User login
Colorectal Cancer Is Spiking Among Some Young Americans
WASHINGTON — Despite encouraging drops in overall colorectal cancer rates in the past two decades, one group stands out as an exception: Americans younger than 45.
As high as those percentages appear, the number of people affected at these ages remains small compared with rates in Americans 45 and older, said Loren Laine, MD, AGAF, professor of medicine (digestive diseases) at Yale School of Medicine, who co-moderated a news briefing discussing the research.
“The trends are alarming [but] the actual numbers of colorectal cancer cases among children and teens are not high enough to suggest widespread screening,” agreed lead investigator Islam Mohamed, MD, an internal medicine resident at the University of Missouri-Kansas City.
For example, 1 out of every 333,000 15- to-19-year-olds developed colorectal cancer in 1999. Colorectal cancer became more common by 2020, when 1 out of every 77,000 teens developed it.
At the same time, the number of cases in young adults 20 to 24 increased from less than 1 to 2 per 100,000 in 2020.
Even if the risk is relatively low in terms of absolute numbers, experts are keeping an eye on why the rates are increasing. It’s also about raising awareness. If someone younger than 45 experiences colorectal cancer symptoms like blood in their stool, stomach pain, changes in bowel habits, or others, they should seek medical attention, Dr. Laine said.
“If you have symptoms like rectal bleeding, you shouldn’t take it lightly. It’s still pretty unlikely that they’re going to have colon cancer ... but obviously you should still not totally dismiss it,” Dr. Laine said.
“Colorectal cancer is no longer considered just a disease of the elderly population,” Dr. Mohamed said during the briefing. “It’s important that the public is aware of signs and symptoms of colorectal cancer.”
Dr. Mohamed and colleagues studied colorectal cancer cases using numbers from the CDC Wonder Database, a central database of public health information. They calculated increases by comparing rates in 1999 to 2020.
Colorectal cancer is a major cause of cancer-related death in the United States. It currently ranks third in terms of new cases and cancer-related deaths once some skin cancers are excluded, American Cancer Society data indicates.
Some Risk Factors Can Be Changed
The colorectal cancer rates in younger people “have been consistently rising. It might be related to the environmental factors, lifestyle factors, and genetic factors as well,” Dr. Mohamed said. “It also might mean that we are doing better. Maybe we’re screening patients more, and maybe we’re doing a greater job of picking patients who are at high risk of colorectal cancer in the younger population.”
“Adopting a healthy lifestyle would be a great approach to curb the rising incidence of colorectal cancer as we saw metabolic syndrome is a big [factor],” Dr. Mohamed added. Patients should be encouraged to maintain a balanced diet, engage in regular physical activity, and maybe limit alcohol consumption, he said.
On the other hand, up to one third of early-onset colorectal cancer cases are linked to factors that cannot be changed. A family history of colorectal cancer, presence of inflammatory bowel disease, and certain types of cancers linked to genetic mutations are examples. “When you think about it, most of those young people [with colorectal cancer] probably have genetic syndromes,” Dr. Laine said. “The big issue is, frankly, finding better ways to identify families that have genetic syndromes. That’s probably the biggest message.”
Risk Varied by Age
In addition to the increases in the 15- to 19-year-old and 20- to 24-year-old groups, the rates in 2020 compared with 1999 showed a
- 68% increase for ages 25 to 29.
- 71% increase for ages 30 to 34.
- 58% increase for ages 35 to 39.
- 45% increase for ages 40 to 44.
“These findings all emphasize the urgent needs for public awareness and personalized screening approaches,” Dr. Mohamed said, “particularly among younger populations who had the most substantial increase in colorectal cancer incidence we observed.”
The US Preventive Services Task Force lowered the recommended age for colorectal cancer screening from 50 to 45 in 2021. Dr. Mohamed suggested more targeted screening for people under 45 at higher risk.
“I think also staying informed about the rising incidence and the latest research and recommendations in terms of colorectal cancer prevention and screening will be really, really helpful.”
A version of this article appeared on WebMD Health News.
WASHINGTON — Despite encouraging drops in overall colorectal cancer rates in the past two decades, one group stands out as an exception: Americans younger than 45.
As high as those percentages appear, the number of people affected at these ages remains small compared with rates in Americans 45 and older, said Loren Laine, MD, AGAF, professor of medicine (digestive diseases) at Yale School of Medicine, who co-moderated a news briefing discussing the research.
“The trends are alarming [but] the actual numbers of colorectal cancer cases among children and teens are not high enough to suggest widespread screening,” agreed lead investigator Islam Mohamed, MD, an internal medicine resident at the University of Missouri-Kansas City.
For example, 1 out of every 333,000 15- to-19-year-olds developed colorectal cancer in 1999. Colorectal cancer became more common by 2020, when 1 out of every 77,000 teens developed it.
At the same time, the number of cases in young adults 20 to 24 increased from less than 1 to 2 per 100,000 in 2020.
Even if the risk is relatively low in terms of absolute numbers, experts are keeping an eye on why the rates are increasing. It’s also about raising awareness. If someone younger than 45 experiences colorectal cancer symptoms like blood in their stool, stomach pain, changes in bowel habits, or others, they should seek medical attention, Dr. Laine said.
“If you have symptoms like rectal bleeding, you shouldn’t take it lightly. It’s still pretty unlikely that they’re going to have colon cancer ... but obviously you should still not totally dismiss it,” Dr. Laine said.
“Colorectal cancer is no longer considered just a disease of the elderly population,” Dr. Mohamed said during the briefing. “It’s important that the public is aware of signs and symptoms of colorectal cancer.”
Dr. Mohamed and colleagues studied colorectal cancer cases using numbers from the CDC Wonder Database, a central database of public health information. They calculated increases by comparing rates in 1999 to 2020.
Colorectal cancer is a major cause of cancer-related death in the United States. It currently ranks third in terms of new cases and cancer-related deaths once some skin cancers are excluded, American Cancer Society data indicates.
Some Risk Factors Can Be Changed
The colorectal cancer rates in younger people “have been consistently rising. It might be related to the environmental factors, lifestyle factors, and genetic factors as well,” Dr. Mohamed said. “It also might mean that we are doing better. Maybe we’re screening patients more, and maybe we’re doing a greater job of picking patients who are at high risk of colorectal cancer in the younger population.”
“Adopting a healthy lifestyle would be a great approach to curb the rising incidence of colorectal cancer as we saw metabolic syndrome is a big [factor],” Dr. Mohamed added. Patients should be encouraged to maintain a balanced diet, engage in regular physical activity, and maybe limit alcohol consumption, he said.
On the other hand, up to one third of early-onset colorectal cancer cases are linked to factors that cannot be changed. A family history of colorectal cancer, presence of inflammatory bowel disease, and certain types of cancers linked to genetic mutations are examples. “When you think about it, most of those young people [with colorectal cancer] probably have genetic syndromes,” Dr. Laine said. “The big issue is, frankly, finding better ways to identify families that have genetic syndromes. That’s probably the biggest message.”
Risk Varied by Age
In addition to the increases in the 15- to 19-year-old and 20- to 24-year-old groups, the rates in 2020 compared with 1999 showed a
- 68% increase for ages 25 to 29.
- 71% increase for ages 30 to 34.
- 58% increase for ages 35 to 39.
- 45% increase for ages 40 to 44.
“These findings all emphasize the urgent needs for public awareness and personalized screening approaches,” Dr. Mohamed said, “particularly among younger populations who had the most substantial increase in colorectal cancer incidence we observed.”
The US Preventive Services Task Force lowered the recommended age for colorectal cancer screening from 50 to 45 in 2021. Dr. Mohamed suggested more targeted screening for people under 45 at higher risk.
“I think also staying informed about the rising incidence and the latest research and recommendations in terms of colorectal cancer prevention and screening will be really, really helpful.”
A version of this article appeared on WebMD Health News.
WASHINGTON — Despite encouraging drops in overall colorectal cancer rates in the past two decades, one group stands out as an exception: Americans younger than 45.
As high as those percentages appear, the number of people affected at these ages remains small compared with rates in Americans 45 and older, said Loren Laine, MD, AGAF, professor of medicine (digestive diseases) at Yale School of Medicine, who co-moderated a news briefing discussing the research.
“The trends are alarming [but] the actual numbers of colorectal cancer cases among children and teens are not high enough to suggest widespread screening,” agreed lead investigator Islam Mohamed, MD, an internal medicine resident at the University of Missouri-Kansas City.
For example, 1 out of every 333,000 15- to-19-year-olds developed colorectal cancer in 1999. Colorectal cancer became more common by 2020, when 1 out of every 77,000 teens developed it.
At the same time, the number of cases in young adults 20 to 24 increased from less than 1 to 2 per 100,000 in 2020.
Even if the risk is relatively low in terms of absolute numbers, experts are keeping an eye on why the rates are increasing. It’s also about raising awareness. If someone younger than 45 experiences colorectal cancer symptoms like blood in their stool, stomach pain, changes in bowel habits, or others, they should seek medical attention, Dr. Laine said.
“If you have symptoms like rectal bleeding, you shouldn’t take it lightly. It’s still pretty unlikely that they’re going to have colon cancer ... but obviously you should still not totally dismiss it,” Dr. Laine said.
“Colorectal cancer is no longer considered just a disease of the elderly population,” Dr. Mohamed said during the briefing. “It’s important that the public is aware of signs and symptoms of colorectal cancer.”
Dr. Mohamed and colleagues studied colorectal cancer cases using numbers from the CDC Wonder Database, a central database of public health information. They calculated increases by comparing rates in 1999 to 2020.
Colorectal cancer is a major cause of cancer-related death in the United States. It currently ranks third in terms of new cases and cancer-related deaths once some skin cancers are excluded, American Cancer Society data indicates.
Some Risk Factors Can Be Changed
The colorectal cancer rates in younger people “have been consistently rising. It might be related to the environmental factors, lifestyle factors, and genetic factors as well,” Dr. Mohamed said. “It also might mean that we are doing better. Maybe we’re screening patients more, and maybe we’re doing a greater job of picking patients who are at high risk of colorectal cancer in the younger population.”
“Adopting a healthy lifestyle would be a great approach to curb the rising incidence of colorectal cancer as we saw metabolic syndrome is a big [factor],” Dr. Mohamed added. Patients should be encouraged to maintain a balanced diet, engage in regular physical activity, and maybe limit alcohol consumption, he said.
On the other hand, up to one third of early-onset colorectal cancer cases are linked to factors that cannot be changed. A family history of colorectal cancer, presence of inflammatory bowel disease, and certain types of cancers linked to genetic mutations are examples. “When you think about it, most of those young people [with colorectal cancer] probably have genetic syndromes,” Dr. Laine said. “The big issue is, frankly, finding better ways to identify families that have genetic syndromes. That’s probably the biggest message.”
Risk Varied by Age
In addition to the increases in the 15- to 19-year-old and 20- to 24-year-old groups, the rates in 2020 compared with 1999 showed a
- 68% increase for ages 25 to 29.
- 71% increase for ages 30 to 34.
- 58% increase for ages 35 to 39.
- 45% increase for ages 40 to 44.
“These findings all emphasize the urgent needs for public awareness and personalized screening approaches,” Dr. Mohamed said, “particularly among younger populations who had the most substantial increase in colorectal cancer incidence we observed.”
The US Preventive Services Task Force lowered the recommended age for colorectal cancer screening from 50 to 45 in 2021. Dr. Mohamed suggested more targeted screening for people under 45 at higher risk.
“I think also staying informed about the rising incidence and the latest research and recommendations in terms of colorectal cancer prevention and screening will be really, really helpful.”
A version of this article appeared on WebMD Health News.
FROM DDW 2024
Semaglutide Aids Weight Loss With or Without Bariatric Surgery
, a first-of-its-kind study reveals.
In addition, insurance coverage/expense was the most common issue for people wishing to start the popular medications, known as GLP-1 receptor agonists. Side effects and drug shortages were among the reasons people stopped taking the medication.
Overall, people lost an average of 6% of their total body weight in almost 1 year of taking semaglutide, the class of drugs that includes Wegovy and Ozempic. When researchers compared people who had weight loss surgery with those who had not, total weight loss was almost identical: 5.8% in those who had surgery, vs 6.0% in those who had not.
People in this study lost a lower percentage of their total body weight, compared with people in clinical trials for the drugs, who tended to lose up to 15%, said lead investigator Pourya Medhati, MD, a postdoctoral research fellow at Brigham and Women’s Hospital in Boston.
These results suggest real-world weight loss results may be different than those in carefully controlled research studies. Dr. Medhati presented the findings at Digestive Disease Week® (DDW) 2024 in Washington.
Total weight loss was not significantly different between men and women in the surgery group. But in the nonsurgery group, women lost 6.4%, compared with 4.8% among men, a significant difference.
Dr. Medhati and Ali Tavakkoli, MD, chief of the Division of General and GI Surgery at Brigham and Women’s Hospital, used electronic health records to study 2491 adults prescribed semaglutide between 2018 and 2023 at Brigham and Women’s Hospital. Average age was 51, 74% were White, and 78% were women. A total of 13% had a history of weight loss surgery.
Costs, Side Effects, and Other Concerns
The investigators looked at issues around starting and staying on semaglutide in a subgroup of 500 patients. A total of 75 people never started the drug, for example. The majority, 72%, of this group said it was because of insurance coverage or the cost of the medication. Another 19% did not give a reason, and 9% said it was because of side effects.
People with higher body mass indexes and diabetes were less likely to start taking semaglutide, Dr. Medhati said.
Another 100 of the 500 patients started and then stopped semaglutide. Again, insurance coverage and cost were reasons, this time cited by 13%. About 36% stopped because of side effects; 21% pointed to a shortage of semaglutide; and 30% stopped for an unspecified reason.
“Our study highlights the importance of addressing insurance to ensure broader access,” Dr. Medhati said.
The 325 people who stayed on semaglutide lost an average of 8.5% of their total body weight at 50 weeks.
