HT Staff

College of Medicine

New research suggests virus-specific T cells (VSTs) can protect patients from severe viral infections that sometimes occur after hematopoietic stem cell transplant (HSCT).

The VSTs proved effective against 5 different viruses—Epstein-Barr virus (EBV), adenovirus (AdV), cytomegalovirus (CMV), BK virus (BKV), and human herpesvirus 6 (HHV-6).

Ifigeneia Tzannou, MD, of Baylor College of Medicine in Houston, Texas, and her colleagues reported these findings in the Journal of Clinical Oncology.

“In this study, we continued our previous work . . . in which we showed that patients who had developed an Epstein-Barr virus infection after a transplant . . . could be helped by receiving immune cells specialized in eliminating that particular virus,” Dr Tzannou said. “Then, we and others successfully targeted other viruses—namely, adenoviruses and cytomegalovirus.”

“The novel contribution of this study is that we have targeted additional viruses, the BK virus and the HHV-6 virus, which had not been targeted this way before,” added study author Bilal Omer, MD, of Baylor College of Medicine.

“This is important because the BK virus does not have an effective treatment, and the complications are significant, including severe pain and bleeding. These patients are in the hospital for weeks, months sometimes, and, now, we have a treatment option.”

The researchers tested their VSTs in a phase 2 trial of 38 HSCT recipients with at least 1 of the aforementioned viruses.

“[To prepare the VSTs,] we take blood from healthy donors who have already been exposed to these viruses and who we have confirmed have immune cells that can fight the infections,” Dr Tzannou said.

“We isolate the cells and let them multiply in culture. The final product is a mixture of cells that, together, can target all 5 viruses. We prepared 59 sets of virus-specific cells from different donors following this procedure.”

“Our strategy is to prepare a number of sets of virus-specific cells ahead of time and store them in a freezer, ready to use when a patient needs them,” Dr Omer noted. “To match patient and donor, we use elaborate matching algorithms.”

Patients

The trial included 38 patients who had undergone HSCT to treat acute myeloid leukemia/myelodysplastic syndromes (n=20), acute lymphoblastic leukemia (n=9), lymphoma/myeloma (n=3), or nonmalignant disorders (n=6).

These 38 patients had a total of 45 infections—CMV (n=17), EBV (n=2), AdV (n=7), BKV (n=16), and HHV-6 (n=3).

Response

The researchers monitored virus levels and other clinical responses in the 37 evaluable patients.

Six weeks after the first VST infusion, the overall response rate was 91.9%.

Seventeen patients received VSTs for persistent CMV. Sixteen of these patients (94.1%) responded, 6 with complete responses (CRs) and 10 with partial responses (PRs).

Two patients received VSTs for EBV, and both achieved a virologic CR.

Seven patients received VSTs for persistent AdV. The response rate was 71.4%. Four patients achieved a CR, 1 had a PR, and 2 patients did not respond.

Three patients received VSTs to treat HHV-6 reactivations. The response rate was 67%. Two patients had a PR, and 1 was not evaluable.

Sixteen patients received VSTs for BKV-associated hemorrhagic cystitis (n= 14) or BKV-associated nephritis (n=2).

All 16 patients responded. One had a clinical and virologic CR. Six had a clinical CR but a virologic PR. Seven had a virologic and clinical PR. And 2 patients had only a virologic PR.

A total of 15 patients received a second VST infusion—1 due to lack of response, 7 who had a PR, and 7 due to recurrence. Ten of these patients responded to the second infusion—1 with a CR and 9 with a PR.

Four patients received a third infusion of VSTs. Two achieved a CR, 1 had a PR, and 1 did not respond.

Toxicity

One patient developed an isolated fever within 24 hours of VST infusion, but the researchers did not observe any other immediate toxicities.

One of the patients with BKV-associated hemorrhagic cystitis experienced transient hydronephrosis and a decrease in renal function associated with a concomitant bacterial urinary tract infection.

Nineteen patients had prior grade 2 to 4 graft-versus-host disease (GVHD)—15 with grade 2 and 4 with grade 3. All GVHD was quiescent at the time of VST infusion.

One patient developed recurrent grade 3 gastrointestinal GVHD after VST infusion and rapid corticosteroid taper. Five patients developed recurrent (n=3) or de novo (n=2) grade 1 to 2 skin GVHD, which resolved with topical treatment (n=4) and reinitiation of corticosteroid treatment (n=1).

Two patients had a flare of upper-gastrointestinal GVHD, which resolved after a brief corticosteroid course.

“We didn’t have any significant toxicities,” Dr Tzannou said. “Taken together, the results of this trial suggest that it is reasonable to consider this treatment as an early option for these patients. We hope that the results of a future multicenter, phase 3 clinical trial will help raise awareness in both physicians and patients that this treatment, which is safe and effective, is available.”

College of Medicine

New research suggests virus-specific T cells (VSTs) can protect patients from severe viral infections that sometimes occur after hematopoietic stem cell transplant (HSCT).

The VSTs proved effective against 5 different viruses—Epstein-Barr virus (EBV), adenovirus (AdV), cytomegalovirus (CMV), BK virus (BKV), and human herpesvirus 6 (HHV-6).

Ifigeneia Tzannou, MD, of Baylor College of Medicine in Houston, Texas, and her colleagues reported these findings in the Journal of Clinical Oncology.

“In this study, we continued our previous work . . . in which we showed that patients who had developed an Epstein-Barr virus infection after a transplant . . . could be helped by receiving immune cells specialized in eliminating that particular virus,” Dr Tzannou said. “Then, we and others successfully targeted other viruses—namely, adenoviruses and cytomegalovirus.”

“The novel contribution of this study is that we have targeted additional viruses, the BK virus and the HHV-6 virus, which had not been targeted this way before,” added study author Bilal Omer, MD, of Baylor College of Medicine.

“This is important because the BK virus does not have an effective treatment, and the complications are significant, including severe pain and bleeding. These patients are in the hospital for weeks, months sometimes, and, now, we have a treatment option.”

The researchers tested their VSTs in a phase 2 trial of 38 HSCT recipients with at least 1 of the aforementioned viruses.

“[To prepare the VSTs,] we take blood from healthy donors who have already been exposed to these viruses and who we have confirmed have immune cells that can fight the infections,” Dr Tzannou said.

“We isolate the cells and let them multiply in culture. The final product is a mixture of cells that, together, can target all 5 viruses. We prepared 59 sets of virus-specific cells from different donors following this procedure.”

“Our strategy is to prepare a number of sets of virus-specific cells ahead of time and store them in a freezer, ready to use when a patient needs them,” Dr Omer noted. “To match patient and donor, we use elaborate matching algorithms.”

Patients

The trial included 38 patients who had undergone HSCT to treat acute myeloid leukemia/myelodysplastic syndromes (n=20), acute lymphoblastic leukemia (n=9), lymphoma/myeloma (n=3), or nonmalignant disorders (n=6).

These 38 patients had a total of 45 infections—CMV (n=17), EBV (n=2), AdV (n=7), BKV (n=16), and HHV-6 (n=3).

Response

The researchers monitored virus levels and other clinical responses in the 37 evaluable patients.

Six weeks after the first VST infusion, the overall response rate was 91.9%.

Seventeen patients received VSTs for persistent CMV. Sixteen of these patients (94.1%) responded, 6 with complete responses (CRs) and 10 with partial responses (PRs).

Two patients received VSTs for EBV, and both achieved a virologic CR.

Seven patients received VSTs for persistent AdV. The response rate was 71.4%. Four patients achieved a CR, 1 had a PR, and 2 patients did not respond.

Three patients received VSTs to treat HHV-6 reactivations. The response rate was 67%. Two patients had a PR, and 1 was not evaluable.

Sixteen patients received VSTs for BKV-associated hemorrhagic cystitis (n= 14) or BKV-associated nephritis (n=2).

All 16 patients responded. One had a clinical and virologic CR. Six had a clinical CR but a virologic PR. Seven had a virologic and clinical PR. And 2 patients had only a virologic PR.

A total of 15 patients received a second VST infusion—1 due to lack of response, 7 who had a PR, and 7 due to recurrence. Ten of these patients responded to the second infusion—1 with a CR and 9 with a PR.

Four patients received a third infusion of VSTs. Two achieved a CR, 1 had a PR, and 1 did not respond.

Toxicity

One patient developed an isolated fever within 24 hours of VST infusion, but the researchers did not observe any other immediate toxicities.

One of the patients with BKV-associated hemorrhagic cystitis experienced transient hydronephrosis and a decrease in renal function associated with a concomitant bacterial urinary tract infection.

Nineteen patients had prior grade 2 to 4 graft-versus-host disease (GVHD)—15 with grade 2 and 4 with grade 3. All GVHD was quiescent at the time of VST infusion.

One patient developed recurrent grade 3 gastrointestinal GVHD after VST infusion and rapid corticosteroid taper. Five patients developed recurrent (n=3) or de novo (n=2) grade 1 to 2 skin GVHD, which resolved with topical treatment (n=4) and reinitiation of corticosteroid treatment (n=1).

Two patients had a flare of upper-gastrointestinal GVHD, which resolved after a brief corticosteroid course.

“We didn’t have any significant toxicities,” Dr Tzannou said. “Taken together, the results of this trial suggest that it is reasonable to consider this treatment as an early option for these patients. We hope that the results of a future multicenter, phase 3 clinical trial will help raise awareness in both physicians and patients that this treatment, which is safe and effective, is available.”

College of Medicine

New research suggests virus-specific T cells (VSTs) can protect patients from severe viral infections that sometimes occur after hematopoietic stem cell transplant (HSCT).

The VSTs proved effective against 5 different viruses—Epstein-Barr virus (EBV), adenovirus (AdV), cytomegalovirus (CMV), BK virus (BKV), and human herpesvirus 6 (HHV-6).

Ifigeneia Tzannou, MD, of Baylor College of Medicine in Houston, Texas, and her colleagues reported these findings in the Journal of Clinical Oncology.

“In this study, we continued our previous work . . . in which we showed that patients who had developed an Epstein-Barr virus infection after a transplant . . . could be helped by receiving immune cells specialized in eliminating that particular virus,” Dr Tzannou said. “Then, we and others successfully targeted other viruses—namely, adenoviruses and cytomegalovirus.”

“The novel contribution of this study is that we have targeted additional viruses, the BK virus and the HHV-6 virus, which had not been targeted this way before,” added study author Bilal Omer, MD, of Baylor College of Medicine.

