User login
MS significantly affects employment and home activities
SEATTLE – according to data presented at the annual meeting of the Consortium of Multiple Sclerosis Centers. The disease appears to prevent people from achieving their full potential at work and at home, largely because of its associated fatigue, said the researchers. “The economic impact of identifying an effective treatment for this symptom of MS cannot be overstated,” said Terrie Livingston, PharmD, head of patient outcomes and solutions at EMD Serono in Wayland, Massachusetts, and colleagues.
The research results from an initiative by the North American Registry for Care and Research in MS (NARCRMS). Since December 2016, NARCRMS has prospectively collected clinical and imaging data, information about patients’ health care economics, and data about the effects of MS on daily life. To examine the economic impact of MS and to help implement health economics outcomes research (HEOR) in decision-making processes, NARCRMS established the HEOR Advisory Group in 2017. The registry created a Health-Related Productivity Questionnaire and Health Resource Utilization Questionnaire, both of which were incorporated into the existing case report forms. Patients complete these questionnaires at enrollment and at annual and exacerbation visits.
As of January 2, 2019, NARCRMS had enrolled 378 people with MS into the registry, and 368 had completed the HEOR case report forms. Among the respondents, 270 (73%) are employed either full or part time. During the week before reporting, 39 respondents (11%) reported that MS kept them from work, 93 (25%) reported that MS affected their work, 105 (29%) reported that MS stopped them from finishing household chores, and 140 (38%) reported that MS affected their household chores. Fatigue was the symptom most commonly reported to affect work and household chores. In the 3 months before reporting, 13 patients (4%) had inpatient hospital stays, 24 patients (7%) visited the ED, 71 patients (19%) visited a general practitioner, and 296 (80%) patients visited a neurologist.
The study had no sponsor. Several of the study authors reported receiving compensation from companies such as Biogen, Celgene, Genentech, Novartis, Sanofi Genzyme, and Teva.
SEATTLE – according to data presented at the annual meeting of the Consortium of Multiple Sclerosis Centers. The disease appears to prevent people from achieving their full potential at work and at home, largely because of its associated fatigue, said the researchers. “The economic impact of identifying an effective treatment for this symptom of MS cannot be overstated,” said Terrie Livingston, PharmD, head of patient outcomes and solutions at EMD Serono in Wayland, Massachusetts, and colleagues.
The research results from an initiative by the North American Registry for Care and Research in MS (NARCRMS). Since December 2016, NARCRMS has prospectively collected clinical and imaging data, information about patients’ health care economics, and data about the effects of MS on daily life. To examine the economic impact of MS and to help implement health economics outcomes research (HEOR) in decision-making processes, NARCRMS established the HEOR Advisory Group in 2017. The registry created a Health-Related Productivity Questionnaire and Health Resource Utilization Questionnaire, both of which were incorporated into the existing case report forms. Patients complete these questionnaires at enrollment and at annual and exacerbation visits.
As of January 2, 2019, NARCRMS had enrolled 378 people with MS into the registry, and 368 had completed the HEOR case report forms. Among the respondents, 270 (73%) are employed either full or part time. During the week before reporting, 39 respondents (11%) reported that MS kept them from work, 93 (25%) reported that MS affected their work, 105 (29%) reported that MS stopped them from finishing household chores, and 140 (38%) reported that MS affected their household chores. Fatigue was the symptom most commonly reported to affect work and household chores. In the 3 months before reporting, 13 patients (4%) had inpatient hospital stays, 24 patients (7%) visited the ED, 71 patients (19%) visited a general practitioner, and 296 (80%) patients visited a neurologist.
The study had no sponsor. Several of the study authors reported receiving compensation from companies such as Biogen, Celgene, Genentech, Novartis, Sanofi Genzyme, and Teva.
SEATTLE – according to data presented at the annual meeting of the Consortium of Multiple Sclerosis Centers. The disease appears to prevent people from achieving their full potential at work and at home, largely because of its associated fatigue, said the researchers. “The economic impact of identifying an effective treatment for this symptom of MS cannot be overstated,” said Terrie Livingston, PharmD, head of patient outcomes and solutions at EMD Serono in Wayland, Massachusetts, and colleagues.
