Affiliations
Regenstrief Institute, Inc.
Given name(s)
Joe G.
Family name
Kesterson
Degrees
BS

Mortality Predictors from the CBC

Article Type
Changed
Sun, 05/28/2017 - 22:42
Display Headline
Which observations from the complete blood cell count predict mortality for hospitalized patients?

The complete blood count (CBC) bundles the automated hemogram, an automated differential count of 5 types of cells, and a reflex manual differential count (when required by protocol) and is one of the most frequently ordered laboratory tests on admission to the hospital. In practice, it is a routine ingredient of all hospital admission ordersphysicians order a hemogram either alone or as part of a complete blood count for 98% of our medical/surgical admissions, and the same is true at most institutions.1 We know that the white blood cell count and hematocrit from the automated hemogram predict disease severity and mortality risk.25 For example, elevated WBC counts predict a worse prognosis in patients with cancer or coronary artery disease,6, 7 and anemia predicts increased risk of death of patients with heart failure.8, 9 Further, these two tests provide direct management guidance in common circumstances, for example, bleeding and infection.

The CBC describes the number and morphology of more than 40 cell types, from acanthocytosis to vacuolated white blood cells. Disagreement exists about the clinical significance of many of these observations.1013 And only a few components of the manual differential, for example, nucleated red blood cells (NRBCs) and lymphocytosis, have been quantitatively evaluated to determine their prognostic significance.1417 But these two observations have not been examined to determine their independent contributions to predictions of mortality when taken in conjunction with their accompanying CBC observations. Which of the numerous cell types and cell counts in the commonly ordered CBC, indicate that a patient is at high risk of death? In this article we report an inpatient study that used univariate and multivariate analyses of admission CBCs to predict 30‐day mortality in order to answer that question.

METHODS

Patients and Protocol

The institutional review board of Indiana University, Purdue University, Indianapolis, approved this study. We included in the study all adult patients (those at least 18 years old) admitted to Wishard Hospital between January 1, 1993, and December 31, 2002, except for prisoners (for IRB reasons) and obstetric patients (because their 30‐day mortality is very close to zero0.07% at our institution). Wishard Hospital is a large urban hospital that serves a diverse but predominantly inner‐city population in Indianapolis. If a patient was admitted more than once during the 10 years of observation, we included only the first admission in the analysis in order to assure statistical independence of the observations. We extracted data from the Regenstrief Medical Record System (RMRS), a comprehensive medical records system that has demographic data, vital signs, diagnoses, results of clinical tests, and pharmacy information on all inpatient, emergency department, and outpatient encounter sites.18

We obtained the admission and discharge ICD9 and DRG codes to assess the disease patterns associated with individual CBC abnormalities. We obtained these codes from routine hospital case abstractions performed by Wishard Hospital's medical records department using NCoder+ and Quadramed. Patients assigned DRG codes 370‐384 were identified as obstetric and therefore excluded. Using the ICD9 and CPT codes according to the Charlson algorithm, we calculated a Charlson Comorbidity Index value19 for each patient as a marker of coexisting conditions.

Outcomes

The primary outcome was 30‐day mortality counted from the date of admission. We used information from the hospital record (inpatient deaths) and the Indiana state death tapes to determine the dates of death of all patients. Patients were matched to the Indiana death tapes by an algorithm using name, social security number, date of birth, and sex.20

Hemogram and Differential Count Test Methods

The hemogram, differential counts, and blood smear exam results included in this study all came from Wishard Hospital's laboratory. During this study, the hospital used only 2 cell counters, the Coulter STK‐S and the Gen‐S automated blood analyzer (Beckman Coulter, Brea, California), to produce hemogram and automated blood differential counts. Both instruments provided automated differential counts of 5 cell types: neutrophils, lymphocytes, monocytes, basophils, and eosinophils. The latter machine also produced platelet counts and reticulocyte counts, but during the study period these counts were not routinely reported to physicians unless ordered specifically, so we did not include them in the analyses. The laboratory reflexively performed 100‐cell manual differential counts and blood smear exams when abnormalities as defined by College of American Pathologists (CAP) criteria were observed in the automated measures. Both automated blood analyzers used the same automated CAP criteria to decide when to add a manual differential count and blood smear analysis, and these criteria were constant throughout the study. This protocol predicts manual differential abnormalities with high sensitivity, missing less than 1% of important findings in a manual differential.21 When the CAP criteria did not require a manual differential count and blood smear exam, we assumed that those counts unique to a manual count, for example, blast cell count, were zero and that there were no abnormalities in blood smear morphology.

Laboratories may report white blood cells as absolute counts (eg, number of cells/mm3) and/or as percentages. We converted all counts reported as percentages to absolute numbers (eg, WBC count 1000 cell type percent/100). For absolute counts that have both high and low ranges, such as white blood cell (WBC) count, we constructed two binary variables. WBC‐low was 1 when the WBC was below the lower limit of normal; otherwise it was 0. WBC‐high was 1 if the WBC was above the upper limit of normal; otherwise it was 0. For continuous variables such as NRBCs or blasts where any presence on the manual differential count is abnormal, we constructed binary variables with 0 indicating absence of the cell type and 1 indicating a cell count was at least 1.

Measurements of many cell types in the manual differential count and smear assessment (eg, burr cells) are reported in qualitative terms such as occasional, few, increased, or present, if observed, or none seen, unremarkable, or no mention, if not observed. We dichotomized all such results as present or absent for analysis purposes.

Statistical Analysis

For all the original variables, we plotted cell counts against 30‐day mortality to graphically show this univariate association. To screen the effects of these 45 binary CBC variables univariately, we used each as the sole independent variable in a logistic regression model with 30‐day mortality as the dependent variable.

The simultaneous effects of the 45 CBC measures on mortality were investigated using multiple logistic regression models, always controlling for patient age (in years, as a continuous variable) and sex (as a dichotomous variable). Two approaches were taken to handle the large number of predictors in the model. First, we formed subgroups of predictors based on clinical judgment (eg, the subgroup of bands, Dohle bodies, and toxic granules associated with infections) and ran logistic regressions of each subgroup to choose the significant predictors of these subgroups to fit them into an overall prediction model of 30‐day mortality. The results were verified using a second approach that did not depend on subjective judgment. Both backward and forward stepwise variable selection procedures were used to choose the subset of significant predictors (P < .005) of 30‐day mortality in logistic regression, again controlling for age and sex. To be sure that the predictive power of the models was not decreased by converting continuous variables into categorical variables, we also ran models that included the continuous variables as potential predictors. We used the c statistic as a measure of the goodness‐of‐fit of the models. We included the Charlson Index and the 10 most common admission diagnoses in our model to control for comorbidities and prime reason for admission, respectively.

We performed the analysis using SAS software, version 8.02 (SAS Institute, Inc., Cary, NC).

Chart Review

For each independent predictor of 30‐day mortality that was both statistically significant and had a very high relative risk (>2.5), one author (A.K.) took a random sample of 100200 patients with positive values for this predictor and reviewed the dictated discharge summaries in order to asses the clinical correlates of these findings.

RESULTS

During the 10 years from January 1993 through December 2002, physicians admitted 46,522 unique eligible patients to Wishard Memorial Hospital. Each patient averaged 2 admissions during the study period, for a total of 94,582 admissions. The overall 30‐day mortality of these admissions was 3.4%. Automated hemograms (white blood cell count, hemoglobin, red cell count, and red blood cell indices) were performed on blood samples from 45,709 of these patients (98%) within one day of admission. Seventy‐seven percent (35,692) had a complete blood count that included an automated differential count plus a reflex manual count and smear when required by the CAP protocol, as well as an automated hemogram. The patients with an admission CBC with differential count had a 30‐day mortality rate of 4%, slightly higher than that of patients who had only a hemogram. The patients' mean Charlson score for the CBC with differential count was 0.83, which was lower than the national average, which is closer to 1.22 Table 1 shows the demographics of this study population.

Characteristics of 35,692 Unique Patients with a CBC and Automated Differential Count
CharacteristicValue
Average age (years)46.2 17.7
Average LOS (days)6.5 8.1
Male (%)55.4
Race
White (%)52.9
Black (%)43.4
Other (%)3.7
Charlson Index (mean)0.83 1.5
Most common admission diagnoses (ICD9)Chest pain
 Pneumonia, organism unspecified
 Other symptoms involving abdomen or pelvis
 Unspecified heart failure
 Intermediate coronary syndrome
 Unspecified hemorrhage of GI tract
 Acute but ill‐defined cerebrovascular disease
 Diseases of pancreas
 Cellulitis and abscess of leg except foot
 Convulsions

Predictors of 30‐Day Mortality

We examined the univariate effect of age, sex, and the 45 CBC variables (Table 2) on 30‐day mortality. Most of these variables showed a significant (P < .0001) effect on mortality. Only a few abnormalities, for example, a low WBC (< 5000/L), basophilia (>200/L), and eosinophilia (>450/L), were unrelated to 30‐day mortality. Increasing age and male sex were associated with increased mortality. Of the 45 CBC variables, 29 were strong (P < .0001) univariate predictors of mortality and had odds ratios (ORs) greater than 2.5. Eight variables had univariate ORs greater than 4: toxic granules, Dohle bodies, smudge cells, promyelocytes, myelocytes, metamyelocytes, NRBCs, and burr cells. All but 2 of these are white blood cell observations.

