User login
Oncogenic drivers and immunotherapy: staying one step ahead of lung cancer
The majority of newly diagnosed lung cancers are NSCLC, and about half of those are adenocarcinomas (Figure 1).2 Over the past decade there has been a significant evolution in the understanding and treatment of lung adenocarcinoma, mostly stemming from a greater appreciation of the distinct pathologies and unique molecular signatures of these tumors. Genomic characterization of the molecular signatures has led to the identification of numerous key genetic alterations that drive lung cancer. The dependency of lung tumors on these genetic drivers has enabled the pharmacological development of targeted therapies that exploit this vulnerability...
Click on the PDF icon at the top of this introduction to read the full article.
The majority of newly diagnosed lung cancers are NSCLC, and about half of those are adenocarcinomas (Figure 1).2 Over the past decade there has been a significant evolution in the understanding and treatment of lung adenocarcinoma, mostly stemming from a greater appreciation of the distinct pathologies and unique molecular signatures of these tumors. Genomic characterization of the molecular signatures has led to the identification of numerous key genetic alterations that drive lung cancer. The dependency of lung tumors on these genetic drivers has enabled the pharmacological development of targeted therapies that exploit this vulnerability...
Click on the PDF icon at the top of this introduction to read the full article.
The majority of newly diagnosed lung cancers are NSCLC, and about half of those are adenocarcinomas (Figure 1).2 Over the past decade there has been a significant evolution in the understanding and treatment of lung adenocarcinoma, mostly stemming from a greater appreciation of the distinct pathologies and unique molecular signatures of these tumors. Genomic characterization of the molecular signatures has led to the identification of numerous key genetic alterations that drive lung cancer. The dependency of lung tumors on these genetic drivers has enabled the pharmacological development of targeted therapies that exploit this vulnerability...
Click on the PDF icon at the top of this introduction to read the full article.
Glioblastoma, bone sarcoma, and liver cancer: tough battles rage on for some tumors
osteosarcoma, chondrosarcoma, CS, Ewing sarcoma, ES, hepatocellular carcinoma, HCC
osteosarcoma, chondrosarcoma, CS, Ewing sarcoma, ES, hepatocellular carcinoma, HCC
osteosarcoma, chondrosarcoma, CS, Ewing sarcoma, ES, hepatocellular carcinoma, HCC
Rising to the therapeutic challenge of head and neck cancer
As a significant cause of cancer-related mortality, head and neck cancer presents an important therapeutic challenge that has proven relatively resistant to attempts to improve patient outcomes over the past several decades. In recent years, molecular profiling of head and neck cancers has provided greater insight into their significant genetic heterogeneity, creating potential opportunities for novel therapies. Here, we discuss the most promising advances.
Limited progress in HNSCC treatment
Cancers of the nasal cavity, sinuses, mouth, lips, salivary glands, throat, and larynx, collectively called head and neck cancers, are the sixth leading cause of cancer-related death worldwide. The majority of head and neck cancer arises in the epithelial cells that line the mucosal surfaces of the head and neck and is known as squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC). If caught in the early stages, HNSCC has a high cure rate with single-modality treatment with either surgery or radiation therapy (RT).1 However, a substantial proportion of patients present with advanced disease that requires multimodality therapy and has significantly poorer outcomes. Locally advanced HNSCC is typically treated with various combinations of surgery, RT, and chemotherapy and survival rates for all patients at 5 years are 40%- 60%, compared with 70%-90% for patients with early-stage disease.1,3 Up to half of locally advanced tumors relapse within the first 2 years after treatment. For patients with recurrent/metastatic disease, various chemotherapeutic regimens are available but median survival is typically less than a year.3-5
Click on the PDF icon at the top of this introduction to read the full article.
As a significant cause of cancer-related mortality, head and neck cancer presents an important therapeutic challenge that has proven relatively resistant to attempts to improve patient outcomes over the past several decades. In recent years, molecular profiling of head and neck cancers has provided greater insight into their significant genetic heterogeneity, creating potential opportunities for novel therapies. Here, we discuss the most promising advances.
