Robert Wesolowski, MD

A 40-year-old premenopausal woman presents with a palpable lump in her left breast. She first noted it 2 months ago on self-examination, and it has steadily grown in size regardless of the phase of her menstrual cycle.

The patient has never undergone mammography. Her menarche was at age 12. At age 35, she had one child (whom she breastfed) after a normal first full-term pregnancy. She took oral contraceptives for 10 years before her pregnancy. She has no other medical problems. She has no family history of breast or ovarian cancer.

On examination, her breasts are slightly asymmetric, without skin discoloration, tenderness, swelling, nipple retraction, or discharge. A 1.5- to 2-cm, rubbery, mobile lump can be felt in the left breast at about the 2 o’clock position. No axillary lymph nodes can be palpated. The rest of her examination is normal.

BREAST CANCER MUST BE RULED OUT

Benign breast disease is found in approximately 90% of women 20 to 50 years of age who come to a physician with a breast problem.¹

Nevertheless, breast cancer is of major concern. It is the most common type of cancer in women in the United States, responsible for an estimated 194,440 new cases and 40,610 deaths in 2009. It is also the leading cause of cancer-related death in women age 45 to 55 years in this country.^2,3

Breast cancer is most common in postmenopausal women, its incidence rising sharply after the age of 45 and leveling off at age 75. The median age at diagnosis is 61 years. Still, 1.9% of breast cancers in women are diagnosed at age 20 to 34, 10.6% at age 35 to 44, and 22.4% at age 45 to 54.⁴

Thus, it is paramount to perform a thorough assessment and workup of women who have breast lumps, regardless of their age. Doing so allows breast cancer to be detected at an early stage. The 5-year survival rate is 98.0% for women with localized disease, 83.6% with regional disease, and 23.4% with distant disease.⁴

WHAT IS THE APPROPRIATE WORKUP?

1. Which of the following are appropriate in the workup of this patient?

• Mammography
• Ultrasonography
• Percutaneous needle biopsy of the lesion
• Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of the brain
• Computed tomography (CT) of the chest, abdomen, and pelvis
• Positron emission tomography (PET)

She should undergo mammography, ultrasonography, and percutaneous needle biopsy.

Physical findings that suggest breast cancer include a hard, isolated, sometimes nonmobile lump, serosanguinous nipple discharge, and unilateral nipple retraction. Peau d’orange skin discoloration can occur. A scaly, vesicular, or ulcerated rash with or without pruritus, burning, irritation, or pain of the nipple or skin (Paget disease of the breast) is found in 1% to 3% of breast cancers and may be initially dismissed as mastitis.^5,6 Palpable enlarged axillary lymph nodes can suggest invasive breast cancer.

Mammography is recommended in all cases of suspicious breast lumps. In a patient with a palpable lump, diagnostic mammography has a positive predictive value of 21.8%, a specificity of 85.8%, and a sensitivity of 87.7%, which are higher values than in a patient without signs or symptoms.⁷

The BIRADS score. Mammographic findings are summarized using a scoring system devised by the American College of Radiology called BIRADS (Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System). This system is based on mass irregularity, density, spiculation, and presence or absence of microcalcifications. It standardizes the results of mammography, gives an estimate of the risk of breast cancer, and recommends the frequency of follow-up examinations.⁸ Scores range from 0 to 6:

• 0—Incomplete assessment warranting additional evaluation
• 1—Completely negative mammogram
• 2—Benign lesion
• 3—Requires follow-up mammogram at 6 months
• 4—Risk of cancer is 2% to 95%; core biopsy needed
• 5—Risk of cancer is more than 95%; core biopsy needed
• 6—Cases that have already been proven to be malignant.

Ultrasonography is also done if a suspicious lesion is found on mammography or physical examination. It helps differentiate between solid and cystic masses. If a mass is identified as a cyst, ultrasonography can further characterize it as simple, complicated-simple, or complex. Simple cysts and complicated-simple cysts are unlikely to be malignant.^9,10 Complex cysts or cysts associated with solid tissue are evaluated by biopsy.

Percutaneous needle biopsy should be done for a definitive diagnosis of most suspicious breast masses.

MRI can sometimes provide more accurate information about the possibility of multifocal breast cancer by revealing additional lesions missed on mammography or ultrasonography. It is also useful in determining more accurately the size of the breast tumor and looking for any possible contralateral lesions. In addition, it can sometimes detect enlarged axillary lymph nodes. However, it has poor specificity for breast cancer and may lead to additional and sometimes unnecessary diagnostic tests, which can delay treatment.

MRI’s role is therefore not clearly established, but it is commonly used in clinical practice. It is argued that workup of MRI findings may help in planning more accurate surgical procedures and may prevent reoperations. Based on retrospective analyses, results of breast MRI may lead to altered surgical treatment in approximately 13% of patients.¹¹

Interestingly, a recent randomized trial showed no difference in reoperation rates between patients who underwent MRI before surgery vs those who did not. However, diagnostic workup of new MRI findings was not mandated by the study protocol, making the results of this trial difficult to interpret.¹²

 

DIFFERENTIAL DIAGNOSIS

2. Which of the following is in the differential diagnosis of a woman presenting with a breast abnormality?

• Fibrocystic changes
• Breast cyst
• Ductal ectasia
• Simple fibroadenoma
• Intraductal papilloma
• Ductal carcinoma in situ
• Mastitis
• Infiltrating ductal carcinoma
• Phyllodes tumor

All of these choices are part of the differential diagnosis.

Benign breast lesions

Benign breast lesions are divided into those that are proliferative and those that are nonproliferative. Some (but not all) proliferative lesions pose a higher risk of progressing to malignancy than nonproliferative lesions do.¹³ Benign breast lesions that do not increase the risk of breast cancer are listed in Table 1.

Simple fibroadenoma, one of the most common proliferative lesions, is not associated with a higher risk of developing breast cancer.

Fibrocystic changes are the most common nonproliferative lesions. Occasionally breast pain, nipple discharge, or significant lumpiness that varies during the course of the menstrual cycle can occur. The nipple discharge in women with fibrocystic changes is physiologic and pale green to brown in color. It can also be yellow, whitish, clear, or bloody. Bloody nipple discharge is considered pathologic and suggests a process other than fibrocystic changes, necessitating further workup. However, bloody discharge is not always a sign of malignancy, as it can have a benign cause as well.

Ductal ectasia, another nonproliferative lesion, is a result of dilation of subareolar ducts that contain fluid with a crystalline material. It can penetrate the duct, forming a nodule, which causes pain and occasionally fever.

Precancerous and cancerous lesions

Lesions that can increase the risk of breast cancer are listed in Table 2. The degree of risk depends on the complexity and amount of atypia found on the biopsy specimen. The relative risk of developing breast cancer in patients with simple proliferative lesions without atypia is 1.6 to 1.9, compared with 3.7 to 5.3 for complex lesions with high degrees of atypia.¹⁴

Ductal carcinoma in situ is a true neoplasm that has not yet developed the ability to invade through the basement membrane of the ducts. The likelihood of progression to invasive breast cancer depends on the histologic grade, the tumor size, and the patient’s age.

Lobular carcinoma in situ arises from lobules and terminal ducts of breast tissue. Much controversy surrounds this type of tumor, which was thought to be a marker of increased risk of developing ipsilateral and contralateral breast cancer and not to be a malignant lesion itself.¹⁵ However, there is emerging evidence to suggest that a pleomorphic variant of lobular carcinoma in situ is associated with development of breast cancer in the same site as the lesion, whereas a nonpleomorphic form is a marker of increased risk of ipsilateral and contralateral breast cancer.¹⁶

Invasive ductal and lobular carcinomas are the true invasive breast cancers, with a potential to metastasize.

Phyllodes tumors are uncommon fibroepithelial lesions that account for less than 1% of all breast neoplasms. The median age at presentation is 45 years.¹⁷ Despite the historical name “cystosarcoma phyllodes,” these lesions are not true sarcomas and have stromal and epithelial components.

These tumors display very heterogeneous behavior and, based on predefined histologic criteria, are often classified as benign, borderline, or malignant. Benign phyllodes tumors are similar to fibroadenomas in both histology and prognosis, making their diagnosis challenging. The most aggressive phyllodes tumors lose their epithelial component and have high metastatic potential. These tumors often have a biphasic growth pattern, and women may present with a smooth, round, well-defined breast lump that was stable for many years but then started to grow rapidly.¹⁷

Surgical resection with wide margins is the primary management of these tumors.¹⁸

Mastitis, ie, inflammation of the breast tissue, often presents with symptoms of breast erythema, swelling, tenderness, and nipple discharge. It may be secondary to infection (most often in lactating women) or other causes such as radiation or underlying malignancy. A complication of infectious mastitis is formation of a breast abscess. Underlying malignancy, especially inflammatory breast cancer, is a common cause of noninfectious mastitis and is very important to recognize.¹⁹

 

RISK FACTORS FOR BREAST CANCER

3. Which of the following are risk factors for breast cancer?

• Menarche before age 12
• Female sex
• Personal history of breast cancer
• Obesity
• Never having had children, or having given birth for the first time at an older age
• Older age
• History of hormone replacement therapy with estrogen and progesterone
• Family history of breast cancer

All of these choices are risk factors for breast cancer.

Family history

The overall relative risk of developing breast cancer in a woman with a first-degree relative with the disease is 1.7. However, the relative risk is about 3 if the first-degree relative developed breast cancer before menopause, and 9 if the first-degree relative developed bilateral breast cancer before menopause.⁵

Familial syndromes are a major factor in 5% to 7% of cases of breast cancer. Most frequently, they involve mutations in the BRCA1 and BRCA2 genes, which encode DNA excision repair proteins. Such mutations are present in about 2.2% of the Ashkenazi Jewish population, and carriers have a lifetime risk of developing breast cancer of 56% to 85%.^20,21 Other common familial syndromes associated with breast cancer include the Cowden and Li-Fraumeni syndromes (Table 3).^22–25

Estrogen exposure

The duration and amount of estrogen exposure are also risk factors. For example, menarche before age 12 and menopause after age 55 are associated with a higher risk. Women who go through menopause after age 55 have a twofold higher risk of breast cancer compared with women who go through menopause at an early age. Pregnancy before age 30 lowers the risk of breast cancer; late first full-term pregnancy or nulliparity increases it. Lactation, on the other hand, has a protective effect.⁵

Oral contraceptives have traditionally been thought to increase the risk of breast cancer. In the 1990s, a meta-analysis involving 153,506 women found that those who had used oral contraceptives had a 24% higher risk of developing breast cancer.²⁶ However, this association has come into question since newer oral contraceptive pills containing different progestins and lower amounts of estrogen have become available. In fact, recent studies showed no link between oral contraceptive use and breast cancer.^27,28 Nevertheless, women at higher risk of developing breast cancer are advised not to use oral contraceptives.

Hormone replacement therapy with estrogen and progesterone was found to increase the risk of breast cancer by 26% in the Women’s Health Initiative (WHI) study, which involved 16,608 healthy women followed for a median of 5.6 years.²⁹

In a study reported separately, the WHI investigators randomized 10,739 women who had undergone hysterectomy to receive either hormone replacement therapy with unopposed estrogen (which is feasible only in women without a uterus) or placebo. They found no increase in the risk of invasive breast cancer in women on hormone replacement therapy with estrogen alone. In fact, the study showed a trend towards a modest reduction of this risk (odds ratio 0.77; 95% confidence interval 0.59–1.01).³⁰

After the results of the WHI were published, the use of hormone replacement therapy in postmenopausal women declined significantly. And in 2003—1 year later—the incidence of breast cancer had dropped by 6.7%.³¹

Most experts now recommend that estrogen-progestin combinations be used only selectively to treat the symptoms of menopause, and only for the short term.

Other risk factors

Other factors found to modestly increase the risk of breast cancer include:

• Alcohol use
• Obesity
• Radiation exposure. Patients are at higher risk of breast cancer 15 to 20 years after receiving upper-mantle radiotherapy for Hodgkin lymphoma.⁵

Case continues: Bad news on mammography, ultrasonography, biopsy

The patient undergoes mammography, which shows a 2.5-cm spiculated lesion with areas of calcifications (BIRADS score of 5). Subsequently, ultrasonography confirms that the suspicious mass is not a cyst. Ultrasound-guided core needle biopsy reveals that the lesion is a high-grade invasive ductal carcinoma. The tumor is positive for both estrogen and progesterone receptors and negative for HER2/neu overexpression.

STAGING EVALUATION

4. Given these findings, what is the next step to take?

• CT of the chest, abdomen, and pelvis
• MRI of the brain
• PET
• Referral to a surgeon for a possible mastectomy with sentinel lymph node dissection
• Referral to a surgeon for a possible lumpectomy with sentinel lymph node dissection

At this point, the patient should be referred to a surgeon for possible mastectomy or lumpectomy.

