Older patients benefit from brentuximab treatment

Doctor and patient

Credit: NIH

SAN FRANCISCO—Younger patients with Hodgkin lymphoma fare well on brentuximab vedotin, experiencing an overall objective response rate (ORR) of 75% and a complete response (CR) rate of 34% in the pivotal phase 2 study of patients with relapsed/refractory disease.

And a retrospective study of patients older than 60 years showed that single-agent therapy was well tolerated, prompting an ORR of 53% and a CR rate of 40% in a relapsed or refractory population.

So investigators decided to explore in a prospective study whether patients 60 years or older could benefit from up-front treatment with brentuximab as a single agent or in combination.

Andres Forero-Torres, MD, of the University of Alabama in Birmingham, presented the results of this trial at the 2014 ASH Annual Meeting (abstract 294).*

Enrolled patients had classic Hodgkin lymphoma, were treatment-naïve, and were ineligible for or declined conventional front-line treatment. The primary endpoint was ORR.

The study is being conducted in 3 parts—brentuximab as a single agent, brentuximab plus dacarbazine, and brentuximab plus bendamustine. At the time of the ASH presentation, data for the brentuximab-bendamustine combination were not available.

Single-agent brentuximab

Twenty-seven patients on the single-agent arm were evaluable for efficacy and safety. They were a median age of 78 (range, 64 to 92). About half (52%) were male, and 78% had an ECOG performance status of grade 0 or 1.

Forty-four percent had moderate renal function impairment with a creatinine clearance between 30 and 60 mL/min. Thirty percent had B symptoms, 22% had bulky disease, and 52% had extra-nodal involvement.

Patients received 1.8 mg/kg of brentuximab intravenously on day 1 of a 21-day cycle. Response was assessed by CT scan during cycles 2, 4, 8, and 16, and by CT plus PET scan during cycles 2 and 8.

The median follow-up was 8.7 months. Dr Forero-Torres pointed out that, initially, “there were no progressions,” and all patients achieved tumor reduction.

The ORR was 93%, the CR rate was 70%, the partial response rate was 22%, and the rate of stable disease was 7%.

The median duration of response was 9.1 months (range, 0.03 to 13.14), and the median progression-free survival was 10.5 months (range, 2.6 to 14.3). For patients who had a CR, the median progression-free survival was about 12 months, Dr Forero-Torres said.

The median number of treatment cycles administered per patient was 8 (range, 3 to 23). Patients discontinued treatment primarily because of progressive disease (41%) or adverse events (AEs, 37%).

AEs occurring in 20% or more of patients were constipation, decreased appetite, diarrhea, peripheral edema, nausea, fatigue, and peripheral sensory neuropathy. All were grade 1 or 2, except for peripheral sensory neuropathy, which also had about 20% grade 3 events.

Grade 3 or higher treatment-related AEs included peripheral sensory neuropathy (n=7), peripheral motor neuropathy (n=2), rash (n=2), and 1 patient each with anemia, increased aspartate aminotransferase, asthenia, neutropenia, orthostatic hypotension, generalized rash, and maculopapular rash.

Serious AEs (SAEs) were minimal, Dr Forero-Torres said, and included 1 patient each with pyrexia, orthostatic hypotension, asthenia and rash, and deep vein thrombosis.

Seven patients discontinued treatment due to peripheral sensory neuropathy, 2 due to peripheral motor neuropathy, and 1 due to orthostatic hypotension.

Dr Forero-Torres emphasized that there were no grade 4 AEs, no AE-related deaths, and no deaths within 30 days of the last dose of medication.

Brentuximab plus dacarbazine

Fourteen of 18 patients in the combination arm were evaluable for efficacy and safety. Their median age was 72.5 (range, 62 to 87), 72% were male, 67% had an ECOG status of grade 0 or 1, and 56% had normal renal function with a creatinine clearance greater than 80 mL/min.

