Article Type
Changed
Tue, 01/31/2023 - 13:52
Display Headline
Fungal Osler Nodes Indicate Candidal Infective Endocarditis

To the Editor:

A 44-year-old woman presented with a low-grade fever (temperature, 38.0 °C) and painful acral lesions of 1 week’s duration. She had a history of hepatitis C viral infection and intravenous (IV) drug use, as well as polymicrobial infective endocarditis that involved the tricuspid and aortic valves; pathogenic organisms were identified via blood culture as Enterococcus faecalis, Serratia species, Streptococcus viridans, and Candida albicans. The patient had received a mechanical aortic valve and bioprosthetic tricuspid valve replacement 5 months prior with warfarin therapy and had completed a postsurgical 6-week course of high-dose micafungin. She reported that she had developed painful, violaceous, thin papules on the plantar surface of the left foot 2 weeks prior to presentation. Her symptoms improved with a short systemic steroid taper; however, within a week she developed new tender, erythematous, thin papules on the plantar surface of the right foot and the palmar surface of the left hand with associated lower extremity swelling. She denied other symptoms, including fever, chills, neurologic symptoms, shortness of breath, chest pain, nausea, vomiting, hematuria, and hematochezia. Due to worsening cutaneous findings, the patient presented to the emergency department, prompting hospital admission for empiric antibacterial therapy with vancomycin and piperacillin-tazobactam for suspected infectious endocarditis. Dermatology was consulted after 1 day of antibacterial therapy without improvement to determine the etiology of the patient’s skin findings.

Physical examination revealed the patient was afebrile with partially blanching violaceous to purpuric, tender, edematous papules on the left fourth and fifth finger pads, as well as scattered, painful, purpuric patches with stellate borders on the right plantar foot (Figure 1). Laboratory test results revealed mild anemia (hemoglobin, 11.9 g/dL [reference range, 12.0–15.0 g/dL], mild neutrophilia (neutrophils, 8.4×109/L [reference range, 1.9–7.9×109/L], elevated acute-phase reactants (erythrocyte sedimentation rate, 71 mm/h [reference range, 0–20 mm/h]; C-reactive protein, 5.7 mg/dL [reference range, 0.0–0.5 mg/dL]), and positive hepatitis C virus antibody with an undetectable viral load. At the time of dermatologic evaluation, admission blood cultures and transthoracic echocardiogram were negative. Additionally, a transesophageal echocardiogram, limited by artifact from the mechanical aortic valve, was equivocal for valvular pathology. Subsequent ophthalmologic evaluation was negative for lesions associated with endocarditis, such as retinal hemorrhages.

A, Left fourth and fifth distal volar fingers with tender, edematous, purpuric papules. B, Right plantar foot with a purpuric stellate patch; similar lesions were present on the left plantar foot (not pictured).
FIGURE 1. A, Left fourth and fifth distal volar fingers with tender, edematous, purpuric papules. B, Right plantar foot with a purpuric stellate patch; similar lesions were present on the left plantar foot (not pictured).

Punch biopsies of the left fourth finger pad were submitted for histopathologic analysis and tissue cultures. Histopathology demonstrated deep dermal perivascular neutrophilic inflammation with multiple intravascular thrombi, perivascular fibrin, and karyorrhectic debris (Figure 2). Periodic acid–Schiff and Grocott-Gomori methenamine-silver stains revealed fungal spores with rare pseudohyphae within the thrombosed vascular spaces and the perivascular dermis, consistent with fungal septic emboli (Figure 3).

A, A punch biopsy of the left fourth finger pad revealed multiple intravascular microthrombi with edema and a dense perivascular neutrophilic infiltrate (H&E, original magnification ×40). B, Higher power showed a thrombus with surrounding fibrin...
FIGURE 2. A, A punch biopsy of the left fourth finger pad revealed multiple intravascular microthrombi with edema and a dense perivascular neutrophilic infiltrate (H&E, original magnification ×40). B, Higher power showed a thrombus with surrounding fibrin deposition and a dense perivascular neutrophilic infiltrate (H&E, original magnification ×100).

Empiric systemic antifungal coverage composed of IV liposomal amphotericin B and oral flucytosine was initiated, and the patient’s tender acral papules rapidly improved. Within 48 hours of biopsy, skin tissue culture confirmed the presence of C albicans. Four days after the preliminary dermatopathology report, confirmatory blood cultures resulted with pansensitive C albicans. Final tissue and blood cultures were negative for bacteria including mycobacteria. In addition to a 6-week course of IV amphotericin B and flucytosine, repeat surgical intervention was considered, and lifelong suppressive antifungal oral therapy was recommended. Unfortunately, the patient did not present for follow-up. Three months later, she presented to the emergency department with peritonitis; in the operating room, she was found to have ischemia of the entirety of the small and large intestines and died shortly thereafter.

 A, Periodic acid–Schiff stain highlighted fungal spores and pseudohyphae within the thrombosed vascular spaces (original magnification ×100). B, Grocott-Gomori methenamine-silver stain demonstrated fungal spores in the thrombosed vascular space
FIGURE 3. A, Periodic acid–Schiff stain highlighted fungal spores and pseudohyphae within the thrombosed vascular spaces (original magnification ×100). B, Grocott-Gomori methenamine-silver stain demonstrated fungal spores in the thrombosed vascular space (original magnification ×100).