Women who appear clinically to have early breast cancer, such as in this case, should have a complete blood count, comprehensive metabolic panel, and chest x-ray as their initial staging evaluation. No further studies are recommended unless the findings on history, physical examination, or the above testing suggest possible metastases.

 

Mastectomy vs lumpectomy

Early-stage breast cancer is managed with definitive surgery. The two options are mastectomy and breast conservation therapy, the latter involving lumpectomy followed by breast radiation therapy.

Multiple randomized studies comparing mastectomy and lumpectomy showed no difference in survival rates, but patients in the lumpectomy groups had higher rates of local recurrence.³² Breast radiation therapy after lumpectomy lowered the rates of local recurrence and breast cancer death.³³ Therefore, most patients can opt to undergo either lumpectomy with radiation or mastectomy, depending on personal preference.

However, mastectomy rather than breast conservation therapy is still recommended in cases of prior radiation therapy, inability to achieve negative surgical margins (as in cases of large tumors), multicentric disease (cancer in separate breast quadrants), or multiple areas of calcifications. Mastectomy is also preferred in most pregnant women unless the diagnosis of breast cancer is made in the third trimester and radiation therapy can be given after delivery. Patients who have large lesions in a small breast may also choose mastectomy with breast reconstruction rather than breast conservation therapy. Patients with a history of scleroderma are encouraged to undergo mastectomy because of increased toxicity from radiation treatment.

Sentinel vs axillary lymph node dissection

Knowledge of axillary lymph node involvement is important because it determines the stage in the tumor-node-metastasis (TNM) system, and it influences the choice of further therapy. Therefore, all patients with nonmetastatic invasive breast cancer must have their axillary lymph nodes sampled.

Conventionally, this involves axillary lymph node dissection. Unfortunately, upper extremity lymphedema develops in 6% to 30% of patients within the first 3 years, and in 49% of patients after 20 years following axillary lymph node dissection.³⁴

Sentinel lymph node dissection was developed to minimize this complication. This procedure involves the injection of a blue dye, isosulfan blue (Lymphazurin), around the edge of the tumor or in the dermis overlying the tumor. The most proximal axillary lymph nodes that stain blue are dissected. Alternatively, a radioactive colloid (most commonly technetium sulfur colloid agents) may be injected, allowing sentinel lymph nodes to be identified by lymphoscintigraphy. If no metastases are found in the sentinel lymph nodes, axillary lymph node dissection is not performed.

A prospective study in 536 women found that at 5 years of follow-up, lymphedema developed in only 5% of patients after sentinel lymph node dissection compared with 16% of those who underwent axillary lymph node dissection (P < .001), with comparable outcomes in terms of disease recurrence.³⁵

Case continues: Patient undergoes surgery

The patient elects to undergo lumpectomy with sentinel lymph node dissection. Pathologic review of the resection specimen reveals a 2.5-cm poorly differentiated invasive ductal carcinoma. Sentinel lymph node dissection shows metastases, and therefore axillary lymph node dissection is performed. One of eight lymph nodes removed is positive for metastases. All surgical margins are negative.

POSTOPERATIVE CARE

5. What would be the next step for our patient?

• Radiation followed by observation
• Tamoxifen (Nolvadex) for 5 years
• Observation only
• Chemotherapy followed by radiation therapy and 5 years of tamoxifen

She should receive chemotherapy, followed by radiation therapy and then tamoxifen for 5 years.

Chemotherapy. Almost all patients who have lymph-node-positive disease are advised to undergo chemotherapy.

The Early Breast Cancer Trialists’ Collaborative Group (EBCTCG) performed a metaanalysis of 194 randomized trials that compared adjuvant chemotherapy and no treatment in early-stage breast cancer. Chemotherapy led to a 10% absolute improvement in survival at 15 years for women younger than 50 years and 3% in women age 51 to 69.³⁶

Indications for chemotherapy include axillary lymph node involvement, locally advanced disease, and other risk factors for recurrence such as young age at diagnosis, strong positive family history of breast cancer, prior history of breast cancer, or lymph-node-negative, estrogen-receptor-negative tumors that are larger than 1 cm in diameter.

The Oncotype DX assay is a new tool to help oncologists decide whether to use chemotherapy in cases of estrogen-receptor-positive breast cancer, in which the benefit of chemotherapy is uncertain. It is a polymerase chain reaction assay that measures the expression of 16 cancer-specific genes and five reference genes within the breast tumor. Based on the pattern of expression of these genes, breast cancer can be characterized as low-risk, intermediate-risk, or high-risk. Patients in the high-risk group have a high chance of cancer recurrence and benefit from chemotherapy. Patients in the low-risk group are unlikely to have a recurrence or to benefit from chemotherapy.³⁷ It is far less clear if patients in the intermediate-risk group benefit from chemotherapy, but this assay might eventually prove useful in deciding for or against chemotherapy in this group of patients as well.³⁸ The Oncotype DX assay is presently being studied in a clinical trial.

Radiation therapy after mastectomy is recommended in patients who have breast tumors larger than 5 cm or metastases to more than three axillary lymph nodes.³⁹

Antiestrogen therapy. After chemotherapy, patients with estrogen-receptor-positive cancers also receive 5 years of antiestrogen therapy. Available antiestrogen agents for such patients include tamoxifen, which is a selective estrogen receptor modulator, and drugs called aromatase inhibitors that block conversion of androgens to estrogens in peripheral tissues. Anastrozole (Arimidex), letrozole (Femara), and exemestane (Aromasin) are examples of available aromatase inhibitors. Premenopausal women are treated with tamoxifen, and postmenopausal women are offered aromatase inhibitors.

The EBCTCG meta-analysis found a 12% absolute reduction in mortality rates and a 9% absolute reduction in relapse rates at 15 years of follow-up in patients who took tamoxifen for 5 years.³⁶

Table 4 lists the most common adverse effects of these agents. Aromatase inhibitors are associated with a higher risk of osteoporosis and arthralgia, while tamoxifen increases the risks of thromboembolism, endometrial cancer, and vaginal discharge. Both agents may produce menopausal symptoms such as hot flashes and mood swings.

 

 

Case continues: Seven years later, metastases in the spine

The patient achieves a complete remission. She is seen for a routine visit 7 years after diagnosis. She now reports mid-back pain that has worsened over the last 2 months. A bone scan reveals diffuse metastatic disease in the spine and in both humeral bones. CT of the chest, abdomen, and pelvis is negative for visceral metastases. Bone marrow aspiration and biopsy study show marrow infiltration by adenocarcinoma that stains positive for estrogen receptors and negative for HER2. The patient otherwise feels well and has no other symptoms.

WHAT TREATMENT FOR METASTATIC BREAST CANCER?

6. What should you now do for our patient?

• Discuss end-of-life care and refer her to a hospice program
• Educate the patient that no options for treatment exist and recommend enrolling in a phase I clinical trial
• Refer her to an oncologist for consideration of chemotherapy
• Refer her to an oncologist for consideration of endocrine treatment

She should be referred to an oncologist for consideration of endocrine treatment.

The most common sites of breast cancer metastases are the bones, followed by the liver and lungs. Metastatic breast cancer almost always is incurable. However, treatment can palliate symptoms.

Although a randomized trial of treatment vs best supportive care has never been done, many believe that treatment may improve survival. ⁴⁰ The median survival of patients treated with standard therapy is about 3 years if the breast cancer is estrogen-receptor-positive and 2 years if it is estrogen-receptor-negative, but survival rates vary widely from patient to patient.^41,42

Standard therapy or enrollment in a clinical phase II or III trial is indicated for this patient before considering enrollment in a phase I clinical trial or supportive care alone.

Endocrine therapy is the first-line therapy in women with estrogen-receptor-positive metastatic breast cancer. Postmenopausal women usually receive an aromatase inhibitor first.^43,44 Response to endocrine therapy usually takes weeks to months but may last for several years.

Premenopausal women with estrogen-receptor-positive breast cancer also receive ovarian ablation therapy (oophorectomy or chemical ovarian ablation) with gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonists.

In addition, most patients with bone involvement are treated with high doses of intravenous bisphosphonates, which can reduce skeletal complications.⁴⁵

Chemotherapy is reserved for patients with estrogen-receptor-negative breast cancer and those with cancer that progresses despite treatment with multiple antiestrogen agents. The time to response when chemotherapy is used is quicker, but the duration of response is usually shorter, lasting on average less than 1 year.³⁷

Trastuzumab (Herceptin), a monoclonal humanized murine antibody to the extracellular domain of the HER2 protein, is indicated in patients with HER2-overexpressing tumors.^46,47

STABLE 2 YEARS LATER

The patient was started on letrozole and a bisphosphonate, zolendronic acid (Zometa). Ovarian ablation was initiated with goserelin (Zoladex) given monthly. A bone scan performed 2 months after starting treatment showed improvement in bony metastases. She also noted significant improvement in pain. Her disease remains stable 2 years after starting endocrine therapy.

A 40-year-old premenopausal woman presents with a palpable lump in her left breast. She first noted it 2 months ago on self-examination, and it has steadily grown in size regardless of the phase of her menstrual cycle.

The patient has never undergone mammography. Her menarche was at age 12. At age 35, she had one child (whom she breastfed) after a normal first full-term pregnancy. She took oral contraceptives for 10 years before her pregnancy. She has no other medical problems. She has no family history of breast or ovarian cancer.

On examination, her breasts are slightly asymmetric, without skin discoloration, tenderness, swelling, nipple retraction, or discharge. A 1.5- to 2-cm, rubbery, mobile lump can be felt in the left breast at about the 2 o’clock position. No axillary lymph nodes can be palpated. The rest of her examination is normal.

BREAST CANCER MUST BE RULED OUT

Benign breast disease is found in approximately 90% of women 20 to 50 years of age who come to a physician with a breast problem.¹

Nevertheless, breast cancer is of major concern. It is the most common type of cancer in women in the United States, responsible for an estimated 194,440 new cases and 40,610 deaths in 2009. It is also the leading cause of cancer-related death in women age 45 to 55 years in this country.^2,3

Breast cancer is most common in postmenopausal women, its incidence rising sharply after the age of 45 and leveling off at age 75. The median age at diagnosis is 61 years. Still, 1.9% of breast cancers in women are diagnosed at age 20 to 34, 10.6% at age 35 to 44, and 22.4% at age 45 to 54.⁴

Thus, it is paramount to perform a thorough assessment and workup of women who have breast lumps, regardless of their age. Doing so allows breast cancer to be detected at an early stage. The 5-year survival rate is 98.0% for women with localized disease, 83.6% with regional disease, and 23.4% with distant disease.⁴

WHAT IS THE APPROPRIATE WORKUP?

1. Which of the following are appropriate in the workup of this patient?

• Mammography
• Ultrasonography
• Percutaneous needle biopsy of the lesion
• Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of the brain
• Computed tomography (CT) of the chest, abdomen, and pelvis
• Positron emission tomography (PET)

She should undergo mammography, ultrasonography, and percutaneous needle biopsy.

Physical findings that suggest breast cancer include a hard, isolated, sometimes nonmobile lump, serosanguinous nipple discharge, and unilateral nipple retraction. Peau d’orange skin discoloration can occur. A scaly, vesicular, or ulcerated rash with or without pruritus, burning, irritation, or pain of the nipple or skin (Paget disease of the breast) is found in 1% to 3% of breast cancers and may be initially dismissed as mastitis.^5,6 Palpable enlarged axillary lymph nodes can suggest invasive breast cancer.

Mammography is recommended in all cases of suspicious breast lumps. In a patient with a palpable lump, diagnostic mammography has a positive predictive value of 21.8%, a specificity of 85.8%, and a sensitivity of 87.7%, which are higher values than in a patient without signs or symptoms.⁷

The BIRADS score. Mammographic findings are summarized using a scoring system devised by the American College of Radiology called BIRADS (Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System). This system is based on mass irregularity, density, spiculation, and presence or absence of microcalcifications. It standardizes the results of mammography, gives an estimate of the risk of breast cancer, and recommends the frequency of follow-up examinations.⁸ Scores range from 0 to 6:

• 0—Incomplete assessment warranting additional evaluation
• 1—Completely negative mammogram
• 2—Benign lesion
• 3—Requires follow-up mammogram at 6 months
• 4—Risk of cancer is 2% to 95%; core biopsy needed
• 5—Risk of cancer is more than 95%; core biopsy needed
• 6—Cases that have already been proven to be malignant.

Ultrasonography is also done if a suspicious lesion is found on mammography or physical examination. It helps differentiate between solid and cystic masses. If a mass is identified as a cyst, ultrasonography can further characterize it as simple, complicated-simple, or complex. Simple cysts and complicated-simple cysts are unlikely to be malignant.^9,10 Complex cysts or cysts associated with solid tissue are evaluated by biopsy.

Percutaneous needle biopsy should be done for a definitive diagnosis of most suspicious breast masses.

