Article Type
Changed
Fri, 06/21/2024 - 15:46

 

TOPLINE:

Lung cancer screening was associated with earlier-stage diagnoses and improved survival in a retrospective analysis of a large cohort with low screening uptake. 

METHODOLOGY:

  • Randomized trials have shown a mortality benefit with low-dose CT screening to detect lung cancer, but the benefits in clinical practice remain unclear, and lung cancer screening uptake has been slow.
  • In this study, researchers assessed the impact of lung cancer screening among Veteran Health Administration patients diagnosed with lung cancer between 2011 and 2018.
  • The team evaluated lung cancer stage at diagnosis, lung cancer–specific survival, and overall survival in patients with lung cancer who did vs did not receive screening before their diagnosis.
  • Statistical analyses included Cox regression modeling and inverse propensity weighting with lead-time bias adjustment.

TAKEAWAY:

  • Among 57,919 individuals diagnosed with lung cancer during the study period, 2167 (3.9%) underwent screening with at least one low-dose CT before receiving their diagnosis. There were no significant differences in age, gender, or race among patients who had prior screening and those who did not.
  • Screened patients had double the rate of stage I diagnoses compared with unscreened patients (52% vs 27%) and about one third the rate of stage IV diagnoses (11% vs 32%).
  • Patients who received screening before their cancer diagnosis had better overall survival rates compared with unscreened patients. The overall survival rates were 81.2% vs 56.6% at 1 year, 69.9% vs 41.1% at 2 years, and 44.9% vs 22.3% at 5 years, respectively. Lung cancer–specific survival was also better: The survival rates were 82.5% vs 58.7% at 1 year, 74.3% vs 44.4% at 2 years, and 59.0% vs 29.7% at 5 years, respectively.
  • A subset analysis of screening-eligible patients (defined as those between the ages of 50-88 who were smokers with a pack-year history of ≥ 20 years or former smokers who quit within 15 years) showed that among those who underwent National Comprehensive Cancer Network guideline-concordant treatment within 12 months of diagnosis, screening resulted in “substantial” reductions in all-cause mortality (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR], 0.79) and lung cancer–specific mortality (aHR, 0.61).

IN PRACTICE:

“These findings provide corroboration of the results of randomized [lung cancer screening] trials in clinical practice,” the authors wrote. “We hope that the striking association between [lung cancer screening], earlier stage diagnosis of lung cancer, and improved mortality spurs a more robust uptake of this life-saving intervention into clinical practice.”

SOURCE:

The study, led by Donna M. Edwards MD, PhD, of the University of Michigan School of Medicine, Ann Arbor, Michigan, was published online in Cancer.

LIMITATIONS:

The study was limited by its retrospective and correlative design, and the authors also were unable to assess whether lung cancer screening contributed to more subsequence procedures in screened vs unscreened patients.

DISCLOSURES:

The study was funded by the LUNGevity Foundation, US Department of Veterans Affairs, National Cancer Institute, and Lung Precision Oncology Program. One author declared being a consultant for industry. The other authors declared no conflicts of interest.

A version of this article first appeared on Medscape.com.

Publications
Topics
Sections

 

TOPLINE:

Lung cancer screening was associated with earlier-stage diagnoses and improved survival in a retrospective analysis of a large cohort with low screening uptake. 

METHODOLOGY:

  • Randomized trials have shown a mortality benefit with low-dose CT screening to detect lung cancer, but the benefits in clinical practice remain unclear, and lung cancer screening uptake has been slow.
  • In this study, researchers assessed the impact of lung cancer screening among Veteran Health Administration patients diagnosed with lung cancer between 2011 and 2018.
  • The team evaluated lung cancer stage at diagnosis, lung cancer–specific survival, and overall survival in patients with lung cancer who did vs did not receive screening before their diagnosis.
  • Statistical analyses included Cox regression modeling and inverse propensity weighting with lead-time bias adjustment.

