The microbiome in celiac disease: Beyond diet-genetic interactions

Article Type
Changed
Wed, 08/16/2017 - 10:45
Display Headline
The microbiome in celiac disease: Beyond diet-genetic interactions

Inheriting the wrong genes and eating the wrong food (ie, gluten) are necessary for celiac disease to develop, but are not enough by themselves. Something else must be contributing, and evidence is pointing to the mix of bacteria that make our guts their home, collectively called the microbiome.

See related article

Celiac disease is a highly prevalent, chronic, immune-mediated form of enteropathy.1 It affects 0.5% to 1% of the population, and although it is mostly seen in people of northern European descent, those in other populations can develop the disease as well. Historically, celiac disease was classified as an infant condition. However, it now commonly presents later in life (between ages 10 and 40) and often with extraintestinal manifestations.2

In this issue of Cleveland Clinic Journal of Medicine, Kochhar et al provide a comprehensive updated review of celiac disease.3

GENES AND GLUTEN ARE NECESSARY BUT NOT SUFFICIENT

Although genetic factors and exposure to gluten in the diet are proven to be necessary for celiac disease to develop, they are not sufficient. Evidence of this is in the numbers; although one-third of the general population carries the HLA susceptibility genes (specifically HLA-DQ2 and DQ8),4 only 2% to 5% of people with these genes develop clinically evident celiac disease.

Additional environmental factors must be contributing to disease development, but these other factors are poorly understood. Some of the possible culprits that might influence the risk of disease occurrence and the timing of its onset include5:

  • The amount and quality of gluten ingested—the higher the concentration of gluten, the higher the risk, and different grains have gluten varieties with more or less immunogenic capabilities, ie, T-cell activation properties
  • The pattern of infant feeding—the risk may be lower with breastfeeding than with formula
  • The age at which gluten is introduced into the diet—the risk may be higher if gluten is introduced earlier.6

More recently, studies of the pathogenesis of celiac disease and gene-environmental interactions have expanded beyond host predisposition and dietary factors.

OUR BODIES, OUR MICROBIOMES: A SYMBIOTIC RELATIONSHIP

The role of the human microbiome in autoimmune disease is now being elucidated.7 Remarkably, the microorganisms living in our bodies outnumber our body cells by a factor of 10, and their genomes vastly exceed our own protein-coding genome capabilities by a factor of 100.

The gut microbiome is now considered a true bioreactor with enzymatic and immunologic capabilities beyond (and complementary to) those of its host. The commensal microbiome of the host intestine provides benefits that can be broken down into three broad categories:

  • Nutritional—producing essential amino acids and vitamins
  • Metabolic—degrading complex polysaccharides from dietary fibers
  • Immunologic—shaping the host immune system while cooperating with it against pathogenic microorganisms.

The immunologic function is highly relevant. We have coevolved with our bacteria in a mutually beneficial, symbiotic relationship in which we maintain an active state of low inflammation so that a constant bacterial and dietary antigenic load can be tolerated.

Evidence points to dysbiosis as a factor leading to celiac disease and other autoimmune disorders

Is there a core human microbiome shared by all individuals? And what is the impact of altering the relative microbial composition (dysbiosis) in physiologic and disease states? To find out, the National Institutes of Health launched the Human Microbiome Project8 in 2008. Important tools in this work include novel culture-independent approaches (high-throughput DNA sequencing and whole-microbiome “shotgun” sequencing with metagenomic analysis) and computational analytical tools.9

An accumulating body of evidence is now available from animal models and human studies correlating states of intestinal dysbiosis (disruption in homeostatic community composition) with various disease processes. These have ranged from inflammatory bowel disease to systemic autoimmune disorders such as psoriasis, inflammatory arthropathies, and demyelinating central nervous system diseases.10–14

RESEARCH INTO THE MICROBIOME IN CELIAC DISEASE

Celiac disease has also served as a unique model for studying this biologic relationship, and the microbiome has been postulated to have a role in its pathogenesis.15 Multiple clinical studies demonstrate that a state of intestinal dysbiosis is indeed associated with celiac disease.

Specifically, decreases in the abundance of Firmicutes spp and increases in Proteobacteria spp have been detected in both children and adults with active celiac disease.16,17 Intriguingly, overrepresentation of Proteobacteria was also correlated with disease activity. Other studies have reported decreases in the proportion of reportedly protective, anti-inflammatory bacteria such as Bifidobacterium and increases in the proportion of Bacteroides and Escherichia coli in patients with active disease.18,19 Altered diversity and altered metabolic function, ie, decreased concentration of protective short-chain fatty acids of the microbiota, have also been reported in patients with celiac disease.19,20

To move beyond correlative studies and mechanistically address the possibility of causation, multiple groups have used a gnotobiotic approach, ie, maintaining animals under germ-free conditions and incorporating microbes of interest. This approach is highly relevant in studying whether the bacterial community composition is capable of modulating loss of tolerance to gluten in genetically susceptible hosts. A few notable examples have been published.

