealed 2 small adjacent areas of cerebellar herniation into arachnoid granulations in the left occipital bone (Figure 5).

 

 

Discussion

Arachnoid granulations appear very early in life, although they are uncommon before age 2 years.2 Classically, they have been understood to act as 1-way valves permitting the outflow of CSF from the subarachnoid space to the dural venous sinuses. However, increasing evidence shows they may only play a minor role in that process.12 The structure of arachnoid granulations is being reexamined. A recent microscopy study demonstrated structural heterogeneity with a fine, porous lining that permits flow.13 Additionally, associated immune components in the microenvironment suggests that arachnoid granulations may function similarly to lymph nodes as part of a central nervous system lymphatic network.13 Evidence is lacking for arachnoid granulations being the primary route of CSF outflow, and newer models include CSF exit pathways along the cranial nerves and drainage through lymphatics within the dura mater.12

New MRI systems have demonstrated that the prevalence of arachnoid granulations increases with age. One study found that all subjects in the aged 40 years cohort had detectable arachnoid granulations on images obtained with a 3T MRI system, with the main site being the superior sagittal sinus.2 The prevalence increased until age 40 years and then noticeably decreased. Not only did the prevalence increase in this pattern, but the total number of detectable arachnoid granulations followed a similar pattern.2 In addition, the detectable arachnoid granulations tend to be larger in older patients. Arachnoid granulations are very common in adults, but little is known about when and why brain tissue herniates through these structures.

This case series illustrates how a small amount of adult cerebral or cerebellar matter in large arachnoid granulations can herniate into the dural sinuses and diploic space. Although arachnoid granulations extending into the dural sinuses and diploic space are a relatively common finding on MRI,BHAGs are rare in these locations.1,2,8 Improved spatial resolution afforded by newer high-field scanners with thinner sections, such as very thin (1 mm) T1- and heavily T2-weighted 3 dimensional sequences may lead to increased detection of BHAG. Some of these herniations are small and may be easily missed or confused for normal arachnoid granulations on 3 to 5 mm thickness MRIs.

Despite increased recognition, it is still uncertain to what degree these herniations contribute to the clinical presentations. Associated neurologic symptoms may include seizures, headaches, tinnitus, syncope, and increased intracranial pressure.7-10

Three cases presented in this article demonstrated abnormal signals adjacent to the herniated brain, presumably due to dysplasia of gliotic tissue. In 1 study, parenchymal signal and structural changes occurred in about one-half of the reported BHAG, all of which were cerebellar herniations.7 In Case 1, the herniation and adjacent abnormal MRI signal corresponded to localization of the seizure semiology as obtained from patient history, strongly suggesting the BHAG played a role in the presentation. Signal abnormality accompanying an adjacent BHAG may suggest a higher likelihood that the BHAG has clinical relevance. However, the patient in Case 2 had a visual aura that corresponded to the BHAG location, so a signal abnormality may not be necessary for a patient to develop symptoms. Case 1 also included a history of documented traumatic brain injuries, suggesting that perhaps head trauma may facilitate BHAG development. Regardless, there is likely also a congenital component to their formation, as BHAG has been observed in the pediatric population.14

The patient's asymmetric left-sided hearing loss in Case 3 appeared unrelated to the BHAG as its location was in the contralateral cerebellar region and did not correspond to the patient’s clinical findings. The patient in Case 4 had a limited history regarding localization details of their prior presumed alcohol withdrawal seizure, such as head movements, eye deviation, or lateralized onset of convulsions. Given this limited data, it is unclear whether their prior seizure could have been related to BHAG or not. The patient in case 5 reported worsening headaches on the left side of his head, which corresponded to BHAG occurring on the left side. However, given that the increased T2 signal occurred in the left cerebellar hemisphere with BHAG in the left occipital bone, the occipital cortex was not involved. In this case, the BHAG would not explain the patient’s visual aura as such a lesion would have been expected in the right occipital cortex rather than its actual location in this patient’s left cerebellar hemisphere.

 

 

CONCLUSIONS

Understanding the clinical impact of brain herniations is important because they are probably more common than previously thought. Improved MRI capabilities suggest that more BHAG will be detected moving forward as radiologists interpret images with higher resolution and thinner slices. Until its significance is fully understood, BHAG will continue to complicate the diagnosis of patients with neurologic complaints whose brain MRIs and EEGs are otherwise unremarkable.

drophawulusateluwuphuslospaneueslerawrorujap

There have been no cases of surgical BHAG intervention and pathology analysis that would help determine their clinical significance. A related entity, temporal lobe encephalocele, has been linked to focal temporal lobe epilepsy, which has demonstrated significant symptom improvement following surgical correction.15 However, encephaloceles have been distinguished from BHAG in part because they do not necessarily herniate through an arachnoid granulation.8 BHAG has only begun to be characterized in detail over the last decade, so more research is needed to understand how it develops and what clinical significance it truly holds.

 

References

1. Ikushima I, Korogi Y, Makita O, et al. MRI of arachnoid granulations within the dural sinuses using a FLAIR pulse sequence. Br J Radiol. 1999;72(863):1046-1051. doi:10.1259/bjr.72.863.10700819

2. Rados M, Zivko M, Perisa A, Oreskovic D, Klarica M. No arachnoid granulations-no problems: number, size, and distribution of arachnoid granulations from birth to 80 years of age. Front Aging Neurosci. 2021;13:698865. doi:10.3389/fnagi.2021.698865

3. Grossman CB, Potts DG. Arachnoid granulations: radiology and anatomy. Radiology. 1974;113(1):95-100. doi:10.1148/113.1.95

4. Wolpow ER, Schaumburg HH. Structure of the human arachnoid granulation. J Neurosurg. 1972;37(6):724-727. doi:10.3171/jns.1972.37.6.0724

5. Leach JL, Jones BV, Tomsick TA, Stewart CA, Balko MG. Normal appearance of arachnoid granulations on contrast-enhanced CT and MR of the brain: differentiation from dural sinus disease. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 1996;17(8):1523-1532.

6. Roche J, Warner D. Arachnoid granulations in the transverse and sigmoid sinuses: CT, MR, and MR angiographic appearance of a normal anatomic variation. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 1996;17(4):677-683.

7. Malekzadehlashkariani S, Wanke I, Rufenacht DA, San Millan D. Brain herniations into arachnoid granulations: about 68 cases in 38 patients and review of the literature. Neuroradiology. 2016;58(5):443-457. doi:10.1007/s00234-016-1662-5

8. Battal B, Castillo M. Brain herniations into the dural venous sinuses or calvarium: MRI of a recently recognized entity. Neuroradiol J. 2014;27(1):55-62. doi:10.15274/NRJ-2014-10006

9. Liebo GB, Lane JJ, Van Gompel JJ, Eckel LJ, Schwartz KM, Lehman VT. Brain herniation into arachnoid granulations: clinical and neuroimaging features. J Neuroimaging. 2016;26(6):592-598. doi:10.1111/jon.12366

10. Smith ER, Caton MT, Villanueva-Meyer JE, et al. Brain herniation (encephalocele) into arachnoid granulations: Prevalence and association with pulsatile tinnitus and idiopathic intracranial hypertension. Neuroradiology. 2022;64(9):1747-1754.

11. Battal B, Hamcan S, Akgun V, et al. Brain herniations into the dural venous sinus or calvarium: MRI findings, possible causes and clinical significance. Eur Radiol. 2016;26(6):1723-1731.

12. Proulx ST. Cerebrospinal fluid outflow: A review of the historical and contemporary evidence for arachnoid villi, perineural routes, and dural lymphatics. Cell Mol Life Sci. 2021;78(6):2429-2457.

13. Shah T, Leurgans SE, Mehta RI, et al. Arachnoid granulations are lymphatic conduits that communicate with bone marrow and dura-arachnoid stroma. J Exp Med. 2023;220(2).

14. Sade R, Ogul H, Polat G, Pirimoglu B, Kantarci M. Brain herniation into the transverse sinuses’ arachnoid granulations in the pediatric population investigated with 3 T MRI. Acta Neurol Belg. 2019;119(2):225-231.

15. Saavalainen T, Jutila L, Mervaala E, Kalviainen R, Vanninen R, Immonen A. Temporal anteroinferior encephalocele: An underrecognized etiology of temporal lobe epilepsy? Neurology. 2015;85(17):1467-1474.

References

1. Ikushima I, Korogi Y, Makita O, et al. MRI of arachnoid granulations within the dural sinuses using a FLAIR pulse sequence. Br J Radiol. 1999;72(863):1046-1051. doi:10.1259/bjr.72.863.10700819

2. Rados M, Zivko M, Perisa A, Oreskovic D, Klarica M. No arachnoid granulations-no problems: number, size, and distribution of arachnoid granulations from birth to 80 years of age. Front Aging Neurosci. 2021;13:698865. doi:10.3389/fnagi.2021.698865

3. Grossman CB, Potts DG. Arachnoid granulations: radiology and anatomy. Radiology. 1974;113(1):95-100. doi:10.1148/113.1.95

4. Wolpow ER, Schaumburg HH. Structure of the human arachnoid granulation. J Neurosurg. 1972;37(6):724-727. doi:10.3171/jns.1972.37.6.0724

5. Leach JL, Jones BV, Tomsick TA, Stewart CA, Balko MG. Normal appearance of arachnoid granulations on contrast-enhanced CT and MR of the brain: differentiation from dural sinus disease. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 1996;17(8):1523-1532.

6. Roche J, Warner D. Arachnoid granulations in the transverse and sigmoid sinuses: CT, MR, and MR angiographic appearance of a normal anatomic variation. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 1996;17(4):677-683.

7. Malekzadehlashkariani S, Wanke I, Rufenacht DA, San Millan D. Brain herniations into arachnoid granulations: about 68 cases in 38 patients and review of the literature. Neuroradiology. 2016;58(5):443-457. doi:10.1007/s00234-016-1662-5

8. Battal B, Castillo M. Brain herniations into the dural venous sinuses or calvarium: MRI of a recently recognized entity. Neuroradiol J. 2014;27(1):55-62. doi:10.15274/NRJ-2014-10006

9. Liebo GB, Lane JJ, Van Gompel JJ, Eckel LJ, Schwartz KM, Lehman VT. Brain herniation into arachnoid granulations: clinical and neuroimaging features. J Neuroimaging. 2016;26(6):592-598. doi:10.1111/jon.12366

10. Smith ER, Caton MT, Villanueva-Meyer JE, et al. Brain herniation (encephalocele) into arachnoid granulations: Prevalence and association with pulsatile tinnitus and idiopathic intracranial hypertension. Neuroradiology. 2022;64(9):1747-1754.

11. Battal B, Hamcan S, Akgun V, et al. Brain herniations into the dural venous sinus or calvarium: MRI findings, possible causes and clinical significance. Eur Radiol. 2016;26(6):1723-1731.

12. Proulx ST. Cerebrospinal fluid outflow: A review of the historical and contemporary evidence for arachnoid villi, perineural routes, and dural lymphatics. Cell Mol Life Sci. 2021;78(6):2429-2457.

13. Shah T, Leurgans SE, Mehta RI, et al. Arachnoid granulations are lymphatic conduits that communicate with bone marrow and dura-arachnoid stroma. J Exp Med. 2023;220(2).

14. Sade R, Ogul H, Polat G, Pirimoglu B, Kantarci M. Brain herniation into the transverse sinuses’ arachnoid granulations in the pediatric population investigated with 3 T MRI. Acta Neurol Belg. 2019;119(2):225-231.

15. Saavalainen T, Jutila L, Mervaala E, Kalviainen R, Vanninen R, Immonen A. Temporal anteroinferior encephalocele: An underrecognized etiology of temporal lobe epilepsy? Neurology. 2015;85(17):1467-1474.

Publications
Publications
Topics
Article Type
Sections
Teambase XML
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!--$RCSfile: InCopy_agile.xsl,v $ $Revision: 1.35 $-->
<!--$RCSfile: drupal.xsl,v $ $Revision: 1.7 $-->
<root generator="drupal.xsl" gversion="1.7"> <header> <fileName>1024 NEURO epub Brain</fileName> <TBEID>0C02F7CE.SIG</TBEID> <TBUniqueIdentifier>NJ_0C02F7CE</TBUniqueIdentifier> <newsOrJournal>Journal</newsOrJournal> <publisherName>Frontline Medical Communications Inc.</publisherName> <storyname/> <articleType>1</articleType> <TBLocation>Copyfitting-FED</TBLocation> <QCDate/> <firstPublished>20240620T122947</firstPublished> <LastPublished>20240620T122947</LastPublished> <pubStatus qcode="stat:"/> <embargoDate/> <killDate/> <CMSDate>20240620T122947</CMSDate> <articleSource/> <facebookInfo/> <meetingNumber/> <byline/> <bylineText>Noah Gafen, MDa; Igor Sirotkin MDb; Amanda Pennington, MD, PhDb; Brittany Rea, MDc; Carlos R. Martinez, MDb</bylineText> <bylineFull/> <bylineTitleText/> <USOrGlobal/> <wireDocType/> <newsDocType/> <journalDocType/> <linkLabel/> <pageRange/> <citation/> <quizID/> <indexIssueDate/> <itemClass qcode="ninat:text"/> <provider qcode="provider:"> <name/> <rightsInfo> <copyrightHolder> <name/> </copyrightHolder> <copyrightNotice/> </rightsInfo> </provider> <abstract/> <metaDescription>The circulation of cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) is crucial for maintaining homeostasis for the optimal functioning of the multiple complex activities of the brain </metaDescription> <articlePDF/> <teaserImage/> <title>Uncommon Locations for Brain Herniations Into Arachnoid Granulations: 5 Cases and Literature Review</title> <deck/> <eyebrow>Case in Point</eyebrow> <disclaimer/> <AuthorList/> <articleURL/> <doi/> <pubMedID/> <publishXMLStatus/> <publishXMLVersion>1</publishXMLVersion> <useEISSN>0</useEISSN> <urgency/> <pubPubdateYear>2024</pubPubdateYear> <pubPubdateMonth/> <pubPubdateDay/> <pubVolume/> <pubNumber/> <wireChannels/> <primaryCMSID/> <CMSIDs> <CMSID>2953</CMSID> <CMSID>3729</CMSID> </CMSIDs> <keywords/> <seeAlsos/> <publications_g> <publicationData> <publicationCode>FED</publicationCode> <pubIssueName>October 2024</pubIssueName> <pubArticleType>Columns | 3729</pubArticleType> <pubTopics/> <pubCategories/> <pubSections> <pubSection>Case in Point | 2953<pubSubsection/></pubSection> </pubSections> <journalTitle>Fed Pract</journalTitle> <journalFullTitle>Federal Practitioner</journalFullTitle> <copyrightStatement>Copyright 2017 Frontline Medical Communications Inc., Parsippany, NJ, USA. All rights reserved.</copyrightStatement> </publicationData> </publications_g> <publications> <term canonical="true">16</term> </publications> <sections> <term canonical="true">45</term> </sections> <topics> <term canonical="true">258</term> </topics> <links/> </header> <itemSet> <newsItem> <itemMeta> <itemRole>Main</itemRole> <itemClass>text</itemClass> <title>Uncommon Locations for Brain Herniations Into Arachnoid Granulations: 5 Cases and Literature Review</title> <deck/> </itemMeta> <itemContent> <p class="abstract"><b>Background</b>: Arachnoid granulations are extensions of the subarachnoid space, an important component of the complex circulation of brain cerebrospinal fluid. While these structures primarily transmit cerebrospinal fluid into the dural venous sinuses, they also may serve as a conduit for brain tissue herniation. Such occurrences have been referred to in the literature as brain herniations into arachnoid granulations (BHAGs), which are considered incidental and asymptomatic but can be associated with nonspecific neurologic symptoms such as headache, tinnitus, vertigo, and seizure. BHAGs can be visualized more readily due to improved cross-sectional magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) with increased spatial and contrast resolution. <b><br/><br/></b><b>Case Presentation</b>: We present 5 cases where brain herniations were detected in patients undergoing MRI for various neurologic symptoms. All patients experienced chronic symptoms, including headaches and seizures. Two cases included BHAG in locations that were associated with the patients’ symptoms. <br/><br/><b>Conclusions</b>: BHAGs are increasingly recognized due to improved spatial resolution in MRIs. While there is still no definitive evidence that these lesions are responsible for various neurologic symptoms, some of these abnormalities may hold clinical significance such as the visual symptoms seen in 2 of the cases described. BHAG can be associated with gliosis of adjacent brain tissue, which may be a mechanism for symptom development.</p> <p><span class="Drop">T</span>he circulation of cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) is crucial for maintaining homeostasis for the optimal functioning of the multiple complex activities of the brain and spinal cord, including the disposal of metabolic waste products of brain and spinal cord activity into the cerebral venous drainage. Throughout the brain, the arachnoid mater forms small outpouchings or diverticula that penetrate the dura mater and communicate with the dural venous sinuses. These outpuchings are called arachnoid granulations or arachnoid villi, and most are found within the dural sinuses, primarily in the transverse sinuses and superior sagittal sinus, but can occasionally be seen extending into the inner table of the calvarium.<sup>1,2</sup></p> <p>The amount of arachnoid granulations seen in bone, particularly around the superior sagittal sinus, may increase with age.<sup>2</sup> Arachnoid granulations are generally small but the largest ones can be seen on gross examination during intracranial procedures or autopsy.<sup>3</sup> Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) can detect arachnoid granulations, which are characterized as T1 hypointense and T2 hyperintense (CSF isointense), well-circumscribed, small, nonenhancing masses within the dural sinuses or in the diploic space (Figure 1). Even small arachnoid granulations &lt; 1 mm in length can be detected.<sup>2<br/><br/></sup>Smaller arachnoid granulations have been described histologically as entirely covered by a dural membrane, thus creating a subdural space that separates the body of the arachnoid granulation from the lumen of the accompanying venous sinus.<sup>4</sup> However, larger arachnoid granulations may not be completely covered by a dural membrane, thus creating a point of contact between the arachnoid granulation and the venous sinus.<sup>4</sup> Larger arachnoid granulations are normally filled with CSF, and their signal characteristics are similar to CSF on imaging.<sup>5,6</sup> Arachnoid granulations also often contain vessels draining into the adjacent venous sinus.<sup>5,6<br/><br/></sup>When larger arachnoid granulations are present, they may permit the protrusion of herniated brain tissue. There has been an increasing number of reports of these brain herniations into arachnoid granulations (BHAGs) in the literature.<sup>7-10</sup> While these herniations have been associated with nonspecific neurologic symptoms like tinnitus and idiopathic intracranial hypertension, their true clinical significance remains undetermined.<sup>10,11</sup> This article presents 5 cases of BHAG, discusses their clinical presentations and image findings, and reviews the current literature.</p> <h3>Case 1</h3> <p>A 30-year-old male with a history of multiple traumatic brain injuries presented for evaluation of seizures. The patient described the semiology of the seizures as a bright, colorful light in his right visual field, followed by loss of vision, then loss of awareness and full body convulsion. The semiology of this patient’s seizures was consistent with left temporo-occipital lobe seizure. The only abnormality seen in the brain MRI was the herniation of brain parenchyma originating from the occipital lobe into the transverse sinus, presumably through an arachnoid granulation (Figure 1). An electroencephalogram (EEG) was unremarkable, though the semiology of the seizure historically described by the patient was localized to the area of BHAG. The patient is currently taking antiseizure medications and has experienced no additional seizures.</p> <h3>Case 2</h3> <p>A male aged 53 years with a history of peripheral artery disease presented with a 6-month history of headaches and dizziness. The patient reported the onset of visual aura to his right visual field, starting as a fingernail-sized scintillating kaleidoscope light that would gradually increase in size to a round shape with fading kaleidoscope colors. This episode would last for a few minutes and was immediately followed by a headache. There was no alteration of consciousness during visual aura, although sometimes the patient would have right-sided scalp tingling. These episodes were often unprovoked, but occasionally triggered by bright lights. A single routine EEG was unremarkable. The patient reported headaches without aura, but not aura without headaches, which made occipital lobe seizure less likely. MRI demonstrated a small herniation of brain parenchyma into the inner table of the left occipital bone (Figure 2). The patient was diagnosed with migraine with aura, and the semiology of the visual aura corresponded to the location of the herniation in the left occipital region.</p> <h3>Case 3</h3> <p>A 77-year-old male with a history of left ear diving injury presented with left-sided asymmetric hearing loss and word recognition difficulty for several years. MRI obtained as part of his work-up to evaluate for possible schwannoma of the eighth left cranial nerve instead demonstrated an incidental right cerebellar herniation within an arachnoid granulation into the diploic space of the occipital bone (Figure 3). The BHAG for this patient appeared to be an incidental finding unrelated to his asymmetric hearing loss.</p> <h3>Case 4</h3> <p>A male aged 62 years with a history of metastatic esophageal cancer, substance abuse, and a prior presumed alcohol withdrawal seizure underwent an MRI for evaluation of brain metastasis after presenting to the hospital with confusion 1 day after starting chemotherapy (Figure 4). Nine years prior, the patient had an isolated generalized tonic-clonic seizure approximately 72 hours following a period of alcohol cessation. The MRI demonstrated an incidental left parasagittal herniation of left parietal lobe tissue through an arachnoid granulation into the superior sagittal sinus, in addition to metastatic brain lesions. An EEG showed mild encephalopathy without evidence of seizures. It was determined that the patient's confusion was most likely due to toxic-metabolic encephalopathy from chemotherapy.</p> <h3>Case 5</h3> <p>A 51-year-old male presented with worsening headache severity and frequency. He had a history of chronic headaches for about 20 years that occurred annually, but were now occurring twice weekly. The headaches often started with a left eye visual aura followed by pressure in the left eye, left frontal region, and left ear, with at times a cervicogenic component. No cervical spine imaging was available. An MRI revealed 2 small adjacent areas of cerebellar herniation into arachnoid granulations in the left occipital bone (Figure 5). </p> <h2>Discussion</h2> <p>Arachnoid granulations appear very early in life, although they are uncommon before age 2 years.<sup>2</sup> Classically, they have been understood to act as 1-way valves permitting the outflow of CSF from the subarachnoid space to the dural venous sinuses. However, increasing evidence shows they may only play a minor role in that process.<sup>12</sup> The structure of arachnoid granulations is being reexamined. A recent microscopy study demonstrated structural heterogeneity with a fine, porous lining that permits flow.<sup>13</sup> Additionally, associated immune components in the microenvironment suggests that arachnoid granulations may function similarly to lymph nodes as part of a central nervous system lymphatic network.<sup>13</sup> Evidence is lacking for arachnoid granulations being the primary route of CSF outflow, and newer models include CSF exit pathways along the cranial nerves and drainage through lymphatics within the dura mater.<sup>12</sup></p> <p>New MRI systems have demonstrated that the prevalence of arachnoid granulations increases with age. One study found that all subjects in the aged 40 years cohort had detectable arachnoid granulations on images obtained with a 3T MRI system, with the main site being the superior sagittal sinus.<sup>2</sup> The prevalence increased until age 40 years and then noticeably decreased. Not only did the prevalence increase in this pattern, but the total number of detectable arachnoid granulations followed a similar pattern.<sup>2</sup> In addition, the detectable arachnoid granulations tend to be larger in older patients. Arachnoid granulations are very common in adults, but little is known about when and why brain tissue herniates through these structures. <br/><br/>This case series illustrates how a small amount of adult cerebral or cerebellar matter in large arachnoid granulations can herniate into the dural sinuses and diploic space. Although arachnoid granulations extending into the dural sinuses and diploic space are a relatively common finding on MRI,<sup> </sup>BHAGs are rare in these locations.<sup>1,2,8</sup> Improved spatial resolution afforded by newer high-field scanners with thinner sections, such as very thin (1 mm) T1- and heavily T2-weighted 3 dimensional sequences may lead to increased detection of BHAG. Some of these herniations are small and may be easily missed or confused for normal arachnoid granulations on 3 to 5 mm thickness MRIs.<br/><br/>Despite increased recognition, it is still uncertain to what degree these herniations contribute to the clinical presentations. Associated neurologic symptoms may include seizures, headaches, tinnitus, syncope, and increased intracranial pressure.<sup>7-10</sup>Three cases presented in this article demonstrated abnormal signals adjacent to the herniated brain, presumably due to dysplasia of gliotic tissue. In 1 study, parenchymal signal and structural changes occurred in about one-half of the reported BHAG, all of which were cerebellar herniations.<sup>7</sup> In Case 1, the herniation and adjacent abnormal MRI signal corresponded to localization of the seizure semiology as obtained from patient history, strongly suggesting the BHAG played a role in the presentation. Signal abnormality accompanying an adjacent BHAG may suggest a higher likelihood that the BHAG has clinical relevance. However, the patient in Case 2 had a visual aura that corresponded to the BHAG location, so a signal abnormality may not be necessary for a patient to develop symptoms. Case 1 also included a history of documented traumatic brain injuries, suggesting that perhaps head trauma may facilitate BHAG development. Regardless, there is likely also a congenital component to their formation, as BHAG has been observed in the pediatric population.<sup>14</sup>The patient's asymmetric left-sided hearing loss in Case 3 appeared unrelated to the BHAG as its location was in the contralateral cerebellar region and did not correspond to the patient’s clinical findings. The patient in Case 4 had a limited history regarding localization details of their prior presumed alcohol withdrawal seizure, such as head movements, eye deviation, or lateralized onset of convulsions. Given this limited data, it is unclear whether their prior seizure could have been related to BHAG or not. The patient in case 5 reported worsening headaches on the left side of his head, which corresponded to BHAG occurring on the left side. However, given that the increased T2 signal occurred in the left cerebellar hemisphere with BHAG in the left occipital bone, the occipital cortex was not involved. In this case, the BHAG would not explain the patient’s visual aura as such a lesion would have been expected in the right occipital cortex rather than its actual location in this patient’s left cerebellar hemisphere.</p> <h2>CONCLUSIONS</h2> <p>Understanding the clinical impact of brain herniations is important because they are probably more common than previously thought. Improved MRI capabilities suggest that more BHAG will be detected moving forward as radiologists interpret images with higher resolution and thinner slices. Until its significance is fully understood, BHAG will continue to complicate the diagnosis of patients with neurologic complaints whose brain MRIs and EEGs are otherwise unremarkable. </p> <p>There have been no cases of surgical BHAG intervention and pathology analysis that would help determine their clinical significance. A related entity, temporal lobe encephalocele, has been linked to focal temporal lobe epilepsy, which has demonstrated significant symptom improvement following surgical correction.<sup>15</sup> However, encephaloceles have been distinguished from BHAG in part because they do not necessarily herniate through an arachnoid granulation.<sup>8</sup> BHAG has only begun to be characterized in detail over the last decade, so more research is needed to understand how it develops and what clinical significance it truly holds.</p> <p class="isub">Author affiliations</p> <p> <em><sup>a</sup>University of Central Florida College of Medicine, Orlando<br/><br/><sup>b</sup>Bay Pines Veteran Affairs Healthcare System, Florida<br/><br/><sup>c</sup>University of South Florida Health, Tampa</em> </p> <p class="isub">Author disclosures</p> <p> <em>The authors report no actual or potential conflicts of interest with regard to this article.</em> </p> <p class="isub">Disclaimer</p> <p> <em>The opinions expressed herein are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect those of <i>Federal Practitioner</i>, Frontline Medical Communications Inc., the US Government, or any of its agencies.</em> </p> <p class="isub">Ethics and consent</p> <p> <em>This study was reviewed and approved by the Bay Pines VA Institutional Review Board research office and Bay Pines VA privacy office.</em> </p> <h2>References</h2> <p class="reference">1. Ikushima I, Korogi Y, Makita O, et al. MRI of arachnoid granulations within the dural sinuses using a FLAIR pulse sequence. <i>Br J Radiol.</i> 1999;72(863):1046-1051. doi:10.1259/bjr.72.863.10700819<br/><br/>2. Rados M, Zivko M, Perisa A, Oreskovic D, Klarica M. No arachnoid granulations-no problems: number, size, and distribution of arachnoid granulations from birth to 80 years of age. <i>Front Aging Neurosci.</i> 2021;13:698865. doi:10.3389/fnagi.2021.698865<br/><br/>3. Grossman CB, Potts DG. Arachnoid granulations: radiology and anatomy. <i>Radiology.</i> 1974;113(1):95-100. doi:10.1148/113.1.95<br/><br/>4. Wolpow ER, Schaumburg HH. Structure of the human arachnoid granulation. <i>J Neurosurg.</i> 1972;37(6):724-727. doi:10.3171/jns.1972.37.6.0724<br/><br/>5. Leach JL, Jones BV, Tomsick TA, Stewart CA, Balko MG. Normal appearance of arachnoid granulations on contrast-enhanced CT and MR of the brain: differentiation from dural sinus disease. <i>AJNR Am J Neuroradiol.</i> 1996;17(8):1523-1532.<br/><br/>6. Roche J, Warner D. Arachnoid granulations in the transverse and sigmoid sinuses: CT, MR, and MR angiographic appearance of a normal anatomic variation. <i>AJNR Am J Neuroradiol.</i> 1996;17(4):677-683.<br/><br/>7. Malekzadehlashkariani S, Wanke I, Rufenacht DA, San Millan D. Brain herniations into arachnoid granulations: about 68 cases in 38 patients and review of the literature. <i>Neuroradiology.</i> 2016;58(5):443-457. doi:10.1007/s00234-016-1662-5<br/><br/>8. Battal B, Castillo M. Brain herniations into the dural venous sinuses or calvarium: MRI of a recently recognized entity. <i>Neuroradiol J.</i> 2014;27(1):55-62. doi:10.15274/NRJ-2014-10006<br/><br/>9. Liebo GB, Lane JJ, Van Gompel JJ, Eckel LJ, Schwartz KM, Lehman VT. Brain herniation into arachnoid granulations: clinical and neuroimaging features. <i>J Neuroimaging.</i> 2016;26(6):592-598. doi:10.1111/jon.12366<br/><br/>10. Smith ER, Caton MT, Villanueva-Meyer JE, et al. Brain herniation (encephalocele) into arachnoid granulations: Prevalence and association with pulsatile tinnitus and idiopathic intracranial hypertension. <i>Neuroradiology.</i> 2022;64(9):1747-1754.<br/><br/>11. Battal B, Hamcan S, Akgun V, et al. Brain herniations into the dural venous sinus or calvarium: MRI findings, possible causes and clinical significance. <i>Eur Radiol.</i> 2016;26(6):1723-1731.<br/><br/>12. Proulx ST. Cerebrospinal fluid outflow: A review of the historical and contemporary evidence for arachnoid villi, perineural routes, and dural lymphatics. <i>Cell Mol Life Sci.</i> 2021;78(6):2429-2457.<br/><br/>13. Shah T, Leurgans SE, Mehta RI, et al. Arachnoid granulations are lymphatic conduits that communicate with bone marrow and dura-arachnoid stroma. <i>J Exp Med.</i> 2023;220(2).<br/><br/>14. Sade R, Ogul H, Polat G, Pirimoglu B, Kantarci M. Brain herniation into the transverse sinuses’ arachnoid granulations in the pediatric population investigated with 3 T MRI. <i>Acta Neurol Belg.</i> 2019;119(2):225-231.<br/><br/>15. Saavalainen T, Jutila L, Mervaala E, Kalviainen R, Vanninen R, Immonen A. Temporal anteroinferior encephalocele: An underrecognized etiology of temporal lobe epilepsy? <i>Neurology.</i> 2015;85(17):1467-1474.</p> </itemContent> </newsItem> </itemSet></root>
Disallow All Ads
Content Gating
No Gating (article Unlocked/Free)
Alternative CME
Disqus Comments
Default
Use ProPublica
Hide sidebar & use full width
render the right sidebar.
Conference Recap Checkbox
Not Conference Recap
Clinical Edge
Display the Slideshow in this Article
Medscape Article
Display survey writer
Reuters content
Disable Inline Native ads
WebMD Article
Article PDF Media
Image
Disable zoom
Off

The Challenges of Delivering Allergen Immunotherapy in the Military Health System

Article Type
Changed
Thu, 06/06/2024 - 11:43

Allergic rhinoconjunctivitis causes onerous symptoms of sneezing, rhinorrhea, postnasal drip, nasal congestion, and itchy, watery eyes. It is a common condition that affects 10% to 25% of the US population and up to 23% of military members with increased symptoms during deployments.1-3 Allergen immunotherapy (AIT), commonly known as allergy shots, is an effective treatment for allergic rhinoconjunctivitis, especially for patients whose symptoms are not controlled by allergy medications.4 Many military personnel who would like to receive AIT cannot continue with their immunotherapy because of frequent moves, deployments, and temporary duty assignments. This case report highlights the difficulty of managing AIT in the Military Health System.

 

Case Presentation

A 34-year-old active-duty US Air Force male surgeon with a medical history of allergic rhinoconjunctivitis was referred to the allergy clinic for evaluation and consideration of AIT. His symptoms included rhinorrhea, sneezing, nasal congestion, and itchy, watery eyes. The symptoms had been present for several years, occurring predominantly in the spring and fall, but also perennially when exposed to animals such as cats, dogs, and horses. The patient was raised on a ranch where he was exposed to these animals.

The patient had prior skin testing at the University of Nebraska Medical Center (UNMC) for aeroallergens and was positive for trees, grasses, weeds, molds, dust mites, cats, dogs, and horses. He received AIT at UNMC with great success for18 months. Regrettably, the patient discontinued AIT following a military move to Keesler Air Force Base in Mississippi. The patient’s examination was notable for injected conjunctiva, nasal mucosa edema, and a cobblestone throat. His symptoms were not alleviated with oral cetirizine and nasal fluticasone.

dasiherurawenavuphutechodrineswejunuspestospechauotrachebrurogimecroshochishewucaprapubrethetoceuugeshaphemephuhibuswekospiphoshotrophetra

His skin testing was positive for trees, weeds, mold, cats, dogs, dust mites, and horsehair (Table). The risks and benefits of AIT were discussed with the patient, who elected to proceed with restarting AIT and received counseling on aeroallergen avoidance. The patient was unable to continue AIT at Keesler Medical Center because of a military deployment.

 

 

Discussion

There are several barriers to receiving AIT for active-duty patients with allergies. Due to previous skin test extracts, our patient had become desensitized to them. Though he had received aeroallergen immunotherapy with success for 18 months, the patients had to restart the build up phase of AIT due to a military-related move.

For patients to benefit from AIT, they must build up and maintain their immunotherapy injections for at least 3 to 5 years.4 The build-up period of immunotherapy lasts about 3 to 4 months. Patients typically receive weekly injections until they reach a maintenance immunotherapy dose of 0.5 mL of a 1:1 concentration ratio.4

Frequent deployments or temporary duty assignments are other barriers to AIT for active-duty patients. AIT is not usually given on deployments or temporary duty assignments unless the patient is located near a major military medical center. The US Air Force and Army operate allergy extender clinics at smaller bases and overseas locations to facilitate the maintenance of immunotherapy for military patients. Primary care physicians act as allergy extenders. These smaller allergy clinics are supervised by regional allergists at major military medical centers via telehealth and electronic/telephonic communication. These allergy clinics are not more widely available because there are not enough allergists and allergy medical technicians.

Allergen immunotherapy is not standardized, meaning civilian allergists use different aeroallergen immunotherapy formulations. While AIT is standardized in the US military through the Extract Laboratory Management System (ELMS), many active-duty patients are evaluated by civilian allergists in the TRICARE system who do not use ELMS, and when they move, AIT is not maintained.

Because up to 25% of active-duty personnel suffer from allergic rhinoconjunctivitis and AIT is not administered in many deployed settings, this issue could affect mission readiness and capabilities.3-6 These personnel may suffer from frequent and severe nasal and ocular allergy symptoms without being able to continue AIT. There is the potential for adverse effects on the military missions because of these impaired military personnel.5,6

Potential steps to improve the availability of allergen immunotherapy in the deployed setting include training deployed physicians, medical technicians, and other health care practitioners in administering and treating AIT so deployed personnel can receive therapy. Additionally, AIT should be standardized and ordered via the ELMS. Civilian allergists should be highly encouraged to use ELMS. This would create standardization of AIT for all active-duty allergy patients. The allergy extender system could be expanded to all military treatment facilities to provide easy access to allergen immunotherapy. The US Navy has the fewest allergists and allergy extenders, and would need to expand its network of allergy extenders to provide AIT at its health care facilities.

 

Conclusions

We present an active-duty servicemember with allergic rhinoconjunctivitis to trees, grasses, weeds, cats, dogs, dust mites, mold, and horses who had intermittent therapy that was interrupted by deployments. Our case highlights the difficulty of managing AIT in the military health system due to frequent moves, deployments, and temporary duty assignments. We also suggest steps that could help expand AIT for military personnel, including those deployed internationally.

References

1. Maciag MC, Phipatanakul W. Update on indoor allergens and their impact on pediatric asthma. Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol. 2022;128(6):652-658. doi:10.1016/j.anai.2022.02.009

2. Worldwide variation in prevalence of symptoms of asthma, allergic rhinoconjunctivitis, and atopic eczema: ISAAC. The International Study of Asthma and Allergies in Childhood (ISAAC) Steering Committee. Lancet. 1998;351(9111):1225-1232.

3. Roop SA, Niven AS, Calvin BE, Bader J, Zacher LL. The prevalence and impact of respiratory symptoms in asthmatics and nonasthmatics during deployment. Mil Med. 2007;172:1264–1269. doi:10.7205/milmed.172.12.1264

4. Cox L, Nelson H, Lockey R, et al. Allergen immunotherapy: a practice parameter third update. [published correction appears in J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2011 Mar;127(3):840]. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2011;127(1 Suppl):S1-S55. doi:10.1016/j.jaci.2010.09.034

5. Szema AM, Peters MC, Weissinger KM, Gagliano CA, Chen JJ. Increased allergic rhinitis rates among U.S. military personnel after deployment to the Persian Gulf. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2008;121,S230. doi:10.1016/j.jaci.2007.12.909

6. Garshick E, Abraham JH, Baird CP, Ciminera P, et al. Respiratory ealth after military service in Southwest Asia and Afghanistan. An official American Thoracic Society Workshop report. Ann Am Thorac Soc. 2019;16(8):e1-e16. doi:10.1513/AnnalsATS.201904-344WS

Article PDF
Author and Disclosure Information

Col Christopher A. Coop, MD, USAFa; Maj Graey M. Wolfley, DO, USAFa; Lt Col Brittanie I. Neaves, MD, USAFa

Correspondence: Christopher Coop (christopher.a.coop@gmail.com)

a81st Medical Group, Keesler Medical Center, Biloxi, Mississippi

Disclosures
The authors report no actual or potential conflicts of interest or outside sources of funding with regard to this article.

Disclaimer
The opinions expressed herein are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect those of Federal Practitioner, Frontline Medical Communications Inc., the US Government, or any of its agencies. This article may discuss unlabeled or investigational use of certain drugs. Please review the complete prescribing information for specific drugs or drug combinations—including indications, contraindications, warnings, and adverse effects—before administering pharmacologic therapy to patients.

Ethics and consent
Written and verbal consent was obtained from the patient.

Issue
Federal Practitioner - 41(6)a
Publications
Topics
Page Number
192-194
Sections
Author and Disclosure Information

Col Christopher A. Coop, MD, USAFa; Maj Graey M. Wolfley, DO, USAFa; Lt Col Brittanie I. Neaves, MD, USAFa

Correspondence: Christopher Coop (christopher.a.coop@gmail.com)

a81st Medical Group, Keesler Medical Center, Biloxi, Mississippi

Disclosures
The authors report no actual or potential conflicts of interest or outside sources of funding with regard to this article.

Disclaimer
The opinions expressed herein are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect those of Federal Practitioner, Frontline Medical Communications Inc., the US Government, or any of its agencies. This article may discuss unlabeled or investigational use of certain drugs. Please review the complete prescribing information for specific drugs or drug combinations—including indications, contraindications, warnings, and adverse effects—before administering pharmacologic therapy to patients.

Ethics and consent
Written and verbal consent was obtained from the patient.

Author and Disclosure Information

Col Christopher A. Coop, MD, USAFa; Maj Graey M. Wolfley, DO, USAFa; Lt Col Brittanie I. Neaves, MD, USAFa

Correspondence: Christopher Coop (christopher.a.coop@gmail.com)

a81st Medical Group, Keesler Medical Center, Biloxi, Mississippi

Disclosures
The authors report no actual or potential conflicts of interest or outside sources of funding with regard to this article.

Disclaimer
The opinions expressed herein are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect those of Federal Practitioner, Frontline Medical Communications Inc., the US Government, or any of its agencies. This article may discuss unlabeled or investigational use of certain drugs. Please review the complete prescribing information for specific drugs or drug combinations—including indications, contraindications, warnings, and adverse effects—before administering pharmacologic therapy to patients.

Ethics and consent
Written and verbal consent was obtained from the patient.

Article PDF
Article PDF

Allergic rhinoconjunctivitis causes onerous symptoms of sneezing, rhinorrhea, postnasal drip, nasal congestion, and itchy, watery eyes. It is a common condition that affects 10% to 25% of the US population and up to 23% of military members with increased symptoms during deployments.1-3 Allergen immunotherapy (AIT), commonly known as allergy shots, is an effective treatment for allergic rhinoconjunctivitis, especially for patients whose symptoms are not controlled by allergy medications.4 Many military personnel who would like to receive AIT cannot continue with their immunotherapy because of frequent moves, deployments, and temporary duty assignments. This case report highlights the difficulty of managing AIT in the Military Health System.

 

Case Presentation

A 34-year-old active-duty US Air Force male surgeon with a medical history of allergic rhinoconjunctivitis was referred to the allergy clinic for evaluation and consideration of AIT. His symptoms included rhinorrhea, sneezing, nasal congestion, and itchy, watery eyes. The symptoms had been present for several years, occurring predominantly in the spring and fall, but also perennially when exposed to animals such as cats, dogs, and horses. The patient was raised on a ranch where he was exposed to these animals.

The patient had prior skin testing at the University of Nebraska Medical Center (UNMC) for aeroallergens and was positive for trees, grasses, weeds, molds, dust mites, cats, dogs, and horses. He received AIT at UNMC with great success for18 months. Regrettably, the patient discontinued AIT following a military move to Keesler Air Force Base in Mississippi. The patient’s examination was notable for injected conjunctiva, nasal mucosa edema, and a cobblestone throat. His symptoms were not alleviated with oral cetirizine and nasal fluticasone.

dasiherurawenavuphutechodrineswejunuspestospechauotrachebrurogimecroshochishewucaprapubrethetoceuugeshaphemephuhibuswekospiphoshotrophetra

His skin testing was positive for trees, weeds, mold, cats, dogs, dust mites, and horsehair (Table). The risks and benefits of AIT were discussed with the patient, who elected to proceed with restarting AIT and received counseling on aeroallergen avoidance. The patient was unable to continue AIT at Keesler Medical Center because of a military deployment.

 

 

Discussion

There are several barriers to receiving AIT for active-duty patients with allergies. Due to previous skin test extracts, our patient had become desensitized to them. Though he had received aeroallergen immunotherapy with success for 18 months, the patients had to restart the build up phase of AIT due to a military-related move.

For patients to benefit from AIT, they must build up and maintain their immunotherapy injections for at least 3 to 5 years.4 The build-up period of immunotherapy lasts about 3 to 4 months. Patients typically receive weekly injections until they reach a maintenance immunotherapy dose of 0.5 mL of a 1:1 concentration ratio.4

Frequent deployments or temporary duty assignments are other barriers to AIT for active-duty patients. AIT is not usually given on deployments or temporary duty assignments unless the patient is located near a major military medical center. The US Air Force and Army operate allergy extender clinics at smaller bases and overseas locations to facilitate the maintenance of immunotherapy for military patients. Primary care physicians act as allergy extenders. These smaller allergy clinics are supervised by regional allergists at major military medical centers via telehealth and electronic/telephonic communication. These allergy clinics are not more widely available because there are not enough allergists and allergy medical technicians.

Allergen immunotherapy is not standardized, meaning civilian allergists use different aeroallergen immunotherapy formulations. While AIT is standardized in the US military through the Extract Laboratory Management System (ELMS), many active-duty patients are evaluated by civilian allergists in the TRICARE system who do not use ELMS, and when they move, AIT is not maintained.

Because up to 25% of active-duty personnel suffer from allergic rhinoconjunctivitis and AIT is not administered in many deployed settings, this issue could affect mission readiness and capabilities.3-6 These personnel may suffer from frequent and severe nasal and ocular allergy symptoms without being able to continue AIT. There is the potential for adverse effects on the military missions because of these impaired military personnel.5,6

Potential steps to improve the availability of allergen immunotherapy in the deployed setting include training deployed physicians, medical technicians, and other health care practitioners in administering and treating AIT so deployed personnel can receive therapy. Additionally, AIT should be standardized and ordered via the ELMS. Civilian allergists should be highly encouraged to use ELMS. This would create standardization of AIT for all active-duty allergy patients. The allergy extender system could be expanded to all military treatment facilities to provide easy access to allergen immunotherapy. The US Navy has the fewest allergists and allergy extenders, and would need to expand its network of allergy extenders to provide AIT at its health care facilities.

 

Conclusions

We present an active-duty servicemember with allergic rhinoconjunctivitis to trees, grasses, weeds, cats, dogs, dust mites, mold, and horses who had intermittent therapy that was interrupted by deployments. Our case highlights the difficulty of managing AIT in the military health system due to frequent moves, deployments, and temporary duty assignments. We also suggest steps that could help expand AIT for military personnel, including those deployed internationally.

Allergic rhinoconjunctivitis causes onerous symptoms of sneezing, rhinorrhea, postnasal drip, nasal congestion, and itchy, watery eyes. It is a common condition that affects 10% to 25% of the US population and up to 23% of military members with increased symptoms during deployments.1-3 Allergen immunotherapy (AIT), commonly known as allergy shots, is an effective treatment for allergic rhinoconjunctivitis, especially for patients whose symptoms are not controlled by allergy medications.4 Many military personnel who would like to receive AIT cannot continue with their immunotherapy because of frequent moves, deployments, and temporary duty assignments. This case report highlights the difficulty of managing AIT in the Military Health System.

 

Case Presentation

A 34-year-old active-duty US Air Force male surgeon with a medical history of allergic rhinoconjunctivitis was referred to the allergy clinic for evaluation and consideration of AIT. His symptoms included rhinorrhea, sneezing, nasal congestion, and itchy, watery eyes. The symptoms had been present for several years, occurring predominantly in the spring and fall, but also perennially when exposed to animals such as cats, dogs, and horses. The patient was raised on a ranch where he was exposed to these animals.

The patient had prior skin testing at the University of Nebraska Medical Center (UNMC) for aeroallergens and was positive for trees, grasses, weeds, molds, dust mites, cats, dogs, and horses. He received AIT at UNMC with great success for18 months. Regrettably, the patient discontinued AIT following a military move to Keesler Air Force Base in Mississippi. The patient’s examination was notable for injected conjunctiva, nasal mucosa edema, and a cobblestone throat. His symptoms were not alleviated with oral cetirizine and nasal fluticasone.

dasiherurawenavuphutechodrineswejunuspestospechauotrachebrurogimecroshochishewucaprapubrethetoceuugeshaphemephuhibuswekospiphoshotrophetra

His skin testing was positive for trees, weeds, mold, cats, dogs, dust mites, and horsehair (Table). The risks and benefits of AIT were discussed with the patient, who elected to proceed with restarting AIT and received counseling on aeroallergen avoidance. The patient was unable to continue AIT at Keesler Medical Center because of a military deployment.

 

 

Discussion

There are several barriers to receiving AIT for active-duty patients with allergies. Due to previous skin test extracts, our patient had become desensitized to them. Though he had received aeroallergen immunotherapy with success for 18 months, the patients had to restart the build up phase of AIT due to a military-related move.

For patients to benefit from AIT, they must build up and maintain their immunotherapy injections for at least 3 to 5 years.4 The build-up period of immunotherapy lasts about 3 to 4 months. Patients typically receive weekly injections until they reach a maintenance immunotherapy dose of 0.5 mL of a 1:1 concentration ratio.4

Frequent deployments or temporary duty assignments are other barriers to AIT for active-duty patients. AIT is not usually given on deployments or temporary duty assignments unless the patient is located near a major military medical center. The US Air Force and Army operate allergy extender clinics at smaller bases and overseas locations to facilitate the maintenance of immunotherapy for military patients. Primary care physicians act as allergy extenders. These smaller allergy clinics are supervised by regional allergists at major military medical centers via telehealth and electronic/telephonic communication. These allergy clinics are not more widely available because there are not enough allergists and allergy medical technicians.

Allergen immunotherapy is not standardized, meaning civilian allergists use different aeroallergen immunotherapy formulations. While AIT is standardized in the US military through the Extract Laboratory Management System (ELMS), many active-duty patients are evaluated by civilian allergists in the TRICARE system who do not use ELMS, and when they move, AIT is not maintained.

Because up to 25% of active-duty personnel suffer from allergic rhinoconjunctivitis and AIT is not administered in many deployed settings, this issue could affect mission readiness and capabilities.3-6 These personnel may suffer from frequent and severe nasal and ocular allergy symptoms without being able to continue AIT. There is the potential for adverse effects on the military missions because of these impaired military personnel.5,6

Potential steps to improve the availability of allergen immunotherapy in the deployed setting include training deployed physicians, medical technicians, and other health care practitioners in administering and treating AIT so deployed personnel can receive therapy. Additionally, AIT should be standardized and ordered via the ELMS. Civilian allergists should be highly encouraged to use ELMS. This would create standardization of AIT for all active-duty allergy patients. The allergy extender system could be expanded to all military treatment facilities to provide easy access to allergen immunotherapy. The US Navy has the fewest allergists and allergy extenders, and would need to expand its network of allergy extenders to provide AIT at its health care facilities.

 

Conclusions

We present an active-duty servicemember with allergic rhinoconjunctivitis to trees, grasses, weeds, cats, dogs, dust mites, mold, and horses who had intermittent therapy that was interrupted by deployments. Our case highlights the difficulty of managing AIT in the military health system due to frequent moves, deployments, and temporary duty assignments. We also suggest steps that could help expand AIT for military personnel, including those deployed internationally.

References

1. Maciag MC, Phipatanakul W. Update on indoor allergens and their impact on pediatric asthma. Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol. 2022;128(6):652-658. doi:10.1016/j.anai.2022.02.009

2. Worldwide variation in prevalence of symptoms of asthma, allergic rhinoconjunctivitis, and atopic eczema: ISAAC. The International Study of Asthma and Allergies in Childhood (ISAAC) Steering Committee. Lancet. 1998;351(9111):1225-1232.

3. Roop SA, Niven AS, Calvin BE, Bader J, Zacher LL. The prevalence and impact of respiratory symptoms in asthmatics and nonasthmatics during deployment. Mil Med. 2007;172:1264–1269. doi:10.7205/milmed.172.12.1264

4. Cox L, Nelson H, Lockey R, et al. Allergen immunotherapy: a practice parameter third update. [published correction appears in J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2011 Mar;127(3):840]. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2011;127(1 Suppl):S1-S55. doi:10.1016/j.jaci.2010.09.034

5. Szema AM, Peters MC, Weissinger KM, Gagliano CA, Chen JJ. Increased allergic rhinitis rates among U.S. military personnel after deployment to the Persian Gulf. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2008;121,S230. doi:10.1016/j.jaci.2007.12.909

6. Garshick E, Abraham JH, Baird CP, Ciminera P, et al. Respiratory ealth after military service in Southwest Asia and Afghanistan. An official American Thoracic Society Workshop report. Ann Am Thorac Soc. 2019;16(8):e1-e16. doi:10.1513/AnnalsATS.201904-344WS

References

1. Maciag MC, Phipatanakul W. Update on indoor allergens and their impact on pediatric asthma. Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol. 2022;128(6):652-658. doi:10.1016/j.anai.2022.02.009

2. Worldwide variation in prevalence of symptoms of asthma, allergic rhinoconjunctivitis, and atopic eczema: ISAAC. The International Study of Asthma and Allergies in Childhood (ISAAC) Steering Committee. Lancet. 1998;351(9111):1225-1232.