Fungal endocarditis is rare, tending to develop in patient populations with particular risk factors such as immune compromise, structural heart defects or prosthetic valves, and IV drug use. Candida infective endocarditis (CIE) represents less than 2% of infective endocarditis cases and carries a high mortality rate (30%–80%).1-3 Diagnosis may be challenging, as the clinical presentation varies widely. Although some patients may present with classic features of infective endocarditis, including fever, cardiac murmurs, and positive blood cultures, many cases of infective endocarditis present with nonspecific symptoms, raising a broad clinical differential diagnosis. Delay in diagnosis, which is seen in 82% of patients with fungal endocarditis, may be attributed to the slow progression of symptoms, inconclusive cardiac imaging, or negative blood cultures seen in almost one-third of cases.2,3 The feared complication of systemic embolization via infective endocarditis may occur in up to one-half of cases, with the highest rates associated with staphylococcal or fungal pathogens.2 The risk for embolization in fungal endocarditis is independent of the size of the cardiac valve vegetations; accordingly, sequelae of embolic complications may arise despite negative cardiac imaging.4 Embolic complications, which typically are seen within the first 2 to 4 weeks of treatment, may serve as the presenting feature of endocarditis and may even occur after completion of antimicrobial therapy.

Detection of cutaneous manifestations of infective endocarditis, including Janeway lesions, Osler nodes, and splinter hemorrhages, may allow for earlier diagnosis. Despite eponymous recognition, Janeway lesions and Osler nodes are relatively uncommon manifestations of infective endocarditis and may be found in only 5% to 15% of cases.5 Biopsies of suspected Janeway lesions and Osler nodes may allow for recognition of relevant vascular pathology, identification of the causative pathogen, and strong support for the diagnosis of infective endocarditis.4-7

The initial photomicrograph of corresponding Janeway lesion histopathology was published by Kerr in 1955 and revealed dermal microabscesses posited to be secondary to bacterial emboli.8,9 Additional cases through the years have reported overlapping histopathologic features of Janeway lesions and Osler nodes, with the latter often defined by the presence of vasculitis.4 Although there appears to be ongoing debate and overlap between the 2 integumentary findings, a general consensus on differentiation takes into account both the clinical signs and symptoms as well as the histopathologic findings.10,11

 

 

Osler nodes present as tender, violaceous, subcutaneous nodules on the acral surfaces, usually on the pads of the fingers and toes.5 The pathogenesis involves the deposition of immune complexes as a sequela of vascular occlusion by microthrombi classically seen in the late phase of subacute endocarditis. Janeway lesions present as nontender erythematous macules on the acral surfaces and are thought to represent microthrombi with dermal microabscesses, more common in acute endocarditis. Our patient demonstrated features of both Osler nodes and Janeway lesions. Despite the presence of fungal thrombi—a pathophysiology closer to that of Janeway lesions—the clinical presentation of painful acral nodules affecting finger pads and histologic features of vasculitis may be better characterized as Osler nodes. Regardless of pathogenesis, these cutaneous findings serve as a minor clinical criterion in the Duke criteria for the diagnosis of infective endocarditis when present.12

Candida infective endocarditis should be suspected in a patient with a history of valvular disease or prior infective endocarditis with fungemia, unexplained neurologic signs, or manifestations of peripheral embolization despite negative blood cultures.3 Particularly in the setting of negative cardiac imaging, recognition of CIE requires heightened diagnostic acumen and clinicopathologic correlation. Although culture and pathologic examination of valvular vegetations represents the gold standard for diagnosis of CIE, aspiration and culture of easily accessible septic emboli may provide rapid identification of the etiologic pathogen. In 1976, Alpert et al13 identified C albicans from an aspirated Osler node. Postmortem examination revealed extensive involvement of the homograft valve and aortic root with C albicans.13 Many other examples exist in the literature demonstrating matching pathogenic isolates from microbiologic cultures of skin and blood.4,9,14,15 Thadepalli and Francis7 investigated 26 cases of endocarditis in heroin users in which the admitting diagnosis was endocarditis in only 4 cases. The etiologic pathogen was aspirated from secondary sites of localized infections secondary to emboli, including cutaneous lesions in 10 of the cases. Gram stain and culture revealed the causative organism leading to the ultimate diagnosis and management in 17 of 26 patients with endocarditis.7

The incidence of fungal endocarditis is increasing, with a reported 67% of cases caused by nosocomial infection.1 Given the rising incidence of fungal endocarditis and its accompanying diagnostic difficulties, including frequently negative blood cultures and cardiac imaging, clinicians must perform careful skin examinations, employ judicious use of skin biopsy, and carefully correlate clinical and pathologic findings to improve recognition of this disease and guide patient care.

