ADHD in older adults: A closer look

Article Type
Changed
Fri, 09/01/2023 - 01:15
Display Headline
ADHD in older adults: A closer look

For many years, attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) was thought of as a disorder of childhood; however, it is now increasingly being recognized as a chronic, lifelong disorder that persists into adulthood in approximately two-thirds of patients.1 While our knowledge about ADHD in adults has increased, most research in this population focused on young or middle-aged adults; less is known about ADHD in older adults. Older adults with ADHD may be newly diagnosed at any point in their lives, or not at all.2 Because ADHD may present differently in older adults than in children or young adults, and because it may impair domains of life in different ways, a closer look at late-life ADHD is needed. This article summarizes the literature on the prevalence, impairment, diagnosis, and treatment of ADHD in adults age >60.

Challenges in determining the prevalence

Few studies have examined the age-specific prevalence of ADHD among older adults.3 Compared with childhood ADHD, adult ADHD is relatively neglected in epidemiological studies, largely due to the absence of well-established, validated diagnostic criteria.1,4 Some experts have noted that DSM-5’s ADHD criteria were designed for diagnosing children, and the children-focused symptom threshold may not be useful for adults because ADHD symptoms decline substantially with age.2 One study evaluating DSM-5 ADHD criteria in young adults (N = 4,000, age 18 to 19) found ADHD was better diagnosed when the required number of clinically relevant inattention and hyperactivity symptoms was reduced from 6 to 5 for each category.5 They also found the DSM-5 age-at-onset criterion of symptoms present before age 12 had a significant effect on ADHD prevalence, reducing the rate from 23.7% (95% CI, 22.38 to 25.02) to 5.4% (95% CI, 13.99 to 16.21).5 This suggests that strict usage of DSM-5 criteria may underestimate the prevalence of ADHD in adults, because ADHD symptoms may not be detected in childhood, or self-reporting of childhood ADHD symptoms in older adults may be unreliable due to aging processes that compromise memory and recall. These findings also indicate that fewer ADHD symptoms are needed to impair functioning in older age.

Determining the prevalence of ADHD among older adults is further complicated by individuals who report symptoms consistent with an ADHD diagnosis despite having never received this diagnosis during childhood.6-8 This may be due to the considerable number of children who meet ADHD criteria but do not get a diagnosis due to limited access to health care.9 Thus, many studies separately analyze the syndromatic (with a childhood onset) and symptomatic (regardless of childhood onset) persistence of ADHD. One epidemiological meta-analysis found the 2020 prevalence of syndromatic ADHD in adults age >60 was 0.77% and the prevalence of symptomatic ADHD was 4.51%, which translates to 7.91 million and 46.36 million affected older adults, respectively.8 Other research has reported higher rates among older adults.6,7,10 The variations among this research may be attributed to the use of different diagnostic tools/criteria, study populations, sampling methods, or DSM versions. Heterogeneity among this research also further supports the idea that the prevalence of ADHD is heavily dependent on how one defines and diagnoses the disorder.

Reasons for late-life ADHD diagnosis

There are many reasons a patient may not be diagnosed with ADHD until they are an older adult.11 In addition to socioeconomic barriers to health care access, members of different ethnic groups exhibit differences in help-seeking behaviors; children may belong to a culture that does not traditionally seek health care even when symptoms are evident.6,9 Therefore, individuals may not receive a diagnosis until adulthood. Some experts have discussed the similarity of ADHD to other neurodevelopmental disorders, such as autism spectrum disorder or social communication disorder, where ADHD symptoms may not manifest until stressors at critical points in life exceed an individual’s capacity to compensate.2

The life transition model contextualizes ADHD as being associated with demand/resource imbalances that come and go throughout life, resulting in variability in the degree of functional impairment ADHD symptoms cause in older adults.2,12 Hypothetically, events in late life—such as the death of a spouse or retirement—can remove essential support structures in the lives of high-functioning individuals with ADHD. As a result, such events surpass these individuals’ ability to cope, resulting in a late-life manifestation of ADHD.

The plausibility of late-onset ADHD

In recent years, many studies identifying ADHD in adults have been published,2,10,12-15 including some that discuss adult ADHD that spontaneously appears without childhood symptoms (ie, late-onset ADHD).2,4,12 Research of late-onset ADHD attracts attention because the data it presents challenge the current rationale that ADHD symptoms should be present before age 12, as defined by DSM-5 criteria. While most reports of late-onset ADHD pertain to younger adults, little evidence exists to reinforce the concept; to date just 1 study has reported cases of late-onset ADHD in older adults (n = 7, age 51 to 59).11 In this study, Sasaki et al11 acknowledged the strong possibility their cases may be late manifestations of long-standing ADHD. Late-onset ADHD is further challenged by findings that 95% of individuals initially diagnosed with late-onset ADHD can be excluded from the diagnosis with further detailed assessment that accounts for co-occurring mental disorders and substance use.16 This suggests false positive cases of late-onset ADHD may be a symptom of narrow clinical assessment that fails to encompass other aspects of a patient’s psychiatric profile, rather than an atypical ADHD presentation.

Comorbidity and psychosocial functioning

ADHD symptoms and diagnosis in older adults are associated with clinically relevant levels of depression and anxiety. The Dutch Longitudinal Aging Study Amsterdam (LASA) examined 1,494 older adults (age 55 to 85) using the Diagnostic Interview for ADHD in Adults version 2.0.10 The 231 individuals identified as having symptoms of ADHD reported clinically relevant levels of depressive and anxiety symptoms. ADHD was significantly associated with these comorbid symptoms.

Continue to: Little is known regarding...

 

 

Little is known regarding the manifestation of symptoms of ADHD in older age and the difficulties these older adults face. Older adults with ADHD are more often divorced and report more loneliness than older adults without this disorder, which suggests loneliness in older age may be more pressing for the older ADHD population.17 ADHD in older adults has also been associated with poor quality-of-life measures, including moderate to severe problems in mobility, self-care, usual activity, pain/discomfort, and anxiety/depression (Table 114,17).

Common co-occurring symptoms of late-life ADHD

Qualitative research has described a domino effect of a lifetime of living with ADHD. In one American study, older adults with ADHD (N = 24, age 60 to 74) reported experiencing a tangible, accumulated impact from ADHD on their finances and long-term relationships with family, friends, and coworkers.13 Another study utilizing the Dutch LASA data examined how ADHD may impact patient’s lives among participants who were unaware of their diagnosis.18 One-half of patients reported low self-esteem, overstepping boundaries, and feeling different from others. When compared to younger adults with ADHD, older adults report significantly greater impairments in productivity and a worse life outlook.19

Differential diagnosis

When assessing whether an older adult has ADHD, it is important to consider other potential causes of their symptoms (Table 211,15,20-23). The differential diagnosis includes impaired vision and hearing as well as medical illness (vitamin B12 deficiency, hyperthyroidism, hypothyroidism, hyperparathyroidism, and infectious diseases such as herpes simplex virus or syphilis).11,15,20-23 Neurological causes include brain tumors, traumatic brain injuries, postconcussive syndrome, stroke, and neurocognitive disorders.11,15,20-23 Other potential causes include obstructive sleep apnea, mood disorders, substance use disorders, and medication adverse effects (especially with polypharmacy).11,15,20-23 In this population, other causes are often responsible for “late-manifestation ADHD symptoms.”1,15 Neurocognitive disorders and other psychiatric conditions are especially difficult to differentiate from ADHD.

Differential diagnosis for ADHD symptoms in older adults

In older adults, ADHD symptoms include frontal-executive impairments, inattentiveness, difficulty with organization or multitasking, forgetfulness, and challenges involving activities of daily living or socialization that can appear to be a mild or major neurocognitive disorder (Table 311,24,25). This includes major neuro­cognitive disorder due to Alzheimer’s disease, Lewy body disease, and vascular disease.2,26 However, frontotemporal lobar degeneration is reported to have more symptom overlap with ADHD.21,22,26,27 A way to differentiate between neurocognitive disorders and ADHD in older adults is to consider that patients with neurocognitive disorders often progress to visual hallucinations and more extreme personality changes than would be expected in ADHD.11 Each disease also has its own identifiable characteristics. Extreme changes in memory are often Alzheimer’s disease, personality changes suggest fronto­temporal lobar degeneration, stepwise decline is classic for vascular disease, and parkinsonian features may indicate dementia with Lewy bodies.21 In addition, the onset of ADHD usually occurs in childhood and can be traced throughout the lifespan,2 whereas neurocognitive diseases usually appear for the first time in later life.2,28 There are nuances in the nature of forgetfulness that can distinguish ADHD from neurocognitive disorders. For instance, the forgetfulness in early-onset Alzheimer’s disease involves “the lack of episodic memories,” while in contrast ADHD is thought to be “forgetfulness due to inadvertence.”11 Furthermore, patients with neurocognitive disorders are reported to have more severe symptoms and an inability to explain why, whereas those with ADHD have a steady level of symptoms and can provide a more comprehensive story.24 Two recent studies have shown that weak performance on language tests is more indicative of a neuro­degenerative process than of ADHD.29,30 Research has suggested that if an older adult shows a sudden, acute onset of ADHD-like symptoms, this is most likely reflective of cognitive decline or a mood disorder such as depression.2,15,24