3. Roop SA, Niven AS, Calvin BE, Bader J, Zacher LL. The prevalence and impact of respiratory symptoms in asthmatics and nonasthmatics during deployment. Mil Med. 2007;172:1264–1269. doi:10.7205/milmed.172.12.1264

4. Cox L, Nelson H, Lockey R, et al. Allergen immunotherapy: a practice parameter third update. [published correction appears in J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2011 Mar;127(3):840]. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2011;127(1 Suppl):S1-S55. doi:10.1016/j.jaci.2010.09.034

5. Szema AM, Peters MC, Weissinger KM, Gagliano CA, Chen JJ. Increased allergic rhinitis rates among U.S. military personnel after deployment to the Persian Gulf. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2008;121,S230. doi:10.1016/j.jaci.2007.12.909

6. Garshick E, Abraham JH, Baird CP, Ciminera P, et al. Respiratory ealth after military service in Southwest Asia and Afghanistan. An official American Thoracic Society Workshop report. Ann Am Thorac Soc. 2019;16(8):e1-e16. doi:10.1513/AnnalsATS.201904-344WS

Issue
Federal Practitioner - 41(6)a
Issue
Federal Practitioner - 41(6)a
Page Number
192-194
Page Number
192-194
Publications
Publications
Topics
Article Type
Sections
Teambase XML
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!--$RCSfile: InCopy_agile.xsl,v $ $Revision: 1.35 $-->
<!--$RCSfile: drupal.xsl,v $ $Revision: 1.7 $-->
<root generator="drupal.xsl" gversion="1.7"> <header> <fileName>0624 FED Allergen Immunotherapy</fileName> <TBEID>0C02F748.SIG</TBEID> <TBUniqueIdentifier>NJ_0C02F748</TBUniqueIdentifier> <newsOrJournal>Journal</newsOrJournal> <publisherName>Frontline Medical Communications Inc.</publisherName> <storyname/> <articleType>1</articleType> <TBLocation>Copyfitting-FED</TBLocation> <QCDate/> <firstPublished>20240603T112401</firstPublished> <LastPublished>20240603T112401</LastPublished> <pubStatus qcode="stat:"/> <embargoDate/> <killDate/> <CMSDate>20240603T112401</CMSDate> <articleSource/> <facebookInfo/> <meetingNumber/> <byline/> <bylineText>Col Christopher A. Coop, MD, USAFa; Maj Graey M. Wolfley, DO, USAFa; Lt Col Brittanie I. Neaves, MD, USAFa </bylineText> <bylineFull/> <bylineTitleText/> <USOrGlobal/> <wireDocType/> <newsDocType/> <journalDocType/> <linkLabel/> <pageRange/> <citation/> <quizID/> <indexIssueDate/> <itemClass qcode="ninat:text"/> <provider qcode="provider:"> <name/> <rightsInfo> <copyrightHolder> <name/> </copyrightHolder> <copyrightNotice/> </rightsInfo> </provider> <abstract/> <metaDescription>Allergic rhinoconjunctivitis causes onerous symptoms of sneezing, rhinorrhea, postnasal drip, nasal congestion, and itchy, watery eyes. It is a common condition</metaDescription> <articlePDF/> <teaserImage/> <title>The Challenges of Delivering Allergen Immunotherapy in the Military Health System</title> <deck/> <eyebrow>CASE IN POINT</eyebrow> <disclaimer/> <AuthorList/> <articleURL/> <doi/> <pubMedID/> <publishXMLStatus/> <publishXMLVersion>1</publishXMLVersion> <useEISSN>0</useEISSN> <urgency/> <pubPubdateYear>2024</pubPubdateYear> <pubPubdateMonth>June</pubPubdateMonth> <pubPubdateDay/> <pubVolume>41</pubVolume> <pubNumber>6</pubNumber> <wireChannels/> <primaryCMSID/> <CMSIDs> <CMSID>2953</CMSID> <CMSID>3729</CMSID> </CMSIDs> <keywords/> <seeAlsos/> <publications_g> <publicationData> <publicationCode>FED</publicationCode> <pubIssueName>June 2024</pubIssueName> <pubArticleType>Columns | 3729</pubArticleType> <pubTopics/> <pubCategories/> <pubSections> <pubSection>Case in Point | 2953<pubSubsection/></pubSection> </pubSections> <journalTitle>Fed Pract</journalTitle> <journalFullTitle>Federal Practitioner</journalFullTitle> <copyrightStatement>Copyright 2017 Frontline Medical Communications Inc., Parsippany, NJ, USA. All rights reserved.</copyrightStatement> </publicationData> </publications_g> <publications> <term canonical="true">16</term> </publications> <sections> <term canonical="true">45</term> </sections> <topics> <term canonical="true">27442</term> </topics> <links/> </header> <itemSet> <newsItem> <itemMeta> <itemRole>Main</itemRole> <itemClass>text</itemClass> <title>The Challenges of Delivering Allergen Immunotherapy in the Military Health System</title> <deck/> </itemMeta> <itemContent> <p class="abstract"><b>Background:</b> Many military members suffer from allergic rhinoconjunctivitis, which causes burdensome symptoms such as rhinorrhea, sneezing, nasal congestion, and itchy, watery eyes. These symptoms are not controlled by medications, and many require aeroallergen immunotherapy. However, many patients in the military have difficulty remaining on immunotherapy due to frequent moves, deployments, and temporary duty assignments.<br/><br/><b>Case Presentation: </b>A 34-year-old active-duty service member was referred to the Keesler Medical Center allergy clinic with severe allergic rhinoconjunctivitis. His symptoms included rhinorrhea, sneezing, nasal congestion, and itchy, watery eyes, which had been present for several years, occurring seasonally and when exposed to animals. The patient previously received aeroallergen immunotherapy but discontinued the therapy due to frequent military deployments and duty station changes. He restarted immunotherapy and received counseling on aeroallergen avoidance. However, a subsequent military deployment interrupted the continued aeroallergen immunotherapy.<br/><br/><b>Conclusions:</b> The case highlights the difficulty of managing allergy immunotherapy in the military health system due to frequent moves, deployments, and temporary duty assignments. Access to allergists and others trained to administer immunotherapy in deployed settings may help alleviate this challenge to mission readiness.</p> <p><span class="Drop">A</span>llergic rhinoconjunctivitis causes onerous symptoms of sneezing, rhinorrhea, postnasal drip, nasal congestion, and itchy, watery eyes. It is a common condition that affects 10% to 25% of the US population and up to 23% of military members with increased symptoms during deployments.<sup>1-3</sup> Allergen immunotherapy (AIT), commonly known as allergy shots, is an effective treatment for allergic rhinoconjunctivitis, especially for patients whose symptoms are not controlled by allergy medications.<sup>4</sup> Many military personnel who would like to receive AIT cannot continue with their immunotherapy because of frequent moves, deployments, and temporary duty assignments. This case report highlights the difficulty of managing AIT in the Military Health System.</p> <h2>Case Presentation</h2> <p>A 34-year-old active-duty US Air Force male surgeon with a medical history of allergic rhinoconjunctivitis was referred to the allergy clinic for evaluation and consideration of AIT. His symptoms included rhinorrhea, sneezing, nasal congestion, and itchy, watery eyes. The symptoms had been present for several years, occurring predominantly in the spring and fall, but also perennially when exposed to animals such as cats, dogs, and horses. The patient was raised on a ranch where he was exposed to these animals.</p> <p>The patient had prior skin testing at the University of Nebraska Medical Center (UNMC) for aeroallergens and was positive for trees, grasses, weeds, molds, dust mites, cats, dogs, and horses. He received AIT at UNMC with great success for18 months. Regrettably, the patient discontinued AIT following a military move to Keesler Air Force Base in Mississippi. The patient’s examination was notable for injected conjunctiva, nasal mucosa edema, and a cobblestone throat. His symptoms were not alleviated with oral cetirizine and nasal fluticasone. <br/><br/>His skin testing was positive for trees, weeds, mold, cats, dogs, dust mites, and horsehair (Table). The risks and benefits of AIT were discussed with the patient, who elected to proceed with restarting AIT and received counseling on aeroallergen avoidance. The patient was unable to continue AIT at Keesler Medical Center because of a military deployment.</p> <h2>Discussion</h2> <p>There are several barriers to receiving AIT for active-duty patients with allergies. Due to previous skin test extracts, our patient had become desensitized to them. Though he had received aeroallergen immunotherapy with success for 18 months, the patients had to restart the build up phase of AIT due to a military-related move.</p> <p>For patients to benefit from AIT, they must build up and maintain their immunotherapy injections for at least 3 to 5 years.<sup>4</sup> The build-up period of immunotherapy lasts about 3 to 4 months. Patients typically receive weekly injections until they reach a maintenance immunotherapy dose of 0.5 mL of a 1:1 concentration ratio.<sup>4<br/><br/></sup>Frequent deployments or temporary duty assignments are other barriers to AIT for active-duty patients. AIT is not usually given on deployments or temporary duty assignments unless the patient is located near a major military medical center. The US Air Force and Army operate allergy extender clinics at smaller bases and overseas locations to facilitate the maintenance of immunotherapy for military patients. Primary care physicians act as allergy extenders. These smaller allergy clinics are supervised by regional allergists at major military medical centers via telehealth and electronic/telephonic communication. These allergy clinics are not more widely available because there are not enough allergists and allergy medical technicians. <br/><br/>Allergen immunotherapy is not standardized, meaning civilian allergists use different aeroallergen immunotherapy formulations. While AIT is standardized in the US military through the Extract Laboratory Management System (ELMS), many active-duty patients are evaluated by civilian allergists in the TRICARE system who do not use ELMS, and when they move, AIT is not maintained.<br/><br/>Because up to 25% of active-duty personnel suffer from allergic rhinoconjunctivitis and AIT is not administered in many deployed settings, this issue could affect mission readiness and capabilities.<sup>3-6</sup> These personnel may suffer from frequent and severe nasal and ocular allergy symptoms without being able to continue AIT. There is the potential for adverse effects on the military missions because of these impaired military personnel.<sup>5,6</sup> <br/><br/>Potential steps to improve the availability of allergen immunotherapy in the deployed setting include training deployed physicians, medical technicians, and other health care practitioners in administering and treating AIT so deployed personnel can receive therapy. Additionally, AIT should be standardized and ordered via the ELMS. Civilian allergists should be highly encouraged to use ELMS. This would create standardization of AIT for all active-duty allergy patients. The allergy extender system could be expanded to all military treatment facilities to provide easy access to allergen immunotherapy. The US Navy has the fewest allergists and allergy extenders, and would need to expand its network of allergy extenders to provide AIT at its health care facilities.</p> <h2>Conclusions</h2> <p>We present an active-duty servicemember with allergic rhinoconjunctivitis to trees, grasses, weeds, cats, dogs, dust mites, mold, and horses who had intermittent therapy that was interrupted by deployments. Our case highlights the difficulty of managing AIT in the military health system due to frequent moves, deployments, and temporary duty assignments. We also suggest steps that could help expand AIT for military personnel, including those deployed internationally. </p> <h3> Author affiliations </h3> <p> <em><sup>a</sup>81st Medical Group, Keesler Medical Center, Biloxi, Mississippi</em> </p> <h3> Disclosures </h3> <p> <em>The authors report no actual or potential conflicts of interest or outside sources of funding with regard to this article.</em> </p> <h3> Disclaimer </h3> <p> <em>The opinions expressed herein are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect those of <i>Federal Practitioner</i>, Frontline Medical Communications Inc., the US Government, or any of its agencies. This article may discuss unlabeled or investigational use of certain drugs. Please review the complete prescribing information for specific drugs or drug combinations—including indications, contraindications, warnings, and adverse effects—before administering pharmacologic therapy to patients.</em> </p> <h3> Ethics and consent </h3> <p> <em>Written and verbal consent was obtained from the patient.</em> </p> <h3> References </h3> <p class="reference"> 1. Maciag MC, Phipatanakul W. Update on indoor allergens and their impact on pediatric asthma. <i>Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol</i>. 2022;128(6):652-658. doi:10.1016/j.anai.2022.02.009<br/><br/> 2. Worldwide variation in prevalence of symptoms of asthma, allergic rhinoconjunctivitis, and atopic eczema: ISAAC. The International Study of Asthma and Allergies in Childhood (ISAAC) Steering Committee. <i>Lancet</i>. 1998;351(9111):1225-1232.<br/><br/> 3. Roop SA, Niven AS, Calvin BE, Bader J, Zacher LL. The prevalence and impact of respiratory symptoms in asthmatics and nonasthmatics during deployment. <i>Mil Med</i>. 2007;172:1264–1269. doi:10.7205/milmed.172.12.1264<br/><br/> 4. Cox L, Nelson H, Lockey R, et al. Allergen immunotherapy: a practice parameter third update. [published correction appears in <i>J Allergy Clin Immunol</i>. 2011 Mar;127(3):840]. <i>J Allergy Clin Immunol</i>. 2011;127(1 Suppl):S1-S55. doi:10.1016/j.jaci.2010.09.034<br/><br/> 5. Szema AM, Peters MC, Weissinger KM, Gagliano CA, Chen JJ. Increased allergic rhinitis rates among U.S. military personnel after deployment to the Persian Gulf. <i>J Allergy Clin Immunol. </i>2008;121,S230. doi:10.1016/j.jaci.2007.12.909<br/><br/> 6. Garshick E, Abraham JH, Baird CP, Ciminera P, et al. Respiratory ealth after military service in Southwest Asia and Afghanistan. An official American Thoracic Society Workshop report. <i>Ann Am Thorac Soc</i>. 2019;16(8):e1-e16. doi:10.1513/AnnalsATS.201904-344WS</p> </itemContent> </newsItem> </itemSet></root>
Disallow All Ads
Content Gating
No Gating (article Unlocked/Free)
Alternative CME
Disqus Comments
Default
Use ProPublica
Hide sidebar & use full width
render the right sidebar.
Conference Recap Checkbox
Not Conference Recap
Clinical Edge
Display the Slideshow in this Article
Medscape Article
Display survey writer
Reuters content
Disable Inline Native ads
WebMD Article
Article PDF Media
Image
Disable zoom
Off

The Clinical Utility of Teledermatology in Triaging and Diagnosing Skin Malignancies: Case Series

Article Type
Changed
Tue, 05/07/2024 - 13:47
Display Headline
The Clinical Utility of Teledermatology in Triaging and Diagnosing Skin Malignancies: Case Series

With the increasing utilization of telemedicine since the COVID-19 pandemic, it is critical that clinicians have an appropriate understanding of the application of virtual care resources, including teledermatology. We present a case series of 3 patients to demonstrate the clinical utility of teledermatology in reducing the time to diagnosis of various rare and/or aggressive cutaneous malignancies, including Merkel cell carcinoma, malignant melanoma, and atypical fibroxanthoma. Cases were obtained from one large Midwestern medical center during the month of July 2021. Each case presented includes a description of the initial teledermatology presentation and reviews the clinical timeline from initial consultation submission to in-person clinic visit with lesion biopsy. This case series demonstrates real-world examples of how teledermatology can be utilized to expedite the care of specific vulnerable patient populations.

Teledermatology is a rapidly growing digital resource with specific utility in triaging patients to determine those requiring in-person evaluation for early and accurate detection of skin malignancies. Approximately one-third of teledermatology consultations result in face-to-face clinical encounters, with malignant neoplasms being the leading cause for biopsy.1,2 For specific populations, such as geriatric and immunocompromised patients, teledermatology may serve as a valuable tool, particularly in the wake of the COVID-19 pandemic. Furthermore, telemedicine may aid in addressing health disparities within the field of medicine and ultimately may improve access to care for vulnerable populations.3 Along with increasing access to specific subspecialty expertise, the use of teledermatology may reduce health care costs and improve the overall quality of care delivered to patients.4,5

We describe the clinical utility of teledermatology in triaging and diagnosing skin malignancies through a series of 3 cases obtained from digital image review at one large Midwestern medical center during the month of July 2021. Three unique cases with a final diagnosis of a rare or aggressive skin cancer were selected as examples, including a 75-year-old man with Merkle cell carcinoma, a 55-year-old man with aggressive pT3b malignant melanoma, and a 72-year-old man with an atypical fibroxanthoma. A clinical timeline of each case is presented, including the time intervals from initial image submission to image review, image submission to face-to-face clinical encounter, and image submission to final diagnosis. In all cases, the primary care provider submitted an order for teledermatology, and the teledermatology team obtained the images.

Case Series

Patient 1—Images of the right hand of a 75-year-old man with a medical history of basal cell carcinoma were submitted for teledermatology consultation utilizing store-and-forward image-capturing technology (day 1). The patient history provided with image submission indicated that the lesion had been present for 6 months and there were no associated symptoms. Clinical imaging demonstrated a pink-red pearly papule located on the proximal fourth digit of the dorsal aspect of the right hand (Figure 1). One day following the teledermatology request (day 2), the patient’s case was reviewed and triaged for an in-person visit. The patient was brought to clinic on day 34, and a biopsy was performed. On day 36, dermatopathology results indicated a diagnosis of Merkel cell carcinoma. On day 37, the patient was referred to surgical oncology, and on day 44, the patient underwent an initial surgical oncology visit with a plan for wide local excision of the right fourth digit with right axillary sentinel lymph node biopsy.

Sabel_1.jpg
%3Cp%3E%3Cstrong%3EFIGURE%201.%3C%2Fstrong%3E%20A%20lesion%20of%20concern%20on%20the%20fourth%20digit%20of%20the%20dorsal%20aspect%20of%20the%20right%20hand%20that%20initially%20was%20evaluated%20via%20teledermatology%20and%20later%20was%20diagnosed%20as%20Merkel%20cell%20carcinoma%20(patient%201).%3C%2Fp%3E

Patient 2—Images of the left flank of a 55-year-old man were submitted for teledermatology consultation via store-and-forward technology (day 1). A patient history provided with the image indicated that the lesion had been present for months to years and there were no associated symptoms, but the lesion recently had changed in color and size. Teledermatology images were reviewed on day 3 and demonstrated a 2- to 3-cm brown plaque on the left flank with color variegation and a prominent red papule protruding centrally (Figure 2). The patient was scheduled for an urgent in-person visit with biopsy. On day 6, the patient presented to clinic and an excision biopsy was performed. Dermatopathology was ordered with a RUSH indication, with results on day 7 revealing a pT3b malignant melanoma. An urgent consultation to surgical oncology was placed on the same day, and the patient underwent an initial surgical oncology visit on day 24 with a plan for wide local excision with left axillary and inguinal sentinel lymph node biopsy.

Sabel_2.jpg
%3Cp%3E%3Cstrong%3EFIGURE%202.%3C%2Fstrong%3E%20A%20lesion%20of%20concern%20on%20the%20left%20flank%20that%20initially%20was%20evaluated%20via%20teledermatology%20and%20later%20was%20diagnosed%20as%20a%20pT3b%20malignant%20melanoma%20(patient%202).%3C%2Fp%3E

Patient 3—Images of the left ear of a 72-year-old man were submitted for teledermatology consultation utilizing review via store-and-forward technology (day 1). A patient history indicated that the lesion had been present for 3 months with associated bleeding. Image review demonstrated a solitary pearly pink papule located on the crura of the antihelix (Figure 3). Initial teledermatology consultation was reviewed on day 2 with notification of the need for in-person evaluation. The patient presented to clinic on day 33 for a biopsy, with dermatopathology results on day 36 consistent with an atypical fibroxanthoma. The patient was scheduled for Mohs micrographic surgery on day 37 and underwent surgical treatment on day 64.

Sabel_3.jpg
%3Cp%3E%3Cstrong%3EFIGURE%203.%3C%2Fstrong%3E%20A%20lesion%20of%20concern%20on%20the%20left%20ear%20that%20initially%20was%20evaluated%20via%20teledermatology%20and%20later%20was%20diagnosed%20as%20atypical%20fibroxanthoma%20(patient%203).%3C%2Fp%3E

Comment

Teledermatology consultations from all patients demonstrated adequate image quality to be able to evaluate the lesion of concern and yielded a request for in-person evaluation with possible biopsy (Table). In this case series, the average time interval from teledermatology consultation placement to teledermatology image report was 2 days (range, 1–3 days). The average time from teledermatology consultation placement to face-to-face encounter with biopsy was 24.3 days for the 3 cases presented in this series (range, 6–34 days). The initial surgical oncology visits took place an average of 34 days after the initial teledermatology consultation was placed for the 2 patients requiring referral (44 days for patient 1; 24 days for patient 2). For patient 3, Mohs micrographic surgery was required for treatment, which was scheduled by day 37 and subsequently performed on day 64.

CT113005211_Table.jpg

 

 

When specifically looking at the diagnosis of cutaneous malignancies, studies have found that the incidence of skin cancer detection is similar for teledermatology compared to in-person clinic visits.6,7 Creighton-Smith et al6 performed a retrospective cohort study comparing prebiopsy and postbiopsy diagnostic accuracy and detection rates of skin cancer between store-and-forward technology and face-to-face consultation. When adjusting for possible compounding factors including personal and family history of skin cancer, there was no notable difference in detection rates of any skin cancer, including melanoma and nonmelanoma skin cancers. Furthermore, the 2 cohorts of patients were found to have similar prebiopsy and postbiopsy diagnostic concordance, with similar times from consultation being placed to requested biopsy and time from biopsy to final treatment.6

Clarke et al7 similarly analyzed the accuracy of store-and-forward teledermatology and found that there was overall concordance in diagnosis when comparing clinical dermatologists to teledermatologists. Moreover, when melanocytic lesions were excluded from the study, the decision to biopsy did not differ substantially.7

Areas of further study include determining what percentage of teledermatology lesions of concern for malignancy were proven to be skin cancer after in-person evaluation and biopsy, as well as investigating the effectiveness of teledermatology for melanocytic lesions, which frequently are removed from analysis in large-scale teledermatology studies.

Although teledermatology has substantial clinical utility and may serve as a great resource for specific populations, including geriatric patients and those who are immunocompromised, it is important to recognize notable limitations. Specifically, brief history and image review should not serve as replacements for a face-to-face visit with physical examination in cases where the diagnosis remains uncertain or when high-risk skin malignancies are suspected or included in the differential. Certain aggressive cutaneous malignancies such as Merkel cell carcinoma may appear as less aggressive via teledermatology due to restrictions of technology.

Conclusion

Teledermatology has had a major impact on the way health care is delivered to patients and may increase access to care, reducing unnecessary in-person visits and decreasing the number of in-person visit no-shows. With the appropriate use of a brief clinical history and image review, teledermatology can be effective to evaluate specific lesions of concern. We report 3 unique cases identified during a 1-month period at a large Midwestern medical center. These cases serve as important examples of the application of teledermatology in reducing the time to diagnosis of aggressive skin malignancies. Further research on the clinical utility of teledermatology is warranted.

Acknowledgments—The authors thank the additional providers from the University of Wisconsin and William S. Middleton Memorial Veterans Hospital (both in Madison, Wisconsin) involved in the medical care of the patients included in this case series.

References
  1. Bianchi MG, Santos A, Cordioli E. Benefits of teledermatology for geriatric patients: population-based cross-sectional study. J Med Internet Res. 2020;22:E16700.
  2. Mortimer S, Rosin A. A retrospective review of incidental malignancies in veterans seen for face-to-face follow-up after teledermatology consultation. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2021;84:1130-1132.
  3. Costello CM, Cumsky HJL, Maly CJ, et al. Improving access to care through the establishment of a local, teledermatology network. Telemed J E Health. 2020;26:935-940. doi:10.1089/tmj.2019.0051
  4. Lee JJ, English JC 3rd. Teledermatology: a review and update. Am J Clin Dermatol. 2018;19:253-260. doi:10.1007/s40257-017-0317-6
  5. Hadeler E, Beer J, Nouri K. The influence of teledermatology on health care access and equity. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2021;84:E219-E220. doi:10.1016/j.jaad.2020.12.036
  6. Creighton-Smith M, Murgia RD 3rd, Konnikov N, et al. Incidence of melanoma and keratinocytic carcinomas in patients evaluated by store-and-forward teledermatology vs dermatology clinic. Int J Dermatol. 2017;56:1026-1031. doi:10.1111/ijd.13672
  7. Clarke EL, Reichenberg JS, Ahmed AM, et al. The utility of teledermatology in the evaluation of skin lesions. J Telemed Telecare. 2023;29:382-389. doi:10.1177/1357633X20987423
Article PDF
Author and Disclosure Information

From the Department of Dermatology, University of Wisconsin, Madison. Drs. Korger, Xu, and Rosin also are from William S. Middleton Memorial Veterans Hospital, Madison.

The authors report no conflict of interest.

Correspondence: Kimberly A. Sable, MD, Department of Dermatology, University of Wisconsin, One S Park St, 7th Floor, Madison, WI 53715 (ksable@uwhealth.org).

Issue
Cutis - 113(5)
Publications
Topics
Page Number
211-213
Sections
Author and Disclosure Information

From the Department of Dermatology, University of Wisconsin, Madison. Drs. Korger, Xu, and Rosin also are from William S. Middleton Memorial Veterans Hospital, Madison.

The authors report no conflict of interest.

Correspondence: Kimberly A. Sable, MD, Department of Dermatology, University of Wisconsin, One S Park St, 7th Floor, Madison, WI 53715 (ksable@uwhealth.org).

Author and Disclosure Information

From the Department of Dermatology, University of Wisconsin, Madison. Drs. Korger, Xu, and Rosin also are from William S. Middleton Memorial Veterans Hospital, Madison.

The authors report no conflict of interest.

Correspondence: Kimberly A. Sable, MD, Department of Dermatology, University of Wisconsin, One S Park St, 7th Floor, Madison, WI 53715 (ksable@uwhealth.org).

Article PDF
Article PDF

With the increasing utilization of telemedicine since the COVID-19 pandemic, it is critical that clinicians have an appropriate understanding of the application of virtual care resources, including teledermatology. We present a case series of 3 patients to demonstrate the clinical utility of teledermatology in reducing the time to diagnosis of various rare and/or aggressive cutaneous malignancies, including Merkel cell carcinoma, malignant melanoma, and atypical fibroxanthoma. Cases were obtained from one large Midwestern medical center during the month of July 2021. Each case presented includes a description of the initial teledermatology presentation and reviews the clinical timeline from initial consultation submission to in-person clinic visit with lesion biopsy. This case series demonstrates real-world examples of how teledermatology can be utilized to expedite the care of specific vulnerable patient populations.

Teledermatology is a rapidly growing digital resource with specific utility in triaging patients to determine those requiring in-person evaluation for early and accurate detection of skin malignancies. Approximately one-third of teledermatology consultations result in face-to-face clinical encounters, with malignant neoplasms being the leading cause for biopsy.1,2 For specific populations, such as geriatric and immunocompromised patients, teledermatology may serve as a valuable tool, particularly in the wake of the COVID-19 pandemic. Furthermore, telemedicine may aid in addressing health disparities within the field of medicine and ultimately may improve access to care for vulnerable populations.3 Along with increasing access to specific subspecialty expertise, the use of teledermatology may reduce health care costs and improve the overall quality of care delivered to patients.4,5

We describe the clinical utility of teledermatology in triaging and diagnosing skin malignancies through a series of 3 cases obtained from digital image review at one large Midwestern medical center during the month of July 2021. Three unique cases with a final diagnosis of a rare or aggressive skin cancer were selected as examples, including a 75-year-old man with Merkle cell carcinoma, a 55-year-old man with aggressive pT3b malignant melanoma, and a 72-year-old man with an atypical fibroxanthoma. A clinical timeline of each case is presented, including the time intervals from initial image submission to image review, image submission to face-to-face clinical encounter, and image submission to final diagnosis. In all cases, the primary care provider submitted an order for teledermatology, and the teledermatology team obtained the images.

Case Series

Patient 1—Images of the right hand of a 75-year-old man with a medical history of basal cell carcinoma were submitted for teledermatology consultation utilizing store-and-forward image-capturing technology (day 1). The patient history provided with image submission indicated that the lesion had been present for 6 months and there were no associated symptoms. Clinical imaging demonstrated a pink-red pearly papule located on the proximal fourth digit of the dorsal aspect of the right hand (Figure 1). One day following the teledermatology request (day 2), the patient’s case was reviewed and triaged for an in-person visit. The patient was brought to clinic on day 34, and a biopsy was performed. On day 36, dermatopathology results indicated a diagnosis of Merkel cell carcinoma. On day 37, the patient was referred to surgical oncology, and on day 44, the patient underwent an initial surgical oncology visit with a plan for wide local excision of the right fourth digit with right axillary sentinel lymph node biopsy.

Sabel_1.jpg
%3Cp%3E%3Cstrong%3EFIGURE%201.%3C%2Fstrong%3E%20A%20lesion%20of%20concern%20on%20the%20fourth%20digit%20of%20the%20dorsal%20aspect%20of%20the%20right%20hand%20that%20initially%20was%20evaluated%20via%20teledermatology%20and%20later%20was%20diagnosed%20as%20Merkel%20cell%20carcinoma%20(patient%201).%3C%2Fp%3E

Patient 2—Images of the left flank of a 55-year-old man were submitted for teledermatology consultation via store-and-forward technology (day 1). A patient history provided with the image indicated that the lesion had been present for months to years and there were no associated symptoms, but the lesion recently had changed in color and size. Teledermatology images were reviewed on day 3 and demonstrated a 2- to 3-cm brown plaque on the left flank with color variegation and a prominent red papule protruding centrally (Figure 2). The patient was scheduled for an urgent in-person visit with biopsy. On day 6, the patient presented to clinic and an excision biopsy was performed. Dermatopathology was ordered with a RUSH indication, with results on day 7 revealing a pT3b malignant melanoma. An urgent consultation to surgical oncology was placed on the same day, and the patient underwent an initial surgical oncology visit on day 24 with a plan for wide local excision with left axillary and inguinal sentinel lymph node biopsy.

Sabel_2.jpg
%3Cp%3E%3Cstrong%3EFIGURE%202.%3C%2Fstrong%3E%20A%20lesion%20of%20concern%20on%20the%20left%20flank%20that%20initially%20was%20evaluated%20via%20teledermatology%20and%20later%20was%20diagnosed%20as%20a%20pT3b%20malignant%20melanoma%20(patient%202).%3C%2Fp%3E

Patient 3—Images of the left ear of a 72-year-old man were submitted for teledermatology consultation utilizing review via store-and-forward technology (day 1). A patient history indicated that the lesion had been present for 3 months with associated bleeding. Image review demonstrated a solitary pearly pink papule located on the crura of the antihelix (Figure 3). Initial teledermatology consultation was reviewed on day 2 with notification of the need for in-person evaluation. The patient presented to clinic on day 33 for a biopsy, with dermatopathology results on day 36 consistent with an atypical fibroxanthoma. The patient was scheduled for Mohs micrographic surgery on day 37 and underwent surgical treatment on day 64.

Sabel_3.jpg
%3Cp%3E%3Cstrong%3EFIGURE%203.%3C%2Fstrong%3E%20A%20lesion%20of%20concern%20on%20the%20left%20ear%20that%20initially%20was%20evaluated%20via%20teledermatology%20and%20later%20was%20diagnosed%20as%20atypical%20fibroxanthoma%20(patient%203).%3C%2Fp%3E

Comment

Teledermatology consultations from all patients demonstrated adequate image quality to be able to evaluate the lesion of concern and yielded a request for in-person evaluation with possible biopsy (Table). In this case series, the average time interval from teledermatology consultation placement to teledermatology image report was 2 days (range, 1–3 days). The average time from teledermatology consultation placement to face-to-face encounter with biopsy was 24.3 days for the 3 cases presented in this series (range, 6–34 days). The initial surgical oncology visits took place an average of 34 days after the initial teledermatology consultation was placed for the 2 patients requiring referral (44 days for patient 1; 24 days for patient 2). For patient 3, Mohs micrographic surgery was required for treatment, which was scheduled by day 37 and subsequently performed on day 64.

CT113005211_Table.jpg

 

 

When specifically looking at the diagnosis of cutaneous malignancies, studies have found that the incidence of skin cancer detection is similar for teledermatology compared to in-person clinic visits.6,7 Creighton-Smith et al6 performed a retrospective cohort study comparing prebiopsy and postbiopsy diagnostic accuracy and detection rates of skin cancer between store-and-forward technology and face-to-face consultation. When adjusting for possible compounding factors including personal and family history of skin cancer, there was no notable difference in detection rates of any skin cancer, including melanoma and nonmelanoma skin cancers. Furthermore, the 2 cohorts of patients were found to have similar prebiopsy and postbiopsy diagnostic concordance, with similar times from consultation being placed to requested biopsy and time from biopsy to final treatment.6

Clarke et al7 similarly analyzed the accuracy of store-and-forward teledermatology and found that there was overall concordance in diagnosis when comparing clinical dermatologists to teledermatologists. Moreover, when melanocytic lesions were excluded from the study, the decision to biopsy did not differ substantially.7

Areas of further study include determining what percentage of teledermatology lesions of concern for malignancy were proven to be skin cancer after in-person evaluation and biopsy, as well as investigating the effectiveness of teledermatology for melanocytic lesions, which frequently are removed from analysis in large-scale teledermatology studies.

Although teledermatology has substantial clinical utility and may serve as a great resource for specific populations, including geriatric patients and those who are immunocompromised, it is important to recognize notable limitations. Specifically, brief history and image review should not serve as replacements for a face-to-face visit with physical examination in cases where the diagnosis remains uncertain or when high-risk skin malignancies are suspected or included in the differential. Certain aggressive cutaneous malignancies such as Merkel cell carcinoma may appear as less aggressive via teledermatology due to restrictions of technology.

Conclusion

Teledermatology has had a major impact on the way health care is delivered to patients and may increase access to care, reducing unnecessary in-person visits and decreasing the number of in-person visit no-shows. With the appropriate use of a brief clinical history and image review, teledermatology can be effective to evaluate specific lesions of concern. We report 3 unique cases identified during a 1-month period at a large Midwestern medical center. These cases serve as important examples of the application of teledermatology in reducing the time to diagnosis of aggressive skin malignancies. Further research on the clinical utility of teledermatology is warranted.

Acknowledgments—The authors thank the additional providers from the University of Wisconsin and William S. Middleton Memorial Veterans Hospital (both in Madison, Wisconsin) involved in the medical care of the patients included in this case series.

With the increasing utilization of telemedicine since the COVID-19 pandemic, it is critical that clinicians have an appropriate understanding of the application of virtual care resources, including teledermatology. We present a case series of 3 patients to demonstrate the clinical utility of teledermatology in reducing the time to diagnosis of various rare and/or aggressive cutaneous malignancies, including Merkel cell carcinoma, malignant melanoma, and atypical fibroxanthoma. Cases were obtained from one large Midwestern medical center during the month of July 2021. Each case presented includes a description of the initial teledermatology presentation and reviews the clinical timeline from initial consultation submission to in-person clinic visit with lesion biopsy. This case series demonstrates real-world examples of how teledermatology can be utilized to expedite the care of specific vulnerable patient populations.

Teledermatology is a rapidly growing digital resource with specific utility in triaging patients to determine those requiring in-person evaluation for early and accurate detection of skin malignancies. Approximately one-third of teledermatology consultations result in face-to-face clinical encounters, with malignant neoplasms being the leading cause for biopsy.1,2 For specific populations, such as geriatric and immunocompromised patients, teledermatology may serve as a valuable tool, particularly in the wake of the COVID-19 pandemic. Furthermore, telemedicine may aid in addressing health disparities within the field of medicine and ultimately may improve access to care for vulnerable populations.3 Along with increasing access to specific subspecialty expertise, the use of teledermatology may reduce health care costs and improve the overall quality of care delivered to patients.4,5

We describe the clinical utility of teledermatology in triaging and diagnosing skin malignancies through a series of 3 cases obtained from digital image review at one large Midwestern medical center during the month of July 2021. Three unique cases with a final diagnosis of a rare or aggressive skin cancer were selected as examples, including a 75-year-old man with Merkle cell carcinoma, a 55-year-old man with aggressive pT3b malignant melanoma, and a 72-year-old man with an atypical fibroxanthoma. A clinical timeline of each case is presented, including the time intervals from initial image submission to image review, image submission to face-to-face clinical encounter, and image submission to final diagnosis. In all cases, the primary care provider submitted an order for teledermatology, and the teledermatology team obtained the images.

Case Series

Patient 1—Images of the right hand of a 75-year-old man with a medical history of basal cell carcinoma were submitted for teledermatology consultation utilizing store-and-forward image-capturing technology (day 1). The patient history provided with image submission indicated that the lesion had been present for 6 months and there were no associated symptoms. Clinical imaging demonstrated a pink-red pearly papule located on the proximal fourth digit of the dorsal aspect of the right hand (Figure 1). One day following the teledermatology request (day 2), the patient’s case was reviewed and triaged for an in-person visit. The patient was brought to clinic on day 34, and a biopsy was performed. On day 36, dermatopathology results indicated a diagnosis of Merkel cell carcinoma. On day 37, the patient was referred to surgical oncology, and on day 44, the patient underwent an initial surgical oncology visit with a plan for wide local excision of the right fourth digit with right axillary sentinel lymph node biopsy.

Sabel_1.jpg
%3Cp%3E%3Cstrong%3EFIGURE%201.%3C%2Fstrong%3E%20A%20lesion%20of%20concern%20on%20the%20fourth%20digit%20of%20the%20dorsal%20aspect%20of%20the%20right%20hand%20that%20initially%20was%20evaluated%20via%20teledermatology%20and%20later%20was%20diagnosed%20as%20Merkel%20cell%20carcinoma%20(patient%201).%3C%2Fp%3E

Patient 2—Images of the left flank of a 55-year-old man were submitted for teledermatology consultation via store-and-forward technology (day 1). A patient history provided with the image indicated that the lesion had been present for months to years and there were no associated symptoms, but the lesion recently had changed in color and size. Teledermatology images were reviewed on day 3 and demonstrated a 2- to 3-cm brown plaque on the left flank with color variegation and a prominent red papule protruding centrally (Figure 2). The patient was scheduled for an urgent in-person visit with biopsy. On day 6, the patient presented to clinic and an excision biopsy was performed. Dermatopathology was ordered with a RUSH indication, with results on day 7 revealing a pT3b malignant melanoma. An urgent consultation to surgical oncology was placed on the same day, and the patient underwent an initial surgical oncology visit on day 24 with a plan for wide local excision with left axillary and inguinal sentinel lymph node biopsy.

Sabel_2.jpg
%3Cp%3E%3Cstrong%3EFIGURE%202.%3C%2Fstrong%3E%20A%20lesion%20of%20concern%20on%20the%20left%20flank%20that%20initially%20was%20evaluated%20via%20teledermatology%20and%20later%20was%20diagnosed%20as%20a%20pT3b%20malignant%20melanoma%20(patient%202).%3C%2Fp%3E

Patient 3—Images of the left ear of a 72-year-old man were submitted for teledermatology consultation utilizing review via store-and-forward technology (day 1). A patient history indicated that the lesion had been present for 3 months with associated bleeding. Image review demonstrated a solitary pearly pink papule located on the crura of the antihelix (Figure 3). Initial teledermatology consultation was reviewed on day 2 with notification of the need for in-person evaluation. The patient presented to clinic on day 33 for a biopsy, with dermatopathology results on day 36 consistent with an atypical fibroxanthoma. The patient was scheduled for Mohs micrographic surgery on day 37 and underwent surgical treatment on day 64.

Sabel_3.jpg
%3Cp%3E%3Cstrong%3EFIGURE%203.%3C%2Fstrong%3E%20A%20lesion%20of%20concern%20on%20the%20left%20ear%20that%20initially%20was%20evaluated%20via%20teledermatology%20and%20later%20was%20diagnosed%20as%20atypical%20fibroxanthoma%20(patient%203).%3C%2Fp%3E

Comment

Teledermatology consultations from all patients demonstrated adequate image quality to be able to evaluate the lesion of concern and yielded a request for in-person evaluation with possible biopsy (Table). In this case series, the average time interval from teledermatology consultation placement to teledermatology image report was 2 days (range, 1–3 days). The average time from teledermatology consultation placement to face-to-face encounter with biopsy was 24.3 days for the 3 cases presented in this series (range, 6–34 days). The initial surgical oncology visits took place an average of 34 days after the initial teledermatology consultation was placed for the 2 patients requiring referral (44 days for patient 1; 24 days for patient 2). For patient 3, Mohs micrographic surgery was required for treatment, which was scheduled by day 37 and subsequently performed on day 64.

CT113005211_Table.jpg

 

 

When specifically looking at the diagnosis of cutaneous malignancies, studies have found that the incidence of skin cancer detection is similar for teledermatology compared to in-person clinic visits.6,7 Creighton-Smith et al6 performed a retrospective cohort study comparing prebiopsy and postbiopsy diagnostic accuracy and detection rates of skin cancer between store-and-forward technology and face-to-face consultation. When adjusting for possible compounding factors including personal and family history of skin cancer, there was no notable difference in detection rates of any skin cancer, including melanoma and nonmelanoma skin cancers. Furthermore, the 2 cohorts of patients were found to have similar prebiopsy and postbiopsy diagnostic concordance, with similar times from consultation being placed to requested biopsy and time from biopsy to final treatment.6

Clarke et al7 similarly analyzed the accuracy of store-and-forward teledermatology and found that there was overall concordance in diagnosis when comparing clinical dermatologists to teledermatologists. Moreover, when melanocytic lesions were excluded from the study, the decision to biopsy did not differ substantially.7

Areas of further study include determining what percentage of teledermatology lesions of concern for malignancy were proven to be skin cancer after in-person evaluation and biopsy, as well as investigating the effectiveness of teledermatology for melanocytic lesions, which frequently are removed from analysis in large-scale teledermatology studies.

Although teledermatology has substantial clinical utility and may serve as a great resource for specific populations, including geriatric patients and those who are immunocompromised, it is important to recognize notable limitations. Specifically, brief history and image review should not serve as replacements for a face-to-face visit with physical examination in cases where the diagnosis remains uncertain or when high-risk skin malignancies are suspected or included in the differential. Certain aggressive cutaneous malignancies such as Merkel cell carcinoma may appear as less aggressive via teledermatology due to restrictions of technology.

Conclusion

Teledermatology has had a major impact on the way health care is delivered to patients and may increase access to care, reducing unnecessary in-person visits and decreasing the number of in-person visit no-shows. With the appropriate use of a brief clinical history and image review, teledermatology can be effective to evaluate specific lesions of concern. We report 3 unique cases identified during a 1-month period at a large Midwestern medical center. These cases serve as important examples of the application of teledermatology in reducing the time to diagnosis of aggressive skin malignancies. Further research on the clinical utility of teledermatology is warranted.

Acknowledgments—The authors thank the additional providers from the University of Wisconsin and William S. Middleton Memorial Veterans Hospital (both in Madison, Wisconsin) involved in the medical care of the patients included in this case series.

References
  1. Bianchi MG, Santos A, Cordioli E. Benefits of teledermatology for geriatric patients: population-based cross-sectional study. J Med Internet Res. 2020;22:E16700.
  2. Mortimer S, Rosin A. A retrospective review of incidental malignancies in veterans seen for face-to-face follow-up after teledermatology consultation. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2021;84:1130-1132.
  3. Costello CM, Cumsky HJL, Maly CJ, et al. Improving access to care through the establishment of a local, teledermatology network. Telemed J E Health. 2020;26:935-940. doi:10.1089/tmj.2019.0051
  4. Lee JJ, English JC 3rd. Teledermatology: a review and update. Am J Clin Dermatol. 2018;19:253-260. doi:10.1007/s40257-017-0317-6
  5. Hadeler E, Beer J, Nouri K. The influence of teledermatology on health care access and equity. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2021;84:E219-E220. doi:10.1016/j.jaad.2020.12.036
  6. Creighton-Smith M, Murgia RD 3rd, Konnikov N, et al. Incidence of melanoma and keratinocytic carcinomas in patients evaluated by store-and-forward teledermatology vs dermatology clinic. Int J Dermatol. 2017;56:1026-1031. doi:10.1111/ijd.13672
  7. Clarke EL, Reichenberg JS, Ahmed AM, et al. The utility of teledermatology in the evaluation of skin lesions. J Telemed Telecare. 2023;29:382-389. doi:10.1177/1357633X20987423
References
  1. Bianchi MG, Santos A, Cordioli E. Benefits of teledermatology for geriatric patients: population-based cross-sectional study. J Med Internet Res. 2020;22:E16700.
  2. Mortimer S, Rosin A. A retrospective review of incidental malignancies in veterans seen for face-to-face follow-up after teledermatology consultation. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2021;84:1130-1132.
  3. Costello CM, Cumsky HJL, Maly CJ, et al. Improving access to care through the establishment of a local, teledermatology network. Telemed J E Health. 2020;26:935-940. doi:10.1089/tmj.2019.0051
  4. Lee JJ, English JC 3rd. Teledermatology: a review and update. Am J Clin Dermatol. 2018;19:253-260. doi:10.1007/s40257-017-0317-6
  5. Hadeler E, Beer J, Nouri K. The influence of teledermatology on health care access and equity. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2021;84:E219-E220. doi:10.1016/j.jaad.2020.12.036
  6. Creighton-Smith M, Murgia RD 3rd, Konnikov N, et al. Incidence of melanoma and keratinocytic carcinomas in patients evaluated by store-and-forward teledermatology vs dermatology clinic. Int J Dermatol. 2017;56:1026-1031. doi:10.1111/ijd.13672
  7. Clarke EL, Reichenberg JS, Ahmed AM, et al. The utility of teledermatology in the evaluation of skin lesions. J Telemed Telecare. 2023;29:382-389. doi:10.1177/1357633X20987423
Issue
Cutis - 113(5)
Issue
Cutis - 113(5)
Page Number
211-213
Page Number
211-213
Publications
Publications
Topics
Article Type
Display Headline
The Clinical Utility of Teledermatology in Triaging and Diagnosing Skin Malignancies: Case Series
Display Headline
The Clinical Utility of Teledermatology in Triaging and Diagnosing Skin Malignancies: Case Series
Sections
Teambase XML
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!--$RCSfile: InCopy_agile.xsl,v $ $Revision: 1.35 $-->
<!--$RCSfile: drupal.xsl,v $ $Revision: 1.7 $-->
<root generator="drupal.xsl" gversion="1.7"> <header> <fileName>Sable_Clinical</fileName> <TBEID>0C02F59A.SIG</TBEID> <TBUniqueIdentifier>NJ_0C02F59A</TBUniqueIdentifier> <newsOrJournal>Journal</newsOrJournal> <publisherName>Frontline Medical Communications Inc.</publisherName> <storyname>Case Report</storyname> <articleType>1</articleType> <TBLocation>Copyfitting-CT</TBLocation> <QCDate/> <firstPublished>20240506T133224</firstPublished> <LastPublished>20240506T133225</LastPublished> <pubStatus qcode="stat:"/> <embargoDate/> <killDate/> <CMSDate>20240506T133224</CMSDate> <articleSource/> <facebookInfo/> <meetingNumber/> <byline>Sable</byline> <bylineText>Kimberly A. Sable, MD; Sarah A. Korger, MD; Yaohui G. Xu, MD, PhD; Daniel D. Bennett, MD; Molly A. Hinshaw, MD; Anne E. Rosin, MD</bylineText> <bylineFull>Sable</bylineFull> <bylineTitleText/> <USOrGlobal/> <wireDocType/> <newsDocType/> <journalDocType/> <linkLabel/> <pageRange>211-213</pageRange> <citation/> <quizID/> <indexIssueDate/> <itemClass qcode="ninat:text"/> <provider qcode="provider:"> <name/> <rightsInfo> <copyrightHolder> <name/> </copyrightHolder> <copyrightNotice/> </rightsInfo> </provider> <abstract/> <metaDescription>Teledermatology is a rapidly growing digital resource with specific utility in triaging patients to determine those requiring in-person evaluation for early and</metaDescription> <articlePDF>301296</articlePDF> <teaserImage/> <title>The Clinical Utility of Teledermatology in Triaging and Diagnosing Skin Malignancies: Case Series</title> <deck/> <disclaimer/> <AuthorList/> <articleURL/> <doi/> <pubMedID/> <publishXMLStatus/> <publishXMLVersion>1</publishXMLVersion> <useEISSN>0</useEISSN> <urgency/> <pubPubdateYear>2024</pubPubdateYear> <pubPubdateMonth>May</pubPubdateMonth> <pubPubdateDay/> <pubVolume>113</pubVolume> <pubNumber>5</pubNumber> <wireChannels/> <primaryCMSID/> <CMSIDs> <CMSID>2307</CMSID> <CMSID>2159</CMSID> </CMSIDs> <keywords> <keyword>melanoma</keyword> <keyword> nonmelanoma skin cancer</keyword> <keyword> teledermatology</keyword> </keywords> <seeAlsos/> <publications_g> <publicationData> <publicationCode>CT</publicationCode> <pubIssueName>May 2024</pubIssueName> <pubArticleType>Departments | 2159</pubArticleType> <pubTopics/> <pubCategories/> <pubSections> <pubSection>Case Letter | 2307<pubSubsection/></pubSection> </pubSections> <journalTitle>Cutis</journalTitle> <journalFullTitle>Cutis</journalFullTitle> <copyrightStatement>Copyright 2015 Frontline Medical Communications Inc., Parsippany, NJ, USA. All rights reserved.</copyrightStatement> </publicationData> </publications_g> <publications> <term canonical="true">12</term> </publications> <sections> <term canonical="true">45</term> </sections> <topics> <term canonical="true">245</term> <term>244</term> </topics> <links> <link> <itemClass qcode="ninat:composite"/> <altRep contenttype="application/pdf">images/18002722.pdf</altRep> <description role="drol:caption"/> <description role="drol:credit"/> </link> </links> </header> <itemSet> <newsItem> <itemMeta> <itemRole>Main</itemRole> <itemClass>text</itemClass> <title>The Clinical Utility of Teledermatology in Triaging and Diagnosing Skin Malignancies: Case Series</title> <deck/> </itemMeta> <itemContent> <p class="abstract">With the increasing utilization of telemedicine since the COVID-19 pandemic, it is critical that clinicians have an appropriate understanding of the application of virtual care resources, including teledermatology. We present a case series of 3 patients to demonstrate the clinical utility of teledermatology in reducing the time to diagnosis of various rare and/or aggressive cutaneous malignancies, including Merkel cell carcinoma, malignant melanoma, and atypical fibroxanthoma. Cases were obtained from one large Midwestern medical center during the month of July 2021. Each case presented includes a description of the initial teledermatology presentation and reviews the clinical timeline from initial consultation submission to in-person clinic visit with lesion biopsy. This case series demonstrates real-world examples of how teledermatology can be utilized to expedite the care of specific vulnerable patient populations. </p> <p>Teledermatology is a rapidly growing digital resource with specific utility in triaging patients to determine those requiring in-person evaluation for early and accurate detection of skin malignancies. Approximately one-third of teledermatology consultations result in face-to-face clinical encounters, with malignant neoplasms being the leading cause for biopsy.<sup>1,2</sup> For specific populations, such as geriatric and immunocompromised patients, teledermatology may serve as a valuable tool, particularly in the wake of the COVID-19 pandemic. Furthermore, telemedicine may aid in addressing health disparities within the field of medicine and ultimately may improve access to care for vulnerable populations.<sup>3</sup> Along with increasing access to specific subspecialty expertise, the use of teledermatology may reduce health care costs and improve the overall quality of care delivered to patients.<sup>4,5</sup></p> <p>We describe the clinical utility of teledermatology in triaging and diagnosing skin malignancies through a series of 3 cases obtained from digital image review at one large Midwestern medical center during the month of July 2021. Three unique cases with a final diagnosis of a rare or aggressive skin cancer were selected as examples, including a 75-year-old man with Merkle cell carcinoma, a 55-year-old man with aggressive pT3b malignant melanoma, and a 72-year-old man with an atypical fibroxanthoma. A clinical timeline of each case is presented, including the time intervals from initial image submission to image review, image submission to face-to-face clinical encounter, and image submission to final diagnosis. In all cases, the primary care provider submitted an order for teledermatology, and the teledermatology team obtained the images.</p> <h3>Case Series</h3> <p><i>Patient 1—</i>Images of the right hand of a 75-year-old man with a medical history of basal cell carcinoma were submitted for teledermatology consultation utilizing store-and-forward image-capturing technology (day 1). The patient history provided with image submission indicated that the lesion had been present for 6 months and there were no associated symptoms. Clinical imaging demonstrated a pink-red pearly papule located on the proximal fourth digit of the dorsal aspect of the right hand (Figure 1). One day following the teledermatology request (day 2), the patient’s case was reviewed and triaged for an in-person visit. The patient was brought to clinic on day 34, and a biopsy was performed. On day 36, dermatopathology results indicated a diagnosis of Merkel cell carcinoma. On day 37, the patient was referred to surgical oncology, and on day 44, the patient underwent an initial surgical oncology visit with a plan for wide local excision of the right fourth digit with right axillary sentinel lymph node biopsy. </p> <p><i>Patient 2—</i>Images of the left flank of a 55-year-old man were submitted for teledermatology consultation via store-and-forward technology (day 1). A patient history provided with the image indicated that the lesion had been present for months to years and there were no associated symptoms, but the lesion recently had changed in color and size. Teledermatology images were reviewed on day 3 and demonstrated a 2- to 3-cm brown plaque on the left flank with color variegation and a prominent red papule protruding centrally (Figure 2). The patient was scheduled for an urgent in-person visit with biopsy. On day 6, the patient presented to clinic and an excision biopsy was performed. Dermatopathology was ordered with a RUSH indication, with results on day 7 revealing a pT3b malignant melanoma. An urgent consultation to surgical oncology was placed on the same day, and the patient underwent an initial surgical oncology visit on day 24 with a plan for wide local excision with left axillary and inguinal sentinel lymph node biopsy. <br/><br/><i>Patient 3</i>—Images of the left ear of a 72-year-old man were submitted for teledermatology consultation utilizing review via store-and-forward technology (day 1). A patient history indicated that the lesion had been present for 3 months with associated bleeding. Image review demonstrated a solitary pearly pink papule located on the crura of the antihelix (Figure 3). Initial teledermatology consultation was reviewed on day 2 with notification of the need for in-person evaluation. The patient presented to clinic on day 33 for a biopsy, with dermatopathology results on day 36 consistent with an atypical fibroxanthoma. The patient was scheduled for Mohs micrographic surgery on day 37 and underwent surgical treatment on day 64. </p> <h3>Comment</h3> <p>Teledermatology consultations from all patients demonstrated adequate image quality to be able to evaluate the lesion of concern and yielded a request for in-person evaluation with possible biopsy (Table). In this case series, the average time interval from teledermatology consultation placement to teledermatology image report was 2 days (range, 1–3 days). The average time from teledermatology consultation placement to face-to-face encounter with biopsy was 24.3 days for the 3 cases presented in this series (range, 6–34 days). The initial surgical oncology visits took place an average of 34 days after the initial teledermatology consultation was placed for the 2 patients requiring referral (44 days for patient 1; 24 days for patient 2). For patient 3, Mohs micrographic surgery was required for treatment, which was scheduled by day 37 and subsequently performed on day 64. </p> <p>When specifically looking at the diagnosis of cutaneous malignancies, studies have found that the incidence of skin cancer detection is similar for teledermatology compared to in-person clinic visits.<sup>6,7</sup> Creighton-Smith et al<sup>6</sup> performed a retrospective cohort study comparing prebiopsy and postbiopsy diagnostic accuracy and detection rates of skin cancer between store-and-forward technology and face-to-face consultation. When adjusting for possible compounding factors including personal and family history of skin cancer, there was no notable difference in detection rates of any skin cancer, including melanoma and nonmelanoma skin cancers. Furthermore, the 2 cohorts of patients were found to have similar prebiopsy and postbiopsy diagnostic concordance, with similar times from consultation being placed to requested biopsy and time from biopsy to final treatment.<sup>6</sup> <br/><br/>Clarke et al<sup>7</sup> similarly analyzed the accuracy of store-and-forward teledermatology and found that there was overall concordance in diagnosis when comparing clinical dermatologists to teledermatologists. Moreover, when melanocytic lesions were excluded from the study, the decision to biopsy did not differ substantially.<sup>7</sup> <br/><br/>Areas of further study include determining what percentage of teledermatology lesions of concern for malignancy were proven to be skin cancer after in-person evaluation and biopsy, as well as investigating the effectiveness of teledermatology for melanocytic lesions, which frequently are removed from analysis in large-scale teledermatology studies. <br/><br/>Although teledermatology has substantial clinical utility and may serve as a great resource for specific populations, including geriatric patients and those who are immunocompromised, it is important to recognize notable limitations. Specifically, brief history and image review should not serve as replacements for a face-to-face visit with physical examination in cases where the diagnosis remains uncertain or when high-risk skin malignancies are suspected or included in the differential. Certain aggressive cutaneous malignancies such as Merkel cell carcinoma may appear as less aggressive via teledermatology due to restrictions of technology. </p> <h3>Conclusion</h3> <p>Teledermatology has had a major impact on the way health care is delivered to patients and may increase access to care, reducing unnecessary in-person visits and decreasing the number of in-person visit no-shows. With the appropriate use of a brief clinical history and image review, teledermatology can be effective to evaluate specific lesions of concern. We report 3 unique cases identified during a 1-month period at a large Midwestern medical center. These cases serve as important examples of the application of teledermatology in reducing the time to diagnosis of aggressive skin malignancies. Further research on the clinical utility of teledermatology is warranted.</p> <p><i>Acknowledgments—</i>The authors thank the additional providers from the University of Wisconsin and William S. Middleton Memorial Veterans Hospital (both in Madison, Wisconsin) involved in the medical care of the patients included in this case series. </p> <h2>References</h2> <p class="reference"> 1. Bianchi MG, Santos A, Cordioli E. Benefits of teledermatology for geriatric patients: population-based cross-sectional study<i>. J Med Internet Res.</i> 2020;22:E16700.<br/><br/> 2. Mortimer S, Rosin A. A retrospective review of incidental malignancies in veterans seen for face-to-face follow-up after teledermatology consultation. <i>J Am Acad Dermatol.</i> 2021;84:1130-1132.<br/><br/> 3. Costello CM, Cumsky HJL, Maly CJ, et al. Improving access to care through the establishment of a local, teledermatology network. <i>Telemed J E Health</i>. 2020;26:935-940. doi:10.1089/tmj.2019.0051<br/><br/> 4. Lee JJ, English JC 3rd. Teledermatology: a review and update. <i>Am J Clin Dermatol</i>. 2018;19:253-260. doi:10.1007/s40257-017-0317-6<br/><br/> 5. Hadeler E, Beer J, Nouri K. The influence of teledermatology on health care access and equity. <i>J Am Acad Dermatol</i>. 2021;84:E219-E220. doi:10.1016/j.jaad.2020.12.036<br/><br/> 6. Creighton-Smith M, Murgia RD 3rd, Konnikov N, et al. Incidence of melanoma and keratinocytic carcinomas in patients evaluated by store-and-forward teledermatology vs dermatology clinic. <i>Int J Dermatol</i>. 2017;56:1026-1031. doi:10.1111/ijd.13672<br/><br/> 7. Clarke EL, Reichenberg JS, Ahmed AM, et al. The utility of teledermatology in the evaluation of skin lesions. <i>J Telemed Telecare</i>. 2023;29:382-389. doi:10.1177/1357633X20987423</p> </itemContent> </newsItem> <newsItem> <itemMeta> <itemRole>bio</itemRole> <itemClass>text</itemClass> <title/> <deck/> </itemMeta> <itemContent> <p class="disclosure">From the Department of Dermatology, University of Wisconsin, Madison. Drs. Korger, Xu, and Rosin also are from William S. Middleton Memorial Veterans Hospital, Madison. </p> <p class="disclosure">The authors report no conflict of interest. <br/><br/>Correspondence: Kimberly A. Sable, MD, Department of Dermatology, University of Wisconsin, One S Park St, 7th Floor, Madison, WI 53715 (ksable@uwhealth.org).<em>Cutis</em>. 2024 May;113(5):211-213. doi:10.12788/cutis.1000</p> </itemContent> </newsItem> <newsItem> <itemMeta> <itemRole>in</itemRole> <itemClass>text</itemClass> <title/> <deck/> </itemMeta> <itemContent> <p class="insidehead">Practice <strong>Points</strong></p> <ul class="insidebody"> <li>Teledermatology via store-and-forward technology has been demonstrated to be effective in assessing and triaging various cutaneous malignancies.</li> <li>The use of teledermatology has increased because of the COVID-19 pandemic and may be useful for specific vulnerable populations. </li> <li>When used appropriately, teledermatology may function as a useful resource to triage patients requiring in-person evaluation for the diagnosis of aggressive skin malignancies and may aid in reducing the time to diagnosis of various skin cancers.</li> </ul> </itemContent> </newsItem> </itemSet></root>
Inside the Article

Practice Points

  • Teledermatology via store-and-forward technology has been demonstrated to be effective in assessing and triaging various cutaneous malignancies.
  • The use of teledermatology has increased because of the COVID-19 pandemic and may be useful for specific vulnerable populations.
  • When used appropriately, teledermatology may function as a useful resource to triage patients requiring in-person evaluation for the diagnosis of aggressive skin malignancies and may aid in reducing the time to diagnosis of various skin cancers.
Disallow All Ads
Content Gating
No Gating (article Unlocked/Free)
Alternative CME
Disqus Comments
Default
Use ProPublica
Hide sidebar & use full width
render the right sidebar.
Conference Recap Checkbox
Not Conference Recap
Clinical Edge
Display the Slideshow in this Article
Medscape Article
Display survey writer
Reuters content
Disable Inline Native ads
WebMD Article
Article PDF Media
Image
Disable zoom
Off

Periorbital Changes Induced by Prostaglandin Eye Drops

Article Type
Changed
Fri, 05/17/2024 - 13:19
Display Headline
Periorbital Changes Induced by Prostaglandin Eye Drops

To the Editor:

A 42-year man presented with hollowing of the upper eyelid and skin discoloration of the left periorbital area of 10 years’ duration. He was a professional mixed martial arts fighter with a history of 2 surgeries for retinal detachment of the left eye 13 years prior to the current presentation. The patient also has macular scarring in the left eye. He denied a history of facial fracture, reconstructive surgery, or other medical conditions. His visual acuity was unknown; however, he did not require corrective glasses. He used 3 prescription ophthalmic eye drops—dorzolamide hydrochloride plus timolol maleate, 10 mL; brimonidine tartrate ophthalmic solution 0.15%, 5 mL; and latanoprost ophthalmic solution 0.005%, 125 μg/2.5 mL—in the left eye to lower intraocular pressure, as therapy for glaucoma. If left untreated, glaucoma can lead to vision loss.

