Jane van Dis, MD

Pique-Regi R, Romero R, Tarca AL, et al. Does the human placenta express the canonical cell entry mediators for SARS CoV-2? eLife. 2020;9:e58716. 

EXPERT COMMENTARY

Maternal infection with the novel SARS-CoV-2 virus has been associated with severe maternal morbidity and mortality causing adverse pregnancy outcomes, such as preterm birth and, potentially, stillbirth, with vertical transmission of the virus to the fetus possible.^1,2 

Uniquely, maternal physiology supports both pro- and anti-inflammatory states within pregnancy—a system that not only must protect the mother but also must tolerate a semi-allogenic fetus. Studies demonstrate that the first and third trimesters are pro-inflammatory, while the second trimester is thought to be anti-inflammatory.³ Since the discovery of the SARS-CoV-2 virus, the question surrounding vertical transmission (infectivity from mother to fetus via the placenta) has occupied the imagination of physicians, scientists, and pregnant women. Importantly, the virus is transmitted to human cells via the ACE2 (angiotensin-converting enzyme 2) receptor, which aids in viral cell attachment. ACE2 receptors are expressed in placental stromal cells, perivascular cells of decidua, cytotrophoblast and syncytiotrophoblast,⁴ as well as blood vessel endothelium and vascular smooth muscle from both primary and secondary villi. 

Details of the study 

In their recent study, Pique-Regi and colleagues used single-cell RNA sequencing data to investigate whether the receptors responsible for SARS-CoV-2 infection are expressed in the human placenta.⁵ Their findings suggest that TMPRSS2 is present in insufficient quantity in the placenta to make vertical transmission possible and/or clinically relevant. Thus, despite the presence of ACE2 receptors in placental tissue, without the enzymatic assistance of a helper protein like TMPRSS2 (transmembrane protease, serine 2), vertical transmission is highly unlikely. The researchers found that there was negligible co-transcription for ACE2 and TMPRSS2 in the placenta and that placental tissue lacks the mRNA necessary to produce the enzyme; they concluded that the likelihood of vertical transmission to the fetus was therefore unlikely. 

As a caveat to their research, the authors noted that: 

1. transcription levels do not always correlate with protein expression 
2. it is possible that a noncanonical cell-entry mediator facilitates entry 
3. individuals with complications related to the renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system (such as hypertensive disease) may have alterations to the expression of ACE2. 

Study strengths and limitations 

Methods for this study reveal that the researchers examined 32 placentas, all taken in the third trimester (32.9-39.1 weeks), with a median gestational age of 36.9 weeks. Notably, 81.3% of placentas were from Black women, 6.2% from White women, and 12.5% from Other women. The median maternal age was 25 years, median body mass index was 27.8 kg/m², and 84.4% of women were multiparous. While this sample was not representative of race, gestational age, or parity, it is difficult to know whether those selection biases would have changed the researchers' findings. 

The question regarding vertical transmission is one not answered solely on the basis of RNA sequencing data. Clinically, we know that neonates of mothers infected with SARS-CoV-2 have been born with immunoglobulin M antibodies, indicating antenatal exposure to the virus.^6,7 In addition, infants have tested positive immediately after birth for coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) via nasopharyngeal swab and amniotic fluid, and there are ample cases of histologic and polymerase chain reaction evidence of placental infection.^8,9 We also know that inflammatory damage to the placenta could possibly break down the placental barrier.¹⁰ 

The destruction that SARS-CoV-2 often leaves in its wake is devastating for the maternal-fetal dyad. The effects of maternal infection on the placenta—where additional research is needed—can be profound, causing profuse endothelial damage, vascular malperfusion, thrombi, and infarcts, all of which can be lethal to some developing fetuses. 

Pique-Regi R, Romero R, Tarca AL, et al. Does the human placenta express the canonical cell entry mediators for SARS CoV-2? eLife. 2020;9:e58716. 

EXPERT COMMENTARY

Maternal infection with the novel SARS-CoV-2 virus has been associated with severe maternal morbidity and mortality causing adverse pregnancy outcomes, such as preterm birth and, potentially, stillbirth, with vertical transmission of the virus to the fetus possible.^1,2 

Uniquely, maternal physiology supports both pro- and anti-inflammatory states within pregnancy—a system that not only must protect the mother but also must tolerate a semi-allogenic fetus. Studies demonstrate that the first and third trimesters are pro-inflammatory, while the second trimester is thought to be anti-inflammatory.³ Since the discovery of the SARS-CoV-2 virus, the question surrounding vertical transmission (infectivity from mother to fetus via the placenta) has occupied the imagination of physicians, scientists, and pregnant women. Importantly, the virus is transmitted to human cells via the ACE2 (angiotensin-converting enzyme 2) receptor, which aids in viral cell attachment. ACE2 receptors are expressed in placental stromal cells, perivascular cells of decidua, cytotrophoblast and syncytiotrophoblast,⁴ as well as blood vessel endothelium and vascular smooth muscle from both primary and secondary villi. 