In germ-free rats, long-term feeding of gliadin, but not albumin, from birth until 2 months of age induced moderate small-intestinal damage.21 Similarly, germ-free nonobese diabetic-DQ8 mice developed more severe gluten-induced disease than mice with normal intestinal bacteria.22

In small studies, people with celiac disease had fewer Firmicutes and Bifidobacteria and more Proteobacteria, Bacteroides, and E coli

These findings suggest that the normal gut microbiome may have intrinsic beneficial properties capable of reducing the inflammatory effects associated with gluten ingestion. Notably, the specific composition of the intestinal microbiome can define the fate of gluten-induced pathology. Mice colonized with commensal microbiota are indeed protected from gluten-induced pathology, while mice colonized with Proteobacteria spp develop a moderate degree of gluten-induced disease. When Escherichia coli derived from patients with celiac disease is added to commensal colonization, the celiac disease-like phenotype develops.23

Taken together, these studies support the hypothesis that the intestinal microbiome may be another environmental factor involved in the development of celiac disease.

QUESTIONS AND CHALLENGES REMAIN

The results of clinical studies are not necessarily consistent at the taxonomy level. The fields of metagenomics, which investigates all genes and their enzymatic function in a given community, and metabolomics, which identifies bacterial end-products, characterizing their functional capabilities, are still in their infancy and will be required to further investigate functionality of the altered microbiome in celiac disease.

Second, the directionality—the causality or consequences of this dysbiosis—and timing—the moment at which changes occur, ie, after introducing gluten or at the time when symptoms appear—remain elusive, and prospective studies in humans will be essential.

Finally, more mechanistic studies in animal models are needed to dissect the host immune response to dietary gluten and perturbation of intestinal community composition. This may lead to the possibility of future interventions in the form of prebiotics, probiotics, or specific metabolites, complementary to gluten avoidance.

In the meantime, increasing disease awareness and rapid diagnosis and treatment continue to be of utmost importance to address the clinical consequences of celiac disease in both children and adults.

References
  1. Guandalini S, Assiri A. Celiac disease: a review. JAMA Pediatr 2014; 168:272–278.
  2. Green PH, Cellier C. Celiac disease. N Engl J Med 2007; 357:1731–1743.
  3. Kochhar GS, Singh T, Gill A, Kirby DF. Celiac disease: an internist’s perspective. Cleve Clin J Med 2016; 83:217–227.
  4. Gutierrez-Achury J, Zhernakova A, Pulit SL, et al. Fine mapping in the MHC region accounts for 18% additional genetic risk for celiac disease. Nat Genet 2015; 47:577–578.
  5. Catassi C, Kryszak D, Bhatti B, et al. Natural history of celiac disease autoimmunity in a USA cohort followed since 1974. Ann Med 2010; 42:530–538.
  6. Norris JM, Barriga K, Hoffenberg EJ, et al. Risk of celiac disease autoimmunity and timing of gluten introduction in the diet of infants at increased risk of disease. JAMA 2005; 293:2343–2351.
  7. Turnbaugh PJ, Ley RE, Hamady M, Fraser-Liggett CM, Knight R, Gordon JI. The human microbiome project. Nature 2007; 449:804–810.
  8. NIH HMP Working Group; Peterson J, Garges S, Giovanni M, et al. The NIH Human Microbiome Project. Genome Res 2009; 19:2317–2323.
  9. Qin J, Li R, Raes J, et al. A human gut microbial gene catalogue established by metagenomic sequencing. Nature 2010; 464:59–65.
  10. Scher JU, Sczesnak A, Longman RS, et al. Expansion of intestinal Prevotella copri correlates with enhanced susceptibility to arthritis. Elife 2013; 2:e01202.
  11. Scher JU, Ubeda C, Artacho A, et al. Decreased bacterial diversity characterizes the altered gut microbiota in patients with psoriatic arthritis, resembling dysbiosis in inflammatory bowel disease. Arthritis Rheumatol 2015; 67:128–139.
  12. Gao Z, Tseng CH, Strober BE, Pei Z, Blaser MJ. Substantial alterations of the cutaneous bacterial biota in psoriatic lesions. PLoS One 2008; 3:e2719.
  13. Hsiao EY, McBride SW, Hsien S, et al. Microbiota modulate behavioral and physiological abnormalities associated with neurodevelopmental disorders. Cell 2013; 155:1451–1463.
  14. Gevers D, Kugathasan S, Denson LA, et al. The treatment-naive microbiome in new-onset Crohn‘s disease. Cell Host Microbe 2014; 15:382–392.
  15. Verdu EF, Galipeau HJ, Jabri B. Novel players in coeliac disease pathogenesis: role of the gut microbiota. Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol 2015; 12:497–506.
  16. Sanchez E, Donat E, Ribes-Koninckx C, Fernandez-Murga ML, Sanz Y. Duodenal-mucosal bacteria associated with celiac disease in children. Appl Environ Microbiol 2013; 79:5472–5479.
  17. Wacklin P, Kaukinen K, Tuovinen E, et al. The duodenal microbiota composition of adult celiac disease patients is associated with the clinical manifestation of the disease. Inflamm Bowel Dis 2013; 19:934–941.
  18. Collado MC, Donat E, Ribes-Koninckx C, Calabuig M, Sanz Y. Specific duodenal and faecal bacterial groups associated with paediatric coeliac disease. J Clin Pathol 2009; 62:264–269.
  19. Di Cagno R, De Angelis M, De Pasquale I, et al. Duodenal and faecal microbiota of celiac children: molecular, phenotype and metabolome characterization. BMC Microbiol 2011; 11:219.
  20. Schippa S, Iebba V, Barbato M, et al. A distinctive ‘microbial signature’ in celiac pediatric patients. BMC Microbiol 2010; 10:175.
  21. Stepankova R, Tlaskalova-Hogenova H, Sinkora J, Jodl J, Fric P. Changes in jejunal mucosa after long-term feeding of germfree rats with gluten. Scand J Gastroenterol 1996; 31:551–557.
  22. Galipeau HJ, Rulli NE, Jury J, et al. Sensitization to gliadin induces moderate enteropathy and insulitis in nonobese diabetic-DQ8 mice. J Immunol 2011; 187:4338–4346.
  23. Galipeau HJ, Verdu EF. Gut microbes and adverse food reactions: focus on gluten related disorders. Gut Microbes 2014; 5:594–605.
Article PDF
Author and Disclosure Information