Access Remains Unequal
“These medications are incredibly powerful to treat obesity and weight-related disease both for people with a history of bariatric surgery and those without,” said session co-moderator Matthew Kroh, MD, vice chair of innovation and technology in the Department of General Surgery at Cleveland Clinic.
More equitable access to semaglutide and other GLP-1s is needed, he said. “Because the cost is so high and they’re not covered by most insurance plans at this point, people with better financial means have access to these medications,” while others may not.
Dr. Kroh said the findings may only apply to the patients, most of whom were female, White, and middle-aged. But he applauded the researchers for doing the study outside of a clinical trial. “Real-world data will help guide these decisions in the future,” he said.
A version of this article appeared on WebMD.com.
, a first-of-its-kind study reveals.
In addition, insurance coverage/expense was the most common issue for people wishing to start the popular medications, known as GLP-1 receptor agonists. Side effects and drug shortages were among the reasons people stopped taking the medication.
Overall, people lost an average of 6% of their total body weight in almost 1 year of taking semaglutide, the class of drugs that includes Wegovy and Ozempic. When researchers compared people who had weight loss surgery with those who had not, total weight loss was almost identical: 5.8% in those who had surgery, vs 6.0% in those who had not.
People in this study lost a lower percentage of their total body weight, compared with people in clinical trials for the drugs, who tended to lose up to 15%, said lead investigator Pourya Medhati, MD, a postdoctoral research fellow at Brigham and Women’s Hospital in Boston.
These results suggest real-world weight loss results may be different than those in carefully controlled research studies. Dr. Medhati presented the findings at Digestive Disease Week® (DDW) 2024 in Washington.
Total weight loss was not significantly different between men and women in the surgery group. But in the nonsurgery group, women lost 6.4%, compared with 4.8% among men, a significant difference.
Dr. Medhati and Ali Tavakkoli, MD, chief of the Division of General and GI Surgery at Brigham and Women’s Hospital, used electronic health records to study 2491 adults prescribed semaglutide between 2018 and 2023 at Brigham and Women’s Hospital. Average age was 51, 74% were White, and 78% were women. A total of 13% had a history of weight loss surgery.
Costs, Side Effects, and Other Concerns
The investigators looked at issues around starting and staying on semaglutide in a subgroup of 500 patients. A total of 75 people never started the drug, for example. The majority, 72%, of this group said it was because of insurance coverage or the cost of the medication. Another 19% did not give a reason, and 9% said it was because of side effects.
People with higher body mass indexes and diabetes were less likely to start taking semaglutide, Dr. Medhati said.
Another 100 of the 500 patients started and then stopped semaglutide. Again, insurance coverage and cost were reasons, this time cited by 13%. About 36% stopped because of side effects; 21% pointed to a shortage of semaglutide; and 30% stopped for an unspecified reason.
“Our study highlights the importance of addressing insurance to ensure broader access,” Dr. Medhati said.
The 325 people who stayed on semaglutide lost an average of 8.5% of their total body weight at 50 weeks.
Access Remains Unequal
“These medications are incredibly powerful to treat obesity and weight-related disease both for people with a history of bariatric surgery and those without,” said session co-moderator Matthew Kroh, MD, vice chair of innovation and technology in the Department of General Surgery at Cleveland Clinic.
More equitable access to semaglutide and other GLP-1s is needed, he said. “Because the cost is so high and they’re not covered by most insurance plans at this point, people with better financial means have access to these medications,” while others may not.
Dr. Kroh said the findings may only apply to the patients, most of whom were female, White, and middle-aged. But he applauded the researchers for doing the study outside of a clinical trial. “Real-world data will help guide these decisions in the future,” he said.
A version of this article appeared on WebMD.com.
, a first-of-its-kind study reveals.
In addition, insurance coverage/expense was the most common issue for people wishing to start the popular medications, known as GLP-1 receptor agonists. Side effects and drug shortages were among the reasons people stopped taking the medication.
Overall, people lost an average of 6% of their total body weight in almost 1 year of taking semaglutide, the class of drugs that includes Wegovy and Ozempic. When researchers compared people who had weight loss surgery with those who had not, total weight loss was almost identical: 5.8% in those who had surgery, vs 6.0% in those who had not.
People in this study lost a lower percentage of their total body weight, compared with people in clinical trials for the drugs, who tended to lose up to 15%, said lead investigator Pourya Medhati, MD, a postdoctoral research fellow at Brigham and Women’s Hospital in Boston.
These results suggest real-world weight loss results may be different than those in carefully controlled research studies. Dr. Medhati presented the findings at Digestive Disease Week® (DDW) 2024 in Washington.
Total weight loss was not significantly different between men and women in the surgery group. But in the nonsurgery group, women lost 6.4%, compared with 4.8% among men, a significant difference.
Dr. Medhati and Ali Tavakkoli, MD, chief of the Division of General and GI Surgery at Brigham and Women’s Hospital, used electronic health records to study 2491 adults prescribed semaglutide between 2018 and 2023 at Brigham and Women’s Hospital. Average age was 51, 74% were White, and 78% were women. A total of 13% had a history of weight loss surgery.
Costs, Side Effects, and Other Concerns
The investigators looked at issues around starting and staying on semaglutide in a subgroup of 500 patients. A total of 75 people never started the drug, for example. The majority, 72%, of this group said it was because of insurance coverage or the cost of the medication. Another 19% did not give a reason, and 9% said it was because of side effects.
People with higher body mass indexes and diabetes were less likely to start taking semaglutide, Dr. Medhati said.
Another 100 of the 500 patients started and then stopped semaglutide. Again, insurance coverage and cost were reasons, this time cited by 13%. About 36% stopped because of side effects; 21% pointed to a shortage of semaglutide; and 30% stopped for an unspecified reason.
“Our study highlights the importance of addressing insurance to ensure broader access,” Dr. Medhati said.
The 325 people who stayed on semaglutide lost an average of 8.5% of their total body weight at 50 weeks.
Access Remains Unequal
“These medications are incredibly powerful to treat obesity and weight-related disease both for people with a history of bariatric surgery and those without,” said session co-moderator Matthew Kroh, MD, vice chair of innovation and technology in the Department of General Surgery at Cleveland Clinic.
More equitable access to semaglutide and other GLP-1s is needed, he said. “Because the cost is so high and they’re not covered by most insurance plans at this point, people with better financial means have access to these medications,” while others may not.
Dr. Kroh said the findings may only apply to the patients, most of whom were female, White, and middle-aged. But he applauded the researchers for doing the study outside of a clinical trial. “Real-world data will help guide these decisions in the future,” he said.
A version of this article appeared on WebMD.com.
Late-Night Eaters May Have Increased Risk for Colorectal Cancer
WASHINGTON —
, according to the results of research presented at the annual Digestive Disease Week® (DDW).Investigators in a new study questioned 664 people getting a colonoscopy to screen for cancer, and 42% said they were late eaters. This group was 46% more likely than non–late eaters to have an adenoma found during colonoscopy. An estimated 5% to 10% of them become cancerous over time.
“A lot of other studies are about what we eat but not when we eat,” said Edena Khoshaba, lead investigator and a medical student at Rush University Medical College in Chicago. “The common advice includes not eating red meat, eating more fruits and vegetables — which is great, of course — but we wanted to see if the timing affects us at all.”
Ms. Khoshaba and colleagues found it did. Late eaters were 5.5 times more likely to have three or more tubular adenomas compared to non–late eaters, even after adjusting for what people were eating. Tubular adenomas are the most common type of polyp found in the colon.
So, what’s the possible connection between late eating and the risk for colorectal cancer?
Resetting Your Internal Clock
Eating close to bedtime could be throwing off the body’s circadian rhythm. But in this case, it’s not the central circadian center located in the brain — the one that releases melatonin. Instead, late eating could disrupt the peripheral circadian rhythm, part of which is found in the GI tract. For example, if a person is eating late at night, the brain thinks it is nighttime while the gut thinks it is daytime, Ms. Khoshaba said in an interview.
This is an interesting study, said Amy Bragagnini, MS, RD, spokesperson for the Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics, when asked to comment on the research. “It is true that eating later at night can disrupt your circadian rhythm.”
“In addition, many of my patients have told me that when they do eat later at night, they don’t always make the healthiest food choices,” Ms. Bragagnini said. “Their late-night food choices are generally higher in added sugar and fat. This may cause them to consume far more calories than their body needs.” So, eating late at night can also lead to unwanted weight gain.
An unanswered question is if late eating is connected in any way at all to increasing rates of colorectal cancer seen in younger patients.
This was an observational study, and another possible limitation, Ms. Khoshaba said, is that people were asked to recall their diets over 24 hours, which may not always be accurate.
Some of the organisms in the gut have their own internal clocks that follow a daily rhythm, and what someone eat determines how many different kinds of these organisms are active, Ms. Bragagnini said.
“So, if your late-night eating consists of foods high in sugar and fat, you may be negatively impacting your microbiome.” she said.
The next step for Ms. Khoshaba and colleagues is a study examining the peripheral circadian rhythm, changes in the gut microbiome, and the risk for developing metabolic syndrome. Ms. Khoshaba and Ms. Bragagnini had no relevant disclosures.
A version of this article appeared on Medscape.com.
WASHINGTON —
, according to the results of research presented at the annual Digestive Disease Week® (DDW).Investigators in a new study questioned 664 people getting a colonoscopy to screen for cancer, and 42% said they were late eaters. This group was 46% more likely than non–late eaters to have an adenoma found during colonoscopy. An estimated 5% to 10% of them become cancerous over time.
“A lot of other studies are about what we eat but not when we eat,” said Edena Khoshaba, lead investigator and a medical student at Rush University Medical College in Chicago. “The common advice includes not eating red meat, eating more fruits and vegetables — which is great, of course — but we wanted to see if the timing affects us at all.”
Ms. Khoshaba and colleagues found it did. Late eaters were 5.5 times more likely to have three or more tubular adenomas compared to non–late eaters, even after adjusting for what people were eating. Tubular adenomas are the most common type of polyp found in the colon.
So, what’s the possible connection between late eating and the risk for colorectal cancer?
Resetting Your Internal Clock
Eating close to bedtime could be throwing off the body’s circadian rhythm. But in this case, it’s not the central circadian center located in the brain — the one that releases melatonin. Instead, late eating could disrupt the peripheral circadian rhythm, part of which is found in the GI tract. For example, if a person is eating late at night, the brain thinks it is nighttime while the gut thinks it is daytime, Ms. Khoshaba said in an interview.
This is an interesting study, said Amy Bragagnini, MS, RD, spokesperson for the Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics, when asked to comment on the research. “It is true that eating later at night can disrupt your circadian rhythm.”
“In addition, many of my patients have told me that when they do eat later at night, they don’t always make the healthiest food choices,” Ms. Bragagnini said. “Their late-night food choices are generally higher in added sugar and fat. This may cause them to consume far more calories than their body needs.” So, eating late at night can also lead to unwanted weight gain.
An unanswered question is if late eating is connected in any way at all to increasing rates of colorectal cancer seen in younger patients.
This was an observational study, and another possible limitation, Ms. Khoshaba said, is that people were asked to recall their diets over 24 hours, which may not always be accurate.
Some of the organisms in the gut have their own internal clocks that follow a daily rhythm, and what someone eat determines how many different kinds of these organisms are active, Ms. Bragagnini said.
“So, if your late-night eating consists of foods high in sugar and fat, you may be negatively impacting your microbiome.” she said.
The next step for Ms. Khoshaba and colleagues is a study examining the peripheral circadian rhythm, changes in the gut microbiome, and the risk for developing metabolic syndrome. Ms. Khoshaba and Ms. Bragagnini had no relevant disclosures.
A version of this article appeared on Medscape.com.
WASHINGTON —
, according to the results of research presented at the annual Digestive Disease Week® (DDW).Investigators in a new study questioned 664 people getting a colonoscopy to screen for cancer, and 42% said they were late eaters. This group was 46% more likely than non–late eaters to have an adenoma found during colonoscopy. An estimated 5% to 10% of them become cancerous over time.
“A lot of other studies are about what we eat but not when we eat,” said Edena Khoshaba, lead investigator and a medical student at Rush University Medical College in Chicago. “The common advice includes not eating red meat, eating more fruits and vegetables — which is great, of course — but we wanted to see if the timing affects us at all.”
Ms. Khoshaba and colleagues found it did. Late eaters were 5.5 times more likely to have three or more tubular adenomas compared to non–late eaters, even after adjusting for what people were eating. Tubular adenomas are the most common type of polyp found in the colon.
So, what’s the possible connection between late eating and the risk for colorectal cancer?
Resetting Your Internal Clock
Eating close to bedtime could be throwing off the body’s circadian rhythm. But in this case, it’s not the central circadian center located in the brain — the one that releases melatonin. Instead, late eating could disrupt the peripheral circadian rhythm, part of which is found in the GI tract. For example, if a person is eating late at night, the brain thinks it is nighttime while the gut thinks it is daytime, Ms. Khoshaba said in an interview.
This is an interesting study, said Amy Bragagnini, MS, RD, spokesperson for the Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics, when asked to comment on the research. “It is true that eating later at night can disrupt your circadian rhythm.”
“In addition, many of my patients have told me that when they do eat later at night, they don’t always make the healthiest food choices,” Ms. Bragagnini said. “Their late-night food choices are generally higher in added sugar and fat. This may cause them to consume far more calories than their body needs.” So, eating late at night can also lead to unwanted weight gain.
An unanswered question is if late eating is connected in any way at all to increasing rates of colorectal cancer seen in younger patients.
This was an observational study, and another possible limitation, Ms. Khoshaba said, is that people were asked to recall their diets over 24 hours, which may not always be accurate.
Some of the organisms in the gut have their own internal clocks that follow a daily rhythm, and what someone eat determines how many different kinds of these organisms are active, Ms. Bragagnini said.