References
  1. Arnold CJ, Johnson M, Bayer AS, et al. Infective endocarditis: an observational cohort study with a focus on therapy. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2015;59:2365. doi:10.1128/AAC.04867-14
  2. Chaudhary SC, Sawlani KK, Arora R, et al. Native aortic valve fungal endocarditis. BMJ Case Rep. 2013;2013:bcr2012007144. doi:10.1136/bcr-2012-007144
  3. Ellis ME, Al-Abdely H, Sandridge A, et al. Fungal endocarditis: evidence in the world literature, 1965–1995. Clin Infect Dis. 2001;32:50-62. doi:10.1086/317550
  4. Gil MP, Velasco M, Botella R, et al. Janeway lesions: differential diagnosis with Osler’s nodes. Int J Dermatol. 1993;32:673-674. doi:10.1111/j.1365-4362.1993.tb04025.x
  5. Gomes RT, Tiberto LR, Bello VNM, et al. Dermatologic manifestations of infective endocarditis. An Bras Dermatol. 2016;91:92-94.
  6. Yee JM. Osler’s nodes and the recognition of infective endocarditis: a lesion of diagnostic importance. South Med J. 1987;80:753-757.
  7. Thadepalli H, Francis C. Diagnostic clues in metastatic lesions of endocarditia in addicts. West J Med. 1978;128:1-5.
  8. Kerr A Jr. Subacute Bacterial Endocarditis. Charles C. Thomas; 1955.
  9. Kerr A Jr, Tan JS. Biopsies of the Janeway lesion of infective endocarditis. J Cutan Pathol. 1979;6:124-129. doi:10.1111/j.1600-0560.1979.tb01113.x
  10. Marrie TJ. Osler’s nodes and Janeway lesions. Am J Med. 2008;121:105-106. doi:10.1016/j.amjmed.2007.07.035
  11. Gunson TH, Oliver GF. Osler’s nodes and Janeway lesions. Australas J Dermatol. 2007;48:251-255. doi:10.1111/j.1440-0960.2007.00397.x
  12. Durack DT, Lukes AS, Bright DK, et al. New criteria for diagnosis of infective endocarditis: utilization of specific echocardiographic findings. Am J Med. 1994;96:200-209.
  13. Alpert JS, Krous HF, Dalen JE, et al. Pathogenesis of Osler’s nodes. Ann Intern Med. 1976;85:471-473. doi:10.7326/0003-4819-85-4-471
  14. Cardullo AC, Silvers DN, Grossman ME. Janeway lesions and Osler’s nodes: a review of histopathologic findings. J Am Acad Dermatol. 1990;22:1088-1090. doi:10.1016/0190-9622(90)70157-D
  15. Vinson RP, Chung A, Elston DM, et al. Septic microemboli in a Janeway lesion of bacterial endocarditis. J Am Acad Dermatol. 1996;35:984-985. doi:10.1016/S0190-9622(96)90125-5
Article PDF
Author and Disclosure Information

From Virginia Commonwealth University Health System, Richmond. Ms. Tisdale is from the School of Medicine, Dr. Massoud is from the Department of Dermatology, and Dr. Mochel is from the Departments of Dermatology and Pathology.

The authors report no conflict of interest.

Correspondence: Mark C. Mochel, MD, Department of Pathology, Virginia Commonwealth University Health System, 1200 E Marshall St, Gateway 6, Richmond, VA 23298 (Mark.Mochel@VCUHealth.org).

Issue
Cutis - 111(1)
Publications
Topics
Page Number
E34-E37
Sections
Author and Disclosure Information

From Virginia Commonwealth University Health System, Richmond. Ms. Tisdale is from the School of Medicine, Dr. Massoud is from the Department of Dermatology, and Dr. Mochel is from the Departments of Dermatology and Pathology.

The authors report no conflict of interest.

Correspondence: Mark C. Mochel, MD, Department of Pathology, Virginia Commonwealth University Health System, 1200 E Marshall St, Gateway 6, Richmond, VA 23298 (Mark.Mochel@VCUHealth.org).

Author and Disclosure Information

From Virginia Commonwealth University Health System, Richmond. Ms. Tisdale is from the School of Medicine, Dr. Massoud is from the Department of Dermatology, and Dr. Mochel is from the Departments of Dermatology and Pathology.

The authors report no conflict of interest.

Correspondence: Mark C. Mochel, MD, Department of Pathology, Virginia Commonwealth University Health System, 1200 E Marshall St, Gateway 6, Richmond, VA 23298 (Mark.Mochel@VCUHealth.org).

Article PDF
Article PDF

To the Editor:

A 44-year-old woman presented with a low-grade fever (temperature, 38.0 °C) and painful acral lesions of 1 week’s duration. She had a history of hepatitis C viral infection and intravenous (IV) drug use, as well as polymicrobial infective endocarditis that involved the tricuspid and aortic valves; pathogenic organisms were identified via blood culture as Enterococcus faecalis, Serratia species, Streptococcus viridans, and Candida albicans. The patient had received a mechanical aortic valve and bioprosthetic tricuspid valve replacement 5 months prior with warfarin therapy and had completed a postsurgical 6-week course of high-dose micafungin. She reported that she had developed painful, violaceous, thin papules on the plantar surface of the left foot 2 weeks prior to presentation. Her symptoms improved with a short systemic steroid taper; however, within a week she developed new tender, erythematous, thin papules on the plantar surface of the right foot and the palmar surface of the left hand with associated lower extremity swelling. She denied other symptoms, including fever, chills, neurologic symptoms, shortness of breath, chest pain, nausea, vomiting, hematuria, and hematochezia. Due to worsening cutaneous findings, the patient presented to the emergency department, prompting hospital admission for empiric antibacterial therapy with vancomycin and piperacillin-tazobactam for suspected infectious endocarditis. Dermatology was consulted after 1 day of antibacterial therapy without improvement to determine the etiology of the patient’s skin findings.