Details of the study 

In their recent study, Pique-Regi and colleagues used single-cell RNA sequencing data to investigate whether the receptors responsible for SARS-CoV-2 infection are expressed in the human placenta.⁵ Their findings suggest that TMPRSS2 is present in insufficient quantity in the placenta to make vertical transmission possible and/or clinically relevant. Thus, despite the presence of ACE2 receptors in placental tissue, without the enzymatic assistance of a helper protein like TMPRSS2 (transmembrane protease, serine 2), vertical transmission is highly unlikely. The researchers found that there was negligible co-transcription for ACE2 and TMPRSS2 in the placenta and that placental tissue lacks the mRNA necessary to produce the enzyme; they concluded that the likelihood of vertical transmission to the fetus was therefore unlikely. 

As a caveat to their research, the authors noted that: 

1. transcription levels do not always correlate with protein expression 
2. it is possible that a noncanonical cell-entry mediator facilitates entry 
3. individuals with complications related to the renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system (such as hypertensive disease) may have alterations to the expression of ACE2. 

Study strengths and limitations 

Methods for this study reveal that the researchers examined 32 placentas, all taken in the third trimester (32.9-39.1 weeks), with a median gestational age of 36.9 weeks. Notably, 81.3% of placentas were from Black women, 6.2% from White women, and 12.5% from Other women. The median maternal age was 25 years, median body mass index was 27.8 kg/m², and 84.4% of women were multiparous. While this sample was not representative of race, gestational age, or parity, it is difficult to know whether those selection biases would have changed the researchers' findings. 

The question regarding vertical transmission is one not answered solely on the basis of RNA sequencing data. Clinically, we know that neonates of mothers infected with SARS-CoV-2 have been born with immunoglobulin M antibodies, indicating antenatal exposure to the virus.^6,7 In addition, infants have tested positive immediately after birth for coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) via nasopharyngeal swab and amniotic fluid, and there are ample cases of histologic and polymerase chain reaction evidence of placental infection.^8,9 We also know that inflammatory damage to the placenta could possibly break down the placental barrier.¹⁰ 

The destruction that SARS-CoV-2 often leaves in its wake is devastating for the maternal-fetal dyad. The effects of maternal infection on the placenta—where additional research is needed—can be profound, causing profuse endothelial damage, vascular malperfusion, thrombi, and infarcts, all of which can be lethal to some developing fetuses. 

Pique-Regi R, Romero R, Tarca AL, et al. Does the human placenta express the canonical cell entry mediators for SARS CoV-2? eLife. 2020;9:e58716. 

EXPERT COMMENTARY

Maternal infection with the novel SARS-CoV-2 virus has been associated with severe maternal morbidity and mortality causing adverse pregnancy outcomes, such as preterm birth and, potentially, stillbirth, with vertical transmission of the virus to the fetus possible.^1,2 

Uniquely, maternal physiology supports both pro- and anti-inflammatory states within pregnancy—a system that not only must protect the mother but also must tolerate a semi-allogenic fetus. Studies demonstrate that the first and third trimesters are pro-inflammatory, while the second trimester is thought to be anti-inflammatory.³ Since the discovery of the SARS-CoV-2 virus, the question surrounding vertical transmission (infectivity from mother to fetus via the placenta) has occupied the imagination of physicians, scientists, and pregnant women. Importantly, the virus is transmitted to human cells via the ACE2 (angiotensin-converting enzyme 2) receptor, which aids in viral cell attachment. ACE2 receptors are expressed in placental stromal cells, perivascular cells of decidua, cytotrophoblast and syncytiotrophoblast,⁴ as well as blood vessel endothelium and vascular smooth muscle from both primary and secondary villi. 

Details of the study 

In their recent study, Pique-Regi and colleagues used single-cell RNA sequencing data to investigate whether the receptors responsible for SARS-CoV-2 infection are expressed in the human placenta.⁵ Their findings suggest that TMPRSS2 is present in insufficient quantity in the placenta to make vertical transmission possible and/or clinically relevant. Thus, despite the presence of ACE2 receptors in placental tissue, without the enzymatic assistance of a helper protein like TMPRSS2 (transmembrane protease, serine 2), vertical transmission is highly unlikely. The researchers found that there was negligible co-transcription for ACE2 and TMPRSS2 in the placenta and that placental tissue lacks the mRNA necessary to produce the enzyme; they concluded that the likelihood of vertical transmission to the fetus was therefore unlikely. 

As a caveat to their research, the authors noted that: 

1. transcription levels do not always correlate with protein expression 
2. it is possible that a noncanonical cell-entry mediator facilitates entry 
3. individuals with complications related to the renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system (such as hypertensive disease) may have alterations to the expression of ACE2. 