TAKEAWAY:

  • Among 57,919 individuals diagnosed with lung cancer during the study period, 2167 (3.9%) underwent screening with at least one low-dose CT before receiving their diagnosis. There were no significant differences in age, gender, or race among patients who had prior screening and those who did not.
  • Screened patients had double the rate of stage I diagnoses compared with unscreened patients (52% vs 27%) and about one third the rate of stage IV diagnoses (11% vs 32%).
  • Patients who received screening before their cancer diagnosis had better overall survival rates compared with unscreened patients. The overall survival rates were 81.2% vs 56.6% at 1 year, 69.9% vs 41.1% at 2 years, and 44.9% vs 22.3% at 5 years, respectively. Lung cancer–specific survival was also better: The survival rates were 82.5% vs 58.7% at 1 year, 74.3% vs 44.4% at 2 years, and 59.0% vs 29.7% at 5 years, respectively.
  • A subset analysis of screening-eligible patients (defined as those between the ages of 50-88 who were smokers with a pack-year history of ≥ 20 years or former smokers who quit within 15 years) showed that among those who underwent National Comprehensive Cancer Network guideline-concordant treatment within 12 months of diagnosis, screening resulted in “substantial” reductions in all-cause mortality (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR], 0.79) and lung cancer–specific mortality (aHR, 0.61).

IN PRACTICE:

“These findings provide corroboration of the results of randomized [lung cancer screening] trials in clinical practice,” the authors wrote. “We hope that the striking association between [lung cancer screening], earlier stage diagnosis of lung cancer, and improved mortality spurs a more robust uptake of this life-saving intervention into clinical practice.”

SOURCE:

The study, led by Donna M. Edwards MD, PhD, of the University of Michigan School of Medicine, Ann Arbor, Michigan, was published online in Cancer.

LIMITATIONS:

The study was limited by its retrospective and correlative design, and the authors also were unable to assess whether lung cancer screening contributed to more subsequence procedures in screened vs unscreened patients.

DISCLOSURES:

The study was funded by the LUNGevity Foundation, US Department of Veterans Affairs, National Cancer Institute, and Lung Precision Oncology Program. One author declared being a consultant for industry. The other authors declared no conflicts of interest.

A version of this article first appeared on Medscape.com.

 

TOPLINE:

Lung cancer screening was associated with earlier-stage diagnoses and improved survival in a retrospective analysis of a large cohort with low screening uptake. 

METHODOLOGY:

  • Randomized trials have shown a mortality benefit with low-dose CT screening to detect lung cancer, but the benefits in clinical practice remain unclear, and lung cancer screening uptake has been slow.
  • In this study, researchers assessed the impact of lung cancer screening among Veteran Health Administration patients diagnosed with lung cancer between 2011 and 2018.
  • The team evaluated lung cancer stage at diagnosis, lung cancer–specific survival, and overall survival in patients with lung cancer who did vs did not receive screening before their diagnosis.
  • Statistical analyses included Cox regression modeling and inverse propensity weighting with lead-time bias adjustment.

TAKEAWAY:

  • Among 57,919 individuals diagnosed with lung cancer during the study period, 2167 (3.9%) underwent screening with at least one low-dose CT before receiving their diagnosis. There were no significant differences in age, gender, or race among patients who had prior screening and those who did not.
  • Screened patients had double the rate of stage I diagnoses compared with unscreened patients (52% vs 27%) and about one third the rate of stage IV diagnoses (11% vs 32%).
  • Patients who received screening before their cancer diagnosis had better overall survival rates compared with unscreened patients. The overall survival rates were 81.2% vs 56.6% at 1 year, 69.9% vs 41.1% at 2 years, and 44.9% vs 22.3% at 5 years, respectively. Lung cancer–specific survival was also better: The survival rates were 82.5% vs 58.7% at 1 year, 74.3% vs 44.4% at 2 years, and 59.0% vs 29.7% at 5 years, respectively.
  • A subset analysis of screening-eligible patients (defined as those between the ages of 50-88 who were smokers with a pack-year history of ≥ 20 years or former smokers who quit within 15 years) showed that among those who underwent National Comprehensive Cancer Network guideline-concordant treatment within 12 months of diagnosis, screening resulted in “substantial” reductions in all-cause mortality (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR], 0.79) and lung cancer–specific mortality (aHR, 0.61).

IN PRACTICE:

“These findings provide corroboration of the results of randomized [lung cancer screening] trials in clinical practice,” the authors wrote. “We hope that the striking association between [lung cancer screening], earlier stage diagnosis of lung cancer, and improved mortality spurs a more robust uptake of this life-saving intervention into clinical practice.”

SOURCE:

The study, led by Donna M. Edwards MD, PhD, of the University of Michigan School of Medicine, Ann Arbor, Michigan, was published online in Cancer.