Limited progress in HNSCC treatment
Cancers of the nasal cavity, sinuses, mouth, lips, salivary glands, throat, and larynx, collectively called head and neck cancers, are the sixth leading cause of cancer-related death worldwide. The majority of head and neck cancer arises in the epithelial cells that line the mucosal surfaces of the head and neck and is known as squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC). If caught in the early stages, HNSCC has a high cure rate with single-modality treatment with either surgery or radiation therapy (RT).1 However, a substantial proportion of patients present with advanced disease that requires multimodality therapy and has significantly poorer outcomes. Locally advanced HNSCC is typically treated with various combinations of surgery, RT, and chemotherapy and survival rates for all patients at 5 years are 40%- 60%, compared with 70%-90% for patients with early-stage disease.1,3 Up to half of locally advanced tumors relapse within the first 2 years after treatment. For patients with recurrent/metastatic disease, various chemotherapeutic regimens are available but median survival is typically less than a year.3-5
Click on the PDF icon at the top of this introduction to read the full article.
As a significant cause of cancer-related mortality, head and neck cancer presents an important therapeutic challenge that has proven relatively resistant to attempts to improve patient outcomes over the past several decades. In recent years, molecular profiling of head and neck cancers has provided greater insight into their significant genetic heterogeneity, creating potential opportunities for novel therapies. Here, we discuss the most promising advances.
Limited progress in HNSCC treatment
Cancers of the nasal cavity, sinuses, mouth, lips, salivary glands, throat, and larynx, collectively called head and neck cancers, are the sixth leading cause of cancer-related death worldwide. The majority of head and neck cancer arises in the epithelial cells that line the mucosal surfaces of the head and neck and is known as squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC). If caught in the early stages, HNSCC has a high cure rate with single-modality treatment with either surgery or radiation therapy (RT).1 However, a substantial proportion of patients present with advanced disease that requires multimodality therapy and has significantly poorer outcomes. Locally advanced HNSCC is typically treated with various combinations of surgery, RT, and chemotherapy and survival rates for all patients at 5 years are 40%- 60%, compared with 70%-90% for patients with early-stage disease.1,3 Up to half of locally advanced tumors relapse within the first 2 years after treatment. For patients with recurrent/metastatic disease, various chemotherapeutic regimens are available but median survival is typically less than a year.3-5
Click on the PDF icon at the top of this introduction to read the full article.
Small victories add up to paradigm shifts for hard-to-treat tumors
Click on the PDF icon at the top of this introduction to read the full article.
Click on the PDF icon at the top of this introduction to read the full article.
Click on the PDF icon at the top of this introduction to read the full article.
Delivering on the promise of cancer biomarkers in the clinic
Click on the PDF icon at the top of this introduction to read the full article.
Click on the PDF icon at the top of this introduction to read the full article.
Click on the PDF icon at the top of this introduction to read the full article.
JCSO 2014;12:381-388
VIDEO: CLEOPATRA combo extends survival in HER2-positive metastatic breast cancer
MADRID – The final overall survival analysis of the CLEOPATRA trial showed an unprecedented 15.7-month increase in overall survival for women with HER2-positive metastatic breast cancer.
The results were achieved by adding pertuzumab to first-line trastuzumab and docetaxel chemotherapy (56.5 months vs. 40.8 months; hazard ratio, 0.68; P = .0002).
Importantly, the survival improvement came without excessive toxicity, including cardiac events, lead author Dr. Sandra Swain reported during a presidential symposium at the European Society for Medical Oncology Congress.
The results, now with a median follow-up of 50 months, build on those previously reported from CLEOPATRA, showing a survival trend favoring the combination of two targeted agents with chemotherapy in the first interim analysis and a statistically significant overall survival advantage at 30 months in a second interim analysis.
In a video interview at the meeting, Dr. Swain, medical director of the Washington Cancer Institute, Medstar Washington Hospital Center, discusses the results and their implications for care.
The video associated with this article is no longer available on this site. Please view all of our videos on the MDedge YouTube channel
MADRID – The final overall survival analysis of the CLEOPATRA trial showed an unprecedented 15.7-month increase in overall survival for women with HER2-positive metastatic breast cancer.
The results were achieved by adding pertuzumab to first-line trastuzumab and docetaxel chemotherapy (56.5 months vs. 40.8 months; hazard ratio, 0.68; P = .0002).
