PAH Guidelines Reflect Data on Newest Drugs

The American College of Chest Physicians has issued updated clinical practice guidelines for the medical management of pulmonary arterial hypertension that reflect findings from several recent clinical trials as well as the additional drugs that have been approved since the previous guidelines were issued in 2004.

The guidelines include an evidence-based, updated treatment algorithm intended to assist physicians in decision making, as “the paradigm for treatment of pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH) continues to advance rapidly” (Chest 2007;131:1917–28).

Two studies that demonstrated survival benefits in patients treated with bosentan, which binds to both endothelin receptors (ETA and ETB) provided new data, said lead author Dr. David B. Badesch of the University of Colorado Health Sciences Center, Denver.

In the first study, 169 patients (aged between 13 and 80 years) with class III or IV PAH were treated with bosentan as first-line therapy. Survival was 96% at 12 months and 89% at 24 months, in contrast to predicted survival rates from the earlier National Institutes of Health registry of 69% and 57%, respectively (Eur. Respir. J. 2005;25:244–9).

In the second study, survival in 139 patients treated with bosentan was compared with historical data from 346 patients who had been treated with epoprostenol. Survival estimates after 1 and 2 years were 97% and 91%, respectively, in the bosentan-treated group, and 91% and 84% in the epoprostenol-treated group (Thorax 2005;60:1025–30).

Bosentan also has now been evaluated in children with PAH associated with congenital heart disease or connective tissue disease. In a retrospective study, 86 children were treated with bosentan with or without concomitant epoprostenol or treprostinil. WHO functional class improved in 46% of patients and was unchanged in 44%, and survival estimates at 1 and 2 years were 98% and 91% (J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. 2005;46:697–704).

Another recent study included 245 patients (ranging in age from 12 years to 78 years) who received bosentan, placebo, or one of two doses of a selective ETA endothelin receptor antagonist, sitaxsentan. At week 18, patients receiving the higher dose of sitaxsentan (100 mg/day) had significant improvements on a 6-minute walk test, compared with those receiving placebo. The incidence of elevated transaminases was 6% in the placebo group, 5% in the sitaxsentan low-dose (50 mg/day) group, 3% in the high-dose sitaxsentan group, and 11% in the bosentan group (J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. 2006;47:2049–56).

Sitaxsentan remains investigational in the United States, but has been approved for use in Europe and Canada.

A second selective ETA endothelin receptor antagonist, ambrisentan, was evaluated in a double-blind, dose-ranging study that included 64 adult patients with PAH. They were randomized to receive 1 mg, 2.5 mg, 5 mg, or 10 mg of ambrisentan orally once daily for 12 weeks. The 6-minute walk test improved significantly for all groups, with a mean increase from baseline of 36.1 meters. Improvements also were seen in WHO functional class, Borg dyspnea index, and cardiac index (J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. 2005;46:529–35).

This drug was recently approved for class II and class III PAH in the United States.

The phosphodiesterase inhibitor sildenafil also is now approved for the treatment of all classes of PAH in a dosage of 20 mg three times daily. The drug was evaluated in a double-blind study that randomized 278 patients (mean age 50 years) to placebo or 20, 40, or 80 mg three times daily for 12 weeks.

In summarizing the treatment options, the authors noted that for patients in functional class II, the only current recommended drugs are sildenafil and subcutaneous and intravenous treprostinil, and suggested that sildenafil may be the first choice for most patients because of ease of administration and relative efficacy.

For patients in functional class III, five drugs are available: bosentan, sildenafil, intravenous epopro-stenol, inhaled iloprost, and subcutaneous or intravenous treprostinil. For those with early class III disease, oral bosentan or sildenafil may be used, with the choice reflecting relative toxicities. For patients with more advanced disease, prostanoid therapy may be needed.

All the available agents are approved for patients with class IV PAH. However, the authors wrote, “[we] strongly encourage IV epoprostenol as the treatment of choice for these most critically ill patients. IV epoprostenol has a rapid and predictable onset of action, and most experts are familiar with how to titrate this drug in the acute setting.”

In conclusion, they also strongly recommended that patients with PAH be referred to specialized centers because of the complexity of the diagnostic and therapeutic considerations involved.