Physical examination revealed periorbital hyperpigmentation on the left side; hypertrichosis and eyelash trichomegaly compared to the right side; and a deep left upper orbital sulcus compared to the right side (Figure). The patient was alert and oriented to person, place, and time. Extraocular movement was intact bilaterally, and his pupillary reflex was symmetric. No tenderness was noted over the affected area on palpation; no subcutaneous masses or lesions were observed or palpated. There was no ocular discharge, the conjunctiva was pink, and the sclera was white bilaterally.

CT113004025_fig.jpg
%3Cp%3EPeriorbital%20hyperpigmentation%20on%20the%20left%20side%3B%20hypertrichosis%20and%20eyelash%20trichomegaly%20compared%20to%20the%20right%20side%3B%20and%20a%20deep%20left%20upper%20orbital%20sulcus%20compared%20to%20the%20right%20side%20that%20was%20determined%20to%20be%20the%20result%20of%20use%20of%20latanoprost%20ophthalmic%20solution%200.005%25.%3C%2Fp%3E

The differential diagnosis included professional trauma-induced orbital changes, nevus of Ota (oculomucodermal melanocytosis), prostaglandin-associated periorbitopathy (PAP), and melasma. Although the patient sustained an injury that caused retinal detachment, he never experienced an orbital bone fracture; additionally, a fracture would not explain the skin discoloration or longer eyelashes. Periorbital nevus of Ota most commonly manifests as a unilateral scleral and brown-bluish skin discoloration but does not cause hollowing of the orbital sulcus or affect the length and thickness of eyelashes. Melasma—bilateral skin hyperpigmentation that most commonly affects women—can be induced by oral contraceptives, antibiotics, heat, sun exposure, and pregnancy. It does not affect the color of the iris or the depth of the scleral sulcus, and it does not increase the length and thickness of eyelashes. Based on the clinical presentation and a review of the eye drops used, he was diagnosed with PAP due to prolonged use of latanoprost ophthalmic solution. The patient was referred to an ophthalmologist for consideration of a switch to a different class of medication.

Of the 3 eye drops used by this patient, latanoprost, a prostaglandin analog, decreases intraocular pressure and is known to cause PAP. This condition comprises a constellation of changes, including upper eyelid ptosis, deepening of the upper eyelid sulcus, involution of dermatochalasis, periorbital fat atrophy, mild enophthalmos (sunken eye), inferior scleral show, increased prominence of eyelid vessels, and tight eyelids.1 Latanoprost most often produces these findings, but all prostaglandin ophthalmic medications can, including the dual-indication bimatoprost, which was approved by the US Food and Drug Administration to reduce elevated intraocular pressure in patients with open-angle glaucoma or ocular hypertension but also is used to grow darker, thicker, and longer eyelashes. Clinicians who prescribe bimatoprost for this cosmetic indication should be mindful of the potential for PAP and discuss it with patients.

The prescribing information (PI) for bimatoprost (Latisse; Allergan) does not list PAP as an adverse reaction observed in the 4-month multicenter, double-blind, randomized, vehicle-controlled study of bimatoprost (as Latisse) in 278 adults.2 The PI does list “periorbital and lid changes associated with periorbital fat atrophy and skin tightness resulting in deepening of eyelid sulcus and eyelid ptosis” as an adverse reaction in postmarketing experience. However, according to the PI, the frequency of these adverse reactions cannot be established, as the reporting of such incidents was voluntary and the size of the treated population was uncertain.2

Prostaglandins can cause periorbitopathy by several mechanisms; one speculated cause is that this group of medications might provoke smooth muscle contraction. Prostaglandin medications also have an affinity for fat cells1; atrophy of fat cells can lead to enophthalmos and deepening upper eyelid sulcus. In an observational study of 105 participants who were using a prostaglandin in 1 eye for longer than 1 month (the other eye was used as a control), the overall frequency of prostaglandin-associated periorbitopathy was 93.3% in the bimatoprost group, 41.4% in the latanoprost group, and 70% in the travoprost group, while the frequency of deepening of the upper eyelid sulcus was 80% in the bimatoprost group, 15.7% in the latanoprost group, and 45% in the travoprost group.3 These changes may not be as striking when a patient is using a prostaglandin ophthalmic medication in both eyes and may not be noticed even by the patient. It is prudent for the clinician to take a baseline photograph of the patient when these medications are prescribed to observe for early signs of periorbitopathy. These adverse effects may not be reversible when the medication is discontinued4 and have been observed as early as 4 to 6 weeks after the start of treatment.5

Our patient was counseled that his constellation of PAP findings potentially could be partially reversed over months or even a year or longer if the offending agent was discontinued. However, he was cautioned that cessation of latanoprost first needed to be discussed with his ophthalmologist, who would determine if there was a suitable alternative to a prostaglandin analog for him. The patient’s only concern was the aesthetic appearance of the left periorbital area. A hyaluronic acid filler or fat grafting can be considered for correction of orbital sulcus hollowing; however, we could not locate any long-term studies in which such corrective treatments were applied for PAP. Our patient continues to use latanoprost with no change in the frequency of use. There have been no further changes or progression in the physical appearance of the left eye or periorbital area. The patient has not undergone any corrective treatments.

References
  1. Berke SJ. PAP: new concerns for prostaglandin use. Rev Ophthalmol. 2012;19:70.
  2. Latisse (bimatoprost ophthalmic solution 0.03%). Package insert. Allergan; 2021. Accessed April 11, 2024. https://www.rxabbvie.com/pdf/latisse_pi.pdf
  3. Kucukevcilioglu M, Bayer A, Uysal Y, et al. Prostaglandin associated periorbitopathy in patients using bimatoprost, latanoprost and travoprost. Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2014;42:126-131. doi:10.1111/ceo.12163
  4. Filippopoulos T, Paula JS, Torun N, et al. Periorbital changes associated with topical bimatoprost. Ophthalmic Plast Reconstr Surg. 2008;24:302-307. doi:10.1097/IOP.0b013e31817d81df
  5. Peplinski LS, Smith KA. Deepening of lid sulcus from topical bimatoprost therapy. Optom Vis Sci. 2004;81:574-577. doi:10.1097/01.opx.0000141791.16683.4a
Article PDF
Author and Disclosure Information

Anya Stassiy is from High Point Medspa, Mountainside, New Jersey. Dr. Khachemoune is from SUNY Downstate Health Sciences University, Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Brooklyn, New York.

The authors report no conflict of interest.

Correspondence: Amor Khachemoune, MD, SUNY Downstate Health Sciences University, Veterans Affairs Medical Center, 800 Poly Pl, Brooklyn, NY 11209 (amorkh@gmail.com).

Issue
Cutis - 113(4)
Publications
Topics
Page Number
E25-E26
Sections
Author and Disclosure Information

Anya Stassiy is from High Point Medspa, Mountainside, New Jersey. Dr. Khachemoune is from SUNY Downstate Health Sciences University, Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Brooklyn, New York.

The authors report no conflict of interest.

Correspondence: Amor Khachemoune, MD, SUNY Downstate Health Sciences University, Veterans Affairs Medical Center, 800 Poly Pl, Brooklyn, NY 11209 (amorkh@gmail.com).

Author and Disclosure Information

Anya Stassiy is from High Point Medspa, Mountainside, New Jersey. Dr. Khachemoune is from SUNY Downstate Health Sciences University, Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Brooklyn, New York.

The authors report no conflict of interest.

Correspondence: Amor Khachemoune, MD, SUNY Downstate Health Sciences University, Veterans Affairs Medical Center, 800 Poly Pl, Brooklyn, NY 11209 (amorkh@gmail.com).

Article PDF
Article PDF

To the Editor:

A 42-year man presented with hollowing of the upper eyelid and skin discoloration of the left periorbital area of 10 years’ duration. He was a professional mixed martial arts fighter with a history of 2 surgeries for retinal detachment of the left eye 13 years prior to the current presentation. The patient also has macular scarring in the left eye. He denied a history of facial fracture, reconstructive surgery, or other medical conditions. His visual acuity was unknown; however, he did not require corrective glasses. He used 3 prescription ophthalmic eye drops—dorzolamide hydrochloride plus timolol maleate, 10 mL; brimonidine tartrate ophthalmic solution 0.15%, 5 mL; and latanoprost ophthalmic solution 0.005%, 125 μg/2.5 mL—in the left eye to lower intraocular pressure, as therapy for glaucoma. If left untreated, glaucoma can lead to vision loss.

Physical examination revealed periorbital hyperpigmentation on the left side; hypertrichosis and eyelash trichomegaly compared to the right side; and a deep left upper orbital sulcus compared to the right side (Figure). The patient was alert and oriented to person, place, and time. Extraocular movement was intact bilaterally, and his pupillary reflex was symmetric. No tenderness was noted over the affected area on palpation; no subcutaneous masses or lesions were observed or palpated. There was no ocular discharge, the conjunctiva was pink, and the sclera was white bilaterally.

CT113004025_fig.jpg
%3Cp%3EPeriorbital%20hyperpigmentation%20on%20the%20left%20side%3B%20hypertrichosis%20and%20eyelash%20trichomegaly%20compared%20to%20the%20right%20side%3B%20and%20a%20deep%20left%20upper%20orbital%20sulcus%20compared%20to%20the%20right%20side%20that%20was%20determined%20to%20be%20the%20result%20of%20use%20of%20latanoprost%20ophthalmic%20solution%200.005%25.%3C%2Fp%3E

The differential diagnosis included professional trauma-induced orbital changes, nevus of Ota (oculomucodermal melanocytosis), prostaglandin-associated periorbitopathy (PAP), and melasma. Although the patient sustained an injury that caused retinal detachment, he never experienced an orbital bone fracture; additionally, a fracture would not explain the skin discoloration or longer eyelashes. Periorbital nevus of Ota most commonly manifests as a unilateral scleral and brown-bluish skin discoloration but does not cause hollowing of the orbital sulcus or affect the length and thickness of eyelashes. Melasma—bilateral skin hyperpigmentation that most commonly affects women—can be induced by oral contraceptives, antibiotics, heat, sun exposure, and pregnancy. It does not affect the color of the iris or the depth of the scleral sulcus, and it does not increase the length and thickness of eyelashes. Based on the clinical presentation and a review of the eye drops used, he was diagnosed with PAP due to prolonged use of latanoprost ophthalmic solution. The patient was referred to an ophthalmologist for consideration of a switch to a different class of medication.

Of the 3 eye drops used by this patient, latanoprost, a prostaglandin analog, decreases intraocular pressure and is known to cause PAP. This condition comprises a constellation of changes, including upper eyelid ptosis, deepening of the upper eyelid sulcus, involution of dermatochalasis, periorbital fat atrophy, mild enophthalmos (sunken eye), inferior scleral show, increased prominence of eyelid vessels, and tight eyelids.1 Latanoprost most often produces these findings, but all prostaglandin ophthalmic medications can, including the dual-indication bimatoprost, which was approved by the US Food and Drug Administration to reduce elevated intraocular pressure in patients with open-angle glaucoma or ocular hypertension but also is used to grow darker, thicker, and longer eyelashes. Clinicians who prescribe bimatoprost for this cosmetic indication should be mindful of the potential for PAP and discuss it with patients.

The prescribing information (PI) for bimatoprost (Latisse; Allergan) does not list PAP as an adverse reaction observed in the 4-month multicenter, double-blind, randomized, vehicle-controlled study of bimatoprost (as Latisse) in 278 adults.2 The PI does list “periorbital and lid changes associated with periorbital fat atrophy and skin tightness resulting in deepening of eyelid sulcus and eyelid ptosis” as an adverse reaction in postmarketing experience. However, according to the PI, the frequency of these adverse reactions cannot be established, as the reporting of such incidents was voluntary and the size of the treated population was uncertain.2

Prostaglandins can cause periorbitopathy by several mechanisms; one speculated cause is that this group of medications might provoke smooth muscle contraction. Prostaglandin medications also have an affinity for fat cells1; atrophy of fat cells can lead to enophthalmos and deepening upper eyelid sulcus. In an observational study of 105 participants who were using a prostaglandin in 1 eye for longer than 1 month (the other eye was used as a control), the overall frequency of prostaglandin-associated periorbitopathy was 93.3% in the bimatoprost group, 41.4% in the latanoprost group, and 70% in the travoprost group, while the frequency of deepening of the upper eyelid sulcus was 80% in the bimatoprost group, 15.7% in the latanoprost group, and 45% in the travoprost group.3 These changes may not be as striking when a patient is using a prostaglandin ophthalmic medication in both eyes and may not be noticed even by the patient. It is prudent for the clinician to take a baseline photograph of the patient when these medications are prescribed to observe for early signs of periorbitopathy. These adverse effects may not be reversible when the medication is discontinued4 and have been observed as early as 4 to 6 weeks after the start of treatment.5

Our patient was counseled that his constellation of PAP findings potentially could be partially reversed over months or even a year or longer if the offending agent was discontinued. However, he was cautioned that cessation of latanoprost first needed to be discussed with his ophthalmologist, who would determine if there was a suitable alternative to a prostaglandin analog for him. The patient’s only concern was the aesthetic appearance of the left periorbital area. A hyaluronic acid filler or fat grafting can be considered for correction of orbital sulcus hollowing; however, we could not locate any long-term studies in which such corrective treatments were applied for PAP. Our patient continues to use latanoprost with no change in the frequency of use. There have been no further changes or progression in the physical appearance of the left eye or periorbital area. The patient has not undergone any corrective treatments.

To the Editor:

A 42-year man presented with hollowing of the upper eyelid and skin discoloration of the left periorbital area of 10 years’ duration. He was a professional mixed martial arts fighter with a history of 2 surgeries for retinal detachment of the left eye 13 years prior to the current presentation. The patient also has macular scarring in the left eye. He denied a history of facial fracture, reconstructive surgery, or other medical conditions. His visual acuity was unknown; however, he did not require corrective glasses. He used 3 prescription ophthalmic eye drops—dorzolamide hydrochloride plus timolol maleate, 10 mL; brimonidine tartrate ophthalmic solution 0.15%, 5 mL; and latanoprost ophthalmic solution 0.005%, 125 μg/2.5 mL—in the left eye to lower intraocular pressure, as therapy for glaucoma. If left untreated, glaucoma can lead to vision loss.

Physical examination revealed periorbital hyperpigmentation on the left side; hypertrichosis and eyelash trichomegaly compared to the right side; and a deep left upper orbital sulcus compared to the right side (Figure). The patient was alert and oriented to person, place, and time. Extraocular movement was intact bilaterally, and his pupillary reflex was symmetric. No tenderness was noted over the affected area on palpation; no subcutaneous masses or lesions were observed or palpated. There was no ocular discharge, the conjunctiva was pink, and the sclera was white bilaterally.

CT113004025_fig.jpg
%3Cp%3EPeriorbital%20hyperpigmentation%20on%20the%20left%20side%3B%20hypertrichosis%20and%20eyelash%20trichomegaly%20compared%20to%20the%20right%20side%3B%20and%20a%20deep%20left%20upper%20orbital%20sulcus%20compared%20to%20the%20right%20side%20that%20was%20determined%20to%20be%20the%20result%20of%20use%20of%20latanoprost%20ophthalmic%20solution%200.005%25.%3C%2Fp%3E

The differential diagnosis included professional trauma-induced orbital changes, nevus of Ota (oculomucodermal melanocytosis), prostaglandin-associated periorbitopathy (PAP), and melasma. Although the patient sustained an injury that caused retinal detachment, he never experienced an orbital bone fracture; additionally, a fracture would not explain the skin discoloration or longer eyelashes. Periorbital nevus of Ota most commonly manifests as a unilateral scleral and brown-bluish skin discoloration but does not cause hollowing of the orbital sulcus or affect the length and thickness of eyelashes. Melasma—bilateral skin hyperpigmentation that most commonly affects women—can be induced by oral contraceptives, antibiotics, heat, sun exposure, and pregnancy. It does not affect the color of the iris or the depth of the scleral sulcus, and it does not increase the length and thickness of eyelashes. Based on the clinical presentation and a review of the eye drops used, he was diagnosed with PAP due to prolonged use of latanoprost ophthalmic solution. The patient was referred to an ophthalmologist for consideration of a switch to a different class of medication.

Of the 3 eye drops used by this patient, latanoprost, a prostaglandin analog, decreases intraocular pressure and is known to cause PAP. This condition comprises a constellation of changes, including upper eyelid ptosis, deepening of the upper eyelid sulcus, involution of dermatochalasis, periorbital fat atrophy, mild enophthalmos (sunken eye), inferior scleral show, increased prominence of eyelid vessels, and tight eyelids.1 Latanoprost most often produces these findings, but all prostaglandin ophthalmic medications can, including the dual-indication bimatoprost, which was approved by the US Food and Drug Administration to reduce elevated intraocular pressure in patients with open-angle glaucoma or ocular hypertension but also is used to grow darker, thicker, and longer eyelashes. Clinicians who prescribe bimatoprost for this cosmetic indication should be mindful of the potential for PAP and discuss it with patients.

The prescribing information (PI) for bimatoprost (Latisse; Allergan) does not list PAP as an adverse reaction observed in the 4-month multicenter, double-blind, randomized, vehicle-controlled study of bimatoprost (as Latisse) in 278 adults.2 The PI does list “periorbital and lid changes associated with periorbital fat atrophy and skin tightness resulting in deepening of eyelid sulcus and eyelid ptosis” as an adverse reaction in postmarketing experience. However, according to the PI, the frequency of these adverse reactions cannot be established, as the reporting of such incidents was voluntary and the size of the treated population was uncertain.2

Prostaglandins can cause periorbitopathy by several mechanisms; one speculated cause is that this group of medications might provoke smooth muscle contraction. Prostaglandin medications also have an affinity for fat cells1; atrophy of fat cells can lead to enophthalmos and deepening upper eyelid sulcus. In an observational study of 105 participants who were using a prostaglandin in 1 eye for longer than 1 month (the other eye was used as a control), the overall frequency of prostaglandin-associated periorbitopathy was 93.3% in the bimatoprost group, 41.4% in the latanoprost group, and 70% in the travoprost group, while the frequency of deepening of the upper eyelid sulcus was 80% in the bimatoprost group, 15.7% in the latanoprost group, and 45% in the travoprost group.3 These changes may not be as striking when a patient is using a prostaglandin ophthalmic medication in both eyes and may not be noticed even by the patient. It is prudent for the clinician to take a baseline photograph of the patient when these medications are prescribed to observe for early signs of periorbitopathy. These adverse effects may not be reversible when the medication is discontinued4 and have been observed as early as 4 to 6 weeks after the start of treatment.5

Our patient was counseled that his constellation of PAP findings potentially could be partially reversed over months or even a year or longer if the offending agent was discontinued. However, he was cautioned that cessation of latanoprost first needed to be discussed with his ophthalmologist, who would determine if there was a suitable alternative to a prostaglandin analog for him. The patient’s only concern was the aesthetic appearance of the left periorbital area. A hyaluronic acid filler or fat grafting can be considered for correction of orbital sulcus hollowing; however, we could not locate any long-term studies in which such corrective treatments were applied for PAP. Our patient continues to use latanoprost with no change in the frequency of use. There have been no further changes or progression in the physical appearance of the left eye or periorbital area. The patient has not undergone any corrective treatments.

References
  1. Berke SJ. PAP: new concerns for prostaglandin use. Rev Ophthalmol. 2012;19:70.
  2. Latisse (bimatoprost ophthalmic solution 0.03%). Package insert. Allergan; 2021. Accessed April 11, 2024. https://www.rxabbvie.com/pdf/latisse_pi.pdf
  3. Kucukevcilioglu M, Bayer A, Uysal Y, et al. Prostaglandin associated periorbitopathy in patients using bimatoprost, latanoprost and travoprost. Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2014;42:126-131. doi:10.1111/ceo.12163
  4. Filippopoulos T, Paula JS, Torun N, et al. Periorbital changes associated with topical bimatoprost. Ophthalmic Plast Reconstr Surg. 2008;24:302-307. doi:10.1097/IOP.0b013e31817d81df
  5. Peplinski LS, Smith KA. Deepening of lid sulcus from topical bimatoprost therapy. Optom Vis Sci. 2004;81:574-577. doi:10.1097/01.opx.0000141791.16683.4a
References
  1. Berke SJ. PAP: new concerns for prostaglandin use. Rev Ophthalmol. 2012;19:70.
  2. Latisse (bimatoprost ophthalmic solution 0.03%). Package insert. Allergan; 2021. Accessed April 11, 2024. https://www.rxabbvie.com/pdf/latisse_pi.pdf
  3. Kucukevcilioglu M, Bayer A, Uysal Y, et al. Prostaglandin associated periorbitopathy in patients using bimatoprost, latanoprost and travoprost. Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2014;42:126-131. doi:10.1111/ceo.12163
  4. Filippopoulos T, Paula JS, Torun N, et al. Periorbital changes associated with topical bimatoprost. Ophthalmic Plast Reconstr Surg. 2008;24:302-307. doi:10.1097/IOP.0b013e31817d81df
  5. Peplinski LS, Smith KA. Deepening of lid sulcus from topical bimatoprost therapy. Optom Vis Sci. 2004;81:574-577. doi:10.1097/01.opx.0000141791.16683.4a
Issue
Cutis - 113(4)
Issue
Cutis - 113(4)
Page Number
E25-E26
Page Number
E25-E26
Publications
Publications
Topics
Article Type
Display Headline
Periorbital Changes Induced by Prostaglandin Eye Drops
Display Headline
Periorbital Changes Induced by Prostaglandin Eye Drops
Sections
Teambase XML
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!--$RCSfile: InCopy_agile.xsl,v $ $Revision: 1.35 $-->
<!--$RCSfile: drupal.xsl,v $ $Revision: 1.7 $-->
<root generator="drupal.xsl" gversion="1.7"> <header> <fileName>Stassiy</fileName> <TBEID>0C02F6CA.SIG</TBEID> <TBUniqueIdentifier>NJ_0C02F6CA</TBUniqueIdentifier> <newsOrJournal>Journal</newsOrJournal> <publisherName>Frontline Medical Communications Inc.</publisherName> <storyname>Periorbital Changes Induced by&#13;</storyname> <articleType>1</articleType> <TBLocation>Copyfitting-CT</TBLocation> <QCDate/> <firstPublished>20240429T094019</firstPublished> <LastPublished>20240429T094019</LastPublished> <pubStatus qcode="stat:"/> <embargoDate/> <killDate/> <CMSDate>20240429T094019</CMSDate> <articleSource/> <facebookInfo/> <meetingNumber/> <byline>Anya Stassiy, PA-C; Amor Khachemoune, MD</byline> <bylineText>Anya Stassiy, PA-C; Amor Khachemoune, MD</bylineText> <bylineFull>Anya Stassiy, PA-C; Amor Khachemoune, MD</bylineFull> <bylineTitleText/> <USOrGlobal/> <wireDocType/> <newsDocType>(choose one)</newsDocType> <journalDocType>(choose one)</journalDocType> <linkLabel/> <pageRange>E25-E26</pageRange> <citation/> <quizID/> <indexIssueDate/> <itemClass qcode="ninat:text"/> <provider qcode="provider:"> <name/> <rightsInfo> <copyrightHolder> <name/> </copyrightHolder> <copyrightNotice/> </rightsInfo> </provider> <abstract/> <metaDescription>To the Editor:A 42-year man presented with hollowing of the upper eyelid and skin discoloration of the left periorbital area of 10 years’ duration. He was a pro</metaDescription> <articlePDF>301206</articlePDF> <teaserImage/> <title>Periorbital Changes Induced by Prostaglandin Eye Drops</title> <deck/> <disclaimer/> <AuthorList/> <articleURL/> <doi/> <pubMedID/> <publishXMLStatus/> <publishXMLVersion>1</publishXMLVersion> <useEISSN>0</useEISSN> <urgency/> <pubPubdateYear>2024</pubPubdateYear> <pubPubdateMonth>April</pubPubdateMonth> <pubPubdateDay/> <pubVolume>113</pubVolume> <pubNumber>4</pubNumber> <wireChannels/> <primaryCMSID/> <CMSIDs> <CMSID>2165</CMSID> </CMSIDs> <keywords> <keyword>pigmentation disorder</keyword> <keyword> prostaglandin eye drops</keyword> </keywords> <seeAlsos/> <publications_g> <publicationData> <publicationCode>CT</publicationCode> <pubIssueName>April 2024</pubIssueName> <pubArticleType>Audio | 2165</pubArticleType> <pubTopics/> <pubCategories/> <pubSections/> <journalTitle>Cutis</journalTitle> <journalFullTitle>Cutis</journalFullTitle> <copyrightStatement>Copyright 2015 Frontline Medical Communications Inc., Parsippany, NJ, USA. All rights reserved.</copyrightStatement> </publicationData> </publications_g> <publications> <term canonical="true">12</term> </publications> <sections> <term canonical="true">45</term> </sections> <topics> <term canonical="true">276</term> </topics> <links> <link> <itemClass qcode="ninat:composite"/> <altRep contenttype="application/pdf">images/18002718.pdf</altRep> <description role="drol:caption"/> <description role="drol:credit"/> </link> </links> </header> <itemSet> <newsItem> <itemMeta> <itemRole>Main</itemRole> <itemClass>text</itemClass> <title>Periorbital Changes Induced by Prostaglandin Eye Drops</title> <deck/> </itemMeta> <itemContent> <p>To the Editor:<br/><br/>A 42-year man presented with hollowing of the upper eyelid and skin discoloration of the left periorbital area of 10 years’ duration. He was a professional mixed martial arts fighter with a history of 2 surgeries for retinal detachment of the left eye 13 years prior to the current presentation. The patient also has macular scarring in the left eye. He denied a history of facial fracture, reconstructive surgery, or other medical conditions. His visual acuity was unknown; however, he did not require corrective glasses. He used 3 prescription ophthalmic eye drops—dorzolamide hydrochloride plus timolol maleate, 10 mL; brimonidine tartrate ophthalmic solution 0.15%, 5 mL; and latanoprost ophthalmic solution 0.005%, 125 μg/2.5 mL—in the left eye to lower intraocular pressure, as therapy for glaucoma. If left untreated, glaucoma can lead to vision loss.</p> <p>Physical examination revealed periorbital hyperpigmentation on the left side; hypertrichosis and eyelash trichomegaly compared to the right side; and a deep left upper orbital sulcus compared to the right side (Figure). The patient was alert and oriented to person, place, and time. Extraocular movement was intact bilaterally, and his pupillary reflex was symmetric. No tenderness was noted over the affected area on palpation; no subcutaneous masses or lesions were observed or palpated. There was no ocular discharge, the conjunctiva was pink, and the sclera was white bilaterally.<br/><br/>The differential diagnosis included professional trauma-induced orbital changes, nevus of Ota (o<span class="hgkelc">culomucodermal melanocytosis)</span>, prostaglandin-associated periorbitopathy (PAP), and melasma. Although the patient sustained an injury that caused retinal detachment, he never experienced an orbital bone fracture; additionally, a fracture would not explain the skin discoloration or longer eyelashes. Periorbital nevus of Ota most commonly manifests as a unilateral scleral and brown-bluish skin discoloration but does not cause hollowing of the orbital sulcus or affect the length and thickness of eyelashes. Melasma—bilateral skin hyperpigmentation that most commonly affects women—can be induced by oral contraceptives, antibiotics, heat, sun exposure, and pregnancy. It does not affect the color of the iris or the depth of the scleral sulcus, and it does not increase the length and thickness of eyelashes.<b> </b>Based on the clinical presentation and a review of the eye drops used, he was diagnosed with PAP due to prolonged use of latanoprost ophthalmic solution. The patient was referred to an ophthalmologist for consideration of a switch to a different class of medication.<br/><br/>Of the 3 eye drops used by this patient, latanoprost, a prostaglandin analog, decreases intraocular pressure and is known to cause PAP. This condition comprises a constellation of changes, including upper eyelid ptosis, deepening of the upper eyelid sulcus, involution of dermatochalasis, periorbital fat atrophy, mild enophthalmos (sunken eye), inferior scleral show, increased prominence of eyelid vessels, and tight eyelids.<sup>1</sup> Latanoprost most often produces these findings, but all prostaglandin ophthalmic medications can, including the dual-indication bimatoprost, which was approved by the US Food and Drug Administration to reduce elevated intraocular pressure in patients with open-angle glaucoma or ocular hypertension but also is used to grow darker, thicker, and longer eyelashes. Clinicians who prescribe bimatoprost for this cosmetic indication should be mindful of the potential for PAP and discuss it with patients.<br/><br/>The prescribing information (PI) for bimatoprost (Latisse; Allergan) does not list PAP as an adverse reaction observed in the 4-month multicenter, double-blind, randomized, vehicle-controlled study of bimatoprost (as Latisse) in 278 adults.<sup>2</sup> The PI does list “periorbital and lid changes associated with periorbital fat atrophy and skin tightness resulting in deepening of eyelid sulcus and eyelid ptosis” as an adverse reaction in postmarketing experience. However, according to the PI, the frequency of these adverse reactions cannot be established, as the reporting of such incidents was voluntary and the size of the treated population was uncertain.<sup>2<br/><br/></sup>Prostaglandins can cause periorbitopathy by several mechanisms; one speculated cause is that this group of medications might provoke smooth muscle contraction. Prostaglandin medications also have an affinity for fat cells<sup>1</sup>; atrophy of fat cells can lead to enophthalmos and deepening upper eyelid sulcus. In an observational study of 105 participants who were using a prostaglandin in 1 eye for longer than 1 month (the other eye was used as a control), the overall frequency of prostaglandin-associated periorbitopathy was 93.3% in the bimatoprost group, 41.4% in the latanoprost group, and 70% in the travoprost group, while the frequency of deepening of the upper eyelid sulcus was 80% in the bimatoprost group, 15.7% in the latanoprost group, and 45% in the travoprost group.<sup>3</sup> These changes may not be as striking when a patient is using a prostaglandin ophthalmic medication in both eyes and may not be noticed even by the patient. It is prudent for the clinician to take a baseline photograph of the patient when these medications are prescribed to observe for early signs of periorbitopathy. These adverse effects may not be reversible when the medication is discontinued<sup>4</sup> and have been observed as early as 4 to 6 weeks after the start of treatment.<sup>5<br/><br/></sup>Our patient was counseled that his constellation of PAP findings potentially could be partially reversed over months or even a year or longer if the offending agent was discontinued. However, he was cautioned that cessation of latanoprost first needed to be discussed with his ophthalmologist, who would determine if there was a suitable alternative to a prostaglandin analog for him. The patient’s only concern was the aesthetic appearance of the left periorbital area. A hyaluronic acid filler or fat grafting can be considered for correction of orbital sulcus hollowing; however, we could not locate any long-term studies in which such corrective treatments were applied for PAP. Our patient continues to use latanoprost with no change in the frequency of use. There have been no further changes or progression in the physical appearance of the left eye or periorbital area. The patient has not undergone any corrective treatments.</p> <h2>REFERENCES</h2> <p class="reference"> 1. Berke SJ. PAP: new concerns for prostaglandin use. <i>Rev Ophthalmol</i>. 2012;19:70. <br/><br/> 2. Latisse (bimatoprost ophthalmic solution 0.03%). Package insert. Allergan; 2021. Accessed April 11, 2024. https://www.rxabbvie.com/pdf/latisse_pi.pdf<br/><br/> 3. Kucukevcilioglu M, Bayer A, Uysal Y, et al. Prostaglandin associated periorbitopathy in patients using bimatoprost, latanoprost and travoprost<i>. Clin Exp Ophthalmol. </i>2014;42:126-131. doi:10.1111/ceo.12163<br/><br/> 4. Filippopoulos T, Paula JS, Torun N, et al. Periorbital changes associated with topical bimatoprost.<i> Ophthalmic Plast Reconstr Surg</i>. 2008;24:302-307. doi:10.1097/IOP.0b013e31817d81df<br/><br/> 5. Peplinski LS, Smith KA. Deepening of lid sulcus from topical bimatoprost therapy. <span class="Emphasis">Optom Vis Sci.</span><span class="Emphasis"> 2004;</span>81:574-577. <span class="citation-doi">doi:10.1097/01.opx.0000141791.16683.4a</span></p> </itemContent> </newsItem> <newsItem> <itemMeta> <itemRole>bio</itemRole> <itemClass>text</itemClass> <title/> <deck/> </itemMeta> <itemContent> <p class="disclosure">Anya Stassiy is from High Point Medspa, Mountainside, New Jersey. Dr. Khachemoune is from SUNY Downstate Health Sciences University, Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Brooklyn, New York.</p> <p class="disclosure">The authors report no conflict of interest.<br/><br/>Correspondence: Amor Khachemoune, MD, SUNY Downstate Health Sciences University, Veterans Affairs Medical Center, 800 Poly Pl, Brooklyn, NY 11209 (amorkh@gmail.com).<br/><br/><i>Cutis</i>. 2024 April;113(4):E25-E26. doi:10.12788/cutis.1005</p> </itemContent> </newsItem> <newsItem> <itemMeta> <itemRole>fig</itemRole> <itemClass>text</itemClass> <title/> <deck/> </itemMeta> <itemContent> <p class="caption">Periorbital hyperpigmentation on the left side; hypertrichosis and eyelash trichomegaly compared to the right side; and a deep left upper orbital sulcus compared to the right side that was determined to be the result of use of latanoprost ophthalmic solution 0.005%.</p> </itemContent> </newsItem> <newsItem> <itemMeta> <itemRole>pp</itemRole> <itemClass>text</itemClass> <title/> <deck/> </itemMeta> <itemContent> <p class="insidehead">Practice <strong>Points</strong></p> <ul class="insidebody"> <li>Ask patients to provide photographs taken prior to noticed changes to assess progression if they are new to your practice.</li> <li>Take photographs of patients in good light against a solid-colored background to have a baseline. It may be helpful to update patient images annually.</li> <li>Discuss with patients the aesthetic changes that may occur with the use of prescription medications. Provide pamphlets with images to educate them on what to expect.</li> </ul> </itemContent> </newsItem> </itemSet></root>
Inside the Article

PRACTICE POINTS

  • Ask patients to provide photographs taken prior to noticed changes to assess progression if they are new to your practice.
  • Take photographs of patients in good light against a solid-colored background to have a baseline. It may be helpful to update patient images annually.
  • Discuss with patients the aesthetic changes that may occur with the use of prescription medications. Provide pamphlets with images to educate them on what to expect.
Disallow All Ads
Content Gating
No Gating (article Unlocked/Free)
Alternative CME
Disqus Comments
Default
Use ProPublica
Hide sidebar & use full width
render the right sidebar.
Conference Recap Checkbox
Not Conference Recap
Clinical Edge
Display the Slideshow in this Article
Medscape Article
Display survey writer
Reuters content
Disable Inline Native ads
WebMD Article
Article PDF Media
Image
Disable zoom
Off

Recurrent Soft Tissue Rosai Dorfman Disease of Right Medial Thigh Lipoma With Lymph Node Involvement

Article Type
Changed
Mon, 04/29/2024 - 19:30

Rosai Dorfman disease (RDD) is a rare non-Langerhans cell histiocytosis first described in 1965 by Destombes and again in 1969 by Rosai and Dorfman to depict patients who presented with massive cervical lymphadenopathy.1 The classification for histiocytosis was revised in 2016 based on new insights into the pathologic, genetic, and molecular features of RDD.2,3 Now, RDD is listed under the R group, which includes familial, sporadic, classical (nodal), extranodal RDD, and other noncutaneous, non-Langerhans cell histiocytosis.3 Cutaneous RDD is classified under the C group and typically presents as painless papules, plaques, or nodules without significant lymphadenopathy, or systemic symptoms usually seen in the presentation of RDD.4

The etiology of RDD is poorly understood, although an underlying infectious or genetic component is suspected.5 Several pathogens—including human herpesvirus 6, parvovirus B19, Epstein-Barr virus, cytomegalovirus, Brucella, and Klebsiella—have all been investigated. A link to kinase mutations has been described in nodal and extranodal RDD; however, the molecular profile of cutaneous RDD remains unknown.2 Histologic findings for RDD typically include cells that are S100 positive, CD68 positive, and CD163 positive, and CD1a and langerin (CD207) negative, thus excluding Langerhans cell histiocytosis.2 The hallmark finding of RDD is emperipolesis, which results from “histiocyte-mediated phagocytosis of intact lymphocytes and other immune cells.”6 Immunoglobulin G (Ig) G4-positive plasma cells are also common, but the significance of this finding is controversial. We present a case of a patient with recurrent RDD within a right medial thigh lipoma and include a literature review to explore the significance of histologic findings and various treatment options in the setting of emerging treatment and diagnostic criteria.

 

Case Presentation

A 56-year-old African American male was evaluated in the rheumatology clinic at the Central Texas Veterans Affairs Medical Center in Temple, Texas, in 2022 for a cutaneous mass of his right medial thigh. The patient previously reported the onset of a right medial thigh mass in 2005 after he had been deployed in Iraq for about 1 year. A biopsy of the mass from 2005 showed infiltration of plasma cells, lymphocytes, and histiocytes and occasional neutrophils with noted reactivity of S100 protein and CD163, but not CD1a. The patient’s original biopsy report from March 2005 was obtained secondhand from an addendum to a Dermatology Consult note. Surgical excision of the mass was not performed until 2012 and systemic therapy was not initiated.

figure_1.png

In 2021, the mass recurred and gradually increased in size, prompting a second surgical removal. Pathology results from the 2021 mass showed a lipoma with areas of fibrosis with a mixed inflammatory cell infiltrate, including abundant lymphocytes, plasma cells, occasional hemosiderin-laden histiocytes, and clusters of enlarged histiocytes with foamy to pale eosinophilic, finely granular cytoplasm, and large, round, vesicular nuclei with prominent nucleoli. Emperipolesis was also present (Figure 1).

figure_2.png

Special immunohistochemical staining showed most of the lymphocytes were CD20 positive B-cells with a minority of CD3 positive T-cells. Histiocytes were CD163 positive and CD68 positive with patchy reactivity for S100 protein. The plasma cells were CD138 positive. There were > 125 IgG4-positive plasma cells present in a single high-powered field and the overall IgG4:IgG plasma cell ratio was > 40%. Pertinent imaging included a whole-body positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) hypermetabolic activity scan of a small right femoral lymph node (9 mm) and nearby medial right femoral lymph node (13 mm) (Figure 2A). A well-defined mass in the medial aspect of the right thigh (2.5 cm x 3.2 cm x 3.9 cm) and a cutaneous/subcutaneous lesion of the anterior medial aspect of the proximal right thigh superior to the mass (2.9 cm) were also evident on imaging (Figure 2B). Each area of hypermetabolic activity had decreased in size and activity when compared to a previous PET/CT obtained 1 month earlier. There was no evidence of skeletal malignancy. A physical examination did not reveal any other soft tissue masses, palpable lymphadenopathy, or areas of skin involvement. Given the patient’s reassuring imaging findings and a lack of any new physical examination findings, no systemic therapy was initiated, and following shared decision making, the patient agreed to a period of watchful waiting. 

 

 

Discussion

RDD is rare with a prevalence of 1:200,000. It has been reported that multisystem involvement occurs in 19% of cases and the prognosis of RDD correlates with the number of extranodal systems involved in the disease process.7 Although sporadic RDD is usually self-limited with favorable outcomes, it is estimated that 10% of patients may die of RDD due to direct complications, infections, and amyloidosis.2,7 RDD commonly affects young male children and young adults with a mean age of 20 years and has a higher incidence among African American children.2,7,8 Although patients with RDD present bilateral, painless cervical lymphadenopathy in 90% of cases, about 43% of patients with RDD and associated adenopathy present with ≥ 1 site of extranodal involvement, and only 23% of patients with RDD present with isolated extranodal sites without adenopathy.9 As was the case with our patient, the most common extranodal sites are found in the skin and soft tissue (16%).6,9 However, histopathologic diagnosis of RDD in a lipoma is exceedingly rare. We found only 1 other case report of a patient with a history of multiple lipomas who developed a new solitary nodule that was excised and demonstrated RDD upon immunohistochemical staining.4 There has been no documented association between multiple lipomas and RDD.4

Histologically, RDD is often characterized by emperipolesis (the presence of an intact cell within the cytoplasm of anther cell) and a mixed cell infiltrate that includes S100 positive histiocytes, mononuclear cells, plasma cells, and lymphocytes.10 Despite these shared histologic features among the various phenotypes of RDD, other type-specific characteristics may also be present. When compared to nodal RDD, extranodal disease tends to demonstrate a lack of nodal architecture, more fibrosis and collagen deposition, fewer RDD cells, a lower degree of emperipolesis, and alternating pale (histiocyte rich) and dark (lymphocyte rich) regions with notable polygonal histiocytes arranged in a storiform pattern.5,10

Our patient’s histology showed an overall IgG4:IgG plasma cell ratio > 40%. RDD frequently presents with IgG4-positive plasma cells, which has confounded the diagnosis of IgG4-related diseases and hyper-IgG4 disease.11 Given this association, the Histiocyte Society revised classification recommends that all cases of RDD be evaluated for IgG4-positive cell infiltration.2,3 Further discussion on this matter was recently provided after an expert panel published a consensus statement in 2015 detailing the evaluation of IgG4. The panel advocates for stricter terminology and criteria on this issue, advises that isolated IgG4-positive plasma cells are nonspecific, and states that the diagnosis of IgG4 disease should be based on careful judgment and correlation with the clinical scenario and supportive findings.12 Therefore, while IgG4 positivity continues to be misleading in RDD cases, further evaluation for IgG4 disease is recommended. 

Sporadic RDD is usually self-limited with a reported remission rate of up to 50%, according to a case series of 80 patients with RDD.13 This leads to the recommendation of a period of watchful monitoring in patients with limited disease.13 In patients with unifocal extranodal disease, surgical excision has shown positive remission results; however, local recurrence of soft tissue lesions can occur at a rate of 21.4% to 51%.14 Although initiation of systemic therapy should be considered in patients with recurrent disease, there is currently no standardized regimen or medication of choice for treatment. Treatment with steroids, including prednisone 40 to 70 mg daily or dexamethasone 8 to 20 mg daily, have been shown to be effective in reducing the nodal size and symptoms, especially in cases of nonresectable multifocal extranodal disease of the central nervous system, bone, and orbital.7,15,16 However, cases of orbital, tracheal, renal, or soft tissue RDD have reported failure in treatment with steroids.17,18

According to the consensus recommendations for the treatment of RDD released in 2018, treatment with chemotherapy has shown mixed results. Anthracycline and alkylating agents have shown minimal efficacy, but combination regimens with vinca alkaloids, methotrexate, and 6-mercaptopurine have helped patients experience remission.19,20 Due to the rarity of RDD and lack of clinical trials, the exact efficacy of these treatment regimens remains unknown and is largely limited to case reports described within the medical literature. Treatment with nucleoside analogs, such as cladribine 2.1 to 5 mg/m2 or clofarabine 25 mg/m2 per day for 5 days every 28 days for 6 months, have shown promising results and helped achieve complete remission in patients with refractory or recurrent RDD.7,21-23 Immunomodulator therapies including TNF-α inhibitor, such as thalidomide and lenalidomide, have also shown to be effective, particularly in patients with refractory disease.24,25 Low-dose thalidomide (100 mg daily) was effective for cases of refractory cutaneous RDD, though no standard dosing regimen exists. Lenalidomide has shown to be effective in patients with multiple refractory nodal or bone RDD, but is associated with more complications given that it is more myelosuppressive than thalidomide.7 Radiotherapy has also been initiated in patients with refractory soft tissue disease or persistent symptoms after resection and in patients who are not candidates for surgery or systemic therapy, though no standard doses of radiotherapy have been established.7,26,27

Conclusions

RDD is a rare histiocytic disorder that presents in a wide range of age groups, different locations in the body, and with variable disease behavior. Multidisciplinary management of the disease and research for mutations and microenvironment of RDD is needed to better understand its clinicopathological nature and improve targeted novel therapies.

Acknowledgments

The authors thank Veterans Affairs Central Texas Health Care Section Chief of Rheumatology, Swastika Jha, MD, for her guidance in this case and Bo Wang, MD, for his preparation of the pathological specimens. 

References

1. Goyal G, Ravindran A, Young JR, et al. Clinicopathological features, treatment approaches, and outcomes in Rosai-Dorfman disease. Haematologica. 2020;105(2):348-357. Published 2020 Jan 31. doi:10.3324/haematol.2019.219626

2. Bruce-Brand C, Schneider JW, Schubert P. Rosai-Dorfman disease: an overview. J Clin Pathol. 2020;73(11):697-705. doi:10.1136/jclinpath-2020-206733

3. Emile JF, Abla O, Fraitag S, et al. Revised classification of histiocytoses and neoplasms of the macrophage-dendritic cell lineages. Blood. 2016;127(22):2672-2681. doi:10.1182/blood-2016-01-690636

4. Farooq U, Chacon AH, Vincek V, Elgart G. Purely cutaneous rosai-dorfman disease with immunohistochemistry. Indian J Dermatol. 2013;58(6):447-450. doi:10.4103/0019-5154.119953

5. Ma H, Zheng Y, Zhu G, Wu J, Lu C, Lai W. Rosai-dorfman disease with massive cutaneous nodule on the shoulder and back. Ann Dermatol. 2015;27(1):71-75. doi:10.5021/ad.2015.27.1.71

6. Deen IU, Chittal A, Badro N, Jones R, Haas C. Extranodal Rosai-Dorfman Disease- a Review of Diagnostic Testing and Management. J Community Hosp Intern Med Perspect. 2022;12(2):18-22. Published 2022 Apr 12. doi:10.55729/2000-9666.1032

7. Oussama A, Jacobsen E, Picarsic J, et al. Consensus recommendations for the diagnosis and clinical management of Rosai-Dorfman-Destombes disease. Blood. 2018;131(26):2877-2890. doi: 10.1182/blood-2018-03-839753

8. Foucar E, Rosai J, Dorfman R. Sinus histiocytosis with massive lymphadenopathy (Rosai-Dorfman disease): review of the entity. Semin Diagn Pathol. 1990;7(1):19-73.

9. Gaitonde S. Multifocal, extranodal sinus histiocytosis with massive lymphadenopathy: an overview. Arch Pathol Lab Med. 2007;131(7):1111-1121. doi:10.5858/2007-131-1117-MESHWM

10. Betini N, Munger AM, Rottmann D, Haims A, Costa J, Lindskog DM. Rare presentation of Rosai-Dorfman disease in soft tissue: diagnostic findings and surgical treatment. Case Rep Surg. 2022;2022:8440836. Published 2022 Mar 30. doi:10.1155/2022/8440836

11. Menon MP, Evbuomwan MO, Rosai J, Jaffe ES, Pittaluga S. A subset of Rosai-Dorfman disease cases show increased IgG4-positive plasma cells: another red herring or a true association with IgG4-related disease? Histopathology. 2014;64(3):455-459. doi:10.1111/his.12274

12. Khosroshahi A, Wallace ZS, Crowe JL, et al. International consensus guidance statement on the management and treatment of IgG4-related disease. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2015;67(7):1688-1699. doi:10.1002/art.39132

13. Pulsoni A, Anghel G, Falcucci P, et al. Treatment of sinus histiocytosis with massive lymphadenopathy (Rosai-Dorfman disease): report of a case and literature review. Am J Hematol. 2002;69(1):67-71. doi:10.1002/ajh.10008

14. Montgomery EA, Meis JM, Firzzera G. Rosai-Dorfman disease of soft tissue. Am J Surg Pathol. 1992;16(2):122-129. doi:10.1097/00000478-199202000-00004

15. Z’Graggen WJ, Sturzenegger M, Mariani L, Keserue B, Kappeler A, Vajtai I. Isolated Rosai-Dorfman disease of intracranial meninges. Pathol Res Pract. 2006;202(3):165-170. doi:10.1016/j.prp.2005.11.004

16. Shulman S, Katzenstein H, Abramowsky C, Broecker J, Wulkan M, Shehata B. Unusual presentation of Rosai-Dorfman disease (RDD) in the bone in adolescents. Fetal Pediatr Pathol. 2011;30(6):442-447. doi:10.3109/15513815.2011.61887317. Ottaviano G, Doro D, Marioni G, et al. Extranodal Rosai-Dorfman disease: involvement of eye, nose and trachea. Acta Otolaryngol. 2006;126(6):657-660. doi:10.1080/00016480500452582

18. Sakallioglu O, Gok F, Kalman S, et al. Minimal change nephropathy in a 7-year-old boy with Rosai-Dorfman disease. J Nephrol. 2006;19(2):211-214.

19. Jabali Y, Smrcka V, Pradna J. Rosai-Dorfman disease: successful long-term results by combination chemotherapy with prednisone, 6-mercaptopurine, methotrexate, and vinblastine: a case report. Int J Surg Pathol. 2005;13(3):285-289. doi:10.1177/106689690501300311

20. Abla O, Jacobsen E, Picarsic J, et al. Consensus recommendations for the diagnosis and clinical management of Rosai-Dorfman-Destombes disease. Blood. 2018;131(26):2877-2890. doi:10.1182/blood-2018-03-839753

21. Konca C, Özkurt ZN, Deger M, Akı Z, Yagcı M. Extranodal multifocal Rosai-Dorfman disease: response to 2-chlorodeoxyadenosine treatment. Int J Hematol. 2009;89(1):58-62. doi:10.1007/s12185-008-0192-2

22. Aouba A, Terrier B, Vasiliu V, et al. Dramatic clinical efficacy of cladribine in Rosai-Dorfman disease and evolution of the cytokine profile: towards a new therapeutic approach. Haematologica. 2006;91(12 Suppl):ECR52.

23. Tasso M, Esquembre C, Blanco E, Moscardó C, Niveiro M, Payá A. Sinus histiocytosis with massive lymphadenopathy (Rosai-Dorfman disease) treated with 2-chlorodeoxyadenosine. Pediatr Blood Cancer. 2006;47(5):612-615. doi:10.1002/pbc.20668

24. Chen E, Pavlidakey P, Sami N. Rosai-Dorfman disease successfully treated with thalidomide. JAAD Case Reports. 2016;2(5):369-372. Published 2016 Sep 28. doi:10.1016/j.jdcr.2016.08.006

25. Rubinstein M, Assal A, Scherba M, et al. Lenalidomide in the treatment of Rosai Dorfman disease-a first in use report. Am J Hematol. 2016;91(2):E1. doi:10.1002/ajh.24225

26. Sandoval-Sus JD, Sandoval-Leon AC, Chapman JR, et al. Rosai-Dorfman disease of the central nervous system: report of 6 cases and review of the literature. Medicine (Baltimore). 2014;93(3):165-175. doi:10.1097/MD.0000000000000030

27. Paryani NN, Daugherty LC, O’Connor MI, Jiang L. Extranodal Rosai-Dorfman disease of the bone treated with surgery and radiotherapy. Rare Tumors. 2014;6(4):5531. Published 2014 Dec 11. doi:10.4081/rt.2014.5531

Article PDF
Author and Disclosure Information

John Corbyn Cravero, MDa; Samar Ibrahim, MDa

Correspondence:  John Cravero  (jccravero13@gmail.com)

aBaylor Scott & White Medical Center – Temple, Texas

Author disclosures

The authors report no actual or potential conflicts of interest or outside sources of funding with regard to this article.

Disclaimer

The opinions expressed herein are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect those of FederalPractitioner, Frontline Medical Communications Inc., the US Government, or any of its agencies. This article may discuss unlabeled or investigational use of certain drugs. Please review the complete prescribing information for specific drugs or drug combinations—including indications, contraindications, warnings, and adverse effects—before administering pharmacologic therapy to patients.

Ethics and consent

Written informed consent for publication was obtained by the patient who was involved in this case report.

Issue
Federal Practitioner - 41(5)s
Publications
Topics
Page Number
S20
Sections
Author and Disclosure Information

John Corbyn Cravero, MDa; Samar Ibrahim, MDa

Correspondence:  John Cravero  (jccravero13@gmail.com)

aBaylor Scott & White Medical Center – Temple, Texas

Author disclosures

The authors report no actual or potential conflicts of interest or outside sources of funding with regard to this article.

Disclaimer

The opinions expressed herein are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect those of FederalPractitioner, Frontline Medical Communications Inc., the US Government, or any of its agencies. This article may discuss unlabeled or investigational use of certain drugs. Please review the complete prescribing information for specific drugs or drug combinations—including indications, contraindications, warnings, and adverse effects—before administering pharmacologic therapy to patients.

Ethics and consent

Written informed consent for publication was obtained by the patient who was involved in this case report.

Author and Disclosure Information

John Corbyn Cravero, MDa; Samar Ibrahim, MDa

Correspondence:  John Cravero  (jccravero13@gmail.com)

aBaylor Scott & White Medical Center – Temple, Texas

Author disclosures

The authors report no actual or potential conflicts of interest or outside sources of funding with regard to this article.

Disclaimer

The opinions expressed herein are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect those of FederalPractitioner, Frontline Medical Communications Inc., the US Government, or any of its agencies. This article may discuss unlabeled or investigational use of certain drugs. Please review the complete prescribing information for specific drugs or drug combinations—including indications, contraindications, warnings, and adverse effects—before administering pharmacologic therapy to patients.

Ethics and consent

Written informed consent for publication was obtained by the patient who was involved in this case report.