“So, if your late-night eating consists of foods high in sugar and fat, you may be negatively impacting your microbiome.” she said.
The next step for Ms. Khoshaba and colleagues is a study examining the peripheral circadian rhythm, changes in the gut microbiome, and the risk for developing metabolic syndrome. Ms. Khoshaba and Ms. Bragagnini had no relevant disclosures.
A version of this article appeared on Medscape.com.
FROM DDW 2024
Healthy Sleep Linked to Lower Odds for Digestive Diseases
TOPLINE:
Healthier sleep is associated with lower odds of developing a wide range of gastrointestinal conditions, regardless of genetic susceptibility, new research revealed.
METHODOLOGY:
- Due to the widespread prevalence of sleep issues and a growing burden of digestive diseases globally, researchers investigated the association between sleep quality and digestive disorders in a prospective cohort study of 410,586 people in the UK Biobank.
- Five individual sleep behaviors were assessed: sleep duration, insomnia, snoring, daytime sleepiness, and chronotype.
- A healthy sleep was defined as a morning chronotype, 7-8 hours of sleep duration, no self-reported snoring, never or rare insomnia, and a low frequency of daytime sleepiness, for a score of 5/5.
- The study investigators tracked the development of 16 digestive diseases over a mean period of 13.2 years.
- As well as looking at healthy sleep scores, researchers considered genetic susceptibility to gastrointestinal conditions.
TAKEAWAY:
- Of the 16 digestive diseases looked at, the reduction of risk was highest for irritable bowel syndrome at 50% (HR, 0.50; 95% CI, 0.45-0.57).
- A healthy sleep score was also associated with 37% reduced odds for metabolic dysfunction–associated steatotic liver disease (formerly known as nonalcoholic fatty liver disease; HR, 0.63; 95% CI, 0.55-0.71), 35% lower chance for peptic ulcer (HR, 0.65; 95% CI, 0.058-0.74), 34% reduced chance for dyspepsia (HR, 0.66; 95% CI, 0.58-0.75), and a 25% lower risk for diverticulosis (HR, 0.75; 95% CI, 0.71-0.80).
- High genetic risk and poor sleep scores were also associated with increased odds (53% to > 200%) of developing digestive diseases.
- However, healthy sleep reduced the risk for digestive diseases regardless of genetic susceptibility.
IN PRACTICE:
“Our findings underscore the potential holistic impact of different sleep behaviors in mitigating the risk of digestive diseases in clinical practice,” wrote Shiyi Yu, MD, of Guangdong Provincial People’s Hospital, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China, and colleagues.
Poor sleep can also change our gut microbiome, Dr. Yu told this news organization. If you don’t sleep well, the repair of the gut lining cannot be finished during the night.
SOURCE:
The study was presented at the Digestive Disease Week® (DDW), 2024, annual meeting.
DISCLOSURES:
Dr. Yu had no relevant financial disclosures.
A version of this article appeared on Medscape.com.
TOPLINE:
Healthier sleep is associated with lower odds of developing a wide range of gastrointestinal conditions, regardless of genetic susceptibility, new research revealed.
METHODOLOGY:
- Due to the widespread prevalence of sleep issues and a growing burden of digestive diseases globally, researchers investigated the association between sleep quality and digestive disorders in a prospective cohort study of 410,586 people in the UK Biobank.
- Five individual sleep behaviors were assessed: sleep duration, insomnia, snoring, daytime sleepiness, and chronotype.
- A healthy sleep was defined as a morning chronotype, 7-8 hours of sleep duration, no self-reported snoring, never or rare insomnia, and a low frequency of daytime sleepiness, for a score of 5/5.
- The study investigators tracked the development of 16 digestive diseases over a mean period of 13.2 years.
- As well as looking at healthy sleep scores, researchers considered genetic susceptibility to gastrointestinal conditions.
TAKEAWAY:
- Of the 16 digestive diseases looked at, the reduction of risk was highest for irritable bowel syndrome at 50% (HR, 0.50; 95% CI, 0.45-0.57).
- A healthy sleep score was also associated with 37% reduced odds for metabolic dysfunction–associated steatotic liver disease (formerly known as nonalcoholic fatty liver disease; HR, 0.63; 95% CI, 0.55-0.71), 35% lower chance for peptic ulcer (HR, 0.65; 95% CI, 0.058-0.74), 34% reduced chance for dyspepsia (HR, 0.66; 95% CI, 0.58-0.75), and a 25% lower risk for diverticulosis (HR, 0.75; 95% CI, 0.71-0.80).
- High genetic risk and poor sleep scores were also associated with increased odds (53% to > 200%) of developing digestive diseases.
- However, healthy sleep reduced the risk for digestive diseases regardless of genetic susceptibility.
IN PRACTICE:
“Our findings underscore the potential holistic impact of different sleep behaviors in mitigating the risk of digestive diseases in clinical practice,” wrote Shiyi Yu, MD, of Guangdong Provincial People’s Hospital, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China, and colleagues.
Poor sleep can also change our gut microbiome, Dr. Yu told this news organization. If you don’t sleep well, the repair of the gut lining cannot be finished during the night.
SOURCE:
The study was presented at the Digestive Disease Week® (DDW), 2024, annual meeting.
DISCLOSURES:
Dr. Yu had no relevant financial disclosures.
A version of this article appeared on Medscape.com.
TOPLINE:
Healthier sleep is associated with lower odds of developing a wide range of gastrointestinal conditions, regardless of genetic susceptibility, new research revealed.
METHODOLOGY:
- Due to the widespread prevalence of sleep issues and a growing burden of digestive diseases globally, researchers investigated the association between sleep quality and digestive disorders in a prospective cohort study of 410,586 people in the UK Biobank.
- Five individual sleep behaviors were assessed: sleep duration, insomnia, snoring, daytime sleepiness, and chronotype.
- A healthy sleep was defined as a morning chronotype, 7-8 hours of sleep duration, no self-reported snoring, never or rare insomnia, and a low frequency of daytime sleepiness, for a score of 5/5.
- The study investigators tracked the development of 16 digestive diseases over a mean period of 13.2 years.
- As well as looking at healthy sleep scores, researchers considered genetic susceptibility to gastrointestinal conditions.
TAKEAWAY:
- Of the 16 digestive diseases looked at, the reduction of risk was highest for irritable bowel syndrome at 50% (HR, 0.50; 95% CI, 0.45-0.57).
- A healthy sleep score was also associated with 37% reduced odds for metabolic dysfunction–associated steatotic liver disease (formerly known as nonalcoholic fatty liver disease; HR, 0.63; 95% CI, 0.55-0.71), 35% lower chance for peptic ulcer (HR, 0.65; 95% CI, 0.058-0.74), 34% reduced chance for dyspepsia (HR, 0.66; 95% CI, 0.58-0.75), and a 25% lower risk for diverticulosis (HR, 0.75; 95% CI, 0.71-0.80).
- High genetic risk and poor sleep scores were also associated with increased odds (53% to > 200%) of developing digestive diseases.
- However, healthy sleep reduced the risk for digestive diseases regardless of genetic susceptibility.
IN PRACTICE:
“Our findings underscore the potential holistic impact of different sleep behaviors in mitigating the risk of digestive diseases in clinical practice,” wrote Shiyi Yu, MD, of Guangdong Provincial People’s Hospital, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China, and colleagues.
Poor sleep can also change our gut microbiome, Dr. Yu told this news organization. If you don’t sleep well, the repair of the gut lining cannot be finished during the night.
SOURCE:
The study was presented at the Digestive Disease Week® (DDW), 2024, annual meeting.
DISCLOSURES:
Dr. Yu had no relevant financial disclosures.
A version of this article appeared on Medscape.com.
Maintenance Treatment With Guselkumab for Ulcerative Colitis Meets All Endpoints: QUASAR
WASHINGTON —
The primary outcome of clinical remission at 44 weeks was greater with either of two dose regimens of guselkumab than with placebo, David Rubin, MD, AGAF, reported as part of his presentation (Abstract 759) at the annual Digestive Disease Week® (DDW).
Guselkumab is not the only biologic approved or in development for UC, but it is unique because of its dual action. It is an interleukin (IL)-23p19 subunit inhibitor that blocks IL-23 and also binds to the CD64 receptor on cells that produce IL-23.
Dr. Rubin, who is chief of the Section of Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Nutrition at University of Chicago Medicine, Chicago, said he was unsure at the beginning of the trial if this dual activity “might have any value.”
Targeting both the IL-23 circulating in the tissue and the receptor remains to be proven, “but nonetheless seems reasonable,” he said.
The study included 568 people, about 42% of whom had an inadequate response or were intolerant to prior advanced therapy, and 42.5% of whom had failed two or more advanced therapy classes.
Clinical responders from two prior guselkumab induction studies were enrolled in this randomized withdrawal, double-blind maintenance trial. At either 12 weeks or 24 weeks of induction, patients were randomly assigned to subcutaneous 200-mg guselkumab every 4 weeks (n = 190), 100-mg guselkumab every 8 weeks (n = 188), or placebo (n = 190). The placebo group served as a guselkumab withdrawal group.
Participants had a mean age of 41 years and a mean disease duration of 7.8 years. The 40% using oral corticosteroids were tapered off during the study.
A total of 45.2% of the 100-mg guselkumab group and 50.0% of the 200-mg guselkumab group met the primary outcome of clinical remission at week 44 compared with 18.9% with placebo.
“It was interesting to note that the 200 mg every 4 weeks was similar in efficacy at week 44 to the 100 mg every 8 weeks. It’s much less medicine, but you get similar results,” Dr. Rubin said.
Secondary Outcomes Also Superior
“The bottom line is not only did it work, but it worked when you look at some secondary endpoints, including endoscopic remission, where the bowel is completely healed,” Dr. Rubin said in an interview.
Overall, 34% of all participants who received guselkumab achieved this outcome, “which is a very high rate,” he said. “We haven’t seen a Mayo score of zero — meaning endoscopic remission — at that rate with any of our other therapies currently.”
Among the participants who achieved clinical remission, 69% of them also showed complete remission on endoscopy.
Other secondary outcomes significantly better at week 44 vs placebo included corticosteroid-free clinical remission, maintenance of clinical remission, clinical response, symptomatic remission, endoscopic improvement, histo-endoscopic mucosal improvement, endoscopic normalization, Inflammatory Bowel Disease Questionnaire remission, and fatigue response.
“It was a great study. I think it’s very promising data,” said session co-moderator Ashwin N. Ananthakrishnan, MBBS, MPH, AGAF, director of the Crohn’s and Colitis Center at Massachusetts General Hospital in Boston.
“As we get more data from these more selective interleukins, we’ll get a better sense of how that plays out” vs other similar agents in development, he added.
IL-23 Target Seems Safe
One or more adverse events were reported by 70% of the higher-dose guselkumab group, 65% of the lower-dose guselkumab group, and 68% of the placebo group.
The most common adverse events in a combined 200-mg and 100-mg guselkumab group were lower than in the placebo group: 11.2% vs 14.1% reported COVID-19, 11.2% vs 29.7% reported exacerbation of UC, and 6.1% vs 6.8% experienced arthralgia, respectively.
No cases of active tuberculosis, opportunistic infection, anaphylaxis, serum sickness, Hy’s law, or serious hepatic issues were reported. One patient had clear cell renal carcinoma, another had rectal adenocarcinoma, and one hemorrhagic stroke was reported in the treatment groups. No patients died during the trial.
A higher proportion of people in the placebo group (13.7%) discontinued the study than those in the 100-mg guselkumab group (10.6%) and the 200-mg guselkumab group (11.6%).
“In general, we have accepted that the IL-23 target seems to be a very safe one,” Dr. Rubin said.
A leading theory is that unlike some interleukins, IL-23 is only expressed where the body has inflammation; therefore, targeting IL-23 does not affect other areas, he explained.
If approved by the Food and Drug Administration, it would expand the official indications for guselkumab, which was approved in 2020 for psoriatic arthritis and in 2017 for plaque psoriasis.
The study was supported by Janssen Research & Development, LLC. Dr. Rubin is a consultant for Janssen. Dr. Ananthakrishnan had no relevant disclosures.
A version of this article appeared on Medscape.com.
WASHINGTON —
The primary outcome of clinical remission at 44 weeks was greater with either of two dose regimens of guselkumab than with placebo, David Rubin, MD, AGAF, reported as part of his presentation (Abstract 759) at the annual Digestive Disease Week® (DDW).
Guselkumab is not the only biologic approved or in development for UC, but it is unique because of its dual action. It is an interleukin (IL)-23p19 subunit inhibitor that blocks IL-23 and also binds to the CD64 receptor on cells that produce IL-23.
Dr. Rubin, who is chief of the Section of Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Nutrition at University of Chicago Medicine, Chicago, said he was unsure at the beginning of the trial if this dual activity “might have any value.”
Targeting both the IL-23 circulating in the tissue and the receptor remains to be proven, “but nonetheless seems reasonable,” he said.
The study included 568 people, about 42% of whom had an inadequate response or were intolerant to prior advanced therapy, and 42.5% of whom had failed two or more advanced therapy classes.
Clinical responders from two prior guselkumab induction studies were enrolled in this randomized withdrawal, double-blind maintenance trial. At either 12 weeks or 24 weeks of induction, patients were randomly assigned to subcutaneous 200-mg guselkumab every 4 weeks (n = 190), 100-mg guselkumab every 8 weeks (n = 188), or placebo (n = 190). The placebo group served as a guselkumab withdrawal group.
Participants had a mean age of 41 years and a mean disease duration of 7.8 years. The 40% using oral corticosteroids were tapered off during the study.
A total of 45.2% of the 100-mg guselkumab group and 50.0% of the 200-mg guselkumab group met the primary outcome of clinical remission at week 44 compared with 18.9% with placebo.
“It was interesting to note that the 200 mg every 4 weeks was similar in efficacy at week 44 to the 100 mg every 8 weeks. It’s much less medicine, but you get similar results,” Dr. Rubin said.