Study strengths and limitations 

Methods for this study reveal that the researchers examined 32 placentas, all taken in the third trimester (32.9-39.1 weeks), with a median gestational age of 36.9 weeks. Notably, 81.3% of placentas were from Black women, 6.2% from White women, and 12.5% from Other women. The median maternal age was 25 years, median body mass index was 27.8 kg/m², and 84.4% of women were multiparous. While this sample was not representative of race, gestational age, or parity, it is difficult to know whether those selection biases would have changed the researchers' findings. 

The question regarding vertical transmission is one not answered solely on the basis of RNA sequencing data. Clinically, we know that neonates of mothers infected with SARS-CoV-2 have been born with immunoglobulin M antibodies, indicating antenatal exposure to the virus.^6,7 In addition, infants have tested positive immediately after birth for coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) via nasopharyngeal swab and amniotic fluid, and there are ample cases of histologic and polymerase chain reaction evidence of placental infection.^8,9 We also know that inflammatory damage to the placenta could possibly break down the placental barrier.¹⁰ 

The destruction that SARS-CoV-2 often leaves in its wake is devastating for the maternal-fetal dyad. The effects of maternal infection on the placenta—where additional research is needed—can be profound, causing profuse endothelial damage, vascular malperfusion, thrombi, and infarcts, all of which can be lethal to some developing fetuses. 

Postpartum depression (PPD) is the most common complication of pregnancy, and onset can occur at any time from pregnancy until up to 1 year post partum.^1,2 The immediate postpartum period is a time during which care is shared among multiple providers for both mother and child, and the transition from inpatient to outpatient postpartum care can impede communication between those caring for the patient in each setting. In 2018, the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists published a committee opinion emphasizing the importance of the “fourth trimester” and calling for health care providers to assist women in navigating the transition from pre- to postpartum care.³ An important consideration of perinatal care is mental health care for the mother, including screening and care for postpartum depression; however, the optimal role for the obstetric hospitalist in providing such services has been unclear.

Highwaystarz-Photography/iStock/Getty Images

Estimates of the prevalence of PPD in new mothers in the United States varied by state from 8% to 20% in 2012, with an overall average of 12%.² Left untreated, PPD may result in significant negative outcomes for women, their children, and families. The depressive symptoms of PPD may persist for months or years afterward,⁴ with one study finding elevated depressive symptoms in women up to 11 years post partum.⁵ Suicide is also a leading cause of pregnancy-related mortality associated with depressive symptoms.^6-9 In addition, maternal postpartum depression symptoms have been associated with impaired mother-infant bonding at 6 months of age¹⁰ and decreased cognitive and fine motor development of children at 18 months.¹¹

Importance of screening

Evidence from the literature shows that, without proper screening, approximately 50% of cases of PPD go undiagnosed, and that increasing the number of women being screened by perinatal providers is an important first step to improving outcomes.^12-18 Current recommendations for the timing and frequency of screening for PPD vary among the published guidelines. ACOG recommends screening at least once during the perinatal period for depression and anxiety using a standardized, validated tool; an update of the ACOG committee opinion in 2018 also states: “It is recommended that all obstetrician-gynecologists and other obstetric care providers complete a full assessment of mood and emotional well-being (including screening for PPD and anxiety with a validated instrument) during the comprehensive postpartum visit for each patient.”¹⁹ The American Medical Association adopted new policies in 2017 promoting the implementation of a routine protocol for depression screening of perinatal women.²⁰ The American Academy of Pediatrics recommends more frequent screening, with assessments at the 1-, 2-, 4-, and 6-month visits.²¹ Finally, the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force recommends screening for depression in the general population including pregnant and postpartum women.²²

Multiple standardized, validated screening instruments are available for detecting possible symptoms of PPD, including the most widely used tools: the Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale (EPDS)^19,23 and the Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-9).²⁴ Two recent studies have shown that screening women for symptoms of PPD with a validated tool may reduce the duration or severity of depressive symptoms,^25,26 further reinforcing the need to ensure that women experiencing symptoms of PPD are identified and treated early.

The inpatient hospitalization for labor, delivery, and birth of a child has not traditionally been viewed as an opportunity for PPD screening. While private practitioners and obstetric medical group practices typically have inquired about and documented the individual patient’s mental health history and risk factors for PPD, the obstetric hospitalist is most commonly meeting a patient in labor or in a postpartum encounter for the first time. As obstetric practices grow ever more consolidated, and as obstetric hospitalist care is implemented for a variety of reasons including, but not limited to, preventing burnout among private practitioners, serving as a safety net for all inpatient obstetric services, and increasing standardization in obstetric triage and obstetric emergency departments, the obstetric hospitalist is in a unique position to assist in screening women during an inpatient admission.
 