Article PDF
Article PDF

Rosai Dorfman disease (RDD) is a rare non-Langerhans cell histiocytosis first described in 1965 by Destombes and again in 1969 by Rosai and Dorfman to depict patients who presented with massive cervical lymphadenopathy.1 The classification for histiocytosis was revised in 2016 based on new insights into the pathologic, genetic, and molecular features of RDD.2,3 Now, RDD is listed under the R group, which includes familial, sporadic, classical (nodal), extranodal RDD, and other noncutaneous, non-Langerhans cell histiocytosis.3 Cutaneous RDD is classified under the C group and typically presents as painless papules, plaques, or nodules without significant lymphadenopathy, or systemic symptoms usually seen in the presentation of RDD.4

The etiology of RDD is poorly understood, although an underlying infectious or genetic component is suspected.5 Several pathogens—including human herpesvirus 6, parvovirus B19, Epstein-Barr virus, cytomegalovirus, Brucella, and Klebsiella—have all been investigated. A link to kinase mutations has been described in nodal and extranodal RDD; however, the molecular profile of cutaneous RDD remains unknown.2 Histologic findings for RDD typically include cells that are S100 positive, CD68 positive, and CD163 positive, and CD1a and langerin (CD207) negative, thus excluding Langerhans cell histiocytosis.2 The hallmark finding of RDD is emperipolesis, which results from “histiocyte-mediated phagocytosis of intact lymphocytes and other immune cells.”6 Immunoglobulin G (Ig) G4-positive plasma cells are also common, but the significance of this finding is controversial. We present a case of a patient with recurrent RDD within a right medial thigh lipoma and include a literature review to explore the significance of histologic findings and various treatment options in the setting of emerging treatment and diagnostic criteria.

 

Case Presentation

A 56-year-old African American male was evaluated in the rheumatology clinic at the Central Texas Veterans Affairs Medical Center in Temple, Texas, in 2022 for a cutaneous mass of his right medial thigh. The patient previously reported the onset of a right medial thigh mass in 2005 after he had been deployed in Iraq for about 1 year. A biopsy of the mass from 2005 showed infiltration of plasma cells, lymphocytes, and histiocytes and occasional neutrophils with noted reactivity of S100 protein and CD163, but not CD1a. The patient’s original biopsy report from March 2005 was obtained secondhand from an addendum to a Dermatology Consult note. Surgical excision of the mass was not performed until 2012 and systemic therapy was not initiated.

figure_1.png

In 2021, the mass recurred and gradually increased in size, prompting a second surgical removal. Pathology results from the 2021 mass showed a lipoma with areas of fibrosis with a mixed inflammatory cell infiltrate, including abundant lymphocytes, plasma cells, occasional hemosiderin-laden histiocytes, and clusters of enlarged histiocytes with foamy to pale eosinophilic, finely granular cytoplasm, and large, round, vesicular nuclei with prominent nucleoli. Emperipolesis was also present (Figure 1).

figure_2.png

Special immunohistochemical staining showed most of the lymphocytes were CD20 positive B-cells with a minority of CD3 positive T-cells. Histiocytes were CD163 positive and CD68 positive with patchy reactivity for S100 protein. The plasma cells were CD138 positive. There were > 125 IgG4-positive plasma cells present in a single high-powered field and the overall IgG4:IgG plasma cell ratio was > 40%. Pertinent imaging included a whole-body positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) hypermetabolic activity scan of a small right femoral lymph node (9 mm) and nearby medial right femoral lymph node (13 mm) (Figure 2A). A well-defined mass in the medial aspect of the right thigh (2.5 cm x 3.2 cm x 3.9 cm) and a cutaneous/subcutaneous lesion of the anterior medial aspect of the proximal right thigh superior to the mass (2.9 cm) were also evident on imaging (Figure 2B). Each area of hypermetabolic activity had decreased in size and activity when compared to a previous PET/CT obtained 1 month earlier. There was no evidence of skeletal malignancy. A physical examination did not reveal any other soft tissue masses, palpable lymphadenopathy, or areas of skin involvement. Given the patient’s reassuring imaging findings and a lack of any new physical examination findings, no systemic therapy was initiated, and following shared decision making, the patient agreed to a period of watchful waiting. 

 

 

Discussion

RDD is rare with a prevalence of 1:200,000. It has been reported that multisystem involvement occurs in 19% of cases and the prognosis of RDD correlates with the number of extranodal systems involved in the disease process.7 Although sporadic RDD is usually self-limited with favorable outcomes, it is estimated that 10% of patients may die of RDD due to direct complications, infections, and amyloidosis.2,7 RDD commonly affects young male children and young adults with a mean age of 20 years and has a higher incidence among African American children.2,7,8 Although patients with RDD present bilateral, painless cervical lymphadenopathy in 90% of cases, about 43% of patients with RDD and associated adenopathy present with ≥ 1 site of extranodal involvement, and only 23% of patients with RDD present with isolated extranodal sites without adenopathy.9 As was the case with our patient, the most common extranodal sites are found in the skin and soft tissue (16%).6,9 However, histopathologic diagnosis of RDD in a lipoma is exceedingly rare. We found only 1 other case report of a patient with a history of multiple lipomas who developed a new solitary nodule that was excised and demonstrated RDD upon immunohistochemical staining.4 There has been no documented association between multiple lipomas and RDD.4

Histologically, RDD is often characterized by emperipolesis (the presence of an intact cell within the cytoplasm of anther cell) and a mixed cell infiltrate that includes S100 positive histiocytes, mononuclear cells, plasma cells, and lymphocytes.10 Despite these shared histologic features among the various phenotypes of RDD, other type-specific characteristics may also be present. When compared to nodal RDD, extranodal disease tends to demonstrate a lack of nodal architecture, more fibrosis and collagen deposition, fewer RDD cells, a lower degree of emperipolesis, and alternating pale (histiocyte rich) and dark (lymphocyte rich) regions with notable polygonal histiocytes arranged in a storiform pattern.5,10

Our patient’s histology showed an overall IgG4:IgG plasma cell ratio > 40%. RDD frequently presents with IgG4-positive plasma cells, which has confounded the diagnosis of IgG4-related diseases and hyper-IgG4 disease.11 Given this association, the Histiocyte Society revised classification recommends that all cases of RDD be evaluated for IgG4-positive cell infiltration.2,3 Further discussion on this matter was recently provided after an expert panel published a consensus statement in 2015 detailing the evaluation of IgG4. The panel advocates for stricter terminology and criteria on this issue, advises that isolated IgG4-positive plasma cells are nonspecific, and states that the diagnosis of IgG4 disease should be based on careful judgment and correlation with the clinical scenario and supportive findings.12 Therefore, while IgG4 positivity continues to be misleading in RDD cases, further evaluation for IgG4 disease is recommended. 

Sporadic RDD is usually self-limited with a reported remission rate of up to 50%, according to a case series of 80 patients with RDD.13 This leads to the recommendation of a period of watchful monitoring in patients with limited disease.13 In patients with unifocal extranodal disease, surgical excision has shown positive remission results; however, local recurrence of soft tissue lesions can occur at a rate of 21.4% to 51%.14 Although initiation of systemic therapy should be considered in patients with recurrent disease, there is currently no standardized regimen or medication of choice for treatment. Treatment with steroids, including prednisone 40 to 70 mg daily or dexamethasone 8 to 20 mg daily, have been shown to be effective in reducing the nodal size and symptoms, especially in cases of nonresectable multifocal extranodal disease of the central nervous system, bone, and orbital.7,15,16 However, cases of orbital, tracheal, renal, or soft tissue RDD have reported failure in treatment with steroids.17,18

According to the consensus recommendations for the treatment of RDD released in 2018, treatment with chemotherapy has shown mixed results. Anthracycline and alkylating agents have shown minimal efficacy, but combination regimens with vinca alkaloids, methotrexate, and 6-mercaptopurine have helped patients experience remission.19,20 Due to the rarity of RDD and lack of clinical trials, the exact efficacy of these treatment regimens remains unknown and is largely limited to case reports described within the medical literature. Treatment with nucleoside analogs, such as cladribine 2.1 to 5 mg/m2 or clofarabine 25 mg/m2 per day for 5 days every 28 days for 6 months, have shown promising results and helped achieve complete remission in patients with refractory or recurrent RDD.7,21-23 Immunomodulator therapies including TNF-α inhibitor, such as thalidomide and lenalidomide, have also shown to be effective, particularly in patients with refractory disease.24,25 Low-dose thalidomide (100 mg daily) was effective for cases of refractory cutaneous RDD, though no standard dosing regimen exists. Lenalidomide has shown to be effective in patients with multiple refractory nodal or bone RDD, but is associated with more complications given that it is more myelosuppressive than thalidomide.7 Radiotherapy has also been initiated in patients with refractory soft tissue disease or persistent symptoms after resection and in patients who are not candidates for surgery or systemic therapy, though no standard doses of radiotherapy have been established.7,26,27

Conclusions

RDD is a rare histiocytic disorder that presents in a wide range of age groups, different locations in the body, and with variable disease behavior. Multidisciplinary management of the disease and research for mutations and microenvironment of RDD is needed to better understand its clinicopathological nature and improve targeted novel therapies.

Acknowledgments

The authors thank Veterans Affairs Central Texas Health Care Section Chief of Rheumatology, Swastika Jha, MD, for her guidance in this case and Bo Wang, MD, for his preparation of the pathological specimens. 

Rosai Dorfman disease (RDD) is a rare non-Langerhans cell histiocytosis first described in 1965 by Destombes and again in 1969 by Rosai and Dorfman to depict patients who presented with massive cervical lymphadenopathy.1 The classification for histiocytosis was revised in 2016 based on new insights into the pathologic, genetic, and molecular features of RDD.2,3 Now, RDD is listed under the R group, which includes familial, sporadic, classical (nodal), extranodal RDD, and other noncutaneous, non-Langerhans cell histiocytosis.3 Cutaneous RDD is classified under the C group and typically presents as painless papules, plaques, or nodules without significant lymphadenopathy, or systemic symptoms usually seen in the presentation of RDD.4

The etiology of RDD is poorly understood, although an underlying infectious or genetic component is suspected.5 Several pathogens—including human herpesvirus 6, parvovirus B19, Epstein-Barr virus, cytomegalovirus, Brucella, and Klebsiella—have all been investigated. A link to kinase mutations has been described in nodal and extranodal RDD; however, the molecular profile of cutaneous RDD remains unknown.2 Histologic findings for RDD typically include cells that are S100 positive, CD68 positive, and CD163 positive, and CD1a and langerin (CD207) negative, thus excluding Langerhans cell histiocytosis.2 The hallmark finding of RDD is emperipolesis, which results from “histiocyte-mediated phagocytosis of intact lymphocytes and other immune cells.”6 Immunoglobulin G (Ig) G4-positive plasma cells are also common, but the significance of this finding is controversial. We present a case of a patient with recurrent RDD within a right medial thigh lipoma and include a literature review to explore the significance of histologic findings and various treatment options in the setting of emerging treatment and diagnostic criteria.

 

Case Presentation

A 56-year-old African American male was evaluated in the rheumatology clinic at the Central Texas Veterans Affairs Medical Center in Temple, Texas, in 2022 for a cutaneous mass of his right medial thigh. The patient previously reported the onset of a right medial thigh mass in 2005 after he had been deployed in Iraq for about 1 year. A biopsy of the mass from 2005 showed infiltration of plasma cells, lymphocytes, and histiocytes and occasional neutrophils with noted reactivity of S100 protein and CD163, but not CD1a. The patient’s original biopsy report from March 2005 was obtained secondhand from an addendum to a Dermatology Consult note. Surgical excision of the mass was not performed until 2012 and systemic therapy was not initiated.

figure_1.png

In 2021, the mass recurred and gradually increased in size, prompting a second surgical removal. Pathology results from the 2021 mass showed a lipoma with areas of fibrosis with a mixed inflammatory cell infiltrate, including abundant lymphocytes, plasma cells, occasional hemosiderin-laden histiocytes, and clusters of enlarged histiocytes with foamy to pale eosinophilic, finely granular cytoplasm, and large, round, vesicular nuclei with prominent nucleoli. Emperipolesis was also present (Figure 1).

figure_2.png

Special immunohistochemical staining showed most of the lymphocytes were CD20 positive B-cells with a minority of CD3 positive T-cells. Histiocytes were CD163 positive and CD68 positive with patchy reactivity for S100 protein. The plasma cells were CD138 positive. There were > 125 IgG4-positive plasma cells present in a single high-powered field and the overall IgG4:IgG plasma cell ratio was > 40%. Pertinent imaging included a whole-body positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) hypermetabolic activity scan of a small right femoral lymph node (9 mm) and nearby medial right femoral lymph node (13 mm) (Figure 2A). A well-defined mass in the medial aspect of the right thigh (2.5 cm x 3.2 cm x 3.9 cm) and a cutaneous/subcutaneous lesion of the anterior medial aspect of the proximal right thigh superior to the mass (2.9 cm) were also evident on imaging (Figure 2B). Each area of hypermetabolic activity had decreased in size and activity when compared to a previous PET/CT obtained 1 month earlier. There was no evidence of skeletal malignancy. A physical examination did not reveal any other soft tissue masses, palpable lymphadenopathy, or areas of skin involvement. Given the patient’s reassuring imaging findings and a lack of any new physical examination findings, no systemic therapy was initiated, and following shared decision making, the patient agreed to a period of watchful waiting. 

 

 

Discussion

RDD is rare with a prevalence of 1:200,000. It has been reported that multisystem involvement occurs in 19% of cases and the prognosis of RDD correlates with the number of extranodal systems involved in the disease process.7 Although sporadic RDD is usually self-limited with favorable outcomes, it is estimated that 10% of patients may die of RDD due to direct complications, infections, and amyloidosis.2,7 RDD commonly affects young male children and young adults with a mean age of 20 years and has a higher incidence among African American children.2,7,8 Although patients with RDD present bilateral, painless cervical lymphadenopathy in 90% of cases, about 43% of patients with RDD and associated adenopathy present with ≥ 1 site of extranodal involvement, and only 23% of patients with RDD present with isolated extranodal sites without adenopathy.9 As was the case with our patient, the most common extranodal sites are found in the skin and soft tissue (16%).6,9 However, histopathologic diagnosis of RDD in a lipoma is exceedingly rare. We found only 1 other case report of a patient with a history of multiple lipomas who developed a new solitary nodule that was excised and demonstrated RDD upon immunohistochemical staining.4 There has been no documented association between multiple lipomas and RDD.4

Histologically, RDD is often characterized by emperipolesis (the presence of an intact cell within the cytoplasm of anther cell) and a mixed cell infiltrate that includes S100 positive histiocytes, mononuclear cells, plasma cells, and lymphocytes.10 Despite these shared histologic features among the various phenotypes of RDD, other type-specific characteristics may also be present. When compared to nodal RDD, extranodal disease tends to demonstrate a lack of nodal architecture, more fibrosis and collagen deposition, fewer RDD cells, a lower degree of emperipolesis, and alternating pale (histiocyte rich) and dark (lymphocyte rich) regions with notable polygonal histiocytes arranged in a storiform pattern.5,10

Our patient’s histology showed an overall IgG4:IgG plasma cell ratio > 40%. RDD frequently presents with IgG4-positive plasma cells, which has confounded the diagnosis of IgG4-related diseases and hyper-IgG4 disease.11 Given this association, the Histiocyte Society revised classification recommends that all cases of RDD be evaluated for IgG4-positive cell infiltration.2,3 Further discussion on this matter was recently provided after an expert panel published a consensus statement in 2015 detailing the evaluation of IgG4. The panel advocates for stricter terminology and criteria on this issue, advises that isolated IgG4-positive plasma cells are nonspecific, and states that the diagnosis of IgG4 disease should be based on careful judgment and correlation with the clinical scenario and supportive findings.12 Therefore, while IgG4 positivity continues to be misleading in RDD cases, further evaluation for IgG4 disease is recommended. 

Sporadic RDD is usually self-limited with a reported remission rate of up to 50%, according to a case series of 80 patients with RDD.13 This leads to the recommendation of a period of watchful monitoring in patients with limited disease.13 In patients with unifocal extranodal disease, surgical excision has shown positive remission results; however, local recurrence of soft tissue lesions can occur at a rate of 21.4% to 51%.14 Although initiation of systemic therapy should be considered in patients with recurrent disease, there is currently no standardized regimen or medication of choice for treatment. Treatment with steroids, including prednisone 40 to 70 mg daily or dexamethasone 8 to 20 mg daily, have been shown to be effective in reducing the nodal size and symptoms, especially in cases of nonresectable multifocal extranodal disease of the central nervous system, bone, and orbital.7,15,16 However, cases of orbital, tracheal, renal, or soft tissue RDD have reported failure in treatment with steroids.17,18

According to the consensus recommendations for the treatment of RDD released in 2018, treatment with chemotherapy has shown mixed results. Anthracycline and alkylating agents have shown minimal efficacy, but combination regimens with vinca alkaloids, methotrexate, and 6-mercaptopurine have helped patients experience remission.19,20 Due to the rarity of RDD and lack of clinical trials, the exact efficacy of these treatment regimens remains unknown and is largely limited to case reports described within the medical literature. Treatment with nucleoside analogs, such as cladribine 2.1 to 5 mg/m2 or clofarabine 25 mg/m2 per day for 5 days every 28 days for 6 months, have shown promising results and helped achieve complete remission in patients with refractory or recurrent RDD.7,21-23 Immunomodulator therapies including TNF-α inhibitor, such as thalidomide and lenalidomide, have also shown to be effective, particularly in patients with refractory disease.24,25 Low-dose thalidomide (100 mg daily) was effective for cases of refractory cutaneous RDD, though no standard dosing regimen exists. Lenalidomide has shown to be effective in patients with multiple refractory nodal or bone RDD, but is associated with more complications given that it is more myelosuppressive than thalidomide.7 Radiotherapy has also been initiated in patients with refractory soft tissue disease or persistent symptoms after resection and in patients who are not candidates for surgery or systemic therapy, though no standard doses of radiotherapy have been established.7,26,27

Conclusions

RDD is a rare histiocytic disorder that presents in a wide range of age groups, different locations in the body, and with variable disease behavior. Multidisciplinary management of the disease and research for mutations and microenvironment of RDD is needed to better understand its clinicopathological nature and improve targeted novel therapies.

Acknowledgments

The authors thank Veterans Affairs Central Texas Health Care Section Chief of Rheumatology, Swastika Jha, MD, for her guidance in this case and Bo Wang, MD, for his preparation of the pathological specimens. 

References

1. Goyal G, Ravindran A, Young JR, et al. Clinicopathological features, treatment approaches, and outcomes in Rosai-Dorfman disease. Haematologica. 2020;105(2):348-357. Published 2020 Jan 31. doi:10.3324/haematol.2019.219626

2. Bruce-Brand C, Schneider JW, Schubert P. Rosai-Dorfman disease: an overview. J Clin Pathol. 2020;73(11):697-705. doi:10.1136/jclinpath-2020-206733

3. Emile JF, Abla O, Fraitag S, et al. Revised classification of histiocytoses and neoplasms of the macrophage-dendritic cell lineages. Blood. 2016;127(22):2672-2681. doi:10.1182/blood-2016-01-690636

4. Farooq U, Chacon AH, Vincek V, Elgart G. Purely cutaneous rosai-dorfman disease with immunohistochemistry. Indian J Dermatol. 2013;58(6):447-450. doi:10.4103/0019-5154.119953

5. Ma H, Zheng Y, Zhu G, Wu J, Lu C, Lai W. Rosai-dorfman disease with massive cutaneous nodule on the shoulder and back. Ann Dermatol. 2015;27(1):71-75. doi:10.5021/ad.2015.27.1.71

6. Deen IU, Chittal A, Badro N, Jones R, Haas C. Extranodal Rosai-Dorfman Disease- a Review of Diagnostic Testing and Management. J Community Hosp Intern Med Perspect. 2022;12(2):18-22. Published 2022 Apr 12. doi:10.55729/2000-9666.1032

7. Oussama A, Jacobsen E, Picarsic J, et al. Consensus recommendations for the diagnosis and clinical management of Rosai-Dorfman-Destombes disease. Blood. 2018;131(26):2877-2890. doi: 10.1182/blood-2018-03-839753

8. Foucar E, Rosai J, Dorfman R. Sinus histiocytosis with massive lymphadenopathy (Rosai-Dorfman disease): review of the entity. Semin Diagn Pathol. 1990;7(1):19-73.

9. Gaitonde S. Multifocal, extranodal sinus histiocytosis with massive lymphadenopathy: an overview. Arch Pathol Lab Med. 2007;131(7):1111-1121. doi:10.5858/2007-131-1117-MESHWM

10. Betini N, Munger AM, Rottmann D, Haims A, Costa J, Lindskog DM. Rare presentation of Rosai-Dorfman disease in soft tissue: diagnostic findings and surgical treatment. Case Rep Surg. 2022;2022:8440836. Published 2022 Mar 30. doi:10.1155/2022/8440836

11. Menon MP, Evbuomwan MO, Rosai J, Jaffe ES, Pittaluga S. A subset of Rosai-Dorfman disease cases show increased IgG4-positive plasma cells: another red herring or a true association with IgG4-related disease? Histopathology. 2014;64(3):455-459. doi:10.1111/his.12274

12. Khosroshahi A, Wallace ZS, Crowe JL, et al. International consensus guidance statement on the management and treatment of IgG4-related disease. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2015;67(7):1688-1699. doi:10.1002/art.39132

13. Pulsoni A, Anghel G, Falcucci P, et al. Treatment of sinus histiocytosis with massive lymphadenopathy (Rosai-Dorfman disease): report of a case and literature review. Am J Hematol. 2002;69(1):67-71. doi:10.1002/ajh.10008

14. Montgomery EA, Meis JM, Firzzera G. Rosai-Dorfman disease of soft tissue. Am J Surg Pathol. 1992;16(2):122-129. doi:10.1097/00000478-199202000-00004

15. Z’Graggen WJ, Sturzenegger M, Mariani L, Keserue B, Kappeler A, Vajtai I. Isolated Rosai-Dorfman disease of intracranial meninges. Pathol Res Pract. 2006;202(3):165-170. doi:10.1016/j.prp.2005.11.004

16. Shulman S, Katzenstein H, Abramowsky C, Broecker J, Wulkan M, Shehata B. Unusual presentation of Rosai-Dorfman disease (RDD) in the bone in adolescents. Fetal Pediatr Pathol. 2011;30(6):442-447. doi:10.3109/15513815.2011.61887317. Ottaviano G, Doro D, Marioni G, et al. Extranodal Rosai-Dorfman disease: involvement of eye, nose and trachea. Acta Otolaryngol. 2006;126(6):657-660. doi:10.1080/00016480500452582

18. Sakallioglu O, Gok F, Kalman S, et al. Minimal change nephropathy in a 7-year-old boy with Rosai-Dorfman disease. J Nephrol. 2006;19(2):211-214.

19. Jabali Y, Smrcka V, Pradna J. Rosai-Dorfman disease: successful long-term results by combination chemotherapy with prednisone, 6-mercaptopurine, methotrexate, and vinblastine: a case report. Int J Surg Pathol. 2005;13(3):285-289. doi:10.1177/106689690501300311

20. Abla O, Jacobsen E, Picarsic J, et al. Consensus recommendations for the diagnosis and clinical management of Rosai-Dorfman-Destombes disease. Blood. 2018;131(26):2877-2890. doi:10.1182/blood-2018-03-839753

21. Konca C, Özkurt ZN, Deger M, Akı Z, Yagcı M. Extranodal multifocal Rosai-Dorfman disease: response to 2-chlorodeoxyadenosine treatment. Int J Hematol. 2009;89(1):58-62. doi:10.1007/s12185-008-0192-2

22. Aouba A, Terrier B, Vasiliu V, et al. Dramatic clinical efficacy of cladribine in Rosai-Dorfman disease and evolution of the cytokine profile: towards a new therapeutic approach. Haematologica. 2006;91(12 Suppl):ECR52.

23. Tasso M, Esquembre C, Blanco E, Moscardó C, Niveiro M, Payá A. Sinus histiocytosis with massive lymphadenopathy (Rosai-Dorfman disease) treated with 2-chlorodeoxyadenosine. Pediatr Blood Cancer. 2006;47(5):612-615. doi:10.1002/pbc.20668

24. Chen E, Pavlidakey P, Sami N. Rosai-Dorfman disease successfully treated with thalidomide. JAAD Case Reports. 2016;2(5):369-372. Published 2016 Sep 28. doi:10.1016/j.jdcr.2016.08.006

25. Rubinstein M, Assal A, Scherba M, et al. Lenalidomide in the treatment of Rosai Dorfman disease-a first in use report. Am J Hematol. 2016;91(2):E1. doi:10.1002/ajh.24225

26. Sandoval-Sus JD, Sandoval-Leon AC, Chapman JR, et al. Rosai-Dorfman disease of the central nervous system: report of 6 cases and review of the literature. Medicine (Baltimore). 2014;93(3):165-175. doi:10.1097/MD.0000000000000030

27. Paryani NN, Daugherty LC, O’Connor MI, Jiang L. Extranodal Rosai-Dorfman disease of the bone treated with surgery and radiotherapy. Rare Tumors. 2014;6(4):5531. Published 2014 Dec 11. doi:10.4081/rt.2014.5531

References

1. Goyal G, Ravindran A, Young JR, et al. Clinicopathological features, treatment approaches, and outcomes in Rosai-Dorfman disease. Haematologica. 2020;105(2):348-357. Published 2020 Jan 31. doi:10.3324/haematol.2019.219626

2. Bruce-Brand C, Schneider JW, Schubert P. Rosai-Dorfman disease: an overview. J Clin Pathol. 2020;73(11):697-705. doi:10.1136/jclinpath-2020-206733

3. Emile JF, Abla O, Fraitag S, et al. Revised classification of histiocytoses and neoplasms of the macrophage-dendritic cell lineages. Blood. 2016;127(22):2672-2681. doi:10.1182/blood-2016-01-690636

4. Farooq U, Chacon AH, Vincek V, Elgart G. Purely cutaneous rosai-dorfman disease with immunohistochemistry. Indian J Dermatol. 2013;58(6):447-450. doi:10.4103/0019-5154.119953

5. Ma H, Zheng Y, Zhu G, Wu J, Lu C, Lai W. Rosai-dorfman disease with massive cutaneous nodule on the shoulder and back. Ann Dermatol. 2015;27(1):71-75. doi:10.5021/ad.2015.27.1.71

6. Deen IU, Chittal A, Badro N, Jones R, Haas C. Extranodal Rosai-Dorfman Disease- a Review of Diagnostic Testing and Management. J Community Hosp Intern Med Perspect. 2022;12(2):18-22. Published 2022 Apr 12. doi:10.55729/2000-9666.1032

7. Oussama A, Jacobsen E, Picarsic J, et al. Consensus recommendations for the diagnosis and clinical management of Rosai-Dorfman-Destombes disease. Blood. 2018;131(26):2877-2890. doi: 10.1182/blood-2018-03-839753

8. Foucar E, Rosai J, Dorfman R. Sinus histiocytosis with massive lymphadenopathy (Rosai-Dorfman disease): review of the entity. Semin Diagn Pathol. 1990;7(1):19-73.

9. Gaitonde S. Multifocal, extranodal sinus histiocytosis with massive lymphadenopathy: an overview. Arch Pathol Lab Med. 2007;131(7):1111-1121. doi:10.5858/2007-131-1117-MESHWM

10. Betini N, Munger AM, Rottmann D, Haims A, Costa J, Lindskog DM. Rare presentation of Rosai-Dorfman disease in soft tissue: diagnostic findings and surgical treatment. Case Rep Surg. 2022;2022:8440836. Published 2022 Mar 30. doi:10.1155/2022/8440836

11. Menon MP, Evbuomwan MO, Rosai J, Jaffe ES, Pittaluga S. A subset of Rosai-Dorfman disease cases show increased IgG4-positive plasma cells: another red herring or a true association with IgG4-related disease? Histopathology. 2014;64(3):455-459. doi:10.1111/his.12274

12. Khosroshahi A, Wallace ZS, Crowe JL, et al. International consensus guidance statement on the management and treatment of IgG4-related disease. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2015;67(7):1688-1699. doi:10.1002/art.39132

13. Pulsoni A, Anghel G, Falcucci P, et al. Treatment of sinus histiocytosis with massive lymphadenopathy (Rosai-Dorfman disease): report of a case and literature review. Am J Hematol. 2002;69(1):67-71. doi:10.1002/ajh.10008

14. Montgomery EA, Meis JM, Firzzera G. Rosai-Dorfman disease of soft tissue. Am J Surg Pathol. 1992;16(2):122-129. doi:10.1097/00000478-199202000-00004

15. Z’Graggen WJ, Sturzenegger M, Mariani L, Keserue B, Kappeler A, Vajtai I. Isolated Rosai-Dorfman disease of intracranial meninges. Pathol Res Pract. 2006;202(3):165-170. doi:10.1016/j.prp.2005.11.004

16. Shulman S, Katzenstein H, Abramowsky C, Broecker J, Wulkan M, Shehata B. Unusual presentation of Rosai-Dorfman disease (RDD) in the bone in adolescents. Fetal Pediatr Pathol. 2011;30(6):442-447. doi:10.3109/15513815.2011.61887317. Ottaviano G, Doro D, Marioni G, et al. Extranodal Rosai-Dorfman disease: involvement of eye, nose and trachea. Acta Otolaryngol. 2006;126(6):657-660. doi:10.1080/00016480500452582

18. Sakallioglu O, Gok F, Kalman S, et al. Minimal change nephropathy in a 7-year-old boy with Rosai-Dorfman disease. J Nephrol. 2006;19(2):211-214.

19. Jabali Y, Smrcka V, Pradna J. Rosai-Dorfman disease: successful long-term results by combination chemotherapy with prednisone, 6-mercaptopurine, methotrexate, and vinblastine: a case report. Int J Surg Pathol. 2005;13(3):285-289. doi:10.1177/106689690501300311

20. Abla O, Jacobsen E, Picarsic J, et al. Consensus recommendations for the diagnosis and clinical management of Rosai-Dorfman-Destombes disease. Blood. 2018;131(26):2877-2890. doi:10.1182/blood-2018-03-839753

21. Konca C, Özkurt ZN, Deger M, Akı Z, Yagcı M. Extranodal multifocal Rosai-Dorfman disease: response to 2-chlorodeoxyadenosine treatment. Int J Hematol. 2009;89(1):58-62. doi:10.1007/s12185-008-0192-2

22. Aouba A, Terrier B, Vasiliu V, et al. Dramatic clinical efficacy of cladribine in Rosai-Dorfman disease and evolution of the cytokine profile: towards a new therapeutic approach. Haematologica. 2006;91(12 Suppl):ECR52.

23. Tasso M, Esquembre C, Blanco E, Moscardó C, Niveiro M, Payá A. Sinus histiocytosis with massive lymphadenopathy (Rosai-Dorfman disease) treated with 2-chlorodeoxyadenosine. Pediatr Blood Cancer. 2006;47(5):612-615. doi:10.1002/pbc.20668

24. Chen E, Pavlidakey P, Sami N. Rosai-Dorfman disease successfully treated with thalidomide. JAAD Case Reports. 2016;2(5):369-372. Published 2016 Sep 28. doi:10.1016/j.jdcr.2016.08.006

25. Rubinstein M, Assal A, Scherba M, et al. Lenalidomide in the treatment of Rosai Dorfman disease-a first in use report. Am J Hematol. 2016;91(2):E1. doi:10.1002/ajh.24225

26. Sandoval-Sus JD, Sandoval-Leon AC, Chapman JR, et al. Rosai-Dorfman disease of the central nervous system: report of 6 cases and review of the literature. Medicine (Baltimore). 2014;93(3):165-175. doi:10.1097/MD.0000000000000030

27. Paryani NN, Daugherty LC, O’Connor MI, Jiang L. Extranodal Rosai-Dorfman disease of the bone treated with surgery and radiotherapy. Rare Tumors. 2014;6(4):5531. Published 2014 Dec 11. doi:10.4081/rt.2014.5531

Issue
Federal Practitioner - 41(5)s
Issue
Federal Practitioner - 41(5)s
Page Number
S20
Page Number
S20
Publications
Publications
Topics
Article Type
Sections
Teambase XML
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!--$RCSfile: InCopy_agile.xsl,v $ $Revision: 1.35 $-->
<!--$RCSfile: drupal.xsl,v $ $Revision: 1.7 $-->
<root generator="drupal.xsl" gversion="1.7"> <header> <fileName>0524 AVAHO RDD</fileName> <TBEID>0C02F4C6.SIG</TBEID> <TBUniqueIdentifier>NJ_0C02F4C6</TBUniqueIdentifier> <newsOrJournal>Journal</newsOrJournal> <publisherName>Frontline Medical Communications Inc.</publisherName> <storyname/> <articleType>1</articleType> <TBLocation>Copyfitting-FED</TBLocation> <QCDate/> <firstPublished>20240428T220046</firstPublished> <LastPublished>20240428T220046</LastPublished> <pubStatus qcode="stat:"/> <embargoDate/> <killDate/> <CMSDate>20240428T220046</CMSDate> <articleSource/> <facebookInfo/> <meetingNumber/> <byline/> <bylineText>John Corbyn Cravero, MDa; Samar Ibrahim, MDa</bylineText> <bylineFull/> <bylineTitleText/> <USOrGlobal/> <wireDocType/> <newsDocType/> <journalDocType/> <linkLabel/> <pageRange/> <citation/> <quizID/> <indexIssueDate/> <itemClass qcode="ninat:text"/> <provider qcode="provider:"> <name/> <rightsInfo> <copyrightHolder> <name/> </copyrightHolder> <copyrightNotice/> </rightsInfo> </provider> <abstract/> <metaDescription>Rosai Dorfman disease (RDD) is a rare non-Langerhans cell histiocytosis first described in 1965 by Destombes and again in 1969 by Rosai and Dorfman to depict pa</metaDescription> <articlePDF/> <teaserImage/> <title>Recurrent Soft Tissue Rosai Dorfman Disease of Right Medial Thigh Lipoma With Lymph Node Involvement</title> <deck/> <eyebrow>Case In Point</eyebrow> <disclaimer/> <AuthorList/> <articleURL/> <doi/> <pubMedID/> <publishXMLStatus/> <publishXMLVersion>1</publishXMLVersion> <useEISSN>0</useEISSN> <urgency/> <pubPubdateYear>2024</pubPubdateYear> <pubPubdateMonth>May</pubPubdateMonth> <pubPubdateDay/> <pubVolume>41</pubVolume> <pubNumber>5</pubNumber> <wireChannels/> <primaryCMSID/> <CMSIDs> <CMSID>2953</CMSID> <CMSID>3639</CMSID> </CMSIDs> <keywords/> <seeAlsos/> <publications_g> <publicationData> <publicationCode>FED</publicationCode> <pubIssueName>May 2024</pubIssueName> <pubArticleType>Feature Articles | 3639</pubArticleType> <pubTopics/> <pubCategories/> <pubSections> <pubSection>Case in Point | 2953<pubSubsection/></pubSection> </pubSections> <journalTitle>Fed Pract</journalTitle> <journalFullTitle>Federal Practitioner</journalFullTitle> <copyrightStatement>Copyright 2017 Frontline Medical Communications Inc., Parsippany, NJ, USA. All rights reserved.</copyrightStatement> </publicationData> </publications_g> <publications> <term canonical="true">16</term> </publications> <sections> <term canonical="true">45</term> </sections> <topics> <term>27442</term> <term canonical="true">263</term> </topics> <links/> </header> <itemSet> <newsItem> <itemMeta> <itemRole>Main</itemRole> <itemClass>text</itemClass> <title>Recurrent Soft Tissue Rosai Dorfman Disease of Right Medial Thigh Lipoma With Lymph Node Involvement</title> <deck/> </itemMeta> <itemContent> <p class="abstract"><b>Background:</b> Rosai Dorfman disease is a rare non-Langerhans cell histiocytosis that affects lymph nodes, soft tissues, and other organs. The etiology of Rosai Dorfman disease is poorly understood, though it may involve an immunologic processes or infection. Treatment varies according to the disease presentation.<br/><br/><b>Case Presentation:</b> A male aged 56 years was evaluated for a cutaneous mass on his right medial thigh. Initially, the patient received surgical debulking with subsequent observation and no systemic therapy. However, the mass recurred, prompting another surgical removal 9 years after the initial surgery. A mass biopsy showed infiltration of plasma cells, lymphocytes, histiocytes, and occasional neutrophils with noted reactivity of S-100 protein and CD163, but not CD1a. No systemic therapy was initiated, and the patient agreed to a period of watchful waiting.<br/><br/><b>Conclusions:</b> Rosai Dorfman disease of soft tissue occurs in older adults and is often associated with soft tissue abnormalities, and more rarely, in lipomas. Multidisciplinary management of the disease and research for mutations and microenvironment is needed to better understand its clinicopathological nature and improve novel therapies.</p> <p>Rosai Dorfman disease (RDD) is a rare non-Langerhans cell histiocytosis first described in 1965 by Destombes and again in 1969 by Rosai and Dorfman to depict patients who presented with massive cervical lymphadenopathy.<sup>1</sup> The classification for histiocytosis was revised in 2016 based on new insights into the pathologic, genetic, and molecular features of RDD.<sup>2,3</sup> Now, RDD is listed under the R group, which includes familial, sporadic, classical (nodal), extranodal RDD, and other noncutaneous, non-Langerhans cell histiocytosis.<sup>3</sup> Cutaneous RDD is classified under the C group and typically presents as painless papules, plaques, or nodules without significant lymphadenopathy, or systemic symptoms usually seen in the presentation of RDD.<sup>4</sup></p> <p>The etiology of RDD is poorly understood, although an underlying infectious or genetic component is suspected.<sup>5</sup> Several pathogens—including human herpesvirus 6, parvovirus B19, Epstein-Barr virus, cytomegalovirus, <i>Brucella</i>, and <i>Klebsiella</i>—have all been investigated. A link to kinase mutations has been described in nodal and extranodal RDD; however, the molecular profile of cutaneous RDD remains unknown.<sup>2</sup> Histologic findings for RDD typically include cells that are S100 positive, CD68 positive, and CD163 positive, and CD1a and langerin (CD207) negative, thus excluding Langerhans cell histiocytosis.<sup>2</sup> The hallmark finding of RDD is emperipolesis, which results from “histiocyte-mediated phagocytosis of intact lymphocytes and other immune cells.”<sup>6</sup> Immunoglobulin G (Ig) G4-positive plasma cells are also common, but the significance of this finding is controversial. We present a case of a patient with recurrent RDD within a right medial thigh lipoma and include a literature review to explore the significance of histologic findings and various treatment options in the setting of emerging treatment and diagnostic criteria.</p> <h2>Case PRESENTATION</h2> <p>A 56-year-old African American male was evaluated in the rheumatology clinic at the Central Texas Veterans Affairs Medical Center in Temple, Texas, in 2022 for a cutaneous mass of his right medial thigh. The patient previously reported the onset of a right medial thigh mass in 2005 after he had been deployed in Iraq for about 1 year. A biopsy of the mass from 2005 showed infiltration of plasma cells, lymphocytes, and histiocytes and occasional neutrophils with noted reactivity of S100 protein and CD163, but not CD1a. The patient’s original biopsy report from March 2005 was obtained secondhand from an addendum to a Dermatology Consult note. Surgical excision of the mass was not performed until 2012 and systemic therapy was not initiated.</p> <p>In 2021, the mass recurred and gradually increased in size, prompting a second surgical removal. Pathology results from the 2021 mass showed a lipoma with areas of fibrosis with a mixed inflammatory cell infiltrate, including abundant lymphocytes, plasma cells, occasional hemosiderin-laden histiocytes, and clusters of enlarged histiocytes with foamy to pale eosinophilic, finely granular cytoplasm, and large, round, vesicular nuclei with prominent nucleoli. Emperipolesis was also present (Figure 1).<br/><br/>Special immunohistochemical staining showed most of the lymphocytes were CD20 positive B-cells with a minority of CD3 positive T-cells. Histiocytes were CD163 positive and CD68 positive with patchy reactivity for S100 protein. The plasma cells were CD138 positive. There were &gt; 125 IgG4-positive plasma cells present in a single high-powered field and the overall IgG4:IgG plasma cell ratio was &gt; 40%. Pertinent imaging included a whole-body positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) hypermetabolic activity scan of a small right femoral lymph node (9 mm) and nearby medial right femoral lymph node (13 mm) (Figure 2A). A well-defined mass in the medial aspect of the right thigh (2.5 cm x 3.2 cm x 3.9 cm) and a cutaneous/subcutaneous lesion of the anterior medial aspect of the proximal right thigh superior to the mass (2.9 cm) were also evident on imaging (Figure 2B). Each area of hypermetabolic activity had decreased in size and activity when compared to a previous PET/CT obtained 1 month earlier. There was no evidence of skeletal malignancy. A physical examination did not reveal any other soft tissue masses, palpable lymphadenopathy, or areas of skin involvement. Given the patient’s reassuring imaging findings and a lack of any new physical examination findings, no systemic therapy was initiated, and following shared decision making, the patient agreed to a period of watchful waiting. </p> <h2>Discussion</h2> <p>RDD is rare with a prevalence of 1:200,000. It has been reported that multisystem involvement occurs in 19% of cases and the prognosis of RDD correlates with the number of extranodal systems involved in the disease process.<sup>7</sup> Although sporadic RDD is usually self-limited with favorable outcomes, it is estimated that 10% of patients may die of RDD due to direct complications, infections, and amyloidosis.<sup>2,7</sup> RDD commonly affects young male children and young adults with a mean age of 20 years and has a higher incidence among African American children.<sup>2,7,8</sup> Although patients with RDD present bilateral, painless cervical lymphadenopathy in 90% of cases, about 43% of patients with RDD and associated adenopathy present with ≥ 1 site of extranodal involvement, and only 23% of patients with RDD present with isolated extranodal sites without adenopathy.<sup>9</sup> As was the case with our patient, the most common extranodal sites are found in the skin and soft tissue (16%).<sup>6,9</sup> However, histopathologic diagnosis of RDD in a lipoma is exceedingly rare. We found only 1 other case report of a patient with a history of multiple lipomas who developed a new solitary nodule that was excised and demonstrated RDD upon immunohistochemical staining.<sup>4</sup> There has been no documented association between multiple lipomas and RDD.<sup>4</sup></p> <p>Histologically, RDD is often characterized by emperipolesis (the presence of an intact cell within the cytoplasm of anther cell) and a mixed cell infiltrate that includes S100 positive histiocytes, mononuclear cells, plasma cells, and lymphocytes.<sup>10</sup> Despite these shared histologic features among the various phenotypes of RDD, other type-specific characteristics may also be present. When compared to nodal RDD, extranodal disease tends to demonstrate a lack of nodal architecture, more fibrosis and collagen deposition, fewer RDD cells, a lower degree of emperipolesis, and alternating pale (histiocyte rich) and dark (lymphocyte rich) regions with notable polygonal histiocytes arranged in a storiform pattern.<sup>5,10</sup> <br/><br/>Our patient’s histology showed an overall IgG4:IgG plasma cell ratio &gt; 40%. RDD frequently presents with IgG4-positive plasma cells, which has confounded the diagnosis of IgG4-related diseases and hyper-IgG4 disease.<sup>11</sup> Given this association, the Histiocyte Society revised classification recommends that all cases of RDD be evaluated for IgG4-positive cell infiltration.<sup>2,3</sup> Further discussion on this matter was recently provided after an expert panel published a consensus statement in 2015 detailing the evaluation of IgG4. The panel advocates for stricter terminology and criteria on this issue, advises that isolated IgG4-positive plasma cells are nonspecific, and states that the diagnosis of IgG4 disease should be based on careful judgment and correlation with the clinical scenario and supportive findings.<sup>12</sup> Therefore, while IgG4 positivity continues to be misleading in RDD cases, further evaluation for IgG4 disease is recommended. <br/><br/>Sporadic RDD is usually self-limited with a reported remission rate of up to 50%, according to a case series of 80 patients with RDD.<sup>13</sup> This leads to the recommendation of a period of watchful monitoring in patients with limited disease.<sup>13</sup> In patients with unifocal extranodal disease, surgical excision has shown positive remission results; however, local recurrence of soft tissue lesions can occur at a rate of 21.4% to 51%.<sup>14</sup> Although initiation of systemic therapy should be considered in patients with recurrent disease, there is currently no standardized regimen or medication of choice for treatment. Treatment with steroids, including prednisone 40 to 70 mg daily or dexamethasone 8 to 20 mg daily, have been shown to be effective in reducing the nodal size and symptoms, especially in cases of nonresectable multifocal extranodal disease of the central nervous system, bone, and orbital.<sup>7,15,16</sup> However, cases of orbital, tracheal, renal, or soft tissue RDD have reported failure in treatment with steroids.<sup>17,18</sup>According to the consensus recommendations for the treatment of RDD released in 2018, treatment with chemotherapy has shown mixed results. Anthracycline and alkylating agents have shown minimal efficacy, but combination regimens with vinca alkaloids, methotrexate, and 6-mercaptopurine have helped patients experience remission.<sup>19,20</sup> Due to the rarity of RDD and lack of clinical trials, the exact efficacy of these treatment regimens remains unknown and is largely limited to case reports described within the medical literature. Treatment with nucleoside analogs, such as cladribine 2.1 to 5 mg/m<sup>2</sup> or clofarabine 25 mg/m<sup>2</sup> per day for 5 days every 28 days for 6 months, have shown promising results and helped achieve complete remission in patients with refractory or recurrent RDD.<sup>7,21-23</sup> Immunomodulator therapies including TNF-α inhibitor, such as thalidomide and lenalidomide, have also shown to be effective, particularly in patients with refractory disease.<sup>24,25</sup> Low-dose thalidomide (100 mg daily) was effective for cases of refractory cutaneous RDD, though no standard dosing regimen exists. Lenalidomide has shown to be effective in patients with multiple refractory nodal or bone RDD, but is associated with more complications given that it is more myelosuppressive than thalidomide.<sup>7</sup> Radiotherapy has also been initiated in patients with refractory soft tissue disease or persistent symptoms after resection and in patients who are not candidates for surgery or systemic therapy, though no standard doses of radiotherapy have been established.<sup>7,26,27</sup></p> <h2>ConclusionS</h2> <p>RDD is a rare histiocytic disorder that presents in a wide range of age groups, different locations in the body, and with variable disease behavior. Multidisciplinary management of the disease and research for mutations and microenvironment of RDD is needed to better understand its clinicopathological nature and improve targeted novel therapies.</p> <p class="isub">Acknowledgments</p> <p> <em>The authors thank Veterans Affairs Central Texas Health Care Section Chief of Rheumatology, Swastika Jha, MD, for her guidance in this case and Bo Wang, MD, for his preparation of the pathological specimens. </em> </p> <p class="isub">Author affiliations</p> <p> <em><sup>a</sup>Baylor Scott &amp; White Medical Center – Temple, Texas</em> </p> <p class="isub">Author disclosures</p> <p> <em>The authors report no actual or potential conflicts of interest or outside sources of funding with regard to this article.</em> </p> <p class="isub">Disclaimer</p> <p> <em>The opinions expressed herein are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect those of <i>FederalPractitioner, </i>Frontline Medical Communications Inc., the US Government, or any of its agencies. This article may discuss unlabeled or investigational use of certain drugs. Please review the complete prescribing information for specific drugs or drug combinations—including indications, contraindications, warnings, and adverse effects—before administering pharmacologic therapy to patients.</em> </p> <p class="isub">Ethics and consent</p> <p> <em>Written informed consent for publication was obtained by the patient who was involved in this case report.</em> </p> <p class="isub">References</p> <p class="reference"> 1. Goyal G, Ravindran A, Young JR, et al. Clinicopathological features, treatment approaches, and outcomes in Rosai-Dorfman disease. <i>Haematologica</i>. 2020;105(2):348-357. Published 2020 Jan 31. doi:10.3324/haematol.2019.219626<br/><br/> 2. Bruce-Brand C, Schneider JW, Schubert P. Rosai-Dorfman disease: an overview. <i>J Clin Pathol</i>. 2020;73(11):697-705. doi:10.1136/jclinpath-2020-206733<br/><br/> 3. Emile JF, Abla O, Fraitag S, et al. Revised classification of histiocytoses and neoplasms of the macrophage-dendritic cell lineages. <i>Blood</i>. 2016;127(22):2672-2681. doi:10.1182/blood-2016-01-690636<br/><br/> 4. Farooq U, Chacon AH, Vincek V, Elgart G. Purely cutaneous rosai-dorfman disease with immunohistochemistry. <i>Indian J Dermatol</i>. 2013;58(6):447-450. doi:10.4103/0019-5154.119953<br/><br/> 5. Ma H, Zheng Y, Zhu G, Wu J, Lu C, Lai W. Rosai-dorfman disease with massive cutaneous nodule on the shoulder and back. <i>Ann Dermatol</i>. 2015;27(1):71-75. doi:10.5021/ad.2015.27.1.71<br/><br/> 6. Deen IU, Chittal A, Badro N, Jones R, Haas C. Extranodal Rosai-Dorfman Disease- a Review of Diagnostic Testing and Management. <i>J Community Hosp Intern Med Perspect</i>. 2022;12(2):18-22. Published 2022 Apr 12. doi:10.55729/2000-9666.1032<br/><br/> 7. Oussama A, Jacobsen E, Picarsic J, et al. Consensus recommendations for the diagnosis and clinical management of Rosai-Dorfman-Destombes disease. <i>Blood</i>. 2018;131(26):2877-2890. doi: 10.1182/blood-2018-03-839753<br/><br/> 8. Foucar E, Rosai J, Dorfman R. Sinus histiocytosis with massive lymphadenopathy (Rosai-Dorfman disease): review of the entity. <i>Semin Diagn Pathol</i>. 1990;7(1):19-73.<br/><br/> 9. Gaitonde S. Multifocal, extranodal sinus histiocytosis with massive lymphadenopathy: an overview. <i>Arch Pathol Lab Med</i>. 2007;131(7):1111-1121. doi:10.5858/2007-131-1117-MESHWM<br/><br/>10. Betini N, Munger AM, Rottmann D, Haims A, Costa J, Lindskog DM. Rare presentation of Rosai-Dorfman disease in soft tissue: diagnostic findings and surgical treatment. <i>Case Rep Surg</i>. 2022;2022:8440836. Published 2022 Mar 30. doi:10.1155/2022/8440836</p> <p class="reference">11. Menon MP, Evbuomwan MO, Rosai J, Jaffe ES, Pittaluga S. A subset of Rosai-Dorfman disease cases show increased IgG4-positive plasma cells: another red herring or a true association with IgG4-related disease? <i>Histopathology</i>. 2014;64(3):455-459. doi:10.1111/his.12274<br/><br/>12. Khosroshahi A, Wallace ZS, Crowe JL, et al. International consensus guidance statement on the management and treatment of IgG4-related disease. <i>Arthritis Rheumatol</i>. 2015;67(7):1688-1699. doi:10.1002/art.39132<br/><br/>13. Pulsoni A, Anghel G, Falcucci P, et al. Treatment of sinus histiocytosis with massive lymphadenopathy (Rosai-Dorfman disease): report of a case and literature review. <i>Am J Hematol</i>. 2002;69(1):67-71. doi:10.1002/ajh.10008<br/><br/>14. Montgomery EA, Meis JM, Firzzera G. Rosai-Dorfman disease of soft tissue. <i>Am J Surg Pathol</i>. 1992;16(2):122-129. doi:10.1097/00000478-199202000-00004<br/><br/>15. Z’Graggen WJ, Sturzenegger M, Mariani L, Keserue B, Kappeler A, Vajtai I. Isolated Rosai-Dorfman disease of intracranial meninges. <i>Pathol Res Pract</i>. 2006;202(3):165-170. doi:10.1016/j.prp.2005.11.004<br/><br/>16. Shulman S, Katzenstein H, Abramowsky C, Broecker J, Wulkan M, Shehata B. Unusual presentation of Rosai-Dorfman disease (RDD) in the bone in adolescents. <i>Fetal Pediatr Pathol</i>. 2011;30(6):442-447. doi:10.3109/15513815.2011.61887317. Ottaviano G, Doro D, Marioni G, et al. Extranodal Rosai-Dorfman disease: involvement of eye, nose and trachea. <i>Acta Otolaryngol</i>. 2006;126(6):657-660. doi:10.1080/00016480500452582<br/><br/>18. Sakallioglu O, Gok F, Kalman S, et al. Minimal change nephropathy in a 7-year-old boy with Rosai-Dorfman disease. <i>J Nephrol</i>. 2006;19(2):211-214.<br/><br/>19. Jabali Y, Smrcka V, Pradna J. Rosai-Dorfman disease: successful long-term results by combination chemotherapy with prednisone, 6-mercaptopurine, methotrexate, and vinblastine: a case report. <i>Int J Surg Pathol</i>. 2005;13(3):285-289. doi:10.1177/106689690501300311<br/><br/>20. Abla O, Jacobsen E, Picarsic J, et al. Consensus recommendations for the diagnosis and clinical management of Rosai-Dorfman-Destombes disease. <i>Blood</i>. 2018;131(26):2877-2890. doi:10.1182/blood-2018-03-839753<br/><br/>21. Konca C, Özkurt ZN, Deger M, Akı Z, Yagcı M. Extranodal multifocal Rosai-Dorfman disease: response to 2-chlorodeoxyadenosine treatment. <i>Int J Hematol</i>. 2009;89(1):58-62. doi:10.1007/s12185-008-0192-2<br/><br/>22. Aouba A, Terrier B, Vasiliu V, et al. Dramatic clinical efficacy of cladribine in Rosai-Dorfman disease and evolution of the cytokine profile: towards a new therapeutic approach. <i>Haematologica</i>. 2006;91(12 Suppl):ECR52.<br/><br/>23. Tasso M, Esquembre C, Blanco E, Moscardó C, Niveiro M, Payá A. Sinus histiocytosis with massive lymphadenopathy (Rosai-Dorfman disease) treated with 2-chlorodeoxyadenosine. <i>Pediatr Blood Cancer</i>. 2006;47(5):612-615. doi:10.1002/pbc.20668<br/><br/>24. Chen E, Pavlidakey P, Sami N. Rosai-Dorfman disease successfully treated with thalidomide. <i>JAAD Case Reports</i>. 2016;2(5):369-372. Published 2016 Sep 28. doi:10.1016/j.jdcr.2016.08.006<br/><br/>25. Rubinstein M, Assal A, Scherba M, et al. Lenalidomide in the treatment of Rosai Dorfman disease-a first in use report. <i>Am J Hematol</i>. 2016;91(2):E1. doi:10.1002/ajh.24225<br/><br/>26. Sandoval-Sus JD, Sandoval-Leon AC, Chapman JR, et al. Rosai-Dorfman disease of the central nervous system: report of 6 cases and review of the literature. <i>Medicine (Baltimore)</i>. 2014;93(3):165-175. doi:10.1097/MD.0000000000000030<br/><br/>27. Paryani NN, Daugherty LC, O’Connor MI, Jiang L. Extranodal Rosai-Dorfman disease of the bone treated with surgery and radiotherapy. <i>Rare Tumors</i>. 2014;6(4):5531. Published 2014 Dec 11. doi:10.4081/rt.2014.5531</p> </itemContent> </newsItem> </itemSet></root>
Disallow All Ads
Content Gating
No Gating (article Unlocked/Free)
Alternative CME
Disqus Comments
Default
Use ProPublica
Hide sidebar & use full width
render the right sidebar.
Conference Recap Checkbox
Not Conference Recap
Clinical Edge
Display the Slideshow in this Article
Medscape Article
Display survey writer
Reuters content
Disable Inline Native ads
WebMD Article
Article PDF Media
Image
Disable zoom
Off

EBER-Negative, Double-Hit High-Grade B-Cell Lymphoma Responding to Methotrexate Discontinuation

Article Type
Changed
Mon, 04/29/2024 - 19:24

High-grade B-cell lymphomas (HGBCLs) are aggressive lymphoproliferative disorders (LPDs) that require fluorescence in-situ hybridization to identify gene rearrangements within MYC and BCL2 and/or BCL6 oncogenes. Traditionally referred to as double-hit or triple-hit lymphomas, HGBCL is a newer entity in the 2016 updated World Health Organization classification of lymphoid neoplasms.1 More than 90% of patients with HGBCL present with advanced clinical features, such as central nervous system involvement, leukocytosis, or lactose dehydrogenase (LDH) greater than 3 times the upper limit of normal. Treatment outcomes with aggressive multiagent chemotherapy combined with anti-CD20–targeted therapy are generally worse for patients with double-hit disease, especially among frail patients with advanced age. Patients with underlying autoimmune and rheumatologic conditions, such as rheumatoid arthritis (RA), are at higher risk for developing LPDs. These include highly aggressive subtypes of non-Hodgkin lymphoma, such as HGBCL, likely due to cascading events secondary to chronic inflammation and/or immunosuppressive medications. These immunodeficiency-associated LPDs often express positivity for Epstein-Barr virus-encoded small RNA (EBER).