Univariate Risk of 30‐Day Mortality in Patients with an Admission CBC and Automated Differential Count
  Number (%)Odds ratioP value
HemogramAge ( 18 years)35,688 (100)1.039< .0001
Sex (male)19,788 (55.4)1.420<.0001
 WBC > 12,00011,124 (31.2)2.049<.0001
 WBC < 50002176 (6.1)0.938.5765
 Hematocrit (>54)212 (0.6)2.633<.0001
 Hematocrit (<37)8687 (24.3)2.359<.0001
 MCV (>94)6552 (18.4)1.584<.0001
 MCV (<80)2815 (7.9)1.258.0121
 High RDW (>14.5)9478 (26.6)2.647<.0001
 High MCH (>32)5308 (14.9)1.367<.0001
 Low MCH (<26)2064 (5.8)1.392.0011
 High MCHC (>36)28 (0.1)3.964.0109
 Low MCHC (<32)738 (2.1)2.190<.0001
 Automated differential countNeutrophilia (>7700)10,578 (37.8)1.601<.0001
Neutropenia (<1500)469 (1.3)2.831<.0001
 Basophilia (>200)1137 (3.2)1.362.0215
 Eosinophilia (>450)1529 (4.3)1.074.5788
 Monocytosis (>800)10,066 (28.2)1.262<.0001
 Lymphocytosis (>4000)3046 (8.5)2.495<.0001
Manual differential countBlast cells (Y/N)31 (0.1)1.638.5001
Myelocytes (Y/N)215 (0.6)8.231< .0001
 Promyelocytes (Y/N)25 (0.1)13.429< .0001
 Metamyeloctyes (Y/N)905 (2.5)5.798< .0001
 Atypical lymphocytes (Y/N)1303 (3.7)1.881< .0001
 Hypersegmented neutrophils (Y/N)141 (0.4)3.061< .0001
 Microcytes (Y/N)3452 (9.7)2.578< .0001
 Macrocytes (Y/N)3475 (9.7)3.282< .0001
 Hypochromic RBCs (Y/N)2252 (6.3)2.290< .0001
 Basophilic stippling (Y/N)273 (0.8)3.553< .0001
 Target cells (Y/N)1140 (3.2)2.866< .0001
 Polychromasia (Y/N)1675 (4.7)3.622< .0001
 Toxic granules (Y/N)1063 (3.0)4.021< .0001
 Dohle bodies (Y/N)524 (1.5)4.821< .0001
 Ovalocytes (Y/N)1555 (4.4)2.558< .0001
 Spherocytes (Y/N)465 (1.3)3.132< .0001
 Schistocytes (Y/N)1484 (4.2)3.150< .0001
 Sickle Cells (Y/N)62 (0.2)0.389.3490
 Howell‐Jolly bodies (Y/N)71 (0.2)3.025.0033
 Pappenheimer bodies (Y/N)67 (0.2)2.344.0468
 Burr cells (Y/N)253 (0.7)9.297<.0001
 Teardrop cells (Y/N)538 (1.5)2.150< .0001
 Vacuolated cells (Y/N)897 (2.5)3.667< .0001
 Giant platelets (Y/N)781 (2.2)3.102< .0001
 Smudge cells (Y/N)50 (0.1)5.237< .0001
 Cleaved cells (Y/N)8 (0.0)3.393.2533
 Band forms (Y/N)7594 (21.3)2.964< .0001
 NRBCs (Y/N)467 (1.3)8.756< .0001

All the statistical approaches produced essentially the same model for predicting mortality. Table 3 shows that age, sex, and 13 of the CBC variables were retained in the final model of dichotomous variables using backward and forward selection. Lymphocytosis, burr cells, and NRBCs were the greatest independent predictors of mortality, with odds ratios greater than 2.5. Only 1 variable, sickle cells, predicted reduced mortality (with an odds ratio well below 1).

Multivariate Model of Statistically Significant (P < .005) Predictors of 30‐Day Mortality from the CBC and Automated Differential Count Pared Stepwise Backward Selection
ParameterOdds ratioConfidence intervalP value
Age (years)1.0401.0371.043< .0001
Sex (male)1.9651.7462.213< .0001
WBC > 12,0001.7011.5081.919< .0001
Hematocrit (>54)2.3311.4383.780< .0006
Hematocrit (<37)1.7141.5141.941< .0001
MCV (>94)1.3521.1861.543< .0001
High RDW (>14.5)1.4631.2911.658< .0001
Lymphocytosis (>4000)2.8482.4353.332< .0001
Metamyeloctye (Y/N)2.0741.6662.581< .0001
Macrocytes (Y/N)1.3171.1271.539< .0005
Toxic granules (Y/N)1.4941.2001.859.0003
Sickle cells (Y/N)0.0390.0050.292.0016
Burr cells (Y/N)3.2542.3474.513< .0001
Band forms (Y/N)1.5861.3861.814< .0001
NRBCs (Y/N)2.9062.2403.770< .0001

The c statistic (the ratio of the area under the ROC curve to the whole area, which reflects the overall predictive power of the final model), was about 0.80 by any approach, which compared favorably with previous prediction models.3, 4 Using continuous measures of CBC in the model did not increase the predictive power. Inclusion of the Charlson Index and the top 10 admission diagnoses did not significantly change the prediction model, although 2 admission diagnoses, chest pain and acute but ill‐defined cerebrovascular disease, emerged as independent predictors of 30‐day mortality, with odds ratios of 0.314 and 2.033, respectively, at P < .0001.

Chart Review

Of the 200 cases with NRBCs, the leading probable causes for this finding were severe hypoxia (average A‐a gradient = 326 mm Hg), acute anemia (average hgb = 6.1 gm/dL), and sickle‐cell anemia. Other diseases associated with NRBCs were infection/sepsis, HIV, solid tumors (breast/lung/colon/prostate), and leukemia or multiple myeloma. Having even a single NRBC at admission correlated with a 25.5% mortality rate. Of note, 30%40% of patients with sickle‐cell disease had NRBCs and moderate anemia (hgb = 8.7 gm/dL) on admission to the hospital, but there was no excess risk of mortality. Indeed, the 49 patients with sickle‐cell disease who had NRBCs at admission had a 30‐day mortality of 0%.

Most of the patients with NRBCs reviewed exhibited overt signs of severe disease, for example, shock, respiratory failure, or severe trauma, in addition to having NRBCs. However, in 2 patients the NRBCs were the only strong signal of disease severity. Both had NRBCs on the day of discharge and were readmitted within 3 days in extremis and died. One was readmitted in fulminant septic shock, likely from a bacterial peritonitis or urinary tract infection, and the other was readmitted in shock, likely from decompensated heart failure.

In univariate analysis, burr cells at admission correlated with a mortality rate of 27.3%. A review of 100 randomly chosen patients with burr cells revealed a pattern of associated diseases, that is, acute renal failure, liver failure, and congestive heart failure, different from that of patients with NRBCs. There was little overlap in the presence of burr cells and NRBCs, but the 12% who had burr cells and NRBCs had a high mortality rate (57%).

Absolute lymphocytosis was associated with a mortality rate of 8.6%. Although univariate analysis showed that the risk with lymphocytosis was not as high as that for patients with NRBCs or burr cells at admission, lymphocytosis was much more common (8.5%), and within the logistic model its presence explained more of the chi‐square statistic than any other variable except age. Indeed, lymphocytosis was a stronger predictor of 30‐day mortality than was high WBCs or anemia. Chart review of 200 patients with lymphocytosis showed a preponderance of them had large physiologic stressors, for example, traumatic tissue injury (surgery) or cerebrovascular injury. In one subset, half the patients (50.9% of 53 patients) who underwent craniotomy for trauma and had absolute lymphocytosis at admission died, compared with 20.8% of 101 patients admitted for the same diagnosis without absolute lymphocytosis.

DISCUSSION

Some investigators have incorporated selected CBC measures, for example, white blood cell count and hemoglobin/hematocrit, into multivariable models that predict mortality or rehospitalizations.6, 7, 9, 23 However, CBC reports can include a spectrum of more than 40 distinct counts and morphologic findings. Our study was the first to take into account all the different variables in the complete blood count and differential to determine elements that independently predict a high risk of mortality.

In addition to age and sex, our multivariable analysis of the 45 CBC variables found 13 independent predictors of mortality. Five were observations about white blood cells: absolute leukocytosis, high band form cell count, the presence of metamyelocytes, the presence of toxic granules, and absolute lymphocytosis. Eight were observations about red blood cells: high hematocrit, low hematocrit, high MCV and the presence of macrocytes, high red cell distribution width, the presence of NRBCs, the presence of burr cells, and the presence of sickle cells. Because controlling for severity of illness by Charlson comorbidity scores did not significantly change the model, the CBC abnormalities among the predictors of mortality did not simply reflect how sick the patients were. Including the 10 most common admission diagnoses did not significantly attenuate our reported odds ratios, suggesting the CBC predictors did not merely reflect the primary reason for admission. Interestingly, however, admission for chest pain did correlate with a greatly reduced risk of 30‐day mortality, which may reflect the low threshold that physicians have for admitting patients with this complaint. Admission for acute but ill‐defined cerebrovascular disease independently predicted a 2‐fold increased risk of 30‐day mortality.

What is the message to physicians from this analysis? Physicians commonly order CBCs and may rely on quick heuristics to sift through the myriad findings in CBC reports. Our analysis focuses physician attention on high‐impact findings in the CBC. We assume that physicians already consider low hematocrit, high hematocrit (a sign of fluid loss and/or chronic hypoxia), high WBC count, high band cell count, and the presence of metamyeloctes (left shift) as important prognostic indicators. These abnormal findings are routinely mentioned at morning report and in a physician's notes.

Physicians, however, may not appreciate the importance of other CBC findings that our analysis found are predictive of mortality. Macrocytosis and a high RDW count (indicating an abnormally wide distribution of red blood cell size) have not previously been reported as predictors of mortality. And although other studies have suggested that bands are not predictors of mortality,11 our study found they were an important prognostic indicator, with an OR =1.59, approaching those of leukocytosis and anemia.

The most impressive predictors of mortality were burr cells, NRBCs, and absolute lymphocytosis. The multivariate ORs of these 3, ranging from 2.8 to 3.2, were the highest of any CBC finding. In univariate analysis, the first 2 were associated with mortality rates 8 to 10 times higher than that of the average admitted patient. There are anecdotal reports in the literature of burr cells being associated with ominous prognoses2426 and more robust statistical analyses showing NRBCs to be associated with increased mortality.14 Lymphocytosis has also been reported as a mortality risk in patients with trauma and emergency medical conditions.15, 16 Our analysis has shown that, indeed, all 3 of these findings are strong independent predictors of mortality.

The presence of sickle cells was also a strong predictor, but of decreased mortality. Patients with sickle cells in their smear had a risk of death one third that of patients without sickle cells. This does not indicate a protective effect. Rather, patients with sickle‐cell disease typically are young and admitted for pain control and other non‐life‐threatening conditions. The presence of NRBCs in patients with sickle‐cell disease appears to be intrinsic to the disease itself and did not have the same implications for mortality as it did for other patients in our study.

The overall logistic model including age, sex, and admission CBC variables had a respectable c statistic for predicting 30‐day mortality of 0.80. This compares well with findings in other multivariable models. For example, the APACHE II score used to predict the mortality of hospitalized critical care patients has a c statistic that ranges from 0.78 to 0.86.3, 27, 28 The APACHE score uses the worst value from the first 2 days after admission for some of its predictors so it cannot provide as early a warning as the admission CBC, and it requires collection of significantly more data. The inclusion of more CBC findings in the APACHE model might increase its predictive accuracy.

Our multivariate analysis was based on a very large number of patient samples using data collected through routine clinical care. However, our study has a number of limitations. The analysis was done at only a single institution, and the exact logistic regression model may not apply to other institutions that have different case mixes and laboratory procedures. Our institution's reported 30‐day mortality rate of 3.4% was lower than the 4.6%11.9% reported in studies of patients admitted to general ward services,2931 but this may be accounted for by the lower‐than‐average Charlson comorbidity scores in our study population. Our risk adjustment by Charlson comorbidity scores may not be as precise as a risk adjustment tailored for our particular institution.32 Our 30‐day mortality rate was calculated using state death tapes, which means we would have missed patients who died outside the state, although we believe this rarely happens. We developed predictive equations on the basis of 30‐day mortality, so we cannot comment on whether the CBC elements predict mortality beyond 30 days. We analyzed most variables as either high or low or as present or absent. Increasing degrees of abnormality may further increase the predictive power of some variables. Finally, the CBC is only one of many tests and clinical findings; it may be that some of these other variables would displace some CBC variables and/or improve the overall predictive power at the time the admission laboratory tests were performed. In this initial study, we have described the prognostic implication of the CBC across a wide range of diagnoses. Future work will focus on the predictive power of commonly gathered variables in more specific conditions (eg, low white blood cell count in sepsis).