Neuropsychological manifestations of ADHD in older adults

Several other psychiatric conditions share many symptoms with ADHD. Overlapping symptomology between ADHD and mood and anxiety disorders presents challenges.27 Emotional dysregulation is a feature of adult ADHD, and this often causes a mood disorder to be diagnosed without considering other possible explanations.21,22,27,31-34 Features of mania can overlap with ADHD symptoms, including psychomotor agitation, talkativeness, and distractibility.27 Several other disorders also include distractibility, such as depression, anxiety, and substance use disorders.35 Depression and anxiety can be an outcome of untreated ADHD, or can co-occur with ADHD.21-23,27 ADHD can also co-occur with bipolar disorder (BD), substance use disorders, and personality disorders (borderline and antisocial personality disorder) (Figure 121-23,27,35). One suggested method of establishing an appropriate diagnosis is to study the efficacy of the treatment retrospectively. For example, if a patient is presumed to have depression and they do not respond to several selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors, this may be undetected ADHD.27 In addition, the argument about the chronicity of the symptoms should also be considered. ADHD symptoms are pervasive whereas BD symptoms are episodic.35 Depression can be chronic; however, there are often discrete major depressive episodes. It is important to have a clear timeline of the patient’s symptoms. Ask about age of onset, because in theory, ADHD is supposed to start in childhood.22 It is sometimes difficult to ascertain this information because many older adults grew up during a time where ADHD was not a recognized diagnosis.21

Overlapping symptomology of ADHD and other psychiatric disorders

Continue to: Diagnosis and workup

 

 

Diagnosis and workup

The key aspects of diagnosing ADHD are the interview based on DSM-5 criteria, exclusion of other diagnoses, and collateral information. Research has shown that clinical interviews and longitudinal family histories provide critical information that can differentiate ADHD from other psychiatric conditions.35 DSM-5 criteria are adjusted for adults: 5 out of 9 criteria for inattention and/or hyperactivity-impulsivity must be fulfilled, as opposed to 6 out of 9 in children age <17.21,31,36 However, no criteria are specific for older adults.37 Since the differential diagnosis involves multiple entities, it is important to follow DSM-5 criteria for ADHD, which include eliminating other conditions that can explain these symptoms.15 Additionally, in DSM-5, the age-of-onset threshold for ADHD diagnosis was increased from 7 and younger to 12 and younger, addressing criticism that the previous cutoff was too restrictive.24,31 The age of onset of childhood symptoms can be challenging to verify in older adults. Older patients can have unreliable memories and their childhood records are not always available.2,20 In this population, childhood symptoms are mainly underreported but sometimes overreported.10,38 However, to establish a diagnosis, the patient should have experienced some symptoms of the disorder within their first 50 years of life, including having impaired functionality in multiple settings.15,26 The goal is to establish the chronicity of this condition to distinguish it from other psychiatric conditions.22 Overall, using DSM-5 criteria without any modifications may lead to underdiagnosis of ADHD in adults.23 At this time, however, DSM-5 remains the main criteria used to make a diagnosis.

While tools to assist in screening and diagnosing ADHD have been validated in adults, none have been validated specifically for older adults.22 Structured diagnostic interviews to diagnose ADHD include39:

  • Adult ADHD Clinical Diagnostic Scale version 1.2
  • ADHD Lifespan Functioning interview
  • Conners’ Adult ADHD Diagnostic interview for DSM-IV
  • Diagnostic Interview for ADHD in Adults version 2.0
  • Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-5.

ADHD symptom measures that can be used for screening and to look at treatment response include39:

  • ADHD Rating Scale 5
  • Adult ADHD Self-Report Scale Symptom Checklist
  • Barkley Adult ADHD Rating Scale IV
  • Barkley Quick-Check for Adult ADHD Diagnosis
  • Young ADHD Questionnaire
  • RATE Scales.

Adult ADHD inventories consider problems that adults with ADHD face. These include39:

  • Brown Attention Deficit Disorders Scales—Adult version
  • Conners’ Adult ADHD Rating Scales
  • Wender-Reimherr Adult Attention Deficit Disorder Scale.

Since these scales were not designed for older adults, they may miss nuances in this population.40

Continue to: It can be particularly...

 

 

It can be particularly perplexing to diagnose ADHD in older adults because the other possible causes of the symptoms are vast. During the interview, it is important to ask questions that may rule out other psychiatric, neurologic, and medical conditions.21 Screen for other diagnoses, and include questions about a patient’s sleep history to rule out obstructive sleep apnea.21 To screen for other psychiatric conditions, the Mini International Neuropsychiatric Interview 5.0.0 may be used.22 Other tools include the Saint Louis University AMSAD screen for depression, the Geriatric Depression Scale, and the Beck Anxiety Inventory.28,41 To screen for cognitive functioning, the Saint Louis University Mental Status Exam, Montreal Cognitive Assessment, or Mini-Mental State Examination can be used.22,28,42,43 Once screening is performed, a physical and neurologic examination is the best next step.26 Additionally, laboratory data and imaging can rule out other conditions; however, these are not routinely performed to diagnose ADHD.

Laboratory tests should include a comprehensive metabolic panel, complete blood count, thyroid-stimulating hormone level, B12/folate level, and possibly a vitamin D level.11,36 These tests cover several conditions that may mimic ADHD. Brain MRI is not routinely recommended for diagnosing ADHD, though it may be useful because some research has found brain structural differences in individuals with ADHD.28,44,45 Neurocognitive disorders have notable MRI findings that distinguish them from ADHD and each other.24 If there is significant concern for neurocognitive disorders, more specific tests can be employed, such as CSF studies, to look for phosphorylated tau and beta amyloid markers.11

Ask about family history (first-degree relative with ADHD) and obtain collateral information to make sure no other diagnoses are overlooked. Family history can help diagnose this disorder in older adults because there is evidence that ADHD runs in families.2,25 This evidence would ideally come from someone who has known the patient their entire life, such as a sibling or parent.24 The collateral information will be especially helpful to discern the chronicity of the patient’s symptoms, which would point toward a diagnosis of ADHD. To summarize (Figure 2):

  • obtain a thorough interview that may be supported by a screening tool
  • rule out other conditions
  • conduct a physical examination
  • obtain laboratory results
  • collect collateral information
  • obtain neuroimaging if necessary.

ADHD workup in older adults

Treatment

ADHD symptoms can be treated with medications and psychotherapy. Research has shown the efficacy of ADHD medications in older adults, demonstrating that treatment leads to better functioning in multiple settings and decreases the risk for developing comorbid psychiatric conditions (mood disorder, substance use disorders).25,27 Symptoms that improve with medication include attention, concentration, self-efficacy, functioning, self-esteem, psychomotor agitation, mood, energy, and procrastination.21,31,46 If a patient with ADHD also has other psychiatric diagnoses, treat the most impairing disorder first.22 This often means mood disorders and substance use disorders must be remedied before ADHD is treated.21

Medication options include stimulants and nonstimulants. First-line treatments are stimulant medications, including methylphenidate, amphetamines, and mixed amphetamine salts.12,22,27,31,35 Stimulants have shown significant efficacy in older adults, although the American Geriatrics Society’s Beers Criteria list stimulants as potentially inappropriate for older adults.33 Adults show significant improvement with methylphenidate.21,23,47 In an observational study, Michielsen et al46 found stimulants were safe and efficacious in older adults if patients are carefully monitored for adverse effects, especially cardiovascular changes. Second-line treatments include the nonstimulant atomoxetine.12,22,27,31 Clonidine and guanfacine are FDA-approved for treating ADHD in children, but not approved for adults.26 There is little evidence for other treatments, such as bupropion.12,22,27 All of these medications have adverse effects, which are especially important to consider in older adults, who experience age-related physiological changes.

Continue to: Medications for ADHD symptoms...

 

 

Medications for ADHD symptoms are thought to act via catecholaminergic mechanisms.21 As a result, adverse effects of stimulants can include headache, appetite suppression, nausea, difficulty sleeping, tremor, blurred vision, agitation, psychosis, increased heart rate, arrhythmia, and hypertension.22,27,32-34 Especially in older adults, adverse effects such as reduced appetite, disrupted sleep, or increased blood pressure or heart rate may be harmful.21,23 Using caffeine or pseudoephedrine can exacerbate these adverse effects.21 Atomoxetine’s adverse effects include appetite suppression, insomnia, dizziness, anxiety, agitation, fatigue, dry mouth, constipation, nausea, vomiting, dyspepsia, and increased heart rate or blood pressure.27,32,35 Genitourinary adverse effects have also been reported, including priapism (rare), decreased libido, and urinary hesitancy and retention.26,32 Before any medication is initiated, it is important to conduct a physical and neurologic examination and a detailed clinical interview.