The American College of Chest Physicians has issued updated clinical practice guidelines for the medical management of pulmonary arterial hypertension that reflect findings from several recent clinical trials as well as the additional drugs that have been approved since the previous guidelines were issued in 2004.

The guidelines include an evidence-based, updated treatment algorithm intended to assist physicians in decision making, as “the paradigm for treatment of pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH) continues to advance rapidly” (Chest 2007;131:1917–28).

Two studies that demonstrated survival benefits in patients treated with bosentan, which binds to both endothelin receptors (ETA and ETB) provided new data, said lead author Dr. David B. Badesch of the University of Colorado Health Sciences Center, Denver.

In the first study, 169 patients (aged between 13 and 80 years) with class III or IV PAH were treated with bosentan as first-line therapy. Survival was 96% at 12 months and 89% at 24 months, in contrast to predicted survival rates from the earlier National Institutes of Health registry of 69% and 57%, respectively (Eur. Respir. J. 2005;25:244–9).

In the second study, survival in 139 patients treated with bosentan was compared with historical data from 346 patients who had been treated with epoprostenol. Survival estimates after 1 and 2 years were 97% and 91%, respectively, in the bosentan-treated group, and 91% and 84% in the epoprostenol-treated group (Thorax 2005;60:1025–30).

Bosentan also has now been evaluated in children with PAH associated with congenital heart disease or connective tissue disease. In a retrospective study, 86 children were treated with bosentan with or without concomitant epoprostenol or treprostinil. WHO functional class improved in 46% of patients and was unchanged in 44%, and survival estimates at 1 and 2 years were 98% and 91% (J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. 2005;46:697–704).

Another recent study included 245 patients (ranging in age from 12 years to 78 years) who received bosentan, placebo, or one of two doses of a selective ETA endothelin receptor antagonist, sitaxsentan. At week 18, patients receiving the higher dose of sitaxsentan (100 mg/day) had significant improvements on a 6-minute walk test, compared with those receiving placebo. The incidence of elevated transaminases was 6% in the placebo group, 5% in the sitaxsentan low-dose (50 mg/day) group, 3% in the high-dose sitaxsentan group, and 11% in the bosentan group (J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. 2006;47:2049–56).

Sitaxsentan remains investigational in the United States, but has been approved for use in Europe and Canada.

A second selective ETA endothelin receptor antagonist, ambrisentan, was evaluated in a double-blind, dose-ranging study that included 64 adult patients with PAH. They were randomized to receive 1 mg, 2.5 mg, 5 mg, or 10 mg of ambrisentan orally once daily for 12 weeks. The 6-minute walk test improved significantly for all groups, with a mean increase from baseline of 36.1 meters. Improvements also were seen in WHO functional class, Borg dyspnea index, and cardiac index (J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. 2005;46:529–35).

This drug was recently approved for class II and class III PAH in the United States.

The phosphodiesterase inhibitor sildenafil also is now approved for the treatment of all classes of PAH in a dosage of 20 mg three times daily. The drug was evaluated in a double-blind study that randomized 278 patients (mean age 50 years) to placebo or 20, 40, or 80 mg three times daily for 12 weeks.

In summarizing the treatment options, the authors noted that for patients in functional class II, the only current recommended drugs are sildenafil and subcutaneous and intravenous treprostinil, and suggested that sildenafil may be the first choice for most patients because of ease of administration and relative efficacy.

For patients in functional class III, five drugs are available: bosentan, sildenafil, intravenous epopro-stenol, inhaled iloprost, and subcutaneous or intravenous treprostinil. For those with early class III disease, oral bosentan or sildenafil may be used, with the choice reflecting relative toxicities. For patients with more advanced disease, prostanoid therapy may be needed.

All the available agents are approved for patients with class IV PAH. However, the authors wrote, “[we] strongly encourage IV epoprostenol as the treatment of choice for these most critically ill patients. IV epoprostenol has a rapid and predictable onset of action, and most experts are familiar with how to titrate this drug in the acute setting.”

In conclusion, they also strongly recommended that patients with PAH be referred to specialized centers because of the complexity of the diagnostic and therapeutic considerations involved.