Physicians generally have an intuitive ability to identify patients who are seriously ill and at high risk of dying33 and adjust their diagnostic and therapeutic efforts accordingly. Our analysis highlights the value that certain observations in the CBC, notably burr cells, NRBCs, and absolute lymphocytosis, add to physicians' assessments of mortality risk. Even after adjustment for age, sex, comorbidities, common admission diagnoses, and other variables in the CBC, the presence of these findings predicted a 3‐fold increase in 30‐day mortality. Identifying the red flags within this ubiquitously performed test can make the difference in premature discharge or inappropriate triage of patients. Busy physicians can choose from a wide selection of ever‐improving diagnostic tests, yet the workhorse CBC can serve as a simple and early identifier of patients with a poor prognosis.

References
  1. Shapiro MF,Greenfield SG.The complete blood count and leukocyte differential count.Ann Intern Med.1987;106:6574.
  2. Chang R,Wong GY.Prognostic significance of marked leukocytosis in hospitalized patients.J Gen Intern Med.1991;6:199203.
  3. Knaus WA,Wagner DP,Draper EA, et al.The APACHE III prognostic system. Risk prediction of hospital mortality for critically ill hospitalized adults.Chest.1991;100:16191636.
  4. Knaus WA,Draper EA,Wagner DP,Zimmerman JE.APACHE II: a severity of disease classification system.Crit Care Med.1985;13:818829.
  5. Fine MJ,Auble TE,Yealy DM, et al.A prediction rule to identify low‐risk patients with community‐acquired pneumonia.N Engl J Med.1997;336:243250.
  6. Grimm R,Neaton J,Ludwig W.Prognostic importance of the white blood cell count for coronary, cancer, and all‐cause mortality.JAMA.1985;254:19321937.
  7. Labry LD,Campion E,Glynn R,Vokonas P.White blood cell count as a predictor of mortality: results over 18 years from the Normative Aging Study.J Clin Epidemiol.1990;43:153157.
  8. Frumin AM,Mendell TH,Mintz SS,Novack P,Faulk AT.Nucleated red blood cells in congestive heart failure.Circulation.1959;20:367370.
  9. Mozaffarian D,Nye R,Levy WC.Anemia predicts mortality in severe heart failure: the prospective randomized amlodipine survival evaluation (PRAISE).J Am Coll Cardiol.2003;41:19331939.
  10. Ardron MJ,Westengard JC,Dutcher TF.Band neutrophil counts are unnecessary for the diagnosis of infection in patients with normal total leukocyte counts.Am J Clin Pathol.1994;102:646649.
  11. Brigden M,Page N.The lack of clinical utility of white blood cell differential counts and blood morphology in elderly individuals with normal hematology profiles.Arch Pathol Lab Med.1990;114:394398.
  12. Wenz B,Gennis P,Canova C,Burns ER.The clinical utility of the leucocyte differential in emergency medicine.Am J Clin Pathol.1986;86:298303.
  13. Wile MJ,Homer LD,Gaehler S,Phillips S,Millan J.Manual differential cell counts help predict bacterial infection.Am J Clin Pathol.2001;115:644649.
  14. Schwartz SO,Stansbury F.Significance of nucleated red blood cells in peripheral blood; analysis of 1,496 cases.JAMA.1954;154:13391340.
  15. Stachon A,Sondermann N,Imohl M,Krieg M.Nucleated red blood cells indicate high risk of in‐hospital mortality.J Lab Clin Med.2002;140:407412.
  16. Teggatz JR,Parkin J,Peterson L.Transient atypical lymphocytosis in patients with emergency medical conditions.Arch Pathol Lab Med.1987;111:712714.
  17. Pinkerton PH,McLellan BA,Quantz MC,Robinson JB.Acute lymphocytosis after trauma—early recognition of the high‐risk patient?J Trauma.1989;29:749751.
  18. McDonald CJ,Overhage JM,Tierney WM, et al.The Regenstrief Medical Record System: a quarter century experience.Int J Med Inf.1999;54:225253.
  19. Charlson M,Szatrowski TP,Peterson J,Gold J.Validation of a combined comorbidity index.J Clin Epidemiol.1994;47:12451251.
  20. Grannis S,Overhage JM,McDonald CJ.Real world performance of approximate string comparators for use in patient matching.Medinfo.2004;11(Pt1):4347.
  21. Picard F,Gicquel C,Marnet L,Guesnu M,Levy JP.Preliminary evaluation of the new hematology analyzer COULTER GEN‐S in a university hospital.Clin Chem Lab Med.1999;37:681686.
  22. Rosenthal GE,Kaboli PJ,Barnett MJ.Differences in length of stay in veterans health administration and other united states hospitals: is the gap closing?Med Care.2003;41:882894.
  23. Kosiborod M,Smith G,Radford M,Foody J,Krumholz H.The Prognostic importance of anemia in patients with heart failure.Am J Med.2003;114:112119.
  24. Schwartz SO,Motto SA.The diagnostic significance of “burr” red blood cells.Am J Med Sci.1949;218:563.
  25. Aherne WA.The “burr” red cell and azotemia.J Clin Pathol.1957;10:252257.
  26. Bell RE.The origin of ‘burr’ erythrocytes.Br J Haematol.1963;9:552555.
  27. de Keizer NF,Bonsel GJ,Goldfad C,Rowan KM.The added value that increasing levels of diagnostic information provide in prognostic models to estimate hospital mortality for adult intensive care patients.Intern Care Med.2000;26:577584.
  28. Harrell F,Califf R,Pryor D,Lee K,Rosati R.Evaluating the yield of medical tests.JAMA.1982;247:25432546.
  29. Meltzer D,Manning WG,Morrison J, et al.Effects of physician experience on costs and outcomes on an academic general medical service: results of a trial of hospitalists.Ann Intern Med.2002;137:866874.
  30. Kearns PJ,Wang CC,Morris WJ, et al.Hospital care by hospital‐based and clinic‐based faculty. a prospective, controlled trial.Arch Intern Med.2001;161:235241.
  31. Auerbach AD,Wachter RM,Katz P,Showstack J,Baron RB,Goldman L.Implementation of a voluntary hospitalist service at a community teaching hospital: improved clinical efficiency and patient outcomes.Ann Intern Med.2002;137:859865.
  32. Rosenthal GE,Harper DL,Quinn LM,Cooper GS.Severity‐adjusted mortality and length of stay in teaching and nonteaching hospitals: results of a regional study.JAMA.1997;278:485490.
  33. McClish DK,Powell SH.How well can physicians estimate mortality in a medical intensive care unit?Med Decis Mak.1989;9:125132.
Article PDF
Issue
Journal of Hospital Medicine - 2(1)
Publications
Page Number
5-12
Legacy Keywords
diagnostic decision making, laboratory testing, electronic medical record
Sections
Article PDF
Article PDF

The complete blood count (CBC) bundles the automated hemogram, an automated differential count of 5 types of cells, and a reflex manual differential count (when required by protocol) and is one of the most frequently ordered laboratory tests on admission to the hospital. In practice, it is a routine ingredient of all hospital admission ordersphysicians order a hemogram either alone or as part of a complete blood count for 98% of our medical/surgical admissions, and the same is true at most institutions.1 We know that the white blood cell count and hematocrit from the automated hemogram predict disease severity and mortality risk.25 For example, elevated WBC counts predict a worse prognosis in patients with cancer or coronary artery disease,6, 7 and anemia predicts increased risk of death of patients with heart failure.8, 9 Further, these two tests provide direct management guidance in common circumstances, for example, bleeding and infection.

The CBC describes the number and morphology of more than 40 cell types, from acanthocytosis to vacuolated white blood cells. Disagreement exists about the clinical significance of many of these observations.1013 And only a few components of the manual differential, for example, nucleated red blood cells (NRBCs) and lymphocytosis, have been quantitatively evaluated to determine their prognostic significance.1417 But these two observations have not been examined to determine their independent contributions to predictions of mortality when taken in conjunction with their accompanying CBC observations. Which of the numerous cell types and cell counts in the commonly ordered CBC, indicate that a patient is at high risk of death? In this article we report an inpatient study that used univariate and multivariate analyses of admission CBCs to predict 30‐day mortality in order to answer that question.

METHODS

Patients and Protocol

The institutional review board of Indiana University, Purdue University, Indianapolis, approved this study. We included in the study all adult patients (those at least 18 years old) admitted to Wishard Hospital between January 1, 1993, and December 31, 2002, except for prisoners (for IRB reasons) and obstetric patients (because their 30‐day mortality is very close to zero0.07% at our institution). Wishard Hospital is a large urban hospital that serves a diverse but predominantly inner‐city population in Indianapolis. If a patient was admitted more than once during the 10 years of observation, we included only the first admission in the analysis in order to assure statistical independence of the observations. We extracted data from the Regenstrief Medical Record System (RMRS), a comprehensive medical records system that has demographic data, vital signs, diagnoses, results of clinical tests, and pharmacy information on all inpatient, emergency department, and outpatient encounter sites.18

We obtained the admission and discharge ICD9 and DRG codes to assess the disease patterns associated with individual CBC abnormalities. We obtained these codes from routine hospital case abstractions performed by Wishard Hospital's medical records department using NCoder+ and Quadramed. Patients assigned DRG codes 370‐384 were identified as obstetric and therefore excluded. Using the ICD9 and CPT codes according to the Charlson algorithm, we calculated a Charlson Comorbidity Index value19 for each patient as a marker of coexisting conditions.

Outcomes

The primary outcome was 30‐day mortality counted from the date of admission. We used information from the hospital record (inpatient deaths) and the Indiana state death tapes to determine the dates of death of all patients. Patients were matched to the Indiana death tapes by an algorithm using name, social security number, date of birth, and sex.20

Hemogram and Differential Count Test Methods

The hemogram, differential counts, and blood smear exam results included in this study all came from Wishard Hospital's laboratory. During this study, the hospital used only 2 cell counters, the Coulter STK‐S and the Gen‐S automated blood analyzer (Beckman Coulter, Brea, California), to produce hemogram and automated blood differential counts. Both instruments provided automated differential counts of 5 cell types: neutrophils, lymphocytes, monocytes, basophils, and eosinophils. The latter machine also produced platelet counts and reticulocyte counts, but during the study period these counts were not routinely reported to physicians unless ordered specifically, so we did not include them in the analyses. The laboratory reflexively performed 100‐cell manual differential counts and blood smear exams when abnormalities as defined by College of American Pathologists (CAP) criteria were observed in the automated measures. Both automated blood analyzers used the same automated CAP criteria to decide when to add a manual differential count and blood smear analysis, and these criteria were constant throughout the study. This protocol predicts manual differential abnormalities with high sensitivity, missing less than 1% of important findings in a manual differential.21 When the CAP criteria did not require a manual differential count and blood smear exam, we assumed that those counts unique to a manual count, for example, blast cell count, were zero and that there were no abnormalities in blood smear morphology.