Before starting medication, as with any medical treatment, conduct a risk vs benefit analysis. Record baseline values for the patient’s heart rate, blood pressure, and weight.23,26,27,31 During the interview, screen for family and personal cardiovascular conditions,27,33 and obtain an electrocardiogram for any patient with cardiovascular risks.23,26,27,31 Once the patient is deemed to be an appropriate candidate for pharmacologic treatment, begin with low doses and titrate the medication slowly until reaching a therapeutic level.23,48

Medications should be combined with psychotherapy (eg, cognitive-behavioral therapy or dialectical behavioral therapy) and other lifestyle changes (exercise, mindfulness, support groups).18,22,23,27,31,49 Psychotherapy can help patients come to terms with receiving an ADHD diagnosis later in life and help with organization and socialization.12,50 Pharmacologic treatments are thought to be helpful with attention challenges and emotional instability.50 Taken together, medications and behavioral interventions can help individuals experience an improved quality of life.

Future directions

Given the relatively recent interest in ADHD in older adults, there are several areas that need further research. For future editions of DSM, it may be prudent to consider establishing ADHD criteria specific to older adults. Research has also shown the need for clear diagnostic and validated tools for older adults.8 Few analyses have been undertaken regarding pharmacotherapy for this population. Randomized controlled clinical trials are needed.23,37,48 More research about the relative utility of psychotherapy and behavioral interventions would also be useful, given their potential to improve the quality of life for older adults with ADHD.

Bottom Line

Although generally thought of as a disorder of childhood, attention-deficit/ hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) has substantial effects in older adults. When the condition is appropriately diagnosed, pharmacologic treatment and psychotherapy are associated with improved quality of life for older patients with ADHD.

Related Resources

Drug Brand Names

Amphetamine/dextroamphetamine • Adderall
Atomoxetine • Straterra
Bupropion • Wellbutrin
Clonidine • Catapres
Guanfacine • Intuniv
Methylphenidate • Ritalin

References

1. Sibley MH, Mitchell JT, Becker SP. Method of adult diagnosis influences estimated persistence of childhood ADHD: a systematic review of longitudinal studies. Lancet Psychiatry. 2016;3(12):1157-1165. doi:10.1016/S2215-0366(16)30190-0

2. Sharma MJ, Lavoie S, Callahan BL. A call for research on the validity of the age-of-onset criterion application in older adults being evaluated for ADHD: a review of the literature in clinical and cognitive psychology. Am J Geriatr Psychiatry. 2021;29(7):669-678. doi:10.1016/j.jagp.2020.10.016

3. Biederman J, Petty CR, Evans M, et al. How persistent is ADHD? A controlled 10-year follow-up study of boys with ADHD. Psychiatry Res. 2010;177(3):299-304. doi:10.1016/j.psychres.2009.12.010

4. McGough JJ, Barkley RA. Diagnostic controversies in adult attention deficit hyperactivity disorder. Am J Psychiatry. 2004;161(11):1948-1956. doi:10.1176/appi.ajp.161.11.1948

5. Matte B, Anselmi L, Salum GA, et al. ADHD in DSM-5: a field trial in a large, representative sample of 18- to 19-year-old adults. Psychol Med. 2015;45(2):361-373. doi:10.1017/S0033291714001470

6. Chung W, Jiang SF, Paksarian D, et al. Trends in the prevalence and incidence of attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder among adults and children of different racial and ethnic groups. JAMA Netw Open. 2019;2(11):e1914344. doi:10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2019.14344

7. Guldberg-Kjär T, Johansson B. Old people reporting childhood AD/HD symptoms: retrospectively self-rated AD/HD symptoms in a population-based Swedish sample aged 65-80. Nord J Psychiatry. 2009;63(5):375-382. doi:10.1080/08039480902818238

8. Song P, Zha M, Yang Q, et al. The prevalence of adult attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder: a global systematic review and meta-analysis. J Glob Health. 2021;11:04009. doi:10.7189/jogh.11.04009

9. Russell AE, Ford T, Williams R, et al. The association between socioeconomic disadvantage and attention deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD): a systematic review. Child Psychiatry Hum Dev. 2016;47(3):440-458. doi:10.1007/s10578/-015-0578-3

10. Michielsen M, Semeijn E, Comijs HC, et al. Prevalence of attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder in older adults in The Netherlands. Br J Psychiatry. 2012;201(4):298-305. doi:10.1192/bjp.bp.111.101196

11. Sasaki H, Jono T, Fukuhara R, et al. Late-manifestation of attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder in older adults: an observational study. BMC Psychiatry. 2022;22(1):354. doi:10.1186/s12888-022-03978-0

12. Turgay A, Goodman DW, Asherson P, et al. Lifespan persistence of ADHD: the life transition model and its application. J Clin Psychiatry. 2012;73(2):192-201. doi:10.4088/JCP.10m06628

13. Brod M, Schmitt E, Goodwin M, et al. ADHD burden of illness in older adults: a life course perspective. Qual Life Res. 2012;21(5):795-799. doi:10.1007/s1136-011-9981-9

14. Thorell LB, Holst Y, Sjöwall D. Quality of life in older adults with ADHD: links to ADHD symptom levels and executive functioning deficits. Nord J Psychiatry. 2019;73(7):409-416. doi:10.1080/08039488.2019.1646804

15. Sibley MH. Diagnosing ADHD in older adults: critical next steps for research. Am J Geriatr Psychiatry. 2021;29(7):679-681. doi:10.1016/j.jagp.2020.11.012

16. Sibley MH, Rohde LA, Swanson JM, et al. Late-onset ADHD reconsidered with comprehensive repeated assessments between ages 10 and 25. Am J Psychiatry. 2018;175(2):140-149. doi:10.1176/appi.ajp.2017.17030298

17. Michielsen M, Comijs HC, Aartsen MJ, et al. The relationships between ADHD and social functioning and participation in older adults in a population-based study. J Atten Disord. 2015;19(5):368-379. doi:10.1177/1087054713515748

18. Michielsen M, de Kruif JTCM, Comijs HC, et al. The burden of ADHD in older adults: a qualitative study. J Atten Disord. 2018;22(6):591-600. doi:10.1177/1087054715610001

19. Lensing MB, Zeiner P, Sandvik L, et al. Quality of life in adults aged 50+ with ADHD. J Atten Disord. 2015;19(5):405-413. doi:10.1177/1087054713480035

20. Fischer BL, Gunter-Hunt G, Steinhafel CH, et al. The identification and assessment of late-life ADHD in memory clinics. J Atten Disord. 2012;16(4):333-338. doi:10.1177/1087054711398886

21. Goodman DW, Mitchell S, Rhodewalt L, et al. Clinical presentation, diagnosis and treatment of attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) in older adults: a review of the evidence and its implications for clinical care. Drugs Aging. 2016;33(1):27-36. doi:10.1007/s40266-015-0327-0

22. Kooij JJ, Michielsen M, Kruithof H, et al. ADHD in old age: a review of the literature and proposal for assessment and treatment. Expert Rev Neurother. 2016;16(12):1371-1381. doi:10.1080/14737175.2016.1204914

23. Torgersen T, Gjervan B, Lensing MB, et al. Optimal management of ADHD in older adults. Neuropsychiatr Dis Treat. 2016;12:79-87. doi:10.2147/NDT.S59271

24. Callahan BL, Bierstone D, Stuss DT, et al. Adult ADHD: risk factor for dementia or phenotypic mimic? Front Aging Neurosci. 2017;9:260. doi:10.3389/fnagi.2017.00260

25. Mendonca F, Sudo FK, Santiago-Bravo G, et al. Mild cognitive impairment or attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder in older adults? A cross sectional study. Front Psychiatry. 2021;12:737357. doi:10.3389/fpsyt.2021.737357

26. De Crescenzo F, Cortese S, Adamo N, et al. Pharmacological and non-pharmacological treatment of adults with ADHD: a meta-review. Evid Based Ment Health. 2017;20(1):4-11. doi:10.1136/eb-2016-102415

27. Katzman MA, Bilkey TS, Chokka PR, et al. Adult ADHD and comorbid disorders: clinical implications of a dimensional approach. BMC Psychiatry. 2017;17(1):302. doi:10.1186/s12888-017-1463-3

28. Klein M, Silva MA, Belizario GO, et al. Longitudinal neuropsychological assessment in two elderly adults with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder: case report. Front Psychol. 2019;10:1119. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2019.01119

29. Prentice JL, Schaeffer MJ, Wall AK, et al. A systematic review and comparison of neurocognitive features of late-life attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder and dementia with Lewy bodies. J Geriatr Psychiatry Neurol. 2021;34(5):466-481. doi:10.1177/0891988720944251

30. Callahan BL, Ramakrishnan N, Shammi P, et al. Cognitive and neuroimaging profiles of older adults with attention deficit/hyperactivity disorder presenting to a memory clinic. J Atten Disord. 2022;26(8):1118-1129. doi:10.1177/10870547211060546

31. Ramos-Quiroga, JA, Nasillo V, Fernández-Aranda, et al. Addressing the lack of studies in attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder in adults. Expert Rev Neurother. 2014;14(5):553-567. doi:10.1586/14737175.2014.908708

32. Stahl SM. Stahl’s Essential Psychopharmacology: Prescriber’s Guide. 6th ed. Cambridge University Press; 2017.

33. Latronica JR, Clegg TJ, Tuan WJ, et al. Are amphetamines associated with adverse cardiovascular events among elderly individuals? J Am Board Fam Med. 2021;34(6):1074-1081. doi:10.3122/jabfm.2021.06.210228

