Clinical Edge

Summaries of Must-Read Clinical Literature, Guidelines, and FDA Actions

Risk of Hypoglycemia in Patients with T2D

JAMA; ePub 2017 Jul 4; Wysham, Bhargava, et al

32 weeks’ treatment with insulin degludec vs insulin glargine U100 in patients with type 2 diabetes and with at least 1 hypoglycemia risk factor resulted in a reduced rate of overall symptomatic hypoglycemia, a recent study found. In the SWITCH 2 randomized clinical trial conducted between January 2014 and December 2015, 721 patients (mean age 61.4 years, 53.1% male) were randomized 1:1 to receive once-daily insulin degludec followed by insulin glargine U100 (n=361) or insulin glargine U100 followed by insulin degludec (n=360) and randomized 1:1 to morning or evening dosing within each treatment group. 580 patients completed the trial. Researchers found:

  • Rates of overall symptomatic hypoglycemia during the 16-week maintenance period for insulin degludec vs insulin glargine U100 were 186 vs 265 episodes per 100 patient-years of exposure (PYE) (rate ratio = 0.70).
  • During the same period, the proportions of patients with hypoglycemic episodes were 22.5% vs 31.6%.
  • Rates of nocturnal symptomatic hypoglycemia with insulin degludec vs insulin glargine U100 were 55.2 vs 93.6 episodes/100 PYE; proportions of patients with hypoglycemic episodes were 9.7% vs 14.7%.
  • The proportions of patients experiencing severe hypoglycemia during the maintenance period were 1.6% for insulin degludec vs 2.4% for insulin glargine U100.

Citation:

Wysham C, Bhargava A, Chaykin L, et al. Effect of insulin degludec vs insulin glargine U100 on hypoglycemia in with type 2 diabetes. The SWITCH 2 randomized clinical trial. JAMA. 2017;318(1):45-56. doi:10.1001/jama.2017.7117.

Commentary:

When we think about what medications to use in diabetes, we assess medications with regard to 5 characteristics: efficacy, effect on weight, hypoglycemia risk, side effect, and cost. This trial is unusual in that it compares 2 popular medications head-to-head. The results showed that insulin degludec essentially has the same efficacy and significantly less hypoglycemia than insulin glargine U100. Ten to 15 years ago, insulin glargine U-100 was shown to have less hypoglycemia than insulin NPH.1 Three years ago, insulin glargine U-300 was shown to have less hypoglycemia than insulin glargine U-100.2 GLP-1 receptor agonists have about the same efficacy as basal insulin but with far less hypoglycemia and they help people achieve weight loss instead of weight gain. The new fixed ratio combination basal insulin/GLP-1 RA provides greater efficacy than either basal insulin or GLP-1 RAs, with no greater hypoglycemia than the basal insulin component and with mitigation of the weight gain that often occurs with basal insulin. It is also clear that insulin degludec has less hypoglycemia than insulin glargine U-100. How it compares to insulin glargine U-300 remains unknown. We now have many choices and increasing evidence with which to make intelligent choices for our patients. —Neil Skolnik, MD

  1. Rosenstock J, Dailey G, Massi-Benedetti M, Fritsche A, Lin Z, Salzman A, et al. Reduced hypoglycemia risk with insulin glargine: a meta-analysis comparing insulin glargine with human NPH insulin in type 2 diabetes. Diabetes Care 2005;28:950–955.
  2. Riddle M, Bolli GB, Ziemen M, et al. New insulin glargine 300 units/mL versus glargine 100 units/mL in people with type 2 diabetes using basal and mealtime insulin: Glucose control and hypoglycemia in a 6-month randomized controlled trial (EDITION 1). Diabetes Care. 2014;37(10):2755-2762. doi:10.2337/dc14-0991.