Laboratories may report white blood cells as absolute counts (eg, number of cells/mm3) and/or as percentages. We converted all counts reported as percentages to absolute numbers (eg, WBC count 1000 cell type percent/100). For absolute counts that have both high and low ranges, such as white blood cell (WBC) count, we constructed two binary variables. WBC‐low was 1 when the WBC was below the lower limit of normal; otherwise it was 0. WBC‐high was 1 if the WBC was above the upper limit of normal; otherwise it was 0. For continuous variables such as NRBCs or blasts where any presence on the manual differential count is abnormal, we constructed binary variables with 0 indicating absence of the cell type and 1 indicating a cell count was at least 1.

Measurements of many cell types in the manual differential count and smear assessment (eg, burr cells) are reported in qualitative terms such as occasional, few, increased, or present, if observed, or none seen, unremarkable, or no mention, if not observed. We dichotomized all such results as present or absent for analysis purposes.

Statistical Analysis

For all the original variables, we plotted cell counts against 30‐day mortality to graphically show this univariate association. To screen the effects of these 45 binary CBC variables univariately, we used each as the sole independent variable in a logistic regression model with 30‐day mortality as the dependent variable.

The simultaneous effects of the 45 CBC measures on mortality were investigated using multiple logistic regression models, always controlling for patient age (in years, as a continuous variable) and sex (as a dichotomous variable). Two approaches were taken to handle the large number of predictors in the model. First, we formed subgroups of predictors based on clinical judgment (eg, the subgroup of bands, Dohle bodies, and toxic granules associated with infections) and ran logistic regressions of each subgroup to choose the significant predictors of these subgroups to fit them into an overall prediction model of 30‐day mortality. The results were verified using a second approach that did not depend on subjective judgment. Both backward and forward stepwise variable selection procedures were used to choose the subset of significant predictors (P < .005) of 30‐day mortality in logistic regression, again controlling for age and sex. To be sure that the predictive power of the models was not decreased by converting continuous variables into categorical variables, we also ran models that included the continuous variables as potential predictors. We used the c statistic as a measure of the goodness‐of‐fit of the models. We included the Charlson Index and the 10 most common admission diagnoses in our model to control for comorbidities and prime reason for admission, respectively.

We performed the analysis using SAS software, version 8.02 (SAS Institute, Inc., Cary, NC).

Chart Review

For each independent predictor of 30‐day mortality that was both statistically significant and had a very high relative risk (>2.5), one author (A.K.) took a random sample of 100200 patients with positive values for this predictor and reviewed the dictated discharge summaries in order to asses the clinical correlates of these findings.

RESULTS

During the 10 years from January 1993 through December 2002, physicians admitted 46,522 unique eligible patients to Wishard Memorial Hospital. Each patient averaged 2 admissions during the study period, for a total of 94,582 admissions. The overall 30‐day mortality of these admissions was 3.4%. Automated hemograms (white blood cell count, hemoglobin, red cell count, and red blood cell indices) were performed on blood samples from 45,709 of these patients (98%) within one day of admission. Seventy‐seven percent (35,692) had a complete blood count that included an automated differential count plus a reflex manual count and smear when required by the CAP protocol, as well as an automated hemogram. The patients with an admission CBC with differential count had a 30‐day mortality rate of 4%, slightly higher than that of patients who had only a hemogram. The patients' mean Charlson score for the CBC with differential count was 0.83, which was lower than the national average, which is closer to 1.22 Table 1 shows the demographics of this study population.

Characteristics of 35,692 Unique Patients with a CBC and Automated Differential Count
CharacteristicValue
Average age (years)46.2 17.7
Average LOS (days)6.5 8.1
Male (%)55.4
Race
White (%)52.9
Black (%)43.4
Other (%)3.7
Charlson Index (mean)0.83 1.5
Most common admission diagnoses (ICD9)Chest pain
 Pneumonia, organism unspecified
 Other symptoms involving abdomen or pelvis
 Unspecified heart failure
 Intermediate coronary syndrome
 Unspecified hemorrhage of GI tract
 Acute but ill‐defined cerebrovascular disease
 Diseases of pancreas
 Cellulitis and abscess of leg except foot
 Convulsions

Predictors of 30‐Day Mortality

We examined the univariate effect of age, sex, and the 45 CBC variables (Table 2) on 30‐day mortality. Most of these variables showed a significant (P < .0001) effect on mortality. Only a few abnormalities, for example, a low WBC (< 5000/L), basophilia (>200/L), and eosinophilia (>450/L), were unrelated to 30‐day mortality. Increasing age and male sex were associated with increased mortality. Of the 45 CBC variables, 29 were strong (P < .0001) univariate predictors of mortality and had odds ratios (ORs) greater than 2.5. Eight variables had univariate ORs greater than 4: toxic granules, Dohle bodies, smudge cells, promyelocytes, myelocytes, metamyelocytes, NRBCs, and burr cells. All but 2 of these are white blood cell observations.

Univariate Risk of 30‐Day Mortality in Patients with an Admission CBC and Automated Differential Count
  Number (%)Odds ratioP value
HemogramAge ( 18 years)35,688 (100)1.039< .0001
Sex (male)19,788 (55.4)1.420<.0001
 WBC > 12,00011,124 (31.2)2.049<.0001
 WBC < 50002176 (6.1)0.938.5765
 Hematocrit (>54)212 (0.6)2.633<.0001
 Hematocrit (<37)8687 (24.3)2.359<.0001
 MCV (>94)6552 (18.4)1.584<.0001
 MCV (<80)2815 (7.9)1.258.0121
 High RDW (>14.5)9478 (26.6)2.647<.0001
 High MCH (>32)5308 (14.9)1.367<.0001
 Low MCH (<26)2064 (5.8)1.392.0011
 High MCHC (>36)28 (0.1)3.964.0109
 Low MCHC (<32)738 (2.1)2.190<.0001
 Automated differential countNeutrophilia (>7700)10,578 (37.8)1.601<.0001
Neutropenia (<1500)469 (1.3)2.831<.0001
 Basophilia (>200)1137 (3.2)1.362.0215
 Eosinophilia (>450)1529 (4.3)1.074.5788
 Monocytosis (>800)10,066 (28.2)1.262<.0001
 Lymphocytosis (>4000)3046 (8.5)2.495<.0001
Manual differential countBlast cells (Y/N)31 (0.1)1.638.5001
Myelocytes (Y/N)215 (0.6)8.231< .0001
 Promyelocytes (Y/N)25 (0.1)13.429< .0001
 Metamyeloctyes (Y/N)905 (2.5)5.798< .0001
 Atypical lymphocytes (Y/N)1303 (3.7)1.881< .0001
 Hypersegmented neutrophils (Y/N)141 (0.4)3.061< .0001
 Microcytes (Y/N)3452 (9.7)2.578< .0001
 Macrocytes (Y/N)3475 (9.7)3.282< .0001
 Hypochromic RBCs (Y/N)2252 (6.3)2.290< .0001
 Basophilic stippling (Y/N)273 (0.8)3.553< .0001
 Target cells (Y/N)1140 (3.2)2.866< .0001
 Polychromasia (Y/N)1675 (4.7)3.622< .0001
 Toxic granules (Y/N)1063 (3.0)4.021< .0001
 Dohle bodies (Y/N)524 (1.5)4.821< .0001
 Ovalocytes (Y/N)1555 (4.4)2.558< .0001
 Spherocytes (Y/N)465 (1.3)3.132< .0001
 Schistocytes (Y/N)1484 (4.2)3.150< .0001
 Sickle Cells (Y/N)62 (0.2)0.389.3490
 Howell‐Jolly bodies (Y/N)71 (0.2)3.025.0033
 Pappenheimer bodies (Y/N)67 (0.2)2.344.0468
 Burr cells (Y/N)253 (0.7)9.297<.0001
 Teardrop cells (Y/N)538 (1.5)2.150< .0001
 Vacuolated cells (Y/N)897 (2.5)3.667< .0001
 Giant platelets (Y/N)781 (2.2)3.102< .0001
 Smudge cells (Y/N)50 (0.1)5.237< .0001
 Cleaved cells (Y/N)8 (0.0)3.393.2533
 Band forms (Y/N)7594 (21.3)2.964< .0001
 NRBCs (Y/N)467 (1.3)8.756< .0001

All the statistical approaches produced essentially the same model for predicting mortality. Table 3 shows that age, sex, and 13 of the CBC variables were retained in the final model of dichotomous variables using backward and forward selection. Lymphocytosis, burr cells, and NRBCs were the greatest independent predictors of mortality, with odds ratios greater than 2.5. Only 1 variable, sickle cells, predicted reduced mortality (with an odds ratio well below 1).

Multivariate Model of Statistically Significant (P < .005) Predictors of 30‐Day Mortality from the CBC and Automated Differential Count Pared Stepwise Backward Selection
ParameterOdds ratioConfidence intervalP value
Age (years)1.0401.0371.043< .0001
Sex (male)1.9651.7462.213< .0001
WBC > 12,0001.7011.5081.919< .0001
Hematocrit (>54)2.3311.4383.780< .0006
Hematocrit (<37)1.7141.5141.941< .0001
MCV (>94)1.3521.1861.543< .0001
High RDW (>14.5)1.4631.2911.658< .0001
Lymphocytosis (>4000)2.8482.4353.332< .0001
Metamyeloctye (Y/N)2.0741.6662.581< .0001
Macrocytes (Y/N)1.3171.1271.539< .0005
Toxic granules (Y/N)1.4941.2001.859.0003
Sickle cells (Y/N)0.0390.0050.292.0016
Burr cells (Y/N)3.2542.3474.513< .0001
Band forms (Y/N)1.5861.3861.814< .0001
NRBCs (Y/N)2.9062.2403.770< .0001

The c statistic (the ratio of the area under the ROC curve to the whole area, which reflects the overall predictive power of the final model), was about 0.80 by any approach, which compared favorably with previous prediction models.3, 4 Using continuous measures of CBC in the model did not increase the predictive power. Inclusion of the Charlson Index and the top 10 admission diagnoses did not significantly change the prediction model, although 2 admission diagnoses, chest pain and acute but ill‐defined cerebrovascular disease, emerged as independent predictors of 30‐day mortality, with odds ratios of 0.314 and 2.033, respectively, at P < .0001.