34. Garcia-Argibay M, du Rietz E, Lu Y, et al. The role of ADHD genetic risk in mid-to-late life somatic health conditions. Transl Psychiatry. 2022;12(1):152. doi:10.1038/s41398-022-01919-9

35. Jain R, Jain S, Montano CB, Addressing diagnosis and treatment gaps in adults with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder. Prim Care Companion CNS Disord. 2017;19(5):17nr02153. doi:10.4088/PCC.17nr02153

36. Sasaki H, Jono T, Fukuhara R, et al. Late-onset attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder as a differential diagnosis of dementia: a case report. BMC Psychiatry. 2020;20(1):550. doi:10.1186/s12888-020-02949-7

37. Surman CBH, Goodman DW. Is ADHD a valid diagnosis in older adults? Atten Defic Hyperact Disord. 2017;9(3):161-168. doi:10.1007/s12402-017-0217-x

38. Semeijn EJ, Michielsen M, Comijs HC, et al. Criterion validity of an attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) screening list for screening ADHD in older adults aged 60-94 years. Am J Geriatr Psychiatry. 2013;21(7):631-635. doi:10.1016/j.jagp.2012.08.003

39. Ramsay JR. Assessment and monitoring of treatment response in adult ADHD patients: current perspectives. Neuropsychiatr Dis Treat. 2017;13:221-232. doi:10.2147/NDT.S104706

40. Das D, Cherbuin N, Easteal S, et al. Attention deficit/hyperactivity disorder symptoms and cognitive abilities in the late-life cohort of the PATH through life study. PLoS One. 2014;9(1):e86552. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0086552

41. Kaya D, Isik AT, Usarel C, et al. The Saint Louis University Mental Status Examination is better than the Mini-Mental State Examination to determine the cognitive impairment in Turkish elderly people. J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2016;17(4):370.e11-370.e3.7E15. doi:10.1016/j.jamda.2015.12.093

42. Michielsen M, Comijs HC, Semeijn EJ, et al. Attention deficit hyperactivity disorder and personality characteristics in older adults in the general Dutch population. Am J Geriatr Psychiatry. 2014;22(12):1623-1632. doi:10.1016/j.jagp.2014.02.005

43. Khoury R, Chakkamparambil B, Chibnall J, et al. Diagnostic accuracy of the SLU AMSAD scale for depression in older adults without dementia. J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2020;21(5):665-668. doi:10.1016/j.jamda.2019.09.011

44. Çavuşoğlu Ç, Demirkol ME, Tamam L. Attention deficit hyperactivity disorder in the elderly. Current Approaches in Psychiatry. 2020;12(2):182-194. doi:10.18863/pgy.548052

45. Klein M, Souza-Duran FL, Menezes AKPM, et al. Gray matter volume in elderly adults with ADHD: associations of symptoms and comorbidities with brain structures. J Atten Disord. 2021;25(6):829-838. doi:10.1177/1087054719855683

46. Michielsen M, Kleef D, Bijlenga D, et al. Response and side effects using stimulant medication in older adults with ADHD: an observational archive study. J Atten Disord. 2021;25(12):1712-1719. doi:10.1177/1087054720925884

47. Manor I, Rozen S, Zemishlani Z, et al. When does it end? Attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder in the middle aged and older populations. Clin Neuropharmacol, 2011;34(4):148-154. doi:10.1097/WNF.0b013e3182206dc1

48. Deshmukh P, Patel D. Attention deficit hyperactivity disorder and its treatment in geriatrics. Curr Dev Disord Rep. 2020;7(3):79-84.

49. Barkley RA. The important role of executive functioning and self-regulation in ADHD. 2010. Accessed August 10, 2023. https://www.russellbarkley.org/factsheets/ADHD_EF_and_SR.pdf

50. Corbisiero S, Bitto H, Newark P, et al. A comparison of cognitive-behavioral therapy and pharmacotherapy vs. pharmacotherapy alone in adults with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD)-a randomized controlled trial. Front Psychiatry. 2018;9:571. doi:10.3389/fpsyt.2018.00571

Article PDF
Author and Disclosure Information

Van Ngo, MS-4
Medical Student

Amanda Springer, MS-4
Medical Student

Phillip Ruppert, PhD
Assistant Professor Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Neuroscience

Noam Grysman, MD
Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Neuroscience

George Grossberg, MD
Samuel W. Fordyce Professor Director, Geriatric Psychiatry

• • • •

Saint Louis University School of Medicine St. Louis, Missouri

Disclosures
The authors report no financial relationships with any companies whose products are mentioned in this article, or with manufacturers of competing products.

Issue
Current Psychiatry - 22(9)
Publications
Topics
Page Number
18-28
Sections
Author and Disclosure Information

Van Ngo, MS-4
Medical Student

Amanda Springer, MS-4
Medical Student

Phillip Ruppert, PhD
Assistant Professor Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Neuroscience

Noam Grysman, MD
Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Neuroscience

George Grossberg, MD
Samuel W. Fordyce Professor Director, Geriatric Psychiatry

• • • •

Saint Louis University School of Medicine St. Louis, Missouri

Disclosures
The authors report no financial relationships with any companies whose products are mentioned in this article, or with manufacturers of competing products.

Author and Disclosure Information

Van Ngo, MS-4
Medical Student

Amanda Springer, MS-4
Medical Student

Phillip Ruppert, PhD
Assistant Professor Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Neuroscience

Noam Grysman, MD
Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Neuroscience

George Grossberg, MD
Samuel W. Fordyce Professor Director, Geriatric Psychiatry

• • • •

Saint Louis University School of Medicine St. Louis, Missouri

Disclosures
The authors report no financial relationships with any companies whose products are mentioned in this article, or with manufacturers of competing products.

Article PDF
Article PDF

For many years, attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) was thought of as a disorder of childhood; however, it is now increasingly being recognized as a chronic, lifelong disorder that persists into adulthood in approximately two-thirds of patients.1 While our knowledge about ADHD in adults has increased, most research in this population focused on young or middle-aged adults; less is known about ADHD in older adults. Older adults with ADHD may be newly diagnosed at any point in their lives, or not at all.2 Because ADHD may present differently in older adults than in children or young adults, and because it may impair domains of life in different ways, a closer look at late-life ADHD is needed. This article summarizes the literature on the prevalence, impairment, diagnosis, and treatment of ADHD in adults age >60.

Challenges in determining the prevalence

Few studies have examined the age-specific prevalence of ADHD among older adults.3 Compared with childhood ADHD, adult ADHD is relatively neglected in epidemiological studies, largely due to the absence of well-established, validated diagnostic criteria.1,4 Some experts have noted that DSM-5’s ADHD criteria were designed for diagnosing children, and the children-focused symptom threshold may not be useful for adults because ADHD symptoms decline substantially with age.2 One study evaluating DSM-5 ADHD criteria in young adults (N = 4,000, age 18 to 19) found ADHD was better diagnosed when the required number of clinically relevant inattention and hyperactivity symptoms was reduced from 6 to 5 for each category.5 They also found the DSM-5 age-at-onset criterion of symptoms present before age 12 had a significant effect on ADHD prevalence, reducing the rate from 23.7% (95% CI, 22.38 to 25.02) to 5.4% (95% CI, 13.99 to 16.21).5 This suggests that strict usage of DSM-5 criteria may underestimate the prevalence of ADHD in adults, because ADHD symptoms may not be detected in childhood, or self-reporting of childhood ADHD symptoms in older adults may be unreliable due to aging processes that compromise memory and recall. These findings also indicate that fewer ADHD symptoms are needed to impair functioning in older age.

Determining the prevalence of ADHD among older adults is further complicated by individuals who report symptoms consistent with an ADHD diagnosis despite having never received this diagnosis during childhood.6-8 This may be due to the considerable number of children who meet ADHD criteria but do not get a diagnosis due to limited access to health care.9 Thus, many studies separately analyze the syndromatic (with a childhood onset) and symptomatic (regardless of childhood onset) persistence of ADHD. One epidemiological meta-analysis found the 2020 prevalence of syndromatic ADHD in adults age >60 was 0.77% and the prevalence of symptomatic ADHD was 4.51%, which translates to 7.91 million and 46.36 million affected older adults, respectively.8 Other research has reported higher rates among older adults.6,7,10 The variations among this research may be attributed to the use of different diagnostic tools/criteria, study populations, sampling methods, or DSM versions. Heterogeneity among this research also further supports the idea that the prevalence of ADHD is heavily dependent on how one defines and diagnoses the disorder.

Reasons for late-life ADHD diagnosis

There are many reasons a patient may not be diagnosed with ADHD until they are an older adult.11 In addition to socioeconomic barriers to health care access, members of different ethnic groups exhibit differences in help-seeking behaviors; children may belong to a culture that does not traditionally seek health care even when symptoms are evident.6,9 Therefore, individuals may not receive a diagnosis until adulthood. Some experts have discussed the similarity of ADHD to other neurodevelopmental disorders, such as autism spectrum disorder or social communication disorder, where ADHD symptoms may not manifest until stressors at critical points in life exceed an individual’s capacity to compensate.2

The life transition model contextualizes ADHD as being associated with demand/resource imbalances that come and go throughout life, resulting in variability in the degree of functional impairment ADHD symptoms cause in older adults.2,12 Hypothetically, events in late life—such as the death of a spouse or retirement—can remove essential support structures in the lives of high-functioning individuals with ADHD. As a result, such events surpass these individuals’ ability to cope, resulting in a late-life manifestation of ADHD.