“This is important because the BK virus does not have an effective treatment, and the complications are significant, including severe pain and bleeding. These patients are in the hospital for weeks, months sometimes, and, now, we have a treatment option.”

The researchers tested their VSTs in a phase 2 trial of 38 HSCT recipients with at least 1 of the aforementioned viruses.

“[To prepare the VSTs,] we take blood from healthy donors who have already been exposed to these viruses and who we have confirmed have immune cells that can fight the infections,” Dr Tzannou said.

“We isolate the cells and let them multiply in culture. The final product is a mixture of cells that, together, can target all 5 viruses. We prepared 59 sets of virus-specific cells from different donors following this procedure.”

“Our strategy is to prepare a number of sets of virus-specific cells ahead of time and store them in a freezer, ready to use when a patient needs them,” Dr Omer noted. “To match patient and donor, we use elaborate matching algorithms.”

Patients

The trial included 38 patients who had undergone HSCT to treat acute myeloid leukemia/myelodysplastic syndromes (n=20), acute lymphoblastic leukemia (n=9), lymphoma/myeloma (n=3), or nonmalignant disorders (n=6).

These 38 patients had a total of 45 infections—CMV (n=17), EBV (n=2), AdV (n=7), BKV (n=16), and HHV-6 (n=3).

Response

The researchers monitored virus levels and other clinical responses in the 37 evaluable patients.

Six weeks after the first VST infusion, the overall response rate was 91.9%.

Seventeen patients received VSTs for persistent CMV. Sixteen of these patients (94.1%) responded, 6 with complete responses (CRs) and 10 with partial responses (PRs).

Two patients received VSTs for EBV, and both achieved a virologic CR.

Seven patients received VSTs for persistent AdV. The response rate was 71.4%. Four patients achieved a CR, 1 had a PR, and 2 patients did not respond.

Three patients received VSTs to treat HHV-6 reactivations. The response rate was 67%. Two patients had a PR, and 1 was not evaluable.

Sixteen patients received VSTs for BKV-associated hemorrhagic cystitis (n= 14) or BKV-associated nephritis (n=2).

All 16 patients responded. One had a clinical and virologic CR. Six had a clinical CR but a virologic PR. Seven had a virologic and clinical PR. And 2 patients had only a virologic PR.

A total of 15 patients received a second VST infusion—1 due to lack of response, 7 who had a PR, and 7 due to recurrence. Ten of these patients responded to the second infusion—1 with a CR and 9 with a PR.

Four patients received a third infusion of VSTs. Two achieved a CR, 1 had a PR, and 1 did not respond.

Toxicity

One patient developed an isolated fever within 24 hours of VST infusion, but the researchers did not observe any other immediate toxicities.

One of the patients with BKV-associated hemorrhagic cystitis experienced transient hydronephrosis and a decrease in renal function associated with a concomitant bacterial urinary tract infection.

Nineteen patients had prior grade 2 to 4 graft-versus-host disease (GVHD)—15 with grade 2 and 4 with grade 3. All GVHD was quiescent at the time of VST infusion.

One patient developed recurrent grade 3 gastrointestinal GVHD after VST infusion and rapid corticosteroid taper. Five patients developed recurrent (n=3) or de novo (n=2) grade 1 to 2 skin GVHD, which resolved with topical treatment (n=4) and reinitiation of corticosteroid treatment (n=1).

Two patients had a flare of upper-gastrointestinal GVHD, which resolved after a brief corticosteroid course.

“We didn’t have any significant toxicities,” Dr Tzannou said. “Taken together, the results of this trial suggest that it is reasonable to consider this treatment as an early option for these patients. We hope that the results of a future multicenter, phase 3 clinical trial will help raise awareness in both physicians and patients that this treatment, which is safe and effective, is available.”

Photo courtesy of the CDC

A study of residents in Ontario, Canada, showed that opioid prescription use was more common in cancer survivors than in individuals without a history of cancer.

This was true even among survivors who were 10 or more years past their cancer diagnosis.

Rinku Sutradhar, PhD, of the University of Toronto in Ontario, Canada, and her colleagues reported these findings in Cancer.

The researchers said little is known about prescribing opioids to relieve pain in individuals who have survived cancer.

To investigate, the team looked at opioid prescribing among residents of Ontario, Canada, with and without a history of cancer.

The study included 8601 adults who were at least 5 years past a cancer diagnosis. These subjects were were matched with 8601 individuals without a prior cancer diagnosis. The subjects were matched based on sex and calendar year of birth.

The researchers looked for opioid prescriptions filled at a pharmacy during the observation period. Follow-up was stopped at any indication of cancer recurrence, second malignancy, or new cancer diagnosis.

The rate of opioid prescribing was 1.22 times higher among cancer survivors than corresponding matched controls.

Over a 36-month period, the average number of opioid prescriptions filled by cancer survivors was 7.7, compared with 6.3 for controls.

This increased rate of opioid prescribing was also seen among survivors who were 10 or more years past their cancer diagnosis.

Individuals with lower income and those who were younger, from rural neighborhoods, and with more comorbidities had significantly higher prescribing rates. Sex was not associated with prescribing rates.

“Our research findings raise concerns about the diagnosis and management of chronic pain problems among survivors stemming from their cancer diagnosis or treatment,” Dr Sutradhar said. “Physicians providing primary care to cancer survivors should consider close examination of reasons for continued opioid use to differentiate chronic pain from dependency.”

Photo courtesy of the CDC

A study of residents in Ontario, Canada, showed that opioid prescription use was more common in cancer survivors than in individuals without a history of cancer.

This was true even among survivors who were 10 or more years past their cancer diagnosis.

Rinku Sutradhar, PhD, of the University of Toronto in Ontario, Canada, and her colleagues reported these findings in Cancer.

The researchers said little is known about prescribing opioids to relieve pain in individuals who have survived cancer.

To investigate, the team looked at opioid prescribing among residents of Ontario, Canada, with and without a history of cancer.

The study included 8601 adults who were at least 5 years past a cancer diagnosis. These subjects were were matched with 8601 individuals without a prior cancer diagnosis. The subjects were matched based on sex and calendar year of birth.

The researchers looked for opioid prescriptions filled at a pharmacy during the observation period. Follow-up was stopped at any indication of cancer recurrence, second malignancy, or new cancer diagnosis.

The rate of opioid prescribing was 1.22 times higher among cancer survivors than corresponding matched controls.

Over a 36-month period, the average number of opioid prescriptions filled by cancer survivors was 7.7, compared with 6.3 for controls.

This increased rate of opioid prescribing was also seen among survivors who were 10 or more years past their cancer diagnosis.

Individuals with lower income and those who were younger, from rural neighborhoods, and with more comorbidities had significantly higher prescribing rates. Sex was not associated with prescribing rates.

“Our research findings raise concerns about the diagnosis and management of chronic pain problems among survivors stemming from their cancer diagnosis or treatment,” Dr Sutradhar said. “Physicians providing primary care to cancer survivors should consider close examination of reasons for continued opioid use to differentiate chronic pain from dependency.”

Photo courtesy of the CDC

A study of residents in Ontario, Canada, showed that opioid prescription use was more common in cancer survivors than in individuals without a history of cancer.

This was true even among survivors who were 10 or more years past their cancer diagnosis.

Rinku Sutradhar, PhD, of the University of Toronto in Ontario, Canada, and her colleagues reported these findings in Cancer.

The researchers said little is known about prescribing opioids to relieve pain in individuals who have survived cancer.

To investigate, the team looked at opioid prescribing among residents of Ontario, Canada, with and without a history of cancer.

The study included 8601 adults who were at least 5 years past a cancer diagnosis. These subjects were were matched with 8601 individuals without a prior cancer diagnosis. The subjects were matched based on sex and calendar year of birth.

The researchers looked for opioid prescriptions filled at a pharmacy during the observation period. Follow-up was stopped at any indication of cancer recurrence, second malignancy, or new cancer diagnosis.

The rate of opioid prescribing was 1.22 times higher among cancer survivors than corresponding matched controls.

Over a 36-month period, the average number of opioid prescriptions filled by cancer survivors was 7.7, compared with 6.3 for controls.

This increased rate of opioid prescribing was also seen among survivors who were 10 or more years past their cancer diagnosis.

Individuals with lower income and those who were younger, from rural neighborhoods, and with more comorbidities had significantly higher prescribing rates. Sex was not associated with prescribing rates.

“Our research findings raise concerns about the diagnosis and management of chronic pain problems among survivors stemming from their cancer diagnosis or treatment,” Dr Sutradhar said. “Physicians providing primary care to cancer survivors should consider close examination of reasons for continued opioid use to differentiate chronic pain from dependency.”

Micrograph showing DLBCL

Results from the SCHOLAR-1 study revealed poor outcomes of salvage therapy in patients with refractory diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL).

This retrospective study included data on patients enrolled in 2 randomized trials and 2 academic databases.

The patients had primary refractory disease, were refractory to second-line or later therapy, or had relapsed within 12 months of autologous stem cell transplant (ASCT).

Twenty-six percent of patients responded to salvage therapy, with 7% achieving a complete response (CR).

The median overall survival (OS) was 6.3 months, and 20% of patients were still alive at 2 years’ follow-up.

Christian Gisselbrecht, MD, of Saint Louis Hospital in Paris, France, and his colleagues reported these findings in Blood. SCHOLAR-1 was funded through an unrestricted grant from Kite Pharma.

“SCHOLAR-1 demonstrates the uniformly poor treatment outcomes for patients with aggressive non-Hodgkin lymphoma and emphasizes the need for breakthrough therapies for these refractory patients,” Dr Gisselbrecht said.

Patient characteristics

The study included pooled, patient-level data from 2 phase 3 trials and 2 databases:

• The Canadian Cancer Trials Group study LY.12 (n=219)
• The Lymphoma Academic Research Organization’s CORAL study  (n=170)
• A cohort from MD Anderson Cancer Center (n=165)
• A cohort from the Molecular Epidemiology Resource of the University of Iowa/Mayo Clinic Lymphoma Specialized Program of Research Excellence (n=82).

There were a total of 636 patients who met criteria for refractory DLBCL, which included primary mediastinal B-cell lymphoma and transformed follicular lymphoma.

Twenty-eight percent of patients were primary refractory, 50% were refractory to second-line or later therapy, and 22% had relapsed within 12 months of transplant.

The patients’ median age was 55 (range, 19-81), and 64% were male. Seventy-three percent had an ECOG performance status of 0-1, 14% had a status of 2-4, and 13% were missing this data. Seventy-two percent of patients had stage III-IV disease, 27% had stage I-II disease, and less than 1% were missing this data.

