AAN Annual Meeting

VANCOUVER – A new transcranial Doppler platform that analyzes subtle changes in the cerebral blood flow waveform performed well in detecting sports-related concussion in a cohort study of 238 Los Angeles high school athletes.

The investigational headset device was able to differentiate between those with and without a recent concussion 83% of the time, investigators reported at the annual meeting of the American Academy of Neurology. In contrast, traditional transcranial Doppler analysis detected a recent concussion only 50%-60% of the time.

“Over the last few years, there has been growing evidence that cerebral hemodynamics are altered following sports-related concussion,” senior author Robert Hamilton, Ph.D., cofounder and chief science officer of Neural Analytics in Los Angeles, commented in a session and interview.

Most studies in this area have used MRI or traditional transcranial Doppler analysis, he said. However, the former is costly, time consuming, and not portable, and the latter has not proven very accurate.

As traditional Doppler analysis disregards the majority of waveform data, Dr. Hamilton and his colleagues developed an advanced platform that uses machine learning to analyze the entire shape of the cerebral blood flow velocity waveform through quantitative cerebral hemodynamics.

They compared the advanced analysis with traditional analysis among 69 high school athletes in contact sports who had sustained a concussion an average of 6 days earlier and a control group of 169 unaffected age-matched high school athletes from contact and noncontact sports.

Both groups had bilateral monitoring of blood flow in the middle cerebral artery with transcranial Doppler while they followed a standard cerebrovascular reactivity protocol that included rest and breath holding.

Results showed that for differentiating between athletes who did and did not have concussion, the advanced analysis had an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of 83%. (Sensitivity was 72%, specificity was 82%, and overall accuracy was 80%.)

In comparison, the area under the curve was substantially lower for the traditional analysis measures: It was 55% for mean velocity (100% sensitivity, 0% specificity, 76% accuracy), 52% for the pulsatility index (86% sensitivity, 23% specificity, 61% accuracy), and 60% for the cerebrovascular reactivity index (51% sensitivity, 68% specificity, 64% accuracy).

“Unfortunately, concussion diagnostics and management today are basically subjective,” Dr. Hamilton commented. The advanced analysis may therefore improve the situation by providing objective evidence of blood flow dysfunction after injury.

The new analysis platform “is easy to use and portable, and [testing] can be done very quickly, within 5 minutes,” he noted. “The nice thing is it can be done on the sideline, in the emergency room, or in a doctor’s office.”

The investigators will next use the advanced analysis to track recovery of blood flow regulation after sports-related concussion and will compare its performance with that of additional modalities, such as MRI, according to Dr. Hamilton. Furthermore, they are testing it in various other populations: adolescents, college athletes, and members of the military.

“Ultimately, blood flow dysfunction is also important in a wide variety of conditions, such as stroke and dementia,” he pointed out. “So those are conditions that we are looking at to study this year and moving forward in the future.”

The research was supported by the National Institutes of Health and the National Science Foundation.

VANCOUVER – A new transcranial Doppler platform that analyzes subtle changes in the cerebral blood flow waveform performed well in detecting sports-related concussion in a cohort study of 238 Los Angeles high school athletes.

The investigational headset device was able to differentiate between those with and without a recent concussion 83% of the time, investigators reported at the annual meeting of the American Academy of Neurology. In contrast, traditional transcranial Doppler analysis detected a recent concussion only 50%-60% of the time.

“Over the last few years, there has been growing evidence that cerebral hemodynamics are altered following sports-related concussion,” senior author Robert Hamilton, Ph.D., cofounder and chief science officer of Neural Analytics in Los Angeles, commented in a session and interview.

Most studies in this area have used MRI or traditional transcranial Doppler analysis, he said. However, the former is costly, time consuming, and not portable, and the latter has not proven very accurate.

As traditional Doppler analysis disregards the majority of waveform data, Dr. Hamilton and his colleagues developed an advanced platform that uses machine learning to analyze the entire shape of the cerebral blood flow velocity waveform through quantitative cerebral hemodynamics.

They compared the advanced analysis with traditional analysis among 69 high school athletes in contact sports who had sustained a concussion an average of 6 days earlier and a control group of 169 unaffected age-matched high school athletes from contact and noncontact sports.

Both groups had bilateral monitoring of blood flow in the middle cerebral artery with transcranial Doppler while they followed a standard cerebrovascular reactivity protocol that included rest and breath holding.

Results showed that for differentiating between athletes who did and did not have concussion, the advanced analysis had an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of 83%. (Sensitivity was 72%, specificity was 82%, and overall accuracy was 80%.)

In comparison, the area under the curve was substantially lower for the traditional analysis measures: It was 55% for mean velocity (100% sensitivity, 0% specificity, 76% accuracy), 52% for the pulsatility index (86% sensitivity, 23% specificity, 61% accuracy), and 60% for the cerebrovascular reactivity index (51% sensitivity, 68% specificity, 64% accuracy).

“Unfortunately, concussion diagnostics and management today are basically subjective,” Dr. Hamilton commented. The advanced analysis may therefore improve the situation by providing objective evidence of blood flow dysfunction after injury.

The new analysis platform “is easy to use and portable, and [testing] can be done very quickly, within 5 minutes,” he noted. “The nice thing is it can be done on the sideline, in the emergency room, or in a doctor’s office.”

The investigators will next use the advanced analysis to track recovery of blood flow regulation after sports-related concussion and will compare its performance with that of additional modalities, such as MRI, according to Dr. Hamilton. Furthermore, they are testing it in various other populations: adolescents, college athletes, and members of the military.

“Ultimately, blood flow dysfunction is also important in a wide variety of conditions, such as stroke and dementia,” he pointed out. “So those are conditions that we are looking at to study this year and moving forward in the future.”

The research was supported by the National Institutes of Health and the National Science Foundation.

VANCOUVER – A new transcranial Doppler platform that analyzes subtle changes in the cerebral blood flow waveform performed well in detecting sports-related concussion in a cohort study of 238 Los Angeles high school athletes.

The investigational headset device was able to differentiate between those with and without a recent concussion 83% of the time, investigators reported at the annual meeting of the American Academy of Neurology. In contrast, traditional transcranial Doppler analysis detected a recent concussion only 50%-60% of the time.

“Over the last few years, there has been growing evidence that cerebral hemodynamics are altered following sports-related concussion,” senior author Robert Hamilton, Ph.D., cofounder and chief science officer of Neural Analytics in Los Angeles, commented in a session and interview.

Most studies in this area have used MRI or traditional transcranial Doppler analysis, he said. However, the former is costly, time consuming, and not portable, and the latter has not proven very accurate.

As traditional Doppler analysis disregards the majority of waveform data, Dr. Hamilton and his colleagues developed an advanced platform that uses machine learning to analyze the entire shape of the cerebral blood flow velocity waveform through quantitative cerebral hemodynamics.

They compared the advanced analysis with traditional analysis among 69 high school athletes in contact sports who had sustained a concussion an average of 6 days earlier and a control group of 169 unaffected age-matched high school athletes from contact and noncontact sports.

Both groups had bilateral monitoring of blood flow in the middle cerebral artery with transcranial Doppler while they followed a standard cerebrovascular reactivity protocol that included rest and breath holding.

Results showed that for differentiating between athletes who did and did not have concussion, the advanced analysis had an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of 83%. (Sensitivity was 72%, specificity was 82%, and overall accuracy was 80%.)

In comparison, the area under the curve was substantially lower for the traditional analysis measures: It was 55% for mean velocity (100% sensitivity, 0% specificity, 76% accuracy), 52% for the pulsatility index (86% sensitivity, 23% specificity, 61% accuracy), and 60% for the cerebrovascular reactivity index (51% sensitivity, 68% specificity, 64% accuracy).

“Unfortunately, concussion diagnostics and management today are basically subjective,” Dr. Hamilton commented. The advanced analysis may therefore improve the situation by providing objective evidence of blood flow dysfunction after injury.

The new analysis platform “is easy to use and portable, and [testing] can be done very quickly, within 5 minutes,” he noted. “The nice thing is it can be done on the sideline, in the emergency room, or in a doctor’s office.”

The investigators will next use the advanced analysis to track recovery of blood flow regulation after sports-related concussion and will compare its performance with that of additional modalities, such as MRI, according to Dr. Hamilton. Furthermore, they are testing it in various other populations: adolescents, college athletes, and members of the military.

“Ultimately, blood flow dysfunction is also important in a wide variety of conditions, such as stroke and dementia,” he pointed out. “So those are conditions that we are looking at to study this year and moving forward in the future.”

The research was supported by the National Institutes of Health and the National Science Foundation.

VANCOUVER – Many retired National Football League (NFL) players seeking care for neurocognitive symptoms have MRI evidence of traumatic brain injury, according to the largest study of this issue among living players.

Data reported at the annual meeting of the American Academy of Neurology show that 43% of a cohort of 40 symptomatic NFL retirees had abnormal results on diffusion tensor MRI and 30% had evidence of traumatic axonal injury on conventional MRI.

Susan London/Frontline Medical News

The likelihood of abnormal diffusion tensor MRI results was correlated, albeit weakly, with the length of the player’s NFL career, but not with the number of concussions sustained.

“It appears that subconcussive hits – that is, the cumulative effects and longer playing careers – place retired alumni at risk for abnormal diffusion tensor MRI,” commented lead author Dr. Francis X. Conidi, director of the Florida Center for Headache & Sports Neurology in Palm Beach and team neurologist for the Florida Panthers of the National Hockey League.

“This could be a possible link to chronic traumatic encephalopathy, as consensus is you need to have repetitive head trauma,” he proposed. “Or this could be a separate entity whereby, in NFL players, the symptoms we are seeing are actually related to the traumatic brain injury itself and [in a subset] with some genetic predisposition, they will go on to have progressive neurological decline.”

Although the cohort was quite young, only 39 years old on average, some had likely played football since youth, and that has implications for prevention, Dr. Conidi added in an interview. “One thing we need to consider is limiting the amount of contact that these people receive on a cumulative basis, starting when they are young and starting in practice, because that’s where most of the contact occurs,” he recommended.

“It is important to note that diffusion tensor imaging is not a routine part of a brain MRI study,” session moderator Dr. José E. Cavazos, professor of neurology and assistant dean at the University of Texas Health Science Center in San Antonio, said in comments provided by email. “The significant correlation between duration of years played and abnormalities in diffusion tensor imaging is of concern given the popularity of the sport.”