Forty-four percent exhibited B symptoms, 11% had bulky disease, and 50% had extra-nodal involvement.

They received brentuximab at 1.8 mg/kg plus dacarbazine at 375 mg/m² for cycles 1-12, followed by monotherapy for cycles 13-16.

At the time of the interim analysis, 83% of patients were still on treatment, “so this is very early preliminary data,” Dr Forero-Torres noted.

All of the patients achieved tumor reduction, and 4 patients achieved a CR.

They had a median treatment duration of 16.7 weeks (range, 3 to 36), received a median of 5.5 cycles (range, 1 to 12), and had a median follow-up time of 19.1 weeks (range, 6.1 to 36.1).

The most common grade 1 or 2 AEs were peripheral sensory neuropathy (33%), nausea (33%), diarrhea (28%), constipation (28%), fatigue (22%), alopecia (22%), arthralgia (22%), and headache (22%).

Grade 3 AEs or SAEs, with 1 patient each, were C difficile colitis (SAE), hypotension (SAE), and hyperglycemia.

Dr Forero-Torres noted that investigators observed “robust antitumor activity” among these older patients receiving front-line brentuximab.

The cohort combining brentuximab with bendamustine is currently enrolling patients.

The study is sponsored by Seattle Genetics, Inc., developer of brentuximab vedotin (Adcetris).

*Information in the abstract differs from that presented at the meeting.

Doctor and patient

Credit: NIH

SAN FRANCISCO—Younger patients with Hodgkin lymphoma fare well on brentuximab vedotin, experiencing an overall objective response rate (ORR) of 75% and a complete response (CR) rate of 34% in the pivotal phase 2 study of patients with relapsed/refractory disease.

And a retrospective study of patients older than 60 years showed that single-agent therapy was well tolerated, prompting an ORR of 53% and a CR rate of 40% in a relapsed or refractory population.

So investigators decided to explore in a prospective study whether patients 60 years or older could benefit from up-front treatment with brentuximab as a single agent or in combination.

Andres Forero-Torres, MD, of the University of Alabama in Birmingham, presented the results of this trial at the 2014 ASH Annual Meeting (abstract 294).*

Enrolled patients had classic Hodgkin lymphoma, were treatment-naïve, and were ineligible for or declined conventional front-line treatment. The primary endpoint was ORR.

The study is being conducted in 3 parts—brentuximab as a single agent, brentuximab plus dacarbazine, and brentuximab plus bendamustine. At the time of the ASH presentation, data for the brentuximab-bendamustine combination were not available.

Single-agent brentuximab

Twenty-seven patients on the single-agent arm were evaluable for efficacy and safety. They were a median age of 78 (range, 64 to 92). About half (52%) were male, and 78% had an ECOG performance status of grade 0 or 1.

Forty-four percent had moderate renal function impairment with a creatinine clearance between 30 and 60 mL/min. Thirty percent had B symptoms, 22% had bulky disease, and 52% had extra-nodal involvement.

Patients received 1.8 mg/kg of brentuximab intravenously on day 1 of a 21-day cycle. Response was assessed by CT scan during cycles 2, 4, 8, and 16, and by CT plus PET scan during cycles 2 and 8.

The median follow-up was 8.7 months. Dr Forero-Torres pointed out that, initially, “there were no progressions,” and all patients achieved tumor reduction.

The ORR was 93%, the CR rate was 70%, the partial response rate was 22%, and the rate of stable disease was 7%.

The median duration of response was 9.1 months (range, 0.03 to 13.14), and the median progression-free survival was 10.5 months (range, 2.6 to 14.3). For patients who had a CR, the median progression-free survival was about 12 months, Dr Forero-Torres said.

The median number of treatment cycles administered per patient was 8 (range, 3 to 23). Patients discontinued treatment primarily because of progressive disease (41%) or adverse events (AEs, 37%).