Physical examination revealed the patient was afebrile with partially blanching violaceous to purpuric, tender, edematous papules on the left fourth and fifth finger pads, as well as scattered, painful, purpuric patches with stellate borders on the right plantar foot (Figure 1). Laboratory test results revealed mild anemia (hemoglobin, 11.9 g/dL [reference range, 12.0–15.0 g/dL], mild neutrophilia (neutrophils, 8.4×109/L [reference range, 1.9–7.9×109/L], elevated acute-phase reactants (erythrocyte sedimentation rate, 71 mm/h [reference range, 0–20 mm/h]; C-reactive protein, 5.7 mg/dL [reference range, 0.0–0.5 mg/dL]), and positive hepatitis C virus antibody with an undetectable viral load. At the time of dermatologic evaluation, admission blood cultures and transthoracic echocardiogram were negative. Additionally, a transesophageal echocardiogram, limited by artifact from the mechanical aortic valve, was equivocal for valvular pathology. Subsequent ophthalmologic evaluation was negative for lesions associated with endocarditis, such as retinal hemorrhages.

A, Left fourth and fifth distal volar fingers with tender, edematous, purpuric papules. B, Right plantar foot with a purpuric stellate patch; similar lesions were present on the left plantar foot (not pictured).
FIGURE 1. A, Left fourth and fifth distal volar fingers with tender, edematous, purpuric papules. B, Right plantar foot with a purpuric stellate patch; similar lesions were present on the left plantar foot (not pictured).

Punch biopsies of the left fourth finger pad were submitted for histopathologic analysis and tissue cultures. Histopathology demonstrated deep dermal perivascular neutrophilic inflammation with multiple intravascular thrombi, perivascular fibrin, and karyorrhectic debris (Figure 2). Periodic acid–Schiff and Grocott-Gomori methenamine-silver stains revealed fungal spores with rare pseudohyphae within the thrombosed vascular spaces and the perivascular dermis, consistent with fungal septic emboli (Figure 3).

A, A punch biopsy of the left fourth finger pad revealed multiple intravascular microthrombi with edema and a dense perivascular neutrophilic infiltrate (H&E, original magnification ×40). B, Higher power showed a thrombus with surrounding fibrin...
FIGURE 2. A, A punch biopsy of the left fourth finger pad revealed multiple intravascular microthrombi with edema and a dense perivascular neutrophilic infiltrate (H&E, original magnification ×40). B, Higher power showed a thrombus with surrounding fibrin deposition and a dense perivascular neutrophilic infiltrate (H&E, original magnification ×100).

Empiric systemic antifungal coverage composed of IV liposomal amphotericin B and oral flucytosine was initiated, and the patient’s tender acral papules rapidly improved. Within 48 hours of biopsy, skin tissue culture confirmed the presence of C albicans. Four days after the preliminary dermatopathology report, confirmatory blood cultures resulted with pansensitive C albicans. Final tissue and blood cultures were negative for bacteria including mycobacteria. In addition to a 6-week course of IV amphotericin B and flucytosine, repeat surgical intervention was considered, and lifelong suppressive antifungal oral therapy was recommended. Unfortunately, the patient did not present for follow-up. Three months later, she presented to the emergency department with peritonitis; in the operating room, she was found to have ischemia of the entirety of the small and large intestines and died shortly thereafter.

 A, Periodic acid–Schiff stain highlighted fungal spores and pseudohyphae within the thrombosed vascular spaces (original magnification ×100). B, Grocott-Gomori methenamine-silver stain demonstrated fungal spores in the thrombosed vascular space
FIGURE 3. A, Periodic acid–Schiff stain highlighted fungal spores and pseudohyphae within the thrombosed vascular spaces (original magnification ×100). B, Grocott-Gomori methenamine-silver stain demonstrated fungal spores in the thrombosed vascular space (original magnification ×100).

Fungal endocarditis is rare, tending to develop in patient populations with particular risk factors such as immune compromise, structural heart defects or prosthetic valves, and IV drug use. Candida infective endocarditis (CIE) represents less than 2% of infective endocarditis cases and carries a high mortality rate (30%–80%).1-3 Diagnosis may be challenging, as the clinical presentation varies widely. Although some patients may present with classic features of infective endocarditis, including fever, cardiac murmurs, and positive blood cultures, many cases of infective endocarditis present with nonspecific symptoms, raising a broad clinical differential diagnosis. Delay in diagnosis, which is seen in 82% of patients with fungal endocarditis, may be attributed to the slow progression of symptoms, inconclusive cardiac imaging, or negative blood cultures seen in almost one-third of cases.2,3 The feared complication of systemic embolization via infective endocarditis may occur in up to one-half of cases, with the highest rates associated with staphylococcal or fungal pathogens.2 The risk for embolization in fungal endocarditis is independent of the size of the cardiac valve vegetations; accordingly, sequelae of embolic complications may arise despite negative cardiac imaging.4 Embolic complications, which typically are seen within the first 2 to 4 weeks of treatment, may serve as the presenting feature of endocarditis and may even occur after completion of antimicrobial therapy.