Secondary Outcomes Also Superior
“The bottom line is not only did it work, but it worked when you look at some secondary endpoints, including endoscopic remission, where the bowel is completely healed,” Dr. Rubin said in an interview.
Overall, 34% of all participants who received guselkumab achieved this outcome, “which is a very high rate,” he said. “We haven’t seen a Mayo score of zero — meaning endoscopic remission — at that rate with any of our other therapies currently.”
Among the participants who achieved clinical remission, 69% of them also showed complete remission on endoscopy.
Other secondary outcomes significantly better at week 44 vs placebo included corticosteroid-free clinical remission, maintenance of clinical remission, clinical response, symptomatic remission, endoscopic improvement, histo-endoscopic mucosal improvement, endoscopic normalization, Inflammatory Bowel Disease Questionnaire remission, and fatigue response.
“It was a great study. I think it’s very promising data,” said session co-moderator Ashwin N. Ananthakrishnan, MBBS, MPH, AGAF, director of the Crohn’s and Colitis Center at Massachusetts General Hospital in Boston.
“As we get more data from these more selective interleukins, we’ll get a better sense of how that plays out” vs other similar agents in development, he added.
IL-23 Target Seems Safe
One or more adverse events were reported by 70% of the higher-dose guselkumab group, 65% of the lower-dose guselkumab group, and 68% of the placebo group.
The most common adverse events in a combined 200-mg and 100-mg guselkumab group were lower than in the placebo group: 11.2% vs 14.1% reported COVID-19, 11.2% vs 29.7% reported exacerbation of UC, and 6.1% vs 6.8% experienced arthralgia, respectively.
No cases of active tuberculosis, opportunistic infection, anaphylaxis, serum sickness, Hy’s law, or serious hepatic issues were reported. One patient had clear cell renal carcinoma, another had rectal adenocarcinoma, and one hemorrhagic stroke was reported in the treatment groups. No patients died during the trial.
A higher proportion of people in the placebo group (13.7%) discontinued the study than those in the 100-mg guselkumab group (10.6%) and the 200-mg guselkumab group (11.6%).
“In general, we have accepted that the IL-23 target seems to be a very safe one,” Dr. Rubin said.
A leading theory is that unlike some interleukins, IL-23 is only expressed where the body has inflammation; therefore, targeting IL-23 does not affect other areas, he explained.
If approved by the Food and Drug Administration, it would expand the official indications for guselkumab, which was approved in 2020 for psoriatic arthritis and in 2017 for plaque psoriasis.
The study was supported by Janssen Research & Development, LLC. Dr. Rubin is a consultant for Janssen. Dr. Ananthakrishnan had no relevant disclosures.
A version of this article appeared on Medscape.com.
WASHINGTON —
The primary outcome of clinical remission at 44 weeks was greater with either of two dose regimens of guselkumab than with placebo, David Rubin, MD, AGAF, reported as part of his presentation (Abstract 759) at the annual Digestive Disease Week® (DDW).
Guselkumab is not the only biologic approved or in development for UC, but it is unique because of its dual action. It is an interleukin (IL)-23p19 subunit inhibitor that blocks IL-23 and also binds to the CD64 receptor on cells that produce IL-23.
Dr. Rubin, who is chief of the Section of Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Nutrition at University of Chicago Medicine, Chicago, said he was unsure at the beginning of the trial if this dual activity “might have any value.”
Targeting both the IL-23 circulating in the tissue and the receptor remains to be proven, “but nonetheless seems reasonable,” he said.
The study included 568 people, about 42% of whom had an inadequate response or were intolerant to prior advanced therapy, and 42.5% of whom had failed two or more advanced therapy classes.
Clinical responders from two prior guselkumab induction studies were enrolled in this randomized withdrawal, double-blind maintenance trial. At either 12 weeks or 24 weeks of induction, patients were randomly assigned to subcutaneous 200-mg guselkumab every 4 weeks (n = 190), 100-mg guselkumab every 8 weeks (n = 188), or placebo (n = 190). The placebo group served as a guselkumab withdrawal group.
Participants had a mean age of 41 years and a mean disease duration of 7.8 years. The 40% using oral corticosteroids were tapered off during the study.
A total of 45.2% of the 100-mg guselkumab group and 50.0% of the 200-mg guselkumab group met the primary outcome of clinical remission at week 44 compared with 18.9% with placebo.
“It was interesting to note that the 200 mg every 4 weeks was similar in efficacy at week 44 to the 100 mg every 8 weeks. It’s much less medicine, but you get similar results,” Dr. Rubin said.
Secondary Outcomes Also Superior
“The bottom line is not only did it work, but it worked when you look at some secondary endpoints, including endoscopic remission, where the bowel is completely healed,” Dr. Rubin said in an interview.
Overall, 34% of all participants who received guselkumab achieved this outcome, “which is a very high rate,” he said. “We haven’t seen a Mayo score of zero — meaning endoscopic remission — at that rate with any of our other therapies currently.”
Among the participants who achieved clinical remission, 69% of them also showed complete remission on endoscopy.
Other secondary outcomes significantly better at week 44 vs placebo included corticosteroid-free clinical remission, maintenance of clinical remission, clinical response, symptomatic remission, endoscopic improvement, histo-endoscopic mucosal improvement, endoscopic normalization, Inflammatory Bowel Disease Questionnaire remission, and fatigue response.
“It was a great study. I think it’s very promising data,” said session co-moderator Ashwin N. Ananthakrishnan, MBBS, MPH, AGAF, director of the Crohn’s and Colitis Center at Massachusetts General Hospital in Boston.
“As we get more data from these more selective interleukins, we’ll get a better sense of how that plays out” vs other similar agents in development, he added.
IL-23 Target Seems Safe
One or more adverse events were reported by 70% of the higher-dose guselkumab group, 65% of the lower-dose guselkumab group, and 68% of the placebo group.
The most common adverse events in a combined 200-mg and 100-mg guselkumab group were lower than in the placebo group: 11.2% vs 14.1% reported COVID-19, 11.2% vs 29.7% reported exacerbation of UC, and 6.1% vs 6.8% experienced arthralgia, respectively.
No cases of active tuberculosis, opportunistic infection, anaphylaxis, serum sickness, Hy’s law, or serious hepatic issues were reported. One patient had clear cell renal carcinoma, another had rectal adenocarcinoma, and one hemorrhagic stroke was reported in the treatment groups. No patients died during the trial.
A higher proportion of people in the placebo group (13.7%) discontinued the study than those in the 100-mg guselkumab group (10.6%) and the 200-mg guselkumab group (11.6%).
“In general, we have accepted that the IL-23 target seems to be a very safe one,” Dr. Rubin said.
A leading theory is that unlike some interleukins, IL-23 is only expressed where the body has inflammation; therefore, targeting IL-23 does not affect other areas, he explained.
If approved by the Food and Drug Administration, it would expand the official indications for guselkumab, which was approved in 2020 for psoriatic arthritis and in 2017 for plaque psoriasis.
The study was supported by Janssen Research & Development, LLC. Dr. Rubin is a consultant for Janssen. Dr. Ananthakrishnan had no relevant disclosures.
A version of this article appeared on Medscape.com.
FROM DDW 2024
GI Complications With GLP-1s for Weight Loss: Reexamining the Risks
WASHINGTON — In contrast with a previous study that found glucagon-like peptide 1 (GLP-1) receptor agonists associated with an increased risk for acute pancreatitis and bowel obstruction, a new retrospective study found no significant link to these complications.
One of the big differences from the previous study, published in JAMA in October 2023 by Sodhi and colleagues , is that the current research was able to account for initial body mass index (BMI), said Benjamin Liu, MD, a resident in internal medicine at Case Western Reserve University School of Medicine, Cleveland, Ohio.
This is important, he explained in his presentation (abstract 1074) at the annual Digestive Disease Week® 2024, because obesity on its own is associated with an increased risk for some of these gastrointestinal (GI) outcomes.
“They did an excellent study,” Dr. Liu said. “But their platform did not allow them to match participants for BMI.”
Another distinction between the two studies is that the JAMA study excluded people who had diabetes 90 days before or 30 days following the start of GLP-1 therapy.
Instead, Dr. Liu said, he and colleague Gengqing Song, MD, “just made it simple” and excluded anyone with diabetes or an A1c ≥ 6.5.
We didn’t want participants with diabetes because “we were looking at GLP-1s for weight loss,” Dr. Liu explained.
Although some clinical trials have already assessed adverse events of these medications, “clinical trials are not always a perfect representation of the real world,” Dr. Liu said in an interview. “So, it’s important to do real-world studies to see just what actually goes on.”
Reassessing GI Complications
In the current study, the researchers identified 105,793 patients from the TriNetX healthcare database taking a GLP-1, either semaglutide or liraglutide, for weight loss and 8794 patients taking 8 mg naltrexone/90 mg bupropion. After propensity matching, including for BMI, there were 8792 patients in each group.
They were identified in the database between 2011 and 2023. Researchers noted their first-ever occurrence of acute pancreatitis, bowel obstruction, gastroparesis, or biliary disease during the study period.
Participants had a BMI ≥ 30 kg/m2. In addition to BMI, propensity score matching included demographics, alcohol use, smoking, hyperlipidemia, and abdominal surgery. A second analysis specifically did not match participants for BMI.
The researchers found no significant association between GLP-1s and acute pancreatitis (adjusted hazard ratio [HR], 1.19; 95% CI, 0.66-2.14).
The labeling for semaglutide and liraglutide warns about an increased risk for acute pancreatitis, “but real-world studies and clinical trials are increasingly suggesting there is no increased risk,” Dr. Liu said.
They also did not find a significant association between GLP-1s and bowel obstruction (HR, 1.30; 95% CI, 0.69-2.18).
Despite the current findings, more research — especially prospective data — is needed to confirm pancreatitis as well as other GI risks like bowel obstruction potentially associated with GLP-1s, he added.
The study did, however, find an elevated risk for biliary disease (HR, 1.27; 95% CI, 1.02-1.59) in the BMI-matched cohorts.
This could be due to the rapidity of weight loss, Dr. Liu suggested. “We found that semaglutide caused more weight loss at 6 and 12 months than naltrexone/bupropion, and it did so at a faster rate. That falls in line with other data that suggest if you lose weight too fast, you actually have an increased risk of gallstones,” he said.
Rapid weight loss can release cholesterol into the body, which then collects in the bile ducts and causes gallstones. This risk for gallstone formation with rapid weight loss is also seen after bariatric surgery, Dr. Liu said.
Without BMI matching, he noted, the increased risk for biliary disease was no longer significant (HR, 1.21; 95% CI, 0.96-1.52).
The researchers also reported a significant association between GLP-1s and gastroparesis (HR, 2.30; 95% CI, 1.19-4.46), confirming the results of the JAMA study “but at a much lower incidence rate once we excluded all patients with diabetes,” said Dr. Liu. The JAMA study had a HR of 3.67 for gastroparesis (95% CI, 1.15-11.90).
Weighing in on the Results
“Overall, their study design looks sound,” said Mahyar Etminan, PharmD, associate professor of medicine at the University of British Columbia in Vancouver and an author of the JAMA study. He agreed that Dr. Liu’s research confirmed their findings about gastroparesis and biliary disease.
However, “I interpret the results with intestinal obstruction and pancreatitis as more inconclusive than no risk,” he added.
Session co-moderator and gastroenterologist and motility specialist with Stanford Health Care in California, Linda Anh Bui Nguyen, MD, AGAF, said that she thinks “it’s a promising study.
“But with any retrospective study where you’re looking at ICD-10 [International Classification of Diseases, Tenth Revision] codes, it really depends on the coders. The code could be subjective and could be wrong,” said Dr. Nguyen, clinical professor of medicine at Stanford Medical School, California.
For example, the diagnosis of gastroparesis requires a normal endoscopy and a gastric emptying test. “But we find that, frequently, patients are being given a diagnosis of gastroparesis without the test,” she said.
An unanswered question also remains regarding how pancreatitis or biliary disease is being diagnosed: “Was it imaging, lab testing, or symptoms?” she said in an interview. “For example, if patients had pain on the right side, did they call it biliary?”
Dr. Nguyen added that it is difficult to get this kind of detail in retrospective studies. She also agreed with Dr. Liu that prospective studies are warranted.
The study was independently supported. Dr. Liu, Dr. Etminan, and Dr. Nguyen had no relevant financial disclosures.
A version of this article appeared on Medscape.com.
WASHINGTON — In contrast with a previous study that found glucagon-like peptide 1 (GLP-1) receptor agonists associated with an increased risk for acute pancreatitis and bowel obstruction, a new retrospective study found no significant link to these complications.
One of the big differences from the previous study, published in JAMA in October 2023 by Sodhi and colleagues , is that the current research was able to account for initial body mass index (BMI), said Benjamin Liu, MD, a resident in internal medicine at Case Western Reserve University School of Medicine, Cleveland, Ohio.
This is important, he explained in his presentation (abstract 1074) at the annual Digestive Disease Week® 2024, because obesity on its own is associated with an increased risk for some of these gastrointestinal (GI) outcomes.
“They did an excellent study,” Dr. Liu said. “But their platform did not allow them to match participants for BMI.”
Another distinction between the two studies is that the JAMA study excluded people who had diabetes 90 days before or 30 days following the start of GLP-1 therapy.
Instead, Dr. Liu said, he and colleague Gengqing Song, MD, “just made it simple” and excluded anyone with diabetes or an A1c ≥ 6.5.
We didn’t want participants with diabetes because “we were looking at GLP-1s for weight loss,” Dr. Liu explained.
Although some clinical trials have already assessed adverse events of these medications, “clinical trials are not always a perfect representation of the real world,” Dr. Liu said in an interview. “So, it’s important to do real-world studies to see just what actually goes on.”