Jose U. Scher, MD
Assistant Professor of Medicine, New York University Division of Rheumatology; Director, Arthritis Clinic and Psoriatic Arthritis Center; Director, Microbiome Center for Rheumatology and Autoimmunity (MiCRA), New York University-Langone Hospital for Joint Diseases, New York, NY

Address: Jose U. Scher, MD, Division of Rheumatology, NYU Hospital for Joint Diseases, 301 East 17th Street, Room 1608, New York, NY 10003; e-mail: Jose.Scher@nyumc.org

Supported by: Grant No. K23AR064318 from NIAMS to Dr. Scher; The Colton Center for Autoimmunity; The Riley Family Foundation.

Issue
Cleveland Clinic Journal of Medicine - 83(3)
Publications
Topics
Page Number
228-230
Legacy Keywords
celiac disease, gluten, microbiome, intestinal bacteria, Firmicutes, Proteobacteria, Bifidobacterium, Bacteroides, Escherichia coli, Jose Scher
Sections
Author and Disclosure Information

Jose U. Scher, MD
Assistant Professor of Medicine, New York University Division of Rheumatology; Director, Arthritis Clinic and Psoriatic Arthritis Center; Director, Microbiome Center for Rheumatology and Autoimmunity (MiCRA), New York University-Langone Hospital for Joint Diseases, New York, NY

Address: Jose U. Scher, MD, Division of Rheumatology, NYU Hospital for Joint Diseases, 301 East 17th Street, Room 1608, New York, NY 10003; e-mail: Jose.Scher@nyumc.org

Supported by: Grant No. K23AR064318 from NIAMS to Dr. Scher; The Colton Center for Autoimmunity; The Riley Family Foundation.

Author and Disclosure Information

Jose U. Scher, MD
Assistant Professor of Medicine, New York University Division of Rheumatology; Director, Arthritis Clinic and Psoriatic Arthritis Center; Director, Microbiome Center for Rheumatology and Autoimmunity (MiCRA), New York University-Langone Hospital for Joint Diseases, New York, NY

Address: Jose U. Scher, MD, Division of Rheumatology, NYU Hospital for Joint Diseases, 301 East 17th Street, Room 1608, New York, NY 10003; e-mail: Jose.Scher@nyumc.org

Supported by: Grant No. K23AR064318 from NIAMS to Dr. Scher; The Colton Center for Autoimmunity; The Riley Family Foundation.