MRI can sometimes provide more accurate information about the possibility of multifocal breast cancer by revealing additional lesions missed on mammography or ultrasonography. It is also useful in determining more accurately the size of the breast tumor and looking for any possible contralateral lesions. In addition, it can sometimes detect enlarged axillary lymph nodes. However, it has poor specificity for breast cancer and may lead to additional and sometimes unnecessary diagnostic tests, which can delay treatment.

MRI’s role is therefore not clearly established, but it is commonly used in clinical practice. It is argued that workup of MRI findings may help in planning more accurate surgical procedures and may prevent reoperations. Based on retrospective analyses, results of breast MRI may lead to altered surgical treatment in approximately 13% of patients.¹¹

Interestingly, a recent randomized trial showed no difference in reoperation rates between patients who underwent MRI before surgery vs those who did not. However, diagnostic workup of new MRI findings was not mandated by the study protocol, making the results of this trial difficult to interpret.¹²

 

DIFFERENTIAL DIAGNOSIS

2. Which of the following is in the differential diagnosis of a woman presenting with a breast abnormality?

• Fibrocystic changes
• Breast cyst
• Ductal ectasia
• Simple fibroadenoma
• Intraductal papilloma
• Ductal carcinoma in situ
• Mastitis
• Infiltrating ductal carcinoma
• Phyllodes tumor

All of these choices are part of the differential diagnosis.

Benign breast lesions

Benign breast lesions are divided into those that are proliferative and those that are nonproliferative. Some (but not all) proliferative lesions pose a higher risk of progressing to malignancy than nonproliferative lesions do.¹³ Benign breast lesions that do not increase the risk of breast cancer are listed in Table 1.

Simple fibroadenoma, one of the most common proliferative lesions, is not associated with a higher risk of developing breast cancer.

Fibrocystic changes are the most common nonproliferative lesions. Occasionally breast pain, nipple discharge, or significant lumpiness that varies during the course of the menstrual cycle can occur. The nipple discharge in women with fibrocystic changes is physiologic and pale green to brown in color. It can also be yellow, whitish, clear, or bloody. Bloody nipple discharge is considered pathologic and suggests a process other than fibrocystic changes, necessitating further workup. However, bloody discharge is not always a sign of malignancy, as it can have a benign cause as well.

Ductal ectasia, another nonproliferative lesion, is a result of dilation of subareolar ducts that contain fluid with a crystalline material. It can penetrate the duct, forming a nodule, which causes pain and occasionally fever.

Precancerous and cancerous lesions

Lesions that can increase the risk of breast cancer are listed in Table 2. The degree of risk depends on the complexity and amount of atypia found on the biopsy specimen. The relative risk of developing breast cancer in patients with simple proliferative lesions without atypia is 1.6 to 1.9, compared with 3.7 to 5.3 for complex lesions with high degrees of atypia.¹⁴

Ductal carcinoma in situ is a true neoplasm that has not yet developed the ability to invade through the basement membrane of the ducts. The likelihood of progression to invasive breast cancer depends on the histologic grade, the tumor size, and the patient’s age.

Lobular carcinoma in situ arises from lobules and terminal ducts of breast tissue. Much controversy surrounds this type of tumor, which was thought to be a marker of increased risk of developing ipsilateral and contralateral breast cancer and not to be a malignant lesion itself.¹⁵ However, there is emerging evidence to suggest that a pleomorphic variant of lobular carcinoma in situ is associated with development of breast cancer in the same site as the lesion, whereas a nonpleomorphic form is a marker of increased risk of ipsilateral and contralateral breast cancer.¹⁶

Invasive ductal and lobular carcinomas are the true invasive breast cancers, with a potential to metastasize.

Phyllodes tumors are uncommon fibroepithelial lesions that account for less than 1% of all breast neoplasms. The median age at presentation is 45 years.¹⁷ Despite the historical name “cystosarcoma phyllodes,” these lesions are not true sarcomas and have stromal and epithelial components.

These tumors display very heterogeneous behavior and, based on predefined histologic criteria, are often classified as benign, borderline, or malignant. Benign phyllodes tumors are similar to fibroadenomas in both histology and prognosis, making their diagnosis challenging. The most aggressive phyllodes tumors lose their epithelial component and have high metastatic potential. These tumors often have a biphasic growth pattern, and women may present with a smooth, round, well-defined breast lump that was stable for many years but then started to grow rapidly.¹⁷

Surgical resection with wide margins is the primary management of these tumors.¹⁸

Mastitis, ie, inflammation of the breast tissue, often presents with symptoms of breast erythema, swelling, tenderness, and nipple discharge. It may be secondary to infection (most often in lactating women) or other causes such as radiation or underlying malignancy. A complication of infectious mastitis is formation of a breast abscess. Underlying malignancy, especially inflammatory breast cancer, is a common cause of noninfectious mastitis and is very important to recognize.¹⁹

 

RISK FACTORS FOR BREAST CANCER

3. Which of the following are risk factors for breast cancer?

• Menarche before age 12
• Female sex
• Personal history of breast cancer
• Obesity
• Never having had children, or having given birth for the first time at an older age
• Older age
• History of hormone replacement therapy with estrogen and progesterone
• Family history of breast cancer

All of these choices are risk factors for breast cancer.

Family history

The overall relative risk of developing breast cancer in a woman with a first-degree relative with the disease is 1.7. However, the relative risk is about 3 if the first-degree relative developed breast cancer before menopause, and 9 if the first-degree relative developed bilateral breast cancer before menopause.⁵

Familial syndromes are a major factor in 5% to 7% of cases of breast cancer. Most frequently, they involve mutations in the BRCA1 and BRCA2 genes, which encode DNA excision repair proteins. Such mutations are present in about 2.2% of the Ashkenazi Jewish population, and carriers have a lifetime risk of developing breast cancer of 56% to 85%.^20,21 Other common familial syndromes associated with breast cancer include the Cowden and Li-Fraumeni syndromes (Table 3).^22–25

Estrogen exposure

The duration and amount of estrogen exposure are also risk factors. For example, menarche before age 12 and menopause after age 55 are associated with a higher risk. Women who go through menopause after age 55 have a twofold higher risk of breast cancer compared with women who go through menopause at an early age. Pregnancy before age 30 lowers the risk of breast cancer; late first full-term pregnancy or nulliparity increases it. Lactation, on the other hand, has a protective effect.⁵

Oral contraceptives have traditionally been thought to increase the risk of breast cancer. In the 1990s, a meta-analysis involving 153,506 women found that those who had used oral contraceptives had a 24% higher risk of developing breast cancer.²⁶ However, this association has come into question since newer oral contraceptive pills containing different progestins and lower amounts of estrogen have become available. In fact, recent studies showed no link between oral contraceptive use and breast cancer.^27,28 Nevertheless, women at higher risk of developing breast cancer are advised not to use oral contraceptives.

Hormone replacement therapy with estrogen and progesterone was found to increase the risk of breast cancer by 26% in the Women’s Health Initiative (WHI) study, which involved 16,608 healthy women followed for a median of 5.6 years.²⁹

In a study reported separately, the WHI investigators randomized 10,739 women who had undergone hysterectomy to receive either hormone replacement therapy with unopposed estrogen (which is feasible only in women without a uterus) or placebo. They found no increase in the risk of invasive breast cancer in women on hormone replacement therapy with estrogen alone. In fact, the study showed a trend towards a modest reduction of this risk (odds ratio 0.77; 95% confidence interval 0.59–1.01).³⁰

After the results of the WHI were published, the use of hormone replacement therapy in postmenopausal women declined significantly. And in 2003—1 year later—the incidence of breast cancer had dropped by 6.7%.³¹

Most experts now recommend that estrogen-progestin combinations be used only selectively to treat the symptoms of menopause, and only for the short term.

Other risk factors

Other factors found to modestly increase the risk of breast cancer include:

• Alcohol use
• Obesity
• Radiation exposure. Patients are at higher risk of breast cancer 15 to 20 years after receiving upper-mantle radiotherapy for Hodgkin lymphoma.⁵

Case continues: Bad news on mammography, ultrasonography, biopsy

The patient undergoes mammography, which shows a 2.5-cm spiculated lesion with areas of calcifications (BIRADS score of 5). Subsequently, ultrasonography confirms that the suspicious mass is not a cyst. Ultrasound-guided core needle biopsy reveals that the lesion is a high-grade invasive ductal carcinoma. The tumor is positive for both estrogen and progesterone receptors and negative for HER2/neu overexpression.

STAGING EVALUATION

4. Given these findings, what is the next step to take?

• CT of the chest, abdomen, and pelvis
• MRI of the brain
• PET
• Referral to a surgeon for a possible mastectomy with sentinel lymph node dissection
• Referral to a surgeon for a possible lumpectomy with sentinel lymph node dissection

At this point, the patient should be referred to a surgeon for possible mastectomy or lumpectomy.

Women who appear clinically to have early breast cancer, such as in this case, should have a complete blood count, comprehensive metabolic panel, and chest x-ray as their initial staging evaluation. No further studies are recommended unless the findings on history, physical examination, or the above testing suggest possible metastases.

 

Mastectomy vs lumpectomy

Early-stage breast cancer is managed with definitive surgery. The two options are mastectomy and breast conservation therapy, the latter involving lumpectomy followed by breast radiation therapy.

Multiple randomized studies comparing mastectomy and lumpectomy showed no difference in survival rates, but patients in the lumpectomy groups had higher rates of local recurrence.³² Breast radiation therapy after lumpectomy lowered the rates of local recurrence and breast cancer death.³³ Therefore, most patients can opt to undergo either lumpectomy with radiation or mastectomy, depending on personal preference.

However, mastectomy rather than breast conservation therapy is still recommended in cases of prior radiation therapy, inability to achieve negative surgical margins (as in cases of large tumors), multicentric disease (cancer in separate breast quadrants), or multiple areas of calcifications. Mastectomy is also preferred in most pregnant women unless the diagnosis of breast cancer is made in the third trimester and radiation therapy can be given after delivery. Patients who have large lesions in a small breast may also choose mastectomy with breast reconstruction rather than breast conservation therapy. Patients with a history of scleroderma are encouraged to undergo mastectomy because of increased toxicity from radiation treatment.

Sentinel vs axillary lymph node dissection

Knowledge of axillary lymph node involvement is important because it determines the stage in the tumor-node-metastasis (TNM) system, and it influences the choice of further therapy. Therefore, all patients with nonmetastatic invasive breast cancer must have their axillary lymph nodes sampled.

Conventionally, this involves axillary lymph node dissection. Unfortunately, upper extremity lymphedema develops in 6% to 30% of patients within the first 3 years, and in 49% of patients after 20 years following axillary lymph node dissection.³⁴

Sentinel lymph node dissection was developed to minimize this complication. This procedure involves the injection of a blue dye, isosulfan blue (Lymphazurin), around the edge of the tumor or in the dermis overlying the tumor. The most proximal axillary lymph nodes that stain blue are dissected. Alternatively, a radioactive colloid (most commonly technetium sulfur colloid agents) may be injected, allowing sentinel lymph nodes to be identified by lymphoscintigraphy. If no metastases are found in the sentinel lymph nodes, axillary lymph node dissection is not performed.

A prospective study in 536 women found that at 5 years of follow-up, lymphedema developed in only 5% of patients after sentinel lymph node dissection compared with 16% of those who underwent axillary lymph node dissection (P < .001), with comparable outcomes in terms of disease recurrence.³⁵

Case continues: Patient undergoes surgery

The patient elects to undergo lumpectomy with sentinel lymph node dissection. Pathologic review of the resection specimen reveals a 2.5-cm poorly differentiated invasive ductal carcinoma. Sentinel lymph node dissection shows metastases, and therefore axillary lymph node dissection is performed. One of eight lymph nodes removed is positive for metastases. All surgical margins are negative.

POSTOPERATIVE CARE

5. What would be the next step for our patient?

• Radiation followed by observation
• Tamoxifen (Nolvadex) for 5 years
• Observation only
• Chemotherapy followed by radiation therapy and 5 years of tamoxifen

She should receive chemotherapy, followed by radiation therapy and then tamoxifen for 5 years.

Chemotherapy. Almost all patients who have lymph-node-positive disease are advised to undergo chemotherapy.

The Early Breast Cancer Trialists’ Collaborative Group (EBCTCG) performed a metaanalysis of 194 randomized trials that compared adjuvant chemotherapy and no treatment in early-stage breast cancer. Chemotherapy led to a 10% absolute improvement in survival at 15 years for women younger than 50 years and 3% in women age 51 to 69.³⁶

Indications for chemotherapy include axillary lymph node involvement, locally advanced disease, and other risk factors for recurrence such as young age at diagnosis, strong positive family history of breast cancer, prior history of breast cancer, or lymph-node-negative, estrogen-receptor-negative tumors that are larger than 1 cm in diameter.