Reassessing GI Complications
In the current study, the researchers identified 105,793 patients from the TriNetX healthcare database taking a GLP-1, either semaglutide or liraglutide, for weight loss and 8794 patients taking 8 mg naltrexone/90 mg bupropion. After propensity matching, including for BMI, there were 8792 patients in each group.
They were identified in the database between 2011 and 2023. Researchers noted their first-ever occurrence of acute pancreatitis, bowel obstruction, gastroparesis, or biliary disease during the study period.
Participants had a BMI ≥ 30 kg/m2. In addition to BMI, propensity score matching included demographics, alcohol use, smoking, hyperlipidemia, and abdominal surgery. A second analysis specifically did not match participants for BMI.
The researchers found no significant association between GLP-1s and acute pancreatitis (adjusted hazard ratio [HR], 1.19; 95% CI, 0.66-2.14).
The labeling for semaglutide and liraglutide warns about an increased risk for acute pancreatitis, “but real-world studies and clinical trials are increasingly suggesting there is no increased risk,” Dr. Liu said.
They also did not find a significant association between GLP-1s and bowel obstruction (HR, 1.30; 95% CI, 0.69-2.18).
Despite the current findings, more research — especially prospective data — is needed to confirm pancreatitis as well as other GI risks like bowel obstruction potentially associated with GLP-1s, he added.
The study did, however, find an elevated risk for biliary disease (HR, 1.27; 95% CI, 1.02-1.59) in the BMI-matched cohorts.
This could be due to the rapidity of weight loss, Dr. Liu suggested. “We found that semaglutide caused more weight loss at 6 and 12 months than naltrexone/bupropion, and it did so at a faster rate. That falls in line with other data that suggest if you lose weight too fast, you actually have an increased risk of gallstones,” he said.
Rapid weight loss can release cholesterol into the body, which then collects in the bile ducts and causes gallstones. This risk for gallstone formation with rapid weight loss is also seen after bariatric surgery, Dr. Liu said.
Without BMI matching, he noted, the increased risk for biliary disease was no longer significant (HR, 1.21; 95% CI, 0.96-1.52).
The researchers also reported a significant association between GLP-1s and gastroparesis (HR, 2.30; 95% CI, 1.19-4.46), confirming the results of the JAMA study “but at a much lower incidence rate once we excluded all patients with diabetes,” said Dr. Liu. The JAMA study had a HR of 3.67 for gastroparesis (95% CI, 1.15-11.90).
Weighing in on the Results
“Overall, their study design looks sound,” said Mahyar Etminan, PharmD, associate professor of medicine at the University of British Columbia in Vancouver and an author of the JAMA study. He agreed that Dr. Liu’s research confirmed their findings about gastroparesis and biliary disease.
However, “I interpret the results with intestinal obstruction and pancreatitis as more inconclusive than no risk,” he added.
Session co-moderator and gastroenterologist and motility specialist with Stanford Health Care in California, Linda Anh Bui Nguyen, MD, AGAF, said that she thinks “it’s a promising study.
“But with any retrospective study where you’re looking at ICD-10 [International Classification of Diseases, Tenth Revision] codes, it really depends on the coders. The code could be subjective and could be wrong,” said Dr. Nguyen, clinical professor of medicine at Stanford Medical School, California.
For example, the diagnosis of gastroparesis requires a normal endoscopy and a gastric emptying test. “But we find that, frequently, patients are being given a diagnosis of gastroparesis without the test,” she said.
An unanswered question also remains regarding how pancreatitis or biliary disease is being diagnosed: “Was it imaging, lab testing, or symptoms?” she said in an interview. “For example, if patients had pain on the right side, did they call it biliary?”
Dr. Nguyen added that it is difficult to get this kind of detail in retrospective studies. She also agreed with Dr. Liu that prospective studies are warranted.
The study was independently supported. Dr. Liu, Dr. Etminan, and Dr. Nguyen had no relevant financial disclosures.
A version of this article appeared on Medscape.com.
WASHINGTON — In contrast with a previous study that found glucagon-like peptide 1 (GLP-1) receptor agonists associated with an increased risk for acute pancreatitis and bowel obstruction, a new retrospective study found no significant link to these complications.
One of the big differences from the previous study, published in JAMA in October 2023 by Sodhi and colleagues , is that the current research was able to account for initial body mass index (BMI), said Benjamin Liu, MD, a resident in internal medicine at Case Western Reserve University School of Medicine, Cleveland, Ohio.
This is important, he explained in his presentation (abstract 1074) at the annual Digestive Disease Week® 2024, because obesity on its own is associated with an increased risk for some of these gastrointestinal (GI) outcomes.
“They did an excellent study,” Dr. Liu said. “But their platform did not allow them to match participants for BMI.”
Another distinction between the two studies is that the JAMA study excluded people who had diabetes 90 days before or 30 days following the start of GLP-1 therapy.
Instead, Dr. Liu said, he and colleague Gengqing Song, MD, “just made it simple” and excluded anyone with diabetes or an A1c ≥ 6.5.
We didn’t want participants with diabetes because “we were looking at GLP-1s for weight loss,” Dr. Liu explained.
Although some clinical trials have already assessed adverse events of these medications, “clinical trials are not always a perfect representation of the real world,” Dr. Liu said in an interview. “So, it’s important to do real-world studies to see just what actually goes on.”
Reassessing GI Complications
In the current study, the researchers identified 105,793 patients from the TriNetX healthcare database taking a GLP-1, either semaglutide or liraglutide, for weight loss and 8794 patients taking 8 mg naltrexone/90 mg bupropion. After propensity matching, including for BMI, there were 8792 patients in each group.
They were identified in the database between 2011 and 2023. Researchers noted their first-ever occurrence of acute pancreatitis, bowel obstruction, gastroparesis, or biliary disease during the study period.
Participants had a BMI ≥ 30 kg/m2. In addition to BMI, propensity score matching included demographics, alcohol use, smoking, hyperlipidemia, and abdominal surgery. A second analysis specifically did not match participants for BMI.
The researchers found no significant association between GLP-1s and acute pancreatitis (adjusted hazard ratio [HR], 1.19; 95% CI, 0.66-2.14).
The labeling for semaglutide and liraglutide warns about an increased risk for acute pancreatitis, “but real-world studies and clinical trials are increasingly suggesting there is no increased risk,” Dr. Liu said.
They also did not find a significant association between GLP-1s and bowel obstruction (HR, 1.30; 95% CI, 0.69-2.18).
Despite the current findings, more research — especially prospective data — is needed to confirm pancreatitis as well as other GI risks like bowel obstruction potentially associated with GLP-1s, he added.
The study did, however, find an elevated risk for biliary disease (HR, 1.27; 95% CI, 1.02-1.59) in the BMI-matched cohorts.
This could be due to the rapidity of weight loss, Dr. Liu suggested. “We found that semaglutide caused more weight loss at 6 and 12 months than naltrexone/bupropion, and it did so at a faster rate. That falls in line with other data that suggest if you lose weight too fast, you actually have an increased risk of gallstones,” he said.
Rapid weight loss can release cholesterol into the body, which then collects in the bile ducts and causes gallstones. This risk for gallstone formation with rapid weight loss is also seen after bariatric surgery, Dr. Liu said.
Without BMI matching, he noted, the increased risk for biliary disease was no longer significant (HR, 1.21; 95% CI, 0.96-1.52).
The researchers also reported a significant association between GLP-1s and gastroparesis (HR, 2.30; 95% CI, 1.19-4.46), confirming the results of the JAMA study “but at a much lower incidence rate once we excluded all patients with diabetes,” said Dr. Liu. The JAMA study had a HR of 3.67 for gastroparesis (95% CI, 1.15-11.90).
Weighing in on the Results
“Overall, their study design looks sound,” said Mahyar Etminan, PharmD, associate professor of medicine at the University of British Columbia in Vancouver and an author of the JAMA study. He agreed that Dr. Liu’s research confirmed their findings about gastroparesis and biliary disease.
However, “I interpret the results with intestinal obstruction and pancreatitis as more inconclusive than no risk,” he added.
Session co-moderator and gastroenterologist and motility specialist with Stanford Health Care in California, Linda Anh Bui Nguyen, MD, AGAF, said that she thinks “it’s a promising study.
“But with any retrospective study where you’re looking at ICD-10 [International Classification of Diseases, Tenth Revision] codes, it really depends on the coders. The code could be subjective and could be wrong,” said Dr. Nguyen, clinical professor of medicine at Stanford Medical School, California.
For example, the diagnosis of gastroparesis requires a normal endoscopy and a gastric emptying test. “But we find that, frequently, patients are being given a diagnosis of gastroparesis without the test,” she said.
An unanswered question also remains regarding how pancreatitis or biliary disease is being diagnosed: “Was it imaging, lab testing, or symptoms?” she said in an interview. “For example, if patients had pain on the right side, did they call it biliary?”
Dr. Nguyen added that it is difficult to get this kind of detail in retrospective studies. She also agreed with Dr. Liu that prospective studies are warranted.
The study was independently supported. Dr. Liu, Dr. Etminan, and Dr. Nguyen had no relevant financial disclosures.
A version of this article appeared on Medscape.com.
FROM DDW 2024
Genetic Test Can Predict Response to Semaglutide for Weight Loss
TOPLINE:
, new evidence reveals.
METHODOLOGY:
- A machine learning genetic risk score can identify people with the hungry gut obesity phenotype, which has been found to be associated with greater weight loss with the glucagon-like peptide 1 receptor agonists (GLP-1 RA) liraglutide and exenatide.
- For this study, researchers calculated the genetic risk score for 84 adults undergoing weight loss interventions at Mayo Clinic who were prescribed the GLP-1 RA semaglutide.
- Study participants were classified as the obesity phenotype hungry gut positive (n = 51) or hungry gut negative (n = 33).
- The researchers measured total body weight loss at 3, 6, 9, and 12 months and assessed the ability of the score to predict the response to semaglutide (defined as ≥ 5% of total body weight loss measured at 12 months).
TAKEAWAY:
- At 3 and 6 months, there were no significant differences in weight loss between the hungry gut positive and hungry gut negative groups.
- By 9 months, participants in the positive group lost 14.4% of their total body weight compared with 10.3% in case of participants in the negative group (P = .045).
- After a total of 12 months, the positive group lost 19.5% of their total body weight compared with 10.0% in case of participants in the negative group (P = .01).
- When used to predict the response to semaglutide, the area under the curve for the machine-learning genetic risk score was 0.76 (95% CI, 0.57-0.94; P = .04).
IN PRACTICE:
We can now tell with confidence who is going to respond to semaglutide, said Andres Acosta, MD, PhD, associate professor of medicine at Mayo Clinic. “For nonresponders, we can think about other interventions or medications that we have available.”
SOURCE:
This study was presented on May 20, 2024, at the annual Digestive Disease Week® (DDW) (Abstract 638).
LIMITATIONS:
Further prospective studies are needed to assess the validity of the test in a more diverse population and with different weight loss interventions.
DISCLOSURES:
This study was supported by a partnership between Mayo Clinic and Phenomix Sciences. Dr. Acosta is a cofounder of Phenomix Sciences.
A version of this article appeared on Medscape.com.
TOPLINE:
, new evidence reveals.
METHODOLOGY:
- A machine learning genetic risk score can identify people with the hungry gut obesity phenotype, which has been found to be associated with greater weight loss with the glucagon-like peptide 1 receptor agonists (GLP-1 RA) liraglutide and exenatide.
- For this study, researchers calculated the genetic risk score for 84 adults undergoing weight loss interventions at Mayo Clinic who were prescribed the GLP-1 RA semaglutide.
- Study participants were classified as the obesity phenotype hungry gut positive (n = 51) or hungry gut negative (n = 33).
- The researchers measured total body weight loss at 3, 6, 9, and 12 months and assessed the ability of the score to predict the response to semaglutide (defined as ≥ 5% of total body weight loss measured at 12 months).
TAKEAWAY:
- At 3 and 6 months, there were no significant differences in weight loss between the hungry gut positive and hungry gut negative groups.
- By 9 months, participants in the positive group lost 14.4% of their total body weight compared with 10.3% in case of participants in the negative group (P = .045).
- After a total of 12 months, the positive group lost 19.5% of their total body weight compared with 10.0% in case of participants in the negative group (P = .01).
- When used to predict the response to semaglutide, the area under the curve for the machine-learning genetic risk score was 0.76 (95% CI, 0.57-0.94; P = .04).
IN PRACTICE:
We can now tell with confidence who is going to respond to semaglutide, said Andres Acosta, MD, PhD, associate professor of medicine at Mayo Clinic. “For nonresponders, we can think about other interventions or medications that we have available.”
SOURCE:
This study was presented on May 20, 2024, at the annual Digestive Disease Week® (DDW) (Abstract 638).
LIMITATIONS:
Further prospective studies are needed to assess the validity of the test in a more diverse population and with different weight loss interventions.
DISCLOSURES:
This study was supported by a partnership between Mayo Clinic and Phenomix Sciences. Dr. Acosta is a cofounder of Phenomix Sciences.
A version of this article appeared on Medscape.com.
TOPLINE:
, new evidence reveals.
METHODOLOGY:
- A machine learning genetic risk score can identify people with the hungry gut obesity phenotype, which has been found to be associated with greater weight loss with the glucagon-like peptide 1 receptor agonists (GLP-1 RA) liraglutide and exenatide.
- For this study, researchers calculated the genetic risk score for 84 adults undergoing weight loss interventions at Mayo Clinic who were prescribed the GLP-1 RA semaglutide.
- Study participants were classified as the obesity phenotype hungry gut positive (n = 51) or hungry gut negative (n = 33).
- The researchers measured total body weight loss at 3, 6, 9, and 12 months and assessed the ability of the score to predict the response to semaglutide (defined as ≥ 5% of total body weight loss measured at 12 months).
TAKEAWAY:
- At 3 and 6 months, there were no significant differences in weight loss between the hungry gut positive and hungry gut negative groups.
- By 9 months, participants in the positive group lost 14.4% of their total body weight compared with 10.3% in case of participants in the negative group (P = .045).