Barriers remain

Despite the need for early detection of PPD, screening practices remain inconsistent. A literature review of health care provider practices showed only one in four physicians reported using screening tools; obstetrician-gynecologists were most likely (36%) to use screening tools, followed by family practitioners (31%), with pediatricians the least likely (7%).²⁷ This low rate is at least partially the result of perceived barriers to screening among health care providers, which contributes to underdiagnosis. A survey of more than 200 physicians who were members of ACOG showed that the top three barriers restricting screening practices were time constraints, inadequate training, and a lack of knowledge of the diagnostic criteria.²⁸

Since 2017, Dignity Health has instituted routine screening of all inpatient postpartum patients at its 29 birth centers in Arizona, California, and Nevada. In this program, of which I am a physician participant, more than 30,000 women have been screened with the EPDS. In addition to providing screening, Dignity Health staff (physicians, certified nurse midwives, nurse practitioners, registered nurses, social workers, mental health therapists, lactation consultants, health educators, and others) have received in-person Perinatal Mental Health training. In this way, the entire care team coordinates inpatient screening and referral to outpatient care providers – thus bridging the gap in postpartum mental health care. For those patients who screen positive while an inpatient, a psychiatric telemedicine appointment is provided and, if necessary, short-course medications can be prescribed until the patient has outpatient follow-up and continuity of care. While we as obstetric hospitalists and community obstetrician-gynecologists recognize that inpatient postpartum screening may be limited in its sensitivity for capturing all women who will go on to develop PPD, there is definitely a benefit to having a discussion about PPD and maternal mental health early and often throughout the postpartum period. For many women suffering in silence, a 6-week postpartum outpatient visit is too late, especially given that approximately one-third of women are lost to postpartum follow-up.^29,30

Addressing barriers

A growing number of states have enacted policies to address the challenge of peripartum behavioral health needs, and several states – Illinois, Massachusetts, New Jersey, and West Virginia – now mandate routine PPD screening by health care providers.³¹ However, few of these laws or policies contain specific guidance, such as the optimal timing for screening, instead leaving the details to providers.³² The proper identification and management of PPD cannot be achieved by state-level policy mandates alone, but must include clinician buy-in and participation.

Obstetricians play an essential role in the identification and treatment of PPD. Among nonpsychiatric specialists, obstetrician-gynecologists are the most likely providers to see and screen during the perinatal period.³³ In addition, women prefer to receive help for PPD from either their obstetric practitioners or a mental-health specialists located at the obstetric clinic, and are more likely to receive mental-health services if they are provided at the same location as that of the obstetric provider.^34,35 According to ACOG’s new guidance on the fourth trimester, obstetricians are encouraged to take responsibility for women’s care immediately after birth, and this care would include contact with all mothers within the first 3 weeks post partum, at follow-up visits as needed, and for a comprehensive postpartum visit at 12 weeks.³

Our specialty has and will continue to evolve, and obstetric hospitalists will play an ever more essential role in the care of women during their inpatient obstetric admission. Whether we are a patient’s primary inpatient obstetric provider or a practice extender for single or multigroup practice, we are in a unique role to screen, begin treatment for, and offer anticipatory guidance for maternal mental health and postpartum depression disorders. Obstetric hospitalists can be a bridge between inpatient and outpatient follow-up and catalysts for implementing universal inpatient PPD screening. Our role presents an opportunity to start the discussion early and often in the fourth trimester and to make a significant difference in addressing this critical unmet need in postnatal care.
 

Dr. van Dis is the medical director of the Ob Hospitalist Group in Burbank, Calif. She disclosed she received editorial assistance from Erik MacLaren, PhD, of Boston Strategic Partners Inc., with funding support from Sage Therapeutics Inc. E-mail obnews@mdedge.com.
 

References

1. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Postpartum Depression. 2017.

2. Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2017;66(6):153-8.

3. Obstet Gynecol. 2018;131(5):e140-e150.

4. Harv Rev Psychiatry. 2014;22(1):1-22.

5. JAMA Psychiatry. 2018;75(3):247-53.

6. J Womens Health (Larchmt). 2016;25(12):1219-24.

7. J Psychiatr Res. 2017;84:284-91.

8. Br J Psychiatry. 2003;183:279-81.

9. Obstet Gynecol Surv. 2005;60(3):183-90.

10. Arch Womens Ment Health. 2016;19(1):87-94.

11. Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol. 2013;48(8):1335-45.

12. J Reprod Med. 1999;44(4):351-8.

13. J Behav Health Serv Res. 2004;31(2):117-33.

14. J Clin Psychiatry. 2016;77(9):1189-200.

15. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2000;182(5):1080-2.

16. J Fam Pract. 2001;50(2):117-22.

17. Obstet Gynecol. 1999;93(5 Pt 1):653-7.

18. J Womens Health (Larchmt). 2010;19(3):477-90.

19. Obstet Gynecol. 2018;132:e208-12.

20. “Physicians back programs to address maternal mortality, depression,” AMA, Nov. 15, 2017

21. Pediatrics. 2019 Jan 1;143(1):e20183260.

22. JAMA. 2016;315(4):380-7.

23. Br J Psychiatry. 1987;150:782-6.

24. Ann Fam Med. 2009;7(1):63-70.

25. Obstet Gynecol. 2016;127(5):917-25.

26. Pediatrics. 2017 Oct;140(4). pii: e20170110.

27. Womens Health Issues. 2015;25(6):703-10.

28. J Psychosom Obstet Gynaecol. 2011;32(1):27-34.

29. Matern Child Health J. 2016;20(Suppl 1):22-7.

30. National Committee for Quality Assurance. Prenatal and Postpartum Care (PPC). 2018.

31. Psychiatr Serv. 2015;66(3):324-8.

32. Postpartum Support International. Legislation. 2018.

33. American Academy of Pediatrics, American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists, eds. Guidelines for Perinatal Care. 7th ed. (Elk Grove Village, IL: Washington, DC: American Academy of Pediatrics; American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists; Oct 2012.)