Treatments

The MD Anderson cohort included patients who were relapsed/refractory to initial rituximab-containing chemotherapy, had failed salvage platinum-containing chemotherapy, and received a second salvage therapy at MD Anderson.

The University of Iowa/Mayo Clinic cohort included unselected, newly diagnosed patients with lymphoma who entered prospective documentation of primary and subsequent treatments and outcomes.

In the LY.12 study, patients were enrolled upon relapse after anthracycline-containing therapy and randomized to 1 of 2 salvage regimens, with a goal of consolidative ASCT.

The CORAL study enrolled patients in their first relapse or whose lymphoma was refractory to first-line therapy. They were randomized to 1 of 2 salvage regimens, with a goal of consolidative ASCT.

In the LY.12 and CORAL studies, eligible patients with CD20+ lymphoma were randomized to rituximab maintenance or observation post-ASCT.

Response

In all, 523 patients were evaluated for response. The overall response rate (ORR) was 26%, with a 7% CR rate and an 18% partial response rate.

Among patients with primary refractory disease, the ORR was 20%, and the CR rate was 3%.

Among patients who were refractory to second-line or later therapy, the ORR was 26%, and the CR rate was 10%.

Among patients who relapsed after transplant, the ORR was 34%, and the CR rate was 15%.

Survival

A total of 603 patients were evaluated for survival.

The median OS from the start of salvage therapy was 6.3 months (range, 5.9-7.0). The 1-year OS rate was 28%, and the 2-year OS was 20%.

Among primary refractory patients, the median OS was 7.1 months (range, 6.0-8.1), 1-year OS was 29%, and 2-year OS was 24%.

Among patient who were refractory to second-line or later therapy, the median OS was 6.1 months (range, 5.2-7.0), 1-year OS was 26%, and 2-year OS was 17%.

Among patients who relapsed after transplant, the median OS was 6.2 months (range, 5.2-7.6), 1-year OS was 32%, and 2-year OS was 19%.

“Although 60% to 70% of non-Hodgkin lymphoma patients survive 5 years after rituximab-based chemotherapy and autologous stem cell transplant, nearly half of them either do not respond or relapse shortly after transplant,” Dr Gisselbrecht noted.

“SCHOLAR-1 provides a rigorous measure of outcomes for these patients who do not benefit from currently available therapies, and this landmark study will serve as an important historical control for evaluating new therapeutic candidates in the field of non-Hodgkin lymphoma.”

Micrograph showing DLBCL

Results from the SCHOLAR-1 study revealed poor outcomes of salvage therapy in patients with refractory diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL).

This retrospective study included data on patients enrolled in 2 randomized trials and 2 academic databases.

The patients had primary refractory disease, were refractory to second-line or later therapy, or had relapsed within 12 months of autologous stem cell transplant (ASCT).

Twenty-six percent of patients responded to salvage therapy, with 7% achieving a complete response (CR).

The median overall survival (OS) was 6.3 months, and 20% of patients were still alive at 2 years’ follow-up.

Christian Gisselbrecht, MD, of Saint Louis Hospital in Paris, France, and his colleagues reported these findings in Blood. SCHOLAR-1 was funded through an unrestricted grant from Kite Pharma.

“SCHOLAR-1 demonstrates the uniformly poor treatment outcomes for patients with aggressive non-Hodgkin lymphoma and emphasizes the need for breakthrough therapies for these refractory patients,” Dr Gisselbrecht said.

Patient characteristics

The study included pooled, patient-level data from 2 phase 3 trials and 2 databases:

• The Canadian Cancer Trials Group study LY.12 (n=219)
• The Lymphoma Academic Research Organization’s CORAL study  (n=170)
• A cohort from MD Anderson Cancer Center (n=165)
• A cohort from the Molecular Epidemiology Resource of the University of Iowa/Mayo Clinic Lymphoma Specialized Program of Research Excellence (n=82).

There were a total of 636 patients who met criteria for refractory DLBCL, which included primary mediastinal B-cell lymphoma and transformed follicular lymphoma.

Twenty-eight percent of patients were primary refractory, 50% were refractory to second-line or later therapy, and 22% had relapsed within 12 months of transplant.

The patients’ median age was 55 (range, 19-81), and 64% were male. Seventy-three percent had an ECOG performance status of 0-1, 14% had a status of 2-4, and 13% were missing this data. Seventy-two percent of patients had stage III-IV disease, 27% had stage I-II disease, and less than 1% were missing this data.

Treatments

The MD Anderson cohort included patients who were relapsed/refractory to initial rituximab-containing chemotherapy, had failed salvage platinum-containing chemotherapy, and received a second salvage therapy at MD Anderson.

The University of Iowa/Mayo Clinic cohort included unselected, newly diagnosed patients with lymphoma who entered prospective documentation of primary and subsequent treatments and outcomes.

In the LY.12 study, patients were enrolled upon relapse after anthracycline-containing therapy and randomized to 1 of 2 salvage regimens, with a goal of consolidative ASCT.

The CORAL study enrolled patients in their first relapse or whose lymphoma was refractory to first-line therapy. They were randomized to 1 of 2 salvage regimens, with a goal of consolidative ASCT.

In the LY.12 and CORAL studies, eligible patients with CD20+ lymphoma were randomized to rituximab maintenance or observation post-ASCT.

Response

In all, 523 patients were evaluated for response. The overall response rate (ORR) was 26%, with a 7% CR rate and an 18% partial response rate.

Among patients with primary refractory disease, the ORR was 20%, and the CR rate was 3%.

Among patients who were refractory to second-line or later therapy, the ORR was 26%, and the CR rate was 10%.

Among patients who relapsed after transplant, the ORR was 34%, and the CR rate was 15%.

Survival

A total of 603 patients were evaluated for survival.

The median OS from the start of salvage therapy was 6.3 months (range, 5.9-7.0). The 1-year OS rate was 28%, and the 2-year OS was 20%.

Among primary refractory patients, the median OS was 7.1 months (range, 6.0-8.1), 1-year OS was 29%, and 2-year OS was 24%.

Among patient who were refractory to second-line or later therapy, the median OS was 6.1 months (range, 5.2-7.0), 1-year OS was 26%, and 2-year OS was 17%.

Among patients who relapsed after transplant, the median OS was 6.2 months (range, 5.2-7.6), 1-year OS was 32%, and 2-year OS was 19%.

“Although 60% to 70% of non-Hodgkin lymphoma patients survive 5 years after rituximab-based chemotherapy and autologous stem cell transplant, nearly half of them either do not respond or relapse shortly after transplant,” Dr Gisselbrecht noted.

“SCHOLAR-1 provides a rigorous measure of outcomes for these patients who do not benefit from currently available therapies, and this landmark study will serve as an important historical control for evaluating new therapeutic candidates in the field of non-Hodgkin lymphoma.”

Micrograph showing DLBCL

Results from the SCHOLAR-1 study revealed poor outcomes of salvage therapy in patients with refractory diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL).

This retrospective study included data on patients enrolled in 2 randomized trials and 2 academic databases.

The patients had primary refractory disease, were refractory to second-line or later therapy, or had relapsed within 12 months of autologous stem cell transplant (ASCT).

Twenty-six percent of patients responded to salvage therapy, with 7% achieving a complete response (CR).

The median overall survival (OS) was 6.3 months, and 20% of patients were still alive at 2 years’ follow-up.

Christian Gisselbrecht, MD, of Saint Louis Hospital in Paris, France, and his colleagues reported these findings in Blood. SCHOLAR-1 was funded through an unrestricted grant from Kite Pharma.

“SCHOLAR-1 demonstrates the uniformly poor treatment outcomes for patients with aggressive non-Hodgkin lymphoma and emphasizes the need for breakthrough therapies for these refractory patients,” Dr Gisselbrecht said.

Patient characteristics

The study included pooled, patient-level data from 2 phase 3 trials and 2 databases:

• The Canadian Cancer Trials Group study LY.12 (n=219)
• The Lymphoma Academic Research Organization’s CORAL study  (n=170)
• A cohort from MD Anderson Cancer Center (n=165)
• A cohort from the Molecular Epidemiology Resource of the University of Iowa/Mayo Clinic Lymphoma Specialized Program of Research Excellence (n=82).

There were a total of 636 patients who met criteria for refractory DLBCL, which included primary mediastinal B-cell lymphoma and transformed follicular lymphoma.

Twenty-eight percent of patients were primary refractory, 50% were refractory to second-line or later therapy, and 22% had relapsed within 12 months of transplant.

The patients’ median age was 55 (range, 19-81), and 64% were male. Seventy-three percent had an ECOG performance status of 0-1, 14% had a status of 2-4, and 13% were missing this data. Seventy-two percent of patients had stage III-IV disease, 27% had stage I-II disease, and less than 1% were missing this data.

Treatments

The MD Anderson cohort included patients who were relapsed/refractory to initial rituximab-containing chemotherapy, had failed salvage platinum-containing chemotherapy, and received a second salvage therapy at MD Anderson.

The University of Iowa/Mayo Clinic cohort included unselected, newly diagnosed patients with lymphoma who entered prospective documentation of primary and subsequent treatments and outcomes.

In the LY.12 study, patients were enrolled upon relapse after anthracycline-containing therapy and randomized to 1 of 2 salvage regimens, with a goal of consolidative ASCT.

The CORAL study enrolled patients in their first relapse or whose lymphoma was refractory to first-line therapy. They were randomized to 1 of 2 salvage regimens, with a goal of consolidative ASCT.

In the LY.12 and CORAL studies, eligible patients with CD20+ lymphoma were randomized to rituximab maintenance or observation post-ASCT.

Response

In all, 523 patients were evaluated for response. The overall response rate (ORR) was 26%, with a 7% CR rate and an 18% partial response rate.

Among patients with primary refractory disease, the ORR was 20%, and the CR rate was 3%.

Among patients who were refractory to second-line or later therapy, the ORR was 26%, and the CR rate was 10%.

Among patients who relapsed after transplant, the ORR was 34%, and the CR rate was 15%.

Survival

A total of 603 patients were evaluated for survival.

The median OS from the start of salvage therapy was 6.3 months (range, 5.9-7.0). The 1-year OS rate was 28%, and the 2-year OS was 20%.

Among primary refractory patients, the median OS was 7.1 months (range, 6.0-8.1), 1-year OS was 29%, and 2-year OS was 24%.

Among patient who were refractory to second-line or later therapy, the median OS was 6.1 months (range, 5.2-7.0), 1-year OS was 26%, and 2-year OS was 17%.