- After a total of 12 months, the positive group lost 19.5% of their total body weight compared with 10.0% in case of participants in the negative group (P = .01).
- When used to predict the response to semaglutide, the area under the curve for the machine-learning genetic risk score was 0.76 (95% CI, 0.57-0.94; P = .04).
IN PRACTICE:
We can now tell with confidence who is going to respond to semaglutide, said Andres Acosta, MD, PhD, associate professor of medicine at Mayo Clinic. “For nonresponders, we can think about other interventions or medications that we have available.”
SOURCE:
This study was presented on May 20, 2024, at the annual Digestive Disease Week® (DDW) (Abstract 638).
LIMITATIONS:
Further prospective studies are needed to assess the validity of the test in a more diverse population and with different weight loss interventions.
DISCLOSURES:
This study was supported by a partnership between Mayo Clinic and Phenomix Sciences. Dr. Acosta is a cofounder of Phenomix Sciences.
A version of this article appeared on Medscape.com.
Endoscopic Procedure Targets ‘Hunger Hormone’ for Weight Loss
WASHINGTON —
.“Patients reported a decrease in hunger, appetite, and cravings and an increase in control over [their] eating,” said senior study investigator Christopher McGowan, MD, AGAF, a gastroenterologist in private practice and medical director of True You Weight Loss in Cary, North Carolina.
“They generally described that their relationship with food had changed,” Dr. McGowan said at a May 8 press briefing during which his research (Abstract 516) was previewed for Digestive Disease Week® (DDW).
Researchers targeted the gastric fundus because its mucosal lining contains 80%-90% of the cells that produce ghrelin. When a person diets and/or loses weight, ghrelin levels increase, making the person hungrier and preventing sustained weight loss, Dr. McGowan said.
Previously, the only proven way to reduce ghrelin was to surgically remove or bypass the fundus. Weight-loss medications like Wegovy, Zepbound, and Ozempic target a different hormonal pathway, glucagon-like peptide 1 (GLP-1).
“What we’ve learned from the GLP-1 medications is the profound impact of reducing hunger,” Dr. McGowan said. “That’s what patients describe quite often — that it really changes their life and their quality of life. That’s really, really important.”
Major Findings
In the trial, 10 women (mean age, 38 years; mean body mass index, 40.2) underwent endoscopic fundic mucosal ablation via hybrid argon plasma coagulation in an ambulatory setting under general anesthesia from November 1, 2022, to April 14, 2023. The procedure took less than an hour on average, and the technique gave them easy access to the fundus, Dr. McGowan said.
Compared with baseline, there were multiple beneficial outcomes at 6 months:
- 45% less circulating ghrelin in the blood.
- 53% drop in ghrelin-producing cells in the fundus.
- 42% reduction in stomach capacity.
- 43% decrease in hunger, appetite, and cravings.
- 7.7% body weight loss.
Over the 6 months of the study, mean ghrelin concentrations dropped from 461.6 pg/mL at baseline to 254.8 pg/mL (P = .006).
It is fascinating that the hormone ghrelin decreased just by ablating, said Loren Laine, MD, AGAF, professor of medicine (digestive diseases) at Yale School of Medicine and chair of DDW 2024. “They used the same device that we use to treat bleeding ulcers or lesions in the stomach and applied it broadly over the whole upper part of the stomach.”
In a standard nutrient drink test, the maximum tolerated volume among participants dropped from a mean 27.3 oz at baseline to 15.8 oz at 6-month follow-up (P = .004).
Participants also completed three questionnaires. From baseline to 6 months, their DAILY EATS mean hunger score decreased from 6.2 to 4 (P = .002), mean Eating Drivers Index score dropped from 7 to 4 (P < .001), and WEL-SF score improved from 47.7 to 62.4 (P = .001).
Repeat endoscopy at 6 months showed that the gastric fundus contracted and healed. An unexpected and beneficial finding was fibrotic tissue, which made the fundus less able to expand, Dr. McGowan said. A smaller fundus “is critical for feeling full.”
No serious adverse events were reported. Participants described gas pressure, mild nausea, and cramping, all of which lasted 1-3 days, he said.
“The key here is preserving safety. This is why we use the technique of injecting a fluid cushion prior to ablating, so we’re not entering any deeper layers of the stomach,” Dr. McGowan said. “Importantly, there are no nerve receptors within the lining of the stomach, so there’s no pain from this procedure.”
Another Anti-Obesity Tool?
“We’re all familiar with the epidemic that is obesity affecting nearly one in two adults, and the profound impact that it has on patients’ health, their quality of life, as well as the healthcare system,” Dr. McGowan said. “It’s clear that we need every tool possible to address this because we know that obesity is not a matter of willpower. It’s a disease.”
Gastric fundus ablation “may represent, and frankly should represent, a treatment option for the greater than 100 million US adults with obesity,” he added.
Not every patient wants to or can access GLP-1 medications, Dr. McGowan said. Also, “there’s a difference between taking a medication long-term, requiring an injection every week, vs a single intervention in time that carries forward.”
Ablation could also help people transition after they stop GLP-1 medications to help them maintain their weight loss, he said.
Weight loss is the endpoint you care about the most, said Dr. Laine, who co-moderated the press briefing.
Though the weight loss of 7.7% was not a large percentage, it was only 10 patients. We will have to see whether the total body weight loss is different when they do the procedure in more patients or if they can combine different mechanisms, Dr. Laine said.
It remains unclear whether gastric fundus ablation would be a stand-alone procedure or used in combination with another endoscopic weight-management intervention, bariatric surgery, or medication.
The endoscopic sleeve, which is a stomach-reducing procedure, is very effective, but it doesn’t diminish hunger, Dr. McGowan said. Combining it with ablation may be “a best-of-both-worlds scenario.”
Dr. Laine added that another open question is whether the gastric fundal accommodation will be associated with any side effects such as dyspepsia.
Dr. McGowan reported consulting for Boston Scientific and Apollo Endosurgery. Dr. Laine reported no relevant financial relationships.
A version of this article first appeared on Medscape.com.
WASHINGTON —
.“Patients reported a decrease in hunger, appetite, and cravings and an increase in control over [their] eating,” said senior study investigator Christopher McGowan, MD, AGAF, a gastroenterologist in private practice and medical director of True You Weight Loss in Cary, North Carolina.
“They generally described that their relationship with food had changed,” Dr. McGowan said at a May 8 press briefing during which his research (Abstract 516) was previewed for Digestive Disease Week® (DDW).
Researchers targeted the gastric fundus because its mucosal lining contains 80%-90% of the cells that produce ghrelin. When a person diets and/or loses weight, ghrelin levels increase, making the person hungrier and preventing sustained weight loss, Dr. McGowan said.
Previously, the only proven way to reduce ghrelin was to surgically remove or bypass the fundus. Weight-loss medications like Wegovy, Zepbound, and Ozempic target a different hormonal pathway, glucagon-like peptide 1 (GLP-1).
“What we’ve learned from the GLP-1 medications is the profound impact of reducing hunger,” Dr. McGowan said. “That’s what patients describe quite often — that it really changes their life and their quality of life. That’s really, really important.”
Major Findings
In the trial, 10 women (mean age, 38 years; mean body mass index, 40.2) underwent endoscopic fundic mucosal ablation via hybrid argon plasma coagulation in an ambulatory setting under general anesthesia from November 1, 2022, to April 14, 2023. The procedure took less than an hour on average, and the technique gave them easy access to the fundus, Dr. McGowan said.
Compared with baseline, there were multiple beneficial outcomes at 6 months:
- 45% less circulating ghrelin in the blood.
- 53% drop in ghrelin-producing cells in the fundus.
- 42% reduction in stomach capacity.
- 43% decrease in hunger, appetite, and cravings.
- 7.7% body weight loss.
Over the 6 months of the study, mean ghrelin concentrations dropped from 461.6 pg/mL at baseline to 254.8 pg/mL (P = .006).
It is fascinating that the hormone ghrelin decreased just by ablating, said Loren Laine, MD, AGAF, professor of medicine (digestive diseases) at Yale School of Medicine and chair of DDW 2024. “They used the same device that we use to treat bleeding ulcers or lesions in the stomach and applied it broadly over the whole upper part of the stomach.”
In a standard nutrient drink test, the maximum tolerated volume among participants dropped from a mean 27.3 oz at baseline to 15.8 oz at 6-month follow-up (P = .004).
Participants also completed three questionnaires. From baseline to 6 months, their DAILY EATS mean hunger score decreased from 6.2 to 4 (P = .002), mean Eating Drivers Index score dropped from 7 to 4 (P < .001), and WEL-SF score improved from 47.7 to 62.4 (P = .001).
Repeat endoscopy at 6 months showed that the gastric fundus contracted and healed. An unexpected and beneficial finding was fibrotic tissue, which made the fundus less able to expand, Dr. McGowan said. A smaller fundus “is critical for feeling full.”
No serious adverse events were reported. Participants described gas pressure, mild nausea, and cramping, all of which lasted 1-3 days, he said.
“The key here is preserving safety. This is why we use the technique of injecting a fluid cushion prior to ablating, so we’re not entering any deeper layers of the stomach,” Dr. McGowan said. “Importantly, there are no nerve receptors within the lining of the stomach, so there’s no pain from this procedure.”
Another Anti-Obesity Tool?
“We’re all familiar with the epidemic that is obesity affecting nearly one in two adults, and the profound impact that it has on patients’ health, their quality of life, as well as the healthcare system,” Dr. McGowan said. “It’s clear that we need every tool possible to address this because we know that obesity is not a matter of willpower. It’s a disease.”
Gastric fundus ablation “may represent, and frankly should represent, a treatment option for the greater than 100 million US adults with obesity,” he added.
Not every patient wants to or can access GLP-1 medications, Dr. McGowan said. Also, “there’s a difference between taking a medication long-term, requiring an injection every week, vs a single intervention in time that carries forward.”
Ablation could also help people transition after they stop GLP-1 medications to help them maintain their weight loss, he said.
Weight loss is the endpoint you care about the most, said Dr. Laine, who co-moderated the press briefing.
Though the weight loss of 7.7% was not a large percentage, it was only 10 patients. We will have to see whether the total body weight loss is different when they do the procedure in more patients or if they can combine different mechanisms, Dr. Laine said.
It remains unclear whether gastric fundus ablation would be a stand-alone procedure or used in combination with another endoscopic weight-management intervention, bariatric surgery, or medication.
The endoscopic sleeve, which is a stomach-reducing procedure, is very effective, but it doesn’t diminish hunger, Dr. McGowan said. Combining it with ablation may be “a best-of-both-worlds scenario.”
Dr. Laine added that another open question is whether the gastric fundal accommodation will be associated with any side effects such as dyspepsia.
Dr. McGowan reported consulting for Boston Scientific and Apollo Endosurgery. Dr. Laine reported no relevant financial relationships.
A version of this article first appeared on Medscape.com.
WASHINGTON —
.“Patients reported a decrease in hunger, appetite, and cravings and an increase in control over [their] eating,” said senior study investigator Christopher McGowan, MD, AGAF, a gastroenterologist in private practice and medical director of True You Weight Loss in Cary, North Carolina.
“They generally described that their relationship with food had changed,” Dr. McGowan said at a May 8 press briefing during which his research (Abstract 516) was previewed for Digestive Disease Week® (DDW).
Researchers targeted the gastric fundus because its mucosal lining contains 80%-90% of the cells that produce ghrelin. When a person diets and/or loses weight, ghrelin levels increase, making the person hungrier and preventing sustained weight loss, Dr. McGowan said.
Previously, the only proven way to reduce ghrelin was to surgically remove or bypass the fundus. Weight-loss medications like Wegovy, Zepbound, and Ozempic target a different hormonal pathway, glucagon-like peptide 1 (GLP-1).
“What we’ve learned from the GLP-1 medications is the profound impact of reducing hunger,” Dr. McGowan said. “That’s what patients describe quite often — that it really changes their life and their quality of life. That’s really, really important.”
Major Findings
In the trial, 10 women (mean age, 38 years; mean body mass index, 40.2) underwent endoscopic fundic mucosal ablation via hybrid argon plasma coagulation in an ambulatory setting under general anesthesia from November 1, 2022, to April 14, 2023. The procedure took less than an hour on average, and the technique gave them easy access to the fundus, Dr. McGowan said.
Compared with baseline, there were multiple beneficial outcomes at 6 months:
- 45% less circulating ghrelin in the blood.
- 53% drop in ghrelin-producing cells in the fundus.
- 42% reduction in stomach capacity.
- 43% decrease in hunger, appetite, and cravings.
- 7.7% body weight loss.
Over the 6 months of the study, mean ghrelin concentrations dropped from 461.6 pg/mL at baseline to 254.8 pg/mL (P = .006).
It is fascinating that the hormone ghrelin decreased just by ablating, said Loren Laine, MD, AGAF, professor of medicine (digestive diseases) at Yale School of Medicine and chair of DDW 2024. “They used the same device that we use to treat bleeding ulcers or lesions in the stomach and applied it broadly over the whole upper part of the stomach.”
In a standard nutrient drink test, the maximum tolerated volume among participants dropped from a mean 27.3 oz at baseline to 15.8 oz at 6-month follow-up (P = .004).
Participants also completed three questionnaires. From baseline to 6 months, their DAILY EATS mean hunger score decreased from 6.2 to 4 (P = .002), mean Eating Drivers Index score dropped from 7 to 4 (P < .001), and WEL-SF score improved from 47.7 to 62.4 (P = .001).
Repeat endoscopy at 6 months showed that the gastric fundus contracted and healed. An unexpected and beneficial finding was fibrotic tissue, which made the fundus less able to expand, Dr. McGowan said. A smaller fundus “is critical for feeling full.”
No serious adverse events were reported. Participants described gas pressure, mild nausea, and cramping, all of which lasted 1-3 days, he said.