“The next step is to replicate the findings, but more importantly, it is to find surrogate markers for early detection for these abnormalities, aiming to intervene (sideline) those players at greater risk for developing cognitive deficits or other impairments,” he added.

In the study, the retired players had a battery of neuropsychological and imaging examinations and tests over a period of 2 days. They were classified as having abnormal diffusion tensor MRI results if they had fractional anisotropy (FA) values at least 2.5 standard deviations below those of age-matched peers in a normative database for specific regions of interest in the brain.

The players ranged in age from 27 to 56 years. On average, they had played 7 years in the NFL and sustained eight concussions during that time. Most had retired in the past 5 years.

Results showed that, overall, 43% had abnormal diffusion tensor MRI results, Dr. Conidi reported. Prevalence, however, varied according to player position: It was highest for defensive linemen (64%) and wide receivers (60%); intermediate for running backs (43%), defensive backs (33%), and offensive linemen (29%); and lowest for quarterbacks (0%) and linebackers (0%).

The number of years played was significantly correlated with abnormal results (P = .049), but the number of concussions was not.

In other findings, sizable proportions of the players had significant abnormalities in attention and concentration (43%), executive function (54%), learning and memory (46%), spatial and perceptual function (24%), and language (5%).

“These guys have played these positions probably since they were young. This isn’t just NFL. We don’t make any claims that professional football caused this,” Dr. Conidi emphasized.

As for future research, the investigators plan to undertake PET scanning to assess clinical and laboratory evidence of Alzheimer’s disease, study sleep pathology, and look for tau protein (a marker for chronic traumatic encephalopathy) in cerebrospinal fluid. Additionally, they will assess treatment outcomes.

The study is not without limitations, Dr. Conidi acknowledged. “With every study that has ever been done on these guys, it is a skewed population: They are coming to us and they are looking to be evaluated,” he elaborated. “The other issue is we don’t have a normative comparison database for the neuropsychological testing.”

Dr. Conidi disclosed that he is a consultant for the NFL, NHL, USTA, PGA, and NCAA and that he receives research support from the Seeing Stars Foundation.

VANCOUVER – Many retired National Football League (NFL) players seeking care for neurocognitive symptoms have MRI evidence of traumatic brain injury, according to the largest study of this issue among living players.

Data reported at the annual meeting of the American Academy of Neurology show that 43% of a cohort of 40 symptomatic NFL retirees had abnormal results on diffusion tensor MRI and 30% had evidence of traumatic axonal injury on conventional MRI.

Susan London/Frontline Medical News

The likelihood of abnormal diffusion tensor MRI results was correlated, albeit weakly, with the length of the player’s NFL career, but not with the number of concussions sustained.

“It appears that subconcussive hits – that is, the cumulative effects and longer playing careers – place retired alumni at risk for abnormal diffusion tensor MRI,” commented lead author Dr. Francis X. Conidi, director of the Florida Center for Headache & Sports Neurology in Palm Beach and team neurologist for the Florida Panthers of the National Hockey League.

“This could be a possible link to chronic traumatic encephalopathy, as consensus is you need to have repetitive head trauma,” he proposed. “Or this could be a separate entity whereby, in NFL players, the symptoms we are seeing are actually related to the traumatic brain injury itself and [in a subset] with some genetic predisposition, they will go on to have progressive neurological decline.”

Although the cohort was quite young, only 39 years old on average, some had likely played football since youth, and that has implications for prevention, Dr. Conidi added in an interview. “One thing we need to consider is limiting the amount of contact that these people receive on a cumulative basis, starting when they are young and starting in practice, because that’s where most of the contact occurs,” he recommended.

“It is important to note that diffusion tensor imaging is not a routine part of a brain MRI study,” session moderator Dr. José E. Cavazos, professor of neurology and assistant dean at the University of Texas Health Science Center in San Antonio, said in comments provided by email. “The significant correlation between duration of years played and abnormalities in diffusion tensor imaging is of concern given the popularity of the sport.”

“The next step is to replicate the findings, but more importantly, it is to find surrogate markers for early detection for these abnormalities, aiming to intervene (sideline) those players at greater risk for developing cognitive deficits or other impairments,” he added.

In the study, the retired players had a battery of neuropsychological and imaging examinations and tests over a period of 2 days. They were classified as having abnormal diffusion tensor MRI results if they had fractional anisotropy (FA) values at least 2.5 standard deviations below those of age-matched peers in a normative database for specific regions of interest in the brain.

The players ranged in age from 27 to 56 years. On average, they had played 7 years in the NFL and sustained eight concussions during that time. Most had retired in the past 5 years.

Results showed that, overall, 43% had abnormal diffusion tensor MRI results, Dr. Conidi reported. Prevalence, however, varied according to player position: It was highest for defensive linemen (64%) and wide receivers (60%); intermediate for running backs (43%), defensive backs (33%), and offensive linemen (29%); and lowest for quarterbacks (0%) and linebackers (0%).

The number of years played was significantly correlated with abnormal results (P = .049), but the number of concussions was not.

In other findings, sizable proportions of the players had significant abnormalities in attention and concentration (43%), executive function (54%), learning and memory (46%), spatial and perceptual function (24%), and language (5%).

“These guys have played these positions probably since they were young. This isn’t just NFL. We don’t make any claims that professional football caused this,” Dr. Conidi emphasized.

As for future research, the investigators plan to undertake PET scanning to assess clinical and laboratory evidence of Alzheimer’s disease, study sleep pathology, and look for tau protein (a marker for chronic traumatic encephalopathy) in cerebrospinal fluid. Additionally, they will assess treatment outcomes.

The study is not without limitations, Dr. Conidi acknowledged. “With every study that has ever been done on these guys, it is a skewed population: They are coming to us and they are looking to be evaluated,” he elaborated. “The other issue is we don’t have a normative comparison database for the neuropsychological testing.”

Dr. Conidi disclosed that he is a consultant for the NFL, NHL, USTA, PGA, and NCAA and that he receives research support from the Seeing Stars Foundation.

VANCOUVER – Many retired National Football League (NFL) players seeking care for neurocognitive symptoms have MRI evidence of traumatic brain injury, according to the largest study of this issue among living players.

Data reported at the annual meeting of the American Academy of Neurology show that 43% of a cohort of 40 symptomatic NFL retirees had abnormal results on diffusion tensor MRI and 30% had evidence of traumatic axonal injury on conventional MRI.

Susan London/Frontline Medical News

The likelihood of abnormal diffusion tensor MRI results was correlated, albeit weakly, with the length of the player’s NFL career, but not with the number of concussions sustained.

“It appears that subconcussive hits – that is, the cumulative effects and longer playing careers – place retired alumni at risk for abnormal diffusion tensor MRI,” commented lead author Dr. Francis X. Conidi, director of the Florida Center for Headache & Sports Neurology in Palm Beach and team neurologist for the Florida Panthers of the National Hockey League.

“This could be a possible link to chronic traumatic encephalopathy, as consensus is you need to have repetitive head trauma,” he proposed. “Or this could be a separate entity whereby, in NFL players, the symptoms we are seeing are actually related to the traumatic brain injury itself and [in a subset] with some genetic predisposition, they will go on to have progressive neurological decline.”

Although the cohort was quite young, only 39 years old on average, some had likely played football since youth, and that has implications for prevention, Dr. Conidi added in an interview. “One thing we need to consider is limiting the amount of contact that these people receive on a cumulative basis, starting when they are young and starting in practice, because that’s where most of the contact occurs,” he recommended.

“It is important to note that diffusion tensor imaging is not a routine part of a brain MRI study,” session moderator Dr. José E. Cavazos, professor of neurology and assistant dean at the University of Texas Health Science Center in San Antonio, said in comments provided by email. “The significant correlation between duration of years played and abnormalities in diffusion tensor imaging is of concern given the popularity of the sport.”

“The next step is to replicate the findings, but more importantly, it is to find surrogate markers for early detection for these abnormalities, aiming to intervene (sideline) those players at greater risk for developing cognitive deficits or other impairments,” he added.

In the study, the retired players had a battery of neuropsychological and imaging examinations and tests over a period of 2 days. They were classified as having abnormal diffusion tensor MRI results if they had fractional anisotropy (FA) values at least 2.5 standard deviations below those of age-matched peers in a normative database for specific regions of interest in the brain.

The players ranged in age from 27 to 56 years. On average, they had played 7 years in the NFL and sustained eight concussions during that time. Most had retired in the past 5 years.

Results showed that, overall, 43% had abnormal diffusion tensor MRI results, Dr. Conidi reported. Prevalence, however, varied according to player position: It was highest for defensive linemen (64%) and wide receivers (60%); intermediate for running backs (43%), defensive backs (33%), and offensive linemen (29%); and lowest for quarterbacks (0%) and linebackers (0%).

The number of years played was significantly correlated with abnormal results (P = .049), but the number of concussions was not.

In other findings, sizable proportions of the players had significant abnormalities in attention and concentration (43%), executive function (54%), learning and memory (46%), spatial and perceptual function (24%), and language (5%).

“These guys have played these positions probably since they were young. This isn’t just NFL. We don’t make any claims that professional football caused this,” Dr. Conidi emphasized.

As for future research, the investigators plan to undertake PET scanning to assess clinical and laboratory evidence of Alzheimer’s disease, study sleep pathology, and look for tau protein (a marker for chronic traumatic encephalopathy) in cerebrospinal fluid. Additionally, they will assess treatment outcomes.

The study is not without limitations, Dr. Conidi acknowledged. “With every study that has ever been done on these guys, it is a skewed population: They are coming to us and they are looking to be evaluated,” he elaborated. “The other issue is we don’t have a normative comparison database for the neuropsychological testing.”

Dr. Conidi disclosed that he is a consultant for the NFL, NHL, USTA, PGA, and NCAA and that he receives research support from the Seeing Stars Foundation.

VANCOUVER – Multiple sclerosis patients discontinued treatment and relapsed earlier with dimethyl fumarate (Tecfidera) than with fingolimod (Gilenya), and had more gadolinium-enhancing lesions at 12 months, in a propensity score matching analysis involving 775 patients at the Cleveland Clinic.