Among patients who relapsed after transplant, the median OS was 6.2 months (range, 5.2-7.6), 1-year OS was 32%, and 2-year OS was 19%.

“Although 60% to 70% of non-Hodgkin lymphoma patients survive 5 years after rituximab-based chemotherapy and autologous stem cell transplant, nearly half of them either do not respond or relapse shortly after transplant,” Dr Gisselbrecht noted.

“SCHOLAR-1 provides a rigorous measure of outcomes for these patients who do not benefit from currently available therapies, and this landmark study will serve as an important historical control for evaluating new therapeutic candidates in the field of non-Hodgkin lymphoma.”

Micrograph showing MM

Tests used to assess treatment response in multiple myeloma (MM) may often produce confusing results after patients have undergone hematopoietic stem cell transplant (HSCT), a new study suggests.

The tests—serum protein electrophoresis/serum immunofixation electrophoresis (SPEP/SIFE) and serum free light chain assay (SFLCA)—can sometimes produce an oligoclonal pattern that can be mistaken for an M spike and suggest disease recurrence.

The study showed that this confusing result was significantly more likely to occur after patients underwent HSCT than after they received chemotherapy.

Gurmukh Singh, MD, PhD, of Augusta University in Augusta, Georgia, reported these findings in the Journal of Clinical Medicine Research.

For this study, Dr Singh looked at lab and clinical data on 251 MM patients treated from January 2010 to December 2016. One hundred and fifty-nine of those patients received autologous HSCTs.

Dr Singh compared results of SPEP/SIFE and/or SFLCA in patients who underwent HSCT and patients who did not. Each patient had at least 3 tests, and, for HSCT recipients, at least 2 of the tests occurred after transplant.

The incidence of oligoclonal patterns was significantly higher in HSCT recipients than in patients who had chemotherapy alone—57.9% and 8.8%, respectively (P=0.000003).

Only 5 of the 159 HSCT recipients had an oligoclonal pattern before treatment, but 92 of them had one afterward.

More than half of the oligoclonal patterns developed within the first year of HSCT. The earliest pattern was detected at 2 months—as soon as the first post-transplant tests were done—and a few occurred as late as 5 years later.

“We want to emphasize that oligoclonal bands should mostly be recognized as a response to treatment and not be mistaken as a recurrence of the original tumor,” Dr Singh said.

He explained that the key clarifier appears to be the location of the M spike when the diagnosis is made compared to the location of new spikes that may show up after HSCT.

“If the original peak was at location A, now the peak is location B, that allows us to determine that it is not the same abnormal, malignant antibody,” he said. “If it’s in a different location, it’s not the same protein. [T]his is just a normal response of recovery of the bone marrow that could be mistaken for recurrence of the disease.”

Micrograph showing MM

Tests used to assess treatment response in multiple myeloma (MM) may often produce confusing results after patients have undergone hematopoietic stem cell transplant (HSCT), a new study suggests.

The tests—serum protein electrophoresis/serum immunofixation electrophoresis (SPEP/SIFE) and serum free light chain assay (SFLCA)—can sometimes produce an oligoclonal pattern that can be mistaken for an M spike and suggest disease recurrence.

The study showed that this confusing result was significantly more likely to occur after patients underwent HSCT than after they received chemotherapy.

Gurmukh Singh, MD, PhD, of Augusta University in Augusta, Georgia, reported these findings in the Journal of Clinical Medicine Research.

For this study, Dr Singh looked at lab and clinical data on 251 MM patients treated from January 2010 to December 2016. One hundred and fifty-nine of those patients received autologous HSCTs.

Dr Singh compared results of SPEP/SIFE and/or SFLCA in patients who underwent HSCT and patients who did not. Each patient had at least 3 tests, and, for HSCT recipients, at least 2 of the tests occurred after transplant.

The incidence of oligoclonal patterns was significantly higher in HSCT recipients than in patients who had chemotherapy alone—57.9% and 8.8%, respectively (P=0.000003).

Only 5 of the 159 HSCT recipients had an oligoclonal pattern before treatment, but 92 of them had one afterward.

More than half of the oligoclonal patterns developed within the first year of HSCT. The earliest pattern was detected at 2 months—as soon as the first post-transplant tests were done—and a few occurred as late as 5 years later.

“We want to emphasize that oligoclonal bands should mostly be recognized as a response to treatment and not be mistaken as a recurrence of the original tumor,” Dr Singh said.

He explained that the key clarifier appears to be the location of the M spike when the diagnosis is made compared to the location of new spikes that may show up after HSCT.

“If the original peak was at location A, now the peak is location B, that allows us to determine that it is not the same abnormal, malignant antibody,” he said. “If it’s in a different location, it’s not the same protein. [T]his is just a normal response of recovery of the bone marrow that could be mistaken for recurrence of the disease.”

Micrograph showing MM

Tests used to assess treatment response in multiple myeloma (MM) may often produce confusing results after patients have undergone hematopoietic stem cell transplant (HSCT), a new study suggests.

The tests—serum protein electrophoresis/serum immunofixation electrophoresis (SPEP/SIFE) and serum free light chain assay (SFLCA)—can sometimes produce an oligoclonal pattern that can be mistaken for an M spike and suggest disease recurrence.

The study showed that this confusing result was significantly more likely to occur after patients underwent HSCT than after they received chemotherapy.

Gurmukh Singh, MD, PhD, of Augusta University in Augusta, Georgia, reported these findings in the Journal of Clinical Medicine Research.

For this study, Dr Singh looked at lab and clinical data on 251 MM patients treated from January 2010 to December 2016. One hundred and fifty-nine of those patients received autologous HSCTs.

Dr Singh compared results of SPEP/SIFE and/or SFLCA in patients who underwent HSCT and patients who did not. Each patient had at least 3 tests, and, for HSCT recipients, at least 2 of the tests occurred after transplant.

The incidence of oligoclonal patterns was significantly higher in HSCT recipients than in patients who had chemotherapy alone—57.9% and 8.8%, respectively (P=0.000003).

Only 5 of the 159 HSCT recipients had an oligoclonal pattern before treatment, but 92 of them had one afterward.

More than half of the oligoclonal patterns developed within the first year of HSCT. The earliest pattern was detected at 2 months—as soon as the first post-transplant tests were done—and a few occurred as late as 5 years later.

“We want to emphasize that oligoclonal bands should mostly be recognized as a response to treatment and not be mistaken as a recurrence of the original tumor,” Dr Singh said.

He explained that the key clarifier appears to be the location of the M spike when the diagnosis is made compared to the location of new spikes that may show up after HSCT.

“If the original peak was at location A, now the peak is location B, that allows us to determine that it is not the same abnormal, malignant antibody,” he said. “If it’s in a different location, it’s not the same protein. [T]his is just a normal response of recovery of the bone marrow that could be mistaken for recurrence of the disease.”

Photo by Rhoda Baer

A study of 300 US cancer patients showed that paying for care can cause “overwhelming” financial distress, even when patients have health insurance.

Sixteen percent of the patients studied reported “high or overwhelming” financial distress, spending a median of 31% of their monthly household income on healthcare, not including insurance premiums.

They had a median monthly out-of-pocket cost of $728 (range, $6 to $47,250).

Fumiko Chino, MD, of Duke University Medical Center in Durham, North Carolina, and her colleagues reported these findings in a letter to JAMA Oncology.

The researchers interviewed 300 insured cancer patients for this study. They had a median age of 59.6, and 68.3% were married.

Fifty-six percent of patients had private insurance, 35.7% had Medicare, and 7.3% had Medicaid.

Annual household incomes were as follows:

• 45.7%, $60,000 or greater
• 15.7%, $40,000 to $59,999
• 17.7%, $20,000 to 39,999
• 13.7%, lower than $20,000
• 7.3%, unknown.

The median monthly out-of-pocket cost for care was $592 (range, $3-$47,250), not including insurance premiums. The median relative cost of care was 11% of a patient’s monthly household income.

“Those who spend more than 10% of their income on healthcare costs are considered underinsured,” Dr Chino said. “Learning about the cost-sharing burden on some insured patients is important right now, given the uncertainty in health insurance.”

Most of the patients studied (83.7%, n=251) reported no, low, or average financial distress. Their median relative cost of care was 10% of their monthly household income, and their median monthly out-of-pocket cost was $565 (range, $3 to $26,756). Six percent of these patients had Medicaid, 39% had Medicare, and 53.8% had private insurance.

For the 16.3% of patients (n=49) who reported high or overwhelming financial distress, 67.3% had private insurance, 18.4% had Medicare, and 14.3% had Medicaid. As stated above, their median relative cost of care was 31% of their monthly household income, and their median monthly out-of-pocket cost was $728 (range, $6 to $47,250).

“This study adds to the growing evidence that we need to intervene,” said study author Yousuf Zafar, MD, of Duke Cancer Institute.

“We know there are a lot of barriers that prevent patients from talking about cost with their providers. We need to create tools for patients at risk of financial toxicity and connect them with resources in a timely fashion so they can afford their care.”

Photo by Rhoda Baer

A study of 300 US cancer patients showed that paying for care can cause “overwhelming” financial distress, even when patients have health insurance.

Sixteen percent of the patients studied reported “high or overwhelming” financial distress, spending a median of 31% of their monthly household income on healthcare, not including insurance premiums.

They had a median monthly out-of-pocket cost of $728 (range, $6 to $47,250).

Fumiko Chino, MD, of Duke University Medical Center in Durham, North Carolina, and her colleagues reported these findings in a letter to JAMA Oncology.

The researchers interviewed 300 insured cancer patients for this study. They had a median age of 59.6, and 68.3% were married.

Fifty-six percent of patients had private insurance, 35.7% had Medicare, and 7.3% had Medicaid.

Annual household incomes were as follows:

• 45.7%, $60,000 or greater
• 15.7%, $40,000 to $59,999
• 17.7%, $20,000 to 39,999
• 13.7%, lower than $20,000
• 7.3%, unknown.

The median monthly out-of-pocket cost for care was $592 (range, $3-$47,250), not including insurance premiums. The median relative cost of care was 11% of a patient’s monthly household income.

“Those who spend more than 10% of their income on healthcare costs are considered underinsured,” Dr Chino said. “Learning about the cost-sharing burden on some insured patients is important right now, given the uncertainty in health insurance.”

Most of the patients studied (83.7%, n=251) reported no, low, or average financial distress. Their median relative cost of care was 10% of their monthly household income, and their median monthly out-of-pocket cost was $565 (range, $3 to $26,756). Six percent of these patients had Medicaid, 39% had Medicare, and 53.8% had private insurance.