Article PDF
Article PDF
Related Articles

Inheriting the wrong genes and eating the wrong food (ie, gluten) are necessary for celiac disease to develop, but are not enough by themselves. Something else must be contributing, and evidence is pointing to the mix of bacteria that make our guts their home, collectively called the microbiome.

See related article

Celiac disease is a highly prevalent, chronic, immune-mediated form of enteropathy.1 It affects 0.5% to 1% of the population, and although it is mostly seen in people of northern European descent, those in other populations can develop the disease as well. Historically, celiac disease was classified as an infant condition. However, it now commonly presents later in life (between ages 10 and 40) and often with extraintestinal manifestations.2

In this issue of Cleveland Clinic Journal of Medicine, Kochhar et al provide a comprehensive updated review of celiac disease.3

GENES AND GLUTEN ARE NECESSARY BUT NOT SUFFICIENT

Although genetic factors and exposure to gluten in the diet are proven to be necessary for celiac disease to develop, they are not sufficient. Evidence of this is in the numbers; although one-third of the general population carries the HLA susceptibility genes (specifically HLA-DQ2 and DQ8),4 only 2% to 5% of people with these genes develop clinically evident celiac disease.

Additional environmental factors must be contributing to disease development, but these other factors are poorly understood. Some of the possible culprits that might influence the risk of disease occurrence and the timing of its onset include5:

  • The amount and quality of gluten ingested—the higher the concentration of gluten, the higher the risk, and different grains have gluten varieties with more or less immunogenic capabilities, ie, T-cell activation properties
  • The pattern of infant feeding—the risk may be lower with breastfeeding than with formula
  • The age at which gluten is introduced into the diet—the risk may be higher if gluten is introduced earlier.6

More recently, studies of the pathogenesis of celiac disease and gene-environmental interactions have expanded beyond host predisposition and dietary factors.

OUR BODIES, OUR MICROBIOMES: A SYMBIOTIC RELATIONSHIP

The role of the human microbiome in autoimmune disease is now being elucidated.7 Remarkably, the microorganisms living in our bodies outnumber our body cells by a factor of 10, and their genomes vastly exceed our own protein-coding genome capabilities by a factor of 100.

The gut microbiome is now considered a true bioreactor with enzymatic and immunologic capabilities beyond (and complementary to) those of its host. The commensal microbiome of the host intestine provides benefits that can be broken down into three broad categories:

  • Nutritional—producing essential amino acids and vitamins
  • Metabolic—degrading complex polysaccharides from dietary fibers
  • Immunologic—shaping the host immune system while cooperating with it against pathogenic microorganisms.

The immunologic function is highly relevant. We have coevolved with our bacteria in a mutually beneficial, symbiotic relationship in which we maintain an active state of low inflammation so that a constant bacterial and dietary antigenic load can be tolerated.

Evidence points to dysbiosis as a factor leading to celiac disease and other autoimmune disorders

Is there a core human microbiome shared by all individuals? And what is the impact of altering the relative microbial composition (dysbiosis) in physiologic and disease states? To find out, the National Institutes of Health launched the Human Microbiome Project8 in 2008. Important tools in this work include novel culture-independent approaches (high-throughput DNA sequencing and whole-microbiome “shotgun” sequencing with metagenomic analysis) and computational analytical tools.9

An accumulating body of evidence is now available from animal models and human studies correlating states of intestinal dysbiosis (disruption in homeostatic community composition) with various disease processes. These have ranged from inflammatory bowel disease to systemic autoimmune disorders such as psoriasis, inflammatory arthropathies, and demyelinating central nervous system diseases.10–14

RESEARCH INTO THE MICROBIOME IN CELIAC DISEASE

Celiac disease has also served as a unique model for studying this biologic relationship, and the microbiome has been postulated to have a role in its pathogenesis.15 Multiple clinical studies demonstrate that a state of intestinal dysbiosis is indeed associated with celiac disease.

Specifically, decreases in the abundance of Firmicutes spp and increases in Proteobacteria spp have been detected in both children and adults with active celiac disease.16,17 Intriguingly, overrepresentation of Proteobacteria was also correlated with disease activity. Other studies have reported decreases in the proportion of reportedly protective, anti-inflammatory bacteria such as Bifidobacterium and increases in the proportion of Bacteroides and Escherichia coli in patients with active disease.18,19 Altered diversity and altered metabolic function, ie, decreased concentration of protective short-chain fatty acids of the microbiota, have also been reported in patients with celiac disease.19,20

To move beyond correlative studies and mechanistically address the possibility of causation, multiple groups have used a gnotobiotic approach, ie, maintaining animals under germ-free conditions and incorporating microbes of interest. This approach is highly relevant in studying whether the bacterial community composition is capable of modulating loss of tolerance to gluten in genetically susceptible hosts. A few notable examples have been published.

