Article Type
Changed
Wed, 12/12/2018 - 20:41
Display Headline
Case Studies in Toxicology: The Perilous Pursuit of Perfection
A 37-year-old woman was presented for emergent care after developing acute confusion, agitation, and hallucinations during an outpatient tumescent liposuction procedure.

 

Case

A 37-year-old woman had undergone outpatient tumescent liposuction of her abdominal adipose tissue. Upon initiation of the procedure, she developed acute confusion followed by agitation and hallucinations and was transported by emergency medical services to the nearest hospital. 

Upon arrival to the ED, the patient was mildly agitated. Her initial vital signs were: blood pressure, 122/79 mm Hg; heart rate, 57 beats/minute; respiratory rate, 18 breaths/minute; and temperature, 96.8°F. Oxygen saturation was 100% on room air.

On examination, the patient was awake and oriented, but was restless and perseverating. She described the sensation of “dying and coming back to life.” The patient’s pupils were equal, round, and normally reactive; her skin was neither diaphoretic nor dry; her heart rate and rhythm were normal; and her lungs were clear to auscultation bilaterally. The skin of the patient’s abdomen was pale, cool, and clammy, but otherwise soft with normoactive bowel sounds. An electrocardiogram revealed sinus rhythm with normal QRS and QTc intervals.

What is tumescent liposuction?

The first procedure for fat removal by suction curette was reported in the early 1960s. Unfortunately, these early attempts at liposuction were plagued by high volumes of blood loss and high infection rates. Development of the “wet-technique” alleviated some of the blood loss by first infiltrating the area with hypotonic saline and epinephrine.1 However, despite these advancements, liposuction still required general anesthesia. In 1985, Klein2 performed the first liposuction using only local anesthesia and subsequently developed the tumescent technique.

The tumescent technique (the word tumescent derived from the Latin word meaning “to swell”) involves the infiltration of a large volume of a dilute solution of lidocaine and epinephrine into the subcutaneous fat until it becomes distended and tense. The administration of this solution allows for the removal of significant adipose tissue with minimal blood loss and without general anesthesia. Advocates of tumescent liposuction argue that this dilution and subcutaneous infiltration alter the pharmacokinetics of lidocaine, providing a safe delivery of large doses of the drug. In addition, a substantial quantity of the infiltrated lidocaine is suctioned out with the fat removal. Klein3 specifically recommends administering a dilution of 1 g lidocaine in 1,000 mL of saline (0.1%) to the patient in aliquots of up to 2 g lidocaine. Such a high dose may approach or surpass 35 mg/kg, far exceeding the recommended lidocaine infiltration dose of 7 mg/kg when mixed with epinephrine.

Several studies have investigated the safety of the tumescent technique and the risk of lidocaine toxicity. In a review of pharmacokinetic studies, patients received between 10.5 and 67.7 mg/kg of lidocaine with a reported maximum serum lidocaine concentration in all patients of only 2.93 mcg/mL (therapeutic, 1-5 mcg/mL).4 However, peak serum lidocaine concentrations may not occur for up to 28 hours following tumescent infiltration.4 Despite the purported safety findings of this and other studies, there are also reports of tumescent anesthesia-associated toxicity and fatalities.5,6

  

 

Case Continuation 

The patient’s mental status slowly improved throughout her hospital stay and she was reportedly at baseline by the following morning. Her serum lidocaine concentration drawn at presentation to the ED was 9.7 mcg/mL.

What are the clinical effects of lidocaine toxicity?

The clinical effects of lidocaine overdose are dependent on both the magnitude of the exposure and the rate at which it occurs. The central nervous system (CNS) and heart are the organ systems primarily affected by lidocaine. As a local anesthetic, lidocaine inhibits the action potential formation in electrically excitable cells. This reversible inhibition of the voltage-gated sodium channels prevents the influx of positively charged sodium ions and the resultant depolarization of the cell. Lidocaine, initially or at low concentrations, has a quiescent effect on neurons, which explains its therapeutic use as a local anesthetic.

