Article Type
Changed
Fri, 01/04/2019 - 14:14

 

Socioeconomic status, as measured by insurance status, was associated with survival among patients with non–small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and pretreatment cancer-associated weight loss, in a retrospective review of medical records.

SOURCE: Lau S et al. J Oncol Pract. 2018 Mar 20. doi: 10.1200/JOP.2017.025239

Publications
Topics
Sections

 

Socioeconomic status, as measured by insurance status, was associated with survival among patients with non–small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and pretreatment cancer-associated weight loss, in a retrospective review of medical records.

SOURCE: Lau S et al. J Oncol Pract. 2018 Mar 20. doi: 10.1200/JOP.2017.025239

 

Socioeconomic status, as measured by insurance status, was associated with survival among patients with non–small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and pretreatment cancer-associated weight loss, in a retrospective review of medical records.

SOURCE: Lau S et al. J Oncol Pract. 2018 Mar 20. doi: 10.1200/JOP.2017.025239

Publications
Publications
Topics
Article Type
Sections
Article Source

FROM JOURNAL OF ONCOLOGY PRACTICE

Disallow All Ads
Content Gating
No Gating (article Unlocked/Free)
Alternative CME
Vitals

 

Key clinical point: Early recognition and management of cancer-associated weight loss in patients with NSCLC and low socioeconomic status may improve outcomes.

Major finding: Lack of insurance was significantly prognostic among patients with NSCLC and pretreatment weight loss (hazard ratio, 1.63 95% CI, 1.14-2.35).

Study details: 1,366 adult patients with NSCLC consecutively treated at a tertiary care health system between Jan. 1, 2006, and Dec. 31, 2013.

Disclosures: The study was supported in part by National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences grants TL1TR001104 and UL1TR001105. Dr. Lau reported employment with LabCorp by an immediate family member. Coauthors reported financial ties to Advenchen Laboratories, Macrogen, Peregrine Pharmaceuticals, and DFINE.

Source: Lau S et al. J Oncol Pract. 2018 Mar 20. doi: 10.1200/JOP.2017.025239.

Disqus Comments
Default