The American College of Chest Physicians has issued updated clinical practice guidelines for the medical management of pulmonary arterial hypertension that reflect findings from several recent clinical trials as well as the additional drugs that have been approved since the previous guidelines were issued in 2004.

The guidelines include an evidence-based, updated treatment algorithm intended to assist physicians in decision making, as “the paradigm for treatment of pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH) continues to advance rapidly” (Chest 2007;131:1917–28).

Two studies that demonstrated survival benefits in patients treated with bosentan, which binds to both endothelin receptors (ETA and ETB) provided new data, said lead author Dr. David B. Badesch of the University of Colorado Health Sciences Center, Denver.

In the first study, 169 patients (aged between 13 and 80 years) with class III or IV PAH were treated with bosentan as first-line therapy. Survival was 96% at 12 months and 89% at 24 months, in contrast to predicted survival rates from the earlier National Institutes of Health registry of 69% and 57%, respectively (Eur. Respir. J. 2005;25:244–9).

In the second study, survival in 139 patients treated with bosentan was compared with historical data from 346 patients who had been treated with epoprostenol. Survival estimates after 1 and 2 years were 97% and 91%, respectively, in the bosentan-treated group, and 91% and 84% in the epoprostenol-treated group (Thorax 2005;60:1025–30).

Bosentan also has now been evaluated in children with PAH associated with congenital heart disease or connective tissue disease. In a retrospective study, 86 children were treated with bosentan with or without concomitant epoprostenol or treprostinil. WHO functional class improved in 46% of patients and was unchanged in 44%, and survival estimates at 1 and 2 years were 98% and 91% (J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. 2005;46:697–704).

Another recent study included 245 patients (ranging in age from 12 years to 78 years) who received bosentan, placebo, or one of two doses of a selective ETA endothelin receptor antagonist, sitaxsentan. At week 18, patients receiving the higher dose of sitaxsentan (100 mg/day) had significant improvements on a 6-minute walk test, compared with those receiving placebo. The incidence of elevated transaminases was 6% in the placebo group, 5% in the sitaxsentan low-dose (50 mg/day) group, 3% in the high-dose sitaxsentan group, and 11% in the bosentan group (J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. 2006;47:2049–56).

Sitaxsentan remains investigational in the United States, but has been approved for use in Europe and Canada.

A second selective ETA endothelin receptor antagonist, ambrisentan, was evaluated in a double-blind, dose-ranging study that included 64 adult patients with PAH. They were randomized to receive 1 mg, 2.5 mg, 5 mg, or 10 mg of ambrisentan orally once daily for 12 weeks. The 6-minute walk test improved significantly for all groups, with a mean increase from baseline of 36.1 meters. Improvements also were seen in WHO functional class, Borg dyspnea index, and cardiac index (J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. 2005;46:529–35).

This drug was recently approved for class II and class III PAH in the United States.

The phosphodiesterase inhibitor sildenafil also is now approved for the treatment of all classes of PAH in a dosage of 20 mg three times daily. The drug was evaluated in a double-blind study that randomized 278 patients (mean age 50 years) to placebo or 20, 40, or 80 mg three times daily for 12 weeks.

In summarizing the treatment options, the authors noted that for patients in functional class II, the only current recommended drugs are sildenafil and subcutaneous and intravenous treprostinil, and suggested that sildenafil may be the first choice for most patients because of ease of administration and relative efficacy.

For patients in functional class III, five drugs are available: bosentan, sildenafil, intravenous epopro-stenol, inhaled iloprost, and subcutaneous or intravenous treprostinil. For those with early class III disease, oral bosentan or sildenafil may be used, with the choice reflecting relative toxicities. For patients with more advanced disease, prostanoid therapy may be needed.

All the available agents are approved for patients with class IV PAH. However, the authors wrote, “[we] strongly encourage IV epoprostenol as the treatment of choice for these most critically ill patients. IV epoprostenol has a rapid and predictable onset of action, and most experts are familiar with how to titrate this drug in the acute setting.”

In conclusion, they also strongly recommended that patients with PAH be referred to specialized centers because of the complexity of the diagnostic and therapeutic considerations involved.