The Oncotype DX assay is a new tool to help oncologists decide whether to use chemotherapy in cases of estrogen-receptor-positive breast cancer, in which the benefit of chemotherapy is uncertain. It is a polymerase chain reaction assay that measures the expression of 16 cancer-specific genes and five reference genes within the breast tumor. Based on the pattern of expression of these genes, breast cancer can be characterized as low-risk, intermediate-risk, or high-risk. Patients in the high-risk group have a high chance of cancer recurrence and benefit from chemotherapy. Patients in the low-risk group are unlikely to have a recurrence or to benefit from chemotherapy.³⁷ It is far less clear if patients in the intermediate-risk group benefit from chemotherapy, but this assay might eventually prove useful in deciding for or against chemotherapy in this group of patients as well.³⁸ The Oncotype DX assay is presently being studied in a clinical trial.

Radiation therapy after mastectomy is recommended in patients who have breast tumors larger than 5 cm or metastases to more than three axillary lymph nodes.³⁹

Antiestrogen therapy. After chemotherapy, patients with estrogen-receptor-positive cancers also receive 5 years of antiestrogen therapy. Available antiestrogen agents for such patients include tamoxifen, which is a selective estrogen receptor modulator, and drugs called aromatase inhibitors that block conversion of androgens to estrogens in peripheral tissues. Anastrozole (Arimidex), letrozole (Femara), and exemestane (Aromasin) are examples of available aromatase inhibitors. Premenopausal women are treated with tamoxifen, and postmenopausal women are offered aromatase inhibitors.

The EBCTCG meta-analysis found a 12% absolute reduction in mortality rates and a 9% absolute reduction in relapse rates at 15 years of follow-up in patients who took tamoxifen for 5 years.³⁶

Table 4 lists the most common adverse effects of these agents. Aromatase inhibitors are associated with a higher risk of osteoporosis and arthralgia, while tamoxifen increases the risks of thromboembolism, endometrial cancer, and vaginal discharge. Both agents may produce menopausal symptoms such as hot flashes and mood swings.

 

 

Case continues: Seven years later, metastases in the spine

The patient achieves a complete remission. She is seen for a routine visit 7 years after diagnosis. She now reports mid-back pain that has worsened over the last 2 months. A bone scan reveals diffuse metastatic disease in the spine and in both humeral bones. CT of the chest, abdomen, and pelvis is negative for visceral metastases. Bone marrow aspiration and biopsy study show marrow infiltration by adenocarcinoma that stains positive for estrogen receptors and negative for HER2. The patient otherwise feels well and has no other symptoms.

WHAT TREATMENT FOR METASTATIC BREAST CANCER?

6. What should you now do for our patient?

• Discuss end-of-life care and refer her to a hospice program
• Educate the patient that no options for treatment exist and recommend enrolling in a phase I clinical trial
• Refer her to an oncologist for consideration of chemotherapy
• Refer her to an oncologist for consideration of endocrine treatment

She should be referred to an oncologist for consideration of endocrine treatment.

The most common sites of breast cancer metastases are the bones, followed by the liver and lungs. Metastatic breast cancer almost always is incurable. However, treatment can palliate symptoms.

Although a randomized trial of treatment vs best supportive care has never been done, many believe that treatment may improve survival. ⁴⁰ The median survival of patients treated with standard therapy is about 3 years if the breast cancer is estrogen-receptor-positive and 2 years if it is estrogen-receptor-negative, but survival rates vary widely from patient to patient.^41,42

Standard therapy or enrollment in a clinical phase II or III trial is indicated for this patient before considering enrollment in a phase I clinical trial or supportive care alone.

Endocrine therapy is the first-line therapy in women with estrogen-receptor-positive metastatic breast cancer. Postmenopausal women usually receive an aromatase inhibitor first.^43,44 Response to endocrine therapy usually takes weeks to months but may last for several years.

Premenopausal women with estrogen-receptor-positive breast cancer also receive ovarian ablation therapy (oophorectomy or chemical ovarian ablation) with gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonists.

In addition, most patients with bone involvement are treated with high doses of intravenous bisphosphonates, which can reduce skeletal complications.⁴⁵

Chemotherapy is reserved for patients with estrogen-receptor-negative breast cancer and those with cancer that progresses despite treatment with multiple antiestrogen agents. The time to response when chemotherapy is used is quicker, but the duration of response is usually shorter, lasting on average less than 1 year.³⁷

Trastuzumab (Herceptin), a monoclonal humanized murine antibody to the extracellular domain of the HER2 protein, is indicated in patients with HER2-overexpressing tumors.^46,47

STABLE 2 YEARS LATER

The patient was started on letrozole and a bisphosphonate, zolendronic acid (Zometa). Ovarian ablation was initiated with goserelin (Zoladex) given monthly. A bone scan performed 2 months after starting treatment showed improvement in bony metastases. She also noted significant improvement in pain. Her disease remains stable 2 years after starting endocrine therapy.

A 40-year-old premenopausal woman presents with a palpable lump in her left breast. She first noted it 2 months ago on self-examination, and it has steadily grown in size regardless of the phase of her menstrual cycle.

The patient has never undergone mammography. Her menarche was at age 12. At age 35, she had one child (whom she breastfed) after a normal first full-term pregnancy. She took oral contraceptives for 10 years before her pregnancy. She has no other medical problems. She has no family history of breast or ovarian cancer.

On examination, her breasts are slightly asymmetric, without skin discoloration, tenderness, swelling, nipple retraction, or discharge. A 1.5- to 2-cm, rubbery, mobile lump can be felt in the left breast at about the 2 o’clock position. No axillary lymph nodes can be palpated. The rest of her examination is normal.

BREAST CANCER MUST BE RULED OUT

Benign breast disease is found in approximately 90% of women 20 to 50 years of age who come to a physician with a breast problem.¹

Nevertheless, breast cancer is of major concern. It is the most common type of cancer in women in the United States, responsible for an estimated 194,440 new cases and 40,610 deaths in 2009. It is also the leading cause of cancer-related death in women age 45 to 55 years in this country.^2,3

Breast cancer is most common in postmenopausal women, its incidence rising sharply after the age of 45 and leveling off at age 75. The median age at diagnosis is 61 years. Still, 1.9% of breast cancers in women are diagnosed at age 20 to 34, 10.6% at age 35 to 44, and 22.4% at age 45 to 54.⁴

Thus, it is paramount to perform a thorough assessment and workup of women who have breast lumps, regardless of their age. Doing so allows breast cancer to be detected at an early stage. The 5-year survival rate is 98.0% for women with localized disease, 83.6% with regional disease, and 23.4% with distant disease.⁴

WHAT IS THE APPROPRIATE WORKUP?

1. Which of the following are appropriate in the workup of this patient?

• Mammography
• Ultrasonography
• Percutaneous needle biopsy of the lesion
• Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of the brain
• Computed tomography (CT) of the chest, abdomen, and pelvis
• Positron emission tomography (PET)

She should undergo mammography, ultrasonography, and percutaneous needle biopsy.

Physical findings that suggest breast cancer include a hard, isolated, sometimes nonmobile lump, serosanguinous nipple discharge, and unilateral nipple retraction. Peau d’orange skin discoloration can occur. A scaly, vesicular, or ulcerated rash with or without pruritus, burning, irritation, or pain of the nipple or skin (Paget disease of the breast) is found in 1% to 3% of breast cancers and may be initially dismissed as mastitis.^5,6 Palpable enlarged axillary lymph nodes can suggest invasive breast cancer.

Mammography is recommended in all cases of suspicious breast lumps. In a patient with a palpable lump, diagnostic mammography has a positive predictive value of 21.8%, a specificity of 85.8%, and a sensitivity of 87.7%, which are higher values than in a patient without signs or symptoms.⁷

The BIRADS score. Mammographic findings are summarized using a scoring system devised by the American College of Radiology called BIRADS (Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System). This system is based on mass irregularity, density, spiculation, and presence or absence of microcalcifications. It standardizes the results of mammography, gives an estimate of the risk of breast cancer, and recommends the frequency of follow-up examinations.⁸ Scores range from 0 to 6:

• 0—Incomplete assessment warranting additional evaluation
• 1—Completely negative mammogram
• 2—Benign lesion
• 3—Requires follow-up mammogram at 6 months
• 4—Risk of cancer is 2% to 95%; core biopsy needed
• 5—Risk of cancer is more than 95%; core biopsy needed
• 6—Cases that have already been proven to be malignant.

Ultrasonography is also done if a suspicious lesion is found on mammography or physical examination. It helps differentiate between solid and cystic masses. If a mass is identified as a cyst, ultrasonography can further characterize it as simple, complicated-simple, or complex. Simple cysts and complicated-simple cysts are unlikely to be malignant.^9,10 Complex cysts or cysts associated with solid tissue are evaluated by biopsy.

Percutaneous needle biopsy should be done for a definitive diagnosis of most suspicious breast masses.

MRI can sometimes provide more accurate information about the possibility of multifocal breast cancer by revealing additional lesions missed on mammography or ultrasonography. It is also useful in determining more accurately the size of the breast tumor and looking for any possible contralateral lesions. In addition, it can sometimes detect enlarged axillary lymph nodes. However, it has poor specificity for breast cancer and may lead to additional and sometimes unnecessary diagnostic tests, which can delay treatment.

MRI’s role is therefore not clearly established, but it is commonly used in clinical practice. It is argued that workup of MRI findings may help in planning more accurate surgical procedures and may prevent reoperations. Based on retrospective analyses, results of breast MRI may lead to altered surgical treatment in approximately 13% of patients.¹¹

Interestingly, a recent randomized trial showed no difference in reoperation rates between patients who underwent MRI before surgery vs those who did not. However, diagnostic workup of new MRI findings was not mandated by the study protocol, making the results of this trial difficult to interpret.¹²

 

DIFFERENTIAL DIAGNOSIS

2. Which of the following is in the differential diagnosis of a woman presenting with a breast abnormality?

• Fibrocystic changes
• Breast cyst
• Ductal ectasia
• Simple fibroadenoma
• Intraductal papilloma
• Ductal carcinoma in situ
• Mastitis
• Infiltrating ductal carcinoma
• Phyllodes tumor

All of these choices are part of the differential diagnosis.

Benign breast lesions

Benign breast lesions are divided into those that are proliferative and those that are nonproliferative. Some (but not all) proliferative lesions pose a higher risk of progressing to malignancy than nonproliferative lesions do.¹³ Benign breast lesions that do not increase the risk of breast cancer are listed in Table 1.

Simple fibroadenoma, one of the most common proliferative lesions, is not associated with a higher risk of developing breast cancer.

Fibrocystic changes are the most common nonproliferative lesions. Occasionally breast pain, nipple discharge, or significant lumpiness that varies during the course of the menstrual cycle can occur. The nipple discharge in women with fibrocystic changes is physiologic and pale green to brown in color. It can also be yellow, whitish, clear, or bloody. Bloody nipple discharge is considered pathologic and suggests a process other than fibrocystic changes, necessitating further workup. However, bloody discharge is not always a sign of malignancy, as it can have a benign cause as well.

Ductal ectasia, another nonproliferative lesion, is a result of dilation of subareolar ducts that contain fluid with a crystalline material. It can penetrate the duct, forming a nodule, which causes pain and occasionally fever.

Precancerous and cancerous lesions

Lesions that can increase the risk of breast cancer are listed in Table 2. The degree of risk depends on the complexity and amount of atypia found on the biopsy specimen. The relative risk of developing breast cancer in patients with simple proliferative lesions without atypia is 1.6 to 1.9, compared with 3.7 to 5.3 for complex lesions with high degrees of atypia.¹⁴

Ductal carcinoma in situ is a true neoplasm that has not yet developed the ability to invade through the basement membrane of the ducts. The likelihood of progression to invasive breast cancer depends on the histologic grade, the tumor size, and the patient’s age.

Lobular carcinoma in situ arises from lobules and terminal ducts of breast tissue. Much controversy surrounds this type of tumor, which was thought to be a marker of increased risk of developing ipsilateral and contralateral breast cancer and not to be a malignant lesion itself.¹⁵ However, there is emerging evidence to suggest that a pleomorphic variant of lobular carcinoma in situ is associated with development of breast cancer in the same site as the lesion, whereas a nonpleomorphic form is a marker of increased risk of ipsilateral and contralateral breast cancer.¹⁶

Invasive ductal and lobular carcinomas are the true invasive breast cancers, with a potential to metastasize.

Phyllodes tumors are uncommon fibroepithelial lesions that account for less than 1% of all breast neoplasms. The median age at presentation is 45 years.¹⁷ Despite the historical name “cystosarcoma phyllodes,” these lesions are not true sarcomas and have stromal and epithelial components.