LIMITATIONS:

The study was limited by its retrospective and correlative design, and the authors also were unable to assess whether lung cancer screening contributed to more subsequence procedures in screened vs unscreened patients.

DISCLOSURES:

The study was funded by the LUNGevity Foundation, US Department of Veterans Affairs, National Cancer Institute, and Lung Precision Oncology Program. One author declared being a consultant for industry. The other authors declared no conflicts of interest.

A version of this article first appeared on Medscape.com.

Publications
Publications
Topics
Article Type
Sections
Teambase XML
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!--$RCSfile: InCopy_agile.xsl,v $ $Revision: 1.35 $-->
<!--$RCSfile: drupal.xsl,v $ $Revision: 1.7 $-->
<root generator="drupal.xsl" gversion="1.7"> <header> <fileName>168504</fileName> <TBEID>0C050ADB.SIG</TBEID> <TBUniqueIdentifier>MD_0C050ADB</TBUniqueIdentifier> <newsOrJournal>News</newsOrJournal> <publisherName>Frontline Medical Communications</publisherName> <storyname/> <articleType>2</articleType> <TBLocation>QC Done-All Pubs</TBLocation> <QCDate>20240621T150428</QCDate> <firstPublished>20240621T154404</firstPublished> <LastPublished>20240621T154404</LastPublished> <pubStatus qcode="stat:"/> <embargoDate/> <killDate/> <CMSDate>20240621T154404</CMSDate> <articleSource/> <facebookInfo/> <meetingNumber/> <byline>MARILYNN LARKIN</byline> <bylineText>MARILYNN LARKIN</bylineText> <bylineFull>MARILYNN LARKIN</bylineFull> <bylineTitleText/> <USOrGlobal/> <wireDocType/> <newsDocType/> <journalDocType/> <linkLabel/> <pageRange/> <citation/> <quizID/> <indexIssueDate/> <itemClass qcode="ninat:text"/> <provider qcode="provider:imng"> <name>IMNG Medical Media</name> <rightsInfo> <copyrightHolder> <name>Frontline Medical News</name> </copyrightHolder> <copyrightNotice>Copyright (c) 2015 Frontline Medical News, a Frontline Medical Communications Inc. company. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, copied, or otherwise reproduced or distributed without the prior written permission of Frontline Medical Communications Inc.</copyrightNotice> </rightsInfo> </provider> <abstract/> <metaDescription>Lung cancer screening was associated with earlier-stage diagnoses and improved survival in a retrospective analysis of a large cohort with low screening uptake.</metaDescription> <articlePDF/> <teaserImage/> <teaser>Screened patients had higher rates of diagnosis compared with unscreened patients and better overall survival rates.</teaser> <title>Lung Cancer Screening Can Boost Early Diagnosis, Survival</title> <deck/> <disclaimer/> <AuthorList/> <articleURL/> <doi/> <pubMedID/> <publishXMLStatus/> <publishXMLVersion>1</publishXMLVersion> <useEISSN>0</useEISSN> <urgency/> <pubPubdateYear/> <pubPubdateMonth/> <pubPubdateDay/> <pubVolume/> <pubNumber/> <wireChannels/> <primaryCMSID/> <CMSIDs/> <keywords/> <seeAlsos/> <publications_g> <publicationData> <publicationCode>chph</publicationCode> <pubIssueName/> <pubArticleType/> <pubTopics/> <pubCategories/> <pubSections/> </publicationData> <publicationData> <publicationCode>fp</publicationCode> <pubIssueName/> <pubArticleType/> <pubTopics/> <pubCategories/> <pubSections/> </publicationData> <publicationData> <publicationCode>im</publicationCode> <pubIssueName/> <pubArticleType/> <pubTopics/> <pubCategories/> <pubSections/> </publicationData> <publicationData> <publicationCode>oncr</publicationCode> <pubIssueName/> <pubArticleType/> <pubTopics/> <pubCategories/> <pubSections/> </publicationData> </publications_g> <publications> <term>6</term> <term>15</term> <term>21</term> <term canonical="true">31</term> </publications> <sections> <term>27970</term> <term canonical="true">39313</term> </sections> <topics> <term canonical="true">240</term> <term>263</term> </topics> <links/> </header> <itemSet> <newsItem> <itemMeta> <itemRole>Main</itemRole> <itemClass>text</itemClass> <title>Lung Cancer Screening Can Boost Early Diagnosis, Survival</title> <deck/> </itemMeta> <itemContent> <h2>TOPLINE:</h2> <p>Lung cancer screening was associated with earlier-stage diagnoses and improved survival in a retrospective analysis of a large cohort with low screening uptake. </p> <h2>METHODOLOGY:</h2> <ul class="body"> <li>Randomized trials have shown a mortality benefit with low-dose CT screening to detect lung cancer, but the benefits in clinical practice remain unclear, and lung cancer screening uptake has been slow.