User login
TOPLINE:
METHODOLOGY:
- National Comprehensive Cancer Network guidelines recommend DCIS surveillance with a physical exam every 6-12 months for 5 years and then annually with a mammogram every 12 months. Research, however, suggested clinical breast exams only detect 15% of second breast cancers.
- A retrospective cohort study of 1550 female members of Kaiser Permanente Northern California diagnosed with unilateral DCIS between January 1, 2008, and January 1, 2011, who were followed until 2021.
- Patients who developed a second breast cancer within 10 years of follow-up were identified from the electronic health records. The detection methods were categorized into three groups: Patient-detected, physician-detected, and imaging-detected.
TAKEAWAY:
- During follow-up, 11.5% of women developed a second breast cancer with a median time to diagnosis of 57 months. Among patients with second breast cancers, 43.0% were ipsilateral, 54.8% were contralateral, and 2.2% presented with distant metastases.
- Overall, patients had a median of five mammograms between years 1 and 6 of surveillance and a median of seven clinic visits with most providers completing a clinical examination during the visit.
- Second breast cancers were detected through imaging in 74.3% of cases compared with 20.1% detected by patients and only 2.2% detected by physicians during physical exams. The remaining 3.4% were detected incidentally from plastic surgery procedures unrelated to oncologic surveillance.
- Mammogram detected 99.2% of cases (132 of 133 cases) identified by imaging.
IN PRACTICE:
“Our findings highlight the importance of mammogram screening and patient education regarding self-detection and can inform future NCCN recommendations for DCIS survivorship care,” the authors concluded, adding that “decreasing the need for in-person breast examinations could allow for other effective methods of survivorship monitoring.”
SOURCE:
This study, led by Bethany T. Waites of Kaiser Permanente San Francisco Medical Center, San Francisco, California, was published online on December 28 in the Journal of the National Comprehensive Cancer Network.
LIMITATIONS:
The retrospective design may have introduced selection bias or confounding. The study’s follow-up period until 2021, including the initial 18 months of the COVID-19 pandemic, may have affected surveillance patterns.
DISCLOSURES:
This study was supported by the Kaiser Permanente Northern California Graduate Medical Education program. The authors declared no relevant financial relationships.
A version of this article appeared on Medscape.com.
TOPLINE:
METHODOLOGY:
- National Comprehensive Cancer Network guidelines recommend DCIS surveillance with a physical exam every 6-12 months for 5 years and then annually with a mammogram every 12 months. Research, however, suggested clinical breast exams only detect 15% of second breast cancers.
- A retrospective cohort study of 1550 female members of Kaiser Permanente Northern California diagnosed with unilateral DCIS between January 1, 2008, and January 1, 2011, who were followed until 2021.
- Patients who developed a second breast cancer within 10 years of follow-up were identified from the electronic health records. The detection methods were categorized into three groups: Patient-detected, physician-detected, and imaging-detected.
TAKEAWAY:
- During follow-up, 11.5% of women developed a second breast cancer with a median time to diagnosis of 57 months. Among patients with second breast cancers, 43.0% were ipsilateral, 54.8% were contralateral, and 2.2% presented with distant metastases.
- Overall, patients had a median of five mammograms between years 1 and 6 of surveillance and a median of seven clinic visits with most providers completing a clinical examination during the visit.
- Second breast cancers were detected through imaging in 74.3% of cases compared with 20.1% detected by patients and only 2.2% detected by physicians during physical exams. The remaining 3.4% were detected incidentally from plastic surgery procedures unrelated to oncologic surveillance.
- Mammogram detected 99.2% of cases (132 of 133 cases) identified by imaging.
IN PRACTICE:
“Our findings highlight the importance of mammogram screening and patient education regarding self-detection and can inform future NCCN recommendations for DCIS survivorship care,” the authors concluded, adding that “decreasing the need for in-person breast examinations could allow for other effective methods of survivorship monitoring.”
SOURCE:
This study, led by Bethany T. Waites of Kaiser Permanente San Francisco Medical Center, San Francisco, California, was published online on December 28 in the Journal of the National Comprehensive Cancer Network.
LIMITATIONS:
The retrospective design may have introduced selection bias or confounding. The study’s follow-up period until 2021, including the initial 18 months of the COVID-19 pandemic, may have affected surveillance patterns.
DISCLOSURES:
This study was supported by the Kaiser Permanente Northern California Graduate Medical Education program. The authors declared no relevant financial relationships.
A version of this article appeared on Medscape.com.
TOPLINE:
METHODOLOGY:
- National Comprehensive Cancer Network guidelines recommend DCIS surveillance with a physical exam every 6-12 months for 5 years and then annually with a mammogram every 12 months. Research, however, suggested clinical breast exams only detect 15% of second breast cancers.
- A retrospective cohort study of 1550 female members of Kaiser Permanente Northern California diagnosed with unilateral DCIS between January 1, 2008, and January 1, 2011, who were followed until 2021.
- Patients who developed a second breast cancer within 10 years of follow-up were identified from the electronic health records. The detection methods were categorized into three groups: Patient-detected, physician-detected, and imaging-detected.
TAKEAWAY:
- During follow-up, 11.5% of women developed a second breast cancer with a median time to diagnosis of 57 months. Among patients with second breast cancers, 43.0% were ipsilateral, 54.8% were contralateral, and 2.2% presented with distant metastases.
- Overall, patients had a median of five mammograms between years 1 and 6 of surveillance and a median of seven clinic visits with most providers completing a clinical examination during the visit.
- Second breast cancers were detected through imaging in 74.3% of cases compared with 20.1% detected by patients and only 2.2% detected by physicians during physical exams. The remaining 3.4% were detected incidentally from plastic surgery procedures unrelated to oncologic surveillance.
- Mammogram detected 99.2% of cases (132 of 133 cases) identified by imaging.
IN PRACTICE:
“Our findings highlight the importance of mammogram screening and patient education regarding self-detection and can inform future NCCN recommendations for DCIS survivorship care,” the authors concluded, adding that “decreasing the need for in-person breast examinations could allow for other effective methods of survivorship monitoring.”
SOURCE:
This study, led by Bethany T. Waites of Kaiser Permanente San Francisco Medical Center, San Francisco, California, was published online on December 28 in the Journal of the National Comprehensive Cancer Network.
LIMITATIONS:
The retrospective design may have introduced selection bias or confounding. The study’s follow-up period until 2021, including the initial 18 months of the COVID-19 pandemic, may have affected surveillance patterns.
DISCLOSURES:
This study was supported by the Kaiser Permanente Northern California Graduate Medical Education program. The authors declared no relevant financial relationships.
A version of this article appeared on Medscape.com.