The research results from an initiative by the North American Registry for Care and Research in MS (NARCRMS). Since December 2016, NARCRMS has prospectively collected clinical and imaging data, information about patients’ health care economics, and data about the effects of MS on daily life. To examine the economic impact of MS and to help implement health economics outcomes research (HEOR) in decision-making processes, NARCRMS established the HEOR Advisory Group in 2017. The registry created a Health-Related Productivity Questionnaire and Health Resource Utilization Questionnaire, both of which were incorporated into the existing case report forms. Patients complete these questionnaires at enrollment and at annual and exacerbation visits.
As of January 2, 2019, NARCRMS had enrolled 378 people with MS into the registry, and 368 had completed the HEOR case report forms. Among the respondents, 270 (73%) are employed either full or part time. During the week before reporting, 39 respondents (11%) reported that MS kept them from work, 93 (25%) reported that MS affected their work, 105 (29%) reported that MS stopped them from finishing household chores, and 140 (38%) reported that MS affected their household chores. Fatigue was the symptom most commonly reported to affect work and household chores. In the 3 months before reporting, 13 patients (4%) had inpatient hospital stays, 24 patients (7%) visited the ED, 71 patients (19%) visited a general practitioner, and 296 (80%) patients visited a neurologist.
The study had no sponsor. Several of the study authors reported receiving compensation from companies such as Biogen, Celgene, Genentech, Novartis, Sanofi Genzyme, and Teva.
REPORTING FROM CMSC 2019
Key clinical point: Fatigue is the most common symptom preventing people with MS from completing work or chores.
Major finding: Approximately 28% of people with MS may be underemployed or unemployed.
Study details: An analysis of registry data, including questionnaires for 368 patients with MS.
Disclosures: The study had no sponsor. Dr. Livingston is an employee of EMD Serono.
Alemtuzumab increases the likelihood of disability improvement in MS
Seattle – , according to a pooled analysis presented at the annual meeting of the Consortium of Multiple Sclerosis Centers.
Patients who achieved this outcome had improvement in several functional systems, regardless of their baseline EDSS scores. “These results suggest a broad and prolonged effect of alemtuzumab on disability improvement and a potential for changing the MS disease course,” said Samuel F. Hunter, MD, a neurologist and psychiatrist at the Advanced Neurosciences Institute in Franklin, Tenn., and colleagues.
The researchers’ findings come from their analysis of pooled data from the CARE-MS I and CARE-MS II trials. Those studies indicated that alemtuzumab improved clinical and MRI outcomes over 2 years in relapsing-remitting MS, compared with interferon beta-1a. In a 4-year extension, alemtuzumab’s efficacy was maintained, and 81% of participants continued in the study until year 6. In addition, 34% of alemtuzumab-treated patients in CARE-MS I and 43% of alemtuzumab-treated patients in CARE-MS II achieved 6-month confirmed disability improvement. The relationship between baseline disability levels and the achievement of disability improvement is not well understood, however.
Dr. Hunter and colleagues conducted a pooled analysis of CARE-MS I and CARE-MS II data to evaluate how baseline disability affects improvements in each functional system in patients treated with alemtuzumab over 6 years. In those studies, patients received two 12-mg/day courses of alemtuzumab: a 5-day course at baseline and a 3-day course 12 months later. Additional treatment with alemtuzumab or other disease-modifying therapies was provided as needed during the extension study.
The investigators defined confirmed disability improvement as a decrease of 1 or more points in EDSS score confirmed over 6 months among patients with a baseline EDSS score of 2 or higher. Improvement (i.e., a decrease of 1 or more points) or stability (i.e., no change) in each of the functional system scores was assessed in patients with confirmed disability improvement, stratified by baseline EDSS scores. Patients were grouped according to whether their baseline EDSS scores were 2.0-2.5, 3.0-3.5, 4.0-4.5, 5.0-5.5, or 6.0-6.5.