Similarly, lidocaine initially reduces impulse propagation through the cardiac conduction system and can be used to treat rhythm disturbances. When used for the suppression of cardiac dysrhythmias, the therapeutic serum concentration of lidocaine is 1 to 5 mcg/mL. Subjective symptoms of lidocaine toxicity arising from therapeutic use (primarily when it is used to manage dysrhythmia) include light-headedness, disorientation, confusion, and psychosis, and are associated with serum concentrations of 3 to 6 mcg/mL. As the concentration increases, the clinical effects of lidocaine appear to shift from inhibitory to excitatory. At serum concentrations of 5 to 9 mcg/mL, objective symptoms, such as excitation, tremor, and seizure predominate. As the concentration continues to rise, coma, respiratory depression, cardiovascular (CV) collapse, and death may occur.7

The exact mechanism of this toxicity transition from inhibitory effect of sodium channel blockade to excitatory effect is not well understood. Some suggest a preferential inhibition of inhibitory interneurons in the CNS is responsible.8 Another potential mechanism is a concentration-dependent inhibition of the potassium rectifier channel.9 Inhibition of the efflux of positively charged potassium ions would result in slowing cellular repolarization, leaving the cells in a relatively excitable state. In the CNS, this produces seizures; in the heart, it may result in dysrhythmia. Cardiovascular collapse may occur with very high serum concentrations of lidocaine or following a rapid serum increase—eg, after a large intravenous (IV) bolus dose,7 which can potentially result from an unintentional intravascular injection during tumescent liposuction.

 

 

What is the treatment for lidocaine toxicity?

The first step in the treatment of lidocaine-associated CNS toxicity is the discontinuation of the drug. Failure to appropriately recognize the symptoms of early lidocaine toxicity may result in the progression to severe CNS effects and eventual CV collapse. Benzodiazepines should be used as needed for mild symptoms. Seizures should be treated aggressively with benzodiazepines or barbiturates, while ensuring maintenance of oxygenation, ventilation, and perfusion.7

In cases of lidocaine-associated CV toxicity, treatment begins with airway management, oxygen administration, and life support. Potential antidotal treatment of severe local anesthetic-associated CV toxicity involves the rapid administration of IV fat emulsion, or “lipid rescue.” Although best studied for bupivacaine toxicity, the exact mechanism of IV fat emulsion as an antidote is not completely understood. However, in the treatment of local anesthetic toxicity, lipid rescue is believed to offer a “sink” to remove the lipid-soluble anesthetics from their site of action and trap them within the vascular space. Suggested dosing of 20% lipid solution is a bolus of 1.5 mL/kg over a 1-minute period, followed by 0.25mL/kg per minute or 15 mL/kg per hour to run over 30 to 60 minutes.10

  

 

Case Conclusion

The patient made a full recovery and was discharged home in normal condition. Her healthcare provider was informed about the complication of the procedure.

  

 


Dr Hines is a senior toxicology fellow, department of emergency medicine, New York University School of Medicine. Dr Nelson, editor of “Case Studies in Toxicology,” is a professor in the department of emergency medicine and director of the medical toxicology fellowship program at the New York University School of Medicine and the New York City Poison Control Center. He is also associate editor, toxicology, of the EMERGENCY MEDICINE editorial board.

References

 

 

