Best Practices

A National WestlawNext Database Analysis of Malpractice Litigation in Radiation Oncology

Author and Disclosure Information

 

References

Conclusion

Litigation involving radiation oncologists were infrequent, and most verdicts were in favor of defendant radiation oncologists. Excessive radiation, unnecessary radiation, and a failure to refer and/or order appropriate tests were noted in most cases. Settlements were reached in the minority of cases, although mean payouts were more than 3 times less in these cases compared with jury verdicts. An increased awareness of radiation oncology malpractice litigation has the potential to improve physician-patient relationships and provide insight into the situations and conditions that commonly lead to litigation within the radiation oncology field.

Click here to read the digital edition.

Pages

Recommended Reading

Prevalence of Suspicious Ultrasound Features in Hot Thyroid Nodules (FULL)
Federal Practitioner
Disappointing Results From a Cetuximab Study
Federal Practitioner
CME: Current Trends in Multiple Myeloma: Customizing Treatment Strategies and Optimizing Outcomes
Federal Practitioner
Researchers share Nobel Prize for cancer immunotherapy discoveries
Federal Practitioner
Breast cancer risk in type 2 diabetes related to adiposity
Federal Practitioner
Which Patients Have the Best Chance With Checkpoint Inhibitors?
Federal Practitioner
“Unique” Challenges for Screening Native American Women
Federal Practitioner
2018: A banner year for hematology drug approvals
Federal Practitioner
Poor-prognosis cancers linked to highest suicide risk in first year
Federal Practitioner
A Safe Treatment Switch for Patients With Prostate Cancer
Federal Practitioner