Chart Review

Of the 200 cases with NRBCs, the leading probable causes for this finding were severe hypoxia (average A‐a gradient = 326 mm Hg), acute anemia (average hgb = 6.1 gm/dL), and sickle‐cell anemia. Other diseases associated with NRBCs were infection/sepsis, HIV, solid tumors (breast/lung/colon/prostate), and leukemia or multiple myeloma. Having even a single NRBC at admission correlated with a 25.5% mortality rate. Of note, 30%40% of patients with sickle‐cell disease had NRBCs and moderate anemia (hgb = 8.7 gm/dL) on admission to the hospital, but there was no excess risk of mortality. Indeed, the 49 patients with sickle‐cell disease who had NRBCs at admission had a 30‐day mortality of 0%.

Most of the patients with NRBCs reviewed exhibited overt signs of severe disease, for example, shock, respiratory failure, or severe trauma, in addition to having NRBCs. However, in 2 patients the NRBCs were the only strong signal of disease severity. Both had NRBCs on the day of discharge and were readmitted within 3 days in extremis and died. One was readmitted in fulminant septic shock, likely from a bacterial peritonitis or urinary tract infection, and the other was readmitted in shock, likely from decompensated heart failure.

In univariate analysis, burr cells at admission correlated with a mortality rate of 27.3%. A review of 100 randomly chosen patients with burr cells revealed a pattern of associated diseases, that is, acute renal failure, liver failure, and congestive heart failure, different from that of patients with NRBCs. There was little overlap in the presence of burr cells and NRBCs, but the 12% who had burr cells and NRBCs had a high mortality rate (57%).

Absolute lymphocytosis was associated with a mortality rate of 8.6%. Although univariate analysis showed that the risk with lymphocytosis was not as high as that for patients with NRBCs or burr cells at admission, lymphocytosis was much more common (8.5%), and within the logistic model its presence explained more of the chi‐square statistic than any other variable except age. Indeed, lymphocytosis was a stronger predictor of 30‐day mortality than was high WBCs or anemia. Chart review of 200 patients with lymphocytosis showed a preponderance of them had large physiologic stressors, for example, traumatic tissue injury (surgery) or cerebrovascular injury. In one subset, half the patients (50.9% of 53 patients) who underwent craniotomy for trauma and had absolute lymphocytosis at admission died, compared with 20.8% of 101 patients admitted for the same diagnosis without absolute lymphocytosis.

DISCUSSION

Some investigators have incorporated selected CBC measures, for example, white blood cell count and hemoglobin/hematocrit, into multivariable models that predict mortality or rehospitalizations.6, 7, 9, 23 However, CBC reports can include a spectrum of more than 40 distinct counts and morphologic findings. Our study was the first to take into account all the different variables in the complete blood count and differential to determine elements that independently predict a high risk of mortality.

In addition to age and sex, our multivariable analysis of the 45 CBC variables found 13 independent predictors of mortality. Five were observations about white blood cells: absolute leukocytosis, high band form cell count, the presence of metamyelocytes, the presence of toxic granules, and absolute lymphocytosis. Eight were observations about red blood cells: high hematocrit, low hematocrit, high MCV and the presence of macrocytes, high red cell distribution width, the presence of NRBCs, the presence of burr cells, and the presence of sickle cells. Because controlling for severity of illness by Charlson comorbidity scores did not significantly change the model, the CBC abnormalities among the predictors of mortality did not simply reflect how sick the patients were. Including the 10 most common admission diagnoses did not significantly attenuate our reported odds ratios, suggesting the CBC predictors did not merely reflect the primary reason for admission. Interestingly, however, admission for chest pain did correlate with a greatly reduced risk of 30‐day mortality, which may reflect the low threshold that physicians have for admitting patients with this complaint. Admission for acute but ill‐defined cerebrovascular disease independently predicted a 2‐fold increased risk of 30‐day mortality.

What is the message to physicians from this analysis? Physicians commonly order CBCs and may rely on quick heuristics to sift through the myriad findings in CBC reports. Our analysis focuses physician attention on high‐impact findings in the CBC. We assume that physicians already consider low hematocrit, high hematocrit (a sign of fluid loss and/or chronic hypoxia), high WBC count, high band cell count, and the presence of metamyeloctes (left shift) as important prognostic indicators. These abnormal findings are routinely mentioned at morning report and in a physician's notes.

Physicians, however, may not appreciate the importance of other CBC findings that our analysis found are predictive of mortality. Macrocytosis and a high RDW count (indicating an abnormally wide distribution of red blood cell size) have not previously been reported as predictors of mortality. And although other studies have suggested that bands are not predictors of mortality,11 our study found they were an important prognostic indicator, with an OR =1.59, approaching those of leukocytosis and anemia.

The most impressive predictors of mortality were burr cells, NRBCs, and absolute lymphocytosis. The multivariate ORs of these 3, ranging from 2.8 to 3.2, were the highest of any CBC finding. In univariate analysis, the first 2 were associated with mortality rates 8 to 10 times higher than that of the average admitted patient. There are anecdotal reports in the literature of burr cells being associated with ominous prognoses2426 and more robust statistical analyses showing NRBCs to be associated with increased mortality.14 Lymphocytosis has also been reported as a mortality risk in patients with trauma and emergency medical conditions.15, 16 Our analysis has shown that, indeed, all 3 of these findings are strong independent predictors of mortality.

The presence of sickle cells was also a strong predictor, but of decreased mortality. Patients with sickle cells in their smear had a risk of death one third that of patients without sickle cells. This does not indicate a protective effect. Rather, patients with sickle‐cell disease typically are young and admitted for pain control and other non‐life‐threatening conditions. The presence of NRBCs in patients with sickle‐cell disease appears to be intrinsic to the disease itself and did not have the same implications for mortality as it did for other patients in our study.

The overall logistic model including age, sex, and admission CBC variables had a respectable c statistic for predicting 30‐day mortality of 0.80. This compares well with findings in other multivariable models. For example, the APACHE II score used to predict the mortality of hospitalized critical care patients has a c statistic that ranges from 0.78 to 0.86.3, 27, 28 The APACHE score uses the worst value from the first 2 days after admission for some of its predictors so it cannot provide as early a warning as the admission CBC, and it requires collection of significantly more data. The inclusion of more CBC findings in the APACHE model might increase its predictive accuracy.

Our multivariate analysis was based on a very large number of patient samples using data collected through routine clinical care. However, our study has a number of limitations. The analysis was done at only a single institution, and the exact logistic regression model may not apply to other institutions that have different case mixes and laboratory procedures. Our institution's reported 30‐day mortality rate of 3.4% was lower than the 4.6%11.9% reported in studies of patients admitted to general ward services,2931 but this may be accounted for by the lower‐than‐average Charlson comorbidity scores in our study population. Our risk adjustment by Charlson comorbidity scores may not be as precise as a risk adjustment tailored for our particular institution.32 Our 30‐day mortality rate was calculated using state death tapes, which means we would have missed patients who died outside the state, although we believe this rarely happens. We developed predictive equations on the basis of 30‐day mortality, so we cannot comment on whether the CBC elements predict mortality beyond 30 days. We analyzed most variables as either high or low or as present or absent. Increasing degrees of abnormality may further increase the predictive power of some variables. Finally, the CBC is only one of many tests and clinical findings; it may be that some of these other variables would displace some CBC variables and/or improve the overall predictive power at the time the admission laboratory tests were performed. In this initial study, we have described the prognostic implication of the CBC across a wide range of diagnoses. Future work will focus on the predictive power of commonly gathered variables in more specific conditions (eg, low white blood cell count in sepsis).

Physicians generally have an intuitive ability to identify patients who are seriously ill and at high risk of dying33 and adjust their diagnostic and therapeutic efforts accordingly. Our analysis highlights the value that certain observations in the CBC, notably burr cells, NRBCs, and absolute lymphocytosis, add to physicians' assessments of mortality risk. Even after adjustment for age, sex, comorbidities, common admission diagnoses, and other variables in the CBC, the presence of these findings predicted a 3‐fold increase in 30‐day mortality. Identifying the red flags within this ubiquitously performed test can make the difference in premature discharge or inappropriate triage of patients. Busy physicians can choose from a wide selection of ever‐improving diagnostic tests, yet the workhorse CBC can serve as a simple and early identifier of patients with a poor prognosis.

The complete blood count (CBC) bundles the automated hemogram, an automated differential count of 5 types of cells, and a reflex manual differential count (when required by protocol) and is one of the most frequently ordered laboratory tests on admission to the hospital. In practice, it is a routine ingredient of all hospital admission ordersphysicians order a hemogram either alone or as part of a complete blood count for 98% of our medical/surgical admissions, and the same is true at most institutions.1 We know that the white blood cell count and hematocrit from the automated hemogram predict disease severity and mortality risk.25 For example, elevated WBC counts predict a worse prognosis in patients with cancer or coronary artery disease,6, 7 and anemia predicts increased risk of death of patients with heart failure.8, 9 Further, these two tests provide direct management guidance in common circumstances, for example, bleeding and infection.

The CBC describes the number and morphology of more than 40 cell types, from acanthocytosis to vacuolated white blood cells. Disagreement exists about the clinical significance of many of these observations.1013 And only a few components of the manual differential, for example, nucleated red blood cells (NRBCs) and lymphocytosis, have been quantitatively evaluated to determine their prognostic significance.1417 But these two observations have not been examined to determine their independent contributions to predictions of mortality when taken in conjunction with their accompanying CBC observations. Which of the numerous cell types and cell counts in the commonly ordered CBC, indicate that a patient is at high risk of death? In this article we report an inpatient study that used univariate and multivariate analyses of admission CBCs to predict 30‐day mortality in order to answer that question.

METHODS

Patients and Protocol

The institutional review board of Indiana University, Purdue University, Indianapolis, approved this study. We included in the study all adult patients (those at least 18 years old) admitted to Wishard Hospital between January 1, 1993, and December 31, 2002, except for prisoners (for IRB reasons) and obstetric patients (because their 30‐day mortality is very close to zero0.07% at our institution). Wishard Hospital is a large urban hospital that serves a diverse but predominantly inner‐city population in Indianapolis. If a patient was admitted more than once during the 10 years of observation, we included only the first admission in the analysis in order to assure statistical independence of the observations. We extracted data from the Regenstrief Medical Record System (RMRS), a comprehensive medical records system that has demographic data, vital signs, diagnoses, results of clinical tests, and pharmacy information on all inpatient, emergency department, and outpatient encounter sites.18

We obtained the admission and discharge ICD9 and DRG codes to assess the disease patterns associated with individual CBC abnormalities. We obtained these codes from routine hospital case abstractions performed by Wishard Hospital's medical records department using NCoder+ and Quadramed. Patients assigned DRG codes 370‐384 were identified as obstetric and therefore excluded. Using the ICD9 and CPT codes according to the Charlson algorithm, we calculated a Charlson Comorbidity Index value19 for each patient as a marker of coexisting conditions.