We present a case of double-hit HGBCL that was EBER negative with MYC and BCL6 rearrangements in an older veteran with RA managed with methotrexate. An excellent sustained response was observed for the patient’s stage IV double-hit HGBCL disease within 4 weeks of methotrexate discontinuation. To our knowledge, this is the first reported response to methotrexate discontinuation for a patient with HGBCL.

CASE PRESENTATION

A male veteran aged 81 years presented to the Raymond G. Murphy Veterans Affairs Medical Center (RGMVAMC) in Albuquerque, New Mexico, with an unintentional 25-pound weight loss over 18 months. Pertinent history included RA managed with methotrexate 15 mg weekly for 6 years and a previous remote seizure. The patients prior prostate cancer was treated with radiation at the time of diagnosis and ongoing androgen deprivation therapy. Initial workup with chest X-ray and chest computed tomography (CT) indicated loculated left pleural fluid collection with a suspected splenic tumor.

figure_1.png

A positron-emission tomography (PET)/CT was ordered given his history of prostate cancer, which showed potential splenic and sternal metastases with corresponding fludeoxyglucose F18 uptake (Figure 1A). Biopsy was not pursued due to the potential for splenic hemorrhage. Based on the patient’s RA and methotrexate use, the collection of findings was initially thought to represent a non-Hodgkin lymphoma, with knowledge that metastatic prostate cancer refractory to androgen deprivation therapy was possible. Because he was unable to undergo a splenic biopsy, an observation strategy involving repeat PET/CT every 6 months was started.

The surveillance PET/CT 6 months later conveyed worsened disease burden with increased avidity in the manubrium (Figure 1B). The patient’s case was discussed at the RGMVAMC tumor board, and the recommendation was to continue with surveillance follow-up imaging because image-guided biopsy might not definitively yield a diagnosis. Repeat PET/CT3 months later indicated continued worsening of disease (Figure 1C) with a rapidly enlarging hypermetabolic mass in the manubrium that extended anteriorly into the subcutaneous tissues and encased the bilateral anterior jugular veins. On physical examination, this sternal mass had become painful and was clearly evident. Additionally, increased avidity in multiple upper abdominal and retroperitoneal lymph nodes was observed.

figure_2.png

Interventional radiology was consulted to assist with a percutaneous fine-needle aspiration of the manubrial mass, which revealed a dense aggregate of large, atypical lymphocytes confirmed to be of B-cell origin (CD20 and PAX5 positive) (Figure 2). The atypical B cells demonstrated co-expression of BCL6, BCL2, MUM1, and MYC but were negative for CD30 and EBER by in situ hybridization. The overall morphologic and immunophenotypic findings were consistent with a large B-cell lymphoma. Fluorescent in-situ hybridization identified the presence of MYC and BCL6 gene rearrangements, and the mass was consequently best classified as a double-hit HGBCL.

Given the patient’s history of long-term methotrexate use, we thought the HGBCL may have reflected an immunodeficiency-associated LPD, although the immunophenotype was not classic because of the CD30 and EBER negativity. With the known toxicity and poor treatment outcomes of aggressive multiagent chemotherapy for patients with double-hit HGBCL—particularly in the older adult population—methotrexate was discontinued on a trial basis.

A PET/CT was completed 4 weeks after methotrexate was discontinued due to concerns about managing an HGBCL without chemotherapy or anti-CD20–directed therapy. The updated PET/CT showed significant improvement with marked reduction in avidity of his manubrial lesion (Figure 1D). Three months after methotrexate discontinuation, the patient remained in partial remission for his double-hit HGBCL, as evidenced by no findings of sternal mass on repeat examinations with continued decrease in hypermetabolic findings on PET/CT. The patient's RA symptoms rebounded, and rheumatology colleagues prescribed sulfasalazine and periodic steroid tapers to help control his inflammatory arthritis. Fourteen months after discontinuation of methotrexate, the patient died after developing pneumonia, which led to multisystemic organ failure.

 

 

DISCUSSION

HGBCL with MYC and BCL2 and/or BCL6 rearrangements is an aggressive LPD.1 A definitive diagnosis requires collection of morphologic and immunophenotypic evaluations of suspicious tissue. Approximately 60% of patients with HGBCL have translocations in MYC and BCL2, 20% have MYC and BCL6 translocations, and the remaining 20% have MYC, BCL2 and BCL6 translocations (triple-hit disease).1

The MYC and BCL gene rearrangements are thought to synergistically drive tumorigenesis, leading to accelerated lymphoma progression and a lesser response to standard multiagent chemotherapy than seen in diffuse large B-cell lymphoma.1-3 Consequently, there have been several attempts to increase treatment efficacy with intense chemotherapy regimens, namely DA-EPOCH-R (dose-adjusted etoposide, prednisone, vincristine, cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, and rituximab), or by adding targeted agents, such as ibrutinib and venetoclax to a standard R-CHOP (rituximab with reduced cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, and prednisone) backbone.4-7 Though the standard choice of therapy for fit patients harboring HGBCL remains controversial, these aggressive regimens at standard doses are typically difficult to tolerate for patients aged > 80 years.

table.png

Patients with immunosuppression are at higher risk for developing LPDs, including aggressive B-cell non-Hodgkin lymphomas such as diffuse large B-cell lymphoma. These patients are frequently classified into 2 groups: those with underlying autoimmune conditions (RA-associated LPDs), or those who have undergone solid-organ or allogeneic hematopoietic stem-cell transplants, which drives the development of posttransplant LPDs (Table).8-11 Both types of LPDs are often EBER positive, indicating some association with Epstein-Barr virus infection driven by ongoing immunosuppression, with knowledge that this finding is not absolute and is less frequent among patients with autoimmune conditions than those with posttransplant LPD.8,12

For indolent and early-stage aggressive LPDs, reduction of immunosuppression is a reasonable frontline treatment. In fact, Tokuyama and colleagues reported a previous case in which an methotrexate-associated EBER-positive early-stage diffuse large B-cell lymphoma responded well to methotrexate withdrawal.13 For advanced, aggressive LPDs associated with immunosuppression, a combination strategy of reducing immunosuppression and initiating a standard multiagent systemic therapy such as with R-CHOP is more common. Reducing immunosuppression without adding systemic anticancer therapy can certainly be considered in patients with EBER-negative LPDs; however, there is less evidence supporting this approach in the literature.

A case series of patients with EBER-positive double-hit HGBCL has been described previously, and response rates were low despite aggressive treatment.14 The current case differs from that case series in 2 ways. First, our patient did not have EBER-positive disease despite having an HGBCL associated with RA and methotrexate use. Second, our patient had a very rapid and excellent partial response simply with methotrexate discontinuation. Aggressive treatment was considered initially; however, given the patient’s age and performance status, reduction of immunosuppression alone was considered the frontline approach.

This case indicates that methotrexate withdrawal may lead to remission in patients with double-hit lymphoma, even without clear signs of Epstein-Barr virus infection being present. We are not sure why our patient with EBER-negative HGBCL responded differently to methotrexate withdrawal than the patients in the aforementioned case series with EBER-positive disease; nevertheless, a short trial of methotrexate withdrawal with repeat imaging 4 to 8 weeks after discontinuation seems reasonable for patients who are older, frail, and seemingly not fit for more aggressive treatment.

CONCLUSIONS

For our older patient with RA and biopsy-proven, stage IV EBER-negative HGBCL bearing MYC and BCL6 rearrangements (double hit), discontinuation of methotrexate led to a rapid and sustained marked response. Reducing immunosuppression should be considered for patients with LPDs associated with autoimmune conditions or immunosuppressive medications, regardless of additional multiagent systemic therapy administration. In older patients who are frail with aggressive B-cell lymphomas, a short trial of methotrexate withdrawal with quick interval imaging is a reasonable frontline option, regardless of EBER status.

References

1. Sesques P, Johnson NA. Approach to the diagnosis and treatment of high-grade B-cell lymphomas with MYC and BCL2 and/or BCL6 rearrangements. Blood. 2017;129(3):280-288. doi:10.1182/blood-2016-02-636316

2. Aukema SM, Siebert R, Schuuring E, et al. Double-hit B-cell lymphomas. Blood. 2011;117(8):2319-2331. doi:10.1182/blood-2010-09-297879

3. Scott DW, King RL, Staiger AM, et al. High-grade B-cell lymphoma with MYC and BCL2 and/or BCL6 rearrangements with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma morphology. Blood. 2018;131(18):2060-2064. doi:10.1182/blood-2017-12-820605

4. Dunleavy K, Fanale MA, Abramson JS, et al. Dose-adjusted EPOCH-R (etoposide, prednisone, vincristine, cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, and rituximab) in untreated aggressive diffuse large B-cell lymphoma with MYC rearrangement: a prospective, multicentre, single-arm phase 2 study. Lancet Haematol. 2018;5(12):e609-e617. doi:10.1016/S2352-3026(18)30177-7

5. Younes A, Sehn LH, Johnson P, et al. Randomized phase III trial of ibrutinib and rituximab plus cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, and prednisone in non-germinal center B-cell diffuse large B-cell lymphoma. J Clin Oncol. 2019;37(15):1285-1295. doi:10.1200/JCO.18.02403

6. Morschhauser F, Feugier P, Flinn IW, et al. A phase 2 study of venetoclax plus R-CHOP as first-line treatment for patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma. Blood. 2021;137(5):600-609. doi:10.1182/blood.2020006578

7. National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN). NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology (NCCN Guidelines®). B-cell lymphomas. Version 2.2024. January 18, 2024. Accessed January 24, 2024. https://www.nccn.org/professionals/physician_gls/pdf/b-cell.pdf

8. Abbas F, Kossi ME, Shaheen IS, Sharma A, Halawa A. Post-transplantation lymphoproliferative disorders: current concepts and future therapeutic approaches. World J Transplant. 2020;10(2):29-46. doi:10.5500/wjt.v10.i2.29

9. Hoshida Y, Xu JX, Fujita S, et al. Lymphoproliferative disorders in rheumatoid arthritis: clinicopathological analysis of 76 cases in relation to methotrexate medication. J Rheumatol. 2007;34(2):322-331.

10. Salloum E, Cooper DL, Howe G, et al. Spontaneous regression of lymphoproliferative disorders in patients treated with methotrexate for rheumatoid arthritis and other rheumatic diseases. J Clin Oncol. 1996;14(6):1943-1949. doi:10.1200/JCO.1996.14.6.1943

11. Nijland ML, Kersten MJ, Pals ST, Bemelman FJ, Ten Berge IJM. Epstein-Barr virus–positive posttransplant lymphoproliferative disease after solid organ transplantation: pathogenesis, clinical manifestations, diagnosis, and management. Transplantation Direct. 2015;2(1):e48. doi:10.1097/txd.0000000000000557

12. Ekström Smedby K, Vajdic CM, Falster M, et al. Autoimmune disorders and risk of non-Hodgkin lymphoma subtypes: a pooled analysis within the InterLymph Consortium. Blood. 2008;111(8):4029-4038. doi:10.1182/blood-2007-10-11997413. Tokuyama K, Okada F, Matsumoto S, et al. EBV-positive methotrexate-diffuse large B cell lymphoma in a rheumatoid arthritis patient. Jpn J Radiol. 2014;32(3):183-187. doi:10.1007/s11604-013-0280-y

14. Liu H, Xu-Monette ZY, Tang G, et al. EBV+ high-grade B cell lymphoma with MYC and BCL2 and/or BCL6 rearrangements: a multi-institutional study. Histopathology. 2022;80(3):575-588. doi:10.1111/his.14585

Article PDF
Author and Disclosure Information

Nhi Nai, DOa,b; Brittany B. Coffman, MDb; Kimberly Reiter, MDb; George Atweh, MDb,c; Vishal Vashistha, MDb,c

Correspondence:  Vishal Vashistha  (vishal.vashistha@va.gov)

aUniversity of New Mexico Hospital, Department of Internal Medicine, Albuquerque

bRaymond G. Murphy New Mexico Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Albuquerque

cUniversity of New Mexico Cancer Center, Albuquerque

Author disclosures

The authors report no actual or potential conflicts of interest or outside soruces of funding with regard to this article.

Disclaimer

The opinions expressed herein are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect those of Federal Practitioner, Frontline Medical Communications Inc., the US Government, or any of its agencies. This article may discuss unlabeled or investigational use of certain drugs. Please review the complete prescribing information for specific drugs or drug combinations—including indications, contraindications, warnings, and adverse effects—before administering pharmacologic therapy to patients.

Ethics and consent

No informed consent was obtained from the patient; patient identifiers were removed to protect the patient’s identity.

Issue
Federal Practitioner - 41(5)s
Publications
Topics
Page Number
S9
Sections
Author and Disclosure Information

Nhi Nai, DOa,b; Brittany B. Coffman, MDb; Kimberly Reiter, MDb; George Atweh, MDb,c; Vishal Vashistha, MDb,c

Correspondence:  Vishal Vashistha  (vishal.vashistha@va.gov)

aUniversity of New Mexico Hospital, Department of Internal Medicine, Albuquerque

bRaymond G. Murphy New Mexico Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Albuquerque

cUniversity of New Mexico Cancer Center, Albuquerque

Author disclosures

The authors report no actual or potential conflicts of interest or outside soruces of funding with regard to this article.

Disclaimer

The opinions expressed herein are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect those of Federal Practitioner, Frontline Medical Communications Inc., the US Government, or any of its agencies. This article may discuss unlabeled or investigational use of certain drugs. Please review the complete prescribing information for specific drugs or drug combinations—including indications, contraindications, warnings, and adverse effects—before administering pharmacologic therapy to patients.

Ethics and consent

No informed consent was obtained from the patient; patient identifiers were removed to protect the patient’s identity.

Author and Disclosure Information

Nhi Nai, DOa,b; Brittany B. Coffman, MDb; Kimberly Reiter, MDb; George Atweh, MDb,c; Vishal Vashistha, MDb,c

Correspondence:  Vishal Vashistha  (vishal.vashistha@va.gov)

aUniversity of New Mexico Hospital, Department of Internal Medicine, Albuquerque

bRaymond G. Murphy New Mexico Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Albuquerque

cUniversity of New Mexico Cancer Center, Albuquerque

Author disclosures

The authors report no actual or potential conflicts of interest or outside soruces of funding with regard to this article.

Disclaimer

The opinions expressed herein are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect those of Federal Practitioner, Frontline Medical Communications Inc., the US Government, or any of its agencies. This article may discuss unlabeled or investigational use of certain drugs. Please review the complete prescribing information for specific drugs or drug combinations—including indications, contraindications, warnings, and adverse effects—before administering pharmacologic therapy to patients.

Ethics and consent

No informed consent was obtained from the patient; patient identifiers were removed to protect the patient’s identity.

Article PDF
Article PDF

High-grade B-cell lymphomas (HGBCLs) are aggressive lymphoproliferative disorders (LPDs) that require fluorescence in-situ hybridization to identify gene rearrangements within MYC and BCL2 and/or BCL6 oncogenes. Traditionally referred to as double-hit or triple-hit lymphomas, HGBCL is a newer entity in the 2016 updated World Health Organization classification of lymphoid neoplasms.1 More than 90% of patients with HGBCL present with advanced clinical features, such as central nervous system involvement, leukocytosis, or lactose dehydrogenase (LDH) greater than 3 times the upper limit of normal. Treatment outcomes with aggressive multiagent chemotherapy combined with anti-CD20–targeted therapy are generally worse for patients with double-hit disease, especially among frail patients with advanced age. Patients with underlying autoimmune and rheumatologic conditions, such as rheumatoid arthritis (RA), are at higher risk for developing LPDs. These include highly aggressive subtypes of non-Hodgkin lymphoma, such as HGBCL, likely due to cascading events secondary to chronic inflammation and/or immunosuppressive medications. These immunodeficiency-associated LPDs often express positivity for Epstein-Barr virus-encoded small RNA (EBER).

We present a case of double-hit HGBCL that was EBER negative with MYC and BCL6 rearrangements in an older veteran with RA managed with methotrexate. An excellent sustained response was observed for the patient’s stage IV double-hit HGBCL disease within 4 weeks of methotrexate discontinuation. To our knowledge, this is the first reported response to methotrexate discontinuation for a patient with HGBCL.

CASE PRESENTATION

A male veteran aged 81 years presented to the Raymond G. Murphy Veterans Affairs Medical Center (RGMVAMC) in Albuquerque, New Mexico, with an unintentional 25-pound weight loss over 18 months. Pertinent history included RA managed with methotrexate 15 mg weekly for 6 years and a previous remote seizure. The patients prior prostate cancer was treated with radiation at the time of diagnosis and ongoing androgen deprivation therapy. Initial workup with chest X-ray and chest computed tomography (CT) indicated loculated left pleural fluid collection with a suspected splenic tumor.

figure_1.png

A positron-emission tomography (PET)/CT was ordered given his history of prostate cancer, which showed potential splenic and sternal metastases with corresponding fludeoxyglucose F18 uptake (Figure 1A). Biopsy was not pursued due to the potential for splenic hemorrhage. Based on the patient’s RA and methotrexate use, the collection of findings was initially thought to represent a non-Hodgkin lymphoma, with knowledge that metastatic prostate cancer refractory to androgen deprivation therapy was possible. Because he was unable to undergo a splenic biopsy, an observation strategy involving repeat PET/CT every 6 months was started.

The surveillance PET/CT 6 months later conveyed worsened disease burden with increased avidity in the manubrium (Figure 1B). The patient’s case was discussed at the RGMVAMC tumor board, and the recommendation was to continue with surveillance follow-up imaging because image-guided biopsy might not definitively yield a diagnosis. Repeat PET/CT3 months later indicated continued worsening of disease (Figure 1C) with a rapidly enlarging hypermetabolic mass in the manubrium that extended anteriorly into the subcutaneous tissues and encased the bilateral anterior jugular veins. On physical examination, this sternal mass had become painful and was clearly evident. Additionally, increased avidity in multiple upper abdominal and retroperitoneal lymph nodes was observed.

figure_2.png

Interventional radiology was consulted to assist with a percutaneous fine-needle aspiration of the manubrial mass, which revealed a dense aggregate of large, atypical lymphocytes confirmed to be of B-cell origin (CD20 and PAX5 positive) (Figure 2). The atypical B cells demonstrated co-expression of BCL6, BCL2, MUM1, and MYC but were negative for CD30 and EBER by in situ hybridization. The overall morphologic and immunophenotypic findings were consistent with a large B-cell lymphoma. Fluorescent in-situ hybridization identified the presence of MYC and BCL6 gene rearrangements, and the mass was consequently best classified as a double-hit HGBCL.

Given the patient’s history of long-term methotrexate use, we thought the HGBCL may have reflected an immunodeficiency-associated LPD, although the immunophenotype was not classic because of the CD30 and EBER negativity. With the known toxicity and poor treatment outcomes of aggressive multiagent chemotherapy for patients with double-hit HGBCL—particularly in the older adult population—methotrexate was discontinued on a trial basis.

A PET/CT was completed 4 weeks after methotrexate was discontinued due to concerns about managing an HGBCL without chemotherapy or anti-CD20–directed therapy. The updated PET/CT showed significant improvement with marked reduction in avidity of his manubrial lesion (Figure 1D). Three months after methotrexate discontinuation, the patient remained in partial remission for his double-hit HGBCL, as evidenced by no findings of sternal mass on repeat examinations with continued decrease in hypermetabolic findings on PET/CT. The patient's RA symptoms rebounded, and rheumatology colleagues prescribed sulfasalazine and periodic steroid tapers to help control his inflammatory arthritis. Fourteen months after discontinuation of methotrexate, the patient died after developing pneumonia, which led to multisystemic organ failure.

 

 

DISCUSSION

HGBCL with MYC and BCL2 and/or BCL6 rearrangements is an aggressive LPD.1 A definitive diagnosis requires collection of morphologic and immunophenotypic evaluations of suspicious tissue. Approximately 60% of patients with HGBCL have translocations in MYC and BCL2, 20% have MYC and BCL6 translocations, and the remaining 20% have MYC, BCL2 and BCL6 translocations (triple-hit disease).1

The MYC and BCL gene rearrangements are thought to synergistically drive tumorigenesis, leading to accelerated lymphoma progression and a lesser response to standard multiagent chemotherapy than seen in diffuse large B-cell lymphoma.1-3 Consequently, there have been several attempts to increase treatment efficacy with intense chemotherapy regimens, namely DA-EPOCH-R (dose-adjusted etoposide, prednisone, vincristine, cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, and rituximab), or by adding targeted agents, such as ibrutinib and venetoclax to a standard R-CHOP (rituximab with reduced cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, and prednisone) backbone.4-7 Though the standard choice of therapy for fit patients harboring HGBCL remains controversial, these aggressive regimens at standard doses are typically difficult to tolerate for patients aged > 80 years.

table.png

Patients with immunosuppression are at higher risk for developing LPDs, including aggressive B-cell non-Hodgkin lymphomas such as diffuse large B-cell lymphoma. These patients are frequently classified into 2 groups: those with underlying autoimmune conditions (RA-associated LPDs), or those who have undergone solid-organ or allogeneic hematopoietic stem-cell transplants, which drives the development of posttransplant LPDs (Table).8-11 Both types of LPDs are often EBER positive, indicating some association with Epstein-Barr virus infection driven by ongoing immunosuppression, with knowledge that this finding is not absolute and is less frequent among patients with autoimmune conditions than those with posttransplant LPD.8,12

For indolent and early-stage aggressive LPDs, reduction of immunosuppression is a reasonable frontline treatment. In fact, Tokuyama and colleagues reported a previous case in which an methotrexate-associated EBER-positive early-stage diffuse large B-cell lymphoma responded well to methotrexate withdrawal.13 For advanced, aggressive LPDs associated with immunosuppression, a combination strategy of reducing immunosuppression and initiating a standard multiagent systemic therapy such as with R-CHOP is more common. Reducing immunosuppression without adding systemic anticancer therapy can certainly be considered in patients with EBER-negative LPDs; however, there is less evidence supporting this approach in the literature.

A case series of patients with EBER-positive double-hit HGBCL has been described previously, and response rates were low despite aggressive treatment.14 The current case differs from that case series in 2 ways. First, our patient did not have EBER-positive disease despite having an HGBCL associated with RA and methotrexate use. Second, our patient had a very rapid and excellent partial response simply with methotrexate discontinuation. Aggressive treatment was considered initially; however, given the patient’s age and performance status, reduction of immunosuppression alone was considered the frontline approach.

This case indicates that methotrexate withdrawal may lead to remission in patients with double-hit lymphoma, even without clear signs of Epstein-Barr virus infection being present. We are not sure why our patient with EBER-negative HGBCL responded differently to methotrexate withdrawal than the patients in the aforementioned case series with EBER-positive disease; nevertheless, a short trial of methotrexate withdrawal with repeat imaging 4 to 8 weeks after discontinuation seems reasonable for patients who are older, frail, and seemingly not fit for more aggressive treatment.

CONCLUSIONS

For our older patient with RA and biopsy-proven, stage IV EBER-negative HGBCL bearing MYC and BCL6 rearrangements (double hit), discontinuation of methotrexate led to a rapid and sustained marked response. Reducing immunosuppression should be considered for patients with LPDs associated with autoimmune conditions or immunosuppressive medications, regardless of additional multiagent systemic therapy administration. In older patients who are frail with aggressive B-cell lymphomas, a short trial of methotrexate withdrawal with quick interval imaging is a reasonable frontline option, regardless of EBER status.

High-grade B-cell lymphomas (HGBCLs) are aggressive lymphoproliferative disorders (LPDs) that require fluorescence in-situ hybridization to identify gene rearrangements within MYC and BCL2 and/or BCL6 oncogenes. Traditionally referred to as double-hit or triple-hit lymphomas, HGBCL is a newer entity in the 2016 updated World Health Organization classification of lymphoid neoplasms.1 More than 90% of patients with HGBCL present with advanced clinical features, such as central nervous system involvement, leukocytosis, or lactose dehydrogenase (LDH) greater than 3 times the upper limit of normal. Treatment outcomes with aggressive multiagent chemotherapy combined with anti-CD20–targeted therapy are generally worse for patients with double-hit disease, especially among frail patients with advanced age. Patients with underlying autoimmune and rheumatologic conditions, such as rheumatoid arthritis (RA), are at higher risk for developing LPDs. These include highly aggressive subtypes of non-Hodgkin lymphoma, such as HGBCL, likely due to cascading events secondary to chronic inflammation and/or immunosuppressive medications. These immunodeficiency-associated LPDs often express positivity for Epstein-Barr virus-encoded small RNA (EBER).

We present a case of double-hit HGBCL that was EBER negative with MYC and BCL6 rearrangements in an older veteran with RA managed with methotrexate. An excellent sustained response was observed for the patient’s stage IV double-hit HGBCL disease within 4 weeks of methotrexate discontinuation. To our knowledge, this is the first reported response to methotrexate discontinuation for a patient with HGBCL.

CASE PRESENTATION

A male veteran aged 81 years presented to the Raymond G. Murphy Veterans Affairs Medical Center (RGMVAMC) in Albuquerque, New Mexico, with an unintentional 25-pound weight loss over 18 months. Pertinent history included RA managed with methotrexate 15 mg weekly for 6 years and a previous remote seizure. The patients prior prostate cancer was treated with radiation at the time of diagnosis and ongoing androgen deprivation therapy. Initial workup with chest X-ray and chest computed tomography (CT) indicated loculated left pleural fluid collection with a suspected splenic tumor.

figure_1.png

A positron-emission tomography (PET)/CT was ordered given his history of prostate cancer, which showed potential splenic and sternal metastases with corresponding fludeoxyglucose F18 uptake (Figure 1A). Biopsy was not pursued due to the potential for splenic hemorrhage. Based on the patient’s RA and methotrexate use, the collection of findings was initially thought to represent a non-Hodgkin lymphoma, with knowledge that metastatic prostate cancer refractory to androgen deprivation therapy was possible. Because he was unable to undergo a splenic biopsy, an observation strategy involving repeat PET/CT every 6 months was started.

The surveillance PET/CT 6 months later conveyed worsened disease burden with increased avidity in the manubrium (Figure 1B). The patient’s case was discussed at the RGMVAMC tumor board, and the recommendation was to continue with surveillance follow-up imaging because image-guided biopsy might not definitively yield a diagnosis. Repeat PET/CT3 months later indicated continued worsening of disease (Figure 1C) with a rapidly enlarging hypermetabolic mass in the manubrium that extended anteriorly into the subcutaneous tissues and encased the bilateral anterior jugular veins. On physical examination, this sternal mass had become painful and was clearly evident. Additionally, increased avidity in multiple upper abdominal and retroperitoneal lymph nodes was observed.

figure_2.png

Interventional radiology was consulted to assist with a percutaneous fine-needle aspiration of the manubrial mass, which revealed a dense aggregate of large, atypical lymphocytes confirmed to be of B-cell origin (CD20 and PAX5 positive) (Figure 2). The atypical B cells demonstrated co-expression of BCL6, BCL2, MUM1, and MYC but were negative for CD30 and EBER by in situ hybridization. The overall morphologic and immunophenotypic findings were consistent with a large B-cell lymphoma. Fluorescent in-situ hybridization identified the presence of MYC and BCL6 gene rearrangements, and the mass was consequently best classified as a double-hit HGBCL.

Given the patient’s history of long-term methotrexate use, we thought the HGBCL may have reflected an immunodeficiency-associated LPD, although the immunophenotype was not classic because of the CD30 and EBER negativity. With the known toxicity and poor treatment outcomes of aggressive multiagent chemotherapy for patients with double-hit HGBCL—particularly in the older adult population—methotrexate was discontinued on a trial basis.

A PET/CT was completed 4 weeks after methotrexate was discontinued due to concerns about managing an HGBCL without chemotherapy or anti-CD20–directed therapy. The updated PET/CT showed significant improvement with marked reduction in avidity of his manubrial lesion (Figure 1D). Three months after methotrexate discontinuation, the patient remained in partial remission for his double-hit HGBCL, as evidenced by no findings of sternal mass on repeat examinations with continued decrease in hypermetabolic findings on PET/CT. The patient's RA symptoms rebounded, and rheumatology colleagues prescribed sulfasalazine and periodic steroid tapers to help control his inflammatory arthritis. Fourteen months after discontinuation of methotrexate, the patient died after developing pneumonia, which led to multisystemic organ failure.

 

 

DISCUSSION

HGBCL with MYC and BCL2 and/or BCL6 rearrangements is an aggressive LPD.1 A definitive diagnosis requires collection of morphologic and immunophenotypic evaluations of suspicious tissue. Approximately 60% of patients with HGBCL have translocations in MYC and BCL2, 20% have MYC and BCL6 translocations, and the remaining 20% have MYC, BCL2 and BCL6 translocations (triple-hit disease).1

The MYC and BCL gene rearrangements are thought to synergistically drive tumorigenesis, leading to accelerated lymphoma progression and a lesser response to standard multiagent chemotherapy than seen in diffuse large B-cell lymphoma.1-3 Consequently, there have been several attempts to increase treatment efficacy with intense chemotherapy regimens, namely DA-EPOCH-R (dose-adjusted etoposide, prednisone, vincristine, cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, and rituximab), or by adding targeted agents, such as ibrutinib and venetoclax to a standard R-CHOP (rituximab with reduced cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, and prednisone) backbone.4-7 Though the standard choice of therapy for fit patients harboring HGBCL remains controversial, these aggressive regimens at standard doses are typically difficult to tolerate for patients aged > 80 years.

table.png

Patients with immunosuppression are at higher risk for developing LPDs, including aggressive B-cell non-Hodgkin lymphomas such as diffuse large B-cell lymphoma. These patients are frequently classified into 2 groups: those with underlying autoimmune conditions (RA-associated LPDs), or those who have undergone solid-organ or allogeneic hematopoietic stem-cell transplants, which drives the development of posttransplant LPDs (Table).8-11 Both types of LPDs are often EBER positive, indicating some association with Epstein-Barr virus infection driven by ongoing immunosuppression, with knowledge that this finding is not absolute and is less frequent among patients with autoimmune conditions than those with posttransplant LPD.8,12

For indolent and early-stage aggressive LPDs, reduction of immunosuppression is a reasonable frontline treatment. In fact, Tokuyama and colleagues reported a previous case in which an methotrexate-associated EBER-positive early-stage diffuse large B-cell lymphoma responded well to methotrexate withdrawal.13 For advanced, aggressive LPDs associated with immunosuppression, a combination strategy of reducing immunosuppression and initiating a standard multiagent systemic therapy such as with R-CHOP is more common. Reducing immunosuppression without adding systemic anticancer therapy can certainly be considered in patients with EBER-negative LPDs; however, there is less evidence supporting this approach in the literature.

A case series of patients with EBER-positive double-hit HGBCL has been described previously, and response rates were low despite aggressive treatment.14 The current case differs from that case series in 2 ways. First, our patient did not have EBER-positive disease despite having an HGBCL associated with RA and methotrexate use. Second, our patient had a very rapid and excellent partial response simply with methotrexate discontinuation. Aggressive treatment was considered initially; however, given the patient’s age and performance status, reduction of immunosuppression alone was considered the frontline approach.

This case indicates that methotrexate withdrawal may lead to remission in patients with double-hit lymphoma, even without clear signs of Epstein-Barr virus infection being present. We are not sure why our patient with EBER-negative HGBCL responded differently to methotrexate withdrawal than the patients in the aforementioned case series with EBER-positive disease; nevertheless, a short trial of methotrexate withdrawal with repeat imaging 4 to 8 weeks after discontinuation seems reasonable for patients who are older, frail, and seemingly not fit for more aggressive treatment.

CONCLUSIONS

For our older patient with RA and biopsy-proven, stage IV EBER-negative HGBCL bearing MYC and BCL6 rearrangements (double hit), discontinuation of methotrexate led to a rapid and sustained marked response. Reducing immunosuppression should be considered for patients with LPDs associated with autoimmune conditions or immunosuppressive medications, regardless of additional multiagent systemic therapy administration. In older patients who are frail with aggressive B-cell lymphomas, a short trial of methotrexate withdrawal with quick interval imaging is a reasonable frontline option, regardless of EBER status.

References

1. Sesques P, Johnson NA. Approach to the diagnosis and treatment of high-grade B-cell lymphomas with MYC and BCL2 and/or BCL6 rearrangements. Blood. 2017;129(3):280-288. doi:10.1182/blood-2016-02-636316

2. Aukema SM, Siebert R, Schuuring E, et al. Double-hit B-cell lymphomas. Blood. 2011;117(8):2319-2331. doi:10.1182/blood-2010-09-297879

3. Scott DW, King RL, Staiger AM, et al. High-grade B-cell lymphoma with MYC and BCL2 and/or BCL6 rearrangements with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma morphology. Blood. 2018;131(18):2060-2064. doi:10.1182/blood-2017-12-820605

4. Dunleavy K, Fanale MA, Abramson JS, et al. Dose-adjusted EPOCH-R (etoposide, prednisone, vincristine, cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, and rituximab) in untreated aggressive diffuse large B-cell lymphoma with MYC rearrangement: a prospective, multicentre, single-arm phase 2 study. Lancet Haematol. 2018;5(12):e609-e617. doi:10.1016/S2352-3026(18)30177-7

5. Younes A, Sehn LH, Johnson P, et al. Randomized phase III trial of ibrutinib and rituximab plus cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, and prednisone in non-germinal center B-cell diffuse large B-cell lymphoma. J Clin Oncol. 2019;37(15):1285-1295. doi:10.1200/JCO.18.02403

6. Morschhauser F, Feugier P, Flinn IW, et al. A phase 2 study of venetoclax plus R-CHOP as first-line treatment for patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma. Blood. 2021;137(5):600-609. doi:10.1182/blood.2020006578

7. National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN). NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology (NCCN Guidelines®). B-cell lymphomas. Version 2.2024. January 18, 2024. Accessed January 24, 2024. https://www.nccn.org/professionals/physician_gls/pdf/b-cell.pdf

8. Abbas F, Kossi ME, Shaheen IS, Sharma A, Halawa A. Post-transplantation lymphoproliferative disorders: current concepts and future therapeutic approaches. World J Transplant. 2020;10(2):29-46. doi:10.5500/wjt.v10.i2.29

9. Hoshida Y, Xu JX, Fujita S, et al. Lymphoproliferative disorders in rheumatoid arthritis: clinicopathological analysis of 76 cases in relation to methotrexate medication. J Rheumatol. 2007;34(2):322-331.

10. Salloum E, Cooper DL, Howe G, et al. Spontaneous regression of lymphoproliferative disorders in patients treated with methotrexate for rheumatoid arthritis and other rheumatic diseases. J Clin Oncol. 1996;14(6):1943-1949. doi:10.1200/JCO.1996.14.6.1943

11. Nijland ML, Kersten MJ, Pals ST, Bemelman FJ, Ten Berge IJM. Epstein-Barr virus–positive posttransplant lymphoproliferative disease after solid organ transplantation: pathogenesis, clinical manifestations, diagnosis, and management. Transplantation Direct. 2015;2(1):e48. doi:10.1097/txd.0000000000000557

12. Ekström Smedby K, Vajdic CM, Falster M, et al. Autoimmune disorders and risk of non-Hodgkin lymphoma subtypes: a pooled analysis within the InterLymph Consortium. Blood. 2008;111(8):4029-4038. doi:10.1182/blood-2007-10-11997413. Tokuyama K, Okada F, Matsumoto S, et al. EBV-positive methotrexate-diffuse large B cell lymphoma in a rheumatoid arthritis patient. Jpn J Radiol. 2014;32(3):183-187. doi:10.1007/s11604-013-0280-y

14. Liu H, Xu-Monette ZY, Tang G, et al. EBV+ high-grade B cell lymphoma with MYC and BCL2 and/or BCL6 rearrangements: a multi-institutional study. Histopathology. 2022;80(3):575-588. doi:10.1111/his.14585

References

1. Sesques P, Johnson NA. Approach to the diagnosis and treatment of high-grade B-cell lymphomas with MYC and BCL2 and/or BCL6 rearrangements. Blood. 2017;129(3):280-288. doi:10.1182/blood-2016-02-636316

2. Aukema SM, Siebert R, Schuuring E, et al. Double-hit B-cell lymphomas. Blood. 2011;117(8):2319-2331. doi:10.1182/blood-2010-09-297879

3. Scott DW, King RL, Staiger AM, et al. High-grade B-cell lymphoma with MYC and BCL2 and/or BCL6 rearrangements with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma morphology. Blood. 2018;131(18):2060-2064. doi:10.1182/blood-2017-12-820605

4. Dunleavy K, Fanale MA, Abramson JS, et al. Dose-adjusted EPOCH-R (etoposide, prednisone, vincristine, cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, and rituximab) in untreated aggressive diffuse large B-cell lymphoma with MYC rearrangement: a prospective, multicentre, single-arm phase 2 study. Lancet Haematol. 2018;5(12):e609-e617. doi:10.1016/S2352-3026(18)30177-7

5. Younes A, Sehn LH, Johnson P, et al. Randomized phase III trial of ibrutinib and rituximab plus cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, and prednisone in non-germinal center B-cell diffuse large B-cell lymphoma. J Clin Oncol. 2019;37(15):1285-1295. doi:10.1200/JCO.18.02403

6. Morschhauser F, Feugier P, Flinn IW, et al. A phase 2 study of venetoclax plus R-CHOP as first-line treatment for patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma. Blood. 2021;137(5):600-609. doi:10.1182/blood.2020006578

7. National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN). NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology (NCCN Guidelines®). B-cell lymphomas. Version 2.2024. January 18, 2024. Accessed January 24, 2024. https://www.nccn.org/professionals/physician_gls/pdf/b-cell.pdf

8. Abbas F, Kossi ME, Shaheen IS, Sharma A, Halawa A. Post-transplantation lymphoproliferative disorders: current concepts and future therapeutic approaches. World J Transplant. 2020;10(2):29-46. doi:10.5500/wjt.v10.i2.29

9. Hoshida Y, Xu JX, Fujita S, et al. Lymphoproliferative disorders in rheumatoid arthritis: clinicopathological analysis of 76 cases in relation to methotrexate medication. J Rheumatol. 2007;34(2):322-331.

10. Salloum E, Cooper DL, Howe G, et al. Spontaneous regression of lymphoproliferative disorders in patients treated with methotrexate for rheumatoid arthritis and other rheumatic diseases. J Clin Oncol. 1996;14(6):1943-1949. doi:10.1200/JCO.1996.14.6.1943

11. Nijland ML, Kersten MJ, Pals ST, Bemelman FJ, Ten Berge IJM. Epstein-Barr virus–positive posttransplant lymphoproliferative disease after solid organ transplantation: pathogenesis, clinical manifestations, diagnosis, and management. Transplantation Direct. 2015;2(1):e48. doi:10.1097/txd.0000000000000557

12. Ekström Smedby K, Vajdic CM, Falster M, et al. Autoimmune disorders and risk of non-Hodgkin lymphoma subtypes: a pooled analysis within the InterLymph Consortium. Blood. 2008;111(8):4029-4038. doi:10.1182/blood-2007-10-11997413. Tokuyama K, Okada F, Matsumoto S, et al. EBV-positive methotrexate-diffuse large B cell lymphoma in a rheumatoid arthritis patient. Jpn J Radiol. 2014;32(3):183-187. doi:10.1007/s11604-013-0280-y

14. Liu H, Xu-Monette ZY, Tang G, et al. EBV+ high-grade B cell lymphoma with MYC and BCL2 and/or BCL6 rearrangements: a multi-institutional study. Histopathology. 2022;80(3):575-588. doi:10.1111/his.14585

Issue
Federal Practitioner - 41(5)s
Issue
Federal Practitioner - 41(5)s
Page Number
S9
Page Number
S9
Publications
Publications
Topics
Article Type
Sections
Teambase XML
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!--$RCSfile: InCopy_agile.xsl,v $ $Revision: 1.35 $-->
<!--$RCSfile: drupal.xsl,v $ $Revision: 1.7 $-->
<root generator="drupal.xsl" gversion="1.7"> <header> <fileName>0524 epub AVAHO Methotrexate</fileName> <TBEID>0C02F2D9.SIG</TBEID> <TBUniqueIdentifier>NJ_0C02F2D9</TBUniqueIdentifier> <newsOrJournal>Journal</newsOrJournal> <publisherName>Frontline Medical Communications Inc.</publisherName> <storyname/> <articleType>1</articleType> <TBLocation>Copyfitting-FED</TBLocation> <QCDate/> <firstPublished>20240408T160515</firstPublished> <LastPublished>20240428T215720</LastPublished> <pubStatus qcode="stat:"/> <embargoDate/> <killDate/> <CMSDate>20240408T160514</CMSDate> <articleSource/> <facebookInfo/> <meetingNumber/> <byline/> <bylineText>Nhi Nai, DOa,b; Brittany B. Coffman, MDb; Kimberly Reiter, MDb; George Atweh, MDb,c; Vishal Vashistha, MDb,c</bylineText> <bylineFull/> <bylineTitleText/> <USOrGlobal/> <wireDocType/> <newsDocType/> <journalDocType/> <linkLabel/> <pageRange/> <citation/> <quizID/> <indexIssueDate/> <itemClass qcode="ninat:text"/> <provider qcode="provider:"> <name/> <rightsInfo> <copyrightHolder> <name/> </copyrightHolder> <copyrightNotice/> </rightsInfo> </provider> <abstract/> <metaDescription>H igh-grade B-cell lymphomas (HGBCLs) are aggressive lymphoproliferative disorders (LPDs) that require fluorescence in-situ hybridization to identify gene rearr</metaDescription> <articlePDF/> <teaserImage/> <title>EBER-Negative, Double-Hit High-Grade B-Cell Lymphoma Responding to Methotrexate Discontinuation</title> <deck/> <eyebrow>Case in Point</eyebrow> <disclaimer/> <AuthorList/> <articleURL/> <doi/> <pubMedID/> <publishXMLStatus/> <publishXMLVersion>2</publishXMLVersion> <useEISSN>0</useEISSN> <urgency/> <pubPubdateYear>2024</pubPubdateYear> <pubPubdateMonth>May</pubPubdateMonth> <pubPubdateDay/> <pubVolume>41</pubVolume> <pubNumber>5</pubNumber> <wireChannels/> <primaryCMSID/> <CMSIDs> <CMSID>2953</CMSID> <CMSID>3639</CMSID> </CMSIDs> <keywords/> <seeAlsos/> <publications_g> <publicationData> <publicationCode>FED</publicationCode> <pubIssueName>May 2024</pubIssueName> <pubArticleType>Feature Articles | 3639</pubArticleType> <pubTopics/> <pubCategories/> <pubSections> <pubSection>Case in Point | 2953<pubSubsection/></pubSection> </pubSections> <journalTitle>Fed Pract</journalTitle> <journalFullTitle>Federal Practitioner</journalFullTitle> <copyrightStatement>Copyright 2017 Frontline Medical Communications Inc., Parsippany, NJ, USA. All rights reserved.</copyrightStatement> </publicationData> </publications_g> <publications> <term canonical="true">16</term> </publications> <sections> <term>112</term> <term canonical="true">45</term> </sections> <topics> <term canonical="true">28798</term> </topics> <links/> </header> <itemSet> <newsItem> <itemMeta> <itemRole>Main</itemRole> <itemClass>text</itemClass> <title>EBER-Negative, Double-Hit High-Grade B-Cell Lymphoma Responding to Methotrexate Discontinuation</title> <deck/> </itemMeta> <itemContent> <p class="abstract"><b>Background:</b> First classified in 2016, high-grade B-cell lymphoma (HGBCL) is a lymphoid neoplasm that is typically seen as an aggressive lymphoproliferative disorder (LPD). In most patients with HGBCL, various oncogene rearrangements present with advanced clinical features, such as central nervous system involvement. Patients with underlying autoimmune and rheumatologic conditions, such as rheumatoid arthritis, are at higher risk for developing LPDs, including highly aggressive subtypes of non-Hodgkin lymphomas such as HGBCL.<br/><br/><b>Case Presentation: </b>We present a case of stage IV double-hit HGBCL with the presence of <i>MYC</i> and <i>BCL6</i> gene rearrangements in an older veteran with rheumatoid arthritis treated with methotrexate. An excellent sustained response was observed for the patient’s disease within 4 weeks of methotrexate discontinuation. To our knowledge, this is the first reported response to methotrexate discontinuation for a patient with HGBCL.<br/><br/><b>Conclusions:</b> Reducing immunosuppression should be considered in all patients with LPDs associated with autoimmune conditions or immunosuppressive medications, regardless of additional multiagent systemic therapy administration. </p> <p>H igh-grade B-cell lymphomas (HGBCLs) are aggressive lymphoproliferative disorders (LPDs) that require fluorescence in-situ hybridization to identify gene rearrangements within <i>MYC</i> and <i>BCL2</i> and/or <i>BCL6</i> oncogenes. Traditionally referred to as double-hit or triple-hit lymphomas, HGBCL is a newer entity in the 2016 updated World Health Organization classification of lymphoid neoplasms.<sup>1</sup> More than 90% of patients with HGBCL present with advanced clinical features, such as central nervous system involvement, leukocytosis, or lactose dehydrogenase (LDH) greater than 3 times the upper limit of normal. Treatment outcomes with aggressive multiagent chemotherapy combined with anti-CD20–targeted therapy are generally worse for patients with double-hit disease, especially among frail patients with advanced age. Patients with underlying autoimmune and rheumatologic conditions, such as rheumatoid arthritis (RA), are at higher risk for developing LPDs. These include highly aggressive subtypes of non-Hodgkin lymphoma, such as HGBCL, likely due to cascading events secondary to chronic inflammation and/or immunosuppressive medications. These immunodeficiency-associated LPDs often express positivity for Epstein-Barr virus-encoded small RNA (EBER).</p> <p>We present a case of double-hit HGBCL that was EBER negative with <i>MYC</i> and <i>BCL6</i> rearrangements in an older veteran with RA managed with methotrexate. An excellent sustained response was observed for the patient’s stage IV double-hit HGBCL disease within 4 weeks of methotrexate discontinuation. To our knowledge, this is the first reported response to methotrexate discontinuation for a patient with HGBCL. </p> <h2>CASE PRESENTATION</h2> <p>A male veteran aged 81 years presented to the Raymond G. Murphy Veterans Affairs Medical Center (RGMVAMC) in Albuquerque, New Mexico, with an unintentional 25-pound weight loss over 18 months. Pertinent history included RA managed with methotrexate 15 mg weekly for 6 years and a previous remote seizure. The patients prior prostate cancer was treated with radiation at the time of diagnosis and ongoing androgen deprivation therapy. Initial workup with chest X-ray and chest computed tomography (CT) indicated loculated left pleural fluid collection with a suspected splenic tumor. </p> <p>A positron-emission tomography (PET)/CT was ordered given his history of prostate cancer, which showed potential splenic and sternal metastases with corresponding fludeoxyglucose F18 uptake (Figure 1A). Biopsy was not pursued due to the potential for splenic hemorrhage. Based on the patient’s RA and methotrexate use, the collection of findings was initially thought to represent a non-Hodgkin lymphoma, with knowledge that metastatic prostate cancer refractory to androgen deprivation therapy was possible. Because he was unable to undergo a splenic biopsy, an observation strategy involving repeat PET/CT every 6 months was started.<br/><br/>The surveillance PET/CT 6 months later conveyed worsened disease burden with increased avidity in the manubrium (Figure 1B). The patient’s case was discussed at the RGMVAMC tumor board, and the recommendation was to continue with surveillance follow-up imaging because image-guided biopsy might not definitively yield a diagnosis. Repeat PET/CT3 months later indicated continued worsening of disease (Figure 1C) with a rapidly enlarging hypermetabolic mass in the manubrium that extended anteriorly into the subcutaneous tissues and encased the bilateral anterior jugular veins. On physical examination, this sternal mass had become painful and was clearly evident. Additionally, increased avidity in multiple upper abdominal and retroperitoneal lymph nodes was observed.Interventional radiology was consulted to assist with a percutaneous fine-needle aspiration of the manubrial mass, which revealed a dense aggregate of large, atypical lymphocytes confirmed to be of B-cell origin (CD20 and PAX5 positive) (Figure 2). The atypical B cells demonstrated co-expression of <i>BCL6</i>, <i>BCL2</i>, <i>MUM1</i>, and <i>MYC</i> but were negative for CD30 and EBER by in situ hybridization. The overall morphologic and immunophenotypic findings were consistent with a large B-cell lymphoma. Fluorescent in-situ hybridization identified the presence of <i>MYC</i> and <i>BCL6</i> gene rearrangements, and the mass was consequently best classified as a double-hit HGBCL. <br/><br/>Given the patient’s history of long-term methotrexate use, we thought the HGBCL may have reflected an immunodeficiency-associated LPD, although the immunophenotype was not classic because of the CD30 and EBER negativity. With the known toxicity and poor treatment outcomes of aggressive multiagent chemotherapy for patients with double-hit HGBCL—particularly in the older adult population—methotrexate was discontinued on a trial basis. <br/><br/>A PET/CT was completed 4 weeks after methotrexate was discontinued due to concerns about managing an HGBCL without chemotherapy or anti-CD20–directed therapy. The updated PET/CT showed significant improvement with marked reduction in avidity of his manubrial lesion (Figure 1D). Three months after methotrexate discontinuation, the patient remained in partial remission for his double-hit HGBCL, as evidenced by no findings of sternal mass on repeat examinations with continued decrease in hypermetabolic findings on PET/CT. The patient's RA symptoms rebounded, and rheumatology colleagues prescribed sulfasalazine and periodic steroid tapers to help control his inflammatory arthritis. Fourteen months after discontinuation of methotrexate, the patient died after developing pneumonia, which led to multisystemic organ failure.</p> <h2>DISCUSSION</h2> <p>HGBCL with <i>MYC </i>and <i>BCL2 </i>and/or <i>BCL6</i> rearrangements is an aggressive LPD.<sup>1</sup> A definitive diagnosis requires collection of morphologic and immunophenotypic evaluations of suspicious tissue. Approximately 60% of patients with HGBCL have translocations in <i>MYC</i> and <i>BCL2</i>, 20% have <i>MYC </i>and <i>BCL6</i> translocations, and the remaining 20% have <i>MYC</i>, <i>BCL2 </i>and <i>BCL6</i> translocations (triple-hit disease).<sup>1</sup> </p> <p>The <i>MYC and BCL</i> gene rearrangements are thought to synergistically drive tumorigenesis, leading to accelerated lymphoma progression and a lesser response to standard multiagent chemotherapy than seen in diffuse large B-cell lymphoma.<sup>1-3</sup> Consequently, there have been several attempts to increase treatment efficacy with intense chemotherapy regimens, namely DA-EPOCH-R (dose-adjusted etoposide, prednisone, vincristine, cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, and rituximab), or by adding targeted agents, such as ibrutinib and venetoclax to a standard R-CHOP (rituximab with reduced cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, and prednisone) backbone.<sup>4-7</sup> Though the standard choice of therapy for fit patients harboring HGBCL remains controversial, these aggressive regimens at standard doses are typically difficult to tolerate for patients aged &gt; 80 years.<br/><br/>Patients with immunosuppression are at higher risk for developing LPDs, including aggressive B-cell non-Hodgkin lymphomas such as diffuse large B-cell lymphoma. These patients are frequently classified into 2 groups: those with underlying autoimmune conditions (RA-associated LPDs), or those who have undergone solid-organ or allogeneic hematopoietic stem-cell transplants, which drives the development of posttransplant LPDs (Table).<sup>8-11</sup> Both types of LPDs are often EBER positive, indicating some association with Epstein-Barr virus infection driven by ongoing immunosuppression, with knowledge that this finding is not absolute and is less frequent among patients with autoimmune conditions than those with posttransplant LPD.<sup>8,12</sup> <br/><br/>For indolent and early-stage aggressive LPDs, reduction of immunosuppression is a reasonable frontline treatment. In fact, Tokuyama and colleagues reported a previous case in which an methotrexate-associated EBER-positive early-stage diffuse large B-cell lymphoma responded well to methotrexate withdrawal.<sup>13</sup> For advanced, aggressive LPDs associated with immunosuppression, a combination strategy of reducing immunosuppression and initiating a standard multiagent systemic therapy such as with R-CHOP is more common. Reducing immunosuppression without adding systemic anticancer therapy can certainly be considered in patients with EBER-negative LPDs; however, there is less evidence supporting this approach in the literature. <br/><br/>A case series of patients with EBER-positive double-hit HGBCL has been described previously, and response rates were low despite aggressive treatment.<sup>14</sup> The current case differs from that case series in 2 ways. First, our patient did not have EBER-positive disease despite having an HGBCL associated with RA and methotrexate use. Second, our patient had a very rapid and excellent partial response simply with methotrexate discontinuation. Aggressive treatment was considered initially; however, given the patient’s age and performance status, reduction of immunosuppression alone was considered the frontline approach. <br/><br/>This case indicates that methotrexate withdrawal may lead to remission in patients with double-hit lymphoma, even without clear signs of Epstein-Barr virus infection being present. We are not sure why our patient with EBER-negative HGBCL responded differently to methotrexate withdrawal than the patients in the aforementioned case series with EBER-positive disease; nevertheless, a short trial of methotrexate withdrawal with repeat imaging 4 to 8 weeks after discontinuation seems reasonable for patients who are older, frail, and seemingly not fit for more aggressive treatment. </p> <h2>CONCLUSIONS</h2> <p>For our older patient with RA and biopsy-proven, stage IV EBER-negative HGBCL bearing <i>MYC </i>and <i>BCL6 </i>rearrangements (double hit), discontinuation of methotrexate led to a rapid and sustained marked response. Reducing immunosuppression should be considered for patients with LPDs associated with autoimmune conditions or immunosuppressive medications, regardless of additional multiagent systemic therapy administration. In older patients who are frail with aggressive B-cell lymphomas, a short trial of methotrexate withdrawal with quick interval imaging is a reasonable frontline option, regardless of EBER status. </p> <p class="isub">Author affiliations</p> <p> <em><sup>a</sup>University of New Mexico Hospital, Department of Internal Medicine, Albuquerque<br/><br/><sup>b</sup>Raymond G. Murphy New Mexico Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Albuquerque <br/><br/><sup>c</sup>University of New Mexico Cancer Center, Albuquerque</em> </p> <p class="isub">Author disclosures</p> <p> <em>The authors report no actual or potential conflicts of interest or outside soruces of funding with regard to this article.</em> </p> <p class="isub">Disclaimer</p> <p> <em>The opinions expressed herein are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect those of <i>Federal Practitioner</i>,Frontline Medical Communications Inc., the US Government, or any of its agencies. This article may discuss unlabeled or investigational use of certain drugs. Please review the complete prescribing information for specific drugs or drug combinations—including indications, contraindications, warnings, and adverse effects—before administering pharmacologic therapy to patients.</em> </p> <p class="isub">Ethics and consent</p> <p> <em>No informed consent was obtained from the patient; patient identifiers were removed to protect the patient’s identity.</em> </p> <h2>References</h2> <p class="reference"> 1. Sesques P, Johnson NA. Approach to the diagnosis and treatment of high-grade B-cell lymphomas with <i>MYC</i> and <i>BCL2</i> and/or <i>BCL6</i> rearrangements. <i>Blood</i>. 2017;129(3):280-288. doi:10.1182/blood-2016-02-636316 <br/><br/> 2. Aukema SM, Siebert R, Schuuring E, et al. Double-hit B-cell lymphomas. <i>Blood</i>. 2011;117(8):2319-2331. doi:10.1182/blood-2010-09-297879 <br/><br/> 3. Scott DW, King RL, Staiger AM, et al. High-grade B-cell lymphoma with <i>MYC</i> and <i>BCL2</i> and/or <i>BCL6</i> rearrangements with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma morphology. <i>Blood</i>. 2018;131(18):2060-2064. doi:10.1182/blood-2017-12-820605 <br/><br/> 4. Dunleavy K, Fanale MA, Abramson JS, et al. Dose-adjusted EPOCH-R (etoposide, prednisone, vincristine, cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, and rituximab) in untreated aggressive diffuse large B-cell lymphoma with <i>MYC</i> rearrangement: a prospective, multicentre, single-arm phase 2 study. <i>Lancet Haematol</i>. 2018;5(12):e609-e617. doi:10.1016/S2352-3026(18)30177-7<br/><br/> 5. Younes A, Sehn LH, Johnson P, et al. Randomized phase III trial of ibrutinib and rituximab plus cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, and prednisone in non-germinal center B-cell diffuse large B-cell lymphoma. <i>J Clin Oncol</i>. 2019;37(15):1285-1295. doi:10.1200/JCO.18.02403<br/><br/> 6. Morschhauser F, Feugier P, Flinn IW, et al. A phase 2 study of venetoclax plus R-CHOP as first-line treatment for patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma. <i>Blood</i>. 2021;137(5):600-609. doi:10.1182/blood.2020006578<br/><br/> 7. National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN). NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology (NCCN Guidelines<sup>®</sup>). B-cell lymphomas. Version 2.2024. January 18, 2024. Accessed January 24, 2024. https://www.nccn.org/professionals/physician_gls/pdf/b-cell.pdf <br/><br/> 8. Abbas F, Kossi ME, Shaheen IS, Sharma A, Halawa A. Post-transplantation lymphoproliferative disorders: current concepts and future therapeutic approaches. <i>World J Transplant</i>. 2020;10(2):29-46. doi:10.5500/wjt.v10.i2.29 <br/><br/> 9. Hoshida Y, Xu JX, Fujita S, et al. Lymphoproliferative disorders in rheumatoid arthritis: clinicopathological analysis of 76 cases in relation to methotrexate medication. <i>J Rheumatol</i>. 2007;34(2):322-331. <br/><br/>10. Salloum E, Cooper DL, Howe G, et al. Spontaneous regression of lymphoproliferative disorders in patients treated with methotrexate for rheumatoid arthritis and other rheumatic diseases. <i>J Clin Oncol</i>. 1996;14(6):1943-1949. doi:10.1200/JCO.1996.14.6.1943 <br/><br/>11. Nijland ML, Kersten MJ, Pals ST, Bemelman FJ, Ten Berge IJM. Epstein-Barr virus–positive posttransplant lymphoproliferative disease after solid organ transplantation: pathogenesis, clinical manifestations, diagnosis, and management. <i>Transplantation Direct</i>. 2015;2(1):e48. doi:10.1097/txd.0000000000000557 <br/><br/>12. Ekström Smedby K, Vajdic CM, Falster M, et al. Autoimmune disorders and risk of non-Hodgkin lymphoma subtypes: a pooled analysis within the InterLymph Consortium. <i>Blood</i>. 2008;111(8):4029-4038. doi:10.1182/blood-2007-10-11997413. Tokuyama K, Okada F, Matsumoto S, et al. EBV-positive methotrexate-diffuse large B cell lymphoma in a rheumatoid arthritis patient. <i>Jpn J Radiol</i>. 2014;32(3):183-187. doi:10.1007/s11604-013-0280-y<br/><br/>14. Liu H, Xu-Monette ZY, Tang G, et al. EBV<sup>+</sup> high-grade B cell lymphoma with <i>MYC</i> and <i>BCL2</i> and/or <i>BCL6</i> rearrangements: a multi-institutional study. <i>Histopathology</i>. 2022;80(3):575-588. doi:10.1111/his.14585 </p> </itemContent> </newsItem> </itemSet></root>
Disallow All Ads
Content Gating
No Gating (article Unlocked/Free)
Alternative CME
Disqus Comments
Default
Use ProPublica
Hide sidebar & use full width
render the right sidebar.
Conference Recap Checkbox
Not Conference Recap
Clinical Edge
Display the Slideshow in this Article
Medscape Article
Display survey writer
Reuters content
Disable Inline Native ads
WebMD Article
Article PDF Media
Image
Disable zoom
Off

A Case of Metastatic Chromophobe Renal Cell Carcinoma Masked as Suspected Hepatic Abscesses

Article Type
Changed
Mon, 04/29/2024 - 19:50

Finding new liver lesions on imaging during a febrile illness may indicate hepatic abscesses or malignancy. These can be difficult to diagnose with imaging alone. Differentiating between infectious and neoplastic etiologies may require additional images and/or tissue samples.