Detection of cutaneous manifestations of infective endocarditis, including Janeway lesions, Osler nodes, and splinter hemorrhages, may allow for earlier diagnosis. Despite eponymous recognition, Janeway lesions and Osler nodes are relatively uncommon manifestations of infective endocarditis and may be found in only 5% to 15% of cases.5 Biopsies of suspected Janeway lesions and Osler nodes may allow for recognition of relevant vascular pathology, identification of the causative pathogen, and strong support for the diagnosis of infective endocarditis.4-7

The initial photomicrograph of corresponding Janeway lesion histopathology was published by Kerr in 1955 and revealed dermal microabscesses posited to be secondary to bacterial emboli.8,9 Additional cases through the years have reported overlapping histopathologic features of Janeway lesions and Osler nodes, with the latter often defined by the presence of vasculitis.4 Although there appears to be ongoing debate and overlap between the 2 integumentary findings, a general consensus on differentiation takes into account both the clinical signs and symptoms as well as the histopathologic findings.10,11

 

 

Osler nodes present as tender, violaceous, subcutaneous nodules on the acral surfaces, usually on the pads of the fingers and toes.5 The pathogenesis involves the deposition of immune complexes as a sequela of vascular occlusion by microthrombi classically seen in the late phase of subacute endocarditis. Janeway lesions present as nontender erythematous macules on the acral surfaces and are thought to represent microthrombi with dermal microabscesses, more common in acute endocarditis. Our patient demonstrated features of both Osler nodes and Janeway lesions. Despite the presence of fungal thrombi—a pathophysiology closer to that of Janeway lesions—the clinical presentation of painful acral nodules affecting finger pads and histologic features of vasculitis may be better characterized as Osler nodes. Regardless of pathogenesis, these cutaneous findings serve as a minor clinical criterion in the Duke criteria for the diagnosis of infective endocarditis when present.12

Candida infective endocarditis should be suspected in a patient with a history of valvular disease or prior infective endocarditis with fungemia, unexplained neurologic signs, or manifestations of peripheral embolization despite negative blood cultures.3 Particularly in the setting of negative cardiac imaging, recognition of CIE requires heightened diagnostic acumen and clinicopathologic correlation. Although culture and pathologic examination of valvular vegetations represents the gold standard for diagnosis of CIE, aspiration and culture of easily accessible septic emboli may provide rapid identification of the etiologic pathogen. In 1976, Alpert et al13 identified C albicans from an aspirated Osler node. Postmortem examination revealed extensive involvement of the homograft valve and aortic root with C albicans.13 Many other examples exist in the literature demonstrating matching pathogenic isolates from microbiologic cultures of skin and blood.4,9,14,15 Thadepalli and Francis7 investigated 26 cases of endocarditis in heroin users in which the admitting diagnosis was endocarditis in only 4 cases. The etiologic pathogen was aspirated from secondary sites of localized infections secondary to emboli, including cutaneous lesions in 10 of the cases. Gram stain and culture revealed the causative organism leading to the ultimate diagnosis and management in 17 of 26 patients with endocarditis.7

The incidence of fungal endocarditis is increasing, with a reported 67% of cases caused by nosocomial infection.1 Given the rising incidence of fungal endocarditis and its accompanying diagnostic difficulties, including frequently negative blood cultures and cardiac imaging, clinicians must perform careful skin examinations, employ judicious use of skin biopsy, and carefully correlate clinical and pathologic findings to improve recognition of this disease and guide patient care.

To the Editor:

A 44-year-old woman presented with a low-grade fever (temperature, 38.0 °C) and painful acral lesions of 1 week’s duration. She had a history of hepatitis C viral infection and intravenous (IV) drug use, as well as polymicrobial infective endocarditis that involved the tricuspid and aortic valves; pathogenic organisms were identified via blood culture as Enterococcus faecalis, Serratia species, Streptococcus viridans, and Candida albicans. The patient had received a mechanical aortic valve and bioprosthetic tricuspid valve replacement 5 months prior with warfarin therapy and had completed a postsurgical 6-week course of high-dose micafungin. She reported that she had developed painful, violaceous, thin papules on the plantar surface of the left foot 2 weeks prior to presentation. Her symptoms improved with a short systemic steroid taper; however, within a week she developed new tender, erythematous, thin papules on the plantar surface of the right foot and the palmar surface of the left hand with associated lower extremity swelling. She denied other symptoms, including fever, chills, neurologic symptoms, shortness of breath, chest pain, nausea, vomiting, hematuria, and hematochezia. Due to worsening cutaneous findings, the patient presented to the emergency department, prompting hospital admission for empiric antibacterial therapy with vancomycin and piperacillin-tazobactam for suspected infectious endocarditis. Dermatology was consulted after 1 day of antibacterial therapy without improvement to determine the etiology of the patient’s skin findings.