“Based on these data, I now [favor] Gilenya over Tecfidera; Gilenya works a little bit better,” lead investigator and staff neurologist Carrie Hersh said at the annual meeting of the American Academy of Neurology.

The two drugs performed about equally in clinical trials, but Dr. Hersh and her colleagues said fingolimod seems to have the edge in clinical practice; they wanted to see if that hunch held up to scrutiny.

In the single-center cohort study, about 30% of the 458 dimethyl fumarate patients discontinued the drug after an average of 4 months, and about 14% relapsed within a year of starting it. About a quarter of the 317 fingolimod patients discontinued at an average of 6.5 months, and 11% relapsed. About 9% of dimethyl fumarate patients, but 6% of fingolimod patients, had new gadolinium-enhancing (GdE) brain lesions at 12 months.

A propensity score analysis was performed to control for confounders; patients were matched one to one for baseline demographics and clinical and MRI characteristics. Dimethyl fumarate patients were almost three times more likely than fingolimod patients to have new GdE lesions after a year (odds ratio, 2.90; 95% confidence interval, 1.24-6.57). They also had an earlier time to discontinuation (OR, 1.35; 95% CI, 1.05-1.74) and clinical relapse (OR, 1.64; 95% CI, 1.10-2.46). The study included patients with secondary progressive disease. Results were the same when the analysis was limited to relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis.

The investigators concluded that “dimethyl fumarate and fingolimod have comparable annualized relapse rates, overall brain MRI activity, and discontinuation at 12 months.” However, “dimethyl fumarate may have greater GdE lesions and side effects early after treatment initiation, leading to early discontinuation and relapses.

“This makes sense from what we are seeing in the clinic. We know Tecfidera patients have tolerability issues,” especially with gastrointestinal and flushing events, “so they discontinue earlier or might not be as adherent, and so they relapse earlier. The new enhancing lesions might be a difference in efficacy,” Dr. Hersh said.

Patients treated with fingolimod were more likely to be white (91% vs. 83%), have a longer disease duration (16 vs. 14 years), have a higher proportion of relapsing-remitting disease (82% vs. 74%), and have more severe baseline brain lesion burden (15% vs. 8%). The subjects had tried interferon, glatiramer acetate (Copaxone), natalizumab (Tysabri), or other options before being switched to the study medications because of disease activity or intolerability. Patients were in their 40s, on average, and about 70% were women.

Data are now being collected for a 2-year analysis.

There was no industry funding for the work, and Dr. Hersh had no disclosures. Other investigators reported ties to both Novartis, the maker of Gilenya, and Biogen, the maker of Tecfidera.

aotto@frontlinemedcom.com

VANCOUVER – Multiple sclerosis patients discontinued treatment and relapsed earlier with dimethyl fumarate (Tecfidera) than with fingolimod (Gilenya), and had more gadolinium-enhancing lesions at 12 months, in a propensity score matching analysis involving 775 patients at the Cleveland Clinic.

“Based on these data, I now [favor] Gilenya over Tecfidera; Gilenya works a little bit better,” lead investigator and staff neurologist Carrie Hersh said at the annual meeting of the American Academy of Neurology.

The two drugs performed about equally in clinical trials, but Dr. Hersh and her colleagues said fingolimod seems to have the edge in clinical practice; they wanted to see if that hunch held up to scrutiny.

In the single-center cohort study, about 30% of the 458 dimethyl fumarate patients discontinued the drug after an average of 4 months, and about 14% relapsed within a year of starting it. About a quarter of the 317 fingolimod patients discontinued at an average of 6.5 months, and 11% relapsed. About 9% of dimethyl fumarate patients, but 6% of fingolimod patients, had new gadolinium-enhancing (GdE) brain lesions at 12 months.

A propensity score analysis was performed to control for confounders; patients were matched one to one for baseline demographics and clinical and MRI characteristics. Dimethyl fumarate patients were almost three times more likely than fingolimod patients to have new GdE lesions after a year (odds ratio, 2.90; 95% confidence interval, 1.24-6.57). They also had an earlier time to discontinuation (OR, 1.35; 95% CI, 1.05-1.74) and clinical relapse (OR, 1.64; 95% CI, 1.10-2.46). The study included patients with secondary progressive disease. Results were the same when the analysis was limited to relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis.

The investigators concluded that “dimethyl fumarate and fingolimod have comparable annualized relapse rates, overall brain MRI activity, and discontinuation at 12 months.” However, “dimethyl fumarate may have greater GdE lesions and side effects early after treatment initiation, leading to early discontinuation and relapses.

“This makes sense from what we are seeing in the clinic. We know Tecfidera patients have tolerability issues,” especially with gastrointestinal and flushing events, “so they discontinue earlier or might not be as adherent, and so they relapse earlier. The new enhancing lesions might be a difference in efficacy,” Dr. Hersh said.

Patients treated with fingolimod were more likely to be white (91% vs. 83%), have a longer disease duration (16 vs. 14 years), have a higher proportion of relapsing-remitting disease (82% vs. 74%), and have more severe baseline brain lesion burden (15% vs. 8%). The subjects had tried interferon, glatiramer acetate (Copaxone), natalizumab (Tysabri), or other options before being switched to the study medications because of disease activity or intolerability. Patients were in their 40s, on average, and about 70% were women.

Data are now being collected for a 2-year analysis.

There was no industry funding for the work, and Dr. Hersh had no disclosures. Other investigators reported ties to both Novartis, the maker of Gilenya, and Biogen, the maker of Tecfidera.

aotto@frontlinemedcom.com

VANCOUVER – Multiple sclerosis patients discontinued treatment and relapsed earlier with dimethyl fumarate (Tecfidera) than with fingolimod (Gilenya), and had more gadolinium-enhancing lesions at 12 months, in a propensity score matching analysis involving 775 patients at the Cleveland Clinic.

“Based on these data, I now [favor] Gilenya over Tecfidera; Gilenya works a little bit better,” lead investigator and staff neurologist Carrie Hersh said at the annual meeting of the American Academy of Neurology.

The two drugs performed about equally in clinical trials, but Dr. Hersh and her colleagues said fingolimod seems to have the edge in clinical practice; they wanted to see if that hunch held up to scrutiny.

In the single-center cohort study, about 30% of the 458 dimethyl fumarate patients discontinued the drug after an average of 4 months, and about 14% relapsed within a year of starting it. About a quarter of the 317 fingolimod patients discontinued at an average of 6.5 months, and 11% relapsed. About 9% of dimethyl fumarate patients, but 6% of fingolimod patients, had new gadolinium-enhancing (GdE) brain lesions at 12 months.

A propensity score analysis was performed to control for confounders; patients were matched one to one for baseline demographics and clinical and MRI characteristics. Dimethyl fumarate patients were almost three times more likely than fingolimod patients to have new GdE lesions after a year (odds ratio, 2.90; 95% confidence interval, 1.24-6.57). They also had an earlier time to discontinuation (OR, 1.35; 95% CI, 1.05-1.74) and clinical relapse (OR, 1.64; 95% CI, 1.10-2.46). The study included patients with secondary progressive disease. Results were the same when the analysis was limited to relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis.

The investigators concluded that “dimethyl fumarate and fingolimod have comparable annualized relapse rates, overall brain MRI activity, and discontinuation at 12 months.” However, “dimethyl fumarate may have greater GdE lesions and side effects early after treatment initiation, leading to early discontinuation and relapses.

“This makes sense from what we are seeing in the clinic. We know Tecfidera patients have tolerability issues,” especially with gastrointestinal and flushing events, “so they discontinue earlier or might not be as adherent, and so they relapse earlier. The new enhancing lesions might be a difference in efficacy,” Dr. Hersh said.

Patients treated with fingolimod were more likely to be white (91% vs. 83%), have a longer disease duration (16 vs. 14 years), have a higher proportion of relapsing-remitting disease (82% vs. 74%), and have more severe baseline brain lesion burden (15% vs. 8%). The subjects had tried interferon, glatiramer acetate (Copaxone), natalizumab (Tysabri), or other options before being switched to the study medications because of disease activity or intolerability. Patients were in their 40s, on average, and about 70% were women.

Data are now being collected for a 2-year analysis.

There was no industry funding for the work, and Dr. Hersh had no disclosures. Other investigators reported ties to both Novartis, the maker of Gilenya, and Biogen, the maker of Tecfidera.

aotto@frontlinemedcom.com

VANCOUVER – Once-daily eslicarbazepine may offer a more convenient option for controlling newly diagnosed partial-onset seizures, suggest findings of a phase III trial reported at the annual meeting of the American Academy of Neurology.

The study of 815 adult patients found that 71.1% of those treated with once-daily eslicarbazepine as monotherapy were seizure free for at least 6 months, compared with 75.6% of those treated with twice-daily controlled-release carbamazepine as monotherapy. The difference fell within the predefined margin for noninferiority.

Additionally, the safety profile of eslicarbazepine was at least as good as that of carbamazepine, and there were no new or unexpected adverse events, relative to those seen in trials in which the former has been used as adjunctive therapy.

“Eslicarbazepine has the same efficacy, has a little bit better safety, and it can be taken once a day,” coauthor Dr. Pedro André Kowacs commented in an interview. “I have been working with it for 12 years. It’s a very, very good drug.”

“There are few antiepileptic drugs that can be taken once a day,” he added. “We know that a more simple schedule enhances adherence of the patient, compliance of the patient to therapy.”

Also, patients can choose when to take eslicarbazepine, according to Dr. Kowacs, who is a neurologist at the Instituto de Neurologia de Curitiba in Brazil. “You can take it in the morning or you can take it at night. It doesn’t matter,” he elaborated. “This is in contrast to, say, phenobarbital. If you take it in the morning, perhaps you are going to sleep all day long. And if you take three tabs of Dilantin (phenytoin), probably you get a little bit dizzy.”

In the trial, patients were randomized evenly to once-daily eslicarbazepine (brand name Aptiom) or twice-daily controlled-release carbamazepine (brand name Tegretol XR), each as monotherapy. Eslicarbazepine is currently approved by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration for the treatment of partial-onset seizures as monotherapy or adjunctive therapy.