Outcomes

The primary outcome was 30‐day mortality counted from the date of admission. We used information from the hospital record (inpatient deaths) and the Indiana state death tapes to determine the dates of death of all patients. Patients were matched to the Indiana death tapes by an algorithm using name, social security number, date of birth, and sex.20

Hemogram and Differential Count Test Methods

The hemogram, differential counts, and blood smear exam results included in this study all came from Wishard Hospital's laboratory. During this study, the hospital used only 2 cell counters, the Coulter STK‐S and the Gen‐S automated blood analyzer (Beckman Coulter, Brea, California), to produce hemogram and automated blood differential counts. Both instruments provided automated differential counts of 5 cell types: neutrophils, lymphocytes, monocytes, basophils, and eosinophils. The latter machine also produced platelet counts and reticulocyte counts, but during the study period these counts were not routinely reported to physicians unless ordered specifically, so we did not include them in the analyses. The laboratory reflexively performed 100‐cell manual differential counts and blood smear exams when abnormalities as defined by College of American Pathologists (CAP) criteria were observed in the automated measures. Both automated blood analyzers used the same automated CAP criteria to decide when to add a manual differential count and blood smear analysis, and these criteria were constant throughout the study. This protocol predicts manual differential abnormalities with high sensitivity, missing less than 1% of important findings in a manual differential.21 When the CAP criteria did not require a manual differential count and blood smear exam, we assumed that those counts unique to a manual count, for example, blast cell count, were zero and that there were no abnormalities in blood smear morphology.

Laboratories may report white blood cells as absolute counts (eg, number of cells/mm3) and/or as percentages. We converted all counts reported as percentages to absolute numbers (eg, WBC count 1000 cell type percent/100). For absolute counts that have both high and low ranges, such as white blood cell (WBC) count, we constructed two binary variables. WBC‐low was 1 when the WBC was below the lower limit of normal; otherwise it was 0. WBC‐high was 1 if the WBC was above the upper limit of normal; otherwise it was 0. For continuous variables such as NRBCs or blasts where any presence on the manual differential count is abnormal, we constructed binary variables with 0 indicating absence of the cell type and 1 indicating a cell count was at least 1.

Measurements of many cell types in the manual differential count and smear assessment (eg, burr cells) are reported in qualitative terms such as occasional, few, increased, or present, if observed, or none seen, unremarkable, or no mention, if not observed. We dichotomized all such results as present or absent for analysis purposes.

Statistical Analysis

For all the original variables, we plotted cell counts against 30‐day mortality to graphically show this univariate association. To screen the effects of these 45 binary CBC variables univariately, we used each as the sole independent variable in a logistic regression model with 30‐day mortality as the dependent variable.

The simultaneous effects of the 45 CBC measures on mortality were investigated using multiple logistic regression models, always controlling for patient age (in years, as a continuous variable) and sex (as a dichotomous variable). Two approaches were taken to handle the large number of predictors in the model. First, we formed subgroups of predictors based on clinical judgment (eg, the subgroup of bands, Dohle bodies, and toxic granules associated with infections) and ran logistic regressions of each subgroup to choose the significant predictors of these subgroups to fit them into an overall prediction model of 30‐day mortality. The results were verified using a second approach that did not depend on subjective judgment. Both backward and forward stepwise variable selection procedures were used to choose the subset of significant predictors (P < .005) of 30‐day mortality in logistic regression, again controlling for age and sex. To be sure that the predictive power of the models was not decreased by converting continuous variables into categorical variables, we also ran models that included the continuous variables as potential predictors. We used the c statistic as a measure of the goodness‐of‐fit of the models. We included the Charlson Index and the 10 most common admission diagnoses in our model to control for comorbidities and prime reason for admission, respectively.

We performed the analysis using SAS software, version 8.02 (SAS Institute, Inc., Cary, NC).

Chart Review

For each independent predictor of 30‐day mortality that was both statistically significant and had a very high relative risk (>2.5), one author (A.K.) took a random sample of 100200 patients with positive values for this predictor and reviewed the dictated discharge summaries in order to asses the clinical correlates of these findings.

RESULTS

During the 10 years from January 1993 through December 2002, physicians admitted 46,522 unique eligible patients to Wishard Memorial Hospital. Each patient averaged 2 admissions during the study period, for a total of 94,582 admissions. The overall 30‐day mortality of these admissions was 3.4%. Automated hemograms (white blood cell count, hemoglobin, red cell count, and red blood cell indices) were performed on blood samples from 45,709 of these patients (98%) within one day of admission. Seventy‐seven percent (35,692) had a complete blood count that included an automated differential count plus a reflex manual count and smear when required by the CAP protocol, as well as an automated hemogram. The patients with an admission CBC with differential count had a 30‐day mortality rate of 4%, slightly higher than that of patients who had only a hemogram. The patients' mean Charlson score for the CBC with differential count was 0.83, which was lower than the national average, which is closer to 1.22 Table 1 shows the demographics of this study population.

Characteristics of 35,692 Unique Patients with a CBC and Automated Differential Count
CharacteristicValue
Average age (years)46.2 17.7
Average LOS (days)6.5 8.1
Male (%)55.4
Race
White (%)52.9
Black (%)43.4
Other (%)3.7
Charlson Index (mean)0.83 1.5
Most common admission diagnoses (ICD9)Chest pain
 Pneumonia, organism unspecified
 Other symptoms involving abdomen or pelvis
 Unspecified heart failure
 Intermediate coronary syndrome
 Unspecified hemorrhage of GI tract
 Acute but ill‐defined cerebrovascular disease
 Diseases of pancreas
 Cellulitis and abscess of leg except foot
 Convulsions

Predictors of 30‐Day Mortality

We examined the univariate effect of age, sex, and the 45 CBC variables (Table 2) on 30‐day mortality. Most of these variables showed a significant (P < .0001) effect on mortality. Only a few abnormalities, for example, a low WBC (< 5000/L), basophilia (>200/L), and eosinophilia (>450/L), were unrelated to 30‐day mortality. Increasing age and male sex were associated with increased mortality. Of the 45 CBC variables, 29 were strong (P < .0001) univariate predictors of mortality and had odds ratios (ORs) greater than 2.5. Eight variables had univariate ORs greater than 4: toxic granules, Dohle bodies, smudge cells, promyelocytes, myelocytes, metamyelocytes, NRBCs, and burr cells. All but 2 of these are white blood cell observations.

Univariate Risk of 30‐Day Mortality in Patients with an Admission CBC and Automated Differential Count
  Number (%)Odds ratioP value
HemogramAge ( 18 years)35,688 (100)1.039< .0001
Sex (male)19,788 (55.4)1.420<.0001
 WBC > 12,00011,124 (31.2)2.049<.0001
 WBC < 50002176 (6.1)0.938.5765
 Hematocrit (>54)212 (0.6)2.633<.0001
 Hematocrit (<37)8687 (24.3)2.359<.0001
 MCV (>94)6552 (18.4)1.584<.0001
 MCV (<80)2815 (7.9)1.258.0121
 High RDW (>14.5)9478 (26.6)2.647<.0001
 High MCH (>32)5308 (14.9)1.367<.0001
 Low MCH (<26)2064 (5.8)1.392.0011
 High MCHC (>36)28 (0.1)3.964.0109
 Low MCHC (<32)738 (2.1)2.190<.0001
 Automated differential countNeutrophilia (>7700)10,578 (37.8)1.601<.0001
Neutropenia (<1500)469 (1.3)2.831<.0001
 Basophilia (>200)1137 (3.2)1.362.0215
 Eosinophilia (>450)1529 (4.3)1.074.5788
 Monocytosis (>800)10,066 (28.2)1.262<.0001
 Lymphocytosis (>4000)3046 (8.5)2.495<.0001
Manual differential countBlast cells (Y/N)31 (0.1)1.638.5001
Myelocytes (Y/N)215 (0.6)8.231< .0001
 Promyelocytes (Y/N)25 (0.1)13.429< .0001
 Metamyeloctyes (Y/N)905 (2.5)5.798< .0001
 Atypical lymphocytes (Y/N)1303 (3.7)1.881< .0001
 Hypersegmented neutrophils (Y/N)141 (0.4)3.061< .0001
 Microcytes (Y/N)3452 (9.7)2.578< .0001
 Macrocytes (Y/N)3475 (9.7)3.282< .0001
 Hypochromic RBCs (Y/N)2252 (6.3)2.290< .0001
 Basophilic stippling (Y/N)273 (0.8)3.553< .0001
 Target cells (Y/N)1140 (3.2)2.866< .0001
 Polychromasia (Y/N)1675 (4.7)3.622< .0001
 Toxic granules (Y/N)1063 (3.0)4.021< .0001
 Dohle bodies (Y/N)524 (1.5)4.821< .0001
 Ovalocytes (Y/N)1555 (4.4)2.558< .0001
 Spherocytes (Y/N)465 (1.3)3.132< .0001
 Schistocytes (Y/N)1484 (4.2)3.150< .0001
 Sickle Cells (Y/N)62 (0.2)0.389.3490
 Howell‐Jolly bodies (Y/N)71 (0.2)3.025.0033
 Pappenheimer bodies (Y/N)67 (0.2)2.344.0468
 Burr cells (Y/N)253 (0.7)9.297<.0001
 Teardrop cells (Y/N)538 (1.5)2.150< .0001
 Vacuolated cells (Y/N)897 (2.5)3.667< .0001
 Giant platelets (Y/N)781 (2.2)3.102< .0001
 Smudge cells (Y/N)50 (0.1)5.237< .0001
 Cleaved cells (Y/N)8 (0.0)3.393.2533
 Band forms (Y/N)7594 (21.3)2.964< .0001
 NRBCs (Y/N)467 (1.3)8.756< .0001

All the statistical approaches produced essentially the same model for predicting mortality. Table 3 shows that age, sex, and 13 of the CBC variables were retained in the final model of dichotomous variables using backward and forward selection. Lymphocytosis, burr cells, and NRBCs were the greatest independent predictors of mortality, with odds ratios greater than 2.5. Only 1 variable, sickle cells, predicted reduced mortality (with an odds ratio well below 1).