  1. Lozinski A, Huq NS. Tumescent liposuction. Clin Plastic Surg. 2013;40(4):593-613.
  2. Klein JA. Tumescent technique chronicles: local anesthesia, liposuction, and beyond. Dermatol Surg. 1995;21(5):449-457.
  3. Klein JA. Tumescent technique for regional anesthesia permits lidocaine doses of 35 mg/kg for liposuction. J Dermatol Surg Oncol. 1990;16(3):248-263.
  4. Conroy PH, O’Rourke J. Tumescent anesthesia. The Surgeon. 2012;210-201.
  5. Rao RR, Fly SF, Hoffman RS. Deaths related to liposuction. N Engl J Med. 1999;340(19):1471-1475.
  6. Martinez MA, Ballesteros S, Segura LJ, Garcia M. Reporting a fatality during tumescent liposuction. Forensic Sci Int. 2008;178(1):e11-e-16.
  7. Schwartz DR, Kaufman B. Local anesthestics. In: Hoffman RS, Howland MA, Lewin NA, Nelson LS, Goldfrank LR. Goldfrank’s Toxicologic Emergencies. 10th ed. New York, NY: McGraw Hill; 2015:921-930.
  8. Tanaka K, Yamasaki M. Blocking of cortical inhibitory synapses by intravenous lidoaine. Nature. 1966;209(5019):207-208.
  9. Friederich P, Benzenberg D, Urban BW. Bupivacaine inhibits human neuronal Kv3 channels in SH-SY5Y human neuroblastoma cells. Br J Anaesth. 2002;88(6):864-866.
  10. Bania TC. Antidotes in depth, intravenous fat emulsions. In: Hoffman RS, Howland MA, Lewin NA, Nelson LS, Goldfrank LR. Goldfrank’s Toxicologic Emergencies. 10th ed. New York, NY: McGraw Hill; 2015:931-937.
Issue
Emergency Medicine - 47(12)
Publications
Topics
Page Number
550-552
Sections
A 37-year-old woman was presented for emergent care after developing acute confusion, agitation, and hallucinations during an outpatient tumescent liposuction procedure.
A 37-year-old woman was presented for emergent care after developing acute confusion, agitation, and hallucinations during an outpatient tumescent liposuction procedure.

 

Case

A 37-year-old woman had undergone outpatient tumescent liposuction of her abdominal adipose tissue. Upon initiation of the procedure, she developed acute confusion followed by agitation and hallucinations and was transported by emergency medical services to the nearest hospital. 

Upon arrival to the ED, the patient was mildly agitated. Her initial vital signs were: blood pressure, 122/79 mm Hg; heart rate, 57 beats/minute; respiratory rate, 18 breaths/minute; and temperature, 96.8°F. Oxygen saturation was 100% on room air.

On examination, the patient was awake and oriented, but was restless and perseverating. She described the sensation of “dying and coming back to life.” The patient’s pupils were equal, round, and normally reactive; her skin was neither diaphoretic nor dry; her heart rate and rhythm were normal; and her lungs were clear to auscultation bilaterally. The skin of the patient’s abdomen was pale, cool, and clammy, but otherwise soft with normoactive bowel sounds. An electrocardiogram revealed sinus rhythm with normal QRS and QTc intervals.

What is tumescent liposuction?

The first procedure for fat removal by suction curette was reported in the early 1960s. Unfortunately, these early attempts at liposuction were plagued by high volumes of blood loss and high infection rates. Development of the “wet-technique” alleviated some of the blood loss by first infiltrating the area with hypotonic saline and epinephrine.1 However, despite these advancements, liposuction still required general anesthesia. In 1985, Klein2 performed the first liposuction using only local anesthesia and subsequently developed the tumescent technique.

The tumescent technique (the word tumescent derived from the Latin word meaning “to swell”) involves the infiltration of a large volume of a dilute solution of lidocaine and epinephrine into the subcutaneous fat until it becomes distended and tense. The administration of this solution allows for the removal of significant adipose tissue with minimal blood loss and without general anesthesia. Advocates of tumescent liposuction argue that this dilution and subcutaneous infiltration alter the pharmacokinetics of lidocaine, providing a safe delivery of large doses of the drug. In addition, a substantial quantity of the infiltrated lidocaine is suctioned out with the fat removal. Klein3 specifically recommends administering a dilution of 1 g lidocaine in 1,000 mL of saline (0.1%) to the patient in aliquots of up to 2 g lidocaine. Such a high dose may approach or surpass 35 mg/kg, far exceeding the recommended lidocaine infiltration dose of 7 mg/kg when mixed with epinephrine.