34. Birth. 2009;36(1):60-9.

35. Gen Hosp Psychiatry. 2009;31(2):155-62.

Postpartum depression (PPD) is the most common complication of pregnancy, and onset can occur at any time from pregnancy until up to 1 year post partum.^1,2 The immediate postpartum period is a time during which care is shared among multiple providers for both mother and child, and the transition from inpatient to outpatient postpartum care can impede communication between those caring for the patient in each setting. In 2018, the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists published a committee opinion emphasizing the importance of the “fourth trimester” and calling for health care providers to assist women in navigating the transition from pre- to postpartum care.³ An important consideration of perinatal care is mental health care for the mother, including screening and care for postpartum depression; however, the optimal role for the obstetric hospitalist in providing such services has been unclear.

Highwaystarz-Photography/iStock/Getty Images

Estimates of the prevalence of PPD in new mothers in the United States varied by state from 8% to 20% in 2012, with an overall average of 12%.² Left untreated, PPD may result in significant negative outcomes for women, their children, and families. The depressive symptoms of PPD may persist for months or years afterward,⁴ with one study finding elevated depressive symptoms in women up to 11 years post partum.⁵ Suicide is also a leading cause of pregnancy-related mortality associated with depressive symptoms.^6-9 In addition, maternal postpartum depression symptoms have been associated with impaired mother-infant bonding at 6 months of age¹⁰ and decreased cognitive and fine motor development of children at 18 months.¹¹

Importance of screening

Evidence from the literature shows that, without proper screening, approximately 50% of cases of PPD go undiagnosed, and that increasing the number of women being screened by perinatal providers is an important first step to improving outcomes.^12-18 Current recommendations for the timing and frequency of screening for PPD vary among the published guidelines. ACOG recommends screening at least once during the perinatal period for depression and anxiety using a standardized, validated tool; an update of the ACOG committee opinion in 2018 also states: “It is recommended that all obstetrician-gynecologists and other obstetric care providers complete a full assessment of mood and emotional well-being (including screening for PPD and anxiety with a validated instrument) during the comprehensive postpartum visit for each patient.”¹⁹ The American Medical Association adopted new policies in 2017 promoting the implementation of a routine protocol for depression screening of perinatal women.²⁰ The American Academy of Pediatrics recommends more frequent screening, with assessments at the 1-, 2-, 4-, and 6-month visits.²¹ Finally, the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force recommends screening for depression in the general population including pregnant and postpartum women.²²

Multiple standardized, validated screening instruments are available for detecting possible symptoms of PPD, including the most widely used tools: the Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale (EPDS)^19,23 and the Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-9).²⁴ Two recent studies have shown that screening women for symptoms of PPD with a validated tool may reduce the duration or severity of depressive symptoms,^25,26 further reinforcing the need to ensure that women experiencing symptoms of PPD are identified and treated early.

The inpatient hospitalization for labor, delivery, and birth of a child has not traditionally been viewed as an opportunity for PPD screening. While private practitioners and obstetric medical group practices typically have inquired about and documented the individual patient’s mental health history and risk factors for PPD, the obstetric hospitalist is most commonly meeting a patient in labor or in a postpartum encounter for the first time. As obstetric practices grow ever more consolidated, and as obstetric hospitalist care is implemented for a variety of reasons including, but not limited to, preventing burnout among private practitioners, serving as a safety net for all inpatient obstetric services, and increasing standardization in obstetric triage and obstetric emergency departments, the obstetric hospitalist is in a unique position to assist in screening women during an inpatient admission.
 

Barriers remain

Despite the need for early detection of PPD, screening practices remain inconsistent. A literature review of health care provider practices showed only one in four physicians reported using screening tools; obstetrician-gynecologists were most likely (36%) to use screening tools, followed by family practitioners (31%), with pediatricians the least likely (7%).²⁷ This low rate is at least partially the result of perceived barriers to screening among health care providers, which contributes to underdiagnosis. A survey of more than 200 physicians who were members of ACOG showed that the top three barriers restricting screening practices were time constraints, inadequate training, and a lack of knowledge of the diagnostic criteria.²⁸