Importantly, the survival improvement came without excessive toxicity, including cardiac events, lead author Dr. Sandra Swain reported during a presidential symposium at the European Society for Medical Oncology Congress.
The results, now with a median follow-up of 50 months, build on those previously reported from CLEOPATRA, showing a survival trend favoring the combination of two targeted agents with chemotherapy in the first interim analysis and a statistically significant overall survival advantage at 30 months in a second interim analysis.
In a video interview at the meeting, Dr. Swain, medical director of the Washington Cancer Institute, Medstar Washington Hospital Center, discusses the results and their implications for care.
The video associated with this article is no longer available on this site. Please view all of our videos on the MDedge YouTube channel
MADRID – The final overall survival analysis of the CLEOPATRA trial showed an unprecedented 15.7-month increase in overall survival for women with HER2-positive metastatic breast cancer.
The results were achieved by adding pertuzumab to first-line trastuzumab and docetaxel chemotherapy (56.5 months vs. 40.8 months; hazard ratio, 0.68; P = .0002).
Importantly, the survival improvement came without excessive toxicity, including cardiac events, lead author Dr. Sandra Swain reported during a presidential symposium at the European Society for Medical Oncology Congress.
The results, now with a median follow-up of 50 months, build on those previously reported from CLEOPATRA, showing a survival trend favoring the combination of two targeted agents with chemotherapy in the first interim analysis and a statistically significant overall survival advantage at 30 months in a second interim analysis.
In a video interview at the meeting, Dr. Swain, medical director of the Washington Cancer Institute, Medstar Washington Hospital Center, discusses the results and their implications for care.
The video associated with this article is no longer available on this site. Please view all of our videos on the MDedge YouTube channel
AT ESMO 2014
Key clinical point: CLEOPATRA establishes pertuzumab and trastuzumab plus chemotherapy as the standard of care in metastatic HER2-positive breast cancer.
Major finding: Overall survival was 40.8 months with trastuzumab plus chemotherapy, and 56.5 months with the addition of pertuzumab.
Data source: Phase III double-blind trial in 808 women with HER2-positive metastatic breast cancer.
Disclosures: The study was funded by Hoffman-La Roche, Genentech. Dr. Swain reported serving as an uncompensated consultant for Genentech/Roche. Her institution has received research funding from Genentech/Roche, Pfizer, Puma, Sanofi-Aventis, and Bristol-Myers Squibb. Several of her coauthors reported financial relationships with several drug firms.
Moving beyond the one-size-fits-all formula for breast cancer treatments
Click on the PDF icon at the top of this introduction to read the full article.
Click on the PDF icon at the top of this introduction to read the full article.
Click on the PDF icon at the top of this introduction to read the full article.
ASCO at 50 … we’ve come a long way, we know a lot, but we’ve only just begun
I recently had both the pleasure and the challenge of attending ASCO 2014, the annual meeting of the American Society of Clinical Oncology. It was my first official ASCO meeting, and as an almost-third-year fellow in oncology, no amount of reading, research, scheduling, ASCO 2014 iPad app organizing, or even attending the day 1 early morning How to Navigate the Annual Meeting seminar could have prepared me for the experience…
Click on the PDF icon at the top of this introduction to read the full article.
I recently had both the pleasure and the challenge of attending ASCO 2014, the annual meeting of the American Society of Clinical Oncology. It was my first official ASCO meeting, and as an almost-third-year fellow in oncology, no amount of reading, research, scheduling, ASCO 2014 iPad app organizing, or even attending the day 1 early morning How to Navigate the Annual Meeting seminar could have prepared me for the experience…
Click on the PDF icon at the top of this introduction to read the full article.
I recently had both the pleasure and the challenge of attending ASCO 2014, the annual meeting of the American Society of Clinical Oncology. It was my first official ASCO meeting, and as an almost-third-year fellow in oncology, no amount of reading, research, scheduling, ASCO 2014 iPad app organizing, or even attending the day 1 early morning How to Navigate the Annual Meeting seminar could have prepared me for the experience…
Click on the PDF icon at the top of this introduction to read the full article.