These tumors display very heterogeneous behavior and, based on predefined histologic criteria, are often classified as benign, borderline, or malignant. Benign phyllodes tumors are similar to fibroadenomas in both histology and prognosis, making their diagnosis challenging. The most aggressive phyllodes tumors lose their epithelial component and have high metastatic potential. These tumors often have a biphasic growth pattern, and women may present with a smooth, round, well-defined breast lump that was stable for many years but then started to grow rapidly.¹⁷

Surgical resection with wide margins is the primary management of these tumors.¹⁸

Mastitis, ie, inflammation of the breast tissue, often presents with symptoms of breast erythema, swelling, tenderness, and nipple discharge. It may be secondary to infection (most often in lactating women) or other causes such as radiation or underlying malignancy. A complication of infectious mastitis is formation of a breast abscess. Underlying malignancy, especially inflammatory breast cancer, is a common cause of noninfectious mastitis and is very important to recognize.¹⁹

 

RISK FACTORS FOR BREAST CANCER

3. Which of the following are risk factors for breast cancer?

• Menarche before age 12
• Female sex
• Personal history of breast cancer
• Obesity
• Never having had children, or having given birth for the first time at an older age
• Older age
• History of hormone replacement therapy with estrogen and progesterone
• Family history of breast cancer

All of these choices are risk factors for breast cancer.

Family history

The overall relative risk of developing breast cancer in a woman with a first-degree relative with the disease is 1.7. However, the relative risk is about 3 if the first-degree relative developed breast cancer before menopause, and 9 if the first-degree relative developed bilateral breast cancer before menopause.⁵

Familial syndromes are a major factor in 5% to 7% of cases of breast cancer. Most frequently, they involve mutations in the BRCA1 and BRCA2 genes, which encode DNA excision repair proteins. Such mutations are present in about 2.2% of the Ashkenazi Jewish population, and carriers have a lifetime risk of developing breast cancer of 56% to 85%.^20,21 Other common familial syndromes associated with breast cancer include the Cowden and Li-Fraumeni syndromes (Table 3).^22–25

Estrogen exposure

The duration and amount of estrogen exposure are also risk factors. For example, menarche before age 12 and menopause after age 55 are associated with a higher risk. Women who go through menopause after age 55 have a twofold higher risk of breast cancer compared with women who go through menopause at an early age. Pregnancy before age 30 lowers the risk of breast cancer; late first full-term pregnancy or nulliparity increases it. Lactation, on the other hand, has a protective effect.⁵

Oral contraceptives have traditionally been thought to increase the risk of breast cancer. In the 1990s, a meta-analysis involving 153,506 women found that those who had used oral contraceptives had a 24% higher risk of developing breast cancer.²⁶ However, this association has come into question since newer oral contraceptive pills containing different progestins and lower amounts of estrogen have become available. In fact, recent studies showed no link between oral contraceptive use and breast cancer.^27,28 Nevertheless, women at higher risk of developing breast cancer are advised not to use oral contraceptives.

Hormone replacement therapy with estrogen and progesterone was found to increase the risk of breast cancer by 26% in the Women’s Health Initiative (WHI) study, which involved 16,608 healthy women followed for a median of 5.6 years.²⁹

In a study reported separately, the WHI investigators randomized 10,739 women who had undergone hysterectomy to receive either hormone replacement therapy with unopposed estrogen (which is feasible only in women without a uterus) or placebo. They found no increase in the risk of invasive breast cancer in women on hormone replacement therapy with estrogen alone. In fact, the study showed a trend towards a modest reduction of this risk (odds ratio 0.77; 95% confidence interval 0.59–1.01).³⁰

After the results of the WHI were published, the use of hormone replacement therapy in postmenopausal women declined significantly. And in 2003—1 year later—the incidence of breast cancer had dropped by 6.7%.³¹

Most experts now recommend that estrogen-progestin combinations be used only selectively to treat the symptoms of menopause, and only for the short term.

Other risk factors

Other factors found to modestly increase the risk of breast cancer include:

• Alcohol use
• Obesity
• Radiation exposure. Patients are at higher risk of breast cancer 15 to 20 years after receiving upper-mantle radiotherapy for Hodgkin lymphoma.⁵

Case continues: Bad news on mammography, ultrasonography, biopsy

The patient undergoes mammography, which shows a 2.5-cm spiculated lesion with areas of calcifications (BIRADS score of 5). Subsequently, ultrasonography confirms that the suspicious mass is not a cyst. Ultrasound-guided core needle biopsy reveals that the lesion is a high-grade invasive ductal carcinoma. The tumor is positive for both estrogen and progesterone receptors and negative for HER2/neu overexpression.

STAGING EVALUATION

4. Given these findings, what is the next step to take?

• CT of the chest, abdomen, and pelvis
• MRI of the brain
• PET
• Referral to a surgeon for a possible mastectomy with sentinel lymph node dissection
• Referral to a surgeon for a possible lumpectomy with sentinel lymph node dissection

At this point, the patient should be referred to a surgeon for possible mastectomy or lumpectomy.

Women who appear clinically to have early breast cancer, such as in this case, should have a complete blood count, comprehensive metabolic panel, and chest x-ray as their initial staging evaluation. No further studies are recommended unless the findings on history, physical examination, or the above testing suggest possible metastases.

 

Mastectomy vs lumpectomy

Early-stage breast cancer is managed with definitive surgery. The two options are mastectomy and breast conservation therapy, the latter involving lumpectomy followed by breast radiation therapy.

Multiple randomized studies comparing mastectomy and lumpectomy showed no difference in survival rates, but patients in the lumpectomy groups had higher rates of local recurrence.³² Breast radiation therapy after lumpectomy lowered the rates of local recurrence and breast cancer death.³³ Therefore, most patients can opt to undergo either lumpectomy with radiation or mastectomy, depending on personal preference.

However, mastectomy rather than breast conservation therapy is still recommended in cases of prior radiation therapy, inability to achieve negative surgical margins (as in cases of large tumors), multicentric disease (cancer in separate breast quadrants), or multiple areas of calcifications. Mastectomy is also preferred in most pregnant women unless the diagnosis of breast cancer is made in the third trimester and radiation therapy can be given after delivery. Patients who have large lesions in a small breast may also choose mastectomy with breast reconstruction rather than breast conservation therapy. Patients with a history of scleroderma are encouraged to undergo mastectomy because of increased toxicity from radiation treatment.

Sentinel vs axillary lymph node dissection

Knowledge of axillary lymph node involvement is important because it determines the stage in the tumor-node-metastasis (TNM) system, and it influences the choice of further therapy. Therefore, all patients with nonmetastatic invasive breast cancer must have their axillary lymph nodes sampled.

Conventionally, this involves axillary lymph node dissection. Unfortunately, upper extremity lymphedema develops in 6% to 30% of patients within the first 3 years, and in 49% of patients after 20 years following axillary lymph node dissection.³⁴

Sentinel lymph node dissection was developed to minimize this complication. This procedure involves the injection of a blue dye, isosulfan blue (Lymphazurin), around the edge of the tumor or in the dermis overlying the tumor. The most proximal axillary lymph nodes that stain blue are dissected. Alternatively, a radioactive colloid (most commonly technetium sulfur colloid agents) may be injected, allowing sentinel lymph nodes to be identified by lymphoscintigraphy. If no metastases are found in the sentinel lymph nodes, axillary lymph node dissection is not performed.

A prospective study in 536 women found that at 5 years of follow-up, lymphedema developed in only 5% of patients after sentinel lymph node dissection compared with 16% of those who underwent axillary lymph node dissection (P < .001), with comparable outcomes in terms of disease recurrence.³⁵

Case continues: Patient undergoes surgery

The patient elects to undergo lumpectomy with sentinel lymph node dissection. Pathologic review of the resection specimen reveals a 2.5-cm poorly differentiated invasive ductal carcinoma. Sentinel lymph node dissection shows metastases, and therefore axillary lymph node dissection is performed. One of eight lymph nodes removed is positive for metastases. All surgical margins are negative.

POSTOPERATIVE CARE

5. What would be the next step for our patient?

• Radiation followed by observation
• Tamoxifen (Nolvadex) for 5 years
• Observation only
• Chemotherapy followed by radiation therapy and 5 years of tamoxifen

She should receive chemotherapy, followed by radiation therapy and then tamoxifen for 5 years.

Chemotherapy. Almost all patients who have lymph-node-positive disease are advised to undergo chemotherapy.

The Early Breast Cancer Trialists’ Collaborative Group (EBCTCG) performed a metaanalysis of 194 randomized trials that compared adjuvant chemotherapy and no treatment in early-stage breast cancer. Chemotherapy led to a 10% absolute improvement in survival at 15 years for women younger than 50 years and 3% in women age 51 to 69.³⁶

Indications for chemotherapy include axillary lymph node involvement, locally advanced disease, and other risk factors for recurrence such as young age at diagnosis, strong positive family history of breast cancer, prior history of breast cancer, or lymph-node-negative, estrogen-receptor-negative tumors that are larger than 1 cm in diameter.

The Oncotype DX assay is a new tool to help oncologists decide whether to use chemotherapy in cases of estrogen-receptor-positive breast cancer, in which the benefit of chemotherapy is uncertain. It is a polymerase chain reaction assay that measures the expression of 16 cancer-specific genes and five reference genes within the breast tumor. Based on the pattern of expression of these genes, breast cancer can be characterized as low-risk, intermediate-risk, or high-risk. Patients in the high-risk group have a high chance of cancer recurrence and benefit from chemotherapy. Patients in the low-risk group are unlikely to have a recurrence or to benefit from chemotherapy.³⁷ It is far less clear if patients in the intermediate-risk group benefit from chemotherapy, but this assay might eventually prove useful in deciding for or against chemotherapy in this group of patients as well.³⁸ The Oncotype DX assay is presently being studied in a clinical trial.

Radiation therapy after mastectomy is recommended in patients who have breast tumors larger than 5 cm or metastases to more than three axillary lymph nodes.³⁹

Antiestrogen therapy. After chemotherapy, patients with estrogen-receptor-positive cancers also receive 5 years of antiestrogen therapy. Available antiestrogen agents for such patients include tamoxifen, which is a selective estrogen receptor modulator, and drugs called aromatase inhibitors that block conversion of androgens to estrogens in peripheral tissues. Anastrozole (Arimidex), letrozole (Femara), and exemestane (Aromasin) are examples of available aromatase inhibitors. Premenopausal women are treated with tamoxifen, and postmenopausal women are offered aromatase inhibitors.

The EBCTCG meta-analysis found a 12% absolute reduction in mortality rates and a 9% absolute reduction in relapse rates at 15 years of follow-up in patients who took tamoxifen for 5 years.³⁶

Table 4 lists the most common adverse effects of these agents. Aromatase inhibitors are associated with a higher risk of osteoporosis and arthralgia, while tamoxifen increases the risks of thromboembolism, endometrial cancer, and vaginal discharge. Both agents may produce menopausal symptoms such as hot flashes and mood swings.

 

 

Case continues: Seven years later, metastases in the spine

The patient achieves a complete remission. She is seen for a routine visit 7 years after diagnosis. She now reports mid-back pain that has worsened over the last 2 months. A bone scan reveals diffuse metastatic disease in the spine and in both humeral bones. CT of the chest, abdomen, and pelvis is negative for visceral metastases. Bone marrow aspiration and biopsy study show marrow infiltration by adenocarcinoma that stains positive for estrogen receptors and negative for HER2. The patient otherwise feels well and has no other symptoms.

WHAT TREATMENT FOR METASTATIC BREAST CANCER?

6. What should you now do for our patient?

• Discuss end-of-life care and refer her to a hospice program
• Educate the patient that no options for treatment exist and recommend enrolling in a phase I clinical trial
• Refer her to an oncologist for consideration of chemotherapy
• Refer her to an oncologist for consideration of endocrine treatment

She should be referred to an oncologist for consideration of endocrine treatment.

The most common sites of breast cancer metastases are the bones, followed by the liver and lungs. Metastatic breast cancer almost always is incurable. However, treatment can palliate symptoms.

Although a randomized trial of treatment vs best supportive care has never been done, many believe that treatment may improve survival. ⁴⁰ The median survival of patients treated with standard therapy is about 3 years if the breast cancer is estrogen-receptor-positive and 2 years if it is estrogen-receptor-negative, but survival rates vary widely from patient to patient.^41,42

Standard therapy or enrollment in a clinical phase II or III trial is indicated for this patient before considering enrollment in a phase I clinical trial or supportive care alone.

Endocrine therapy is the first-line therapy in women with estrogen-receptor-positive metastatic breast cancer. Postmenopausal women usually receive an aromatase inhibitor first.^43,44 Response to endocrine therapy usually takes weeks to months but may last for several years.

Premenopausal women with estrogen-receptor-positive breast cancer also receive ovarian ablation therapy (oophorectomy or chemical ovarian ablation) with gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonists.