In germ-free rats, long-term feeding of gliadin, but not albumin, from birth until 2 months of age induced moderate small-intestinal damage.21 Similarly, germ-free nonobese diabetic-DQ8 mice developed more severe gluten-induced disease than mice with normal intestinal bacteria.22

In small studies, people with celiac disease had fewer Firmicutes and Bifidobacteria and more Proteobacteria, Bacteroides, and E coli

These findings suggest that the normal gut microbiome may have intrinsic beneficial properties capable of reducing the inflammatory effects associated with gluten ingestion. Notably, the specific composition of the intestinal microbiome can define the fate of gluten-induced pathology. Mice colonized with commensal microbiota are indeed protected from gluten-induced pathology, while mice colonized with Proteobacteria spp develop a moderate degree of gluten-induced disease. When Escherichia coli derived from patients with celiac disease is added to commensal colonization, the celiac disease-like phenotype develops.23

Taken together, these studies support the hypothesis that the intestinal microbiome may be another environmental factor involved in the development of celiac disease.

QUESTIONS AND CHALLENGES REMAIN

The results of clinical studies are not necessarily consistent at the taxonomy level. The fields of metagenomics, which investigates all genes and their enzymatic function in a given community, and metabolomics, which identifies bacterial end-products, characterizing their functional capabilities, are still in their infancy and will be required to further investigate functionality of the altered microbiome in celiac disease.

Second, the directionality—the causality or consequences of this dysbiosis—and timing—the moment at which changes occur, ie, after introducing gluten or at the time when symptoms appear—remain elusive, and prospective studies in humans will be essential.

Finally, more mechanistic studies in animal models are needed to dissect the host immune response to dietary gluten and perturbation of intestinal community composition. This may lead to the possibility of future interventions in the form of prebiotics, probiotics, or specific metabolites, complementary to gluten avoidance.

In the meantime, increasing disease awareness and rapid diagnosis and treatment continue to be of utmost importance to address the clinical consequences of celiac disease in both children and adults.

Inheriting the wrong genes and eating the wrong food (ie, gluten) are necessary for celiac disease to develop, but are not enough by themselves. Something else must be contributing, and evidence is pointing to the mix of bacteria that make our guts their home, collectively called the microbiome.

See related article

Celiac disease is a highly prevalent, chronic, immune-mediated form of enteropathy.1 It affects 0.5% to 1% of the population, and although it is mostly seen in people of northern European descent, those in other populations can develop the disease as well. Historically, celiac disease was classified as an infant condition. However, it now commonly presents later in life (between ages 10 and 40) and often with extraintestinal manifestations.2

In this issue of Cleveland Clinic Journal of Medicine, Kochhar et al provide a comprehensive updated review of celiac disease.3

GENES AND GLUTEN ARE NECESSARY BUT NOT SUFFICIENT

Although genetic factors and exposure to gluten in the diet are proven to be necessary for celiac disease to develop, they are not sufficient. Evidence of this is in the numbers; although one-third of the general population carries the HLA susceptibility genes (specifically HLA-DQ2 and DQ8),4 only 2% to 5% of people with these genes develop clinically evident celiac disease.

Additional environmental factors must be contributing to disease development, but these other factors are poorly understood. Some of the possible culprits that might influence the risk of disease occurrence and the timing of its onset include5:

  • The amount and quality of gluten ingested—the higher the concentration of gluten, the higher the risk, and different grains have gluten varieties with more or less immunogenic capabilities, ie, T-cell activation properties
  • The pattern of infant feeding—the risk may be lower with breastfeeding than with formula
  • The age at which gluten is introduced into the diet—the risk may be higher if gluten is introduced earlier.6

More recently, studies of the pathogenesis of celiac disease and gene-environmental interactions have expanded beyond host predisposition and dietary factors.

OUR BODIES, OUR MICROBIOMES: A SYMBIOTIC RELATIONSHIP

The role of the human microbiome in autoimmune disease is now being elucidated.7 Remarkably, the microorganisms living in our bodies outnumber our body cells by a factor of 10, and their genomes vastly exceed our own protein-coding genome capabilities by a factor of 100.

The gut microbiome is now considered a true bioreactor with enzymatic and immunologic capabilities beyond (and complementary to) those of its host. The commensal microbiome of the host intestine provides benefits that can be broken down into three broad categories:

  • Nutritional—producing essential amino acids and vitamins
  • Metabolic—degrading complex polysaccharides from dietary fibers
  • Immunologic—shaping the host immune system while cooperating with it against pathogenic microorganisms.