For the 16.3% of patients (n=49) who reported high or overwhelming financial distress, 67.3% had private insurance, 18.4% had Medicare, and 14.3% had Medicaid. As stated above, their median relative cost of care was 31% of their monthly household income, and their median monthly out-of-pocket cost was $728 (range, $6 to $47,250).

“This study adds to the growing evidence that we need to intervene,” said study author Yousuf Zafar, MD, of Duke Cancer Institute.

“We know there are a lot of barriers that prevent patients from talking about cost with their providers. We need to create tools for patients at risk of financial toxicity and connect them with resources in a timely fashion so they can afford their care.”

Photo by Rhoda Baer

A study of 300 US cancer patients showed that paying for care can cause “overwhelming” financial distress, even when patients have health insurance.

Sixteen percent of the patients studied reported “high or overwhelming” financial distress, spending a median of 31% of their monthly household income on healthcare, not including insurance premiums.

They had a median monthly out-of-pocket cost of $728 (range, $6 to $47,250).

Fumiko Chino, MD, of Duke University Medical Center in Durham, North Carolina, and her colleagues reported these findings in a letter to JAMA Oncology.

The researchers interviewed 300 insured cancer patients for this study. They had a median age of 59.6, and 68.3% were married.

Fifty-six percent of patients had private insurance, 35.7% had Medicare, and 7.3% had Medicaid.

Annual household incomes were as follows:

• 45.7%, $60,000 or greater
• 15.7%, $40,000 to $59,999
• 17.7%, $20,000 to 39,999
• 13.7%, lower than $20,000
• 7.3%, unknown.

The median monthly out-of-pocket cost for care was $592 (range, $3-$47,250), not including insurance premiums. The median relative cost of care was 11% of a patient’s monthly household income.

“Those who spend more than 10% of their income on healthcare costs are considered underinsured,” Dr Chino said. “Learning about the cost-sharing burden on some insured patients is important right now, given the uncertainty in health insurance.”

Most of the patients studied (83.7%, n=251) reported no, low, or average financial distress. Their median relative cost of care was 10% of their monthly household income, and their median monthly out-of-pocket cost was $565 (range, $3 to $26,756). Six percent of these patients had Medicaid, 39% had Medicare, and 53.8% had private insurance.

For the 16.3% of patients (n=49) who reported high or overwhelming financial distress, 67.3% had private insurance, 18.4% had Medicare, and 14.3% had Medicaid. As stated above, their median relative cost of care was 31% of their monthly household income, and their median monthly out-of-pocket cost was $728 (range, $6 to $47,250).

“This study adds to the growing evidence that we need to intervene,” said study author Yousuf Zafar, MD, of Duke Cancer Institute.

“We know there are a lot of barriers that prevent patients from talking about cost with their providers. We need to create tools for patients at risk of financial toxicity and connect them with resources in a timely fashion so they can afford their care.”

Lab mouse

Researchers believe they may have found a way to prevent chemotherapy-induced myelosuppression in acute myeloid leukemia (AML).

The team found that priming mice with the FLT3 inhibitor quizartinib protected multipotent progenitor cells (MPPs) from subsequent treatment with fluorouracil (5-FU) or gemcitabine.

And treatment with quizartinib followed by 5-FU proved more effective against AML than standard induction with cytarabine and doxorubicin.

Samuel Taylor, of the University of Western Australia in Crawley, Australia, and his colleagues reported these results in Science Translational Medicine.

The researchers first found that quizartinib induced “rapid and transient” quiescence of MPPs in C57BL/6 mice.

Quizartinib also provided MPPs with “marked protection” from 5-FU. In these experiments, a 10 mg/kg dose of quizartinib was given to mice at the same time as a 150 mg/kg dose of 5-FU. This treatment provided MPPs with 4- to 5-fold greater protection than vehicle control.

Subsequent experiments revealed the optimal dose and schedule for quizartinib. A priming dose of 30 mg/kg given 6 hours before 5-FU provided “slightly greater” protection to hematopoietic stem and progenitor cells than a 10 mg/kg dose, with significantly greater protection observed for short-term hematopoietic stem cells.

The researchers then showed that priming with quizartinib allowed for “rapid recovery of bone marrow cellularity” after treatment with 5-FU. Bone marrow cells were fully restored by day 8 after treatment in quizartinib-primed mice but not in vehicle-primed mice.

Quizartinib priming also protected mice from multiple rounds of treatment with 5-FU (15 cycles in some mice) and from myelosuppression induced by gemcitabine.

Finally, the researchers tested quizartinib followed by 5-FU in mouse models of AML. They found the treatment was more effective than treatment with cytarabine and doxorubicin in both FLT3-ITD(F692L)/NPM1c AML and NPM1c/Nras^G12D AML.

FLT3-ITD(F692L)/NPM1c AML

The researchers transplanted 15 non-irradiated B6.CD45.1 mice with 3 × 10⁵ spleen cells each from a FLT3-ITD(F691L)/NPM1c mouse that succumbed to AML at 6 weeks of age. Sixteen days after transplant, the mice were given one of the following:

• No treatment
• 10-day cycles of quizartinib (30 mg/kg) followed 6 hours later by 5-FU (150 mg/kg)
• Cytarabine plus doxorubicin (5+3).

All 5 of the untreated mice died within 30 days of transplantation, exhibiting high white blood cell (WBC) counts and splenomegaly.

The 5+3 mice received 2 cycles of treatment (days 16 to 21 and 36 to 41). All 5 had died by day 56 after transplantation, with high WBC counts and splenomegaly.

One the other hand, 4 of the 5 mice in the quizartinib/5-FU arm were still healthy at 176 days after transplantation and 80 days after stopping treatment. There were no detectable CD45.2+ AML cells when the mice were last bled on day 160, and they had normal WBC counts. There were no AML cells detectable in the animals’ bone marrow after they were killed at day 176.

The quizartinib/5-FU mouse that died before day 176 is believed to have developed resistance to 5-FU. This animal died 121 days after transplantation.

NPM1c/ Nras^G12D AML

For another AML model, the researchers crossed NPM1c-mutant mice with Nras^G12D-mutant mice. The team transplanted spleen cells from NPM1c/Nras^G12D leukemic mice into 15 non-irradiated B6.CD45.1 recipient mice.

Fifteen days after transplantation, the NPM1c/ Nras^G12D mice received one of the following:

• No treatment
• Quizartinib and 5-FU as above
• Cytarabine plus doxorubicin (5+3).

All 5 untreated mice died by day 32 after transplantation, and all 5 mice that received 5+3 died by day 35. Both groups of mice had high WBC counts and splenomegaly.

Mice in the quizartinib/5-FU arm initially received 4 cycles of treatment, starting on days 15, 25, 35, and 45 after transplantation. On day 53, they had minimal or undetectable numbers of CD45.2+ AML cells, and WBC counts were normal or slightly below normal.

At day 81—a month after stopping treatment—4 of the mice had detectable CD45.2+ AML cells in their blood. So they restarted treatment the next day. After 4 additional cycles, AML cells were undetectable in all 5 mice. At day 146—a month after stopping the second round of treatment—AML cells again became detectable in the blood.

The mice did not receive any additional treatment. One died at day 196, and 1 was killed at day 197 due to weight loss related to feeding difficulties (but this mouse did not show signs of AML).

The other 3 mice were “active and healthy” until they were killed at day 214. However, they had “high proportions” of CD45.2+ myeloid cells in their blood since day 183. And 2 of the mice had increased WBC counts from day 197.

Lab mouse

Researchers believe they may have found a way to prevent chemotherapy-induced myelosuppression in acute myeloid leukemia (AML).

The team found that priming mice with the FLT3 inhibitor quizartinib protected multipotent progenitor cells (MPPs) from subsequent treatment with fluorouracil (5-FU) or gemcitabine.

And treatment with quizartinib followed by 5-FU proved more effective against AML than standard induction with cytarabine and doxorubicin.

Samuel Taylor, of the University of Western Australia in Crawley, Australia, and his colleagues reported these results in Science Translational Medicine.

The researchers first found that quizartinib induced “rapid and transient” quiescence of MPPs in C57BL/6 mice.

Quizartinib also provided MPPs with “marked protection” from 5-FU. In these experiments, a 10 mg/kg dose of quizartinib was given to mice at the same time as a 150 mg/kg dose of 5-FU. This treatment provided MPPs with 4- to 5-fold greater protection than vehicle control.

Subsequent experiments revealed the optimal dose and schedule for quizartinib. A priming dose of 30 mg/kg given 6 hours before 5-FU provided “slightly greater” protection to hematopoietic stem and progenitor cells than a 10 mg/kg dose, with significantly greater protection observed for short-term hematopoietic stem cells.

The researchers then showed that priming with quizartinib allowed for “rapid recovery of bone marrow cellularity” after treatment with 5-FU. Bone marrow cells were fully restored by day 8 after treatment in quizartinib-primed mice but not in vehicle-primed mice.

Quizartinib priming also protected mice from multiple rounds of treatment with 5-FU (15 cycles in some mice) and from myelosuppression induced by gemcitabine.

Finally, the researchers tested quizartinib followed by 5-FU in mouse models of AML. They found the treatment was more effective than treatment with cytarabine and doxorubicin in both FLT3-ITD(F692L)/NPM1c AML and NPM1c/Nras^G12D AML.

FLT3-ITD(F692L)/NPM1c AML

The researchers transplanted 15 non-irradiated B6.CD45.1 mice with 3 × 10⁵ spleen cells each from a FLT3-ITD(F691L)/NPM1c mouse that succumbed to AML at 6 weeks of age. Sixteen days after transplant, the mice were given one of the following:

• No treatment
• 10-day cycles of quizartinib (30 mg/kg) followed 6 hours later by 5-FU (150 mg/kg)
• Cytarabine plus doxorubicin (5+3).

All 5 of the untreated mice died within 30 days of transplantation, exhibiting high white blood cell (WBC) counts and splenomegaly.

The 5+3 mice received 2 cycles of treatment (days 16 to 21 and 36 to 41). All 5 had died by day 56 after transplantation, with high WBC counts and splenomegaly.

One the other hand, 4 of the 5 mice in the quizartinib/5-FU arm were still healthy at 176 days after transplantation and 80 days after stopping treatment. There were no detectable CD45.2+ AML cells when the mice were last bled on day 160, and they had normal WBC counts. There were no AML cells detectable in the animals’ bone marrow after they were killed at day 176.

The quizartinib/5-FU mouse that died before day 176 is believed to have developed resistance to 5-FU. This animal died 121 days after transplantation.