The plausibility of late-onset ADHD

In recent years, many studies identifying ADHD in adults have been published,2,10,12-15 including some that discuss adult ADHD that spontaneously appears without childhood symptoms (ie, late-onset ADHD).2,4,12 Research of late-onset ADHD attracts attention because the data it presents challenge the current rationale that ADHD symptoms should be present before age 12, as defined by DSM-5 criteria. While most reports of late-onset ADHD pertain to younger adults, little evidence exists to reinforce the concept; to date just 1 study has reported cases of late-onset ADHD in older adults (n = 7, age 51 to 59).11 In this study, Sasaki et al11 acknowledged the strong possibility their cases may be late manifestations of long-standing ADHD. Late-onset ADHD is further challenged by findings that 95% of individuals initially diagnosed with late-onset ADHD can be excluded from the diagnosis with further detailed assessment that accounts for co-occurring mental disorders and substance use.16 This suggests false positive cases of late-onset ADHD may be a symptom of narrow clinical assessment that fails to encompass other aspects of a patient’s psychiatric profile, rather than an atypical ADHD presentation.

Comorbidity and psychosocial functioning

ADHD symptoms and diagnosis in older adults are associated with clinically relevant levels of depression and anxiety. The Dutch Longitudinal Aging Study Amsterdam (LASA) examined 1,494 older adults (age 55 to 85) using the Diagnostic Interview for ADHD in Adults version 2.0.10 The 231 individuals identified as having symptoms of ADHD reported clinically relevant levels of depressive and anxiety symptoms. ADHD was significantly associated with these comorbid symptoms.

Continue to: Little is known regarding...

 

 

Little is known regarding the manifestation of symptoms of ADHD in older age and the difficulties these older adults face. Older adults with ADHD are more often divorced and report more loneliness than older adults without this disorder, which suggests loneliness in older age may be more pressing for the older ADHD population.17 ADHD in older adults has also been associated with poor quality-of-life measures, including moderate to severe problems in mobility, self-care, usual activity, pain/discomfort, and anxiety/depression (Table 114,17).

Common co-occurring symptoms of late-life ADHD

Qualitative research has described a domino effect of a lifetime of living with ADHD. In one American study, older adults with ADHD (N = 24, age 60 to 74) reported experiencing a tangible, accumulated impact from ADHD on their finances and long-term relationships with family, friends, and coworkers.13 Another study utilizing the Dutch LASA data examined how ADHD may impact patient’s lives among participants who were unaware of their diagnosis.18 One-half of patients reported low self-esteem, overstepping boundaries, and feeling different from others. When compared to younger adults with ADHD, older adults report significantly greater impairments in productivity and a worse life outlook.19

Differential diagnosis

When assessing whether an older adult has ADHD, it is important to consider other potential causes of their symptoms (Table 211,15,20-23). The differential diagnosis includes impaired vision and hearing as well as medical illness (vitamin B12 deficiency, hyperthyroidism, hypothyroidism, hyperparathyroidism, and infectious diseases such as herpes simplex virus or syphilis).11,15,20-23 Neurological causes include brain tumors, traumatic brain injuries, postconcussive syndrome, stroke, and neurocognitive disorders.11,15,20-23 Other potential causes include obstructive sleep apnea, mood disorders, substance use disorders, and medication adverse effects (especially with polypharmacy).11,15,20-23 In this population, other causes are often responsible for “late-manifestation ADHD symptoms.”1,15 Neurocognitive disorders and other psychiatric conditions are especially difficult to differentiate from ADHD.

Differential diagnosis for ADHD symptoms in older adults

In older adults, ADHD symptoms include frontal-executive impairments, inattentiveness, difficulty with organization or multitasking, forgetfulness, and challenges involving activities of daily living or socialization that can appear to be a mild or major neurocognitive disorder (Table 311,24,25). This includes major neuro­cognitive disorder due to Alzheimer’s disease, Lewy body disease, and vascular disease.2,26 However, frontotemporal lobar degeneration is reported to have more symptom overlap with ADHD.21,22,26,27 A way to differentiate between neurocognitive disorders and ADHD in older adults is to consider that patients with neurocognitive disorders often progress to visual hallucinations and more extreme personality changes than would be expected in ADHD.11 Each disease also has its own identifiable characteristics. Extreme changes in memory are often Alzheimer’s disease, personality changes suggest fronto­temporal lobar degeneration, stepwise decline is classic for vascular disease, and parkinsonian features may indicate dementia with Lewy bodies.21 In addition, the onset of ADHD usually occurs in childhood and can be traced throughout the lifespan,2 whereas neurocognitive diseases usually appear for the first time in later life.2,28 There are nuances in the nature of forgetfulness that can distinguish ADHD from neurocognitive disorders. For instance, the forgetfulness in early-onset Alzheimer’s disease involves “the lack of episodic memories,” while in contrast ADHD is thought to be “forgetfulness due to inadvertence.”11 Furthermore, patients with neurocognitive disorders are reported to have more severe symptoms and an inability to explain why, whereas those with ADHD have a steady level of symptoms and can provide a more comprehensive story.24 Two recent studies have shown that weak performance on language tests is more indicative of a neuro­degenerative process than of ADHD.29,30 Research has suggested that if an older adult shows a sudden, acute onset of ADHD-like symptoms, this is most likely reflective of cognitive decline or a mood disorder such as depression.2,15,24

Neuropsychological manifestations of ADHD in older adults

Several other psychiatric conditions share many symptoms with ADHD. Overlapping symptomology between ADHD and mood and anxiety disorders presents challenges.27 Emotional dysregulation is a feature of adult ADHD, and this often causes a mood disorder to be diagnosed without considering other possible explanations.21,22,27,31-34 Features of mania can overlap with ADHD symptoms, including psychomotor agitation, talkativeness, and distractibility.27 Several other disorders also include distractibility, such as depression, anxiety, and substance use disorders.35 Depression and anxiety can be an outcome of untreated ADHD, or can co-occur with ADHD.21-23,27 ADHD can also co-occur with bipolar disorder (BD), substance use disorders, and personality disorders (borderline and antisocial personality disorder) (Figure 121-23,27,35). One suggested method of establishing an appropriate diagnosis is to study the efficacy of the treatment retrospectively. For example, if a patient is presumed to have depression and they do not respond to several selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors, this may be undetected ADHD.27 In addition, the argument about the chronicity of the symptoms should also be considered. ADHD symptoms are pervasive whereas BD symptoms are episodic.35 Depression can be chronic; however, there are often discrete major depressive episodes. It is important to have a clear timeline of the patient’s symptoms. Ask about age of onset, because in theory, ADHD is supposed to start in childhood.22 It is sometimes difficult to ascertain this information because many older adults grew up during a time where ADHD was not a recognized diagnosis.21

Overlapping symptomology of ADHD and other psychiatric disorders

Continue to: Diagnosis and workup

 

 

Diagnosis and workup

The key aspects of diagnosing ADHD are the interview based on DSM-5 criteria, exclusion of other diagnoses, and collateral information. Research has shown that clinical interviews and longitudinal family histories provide critical information that can differentiate ADHD from other psychiatric conditions.35 DSM-5 criteria are adjusted for adults: 5 out of 9 criteria for inattention and/or hyperactivity-impulsivity must be fulfilled, as opposed to 6 out of 9 in children age <17.21,31,36 However, no criteria are specific for older adults.37 Since the differential diagnosis involves multiple entities, it is important to follow DSM-5 criteria for ADHD, which include eliminating other conditions that can explain these symptoms.15 Additionally, in DSM-5, the age-of-onset threshold for ADHD diagnosis was increased from 7 and younger to 12 and younger, addressing criticism that the previous cutoff was too restrictive.24,31 The age of onset of childhood symptoms can be challenging to verify in older adults. Older patients can have unreliable memories and their childhood records are not always available.2,20 In this population, childhood symptoms are mainly underreported but sometimes overreported.10,38 However, to establish a diagnosis, the patient should have experienced some symptoms of the disorder within their first 50 years of life, including having impaired functionality in multiple settings.15,26 The goal is to establish the chronicity of this condition to distinguish it from other psychiatric conditions.22 Overall, using DSM-5 criteria without any modifications may lead to underdiagnosis of ADHD in adults.23 At this time, however, DSM-5 remains the main criteria used to make a diagnosis.

While tools to assist in screening and diagnosing ADHD have been validated in adults, none have been validated specifically for older adults.22 Structured diagnostic interviews to diagnose ADHD include39:

  • Adult ADHD Clinical Diagnostic Scale version 1.2
  • ADHD Lifespan Functioning interview
  • Conners’ Adult ADHD Diagnostic interview for DSM-IV
  • Diagnostic Interview for ADHD in Adults version 2.0
  • Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-5.