The immunologic function is highly relevant. We have coevolved with our bacteria in a mutually beneficial, symbiotic relationship in which we maintain an active state of low inflammation so that a constant bacterial and dietary antigenic load can be tolerated.

Evidence points to dysbiosis as a factor leading to celiac disease and other autoimmune disorders

Is there a core human microbiome shared by all individuals? And what is the impact of altering the relative microbial composition (dysbiosis) in physiologic and disease states? To find out, the National Institutes of Health launched the Human Microbiome Project8 in 2008. Important tools in this work include novel culture-independent approaches (high-throughput DNA sequencing and whole-microbiome “shotgun” sequencing with metagenomic analysis) and computational analytical tools.9

An accumulating body of evidence is now available from animal models and human studies correlating states of intestinal dysbiosis (disruption in homeostatic community composition) with various disease processes. These have ranged from inflammatory bowel disease to systemic autoimmune disorders such as psoriasis, inflammatory arthropathies, and demyelinating central nervous system diseases.10–14

RESEARCH INTO THE MICROBIOME IN CELIAC DISEASE

Celiac disease has also served as a unique model for studying this biologic relationship, and the microbiome has been postulated to have a role in its pathogenesis.15 Multiple clinical studies demonstrate that a state of intestinal dysbiosis is indeed associated with celiac disease.

Specifically, decreases in the abundance of Firmicutes spp and increases in Proteobacteria spp have been detected in both children and adults with active celiac disease.16,17 Intriguingly, overrepresentation of Proteobacteria was also correlated with disease activity. Other studies have reported decreases in the proportion of reportedly protective, anti-inflammatory bacteria such as Bifidobacterium and increases in the proportion of Bacteroides and Escherichia coli in patients with active disease.18,19 Altered diversity and altered metabolic function, ie, decreased concentration of protective short-chain fatty acids of the microbiota, have also been reported in patients with celiac disease.19,20

To move beyond correlative studies and mechanistically address the possibility of causation, multiple groups have used a gnotobiotic approach, ie, maintaining animals under germ-free conditions and incorporating microbes of interest. This approach is highly relevant in studying whether the bacterial community composition is capable of modulating loss of tolerance to gluten in genetically susceptible hosts. A few notable examples have been published.

In germ-free rats, long-term feeding of gliadin, but not albumin, from birth until 2 months of age induced moderate small-intestinal damage.21 Similarly, germ-free nonobese diabetic-DQ8 mice developed more severe gluten-induced disease than mice with normal intestinal bacteria.22

In small studies, people with celiac disease had fewer Firmicutes and Bifidobacteria and more Proteobacteria, Bacteroides, and E coli

These findings suggest that the normal gut microbiome may have intrinsic beneficial properties capable of reducing the inflammatory effects associated with gluten ingestion. Notably, the specific composition of the intestinal microbiome can define the fate of gluten-induced pathology. Mice colonized with commensal microbiota are indeed protected from gluten-induced pathology, while mice colonized with Proteobacteria spp develop a moderate degree of gluten-induced disease. When Escherichia coli derived from patients with celiac disease is added to commensal colonization, the celiac disease-like phenotype develops.23

Taken together, these studies support the hypothesis that the intestinal microbiome may be another environmental factor involved in the development of celiac disease.

QUESTIONS AND CHALLENGES REMAIN

The results of clinical studies are not necessarily consistent at the taxonomy level. The fields of metagenomics, which investigates all genes and their enzymatic function in a given community, and metabolomics, which identifies bacterial end-products, characterizing their functional capabilities, are still in their infancy and will be required to further investigate functionality of the altered microbiome in celiac disease.

Second, the directionality—the causality or consequences of this dysbiosis—and timing—the moment at which changes occur, ie, after introducing gluten or at the time when symptoms appear—remain elusive, and prospective studies in humans will be essential.

Finally, more mechanistic studies in animal models are needed to dissect the host immune response to dietary gluten and perturbation of intestinal community composition. This may lead to the possibility of future interventions in the form of prebiotics, probiotics, or specific metabolites, complementary to gluten avoidance.

In the meantime, increasing disease awareness and rapid diagnosis and treatment continue to be of utmost importance to address the clinical consequences of celiac disease in both children and adults.