</li> <li>In this study, researchers assessed the impact of lung cancer screening among Veteran Health Administration patients diagnosed with lung cancer between 2011 and 2018.</li> <li>The team evaluated lung cancer stage at diagnosis, lung cancer–specific survival, and overall survival in patients with lung cancer who did vs did not receive screening before their diagnosis.</li> <li>Statistical analyses included Cox regression modeling and inverse propensity weighting with lead-time bias adjustment.</li> </ul> <h2>TAKEAWAY:</h2> <ul class="body"> <li>Among 57,919 individuals diagnosed with lung cancer during the study period, 2167 (3.9%) underwent screening with at least one low-dose CT before receiving their diagnosis. There were no significant differences in age, gender, or race among patients who had prior screening and those who did not.</li> <li>Screened patients had double the rate of stage I diagnoses compared with unscreened patients (52% vs 27%) and about one third the rate of stage IV diagnoses (11% vs 32%).</li> <li>Patients who received screening before their cancer diagnosis had better overall survival rates compared with unscreened patients. The overall survival rates were 81.2% vs 56.6% at 1 year, 69.9% vs 41.1% at 2 years, and 44.9% vs 22.3% at 5 years, respectively. Lung cancer–specific survival was also better: The survival rates were 82.5% vs 58.7% at 1 year, 74.3% vs 44.4% at 2 years, and 59.0% vs 29.7% at 5 years, respectively.</li> <li>A subset analysis of screening-eligible patients (defined as those between the ages of 50-88 who were smokers with a pack-year history of ≥ 20 years or former smokers who quit within 15 years) showed that among those who underwent National Comprehensive Cancer Network guideline-concordant treatment within 12 months of diagnosis, screening resulted in “substantial” reductions in all-cause mortality (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR], 0.79) and lung cancer–specific mortality (aHR, 0.61).</li> </ul> <h2>IN PRACTICE:</h2> <p>“These findings provide corroboration of the results of randomized [lung cancer screening] trials in clinical practice,” the authors wrote. “We hope that the striking association between [lung cancer screening], earlier stage diagnosis of lung cancer, and improved mortality spurs a more robust uptake of this life-saving intervention into clinical practice.”</p> <h2>SOURCE:</h2> <p>The study, led by Donna M. Edwards MD, PhD, of the University of Michigan School of Medicine, Ann Arbor, Michigan, was published <a href="https://acsjournals.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/cncr.35340">online</a> in <em>Cancer</em>.</p> <h2>LIMITATIONS:</h2> <p>The study was limited by its retrospective and correlative design, and the authors also were unable to assess whether lung cancer screening contributed to more subsequence procedures in screened vs unscreened patients.</p> <h2>DISCLOSURES:</h2> <p>The study was funded by the LUNGevity Foundation, US Department of Veterans Affairs, National Cancer Institute, and Lung Precision Oncology Program. One author declared being a consultant for industry. The other authors declared no conflicts of interest.<span class="end"/></p> <p> <em>A version of this article first appeared on <span class="Hyperlink"><a href="https://www.medscape.com/viewarticle/lung-cancer-screening-can-boost-early-diagnosis-survival-2024a1000bhb">Medscape.com</a></span>.</em> </p> </itemContent> </newsItem> <newsItem> <itemMeta> <itemRole>teaser</itemRole> <itemClass>text</itemClass> <title/> <deck/> </itemMeta> <itemContent> </itemContent> </newsItem> </itemSet></root>
Disallow All Ads
Content Gating
No Gating (article Unlocked/Free)
Alternative CME
Disqus Comments
Default
Use ProPublica
Hide sidebar & use full width
render the right sidebar.
Conference Recap Checkbox
Not Conference Recap
Clinical Edge
Display the Slideshow in this Article
Medscape Article
Display survey writer
Reuters content
Disable Inline Native ads
WebMD Article