“The key here is preserving safety. This is why we use the technique of injecting a fluid cushion prior to ablating, so we’re not entering any deeper layers of the stomach,” Dr. McGowan said. “Importantly, there are no nerve receptors within the lining of the stomach, so there’s no pain from this procedure.”
Another Anti-Obesity Tool?
“We’re all familiar with the epidemic that is obesity affecting nearly one in two adults, and the profound impact that it has on patients’ health, their quality of life, as well as the healthcare system,” Dr. McGowan said. “It’s clear that we need every tool possible to address this because we know that obesity is not a matter of willpower. It’s a disease.”
Gastric fundus ablation “may represent, and frankly should represent, a treatment option for the greater than 100 million US adults with obesity,” he added.
Not every patient wants to or can access GLP-1 medications, Dr. McGowan said. Also, “there’s a difference between taking a medication long-term, requiring an injection every week, vs a single intervention in time that carries forward.”
Ablation could also help people transition after they stop GLP-1 medications to help them maintain their weight loss, he said.
Weight loss is the endpoint you care about the most, said Dr. Laine, who co-moderated the press briefing.
Though the weight loss of 7.7% was not a large percentage, it was only 10 patients. We will have to see whether the total body weight loss is different when they do the procedure in more patients or if they can combine different mechanisms, Dr. Laine said.
It remains unclear whether gastric fundus ablation would be a stand-alone procedure or used in combination with another endoscopic weight-management intervention, bariatric surgery, or medication.
The endoscopic sleeve, which is a stomach-reducing procedure, is very effective, but it doesn’t diminish hunger, Dr. McGowan said. Combining it with ablation may be “a best-of-both-worlds scenario.”
Dr. Laine added that another open question is whether the gastric fundal accommodation will be associated with any side effects such as dyspepsia.
Dr. McGowan reported consulting for Boston Scientific and Apollo Endosurgery. Dr. Laine reported no relevant financial relationships.
A version of this article first appeared on Medscape.com.
FROM DDW 2024
Oral Microbiome Test Could Detect Gastric Cancer Earlier
WASHINGTON, DC –
Researchers found distinct bacterial composition differences in patient samples that point to the potential for oral microbial signatures to be used as biomarkers for assessing gastric cancer risk.
“Too many patients are being diagnosed too late. There are no formal screening guidelines for gastric cancer, and more than half of patients with gastric cancer do not receive a diagnosis until their cancer is already at an advanced stage,” said Shruthi Reddy Perati, MD, a general surgery resident at Rutgers University Robert Wood Johnson School of Medicine in New Brunswick, New Jersey.
Detecting gastric cancer now generally requires an invasive procedure, such as endoscopy. Therefore, a noninvasive “swish and spit” test could be more accessible and allow for more widespread screening, Dr. Perati said at a May 8 press briefing during which her research (Abstract 949) was previewed for Digestive Disease Week® (DDW).
Gastric cancer, also known as stomach cancer, is the fourth most common cause of cancer-related death in the world. The United States can expect 26,890 new cases and 10,880 deaths from this type of cancer in 2024, the American Cancer Society estimates.
Microbial Signatures Found
Dr. Perati and colleagues collected oral rinse samples from 98 patients: 30 known to have gastric cancer , 30 with precancerous gastric conditions (pre–gastric cancer), and 38 control participants without pre-gastric or gastric cancer. Sixty-two percent were women, 32% were Hispanic, 31% had diabetes, and 18% were smokers.
The researchers analyzed the samples for alpha and beta diversity and conducted differential analysis using the framework called analysis of compositions of microbiomes.
They found distinct differences between the oral microbiomes of the healthy group and those of the groups with gastric cancer and pre–gastric cancer. In addition, the microbiomes of participants with cancer and of those with precancerous conditions were similar.
The results suggest that the microbiome changes may occur as soon as the stomach environment starts to undergo changes that can eventually turn into cancer.
“The oral microbiome may serve as a window into the composition of the stomach environment,” Dr. Perati said.
The investigators created a screening model to detect the most relevant 13 bacterial genera that differed between the control group and the gastric cancer and pre–gastric cancer groups. The tenfold cross-validation model demonstrated good ability to discriminate using bacteria alone (area under the curve [AUC], 0.74) and was further improved with the addition of clinical variables, including demographics and comorbidities (AUC, 0.91), the researchers noted.
As the investigators noted, the model’s performance improved with the addition of clinical variables, said Loren Laine, MD, professor of medicine (digestive diseases) at Yale School of Medicine and chair of DDW 2024.
An AUC of 0.74 using bacteria alone, which increased to 0.91 by adding demographics and comorbidities, “[is] starting to be really meaningful,” Dr. Laine said.
Further studies should evaluate the test’s sensitivity and specificity, Dr. Laine added.
Additional Considerations
The microbiome can vary between people and within the same individual over time. Probiotics, antibiotics, and diet can lead to changes in the microbiome, Dr. Perati said.
When asked how these changes could affect the accuracy of an oral rinse test, Dr. Perati said “it’s known that, in general, dietary modifications can have an impact on the diversity and the prevalence of certain bacteria throughout the GI tract.”
Though variance is expected, we’re hoping to see that the differences in the microbiome composition between the malignant groups and the control groups are more significant than those lower-level background changes due to dietary modifications, for example, she added.
The research is in its early days, and the results need to be validated in a larger study, Dr. Perati said.
Ninety-eight patients is “still a very small number,” said Dr. Laine, who co-moderated the press briefing. “More research is needed.”
Still, the study “has huge implications that could eventually lead to the development of noninvasive and accessible early screening for gastric cancer,” she said.
Dr. Perati and Dr. Laine reported no relevant financial relationships. The study was independently supported.
A version of this article appeared on Medscape.com.
WASHINGTON, DC –
Researchers found distinct bacterial composition differences in patient samples that point to the potential for oral microbial signatures to be used as biomarkers for assessing gastric cancer risk.
“Too many patients are being diagnosed too late. There are no formal screening guidelines for gastric cancer, and more than half of patients with gastric cancer do not receive a diagnosis until their cancer is already at an advanced stage,” said Shruthi Reddy Perati, MD, a general surgery resident at Rutgers University Robert Wood Johnson School of Medicine in New Brunswick, New Jersey.
Detecting gastric cancer now generally requires an invasive procedure, such as endoscopy. Therefore, a noninvasive “swish and spit” test could be more accessible and allow for more widespread screening, Dr. Perati said at a May 8 press briefing during which her research (Abstract 949) was previewed for Digestive Disease Week® (DDW).
Gastric cancer, also known as stomach cancer, is the fourth most common cause of cancer-related death in the world. The United States can expect 26,890 new cases and 10,880 deaths from this type of cancer in 2024, the American Cancer Society estimates.
Microbial Signatures Found
Dr. Perati and colleagues collected oral rinse samples from 98 patients: 30 known to have gastric cancer , 30 with precancerous gastric conditions (pre–gastric cancer), and 38 control participants without pre-gastric or gastric cancer. Sixty-two percent were women, 32% were Hispanic, 31% had diabetes, and 18% were smokers.
The researchers analyzed the samples for alpha and beta diversity and conducted differential analysis using the framework called analysis of compositions of microbiomes.
They found distinct differences between the oral microbiomes of the healthy group and those of the groups with gastric cancer and pre–gastric cancer. In addition, the microbiomes of participants with cancer and of those with precancerous conditions were similar.
The results suggest that the microbiome changes may occur as soon as the stomach environment starts to undergo changes that can eventually turn into cancer.
“The oral microbiome may serve as a window into the composition of the stomach environment,” Dr. Perati said.
The investigators created a screening model to detect the most relevant 13 bacterial genera that differed between the control group and the gastric cancer and pre–gastric cancer groups. The tenfold cross-validation model demonstrated good ability to discriminate using bacteria alone (area under the curve [AUC], 0.74) and was further improved with the addition of clinical variables, including demographics and comorbidities (AUC, 0.91), the researchers noted.
As the investigators noted, the model’s performance improved with the addition of clinical variables, said Loren Laine, MD, professor of medicine (digestive diseases) at Yale School of Medicine and chair of DDW 2024.
An AUC of 0.74 using bacteria alone, which increased to 0.91 by adding demographics and comorbidities, “[is] starting to be really meaningful,” Dr. Laine said.
Further studies should evaluate the test’s sensitivity and specificity, Dr. Laine added.
Additional Considerations
The microbiome can vary between people and within the same individual over time. Probiotics, antibiotics, and diet can lead to changes in the microbiome, Dr. Perati said.
When asked how these changes could affect the accuracy of an oral rinse test, Dr. Perati said “it’s known that, in general, dietary modifications can have an impact on the diversity and the prevalence of certain bacteria throughout the GI tract.”
Though variance is expected, we’re hoping to see that the differences in the microbiome composition between the malignant groups and the control groups are more significant than those lower-level background changes due to dietary modifications, for example, she added.
The research is in its early days, and the results need to be validated in a larger study, Dr. Perati said.
Ninety-eight patients is “still a very small number,” said Dr. Laine, who co-moderated the press briefing. “More research is needed.”
Still, the study “has huge implications that could eventually lead to the development of noninvasive and accessible early screening for gastric cancer,” she said.
Dr. Perati and Dr. Laine reported no relevant financial relationships. The study was independently supported.
A version of this article appeared on Medscape.com.
WASHINGTON, DC –
Researchers found distinct bacterial composition differences in patient samples that point to the potential for oral microbial signatures to be used as biomarkers for assessing gastric cancer risk.
“Too many patients are being diagnosed too late. There are no formal screening guidelines for gastric cancer, and more than half of patients with gastric cancer do not receive a diagnosis until their cancer is already at an advanced stage,” said Shruthi Reddy Perati, MD, a general surgery resident at Rutgers University Robert Wood Johnson School of Medicine in New Brunswick, New Jersey.
Detecting gastric cancer now generally requires an invasive procedure, such as endoscopy. Therefore, a noninvasive “swish and spit” test could be more accessible and allow for more widespread screening, Dr. Perati said at a May 8 press briefing during which her research (Abstract 949) was previewed for Digestive Disease Week® (DDW).
Gastric cancer, also known as stomach cancer, is the fourth most common cause of cancer-related death in the world. The United States can expect 26,890 new cases and 10,880 deaths from this type of cancer in 2024, the American Cancer Society estimates.
Microbial Signatures Found
Dr. Perati and colleagues collected oral rinse samples from 98 patients: 30 known to have gastric cancer , 30 with precancerous gastric conditions (pre–gastric cancer), and 38 control participants without pre-gastric or gastric cancer. Sixty-two percent were women, 32% were Hispanic, 31% had diabetes, and 18% were smokers.
The researchers analyzed the samples for alpha and beta diversity and conducted differential analysis using the framework called analysis of compositions of microbiomes.
They found distinct differences between the oral microbiomes of the healthy group and those of the groups with gastric cancer and pre–gastric cancer. In addition, the microbiomes of participants with cancer and of those with precancerous conditions were similar.
The results suggest that the microbiome changes may occur as soon as the stomach environment starts to undergo changes that can eventually turn into cancer.
“The oral microbiome may serve as a window into the composition of the stomach environment,” Dr. Perati said.
The investigators created a screening model to detect the most relevant 13 bacterial genera that differed between the control group and the gastric cancer and pre–gastric cancer groups. The tenfold cross-validation model demonstrated good ability to discriminate using bacteria alone (area under the curve [AUC], 0.74) and was further improved with the addition of clinical variables, including demographics and comorbidities (AUC, 0.91), the researchers noted.
As the investigators noted, the model’s performance improved with the addition of clinical variables, said Loren Laine, MD, professor of medicine (digestive diseases) at Yale School of Medicine and chair of DDW 2024.
An AUC of 0.74 using bacteria alone, which increased to 0.91 by adding demographics and comorbidities, “[is] starting to be really meaningful,” Dr. Laine said.
Further studies should evaluate the test’s sensitivity and specificity, Dr. Laine added.
Additional Considerations
The microbiome can vary between people and within the same individual over time. Probiotics, antibiotics, and diet can lead to changes in the microbiome, Dr. Perati said.
When asked how these changes could affect the accuracy of an oral rinse test, Dr. Perati said “it’s known that, in general, dietary modifications can have an impact on the diversity and the prevalence of certain bacteria throughout the GI tract.”
Though variance is expected, we’re hoping to see that the differences in the microbiome composition between the malignant groups and the control groups are more significant than those lower-level background changes due to dietary modifications, for example, she added.
The research is in its early days, and the results need to be validated in a larger study, Dr. Perati said.
Ninety-eight patients is “still a very small number,” said Dr. Laine, who co-moderated the press briefing. “More research is needed.”
Still, the study “has huge implications that could eventually lead to the development of noninvasive and accessible early screening for gastric cancer,” she said.
Dr. Perati and Dr. Laine reported no relevant financial relationships. The study was independently supported.
A version of this article appeared on Medscape.com.
AT DDW 2024
‘Thunderstorm Asthma’ Could Strike More Often With Climate Change
Thunderstorm asthma can strike with little warning, leaving people with the symptoms of an asthma attack during or after the dark clouds pass.
If you’re unfamiliar, the risk for a thunderstorm asthma attack grows when heavy storms arrive on a day with very high pollen or spores. The storm uplifts these particles, adds water, and causes them to explode into smaller grains. The electrical activity in a storm can do the same. Next, strong winds sweep these particles down and across the ground. People in the path of the storm can experience shortness of breath, coughing, and wheezing.
“Yes, if only because the amount of pollen appears to be increasing in many areas due to climate change,” said Frank S. Virant, MD, chief of the Allergy Division at Seattle Children’s Hospital in Washington.
Most cases of thunderstorm asthma occur in the spring and early summer, but that also could change. Pollen seasons “have been getting longer and more intense,” said Shaan M. Waqar, MD, an allergist at ENT and Allergy Associates in Plainview, NY.