In both groups, the patients were treated according to a three-step dose-level design, with upward titration of dose if they experienced seizures. However, the majority in each group – 67.6% for eslicarbazepine and 76.9% for carbamazepine – remained at the lowest-dose level studied (800 mg once daily and 200 mg twice daily, respectively).

The primary endpoint was the proportion of patients in the per-protocol population who were seizure free for the entire 26-week evaluation period at the last received dose level.

Overall, that proportion was 71.1% in the eslicarbazepine group and 75.6% in the carbamazepine group, Dr. Kowacs reported in an Emerging Science session. The absolute difference of –4.28% and the lower bound of the 95% confidence interval of –10.30% fell within the predefined noninferiority margin of –12%.

The 1-year rate of freedom from seizures was 64.7% in the eslicarbazepine group and 70.3% in the carbamazepine group. The absolute difference of –5.46% and the lower bound of the 95% confidence interval of –11.88% again fell within the noninferiority margin.

Patients in the eslicarbazepine tended to have a lower rate of treatment-emergent adverse events possibly related to the drug, compared with counterparts in the carbamazepine group (41.1% vs. 49.5%). The most common were dizziness and headache.

“The [gamma glutamyl transferase level] was increased in more patients taking carbamazepine,” Dr. Kowacs noted, with a rate of 12.4% versus 2.7% with eslicarbazepine. “Hyponatremia occurred in both groups, but no patient was symptomatic.”

There were two deaths each in the eslicarbazepine group (from glioblastoma and cardiac arrest) and the carbamazepine group (from suicide and lung cancer).

Dr. Kowacs disclosed that he has received personal compensation for activities with Bial, Abbott Laboratories, GlaxoSmithKline, and Cyberonics. The trial was sponsored by Bial-Portela & Cª SA.

VANCOUVER – Once-daily eslicarbazepine may offer a more convenient option for controlling newly diagnosed partial-onset seizures, suggest findings of a phase III trial reported at the annual meeting of the American Academy of Neurology.

The study of 815 adult patients found that 71.1% of those treated with once-daily eslicarbazepine as monotherapy were seizure free for at least 6 months, compared with 75.6% of those treated with twice-daily controlled-release carbamazepine as monotherapy. The difference fell within the predefined margin for noninferiority.

Additionally, the safety profile of eslicarbazepine was at least as good as that of carbamazepine, and there were no new or unexpected adverse events, relative to those seen in trials in which the former has been used as adjunctive therapy.

“Eslicarbazepine has the same efficacy, has a little bit better safety, and it can be taken once a day,” coauthor Dr. Pedro André Kowacs commented in an interview. “I have been working with it for 12 years. It’s a very, very good drug.”

“There are few antiepileptic drugs that can be taken once a day,” he added. “We know that a more simple schedule enhances adherence of the patient, compliance of the patient to therapy.”

Also, patients can choose when to take eslicarbazepine, according to Dr. Kowacs, who is a neurologist at the Instituto de Neurologia de Curitiba in Brazil. “You can take it in the morning or you can take it at night. It doesn’t matter,” he elaborated. “This is in contrast to, say, phenobarbital. If you take it in the morning, perhaps you are going to sleep all day long. And if you take three tabs of Dilantin (phenytoin), probably you get a little bit dizzy.”

In the trial, patients were randomized evenly to once-daily eslicarbazepine (brand name Aptiom) or twice-daily controlled-release carbamazepine (brand name Tegretol XR), each as monotherapy. Eslicarbazepine is currently approved by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration for the treatment of partial-onset seizures as monotherapy or adjunctive therapy.

In both groups, the patients were treated according to a three-step dose-level design, with upward titration of dose if they experienced seizures. However, the majority in each group – 67.6% for eslicarbazepine and 76.9% for carbamazepine – remained at the lowest-dose level studied (800 mg once daily and 200 mg twice daily, respectively).

The primary endpoint was the proportion of patients in the per-protocol population who were seizure free for the entire 26-week evaluation period at the last received dose level.

Overall, that proportion was 71.1% in the eslicarbazepine group and 75.6% in the carbamazepine group, Dr. Kowacs reported in an Emerging Science session. The absolute difference of –4.28% and the lower bound of the 95% confidence interval of –10.30% fell within the predefined noninferiority margin of –12%.

The 1-year rate of freedom from seizures was 64.7% in the eslicarbazepine group and 70.3% in the carbamazepine group. The absolute difference of –5.46% and the lower bound of the 95% confidence interval of –11.88% again fell within the noninferiority margin.

Patients in the eslicarbazepine tended to have a lower rate of treatment-emergent adverse events possibly related to the drug, compared with counterparts in the carbamazepine group (41.1% vs. 49.5%). The most common were dizziness and headache.

“The [gamma glutamyl transferase level] was increased in more patients taking carbamazepine,” Dr. Kowacs noted, with a rate of 12.4% versus 2.7% with eslicarbazepine. “Hyponatremia occurred in both groups, but no patient was symptomatic.”

There were two deaths each in the eslicarbazepine group (from glioblastoma and cardiac arrest) and the carbamazepine group (from suicide and lung cancer).

Dr. Kowacs disclosed that he has received personal compensation for activities with Bial, Abbott Laboratories, GlaxoSmithKline, and Cyberonics. The trial was sponsored by Bial-Portela & Cª SA.

VANCOUVER – Once-daily eslicarbazepine may offer a more convenient option for controlling newly diagnosed partial-onset seizures, suggest findings of a phase III trial reported at the annual meeting of the American Academy of Neurology.

The study of 815 adult patients found that 71.1% of those treated with once-daily eslicarbazepine as monotherapy were seizure free for at least 6 months, compared with 75.6% of those treated with twice-daily controlled-release carbamazepine as monotherapy. The difference fell within the predefined margin for noninferiority.

Additionally, the safety profile of eslicarbazepine was at least as good as that of carbamazepine, and there were no new or unexpected adverse events, relative to those seen in trials in which the former has been used as adjunctive therapy.

“Eslicarbazepine has the same efficacy, has a little bit better safety, and it can be taken once a day,” coauthor Dr. Pedro André Kowacs commented in an interview. “I have been working with it for 12 years. It’s a very, very good drug.”

“There are few antiepileptic drugs that can be taken once a day,” he added. “We know that a more simple schedule enhances adherence of the patient, compliance of the patient to therapy.”

Also, patients can choose when to take eslicarbazepine, according to Dr. Kowacs, who is a neurologist at the Instituto de Neurologia de Curitiba in Brazil. “You can take it in the morning or you can take it at night. It doesn’t matter,” he elaborated. “This is in contrast to, say, phenobarbital. If you take it in the morning, perhaps you are going to sleep all day long. And if you take three tabs of Dilantin (phenytoin), probably you get a little bit dizzy.”

In the trial, patients were randomized evenly to once-daily eslicarbazepine (brand name Aptiom) or twice-daily controlled-release carbamazepine (brand name Tegretol XR), each as monotherapy. Eslicarbazepine is currently approved by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration for the treatment of partial-onset seizures as monotherapy or adjunctive therapy.

In both groups, the patients were treated according to a three-step dose-level design, with upward titration of dose if they experienced seizures. However, the majority in each group – 67.6% for eslicarbazepine and 76.9% for carbamazepine – remained at the lowest-dose level studied (800 mg once daily and 200 mg twice daily, respectively).

The primary endpoint was the proportion of patients in the per-protocol population who were seizure free for the entire 26-week evaluation period at the last received dose level.

Overall, that proportion was 71.1% in the eslicarbazepine group and 75.6% in the carbamazepine group, Dr. Kowacs reported in an Emerging Science session. The absolute difference of –4.28% and the lower bound of the 95% confidence interval of –10.30% fell within the predefined noninferiority margin of –12%.

The 1-year rate of freedom from seizures was 64.7% in the eslicarbazepine group and 70.3% in the carbamazepine group. The absolute difference of –5.46% and the lower bound of the 95% confidence interval of –11.88% again fell within the noninferiority margin.

Patients in the eslicarbazepine tended to have a lower rate of treatment-emergent adverse events possibly related to the drug, compared with counterparts in the carbamazepine group (41.1% vs. 49.5%). The most common were dizziness and headache.

“The [gamma glutamyl transferase level] was increased in more patients taking carbamazepine,” Dr. Kowacs noted, with a rate of 12.4% versus 2.7% with eslicarbazepine. “Hyponatremia occurred in both groups, but no patient was symptomatic.”

There were two deaths each in the eslicarbazepine group (from glioblastoma and cardiac arrest) and the carbamazepine group (from suicide and lung cancer).

Dr. Kowacs disclosed that he has received personal compensation for activities with Bial, Abbott Laboratories, GlaxoSmithKline, and Cyberonics. The trial was sponsored by Bial-Portela & Cª SA.

VANCOUVER – The relationship between hospitals’ procedural volume and patient outcomes that has been observed for many cardiovascular interventions and other surgeries does not hold for endovascular mechanical thrombectomy procedures for acute ischemic stroke, according to an analysis of cases during 2008-2011 in the Nationwide Inpatient Sample.

In-hospital mortality and rates for any complications were not associated with high or low endovascular mechanical thrombectomy (EMT) volume at hospitals across the United States in the analysis of 13,502 adult patients hospitalized with a primary diagnosis of acute ischemic stroke and treated with EMT, neurology resident Dr. Abhishek Lunagariya of the University of Florida, Gainesville, reported at the annual meeting of the American Academy of Neurology.

A smaller prior study of 2,749 EMTs done in 296 hospitals in 2008 showed lower mortality in high-volume hospitals that performed 10 or more of the procedures per year (J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis. 2013 Nov; 22[8]:1263-9).

Of the 13,502 EMTs in the study, 25% occurred at low-volume hospitals performing less than 10 per year. Low-volume hospitals had higher in-hospital mortality than did higher-volume centers performing 10 or more of the procedures per year in an unadjusted comparison (26% vs. 21%). A comparison of a combined endpoint for any complications (in-hospital mortality, intracerebral hemorrhage, and vascular complications) was also significantly in favor of high-volume hospitals (34% vs. 30%).

However, in a multivariate hierarchical model, low-volume hospitals were not associated with higher in-hospital mortality (odds ratio, 0.95; 95% confidence interval, 0.74-1.23) or rate of any complications (OR, 0.96; 95% CI, 0.76-1.21). These analyses were adjusted for age, gender, ethnicity, primary payer, median household income, hospital region/teaching status/location/bed size, Charlson Comorbidity Index, calendar year, and use of intravenous tissue plasminogen activator.