AEs occurring in 20% or more of patients were constipation, decreased appetite, diarrhea, peripheral edema, nausea, fatigue, and peripheral sensory neuropathy. All were grade 1 or 2, except for peripheral sensory neuropathy, which also had about 20% grade 3 events.

Grade 3 or higher treatment-related AEs included peripheral sensory neuropathy (n=7), peripheral motor neuropathy (n=2), rash (n=2), and 1 patient each with anemia, increased aspartate aminotransferase, asthenia, neutropenia, orthostatic hypotension, generalized rash, and maculopapular rash.

Serious AEs (SAEs) were minimal, Dr Forero-Torres said, and included 1 patient each with pyrexia, orthostatic hypotension, asthenia and rash, and deep vein thrombosis.

Seven patients discontinued treatment due to peripheral sensory neuropathy, 2 due to peripheral motor neuropathy, and 1 due to orthostatic hypotension.

Dr Forero-Torres emphasized that there were no grade 4 AEs, no AE-related deaths, and no deaths within 30 days of the last dose of medication.

Brentuximab plus dacarbazine

Fourteen of 18 patients in the combination arm were evaluable for efficacy and safety. Their median age was 72.5 (range, 62 to 87), 72% were male, 67% had an ECOG status of grade 0 or 1, and 56% had normal renal function with a creatinine clearance greater than 80 mL/min.

Forty-four percent exhibited B symptoms, 11% had bulky disease, and 50% had extra-nodal involvement.

They received brentuximab at 1.8 mg/kg plus dacarbazine at 375 mg/m² for cycles 1-12, followed by monotherapy for cycles 13-16.

At the time of the interim analysis, 83% of patients were still on treatment, “so this is very early preliminary data,” Dr Forero-Torres noted.

All of the patients achieved tumor reduction, and 4 patients achieved a CR.

They had a median treatment duration of 16.7 weeks (range, 3 to 36), received a median of 5.5 cycles (range, 1 to 12), and had a median follow-up time of 19.1 weeks (range, 6.1 to 36.1).

The most common grade 1 or 2 AEs were peripheral sensory neuropathy (33%), nausea (33%), diarrhea (28%), constipation (28%), fatigue (22%), alopecia (22%), arthralgia (22%), and headache (22%).

Grade 3 AEs or SAEs, with 1 patient each, were C difficile colitis (SAE), hypotension (SAE), and hyperglycemia.

Dr Forero-Torres noted that investigators observed “robust antitumor activity” among these older patients receiving front-line brentuximab.

The cohort combining brentuximab with bendamustine is currently enrolling patients.

The study is sponsored by Seattle Genetics, Inc., developer of brentuximab vedotin (Adcetris).

*Information in the abstract differs from that presented at the meeting.

Doctor and patient

Credit: NIH

SAN FRANCISCO—Younger patients with Hodgkin lymphoma fare well on brentuximab vedotin, experiencing an overall objective response rate (ORR) of 75% and a complete response (CR) rate of 34% in the pivotal phase 2 study of patients with relapsed/refractory disease.

And a retrospective study of patients older than 60 years showed that single-agent therapy was well tolerated, prompting an ORR of 53% and a CR rate of 40% in a relapsed or refractory population.

So investigators decided to explore in a prospective study whether patients 60 years or older could benefit from up-front treatment with brentuximab as a single agent or in combination.

Andres Forero-Torres, MD, of the University of Alabama in Birmingham, presented the results of this trial at the 2014 ASH Annual Meeting (abstract 294).*

Enrolled patients had classic Hodgkin lymphoma, were treatment-naïve, and were ineligible for or declined conventional front-line treatment. The primary endpoint was ORR.

The study is being conducted in 3 parts—brentuximab as a single agent, brentuximab plus dacarbazine, and brentuximab plus bendamustine. At the time of the ASH presentation, data for the brentuximab-bendamustine combination were not available.

Single-agent brentuximab

Twenty-seven patients on the single-agent arm were evaluable for efficacy and safety. They were a median age of 78 (range, 64 to 92). About half (52%) were male, and 78% had an ECOG performance status of grade 0 or 1.