ADHD symptom measures that can be used for screening and to look at treatment response include39:

  • ADHD Rating Scale 5
  • Adult ADHD Self-Report Scale Symptom Checklist
  • Barkley Adult ADHD Rating Scale IV
  • Barkley Quick-Check for Adult ADHD Diagnosis
  • Young ADHD Questionnaire
  • RATE Scales.

Adult ADHD inventories consider problems that adults with ADHD face. These include39:

  • Brown Attention Deficit Disorders Scales—Adult version
  • Conners’ Adult ADHD Rating Scales
  • Wender-Reimherr Adult Attention Deficit Disorder Scale.

Since these scales were not designed for older adults, they may miss nuances in this population.40

Continue to: It can be particularly...

 

 

It can be particularly perplexing to diagnose ADHD in older adults because the other possible causes of the symptoms are vast. During the interview, it is important to ask questions that may rule out other psychiatric, neurologic, and medical conditions.21 Screen for other diagnoses, and include questions about a patient’s sleep history to rule out obstructive sleep apnea.21 To screen for other psychiatric conditions, the Mini International Neuropsychiatric Interview 5.0.0 may be used.22 Other tools include the Saint Louis University AMSAD screen for depression, the Geriatric Depression Scale, and the Beck Anxiety Inventory.28,41 To screen for cognitive functioning, the Saint Louis University Mental Status Exam, Montreal Cognitive Assessment, or Mini-Mental State Examination can be used.22,28,42,43 Once screening is performed, a physical and neurologic examination is the best next step.26 Additionally, laboratory data and imaging can rule out other conditions; however, these are not routinely performed to diagnose ADHD.

Laboratory tests should include a comprehensive metabolic panel, complete blood count, thyroid-stimulating hormone level, B12/folate level, and possibly a vitamin D level.11,36 These tests cover several conditions that may mimic ADHD. Brain MRI is not routinely recommended for diagnosing ADHD, though it may be useful because some research has found brain structural differences in individuals with ADHD.28,44,45 Neurocognitive disorders have notable MRI findings that distinguish them from ADHD and each other.24 If there is significant concern for neurocognitive disorders, more specific tests can be employed, such as CSF studies, to look for phosphorylated tau and beta amyloid markers.11

Ask about family history (first-degree relative with ADHD) and obtain collateral information to make sure no other diagnoses are overlooked. Family history can help diagnose this disorder in older adults because there is evidence that ADHD runs in families.2,25 This evidence would ideally come from someone who has known the patient their entire life, such as a sibling or parent.24 The collateral information will be especially helpful to discern the chronicity of the patient’s symptoms, which would point toward a diagnosis of ADHD. To summarize (Figure 2):

  • obtain a thorough interview that may be supported by a screening tool
  • rule out other conditions
  • conduct a physical examination
  • obtain laboratory results
  • collect collateral information
  • obtain neuroimaging if necessary.

ADHD workup in older adults

Treatment

ADHD symptoms can be treated with medications and psychotherapy. Research has shown the efficacy of ADHD medications in older adults, demonstrating that treatment leads to better functioning in multiple settings and decreases the risk for developing comorbid psychiatric conditions (mood disorder, substance use disorders).25,27 Symptoms that improve with medication include attention, concentration, self-efficacy, functioning, self-esteem, psychomotor agitation, mood, energy, and procrastination.21,31,46 If a patient with ADHD also has other psychiatric diagnoses, treat the most impairing disorder first.22 This often means mood disorders and substance use disorders must be remedied before ADHD is treated.21

Medication options include stimulants and nonstimulants. First-line treatments are stimulant medications, including methylphenidate, amphetamines, and mixed amphetamine salts.12,22,27,31,35 Stimulants have shown significant efficacy in older adults, although the American Geriatrics Society’s Beers Criteria list stimulants as potentially inappropriate for older adults.33 Adults show significant improvement with methylphenidate.21,23,47 In an observational study, Michielsen et al46 found stimulants were safe and efficacious in older adults if patients are carefully monitored for adverse effects, especially cardiovascular changes. Second-line treatments include the nonstimulant atomoxetine.12,22,27,31 Clonidine and guanfacine are FDA-approved for treating ADHD in children, but not approved for adults.26 There is little evidence for other treatments, such as bupropion.12,22,27 All of these medications have adverse effects, which are especially important to consider in older adults, who experience age-related physiological changes.

Continue to: Medications for ADHD symptoms...

 

 

Medications for ADHD symptoms are thought to act via catecholaminergic mechanisms.21 As a result, adverse effects of stimulants can include headache, appetite suppression, nausea, difficulty sleeping, tremor, blurred vision, agitation, psychosis, increased heart rate, arrhythmia, and hypertension.22,27,32-34 Especially in older adults, adverse effects such as reduced appetite, disrupted sleep, or increased blood pressure or heart rate may be harmful.21,23 Using caffeine or pseudoephedrine can exacerbate these adverse effects.21 Atomoxetine’s adverse effects include appetite suppression, insomnia, dizziness, anxiety, agitation, fatigue, dry mouth, constipation, nausea, vomiting, dyspepsia, and increased heart rate or blood pressure.27,32,35 Genitourinary adverse effects have also been reported, including priapism (rare), decreased libido, and urinary hesitancy and retention.26,32 Before any medication is initiated, it is important to conduct a physical and neurologic examination and a detailed clinical interview.

Before starting medication, as with any medical treatment, conduct a risk vs benefit analysis. Record baseline values for the patient’s heart rate, blood pressure, and weight.23,26,27,31 During the interview, screen for family and personal cardiovascular conditions,27,33 and obtain an electrocardiogram for any patient with cardiovascular risks.23,26,27,31 Once the patient is deemed to be an appropriate candidate for pharmacologic treatment, begin with low doses and titrate the medication slowly until reaching a therapeutic level.23,48

Medications should be combined with psychotherapy (eg, cognitive-behavioral therapy or dialectical behavioral therapy) and other lifestyle changes (exercise, mindfulness, support groups).18,22,23,27,31,49 Psychotherapy can help patients come to terms with receiving an ADHD diagnosis later in life and help with organization and socialization.12,50 Pharmacologic treatments are thought to be helpful with attention challenges and emotional instability.50 Taken together, medications and behavioral interventions can help individuals experience an improved quality of life.

Future directions

Given the relatively recent interest in ADHD in older adults, there are several areas that need further research. For future editions of DSM, it may be prudent to consider establishing ADHD criteria specific to older adults. Research has also shown the need for clear diagnostic and validated tools for older adults.8 Few analyses have been undertaken regarding pharmacotherapy for this population. Randomized controlled clinical trials are needed.23,37,48 More research about the relative utility of psychotherapy and behavioral interventions would also be useful, given their potential to improve the quality of life for older adults with ADHD.

Bottom Line

Although generally thought of as a disorder of childhood, attention-deficit/ hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) has substantial effects in older adults. When the condition is appropriately diagnosed, pharmacologic treatment and psychotherapy are associated with improved quality of life for older patients with ADHD.

Related Resources

Drug Brand Names

Amphetamine/dextroamphetamine • Adderall
Atomoxetine • Straterra
Bupropion • Wellbutrin
Clonidine • Catapres
Guanfacine • Intuniv
Methylphenidate • Ritalin

For many years, attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) was thought of as a disorder of childhood; however, it is now increasingly being recognized as a chronic, lifelong disorder that persists into adulthood in approximately two-thirds of patients.1 While our knowledge about ADHD in adults has increased, most research in this population focused on young or middle-aged adults; less is known about ADHD in older adults. Older adults with ADHD may be newly diagnosed at any point in their lives, or not at all.2 Because ADHD may present differently in older adults than in children or young adults, and because it may impair domains of life in different ways, a closer look at late-life ADHD is needed. This article summarizes the literature on the prevalence, impairment, diagnosis, and treatment of ADHD in adults age >60.

Challenges in determining the prevalence

Few studies have examined the age-specific prevalence of ADHD among older adults.3 Compared with childhood ADHD, adult ADHD is relatively neglected in epidemiological studies, largely due to the absence of well-established, validated diagnostic criteria.1,4 Some experts have noted that DSM-5’s ADHD criteria were designed for diagnosing children, and the children-focused symptom threshold may not be useful for adults because ADHD symptoms decline substantially with age.2 One study evaluating DSM-5 ADHD criteria in young adults (N = 4,000, age 18 to 19) found ADHD was better diagnosed when the required number of clinically relevant inattention and hyperactivity symptoms was reduced from 6 to 5 for each category.5 They also found the DSM-5 age-at-onset criterion of symptoms present before age 12 had a significant effect on ADHD prevalence, reducing the rate from 23.7% (95% CI, 22.38 to 25.02) to 5.4% (95% CI, 13.99 to 16.21).5 This suggests that strict usage of DSM-5 criteria may underestimate the prevalence of ADHD in adults, because ADHD symptoms may not be detected in childhood, or self-reporting of childhood ADHD symptoms in older adults may be unreliable due to aging processes that compromise memory and recall. These findings also indicate that fewer ADHD symptoms are needed to impair functioning in older age.