Since 2017, Dignity Health has instituted routine screening of all inpatient postpartum patients at its 29 birth centers in Arizona, California, and Nevada. In this program, of which I am a physician participant, more than 30,000 women have been screened with the EPDS. In addition to providing screening, Dignity Health staff (physicians, certified nurse midwives, nurse practitioners, registered nurses, social workers, mental health therapists, lactation consultants, health educators, and others) have received in-person Perinatal Mental Health training. In this way, the entire care team coordinates inpatient screening and referral to outpatient care providers – thus bridging the gap in postpartum mental health care. For those patients who screen positive while an inpatient, a psychiatric telemedicine appointment is provided and, if necessary, short-course medications can be prescribed until the patient has outpatient follow-up and continuity of care. While we as obstetric hospitalists and community obstetrician-gynecologists recognize that inpatient postpartum screening may be limited in its sensitivity for capturing all women who will go on to develop PPD, there is definitely a benefit to having a discussion about PPD and maternal mental health early and often throughout the postpartum period. For many women suffering in silence, a 6-week postpartum outpatient visit is too late, especially given that approximately one-third of women are lost to postpartum follow-up.^29,30

Addressing barriers

A growing number of states have enacted policies to address the challenge of peripartum behavioral health needs, and several states – Illinois, Massachusetts, New Jersey, and West Virginia – now mandate routine PPD screening by health care providers.³¹ However, few of these laws or policies contain specific guidance, such as the optimal timing for screening, instead leaving the details to providers.³² The proper identification and management of PPD cannot be achieved by state-level policy mandates alone, but must include clinician buy-in and participation.

Obstetricians play an essential role in the identification and treatment of PPD. Among nonpsychiatric specialists, obstetrician-gynecologists are the most likely providers to see and screen during the perinatal period.³³ In addition, women prefer to receive help for PPD from either their obstetric practitioners or a mental-health specialists located at the obstetric clinic, and are more likely to receive mental-health services if they are provided at the same location as that of the obstetric provider.^34,35 According to ACOG’s new guidance on the fourth trimester, obstetricians are encouraged to take responsibility for women’s care immediately after birth, and this care would include contact with all mothers within the first 3 weeks post partum, at follow-up visits as needed, and for a comprehensive postpartum visit at 12 weeks.³

Our specialty has and will continue to evolve, and obstetric hospitalists will play an ever more essential role in the care of women during their inpatient obstetric admission. Whether we are a patient’s primary inpatient obstetric provider or a practice extender for single or multigroup practice, we are in a unique role to screen, begin treatment for, and offer anticipatory guidance for maternal mental health and postpartum depression disorders. Obstetric hospitalists can be a bridge between inpatient and outpatient follow-up and catalysts for implementing universal inpatient PPD screening. Our role presents an opportunity to start the discussion early and often in the fourth trimester and to make a significant difference in addressing this critical unmet need in postnatal care.
 

Dr. van Dis is the medical director of the Ob Hospitalist Group in Burbank, Calif. She disclosed she received editorial assistance from Erik MacLaren, PhD, of Boston Strategic Partners Inc., with funding support from Sage Therapeutics Inc. E-mail obnews@mdedge.com.
 

References

1. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Postpartum Depression. 2017.

2. Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2017;66(6):153-8.

3. Obstet Gynecol. 2018;131(5):e140-e150.

4. Harv Rev Psychiatry. 2014;22(1):1-22.

5. JAMA Psychiatry. 2018;75(3):247-53.

6. J Womens Health (Larchmt). 2016;25(12):1219-24.

7. J Psychiatr Res. 2017;84:284-91.

8. Br J Psychiatry. 2003;183:279-81.

9. Obstet Gynecol Surv. 2005;60(3):183-90.

10. Arch Womens Ment Health. 2016;19(1):87-94.

11. Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol. 2013;48(8):1335-45.

12. J Reprod Med. 1999;44(4):351-8.

13. J Behav Health Serv Res. 2004;31(2):117-33.

14. J Clin Psychiatry. 2016;77(9):1189-200.

15. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2000;182(5):1080-2.

16. J Fam Pract. 2001;50(2):117-22.

17. Obstet Gynecol. 1999;93(5 Pt 1):653-7.

18. J Womens Health (Larchmt). 2010;19(3):477-90.

19. Obstet Gynecol. 2018;132:e208-12.

20. “Physicians back programs to address maternal mortality, depression,” AMA, Nov. 15, 2017

21. Pediatrics. 2019 Jan 1;143(1):e20183260.

22. JAMA. 2016;315(4):380-7.

23. Br J Psychiatry. 1987;150:782-6.

24. Ann Fam Med. 2009;7(1):63-70.

25. Obstet Gynecol. 2016;127(5):917-25.

26. Pediatrics. 2017 Oct;140(4). pii: e20170110.

27. Womens Health Issues. 2015;25(6):703-10.

28. J Psychosom Obstet Gynaecol. 2011;32(1):27-34.

29. Matern Child Health J. 2016;20(Suppl 1):22-7.

30. National Committee for Quality Assurance. Prenatal and Postpartum Care (PPC). 2018.

31. Psychiatr Serv. 2015;66(3):324-8.

32. Postpartum Support International. Legislation. 2018.

33. American Academy of Pediatrics, American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists, eds. Guidelines for Perinatal Care. 7th ed. (Elk Grove Village, IL: Washington, DC: American Academy of Pediatrics; American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists; Oct 2012.)