References
  1. Guandalini S, Assiri A. Celiac disease: a review. JAMA Pediatr 2014; 168:272–278.
  2. Green PH, Cellier C. Celiac disease. N Engl J Med 2007; 357:1731–1743.
  3. Kochhar GS, Singh T, Gill A, Kirby DF. Celiac disease: an internist’s perspective. Cleve Clin J Med 2016; 83:217–227.
  4. Gutierrez-Achury J, Zhernakova A, Pulit SL, et al. Fine mapping in the MHC region accounts for 18% additional genetic risk for celiac disease. Nat Genet 2015; 47:577–578.
  5. Catassi C, Kryszak D, Bhatti B, et al. Natural history of celiac disease autoimmunity in a USA cohort followed since 1974. Ann Med 2010; 42:530–538.
  6. Norris JM, Barriga K, Hoffenberg EJ, et al. Risk of celiac disease autoimmunity and timing of gluten introduction in the diet of infants at increased risk of disease. JAMA 2005; 293:2343–2351.
  7. Turnbaugh PJ, Ley RE, Hamady M, Fraser-Liggett CM, Knight R, Gordon JI. The human microbiome project. Nature 2007; 449:804–810.
  8. NIH HMP Working Group; Peterson J, Garges S, Giovanni M, et al. The NIH Human Microbiome Project. Genome Res 2009; 19:2317–2323.
  9. Qin J, Li R, Raes J, et al. A human gut microbial gene catalogue established by metagenomic sequencing. Nature 2010; 464:59–65.
  10. Scher JU, Sczesnak A, Longman RS, et al. Expansion of intestinal Prevotella copri correlates with enhanced susceptibility to arthritis. Elife 2013; 2:e01202.
  11. Scher JU, Ubeda C, Artacho A, et al. Decreased bacterial diversity characterizes the altered gut microbiota in patients with psoriatic arthritis, resembling dysbiosis in inflammatory bowel disease. Arthritis Rheumatol 2015; 67:128–139.
  12. Gao Z, Tseng CH, Strober BE, Pei Z, Blaser MJ. Substantial alterations of the cutaneous bacterial biota in psoriatic lesions. PLoS One 2008; 3:e2719.
  13. Hsiao EY, McBride SW, Hsien S, et al. Microbiota modulate behavioral and physiological abnormalities associated with neurodevelopmental disorders. Cell 2013; 155:1451–1463.
  14. Gevers D, Kugathasan S, Denson LA, et al. The treatment-naive microbiome in new-onset Crohn‘s disease. Cell Host Microbe 2014; 15:382–392.
  15. Verdu EF, Galipeau HJ, Jabri B. Novel players in coeliac disease pathogenesis: role of the gut microbiota. Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol 2015; 12:497–506.
  16. Sanchez E, Donat E, Ribes-Koninckx C, Fernandez-Murga ML, Sanz Y. Duodenal-mucosal bacteria associated with celiac disease in children. Appl Environ Microbiol 2013; 79:5472–5479.
  17. Wacklin P, Kaukinen K, Tuovinen E, et al. The duodenal microbiota composition of adult celiac disease patients is associated with the clinical manifestation of the disease. Inflamm Bowel Dis 2013; 19:934–941.
  18. Collado MC, Donat E, Ribes-Koninckx C, Calabuig M, Sanz Y. Specific duodenal and faecal bacterial groups associated with paediatric coeliac disease. J Clin Pathol 2009; 62:264–269.
  19. Di Cagno R, De Angelis M, De Pasquale I, et al. Duodenal and faecal microbiota of celiac children: molecular, phenotype and metabolome characterization. BMC Microbiol 2011; 11:219.
  20. Schippa S, Iebba V, Barbato M, et al. A distinctive ‘microbial signature’ in celiac pediatric patients. BMC Microbiol 2010; 10:175.
  21. Stepankova R, Tlaskalova-Hogenova H, Sinkora J, Jodl J, Fric P. Changes in jejunal mucosa after long-term feeding of germfree rats with gluten. Scand J Gastroenterol 1996; 31:551–557.
  22. Galipeau HJ, Rulli NE, Jury J, et al. Sensitization to gliadin induces moderate enteropathy and insulitis in nonobese diabetic-DQ8 mice. J Immunol 2011; 187:4338–4346.
  23. Galipeau HJ, Verdu EF. Gut microbes and adverse food reactions: focus on gluten related disorders. Gut Microbes 2014; 5:594–605.
References
  1. Guandalini S, Assiri A. Celiac disease: a review. JAMA Pediatr 2014; 168:272–278.
  2. Green PH, Cellier C. Celiac disease. N Engl J Med 2007; 357:1731–1743.
  3. Kochhar GS, Singh T, Gill A, Kirby DF. Celiac disease: an internist’s perspective. Cleve Clin J Med 2016; 83:217–227.