Physical examination revealed the patient was afebrile with partially blanching violaceous to purpuric, tender, edematous papules on the left fourth and fifth finger pads, as well as scattered, painful, purpuric patches with stellate borders on the right plantar foot (Figure 1). Laboratory test results revealed mild anemia (hemoglobin, 11.9 g/dL [reference range, 12.0–15.0 g/dL], mild neutrophilia (neutrophils, 8.4×109/L [reference range, 1.9–7.9×109/L], elevated acute-phase reactants (erythrocyte sedimentation rate, 71 mm/h [reference range, 0–20 mm/h]; C-reactive protein, 5.7 mg/dL [reference range, 0.0–0.5 mg/dL]), and positive hepatitis C virus antibody with an undetectable viral load. At the time of dermatologic evaluation, admission blood cultures and transthoracic echocardiogram were negative. Additionally, a transesophageal echocardiogram, limited by artifact from the mechanical aortic valve, was equivocal for valvular pathology. Subsequent ophthalmologic evaluation was negative for lesions associated with endocarditis, such as retinal hemorrhages.

A, Left fourth and fifth distal volar fingers with tender, edematous, purpuric papules. B, Right plantar foot with a purpuric stellate patch; similar lesions were present on the left plantar foot (not pictured).
FIGURE 1. A, Left fourth and fifth distal volar fingers with tender, edematous, purpuric papules. B, Right plantar foot with a purpuric stellate patch; similar lesions were present on the left plantar foot (not pictured).

Punch biopsies of the left fourth finger pad were submitted for histopathologic analysis and tissue cultures. Histopathology demonstrated deep dermal perivascular neutrophilic inflammation with multiple intravascular thrombi, perivascular fibrin, and karyorrhectic debris (Figure 2). Periodic acid–Schiff and Grocott-Gomori methenamine-silver stains revealed fungal spores with rare pseudohyphae within the thrombosed vascular spaces and the perivascular dermis, consistent with fungal septic emboli (Figure 3).

A, A punch biopsy of the left fourth finger pad revealed multiple intravascular microthrombi with edema and a dense perivascular neutrophilic infiltrate (H&E, original magnification ×40). B, Higher power showed a thrombus with surrounding fibrin...
FIGURE 2. A, A punch biopsy of the left fourth finger pad revealed multiple intravascular microthrombi with edema and a dense perivascular neutrophilic infiltrate (H&E, original magnification ×40). B, Higher power showed a thrombus with surrounding fibrin deposition and a dense perivascular neutrophilic infiltrate (H&E, original magnification ×100).

Empiric systemic antifungal coverage composed of IV liposomal amphotericin B and oral flucytosine was initiated, and the patient’s tender acral papules rapidly improved. Within 48 hours of biopsy, skin tissue culture confirmed the presence of C albicans. Four days after the preliminary dermatopathology report, confirmatory blood cultures resulted with pansensitive C albicans. Final tissue and blood cultures were negative for bacteria including mycobacteria. In addition to a 6-week course of IV amphotericin B and flucytosine, repeat surgical intervention was considered, and lifelong suppressive antifungal oral therapy was recommended. Unfortunately, the patient did not present for follow-up. Three months later, she presented to the emergency department with peritonitis; in the operating room, she was found to have ischemia of the entirety of the small and large intestines and died shortly thereafter.

 A, Periodic acid–Schiff stain highlighted fungal spores and pseudohyphae within the thrombosed vascular spaces (original magnification ×100). B, Grocott-Gomori methenamine-silver stain demonstrated fungal spores in the thrombosed vascular space
FIGURE 3. A, Periodic acid–Schiff stain highlighted fungal spores and pseudohyphae within the thrombosed vascular spaces (original magnification ×100). B, Grocott-Gomori methenamine-silver stain demonstrated fungal spores in the thrombosed vascular space (original magnification ×100).

Fungal endocarditis is rare, tending to develop in patient populations with particular risk factors such as immune compromise, structural heart defects or prosthetic valves, and IV drug use. Candida infective endocarditis (CIE) represents less than 2% of infective endocarditis cases and carries a high mortality rate (30%–80%).1-3 Diagnosis may be challenging, as the clinical presentation varies widely. Although some patients may present with classic features of infective endocarditis, including fever, cardiac murmurs, and positive blood cultures, many cases of infective endocarditis present with nonspecific symptoms, raising a broad clinical differential diagnosis. Delay in diagnosis, which is seen in 82% of patients with fungal endocarditis, may be attributed to the slow progression of symptoms, inconclusive cardiac imaging, or negative blood cultures seen in almost one-third of cases.2,3 The feared complication of systemic embolization via infective endocarditis may occur in up to one-half of cases, with the highest rates associated with staphylococcal or fungal pathogens.2 The risk for embolization in fungal endocarditis is independent of the size of the cardiac valve vegetations; accordingly, sequelae of embolic complications may arise despite negative cardiac imaging.4 Embolic complications, which typically are seen within the first 2 to 4 weeks of treatment, may serve as the presenting feature of endocarditis and may even occur after completion of antimicrobial therapy.