Several studies have investigated the safety of the tumescent technique and the risk of lidocaine toxicity. In a review of pharmacokinetic studies, patients received between 10.5 and 67.7 mg/kg of lidocaine with a reported maximum serum lidocaine concentration in all patients of only 2.93 mcg/mL (therapeutic, 1-5 mcg/mL).4 However, peak serum lidocaine concentrations may not occur for up to 28 hours following tumescent infiltration.4 Despite the purported safety findings of this and other studies, there are also reports of tumescent anesthesia-associated toxicity and fatalities.5,6

  

 

Case Continuation 

The patient’s mental status slowly improved throughout her hospital stay and she was reportedly at baseline by the following morning. Her serum lidocaine concentration drawn at presentation to the ED was 9.7 mcg/mL.

What are the clinical effects of lidocaine toxicity?

The clinical effects of lidocaine overdose are dependent on both the magnitude of the exposure and the rate at which it occurs. The central nervous system (CNS) and heart are the organ systems primarily affected by lidocaine. As a local anesthetic, lidocaine inhibits the action potential formation in electrically excitable cells. This reversible inhibition of the voltage-gated sodium channels prevents the influx of positively charged sodium ions and the resultant depolarization of the cell. Lidocaine, initially or at low concentrations, has a quiescent effect on neurons, which explains its therapeutic use as a local anesthetic.

Similarly, lidocaine initially reduces impulse propagation through the cardiac conduction system and can be used to treat rhythm disturbances. When used for the suppression of cardiac dysrhythmias, the therapeutic serum concentration of lidocaine is 1 to 5 mcg/mL. Subjective symptoms of lidocaine toxicity arising from therapeutic use (primarily when it is used to manage dysrhythmia) include light-headedness, disorientation, confusion, and psychosis, and are associated with serum concentrations of 3 to 6 mcg/mL. As the concentration increases, the clinical effects of lidocaine appear to shift from inhibitory to excitatory. At serum concentrations of 5 to 9 mcg/mL, objective symptoms, such as excitation, tremor, and seizure predominate. As the concentration continues to rise, coma, respiratory depression, cardiovascular (CV) collapse, and death may occur.7

The exact mechanism of this toxicity transition from inhibitory effect of sodium channel blockade to excitatory effect is not well understood. Some suggest a preferential inhibition of inhibitory interneurons in the CNS is responsible.8 Another potential mechanism is a concentration-dependent inhibition of the potassium rectifier channel.9 Inhibition of the efflux of positively charged potassium ions would result in slowing cellular repolarization, leaving the cells in a relatively excitable state. In the CNS, this produces seizures; in the heart, it may result in dysrhythmia. Cardiovascular collapse may occur with very high serum concentrations of lidocaine or following a rapid serum increase—eg, after a large intravenous (IV) bolus dose,7 which can potentially result from an unintentional intravascular injection during tumescent liposuction.

 

 

What is the treatment for lidocaine toxicity?

The first step in the treatment of lidocaine-associated CNS toxicity is the discontinuation of the drug. Failure to appropriately recognize the symptoms of early lidocaine toxicity may result in the progression to severe CNS effects and eventual CV collapse. Benzodiazepines should be used as needed for mild symptoms. Seizures should be treated aggressively with benzodiazepines or barbiturates, while ensuring maintenance of oxygenation, ventilation, and perfusion.7

In cases of lidocaine-associated CV toxicity, treatment begins with airway management, oxygen administration, and life support. Potential antidotal treatment of severe local anesthetic-associated CV toxicity involves the rapid administration of IV fat emulsion, or “lipid rescue.” Although best studied for bupivacaine toxicity, the exact mechanism of IV fat emulsion as an antidote is not completely understood. However, in the treatment of local anesthetic toxicity, lipid rescue is believed to offer a “sink” to remove the lipid-soluble anesthetics from their site of action and trap them within the vascular space. Suggested dosing of 20% lipid solution is a bolus of 1.5 mL/kg over a 1-minute period, followed by 0.25mL/kg per minute or 15 mL/kg per hour to run over 30 to 60 minutes.10

  

 

Case Conclusion

The patient made a full recovery and was discharged home in normal condition. Her healthcare provider was informed about the complication of the procedure.

