Clinical Edge Journal Scan

Commentary: Benign Breast Disease, PD-L1+ TNBC, and Exercise in BC, February 2024

Dr. Roesch scans the journals so you don't have to!

Author and Disclosure Information

 

Erin Roesch, MD

Benign breast disease (BBD), including nonproliferative disease (NP), proliferative disease without atypia (PDWA), and atypical hyperplasia (AH), is the most common finding after a breast biopsy, representing approximately 75% of cases. Multiple prior studies in the setting of surgical biopsies have shown an association of BBD with an increased risk for breast cancer.[1] Sherman and colleagues investigated this relationship between BBD and breast cancer risk in a contemporary population with use of percutaneous biopsy. This retrospective cohort study included 4819 women with BBD and demonstrated a higher risk in the BBD cohort compared with Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) data. The study results showed an increase in breast cancer overall (standard incidence ratio (SIR) 1.95; 95% CI 0.176-2.17), invasive breast cancer (SIR 1.56; 95% CI 1.37-1.78), and ductal carcinoma in situ (SIR 3.10; 95% CI 2.54-3.77). Furthermore, increasing BBD severity and an increasing number of foci of BBD were found to have progressively increased the risk. The 10-year breast cancer cumulative incidence was 4.3% for NP, 6.6% for PDWA, and 14.6% for AH compared with an expected cumulative incidence of 2.9% for the general SEER population. This study further helps to inform our understanding of the breast cancer risk associated with BBD and encourages optimization of screening techniques and other diagnostics, modification of lifestyle factors that may influence this risk, and other preventative measures (such as chemoprevention).

The benefit of immunotherapy in combination with chemotherapy for programmed death–ligand 1–positive (PD-L1+) metastatic triple-negative breast cancer (mTNBC) has been shown in both the IMpassion130 and KEYNOTE-355 trials.[2,3] However, the IMpassion131 trial, which evaluated atezolizumab plus paclitaxel, did not show a progression-free survival (PFS) or overall survival (OS) benefit vs paclitaxel alone in PD-L1+ mTNBC.[4] Various explanations for these divergent results have been proposed, including the inherent properties of the chemotherapy backbone, patient populations, and the heterogenous nature of TNBC, which can affect response to immunotherapy. Of present, the various KEYNOTE-355 regimens (pembrolizumab plus investigator's choice chemotherapy [nab-paclitaxel, paclitaxel, or gemcitabine-carboplatin]) are US Food and Drug Administration approved for PD-L1+ mTNBC in the first-line setting. The phase 2 randomized TBCRC 043 trial investigated the effect of atezolizumab with carboplatin in patients with mTNBC and further looked at clinical and molecular correlates of response (Lehmann et al). A total of 106 patients were randomly assigned to carboplatin or carboplatin plus atezolizumab; the combination improved PFS (median PFS, 4.1 vs 2.2 mo; hazard ratio [HR] 0.66; P = .05) and OS (12.6 vs 8.6 mo; HR 0.60; P = .03). Grade 3/4 serious adverse events were more common with carboplatin-atezolizumab vs carboplatin alone (41% vs 8%). In addition, an association of better responses with PD-L1 immunotherapy was seen in patients with obesity, uncontrolled blood glucose levels, high tumor mutation burden, and increased tumor infiltrating lymphocytes. These data support the role of immunotherapy in mTNBC, highlight tumor heterogeneity within this subtype and encourage correlative studies to better define which patients benefit from immunotherapy.

Various studies have demonstrated the favorable impact of physical activity on breast cancer risk in postmenopausal women.[5] However, data in premenopausal women is less clear. Various mechanisms connecting physical activity to premenopausal breast cancer risk have been proposed including the effect of exercise on sex steroid hormones, fasting insulin levels, and inflammation.[6] A pooled analysis from 19 cohort studies including 547,601 premenopausal women, with 10,231 incident cases of breast cancer, aimed to examine the relationship between leisure-time physical activity (sports, exercise, recreational walking) and breast cancer risk in young women (Timmins et al). Higher (90th percentile) vs lower (10th percentile) levels of leisure-time physical activity were associated with a 10% reduction in breast cancer risk after adjustment for body mass index (BMI; adjusted HR 0.90; 95% CI 0.85-0.95; P < .001). They also found a significant reduction in risk: 32% (HR 0.68; P = .01) and 9% (HR 0.91; P = .005) for women with underweight (BMI < 18.5) and with average weight (BMI 18.5-24.9), respectively. Further, the effect of physical activity was most pronounced in the human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)–enriched breast cancer subtype, wherein higher vs lower levels of activity were associated with an estimated 45% reduction in breast cancer risk (adjusted HR 0.55; 95% CI 0.37-0.82). These findings support the beneficial role of aerobic exercise and healthy body weight on breast cancer risk among premenopausal women and highlight the value of incorporating this information into counseling for our patients.

Additional References

  1. Figueroa JD, Gierach GL, Duggan MA, et al. Risk factors for breast cancer development by tumor characteristics among women with benign breast disease. Breast Cancer Res. 2021;23:34. doi: 10.1186/s13058-021-01410-1 Source
  2. Schmid P, Adams S, Rugo HS, et al, for the IMpassion130 Trial Investigators. Atezolizumab and nab-paclitaxel in advanced triple-negative breast cancer. N Engl J Med. 2018;379:2108-2121. doi: 10.1056/nejmoa1809615 Source
  3. Cortes J, Rugo HS, Cescon DW, et al, for the KEYNOTE-355 Investigators. Pembrolizumab plus chemotherapy in advanced triple-negative breast cancer. N Engl J Med. 2022;387:217-226. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa2202809 Source
  4. Miles D, Gligorov J, André F, et al, on behalf of the IMpassion131 investigators. Primary results from IMpassion131, a double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomised phase III trial of first-line paclitaxel with or without atezolizumab for unresectable locally advanced/metastatic triple-negative breast cancer. Ann Oncol. 2021;32:994-1004. doi: 10.1016/j.annonc.2021.05.801 Source
  5. Eliassen AH, Hankinson SE, Rosner B, et al. Physical activity and risk of breast cancer among postmenopausal women. Arch Intern Med. 2010;170:1758-1764. doi: 10.1001/archinternmed.2010.363 Source
  6. Swain CTV, Drummond AE, Boing L, et al. Linking physical activity to breast cancer via sex hormones, part 1: The effect of physical activity on sex steroid hormones. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2022;31:16-27. doi: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-21-0437 Source

Recommended Reading

Women over 50 may safely de-escalate mammogram frequency following surgery
Federal Practitioner
‘Baby TAM’ effective, tolerable for breast cancer prevention
Federal Practitioner
Lower olanzapine dose just as effective for chemotherapy-induced nausea, vomiting
Federal Practitioner
Nodal Radiation May Make BC Axillary Dissection Unnecessary
Federal Practitioner
No Added Benefit From Chemo in This Breast Cancer Subtype
Federal Practitioner
Magnetic Seeds or Guidewires for Breast Cancer Localization?
Federal Practitioner
Radiation Oncologists Fight for Payment Reform Amid Cuts
Federal Practitioner
Dana-Farber Moves to Retract, Correct Dozens of Cancer Papers Amid Allegations
Federal Practitioner
Chemo-Free Maintenance Strategies May Boost Survival in TNBC
Federal Practitioner
More Young Women Being Diagnosed With Breast Cancer Than Ever Before
Federal Practitioner