In addition, most patients with bone involvement are treated with high doses of intravenous bisphosphonates, which can reduce skeletal complications.⁴⁵

Chemotherapy is reserved for patients with estrogen-receptor-negative breast cancer and those with cancer that progresses despite treatment with multiple antiestrogen agents. The time to response when chemotherapy is used is quicker, but the duration of response is usually shorter, lasting on average less than 1 year.³⁷

Trastuzumab (Herceptin), a monoclonal humanized murine antibody to the extracellular domain of the HER2 protein, is indicated in patients with HER2-overexpressing tumors.^46,47

STABLE 2 YEARS LATER

The patient was started on letrozole and a bisphosphonate, zolendronic acid (Zometa). Ovarian ablation was initiated with goserelin (Zoladex) given monthly. A bone scan performed 2 months after starting treatment showed improvement in bony metastases. She also noted significant improvement in pain. Her disease remains stable 2 years after starting endocrine therapy.

Surgical resection is the mainstay of treatment for musculoskeletal sarcomas, as detailed earlier in this supplement, but chemotherapy also has a proven role in the primary therapy of most bone sarcomas and a potential role for some patients with soft-tissue sarcomas. This article provides an overview of the roles of chemotherapy for patients with bone and soft-tissue sarcomas and addresses key considerations surrounding chemo­therapy in the context of overall patient management.

BONE SARCOMAS

Because most bone sarcomas occur in pediatric patients and young adults, studies of chemotherapy in this disease have often enrolled predominantly young subjects. As a result, very limited data are available in older adults. Single-institution experiences indicate that adults with bone sarcomas have inferior outcomes compared with their pediatric and adolescent counterparts,¹ but the literature on these tumors in adults is scant. Therefore, the following discussion on chemotherapy for bone sarcomas incorporates data from trials conducted predominantly in children and young adults (ie, generally younger than 30 years and with a very large majority younger than 20 years).

Chemotherapy for osteosarcoma

At present, neoadjuvant (preoperative) chemotherapy followed by definitive resection with subsequent adjuvant (postoperative) chemotherapy is the well-established approach to treatment of localized osteosarcomas. Chemo­therapy can eradicate the micrometastatic disease that is believed to be present in the majority of patients with clinically resectable cancer.²

Efficacy. Historically, prior to the institution of effective chemotherapy, metastatic disease developed in 80% to 90% of patients who underwent curative resection with or without radiation therapy, which resulted in a long-term survival rate of less than 20%.³ In the 1980s, clinical trials that randomized patients with resectable osteosarcoma to surgery alone or to surgery plus chemotherapy found that the addition of perioperative chemotherapy led to significant improvements in recurrence rates and survival.^4,5 More recent randomized trials have shown that treatment of such patients with modern multiagent chemotherapy regimens results in a 5-year survival rate of approximately 70%.⁶ Additionally, response to neoadjuvant (preoperative) treatment has become the most important predictor of outcome, as the median survival of osteosarcoma patients who have greater than 90% necrosis in the resected specimen following neoadjuvant chemotherapy is about 90% at 5 years.^7,8

Toxicity. Current chemotherapy regimens are based on high doses of methotrexate and leucovorin in combination with doxorubicin, ifosfamide, and platinum. Long-term effects of such regimens include the following³:

• Azospermia (in 100% of patients who received a total ifosfamide dose > 75 g/m²)
• Subclinical renal impairment (in 48% of patients treated with high doses of ifosfamide)
• Hearing impairment (in 40% of patients treated with cisplatin)
• Second malignancies (in 2.1%)
• Cardiomyopathy (in 1.7%).³

In light of this, the development of equally effective but less intensive regimens for patients whose disease carries a better prognosis is highly desirable. Ongoing clinical trials are investigating this strategy.

Metastatic disease. Metastatic osteosarcoma is found in approximately 20% of patients at the time of diagnosis. Sarcoma mainly spreads hematogenously, and the lungs are the most common initial site of metastases, being affected in more than 60% of patients who develop metastatic disease.⁹ Patients with metachronous lung lesions are initially considered for aggressive treatment with neoadjuvant chemo­therapy and subsequent resection of clinically apparent disease, which results in event-free survival rates of 20% to 30%.³

Patients with disease limited to the primary tumor and no more than one or two bone lesions fare best. The presence of multiple metastases is associated with the poorest prognosis, as few patients with this profile live past 2 years.¹⁰ In a review of 202 pediatric and adult patients with documented metastases at the time of osteosarcoma diagnosis, the presence of more than 5 metastatic lesions (which was reported in 91 patients) was associated with a 5-year overall survival rate of 19%.⁹

Chemotherapy for Ewing sarcoma

Perioperative chemotherapy in patients with localized Ewing sarcoma is believed to reduce the burden of micrometastasis that is thought to be present in most patients with early-stage disease. Five-year survival rates of 50% to 72% have been reported among patients with resectable Ewing sarcoma treated perioperatively with multiagent chemotherapy.^11,12 Notably, randomized trials that studied intense multiagent chemotherapy regimens (consisting of doxorubicin, cyclophosphamide, vincristine, and dactinomycin alternating with etoposide and ifosfamide) reported the best outcomes despite significant but acceptable toxicity. In a large randomized trial involving 398 patients with resectable disease, a 5-year survival rate of 72% was achieved with the above regimen, compared with 61% in patients treated with a less intense regimen that did not contain ifosfamide and etoposide (p = .01).¹²

Compressing these standard regimens to an every-14-day instead of every-21-day schedule improved event-free survival at 3 years from 65% to 76% (p = .028) without any significant increase in toxicity in a randomized trial involving 568 patients.¹³ Data on overall survival from this trial are not yet published.

Metastatic disease. Metastatic Ewing sarcoma is found in 15% to 35% of patients with newly diagnosed disease and is treated with multiagent chemotherapy; resection of residual disease is considered in good responders.³ This approach produces objective responses to therapy, but long-term survival is rare.

Toxicity. Myelodysplastic syndrome and acute myeloid leukemia are the most dreaded long-term complications of intensive multiagent chemotherapy for Ewing sarcoma and develop in up to 8% of patients.¹⁴ Additionally, ifosfamide can lead to hematuria (~12% incidence), encephalopathy (mild somnolence and hallucinations to coma), chronic renal impairment (6% incidence), and hemorrhagic cystitis (though administration of mesna and generous intravenous hydration can minimize this latter complication).¹⁵ Recent efforts are therefore focused on testing less-intensive regimens in patients who have good prognostic features.

Chondrosarcoma: No role for chemotherapy

Chondrosarcoma, which represents approximately 20% of all bone sarcomas and has a peak incidence in older adults (ie, in the sixth decade of life), is insensitive to chemotherapy. Radiotherapy is also of limited value and is reserved for patients treated in the palliative setting.¹⁶ Definitive management of chondrosarcoma involves adequate surgical resection alone.

 

 

SOFT-TISSUE SARCOMAS

Aside from recent advances in the treatment of gastrointestinal stromal tumors with the small-molecule tyrosine kinase inhibitors imatinib and sunitinib (which are beyond the scope of this article), an overall survival advantage with chemotherapy has not been demonstrated in adults with soft-tissue sarcoma.¹⁷

Resectable disease

The decision to use chemotherapy needs to be weighed against the magnitude of potential clinical benefit and the acute and chronic toxicities that can develop.

Toxicity. Chemotherapy regimens with activity against soft-tissue sarcomas often contain anthracyclines, alkylating agents, and taxanes. These agents can produce serious long-term toxicities, which is especially important in patients treated with curative intent. Doxorubicin and other anthracyclines, for example, may result in cardiomyopathy, the risk of which rises with increasing cumulative dose.¹⁸ In addition, acute myeloid leukemia may develop in 2% to 12% of patients treated with anthracyclines or alkylating agents such as ifosfamide and dacarbazine.^3,19 Renal failure and an elevated risk of bladder carcinoma are uncommonly reported in patients with a history of ifosfamide treatment.¹⁵ Sensory neuropathy associated with the use of taxanes (eg, paclitaxel and docetaxel) is dose dependent and reversible in more than half of patients. However, some patients treated with high doses of these agents can have persistent symptoms of paresthesias, burning, and decreased reflexes, which can be debilitating.²⁰

Efficacy of adjuvant chemotherapy. Because chemotherapy puts patients at risk of such serious chronic toxicities, its use can be justified only if it results in significant benefit, such as prolongation of survival. A 1997 meta-analysis of 14 clinical trials evaluating adjuvant chemotherapy in patients with resectable soft-tissue sarcomas found chemotherapy to have an absolute benefit of 10% in recurrence-free survival at 10 years (ie, from 45% survival to 55% survival), with a hazard ratio of 0.75 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.64–0.87; p = .0001) for recurrence or death.²¹ However, when the analysis was limited to overall survival at 10 years, the survival difference between patients who received adjuvant chemotherapy and those who did not (54% vs 50%, respectively) was not statistically significant (hazard ratio = 0.89; 95% CI, 0.76–1.03, p = .12).²¹

The concept of adjuvant therapy has been revisited since the antisarcoma activity of ifosfamide was established. A large European trial randomized 351 patients with resected soft-tissue sarcoma either to placebo or to doxorubicin and ifosfamide given every 21 days.²² The preliminary results, reported in abstract form at the 2007 annual meeting of the American Society of Clinical Oncology, showed a higher 5-year survival rate in the placebo arm (69%) compared with the chemotherapy arm (64%).²² This and other trials using ifosfamide in various drug combinations showed no difference in survival, suggesting that adjuvant chemotherapy should not be considered to be standard practice outside of a clinical trial.

Efficacy of neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy also has been studied in patients with soft-tissue sarcomas. A retrospective analysis found that the greatest benefit is derived in patients with primary tumors larger than 10 cm, in whom neoadjuvant chemotherapy increased 3-year disease-specific survival from 62% to 83%.²³ However, differing results came from a prospective multicenter trial that randomized patients with large primary and recurrent tumors to either surgery alone or surgery preceded by three cycles of neoadjuvant doxorubicin and ifosfamide (all patients could also receive adjuvant radiation therapy, depending on grade and adequacy of resection).²⁴ The trial suffered from slow accrual, and only 150 patients were enrolled. At 5 years, survival was similar between the groups with and without neoadjuvant chemotherapy.²⁴ Therefore, neoadjuvant chemotherapy is not yet recommended pending results of larger randomized trials.

No clear role for recurrent disease. Local recurrence of the primary tumor after resection occurs in 10% to 50% of cases of soft-tissue sarcoma, with the specific rate depending on the primary tumor location. The highest incidence of recurrence is found in patients with retroperitoneal and head and neck sarcoma (40% and 50%, respectively), mainly because of the difficulty of obtaining clear margins. Chemotherapy has not been well studied in this setting and is of uncertain value.³

Metastatic disease

Metastatic soft-tissue sarcomas may respond to chemotherapy, but there is a lack of evidence that chemotherapy improves overall survival. Pulmonary lesions are the most common site of distant recurrence, and resection of such metastases is sometimes undertaken in well-selected patients. However, there is no level 1 evidence supporting chemotherapy in this clinical setting despite its common preoperative use. There is a paucity of randomized phase 3 trials that compare established palliative chemotherapy regimens to best supportive care. It is believed that some groups of patients do benefit, however, including those who are young and have good performance status, low tumor grade, absence of liver metastasis or pulmonary metastasis only, and a long interval between treatment of the primary tumor and development of metastatic disease.³ Some histologies, such as uterine leiomyosarcomas and facial/scalp angiosarcomas, respond better to chemotherapy.¹⁷

Drugs found to have activity against metastatic sarcoma include doxorubicin, ifosfamide, platinum agents, gemcitabine, taxanes, and dacarbazine. Used either alone or in combinations, these drugs produce responses (ie, shrink metastatic tumors) in about 13% to 33% of patients.³ Use of chemotherapy is frequently curtailed by the acute toxicity of these agents, which includes pancytopenia, transfusion requirements, febrile neutropenia, nausea, alopecia, and significant fatigue, as well as renal failure with ifosfamide or cisplatin and peripheral neuropathy with platinum agents or taxanes. Appropriate patient selection for chemo­therapy and exclusion of those who should be managed solely with best supportive care is an important challenge that oncologists often face when managing patients with metastatic soft-tissue sarcoma.

Future directions

Trabectedin (ET-743) is a novel compound with promising activity against soft-tissue sarcomas that acts by inhibiting cell-cycle transition from the G₂ to M stages. The drug covalently binds to the minor grove of the DNA molecule, changing its three-dimensional structure and impairing transcription and possibly DNA repair.²⁵ Phase 2 studies showed durable responses to trabectedin in 3% to 8% of heavily pretreated patients^26–28 and in 17% of treatment-naïve patients with advanced soft-tissue sarcomas.²⁵ Time to progression of up to 20 months has been reported in patients who respond or develop stable disease.³

Toxic effects of trabec­tedin include myelosuppression, fever, edema, arthralgias, hepatotoxicity, and (rarely) rhabdomyolysis. To date, these toxicities have been self-limiting. Larger clinical trials and longer follow-up is needed to assess whether this agent has any significant long-term toxicities.

