User login
TORONTO – Youth with nonbinary identities – those that are beyond or outside of the categories of male/man and female/woman – feel significantly safer and more supported at school, compared with their transgender and gender nonconforming peers with binary identities, results from a survey of more than 300 youth showed.
“There has been little research specifically about the experiences of transgender and gender nonconforming youth that have nonbinary identities,” lead study author Brittany Allen, MD, said in an interview in advance of the Pediatric Academic Societies meeting.
Dr. Allen, a pediatrician at the University of Wisconsin–Madison, and her associates conducted an online survey of 311 transgender, nonbinary, and gender nonconforming youth in the state who ranged aged 12-22 years. Study participants were asked about their school safety and support experiences, and the researchers used Wilcoxon rank-sum tests to compare Likert scale responses among youth who reported nonbinary identities with those who reported binary identities. On the 1-5 scale, 1 meant “strongly agree” while 5 meant “strongly disagree.”
Dr. Allen, who is also comedical director of the Pediatric and Adolescent Transgender Health Clinic at American Family Children’s Hospital, Madison, reported that 311 young people completed more than 70% of the survey. Of those, 287 identified as having either binary (164; 57%) or nonbinary (123; 43%) gender identities. That percentage of those reporting nonbinary identities “is striking,” she said, and is “a much higher percentage than seen in adult studies of transgender and gender nonconforming people.”
Compared with respondents with binary identities, those with nonbinary identities were more often Caucasian/White (81% vs. 65% for those with binary identities; P = .003) and less likely to qualify for free lunch (28% vs. 55%; P = .001). Both binary and nonbinary groups reported similar school attendance and belonging. However, compared with the binary group, the nonbinary group reported significantly higher ratings of school safety (Likert score of 2.62 vs. 2.96, respectively; P = .0078) and peer support (Likert score of 2.54 vs. 2.87; P = .0139) and also were more likely to report being able to access adult support at school if needed (Likert score of 2.31 vs. 2.66; P = .0085).
“The primary message is that many transgender or gender nonconforming youth have identities outside of a gender binary and that transgender and gender nonconforming youth with different gender identities may have different strengths and challenges in different settings,” Dr. Allen said.
“Our work shows that nonbinary youth have relative safety and support at school compared to their transgender and gender nonconforming peers with binary identities – though it’s important to note that transgender and gender nonconforming youth overall are still at high risk of school harassment and violence. Interventions to promote school safety for youth of all gender identities should consider that transgender and gender nonconforming youth with different gender identities have different risks related to school safety and support.”
She acknowledged certain limitations of the study, including the fact that the researchers used a convenience sample to recruit participants, “which means that we may not have reached transgender and gender nonconforming youth that were less connected to support services or transgender and gender nonconforming peers,” Dr. Allen said. “This study also specifically assessed transgender and gender nonconforming youth; we did not have a comparison group of cisgender participants for comparison due to our study design.”
The study was funded by the National Institutes of Health, the Baldwin Wisconsin Ideas Endowment, the University of Wisconsin Advancing Health Equity and Diversity initiative, and the Wisconsin Partnership Program. Dr. Allen reported having no financial disclosures.
TORONTO – Youth with nonbinary identities – those that are beyond or outside of the categories of male/man and female/woman – feel significantly safer and more supported at school, compared with their transgender and gender nonconforming peers with binary identities, results from a survey of more than 300 youth showed.
“There has been little research specifically about the experiences of transgender and gender nonconforming youth that have nonbinary identities,” lead study author Brittany Allen, MD, said in an interview in advance of the Pediatric Academic Societies meeting.
Dr. Allen, a pediatrician at the University of Wisconsin–Madison, and her associates conducted an online survey of 311 transgender, nonbinary, and gender nonconforming youth in the state who ranged aged 12-22 years. Study participants were asked about their school safety and support experiences, and the researchers used Wilcoxon rank-sum tests to compare Likert scale responses among youth who reported nonbinary identities with those who reported binary identities. On the 1-5 scale, 1 meant “strongly agree” while 5 meant “strongly disagree.”
Dr. Allen, who is also comedical director of the Pediatric and Adolescent Transgender Health Clinic at American Family Children’s Hospital, Madison, reported that 311 young people completed more than 70% of the survey. Of those, 287 identified as having either binary (164; 57%) or nonbinary (123; 43%) gender identities. That percentage of those reporting nonbinary identities “is striking,” she said, and is “a much higher percentage than seen in adult studies of transgender and gender nonconforming people.”
Compared with respondents with binary identities, those with nonbinary identities were more often Caucasian/White (81% vs. 65% for those with binary identities; P = .003) and less likely to qualify for free lunch (28% vs. 55%; P = .001). Both binary and nonbinary groups reported similar school attendance and belonging. However, compared with the binary group, the nonbinary group reported significantly higher ratings of school safety (Likert score of 2.62 vs. 2.96, respectively; P = .0078) and peer support (Likert score of 2.54 vs. 2.87; P = .0139) and also were more likely to report being able to access adult support at school if needed (Likert score of 2.31 vs. 2.66; P = .0085).