Detection of cutaneous manifestations of infective endocarditis, including Janeway lesions, Osler nodes, and splinter hemorrhages, may allow for earlier diagnosis. Despite eponymous recognition, Janeway lesions and Osler nodes are relatively uncommon manifestations of infective endocarditis and may be found in only 5% to 15% of cases.5 Biopsies of suspected Janeway lesions and Osler nodes may allow for recognition of relevant vascular pathology, identification of the causative pathogen, and strong support for the diagnosis of infective endocarditis.4-7

The initial photomicrograph of corresponding Janeway lesion histopathology was published by Kerr in 1955 and revealed dermal microabscesses posited to be secondary to bacterial emboli.8,9 Additional cases through the years have reported overlapping histopathologic features of Janeway lesions and Osler nodes, with the latter often defined by the presence of vasculitis.4 Although there appears to be ongoing debate and overlap between the 2 integumentary findings, a general consensus on differentiation takes into account both the clinical signs and symptoms as well as the histopathologic findings.10,11

 

 

Osler nodes present as tender, violaceous, subcutaneous nodules on the acral surfaces, usually on the pads of the fingers and toes.5 The pathogenesis involves the deposition of immune complexes as a sequela of vascular occlusion by microthrombi classically seen in the late phase of subacute endocarditis. Janeway lesions present as nontender erythematous macules on the acral surfaces and are thought to represent microthrombi with dermal microabscesses, more common in acute endocarditis. Our patient demonstrated features of both Osler nodes and Janeway lesions. Despite the presence of fungal thrombi—a pathophysiology closer to that of Janeway lesions—the clinical presentation of painful acral nodules affecting finger pads and histologic features of vasculitis may be better characterized as Osler nodes. Regardless of pathogenesis, these cutaneous findings serve as a minor clinical criterion in the Duke criteria for the diagnosis of infective endocarditis when present.12

Candida infective endocarditis should be suspected in a patient with a history of valvular disease or prior infective endocarditis with fungemia, unexplained neurologic signs, or manifestations of peripheral embolization despite negative blood cultures.3 Particularly in the setting of negative cardiac imaging, recognition of CIE requires heightened diagnostic acumen and clinicopathologic correlation. Although culture and pathologic examination of valvular vegetations represents the gold standard for diagnosis of CIE, aspiration and culture of easily accessible septic emboli may provide rapid identification of the etiologic pathogen. In 1976, Alpert et al13 identified C albicans from an aspirated Osler node. Postmortem examination revealed extensive involvement of the homograft valve and aortic root with C albicans.13 Many other examples exist in the literature demonstrating matching pathogenic isolates from microbiologic cultures of skin and blood.4,9,14,15 Thadepalli and Francis7 investigated 26 cases of endocarditis in heroin users in which the admitting diagnosis was endocarditis in only 4 cases. The etiologic pathogen was aspirated from secondary sites of localized infections secondary to emboli, including cutaneous lesions in 10 of the cases. Gram stain and culture revealed the causative organism leading to the ultimate diagnosis and management in 17 of 26 patients with endocarditis.7

The incidence of fungal endocarditis is increasing, with a reported 67% of cases caused by nosocomial infection.1 Given the rising incidence of fungal endocarditis and its accompanying diagnostic difficulties, including frequently negative blood cultures and cardiac imaging, clinicians must perform careful skin examinations, employ judicious use of skin biopsy, and carefully correlate clinical and pathologic findings to improve recognition of this disease and guide patient care.

