RESEARCH

Rate of Clinical Trial Enrollment in Patients Treated for DLBCL Within the Veterans Health Administration

Author and Disclosure Information

 

BACKGROUND: Diffuse large B cell lymphoma (DLBCL) is curable in most patients, however this high cure rate is mostly reserved for those who achieve a complete remission with first line treatment. In patients who have relapsed/refractory disease the cure rate is significantly lower. There are limited studies that have previously investigated the rate of clinical trial discussion and enrollment among DLBCL patients. Our aim, as part of a larger study, was to determine the rate of clinical trial enrollment for patients diagnosed with DLBCL at the Veterans Health Administration system (VHA), a population that traditionally experiences poorer outcomes when compared to the community and academic centers.

METHODS: We performed a retrospective chart review of patients diagnosed with DLBCL in the VHA nationwide from 01/01/2011 to 12/31/2017. Patients treated outside of the VHA and patients with primary DLBCL of the CNS were excluded. During our inclusion period, we randomly selected patients and evaluated the number of patients that engaged in discussions with their providers about clinical trials and the number of patients that eventually enrolled in trials.

RESULTS: In total, 721 patients met our inclusion criteria. Median age was 67 and the majority of patients were white (74.5%), male (96.8%), had an ECOG of 2 (83.7%) and presented with advanced stage disease (stage IV: 40.3% and stage III: 26.5%). Of all the patients included in our study 3.7% engaged in discussion about clinical trials and amongst relapsed/ refractory patients (N=182), 12.6% engaged in discussion. The rate of clinical trial enrollment was 1.8% in all patients and 6% in relapsed/refractory patients.

CONCLUSION: Our results show a low rate of 1.8% of DLBCL patients enrolling in clinical trials. These rates are improved but remain low at 6% in relapsed/ refractory patients with only 12.6 % of all relapsed/refractory patients engaging in discussions with their provider about clinical trials, despite NCCN’s recommendation for clinical trial consideration in this subset of DLBCL patients. These results are concerning and show a need to identify and understand the barriers to enrollment in this population in addition to the implementation of mitigation practices.

Recommended Reading

Improving Ototoxicity Monitoring with Cisplatin Therapy at VA Northeast Ohio Healthcare System (VANOHS), An Interdisciplinary Team Approach
Federal Practitioner
In-Depth Look at a Community- Based Population of Multiple Myeloma (MM) Patients Undergoing an in-Class Transition (iCT) from Parenteral Bortezomib to Oral Ixazomib in the United States (US) MM-6 Study
Federal Practitioner
Initiation of Schwartz Rounds at VA Connecticut to Engage Providers and Improve Communication
Federal Practitioner
Novel Combination Therapy Rises When Occam’s Razor Falls
Federal Practitioner
Oncology-Palliative Care Collaboration: Impact on Hospice Accession and End-of-Life Care
Federal Practitioner
Patient-Centered Cancer Care: A Streamline Practice to MyHealtheVet Usage
Federal Practitioner
Primary Hepatic Neuroendocrine Neoplasm: A SEER Population-Based Study
Federal Practitioner
Primitive Neuroectodermal Tumor of the Pancreas in Adults; A Rare and Aggressive Malignancy
Federal Practitioner
Prostate Cancer in a Transgender Woman
Federal Practitioner
Prostate-Specific Antigen Decline >50% After 4 Weeks of Treatment Is an Indicator of Better Progression Free and Overall Survival Both With Abiraterone and Enzalutamide in Metastatic Castrate Resistant Prostate Cancer
Federal Practitioner