Article Type
Changed
Thu, 09/27/2018 - 00:02
Display Headline
Study supports immediate compression after DVT

Universitair Medisch Centrum
Arina ten Cate-Hoek, MD, PhD Photo from Maastricht

Immediate compression therapy provides a “clear benefit” for patients with deep vein thrombosis (DVT), according to the senior author of a study published in Blood.

In this prospective study, patients who started compression therapy within the first 24 hours of DVT diagnosis were 20% less likely to develop residual vein occlusion (RVO) than patients who did not start compression therapy in the acute phase.

Furthermore, patients who did not develop RVO were 8% less likely to have post-thrombotic syndrome (PTS) than patients with RVO.

“We found little reason for those treating DVT not to use compression therapy as a prevention measure against future complications,” said study author Arina J. ten Cate-Hoek, MD, PhD, of Maastricht University in the Netherlands.

“Although the use of compression stockings after DVT is routine across much of Europe, it is less common in the United States, where guidelines emphasize compression primarily for patients who complain of ongoing symptoms.”

Dr. ten Cate-Hoek and her colleagues studied 592 adults with DVT who were treated in 10 centers across the Netherlands.

All patients were treated with anticoagulants, largely vitamin K antagonists (80.6%) but also direct oral anticoagulants (3.0%), investigational anticoagulants (11.1%), and low-molecular-weight heparin (4.4%).

Within 24 hours of DVT diagnosis, most patients received compression therapy (pressure 35 mmHg) with either multilayer compression bandaging (62.3%) or compression hosiery (25.5%). A minority of patients did not receive compression in the acute phase (12.2%).

The average time from DVT diagnosis to RVO assessment was 5.3 months.

The incidence of RVO was significantly lower in patients who received immediate compression than in those who did not—46.3% and 66.7%, respectively (odds ratio [OR], 0.46; P=0.005).

In addition, PTS was more common among patients with RVO.

At 6 months, the incidence of PTS was 55.7% among patients with RVO and 44.3% among patients without RVO (OR, 0.66; P=0.029). At 24 months, the incidence of PTS was 54.0% and 46.0%, respectively (OR, 0.65; P=0.013).

The researchers said there was no significant association between RVO and recurrent DVT or pulmonary embolism.

Among the 30 patients with DVT recurrence, 60% had RVO and 40% did not (OR, 0.82; P=0.263).

Among the 19 patients who had recurrent pulmonary embolism, 52.6% had RVO and 47.7% did not (OR, 0.95; P=0.805).

Dr. ten Cate-Hoek noted that compression therapy is thought to improve blood flow by reducing the diameter of veins so that blood is pushed through them more forcefully, which helps to clear clot material.

“I think we can infer from our findings that this improved blood flow certainly helps prevent complications like residual vein occlusion and post-thrombotic syndrome after DVT,” she said.

“Given these outcomes, and that compression stockings are fairly easy to self-administer, relatively inexpensive, and minimally intrusive, compression therapy offers a clear benefit for all patients with DVT.”

Publications
Topics

Universitair Medisch Centrum
Arina ten Cate-Hoek, MD, PhD Photo from Maastricht

Immediate compression therapy provides a “clear benefit” for patients with deep vein thrombosis (DVT), according to the senior author of a study published in Blood.

In this prospective study, patients who started compression therapy within the first 24 hours of DVT diagnosis were 20% less likely to develop residual vein occlusion (RVO) than patients who did not start compression therapy in the acute phase.

Furthermore, patients who did not develop RVO were 8% less likely to have post-thrombotic syndrome (PTS) than patients with RVO.

“We found little reason for those treating DVT not to use compression therapy as a prevention measure against future complications,” said study author Arina J. ten Cate-Hoek, MD, PhD, of Maastricht University in the Netherlands.

“Although the use of compression stockings after DVT is routine across much of Europe, it is less common in the United States, where guidelines emphasize compression primarily for patients who complain of ongoing symptoms.”

Dr. ten Cate-Hoek and her colleagues studied 592 adults with DVT who were treated in 10 centers across the Netherlands.

All patients were treated with anticoagulants, largely vitamin K antagonists (80.6%) but also direct oral anticoagulants (3.0%), investigational anticoagulants (11.1%), and low-molecular-weight heparin (4.4%).

Within 24 hours of DVT diagnosis, most patients received compression therapy (pressure 35 mmHg) with either multilayer compression bandaging (62.3%) or compression hosiery (25.5%). A minority of patients did not receive compression in the acute phase (12.2%).