Determining the prevalence of ADHD among older adults is further complicated by individuals who report symptoms consistent with an ADHD diagnosis despite having never received this diagnosis during childhood.6-8 This may be due to the considerable number of children who meet ADHD criteria but do not get a diagnosis due to limited access to health care.9 Thus, many studies separately analyze the syndromatic (with a childhood onset) and symptomatic (regardless of childhood onset) persistence of ADHD. One epidemiological meta-analysis found the 2020 prevalence of syndromatic ADHD in adults age >60 was 0.77% and the prevalence of symptomatic ADHD was 4.51%, which translates to 7.91 million and 46.36 million affected older adults, respectively.8 Other research has reported higher rates among older adults.6,7,10 The variations among this research may be attributed to the use of different diagnostic tools/criteria, study populations, sampling methods, or DSM versions. Heterogeneity among this research also further supports the idea that the prevalence of ADHD is heavily dependent on how one defines and diagnoses the disorder.

Reasons for late-life ADHD diagnosis

There are many reasons a patient may not be diagnosed with ADHD until they are an older adult.11 In addition to socioeconomic barriers to health care access, members of different ethnic groups exhibit differences in help-seeking behaviors; children may belong to a culture that does not traditionally seek health care even when symptoms are evident.6,9 Therefore, individuals may not receive a diagnosis until adulthood. Some experts have discussed the similarity of ADHD to other neurodevelopmental disorders, such as autism spectrum disorder or social communication disorder, where ADHD symptoms may not manifest until stressors at critical points in life exceed an individual’s capacity to compensate.2

The life transition model contextualizes ADHD as being associated with demand/resource imbalances that come and go throughout life, resulting in variability in the degree of functional impairment ADHD symptoms cause in older adults.2,12 Hypothetically, events in late life—such as the death of a spouse or retirement—can remove essential support structures in the lives of high-functioning individuals with ADHD. As a result, such events surpass these individuals’ ability to cope, resulting in a late-life manifestation of ADHD.

The plausibility of late-onset ADHD

In recent years, many studies identifying ADHD in adults have been published,2,10,12-15 including some that discuss adult ADHD that spontaneously appears without childhood symptoms (ie, late-onset ADHD).2,4,12 Research of late-onset ADHD attracts attention because the data it presents challenge the current rationale that ADHD symptoms should be present before age 12, as defined by DSM-5 criteria. While most reports of late-onset ADHD pertain to younger adults, little evidence exists to reinforce the concept; to date just 1 study has reported cases of late-onset ADHD in older adults (n = 7, age 51 to 59).11 In this study, Sasaki et al11 acknowledged the strong possibility their cases may be late manifestations of long-standing ADHD. Late-onset ADHD is further challenged by findings that 95% of individuals initially diagnosed with late-onset ADHD can be excluded from the diagnosis with further detailed assessment that accounts for co-occurring mental disorders and substance use.16 This suggests false positive cases of late-onset ADHD may be a symptom of narrow clinical assessment that fails to encompass other aspects of a patient’s psychiatric profile, rather than an atypical ADHD presentation.

Comorbidity and psychosocial functioning

ADHD symptoms and diagnosis in older adults are associated with clinically relevant levels of depression and anxiety. The Dutch Longitudinal Aging Study Amsterdam (LASA) examined 1,494 older adults (age 55 to 85) using the Diagnostic Interview for ADHD in Adults version 2.0.10 The 231 individuals identified as having symptoms of ADHD reported clinically relevant levels of depressive and anxiety symptoms. ADHD was significantly associated with these comorbid symptoms.

Continue to: Little is known regarding...

 

 

Little is known regarding the manifestation of symptoms of ADHD in older age and the difficulties these older adults face. Older adults with ADHD are more often divorced and report more loneliness than older adults without this disorder, which suggests loneliness in older age may be more pressing for the older ADHD population.17 ADHD in older adults has also been associated with poor quality-of-life measures, including moderate to severe problems in mobility, self-care, usual activity, pain/discomfort, and anxiety/depression (Table 114,17).

Common co-occurring symptoms of late-life ADHD

Qualitative research has described a domino effect of a lifetime of living with ADHD. In one American study, older adults with ADHD (N = 24, age 60 to 74) reported experiencing a tangible, accumulated impact from ADHD on their finances and long-term relationships with family, friends, and coworkers.13 Another study utilizing the Dutch LASA data examined how ADHD may impact patient’s lives among participants who were unaware of their diagnosis.18 One-half of patients reported low self-esteem, overstepping boundaries, and feeling different from others. When compared to younger adults with ADHD, older adults report significantly greater impairments in productivity and a worse life outlook.19

Differential diagnosis

When assessing whether an older adult has ADHD, it is important to consider other potential causes of their symptoms (Table 211,15,20-23). The differential diagnosis includes impaired vision and hearing as well as medical illness (vitamin B12 deficiency, hyperthyroidism, hypothyroidism, hyperparathyroidism, and infectious diseases such as herpes simplex virus or syphilis).11,15,20-23 Neurological causes include brain tumors, traumatic brain injuries, postconcussive syndrome, stroke, and neurocognitive disorders.11,15,20-23 Other potential causes include obstructive sleep apnea, mood disorders, substance use disorders, and medication adverse effects (especially with polypharmacy).11,15,20-23 In this population, other causes are often responsible for “late-manifestation ADHD symptoms.”1,15 Neurocognitive disorders and other psychiatric conditions are especially difficult to differentiate from ADHD.

Differential diagnosis for ADHD symptoms in older adults

In older adults, ADHD symptoms include frontal-executive impairments, inattentiveness, difficulty with organization or multitasking, forgetfulness, and challenges involving activities of daily living or socialization that can appear to be a mild or major neurocognitive disorder (Table 311,24,25). This includes major neuro­cognitive disorder due to Alzheimer’s disease, Lewy body disease, and vascular disease.2,26 However, frontotemporal lobar degeneration is reported to have more symptom overlap with ADHD.21,22,26,27 A way to differentiate between neurocognitive disorders and ADHD in older adults is to consider that patients with neurocognitive disorders often progress to visual hallucinations and more extreme personality changes than would be expected in ADHD.11 Each disease also has its own identifiable characteristics. Extreme changes in memory are often Alzheimer’s disease, personality changes suggest fronto­temporal lobar degeneration, stepwise decline is classic for vascular disease, and parkinsonian features may indicate dementia with Lewy bodies.21 In addition, the onset of ADHD usually occurs in childhood and can be traced throughout the lifespan,2 whereas neurocognitive diseases usually appear for the first time in later life.2,28 There are nuances in the nature of forgetfulness that can distinguish ADHD from neurocognitive disorders. For instance, the forgetfulness in early-onset Alzheimer’s disease involves “the lack of episodic memories,” while in contrast ADHD is thought to be “forgetfulness due to inadvertence.”11 Furthermore, patients with neurocognitive disorders are reported to have more severe symptoms and an inability to explain why, whereas those with ADHD have a steady level of symptoms and can provide a more comprehensive story.24 Two recent studies have shown that weak performance on language tests is more indicative of a neuro­degenerative process than of ADHD.29,30 Research has suggested that if an older adult shows a sudden, acute onset of ADHD-like symptoms, this is most likely reflective of cognitive decline or a mood disorder such as depression.2,15,24

Neuropsychological manifestations of ADHD in older adults

Several other psychiatric conditions share many symptoms with ADHD. Overlapping symptomology between ADHD and mood and anxiety disorders presents challenges.27 Emotional dysregulation is a feature of adult ADHD, and this often causes a mood disorder to be diagnosed without considering other possible explanations.21,22,27,31-34 Features of mania can overlap with ADHD symptoms, including psychomotor agitation, talkativeness, and distractibility.27 Several other disorders also include distractibility, such as depression, anxiety, and substance use disorders.35 Depression and anxiety can be an outcome of untreated ADHD, or can co-occur with ADHD.21-23,27 ADHD can also co-occur with bipolar disorder (BD), substance use disorders, and personality disorders (borderline and antisocial personality disorder) (Figure 121-23,27,35). One suggested method of establishing an appropriate diagnosis is to study the efficacy of the treatment retrospectively. For example, if a patient is presumed to have depression and they do not respond to several selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors, this may be undetected ADHD.27 In addition, the argument about the chronicity of the symptoms should also be considered. ADHD symptoms are pervasive whereas BD symptoms are episodic.35 Depression can be chronic; however, there are often discrete major depressive episodes. It is important to have a clear timeline of the patient’s symptoms. Ask about age of onset, because in theory, ADHD is supposed to start in childhood.22 It is sometimes difficult to ascertain this information because many older adults grew up during a time where ADHD was not a recognized diagnosis.21

Overlapping symptomology of ADHD and other psychiatric disorders

Continue to: Diagnosis and workup

 

 

Diagnosis and workup

The key aspects of diagnosing ADHD are the interview based on DSM-5 criteria, exclusion of other diagnoses, and collateral information. Research has shown that clinical interviews and longitudinal family histories provide critical information that can differentiate ADHD from other psychiatric conditions.35 DSM-5 criteria are adjusted for adults: 5 out of 9 criteria for inattention and/or hyperactivity-impulsivity must be fulfilled, as opposed to 6 out of 9 in children age <17.21,31,36 However, no criteria are specific for older adults.37 Since the differential diagnosis involves multiple entities, it is important to follow DSM-5 criteria for ADHD, which include eliminating other conditions that can explain these symptoms.15 Additionally, in DSM-5, the age-of-onset threshold for ADHD diagnosis was increased from 7 and younger to 12 and younger, addressing criticism that the previous cutoff was too restrictive.24,31 The age of onset of childhood symptoms can be challenging to verify in older adults. Older patients can have unreliable memories and their childhood records are not always available.2,20 In this population, childhood symptoms are mainly underreported but sometimes overreported.10,38 However, to establish a diagnosis, the patient should have experienced some symptoms of the disorder within their first 50 years of life, including having impaired functionality in multiple settings.15,26 The goal is to establish the chronicity of this condition to distinguish it from other psychiatric conditions.22 Overall, using DSM-5 criteria without any modifications may lead to underdiagnosis of ADHD in adults.23 At this time, however, DSM-5 remains the main criteria used to make a diagnosis.