Hepatic abscesses are more commonly seen with other abdominal or biliary infections while metastatic disease usually presents in patients with active cancer or on surveillance imaging. While renal cell carcinoma (RCC) is the most common malignant neoplasm of the kidney, chromophobe renal cell carcinoma (chRCC) is a rare subtype that comprises only 5% of RCC cases.1 We present a case of a patient with numerous new liver lesions and fever, initially thought to be hepatic abscesses, who was found to have metastatic chRCC.

 

CASE PRESENTATION

A 53 year-old male with a history of stage 2 chRCC and right radical nephrectomy 2 years prior presented to the emergency department following 1 week of drenching night sweats, fatigue, and subjective fevers. In addition, the patient reported gradually progressive, dull, right upper-quadrant abdominal pain. He noted no other acute medical complaints at the time of presentation. His history was notable for hyperlipidemia. His only surgery was the nephrectomy 2 years earlier. The patient reported no alcohol, tobacco, or drug use, any recent travel, or pet or animal exposure. On admission, he was afebrile with normal heart rate and was normotensive. His physical examination was remarkable for hepatomegaly with right upper-quadrant abdominal tenderness to palpation with a negative Murphy sign. There were otherwise no abnormal cardiovascular, respiratory, or skin findings.

Laboratory tests during initial evaluation were notable for hemoglobin of 10.0 g/dL, white blood cell count of 16.7×103 μL, alkaline phosphatase of 213 U/L, aspartate aminotransferase of 185 U/L, and alanine aminotransferase of 36 U/L. Screening tests for viral hepatitis A, B, and C were negative. Additional tests for HIV, rapid plasma reagin, Epstein-Barr virus, cytomegalovirus, and toxoplasma were negative. Tests for antimitochondrial, antismooth muscle, and serum antinuclear antibodies were negative.

figure_1.png

Chest X-ray did not reveal any acute cardiopulmonary process. Computed tomography with contrast of the abdomen and pelvis demonstrated numerous hypodensities within the right hepatic lobe. Right upper-quadrant ultrasound demonstrated multiple hyperechoic foci throughout the liver. confluent decreased T1 signal lesions with peripheral gadolinium hyperenhancement were evident on Gadolinium-enhanced T1-weighted magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) with fat saturation demonstrated numerous (Figure 1).

Liver biopsy and tissue cultures demonstrated normal hepatic tissue and no organism growth. Blood cultures demonstrated no growth. The patient was empirically treated with IV ceftriaxone 1 g daily and metronidazole 500 mg every 8 hours for suspected hepatic abscesses after he was admitted to the hospital.

figure_2.png

The patient’s symptoms initially improved following antibiotic treatment; however, he reported recurrence of the initial symptoms2 months later at a follow-up appointment with gastroenterology. Liver-associated enzymes also remained elevated despite 4 weeks of antibiotic treatment. Repeat gadolinium-enhanced T1 fat-saturated MRI demonstrated an interval increase in size and number of confluent hepatic lesions throughout the liver (Figure 2).

figure_4.png

figure_3.png

A repeat liver biopsy revealed metastatic chRCC (Figures 3 and 4) that was both morphologically and immunohistochemically similar to the first pathologic diagnosis made following nephrectomy. The first liver biopsy likely did not sample the metastatic lesions that were present but instead sampled the surrounding normal liver. The patient was initiated on lenvatinib and everolimus therapy with oncology, a recommended regimen per the National Comprehensive Cancer Network for patients with nonclear cell RCC.1

 

 

DISCUSSION

Chromophobe RCC is a rare form of RCC that has a recurrence-free survival of > 80% when treated in early stages.2 These neoplasms represent only 3000 to 6000 new cases of RCC annually, with an even lower incidence (6% to 7%) resulting in metastatic disease. The liver is the most common site of metastases (39%).2 Previously reported metastatic chRCC hepatic lesions have been incidentally noted on imaging with asymptomatic clinical presentations. In contrast to our patient, most documented cases report metastatic chRCC as a solitary hepatic lesion.3-7

A noteworthy genetic association with ChRCC is the Birt-Hogg-Dubé syndrome, which is an autosomal-dominant genetic disorder that results from germline mutations in the tumor suppressor folliculin gene located on chromosome 17.8 This syndrome is characterized by the development of various benign and malignant tumors, particularly chRCC. Our patient appeared to have a sporadic chRCC with the absence of other tumors and negative family history for malignancies. On his initial staging imaging, in accordance with National Comprehensive Cancer Network guidelines, our patient was identified only as having a 10-cm right renal mass and 1 benign regional lymph node with an otherwise unremarkable computed tomography of the chest, abdomen and pelvis, corresponding to stage 2 cancer.

Common causes of hepatic abscesses, the other potential diagnosis of concern for the patient, were biliary infections, portal vein ascension from abdominal sources, arterial translocation due to bacteremia, and local invasion due to suppuration of adjacent tissue.9 Incidence for hepatic abscesses increases with comorbidities such as diabetes, cirrhosis, malignancy, immunosuppression, and malnutrition.10Candida is also a common culprit when there are multiple, small abscesses, often in immunocompromised patients.11 Given the high mortality rates associated with hepatic abscesses, prompt treatment is imperative.10,12 Since the clinical signs and symptoms for hepatic abscesses are nonspecific (abdominal pain, fever, and malaise) and liver function tests can vary, the diagnosis primarily relies on imaging or tissue sampling.9

It can be difficult to distinguish abscesses from metastatic lesions based on imaging alone without microbiologic and pathologic confirmation.11,13,14 There are certain radiologic characteristics that have been found to favor abscesses over metastasis, including parenchymal enhancement, arterial rim enhancement, and perilesional hyperemia.15 However, previously described hallmark characteristics of hepatic abscesses, such as the “cluster sign” demonstrating early stages of abscess coalescence, have also been seen in some hepatic metastases.16

CONCLUSIONS

This patient highlights the presentation of a rare case of metastatic chRCC with multiple hepatic lesions. While often differentiated clinically, radiographically, or histologically, malignancy and abscess can be difficult to differentiate in a patient with fevers and leukocytosis with hepatic lesions.17 Early diagnosis of hepatic abscesses and initiation of antibiotic therapy are essential. In cases when it is challenging to characterize the hepatic lesions, repeated tissue sampling and imaging can help direct therapy. Attention should be paid to a previous history of malignancy and should raise suspicion for metastatic disease, particularly with misleading imaging studies and tissue samples.

Acknowledgments

This case was presented as a poster presentation at the Tri-Service American College of Physicians Meeting, September 7-10, 2022, San Antonio, Texas.

References

1. National Comprehensive Cancer Network. Kidney cancer (version 2.2024). Accessed February 5, 2024. https://www.nccn.org/professionals/physician_gls/pdf/kidney.pdf

2. Vera-Badillo FE, Conde E, Duran I. Chromophobe renal cell carcinoma: a review of an uncommon entity. Int J Urol. 2012;19(10):894-900.doi:10.1111/j.1442-2042.2012.03079.x

3. Lordan JT, Fawcett WJ, Karanjia ND. Solitary liver metastasis of chromophobe renal cell carcinoma 20 years after nephrectomy treated by hepatic resection. Urology. 2008;72(1):230.e5-6. doi:10.1016/j.urology.2007.11.134

4. Talarico F, Buli P, Iusco D, Sangiorgi A, Jovine E. Synchronous nephrectomy and right hepatectomy for metastatic chromophobe renal cell carcinoma: report of a case and review of the literature. Chir Ital. 2007;59(2):257-261.

5. Aslam MI, Spencer L, Garcea G, et al. A case of liver metastasis from an oncocytoma with a focal area of chromophobe renal cell carcinoma: a wolf in sheep’s clothing. Int J Surg Pathol. 2008;17(2):158-162. doi:10.1177/1066896908318741

6. Kyoda Y, Kobayashi K, Takahashi A, et al. Liver metastasis with portal vein tumor thrombosis as a late recurrence of chromophobe renal cell carcinoma. Article in Japanese. Hinyokika Kiyo. 2009;55(1):23-25.

7. Talarico F, Capizzi D, Iusco DR. Solitary liver metastasis of chromophobe renal cell carcinoma 17 years after nephrectomy. a case report and review of the literature. Ann Ital Chir. 2013;84(ePub):S2239253X13021816.

8. Garje R, Elhag D, Yasin HA, Acharya L, Vaena D, Dahmoush L. Comprehensive review of chromophobe renal cell carcinoma. Crit Rev Oncol Hematol. 2021;160:103287. doi:10.1016/j.critrevonc.2021.103287

9. Pearl R, Pancu D, Legome E. Hepatic abscess. J Emerg Med. 2005;28:337-339.doi:10.1016/j.jemermed.2004.08.024

10. Huang CJ, Pitt HA, Lipsett PA, et al. Pyogenic hepatic abscess. Changing trends over 42 years. Ann Surg. 1996;223(5):600-607; discussion 607-609.

11. Özgül E. Multiple pyogenic liver abscesses mimicking metastatic disease on computed tomography. Cureus. 2020;12(2):e7050. doi:10.7759/cureus.7050

12. Kuo SH, Lee YT, Li CR, et al. Mortality in Emergency Department Sepsis score as a prognostic indicator in patients with pyogenic liver abscess. Am J Emerg Med. 201331(6):916-921.

13. Lardière-Deguelte S, Ragot E, Amroun K, et al. Hepatic abscess: diagnosis and management. J Visc Surg. 2015;152(4):231-243. doi:10.1016/j.jviscsurg.2015.01.013

14. Halvorsen RA, Korobkin M, Foster WL, Silverman PM, Thompson WM. The variable CT appearance of hepatic abscesses. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1984;142(5):941-946. doi:10.2214/ajr.142.5.941

15. Oh JG, Choi SY, Lee MH, et al. Differentiation of hepatic abscess from metastasis on contrast-enhanced dynamic computed tomography in patients with a history of extrahepatic malignancy: emphasis on dynamic change of arterial rim enhancement. Abdom Radiol (NY). 2019;44(2):529-538.

16. Jeffrey RB Jr, Tolentino CS, Chang FC, Federle MP. CT of small pyogenic hepatic abscesses: the cluster sign. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1988;151(3):487-489. doi:10.2214/ajr.151.3.487

17. Mavilia MG, Molina M, Wu GY. The evolving nature of hepatic abscess: a review. J Clin Transl Hepatol. 2016;4(2):158-168. doi:10.14218/JCTH.2016.00004

Article PDF
Author and Disclosure Information

Jake A. Cresta, MDa; Michael A. Pavio, MDb; Jamie L. Lombardo, MDb; John G. McCarthy, MDa; Allison M. Bush, MDb

Correspondence:  Jake Cresta  (jcresta15@gmail.com)

aWalter Reed National Military Medical Center, Bethesda, Maryland

bNaval Medical Center Portsmouth, Virginia

Author disclosures
The authors report no actual or potential conflicts of interest or outside sources of funding with regard to this article.

Disclaimer
The opinions expressed herein are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect those of Federal Practitioner, Frontline Medical Communications Inc., the US Government, or any of its agencies. This article may discuss unlabeled or investigational use of certain drugs. Please review the complete prescribing information for specific drugs or drug combinations—including indications, contraindications, warnings, and adverse effects—before administering pharmacologic therapy to patients.

Ethics and consent
Written informed consent for publication was obtained by the patient who was involved in this case.

Issue
Federal Practitioner - 41(5)s
Publications
Topics
Sections
Author and Disclosure Information

Jake A. Cresta, MDa; Michael A. Pavio, MDb; Jamie L. Lombardo, MDb; John G. McCarthy, MDa; Allison M. Bush, MDb

Correspondence:  Jake Cresta  (jcresta15@gmail.com)

aWalter Reed National Military Medical Center, Bethesda, Maryland

bNaval Medical Center Portsmouth, Virginia

Author disclosures
The authors report no actual or potential conflicts of interest or outside sources of funding with regard to this article.

Disclaimer
The opinions expressed herein are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect those of Federal Practitioner, Frontline Medical Communications Inc., the US Government, or any of its agencies. This article may discuss unlabeled or investigational use of certain drugs. Please review the complete prescribing information for specific drugs or drug combinations—including indications, contraindications, warnings, and adverse effects—before administering pharmacologic therapy to patients.

Ethics and consent
Written informed consent for publication was obtained by the patient who was involved in this case.

Author and Disclosure Information

Jake A. Cresta, MDa; Michael A. Pavio, MDb; Jamie L. Lombardo, MDb; John G. McCarthy, MDa; Allison M. Bush, MDb

Correspondence:  Jake Cresta  (jcresta15@gmail.com)

aWalter Reed National Military Medical Center, Bethesda, Maryland

bNaval Medical Center Portsmouth, Virginia

Author disclosures
The authors report no actual or potential conflicts of interest or outside sources of funding with regard to this article.

Disclaimer
The opinions expressed herein are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect those of Federal Practitioner, Frontline Medical Communications Inc., the US Government, or any of its agencies. This article may discuss unlabeled or investigational use of certain drugs. Please review the complete prescribing information for specific drugs or drug combinations—including indications, contraindications, warnings, and adverse effects—before administering pharmacologic therapy to patients.

Ethics and consent
Written informed consent for publication was obtained by the patient who was involved in this case.

Article PDF
Article PDF

Finding new liver lesions on imaging during a febrile illness may indicate hepatic abscesses or malignancy. These can be difficult to diagnose with imaging alone. Differentiating between infectious and neoplastic etiologies may require additional images and/or tissue samples.

Hepatic abscesses are more commonly seen with other abdominal or biliary infections while metastatic disease usually presents in patients with active cancer or on surveillance imaging. While renal cell carcinoma (RCC) is the most common malignant neoplasm of the kidney, chromophobe renal cell carcinoma (chRCC) is a rare subtype that comprises only 5% of RCC cases.1 We present a case of a patient with numerous new liver lesions and fever, initially thought to be hepatic abscesses, who was found to have metastatic chRCC.

 

CASE PRESENTATION

A 53 year-old male with a history of stage 2 chRCC and right radical nephrectomy 2 years prior presented to the emergency department following 1 week of drenching night sweats, fatigue, and subjective fevers. In addition, the patient reported gradually progressive, dull, right upper-quadrant abdominal pain. He noted no other acute medical complaints at the time of presentation. His history was notable for hyperlipidemia. His only surgery was the nephrectomy 2 years earlier. The patient reported no alcohol, tobacco, or drug use, any recent travel, or pet or animal exposure. On admission, he was afebrile with normal heart rate and was normotensive. His physical examination was remarkable for hepatomegaly with right upper-quadrant abdominal tenderness to palpation with a negative Murphy sign. There were otherwise no abnormal cardiovascular, respiratory, or skin findings.

Laboratory tests during initial evaluation were notable for hemoglobin of 10.0 g/dL, white blood cell count of 16.7×103 μL, alkaline phosphatase of 213 U/L, aspartate aminotransferase of 185 U/L, and alanine aminotransferase of 36 U/L. Screening tests for viral hepatitis A, B, and C were negative. Additional tests for HIV, rapid plasma reagin, Epstein-Barr virus, cytomegalovirus, and toxoplasma were negative. Tests for antimitochondrial, antismooth muscle, and serum antinuclear antibodies were negative.

figure_1.png

Chest X-ray did not reveal any acute cardiopulmonary process. Computed tomography with contrast of the abdomen and pelvis demonstrated numerous hypodensities within the right hepatic lobe. Right upper-quadrant ultrasound demonstrated multiple hyperechoic foci throughout the liver. confluent decreased T1 signal lesions with peripheral gadolinium hyperenhancement were evident on Gadolinium-enhanced T1-weighted magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) with fat saturation demonstrated numerous (Figure 1).

Liver biopsy and tissue cultures demonstrated normal hepatic tissue and no organism growth. Blood cultures demonstrated no growth. The patient was empirically treated with IV ceftriaxone 1 g daily and metronidazole 500 mg every 8 hours for suspected hepatic abscesses after he was admitted to the hospital.

figure_2.png

The patient’s symptoms initially improved following antibiotic treatment; however, he reported recurrence of the initial symptoms2 months later at a follow-up appointment with gastroenterology. Liver-associated enzymes also remained elevated despite 4 weeks of antibiotic treatment. Repeat gadolinium-enhanced T1 fat-saturated MRI demonstrated an interval increase in size and number of confluent hepatic lesions throughout the liver (Figure 2).

figure_4.png

figure_3.png

A repeat liver biopsy revealed metastatic chRCC (Figures 3 and 4) that was both morphologically and immunohistochemically similar to the first pathologic diagnosis made following nephrectomy. The first liver biopsy likely did not sample the metastatic lesions that were present but instead sampled the surrounding normal liver. The patient was initiated on lenvatinib and everolimus therapy with oncology, a recommended regimen per the National Comprehensive Cancer Network for patients with nonclear cell RCC.1

 

 

DISCUSSION

Chromophobe RCC is a rare form of RCC that has a recurrence-free survival of > 80% when treated in early stages.2 These neoplasms represent only 3000 to 6000 new cases of RCC annually, with an even lower incidence (6% to 7%) resulting in metastatic disease. The liver is the most common site of metastases (39%).2 Previously reported metastatic chRCC hepatic lesions have been incidentally noted on imaging with asymptomatic clinical presentations. In contrast to our patient, most documented cases report metastatic chRCC as a solitary hepatic lesion.3-7

A noteworthy genetic association with ChRCC is the Birt-Hogg-Dubé syndrome, which is an autosomal-dominant genetic disorder that results from germline mutations in the tumor suppressor folliculin gene located on chromosome 17.8 This syndrome is characterized by the development of various benign and malignant tumors, particularly chRCC. Our patient appeared to have a sporadic chRCC with the absence of other tumors and negative family history for malignancies. On his initial staging imaging, in accordance with National Comprehensive Cancer Network guidelines, our patient was identified only as having a 10-cm right renal mass and 1 benign regional lymph node with an otherwise unremarkable computed tomography of the chest, abdomen and pelvis, corresponding to stage 2 cancer.

Common causes of hepatic abscesses, the other potential diagnosis of concern for the patient, were biliary infections, portal vein ascension from abdominal sources, arterial translocation due to bacteremia, and local invasion due to suppuration of adjacent tissue.9 Incidence for hepatic abscesses increases with comorbidities such as diabetes, cirrhosis, malignancy, immunosuppression, and malnutrition.10Candida is also a common culprit when there are multiple, small abscesses, often in immunocompromised patients.11 Given the high mortality rates associated with hepatic abscesses, prompt treatment is imperative.10,12 Since the clinical signs and symptoms for hepatic abscesses are nonspecific (abdominal pain, fever, and malaise) and liver function tests can vary, the diagnosis primarily relies on imaging or tissue sampling.9

It can be difficult to distinguish abscesses from metastatic lesions based on imaging alone without microbiologic and pathologic confirmation.11,13,14 There are certain radiologic characteristics that have been found to favor abscesses over metastasis, including parenchymal enhancement, arterial rim enhancement, and perilesional hyperemia.15 However, previously described hallmark characteristics of hepatic abscesses, such as the “cluster sign” demonstrating early stages of abscess coalescence, have also been seen in some hepatic metastases.16

CONCLUSIONS

This patient highlights the presentation of a rare case of metastatic chRCC with multiple hepatic lesions. While often differentiated clinically, radiographically, or histologically, malignancy and abscess can be difficult to differentiate in a patient with fevers and leukocytosis with hepatic lesions.17 Early diagnosis of hepatic abscesses and initiation of antibiotic therapy are essential. In cases when it is challenging to characterize the hepatic lesions, repeated tissue sampling and imaging can help direct therapy. Attention should be paid to a previous history of malignancy and should raise suspicion for metastatic disease, particularly with misleading imaging studies and tissue samples.

Acknowledgments

This case was presented as a poster presentation at the Tri-Service American College of Physicians Meeting, September 7-10, 2022, San Antonio, Texas.

Finding new liver lesions on imaging during a febrile illness may indicate hepatic abscesses or malignancy. These can be difficult to diagnose with imaging alone. Differentiating between infectious and neoplastic etiologies may require additional images and/or tissue samples.

Hepatic abscesses are more commonly seen with other abdominal or biliary infections while metastatic disease usually presents in patients with active cancer or on surveillance imaging. While renal cell carcinoma (RCC) is the most common malignant neoplasm of the kidney, chromophobe renal cell carcinoma (chRCC) is a rare subtype that comprises only 5% of RCC cases.1 We present a case of a patient with numerous new liver lesions and fever, initially thought to be hepatic abscesses, who was found to have metastatic chRCC.

 

CASE PRESENTATION

A 53 year-old male with a history of stage 2 chRCC and right radical nephrectomy 2 years prior presented to the emergency department following 1 week of drenching night sweats, fatigue, and subjective fevers. In addition, the patient reported gradually progressive, dull, right upper-quadrant abdominal pain. He noted no other acute medical complaints at the time of presentation. His history was notable for hyperlipidemia. His only surgery was the nephrectomy 2 years earlier. The patient reported no alcohol, tobacco, or drug use, any recent travel, or pet or animal exposure. On admission, he was afebrile with normal heart rate and was normotensive. His physical examination was remarkable for hepatomegaly with right upper-quadrant abdominal tenderness to palpation with a negative Murphy sign. There were otherwise no abnormal cardiovascular, respiratory, or skin findings.

Laboratory tests during initial evaluation were notable for hemoglobin of 10.0 g/dL, white blood cell count of 16.7×103 μL, alkaline phosphatase of 213 U/L, aspartate aminotransferase of 185 U/L, and alanine aminotransferase of 36 U/L. Screening tests for viral hepatitis A, B, and C were negative. Additional tests for HIV, rapid plasma reagin, Epstein-Barr virus, cytomegalovirus, and toxoplasma were negative. Tests for antimitochondrial, antismooth muscle, and serum antinuclear antibodies were negative.

figure_1.png

Chest X-ray did not reveal any acute cardiopulmonary process. Computed tomography with contrast of the abdomen and pelvis demonstrated numerous hypodensities within the right hepatic lobe. Right upper-quadrant ultrasound demonstrated multiple hyperechoic foci throughout the liver. confluent decreased T1 signal lesions with peripheral gadolinium hyperenhancement were evident on Gadolinium-enhanced T1-weighted magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) with fat saturation demonstrated numerous (Figure 1).

Liver biopsy and tissue cultures demonstrated normal hepatic tissue and no organism growth. Blood cultures demonstrated no growth. The patient was empirically treated with IV ceftriaxone 1 g daily and metronidazole 500 mg every 8 hours for suspected hepatic abscesses after he was admitted to the hospital.

figure_2.png

The patient’s symptoms initially improved following antibiotic treatment; however, he reported recurrence of the initial symptoms2 months later at a follow-up appointment with gastroenterology. Liver-associated enzymes also remained elevated despite 4 weeks of antibiotic treatment. Repeat gadolinium-enhanced T1 fat-saturated MRI demonstrated an interval increase in size and number of confluent hepatic lesions throughout the liver (Figure 2).

figure_4.png

figure_3.png

A repeat liver biopsy revealed metastatic chRCC (Figures 3 and 4) that was both morphologically and immunohistochemically similar to the first pathologic diagnosis made following nephrectomy. The first liver biopsy likely did not sample the metastatic lesions that were present but instead sampled the surrounding normal liver. The patient was initiated on lenvatinib and everolimus therapy with oncology, a recommended regimen per the National Comprehensive Cancer Network for patients with nonclear cell RCC.1

 

 

DISCUSSION

Chromophobe RCC is a rare form of RCC that has a recurrence-free survival of > 80% when treated in early stages.2 These neoplasms represent only 3000 to 6000 new cases of RCC annually, with an even lower incidence (6% to 7%) resulting in metastatic disease. The liver is the most common site of metastases (39%).2 Previously reported metastatic chRCC hepatic lesions have been incidentally noted on imaging with asymptomatic clinical presentations. In contrast to our patient, most documented cases report metastatic chRCC as a solitary hepatic lesion.3-7

A noteworthy genetic association with ChRCC is the Birt-Hogg-Dubé syndrome, which is an autosomal-dominant genetic disorder that results from germline mutations in the tumor suppressor folliculin gene located on chromosome 17.8 This syndrome is characterized by the development of various benign and malignant tumors, particularly chRCC. Our patient appeared to have a sporadic chRCC with the absence of other tumors and negative family history for malignancies. On his initial staging imaging, in accordance with National Comprehensive Cancer Network guidelines, our patient was identified only as having a 10-cm right renal mass and 1 benign regional lymph node with an otherwise unremarkable computed tomography of the chest, abdomen and pelvis, corresponding to stage 2 cancer.

Common causes of hepatic abscesses, the other potential diagnosis of concern for the patient, were biliary infections, portal vein ascension from abdominal sources, arterial translocation due to bacteremia, and local invasion due to suppuration of adjacent tissue.9 Incidence for hepatic abscesses increases with comorbidities such as diabetes, cirrhosis, malignancy, immunosuppression, and malnutrition.10Candida is also a common culprit when there are multiple, small abscesses, often in immunocompromised patients.11 Given the high mortality rates associated with hepatic abscesses, prompt treatment is imperative.10,12 Since the clinical signs and symptoms for hepatic abscesses are nonspecific (abdominal pain, fever, and malaise) and liver function tests can vary, the diagnosis primarily relies on imaging or tissue sampling.9

It can be difficult to distinguish abscesses from metastatic lesions based on imaging alone without microbiologic and pathologic confirmation.11,13,14 There are certain radiologic characteristics that have been found to favor abscesses over metastasis, including parenchymal enhancement, arterial rim enhancement, and perilesional hyperemia.15 However, previously described hallmark characteristics of hepatic abscesses, such as the “cluster sign” demonstrating early stages of abscess coalescence, have also been seen in some hepatic metastases.16

CONCLUSIONS

This patient highlights the presentation of a rare case of metastatic chRCC with multiple hepatic lesions. While often differentiated clinically, radiographically, or histologically, malignancy and abscess can be difficult to differentiate in a patient with fevers and leukocytosis with hepatic lesions.17 Early diagnosis of hepatic abscesses and initiation of antibiotic therapy are essential. In cases when it is challenging to characterize the hepatic lesions, repeated tissue sampling and imaging can help direct therapy. Attention should be paid to a previous history of malignancy and should raise suspicion for metastatic disease, particularly with misleading imaging studies and tissue samples.

Acknowledgments

This case was presented as a poster presentation at the Tri-Service American College of Physicians Meeting, September 7-10, 2022, San Antonio, Texas.

References

1. National Comprehensive Cancer Network. Kidney cancer (version 2.2024). Accessed February 5, 2024. https://www.nccn.org/professionals/physician_gls/pdf/kidney.pdf

2. Vera-Badillo FE, Conde E, Duran I. Chromophobe renal cell carcinoma: a review of an uncommon entity. Int J Urol. 2012;19(10):894-900.doi:10.1111/j.1442-2042.2012.03079.x

3. Lordan JT, Fawcett WJ, Karanjia ND. Solitary liver metastasis of chromophobe renal cell carcinoma 20 years after nephrectomy treated by hepatic resection. Urology. 2008;72(1):230.e5-6. doi:10.1016/j.urology.2007.11.134

4. Talarico F, Buli P, Iusco D, Sangiorgi A, Jovine E. Synchronous nephrectomy and right hepatectomy for metastatic chromophobe renal cell carcinoma: report of a case and review of the literature. Chir Ital. 2007;59(2):257-261.

5. Aslam MI, Spencer L, Garcea G, et al. A case of liver metastasis from an oncocytoma with a focal area of chromophobe renal cell carcinoma: a wolf in sheep’s clothing. Int J Surg Pathol. 2008;17(2):158-162. doi:10.1177/1066896908318741

6. Kyoda Y, Kobayashi K, Takahashi A, et al. Liver metastasis with portal vein tumor thrombosis as a late recurrence of chromophobe renal cell carcinoma. Article in Japanese. Hinyokika Kiyo. 2009;55(1):23-25.

7. Talarico F, Capizzi D, Iusco DR. Solitary liver metastasis of chromophobe renal cell carcinoma 17 years after nephrectomy. a case report and review of the literature. Ann Ital Chir. 2013;84(ePub):S2239253X13021816.

8. Garje R, Elhag D, Yasin HA, Acharya L, Vaena D, Dahmoush L. Comprehensive review of chromophobe renal cell carcinoma. Crit Rev Oncol Hematol. 2021;160:103287. doi:10.1016/j.critrevonc.2021.103287

9. Pearl R, Pancu D, Legome E. Hepatic abscess. J Emerg Med. 2005;28:337-339.doi:10.1016/j.jemermed.2004.08.024

10. Huang CJ, Pitt HA, Lipsett PA, et al. Pyogenic hepatic abscess. Changing trends over 42 years. Ann Surg. 1996;223(5):600-607; discussion 607-609.

11. Özgül E. Multiple pyogenic liver abscesses mimicking metastatic disease on computed tomography. Cureus. 2020;12(2):e7050. doi:10.7759/cureus.7050

12. Kuo SH, Lee YT, Li CR, et al. Mortality in Emergency Department Sepsis score as a prognostic indicator in patients with pyogenic liver abscess. Am J Emerg Med. 201331(6):916-921.

13. Lardière-Deguelte S, Ragot E, Amroun K, et al. Hepatic abscess: diagnosis and management. J Visc Surg. 2015;152(4):231-243. doi:10.1016/j.jviscsurg.2015.01.013

14. Halvorsen RA, Korobkin M, Foster WL, Silverman PM, Thompson WM. The variable CT appearance of hepatic abscesses. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1984;142(5):941-946. doi:10.2214/ajr.142.5.941

15. Oh JG, Choi SY, Lee MH, et al. Differentiation of hepatic abscess from metastasis on contrast-enhanced dynamic computed tomography in patients with a history of extrahepatic malignancy: emphasis on dynamic change of arterial rim enhancement. Abdom Radiol (NY). 2019;44(2):529-538.

16. Jeffrey RB Jr, Tolentino CS, Chang FC, Federle MP. CT of small pyogenic hepatic abscesses: the cluster sign. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1988;151(3):487-489. doi:10.2214/ajr.151.3.487

17. Mavilia MG, Molina M, Wu GY. The evolving nature of hepatic abscess: a review. J Clin Transl Hepatol. 2016;4(2):158-168. doi:10.14218/JCTH.2016.00004

References

1. National Comprehensive Cancer Network. Kidney cancer (version 2.2024). Accessed February 5, 2024. https://www.nccn.org/professionals/physician_gls/pdf/kidney.pdf

2. Vera-Badillo FE, Conde E, Duran I. Chromophobe renal cell carcinoma: a review of an uncommon entity. Int J Urol. 2012;19(10):894-900.doi:10.1111/j.1442-2042.2012.03079.x

3. Lordan JT, Fawcett WJ, Karanjia ND. Solitary liver metastasis of chromophobe renal cell carcinoma 20 years after nephrectomy treated by hepatic resection. Urology. 2008;72(1):230.e5-6. doi:10.1016/j.urology.2007.11.134

4. Talarico F, Buli P, Iusco D, Sangiorgi A, Jovine E. Synchronous nephrectomy and right hepatectomy for metastatic chromophobe renal cell carcinoma: report of a case and review of the literature. Chir Ital. 2007;59(2):257-261.

5. Aslam MI, Spencer L, Garcea G, et al. A case of liver metastasis from an oncocytoma with a focal area of chromophobe renal cell carcinoma: a wolf in sheep’s clothing. Int J Surg Pathol. 2008;17(2):158-162. doi:10.1177/1066896908318741

6. Kyoda Y, Kobayashi K, Takahashi A, et al. Liver metastasis with portal vein tumor thrombosis as a late recurrence of chromophobe renal cell carcinoma. Article in Japanese. Hinyokika Kiyo. 2009;55(1):23-25.

7. Talarico F, Capizzi D, Iusco DR. Solitary liver metastasis of chromophobe renal cell carcinoma 17 years after nephrectomy. a case report and review of the literature. Ann Ital Chir. 2013;84(ePub):S2239253X13021816.

8. Garje R, Elhag D, Yasin HA, Acharya L, Vaena D, Dahmoush L. Comprehensive review of chromophobe renal cell carcinoma. Crit Rev Oncol Hematol. 2021;160:103287. doi:10.1016/j.critrevonc.2021.103287

9. Pearl R, Pancu D, Legome E. Hepatic abscess. J Emerg Med. 2005;28:337-339.doi:10.1016/j.jemermed.2004.08.024

10. Huang CJ, Pitt HA, Lipsett PA, et al. Pyogenic hepatic abscess. Changing trends over 42 years. Ann Surg. 1996;223(5):600-607; discussion 607-609.

11. Özgül E. Multiple pyogenic liver abscesses mimicking metastatic disease on computed tomography. Cureus. 2020;12(2):e7050. doi:10.7759/cureus.7050

12. Kuo SH, Lee YT, Li CR, et al. Mortality in Emergency Department Sepsis score as a prognostic indicator in patients with pyogenic liver abscess. Am J Emerg Med. 201331(6):916-921.

13. Lardière-Deguelte S, Ragot E, Amroun K, et al. Hepatic abscess: diagnosis and management. J Visc Surg. 2015;152(4):231-243. doi:10.1016/j.jviscsurg.2015.01.013

14. Halvorsen RA, Korobkin M, Foster WL, Silverman PM, Thompson WM. The variable CT appearance of hepatic abscesses. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1984;142(5):941-946. doi:10.2214/ajr.142.5.941

15. Oh JG, Choi SY, Lee MH, et al. Differentiation of hepatic abscess from metastasis on contrast-enhanced dynamic computed tomography in patients with a history of extrahepatic malignancy: emphasis on dynamic change of arterial rim enhancement. Abdom Radiol (NY). 2019;44(2):529-538.

16. Jeffrey RB Jr, Tolentino CS, Chang FC, Federle MP. CT of small pyogenic hepatic abscesses: the cluster sign. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1988;151(3):487-489. doi:10.2214/ajr.151.3.487

17. Mavilia MG, Molina M, Wu GY. The evolving nature of hepatic abscess: a review. J Clin Transl Hepatol. 2016;4(2):158-168. doi:10.14218/JCTH.2016.00004

Issue
Federal Practitioner - 41(5)s
Issue
Federal Practitioner - 41(5)s
Publications
Publications
Topics
Article Type
Sections
Teambase XML
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!--$RCSfile: InCopy_agile.xsl,v $ $Revision: 1.35 $-->
<!--$RCSfile: drupal.xsl,v $ $Revision: 1.7 $-->
<root generator="drupal.xsl" gversion="1.7"> <header> <fileName>0524 AVAHO RCC</fileName> <TBEID>0C02F265.SIG</TBEID> <TBUniqueIdentifier>NJ_0C02F265</TBUniqueIdentifier> <newsOrJournal>Journal</newsOrJournal> <publisherName>Frontline Medical Communications Inc.</publisherName> <storyname/> <articleType>1</articleType> <TBLocation>Copyfitting-FED</TBLocation> <QCDate/> <firstPublished>20240308T112914</firstPublished> <LastPublished>20240428T220406</LastPublished> <pubStatus qcode="stat:"/> <embargoDate/> <killDate/> <CMSDate>20240308T112914</CMSDate> <articleSource/> <facebookInfo/> <meetingNumber/> <byline/> <bylineText>Jake A. Cresta, MDa; Michael A. Pavio, MDb; Jamie L. Lombardo, MDb; John G. McCarthy, MDa; Allison M. Bush, MDb</bylineText> <bylineFull/> <bylineTitleText/> <USOrGlobal/> <wireDocType/> <newsDocType/> <journalDocType/> <linkLabel/> <pageRange/> <citation/> <quizID/> <indexIssueDate/> <itemClass qcode="ninat:text"/> <provider qcode="provider:"> <name/> <rightsInfo> <copyrightHolder> <name/> </copyrightHolder> <copyrightNotice/> </rightsInfo> </provider> <abstract/> <metaDescription>Finding new liver lesions on imaging during a febrile illness may indicate hepatic abscesses or malignancy. These can be difficult to diagnose with imaging alon</metaDescription> <articlePDF/> <teaserImage/> <title>A Case of Metastatic Chromophobe Renal Cell Carcinoma Masked as Suspected Hepatic Abscesses</title> <deck/> <eyebrow>Case in Point</eyebrow> <disclaimer/> <AuthorList/> <articleURL/> <doi/> <pubMedID/> <publishXMLStatus/> <publishXMLVersion>2</publishXMLVersion> <useEISSN>0</useEISSN> <urgency/> <pubPubdateYear>2024</pubPubdateYear> <pubPubdateMonth>May</pubPubdateMonth> <pubPubdateDay/> <pubVolume>41</pubVolume> <pubNumber>5</pubNumber> <wireChannels/> <primaryCMSID/> <CMSIDs> <CMSID>2953</CMSID> <CMSID>3639</CMSID> </CMSIDs> <keywords/> <seeAlsos/> <publications_g> <publicationData> <publicationCode>FED</publicationCode> <pubIssueName>May 2024</pubIssueName> <pubArticleType>Feature Articles | 3639</pubArticleType> <pubTopics/> <pubCategories/> <pubSections> <pubSection>Case in Point | 2953<pubSubsection/></pubSection> </pubSections> <journalTitle>Fed Pract</journalTitle> <journalFullTitle>Federal Practitioner</journalFullTitle> <copyrightStatement>Copyright 2017 Frontline Medical Communications Inc., Parsippany, NJ, USA. All rights reserved.</copyrightStatement> </publicationData> </publications_g> <publications> <term canonical="true">16</term> </publications> <sections> <term canonical="true">45</term> </sections> <topics> <term canonical="true">263</term> </topics> <links/> </header> <itemSet> <newsItem> <itemMeta> <itemRole>Main</itemRole> <itemClass>text</itemClass> <title>A Case of Metastatic Chromophobe Renal Cell Carcinoma Masked as Suspected Hepatic Abscesses</title> <deck/> </itemMeta> <itemContent> <p class="abstract"><b>Background: </b>Characterizing multiple hepatic lesions on cross-sectional imaging, particularly differentiating abscesses from metastatic lesions, can be challenging. <br/><br/><b>Case Presentation:</b> A male aged 53 years with a history of chromophobe renal cell carcinoma presented with fevers and abdominal pain and was found to have multiple hepatic lesions concerning for hepatic abscesses. The lesions initially evaded diagnosis on imaging, laboratory tests, and biopsy, but ultimately were determined to be a rare case of metastatic chromophobe renal cell carcinoma of the liver. <br/><br/><b>Conclusions:</b> The finding of multiple new liver lesions on imaging during a febrile illness is concerning for hepatic abscess or malignancy, which can be difficult to diagnose with imaging alone. Differentiation between infectious and neoplastic etiologies may require additional imaging and/or tissue sampling. </p> <p>Finding new liver lesions on imaging during a febrile illness may indicate hepatic abscesses or malignancy. These can be difficult to diagnose with imaging alone. Differentiating between infectious and neoplastic etiologies may require additional images and/or tissue samples.</p> <p>Hepatic abscesses are more commonly seen with other abdominal or biliary infections while metastatic disease usually presents in patients with active cancer or on surveillance imaging. While renal cell carcinoma (RCC) is the most common malignant neoplasm of the kidney, chromophobe renal cell carcinoma (chRCC) is a rare subtype that comprises only 5% of RCC cases.<sup>1</sup> We present a case of a patient with numerous new liver lesions and fever, initially thought to be hepatic abscesses, who was found to have metastatic chRCC.</p> <h2>CASE PRESENTATION</h2> <p>A 53 year-old male with a history of stage 2 chRCC and right radical nephrectomy 2 years prior presented to the emergency department following 1 week of drenching night sweats, fatigue, and subjective fevers. In addition, the patient reported gradually progressive, dull, right upper-quadrant abdominal pain. He noted no other acute medical complaints at the time of presentation. His history was notable for hyperlipidemia. His only surgery was the nephrectomy 2 years earlier. The patient reported no alcohol, tobacco, or drug use, any recent travel, or pet or animal exposure. On admission, he was afebrile with normal heart rate and was normotensive. His physical examination was remarkable for hepatomegaly with right upper-quadrant abdominal tenderness to palpation with a negative Murphy sign. There were otherwise no abnormal cardiovascular, respiratory, or skin findings.</p> <p>Laboratory tests during initial evaluation were notable for hemoglobin of 10.0 g/dL, white blood cell count of 16.7×10<sup>3</sup> μL, alkaline phosphatase of 213 U/L, aspartate aminotransferase of 185 U/L, and alanine aminotransferase of 36 U/L. Screening tests for viral hepatitis A, B, and C were negative. Additional tests for HIV, rapid plasma reagin, Epstein-Barr virus, cytomegalovirus, and toxoplasma were negative. Tests for antimitochondrial, antismooth muscle, and serum antinuclear antibodies were negative.<br/><br/>Chest X-ray did not reveal any acute cardiopulmonary process. Computed tomography with contrast of the abdomen and pelvis demonstrated numerous hypodensities within the right hepatic lobe. Right upper-quadrant ultrasound demonstrated multiple hyperechoic foci throughout the liver. confluent decreased T1 signal lesions with peripheral gadolinium hyperenhancement were evident on Gadolinium-enhanced T1-weighted magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) with fat saturation demonstrated numerous (Figure 1).<br/><br/>Liver biopsy and tissue cultures demonstrated normal hepatic tissue and no organism growth. Blood cultures demonstrated no growth. The patient was empirically treated with IV ceftriaxone 1 g daily and metronidazole 500 mg every 8 hours for suspected hepatic abscesses after he was admitted to the hospital.<br/><br/>The patient’s symptoms initially improved following antibiotic treatment; however, he reported recurrence of the initial symptoms2 months later at a follow-up appointment with gastroenterology. Liver-associated enzymes also remained elevated despite 4 weeks of antibiotic treatment. Repeat gadolinium-enhanced T1 fat-saturated MRI demonstrated an interval increase in size and number of confluent hepatic lesions throughout the liver (Figure 2).<br/><br/>A repeat liver biopsy revealed metastatic chRCC (Figures 3 and 4) that was both morphologically and immunohistochemically similar to the first pathologic diagnosis made following nephrectomy. The first liver biopsy likely did not sample the metastatic lesions that were present but instead sampled the surrounding normal liver. The patient was initiated on lenvatinib and everolimus therapy with oncology, a recommended regimen per the National Comprehensive Cancer Network for patients with nonclear cell RCC.<sup>1</sup></p> <h2>DISCUSSION</h2> <p>Chromophobe RCC is a rare form of RCC that has a recurrence-free survival of &gt; 80% when treated in early stages.<sup>2</sup> These neoplasms represent only 3000 to 6000 new cases of RCC annually, with an even lower incidence (6% to 7%) resulting in metastatic disease. The liver is the most common site of metastases (39%).<sup>2</sup> Previously reported metastatic chRCC hepatic lesions have been incidentally noted on imaging with asymptomatic clinical presentations. In contrast to our patient, most documented cases report metastatic chRCC as a solitary hepatic lesion.<sup>3-7</sup> </p> <p>A noteworthy genetic association with ChRCC is the Birt-Hogg-Dubé syndrome, which is an autosomal-dominant genetic disorder that results from germline mutations in the tumor suppressor folliculin gene located on chromosome 17.<sup>8</sup> This syndrome is characterized by the development of various benign and malignant tumors, particularly chRCC. Our patient appeared to have a sporadic chRCC with the absence of other tumors and negative family history for malignancies. On his initial staging imaging, in accordance with National Comprehensive Cancer Network guidelines, our patient was identified only as having a 10-cm right renal mass and 1 benign regional lymph node with an otherwise unremarkable computed tomography of the chest, abdomen and pelvis, corresponding to stage 2 cancer. <br/><br/>Common causes of hepatic abscesses, the other potential diagnosis of concern for the patient, were biliary infections, portal vein ascension from abdominal sources, arterial translocation due to bacteremia, and local invasion due to suppuration of adjacent tissue.<sup>9</sup> Incidence for hepatic abscesses increases with comorbidities such as diabetes, cirrhosis, malignancy, immunosuppression, and malnutrition.<sup>10</sup> <i>Candida</i> is also a common culprit when there are multiple, small abscesses, often in immunocompromised patients.<sup>11</sup> Given the high mortality rates associated with hepatic abscesses, prompt treatment is imperative.<sup>10,12</sup> Since the clinical signs and symptoms for hepatic abscesses are nonspecific (abdominal pain, fever, and malaise) and liver function tests can vary, the diagnosis primarily relies on imaging or tissue sampling.<sup>9</sup> <br/><br/>It can be difficult to distinguish abscesses from metastatic lesions based on imaging alone without microbiologic and pathologic confirmation.<sup>11,13,14</sup> There are certain radiologic characteristics that have been found to favor abscesses over metastasis, including parenchymal enhancement, arterial rim enhancement, and perilesional hyperemia.<sup>15</sup> However, previously described hallmark characteristics of hepatic abscesses, such as the “cluster sign” demonstrating early stages of abscess coalescence, have also been seen in some hepatic metastases.<sup>16</sup></p> <h2>CONCLUSIONS</h2> <p>This patient highlights the presentation of a rare case of metastatic chRCC with multiple hepatic lesions. While often differentiated clinically, radiographically, or histologically, malignancy and abscess can be difficult to differentiate in a patient with fevers and leukocytosis with hepatic lesions.<sup>17</sup> Early diagnosis of hepatic abscesses and initiation of antibiotic therapy are essential. In cases when it is challenging to characterize the hepatic lesions, repeated tissue sampling and imaging can help direct therapy. Attention should be paid to a previous history of malignancy and should raise suspicion for metastatic disease, particularly with misleading imaging studies and tissue samples. </p> <h3> Acknowledgments </h3> <p> <em>This case was presented as a poster presentation at the Tri-Service American College of Physicians Meeting, September 7-10, 2022, San Antonio, Texas.</em> </p> <h3> Author affiliations </h3> <p> <em><sup>a</sup>Walter Reed National Military Medical Center, Bethesda, Maryland<br/><br/><sup>b</sup>Naval Medical Center Portsmouth, Virginia</em> </p> <h3> Author disclosures </h3> <p> <em>The authors report no actual or potential conflicts of interest or outside sources of funding with regard to this article.</em> </p> <h3> Disclaimer </h3> <p> <em>The opinions expressed herein are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect those of <i>Federal Practitioner</i>, Frontline Medical Communications Inc., the US Government, or any of its agencies. This article may discuss unlabeled or investigational use of certain drugs. Please review the complete prescribing information for specific drugs or drug combinations—including indications, contraindications, warnings, and adverse effects—before administering pharmacologic therapy to patients.</em> </p> <h3> Ethics and consent </h3> <p> <em>Written informed consent for publication was obtained by the patient who was involved in this case.</em> </p> <h3> References </h3> <p class="reference"> 1. National Comprehensive Cancer Network. Kidney cancer (version 2.2024). Accessed February 5, 2024. https://www.nccn.org/professionals/physician_gls/pdf/kidney.pdf<br/><br/> 2. Vera-Badillo FE, Conde E, Duran I. Chromophobe renal cell carcinoma: a review of an uncommon entity. <em>Int J Urol</em>. 2012;19(10):894-900.doi:10.1111/j.1442-2042.2012.03079.x<br/><br/> 3. Lordan JT, Fawcett WJ, Karanjia ND. Solitary liver metastasis of chromophobe renal cell carcinoma 20 years after nephrectomy treated by hepatic resection. <em>Urology</em>. 2008;72(1):230.e5-6. doi:10.1016/j.urology.2007.11.134<br/><br/> 4. Talarico F, Buli P, Iusco D, Sangiorgi A, Jovine E. Synchronous nephrectomy and right hepatectomy for metastatic chromophobe renal cell carcinoma: report of a case and review of the literature. <em>Chir Ital</em>. 2007;59(2):257-261.<br/><br/> 5. Aslam MI, Spencer L, Garcea G, et al. A case of liver metastasis from an oncocytoma with a focal area of chromophobe renal cell carcinoma: a wolf in sheep’s clothing. <em>Int J Surg Pathol</em>. 2008;17(2):158-162. doi:10.1177/1066896908318741<br/><br/> 6. Kyoda Y, Kobayashi K, Takahashi A, et al. Liver metastasis with portal vein tumor thrombosis as a late recurrence of chromophobe renal cell carcinoma. Article in Japanese. <em>Hinyokika Kiyo</em>. 2009;55(1):23-25.<br/><br/> 7. Talarico F, Capizzi D, Iusco DR. Solitary liver metastasis of chromophobe renal cell carcinoma 17 years after nephrectomy. a case report and review of the literature. <em>Ann Ital Chir</em>. 2013;84(ePub):S2239253X13021816.<br/><br/> 8. Garje R, Elhag D, Yasin HA, Acharya L, Vaena D, Dahmoush L. Comprehensive review of chromophobe renal cell carcinoma. <em>Crit Rev Oncol Hematol</em>. 2021;160:103287. doi:10.1016/j.critrevonc.2021.103287<br/><br/> 9. Pearl R, Pancu D, Legome E. Hepatic abscess. <em>J Emerg Med</em>. 2005;28:337-339.doi:10.1016/j.jemermed.2004.08.024<br/><br/>10. Huang CJ, Pitt HA, Lipsett PA, et al. Pyogenic hepatic abscess. Changing trends over 42 years. <em>Ann Surg</em>. 1996;223(5):600-607; discussion 607-609.<br/><br/>11. Özgül E. Multiple pyogenic liver abscesses mimicking metastatic disease on computed tomography. <em>Cureus</em>. 2020;12(2):e7050. doi:10.7759/cureus.7050<br/><br/>12. Kuo SH, Lee YT, Li CR, et al. Mortality in Emergency Department Sepsis score as a prognostic indicator in patients with pyogenic liver abscess. <em>Am J Emerg Med</em>. 201331(6):916-921.<br/><br/>13. Lardière-Deguelte S, Ragot E, Amroun K, et al. Hepatic abscess: diagnosis and management. <em>J Visc Surg</em>. 2015;152(4):231-243. doi:10.1016/j.jviscsurg.2015.01.013 <br/><br/>14. Halvorsen RA, Korobkin M, Foster WL, Silverman PM, Thompson WM. The variable CT appearance of hepatic abscesses. <em>AJR Am J Roentgenol</em>. 1984;142(5):941-946. doi:10.2214/ajr.142.5.941<br/><br/>15. Oh JG, Choi SY, Lee MH, et al. Differentiation of hepatic abscess from metastasis on contrast-enhanced dynamic computed tomography in patients with a history of extrahepatic malignancy: emphasis on dynamic change of arterial rim enhancement. <em>Abdom Radiol (NY)</em>. 2019;44(2):529-538.<br/><br/>16. Jeffrey RB Jr, Tolentino CS, Chang FC, Federle MP. CT of small pyogenic hepatic abscesses: the cluster sign. <em>AJR Am J Roentgenol</em>. 1988;151(3):487-489. doi:10.2214/ajr.151.3.487<br/><br/>17. Mavilia MG, Molina M, Wu GY. The evolving nature of hepatic abscess: a review. <em>J Clin Transl Hepatol</em>. 2016;4(2):158-168. doi:10.14218/JCTH.2016.00004</p> </itemContent> </newsItem> </itemSet></root>
Disallow All Ads
Content Gating
No Gating (article Unlocked/Free)
Alternative CME
Disqus Comments
Default
Use ProPublica
Hide sidebar & use full width
render the right sidebar.
Conference Recap Checkbox
Not Conference Recap
Clinical Edge
Display the Slideshow in this Article
Medscape Article
Display survey writer
Reuters content
Disable Inline Native ads
WebMD Article
Article PDF Media

Medication-Nonadherent Hypothyroidism Requiring Frequent Primary Care Visits to Achieve Euthyroidism

Article Type
Changed
Thu, 03/07/2024 - 12:47

Nonadherence to medications is an issue across health care. In endocrinology, hypothyroidism, a deficiency of thyroid hormones, is most often treated with levothyroxine and if left untreated can lead to myxedema coma, which can lead to death due to multiorgan dysfunction.1 Therefore, adherence to levothyroxine is very important in preventing fatal complications.