“Thunderstorm asthma events are rare, but our changing environment and the increase in the number of people with allergies may make such events more common and more severe into the future,” agreed Paul J. Beggs, PhD, associate professor in the School of Natural Sciences at Macquarie University in Sydney, Australia.
How to Minimize Your Risk
If your patients are sensitive to pollen, advise them to continue to monitor outdoor levels, particularly during tree, grass, and weed pollen season, Dr. Virant recommended. Also patients should pay attention to weather reports. Watch for thunderstorms that could “amplify exposure to the pollen with 40-plus mile per hour winds and often colder air downdrafts.” Cold is an additional asthma trigger, he noted.
People with asthma should try to stay indoors with windows and doors closed during strong thunderstorms and for several hours afterward. Using air filters can also help reduce risk, said Deepti V. Manian, MD, an allergist and immunologist at Stormont Vail Health in Topeka, Kansas.
Patients should continue controller therapies -- such as longer-acting inhalers and allergy medications -- and use a rescue inhaler or nebulizer for prompt treatment of symptoms, recommended Donald J. Dvorin, MD, of The Allergy and Asthma Doctors in Mount Laurel, NJ. Ideally, people seeking shelter indoors during storms should be “accompanied by friends or family who can help them transport quickly to a hospital if needed.”
Asthma Diagnosis Not Required
Even peoples who would not consider themselves to have asthma can be seriously affected. For example, people with hay fever, or allergic rhinitis as it’s also known, are also at risk, said Ajay Kevat, MBBS, MPH, of the respiratory department at Queensland Children’s Hospital in Brisbane, Australia.
People with hay fever can also experience stronger symptoms during and after thunderstorms. Optimally treating allergic rhinitis during the pollen season with non-sedation antihistamines and nasal steroids can help, Dr. Virant said, instead of “chasing symptoms with medication after they are already severe.”
Part of the challenge is connecting severe weather to worse asthma symptoms. “In my experience, there is a lack of awareness surrounding thunderstorm asthma,” Dr. Manian said. For example, people with non-allergic rhinitis, also known as vasomotor rhinitis, can also experience the effects. “It often surprises many of my patients when I introduce the concept of vasomotor rhinitis, which can be triggered by environmental fluctuations.”
Gathering Clouds, Gathering Evidence
Climate change could also change which Americans experience the most storms. Researchers in a June 2022 study predicted fewer storms in the Southern plains and more storms in the Midwest and the Southeastern United States in the future.
Dr. Dvorin practices in Southern New Jersey, and in this area, “we fortunate in this area not to experience thunderstorm-induced asthma exacerbations,” he said.
But climate change means that in the future, thunderstorm asthma could strike in places it has never been seen before, said Dr. Kevat, who wrote a thunderstorm asthma review article published online June 2020 in the Journal of Asthma and Allergy.
And this is not just a concern in the United States. Major thunderstorm asthma events have been reported in Italy, the United Kingdom, the Middle East, Asia, and Australia. In November 2016, for instance, a strong set of storms swept across Melbourne, Australia. Temperatures dropped 10C (about 18F), humidity rose above 70%, and particulate matter like pollen became more concentrated in the air.
This event spurred a “thunderstorm asthma epidemic of unprecedented magnitude, tempo, and geographical range and severity,” Dr. Beggs and colleagues wrote in their June 2018 report in The Lancet Planetary Health.
Large-scale events like this can affect entire communities and quickly overwhelm local health care resources. Within 30 hours of the Melbourne storms, 3,365 people more than usual came to local emergency departments with respiratory issues — and 476 with asthma were admitted to the hospital. Ten people died: five in the hospital and five who could not be resuscitated or died while waiting for emergency services.
More research is needed “so as to best prepare for this unpredictable, significant public health threat,” Dr. Kevat wrote.
People whose asthma is triggered by pollen or mold spores are particularly at risk for thunderstorm asthma, Dr. Waqar said. If you’re unsure, an allergist can help diagnose and treat your allergic risks.
More severe thunderstorms are just one asthma trigger associated with climate change. Last summer, Canadian wildfires sent smoke across the northern U.S. and triggered widespread asthma exacerbations.
A version of this article appeared on WebMD.com.
Thunderstorm asthma can strike with little warning, leaving people with the symptoms of an asthma attack during or after the dark clouds pass.
If you’re unfamiliar, the risk for a thunderstorm asthma attack grows when heavy storms arrive on a day with very high pollen or spores. The storm uplifts these particles, adds water, and causes them to explode into smaller grains. The electrical activity in a storm can do the same. Next, strong winds sweep these particles down and across the ground. People in the path of the storm can experience shortness of breath, coughing, and wheezing.
“Yes, if only because the amount of pollen appears to be increasing in many areas due to climate change,” said Frank S. Virant, MD, chief of the Allergy Division at Seattle Children’s Hospital in Washington.
Most cases of thunderstorm asthma occur in the spring and early summer, but that also could change. Pollen seasons “have been getting longer and more intense,” said Shaan M. Waqar, MD, an allergist at ENT and Allergy Associates in Plainview, NY.
“Thunderstorm asthma events are rare, but our changing environment and the increase in the number of people with allergies may make such events more common and more severe into the future,” agreed Paul J. Beggs, PhD, associate professor in the School of Natural Sciences at Macquarie University in Sydney, Australia.
How to Minimize Your Risk
If your patients are sensitive to pollen, advise them to continue to monitor outdoor levels, particularly during tree, grass, and weed pollen season, Dr. Virant recommended. Also patients should pay attention to weather reports. Watch for thunderstorms that could “amplify exposure to the pollen with 40-plus mile per hour winds and often colder air downdrafts.” Cold is an additional asthma trigger, he noted.
People with asthma should try to stay indoors with windows and doors closed during strong thunderstorms and for several hours afterward. Using air filters can also help reduce risk, said Deepti V. Manian, MD, an allergist and immunologist at Stormont Vail Health in Topeka, Kansas.
Patients should continue controller therapies -- such as longer-acting inhalers and allergy medications -- and use a rescue inhaler or nebulizer for prompt treatment of symptoms, recommended Donald J. Dvorin, MD, of The Allergy and Asthma Doctors in Mount Laurel, NJ. Ideally, people seeking shelter indoors during storms should be “accompanied by friends or family who can help them transport quickly to a hospital if needed.”
Asthma Diagnosis Not Required
Even peoples who would not consider themselves to have asthma can be seriously affected. For example, people with hay fever, or allergic rhinitis as it’s also known, are also at risk, said Ajay Kevat, MBBS, MPH, of the respiratory department at Queensland Children’s Hospital in Brisbane, Australia.
People with hay fever can also experience stronger symptoms during and after thunderstorms. Optimally treating allergic rhinitis during the pollen season with non-sedation antihistamines and nasal steroids can help, Dr. Virant said, instead of “chasing symptoms with medication after they are already severe.”
Part of the challenge is connecting severe weather to worse asthma symptoms. “In my experience, there is a lack of awareness surrounding thunderstorm asthma,” Dr. Manian said. For example, people with non-allergic rhinitis, also known as vasomotor rhinitis, can also experience the effects. “It often surprises many of my patients when I introduce the concept of vasomotor rhinitis, which can be triggered by environmental fluctuations.”
Gathering Clouds, Gathering Evidence
Climate change could also change which Americans experience the most storms. Researchers in a June 2022 study predicted fewer storms in the Southern plains and more storms in the Midwest and the Southeastern United States in the future.
Dr. Dvorin practices in Southern New Jersey, and in this area, “we fortunate in this area not to experience thunderstorm-induced asthma exacerbations,” he said.
But climate change means that in the future, thunderstorm asthma could strike in places it has never been seen before, said Dr. Kevat, who wrote a thunderstorm asthma review article published online June 2020 in the Journal of Asthma and Allergy.
And this is not just a concern in the United States. Major thunderstorm asthma events have been reported in Italy, the United Kingdom, the Middle East, Asia, and Australia. In November 2016, for instance, a strong set of storms swept across Melbourne, Australia. Temperatures dropped 10C (about 18F), humidity rose above 70%, and particulate matter like pollen became more concentrated in the air.
This event spurred a “thunderstorm asthma epidemic of unprecedented magnitude, tempo, and geographical range and severity,” Dr. Beggs and colleagues wrote in their June 2018 report in The Lancet Planetary Health.
Large-scale events like this can affect entire communities and quickly overwhelm local health care resources. Within 30 hours of the Melbourne storms, 3,365 people more than usual came to local emergency departments with respiratory issues — and 476 with asthma were admitted to the hospital. Ten people died: five in the hospital and five who could not be resuscitated or died while waiting for emergency services.
More research is needed “so as to best prepare for this unpredictable, significant public health threat,” Dr. Kevat wrote.
People whose asthma is triggered by pollen or mold spores are particularly at risk for thunderstorm asthma, Dr. Waqar said. If you’re unsure, an allergist can help diagnose and treat your allergic risks.
More severe thunderstorms are just one asthma trigger associated with climate change. Last summer, Canadian wildfires sent smoke across the northern U.S. and triggered widespread asthma exacerbations.
A version of this article appeared on WebMD.com.
Thunderstorm asthma can strike with little warning, leaving people with the symptoms of an asthma attack during or after the dark clouds pass.
If you’re unfamiliar, the risk for a thunderstorm asthma attack grows when heavy storms arrive on a day with very high pollen or spores. The storm uplifts these particles, adds water, and causes them to explode into smaller grains. The electrical activity in a storm can do the same. Next, strong winds sweep these particles down and across the ground. People in the path of the storm can experience shortness of breath, coughing, and wheezing.
“Yes, if only because the amount of pollen appears to be increasing in many areas due to climate change,” said Frank S. Virant, MD, chief of the Allergy Division at Seattle Children’s Hospital in Washington.
Most cases of thunderstorm asthma occur in the spring and early summer, but that also could change. Pollen seasons “have been getting longer and more intense,” said Shaan M. Waqar, MD, an allergist at ENT and Allergy Associates in Plainview, NY.
“Thunderstorm asthma events are rare, but our changing environment and the increase in the number of people with allergies may make such events more common and more severe into the future,” agreed Paul J. Beggs, PhD, associate professor in the School of Natural Sciences at Macquarie University in Sydney, Australia.
How to Minimize Your Risk
If your patients are sensitive to pollen, advise them to continue to monitor outdoor levels, particularly during tree, grass, and weed pollen season, Dr. Virant recommended. Also patients should pay attention to weather reports. Watch for thunderstorms that could “amplify exposure to the pollen with 40-plus mile per hour winds and often colder air downdrafts.” Cold is an additional asthma trigger, he noted.
People with asthma should try to stay indoors with windows and doors closed during strong thunderstorms and for several hours afterward. Using air filters can also help reduce risk, said Deepti V. Manian, MD, an allergist and immunologist at Stormont Vail Health in Topeka, Kansas.
Patients should continue controller therapies -- such as longer-acting inhalers and allergy medications -- and use a rescue inhaler or nebulizer for prompt treatment of symptoms, recommended Donald J. Dvorin, MD, of The Allergy and Asthma Doctors in Mount Laurel, NJ. Ideally, people seeking shelter indoors during storms should be “accompanied by friends or family who can help them transport quickly to a hospital if needed.”
Asthma Diagnosis Not Required
Even peoples who would not consider themselves to have asthma can be seriously affected. For example, people with hay fever, or allergic rhinitis as it’s also known, are also at risk, said Ajay Kevat, MBBS, MPH, of the respiratory department at Queensland Children’s Hospital in Brisbane, Australia.
People with hay fever can also experience stronger symptoms during and after thunderstorms. Optimally treating allergic rhinitis during the pollen season with non-sedation antihistamines and nasal steroids can help, Dr. Virant said, instead of “chasing symptoms with medication after they are already severe.”
Part of the challenge is connecting severe weather to worse asthma symptoms. “In my experience, there is a lack of awareness surrounding thunderstorm asthma,” Dr. Manian said. For example, people with non-allergic rhinitis, also known as vasomotor rhinitis, can also experience the effects. “It often surprises many of my patients when I introduce the concept of vasomotor rhinitis, which can be triggered by environmental fluctuations.”
Gathering Clouds, Gathering Evidence
Climate change could also change which Americans experience the most storms. Researchers in a June 2022 study predicted fewer storms in the Southern plains and more storms in the Midwest and the Southeastern United States in the future.
Dr. Dvorin practices in Southern New Jersey, and in this area, “we fortunate in this area not to experience thunderstorm-induced asthma exacerbations,” he said.
But climate change means that in the future, thunderstorm asthma could strike in places it has never been seen before, said Dr. Kevat, who wrote a thunderstorm asthma review article published online June 2020 in the Journal of Asthma and Allergy.
And this is not just a concern in the United States. Major thunderstorm asthma events have been reported in Italy, the United Kingdom, the Middle East, Asia, and Australia. In November 2016, for instance, a strong set of storms swept across Melbourne, Australia. Temperatures dropped 10C (about 18F), humidity rose above 70%, and particulate matter like pollen became more concentrated in the air.
This event spurred a “thunderstorm asthma epidemic of unprecedented magnitude, tempo, and geographical range and severity,” Dr. Beggs and colleagues wrote in their June 2018 report in The Lancet Planetary Health.
Large-scale events like this can affect entire communities and quickly overwhelm local health care resources. Within 30 hours of the Melbourne storms, 3,365 people more than usual came to local emergency departments with respiratory issues — and 476 with asthma were admitted to the hospital. Ten people died: five in the hospital and five who could not be resuscitated or died while waiting for emergency services.
More research is needed “so as to best prepare for this unpredictable, significant public health threat,” Dr. Kevat wrote.
People whose asthma is triggered by pollen or mold spores are particularly at risk for thunderstorm asthma, Dr. Waqar said. If you’re unsure, an allergist can help diagnose and treat your allergic risks.
More severe thunderstorms are just one asthma trigger associated with climate change. Last summer, Canadian wildfires sent smoke across the northern U.S. and triggered widespread asthma exacerbations.
A version of this article appeared on WebMD.com.