Dr. Lunagariya noted that he and his associates could not adjust the comparisons for National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale scores because they are not recorded in the National Inpatient Sample. They also could not examine what happened to patients after discharge.

Dr. Lunagariya suggested a variety of possible reasons that might help to explain the lack of an association between hospital procedure volume and outcomes after adjustment: the availability of better thrombectomy devices since the smaller 2008 study, lesser operator variability, favorable patient selection, and an increased skill set of operators working at low-volume hospitals.

One audience member noted that some endovascular interventionalists will operate at both high-volume and low-volume hospitals and could account for some of the findings. That indeed might be happening more often and needs to happen more often, Dr. Lunagariya said in an interview, in order to combat the “common belief” that it would be better to wait for a patient to undergo the procedure at a high- rather than low-volume hospital. Patients who receive initial care for stroke at a low-volume hospital but are not stable enough or do not have enough time to be transferred could benefit from EMT if an interventionalist who performs EMT drove there instead, he said.

With even newer devices now available that are thought to be easier to use, Dr. Lunagariya suggested that the similarity in outcomes at low- and higher-volume centers may not change in updated analyses of more recent EMT procedures for ischemic stroke.

The investigators received no funding for the study, and they reported having no financial disclosures.

jevans@frontlinemedcom.com

VANCOUVER – The relationship between hospitals’ procedural volume and patient outcomes that has been observed for many cardiovascular interventions and other surgeries does not hold for endovascular mechanical thrombectomy procedures for acute ischemic stroke, according to an analysis of cases during 2008-2011 in the Nationwide Inpatient Sample.

In-hospital mortality and rates for any complications were not associated with high or low endovascular mechanical thrombectomy (EMT) volume at hospitals across the United States in the analysis of 13,502 adult patients hospitalized with a primary diagnosis of acute ischemic stroke and treated with EMT, neurology resident Dr. Abhishek Lunagariya of the University of Florida, Gainesville, reported at the annual meeting of the American Academy of Neurology.

A smaller prior study of 2,749 EMTs done in 296 hospitals in 2008 showed lower mortality in high-volume hospitals that performed 10 or more of the procedures per year (J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis. 2013 Nov; 22[8]:1263-9).

Of the 13,502 EMTs in the study, 25% occurred at low-volume hospitals performing less than 10 per year. Low-volume hospitals had higher in-hospital mortality than did higher-volume centers performing 10 or more of the procedures per year in an unadjusted comparison (26% vs. 21%). A comparison of a combined endpoint for any complications (in-hospital mortality, intracerebral hemorrhage, and vascular complications) was also significantly in favor of high-volume hospitals (34% vs. 30%).

However, in a multivariate hierarchical model, low-volume hospitals were not associated with higher in-hospital mortality (odds ratio, 0.95; 95% confidence interval, 0.74-1.23) or rate of any complications (OR, 0.96; 95% CI, 0.76-1.21). These analyses were adjusted for age, gender, ethnicity, primary payer, median household income, hospital region/teaching status/location/bed size, Charlson Comorbidity Index, calendar year, and use of intravenous tissue plasminogen activator.

Dr. Lunagariya noted that he and his associates could not adjust the comparisons for National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale scores because they are not recorded in the National Inpatient Sample. They also could not examine what happened to patients after discharge.

Dr. Lunagariya suggested a variety of possible reasons that might help to explain the lack of an association between hospital procedure volume and outcomes after adjustment: the availability of better thrombectomy devices since the smaller 2008 study, lesser operator variability, favorable patient selection, and an increased skill set of operators working at low-volume hospitals.

One audience member noted that some endovascular interventionalists will operate at both high-volume and low-volume hospitals and could account for some of the findings. That indeed might be happening more often and needs to happen more often, Dr. Lunagariya said in an interview, in order to combat the “common belief” that it would be better to wait for a patient to undergo the procedure at a high- rather than low-volume hospital. Patients who receive initial care for stroke at a low-volume hospital but are not stable enough or do not have enough time to be transferred could benefit from EMT if an interventionalist who performs EMT drove there instead, he said.

With even newer devices now available that are thought to be easier to use, Dr. Lunagariya suggested that the similarity in outcomes at low- and higher-volume centers may not change in updated analyses of more recent EMT procedures for ischemic stroke.

The investigators received no funding for the study, and they reported having no financial disclosures.

jevans@frontlinemedcom.com

VANCOUVER – The relationship between hospitals’ procedural volume and patient outcomes that has been observed for many cardiovascular interventions and other surgeries does not hold for endovascular mechanical thrombectomy procedures for acute ischemic stroke, according to an analysis of cases during 2008-2011 in the Nationwide Inpatient Sample.

In-hospital mortality and rates for any complications were not associated with high or low endovascular mechanical thrombectomy (EMT) volume at hospitals across the United States in the analysis of 13,502 adult patients hospitalized with a primary diagnosis of acute ischemic stroke and treated with EMT, neurology resident Dr. Abhishek Lunagariya of the University of Florida, Gainesville, reported at the annual meeting of the American Academy of Neurology.

A smaller prior study of 2,749 EMTs done in 296 hospitals in 2008 showed lower mortality in high-volume hospitals that performed 10 or more of the procedures per year (J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis. 2013 Nov; 22[8]:1263-9).

Of the 13,502 EMTs in the study, 25% occurred at low-volume hospitals performing less than 10 per year. Low-volume hospitals had higher in-hospital mortality than did higher-volume centers performing 10 or more of the procedures per year in an unadjusted comparison (26% vs. 21%). A comparison of a combined endpoint for any complications (in-hospital mortality, intracerebral hemorrhage, and vascular complications) was also significantly in favor of high-volume hospitals (34% vs. 30%).

However, in a multivariate hierarchical model, low-volume hospitals were not associated with higher in-hospital mortality (odds ratio, 0.95; 95% confidence interval, 0.74-1.23) or rate of any complications (OR, 0.96; 95% CI, 0.76-1.21). These analyses were adjusted for age, gender, ethnicity, primary payer, median household income, hospital region/teaching status/location/bed size, Charlson Comorbidity Index, calendar year, and use of intravenous tissue plasminogen activator.

Dr. Lunagariya noted that he and his associates could not adjust the comparisons for National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale scores because they are not recorded in the National Inpatient Sample. They also could not examine what happened to patients after discharge.

Dr. Lunagariya suggested a variety of possible reasons that might help to explain the lack of an association between hospital procedure volume and outcomes after adjustment: the availability of better thrombectomy devices since the smaller 2008 study, lesser operator variability, favorable patient selection, and an increased skill set of operators working at low-volume hospitals.

One audience member noted that some endovascular interventionalists will operate at both high-volume and low-volume hospitals and could account for some of the findings. That indeed might be happening more often and needs to happen more often, Dr. Lunagariya said in an interview, in order to combat the “common belief” that it would be better to wait for a patient to undergo the procedure at a high- rather than low-volume hospital. Patients who receive initial care for stroke at a low-volume hospital but are not stable enough or do not have enough time to be transferred could benefit from EMT if an interventionalist who performs EMT drove there instead, he said.

With even newer devices now available that are thought to be easier to use, Dr. Lunagariya suggested that the similarity in outcomes at low- and higher-volume centers may not change in updated analyses of more recent EMT procedures for ischemic stroke.

The investigators received no funding for the study, and they reported having no financial disclosures.

jevans@frontlinemedcom.com

VANCOUVER – Certain patient and disease characteristics may help guide decisions about starting and stopping therapy in progressive multiple sclerosis, according to a pair of longitudinal cohort studies reported at the annual meeting of the American Academy of Neurology.

In a cohort of patients transitioning from relapsing-remitting to progressive multiple sclerosis (MS), the age at onset of progression predicted the likelihood of subsequent relapses. The absolute lifetime risk ranged from 18% for patients younger than 35 years at the time to just 5% for those aged 55 years or older at the time.

And in a cohort of patients with secondary progressive MS, the annual rate of clinical relapse fell in the third year after immunomodulator discontinuation. Overall, 35% had a clinical relapse or radiologic disease activity. Patients had a lower risk of this outcome if they had greater disability at the time of discontinuation or if they had not had any radiologic disease activity in the antecedent years.

“These studies address a very important question, because not many people talk about stopping drugs,” commented session comoderator Helen Tremlett, Ph.D., of the division of neurology at the University of British Columbia, Vancouver, and the Canada Research Chair in Neuroepidemiology and Multiple Sclerosis. “I would like to see some of these findings validated in other cohorts. But I did like the questions they are asking.”

Age, risk of postprogression relapse

The first study focused on ongoing relapses in patients transitioning to progressive MS. “We have recently shown that these relapses indeed matter. People who continue to relapse after progressive MS onset develop a need for a cane 2 years earlier than those who don’t” continue to have relapses, explained senior author Dr. Orhun H. Kantarci of the department of neurology at the Mayo Clinic in Rochester, Minn. Therefore, continuation or initiation of disease-modifying drugs (DMDs) during this period of overlap may be beneficial.

Courtesy Mayo Clinic

He and his colleagues followed 946 patients with MS from a clinic- and population-based cohort, assessing the age at various disease landmarks.

Results showed the mean age at first relapse was 33 years, the mean age at the onset of progressive MS was 45 years, and the mean age at last relapse (whether it occurred before or after the onset of progressive disease) was 43 years.

The 95% overlap age range for age at first relapse and age at onset of progressive MS was 27-46 years, Dr. Kantarci reported. Therefore, DMDs would be expected to have a some impact during those years.

Further analyses showed that if the age of progressive MS onset was before 35 years, 35-44 years, 45-54 years, and 55 years or older, the absolute lifetime risk of relapse after progressive MS onset was 18%, 17%, 13%, and 5%, respectively. The corresponding last predicted relapse for these groups was before age 50, age 60, age 70, and age 70.

Taken together, the data suggest that in patients transitioning to progressive MS, initiation or continuation of a DMD is most likely to be beneficial if the patient is younger than 35, with some benefit, albeit less, up to the age of 54, according to Dr. Kantarci.