We present the case of a patient with persistent primary hypothyroidism who was suspected to be nonadherent to levothyroxine, although the patient consistently claimed adherence. The patient’s plasma thyrotropin (TSH) level improved to reference range after 6 weeks of weekly primary care clinic visits. After stopping the visits, his plasma TSH level increased again, so 9 more weeks of visits resumed, which again helped bring down his plasma TSH levels.

Case Presentation

A male patient aged 67 years presented to the Dayton Veterans Affairs Medical Center (VAMC) endocrinology clinic for evaluation of thyroid nodules. The patient reported no history of neck irradiation and a physical examination was unremarkable. At that time, laboratory results showed a slightly elevated plasma TSH level of 4.35 uIU/mL (reference range, 0.35-4.00 uIU/mL) and normal free thyroxine (T4) of 1.00 ng/dL (reference range, 0.74-1.46 ng/dL). Later that year, the patient underwent a total thyroidectomy at the Cincinnati VAMC for Hurthle cell variant papillary thyroid carcinoma that was noted on biopsy at the Dayton VAMC. After surgical pathology results were available, the patient started levothyroxine 200 mcg daily, although 224 mcg would have been more appropriate based on his 142 kg weight. Due to a history of arrhythmia, the goal plasma TSH level was 0.10 to 0.50 uIU/mL. The patient subsequently underwent radioactive iodine ablation. After levothyroxine dose adjustments, the patient’s plasma TSH level was noted to be within his target range at 0.28 uIU/mL 3 months postablation.

Over the next 5 years the patient had regular laboratory tests during which his plasma TSH level rose and were typically high despite adjusting levothyroxine doses between 200 mcg and 325 mcg. The patient received counseling on taking the medication in the morning on an empty stomach and waiting at least 1 hour before consuming anything, and he went to many follow-up visits at the Dayton VAMC endocrinology clinic. He reported no vomiting or diarrhea but endorsed weight gain once. The patient also had high free T4 at times and did not take extra levothyroxine before undergoing laboratory tests.

Nonadherence to levothyroxine was suspected, but the patient insisted he was adherent. He received the medication in the mail regularly, generally had 90-day refills unless a dose change was made, used a pill box, and had social support from his son, but he did not use a phone alarm to remind him to take it. A home care nurse made weekly visits to make sure the remaining levothyroxine pill counts were correct; however, the patient continued to have difficulty maintaining daily adherence at home as indicated by the nurse’s pill counts not aligning with the number of pills which should have been left if the patient was talking the pills daily.

table.png

The patient was asked to visit a local community-based outpatient clinic (CBOC) weekly (to avoid patient travel time to Dayton VAMC > 1 hour) to check pill counts and assess adherence. The patient went to the CBOC clinic for these visits, during which pill counts indicated much better but not 100% adherence. After 6 weeks of clinic visits, his plasma TSH decreased to 1.01 uIU/mL, which was within the reference range, and the patient stopped coming to the weekly clinic visits (Table). Four months later, the patient's plasma TSH levels increased to 80.72 uIU/mL. Nonadherence to levothyroxine was suspected again. He was asked to resume weekly clinic visits, and the life-threatening effects of hypothyroidism and not taking levothyroxine were discussed with the patient and his son. The patient made CBOC clinic visits for 9 weeks, after which his plasma TSH level was low at 0.23 uIU/mL.

 

 

Discussion

There are multiple important causes to consider in patients with persistent hypothyroidism. One is medication nonadherence, which was most likely seen in the patient in this case. Missing even 1 day of levothyroxine can affect TSH and thyroid hormone levels for several days due to the long half-life of the medication.2 Hepp and colleagues found that patients with hypothyroidism were significantly more likely to be nonadherent to levothyroxine if they had comorbid conditions such as type 2 diabetes or were obese.3 Another study of levothyroxine adherence found that the most common reason for missing doses was forgetfulness.4 However, memory and cognition impairments can also be symptoms of hypothyroidism itself; Haskard-Zolnierek and colleagues found a significant association between nonadherence to levothyroxine and self-reported brain fog in patients with hypothyroidism.5

Another cause of persistent hypothyroidism is malabsorption. Absorption of levothyroxine can be affected by intestinal malabsorption due to inflammatory bowel disease, lactose intolerance, or gastrointestinal infection, as well as several foods, drinks (eg, coffee), medications, vitamins, and supplements (eg, proton-pump inhibitors and calcium).2,6 Levothyroxine is absorbed mainly at the jejunum and upper ileum, so any pathologies or ingested items that would directly or indirectly affect absorption at those sites can affect levothyroxine absorption.2

A liquid levothyroxine formulation can help with malabsorption.2 Alternatively, weight gain may lead to a need for increasing the dosage of levothyroxine.2,6 Other factors that can affect TSH levels include Addison disease, dysregulation of the hypothalamic-pituitary-thyroid axis, and TSH heterophile antibodies.2

Research describes methods that have effectively treated hypothyroidism in patients struggling with levothyroxine adherence. Two case reports describe weekly visits for levothyroxine administration successfully treating uncontrolled hypothyroidism.7,8 A meta-analysis found that while weekly levothyroxine tablets led to a higher mean TSH level than daily use, weekly use still led to reference-range TSH levels, suggesting that weekly levothyroxine may be a helpful alternative for nonadherent patients.9 Alternatively, patients taking levothyroxine tablets have been shown to forget to take their medication more frequently compared to those taking the liquid formulation.10,11 Additionally, a study by El Helou and colleagues found that adherence to levothyroxine was significantly improved when patients had endocrinology visits once a month and when the endocrinologist provided information about hypothyroidism.12

Another method that may improve adherence to levothyroxine is telehealth visits. This would be especially helpful for patients who live far from the clinic or do not have the time, transportation, or financial means to visit the clinic for weekly visits to assess medication adherence. Additionally, patients may be afraid of admitting to a health care professional that they are nonadherent. Clinicians must be tactful when asking about adherence to make the patient feel comfortable with admitting to nonadherence if their cognition is not impaired. Then, a patient-led conversation can occur regarding realistic ways the patient feels they can work toward adherence.

To our knowledge, the patient in this case report had no symptoms of intestinal malabsorption, and weight gain was not thought to be the issue, as levothyroxine dosage was adjusted multiple times. His plasma TSH levels returned to reference range after weekly pill count visits for 6 weeks and after weekly pill count visits for 9 weeks. Therefore, nonadherence to levothyroxine was suspected to be the cause of frequently elevated plasma TSH levels despite the patient’s insistence on adherence. While the patient did not report memory issues, cognitive impairments due to hypothyroidism may have been contributing to his probable nonadherence. Additionally, he had comorbidities, such as type 2 diabetes mellitus and obesity, which may have made adherence more difficult.

Levothyroxine was also only prescribed in daily tablet form, so the frequency and formulation may have also contributed to nonadherence. While the home nurse was originally sent to assess the patient’s adherence, the care team could have had the nurse start giving the patient weekly levothyroxine once nonadherence was determined to be a likely issue. The patient’s adherence only improved when he went to the clinic for pill counts but not when the home nurse came to his house weekly; this could be because the patient knew he had to invest the time to physically go to clinic visits for pill checks, motivating him to increase adherence.

Conclusions

This case reports a patient with frequently high plasma TSH levels achieving normalization of plasma TSH levels after weekly medication adherence checks at a primary care clinic. Weekly visits to a clinic seem impractical compared to weekly dosing with a visiting nurse; however, after review of the literature, this may be an approach to consider in the future. This strategy may especially help in cases of persistent abnormal plasma TSH levels in which no etiology can be found other than suspected medication nonadherence. Knowing their medication use will be checked at weekly clinic visits may motivate patients to be adherent.

References

1. Chaker L, Bianco AC, Jonklaas J, Peeters RP. Hypothyroidism. Lancet. 2017;390(10101):1550-1562. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(17)30703-1

2. Centanni M, Benvenga S, Sachmechi I. Diagnosis and management of treatment-refractory hypothyroidism: an expert consensus report. J Endocrinol Invest. 2017;40(12):1289-1301. doi:10.1007/s40618-017-0706-y

3. Hepp Z, Lage MJ, Espaillat R, Gossain VV. The association between adherence to levothyroxine and economic and clinical outcomes in patients with hypothyroidism in the US. J Med Econ. 2018;21(9):912-919. doi:10.1080/13696998.2018.1484749

4. Shakya Shrestha S, Risal K, Shrestha R, Bhatta RD. Medication Adherence to Levothyroxine Therapy among Hypothyroid Patients and their Clinical Outcomes with Special Reference to Thyroid Function Parameters. Kathmandu Univ Med J (KUMJ). 2018;16(62):129-137.

5. Haskard-Zolnierek K, Wilson C, Pruin J, Deason R, Howard K. The Relationship Between Brain Fog and Medication Adherence for Individuals With Hypothyroidism. Clin Nurs Res. 2022;31(3):445-452. doi:10.1177/10547738211038127

6. McNally LJ, Ofiaeli CI, Oyibo SO. Treatment-refractory hypothyroidism. BMJ. 2019;364:l579. Published 2019 Feb 25. doi:10.1136/bmj.l579

7. Nakano Y, Hashimoto K, Ohkiba N, et al. A Case of Refractory Hypothyroidism due to Poor Compliance Treated with the Weekly Intravenous and Oral Levothyroxine Administration. Case Rep Endocrinol. 2019;2019:5986014. Published 2019 Feb 5. doi:10.1155/2019/5986014

8. Kiran Z, Shaikh KS, Fatima N, Tariq N, Baloch AA. Levothyroxine absorption test followed by directly observed treatment on an outpatient basis to address long-term high TSH levels in a hypothyroid patient: a case report. J Med Case Rep. 2023;17(1):24. Published 2023 Jan 25. doi:10.1186/s13256-023-03760-0

9. Chiu HH, Larrazabal R Jr, Uy AB, Jimeno C. Weekly Versus Daily Levothyroxine Tablet Replacement in Adults with Hypothyroidism: A Meta-Analysis. J ASEAN Fed Endocr Soc. 2021;36(2):156-160. doi:10.15605/jafes.036.02.07

10. Cappelli C, Castello R, Marini F, et al. Adherence to Levothyroxine Treatment Among Patients With Hypothyroidism: A Northeastern Italian Survey. Front Endocrinol (Lausanne). 2018;9:699. Published 2018 Nov 23. doi:10.3389/fendo.2018.00699

11. Bocale R, Desideri G, Barini A, et al. Long-Term Adherence to Levothyroxine Replacement Therapy in Thyroidectomized Patients. J Clin Med. 2022;11(15):4296. Published 2022 Jul 24. doi:10.3390/jcm11154296

12. El Helou S, Hallit S, Awada S, et al. Adherence to levothyroxine among patients with hypothyroidism in Lebanon. East Mediterr Health J. 2019;25(3):149-159. Published 2019 Apr 25. doi:10.26719/emhj.18.022

Article PDF
Author and Disclosure Information

Sabrina Kaul;a,b Ankur Gupta, MDa,b

Correspondence: Ankur Gupta (ankur.gupta@va.gov)

aDayton Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Ohio

bWright State University Boonshoft School of Medicine, Dayton, Ohio

Author disclosures

The authors report no actual or potential conflicts of interest or outside sources of funding with regard to this article.

Disclaimer

The opinions expressed herein are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect those of Federal Practitioner, Frontline Medical Communications Inc., the US Government, or any of its agencies. This article may discuss unlabeled or investigational use of certain drugs. Please review the complete prescribing information for specific drug combinations—including indications, contraindications, warnings, and adverse effects—before administering pharmacologic therapy to patients.

Ethics and consent

Written informed consent was obtained from the patient presented in this case report. Patient identifiers have been removed to protect the privacy of the patient.

Issue
Federal Practitioner - 41(3)a
Publications
Topics
Page Number
84
Sections
Author and Disclosure Information

Sabrina Kaul;a,b Ankur Gupta, MDa,b

Correspondence: Ankur Gupta (ankur.gupta@va.gov)

aDayton Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Ohio

bWright State University Boonshoft School of Medicine, Dayton, Ohio

Author disclosures

The authors report no actual or potential conflicts of interest or outside sources of funding with regard to this article.

Disclaimer

The opinions expressed herein are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect those of Federal Practitioner, Frontline Medical Communications Inc., the US Government, or any of its agencies. This article may discuss unlabeled or investigational use of certain drugs. Please review the complete prescribing information for specific drug combinations—including indications, contraindications, warnings, and adverse effects—before administering pharmacologic therapy to patients.

Ethics and consent

Written informed consent was obtained from the patient presented in this case report. Patient identifiers have been removed to protect the privacy of the patient.

Author and Disclosure Information

Sabrina Kaul;a,b Ankur Gupta, MDa,b

Correspondence: Ankur Gupta (ankur.gupta@va.gov)

aDayton Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Ohio

bWright State University Boonshoft School of Medicine, Dayton, Ohio

Author disclosures

The authors report no actual or potential conflicts of interest or outside sources of funding with regard to this article.

Disclaimer

The opinions expressed herein are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect those of Federal Practitioner, Frontline Medical Communications Inc., the US Government, or any of its agencies. This article may discuss unlabeled or investigational use of certain drugs. Please review the complete prescribing information for specific drug combinations—including indications, contraindications, warnings, and adverse effects—before administering pharmacologic therapy to patients.

Ethics and consent

Written informed consent was obtained from the patient presented in this case report. Patient identifiers have been removed to protect the privacy of the patient.

Article PDF
Article PDF

Nonadherence to medications is an issue across health care. In endocrinology, hypothyroidism, a deficiency of thyroid hormones, is most often treated with levothyroxine and if left untreated can lead to myxedema coma, which can lead to death due to multiorgan dysfunction.1 Therefore, adherence to levothyroxine is very important in preventing fatal complications.

We present the case of a patient with persistent primary hypothyroidism who was suspected to be nonadherent to levothyroxine, although the patient consistently claimed adherence. The patient’s plasma thyrotropin (TSH) level improved to reference range after 6 weeks of weekly primary care clinic visits. After stopping the visits, his plasma TSH level increased again, so 9 more weeks of visits resumed, which again helped bring down his plasma TSH levels.

Case Presentation

A male patient aged 67 years presented to the Dayton Veterans Affairs Medical Center (VAMC) endocrinology clinic for evaluation of thyroid nodules. The patient reported no history of neck irradiation and a physical examination was unremarkable. At that time, laboratory results showed a slightly elevated plasma TSH level of 4.35 uIU/mL (reference range, 0.35-4.00 uIU/mL) and normal free thyroxine (T4) of 1.00 ng/dL (reference range, 0.74-1.46 ng/dL). Later that year, the patient underwent a total thyroidectomy at the Cincinnati VAMC for Hurthle cell variant papillary thyroid carcinoma that was noted on biopsy at the Dayton VAMC. After surgical pathology results were available, the patient started levothyroxine 200 mcg daily, although 224 mcg would have been more appropriate based on his 142 kg weight. Due to a history of arrhythmia, the goal plasma TSH level was 0.10 to 0.50 uIU/mL. The patient subsequently underwent radioactive iodine ablation. After levothyroxine dose adjustments, the patient’s plasma TSH level was noted to be within his target range at 0.28 uIU/mL 3 months postablation.

Over the next 5 years the patient had regular laboratory tests during which his plasma TSH level rose and were typically high despite adjusting levothyroxine doses between 200 mcg and 325 mcg. The patient received counseling on taking the medication in the morning on an empty stomach and waiting at least 1 hour before consuming anything, and he went to many follow-up visits at the Dayton VAMC endocrinology clinic. He reported no vomiting or diarrhea but endorsed weight gain once. The patient also had high free T4 at times and did not take extra levothyroxine before undergoing laboratory tests.

Nonadherence to levothyroxine was suspected, but the patient insisted he was adherent. He received the medication in the mail regularly, generally had 90-day refills unless a dose change was made, used a pill box, and had social support from his son, but he did not use a phone alarm to remind him to take it. A home care nurse made weekly visits to make sure the remaining levothyroxine pill counts were correct; however, the patient continued to have difficulty maintaining daily adherence at home as indicated by the nurse’s pill counts not aligning with the number of pills which should have been left if the patient was talking the pills daily.

table.png

The patient was asked to visit a local community-based outpatient clinic (CBOC) weekly (to avoid patient travel time to Dayton VAMC > 1 hour) to check pill counts and assess adherence. The patient went to the CBOC clinic for these visits, during which pill counts indicated much better but not 100% adherence. After 6 weeks of clinic visits, his plasma TSH decreased to 1.01 uIU/mL, which was within the reference range, and the patient stopped coming to the weekly clinic visits (Table). Four months later, the patient's plasma TSH levels increased to 80.72 uIU/mL. Nonadherence to levothyroxine was suspected again. He was asked to resume weekly clinic visits, and the life-threatening effects of hypothyroidism and not taking levothyroxine were discussed with the patient and his son. The patient made CBOC clinic visits for 9 weeks, after which his plasma TSH level was low at 0.23 uIU/mL.

 

 

Discussion

There are multiple important causes to consider in patients with persistent hypothyroidism. One is medication nonadherence, which was most likely seen in the patient in this case. Missing even 1 day of levothyroxine can affect TSH and thyroid hormone levels for several days due to the long half-life of the medication.2 Hepp and colleagues found that patients with hypothyroidism were significantly more likely to be nonadherent to levothyroxine if they had comorbid conditions such as type 2 diabetes or were obese.3 Another study of levothyroxine adherence found that the most common reason for missing doses was forgetfulness.4 However, memory and cognition impairments can also be symptoms of hypothyroidism itself; Haskard-Zolnierek and colleagues found a significant association between nonadherence to levothyroxine and self-reported brain fog in patients with hypothyroidism.5

Another cause of persistent hypothyroidism is malabsorption. Absorption of levothyroxine can be affected by intestinal malabsorption due to inflammatory bowel disease, lactose intolerance, or gastrointestinal infection, as well as several foods, drinks (eg, coffee), medications, vitamins, and supplements (eg, proton-pump inhibitors and calcium).2,6 Levothyroxine is absorbed mainly at the jejunum and upper ileum, so any pathologies or ingested items that would directly or indirectly affect absorption at those sites can affect levothyroxine absorption.2

A liquid levothyroxine formulation can help with malabsorption.2 Alternatively, weight gain may lead to a need for increasing the dosage of levothyroxine.2,6 Other factors that can affect TSH levels include Addison disease, dysregulation of the hypothalamic-pituitary-thyroid axis, and TSH heterophile antibodies.2

Research describes methods that have effectively treated hypothyroidism in patients struggling with levothyroxine adherence. Two case reports describe weekly visits for levothyroxine administration successfully treating uncontrolled hypothyroidism.7,8 A meta-analysis found that while weekly levothyroxine tablets led to a higher mean TSH level than daily use, weekly use still led to reference-range TSH levels, suggesting that weekly levothyroxine may be a helpful alternative for nonadherent patients.9 Alternatively, patients taking levothyroxine tablets have been shown to forget to take their medication more frequently compared to those taking the liquid formulation.10,11 Additionally, a study by El Helou and colleagues found that adherence to levothyroxine was significantly improved when patients had endocrinology visits once a month and when the endocrinologist provided information about hypothyroidism.12

Another method that may improve adherence to levothyroxine is telehealth visits. This would be especially helpful for patients who live far from the clinic or do not have the time, transportation, or financial means to visit the clinic for weekly visits to assess medication adherence. Additionally, patients may be afraid of admitting to a health care professional that they are nonadherent. Clinicians must be tactful when asking about adherence to make the patient feel comfortable with admitting to nonadherence if their cognition is not impaired. Then, a patient-led conversation can occur regarding realistic ways the patient feels they can work toward adherence.

To our knowledge, the patient in this case report had no symptoms of intestinal malabsorption, and weight gain was not thought to be the issue, as levothyroxine dosage was adjusted multiple times. His plasma TSH levels returned to reference range after weekly pill count visits for 6 weeks and after weekly pill count visits for 9 weeks. Therefore, nonadherence to levothyroxine was suspected to be the cause of frequently elevated plasma TSH levels despite the patient’s insistence on adherence. While the patient did not report memory issues, cognitive impairments due to hypothyroidism may have been contributing to his probable nonadherence. Additionally, he had comorbidities, such as type 2 diabetes mellitus and obesity, which may have made adherence more difficult.

Levothyroxine was also only prescribed in daily tablet form, so the frequency and formulation may have also contributed to nonadherence. While the home nurse was originally sent to assess the patient’s adherence, the care team could have had the nurse start giving the patient weekly levothyroxine once nonadherence was determined to be a likely issue. The patient’s adherence only improved when he went to the clinic for pill counts but not when the home nurse came to his house weekly; this could be because the patient knew he had to invest the time to physically go to clinic visits for pill checks, motivating him to increase adherence.

Conclusions

This case reports a patient with frequently high plasma TSH levels achieving normalization of plasma TSH levels after weekly medication adherence checks at a primary care clinic. Weekly visits to a clinic seem impractical compared to weekly dosing with a visiting nurse; however, after review of the literature, this may be an approach to consider in the future. This strategy may especially help in cases of persistent abnormal plasma TSH levels in which no etiology can be found other than suspected medication nonadherence. Knowing their medication use will be checked at weekly clinic visits may motivate patients to be adherent.

Nonadherence to medications is an issue across health care. In endocrinology, hypothyroidism, a deficiency of thyroid hormones, is most often treated with levothyroxine and if left untreated can lead to myxedema coma, which can lead to death due to multiorgan dysfunction.1 Therefore, adherence to levothyroxine is very important in preventing fatal complications.

We present the case of a patient with persistent primary hypothyroidism who was suspected to be nonadherent to levothyroxine, although the patient consistently claimed adherence. The patient’s plasma thyrotropin (TSH) level improved to reference range after 6 weeks of weekly primary care clinic visits. After stopping the visits, his plasma TSH level increased again, so 9 more weeks of visits resumed, which again helped bring down his plasma TSH levels.

Case Presentation

A male patient aged 67 years presented to the Dayton Veterans Affairs Medical Center (VAMC) endocrinology clinic for evaluation of thyroid nodules. The patient reported no history of neck irradiation and a physical examination was unremarkable. At that time, laboratory results showed a slightly elevated plasma TSH level of 4.35 uIU/mL (reference range, 0.35-4.00 uIU/mL) and normal free thyroxine (T4) of 1.00 ng/dL (reference range, 0.74-1.46 ng/dL). Later that year, the patient underwent a total thyroidectomy at the Cincinnati VAMC for Hurthle cell variant papillary thyroid carcinoma that was noted on biopsy at the Dayton VAMC. After surgical pathology results were available, the patient started levothyroxine 200 mcg daily, although 224 mcg would have been more appropriate based on his 142 kg weight. Due to a history of arrhythmia, the goal plasma TSH level was 0.10 to 0.50 uIU/mL. The patient subsequently underwent radioactive iodine ablation. After levothyroxine dose adjustments, the patient’s plasma TSH level was noted to be within his target range at 0.28 uIU/mL 3 months postablation.

Over the next 5 years the patient had regular laboratory tests during which his plasma TSH level rose and were typically high despite adjusting levothyroxine doses between 200 mcg and 325 mcg. The patient received counseling on taking the medication in the morning on an empty stomach and waiting at least 1 hour before consuming anything, and he went to many follow-up visits at the Dayton VAMC endocrinology clinic. He reported no vomiting or diarrhea but endorsed weight gain once. The patient also had high free T4 at times and did not take extra levothyroxine before undergoing laboratory tests.

Nonadherence to levothyroxine was suspected, but the patient insisted he was adherent. He received the medication in the mail regularly, generally had 90-day refills unless a dose change was made, used a pill box, and had social support from his son, but he did not use a phone alarm to remind him to take it. A home care nurse made weekly visits to make sure the remaining levothyroxine pill counts were correct; however, the patient continued to have difficulty maintaining daily adherence at home as indicated by the nurse’s pill counts not aligning with the number of pills which should have been left if the patient was talking the pills daily.

table.png

The patient was asked to visit a local community-based outpatient clinic (CBOC) weekly (to avoid patient travel time to Dayton VAMC > 1 hour) to check pill counts and assess adherence. The patient went to the CBOC clinic for these visits, during which pill counts indicated much better but not 100% adherence. After 6 weeks of clinic visits, his plasma TSH decreased to 1.01 uIU/mL, which was within the reference range, and the patient stopped coming to the weekly clinic visits (Table). Four months later, the patient's plasma TSH levels increased to 80.72 uIU/mL. Nonadherence to levothyroxine was suspected again. He was asked to resume weekly clinic visits, and the life-threatening effects of hypothyroidism and not taking levothyroxine were discussed with the patient and his son. The patient made CBOC clinic visits for 9 weeks, after which his plasma TSH level was low at 0.23 uIU/mL.

 

 

Discussion

There are multiple important causes to consider in patients with persistent hypothyroidism. One is medication nonadherence, which was most likely seen in the patient in this case. Missing even 1 day of levothyroxine can affect TSH and thyroid hormone levels for several days due to the long half-life of the medication.2 Hepp and colleagues found that patients with hypothyroidism were significantly more likely to be nonadherent to levothyroxine if they had comorbid conditions such as type 2 diabetes or were obese.3 Another study of levothyroxine adherence found that the most common reason for missing doses was forgetfulness.4 However, memory and cognition impairments can also be symptoms of hypothyroidism itself; Haskard-Zolnierek and colleagues found a significant association between nonadherence to levothyroxine and self-reported brain fog in patients with hypothyroidism.5

Another cause of persistent hypothyroidism is malabsorption. Absorption of levothyroxine can be affected by intestinal malabsorption due to inflammatory bowel disease, lactose intolerance, or gastrointestinal infection, as well as several foods, drinks (eg, coffee), medications, vitamins, and supplements (eg, proton-pump inhibitors and calcium).2,6 Levothyroxine is absorbed mainly at the jejunum and upper ileum, so any pathologies or ingested items that would directly or indirectly affect absorption at those sites can affect levothyroxine absorption.2

A liquid levothyroxine formulation can help with malabsorption.2 Alternatively, weight gain may lead to a need for increasing the dosage of levothyroxine.2,6 Other factors that can affect TSH levels include Addison disease, dysregulation of the hypothalamic-pituitary-thyroid axis, and TSH heterophile antibodies.2

Research describes methods that have effectively treated hypothyroidism in patients struggling with levothyroxine adherence. Two case reports describe weekly visits for levothyroxine administration successfully treating uncontrolled hypothyroidism.7,8 A meta-analysis found that while weekly levothyroxine tablets led to a higher mean TSH level than daily use, weekly use still led to reference-range TSH levels, suggesting that weekly levothyroxine may be a helpful alternative for nonadherent patients.9 Alternatively, patients taking levothyroxine tablets have been shown to forget to take their medication more frequently compared to those taking the liquid formulation.10,11 Additionally, a study by El Helou and colleagues found that adherence to levothyroxine was significantly improved when patients had endocrinology visits once a month and when the endocrinologist provided information about hypothyroidism.12

Another method that may improve adherence to levothyroxine is telehealth visits. This would be especially helpful for patients who live far from the clinic or do not have the time, transportation, or financial means to visit the clinic for weekly visits to assess medication adherence. Additionally, patients may be afraid of admitting to a health care professional that they are nonadherent. Clinicians must be tactful when asking about adherence to make the patient feel comfortable with admitting to nonadherence if their cognition is not impaired. Then, a patient-led conversation can occur regarding realistic ways the patient feels they can work toward adherence.

To our knowledge, the patient in this case report had no symptoms of intestinal malabsorption, and weight gain was not thought to be the issue, as levothyroxine dosage was adjusted multiple times. His plasma TSH levels returned to reference range after weekly pill count visits for 6 weeks and after weekly pill count visits for 9 weeks. Therefore, nonadherence to levothyroxine was suspected to be the cause of frequently elevated plasma TSH levels despite the patient’s insistence on adherence. While the patient did not report memory issues, cognitive impairments due to hypothyroidism may have been contributing to his probable nonadherence. Additionally, he had comorbidities, such as type 2 diabetes mellitus and obesity, which may have made adherence more difficult.

Levothyroxine was also only prescribed in daily tablet form, so the frequency and formulation may have also contributed to nonadherence. While the home nurse was originally sent to assess the patient’s adherence, the care team could have had the nurse start giving the patient weekly levothyroxine once nonadherence was determined to be a likely issue. The patient’s adherence only improved when he went to the clinic for pill counts but not when the home nurse came to his house weekly; this could be because the patient knew he had to invest the time to physically go to clinic visits for pill checks, motivating him to increase adherence.

Conclusions

This case reports a patient with frequently high plasma TSH levels achieving normalization of plasma TSH levels after weekly medication adherence checks at a primary care clinic. Weekly visits to a clinic seem impractical compared to weekly dosing with a visiting nurse; however, after review of the literature, this may be an approach to consider in the future. This strategy may especially help in cases of persistent abnormal plasma TSH levels in which no etiology can be found other than suspected medication nonadherence. Knowing their medication use will be checked at weekly clinic visits may motivate patients to be adherent.

References

1. Chaker L, Bianco AC, Jonklaas J, Peeters RP. Hypothyroidism. Lancet. 2017;390(10101):1550-1562. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(17)30703-1

2. Centanni M, Benvenga S, Sachmechi I. Diagnosis and management of treatment-refractory hypothyroidism: an expert consensus report. J Endocrinol Invest. 2017;40(12):1289-1301. doi:10.1007/s40618-017-0706-y

3. Hepp Z, Lage MJ, Espaillat R, Gossain VV. The association between adherence to levothyroxine and economic and clinical outcomes in patients with hypothyroidism in the US. J Med Econ. 2018;21(9):912-919. doi:10.1080/13696998.2018.1484749

4. Shakya Shrestha S, Risal K, Shrestha R, Bhatta RD. Medication Adherence to Levothyroxine Therapy among Hypothyroid Patients and their Clinical Outcomes with Special Reference to Thyroid Function Parameters. Kathmandu Univ Med J (KUMJ). 2018;16(62):129-137.

5. Haskard-Zolnierek K, Wilson C, Pruin J, Deason R, Howard K. The Relationship Between Brain Fog and Medication Adherence for Individuals With Hypothyroidism. Clin Nurs Res. 2022;31(3):445-452. doi:10.1177/10547738211038127

6. McNally LJ, Ofiaeli CI, Oyibo SO. Treatment-refractory hypothyroidism. BMJ. 2019;364:l579. Published 2019 Feb 25. doi:10.1136/bmj.l579

7. Nakano Y, Hashimoto K, Ohkiba N, et al. A Case of Refractory Hypothyroidism due to Poor Compliance Treated with the Weekly Intravenous and Oral Levothyroxine Administration. Case Rep Endocrinol. 2019;2019:5986014. Published 2019 Feb 5. doi:10.1155/2019/5986014

8. Kiran Z, Shaikh KS, Fatima N, Tariq N, Baloch AA. Levothyroxine absorption test followed by directly observed treatment on an outpatient basis to address long-term high TSH levels in a hypothyroid patient: a case report. J Med Case Rep. 2023;17(1):24. Published 2023 Jan 25. doi:10.1186/s13256-023-03760-0

9. Chiu HH, Larrazabal R Jr, Uy AB, Jimeno C. Weekly Versus Daily Levothyroxine Tablet Replacement in Adults with Hypothyroidism: A Meta-Analysis. J ASEAN Fed Endocr Soc. 2021;36(2):156-160. doi:10.15605/jafes.036.02.07

10. Cappelli C, Castello R, Marini F, et al. Adherence to Levothyroxine Treatment Among Patients With Hypothyroidism: A Northeastern Italian Survey. Front Endocrinol (Lausanne). 2018;9:699. Published 2018 Nov 23. doi:10.3389/fendo.2018.00699

11. Bocale R, Desideri G, Barini A, et al. Long-Term Adherence to Levothyroxine Replacement Therapy in Thyroidectomized Patients. J Clin Med. 2022;11(15):4296. Published 2022 Jul 24. doi:10.3390/jcm11154296

12. El Helou S, Hallit S, Awada S, et al. Adherence to levothyroxine among patients with hypothyroidism in Lebanon. East Mediterr Health J. 2019;25(3):149-159. Published 2019 Apr 25. doi:10.26719/emhj.18.022

References

1. Chaker L, Bianco AC, Jonklaas J, Peeters RP. Hypothyroidism. Lancet. 2017;390(10101):1550-1562. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(17)30703-1

2. Centanni M, Benvenga S, Sachmechi I. Diagnosis and management of treatment-refractory hypothyroidism: an expert consensus report. J Endocrinol Invest. 2017;40(12):1289-1301. doi:10.1007/s40618-017-0706-y

3. Hepp Z, Lage MJ, Espaillat R, Gossain VV. The association between adherence to levothyroxine and economic and clinical outcomes in patients with hypothyroidism in the US. J Med Econ. 2018;21(9):912-919. doi:10.1080/13696998.2018.1484749

4. Shakya Shrestha S, Risal K, Shrestha R, Bhatta RD. Medication Adherence to Levothyroxine Therapy among Hypothyroid Patients and their Clinical Outcomes with Special Reference to Thyroid Function Parameters. Kathmandu Univ Med J (KUMJ). 2018;16(62):129-137.

5. Haskard-Zolnierek K, Wilson C, Pruin J, Deason R, Howard K. The Relationship Between Brain Fog and Medication Adherence for Individuals With Hypothyroidism. Clin Nurs Res. 2022;31(3):445-452. doi:10.1177/10547738211038127

6. McNally LJ, Ofiaeli CI, Oyibo SO. Treatment-refractory hypothyroidism. BMJ. 2019;364:l579. Published 2019 Feb 25. doi:10.1136/bmj.l579

7. Nakano Y, Hashimoto K, Ohkiba N, et al. A Case of Refractory Hypothyroidism due to Poor Compliance Treated with the Weekly Intravenous and Oral Levothyroxine Administration. Case Rep Endocrinol. 2019;2019:5986014. Published 2019 Feb 5. doi:10.1155/2019/5986014

8. Kiran Z, Shaikh KS, Fatima N, Tariq N, Baloch AA. Levothyroxine absorption test followed by directly observed treatment on an outpatient basis to address long-term high TSH levels in a hypothyroid patient: a case report. J Med Case Rep. 2023;17(1):24. Published 2023 Jan 25. doi:10.1186/s13256-023-03760-0

9. Chiu HH, Larrazabal R Jr, Uy AB, Jimeno C. Weekly Versus Daily Levothyroxine Tablet Replacement in Adults with Hypothyroidism: A Meta-Analysis. J ASEAN Fed Endocr Soc. 2021;36(2):156-160. doi:10.15605/jafes.036.02.07

10. Cappelli C, Castello R, Marini F, et al. Adherence to Levothyroxine Treatment Among Patients With Hypothyroidism: A Northeastern Italian Survey. Front Endocrinol (Lausanne). 2018;9:699. Published 2018 Nov 23. doi:10.3389/fendo.2018.00699

11. Bocale R, Desideri G, Barini A, et al. Long-Term Adherence to Levothyroxine Replacement Therapy in Thyroidectomized Patients. J Clin Med. 2022;11(15):4296. Published 2022 Jul 24. doi:10.3390/jcm11154296

12. El Helou S, Hallit S, Awada S, et al. Adherence to levothyroxine among patients with hypothyroidism in Lebanon. East Mediterr Health J. 2019;25(3):149-159. Published 2019 Apr 25. doi:10.26719/emhj.18.022

Issue
Federal Practitioner - 41(3)a
Issue
Federal Practitioner - 41(3)a
Page Number
84
Page Number
84
Publications
Publications
Topics
Article Type
Sections
Teambase XML
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!--$RCSfile: InCopy_agile.xsl,v $ $Revision: 1.35 $-->
<!--$RCSfile: drupal.xsl,v $ $Revision: 1.7 $-->
<root generator="drupal.xsl" gversion="1.7"> <header> <fileName>0324 FED Hypothyroidism</fileName> <TBEID>0C02F244.SIG</TBEID> <TBUniqueIdentifier>NJ_0C02F244</TBUniqueIdentifier> <newsOrJournal>Journal</newsOrJournal> <publisherName>Frontline Medical Communications Inc.</publisherName> <storyname/> <articleType>1</articleType> <TBLocation>Copyfitting-FED</TBLocation> <QCDate/> <firstPublished>20240302T213953</firstPublished> <LastPublished>20240302T213953</LastPublished> <pubStatus qcode="stat:"/> <embargoDate/> <killDate/> <CMSDate>20240302T213953</CMSDate> <articleSource/> <facebookInfo/> <meetingNumber/> <byline/> <bylineText>Sabrina Kaul;a,b Ankur Gupta, MDa,b</bylineText> <bylineFull/> <bylineTitleText/> <USOrGlobal/> <wireDocType/> <newsDocType/> <journalDocType/> <linkLabel/> <pageRange/> <citation/> <quizID/> <indexIssueDate/> <itemClass qcode="ninat:text"/> <provider qcode="provider:"> <name/> <rightsInfo> <copyrightHolder> <name/> </copyrightHolder> <copyrightNotice/> </rightsInfo> </provider> <abstract/> <metaDescription>Nonadherence to medications is an issue across health care. In endocrinology, hypothyroidism, a deficiency of thyroid hormones, is most often treated with levot</metaDescription> <articlePDF/> <teaserImage/> <title>Medication-Nonadherent Hypothyroidism Requiring Frequent Primary Care Visits to Achieve Euthyroidism</title> <deck/> <eyebrow>Case in Point</eyebrow> <disclaimer/> <AuthorList/> <articleURL/> <doi/> <pubMedID/> <publishXMLStatus/> <publishXMLVersion>1</publishXMLVersion> <useEISSN>0</useEISSN> <urgency/> <pubPubdateYear>2024</pubPubdateYear> <pubPubdateMonth>March</pubPubdateMonth> <pubPubdateDay/> <pubVolume>41</pubVolume> <pubNumber>3</pubNumber> <wireChannels/> <primaryCMSID/> <CMSIDs> <CMSID>2953</CMSID> <CMSID>3639</CMSID> </CMSIDs> <keywords/> <seeAlsos/> <publications_g> <publicationData> <publicationCode>FED</publicationCode> <pubIssueName>March 2024</pubIssueName> <pubArticleType>Feature Articles | 3639</pubArticleType> <pubTopics/> <pubCategories/> <pubSections> <pubSection>Case in Point | 2953<pubSubsection/></pubSection> </pubSections> <journalTitle>Fed Pract</journalTitle> <journalFullTitle>Federal Practitioner</journalFullTitle> <copyrightStatement>Copyright 2017 Frontline Medical Communications Inc., Parsippany, NJ, USA. All rights reserved.</copyrightStatement> </publicationData> </publications_g> <publications> <term canonical="true">16</term> </publications> <sections> <term canonical="true">45</term> </sections> <topics> <term canonical="true">27442</term> </topics> <links/> </header> <itemSet> <newsItem> <itemMeta> <itemRole>Main</itemRole> <itemClass>text</itemClass> <title>Medication-Nonadherent Hypothyroidism Requiring Frequent Primary Care Visits to Achieve Euthyroidism</title> <deck/> </itemMeta> <itemContent> <p class="abstract"><b>Background:</b> Nonadherence to medications is a common clinical issue. We describe a case in which weekly visits to assess medication adherence achieved euthyroidism in a patient with persistent primary hypothyroidism and suspected nonadherence to levothyroxine. The patient, however, did not report nonadherence.<br/><br/><b>Case Presentation:</b> A male aged 67 years with multinodular goiter underwent total thyroidectomy for abnormal thyroid nodule biopsy. Surgical pathology revealed papillary thyroid cancer with lymph node metastasis for which he received radioactive iodine treatment. His plasma thyrotropin (TSH) was noted to be 0.28 uIU/mL (reference range 0.35-4.00 uIU/mL) 7 months postsurgery while taking 224 mcg levothyroxine tablets daily. His plasma TSH remained elevated for about 5 years despite titrations of the levothyroxine dosage, counseling, and multiple follow-up visits. A home care nurse was involved in monitoring the patient taking levothyroxine daily and correctly but was unsuccessful. The patient and his son reported taking levothyroxine daily and correctly. The patient was asked to visit the primary care clinic every week for 6 weeks with all his medications. Repeat plasma TSH normalized to 1.01 uIU/mL. The suspected etiology of previously high plasma TSH was nonadherence to levothyroxine, which was discussed in detail with the patient. The patient verbalized understanding, was willing to follow recommendations and ended the weekly clinic visits. Repeat plasma TSH was again high and the patient claimed adherence, but weekly visits to primary care clinic were resumed, and life-threatening consequences of hypothyroidism were discussed with the patient and his son. After 9 weeks of visits, he was noted to have low plasma TSH (0.23 uIU/mL).<br/><br/><b>Conclusions:</b> Weekly visits seem impractical but may help in cases of persistent hypothyroidism in which the patient admits to being or is suspected to be nonadherent to levothyroxine. Knowing their medication use will be checked at weekly clinic visits may motivate the patient to be adherent.</p> <p><span class="Drop">N</span>onadherence to medications is an issue across health care. In endocrinology, hypothyroidism, a deficiency of thyroid hormones, is most often treated with levothyroxine and if left untreated can lead to myxedema coma, which can lead to death due to multiorgan dysfunction.<sup>1</sup> Therefore, adherence to levothyroxine is very important in preventing fatal complications. </p> <p>We present the case of a patient with persistent primary hypothyroidism who was suspected to be nonadherent to levothyroxine, although the patient consistently claimed adherence. The patient’s plasma thyrotropin (TSH) level improved to reference range after 6 weeks of weekly primary care clinic visits. After stopping the visits, his plasma TSH level increased again, so 9 more weeks of visits resumed, which again helped bring down his plasma TSH levels.</p> <h2>Case Presentation</h2> <p>A male patient aged 67 years presented to the Dayton Veterans Affairs Medical Center (VAMC) endocrinology clinic for evaluation of thyroid nodules. The patient reported no history of neck irradiation and a physical examination was unremarkable. At that time, laboratory results showed a slightly elevated plasma TSH level of 4.35 uIU/mL (reference range, 0.35-4.00 uIU/mL) and normal free thyroxine (T4) of 1.00 ng/dL (reference range, 0.74-1.46 ng/dL). Later that year, the patient underwent a total thyroidectomy at the Cincinnati VAMC for Hurthle cell variant papillary thyroid carcinoma that was noted on biopsy at the Dayton VAMC. After surgical pathology results were available, the patient started levothyroxine 200 mcg daily, although 224 mcg would have been more appropriate based on his 142 kg weight. Due to a history of arrhythmia, the goal plasma TSH level was 0.10 to 0.50 uIU/mL. The patient subsequently underwent radioactive iodine ablation. After levothyroxine dose adjustments, the patient’s plasma TSH level was noted to be within his target range at 0.28 uIU/mL 3 months postablation. </p> <p>Over the next 5 years the patient had regular laboratory tests during which his plasma TSH level rose and were typically high despite adjusting levothyroxine doses between 200 mcg and 325 mcg. The patient received counseling on taking the medication in the morning on an empty stomach and waiting at least 1 hour before consuming anything, and he went to many follow-up visits at the Dayton VAMC endocrinology clinic<b>.</b> He reported no vomiting or diarrhea but endorsed weight gain once. The patient also had high free T4 at times and did not take extra levothyroxine before undergoing laboratory tests. <br/><br/>Nonadherence to levothyroxine was suspected, but the patient insisted he was adherent. He received the medication in the mail regularly, generally had 90-day refills unless a dose change was made, used a pill box, and had social support from his son, but he did not use a phone alarm to remind him to take it. A home care nurse made weekly visits to make sure the remaining levothyroxine pill counts were correct; however, the patient continued to have difficulty maintaining daily adherence at home as indicated by the nurse’s pill counts not aligning with the number of pills which should have been left if the patient was talking the pills daily. <br/><br/>The patient was asked to visit a local community-based outpatient clinic (CBOC) weekly (to avoid patient travel time to Dayton VAMC &gt; 1 hour) to check pill counts and assess adherence. The patient went to the CBOC clinic for these visits, during which pill counts indicated much better but not 100% adherence. After 6 weeks of clinic visits, his plasma TSH decreased to 1.01 uIU/mL, which was within the reference range, and the patient stopped coming to the weekly clinic visits (Table). Four months later, the patient's plasma TSH levels increased to 80.72 uIU/mL. Nonadherence to levothyroxine was suspected again. He was asked to resume weekly clinic visits, and the life-threatening effects of hypothyroidism and not taking levothyroxine were discussed with the patient and his son. The patient made CBOC clinic visits for 9 weeks, after which his plasma TSH level was low at 0.23 uIU/mL.</p> <h2>Discussion</h2> <p>There are multiple important causes to consider in patients with persistent hypothyroidism. One is medication nonadherence, which was most likely seen in the patient in this case. Missing even 1 day of levothyroxine can affect TSH and thyroid hormone levels for several days due to the long half-life of the medication.<sup>2</sup> Hepp and colleagues found that patients with hypothyroidism were significantly more likely to be nonadherent to levothyroxine if they had comorbid conditions such as type 2 diabetes or were obese.<sup>3</sup> Another study of levothyroxine adherence found that the most common reason for missing doses was forgetfulness.<sup>4</sup> However, memory and cognition impairments can also be symptoms of hypothyroidism itself; Haskard-Zolnierek and colleagues found a significant association between nonadherence to levothyroxine and self-reported brain fog in patients with hypothyroidism.<sup>5</sup></p> <p>Another cause of persistent hypothyroidism is malabsorption. Absorption of levothyroxine can be affected by intestinal malabsorption due to inflammatory bowel disease, lactose intolerance, or gastrointestinal infection, as well as several foods, drinks (eg, coffee), medications, vitamins, and supplements (eg, proton-pump inhibitors and calcium).<sup>2,6</sup> Levothyroxine is absorbed mainly at the jejunum and upper ileum, so any pathologies or ingested items that would directly or indirectly affect absorption at those sites can affect levothyroxine absorption.<sup>2</sup> <br/><br/>A liquid levothyroxine formulation can help with malabsorption.<sup>2</sup> Alternatively, weight gain may lead to a need for increasing the dosage of levothyroxine.<sup>2,6</sup> Other factors that can affect TSH levels include Addison disease, dysregulation of the hypothalamic-pituitary-thyroid axis, and TSH heterophile antibodies.<sup>2<br/><br/></sup>Research describes methods that have effectively treated hypothyroidism in patients struggling with levothyroxine adherence. Two case reports describe weekly visits for levothyroxine administration successfully treating uncontrolled hypothyroidism.<sup>7,8 </sup>A meta-analysis found that while weekly levothyroxine tablets led to a higher mean TSH level than daily use, weekly use still led to reference-range TSH levels, suggesting that weekly levothyroxine may be a helpful alternative for nonadherent patients.<sup>9</sup> Alternatively, patients taking levothyroxine tablets have been shown to forget to take their medication more frequently compared to those taking the liquid formulation.<sup>10,11</sup> Additionally, a study by El Helou and colleagues found that adherence to levothyroxine was significantly improved when patients had endocrinology visits once a month and when the endocrinologist provided information about hypothyroidism.<sup>12<br/><br/></sup>Another method that may improve adherence to levothyroxine is telehealth visits. This would be especially helpful for patients who live far from the clinic or do not have the time, transportation, or financial means to visit the clinic for weekly visits to assess medication adherence. Additionally, patients may be afraid of admitting to a health care professional that they are nonadherent. Clinicians must be tactful when asking about adherence to make the patient feel comfortable with admitting to nonadherence if their cognition is not impaired. Then, a patient-led conversation can occur regarding realistic ways the patient feels they can work toward adherence.<br/><br/>To our knowledge, the patient in this case report had no symptoms of intestinal malabsorption, and weight gain was not thought to be the issue, as levothyroxine dosage was adjusted multiple times. His plasma TSH levels returned to reference range after weekly pill count visits for 6 weeks and after weekly pill count visits for 9 weeks. Therefore, nonadherence to levothyroxine was suspected to be the cause of frequently elevated plasma TSH levels despite the patient’s insistence on adherence. While the patient did not report memory issues, cognitive impairments due to hypothyroidism may have been contributing to his probable nonadherence. Additionally, he had comorbidities, such as type 2 diabetes mellitus and obesity, which may have made adherence more difficult. <br/><br/>Levothyroxine was also only prescribed in daily tablet form, so the frequency and formulation may have also contributed to nonadherence. While the home nurse was originally sent to assess the patient’s adherence, the care team could have had the nurse start giving the patient weekly levothyroxine once nonadherence was determined to be a likely issue. The patient’s adherence only improved when he went to the clinic for pill counts but not when the home nurse came to his house weekly; this could be because the patient knew he had to invest the time to physically go to clinic visits for pill checks, motivating him to increase adherence.</p> <h2>Conclusions</h2> <p>This case reports a patient with frequently high plasma TSH levels achieving normalization of plasma TSH levels after weekly medication adherence checks at a primary care clinic. Weekly visits to a clinic seem impractical compared to weekly dosing with a visiting nurse; however, after review of the literature, this may be an approach to consider in the future. This strategy may especially help in cases of persistent abnormal plasma TSH levels in which no etiology can be found other than suspected medication nonadherence. Knowing their medication use will be checked at weekly clinic visits may motivate patients to be adherent.</p> <p class="isub">Author affiliations</p> <p> <em><sup>a</sup>Dayton Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Ohio<br/><br/><sup>b</sup>Wright State University Boonshoft School of Medicine, Dayton, Ohio</em> </p> <p class="isub">Author disclosures</p> <p> <em>The authors report no actual or potential conflicts of interest or outside sources of funding with regard to this article.</em> </p> <p class="isub">Disclaimer</p> <p> <em>The opinions expressed herein are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect those of <i>Federal Practitioner,</i> Frontline Medical Communications Inc., the US Government, or any of its agencies. This article may discuss unlabeled or investigational use of certain drugs. Please review the complete prescribing information for specific drug combinations—including indications, contraindications, warnings, and adverse effects—before administering pharmacologic therapy to patients.</em> </p> <p class="isub">Ethics and consent </p> <p> <em>Written informed consent was obtained from the patient presented in this case report. Patient identifiers have been removed to protect the privacy of the patient.</em> </p> <p class="isub">References</p> <p class="reference"> 1. Chaker L, Bianco AC, Jonklaas J, Peeters RP. Hypothyroidism. <i>Lancet</i>. 2017;390(10101):1550-1562. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(17)30703-1<br/><br/> 2. Centanni M, Benvenga S, Sachmechi I. Diagnosis and management of treatment-refractory hypothyroidism: an expert consensus report. <i>J Endocrinol Invest</i>. 2017;40(12):1289-1301. doi:10.1007/s40618-017-0706-y <br/><br/> 3. Hepp Z, Lage MJ, Espaillat R, Gossain VV. The association between adherence to levothyroxine and economic and clinical outcomes in patients with hypothyroidism in the US. <i>J Med Econ</i>. 2018;21(9):912-919. doi:10.1080/13696998.2018.1484749<br/><br/> 4. Shakya Shrestha S, Risal K, Shrestha R, Bhatta RD. Medication Adherence to Levothyroxine Therapy among Hypothyroid Patients and their Clinical Outcomes with Special Reference to Thyroid Function Parameters. <i>Kathmandu Univ Med J (KUMJ)</i>. 2018;16(62):129-137.<br/><br/> 5. Haskard-Zolnierek K, Wilson C, Pruin J, Deason R, Howard K. The Relationship Between Brain Fog and Medication Adherence for Individuals With Hypothyroidism. <i>Clin Nurs Res</i>. 2022;31(3):445-452. doi:10.1177/10547738211038127<br/><br/> 6. McNally LJ, Ofiaeli CI, Oyibo SO. Treatment-refractory hypothyroidism. <i>BMJ</i>. 2019;364:l579. Published 2019 Feb 25. doi:10.1136/bmj.l579<br/><br/> 7. Nakano Y, Hashimoto K, Ohkiba N, et al. A Case of Refractory Hypothyroidism due to Poor Compliance Treated with the Weekly Intravenous and Oral Levothyroxine Administration. <i>Case Rep Endocrinol</i>. 2019;2019:5986014. Published 2019 Feb 5. doi:10.1155/2019/5986014<br/><br/> 8. Kiran Z, Shaikh KS, Fatima N, Tariq N, Baloch AA. Levothyroxine absorption test followed by directly observed treatment on an outpatient basis to address long-term high TSH levels in a hypothyroid patient: a case report. <i>J Med Case Rep</i>. 2023;17(1):24. Published 2023 Jan 25. doi:10.1186/s13256-023-03760-0<br/><br/> 9. Chiu HH, Larrazabal R Jr, Uy AB, Jimeno C. Weekly Versus Daily Levothyroxine Tablet Replacement in Adults with Hypothyroidism: A Meta-Analysis. <i>J ASEAN Fed Endocr Soc</i>. 2021;36(2):156-160. doi:10.15605/jafes.036.02.07<br/><br/>10. Cappelli C, Castello R, Marini F, et al. Adherence to Levothyroxine Treatment Among Patients With Hypothyroidism: A Northeastern Italian Survey. <i>Front Endocrinol (Lausanne)</i>. 2018;9:699. Published 2018 Nov 23. doi:10.3389/fendo.2018.00699<br/><br/>11. Bocale R, Desideri G, Barini A, et al. Long-Term Adherence to Levothyroxine Replacement Therapy in Thyroidectomized Patients. <i>J Clin Med</i>. 2022;11(15):4296. Published 2022 Jul 24. doi:10.3390/jcm11154296<br/><br/>12. El Helou S, Hallit S, Awada S, et al. Adherence to levothyroxine among patients with hypothyroidism in Lebanon. <i>East Mediterr Health J</i>. 2019;25(3):149-159. Published 2019 Apr 25. doi:10.26719/emhj.18.022</p> </itemContent> </newsItem> </itemSet></root>
Disallow All Ads
Content Gating
No Gating (article Unlocked/Free)
Alternative CME
Disqus Comments
Default
Use ProPublica
Hide sidebar & use full width
render the right sidebar.
Conference Recap Checkbox
Not Conference Recap
Clinical Edge
Display the Slideshow in this Article
Medscape Article
Display survey writer
Reuters content
Disable Inline Native ads
WebMD Article
Article PDF Media

Dermatologic Reactions Following COVID-19 Vaccination: A Case Series

Article Type
Changed
Thu, 02/22/2024 - 10:06
Display Headline
Dermatologic Reactions Following COVID-19 Vaccination: A Case Series

Cutaneous reactions associated with the Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 vaccine have been reported worldwide since December 2020. Local injection site reactions (<1%) such as erythema, swelling, delayed local reactions (1%–10%), morbilliform rash, urticarial reactions, pityriasis rosea, Rowell syndrome, and lichen planus have been reported following the Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 vaccine.1 Cutaneous reactions reported in association with the Sinovac-Coronavac COVID-19 vaccine include swelling, redness, itching, discoloration, induration (1%–10%), urticaria, petechial rash, and exacerbation of psoriasis at the local injection site (<1%).2

We describe 7 patients from Turkey who presented with various dermatologic problems 5 to 28 days after COVID-19 vaccination, highlighting the possibility of early and late cutaneous reactions related to the vaccine (Table).

CT11302016_e_Table.jpg

Case Reports

Patient 1—A 44-year-old woman was admitted to the dermatology clinic with painful lesions on the trunk of 3 days’ duration. Dermatologic examination revealed grouped erythematous vesicles showing dermatomal spread in the right thoracolumbar (dermatome T10) region. The patient reported that she had received 2 doses of the Sinovac-Coronavac vaccine (doses 1 and 2) and 2 doses of the BioNTech COVID-19 vaccine (doses 3 and 4); the rash had developed 28 days after she received the 4th dose. Her medical history was unremarkable. The lesions regressed after 1 week of treatment with oral valacyclovir 1000 mg 3 times daily, but she developed postherpetic neuralgia 1 week after starting treatment, which resolved after 8 weeks.

Patient 2—A 68-year-old woman presented to the dermatology clinic for evaluation of painful sores on the upper lip of 1 day’s duration. She had a history of rheumatoid arthritis, hypertension, and atopy and was currently taking prednisone and etanercept. Dermatologic examination revealed grouped vesicles on an erythematous base on the upper lip. A diagnosis of herpes labialis was made. The patient reported that she had received a third dose of the Sinovac-Coronavac vaccine 10 days prior to the appearance of the lesions. Her symptoms resolved completely within 2 weeks of treatment with topical acyclovir.