  4. Gutierrez-Achury J, Zhernakova A, Pulit SL, et al. Fine mapping in the MHC region accounts for 18% additional genetic risk for celiac disease. Nat Genet 2015; 47:577–578.
  5. Catassi C, Kryszak D, Bhatti B, et al. Natural history of celiac disease autoimmunity in a USA cohort followed since 1974. Ann Med 2010; 42:530–538.
  6. Norris JM, Barriga K, Hoffenberg EJ, et al. Risk of celiac disease autoimmunity and timing of gluten introduction in the diet of infants at increased risk of disease. JAMA 2005; 293:2343–2351.
  7. Turnbaugh PJ, Ley RE, Hamady M, Fraser-Liggett CM, Knight R, Gordon JI. The human microbiome project. Nature 2007; 449:804–810.
  8. NIH HMP Working Group; Peterson J, Garges S, Giovanni M, et al. The NIH Human Microbiome Project. Genome Res 2009; 19:2317–2323.
  9. Qin J, Li R, Raes J, et al. A human gut microbial gene catalogue established by metagenomic sequencing. Nature 2010; 464:59–65.
  10. Scher JU, Sczesnak A, Longman RS, et al. Expansion of intestinal Prevotella copri correlates with enhanced susceptibility to arthritis. Elife 2013; 2:e01202.
  11. Scher JU, Ubeda C, Artacho A, et al. Decreased bacterial diversity characterizes the altered gut microbiota in patients with psoriatic arthritis, resembling dysbiosis in inflammatory bowel disease. Arthritis Rheumatol 2015; 67:128–139.
  12. Gao Z, Tseng CH, Strober BE, Pei Z, Blaser MJ. Substantial alterations of the cutaneous bacterial biota in psoriatic lesions. PLoS One 2008; 3:e2719.
  13. Hsiao EY, McBride SW, Hsien S, et al. Microbiota modulate behavioral and physiological abnormalities associated with neurodevelopmental disorders. Cell 2013; 155:1451–1463.
  14. Gevers D, Kugathasan S, Denson LA, et al. The treatment-naive microbiome in new-onset Crohn‘s disease. Cell Host Microbe 2014; 15:382–392.
  15. Verdu EF, Galipeau HJ, Jabri B. Novel players in coeliac disease pathogenesis: role of the gut microbiota. Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol 2015; 12:497–506.
  16. Sanchez E, Donat E, Ribes-Koninckx C, Fernandez-Murga ML, Sanz Y. Duodenal-mucosal bacteria associated with celiac disease in children. Appl Environ Microbiol 2013; 79:5472–5479.
  17. Wacklin P, Kaukinen K, Tuovinen E, et al. The duodenal microbiota composition of adult celiac disease patients is associated with the clinical manifestation of the disease. Inflamm Bowel Dis 2013; 19:934–941.
  18. Collado MC, Donat E, Ribes-Koninckx C, Calabuig M, Sanz Y. Specific duodenal and faecal bacterial groups associated with paediatric coeliac disease. J Clin Pathol 2009; 62:264–269.
  19. Di Cagno R, De Angelis M, De Pasquale I, et al. Duodenal and faecal microbiota of celiac children: molecular, phenotype and metabolome characterization. BMC Microbiol 2011; 11:219.
  20. Schippa S, Iebba V, Barbato M, et al. A distinctive ‘microbial signature’ in celiac pediatric patients. BMC Microbiol 2010; 10:175.
  21. Stepankova R, Tlaskalova-Hogenova H, Sinkora J, Jodl J, Fric P. Changes in jejunal mucosa after long-term feeding of germfree rats with gluten. Scand J Gastroenterol 1996; 31:551–557.
  22. Galipeau HJ, Rulli NE, Jury J, et al. Sensitization to gliadin induces moderate enteropathy and insulitis in nonobese diabetic-DQ8 mice. J Immunol 2011; 187:4338–4346.
  23. Galipeau HJ, Verdu EF. Gut microbes and adverse food reactions: focus on gluten related disorders. Gut Microbes 2014; 5:594–605.
Issue
Cleveland Clinic Journal of Medicine - 83(3)
Issue
Cleveland Clinic Journal of Medicine - 83(3)
Page Number
228-230
Page Number
228-230
Publications
Publications
Topics
Article Type
Display Headline
The microbiome in celiac disease: Beyond diet-genetic interactions
Display Headline
The microbiome in celiac disease: Beyond diet-genetic interactions
Legacy Keywords
celiac disease, gluten, microbiome, intestinal bacteria, Firmicutes, Proteobacteria, Bifidobacterium, Bacteroides, Escherichia coli, Jose Scher
Legacy Keywords
celiac disease, gluten, microbiome, intestinal bacteria, Firmicutes, Proteobacteria, Bifidobacterium, Bacteroides, Escherichia coli, Jose Scher
Sections
Disallow All Ads
Alternative CME
Article PDF Media