34. Birth. 2009;36(1):60-9.

35. Gen Hosp Psychiatry. 2009;31(2):155-62.

Postpartum depression (PPD) is the most common complication of pregnancy, and onset can occur at any time from pregnancy until up to 1 year post partum.^1,2 The immediate postpartum period is a time during which care is shared among multiple providers for both mother and child, and the transition from inpatient to outpatient postpartum care can impede communication between those caring for the patient in each setting. In 2018, the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists published a committee opinion emphasizing the importance of the “fourth trimester” and calling for health care providers to assist women in navigating the transition from pre- to postpartum care.³ An important consideration of perinatal care is mental health care for the mother, including screening and care for postpartum depression; however, the optimal role for the obstetric hospitalist in providing such services has been unclear.

Highwaystarz-Photography/iStock/Getty Images

Estimates of the prevalence of PPD in new mothers in the United States varied by state from 8% to 20% in 2012, with an overall average of 12%.² Left untreated, PPD may result in significant negative outcomes for women, their children, and families. The depressive symptoms of PPD may persist for months or years afterward,⁴ with one study finding elevated depressive symptoms in women up to 11 years post partum.⁵ Suicide is also a leading cause of pregnancy-related mortality associated with depressive symptoms.^6-9 In addition, maternal postpartum depression symptoms have been associated with impaired mother-infant bonding at 6 months of age¹⁰ and decreased cognitive and fine motor development of children at 18 months.¹¹

Importance of screening

Evidence from the literature shows that, without proper screening, approximately 50% of cases of PPD go undiagnosed, and that increasing the number of women being screened by perinatal providers is an important first step to improving outcomes.^12-18 Current recommendations for the timing and frequency of screening for PPD vary among the published guidelines. ACOG recommends screening at least once during the perinatal period for depression and anxiety using a standardized, validated tool; an update of the ACOG committee opinion in 2018 also states: “It is recommended that all obstetrician-gynecologists and other obstetric care providers complete a full assessment of mood and emotional well-being (including screening for PPD and anxiety with a validated instrument) during the comprehensive postpartum visit for each patient.”¹⁹ The American Medical Association adopted new policies in 2017 promoting the implementation of a routine protocol for depression screening of perinatal women.²⁰ The American Academy of Pediatrics recommends more frequent screening, with assessments at the 1-, 2-, 4-, and 6-month visits.²¹ Finally, the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force recommends screening for depression in the general population including pregnant and postpartum women.²²

Multiple standardized, validated screening instruments are available for detecting possible symptoms of PPD, including the most widely used tools: the Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale (EPDS)^19,23 and the Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-9).²⁴ Two recent studies have shown that screening women for symptoms of PPD with a validated tool may reduce the duration or severity of depressive symptoms,^25,26 further reinforcing the need to ensure that women experiencing symptoms of PPD are identified and treated early.

The inpatient hospitalization for labor, delivery, and birth of a child has not traditionally been viewed as an opportunity for PPD screening. While private practitioners and obstetric medical group practices typically have inquired about and documented the individual patient’s mental health history and risk factors for PPD, the obstetric hospitalist is most commonly meeting a patient in labor or in a postpartum encounter for the first time. As obstetric practices grow ever more consolidated, and as obstetric hospitalist care is implemented for a variety of reasons including, but not limited to, preventing burnout among private practitioners, serving as a safety net for all inpatient obstetric services, and increasing standardization in obstetric triage and obstetric emergency departments, the obstetric hospitalist is in a unique position to assist in screening women during an inpatient admission.
 

Barriers remain

Despite the need for early detection of PPD, screening practices remain inconsistent. A literature review of health care provider practices showed only one in four physicians reported using screening tools; obstetrician-gynecologists were most likely (36%) to use screening tools, followed by family practitioners (31%), with pediatricians the least likely (7%).²⁷ This low rate is at least partially the result of perceived barriers to screening among health care providers, which contributes to underdiagnosis. A survey of more than 200 physicians who were members of ACOG showed that the top three barriers restricting screening practices were time constraints, inadequate training, and a lack of knowledge of the diagnostic criteria.²⁸

Since 2017, Dignity Health has instituted routine screening of all inpatient postpartum patients at its 29 birth centers in Arizona, California, and Nevada. In this program, of which I am a physician participant, more than 30,000 women have been screened with the EPDS. In addition to providing screening, Dignity Health staff (physicians, certified nurse midwives, nurse practitioners, registered nurses, social workers, mental health therapists, lactation consultants, health educators, and others) have received in-person Perinatal Mental Health training. In this way, the entire care team coordinates inpatient screening and referral to outpatient care providers – thus bridging the gap in postpartum mental health care. For those patients who screen positive while an inpatient, a psychiatric telemedicine appointment is provided and, if necessary, short-course medications can be prescribed until the patient has outpatient follow-up and continuity of care. While we as obstetric hospitalists and community obstetrician-gynecologists recognize that inpatient postpartum screening may be limited in its sensitivity for capturing all women who will go on to develop PPD, there is definitely a benefit to having a discussion about PPD and maternal mental health early and often throughout the postpartum period. For many women suffering in silence, a 6-week postpartum outpatient visit is too late, especially given that approximately one-third of women are lost to postpartum follow-up.^29,30