“But above 55, if a person has never been on a DMD, it is unlikely to be recommended, because I don’t expect it to do anything from the data we have,” he said. Furthermore, “DMD stopping can be offered to these patients. If a person is on a DMD and they are asking, ‘Can I stop it? I have been stable,’ and they are above age 55, it can be considered.”

The investigators are performing additional analyses of the data to assess the impact of DMDs on disease course, including the influence of initial and maintenance treatment choices, and factors that prompt physicians to switch treatments.

“What we haven’t done and will not be possible with this data ... the most interesting question is the impact of subclinical MRI disease, which is a different question,” Dr. Kantarci concluded. “And ultimately, we will have to have an actual stopping experiment and [assess] outcomes, which is an ongoing major planned effort.”

Outcomes after stopping immunomodulators

The second study assessed clinical and radiologic outcomes after discontinuation of immunomodulatory therapy in patients with secondary progressive MS.

“We have more and more patients [with secondary progressive disease] treated for several years, yet the natural history of the disease is less and less relapse, and progression of disability,” commented first author Dr. Julien Bonenfant, a neurologist at the Rennes University Hospital in France. Thus, the benefit of continuing treatment is unclear, especially given its cost and side effects.

He and his colleagues studied 106 consecutive patients with secondary progressive MS who had been on immunomodulators for at least 6 months, were taken off the immunomodulators, and were followed for a mean of 5 years.

Results showed that 16% of the patients had a clinical relapse after discontinuation, nearly all within the first 3 years. The annualized rate of clinical relapse actually fell from 0.13 in the 3 years before discontinuation to 0.07 in the 3 years afterward.

Overall, 35% of patients had either a clinical relapse and/or new contrast enhancement on MRI. Again, most of these events occurred within the first 3 years of discontinuation.

Patients had a lower risk of this outcome after treatment discontinuation if they had an Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) score of 6 or greater at the time of discontinuation (hazard ratio, 0.4) and if they had not had any gadolinium enhancement on MRI in the 3 years before treatment discontinuation (HR, 0.4).

“Disease activity remained low after treatment withdrawal. We found no rebound of relapse rate in our population,” Dr. Bonenfant summarized. “There was no consequence on the slope of disability progression,” nor on the finding of enhancement on MRI alone.

Thirty patients were restarted on immunomodulators, about half of them solely because of MRI findings, he noted. This raises “the controversial question, is it relevant or not to resume treatment in these patients?”

“This study suggests that immunomodulatory treatment withdrawal seems reasonable for patients with advanced secondary progressive MS, especially with an EDSS of 6 or greater and no focal inflammatory disease [clinical or radiologic] at least in the past 3 years,” Dr. Bonenfant maintained. “It shows the importance of MRI monitoring to define the patients who are still in a focal immunoreactive state.”

“The results are far from being definitive, and further prospective studies are needed to provide evidence-based recommendations for clinical practice,” he concluded.

Dr. Kantarci disclosed that he has given scientific presentations at meetings supported by Novartis Pharmaceuticals and has presented as an invited speaker for Biogen but has received no personal compensation from either company. Dr. Bonenfant disclosed that he had no relevant conflicts of interest.

VANCOUVER – Certain patient and disease characteristics may help guide decisions about starting and stopping therapy in progressive multiple sclerosis, according to a pair of longitudinal cohort studies reported at the annual meeting of the American Academy of Neurology.

In a cohort of patients transitioning from relapsing-remitting to progressive multiple sclerosis (MS), the age at onset of progression predicted the likelihood of subsequent relapses. The absolute lifetime risk ranged from 18% for patients younger than 35 years at the time to just 5% for those aged 55 years or older at the time.

And in a cohort of patients with secondary progressive MS, the annual rate of clinical relapse fell in the third year after immunomodulator discontinuation. Overall, 35% had a clinical relapse or radiologic disease activity. Patients had a lower risk of this outcome if they had greater disability at the time of discontinuation or if they had not had any radiologic disease activity in the antecedent years.

“These studies address a very important question, because not many people talk about stopping drugs,” commented session comoderator Helen Tremlett, Ph.D., of the division of neurology at the University of British Columbia, Vancouver, and the Canada Research Chair in Neuroepidemiology and Multiple Sclerosis. “I would like to see some of these findings validated in other cohorts. But I did like the questions they are asking.”

Age, risk of postprogression relapse

The first study focused on ongoing relapses in patients transitioning to progressive MS. “We have recently shown that these relapses indeed matter. People who continue to relapse after progressive MS onset develop a need for a cane 2 years earlier than those who don’t” continue to have relapses, explained senior author Dr. Orhun H. Kantarci of the department of neurology at the Mayo Clinic in Rochester, Minn. Therefore, continuation or initiation of disease-modifying drugs (DMDs) during this period of overlap may be beneficial.

Courtesy Mayo Clinic

He and his colleagues followed 946 patients with MS from a clinic- and population-based cohort, assessing the age at various disease landmarks.

Results showed the mean age at first relapse was 33 years, the mean age at the onset of progressive MS was 45 years, and the mean age at last relapse (whether it occurred before or after the onset of progressive disease) was 43 years.

The 95% overlap age range for age at first relapse and age at onset of progressive MS was 27-46 years, Dr. Kantarci reported. Therefore, DMDs would be expected to have a some impact during those years.

Further analyses showed that if the age of progressive MS onset was before 35 years, 35-44 years, 45-54 years, and 55 years or older, the absolute lifetime risk of relapse after progressive MS onset was 18%, 17%, 13%, and 5%, respectively. The corresponding last predicted relapse for these groups was before age 50, age 60, age 70, and age 70.

Taken together, the data suggest that in patients transitioning to progressive MS, initiation or continuation of a DMD is most likely to be beneficial if the patient is younger than 35, with some benefit, albeit less, up to the age of 54, according to Dr. Kantarci.

“But above 55, if a person has never been on a DMD, it is unlikely to be recommended, because I don’t expect it to do anything from the data we have,” he said. Furthermore, “DMD stopping can be offered to these patients. If a person is on a DMD and they are asking, ‘Can I stop it? I have been stable,’ and they are above age 55, it can be considered.”

The investigators are performing additional analyses of the data to assess the impact of DMDs on disease course, including the influence of initial and maintenance treatment choices, and factors that prompt physicians to switch treatments.

“What we haven’t done and will not be possible with this data ... the most interesting question is the impact of subclinical MRI disease, which is a different question,” Dr. Kantarci concluded. “And ultimately, we will have to have an actual stopping experiment and [assess] outcomes, which is an ongoing major planned effort.”

Outcomes after stopping immunomodulators

The second study assessed clinical and radiologic outcomes after discontinuation of immunomodulatory therapy in patients with secondary progressive MS.

“We have more and more patients [with secondary progressive disease] treated for several years, yet the natural history of the disease is less and less relapse, and progression of disability,” commented first author Dr. Julien Bonenfant, a neurologist at the Rennes University Hospital in France. Thus, the benefit of continuing treatment is unclear, especially given its cost and side effects.

He and his colleagues studied 106 consecutive patients with secondary progressive MS who had been on immunomodulators for at least 6 months, were taken off the immunomodulators, and were followed for a mean of 5 years.

Results showed that 16% of the patients had a clinical relapse after discontinuation, nearly all within the first 3 years. The annualized rate of clinical relapse actually fell from 0.13 in the 3 years before discontinuation to 0.07 in the 3 years afterward.

Overall, 35% of patients had either a clinical relapse and/or new contrast enhancement on MRI. Again, most of these events occurred within the first 3 years of discontinuation.

Patients had a lower risk of this outcome after treatment discontinuation if they had an Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) score of 6 or greater at the time of discontinuation (hazard ratio, 0.4) and if they had not had any gadolinium enhancement on MRI in the 3 years before treatment discontinuation (HR, 0.4).

“Disease activity remained low after treatment withdrawal. We found no rebound of relapse rate in our population,” Dr. Bonenfant summarized. “There was no consequence on the slope of disability progression,” nor on the finding of enhancement on MRI alone.

Thirty patients were restarted on immunomodulators, about half of them solely because of MRI findings, he noted. This raises “the controversial question, is it relevant or not to resume treatment in these patients?”

“This study suggests that immunomodulatory treatment withdrawal seems reasonable for patients with advanced secondary progressive MS, especially with an EDSS of 6 or greater and no focal inflammatory disease [clinical or radiologic] at least in the past 3 years,” Dr. Bonenfant maintained. “It shows the importance of MRI monitoring to define the patients who are still in a focal immunoreactive state.”

“The results are far from being definitive, and further prospective studies are needed to provide evidence-based recommendations for clinical practice,” he concluded.

Dr. Kantarci disclosed that he has given scientific presentations at meetings supported by Novartis Pharmaceuticals and has presented as an invited speaker for Biogen but has received no personal compensation from either company. Dr. Bonenfant disclosed that he had no relevant conflicts of interest.

VANCOUVER – Certain patient and disease characteristics may help guide decisions about starting and stopping therapy in progressive multiple sclerosis, according to a pair of longitudinal cohort studies reported at the annual meeting of the American Academy of Neurology.

In a cohort of patients transitioning from relapsing-remitting to progressive multiple sclerosis (MS), the age at onset of progression predicted the likelihood of subsequent relapses. The absolute lifetime risk ranged from 18% for patients younger than 35 years at the time to just 5% for those aged 55 years or older at the time.

And in a cohort of patients with secondary progressive MS, the annual rate of clinical relapse fell in the third year after immunomodulator discontinuation. Overall, 35% had a clinical relapse or radiologic disease activity. Patients had a lower risk of this outcome if they had greater disability at the time of discontinuation or if they had not had any radiologic disease activity in the antecedent years.

“These studies address a very important question, because not many people talk about stopping drugs,” commented session comoderator Helen Tremlett, Ph.D., of the division of neurology at the University of British Columbia, Vancouver, and the Canada Research Chair in Neuroepidemiology and Multiple Sclerosis. “I would like to see some of these findings validated in other cohorts. But I did like the questions they are asking.”

Age, risk of postprogression relapse

The first study focused on ongoing relapses in patients transitioning to progressive MS. “We have recently shown that these relapses indeed matter. People who continue to relapse after progressive MS onset develop a need for a cane 2 years earlier than those who don’t” continue to have relapses, explained senior author Dr. Orhun H. Kantarci of the department of neurology at the Mayo Clinic in Rochester, Minn. Therefore, continuation or initiation of disease-modifying drugs (DMDs) during this period of overlap may be beneficial.