A total of 208 of 565 patients (37%) achieved 6-month confirmed disability improvement through year 6. This outcome was achieved by the highest percentages of patients with baseline EDSS scores of 4.0-4.5 (57%) and 3.0-3.5 (44%), followed by those with baseline EDSS scores of 5.0-5.5 (28%) and 2.0-2.5 (27%). No patients with baseline EDSS scores of 6.0-6.5 achieved confirmed disability improvement.
At 6 months after onset of confirmed disability improvement, patients within each baseline EDSS group showed stability or improvement in each individual functional system. The proportion of stable or improved patients was 94% or greater in the 2.0-2.5 group, 92% or greater in the 3.0-3.5 group, 88% or greater in the 4.0-4.5 group, and 75% or greater in the 5.0-5.5 group. Between 67% and 76% of patients achieved improvements in two or more functional systems. Improvements were most frequent in the pyramidal (13% to 50%), sensory (42% to 50%), and cerebellar (13% to 55%) functional systems.
Sanofi, Bayer HealthCare Pharmaceuticals supported the study. Dr. Hunter received grants and financial support from AbbVie, Actelion, Acorda, Adamas, Alkermes, Avanir, Bayer HealthCare, Biogen, Novartis, Osmotica, Questcor, Roche, Sanofi, Synthon, and Teva.
SOURCE: Hunter SF et al. CMSC 2019. Abstract DXT08.
Seattle – , according to a pooled analysis presented at the annual meeting of the Consortium of Multiple Sclerosis Centers.
Patients who achieved this outcome had improvement in several functional systems, regardless of their baseline EDSS scores. “These results suggest a broad and prolonged effect of alemtuzumab on disability improvement and a potential for changing the MS disease course,” said Samuel F. Hunter, MD, a neurologist and psychiatrist at the Advanced Neurosciences Institute in Franklin, Tenn., and colleagues.
The researchers’ findings come from their analysis of pooled data from the CARE-MS I and CARE-MS II trials. Those studies indicated that alemtuzumab improved clinical and MRI outcomes over 2 years in relapsing-remitting MS, compared with interferon beta-1a. In a 4-year extension, alemtuzumab’s efficacy was maintained, and 81% of participants continued in the study until year 6. In addition, 34% of alemtuzumab-treated patients in CARE-MS I and 43% of alemtuzumab-treated patients in CARE-MS II achieved 6-month confirmed disability improvement. The relationship between baseline disability levels and the achievement of disability improvement is not well understood, however.
Dr. Hunter and colleagues conducted a pooled analysis of CARE-MS I and CARE-MS II data to evaluate how baseline disability affects improvements in each functional system in patients treated with alemtuzumab over 6 years. In those studies, patients received two 12-mg/day courses of alemtuzumab: a 5-day course at baseline and a 3-day course 12 months later. Additional treatment with alemtuzumab or other disease-modifying therapies was provided as needed during the extension study.
The investigators defined confirmed disability improvement as a decrease of 1 or more points in EDSS score confirmed over 6 months among patients with a baseline EDSS score of 2 or higher. Improvement (i.e., a decrease of 1 or more points) or stability (i.e., no change) in each of the functional system scores was assessed in patients with confirmed disability improvement, stratified by baseline EDSS scores. Patients were grouped according to whether their baseline EDSS scores were 2.0-2.5, 3.0-3.5, 4.0-4.5, 5.0-5.5, or 6.0-6.5.
A total of 208 of 565 patients (37%) achieved 6-month confirmed disability improvement through year 6. This outcome was achieved by the highest percentages of patients with baseline EDSS scores of 4.0-4.5 (57%) and 3.0-3.5 (44%), followed by those with baseline EDSS scores of 5.0-5.5 (28%) and 2.0-2.5 (27%). No patients with baseline EDSS scores of 6.0-6.5 achieved confirmed disability improvement.
At 6 months after onset of confirmed disability improvement, patients within each baseline EDSS group showed stability or improvement in each individual functional system. The proportion of stable or improved patients was 94% or greater in the 2.0-2.5 group, 92% or greater in the 3.0-3.5 group, 88% or greater in the 4.0-4.5 group, and 75% or greater in the 5.0-5.5 group. Between 67% and 76% of patients achieved improvements in two or more functional systems. Improvements were most frequent in the pyramidal (13% to 50%), sensory (42% to 50%), and cerebellar (13% to 55%) functional systems.
