Case Reports

A Case of Duodenocaval Fistula in the Setting of Respiratory Failure Initially Confused for Transfusion-Related Acute Lung Injury

Author and Disclosure Information

 

References

The most challenging aspect in diagnosing DCF is that many times patients present with nonspecific symptoms, and given its rarity it is not something that is usually at the forefront of most differentials.2 This diagnostic difficulty may elucidate why there is such a relatively high mortality rate—nearly 40%—associated with DCF and why many times accurate diagnosis is not made until autopsy.1,3 The most common presenting manifestations are sepsis and/or GI bleeding; in less than half the cases described in the literature patients had both sepsis and GI bleeding. In our case, the patient had signs of melena but was not felt to be septic as his presenting signs were felt to be in the setting of blood loss and dehydration (given his history of bulimia), not an acute infectious source.

In retrospect, one of the more confounding aspects of this case is the clinical picture concerning for TRALI. The patient required supplemental oxygen throughout his hospitalization and decompensated while or after receiving a transfusion, thus having TRALI on the differential was not felt inappropriate at that time. However, this case also illustrates the power of an anchoring bias, and perhaps the clinical team anchored on the diagnosis of TRALI too quickly before considering other possible etiologies for the patient’s respiratory distress. TRALI can be one of the most challenging diagnoses to make in the field of transfusion medicine as there are no definitive diagnostic criteria.6 It is felt to be a clinical diagnosis of exclusion as there is no pathognomonic sign or diagnostic test to confirm it as the cause of the patient’s respiratory distress, though anti–human leukocyte antigen antibodies commonly are present.6,7 Considering how quickly the patient decompensated on day 2 of hospitalization and the presence of C perfringens bacteremia, which carries a mortality rate of 27% to 44%, it is likely that further diagnostic workup would not have changed the clinical outcome.8

Conclusions

Our investigation reports a case of a DCF in the setting of significant duodenal peptic ulcer disease. We highlight the diagnostic challenge that this commonly lethal etiology presents. We believe ours is the first case in which it was confused for TRALI and associated with food embolism to the lungs causing hypoxic respiratory failure. We want to highlight that DCF, though rare, should be considered for patients who present with GI bleeding and hypoxic respiratory failure.

Pages

Recommended Reading

Registered Dietitian Nutritionists’ Role in Hospital in Home
Federal Practitioner
Effect of Pharmacist Interventions on Hospital Readmissions for Home-Based Primary Care Veterans
Federal Practitioner
Hospital-acquired pneumonia is killing patients, yet there is a simple way to stop it
Federal Practitioner
Establishing a Hospital Artificial Intelligence Committee to Improve Patient Care
Federal Practitioner
Antibiotic Stewardship Improvement Initiative at a Veterans Health Administration Ambulatory Care Center
Federal Practitioner
Value of a Pharmacy-Adjudicated Community Care Prior Authorization Drug Request Service
Federal Practitioner
Capturing Pathology Workload Required for a Precision Oncology Molecular Test (POMT)
Federal Practitioner
Improving Veteran Adherence to Preadmission ERAS Protocol: Decreasing Avoidable Surgical Cancellations and Post-Operative Length of Stay (LOS)
Federal Practitioner
Standardize Documentation of at Least 3 or More Toxicities of Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors to Improve Patient-Reported Outcomes
Federal Practitioner
Infiltrating Wound Vacuum-Assisted Closure With Topical Amphotericin for Mucormycosis Infection of the Achilles Tendon
Federal Practitioner