Trabectedin has already been approved in Europe for treatment of chemotherapy-refractory soft-tissue sarcoma when given as a 24-hour infusion every 21 days.

More broadly, an active effort is under way to better understand the molecular derangements in a variety of soft-tissue sarcoma subtypes. The hope is that this understanding will lead to improved therapies that target aberrant proliferation, angiogenesis, and other biologic processes that drive the growth and metastasis of soft-tissue and bone sarcomas.

Surgical resection is the mainstay of treatment for musculoskeletal sarcomas, as detailed earlier in this supplement, but chemotherapy also has a proven role in the primary therapy of most bone sarcomas and a potential role for some patients with soft-tissue sarcomas. This article provides an overview of the roles of chemotherapy for patients with bone and soft-tissue sarcomas and addresses key considerations surrounding chemo­therapy in the context of overall patient management.

BONE SARCOMAS

Because most bone sarcomas occur in pediatric patients and young adults, studies of chemotherapy in this disease have often enrolled predominantly young subjects. As a result, very limited data are available in older adults. Single-institution experiences indicate that adults with bone sarcomas have inferior outcomes compared with their pediatric and adolescent counterparts,¹ but the literature on these tumors in adults is scant. Therefore, the following discussion on chemotherapy for bone sarcomas incorporates data from trials conducted predominantly in children and young adults (ie, generally younger than 30 years and with a very large majority younger than 20 years).

Chemotherapy for osteosarcoma

At present, neoadjuvant (preoperative) chemotherapy followed by definitive resection with subsequent adjuvant (postoperative) chemotherapy is the well-established approach to treatment of localized osteosarcomas. Chemo­therapy can eradicate the micrometastatic disease that is believed to be present in the majority of patients with clinically resectable cancer.²

Efficacy. Historically, prior to the institution of effective chemotherapy, metastatic disease developed in 80% to 90% of patients who underwent curative resection with or without radiation therapy, which resulted in a long-term survival rate of less than 20%.³ In the 1980s, clinical trials that randomized patients with resectable osteosarcoma to surgery alone or to surgery plus chemotherapy found that the addition of perioperative chemotherapy led to significant improvements in recurrence rates and survival.^4,5 More recent randomized trials have shown that treatment of such patients with modern multiagent chemotherapy regimens results in a 5-year survival rate of approximately 70%.⁶ Additionally, response to neoadjuvant (preoperative) treatment has become the most important predictor of outcome, as the median survival of osteosarcoma patients who have greater than 90% necrosis in the resected specimen following neoadjuvant chemotherapy is about 90% at 5 years.^7,8

Toxicity. Current chemotherapy regimens are based on high doses of methotrexate and leucovorin in combination with doxorubicin, ifosfamide, and platinum. Long-term effects of such regimens include the following³:

• Azospermia (in 100% of patients who received a total ifosfamide dose > 75 g/m²)
• Subclinical renal impairment (in 48% of patients treated with high doses of ifosfamide)
• Hearing impairment (in 40% of patients treated with cisplatin)
• Second malignancies (in 2.1%)
• Cardiomyopathy (in 1.7%).³

In light of this, the development of equally effective but less intensive regimens for patients whose disease carries a better prognosis is highly desirable. Ongoing clinical trials are investigating this strategy.

Metastatic disease. Metastatic osteosarcoma is found in approximately 20% of patients at the time of diagnosis. Sarcoma mainly spreads hematogenously, and the lungs are the most common initial site of metastases, being affected in more than 60% of patients who develop metastatic disease.⁹ Patients with metachronous lung lesions are initially considered for aggressive treatment with neoadjuvant chemo­therapy and subsequent resection of clinically apparent disease, which results in event-free survival rates of 20% to 30%.³

Patients with disease limited to the primary tumor and no more than one or two bone lesions fare best. The presence of multiple metastases is associated with the poorest prognosis, as few patients with this profile live past 2 years.¹⁰ In a review of 202 pediatric and adult patients with documented metastases at the time of osteosarcoma diagnosis, the presence of more than 5 metastatic lesions (which was reported in 91 patients) was associated with a 5-year overall survival rate of 19%.⁹

Chemotherapy for Ewing sarcoma

Perioperative chemotherapy in patients with localized Ewing sarcoma is believed to reduce the burden of micrometastasis that is thought to be present in most patients with early-stage disease. Five-year survival rates of 50% to 72% have been reported among patients with resectable Ewing sarcoma treated perioperatively with multiagent chemotherapy.^11,12 Notably, randomized trials that studied intense multiagent chemotherapy regimens (consisting of doxorubicin, cyclophosphamide, vincristine, and dactinomycin alternating with etoposide and ifosfamide) reported the best outcomes despite significant but acceptable toxicity. In a large randomized trial involving 398 patients with resectable disease, a 5-year survival rate of 72% was achieved with the above regimen, compared with 61% in patients treated with a less intense regimen that did not contain ifosfamide and etoposide (p = .01).¹²

Compressing these standard regimens to an every-14-day instead of every-21-day schedule improved event-free survival at 3 years from 65% to 76% (p = .028) without any significant increase in toxicity in a randomized trial involving 568 patients.¹³ Data on overall survival from this trial are not yet published.

Metastatic disease. Metastatic Ewing sarcoma is found in 15% to 35% of patients with newly diagnosed disease and is treated with multiagent chemotherapy; resection of residual disease is considered in good responders.³ This approach produces objective responses to therapy, but long-term survival is rare.

Toxicity. Myelodysplastic syndrome and acute myeloid leukemia are the most dreaded long-term complications of intensive multiagent chemotherapy for Ewing sarcoma and develop in up to 8% of patients.¹⁴ Additionally, ifosfamide can lead to hematuria (~12% incidence), encephalopathy (mild somnolence and hallucinations to coma), chronic renal impairment (6% incidence), and hemorrhagic cystitis (though administration of mesna and generous intravenous hydration can minimize this latter complication).¹⁵ Recent efforts are therefore focused on testing less-intensive regimens in patients who have good prognostic features.

Chondrosarcoma: No role for chemotherapy

Chondrosarcoma, which represents approximately 20% of all bone sarcomas and has a peak incidence in older adults (ie, in the sixth decade of life), is insensitive to chemotherapy. Radiotherapy is also of limited value and is reserved for patients treated in the palliative setting.¹⁶ Definitive management of chondrosarcoma involves adequate surgical resection alone.

 

 

SOFT-TISSUE SARCOMAS

Aside from recent advances in the treatment of gastrointestinal stromal tumors with the small-molecule tyrosine kinase inhibitors imatinib and sunitinib (which are beyond the scope of this article), an overall survival advantage with chemotherapy has not been demonstrated in adults with soft-tissue sarcoma.¹⁷

Resectable disease

The decision to use chemotherapy needs to be weighed against the magnitude of potential clinical benefit and the acute and chronic toxicities that can develop.

Toxicity. Chemotherapy regimens with activity against soft-tissue sarcomas often contain anthracyclines, alkylating agents, and taxanes. These agents can produce serious long-term toxicities, which is especially important in patients treated with curative intent. Doxorubicin and other anthracyclines, for example, may result in cardiomyopathy, the risk of which rises with increasing cumulative dose.¹⁸ In addition, acute myeloid leukemia may develop in 2% to 12% of patients treated with anthracyclines or alkylating agents such as ifosfamide and dacarbazine.^3,19 Renal failure and an elevated risk of bladder carcinoma are uncommonly reported in patients with a history of ifosfamide treatment.¹⁵ Sensory neuropathy associated with the use of taxanes (eg, paclitaxel and docetaxel) is dose dependent and reversible in more than half of patients. However, some patients treated with high doses of these agents can have persistent symptoms of paresthesias, burning, and decreased reflexes, which can be debilitating.²⁰

Efficacy of adjuvant chemotherapy. Because chemotherapy puts patients at risk of such serious chronic toxicities, its use can be justified only if it results in significant benefit, such as prolongation of survival. A 1997 meta-analysis of 14 clinical trials evaluating adjuvant chemotherapy in patients with resectable soft-tissue sarcomas found chemotherapy to have an absolute benefit of 10% in recurrence-free survival at 10 years (ie, from 45% survival to 55% survival), with a hazard ratio of 0.75 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.64–0.87; p = .0001) for recurrence or death.²¹ However, when the analysis was limited to overall survival at 10 years, the survival difference between patients who received adjuvant chemotherapy and those who did not (54% vs 50%, respectively) was not statistically significant (hazard ratio = 0.89; 95% CI, 0.76–1.03, p = .12).²¹

The concept of adjuvant therapy has been revisited since the antisarcoma activity of ifosfamide was established. A large European trial randomized 351 patients with resected soft-tissue sarcoma either to placebo or to doxorubicin and ifosfamide given every 21 days.²² The preliminary results, reported in abstract form at the 2007 annual meeting of the American Society of Clinical Oncology, showed a higher 5-year survival rate in the placebo arm (69%) compared with the chemotherapy arm (64%).²² This and other trials using ifosfamide in various drug combinations showed no difference in survival, suggesting that adjuvant chemotherapy should not be considered to be standard practice outside of a clinical trial.

Efficacy of neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy also has been studied in patients with soft-tissue sarcomas. A retrospective analysis found that the greatest benefit is derived in patients with primary tumors larger than 10 cm, in whom neoadjuvant chemotherapy increased 3-year disease-specific survival from 62% to 83%.²³ However, differing results came from a prospective multicenter trial that randomized patients with large primary and recurrent tumors to either surgery alone or surgery preceded by three cycles of neoadjuvant doxorubicin and ifosfamide (all patients could also receive adjuvant radiation therapy, depending on grade and adequacy of resection).²⁴ The trial suffered from slow accrual, and only 150 patients were enrolled. At 5 years, survival was similar between the groups with and without neoadjuvant chemotherapy.²⁴ Therefore, neoadjuvant chemotherapy is not yet recommended pending results of larger randomized trials.

No clear role for recurrent disease. Local recurrence of the primary tumor after resection occurs in 10% to 50% of cases of soft-tissue sarcoma, with the specific rate depending on the primary tumor location. The highest incidence of recurrence is found in patients with retroperitoneal and head and neck sarcoma (40% and 50%, respectively), mainly because of the difficulty of obtaining clear margins. Chemotherapy has not been well studied in this setting and is of uncertain value.³

Metastatic disease

Metastatic soft-tissue sarcomas may respond to chemotherapy, but there is a lack of evidence that chemotherapy improves overall survival. Pulmonary lesions are the most common site of distant recurrence, and resection of such metastases is sometimes undertaken in well-selected patients. However, there is no level 1 evidence supporting chemotherapy in this clinical setting despite its common preoperative use. There is a paucity of randomized phase 3 trials that compare established palliative chemotherapy regimens to best supportive care. It is believed that some groups of patients do benefit, however, including those who are young and have good performance status, low tumor grade, absence of liver metastasis or pulmonary metastasis only, and a long interval between treatment of the primary tumor and development of metastatic disease.³ Some histologies, such as uterine leiomyosarcomas and facial/scalp angiosarcomas, respond better to chemotherapy.¹⁷

Drugs found to have activity against metastatic sarcoma include doxorubicin, ifosfamide, platinum agents, gemcitabine, taxanes, and dacarbazine. Used either alone or in combinations, these drugs produce responses (ie, shrink metastatic tumors) in about 13% to 33% of patients.³ Use of chemotherapy is frequently curtailed by the acute toxicity of these agents, which includes pancytopenia, transfusion requirements, febrile neutropenia, nausea, alopecia, and significant fatigue, as well as renal failure with ifosfamide or cisplatin and peripheral neuropathy with platinum agents or taxanes. Appropriate patient selection for chemo­therapy and exclusion of those who should be managed solely with best supportive care is an important challenge that oncologists often face when managing patients with metastatic soft-tissue sarcoma.

Future directions

Trabectedin (ET-743) is a novel compound with promising activity against soft-tissue sarcomas that acts by inhibiting cell-cycle transition from the G₂ to M stages. The drug covalently binds to the minor grove of the DNA molecule, changing its three-dimensional structure and impairing transcription and possibly DNA repair.²⁵ Phase 2 studies showed durable responses to trabectedin in 3% to 8% of heavily pretreated patients^26–28 and in 17% of treatment-naïve patients with advanced soft-tissue sarcomas.²⁵ Time to progression of up to 20 months has been reported in patients who respond or develop stable disease.³

Toxic effects of trabec­tedin include myelosuppression, fever, edema, arthralgias, hepatotoxicity, and (rarely) rhabdomyolysis. To date, these toxicities have been self-limiting. Larger clinical trials and longer follow-up is needed to assess whether this agent has any significant long-term toxicities.

Trabectedin has already been approved in Europe for treatment of chemotherapy-refractory soft-tissue sarcoma when given as a 24-hour infusion every 21 days.