Multivariate Model of Statistically Significant (P < .005) Predictors of 30‐Day Mortality from the CBC and Automated Differential Count Pared Stepwise Backward Selection
ParameterOdds ratioConfidence intervalP value
Age (years)1.0401.0371.043< .0001
Sex (male)1.9651.7462.213< .0001
WBC > 12,0001.7011.5081.919< .0001
Hematocrit (>54)2.3311.4383.780< .0006
Hematocrit (<37)1.7141.5141.941< .0001
MCV (>94)1.3521.1861.543< .0001
High RDW (>14.5)1.4631.2911.658< .0001
Lymphocytosis (>4000)2.8482.4353.332< .0001
Metamyeloctye (Y/N)2.0741.6662.581< .0001
Macrocytes (Y/N)1.3171.1271.539< .0005
Toxic granules (Y/N)1.4941.2001.859.0003
Sickle cells (Y/N)0.0390.0050.292.0016
Burr cells (Y/N)3.2542.3474.513< .0001
Band forms (Y/N)1.5861.3861.814< .0001
NRBCs (Y/N)2.9062.2403.770< .0001

The c statistic (the ratio of the area under the ROC curve to the whole area, which reflects the overall predictive power of the final model), was about 0.80 by any approach, which compared favorably with previous prediction models.3, 4 Using continuous measures of CBC in the model did not increase the predictive power. Inclusion of the Charlson Index and the top 10 admission diagnoses did not significantly change the prediction model, although 2 admission diagnoses, chest pain and acute but ill‐defined cerebrovascular disease, emerged as independent predictors of 30‐day mortality, with odds ratios of 0.314 and 2.033, respectively, at P < .0001.

Chart Review

Of the 200 cases with NRBCs, the leading probable causes for this finding were severe hypoxia (average A‐a gradient = 326 mm Hg), acute anemia (average hgb = 6.1 gm/dL), and sickle‐cell anemia. Other diseases associated with NRBCs were infection/sepsis, HIV, solid tumors (breast/lung/colon/prostate), and leukemia or multiple myeloma. Having even a single NRBC at admission correlated with a 25.5% mortality rate. Of note, 30%40% of patients with sickle‐cell disease had NRBCs and moderate anemia (hgb = 8.7 gm/dL) on admission to the hospital, but there was no excess risk of mortality. Indeed, the 49 patients with sickle‐cell disease who had NRBCs at admission had a 30‐day mortality of 0%.

Most of the patients with NRBCs reviewed exhibited overt signs of severe disease, for example, shock, respiratory failure, or severe trauma, in addition to having NRBCs. However, in 2 patients the NRBCs were the only strong signal of disease severity. Both had NRBCs on the day of discharge and were readmitted within 3 days in extremis and died. One was readmitted in fulminant septic shock, likely from a bacterial peritonitis or urinary tract infection, and the other was readmitted in shock, likely from decompensated heart failure.

In univariate analysis, burr cells at admission correlated with a mortality rate of 27.3%. A review of 100 randomly chosen patients with burr cells revealed a pattern of associated diseases, that is, acute renal failure, liver failure, and congestive heart failure, different from that of patients with NRBCs. There was little overlap in the presence of burr cells and NRBCs, but the 12% who had burr cells and NRBCs had a high mortality rate (57%).

Absolute lymphocytosis was associated with a mortality rate of 8.6%. Although univariate analysis showed that the risk with lymphocytosis was not as high as that for patients with NRBCs or burr cells at admission, lymphocytosis was much more common (8.5%), and within the logistic model its presence explained more of the chi‐square statistic than any other variable except age. Indeed, lymphocytosis was a stronger predictor of 30‐day mortality than was high WBCs or anemia. Chart review of 200 patients with lymphocytosis showed a preponderance of them had large physiologic stressors, for example, traumatic tissue injury (surgery) or cerebrovascular injury. In one subset, half the patients (50.9% of 53 patients) who underwent craniotomy for trauma and had absolute lymphocytosis at admission died, compared with 20.8% of 101 patients admitted for the same diagnosis without absolute lymphocytosis.

DISCUSSION

Some investigators have incorporated selected CBC measures, for example, white blood cell count and hemoglobin/hematocrit, into multivariable models that predict mortality or rehospitalizations.6, 7, 9, 23 However, CBC reports can include a spectrum of more than 40 distinct counts and morphologic findings. Our study was the first to take into account all the different variables in the complete blood count and differential to determine elements that independently predict a high risk of mortality.

In addition to age and sex, our multivariable analysis of the 45 CBC variables found 13 independent predictors of mortality. Five were observations about white blood cells: absolute leukocytosis, high band form cell count, the presence of metamyelocytes, the presence of toxic granules, and absolute lymphocytosis. Eight were observations about red blood cells: high hematocrit, low hematocrit, high MCV and the presence of macrocytes, high red cell distribution width, the presence of NRBCs, the presence of burr cells, and the presence of sickle cells. Because controlling for severity of illness by Charlson comorbidity scores did not significantly change the model, the CBC abnormalities among the predictors of mortality did not simply reflect how sick the patients were. Including the 10 most common admission diagnoses did not significantly attenuate our reported odds ratios, suggesting the CBC predictors did not merely reflect the primary reason for admission. Interestingly, however, admission for chest pain did correlate with a greatly reduced risk of 30‐day mortality, which may reflect the low threshold that physicians have for admitting patients with this complaint. Admission for acute but ill‐defined cerebrovascular disease independently predicted a 2‐fold increased risk of 30‐day mortality.

What is the message to physicians from this analysis? Physicians commonly order CBCs and may rely on quick heuristics to sift through the myriad findings in CBC reports. Our analysis focuses physician attention on high‐impact findings in the CBC. We assume that physicians already consider low hematocrit, high hematocrit (a sign of fluid loss and/or chronic hypoxia), high WBC count, high band cell count, and the presence of metamyeloctes (left shift) as important prognostic indicators. These abnormal findings are routinely mentioned at morning report and in a physician's notes.

Physicians, however, may not appreciate the importance of other CBC findings that our analysis found are predictive of mortality. Macrocytosis and a high RDW count (indicating an abnormally wide distribution of red blood cell size) have not previously been reported as predictors of mortality. And although other studies have suggested that bands are not predictors of mortality,11 our study found they were an important prognostic indicator, with an OR =1.59, approaching those of leukocytosis and anemia.

The most impressive predictors of mortality were burr cells, NRBCs, and absolute lymphocytosis. The multivariate ORs of these 3, ranging from 2.8 to 3.2, were the highest of any CBC finding. In univariate analysis, the first 2 were associated with mortality rates 8 to 10 times higher than that of the average admitted patient. There are anecdotal reports in the literature of burr cells being associated with ominous prognoses2426 and more robust statistical analyses showing NRBCs to be associated with increased mortality.14 Lymphocytosis has also been reported as a mortality risk in patients with trauma and emergency medical conditions.15, 16 Our analysis has shown that, indeed, all 3 of these findings are strong independent predictors of mortality.

The presence of sickle cells was also a strong predictor, but of decreased mortality. Patients with sickle cells in their smear had a risk of death one third that of patients without sickle cells. This does not indicate a protective effect. Rather, patients with sickle‐cell disease typically are young and admitted for pain control and other non‐life‐threatening conditions. The presence of NRBCs in patients with sickle‐cell disease appears to be intrinsic to the disease itself and did not have the same implications for mortality as it did for other patients in our study.

The overall logistic model including age, sex, and admission CBC variables had a respectable c statistic for predicting 30‐day mortality of 0.80. This compares well with findings in other multivariable models. For example, the APACHE II score used to predict the mortality of hospitalized critical care patients has a c statistic that ranges from 0.78 to 0.86.3, 27, 28 The APACHE score uses the worst value from the first 2 days after admission for some of its predictors so it cannot provide as early a warning as the admission CBC, and it requires collection of significantly more data. The inclusion of more CBC findings in the APACHE model might increase its predictive accuracy.

Our multivariate analysis was based on a very large number of patient samples using data collected through routine clinical care. However, our study has a number of limitations. The analysis was done at only a single institution, and the exact logistic regression model may not apply to other institutions that have different case mixes and laboratory procedures. Our institution's reported 30‐day mortality rate of 3.4% was lower than the 4.6%11.9% reported in studies of patients admitted to general ward services,2931 but this may be accounted for by the lower‐than‐average Charlson comorbidity scores in our study population. Our risk adjustment by Charlson comorbidity scores may not be as precise as a risk adjustment tailored for our particular institution.32 Our 30‐day mortality rate was calculated using state death tapes, which means we would have missed patients who died outside the state, although we believe this rarely happens. We developed predictive equations on the basis of 30‐day mortality, so we cannot comment on whether the CBC elements predict mortality beyond 30 days. We analyzed most variables as either high or low or as present or absent. Increasing degrees of abnormality may further increase the predictive power of some variables. Finally, the CBC is only one of many tests and clinical findings; it may be that some of these other variables would displace some CBC variables and/or improve the overall predictive power at the time the admission laboratory tests were performed. In this initial study, we have described the prognostic implication of the CBC across a wide range of diagnoses. Future work will focus on the predictive power of commonly gathered variables in more specific conditions (eg, low white blood cell count in sepsis).

Physicians generally have an intuitive ability to identify patients who are seriously ill and at high risk of dying33 and adjust their diagnostic and therapeutic efforts accordingly. Our analysis highlights the value that certain observations in the CBC, notably burr cells, NRBCs, and absolute lymphocytosis, add to physicians' assessments of mortality risk. Even after adjustment for age, sex, comorbidities, common admission diagnoses, and other variables in the CBC, the presence of these findings predicted a 3‐fold increase in 30‐day mortality. Identifying the red flags within this ubiquitously performed test can make the difference in premature discharge or inappropriate triage of patients. Busy physicians can choose from a wide selection of ever‐improving diagnostic tests, yet the workhorse CBC can serve as a simple and early identifier of patients with a poor prognosis.