Forty-four percent had moderate renal function impairment with a creatinine clearance between 30 and 60 mL/min. Thirty percent had B symptoms, 22% had bulky disease, and 52% had extra-nodal involvement.

Patients received 1.8 mg/kg of brentuximab intravenously on day 1 of a 21-day cycle. Response was assessed by CT scan during cycles 2, 4, 8, and 16, and by CT plus PET scan during cycles 2 and 8.

The median follow-up was 8.7 months. Dr Forero-Torres pointed out that, initially, “there were no progressions,” and all patients achieved tumor reduction.

The ORR was 93%, the CR rate was 70%, the partial response rate was 22%, and the rate of stable disease was 7%.

The median duration of response was 9.1 months (range, 0.03 to 13.14), and the median progression-free survival was 10.5 months (range, 2.6 to 14.3). For patients who had a CR, the median progression-free survival was about 12 months, Dr Forero-Torres said.

The median number of treatment cycles administered per patient was 8 (range, 3 to 23). Patients discontinued treatment primarily because of progressive disease (41%) or adverse events (AEs, 37%).

AEs occurring in 20% or more of patients were constipation, decreased appetite, diarrhea, peripheral edema, nausea, fatigue, and peripheral sensory neuropathy. All were grade 1 or 2, except for peripheral sensory neuropathy, which also had about 20% grade 3 events.

Grade 3 or higher treatment-related AEs included peripheral sensory neuropathy (n=7), peripheral motor neuropathy (n=2), rash (n=2), and 1 patient each with anemia, increased aspartate aminotransferase, asthenia, neutropenia, orthostatic hypotension, generalized rash, and maculopapular rash.

Serious AEs (SAEs) were minimal, Dr Forero-Torres said, and included 1 patient each with pyrexia, orthostatic hypotension, asthenia and rash, and deep vein thrombosis.

Seven patients discontinued treatment due to peripheral sensory neuropathy, 2 due to peripheral motor neuropathy, and 1 due to orthostatic hypotension.

Dr Forero-Torres emphasized that there were no grade 4 AEs, no AE-related deaths, and no deaths within 30 days of the last dose of medication.

Brentuximab plus dacarbazine

Fourteen of 18 patients in the combination arm were evaluable for efficacy and safety. Their median age was 72.5 (range, 62 to 87), 72% were male, 67% had an ECOG status of grade 0 or 1, and 56% had normal renal function with a creatinine clearance greater than 80 mL/min.

Forty-four percent exhibited B symptoms, 11% had bulky disease, and 50% had extra-nodal involvement.

They received brentuximab at 1.8 mg/kg plus dacarbazine at 375 mg/m² for cycles 1-12, followed by monotherapy for cycles 13-16.

At the time of the interim analysis, 83% of patients were still on treatment, “so this is very early preliminary data,” Dr Forero-Torres noted.

All of the patients achieved tumor reduction, and 4 patients achieved a CR.

They had a median treatment duration of 16.7 weeks (range, 3 to 36), received a median of 5.5 cycles (range, 1 to 12), and had a median follow-up time of 19.1 weeks (range, 6.1 to 36.1).

The most common grade 1 or 2 AEs were peripheral sensory neuropathy (33%), nausea (33%), diarrhea (28%), constipation (28%), fatigue (22%), alopecia (22%), arthralgia (22%), and headache (22%).

Grade 3 AEs or SAEs, with 1 patient each, were C difficile colitis (SAE), hypotension (SAE), and hyperglycemia.

Dr Forero-Torres noted that investigators observed “robust antitumor activity” among these older patients receiving front-line brentuximab.

The cohort combining brentuximab with bendamustine is currently enrolling patients.

The study is sponsored by Seattle Genetics, Inc., developer of brentuximab vedotin (Adcetris).

*Information in the abstract differs from that presented at the meeting.