Patient 3—A 64-year-old woman was admitted to the hospital with pain, redness, and watery sores on and around the left eyelid of 2 days’ duration. Dermatologic evaluation revealed the erythematous surface of the left eyelid and periorbital area showed partial crusts, clustered vesicles, erythema, and edema. Additionally, the conjunctiva was purulent and erythematous. The patient’s medical history was notable for allergic asthma, hypertension, anxiety, and depression. For this reason, the patient was prescribed an angiotensin receptor blocker and a selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor. She noted that a similar rash had developed around the left eye 6 years prior that was diagnosed as herpes zoster (HZ). She also reported that she had received 2 doses of the Sinovac-Coronavac COVID-19 vaccine followed by 1 dose of the BioNTech COVID-19 vaccine, which she had received 2 weeks before the rash developed. The patient was treated at the eye clinic and was found to have ocular involvement. Ophthalmology was consulted and a diagnosis of herpes zoster ophthalmicus (HZO) was made. Systemic valacyclovir treatment was initiated, resulting in clinical improvement within 3 weeks.

Patient 4—A 75-year-old man was admitted to the hospital with chest and back pain and widespread muscle pain of several days’ duration. His medical history was remarkable for diabetes mellitus, hypertension, depression, and coronary artery bypass surgery. A medication history revealed treatment with a β-blocker, acetylsalicylic acid, a calcium channel blocker, a dipeptidyl peptidase 4 inhibitor, and a selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor. Dermatologic examination revealed grouped vesicles on an erythematous background in dermatome T5 on the right chest and back. A diagnosis of HZ was made. The patient reported that he had received 2 doses of the Sinovac-Coronavac vaccine followed by 1 dose of the Pfizer-BioNTech vaccine 2 weeks prior to the current presentation. He was treated with valacyclovir for 1 week, and his symptoms resolved entirely within 3 weeks.

Patient 5—A 50-year-old woman presented to the hospital for evaluation of painful sores on the back, chest, groin, and abdomen of 10 days’ duration. The lesions initially had developed 7 days after receiving the BioNTech COVID-19 vaccine; she previously had received 2 doses of the Sinovac-Coronavac vaccine. The patient had a history of untreated psoriasis. Dermatologic examination revealed grouped vesicles on an erythematous background in the T2–L2 dermatomes on the left side of the trunk. A diagnosis of HZ was made. The lesions resolved after 1 week of treatment with systemic valacyclovir; however, she subsequently developed postherpetic neuralgia, hypoesthesia, and postinflammatory hyperpigmentation in the affected regions.

 

 

Patient 6—A 37-year-old woman presented to the hospital with redness, swelling, and itching all over the body of 3 days’ duration. The patient noted that the rash would subside and reappear throughout the day. Her medical history was unremarkable, except for COVID-19 infection 6 months prior. She had received a second dose of the BioNTech vaccine 20 days prior to development of symptoms. Dermatologic examination revealed widespread erythematous urticarial plaques. A diagnosis of acute urticaria was made. The patient recovered completely after 1 week of treatment with a systemic steroid and 3 weeks of antihistamine treatment.

Patient 7—A 63-year-old woman presented to the hospital with widespread itching and rash that appeared 5 days after the first dose of the BioNTech COVID-19 vaccine. The patient reported that the rash resolved spontaneously within a few hours but then reappeared. Her medical history revealed that she was taking tamoxifen for breast cancer and that she previously had received 2 doses of the Sinovac-Coronavac vaccine. Dermatologic examination revealed erythematous urticarial plaques on the trunk and arms. A diagnosis of urticaria was made, and her symptoms resolved after 6 weeks of antihistamine treatment.

Comment

Skin lesions associated with COVID-19 infection have been reported worldwide3,4 as well as dermatologic reactions following COVID-19 vaccination. In one case from Turkey, HZ infection was reported in a 68-year-old man 5 days after he received a second dose of the COVID-19 vaccine.5 In another case, HZ infection developed in a 78-year-old man 5 days after COVID-19 vaccination.6 Numerous cases of HZ infection developing within 1 to 26 days of COVID-19 vaccination have been reported worldwide.7-9

In a study conducted in the United States, 40 skin reactions associated with the COVID-19 vaccine were investigated; of these cases, 87.5% (35/40) were reported as varicella-zoster virus, and 12.5% (5/40) were reported as herpes simplex reactivation; 54% (19/35) and 80% (4/5) of these cases, respectively, were associated with the Pfizer-BioNTech vaccine.10 The average age of patients who developed a skin reaction was 46 years, and 70% (28/40) were women. The time to onset of the reaction was 2 to 13 days after vaccination, and symptoms were reported to improve within 7 days on average.10

Another study from Spain examined 405 vaccine-related skin reactions, 40.2% of which were related to the Pfizer-BioNTech vaccine. Among them, 80.2% occurred in women; 13.8% of cases were diagnosed as varicella-zoster virus or HZ virus reactivation, and 14.6% were urticaria. Eighty reactions (21%) were classified as severe/very severe and 81% required treatment.11 One study reported 414 skin reactions from the COVID-19 vaccine from December 2020 to February 2021; of these cases, 83% occurred after the Moderna vaccine, which is not available in Turkey, and 17% occurred after the Pfizer-BioNTech vaccine.12A systematic review of 91 patients who developed HZ infection after COVID-19 vaccination reported that 10% (9/91) of cases were receiving immunosuppressive therapy and 13% (12/91) had an autoimmune disease.7 In our case series, it is known that at least 2 of the patients (patients 2 and 5), including 1 patient with rheumatoid arthritis (patient 2) who was on immunosuppressive treatment, had autoimmune disorders. However, reports in the literature indicate that most patients with autoimmune inflammatory rheumatic diseases remain stable after vaccination.13

Herpes zoster ophthalmicus is a rare form of HZ caused by involvement of the ophthalmic branch of the trigeminal nerve that manifests as vesicular lesions and retinitis, uveitis, keratitis, conjunctivitis, and pain on an erythematous background. Two cases of women who developed HZO infection after Pfizer-BioNTech vaccination were reported in the literature.14 Although patient 3 in our case series had a history of HZO 6 years prior, the possibility of the Pfizer-BioNTech vaccine triggering HZO should be taken into consideration.

Although cutaneous reactions after the Sinovac-Coronavac vaccine were observed in only 1 of 7 patients in our case series, skin reactions after Sinovac-Coronavac (an inactivated viral vaccine) have been reported in the literature. In one study, after a total of 35,229 injections, the incidence of cutaneous adverse events due to Sinovac-Coronavac was reported to be 0.94% and 0.70% after the first and second doses, respectively.15 Therefore, further study results are needed to directly attribute the reactions to COVID-19 vaccination.

Conclusion

Our case series highlights that clinicians should be vigilant in diagnosing cutaneous reactions following COVID-19 vaccination early to prevent potential complications. Early recognition of reactions is crucial, and the prognosis can be improved with appropriate treatment. Despite the potential dermatologic adverse effects of the COVID-19 vaccine, the most effective way to protect against serious COVID-19 infection is to continue to be vaccinated.

References
  1. Polack FP, Thomas SJ, Kitchin N, et al. Safety and efficacy of the BNT162b2 mRNA COVID-19 vaccine. N Engl J Med. 2020;383:2603-2615.
  2. Zhang Y, Zeng G, Pan H, et al. Safety, tolerability, and immunogenicity of an inactivated SARS-CoV-2 vaccine in healthy adults aged 18–59 years: a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 1/2 clinical trial. Lancet Infect Dis. 2021;21:181-192.
  3. Tan SW, Tam YC, Oh CC. Skin manifestations of COVID-19: a worldwide review. JAAD Int. 2021;2:119-133.
  4. Singh H, Kaur H, Singh K, et al. Cutaneous manifestations of COVID-19: a systematic review. advances in wound care. 2021;10:51-80.
  5. Aksu SB, Öztürk GZ. A rare case of shingles after COVID-19 vaccine: is it a possible adverse effect? clinical and experimental vaccine research. 2021;10:198-201.
  6. Bostan E, Yalici-Armagan B. Herpes zoster following inactivated COVID-19 vaccine: a coexistence or coincidence? J Cosmet Dermatol. 2021;20:1566-1567.
  7. Katsikas Triantafyllidis K, Giannos P, Mian IT, et al. Varicella zoster virus reactivation following COVID-19 vaccination: a systematic review of case reports. Vaccines (Basel). 2021;9:1013. doi:10.3390/vaccines9091013
  8. Rodríguez-Jiménez P, Chicharro P, Cabrera LM, et al. Varicella-zoster virus reactivation after SARS-CoV-2 BNT162b2 mRNA vaccination: report of 5 cases. JAAD Case Rep. 2021;12:58-59. doi:10.1016/j.jdcr.2021.04.014
  9. Lee C, Cotter D, Basa J, et al. 20 Post-COVID-19 vaccine-related shingles cases seen at the Las Vegas Dermatology clinic and sent to us via social media. J Cosmet Dermatol. 2021;20:1960-1964.
  10. Fathy RA, McMahon DE, Lee C, et al. Varicella-zoster and herpes simplex virus reactivation post-COVID-19 vaccination: a review of 40 cases in an International Dermatology Registry. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venerol. 2022;36:E6-E9.
  11. Català A, Muñoz-Santos C, Galván-Casas C, et al. Cutaneous reactions after SARS-CoV-2 vaccination: a cross-sectional Spanish nationwide study of 405 cases. Br J Dermatol. 2022;186:142-152.
  12. McMahon DE, Amerson E, Rosenbach M, et al. Cutaneous reactions reported after Moderna and Pfizer COVID-19 vaccination: a registry-based study of 414 cases. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2021;85:46-55.
  13. Furer V, Eviatar T, Zisman D, et al. Immunogenicity and safety of the BNT162b2 mRNA COVID-19 vaccine in adult patients with autoimmune inflammatory rheumatic diseases and in the general population: a multicentre study. Ann Rheum Dis. 2021;80:1330-1338.
  14. Bernardini N, Skroza N, Mambrin A, et al. Herpes zoster ophthalmicus in two women after Pfizer-BioNTech (BNT162b2) vaccine. J Med Virol. 2022;94:817-818.
  15. Rerknimitr P, Puaratanaarunkon T, Wongtada C, et al. Cutaneous adverse reactions from 35,229 doses of Sinovac and AstraZeneca COVID-19 vaccination: a prospective cohort study in healthcare workers. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol. 2022;36:E158-E161.
Article PDF
Author and Disclosure Information

From Giresun University, Turkey. Dr. Alkanat is from the Faculty of Health Sciences, and Dr. Kulaklı is from the Faculty of Medicine, Dermatology Clinic.

The authors report no conflict of interest.

Correspondence: Hafize Özdemir Alkanat, RN, PhD, Giresun University, Faculty of Health Sciences, 28340 Piraziz/Giresun, Turkey (hafize.ozdemir@giresun.edu.tr).

Issue
Cutis - 113(2)
Publications
Topics
Page Number
E16-E19
Sections
Author and Disclosure Information

From Giresun University, Turkey. Dr. Alkanat is from the Faculty of Health Sciences, and Dr. Kulaklı is from the Faculty of Medicine, Dermatology Clinic.

The authors report no conflict of interest.

Correspondence: Hafize Özdemir Alkanat, RN, PhD, Giresun University, Faculty of Health Sciences, 28340 Piraziz/Giresun, Turkey (hafize.ozdemir@giresun.edu.tr).

Author and Disclosure Information

From Giresun University, Turkey. Dr. Alkanat is from the Faculty of Health Sciences, and Dr. Kulaklı is from the Faculty of Medicine, Dermatology Clinic.

The authors report no conflict of interest.

Correspondence: Hafize Özdemir Alkanat, RN, PhD, Giresun University, Faculty of Health Sciences, 28340 Piraziz/Giresun, Turkey (hafize.ozdemir@giresun.edu.tr).

Article PDF
Article PDF

Cutaneous reactions associated with the Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 vaccine have been reported worldwide since December 2020. Local injection site reactions (<1%) such as erythema, swelling, delayed local reactions (1%–10%), morbilliform rash, urticarial reactions, pityriasis rosea, Rowell syndrome, and lichen planus have been reported following the Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 vaccine.1 Cutaneous reactions reported in association with the Sinovac-Coronavac COVID-19 vaccine include swelling, redness, itching, discoloration, induration (1%–10%), urticaria, petechial rash, and exacerbation of psoriasis at the local injection site (<1%).2

We describe 7 patients from Turkey who presented with various dermatologic problems 5 to 28 days after COVID-19 vaccination, highlighting the possibility of early and late cutaneous reactions related to the vaccine (Table).

CT11302016_e_Table.jpg

Case Reports

Patient 1—A 44-year-old woman was admitted to the dermatology clinic with painful lesions on the trunk of 3 days’ duration. Dermatologic examination revealed grouped erythematous vesicles showing dermatomal spread in the right thoracolumbar (dermatome T10) region. The patient reported that she had received 2 doses of the Sinovac-Coronavac vaccine (doses 1 and 2) and 2 doses of the BioNTech COVID-19 vaccine (doses 3 and 4); the rash had developed 28 days after she received the 4th dose. Her medical history was unremarkable. The lesions regressed after 1 week of treatment with oral valacyclovir 1000 mg 3 times daily, but she developed postherpetic neuralgia 1 week after starting treatment, which resolved after 8 weeks.

Patient 2—A 68-year-old woman presented to the dermatology clinic for evaluation of painful sores on the upper lip of 1 day’s duration. She had a history of rheumatoid arthritis, hypertension, and atopy and was currently taking prednisone and etanercept. Dermatologic examination revealed grouped vesicles on an erythematous base on the upper lip. A diagnosis of herpes labialis was made. The patient reported that she had received a third dose of the Sinovac-Coronavac vaccine 10 days prior to the appearance of the lesions. Her symptoms resolved completely within 2 weeks of treatment with topical acyclovir.

Patient 3—A 64-year-old woman was admitted to the hospital with pain, redness, and watery sores on and around the left eyelid of 2 days’ duration. Dermatologic evaluation revealed the erythematous surface of the left eyelid and periorbital area showed partial crusts, clustered vesicles, erythema, and edema. Additionally, the conjunctiva was purulent and erythematous. The patient’s medical history was notable for allergic asthma, hypertension, anxiety, and depression. For this reason, the patient was prescribed an angiotensin receptor blocker and a selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor. She noted that a similar rash had developed around the left eye 6 years prior that was diagnosed as herpes zoster (HZ). She also reported that she had received 2 doses of the Sinovac-Coronavac COVID-19 vaccine followed by 1 dose of the BioNTech COVID-19 vaccine, which she had received 2 weeks before the rash developed. The patient was treated at the eye clinic and was found to have ocular involvement. Ophthalmology was consulted and a diagnosis of herpes zoster ophthalmicus (HZO) was made. Systemic valacyclovir treatment was initiated, resulting in clinical improvement within 3 weeks.

Patient 4—A 75-year-old man was admitted to the hospital with chest and back pain and widespread muscle pain of several days’ duration. His medical history was remarkable for diabetes mellitus, hypertension, depression, and coronary artery bypass surgery. A medication history revealed treatment with a β-blocker, acetylsalicylic acid, a calcium channel blocker, a dipeptidyl peptidase 4 inhibitor, and a selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor. Dermatologic examination revealed grouped vesicles on an erythematous background in dermatome T5 on the right chest and back. A diagnosis of HZ was made. The patient reported that he had received 2 doses of the Sinovac-Coronavac vaccine followed by 1 dose of the Pfizer-BioNTech vaccine 2 weeks prior to the current presentation. He was treated with valacyclovir for 1 week, and his symptoms resolved entirely within 3 weeks.

Patient 5—A 50-year-old woman presented to the hospital for evaluation of painful sores on the back, chest, groin, and abdomen of 10 days’ duration. The lesions initially had developed 7 days after receiving the BioNTech COVID-19 vaccine; she previously had received 2 doses of the Sinovac-Coronavac vaccine. The patient had a history of untreated psoriasis. Dermatologic examination revealed grouped vesicles on an erythematous background in the T2–L2 dermatomes on the left side of the trunk. A diagnosis of HZ was made. The lesions resolved after 1 week of treatment with systemic valacyclovir; however, she subsequently developed postherpetic neuralgia, hypoesthesia, and postinflammatory hyperpigmentation in the affected regions.

 

 

Patient 6—A 37-year-old woman presented to the hospital with redness, swelling, and itching all over the body of 3 days’ duration. The patient noted that the rash would subside and reappear throughout the day. Her medical history was unremarkable, except for COVID-19 infection 6 months prior. She had received a second dose of the BioNTech vaccine 20 days prior to development of symptoms. Dermatologic examination revealed widespread erythematous urticarial plaques. A diagnosis of acute urticaria was made. The patient recovered completely after 1 week of treatment with a systemic steroid and 3 weeks of antihistamine treatment.

Patient 7—A 63-year-old woman presented to the hospital with widespread itching and rash that appeared 5 days after the first dose of the BioNTech COVID-19 vaccine. The patient reported that the rash resolved spontaneously within a few hours but then reappeared. Her medical history revealed that she was taking tamoxifen for breast cancer and that she previously had received 2 doses of the Sinovac-Coronavac vaccine. Dermatologic examination revealed erythematous urticarial plaques on the trunk and arms. A diagnosis of urticaria was made, and her symptoms resolved after 6 weeks of antihistamine treatment.

Comment

Skin lesions associated with COVID-19 infection have been reported worldwide3,4 as well as dermatologic reactions following COVID-19 vaccination. In one case from Turkey, HZ infection was reported in a 68-year-old man 5 days after he received a second dose of the COVID-19 vaccine.5 In another case, HZ infection developed in a 78-year-old man 5 days after COVID-19 vaccination.6 Numerous cases of HZ infection developing within 1 to 26 days of COVID-19 vaccination have been reported worldwide.7-9

In a study conducted in the United States, 40 skin reactions associated with the COVID-19 vaccine were investigated; of these cases, 87.5% (35/40) were reported as varicella-zoster virus, and 12.5% (5/40) were reported as herpes simplex reactivation; 54% (19/35) and 80% (4/5) of these cases, respectively, were associated with the Pfizer-BioNTech vaccine.10 The average age of patients who developed a skin reaction was 46 years, and 70% (28/40) were women. The time to onset of the reaction was 2 to 13 days after vaccination, and symptoms were reported to improve within 7 days on average.10

Another study from Spain examined 405 vaccine-related skin reactions, 40.2% of which were related to the Pfizer-BioNTech vaccine. Among them, 80.2% occurred in women; 13.8% of cases were diagnosed as varicella-zoster virus or HZ virus reactivation, and 14.6% were urticaria. Eighty reactions (21%) were classified as severe/very severe and 81% required treatment.11 One study reported 414 skin reactions from the COVID-19 vaccine from December 2020 to February 2021; of these cases, 83% occurred after the Moderna vaccine, which is not available in Turkey, and 17% occurred after the Pfizer-BioNTech vaccine.12A systematic review of 91 patients who developed HZ infection after COVID-19 vaccination reported that 10% (9/91) of cases were receiving immunosuppressive therapy and 13% (12/91) had an autoimmune disease.7 In our case series, it is known that at least 2 of the patients (patients 2 and 5), including 1 patient with rheumatoid arthritis (patient 2) who was on immunosuppressive treatment, had autoimmune disorders. However, reports in the literature indicate that most patients with autoimmune inflammatory rheumatic diseases remain stable after vaccination.13

Herpes zoster ophthalmicus is a rare form of HZ caused by involvement of the ophthalmic branch of the trigeminal nerve that manifests as vesicular lesions and retinitis, uveitis, keratitis, conjunctivitis, and pain on an erythematous background. Two cases of women who developed HZO infection after Pfizer-BioNTech vaccination were reported in the literature.14 Although patient 3 in our case series had a history of HZO 6 years prior, the possibility of the Pfizer-BioNTech vaccine triggering HZO should be taken into consideration.

Although cutaneous reactions after the Sinovac-Coronavac vaccine were observed in only 1 of 7 patients in our case series, skin reactions after Sinovac-Coronavac (an inactivated viral vaccine) have been reported in the literature. In one study, after a total of 35,229 injections, the incidence of cutaneous adverse events due to Sinovac-Coronavac was reported to be 0.94% and 0.70% after the first and second doses, respectively.15 Therefore, further study results are needed to directly attribute the reactions to COVID-19 vaccination.

Conclusion

Our case series highlights that clinicians should be vigilant in diagnosing cutaneous reactions following COVID-19 vaccination early to prevent potential complications. Early recognition of reactions is crucial, and the prognosis can be improved with appropriate treatment. Despite the potential dermatologic adverse effects of the COVID-19 vaccine, the most effective way to protect against serious COVID-19 infection is to continue to be vaccinated.

Cutaneous reactions associated with the Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 vaccine have been reported worldwide since December 2020. Local injection site reactions (<1%) such as erythema, swelling, delayed local reactions (1%–10%), morbilliform rash, urticarial reactions, pityriasis rosea, Rowell syndrome, and lichen planus have been reported following the Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 vaccine.1 Cutaneous reactions reported in association with the Sinovac-Coronavac COVID-19 vaccine include swelling, redness, itching, discoloration, induration (1%–10%), urticaria, petechial rash, and exacerbation of psoriasis at the local injection site (<1%).2

We describe 7 patients from Turkey who presented with various dermatologic problems 5 to 28 days after COVID-19 vaccination, highlighting the possibility of early and late cutaneous reactions related to the vaccine (Table).

CT11302016_e_Table.jpg

Case Reports

Patient 1—A 44-year-old woman was admitted to the dermatology clinic with painful lesions on the trunk of 3 days’ duration. Dermatologic examination revealed grouped erythematous vesicles showing dermatomal spread in the right thoracolumbar (dermatome T10) region. The patient reported that she had received 2 doses of the Sinovac-Coronavac vaccine (doses 1 and 2) and 2 doses of the BioNTech COVID-19 vaccine (doses 3 and 4); the rash had developed 28 days after she received the 4th dose. Her medical history was unremarkable. The lesions regressed after 1 week of treatment with oral valacyclovir 1000 mg 3 times daily, but she developed postherpetic neuralgia 1 week after starting treatment, which resolved after 8 weeks.

Patient 2—A 68-year-old woman presented to the dermatology clinic for evaluation of painful sores on the upper lip of 1 day’s duration. She had a history of rheumatoid arthritis, hypertension, and atopy and was currently taking prednisone and etanercept. Dermatologic examination revealed grouped vesicles on an erythematous base on the upper lip. A diagnosis of herpes labialis was made. The patient reported that she had received a third dose of the Sinovac-Coronavac vaccine 10 days prior to the appearance of the lesions. Her symptoms resolved completely within 2 weeks of treatment with topical acyclovir.

Patient 3—A 64-year-old woman was admitted to the hospital with pain, redness, and watery sores on and around the left eyelid of 2 days’ duration. Dermatologic evaluation revealed the erythematous surface of the left eyelid and periorbital area showed partial crusts, clustered vesicles, erythema, and edema. Additionally, the conjunctiva was purulent and erythematous. The patient’s medical history was notable for allergic asthma, hypertension, anxiety, and depression. For this reason, the patient was prescribed an angiotensin receptor blocker and a selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor. She noted that a similar rash had developed around the left eye 6 years prior that was diagnosed as herpes zoster (HZ). She also reported that she had received 2 doses of the Sinovac-Coronavac COVID-19 vaccine followed by 1 dose of the BioNTech COVID-19 vaccine, which she had received 2 weeks before the rash developed. The patient was treated at the eye clinic and was found to have ocular involvement. Ophthalmology was consulted and a diagnosis of herpes zoster ophthalmicus (HZO) was made. Systemic valacyclovir treatment was initiated, resulting in clinical improvement within 3 weeks.

Patient 4—A 75-year-old man was admitted to the hospital with chest and back pain and widespread muscle pain of several days’ duration. His medical history was remarkable for diabetes mellitus, hypertension, depression, and coronary artery bypass surgery. A medication history revealed treatment with a β-blocker, acetylsalicylic acid, a calcium channel blocker, a dipeptidyl peptidase 4 inhibitor, and a selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor. Dermatologic examination revealed grouped vesicles on an erythematous background in dermatome T5 on the right chest and back. A diagnosis of HZ was made. The patient reported that he had received 2 doses of the Sinovac-Coronavac vaccine followed by 1 dose of the Pfizer-BioNTech vaccine 2 weeks prior to the current presentation. He was treated with valacyclovir for 1 week, and his symptoms resolved entirely within 3 weeks.

Patient 5—A 50-year-old woman presented to the hospital for evaluation of painful sores on the back, chest, groin, and abdomen of 10 days’ duration. The lesions initially had developed 7 days after receiving the BioNTech COVID-19 vaccine; she previously had received 2 doses of the Sinovac-Coronavac vaccine. The patient had a history of untreated psoriasis. Dermatologic examination revealed grouped vesicles on an erythematous background in the T2–L2 dermatomes on the left side of the trunk. A diagnosis of HZ was made. The lesions resolved after 1 week of treatment with systemic valacyclovir; however, she subsequently developed postherpetic neuralgia, hypoesthesia, and postinflammatory hyperpigmentation in the affected regions.

 

 

Patient 6—A 37-year-old woman presented to the hospital with redness, swelling, and itching all over the body of 3 days’ duration. The patient noted that the rash would subside and reappear throughout the day. Her medical history was unremarkable, except for COVID-19 infection 6 months prior. She had received a second dose of the BioNTech vaccine 20 days prior to development of symptoms. Dermatologic examination revealed widespread erythematous urticarial plaques. A diagnosis of acute urticaria was made. The patient recovered completely after 1 week of treatment with a systemic steroid and 3 weeks of antihistamine treatment.

Patient 7—A 63-year-old woman presented to the hospital with widespread itching and rash that appeared 5 days after the first dose of the BioNTech COVID-19 vaccine. The patient reported that the rash resolved spontaneously within a few hours but then reappeared. Her medical history revealed that she was taking tamoxifen for breast cancer and that she previously had received 2 doses of the Sinovac-Coronavac vaccine. Dermatologic examination revealed erythematous urticarial plaques on the trunk and arms. A diagnosis of urticaria was made, and her symptoms resolved after 6 weeks of antihistamine treatment.

Comment

Skin lesions associated with COVID-19 infection have been reported worldwide3,4 as well as dermatologic reactions following COVID-19 vaccination. In one case from Turkey, HZ infection was reported in a 68-year-old man 5 days after he received a second dose of the COVID-19 vaccine.5 In another case, HZ infection developed in a 78-year-old man 5 days after COVID-19 vaccination.6 Numerous cases of HZ infection developing within 1 to 26 days of COVID-19 vaccination have been reported worldwide.7-9

In a study conducted in the United States, 40 skin reactions associated with the COVID-19 vaccine were investigated; of these cases, 87.5% (35/40) were reported as varicella-zoster virus, and 12.5% (5/40) were reported as herpes simplex reactivation; 54% (19/35) and 80% (4/5) of these cases, respectively, were associated with the Pfizer-BioNTech vaccine.10 The average age of patients who developed a skin reaction was 46 years, and 70% (28/40) were women. The time to onset of the reaction was 2 to 13 days after vaccination, and symptoms were reported to improve within 7 days on average.10

Another study from Spain examined 405 vaccine-related skin reactions, 40.2% of which were related to the Pfizer-BioNTech vaccine. Among them, 80.2% occurred in women; 13.8% of cases were diagnosed as varicella-zoster virus or HZ virus reactivation, and 14.6% were urticaria. Eighty reactions (21%) were classified as severe/very severe and 81% required treatment.11 One study reported 414 skin reactions from the COVID-19 vaccine from December 2020 to February 2021; of these cases, 83% occurred after the Moderna vaccine, which is not available in Turkey, and 17% occurred after the Pfizer-BioNTech vaccine.12A systematic review of 91 patients who developed HZ infection after COVID-19 vaccination reported that 10% (9/91) of cases were receiving immunosuppressive therapy and 13% (12/91) had an autoimmune disease.7 In our case series, it is known that at least 2 of the patients (patients 2 and 5), including 1 patient with rheumatoid arthritis (patient 2) who was on immunosuppressive treatment, had autoimmune disorders. However, reports in the literature indicate that most patients with autoimmune inflammatory rheumatic diseases remain stable after vaccination.13

Herpes zoster ophthalmicus is a rare form of HZ caused by involvement of the ophthalmic branch of the trigeminal nerve that manifests as vesicular lesions and retinitis, uveitis, keratitis, conjunctivitis, and pain on an erythematous background. Two cases of women who developed HZO infection after Pfizer-BioNTech vaccination were reported in the literature.14 Although patient 3 in our case series had a history of HZO 6 years prior, the possibility of the Pfizer-BioNTech vaccine triggering HZO should be taken into consideration.

Although cutaneous reactions after the Sinovac-Coronavac vaccine were observed in only 1 of 7 patients in our case series, skin reactions after Sinovac-Coronavac (an inactivated viral vaccine) have been reported in the literature. In one study, after a total of 35,229 injections, the incidence of cutaneous adverse events due to Sinovac-Coronavac was reported to be 0.94% and 0.70% after the first and second doses, respectively.15 Therefore, further study results are needed to directly attribute the reactions to COVID-19 vaccination.

Conclusion

Our case series highlights that clinicians should be vigilant in diagnosing cutaneous reactions following COVID-19 vaccination early to prevent potential complications. Early recognition of reactions is crucial, and the prognosis can be improved with appropriate treatment. Despite the potential dermatologic adverse effects of the COVID-19 vaccine, the most effective way to protect against serious COVID-19 infection is to continue to be vaccinated.

References
  1. Polack FP, Thomas SJ, Kitchin N, et al. Safety and efficacy of the BNT162b2 mRNA COVID-19 vaccine. N Engl J Med. 2020;383:2603-2615.
  2. Zhang Y, Zeng G, Pan H, et al. Safety, tolerability, and immunogenicity of an inactivated SARS-CoV-2 vaccine in healthy adults aged 18–59 years: a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 1/2 clinical trial. Lancet Infect Dis. 2021;21:181-192.
  3. Tan SW, Tam YC, Oh CC. Skin manifestations of COVID-19: a worldwide review. JAAD Int. 2021;2:119-133.
  4. Singh H, Kaur H, Singh K, et al. Cutaneous manifestations of COVID-19: a systematic review. advances in wound care. 2021;10:51-80.
  5. Aksu SB, Öztürk GZ. A rare case of shingles after COVID-19 vaccine: is it a possible adverse effect? clinical and experimental vaccine research. 2021;10:198-201.
  6. Bostan E, Yalici-Armagan B. Herpes zoster following inactivated COVID-19 vaccine: a coexistence or coincidence? J Cosmet Dermatol. 2021;20:1566-1567.
  7. Katsikas Triantafyllidis K, Giannos P, Mian IT, et al. Varicella zoster virus reactivation following COVID-19 vaccination: a systematic review of case reports. Vaccines (Basel). 2021;9:1013. doi:10.3390/vaccines9091013
  8. Rodríguez-Jiménez P, Chicharro P, Cabrera LM, et al. Varicella-zoster virus reactivation after SARS-CoV-2 BNT162b2 mRNA vaccination: report of 5 cases. JAAD Case Rep. 2021;12:58-59. doi:10.1016/j.jdcr.2021.04.014
  9. Lee C, Cotter D, Basa J, et al. 20 Post-COVID-19 vaccine-related shingles cases seen at the Las Vegas Dermatology clinic and sent to us via social media. J Cosmet Dermatol. 2021;20:1960-1964.
  10. Fathy RA, McMahon DE, Lee C, et al. Varicella-zoster and herpes simplex virus reactivation post-COVID-19 vaccination: a review of 40 cases in an International Dermatology Registry. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venerol. 2022;36:E6-E9.
  11. Català A, Muñoz-Santos C, Galván-Casas C, et al. Cutaneous reactions after SARS-CoV-2 vaccination: a cross-sectional Spanish nationwide study of 405 cases. Br J Dermatol. 2022;186:142-152.
  12. McMahon DE, Amerson E, Rosenbach M, et al. Cutaneous reactions reported after Moderna and Pfizer COVID-19 vaccination: a registry-based study of 414 cases. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2021;85:46-55.
  13. Furer V, Eviatar T, Zisman D, et al. Immunogenicity and safety of the BNT162b2 mRNA COVID-19 vaccine in adult patients with autoimmune inflammatory rheumatic diseases and in the general population: a multicentre study. Ann Rheum Dis. 2021;80:1330-1338.
  14. Bernardini N, Skroza N, Mambrin A, et al. Herpes zoster ophthalmicus in two women after Pfizer-BioNTech (BNT162b2) vaccine. J Med Virol. 2022;94:817-818.
  15. Rerknimitr P, Puaratanaarunkon T, Wongtada C, et al. Cutaneous adverse reactions from 35,229 doses of Sinovac and AstraZeneca COVID-19 vaccination: a prospective cohort study in healthcare workers. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol. 2022;36:E158-E161.
References
  1. Polack FP, Thomas SJ, Kitchin N, et al. Safety and efficacy of the BNT162b2 mRNA COVID-19 vaccine. N Engl J Med. 2020;383:2603-2615.
  2. Zhang Y, Zeng G, Pan H, et al. Safety, tolerability, and immunogenicity of an inactivated SARS-CoV-2 vaccine in healthy adults aged 18–59 years: a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 1/2 clinical trial. Lancet Infect Dis. 2021;21:181-192.
  3. Tan SW, Tam YC, Oh CC. Skin manifestations of COVID-19: a worldwide review. JAAD Int. 2021;2:119-133.
  4. Singh H, Kaur H, Singh K, et al. Cutaneous manifestations of COVID-19: a systematic review. advances in wound care. 2021;10:51-80.
  5. Aksu SB, Öztürk GZ. A rare case of shingles after COVID-19 vaccine: is it a possible adverse effect? clinical and experimental vaccine research. 2021;10:198-201.
  6. Bostan E, Yalici-Armagan B. Herpes zoster following inactivated COVID-19 vaccine: a coexistence or coincidence? J Cosmet Dermatol. 2021;20:1566-1567.
  7. Katsikas Triantafyllidis K, Giannos P, Mian IT, et al. Varicella zoster virus reactivation following COVID-19 vaccination: a systematic review of case reports. Vaccines (Basel). 2021;9:1013. doi:10.3390/vaccines9091013
  8. Rodríguez-Jiménez P, Chicharro P, Cabrera LM, et al. Varicella-zoster virus reactivation after SARS-CoV-2 BNT162b2 mRNA vaccination: report of 5 cases. JAAD Case Rep. 2021;12:58-59. doi:10.1016/j.jdcr.2021.04.014
  9. Lee C, Cotter D, Basa J, et al. 20 Post-COVID-19 vaccine-related shingles cases seen at the Las Vegas Dermatology clinic and sent to us via social media. J Cosmet Dermatol. 2021;20:1960-1964.
  10. Fathy RA, McMahon DE, Lee C, et al. Varicella-zoster and herpes simplex virus reactivation post-COVID-19 vaccination: a review of 40 cases in an International Dermatology Registry. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venerol. 2022;36:E6-E9.
  11. Català A, Muñoz-Santos C, Galván-Casas C, et al. Cutaneous reactions after SARS-CoV-2 vaccination: a cross-sectional Spanish nationwide study of 405 cases. Br J Dermatol. 2022;186:142-152.
  12. McMahon DE, Amerson E, Rosenbach M, et al. Cutaneous reactions reported after Moderna and Pfizer COVID-19 vaccination: a registry-based study of 414 cases. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2021;85:46-55.
  13. Furer V, Eviatar T, Zisman D, et al. Immunogenicity and safety of the BNT162b2 mRNA COVID-19 vaccine in adult patients with autoimmune inflammatory rheumatic diseases and in the general population: a multicentre study. Ann Rheum Dis. 2021;80:1330-1338.
  14. Bernardini N, Skroza N, Mambrin A, et al. Herpes zoster ophthalmicus in two women after Pfizer-BioNTech (BNT162b2) vaccine. J Med Virol. 2022;94:817-818.
  15. Rerknimitr P, Puaratanaarunkon T, Wongtada C, et al. Cutaneous adverse reactions from 35,229 doses of Sinovac and AstraZeneca COVID-19 vaccination: a prospective cohort study in healthcare workers. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol. 2022;36:E158-E161.
Issue
Cutis - 113(2)
Issue
Cutis - 113(2)
Page Number
E16-E19
Page Number
E16-E19
Publications
Publications
Topics
Article Type
Display Headline
Dermatologic Reactions Following COVID-19 Vaccination: A Case Series
Display Headline
Dermatologic Reactions Following COVID-19 Vaccination: A Case Series
Sections
Teambase XML
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!--$RCSfile: InCopy_agile.xsl,v $ $Revision: 1.35 $-->
<!--$RCSfile: drupal.xsl,v $ $Revision: 1.7 $-->
<root generator="drupal.xsl" gversion="1.7"> <header> <fileName>Alkanat</fileName> <TBEID>0C02F2C1.SIG</TBEID> <TBUniqueIdentifier>NJ_0C02F2C1</TBUniqueIdentifier> <newsOrJournal>Journal</newsOrJournal> <publisherName>Frontline Medical Communications Inc.</publisherName> <storyname>Alkanat</storyname> <articleType>1</articleType> <TBLocation>Copyfitting-CT</TBLocation> <QCDate/> <firstPublished>20240222T085847</firstPublished> <LastPublished>20240222T085848</LastPublished> <pubStatus qcode="stat:"/> <embargoDate/> <killDate/> <CMSDate>20240222T085847</CMSDate> <articleSource/> <facebookInfo/> <meetingNumber/> <byline>Hafize Özdemir Alkanat, RN, PhD; Sevgi Kulaklý, MD</byline> <bylineText>Hafize Özdemir Alkanat, RN, PhD; Sevgi Kulaklı, MD</bylineText> <bylineFull>Hafize Özdemir Alkanat, RN, PhD; Sevgi Kulaklý, MD</bylineFull> <bylineTitleText/> <USOrGlobal/> <wireDocType/> <newsDocType/> <journalDocType/> <linkLabel/> <pageRange>E16-E19</pageRange> <citation/> <quizID/> <indexIssueDate/> <itemClass qcode="ninat:text"/> <provider qcode="provider:"> <name/> <rightsInfo> <copyrightHolder> <name/> </copyrightHolder> <copyrightNotice/> </rightsInfo> </provider> <abstract/> <metaDescription>Cutaneous reactions associated with the Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 vaccine have been reported worldwide since December 2020. Local injection site reactions (&lt;1%) </metaDescription> <articlePDF>300329</articlePDF> <teaserImage/> <title>Dermatologic Reactions Following COVID-19 Vaccination: A Case Series</title> <deck/> <disclaimer/> <AuthorList/> <articleURL/> <doi/> <pubMedID/> <publishXMLStatus/> <publishXMLVersion>1</publishXMLVersion> <useEISSN>0</useEISSN> <urgency/> <pubPubdateYear>2024</pubPubdateYear> <pubPubdateMonth>February</pubPubdateMonth> <pubPubdateDay/> <pubVolume>113</pubVolume> <pubNumber>2</pubNumber> <wireChannels/> <primaryCMSID/> <CMSIDs> <CMSID>2165</CMSID> </CMSIDs> <keywords> <keyword>COVID-19</keyword> <keyword> infectious disease</keyword> </keywords> <seeAlsos/> <publications_g> <publicationData> <publicationCode>CT</publicationCode> <pubIssueName>February 2024</pubIssueName> <pubArticleType>Audio | 2165</pubArticleType> <pubTopics/> <pubCategories/> <pubSections/> <journalTitle>Cutis</journalTitle> <journalFullTitle>Cutis</journalFullTitle> <copyrightStatement>Copyright 2015 Frontline Medical Communications Inc., Parsippany, NJ, USA. All rights reserved.</copyrightStatement> </publicationData> </publications_g> <publications> <term canonical="true">12</term> </publications> <sections> <term canonical="true">45</term> </sections> <topics> <term>234</term> <term canonical="true">63993</term> </topics> <links> <link> <itemClass qcode="ninat:composite"/> <altRep contenttype="application/pdf">images/180026ce.pdf</altRep> <description role="drol:caption"/> <description role="drol:credit"/> </link> </links> </header> <itemSet> <newsItem> <itemMeta> <itemRole>Main</itemRole> <itemClass>text</itemClass> <title>Dermatologic Reactions Following COVID-19 Vaccination: A Case Series</title> <deck/> </itemMeta> <itemContent> <p class="abstract">We describe 7 patients with various dermatologic reactions following COVID-19 vaccination, including herpes zoster (HZ) infection, herpes zoster ophthalmicus (HZO), herpes labialis, and urticaria. Although the reactions described here may be related to COVID-19 vaccination, continued vaccination is recommended, as it is the most effective way to protect against serious COVID-19 infection.</p> <p> <em><em>Cutis. </em>2024;113:E16-E19.</em> </p> <p>Cutaneous reactions associated with the Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 vaccine have been reported worldwide since December 2020. Local injection site reactions (<span class="body">&lt;</span>1%) such as erythema, swelling, delayed local reactions (1%–10%), morbilliform rash, urticarial reactions, pityriasis rosea, Rowell syndrome, and lichen planus have been reported following the Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 vaccine.<sup>1</sup> Cutaneous reactions reported in association with the Sinovac-Coronavac COVID-19 vaccine include swelling, redness, itching, discoloration, induration (1%–10%), urticaria, petechial rash, and exacerbation of psoriasis at the local injection site (<span class="body">&lt;</span>1%).<sup>2</sup></p> <p>We describe 7 patients from Turkey who presented with various dermatologic problems 5 to 28 days after COVID-19 vaccination, highlighting the possibility of early and late cutaneous reactions related to the vaccine (Table).</p> <h3>Case Reports</h3> <p><i>Patient 1—</i>A 44-year-old woman was admitted to the dermatology clinic with painful lesions on the trunk of 3 days’ duration. Dermatologic examination revealed grouped erythematous vesicles showing dermatomal spread in the right thoracolumbar (dermatome T10) region. The patient reported that she had received 2 doses of the Sinovac-Coronavac vaccine (doses 1 and 2) and 2 doses of the BioNTech COVID-19 vaccine (doses 3 and 4); the rash had developed 28 days after she received the 4th dose. Her medical history was unremarkable. The lesions regressed after 1 week of treatment with oral valacyclovir 1000 mg 3 times daily, but she developed postherpetic neuralgia 1 week after starting treatment, which resolved after 8 weeks.</p> <p><i>Patient 2—</i>A 68-year-old woman presented to the dermatology clinic for evaluation of painful sores on the upper lip of 1 day’s duration. She had a history of rheumatoid arthritis, hypertension, and atopy and was currently taking prednisone and etanercept. Dermatologic examination revealed grouped vesicles on an erythematous base on the upper lip. A diagnosis of herpes labialis was made. The patient reported that she had received a third dose of the Sinovac-Coronavac vaccine 10 days prior to the appearance of the lesions. Her symptoms resolved completely within 2 weeks of treatment with topical acyclovir.<br/><br/><i>Patient 3—</i>A 64-year-old woman was admitted to the hospital with pain, redness, and watery sores on and around the left eyelid of 2 days’ duration. Dermatologic evaluation revealed the erythematous surface of the left eyelid and periorbital area showed partial crusts, clustered vesicles, erythema, and edema. Additionally, the conjunctiva was purulent and erythematous.<span class="cf01"> </span>The patient’s medical history was notable for allergic asthma, hypertension, anxiety, and depression. For this reason, the patient was prescribed an angiotensin receptor blocker and a selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor. She noted that a similar rash had developed around the left eye 6 years prior that was diagnosed as herpes zoster (HZ). She also reported that she had received 2 doses of the Sinovac-Coronavac COVID-19 vaccine followed by 1 dose of the BioNTech COVID-19 vaccine, which she had received 2 weeks before the rash developed. The patient was treated at the eye clinic and was found to have ocular involvement. Ophthalmology was consulted and a diagnosis of herpes zoster ophthalmicus (HZO) was made. Systemic valacyclovir treatment was initiated, resulting in clinical improvement within 3 weeks.<br/><br/><i>Patient 4—</i>A 75-year-old man was admitted to the hospital with chest and back pain and widespread muscle pain of several days’ duration. His medical history was remarkable for diabetes mellitus, hypertension, depression, and coronary artery bypass surgery. A medication history revealed treatment with a β-blocker, acetylsalicylic acid, a calcium channel blocker, a dipeptidyl peptidase 4 inhibitor, and a selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor. Dermatologic examination revealed grouped vesicles on an erythematous background in dermatome T5 on the right chest and back. A diagnosis of HZ was made. The patient reported that he had received 2 doses of the Sinovac-Coronavac vaccine followed by 1 dose of the Pfizer-BioNTech vaccine 2 weeks prior to the current presentation. He was treated with valacyclovir for 1 week, and his symptoms resolved entirely within 3 weeks.<br/><br/><i>Patient 5—</i>A 50-year-old woman presented to the hospital for evaluation of painful sores on the back, chest, groin, and abdomen of 10 days’ duration. The lesions initially had developed 7 days after receiving the BioNTech COVID-19 vaccine; she previously had received 2 doses of the Sinovac-Coronavac vaccine. The patient had a history of untreated psoriasis. Dermatologic examination revealed grouped vesicles on an erythematous background in the T2–L2 dermatomes on the left side of the trunk. A diagnosis of HZ was made. The lesions resolved after 1 week of treatment with systemic valacyclovir; however, she subsequently developed postherpetic neuralgia, hypoesthesia, and postinflammatory hyperpigmentation in the affected regions.<br/><br/><i>Patient 6—</i>A 37-year-old woman presented to the hospital with redness, swelling, and itching all over the body of 3 days’ duration. The patient noted that the rash would subside and reappear throughout the day. Her medical history was unremarkable, except for COVID-19 infection 6 months prior. She had received a second dose of the BioNTech vaccine 20 days prior to development of symptoms. Dermatologic examination revealed widespread erythematous urticarial plaques. A diagnosis of acute urticaria was made. The patient recovered completely after 1 week of treatment with a systemic steroid and 3 weeks of antihistamine treatment.<br/><br/><i>Patient 7—</i>A 63-year-old woman presented to the hospital with widespread itching and rash that appeared 5 days after the first dose of the BioNTech COVID-19 vaccine. The patient reported that the rash resolved spontaneously within a few hours but then reappeared. Her medical history revealed that she was taking tamoxifen for breast cancer and that she previously had received 2 doses of the Sinovac-Coronavac vaccine. Dermatologic examination revealed erythematous urticarial plaques on the trunk and arms. A diagnosis of urticaria was made, and her symptoms resolved after 6 weeks of antihistamine treatment.</p> <h3>Comment</h3> <p>Skin lesions associated with COVID-19 infection have been reported worldwide<sup>3,4</sup> as well as dermatologic reactions following COVID-19 vaccination. In one case from Turkey, HZ infection was reported in a 68-year-old man 5 days after he received a second dose of the COVID-19 vaccine.<sup>5</sup> In another case, HZ infection developed in a 78-year-old man 5 days after COVID-19 vaccination.<sup>6</sup> Numerous cases of HZ infection developing within 1 to 26 days of COVID-19 vaccination have been reported worldwide.<sup>7-9</sup></p> <p>In a study conducted in the United States, 40 skin reactions associated with the COVID-19 vaccine were investigated; of these cases, 87.5% (35/40) were reported as varicella-zoster virus, and 12.5% (5/40) were reported as herpes simplex reactivation; 54% (19/35) and 80% (4/5) of these cases, respectively, were associated with the Pfizer-BioNTech vaccine.<sup>10</sup> The average age of patients who developed a skin reaction was 46 years, and 70% (28/40) were women. The time to onset of the reaction was 2 to 13 days after vaccination, and symptoms were reported to improve within 7 days on average.<sup>10</sup> <br/><br/>Another study from Spain examined 405 vaccine-related skin reactions, 40.2% of which were related to the Pfizer-BioNTech vaccine. Among them, 80.2% occurred in women; 13.8% of cases were diagnosed as varicella-zoster virus or HZ virus reactivation, and 14.6% were urticaria. Eighty reactions (21%) were classified as severe/very severe and 81% required treatment.<sup>11</sup> One study reported 414 skin reactions from the COVID-19 vaccine from December 2020 to February 2021; of these cases, 83% occurred after the Moderna vaccine, which is not available in Turkey, and 17% occurred after the Pfizer-BioNTech vaccine.<sup>12</sup><span class="markedcontent">A systematic review of 91 patients who developed HZ infection after COVID-19 vaccination reported that 10% (9/91) of cases were receiving immunosuppressive therapy and 13% (12/91) had an autoimmune disease.</span><span class="markedcontent"><sup>7</sup></span><span class="markedcontent"> </span>In our case series, it is known that at least 2 of the patients (patients 2 and 5), including 1 patient with rheumatoid arthritis (patient 2) who was on immunosuppressive treatment, had autoimmune disorders.<span class="markedcontent"> However, reports in the literature indicate that most patients with autoimmune inflammatory rheumatic diseases remain stable after vaccination.</span><sup>13</sup><br/><br/>Herpes zoster ophthalmicus is a rare form of HZ caused by involvement of the ophthalmic branch of the trigeminal nerve that manifests as vesicular lesions and retinitis, uveitis, keratitis, conjunctivitis, and pain on an erythematous background. Two cases of women who developed HZO infection after Pfizer-BioNTech vaccination were reported in the literature.<sup>14</sup> Although patient 3 in our case series had a history of HZO 6 years prior, the possibility of the Pfizer-BioNTech vaccine triggering HZO should be taken into consideration.<br/><br/>Although cutaneous reactions after the Sinovac-Coronavac vaccine were observed in only 1 of 7 patients in our case series, skin reactions after Sinovac-Coronavac (an inactivated viral vaccine) have been reported in the literature. In one study, after a total of 35,229 injections, the incidence of cutaneous adverse events due to Sinovac-Coronavac was reported to be 0.94% and 0.70% after the first and second doses, respectively.<sup>15</sup> Therefore, further study results are needed to directly attribute the reactions to COVID-19 vaccination.</p> <h3> <span class="y2iqfc">Conclusion</span> </h3> <p>Our case series highlights that clinicians should be vigilant in diagnosing cutaneous reactions following COVID-19 vaccination early to prevent potential complications. Early recognition of reactions is crucial, and the prognosis can be improved with appropriate treatment. Despite the potential dermatologic adverse effects of the COVID-19 vaccine, the most effective way to protect against serious COVID-19 infection is to continue to be vaccinated.</p> <h2>References</h2> <p class="reference"> 1. Polack FP, Thomas SJ, Kitchin N, et al. Safety and efficacy of the BNT162b2 mRNA COVID-19 vaccine. <span class="html-italic"><i>N Engl J Med.</i></span> 2020;<span class="html-italic">383:</span>2603-2615.<br/><br/> 2. Zhang Y, Zeng G, Pan H, et al. Safety, tolerability, and immunogenicity of an inactivated SARS-CoV-2 vaccine in healthy adults aged 18–59 years: a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 1/2 clinical trial. <span class="html-italic"><i>Lancet Infect Dis.</i></span> 2021;<span class="html-italic">21:</span>181-192. <br/><br/> 3. Tan SW, Tam YC, Oh CC. Skin manifestations of COVID-19: a worldwide review. <i>JAAD Int</i>. 2021;2:119-133.<br/><br/> 4. Singh H, Kaur H, Singh K, et al. Cutaneous manifestations of COVID-19: a systematic review. advances in wound care. 2021;10:51-80.<br/><br/> 5. Aksu SB, Öztürk GZ. A rare case of shingles after COVID-19 vaccine: is it a possible adverse effect? clinical and experimental vaccine research. 2021;10:198-201.<br/><br/> 6. Bostan E, Yalici-Armagan B. Herpes zoster following inactivated COVID-19 vaccine: a coexistence or coincidence?<i> J Cosmet Dermatol.</i> 2021;20:1566-1567.<br/><br/> 7. Katsikas Triantafyllidis K, Giannos P, Mian IT, et al. Varicella zoster virus reactivation following COVID-19 vaccination: a systematic review of case reports. <i>Vaccines (Basel).</i> 2021;9:1013. <span class="citation-doi">doi:10.3390/vaccines9091013<br/><br/></span> 8. Rodríguez-Jiménez P, Chicharro P, Cabrera LM, et al. Varicella-zoster virus reactivation after SARS-CoV-2 BNT162b2 mRNA vaccination: report of 5 cases. <i>JAAD Case Rep</i>. 2021;12:58-59. <span class="citation-doi">doi:10.1016/j.jdcr.2021.04.014<br/><br/></span> 9. Lee C, Cotter D, Basa J, et al. 20 Post-COVID-19 vaccine-related shingles cases seen at the Las Vegas Dermatology clinic and sent to us via social media. <i>J Cosmet Dermatol. </i>2021;20:1960-1964.<br/><br/>10. Fathy RA, McMahon DE, Lee C, et al. Varicella-zoster and herpes simplex virus reactivation post-COVID-19 vaccination: a review of 40 cases in an International Dermatology Registry. <i>J Eur Acad Dermatol Venerol</i>. 2022;36:E6-E9.<br/><br/>11. Català A, Muñoz-Santos C, Galván-Casas C, et al. Cutaneous reactions after SARS-CoV-2 vaccination: a cross-sectional Spanish nationwide study of 405 cases. <i>Br J Dermatol. </i>2022;186:142-152.<br/><br/>12. McMahon DE, Amerson E, Rosenbach M, et al. Cutaneous reactions reported after Moderna and Pfizer COVID-19 vaccination: a registry-based study of 414 cases. <i>J Am Acad Dermatol</i>. 2021;85:46-55.<br/><br/>13. Furer V, Eviatar T, Zisman D, et al. Immunogenicity and safety of the BNT162b2 mRNA COVID-19 vaccine in adult patients with autoimmune inflammatory rheumatic diseases and in the general population: a multicentre study. <i>Ann Rheum Dis.</i> 2021;80:1330-1338.<br/><br/>14. Bernardini N, Skroza N, Mambrin A, et al. Herpes zoster ophthalmicus in two women after Pfizer-BioNTech (BNT162b2) vaccine. <i>J Med Virol.</i> 2022;94:817-818.<br/><br/>15. Rerknimitr P, Puaratanaarunkon T, Wongtada C, et al. Cutaneous adverse reactions from 35,229 doses of Sinovac and AstraZeneca COVID-19 vaccination: a prospective cohort study in healthcare workers. <i>J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol. </i>2022;36:E158-E161.</p> </itemContent> </newsItem> <newsItem> <itemMeta> <itemRole>bio</itemRole> <itemClass>text</itemClass> <title/> <deck/> </itemMeta> <itemContent> <p class="disclosure">From Giresun University, Turkey. Dr. Alkanat is from the Faculty of Health Sciences, and Dr. Kulaklı is from the Faculty of Medicine, Dermatology Clinic.</p> <p class="disclosure">The authors report no conflict of interest.<br/><br/>Correspondence: Hafize Özdemir Alkanat, RN, PhD, Giresun University, Faculty of Health Sciences, 28340 Piraziz/Giresun, Turkey (hafize.ozdemir@giresun.edu.tr).<br/><br/>doi:10.12788/cutis.0966</p> </itemContent> </newsItem> <newsItem> <itemMeta> <itemRole>in</itemRole> <itemClass>text</itemClass> <title/> <deck/> </itemMeta> <itemContent> <p class="insidehead">Practice <strong>Points</strong></p> <ul class="insidebody"> <li>Cutaneous reactions have been reported following COVID-19 vaccination.</li> <li>Herpes infections and urticarial reactions can be associated with COVID-19 vaccination, regardless of the delay in onset between the injection and symptom development.</li> </ul> </itemContent> </newsItem> </itemSet></root>
Inside the Article

Practice Points

  • Cutaneous reactions have been reported following COVID-19 vaccination.
  • Herpes infections and urticarial reactions can be associated with COVID-19 vaccination, regardless of the delay in onset between the injection and symptom development.
Disallow All Ads
Content Gating
No Gating (article Unlocked/Free)
Alternative CME
Disqus Comments
Default
Use ProPublica
Hide sidebar & use full width
render the right sidebar.
Conference Recap Checkbox
Not Conference Recap
Clinical Edge
Display the Slideshow in this Article
Medscape Article
Display survey writer
Reuters content
Disable Inline Native ads
WebMD Article
Article PDF Media
Image
Teambase ID
180026CE.SIG
Disable zoom
Off