Courtesy Mayo Clinic

He and his colleagues followed 946 patients with MS from a clinic- and population-based cohort, assessing the age at various disease landmarks.

Results showed the mean age at first relapse was 33 years, the mean age at the onset of progressive MS was 45 years, and the mean age at last relapse (whether it occurred before or after the onset of progressive disease) was 43 years.

The 95% overlap age range for age at first relapse and age at onset of progressive MS was 27-46 years, Dr. Kantarci reported. Therefore, DMDs would be expected to have a some impact during those years.

Further analyses showed that if the age of progressive MS onset was before 35 years, 35-44 years, 45-54 years, and 55 years or older, the absolute lifetime risk of relapse after progressive MS onset was 18%, 17%, 13%, and 5%, respectively. The corresponding last predicted relapse for these groups was before age 50, age 60, age 70, and age 70.

Taken together, the data suggest that in patients transitioning to progressive MS, initiation or continuation of a DMD is most likely to be beneficial if the patient is younger than 35, with some benefit, albeit less, up to the age of 54, according to Dr. Kantarci.

“But above 55, if a person has never been on a DMD, it is unlikely to be recommended, because I don’t expect it to do anything from the data we have,” he said. Furthermore, “DMD stopping can be offered to these patients. If a person is on a DMD and they are asking, ‘Can I stop it? I have been stable,’ and they are above age 55, it can be considered.”

The investigators are performing additional analyses of the data to assess the impact of DMDs on disease course, including the influence of initial and maintenance treatment choices, and factors that prompt physicians to switch treatments.

“What we haven’t done and will not be possible with this data ... the most interesting question is the impact of subclinical MRI disease, which is a different question,” Dr. Kantarci concluded. “And ultimately, we will have to have an actual stopping experiment and [assess] outcomes, which is an ongoing major planned effort.”

Outcomes after stopping immunomodulators

The second study assessed clinical and radiologic outcomes after discontinuation of immunomodulatory therapy in patients with secondary progressive MS.

“We have more and more patients [with secondary progressive disease] treated for several years, yet the natural history of the disease is less and less relapse, and progression of disability,” commented first author Dr. Julien Bonenfant, a neurologist at the Rennes University Hospital in France. Thus, the benefit of continuing treatment is unclear, especially given its cost and side effects.

He and his colleagues studied 106 consecutive patients with secondary progressive MS who had been on immunomodulators for at least 6 months, were taken off the immunomodulators, and were followed for a mean of 5 years.

Results showed that 16% of the patients had a clinical relapse after discontinuation, nearly all within the first 3 years. The annualized rate of clinical relapse actually fell from 0.13 in the 3 years before discontinuation to 0.07 in the 3 years afterward.

Overall, 35% of patients had either a clinical relapse and/or new contrast enhancement on MRI. Again, most of these events occurred within the first 3 years of discontinuation.

Patients had a lower risk of this outcome after treatment discontinuation if they had an Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) score of 6 or greater at the time of discontinuation (hazard ratio, 0.4) and if they had not had any gadolinium enhancement on MRI in the 3 years before treatment discontinuation (HR, 0.4).

“Disease activity remained low after treatment withdrawal. We found no rebound of relapse rate in our population,” Dr. Bonenfant summarized. “There was no consequence on the slope of disability progression,” nor on the finding of enhancement on MRI alone.

Thirty patients were restarted on immunomodulators, about half of them solely because of MRI findings, he noted. This raises “the controversial question, is it relevant or not to resume treatment in these patients?”

“This study suggests that immunomodulatory treatment withdrawal seems reasonable for patients with advanced secondary progressive MS, especially with an EDSS of 6 or greater and no focal inflammatory disease [clinical or radiologic] at least in the past 3 years,” Dr. Bonenfant maintained. “It shows the importance of MRI monitoring to define the patients who are still in a focal immunoreactive state.”

“The results are far from being definitive, and further prospective studies are needed to provide evidence-based recommendations for clinical practice,” he concluded.

Dr. Kantarci disclosed that he has given scientific presentations at meetings supported by Novartis Pharmaceuticals and has presented as an invited speaker for Biogen but has received no personal compensation from either company. Dr. Bonenfant disclosed that he had no relevant conflicts of interest.

VANCOUVER – Women with epilepsy have fertility rates comparable with healthy women in the general population, according to results from the first prospective observational cohort study to make the comparison.

During the year-long Women With Epilepsy: Pregnancy Outcomes and Deliveries (WEPOD) study, 70% of women with epilepsy and 67% of healthy control women became pregnant, and there was no significant difference in the mean time to pregnancy between those with and without epilepsy (6 months vs. 9 months, respectively), Dr. Page Pennell reported at the annual meeting of the American Academy of Neurology.

Live births occurred in 82% of pregnancies of women with epilepsy and 80% of controls, while miscarriages occurred in 13% and 20%, respectively. Both of those rates are very similar to the general population. Another 5% of pregnancies in women with epilepsy were ectopic, terminated due to chromosomal abnormality, or lost to follow-up.

“These findings should reassure women with epilepsy and clinicians when counseling women with epilepsy who are planning pregnancy,” said Dr. Pennell, director of research for the division of epilepsy in the department of neurology at Brigham and Women’s Hospital in Boston. She is a primary investigator of the study along with Dr. Jacqueline French, professor of neurology at NYU Langone Medical Center and Dr. Cynthia Harden, system director of epilepsy services at Mount Sinai Beth Israel, both in New York.

“I think overall the findings are more in the light of myth busting. ... We don’t necessarily see a lot of problems with fertility, yet the literature suggests that the birth rates are much lower,” Dr. Harden said in an interview.

“It’s really the first solid evidence, and it’s nice because in a sea of bad news for women when it comes to family planning and achieving pregnancy and pregnancy outcomes, I think this was very positive to say that their ability to achieve pregnancy was no different than what was reported by a control population without epilepsy,” Dr. Katherine Noe, an epilepsy specialist at the Mayo Clinic in Scottsdale, Ariz., said when asked to comment on the study.

“There was certainly reason to be concerned,” said Dr. Noe, who was not involved in the study. “We have a lot of data saying that babies exposed to antiepileptic drugs are more likely to have malformations, and so you could have a baby that already early in pregnancy has severe malformations that would be more likely to end in spontaneous abortion.”

Dr. Noe said that pregnancy registry data indicate that women with epilepsy may be more likely to have a pregnancy that ends in a miscarriage. Investigators for several studies published in 2015 reported that women with epilepsy face greater risk for morbidity and adverse outcomes at the time of delivery and during pregnancy than women without epilepsy (JAMA Neurol. 2015;72[9]:981-8 and Lancet. 2016;386[10006]:1845–52). Women with epilepsy also have been thought to be more prone to infertility for various reasons, including menstrual irregularities, polycystic ovarian syndrome related to antiepileptic medications, and early menopause, she said.

Three previous studies had reported that women with epilepsy had birth rates as low as only one-quarter to one-third that of women without epilepsy. There have been many reasons reported for why that might be the case, including lower marriage rates, sexual dysfunction, lower libido (in both men and women with epilepsy), and increased number of anovulatory cycles, or greater choice to not become pregnant, Dr. Pennell said.

The WEPOD study enrolled 89 women with epilepsy and 109 healthy controls who were seeking to become pregnant and had stopped using contraception within 6 months of enrollment or were about to stop using it. The investigators excluded women with infertility, polycystic ovarian syndrome, endometriosis, endocrine disorder, and heavy smoking, or who were not in an exclusive heterosexual relationship with a significant other or spouse.

Participants received iPod touch devices with an app with which they tracked menses and intercourse, as well as antiepileptic drug use and seizures in women with epilepsy. “This was a particularly novel part of the study,” Dr. Harden said. It allowed the investigators to track adherence very well. Participants logged about 87% of their days in the app, and the investigators could see when the entries were made.

Women in both groups had a mean age of about 31 years and mean body mass index of about 25 kg/m². Overall, 52%-58% had undergone a prior pregnancy. Women with epilepsy, compared with controls, were less often Asian (17% vs. 6%) or African American (16% vs. 1%). The education level of participants was “fairly similar” between the groups, and slightly more women with epilepsy were unemployed (21% vs. 10%). Women with epilepsy also were more often married than were controls (89% vs. 75%).

During the study, 36% of women with epilepsy were still having seizures. At enrollment, most of the women’s seizure types were generalized (30%) or focal only (63%). Dr. Pennell noted that the antiseizure medications that the women were taking were typical for women of reproductive age: lamotrigine monotherapy (44%), levetiracetam monotherapy (28%), monotherapy with a strong enzyme-inducing drug (12%), other polytherapy (10%), polytherapy with a strong enzyme-inducing drug (6%), other monotherapy (3%), or no antiseizure medication (2%). A few women either added or stopped drugs during the study. A total of 18 women with epilepsy and 15 healthy controls dropped out.

As expected, age affected the likelihood of becoming pregnant, as well as number of prior pregnancies. Body mass index did not affect the likelihood of becoming pregnant, while white race and being married increased the likelihood.

In future analyses, the investigators are planning on checking whether ovulatory rates, frequency of intercourse, and time of intercourse had any impact on pregnancy, and in women with epilepsy, they will check the effect of the type of antiseizure medication and seizure-related factors.

“I think our findings will stand with future analyses.” Dr. Harden said. “The most interesting future findings may come from within the epilepsy group,” she said, noting that older antiepileptic medications have been previously associated with difficulty conceiving.

The WEPOD study was funded by the Milken Family Foundation, the Epilepsy Therapy Project, and the Epilepsy Foundation.

jevans@frontlinemedcom.com

VANCOUVER – Women with epilepsy have fertility rates comparable with healthy women in the general population, according to results from the first prospective observational cohort study to make the comparison.

During the year-long Women With Epilepsy: Pregnancy Outcomes and Deliveries (WEPOD) study, 70% of women with epilepsy and 67% of healthy control women became pregnant, and there was no significant difference in the mean time to pregnancy between those with and without epilepsy (6 months vs. 9 months, respectively), Dr. Page Pennell reported at the annual meeting of the American Academy of Neurology.