NPM1c/ Nras^G12D AML

For another AML model, the researchers crossed NPM1c-mutant mice with Nras^G12D-mutant mice. The team transplanted spleen cells from NPM1c/Nras^G12D leukemic mice into 15 non-irradiated B6.CD45.1 recipient mice.

Fifteen days after transplantation, the NPM1c/ Nras^G12D mice received one of the following:

• No treatment
• Quizartinib and 5-FU as above
• Cytarabine plus doxorubicin (5+3).

All 5 untreated mice died by day 32 after transplantation, and all 5 mice that received 5+3 died by day 35. Both groups of mice had high WBC counts and splenomegaly.

Mice in the quizartinib/5-FU arm initially received 4 cycles of treatment, starting on days 15, 25, 35, and 45 after transplantation. On day 53, they had minimal or undetectable numbers of CD45.2+ AML cells, and WBC counts were normal or slightly below normal.

At day 81—a month after stopping treatment—4 of the mice had detectable CD45.2+ AML cells in their blood. So they restarted treatment the next day. After 4 additional cycles, AML cells were undetectable in all 5 mice. At day 146—a month after stopping the second round of treatment—AML cells again became detectable in the blood.

The mice did not receive any additional treatment. One died at day 196, and 1 was killed at day 197 due to weight loss related to feeding difficulties (but this mouse did not show signs of AML).

The other 3 mice were “active and healthy” until they were killed at day 214. However, they had “high proportions” of CD45.2+ myeloid cells in their blood since day 183. And 2 of the mice had increased WBC counts from day 197.

Lab mouse

Researchers believe they may have found a way to prevent chemotherapy-induced myelosuppression in acute myeloid leukemia (AML).

The team found that priming mice with the FLT3 inhibitor quizartinib protected multipotent progenitor cells (MPPs) from subsequent treatment with fluorouracil (5-FU) or gemcitabine.

And treatment with quizartinib followed by 5-FU proved more effective against AML than standard induction with cytarabine and doxorubicin.

Samuel Taylor, of the University of Western Australia in Crawley, Australia, and his colleagues reported these results in Science Translational Medicine.

The researchers first found that quizartinib induced “rapid and transient” quiescence of MPPs in C57BL/6 mice.

Quizartinib also provided MPPs with “marked protection” from 5-FU. In these experiments, a 10 mg/kg dose of quizartinib was given to mice at the same time as a 150 mg/kg dose of 5-FU. This treatment provided MPPs with 4- to 5-fold greater protection than vehicle control.

Subsequent experiments revealed the optimal dose and schedule for quizartinib. A priming dose of 30 mg/kg given 6 hours before 5-FU provided “slightly greater” protection to hematopoietic stem and progenitor cells than a 10 mg/kg dose, with significantly greater protection observed for short-term hematopoietic stem cells.

The researchers then showed that priming with quizartinib allowed for “rapid recovery of bone marrow cellularity” after treatment with 5-FU. Bone marrow cells were fully restored by day 8 after treatment in quizartinib-primed mice but not in vehicle-primed mice.

Quizartinib priming also protected mice from multiple rounds of treatment with 5-FU (15 cycles in some mice) and from myelosuppression induced by gemcitabine.

Finally, the researchers tested quizartinib followed by 5-FU in mouse models of AML. They found the treatment was more effective than treatment with cytarabine and doxorubicin in both FLT3-ITD(F692L)/NPM1c AML and NPM1c/Nras^G12D AML.

FLT3-ITD(F692L)/NPM1c AML

The researchers transplanted 15 non-irradiated B6.CD45.1 mice with 3 × 10⁵ spleen cells each from a FLT3-ITD(F691L)/NPM1c mouse that succumbed to AML at 6 weeks of age. Sixteen days after transplant, the mice were given one of the following:

• No treatment
• 10-day cycles of quizartinib (30 mg/kg) followed 6 hours later by 5-FU (150 mg/kg)
• Cytarabine plus doxorubicin (5+3).

All 5 of the untreated mice died within 30 days of transplantation, exhibiting high white blood cell (WBC) counts and splenomegaly.

The 5+3 mice received 2 cycles of treatment (days 16 to 21 and 36 to 41). All 5 had died by day 56 after transplantation, with high WBC counts and splenomegaly.

One the other hand, 4 of the 5 mice in the quizartinib/5-FU arm were still healthy at 176 days after transplantation and 80 days after stopping treatment. There were no detectable CD45.2+ AML cells when the mice were last bled on day 160, and they had normal WBC counts. There were no AML cells detectable in the animals’ bone marrow after they were killed at day 176.

The quizartinib/5-FU mouse that died before day 176 is believed to have developed resistance to 5-FU. This animal died 121 days after transplantation.

NPM1c/ Nras^G12D AML

For another AML model, the researchers crossed NPM1c-mutant mice with Nras^G12D-mutant mice. The team transplanted spleen cells from NPM1c/Nras^G12D leukemic mice into 15 non-irradiated B6.CD45.1 recipient mice.

Fifteen days after transplantation, the NPM1c/ Nras^G12D mice received one of the following:

• No treatment
• Quizartinib and 5-FU as above
• Cytarabine plus doxorubicin (5+3).

All 5 untreated mice died by day 32 after transplantation, and all 5 mice that received 5+3 died by day 35. Both groups of mice had high WBC counts and splenomegaly.

Mice in the quizartinib/5-FU arm initially received 4 cycles of treatment, starting on days 15, 25, 35, and 45 after transplantation. On day 53, they had minimal or undetectable numbers of CD45.2+ AML cells, and WBC counts were normal or slightly below normal.

At day 81—a month after stopping treatment—4 of the mice had detectable CD45.2+ AML cells in their blood. So they restarted treatment the next day. After 4 additional cycles, AML cells were undetectable in all 5 mice. At day 146—a month after stopping the second round of treatment—AML cells again became detectable in the blood.

The mice did not receive any additional treatment. One died at day 196, and 1 was killed at day 197 due to weight loss related to feeding difficulties (but this mouse did not show signs of AML).

The other 3 mice were “active and healthy” until they were killed at day 214. However, they had “high proportions” of CD45.2+ myeloid cells in their blood since day 183. And 2 of the mice had increased WBC counts from day 197.

Photo from US Agency for International Development

A large study suggests the use of rapid diagnostic tests (RDTs) for malaria can reduce overuse of artemisinin combination therapies (ACTs), but malaria may also go untreated.

Researchers analyzed data from more than 500,000 patient visits across malaria-endemic regions of Africa and Afghanistan.

They found that, in most settings, the introduction of RDTs improved antimalarial targeting.

However, a substantial number of patients who tested positive for malaria appeared to go untreated, and negative test results prompted a shift to antibiotic prescriptions.

Katia Bruxvoort, PhD, of London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine in the UK, and her colleagues reported these results in the American Journal of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene.

The researchers analyzed drug prescriptions written from 2007 to 2013 in 562,368 patient encounters documented in 10 related studies. Eight studies were conducted in sub-Saharan Africa (Cameroon, Ghana, Nigeria, Tanzania, and Uganda), and 2 were conducted in Afghanistan.

Overall, RDTs appeared to limit—though not eliminate—routine prescription of ACTs to patients presenting with fever but not malaria.

In most cases, fewer than 30% of patients who tested negative for malaria still received ACTs. However, in Cameroon and Ghana, 39% to 49% of patients who tested negative for malaria received ACTs.

“[I]n many places, a reduction in the use of ACTs was accompanied by an increase in the use of antibiotics, which may drive up the risk of antibiotic-resistant infections,” Dr Bruxvoort noted.

Overall, 75% of patients studied left the clinic with either an antibiotic or an ACT.

In most areas studied, antibiotics were given to 40% to 80% of patients who had tested negative for malaria.

The researchers believe the shift to antibiotic use after ruling out malaria may indicate that many patients and providers are not comfortable treating a fever using only supportive care (taking a fever-reducing drug and drinking plenty of fluids).

“A key challenge is that we don’t currently have a reliable way to determine which fevers are evidence of a bacterial infection that requires a specific antibiotic treatment and which fevers will resolve with supportive care only,” Dr Bruxvoort said.

In addition, Dr Bruxvoort and her colleagues were surprised to find that, in 5 of the 8 African studies, more than 20% of patients who tested positive for malaria were not prescribed ACTs.

“Drug supply issues did not seem to be a problem in most of the areas where these patients sought treatment,” Dr Bruxvoort said. “There might be other reasons either patients or providers are not using ACTs in these contexts, but the issue of undertreating malaria, even when there is clear evidence of the disease, is troubling and deserves further study.”

Photo from US Agency for International Development

A large study suggests the use of rapid diagnostic tests (RDTs) for malaria can reduce overuse of artemisinin combination therapies (ACTs), but malaria may also go untreated.

Researchers analyzed data from more than 500,000 patient visits across malaria-endemic regions of Africa and Afghanistan.

They found that, in most settings, the introduction of RDTs improved antimalarial targeting.

However, a substantial number of patients who tested positive for malaria appeared to go untreated, and negative test results prompted a shift to antibiotic prescriptions.

Katia Bruxvoort, PhD, of London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine in the UK, and her colleagues reported these results in the American Journal of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene.

The researchers analyzed drug prescriptions written from 2007 to 2013 in 562,368 patient encounters documented in 10 related studies. Eight studies were conducted in sub-Saharan Africa (Cameroon, Ghana, Nigeria, Tanzania, and Uganda), and 2 were conducted in Afghanistan.

Overall, RDTs appeared to limit—though not eliminate—routine prescription of ACTs to patients presenting with fever but not malaria.

In most cases, fewer than 30% of patients who tested negative for malaria still received ACTs. However, in Cameroon and Ghana, 39% to 49% of patients who tested negative for malaria received ACTs.

“[I]n many places, a reduction in the use of ACTs was accompanied by an increase in the use of antibiotics, which may drive up the risk of antibiotic-resistant infections,” Dr Bruxvoort noted.

Overall, 75% of patients studied left the clinic with either an antibiotic or an ACT.

In most areas studied, antibiotics were given to 40% to 80% of patients who had tested negative for malaria.

The researchers believe the shift to antibiotic use after ruling out malaria may indicate that many patients and providers are not comfortable treating a fever using only supportive care (taking a fever-reducing drug and drinking plenty of fluids).

“A key challenge is that we don’t currently have a reliable way to determine which fevers are evidence of a bacterial infection that requires a specific antibiotic treatment and which fevers will resolve with supportive care only,” Dr Bruxvoort said.