The average time from DVT diagnosis to RVO assessment was 5.3 months.

The incidence of RVO was significantly lower in patients who received immediate compression than in those who did not—46.3% and 66.7%, respectively (odds ratio [OR], 0.46; P=0.005).

In addition, PTS was more common among patients with RVO.

At 6 months, the incidence of PTS was 55.7% among patients with RVO and 44.3% among patients without RVO (OR, 0.66; P=0.029). At 24 months, the incidence of PTS was 54.0% and 46.0%, respectively (OR, 0.65; P=0.013).

The researchers said there was no significant association between RVO and recurrent DVT or pulmonary embolism.

Among the 30 patients with DVT recurrence, 60% had RVO and 40% did not (OR, 0.82; P=0.263).

Among the 19 patients who had recurrent pulmonary embolism, 52.6% had RVO and 47.7% did not (OR, 0.95; P=0.805).

Dr. ten Cate-Hoek noted that compression therapy is thought to improve blood flow by reducing the diameter of veins so that blood is pushed through them more forcefully, which helps to clear clot material.

“I think we can infer from our findings that this improved blood flow certainly helps prevent complications like residual vein occlusion and post-thrombotic syndrome after DVT,” she said.

“Given these outcomes, and that compression stockings are fairly easy to self-administer, relatively inexpensive, and minimally intrusive, compression therapy offers a clear benefit for all patients with DVT.”

Universitair Medisch Centrum
Arina ten Cate-Hoek, MD, PhD Photo from Maastricht

Immediate compression therapy provides a “clear benefit” for patients with deep vein thrombosis (DVT), according to the senior author of a study published in Blood.

In this prospective study, patients who started compression therapy within the first 24 hours of DVT diagnosis were 20% less likely to develop residual vein occlusion (RVO) than patients who did not start compression therapy in the acute phase.

Furthermore, patients who did not develop RVO were 8% less likely to have post-thrombotic syndrome (PTS) than patients with RVO.

“We found little reason for those treating DVT not to use compression therapy as a prevention measure against future complications,” said study author Arina J. ten Cate-Hoek, MD, PhD, of Maastricht University in the Netherlands.

“Although the use of compression stockings after DVT is routine across much of Europe, it is less common in the United States, where guidelines emphasize compression primarily for patients who complain of ongoing symptoms.”

Dr. ten Cate-Hoek and her colleagues studied 592 adults with DVT who were treated in 10 centers across the Netherlands.

All patients were treated with anticoagulants, largely vitamin K antagonists (80.6%) but also direct oral anticoagulants (3.0%), investigational anticoagulants (11.1%), and low-molecular-weight heparin (4.4%).

Within 24 hours of DVT diagnosis, most patients received compression therapy (pressure 35 mmHg) with either multilayer compression bandaging (62.3%) or compression hosiery (25.5%). A minority of patients did not receive compression in the acute phase (12.2%).

The average time from DVT diagnosis to RVO assessment was 5.3 months.

The incidence of RVO was significantly lower in patients who received immediate compression than in those who did not—46.3% and 66.7%, respectively (odds ratio [OR], 0.46; P=0.005).

In addition, PTS was more common among patients with RVO.

At 6 months, the incidence of PTS was 55.7% among patients with RVO and 44.3% among patients without RVO (OR, 0.66; P=0.029). At 24 months, the incidence of PTS was 54.0% and 46.0%, respectively (OR, 0.65; P=0.013).

The researchers said there was no significant association between RVO and recurrent DVT or pulmonary embolism.

Among the 30 patients with DVT recurrence, 60% had RVO and 40% did not (OR, 0.82; P=0.263).

Among the 19 patients who had recurrent pulmonary embolism, 52.6% had RVO and 47.7% did not (OR, 0.95; P=0.805).

Dr. ten Cate-Hoek noted that compression therapy is thought to improve blood flow by reducing the diameter of veins so that blood is pushed through them more forcefully, which helps to clear clot material.

“I think we can infer from our findings that this improved blood flow certainly helps prevent complications like residual vein occlusion and post-thrombotic syndrome after DVT,” she said.

“Given these outcomes, and that compression stockings are fairly easy to self-administer, relatively inexpensive, and minimally intrusive, compression therapy offers a clear benefit for all patients with DVT.”

Publications
Publications
Topics
Article Type
Display Headline
Study supports immediate compression after DVT
Display Headline
Study supports immediate compression after DVT
Disallow All Ads
Content Gating
No Gating (article Unlocked/Free)
Alternative CME
Disqus Comments
Default
Use ProPublica