User login
Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus: A link to statin therapy?
To the Editor: We read the interesting paper by Dr. Susan Rehm on the recently changing epidemiology and increasing incidence of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) bacteremia.1 We feel these trends may be related in part to the increasing use of statin therapy in both outpatient and hospital settings.
In a case-control study,2 skin and soft tissue infections as the source of bacteremia were significantly more prevalent among patients treated with statins compared with patients not receiving statin therapy. Additionally, there have been isolated reports of recurrent community-acquired MRSA skin infections in subjects on therapy with high-dose statins and no obvious risk factors for skin infection.3
The epidermis is a very active site of cholesterol synthesis, and after barrier disruption in the murine model, there is a brisk increase in epidermal cholesterol synthesis.4 Moreover, if the increase in epidermal cholesterol synthesis is inhibited by the topical application of statins, barrier function is impaired.4
Therefore, it is plausible that systemic statin therapy alters epidermal cholesterol homeostasis, resulting in barrier inadequacy and impaired innate immune function of the skin,5 leaving it more vulnerable to external pathogens and resulting bacteremia. Importantly, this needs to be investigated, particularly in light of the increasing and widespread use of high-dose statin therapy.
- Rehm SJ. Staphylococcus aureus: the new adventures of a legendary pathogen. Cleve Clin J Med 2008; 75:177–192.
- Liappis AP, Kan VL, Rochester CG, Simon GL. The effect of statins on mortality in patients with bacteremia. Clin Infect Dis 2001; 33:1352–1357.
- Moellering RC. A 39-year-old man with a skin infection. JAMA 2008; 299:79–87.
- Feingold KR. The role of epidermal lipids in cutaneous permeability barrier homeostasis. J Lipid Res 2007; 48:2531–2546.
- Pivarcsi A, Nagy I, Kemeny L. Innate immunity in the skin: how keratinocytes fight against pathogens. Curr Immunol Rev 2005; 1:29–42.
To the Editor: We read the interesting paper by Dr. Susan Rehm on the recently changing epidemiology and increasing incidence of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) bacteremia.1 We feel these trends may be related in part to the increasing use of statin therapy in both outpatient and hospital settings.
In a case-control study,2 skin and soft tissue infections as the source of bacteremia were significantly more prevalent among patients treated with statins compared with patients not receiving statin therapy. Additionally, there have been isolated reports of recurrent community-acquired MRSA skin infections in subjects on therapy with high-dose statins and no obvious risk factors for skin infection.3
The epidermis is a very active site of cholesterol synthesis, and after barrier disruption in the murine model, there is a brisk increase in epidermal cholesterol synthesis.4 Moreover, if the increase in epidermal cholesterol synthesis is inhibited by the topical application of statins, barrier function is impaired.4
Therefore, it is plausible that systemic statin therapy alters epidermal cholesterol homeostasis, resulting in barrier inadequacy and impaired innate immune function of the skin,5 leaving it more vulnerable to external pathogens and resulting bacteremia. Importantly, this needs to be investigated, particularly in light of the increasing and widespread use of high-dose statin therapy.
To the Editor: We read the interesting paper by Dr. Susan Rehm on the recently changing epidemiology and increasing incidence of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) bacteremia.1 We feel these trends may be related in part to the increasing use of statin therapy in both outpatient and hospital settings.
In a case-control study,2 skin and soft tissue infections as the source of bacteremia were significantly more prevalent among patients treated with statins compared with patients not receiving statin therapy. Additionally, there have been isolated reports of recurrent community-acquired MRSA skin infections in subjects on therapy with high-dose statins and no obvious risk factors for skin infection.3
The epidermis is a very active site of cholesterol synthesis, and after barrier disruption in the murine model, there is a brisk increase in epidermal cholesterol synthesis.4 Moreover, if the increase in epidermal cholesterol synthesis is inhibited by the topical application of statins, barrier function is impaired.4
Therefore, it is plausible that systemic statin therapy alters epidermal cholesterol homeostasis, resulting in barrier inadequacy and impaired innate immune function of the skin,5 leaving it more vulnerable to external pathogens and resulting bacteremia. Importantly, this needs to be investigated, particularly in light of the increasing and widespread use of high-dose statin therapy.
- Rehm SJ. Staphylococcus aureus: the new adventures of a legendary pathogen. Cleve Clin J Med 2008; 75:177–192.
- Liappis AP, Kan VL, Rochester CG, Simon GL. The effect of statins on mortality in patients with bacteremia. Clin Infect Dis 2001; 33:1352–1357.
- Moellering RC. A 39-year-old man with a skin infection. JAMA 2008; 299:79–87.
- Feingold KR. The role of epidermal lipids in cutaneous permeability barrier homeostasis. J Lipid Res 2007; 48:2531–2546.
- Pivarcsi A, Nagy I, Kemeny L. Innate immunity in the skin: how keratinocytes fight against pathogens. Curr Immunol Rev 2005; 1:29–42.
- Rehm SJ. Staphylococcus aureus: the new adventures of a legendary pathogen. Cleve Clin J Med 2008; 75:177–192.
- Liappis AP, Kan VL, Rochester CG, Simon GL. The effect of statins on mortality in patients with bacteremia. Clin Infect Dis 2001; 33:1352–1357.
- Moellering RC. A 39-year-old man with a skin infection. JAMA 2008; 299:79–87.
- Feingold KR. The role of epidermal lipids in cutaneous permeability barrier homeostasis. J Lipid Res 2007; 48:2531–2546.
- Pivarcsi A, Nagy I, Kemeny L. Innate immunity in the skin: how keratinocytes fight against pathogens. Curr Immunol Rev 2005; 1:29–42.