Sanofi, Bayer HealthCare Pharmaceuticals supported the study. Dr. Hunter received grants and financial support from AbbVie, Actelion, Acorda, Adamas, Alkermes, Avanir, Bayer HealthCare, Biogen, Novartis, Osmotica, Questcor, Roche, Sanofi, Synthon, and Teva.
SOURCE: Hunter SF et al. CMSC 2019. Abstract DXT08.
Seattle – , according to a pooled analysis presented at the annual meeting of the Consortium of Multiple Sclerosis Centers.
Patients who achieved this outcome had improvement in several functional systems, regardless of their baseline EDSS scores. “These results suggest a broad and prolonged effect of alemtuzumab on disability improvement and a potential for changing the MS disease course,” said Samuel F. Hunter, MD, a neurologist and psychiatrist at the Advanced Neurosciences Institute in Franklin, Tenn., and colleagues.
The researchers’ findings come from their analysis of pooled data from the CARE-MS I and CARE-MS II trials. Those studies indicated that alemtuzumab improved clinical and MRI outcomes over 2 years in relapsing-remitting MS, compared with interferon beta-1a. In a 4-year extension, alemtuzumab’s efficacy was maintained, and 81% of participants continued in the study until year 6. In addition, 34% of alemtuzumab-treated patients in CARE-MS I and 43% of alemtuzumab-treated patients in CARE-MS II achieved 6-month confirmed disability improvement. The relationship between baseline disability levels and the achievement of disability improvement is not well understood, however.
Dr. Hunter and colleagues conducted a pooled analysis of CARE-MS I and CARE-MS II data to evaluate how baseline disability affects improvements in each functional system in patients treated with alemtuzumab over 6 years. In those studies, patients received two 12-mg/day courses of alemtuzumab: a 5-day course at baseline and a 3-day course 12 months later. Additional treatment with alemtuzumab or other disease-modifying therapies was provided as needed during the extension study.
The investigators defined confirmed disability improvement as a decrease of 1 or more points in EDSS score confirmed over 6 months among patients with a baseline EDSS score of 2 or higher. Improvement (i.e., a decrease of 1 or more points) or stability (i.e., no change) in each of the functional system scores was assessed in patients with confirmed disability improvement, stratified by baseline EDSS scores. Patients were grouped according to whether their baseline EDSS scores were 2.0-2.5, 3.0-3.5, 4.0-4.5, 5.0-5.5, or 6.0-6.5.
A total of 208 of 565 patients (37%) achieved 6-month confirmed disability improvement through year 6. This outcome was achieved by the highest percentages of patients with baseline EDSS scores of 4.0-4.5 (57%) and 3.0-3.5 (44%), followed by those with baseline EDSS scores of 5.0-5.5 (28%) and 2.0-2.5 (27%). No patients with baseline EDSS scores of 6.0-6.5 achieved confirmed disability improvement.
At 6 months after onset of confirmed disability improvement, patients within each baseline EDSS group showed stability or improvement in each individual functional system. The proportion of stable or improved patients was 94% or greater in the 2.0-2.5 group, 92% or greater in the 3.0-3.5 group, 88% or greater in the 4.0-4.5 group, and 75% or greater in the 5.0-5.5 group. Between 67% and 76% of patients achieved improvements in two or more functional systems. Improvements were most frequent in the pyramidal (13% to 50%), sensory (42% to 50%), and cerebellar (13% to 55%) functional systems.
Sanofi, Bayer HealthCare Pharmaceuticals supported the study. Dr. Hunter received grants and financial support from AbbVie, Actelion, Acorda, Adamas, Alkermes, Avanir, Bayer HealthCare, Biogen, Novartis, Osmotica, Questcor, Roche, Sanofi, Synthon, and Teva.
SOURCE: Hunter SF et al. CMSC 2019. Abstract DXT08.
REPORTING FROM CMSC 2019