  

 


Dr Hines is a senior toxicology fellow, department of emergency medicine, New York University School of Medicine. Dr Nelson, editor of “Case Studies in Toxicology,” is a professor in the department of emergency medicine and director of the medical toxicology fellowship program at the New York University School of Medicine and the New York City Poison Control Center. He is also associate editor, toxicology, of the EMERGENCY MEDICINE editorial board.

 

Case

A 37-year-old woman had undergone outpatient tumescent liposuction of her abdominal adipose tissue. Upon initiation of the procedure, she developed acute confusion followed by agitation and hallucinations and was transported by emergency medical services to the nearest hospital. 

Upon arrival to the ED, the patient was mildly agitated. Her initial vital signs were: blood pressure, 122/79 mm Hg; heart rate, 57 beats/minute; respiratory rate, 18 breaths/minute; and temperature, 96.8°F. Oxygen saturation was 100% on room air.

On examination, the patient was awake and oriented, but was restless and perseverating. She described the sensation of “dying and coming back to life.” The patient’s pupils were equal, round, and normally reactive; her skin was neither diaphoretic nor dry; her heart rate and rhythm were normal; and her lungs were clear to auscultation bilaterally. The skin of the patient’s abdomen was pale, cool, and clammy, but otherwise soft with normoactive bowel sounds. An electrocardiogram revealed sinus rhythm with normal QRS and QTc intervals.

What is tumescent liposuction?

The first procedure for fat removal by suction curette was reported in the early 1960s. Unfortunately, these early attempts at liposuction were plagued by high volumes of blood loss and high infection rates. Development of the “wet-technique” alleviated some of the blood loss by first infiltrating the area with hypotonic saline and epinephrine.1 However, despite these advancements, liposuction still required general anesthesia. In 1985, Klein2 performed the first liposuction using only local anesthesia and subsequently developed the tumescent technique.

The tumescent technique (the word tumescent derived from the Latin word meaning “to swell”) involves the infiltration of a large volume of a dilute solution of lidocaine and epinephrine into the subcutaneous fat until it becomes distended and tense. The administration of this solution allows for the removal of significant adipose tissue with minimal blood loss and without general anesthesia. Advocates of tumescent liposuction argue that this dilution and subcutaneous infiltration alter the pharmacokinetics of lidocaine, providing a safe delivery of large doses of the drug. In addition, a substantial quantity of the infiltrated lidocaine is suctioned out with the fat removal. Klein3 specifically recommends administering a dilution of 1 g lidocaine in 1,000 mL of saline (0.1%) to the patient in aliquots of up to 2 g lidocaine. Such a high dose may approach or surpass 35 mg/kg, far exceeding the recommended lidocaine infiltration dose of 7 mg/kg when mixed with epinephrine.

Several studies have investigated the safety of the tumescent technique and the risk of lidocaine toxicity. In a review of pharmacokinetic studies, patients received between 10.5 and 67.7 mg/kg of lidocaine with a reported maximum serum lidocaine concentration in all patients of only 2.93 mcg/mL (therapeutic, 1-5 mcg/mL).4 However, peak serum lidocaine concentrations may not occur for up to 28 hours following tumescent infiltration.4 Despite the purported safety findings of this and other studies, there are also reports of tumescent anesthesia-associated toxicity and fatalities.5,6

  

 

Case Continuation 

The patient’s mental status slowly improved throughout her hospital stay and she was reportedly at baseline by the following morning. Her serum lidocaine concentration drawn at presentation to the ED was 9.7 mcg/mL.

What are the clinical effects of lidocaine toxicity?