Addressing barriers

A growing number of states have enacted policies to address the challenge of peripartum behavioral health needs, and several states – Illinois, Massachusetts, New Jersey, and West Virginia – now mandate routine PPD screening by health care providers.³¹ However, few of these laws or policies contain specific guidance, such as the optimal timing for screening, instead leaving the details to providers.³² The proper identification and management of PPD cannot be achieved by state-level policy mandates alone, but must include clinician buy-in and participation.

Obstetricians play an essential role in the identification and treatment of PPD. Among nonpsychiatric specialists, obstetrician-gynecologists are the most likely providers to see and screen during the perinatal period.³³ In addition, women prefer to receive help for PPD from either their obstetric practitioners or a mental-health specialists located at the obstetric clinic, and are more likely to receive mental-health services if they are provided at the same location as that of the obstetric provider.^34,35 According to ACOG’s new guidance on the fourth trimester, obstetricians are encouraged to take responsibility for women’s care immediately after birth, and this care would include contact with all mothers within the first 3 weeks post partum, at follow-up visits as needed, and for a comprehensive postpartum visit at 12 weeks.³

Our specialty has and will continue to evolve, and obstetric hospitalists will play an ever more essential role in the care of women during their inpatient obstetric admission. Whether we are a patient’s primary inpatient obstetric provider or a practice extender for single or multigroup practice, we are in a unique role to screen, begin treatment for, and offer anticipatory guidance for maternal mental health and postpartum depression disorders. Obstetric hospitalists can be a bridge between inpatient and outpatient follow-up and catalysts for implementing universal inpatient PPD screening. Our role presents an opportunity to start the discussion early and often in the fourth trimester and to make a significant difference in addressing this critical unmet need in postnatal care.
 

Dr. van Dis is the medical director of the Ob Hospitalist Group in Burbank, Calif. She disclosed she received editorial assistance from Erik MacLaren, PhD, of Boston Strategic Partners Inc., with funding support from Sage Therapeutics Inc. E-mail obnews@mdedge.com.
 

References

1. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Postpartum Depression. 2017.

2. Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2017;66(6):153-8.

3. Obstet Gynecol. 2018;131(5):e140-e150.

4. Harv Rev Psychiatry. 2014;22(1):1-22.

5. JAMA Psychiatry. 2018;75(3):247-53.

6. J Womens Health (Larchmt). 2016;25(12):1219-24.

7. J Psychiatr Res. 2017;84:284-91.

8. Br J Psychiatry. 2003;183:279-81.

9. Obstet Gynecol Surv. 2005;60(3):183-90.

10. Arch Womens Ment Health. 2016;19(1):87-94.

11. Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol. 2013;48(8):1335-45.

12. J Reprod Med. 1999;44(4):351-8.

13. J Behav Health Serv Res. 2004;31(2):117-33.

14. J Clin Psychiatry. 2016;77(9):1189-200.

15. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2000;182(5):1080-2.

16. J Fam Pract. 2001;50(2):117-22.

17. Obstet Gynecol. 1999;93(5 Pt 1):653-7.

18. J Womens Health (Larchmt). 2010;19(3):477-90.

19. Obstet Gynecol. 2018;132:e208-12.

20. “Physicians back programs to address maternal mortality, depression,” AMA, Nov. 15, 2017

21. Pediatrics. 2019 Jan 1;143(1):e20183260.

22. JAMA. 2016;315(4):380-7.

23. Br J Psychiatry. 1987;150:782-6.

24. Ann Fam Med. 2009;7(1):63-70.

25. Obstet Gynecol. 2016;127(5):917-25.

26. Pediatrics. 2017 Oct;140(4). pii: e20170110.

27. Womens Health Issues. 2015;25(6):703-10.

28. J Psychosom Obstet Gynaecol. 2011;32(1):27-34.

29. Matern Child Health J. 2016;20(Suppl 1):22-7.

30. National Committee for Quality Assurance. Prenatal and Postpartum Care (PPC). 2018.

31. Psychiatr Serv. 2015;66(3):324-8.

32. Postpartum Support International. Legislation. 2018.

33. American Academy of Pediatrics, American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists, eds. Guidelines for Perinatal Care. 7th ed. (Elk Grove Village, IL: Washington, DC: American Academy of Pediatrics; American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists; Oct 2012.)

34. Birth. 2009;36(1):60-9.

35. Gen Hosp Psychiatry. 2009;31(2):155-62.