Encouraging data at ASCO 2014 for survival and fertility in some cancers
The American Society of Clinical Oncology marked its 50th anniversary at this year’s annual conference in Chicago, where it showcased the latest scientific advances in oncology and explored the translation of research findings into practice under its umbrella theme, Science and Society.
Drug combo extends survival by more than 1 year in metastatic prostate cancer patients
Key clinical finding Adding docetaxel to hormonal therapy at the time of diagnosis of metastatic prostate cancer extends survival. Major finding Patients receiving docetaxel and androgen deprivation therapy at the time of diagnoses had median overall survival that was 13.6 months longer than men who received androgen deprivation therapy alone. Data source Randomized trial in 790 men with newly diagnosed metastatic hormone-sensitive prostate cancer...
Click on the PDF icon at the top of this introduction to read the full article.
The American Society of Clinical Oncology marked its 50th anniversary at this year’s annual conference in Chicago, where it showcased the latest scientific advances in oncology and explored the translation of research findings into practice under its umbrella theme, Science and Society.
Drug combo extends survival by more than 1 year in metastatic prostate cancer patients
Key clinical finding Adding docetaxel to hormonal therapy at the time of diagnosis of metastatic prostate cancer extends survival. Major finding Patients receiving docetaxel and androgen deprivation therapy at the time of diagnoses had median overall survival that was 13.6 months longer than men who received androgen deprivation therapy alone. Data source Randomized trial in 790 men with newly diagnosed metastatic hormone-sensitive prostate cancer...
Click on the PDF icon at the top of this introduction to read the full article.
The American Society of Clinical Oncology marked its 50th anniversary at this year’s annual conference in Chicago, where it showcased the latest scientific advances in oncology and explored the translation of research findings into practice under its umbrella theme, Science and Society.
Drug combo extends survival by more than 1 year in metastatic prostate cancer patients
Key clinical finding Adding docetaxel to hormonal therapy at the time of diagnosis of metastatic prostate cancer extends survival. Major finding Patients receiving docetaxel and androgen deprivation therapy at the time of diagnoses had median overall survival that was 13.6 months longer than men who received androgen deprivation therapy alone. Data source Randomized trial in 790 men with newly diagnosed metastatic hormone-sensitive prostate cancer...
Click on the PDF icon at the top of this introduction to read the full article.
Targeting B-cell signaling pathways: a central role for Bruton’s tyrosine kinase
B-cell cancers constitute a large group of diseases with diverse clinical and pathological characteristics that arise from the B (bursal- or bone marrow-derived) lymphocytes of the immune system. B cells are involved in humoral immunity as part of the adaptive immune response. They display a unique B-cell receptor (BCR) on their surface which binds to a specific antigen. Antigen- binding activates the process of clonal expansion, during which the B cell reproduces to form an army of clones that secrete the same antibody. These antibodies then bind to the target antigen on foreign cells and initiate a range of immune responses that ultimately lead to the destruction of that cell.
Click on the PDF icon at the top of this introduction to read the full article.
B-cell cancers constitute a large group of diseases with diverse clinical and pathological characteristics that arise from the B (bursal- or bone marrow-derived) lymphocytes of the immune system. B cells are involved in humoral immunity as part of the adaptive immune response. They display a unique B-cell receptor (BCR) on their surface which binds to a specific antigen. Antigen- binding activates the process of clonal expansion, during which the B cell reproduces to form an army of clones that secrete the same antibody. These antibodies then bind to the target antigen on foreign cells and initiate a range of immune responses that ultimately lead to the destruction of that cell.
Click on the PDF icon at the top of this introduction to read the full article.
B-cell cancers constitute a large group of diseases with diverse clinical and pathological characteristics that arise from the B (bursal- or bone marrow-derived) lymphocytes of the immune system. B cells are involved in humoral immunity as part of the adaptive immune response. They display a unique B-cell receptor (BCR) on their surface which binds to a specific antigen. Antigen- binding activates the process of clonal expansion, during which the B cell reproduces to form an army of clones that secrete the same antibody. These antibodies then bind to the target antigen on foreign cells and initiate a range of immune responses that ultimately lead to the destruction of that cell.
Click on the PDF icon at the top of this introduction to read the full article.