The clinical effects of lidocaine overdose are dependent on both the magnitude of the exposure and the rate at which it occurs. The central nervous system (CNS) and heart are the organ systems primarily affected by lidocaine. As a local anesthetic, lidocaine inhibits the action potential formation in electrically excitable cells. This reversible inhibition of the voltage-gated sodium channels prevents the influx of positively charged sodium ions and the resultant depolarization of the cell. Lidocaine, initially or at low concentrations, has a quiescent effect on neurons, which explains its therapeutic use as a local anesthetic.

Similarly, lidocaine initially reduces impulse propagation through the cardiac conduction system and can be used to treat rhythm disturbances. When used for the suppression of cardiac dysrhythmias, the therapeutic serum concentration of lidocaine is 1 to 5 mcg/mL. Subjective symptoms of lidocaine toxicity arising from therapeutic use (primarily when it is used to manage dysrhythmia) include light-headedness, disorientation, confusion, and psychosis, and are associated with serum concentrations of 3 to 6 mcg/mL. As the concentration increases, the clinical effects of lidocaine appear to shift from inhibitory to excitatory. At serum concentrations of 5 to 9 mcg/mL, objective symptoms, such as excitation, tremor, and seizure predominate. As the concentration continues to rise, coma, respiratory depression, cardiovascular (CV) collapse, and death may occur.7

The exact mechanism of this toxicity transition from inhibitory effect of sodium channel blockade to excitatory effect is not well understood. Some suggest a preferential inhibition of inhibitory interneurons in the CNS is responsible.8 Another potential mechanism is a concentration-dependent inhibition of the potassium rectifier channel.9 Inhibition of the efflux of positively charged potassium ions would result in slowing cellular repolarization, leaving the cells in a relatively excitable state. In the CNS, this produces seizures; in the heart, it may result in dysrhythmia. Cardiovascular collapse may occur with very high serum concentrations of lidocaine or following a rapid serum increase—eg, after a large intravenous (IV) bolus dose,7 which can potentially result from an unintentional intravascular injection during tumescent liposuction.

 

 

What is the treatment for lidocaine toxicity?

The first step in the treatment of lidocaine-associated CNS toxicity is the discontinuation of the drug. Failure to appropriately recognize the symptoms of early lidocaine toxicity may result in the progression to severe CNS effects and eventual CV collapse. Benzodiazepines should be used as needed for mild symptoms. Seizures should be treated aggressively with benzodiazepines or barbiturates, while ensuring maintenance of oxygenation, ventilation, and perfusion.7

In cases of lidocaine-associated CV toxicity, treatment begins with airway management, oxygen administration, and life support. Potential antidotal treatment of severe local anesthetic-associated CV toxicity involves the rapid administration of IV fat emulsion, or “lipid rescue.” Although best studied for bupivacaine toxicity, the exact mechanism of IV fat emulsion as an antidote is not completely understood. However, in the treatment of local anesthetic toxicity, lipid rescue is believed to offer a “sink” to remove the lipid-soluble anesthetics from their site of action and trap them within the vascular space. Suggested dosing of 20% lipid solution is a bolus of 1.5 mL/kg over a 1-minute period, followed by 0.25mL/kg per minute or 15 mL/kg per hour to run over 30 to 60 minutes.10

  

 

Case Conclusion

The patient made a full recovery and was discharged home in normal condition. Her healthcare provider was informed about the complication of the procedure.

  

 


Dr Hines is a senior toxicology fellow, department of emergency medicine, New York University School of Medicine. Dr Nelson, editor of “Case Studies in Toxicology,” is a professor in the department of emergency medicine and director of the medical toxicology fellowship program at the New York University School of Medicine and the New York City Poison Control Center. He is also associate editor, toxicology, of the EMERGENCY MEDICINE editorial board.