More broadly, an active effort is under way to better understand the molecular derangements in a variety of soft-tissue sarcoma subtypes. The hope is that this understanding will lead to improved therapies that target aberrant proliferation, angiogenesis, and other biologic processes that drive the growth and metastasis of soft-tissue and bone sarcomas.

Surgical resection is the mainstay of treatment for musculoskeletal sarcomas, as detailed earlier in this supplement, but chemotherapy also has a proven role in the primary therapy of most bone sarcomas and a potential role for some patients with soft-tissue sarcomas. This article provides an overview of the roles of chemotherapy for patients with bone and soft-tissue sarcomas and addresses key considerations surrounding chemo­therapy in the context of overall patient management.

BONE SARCOMAS

Because most bone sarcomas occur in pediatric patients and young adults, studies of chemotherapy in this disease have often enrolled predominantly young subjects. As a result, very limited data are available in older adults. Single-institution experiences indicate that adults with bone sarcomas have inferior outcomes compared with their pediatric and adolescent counterparts,¹ but the literature on these tumors in adults is scant. Therefore, the following discussion on chemotherapy for bone sarcomas incorporates data from trials conducted predominantly in children and young adults (ie, generally younger than 30 years and with a very large majority younger than 20 years).

Chemotherapy for osteosarcoma

At present, neoadjuvant (preoperative) chemotherapy followed by definitive resection with subsequent adjuvant (postoperative) chemotherapy is the well-established approach to treatment of localized osteosarcomas. Chemo­therapy can eradicate the micrometastatic disease that is believed to be present in the majority of patients with clinically resectable cancer.²

Efficacy. Historically, prior to the institution of effective chemotherapy, metastatic disease developed in 80% to 90% of patients who underwent curative resection with or without radiation therapy, which resulted in a long-term survival rate of less than 20%.³ In the 1980s, clinical trials that randomized patients with resectable osteosarcoma to surgery alone or to surgery plus chemotherapy found that the addition of perioperative chemotherapy led to significant improvements in recurrence rates and survival.^4,5 More recent randomized trials have shown that treatment of such patients with modern multiagent chemotherapy regimens results in a 5-year survival rate of approximately 70%.⁶ Additionally, response to neoadjuvant (preoperative) treatment has become the most important predictor of outcome, as the median survival of osteosarcoma patients who have greater than 90% necrosis in the resected specimen following neoadjuvant chemotherapy is about 90% at 5 years.^7,8

Toxicity. Current chemotherapy regimens are based on high doses of methotrexate and leucovorin in combination with doxorubicin, ifosfamide, and platinum. Long-term effects of such regimens include the following³:

• Azospermia (in 100% of patients who received a total ifosfamide dose > 75 g/m²)
• Subclinical renal impairment (in 48% of patients treated with high doses of ifosfamide)
• Hearing impairment (in 40% of patients treated with cisplatin)
• Second malignancies (in 2.1%)
• Cardiomyopathy (in 1.7%).³

In light of this, the development of equally effective but less intensive regimens for patients whose disease carries a better prognosis is highly desirable. Ongoing clinical trials are investigating this strategy.

Metastatic disease. Metastatic osteosarcoma is found in approximately 20% of patients at the time of diagnosis. Sarcoma mainly spreads hematogenously, and the lungs are the most common initial site of metastases, being affected in more than 60% of patients who develop metastatic disease.⁹ Patients with metachronous lung lesions are initially considered for aggressive treatment with neoadjuvant chemo­therapy and subsequent resection of clinically apparent disease, which results in event-free survival rates of 20% to 30%.³

Patients with disease limited to the primary tumor and no more than one or two bone lesions fare best. The presence of multiple metastases is associated with the poorest prognosis, as few patients with this profile live past 2 years.¹⁰ In a review of 202 pediatric and adult patients with documented metastases at the time of osteosarcoma diagnosis, the presence of more than 5 metastatic lesions (which was reported in 91 patients) was associated with a 5-year overall survival rate of 19%.⁹

Chemotherapy for Ewing sarcoma

Perioperative chemotherapy in patients with localized Ewing sarcoma is believed to reduce the burden of micrometastasis that is thought to be present in most patients with early-stage disease. Five-year survival rates of 50% to 72% have been reported among patients with resectable Ewing sarcoma treated perioperatively with multiagent chemotherapy.^11,12 Notably, randomized trials that studied intense multiagent chemotherapy regimens (consisting of doxorubicin, cyclophosphamide, vincristine, and dactinomycin alternating with etoposide and ifosfamide) reported the best outcomes despite significant but acceptable toxicity. In a large randomized trial involving 398 patients with resectable disease, a 5-year survival rate of 72% was achieved with the above regimen, compared with 61% in patients treated with a less intense regimen that did not contain ifosfamide and etoposide (p = .01).¹²

Compressing these standard regimens to an every-14-day instead of every-21-day schedule improved event-free survival at 3 years from 65% to 76% (p = .028) without any significant increase in toxicity in a randomized trial involving 568 patients.¹³ Data on overall survival from this trial are not yet published.

Metastatic disease. Metastatic Ewing sarcoma is found in 15% to 35% of patients with newly diagnosed disease and is treated with multiagent chemotherapy; resection of residual disease is considered in good responders.³ This approach produces objective responses to therapy, but long-term survival is rare.

Toxicity. Myelodysplastic syndrome and acute myeloid leukemia are the most dreaded long-term complications of intensive multiagent chemotherapy for Ewing sarcoma and develop in up to 8% of patients.¹⁴ Additionally, ifosfamide can lead to hematuria (~12% incidence), encephalopathy (mild somnolence and hallucinations to coma), chronic renal impairment (6% incidence), and hemorrhagic cystitis (though administration of mesna and generous intravenous hydration can minimize this latter complication).¹⁵ Recent efforts are therefore focused on testing less-intensive regimens in patients who have good prognostic features.

Chondrosarcoma: No role for chemotherapy

Chondrosarcoma, which represents approximately 20% of all bone sarcomas and has a peak incidence in older adults (ie, in the sixth decade of life), is insensitive to chemotherapy. Radiotherapy is also of limited value and is reserved for patients treated in the palliative setting.¹⁶ Definitive management of chondrosarcoma involves adequate surgical resection alone.

 

 

SOFT-TISSUE SARCOMAS

Aside from recent advances in the treatment of gastrointestinal stromal tumors with the small-molecule tyrosine kinase inhibitors imatinib and sunitinib (which are beyond the scope of this article), an overall survival advantage with chemotherapy has not been demonstrated in adults with soft-tissue sarcoma.¹⁷

Resectable disease

The decision to use chemotherapy needs to be weighed against the magnitude of potential clinical benefit and the acute and chronic toxicities that can develop.

Toxicity. Chemotherapy regimens with activity against soft-tissue sarcomas often contain anthracyclines, alkylating agents, and taxanes. These agents can produce serious long-term toxicities, which is especially important in patients treated with curative intent. Doxorubicin and other anthracyclines, for example, may result in cardiomyopathy, the risk of which rises with increasing cumulative dose.¹⁸ In addition, acute myeloid leukemia may develop in 2% to 12% of patients treated with anthracyclines or alkylating agents such as ifosfamide and dacarbazine.^3,19 Renal failure and an elevated risk of bladder carcinoma are uncommonly reported in patients with a history of ifosfamide treatment.¹⁵ Sensory neuropathy associated with the use of taxanes (eg, paclitaxel and docetaxel) is dose dependent and reversible in more than half of patients. However, some patients treated with high doses of these agents can have persistent symptoms of paresthesias, burning, and decreased reflexes, which can be debilitating.²⁰

Efficacy of adjuvant chemotherapy. Because chemotherapy puts patients at risk of such serious chronic toxicities, its use can be justified only if it results in significant benefit, such as prolongation of survival. A 1997 meta-analysis of 14 clinical trials evaluating adjuvant chemotherapy in patients with resectable soft-tissue sarcomas found chemotherapy to have an absolute benefit of 10% in recurrence-free survival at 10 years (ie, from 45% survival to 55% survival), with a hazard ratio of 0.75 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.64–0.87; p = .0001) for recurrence or death.²¹ However, when the analysis was limited to overall survival at 10 years, the survival difference between patients who received adjuvant chemotherapy and those who did not (54% vs 50%, respectively) was not statistically significant (hazard ratio = 0.89; 95% CI, 0.76–1.03, p = .12).²¹

The concept of adjuvant therapy has been revisited since the antisarcoma activity of ifosfamide was established. A large European trial randomized 351 patients with resected soft-tissue sarcoma either to placebo or to doxorubicin and ifosfamide given every 21 days.²² The preliminary results, reported in abstract form at the 2007 annual meeting of the American Society of Clinical Oncology, showed a higher 5-year survival rate in the placebo arm (69%) compared with the chemotherapy arm (64%).²² This and other trials using ifosfamide in various drug combinations showed no difference in survival, suggesting that adjuvant chemotherapy should not be considered to be standard practice outside of a clinical trial.

Efficacy of neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy also has been studied in patients with soft-tissue sarcomas. A retrospective analysis found that the greatest benefit is derived in patients with primary tumors larger than 10 cm, in whom neoadjuvant chemotherapy increased 3-year disease-specific survival from 62% to 83%.²³ However, differing results came from a prospective multicenter trial that randomized patients with large primary and recurrent tumors to either surgery alone or surgery preceded by three cycles of neoadjuvant doxorubicin and ifosfamide (all patients could also receive adjuvant radiation therapy, depending on grade and adequacy of resection).²⁴ The trial suffered from slow accrual, and only 150 patients were enrolled. At 5 years, survival was similar between the groups with and without neoadjuvant chemotherapy.²⁴ Therefore, neoadjuvant chemotherapy is not yet recommended pending results of larger randomized trials.

No clear role for recurrent disease. Local recurrence of the primary tumor after resection occurs in 10% to 50% of cases of soft-tissue sarcoma, with the specific rate depending on the primary tumor location. The highest incidence of recurrence is found in patients with retroperitoneal and head and neck sarcoma (40% and 50%, respectively), mainly because of the difficulty of obtaining clear margins. Chemotherapy has not been well studied in this setting and is of uncertain value.³

Metastatic disease

Metastatic soft-tissue sarcomas may respond to chemotherapy, but there is a lack of evidence that chemotherapy improves overall survival. Pulmonary lesions are the most common site of distant recurrence, and resection of such metastases is sometimes undertaken in well-selected patients. However, there is no level 1 evidence supporting chemotherapy in this clinical setting despite its common preoperative use. There is a paucity of randomized phase 3 trials that compare established palliative chemotherapy regimens to best supportive care. It is believed that some groups of patients do benefit, however, including those who are young and have good performance status, low tumor grade, absence of liver metastasis or pulmonary metastasis only, and a long interval between treatment of the primary tumor and development of metastatic disease.³ Some histologies, such as uterine leiomyosarcomas and facial/scalp angiosarcomas, respond better to chemotherapy.¹⁷

Drugs found to have activity against metastatic sarcoma include doxorubicin, ifosfamide, platinum agents, gemcitabine, taxanes, and dacarbazine. Used either alone or in combinations, these drugs produce responses (ie, shrink metastatic tumors) in about 13% to 33% of patients.³ Use of chemotherapy is frequently curtailed by the acute toxicity of these agents, which includes pancytopenia, transfusion requirements, febrile neutropenia, nausea, alopecia, and significant fatigue, as well as renal failure with ifosfamide or cisplatin and peripheral neuropathy with platinum agents or taxanes. Appropriate patient selection for chemo­therapy and exclusion of those who should be managed solely with best supportive care is an important challenge that oncologists often face when managing patients with metastatic soft-tissue sarcoma.

Future directions

Trabectedin (ET-743) is a novel compound with promising activity against soft-tissue sarcomas that acts by inhibiting cell-cycle transition from the G₂ to M stages. The drug covalently binds to the minor grove of the DNA molecule, changing its three-dimensional structure and impairing transcription and possibly DNA repair.²⁵ Phase 2 studies showed durable responses to trabectedin in 3% to 8% of heavily pretreated patients^26–28 and in 17% of treatment-naïve patients with advanced soft-tissue sarcomas.²⁵ Time to progression of up to 20 months has been reported in patients who respond or develop stable disease.³

Toxic effects of trabec­tedin include myelosuppression, fever, edema, arthralgias, hepatotoxicity, and (rarely) rhabdomyolysis. To date, these toxicities have been self-limiting. Larger clinical trials and longer follow-up is needed to assess whether this agent has any significant long-term toxicities.

Trabectedin has already been approved in Europe for treatment of chemotherapy-refractory soft-tissue sarcoma when given as a 24-hour infusion every 21 days.

More broadly, an active effort is under way to better understand the molecular derangements in a variety of soft-tissue sarcoma subtypes. The hope is that this understanding will lead to improved therapies that target aberrant proliferation, angiogenesis, and other biologic processes that drive the growth and metastasis of soft-tissue and bone sarcomas.