In addition, Dr Bruxvoort and her colleagues were surprised to find that, in 5 of the 8 African studies, more than 20% of patients who tested positive for malaria were not prescribed ACTs.

“Drug supply issues did not seem to be a problem in most of the areas where these patients sought treatment,” Dr Bruxvoort said. “There might be other reasons either patients or providers are not using ACTs in these contexts, but the issue of undertreating malaria, even when there is clear evidence of the disease, is troubling and deserves further study.”

Photo from US Agency for International Development

A large study suggests the use of rapid diagnostic tests (RDTs) for malaria can reduce overuse of artemisinin combination therapies (ACTs), but malaria may also go untreated.

Researchers analyzed data from more than 500,000 patient visits across malaria-endemic regions of Africa and Afghanistan.

They found that, in most settings, the introduction of RDTs improved antimalarial targeting.

However, a substantial number of patients who tested positive for malaria appeared to go untreated, and negative test results prompted a shift to antibiotic prescriptions.

Katia Bruxvoort, PhD, of London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine in the UK, and her colleagues reported these results in the American Journal of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene.

The researchers analyzed drug prescriptions written from 2007 to 2013 in 562,368 patient encounters documented in 10 related studies. Eight studies were conducted in sub-Saharan Africa (Cameroon, Ghana, Nigeria, Tanzania, and Uganda), and 2 were conducted in Afghanistan.

Overall, RDTs appeared to limit—though not eliminate—routine prescription of ACTs to patients presenting with fever but not malaria.

In most cases, fewer than 30% of patients who tested negative for malaria still received ACTs. However, in Cameroon and Ghana, 39% to 49% of patients who tested negative for malaria received ACTs.

“[I]n many places, a reduction in the use of ACTs was accompanied by an increase in the use of antibiotics, which may drive up the risk of antibiotic-resistant infections,” Dr Bruxvoort noted.

Overall, 75% of patients studied left the clinic with either an antibiotic or an ACT.

In most areas studied, antibiotics were given to 40% to 80% of patients who had tested negative for malaria.

The researchers believe the shift to antibiotic use after ruling out malaria may indicate that many patients and providers are not comfortable treating a fever using only supportive care (taking a fever-reducing drug and drinking plenty of fluids).

“A key challenge is that we don’t currently have a reliable way to determine which fevers are evidence of a bacterial infection that requires a specific antibiotic treatment and which fevers will resolve with supportive care only,” Dr Bruxvoort said.

In addition, Dr Bruxvoort and her colleagues were surprised to find that, in 5 of the 8 African studies, more than 20% of patients who tested positive for malaria were not prescribed ACTs.

“Drug supply issues did not seem to be a problem in most of the areas where these patients sought treatment,” Dr Bruxvoort said. “There might be other reasons either patients or providers are not using ACTs in these contexts, but the issue of undertreating malaria, even when there is clear evidence of the disease, is troubling and deserves further study.”

Henrique Orlandi Mourao

Researchers have found evidence to suggest that a type of acute myeloid leukemia (AML) depends on the production of heme.

The group’s work has revealed 2 ways to target heme synthesis that might be used to treat this type of AML, which is driven by the oncogene MYCN.

John Schuetz, PhD, of St. Jude Children’s Research Hospital in Memphis, Tennessee, and his colleague described this research in JCI Insight.

Previous research had suggested that heme production was affected in leukemia.

However, Dr Schuetz said, “Absolutely nothing was known about the role of heme biosynthesis [in AML] before our work.”

The researchers’ first clue regarding heme’s role in AML arose from a computer search. The team searched a genomic database for other genes that were abnormally switched on in MYCN-driven AML.

They found that UROD was highly activated and noted that UROD is part of the molecular machinery that synthesizes heme.

Especially significant, Dr Schuetz said, was the finding that MYCN-driven AML with the most over-activated UROD was far more lethal than other AMLs.

The researchers found that cells with over-activated MYCN consumed more oxygen and depended on the production of heme for self-renewal and oncogenic transformation. But the team was able to block cancer cell self-renewal in the MYCN cells by blocking heme synthesis.

The researchers also found they could suppress self-renewal by blocking ABCG2, a “relief-valve” molecule that rids the cells of porphyrin, a building-block molecule of heme.

Blocking ABCG2 caused the buildup of porphyrin, which is toxic to the leukemia cells. However, blocking ABCG2 in normal cells produced no ill effects.

In mouse models of MYCN leukemia, the researchers tested a strategy of knocking out ABCG2. These knockout mice had significantly slower disease progression and longer survival.

What’s more, the team found they could cure leukemia in these mice by inhibiting ABCG2 and ramping up the heme machinery.

“Our findings suggest 2 drug strategies to treat AML,” Dr Schuetz said. “One would be to target UROD, which would reduce heme biosynthesis. Such drugs would selectively affect leukemia cells because they are so dependent on heme.”

“The other strategy would be to use drugs to inhibit the relief-valve protein and, at the same time, administer a chemical that is a precursor of heme. This would cause a buildup of toxic molecules that are part of the heme synthesis pathway.”

Dr Schuetz said other cancers with an over-activated heme pathway might also be vulnerable to such a treatment strategy.

He and his colleagues plan to extend their understanding of the heme machinery in AML with further studies. For example, they don’t know whether heme’s role in cell respiration is the only important one in supporting AML progression, since heme plays a wide range of roles in cells.

The researchers are also planning to test whether drugs that suppress UROD function in the heme-production machinery can effectively battle AML.

Henrique Orlandi Mourao

Researchers have found evidence to suggest that a type of acute myeloid leukemia (AML) depends on the production of heme.

The group’s work has revealed 2 ways to target heme synthesis that might be used to treat this type of AML, which is driven by the oncogene MYCN.

John Schuetz, PhD, of St. Jude Children’s Research Hospital in Memphis, Tennessee, and his colleague described this research in JCI Insight.

Previous research had suggested that heme production was affected in leukemia.

However, Dr Schuetz said, “Absolutely nothing was known about the role of heme biosynthesis [in AML] before our work.”

The researchers’ first clue regarding heme’s role in AML arose from a computer search. The team searched a genomic database for other genes that were abnormally switched on in MYCN-driven AML.

They found that UROD was highly activated and noted that UROD is part of the molecular machinery that synthesizes heme.

Especially significant, Dr Schuetz said, was the finding that MYCN-driven AML with the most over-activated UROD was far more lethal than other AMLs.

The researchers found that cells with over-activated MYCN consumed more oxygen and depended on the production of heme for self-renewal and oncogenic transformation. But the team was able to block cancer cell self-renewal in the MYCN cells by blocking heme synthesis.

The researchers also found they could suppress self-renewal by blocking ABCG2, a “relief-valve” molecule that rids the cells of porphyrin, a building-block molecule of heme.

Blocking ABCG2 caused the buildup of porphyrin, which is toxic to the leukemia cells. However, blocking ABCG2 in normal cells produced no ill effects.

In mouse models of MYCN leukemia, the researchers tested a strategy of knocking out ABCG2. These knockout mice had significantly slower disease progression and longer survival.

What’s more, the team found they could cure leukemia in these mice by inhibiting ABCG2 and ramping up the heme machinery.

“Our findings suggest 2 drug strategies to treat AML,” Dr Schuetz said. “One would be to target UROD, which would reduce heme biosynthesis. Such drugs would selectively affect leukemia cells because they are so dependent on heme.”

“The other strategy would be to use drugs to inhibit the relief-valve protein and, at the same time, administer a chemical that is a precursor of heme. This would cause a buildup of toxic molecules that are part of the heme synthesis pathway.”

Dr Schuetz said other cancers with an over-activated heme pathway might also be vulnerable to such a treatment strategy.

He and his colleagues plan to extend their understanding of the heme machinery in AML with further studies. For example, they don’t know whether heme’s role in cell respiration is the only important one in supporting AML progression, since heme plays a wide range of roles in cells.

The researchers are also planning to test whether drugs that suppress UROD function in the heme-production machinery can effectively battle AML.

Henrique Orlandi Mourao

Researchers have found evidence to suggest that a type of acute myeloid leukemia (AML) depends on the production of heme.

The group’s work has revealed 2 ways to target heme synthesis that might be used to treat this type of AML, which is driven by the oncogene MYCN.

John Schuetz, PhD, of St. Jude Children’s Research Hospital in Memphis, Tennessee, and his colleague described this research in JCI Insight.

Previous research had suggested that heme production was affected in leukemia.

However, Dr Schuetz said, “Absolutely nothing was known about the role of heme biosynthesis [in AML] before our work.”

The researchers’ first clue regarding heme’s role in AML arose from a computer search. The team searched a genomic database for other genes that were abnormally switched on in MYCN-driven AML.

They found that UROD was highly activated and noted that UROD is part of the molecular machinery that synthesizes heme.

Especially significant, Dr Schuetz said, was the finding that MYCN-driven AML with the most over-activated UROD was far more lethal than other AMLs.

The researchers found that cells with over-activated MYCN consumed more oxygen and depended on the production of heme for self-renewal and oncogenic transformation. But the team was able to block cancer cell self-renewal in the MYCN cells by blocking heme synthesis.

The researchers also found they could suppress self-renewal by blocking ABCG2, a “relief-valve” molecule that rids the cells of porphyrin, a building-block molecule of heme.

Blocking ABCG2 caused the buildup of porphyrin, which is toxic to the leukemia cells. However, blocking ABCG2 in normal cells produced no ill effects.

In mouse models of MYCN leukemia, the researchers tested a strategy of knocking out ABCG2. These knockout mice had significantly slower disease progression and longer survival.

What’s more, the team found they could cure leukemia in these mice by inhibiting ABCG2 and ramping up the heme machinery.

“Our findings suggest 2 drug strategies to treat AML,” Dr Schuetz said. “One would be to target UROD, which would reduce heme biosynthesis. Such drugs would selectively affect leukemia cells because they are so dependent on heme.”

“The other strategy would be to use drugs to inhibit the relief-valve protein and, at the same time, administer a chemical that is a precursor of heme. This would cause a buildup of toxic molecules that are part of the heme synthesis pathway.”

Dr Schuetz said other cancers with an over-activated heme pathway might also be vulnerable to such a treatment strategy.

He and his colleagues plan to extend their understanding of the heme machinery in AML with further studies. For example, they don’t know whether heme’s role in cell respiration is the only important one in supporting AML progression, since heme plays a wide range of roles in cells.

The researchers are also planning to test whether drugs that suppress UROD function in the heme-production machinery can effectively battle AML.