References

 

 

  1. Lozinski A, Huq NS. Tumescent liposuction. Clin Plastic Surg. 2013;40(4):593-613.
  2. Klein JA. Tumescent technique chronicles: local anesthesia, liposuction, and beyond. Dermatol Surg. 1995;21(5):449-457.
  3. Klein JA. Tumescent technique for regional anesthesia permits lidocaine doses of 35 mg/kg for liposuction. J Dermatol Surg Oncol. 1990;16(3):248-263.
  4. Conroy PH, O’Rourke J. Tumescent anesthesia. The Surgeon. 2012;210-201.
  5. Rao RR, Fly SF, Hoffman RS. Deaths related to liposuction. N Engl J Med. 1999;340(19):1471-1475.
  6. Martinez MA, Ballesteros S, Segura LJ, Garcia M. Reporting a fatality during tumescent liposuction. Forensic Sci Int. 2008;178(1):e11-e-16.
  7. Schwartz DR, Kaufman B. Local anesthestics. In: Hoffman RS, Howland MA, Lewin NA, Nelson LS, Goldfrank LR. Goldfrank’s Toxicologic Emergencies. 10th ed. New York, NY: McGraw Hill; 2015:921-930.
  8. Tanaka K, Yamasaki M. Blocking of cortical inhibitory synapses by intravenous lidoaine. Nature. 1966;209(5019):207-208.
  9. Friederich P, Benzenberg D, Urban BW. Bupivacaine inhibits human neuronal Kv3 channels in SH-SY5Y human neuroblastoma cells. Br J Anaesth. 2002;88(6):864-866.
  10. Bania TC. Antidotes in depth, intravenous fat emulsions. In: Hoffman RS, Howland MA, Lewin NA, Nelson LS, Goldfrank LR. Goldfrank’s Toxicologic Emergencies. 10th ed. New York, NY: McGraw Hill; 2015:931-937.
References

 

 

  1. Lozinski A, Huq NS. Tumescent liposuction. Clin Plastic Surg. 2013;40(4):593-613.
  2. Klein JA. Tumescent technique chronicles: local anesthesia, liposuction, and beyond. Dermatol Surg. 1995;21(5):449-457.
  3. Klein JA. Tumescent technique for regional anesthesia permits lidocaine doses of 35 mg/kg for liposuction. J Dermatol Surg Oncol. 1990;16(3):248-263.
  4. Conroy PH, O’Rourke J. Tumescent anesthesia. The Surgeon. 2012;210-201.
  5. Rao RR, Fly SF, Hoffman RS. Deaths related to liposuction. N Engl J Med. 1999;340(19):1471-1475.
  6. Martinez MA, Ballesteros S, Segura LJ, Garcia M. Reporting a fatality during tumescent liposuction. Forensic Sci Int. 2008;178(1):e11-e-16.
  7. Schwartz DR, Kaufman B. Local anesthestics. In: Hoffman RS, Howland MA, Lewin NA, Nelson LS, Goldfrank LR. Goldfrank’s Toxicologic Emergencies. 10th ed. New York, NY: McGraw Hill; 2015:921-930.
  8. Tanaka K, Yamasaki M. Blocking of cortical inhibitory synapses by intravenous lidoaine. Nature. 1966;209(5019):207-208.
  9. Friederich P, Benzenberg D, Urban BW. Bupivacaine inhibits human neuronal Kv3 channels in SH-SY5Y human neuroblastoma cells. Br J Anaesth. 2002;88(6):864-866.
  10. Bania TC. Antidotes in depth, intravenous fat emulsions. In: Hoffman RS, Howland MA, Lewin NA, Nelson LS, Goldfrank LR. Goldfrank’s Toxicologic Emergencies. 10th ed. New York, NY: McGraw Hill; 2015:931-937.
Issue
Emergency Medicine - 47(12)
Issue
Emergency Medicine - 47(12)
Page Number
550-552
Page Number
550-552
Publications
Publications
Topics
Article Type
Display Headline
Case Studies in Toxicology: The Perilous Pursuit of Perfection
Display Headline
Case Studies in Toxicology: The Perilous Pursuit of Perfection
Sections
PURLs Copyright

Disallow All Ads
Alternative CME
Use ProPublica