Live births occurred in 82% of pregnancies of women with epilepsy and 80% of controls, while miscarriages occurred in 13% and 20%, respectively. Both of those rates are very similar to the general population. Another 5% of pregnancies in women with epilepsy were ectopic, terminated due to chromosomal abnormality, or lost to follow-up.

“These findings should reassure women with epilepsy and clinicians when counseling women with epilepsy who are planning pregnancy,” said Dr. Pennell, director of research for the division of epilepsy in the department of neurology at Brigham and Women’s Hospital in Boston. She is a primary investigator of the study along with Dr. Jacqueline French, professor of neurology at NYU Langone Medical Center and Dr. Cynthia Harden, system director of epilepsy services at Mount Sinai Beth Israel, both in New York.

“I think overall the findings are more in the light of myth busting. ... We don’t necessarily see a lot of problems with fertility, yet the literature suggests that the birth rates are much lower,” Dr. Harden said in an interview.

“It’s really the first solid evidence, and it’s nice because in a sea of bad news for women when it comes to family planning and achieving pregnancy and pregnancy outcomes, I think this was very positive to say that their ability to achieve pregnancy was no different than what was reported by a control population without epilepsy,” Dr. Katherine Noe, an epilepsy specialist at the Mayo Clinic in Scottsdale, Ariz., said when asked to comment on the study.

“There was certainly reason to be concerned,” said Dr. Noe, who was not involved in the study. “We have a lot of data saying that babies exposed to antiepileptic drugs are more likely to have malformations, and so you could have a baby that already early in pregnancy has severe malformations that would be more likely to end in spontaneous abortion.”

Dr. Noe said that pregnancy registry data indicate that women with epilepsy may be more likely to have a pregnancy that ends in a miscarriage. Investigators for several studies published in 2015 reported that women with epilepsy face greater risk for morbidity and adverse outcomes at the time of delivery and during pregnancy than women without epilepsy (JAMA Neurol. 2015;72[9]:981-8 and Lancet. 2016;386[10006]:1845–52). Women with epilepsy also have been thought to be more prone to infertility for various reasons, including menstrual irregularities, polycystic ovarian syndrome related to antiepileptic medications, and early menopause, she said.

Three previous studies had reported that women with epilepsy had birth rates as low as only one-quarter to one-third that of women without epilepsy. There have been many reasons reported for why that might be the case, including lower marriage rates, sexual dysfunction, lower libido (in both men and women with epilepsy), and increased number of anovulatory cycles, or greater choice to not become pregnant, Dr. Pennell said.

The WEPOD study enrolled 89 women with epilepsy and 109 healthy controls who were seeking to become pregnant and had stopped using contraception within 6 months of enrollment or were about to stop using it. The investigators excluded women with infertility, polycystic ovarian syndrome, endometriosis, endocrine disorder, and heavy smoking, or who were not in an exclusive heterosexual relationship with a significant other or spouse.

Participants received iPod touch devices with an app with which they tracked menses and intercourse, as well as antiepileptic drug use and seizures in women with epilepsy. “This was a particularly novel part of the study,” Dr. Harden said. It allowed the investigators to track adherence very well. Participants logged about 87% of their days in the app, and the investigators could see when the entries were made.

Women in both groups had a mean age of about 31 years and mean body mass index of about 25 kg/m². Overall, 52%-58% had undergone a prior pregnancy. Women with epilepsy, compared with controls, were less often Asian (17% vs. 6%) or African American (16% vs. 1%). The education level of participants was “fairly similar” between the groups, and slightly more women with epilepsy were unemployed (21% vs. 10%). Women with epilepsy also were more often married than were controls (89% vs. 75%).

During the study, 36% of women with epilepsy were still having seizures. At enrollment, most of the women’s seizure types were generalized (30%) or focal only (63%). Dr. Pennell noted that the antiseizure medications that the women were taking were typical for women of reproductive age: lamotrigine monotherapy (44%), levetiracetam monotherapy (28%), monotherapy with a strong enzyme-inducing drug (12%), other polytherapy (10%), polytherapy with a strong enzyme-inducing drug (6%), other monotherapy (3%), or no antiseizure medication (2%). A few women either added or stopped drugs during the study. A total of 18 women with epilepsy and 15 healthy controls dropped out.

As expected, age affected the likelihood of becoming pregnant, as well as number of prior pregnancies. Body mass index did not affect the likelihood of becoming pregnant, while white race and being married increased the likelihood.

In future analyses, the investigators are planning on checking whether ovulatory rates, frequency of intercourse, and time of intercourse had any impact on pregnancy, and in women with epilepsy, they will check the effect of the type of antiseizure medication and seizure-related factors.

“I think our findings will stand with future analyses.” Dr. Harden said. “The most interesting future findings may come from within the epilepsy group,” she said, noting that older antiepileptic medications have been previously associated with difficulty conceiving.

The WEPOD study was funded by the Milken Family Foundation, the Epilepsy Therapy Project, and the Epilepsy Foundation.

jevans@frontlinemedcom.com

VANCOUVER – Women with epilepsy have fertility rates comparable with healthy women in the general population, according to results from the first prospective observational cohort study to make the comparison.

During the year-long Women With Epilepsy: Pregnancy Outcomes and Deliveries (WEPOD) study, 70% of women with epilepsy and 67% of healthy control women became pregnant, and there was no significant difference in the mean time to pregnancy between those with and without epilepsy (6 months vs. 9 months, respectively), Dr. Page Pennell reported at the annual meeting of the American Academy of Neurology.

Live births occurred in 82% of pregnancies of women with epilepsy and 80% of controls, while miscarriages occurred in 13% and 20%, respectively. Both of those rates are very similar to the general population. Another 5% of pregnancies in women with epilepsy were ectopic, terminated due to chromosomal abnormality, or lost to follow-up.

“These findings should reassure women with epilepsy and clinicians when counseling women with epilepsy who are planning pregnancy,” said Dr. Pennell, director of research for the division of epilepsy in the department of neurology at Brigham and Women’s Hospital in Boston. She is a primary investigator of the study along with Dr. Jacqueline French, professor of neurology at NYU Langone Medical Center and Dr. Cynthia Harden, system director of epilepsy services at Mount Sinai Beth Israel, both in New York.

“I think overall the findings are more in the light of myth busting. ... We don’t necessarily see a lot of problems with fertility, yet the literature suggests that the birth rates are much lower,” Dr. Harden said in an interview.

“It’s really the first solid evidence, and it’s nice because in a sea of bad news for women when it comes to family planning and achieving pregnancy and pregnancy outcomes, I think this was very positive to say that their ability to achieve pregnancy was no different than what was reported by a control population without epilepsy,” Dr. Katherine Noe, an epilepsy specialist at the Mayo Clinic in Scottsdale, Ariz., said when asked to comment on the study.

“There was certainly reason to be concerned,” said Dr. Noe, who was not involved in the study. “We have a lot of data saying that babies exposed to antiepileptic drugs are more likely to have malformations, and so you could have a baby that already early in pregnancy has severe malformations that would be more likely to end in spontaneous abortion.”

Dr. Noe said that pregnancy registry data indicate that women with epilepsy may be more likely to have a pregnancy that ends in a miscarriage. Investigators for several studies published in 2015 reported that women with epilepsy face greater risk for morbidity and adverse outcomes at the time of delivery and during pregnancy than women without epilepsy (JAMA Neurol. 2015;72[9]:981-8 and Lancet. 2016;386[10006]:1845–52). Women with epilepsy also have been thought to be more prone to infertility for various reasons, including menstrual irregularities, polycystic ovarian syndrome related to antiepileptic medications, and early menopause, she said.

Three previous studies had reported that women with epilepsy had birth rates as low as only one-quarter to one-third that of women without epilepsy. There have been many reasons reported for why that might be the case, including lower marriage rates, sexual dysfunction, lower libido (in both men and women with epilepsy), and increased number of anovulatory cycles, or greater choice to not become pregnant, Dr. Pennell said.

The WEPOD study enrolled 89 women with epilepsy and 109 healthy controls who were seeking to become pregnant and had stopped using contraception within 6 months of enrollment or were about to stop using it. The investigators excluded women with infertility, polycystic ovarian syndrome, endometriosis, endocrine disorder, and heavy smoking, or who were not in an exclusive heterosexual relationship with a significant other or spouse.

Participants received iPod touch devices with an app with which they tracked menses and intercourse, as well as antiepileptic drug use and seizures in women with epilepsy. “This was a particularly novel part of the study,” Dr. Harden said. It allowed the investigators to track adherence very well. Participants logged about 87% of their days in the app, and the investigators could see when the entries were made.

Women in both groups had a mean age of about 31 years and mean body mass index of about 25 kg/m². Overall, 52%-58% had undergone a prior pregnancy. Women with epilepsy, compared with controls, were less often Asian (17% vs. 6%) or African American (16% vs. 1%). The education level of participants was “fairly similar” between the groups, and slightly more women with epilepsy were unemployed (21% vs. 10%). Women with epilepsy also were more often married than were controls (89% vs. 75%).

During the study, 36% of women with epilepsy were still having seizures. At enrollment, most of the women’s seizure types were generalized (30%) or focal only (63%). Dr. Pennell noted that the antiseizure medications that the women were taking were typical for women of reproductive age: lamotrigine monotherapy (44%), levetiracetam monotherapy (28%), monotherapy with a strong enzyme-inducing drug (12%), other polytherapy (10%), polytherapy with a strong enzyme-inducing drug (6%), other monotherapy (3%), or no antiseizure medication (2%). A few women either added or stopped drugs during the study. A total of 18 women with epilepsy and 15 healthy controls dropped out.

As expected, age affected the likelihood of becoming pregnant, as well as number of prior pregnancies. Body mass index did not affect the likelihood of becoming pregnant, while white race and being married increased the likelihood.

In future analyses, the investigators are planning on checking whether ovulatory rates, frequency of intercourse, and time of intercourse had any impact on pregnancy, and in women with epilepsy, they will check the effect of the type of antiseizure medication and seizure-related factors.

“I think our findings will stand with future analyses.” Dr. Harden said. “The most interesting future findings may come from within the epilepsy group,” she said, noting that older antiepileptic medications have been previously associated with difficulty conceiving.

The WEPOD study was funded by the Milken Family Foundation, the Epilepsy Therapy Project, and the Epilepsy Foundation.

jevans@frontlinemedcom.com