References
  1. Shapiro MF,Greenfield SG.The complete blood count and leukocyte differential count.Ann Intern Med.1987;106:6574.
  2. Chang R,Wong GY.Prognostic significance of marked leukocytosis in hospitalized patients.J Gen Intern Med.1991;6:199203.
  3. Knaus WA,Wagner DP,Draper EA, et al.The APACHE III prognostic system. Risk prediction of hospital mortality for critically ill hospitalized adults.Chest.1991;100:16191636.
  4. Knaus WA,Draper EA,Wagner DP,Zimmerman JE.APACHE II: a severity of disease classification system.Crit Care Med.1985;13:818829.
  5. Fine MJ,Auble TE,Yealy DM, et al.A prediction rule to identify low‐risk patients with community‐acquired pneumonia.N Engl J Med.1997;336:243250.
  6. Grimm R,Neaton J,Ludwig W.Prognostic importance of the white blood cell count for coronary, cancer, and all‐cause mortality.JAMA.1985;254:19321937.
  7. Labry LD,Campion E,Glynn R,Vokonas P.White blood cell count as a predictor of mortality: results over 18 years from the Normative Aging Study.J Clin Epidemiol.1990;43:153157.
  8. Frumin AM,Mendell TH,Mintz SS,Novack P,Faulk AT.Nucleated red blood cells in congestive heart failure.Circulation.1959;20:367370.
  9. Mozaffarian D,Nye R,Levy WC.Anemia predicts mortality in severe heart failure: the prospective randomized amlodipine survival evaluation (PRAISE).J Am Coll Cardiol.2003;41:19331939.
  10. Ardron MJ,Westengard JC,Dutcher TF.Band neutrophil counts are unnecessary for the diagnosis of infection in patients with normal total leukocyte counts.Am J Clin Pathol.1994;102:646649.
  11. Brigden M,Page N.The lack of clinical utility of white blood cell differential counts and blood morphology in elderly individuals with normal hematology profiles.Arch Pathol Lab Med.1990;114:394398.
  12. Wenz B,Gennis P,Canova C,Burns ER.The clinical utility of the leucocyte differential in emergency medicine.Am J Clin Pathol.1986;86:298303.
  13. Wile MJ,Homer LD,Gaehler S,Phillips S,Millan J.Manual differential cell counts help predict bacterial infection.Am J Clin Pathol.2001;115:644649.
  14. Schwartz SO,Stansbury F.Significance of nucleated red blood cells in peripheral blood; analysis of 1,496 cases.JAMA.1954;154:13391340.
  15. Stachon A,Sondermann N,Imohl M,Krieg M.Nucleated red blood cells indicate high risk of in‐hospital mortality.J Lab Clin Med.2002;140:407412.
  16. Teggatz JR,Parkin J,Peterson L.Transient atypical lymphocytosis in patients with emergency medical conditions.Arch Pathol Lab Med.1987;111:712714.
  17. Pinkerton PH,McLellan BA,Quantz MC,Robinson JB.Acute lymphocytosis after trauma—early recognition of the high‐risk patient?J Trauma.1989;29:749751.
  18. McDonald CJ,Overhage JM,Tierney WM, et al.The Regenstrief Medical Record System: a quarter century experience.Int J Med Inf.1999;54:225253.
  19. Charlson M,Szatrowski TP,Peterson J,Gold J.Validation of a combined comorbidity index.J Clin Epidemiol.1994;47:12451251.
  20. Grannis S,Overhage JM,McDonald CJ.Real world performance of approximate string comparators for use in patient matching.Medinfo.2004;11(Pt1):4347.
  21. Picard F,Gicquel C,Marnet L,Guesnu M,Levy JP.Preliminary evaluation of the new hematology analyzer COULTER GEN‐S in a university hospital.Clin Chem Lab Med.1999;37:681686.
  22. Rosenthal GE,Kaboli PJ,Barnett MJ.Differences in length of stay in veterans health administration and other united states hospitals: is the gap closing?Med Care.2003;41:882894.
  23. Kosiborod M,Smith G,Radford M,Foody J,Krumholz H.The Prognostic importance of anemia in patients with heart failure.Am J Med.2003;114:112119.
  24. Schwartz SO,Motto SA.The diagnostic significance of “burr” red blood cells.Am J Med Sci.1949;218:563.
  25. Aherne WA.The “burr” red cell and azotemia.J Clin Pathol.1957;10:252257.
  26. Bell RE.The origin of ‘burr’ erythrocytes.Br J Haematol.1963;9:552555.
  27. de Keizer NF,Bonsel GJ,Goldfad C,Rowan KM.The added value that increasing levels of diagnostic information provide in prognostic models to estimate hospital mortality for adult intensive care patients.Intern Care Med.2000;26:577584.
  28. Harrell F,Califf R,Pryor D,Lee K,Rosati R.Evaluating the yield of medical tests.JAMA.1982;247:25432546.
  29. Meltzer D,Manning WG,Morrison J, et al.Effects of physician experience on costs and outcomes on an academic general medical service: results of a trial of hospitalists.Ann Intern Med.2002;137:866874.
  30. Kearns PJ,Wang CC,Morris WJ, et al.Hospital care by hospital‐based and clinic‐based faculty. a prospective, controlled trial.Arch Intern Med.2001;161:235241.
  31. Auerbach AD,Wachter RM,Katz P,Showstack J,Baron RB,Goldman L.Implementation of a voluntary hospitalist service at a community teaching hospital: improved clinical efficiency and patient outcomes.Ann Intern Med.2002;137:859865.
  32. Rosenthal GE,Harper DL,Quinn LM,Cooper GS.Severity‐adjusted mortality and length of stay in teaching and nonteaching hospitals: results of a regional study.JAMA.1997;278:485490.
  33. McClish DK,Powell SH.How well can physicians estimate mortality in a medical intensive care unit?Med Decis Mak.1989;9:125132.
References
  1. Shapiro MF,Greenfield SG.The complete blood count and leukocyte differential count.Ann Intern Med.1987;106:6574.
  2. Chang R,Wong GY.Prognostic significance of marked leukocytosis in hospitalized patients.J Gen Intern Med.1991;6:199203.
  3. Knaus WA,Wagner DP,Draper EA, et al.The APACHE III prognostic system. Risk prediction of hospital mortality for critically ill hospitalized adults.Chest.1991;100:16191636.
  4. Knaus WA,Draper EA,Wagner DP,Zimmerman JE.APACHE II: a severity of disease classification system.Crit Care Med.1985;13:818829.
  5. Fine MJ,Auble TE,Yealy DM, et al.A prediction rule to identify low‐risk patients with community‐acquired pneumonia.N Engl J Med.1997;336:243250.
  6. Grimm R,Neaton J,Ludwig W.Prognostic importance of the white blood cell count for coronary, cancer, and all‐cause mortality.JAMA.1985;254:19321937.
  7. Labry LD,Campion E,Glynn R,Vokonas P.White blood cell count as a predictor of mortality: results over 18 years from the Normative Aging Study.J Clin Epidemiol.1990;43:153157.
  8. Frumin AM,Mendell TH,Mintz SS,Novack P,Faulk AT.Nucleated red blood cells in congestive heart failure.Circulation.1959;20:367370.
  9. Mozaffarian D,Nye R,Levy WC.Anemia predicts mortality in severe heart failure: the prospective randomized amlodipine survival evaluation (PRAISE).J Am Coll Cardiol.2003;41:19331939.
  10. Ardron MJ,Westengard JC,Dutcher TF.Band neutrophil counts are unnecessary for the diagnosis of infection in patients with normal total leukocyte counts.Am J Clin Pathol.1994;102:646649.
  11. Brigden M,Page N.The lack of clinical utility of white blood cell differential counts and blood morphology in elderly individuals with normal hematology profiles.Arch Pathol Lab Med.1990;114:394398.
  12. Wenz B,Gennis P,Canova C,Burns ER.The clinical utility of the leucocyte differential in emergency medicine.Am J Clin Pathol.1986;86:298303.
  13. Wile MJ,Homer LD,Gaehler S,Phillips S,Millan J.Manual differential cell counts help predict bacterial infection.Am J Clin Pathol.2001;115:644649.
  14. Schwartz SO,Stansbury F.Significance of nucleated red blood cells in peripheral blood; analysis of 1,496 cases.JAMA.1954;154:13391340.
  15. Stachon A,Sondermann N,Imohl M,Krieg M.Nucleated red blood cells indicate high risk of in‐hospital mortality.J Lab Clin Med.2002;140:407412.
  16. Teggatz JR,Parkin J,Peterson L.Transient atypical lymphocytosis in patients with emergency medical conditions.Arch Pathol Lab Med.1987;111:712714.
  17. Pinkerton PH,McLellan BA,Quantz MC,Robinson JB.Acute lymphocytosis after trauma—early recognition of the high‐risk patient?J Trauma.1989;29:749751.
  18. McDonald CJ,Overhage JM,Tierney WM, et al.The Regenstrief Medical Record System: a quarter century experience.Int J Med Inf.1999;54:225253.
  19. Charlson M,Szatrowski TP,Peterson J,Gold J.Validation of a combined comorbidity index.J Clin Epidemiol.1994;47:12451251.
  20. Grannis S,Overhage JM,McDonald CJ.Real world performance of approximate string comparators for use in patient matching.Medinfo.2004;11(Pt1):4347.
  21. Picard F,Gicquel C,Marnet L,Guesnu M,Levy JP.Preliminary evaluation of the new hematology analyzer COULTER GEN‐S in a university hospital.Clin Chem Lab Med.1999;37:681686.
  22. Rosenthal GE,Kaboli PJ,Barnett MJ.Differences in length of stay in veterans health administration and other united states hospitals: is the gap closing?Med Care.2003;41:882894.
  23. Kosiborod M,Smith G,Radford M,Foody J,Krumholz H.The Prognostic importance of anemia in patients with heart failure.Am J Med.2003;114:112119.
  24. Schwartz SO,Motto SA.The diagnostic significance of “burr” red blood cells.Am J Med Sci.1949;218:563.
  25. Aherne WA.The “burr” red cell and azotemia.J Clin Pathol.1957;10:252257.
  26. Bell RE.The origin of ‘burr’ erythrocytes.Br J Haematol.1963;9:552555.
  27. de Keizer NF,Bonsel GJ,Goldfad C,Rowan KM.The added value that increasing levels of diagnostic information provide in prognostic models to estimate hospital mortality for adult intensive care patients.Intern Care Med.2000;26:577584.
  28. Harrell F,Califf R,Pryor D,Lee K,Rosati R.Evaluating the yield of medical tests.JAMA.1982;247:25432546.
  29. Meltzer D,Manning WG,Morrison J, et al.Effects of physician experience on costs and outcomes on an academic general medical service: results of a trial of hospitalists.Ann Intern Med.2002;137:866874.
  30. Kearns PJ,Wang CC,Morris WJ, et al.Hospital care by hospital‐based and clinic‐based faculty. a prospective, controlled trial.Arch Intern Med.2001;161:235241.
  31. Auerbach AD,Wachter RM,Katz P,Showstack J,Baron RB,Goldman L.Implementation of a voluntary hospitalist service at a community teaching hospital: improved clinical efficiency and patient outcomes.Ann Intern Med.2002;137:859865.
  32. Rosenthal GE,Harper DL,Quinn LM,Cooper GS.Severity‐adjusted mortality and length of stay in teaching and nonteaching hospitals: results of a regional study.JAMA.1997;278:485490.
  33. McClish DK,Powell SH.How well can physicians estimate mortality in a medical intensive care unit?Med Decis Mak.1989;9:125132.
Issue
Journal of Hospital Medicine - 2(1)
Issue
Journal of Hospital Medicine - 2(1)
Page Number
5-12
Page Number
5-12
Publications
Publications
Article Type
Display Headline
Which observations from the complete blood cell count predict mortality for hospitalized patients?
Display Headline
Which observations from the complete blood cell count predict mortality for hospitalized patients?
Legacy Keywords
diagnostic decision making, laboratory testing, electronic medical record
Legacy Keywords
diagnostic decision making, laboratory testing, electronic medical record
Sections
Article Source

Copyright © 2007 Society of Hospital Medicine

Disallow All Ads
Correspondence Location
Northwestern University, General Internal Medicine, 676 N. St. Clair, Suite 200, Chicago, IL 60611; Fax: (312) 695‐4307
Content Gating
No Gating (article Unlocked/Free)
Alternative CME
Article PDF Media