Original Research

Prevalence of Hypogonadism in Low-Risk Prostate Cancer Survivors

Author and Disclosure Information

 

References

Conclusion

As life expectancy increases, many survivors of treated PCa present with symptoms of hypogonadism associated with low serum T levels and request TRT. The prevalence of hypogonadism before or after treatment for PCa in this population is not known. This study suggests that many low-risk PCa survivors have hypogonadism. Because hypogonadism negatively impacts quality of life by increasing the risk for sexual dysfunction, mood disturbances, bone fracture, development of metabolic syndrome, frailty, and decline in the feeling of general well-being and may have significant deleterious effects on other body systems, consideration for treatment is warranted.

Patients with PCa may be untreated because the safety of TRT in this population is unknown. Clinical practice guidelines caution against using TRT in this population, and recent literature questions the benefits and risks associated with the long-term safety of TRT, particularly in older men. 28,41 Although further studies are necessary before definitive conclusions can be drawn, increasing evidence, albeit small, suggests that TRT can be cautiously considered in selected hypogonadal men treated with curative intent for PCa and without evidence of active disease. However, because obese patients are at higher risk for aggressive PCa and mortality, it is unclear whether obese PCa survivors have an additional risk in regard to TRT. 42,43 To help clinicians provide information and care for their patients, appropriately designed prospective randomized studies using a collaborative approach and long-term follow-up are urgently needed to determine the safety of TRT in hypogonadal men with a history of low-risk PCa.

Acknowledgments
This material is the result of work supported with resources and the use of facilities at the Edward Hines Jr. VA Hospital.
Dr. Silva’s work was carried out while she was a postdoctoral fellow supported by the VA Office of Academic Affiliations (TPP 42-013). The authors thank Ahmer V. Farooq, DO, Department of Surgery, Division of Urology, for his help in planning the design of the study. Dr. Agrawal affirms that all coauthors contributed significantly to the work and had full access to all data in the study and take responsibility for the integrity of the data and the accuracy of the data analysis.

Author disclosures
The authors report no actual or potential conflicts of interest with regard to this article.

Disclaimer
The opinions expressed herein are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect those of
Federal Practitioner, Frontline Medical Communications Inc., the U.S. Government, or any of its agencies. This article may discuss unlabeled or investigational use of certain drugs. Please review complete prescribing information for specific drugs or drug combinations—including indications, contraindications, warnings, and adverse effects—before administering pharmacologic therapy to patients.

Click here to read the digital edition.

Pages

Recommended Reading

Study Points to Risk Factors for Lymphoma
Federal Practitioner
Change in end-of-life cancer care imperative
Federal Practitioner
Hepatitis infection raises non-Hodgkin lymphoma risk in HIV patients
Federal Practitioner
The Long Legacy of Agent Orange
Federal Practitioner
Guidelines tackle long-term screening, management of myeloma
Federal Practitioner
Phase III trial: VZV protects auto-HCT patients
Federal Practitioner
‘Strong evidence’ links obesity to cancers
Federal Practitioner
The Availability of Advanced Radiation Oncology Technology Within VHA Radiation Oncology Centers
Federal Practitioner
γ-δ T-Cell Lymphoma With Disseminated Intravascular Coagulation and Autoimmune Hemolytic Anemia
Federal Practitioner
Best Practices in Hematology and Oncology (February 2017)
Federal Practitioner