References
  1. Arnold CJ, Johnson M, Bayer AS, et al. Infective endocarditis: an observational cohort study with a focus on therapy. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2015;59:2365. doi:10.1128/AAC.04867-14
  2. Chaudhary SC, Sawlani KK, Arora R, et al. Native aortic valve fungal endocarditis. BMJ Case Rep. 2013;2013:bcr2012007144. doi:10.1136/bcr-2012-007144
  3. Ellis ME, Al-Abdely H, Sandridge A, et al. Fungal endocarditis: evidence in the world literature, 1965–1995. Clin Infect Dis. 2001;32:50-62. doi:10.1086/317550
  4. Gil MP, Velasco M, Botella R, et al. Janeway lesions: differential diagnosis with Osler’s nodes. Int J Dermatol. 1993;32:673-674. doi:10.1111/j.1365-4362.1993.tb04025.x
  5. Gomes RT, Tiberto LR, Bello VNM, et al. Dermatologic manifestations of infective endocarditis. An Bras Dermatol. 2016;91:92-94.
  6. Yee JM. Osler’s nodes and the recognition of infective endocarditis: a lesion of diagnostic importance. South Med J. 1987;80:753-757.
  7. Thadepalli H, Francis C. Diagnostic clues in metastatic lesions of endocarditia in addicts. West J Med. 1978;128:1-5.
  8. Kerr A Jr. Subacute Bacterial Endocarditis. Charles C. Thomas; 1955.
  9. Kerr A Jr, Tan JS. Biopsies of the Janeway lesion of infective endocarditis. J Cutan Pathol. 1979;6:124-129. doi:10.1111/j.1600-0560.1979.tb01113.x
  10. Marrie TJ. Osler’s nodes and Janeway lesions. Am J Med. 2008;121:105-106. doi:10.1016/j.amjmed.2007.07.035
  11. Gunson TH, Oliver GF. Osler’s nodes and Janeway lesions. Australas J Dermatol. 2007;48:251-255. doi:10.1111/j.1440-0960.2007.00397.x
  12. Durack DT, Lukes AS, Bright DK, et al. New criteria for diagnosis of infective endocarditis: utilization of specific echocardiographic findings. Am J Med. 1994;96:200-209.
  13. Alpert JS, Krous HF, Dalen JE, et al. Pathogenesis of Osler’s nodes. Ann Intern Med. 1976;85:471-473. doi:10.7326/0003-4819-85-4-471
  14. Cardullo AC, Silvers DN, Grossman ME. Janeway lesions and Osler’s nodes: a review of histopathologic findings. J Am Acad Dermatol. 1990;22:1088-1090. doi:10.1016/0190-9622(90)70157-D
  15. Vinson RP, Chung A, Elston DM, et al. Septic microemboli in a Janeway lesion of bacterial endocarditis. J Am Acad Dermatol. 1996;35:984-985. doi:10.1016/S0190-9622(96)90125-5
References
  1. Arnold CJ, Johnson M, Bayer AS, et al. Infective endocarditis: an observational cohort study with a focus on therapy. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2015;59:2365. doi:10.1128/AAC.04867-14
  2. Chaudhary SC, Sawlani KK, Arora R, et al. Native aortic valve fungal endocarditis. BMJ Case Rep. 2013;2013:bcr2012007144. doi:10.1136/bcr-2012-007144
  3. Ellis ME, Al-Abdely H, Sandridge A, et al. Fungal endocarditis: evidence in the world literature, 1965–1995. Clin Infect Dis. 2001;32:50-62. doi:10.1086/317550
  4. Gil MP, Velasco M, Botella R, et al. Janeway lesions: differential diagnosis with Osler’s nodes. Int J Dermatol. 1993;32:673-674. doi:10.1111/j.1365-4362.1993.tb04025.x
  5. Gomes RT, Tiberto LR, Bello VNM, et al. Dermatologic manifestations of infective endocarditis. An Bras Dermatol. 2016;91:92-94.
  6. Yee JM. Osler’s nodes and the recognition of infective endocarditis: a lesion of diagnostic importance. South Med J. 1987;80:753-757.
  7. Thadepalli H, Francis C. Diagnostic clues in metastatic lesions of endocarditia in addicts. West J Med. 1978;128:1-5.
  8. Kerr A Jr. Subacute Bacterial Endocarditis. Charles C. Thomas; 1955.
  9. Kerr A Jr, Tan JS. Biopsies of the Janeway lesion of infective endocarditis. J Cutan Pathol. 1979;6:124-129. doi:10.1111/j.1600-0560.1979.tb01113.x
  10. Marrie TJ. Osler’s nodes and Janeway lesions. Am J Med. 2008;121:105-106. doi:10.1016/j.amjmed.2007.07.035
  11. Gunson TH, Oliver GF. Osler’s nodes and Janeway lesions. Australas J Dermatol. 2007;48:251-255. doi:10.1111/j.1440-0960.2007.00397.x
  12. Durack DT, Lukes AS, Bright DK, et al. New criteria for diagnosis of infective endocarditis: utilization of specific echocardiographic findings. Am J Med. 1994;96:200-209.
  13. Alpert JS, Krous HF, Dalen JE, et al. Pathogenesis of Osler’s nodes. Ann Intern Med. 1976;85:471-473. doi:10.7326/0003-4819-85-4-471
  14. Cardullo AC, Silvers DN, Grossman ME. Janeway lesions and Osler’s nodes: a review of histopathologic findings. J Am Acad Dermatol. 1990;22:1088-1090. doi:10.1016/0190-9622(90)70157-D
  15. Vinson RP, Chung A, Elston DM, et al. Septic microemboli in a Janeway lesion of bacterial endocarditis. J Am Acad Dermatol. 1996;35:984-985. doi:10.1016/S0190-9622(96)90125-5
Issue
Cutis - 111(1)
Issue
Cutis - 111(1)
Page Number
E34-E37
Page Number
E34-E37
Publications
Publications
Topics
Article Type
Display Headline
Fungal Osler Nodes Indicate Candidal Infective Endocarditis
Display Headline
Fungal Osler Nodes Indicate Candidal Infective Endocarditis
Sections
Inside the Article

PRACTICE POINTS

  • Fungal infective endocarditis is rare, and diagnostic tests such as blood cultures and echocardiography may not detect the disease.
  • The mortality rate of fungal endocarditis is high, with improved clinical outcomes if diagnosed and treated early.
  • Clinicopathologic correlation between integumentary examination and skin biopsy findings may provide timely diagnosis, thereby guiding appropriate therapy.
Disallow All Ads
Content Gating
No Gating (article Unlocked/Free)
Alternative CME
Disqus Comments
Default
Use ProPublica
Hide sidebar & use full width
render the right sidebar.
Conference Recap Checkbox
Not Conference Recap
Clinical Edge
Display the Slideshow in this Article
Medscape Article
Display survey writer
Reuters content
Disable Inline Native ads
WebMD Article
Article PDF Media