Photo by Diane Reid

A new study suggests patients with advanced cancer who suffer cardiac arrest in the hospital have a survival rate of less than 10%, which is about half the rate of patients without cancer who suffer cardiac arrest.

This finding helps to clear up some myths about cardiac arrest survival and can be used as a guidepost when hospitalized cancer patients and their families consider do-not-resuscitate (DNR) orders, said Jeffrey T. Bruckel, MD, of the University of Rochester Medical Center in New York.

“We’re hopeful that our study, in some way, will help doctors and cancer patients make more informed decisions about the end of life,” Dr Bruckel said. “It’s very important to have early, frank discussions around the goals of care.”

Dr Bruckel and his colleagues published their study in the Journal of Oncology Practice.

The researchers used a US-wide resuscitation registry to evaluate survival after cardiac arrest in patients treated at 369 hospitals.

The study excluded patients with implantable defibrillators and those who were admitted for surgery, emergency room treatment, rehabilitation, or treatment from cardiac catheterization labs or interventional radiology.

Of the 47,157 eligible patients who experienced cardiac arrest, 14% (n=6585) had advanced cancer, including hematologic malignancies.

After cardiac arrest, 57.5% of the advanced cancer patients were resuscitated successfully, as were 63% of non-cancer patients (P<0.001).

After resuscitation, 9.6% of the cancer patients survived to be discharged, compared to 19.2% of non-cancer patients (P<0.001).

When the researchers adjusted their analysis for potential confounders, results were similar. The rate of successful resuscitation was 52.3% in advanced cancer patients and 56.6% in non-cancer patients (P<0.001). The rate of survival to discharge was 7.4% and 13.4%, respectively (P<0.001).

Dr Bruckel said there was no evidence to suggest that patients with advanced cancer received less aggressive resuscitation care.

However, there was a significant difference in the mean duration of resuscitation time among non-survivors with cancer—22.5 minutes—and non-survivors without cancer—24.2 minutes (P<0.001). After adjustment, the mean duration of resuscitation was 22.5 minutes and 24.1 minutes, respectively (P<0.001).

Cancer patients were more likely than those without cancer to sign DNR orders after resuscitation—55.6% and 43%, respectively (P<0.001). Results were similar after adjustment—50.4% and 41.6%, respectively (P<0.001).

Dr Bruckel and his colleagues said there were several limitations to this study, including a lack of detailed data on the types of advanced cancer and cancer treatments being given at the time of cardiac arrest.

Therefore, the next step in advancing this work is to gather data on the types of cancer diagnosis and treatment plans of patients who undergo in-hospital cardiac arrest.

Dr Bruckel also believes it is important to know how patients feel about this data and how both patients and physicians are using this data in decision-making.

“A large component of end-of-life care involves patient and family care decision-making, and a lot of that is driven by the routine discussions that we have,” Dr Bruckel said. “Not every patient is going to want detailed information, but for those that do, it’s important to have it. It’s important to tell them what we know.” 

Photo by Diane Reid

A new study suggests patients with advanced cancer who suffer cardiac arrest in the hospital have a survival rate of less than 10%, which is about half the rate of patients without cancer who suffer cardiac arrest.

This finding helps to clear up some myths about cardiac arrest survival and can be used as a guidepost when hospitalized cancer patients and their families consider do-not-resuscitate (DNR) orders, said Jeffrey T. Bruckel, MD, of the University of Rochester Medical Center in New York.

“We’re hopeful that our study, in some way, will help doctors and cancer patients make more informed decisions about the end of life,” Dr Bruckel said. “It’s very important to have early, frank discussions around the goals of care.”

Dr Bruckel and his colleagues published their study in the Journal of Oncology Practice.

The researchers used a US-wide resuscitation registry to evaluate survival after cardiac arrest in patients treated at 369 hospitals.

The study excluded patients with implantable defibrillators and those who were admitted for surgery, emergency room treatment, rehabilitation, or treatment from cardiac catheterization labs or interventional radiology.

Of the 47,157 eligible patients who experienced cardiac arrest, 14% (n=6585) had advanced cancer, including hematologic malignancies.

After cardiac arrest, 57.5% of the advanced cancer patients were resuscitated successfully, as were 63% of non-cancer patients (P<0.001).

After resuscitation, 9.6% of the cancer patients survived to be discharged, compared to 19.2% of non-cancer patients (P<0.001).

When the researchers adjusted their analysis for potential confounders, results were similar. The rate of successful resuscitation was 52.3% in advanced cancer patients and 56.6% in non-cancer patients (P<0.001). The rate of survival to discharge was 7.4% and 13.4%, respectively (P<0.001).

Dr Bruckel said there was no evidence to suggest that patients with advanced cancer received less aggressive resuscitation care.

However, there was a significant difference in the mean duration of resuscitation time among non-survivors with cancer—22.5 minutes—and non-survivors without cancer—24.2 minutes (P<0.001). After adjustment, the mean duration of resuscitation was 22.5 minutes and 24.1 minutes, respectively (P<0.001).

Cancer patients were more likely than those without cancer to sign DNR orders after resuscitation—55.6% and 43%, respectively (P<0.001). Results were similar after adjustment—50.4% and 41.6%, respectively (P<0.001).

Dr Bruckel and his colleagues said there were several limitations to this study, including a lack of detailed data on the types of advanced cancer and cancer treatments being given at the time of cardiac arrest.

Therefore, the next step in advancing this work is to gather data on the types of cancer diagnosis and treatment plans of patients who undergo in-hospital cardiac arrest.

Dr Bruckel also believes it is important to know how patients feel about this data and how both patients and physicians are using this data in decision-making.

“A large component of end-of-life care involves patient and family care decision-making, and a lot of that is driven by the routine discussions that we have,” Dr Bruckel said. “Not every patient is going to want detailed information, but for those that do, it’s important to have it. It’s important to tell them what we know.” 

Photo by Diane Reid

A new study suggests patients with advanced cancer who suffer cardiac arrest in the hospital have a survival rate of less than 10%, which is about half the rate of patients without cancer who suffer cardiac arrest.

This finding helps to clear up some myths about cardiac arrest survival and can be used as a guidepost when hospitalized cancer patients and their families consider do-not-resuscitate (DNR) orders, said Jeffrey T. Bruckel, MD, of the University of Rochester Medical Center in New York.

“We’re hopeful that our study, in some way, will help doctors and cancer patients make more informed decisions about the end of life,” Dr Bruckel said. “It’s very important to have early, frank discussions around the goals of care.”

Dr Bruckel and his colleagues published their study in the Journal of Oncology Practice.

The researchers used a US-wide resuscitation registry to evaluate survival after cardiac arrest in patients treated at 369 hospitals.

The study excluded patients with implantable defibrillators and those who were admitted for surgery, emergency room treatment, rehabilitation, or treatment from cardiac catheterization labs or interventional radiology.

Of the 47,157 eligible patients who experienced cardiac arrest, 14% (n=6585) had advanced cancer, including hematologic malignancies.

After cardiac arrest, 57.5% of the advanced cancer patients were resuscitated successfully, as were 63% of non-cancer patients (P<0.001).

After resuscitation, 9.6% of the cancer patients survived to be discharged, compared to 19.2% of non-cancer patients (P<0.001).

When the researchers adjusted their analysis for potential confounders, results were similar. The rate of successful resuscitation was 52.3% in advanced cancer patients and 56.6% in non-cancer patients (P<0.001). The rate of survival to discharge was 7.4% and 13.4%, respectively (P<0.001).

Dr Bruckel said there was no evidence to suggest that patients with advanced cancer received less aggressive resuscitation care.

However, there was a significant difference in the mean duration of resuscitation time among non-survivors with cancer—22.5 minutes—and non-survivors without cancer—24.2 minutes (P<0.001). After adjustment, the mean duration of resuscitation was 22.5 minutes and 24.1 minutes, respectively (P<0.001).

Cancer patients were more likely than those without cancer to sign DNR orders after resuscitation—55.6% and 43%, respectively (P<0.001). Results were similar after adjustment—50.4% and 41.6%, respectively (P<0.001).

Dr Bruckel and his colleagues said there were several limitations to this study, including a lack of detailed data on the types of advanced cancer and cancer treatments being given at the time of cardiac arrest.

Therefore, the next step in advancing this work is to gather data on the types of cancer diagnosis and treatment plans of patients who undergo in-hospital cardiac arrest.

Dr Bruckel also believes it is important to know how patients feel about this data and how both patients and physicians are using this data in decision-making.

“A large component of end-of-life care involves patient and family care decision-making, and a lot of that is driven by the routine discussions that we have,” Dr Bruckel said. “Not every patient is going to want detailed information, but for those that do, it’s important to have it. It’s important to tell them what we know.” 

Photo by Darren Baker

A database containing information on more than 11,000 tumors is now available to researchers studying pediatric cancers.

The database was created as part of UC Santa Cruz Genomics Institute’s Treehouse Childhood Cancer Initiative.

The goal of this initiative is to allow researchers to analyze their patients’ data alongside data from thousands of patients with pediatric and adult cancers, including leukemias and lymphomas.

The intention is to help researchers find hidden causes of cancer that may be missed when they analyze a patient’s data in isolation.

The database, which is available at https://treehouse.xenahubs.net, contains RNA-sequencing gene expression data, as well as information on patients’ age, sex, and disease.

Photo by Darren Baker

A database containing information on more than 11,000 tumors is now available to researchers studying pediatric cancers.

The database was created as part of UC Santa Cruz Genomics Institute’s Treehouse Childhood Cancer Initiative.

The goal of this initiative is to allow researchers to analyze their patients’ data alongside data from thousands of patients with pediatric and adult cancers, including leukemias and lymphomas.

The intention is to help researchers find hidden causes of cancer that may be missed when they analyze a patient’s data in isolation.

The database, which is available at https://treehouse.xenahubs.net, contains RNA-sequencing gene expression data, as well as information on patients’ age, sex, and disease.

Photo by Darren Baker

A database containing information on more than 11,000 tumors is now available to researchers studying pediatric cancers.

The database was created as part of UC Santa Cruz Genomics Institute’s Treehouse Childhood Cancer Initiative.

The goal of this initiative is to allow researchers to analyze their patients’ data alongside data from thousands of patients with pediatric and adult cancers, including leukemias and lymphomas.

The intention is to help researchers find hidden causes of cancer that may be missed when they analyze a patient’s data in isolation.

The database, which is available at https://treehouse.xenahubs.net, contains RNA-sequencing gene expression data, as well as information on patients’ age, sex, and disease.