“The primary message is that many transgender or gender nonconforming youth have identities outside of a gender binary and that transgender and gender nonconforming youth with different gender identities may have different strengths and challenges in different settings,” Dr. Allen said.
“Our work shows that nonbinary youth have relative safety and support at school compared to their transgender and gender nonconforming peers with binary identities – though it’s important to note that transgender and gender nonconforming youth overall are still at high risk of school harassment and violence. Interventions to promote school safety for youth of all gender identities should consider that transgender and gender nonconforming youth with different gender identities have different risks related to school safety and support.”
She acknowledged certain limitations of the study, including the fact that the researchers used a convenience sample to recruit participants, “which means that we may not have reached transgender and gender nonconforming youth that were less connected to support services or transgender and gender nonconforming peers,” Dr. Allen said. “This study also specifically assessed transgender and gender nonconforming youth; we did not have a comparison group of cisgender participants for comparison due to our study design.”
The study was funded by the National Institutes of Health, the Baldwin Wisconsin Ideas Endowment, the University of Wisconsin Advancing Health Equity and Diversity initiative, and the Wisconsin Partnership Program. Dr. Allen reported having no financial disclosures.
TORONTO – Youth with nonbinary identities – those that are beyond or outside of the categories of male/man and female/woman – feel significantly safer and more supported at school, compared with their transgender and gender nonconforming peers with binary identities, results from a survey of more than 300 youth showed.
“There has been little research specifically about the experiences of transgender and gender nonconforming youth that have nonbinary identities,” lead study author Brittany Allen, MD, said in an interview in advance of the Pediatric Academic Societies meeting.
Dr. Allen, a pediatrician at the University of Wisconsin–Madison, and her associates conducted an online survey of 311 transgender, nonbinary, and gender nonconforming youth in the state who ranged aged 12-22 years. Study participants were asked about their school safety and support experiences, and the researchers used Wilcoxon rank-sum tests to compare Likert scale responses among youth who reported nonbinary identities with those who reported binary identities. On the 1-5 scale, 1 meant “strongly agree” while 5 meant “strongly disagree.”
Dr. Allen, who is also comedical director of the Pediatric and Adolescent Transgender Health Clinic at American Family Children’s Hospital, Madison, reported that 311 young people completed more than 70% of the survey. Of those, 287 identified as having either binary (164; 57%) or nonbinary (123; 43%) gender identities. That percentage of those reporting nonbinary identities “is striking,” she said, and is “a much higher percentage than seen in adult studies of transgender and gender nonconforming people.”
Compared with respondents with binary identities, those with nonbinary identities were more often Caucasian/White (81% vs. 65% for those with binary identities; P = .003) and less likely to qualify for free lunch (28% vs. 55%; P = .001). Both binary and nonbinary groups reported similar school attendance and belonging. However, compared with the binary group, the nonbinary group reported significantly higher ratings of school safety (Likert score of 2.62 vs. 2.96, respectively; P = .0078) and peer support (Likert score of 2.54 vs. 2.87; P = .0139) and also were more likely to report being able to access adult support at school if needed (Likert score of 2.31 vs. 2.66; P = .0085).
“The primary message is that many transgender or gender nonconforming youth have identities outside of a gender binary and that transgender and gender nonconforming youth with different gender identities may have different strengths and challenges in different settings,” Dr. Allen said.
“Our work shows that nonbinary youth have relative safety and support at school compared to their transgender and gender nonconforming peers with binary identities – though it’s important to note that transgender and gender nonconforming youth overall are still at high risk of school harassment and violence. Interventions to promote school safety for youth of all gender identities should consider that transgender and gender nonconforming youth with different gender identities have different risks related to school safety and support.”
She acknowledged certain limitations of the study, including the fact that the researchers used a convenience sample to recruit participants, “which means that we may not have reached transgender and gender nonconforming youth that were less connected to support services or transgender and gender nonconforming peers,” Dr. Allen said. “This study also specifically assessed transgender and gender nonconforming youth; we did not have a comparison group of cisgender participants for comparison due to our study design.”
The study was funded by the National Institutes of Health, the Baldwin Wisconsin Ideas Endowment, the University of Wisconsin Advancing Health Equity and Diversity initiative, and the Wisconsin Partnership Program. Dr. Allen reported having no financial disclosures.
Key clinical point: Nonbinary youth felt significantly safer and more supported at school, compared with transgender peers with binary identities.
Major finding: Compared with the binary group, the nonbinary group reported significantly higher ratings of school safety (Likert score of 2.62 vs. 2.96, respectively) and peer support (Likert score of 2.54 vs. 2.87).
Study details: An online survey of 311 transgender, nonbinary, and gender nonconforming youth in Wisconsin who aged 12-22 years.
Disclosures: The study was funded by the National Institutes of Health, the Baldwin Wisconsin Ideas Endowment, the University of Wisconsin Advancing Health Equity and Diversity initiative, and the Wisconsin Partnership Program. Dr. Allen reported having no financial disclosures.