Article Type
Changed
Wed, 04/18/2018 - 15:39
Display Headline
In reply: Hematuria evaluation

In Reply: Although a Foley catheter can contribute to macroscopic (gross) hematuria, to assume that it is the cause of the hematuria carries some undefined, but presumably small, risk of missing a more serious diagnosis. A more serious potential for misdiagnosis is in the setting of anticoagulation. As we discuss in our review, hematuria is analagous to hematochezia in the setting of anticoagulants. The possibility that anticoagulation has simply exposed an underlying bleeding source such as a tumor in either setting must not be underestimated, and we recommend that all patients with macroscopic hematuria undergo urologic evaluation unless there is a documented benign physical cause of bleeding such as traumatic catheterization.

Article PDF
Author and Disclosure Information

J. Stephen Jones, MD
Chairman, Department of Regional Urology Glickman Urological and Kidney Institute, Cleveland Clinic

Pravin Kumar Rao, MD
Glickman Urological and Kidney Institute, Cleveland Clinic

Issue
Cleveland Clinic Journal of Medicine - 75(5)
Publications
Topics
Page Number
328
Sections
Author and Disclosure Information

J. Stephen Jones, MD
Chairman, Department of Regional Urology Glickman Urological and Kidney Institute, Cleveland Clinic

Pravin Kumar Rao, MD
Glickman Urological and Kidney Institute, Cleveland Clinic

Author and Disclosure Information

J. Stephen Jones, MD
Chairman, Department of Regional Urology Glickman Urological and Kidney Institute, Cleveland Clinic

Pravin Kumar Rao, MD
Glickman Urological and Kidney Institute, Cleveland Clinic

Article PDF
Article PDF
Related Articles

In Reply: Although a Foley catheter can contribute to macroscopic (gross) hematuria, to assume that it is the cause of the hematuria carries some undefined, but presumably small, risk of missing a more serious diagnosis. A more serious potential for misdiagnosis is in the setting of anticoagulation. As we discuss in our review, hematuria is analagous to hematochezia in the setting of anticoagulants. The possibility that anticoagulation has simply exposed an underlying bleeding source such as a tumor in either setting must not be underestimated, and we recommend that all patients with macroscopic hematuria undergo urologic evaluation unless there is a documented benign physical cause of bleeding such as traumatic catheterization.

In Reply: Although a Foley catheter can contribute to macroscopic (gross) hematuria, to assume that it is the cause of the hematuria carries some undefined, but presumably small, risk of missing a more serious diagnosis. A more serious potential for misdiagnosis is in the setting of anticoagulation. As we discuss in our review, hematuria is analagous to hematochezia in the setting of anticoagulants. The possibility that anticoagulation has simply exposed an underlying bleeding source such as a tumor in either setting must not be underestimated, and we recommend that all patients with macroscopic hematuria undergo urologic evaluation unless there is a documented benign physical cause of bleeding such as traumatic catheterization.

Issue
Cleveland Clinic Journal of Medicine - 75(5)
Issue
Cleveland Clinic Journal of Medicine - 75(5)
Page Number
328
Page Number
328
Publications
Publications
Topics
Article Type
Display Headline
In reply: Hematuria evaluation
Display Headline
In reply: Hematuria evaluation
Sections
Disallow All Ads
Alternative CME
Use ProPublica
Article PDF Media