While tools to assist in screening and diagnosing ADHD have been validated in adults, none have been validated specifically for older adults.22 Structured diagnostic interviews to diagnose ADHD include39:

  • Adult ADHD Clinical Diagnostic Scale version 1.2
  • ADHD Lifespan Functioning interview
  • Conners’ Adult ADHD Diagnostic interview for DSM-IV
  • Diagnostic Interview for ADHD in Adults version 2.0
  • Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-5.

ADHD symptom measures that can be used for screening and to look at treatment response include39:

  • ADHD Rating Scale 5
  • Adult ADHD Self-Report Scale Symptom Checklist
  • Barkley Adult ADHD Rating Scale IV
  • Barkley Quick-Check for Adult ADHD Diagnosis
  • Young ADHD Questionnaire
  • RATE Scales.

Adult ADHD inventories consider problems that adults with ADHD face. These include39:

  • Brown Attention Deficit Disorders Scales—Adult version
  • Conners’ Adult ADHD Rating Scales
  • Wender-Reimherr Adult Attention Deficit Disorder Scale.

Since these scales were not designed for older adults, they may miss nuances in this population.40

Continue to: It can be particularly...

 

 

It can be particularly perplexing to diagnose ADHD in older adults because the other possible causes of the symptoms are vast. During the interview, it is important to ask questions that may rule out other psychiatric, neurologic, and medical conditions.21 Screen for other diagnoses, and include questions about a patient’s sleep history to rule out obstructive sleep apnea.21 To screen for other psychiatric conditions, the Mini International Neuropsychiatric Interview 5.0.0 may be used.22 Other tools include the Saint Louis University AMSAD screen for depression, the Geriatric Depression Scale, and the Beck Anxiety Inventory.28,41 To screen for cognitive functioning, the Saint Louis University Mental Status Exam, Montreal Cognitive Assessment, or Mini-Mental State Examination can be used.22,28,42,43 Once screening is performed, a physical and neurologic examination is the best next step.26 Additionally, laboratory data and imaging can rule out other conditions; however, these are not routinely performed to diagnose ADHD.

Laboratory tests should include a comprehensive metabolic panel, complete blood count, thyroid-stimulating hormone level, B12/folate level, and possibly a vitamin D level.11,36 These tests cover several conditions that may mimic ADHD. Brain MRI is not routinely recommended for diagnosing ADHD, though it may be useful because some research has found brain structural differences in individuals with ADHD.28,44,45 Neurocognitive disorders have notable MRI findings that distinguish them from ADHD and each other.24 If there is significant concern for neurocognitive disorders, more specific tests can be employed, such as CSF studies, to look for phosphorylated tau and beta amyloid markers.11

Ask about family history (first-degree relative with ADHD) and obtain collateral information to make sure no other diagnoses are overlooked. Family history can help diagnose this disorder in older adults because there is evidence that ADHD runs in families.2,25 This evidence would ideally come from someone who has known the patient their entire life, such as a sibling or parent.24 The collateral information will be especially helpful to discern the chronicity of the patient’s symptoms, which would point toward a diagnosis of ADHD. To summarize (Figure 2):

  • obtain a thorough interview that may be supported by a screening tool
  • rule out other conditions
  • conduct a physical examination
  • obtain laboratory results
  • collect collateral information
  • obtain neuroimaging if necessary.

ADHD workup in older adults

Treatment

ADHD symptoms can be treated with medications and psychotherapy. Research has shown the efficacy of ADHD medications in older adults, demonstrating that treatment leads to better functioning in multiple settings and decreases the risk for developing comorbid psychiatric conditions (mood disorder, substance use disorders).25,27 Symptoms that improve with medication include attention, concentration, self-efficacy, functioning, self-esteem, psychomotor agitation, mood, energy, and procrastination.21,31,46 If a patient with ADHD also has other psychiatric diagnoses, treat the most impairing disorder first.22 This often means mood disorders and substance use disorders must be remedied before ADHD is treated.21

Medication options include stimulants and nonstimulants. First-line treatments are stimulant medications, including methylphenidate, amphetamines, and mixed amphetamine salts.12,22,27,31,35 Stimulants have shown significant efficacy in older adults, although the American Geriatrics Society’s Beers Criteria list stimulants as potentially inappropriate for older adults.33 Adults show significant improvement with methylphenidate.21,23,47 In an observational study, Michielsen et al46 found stimulants were safe and efficacious in older adults if patients are carefully monitored for adverse effects, especially cardiovascular changes. Second-line treatments include the nonstimulant atomoxetine.12,22,27,31 Clonidine and guanfacine are FDA-approved for treating ADHD in children, but not approved for adults.26 There is little evidence for other treatments, such as bupropion.12,22,27 All of these medications have adverse effects, which are especially important to consider in older adults, who experience age-related physiological changes.

Continue to: Medications for ADHD symptoms...

 

 

Medications for ADHD symptoms are thought to act via catecholaminergic mechanisms.21 As a result, adverse effects of stimulants can include headache, appetite suppression, nausea, difficulty sleeping, tremor, blurred vision, agitation, psychosis, increased heart rate, arrhythmia, and hypertension.22,27,32-34 Especially in older adults, adverse effects such as reduced appetite, disrupted sleep, or increased blood pressure or heart rate may be harmful.21,23 Using caffeine or pseudoephedrine can exacerbate these adverse effects.21 Atomoxetine’s adverse effects include appetite suppression, insomnia, dizziness, anxiety, agitation, fatigue, dry mouth, constipation, nausea, vomiting, dyspepsia, and increased heart rate or blood pressure.27,32,35 Genitourinary adverse effects have also been reported, including priapism (rare), decreased libido, and urinary hesitancy and retention.26,32 Before any medication is initiated, it is important to conduct a physical and neurologic examination and a detailed clinical interview.

Before starting medication, as with any medical treatment, conduct a risk vs benefit analysis. Record baseline values for the patient’s heart rate, blood pressure, and weight.23,26,27,31 During the interview, screen for family and personal cardiovascular conditions,27,33 and obtain an electrocardiogram for any patient with cardiovascular risks.23,26,27,31 Once the patient is deemed to be an appropriate candidate for pharmacologic treatment, begin with low doses and titrate the medication slowly until reaching a therapeutic level.23,48

Medications should be combined with psychotherapy (eg, cognitive-behavioral therapy or dialectical behavioral therapy) and other lifestyle changes (exercise, mindfulness, support groups).18,22,23,27,31,49 Psychotherapy can help patients come to terms with receiving an ADHD diagnosis later in life and help with organization and socialization.12,50 Pharmacologic treatments are thought to be helpful with attention challenges and emotional instability.50 Taken together, medications and behavioral interventions can help individuals experience an improved quality of life.

Future directions

Given the relatively recent interest in ADHD in older adults, there are several areas that need further research. For future editions of DSM, it may be prudent to consider establishing ADHD criteria specific to older adults. Research has also shown the need for clear diagnostic and validated tools for older adults.8 Few analyses have been undertaken regarding pharmacotherapy for this population. Randomized controlled clinical trials are needed.23,37,48 More research about the relative utility of psychotherapy and behavioral interventions would also be useful, given their potential to improve the quality of life for older adults with ADHD.

Bottom Line

Although generally thought of as a disorder of childhood, attention-deficit/ hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) has substantial effects in older adults. When the condition is appropriately diagnosed, pharmacologic treatment and psychotherapy are associated with improved quality of life for older patients with ADHD.

Related Resources

Drug Brand Names

Amphetamine/dextroamphetamine • Adderall
Atomoxetine • Straterra
Bupropion • Wellbutrin
Clonidine • Catapres
Guanfacine • Intuniv
Methylphenidate • Ritalin

References

1. Sibley MH, Mitchell JT, Becker SP. Method of adult diagnosis influences estimated persistence of childhood ADHD: a systematic review of longitudinal studies. Lancet Psychiatry. 2016;3(12):1157-1165. doi:10.1016/S2215-0366(16)30190-0

2. Sharma MJ, Lavoie S, Callahan BL. A call for research on the validity of the age-of-onset criterion application in older adults being evaluated for ADHD: a review of the literature in clinical and cognitive psychology. Am J Geriatr Psychiatry. 2021;29(7):669-678. doi:10.1016/j.jagp.2020.10.016

3. Biederman J, Petty CR, Evans M, et al. How persistent is ADHD? A controlled 10-year follow-up study of boys with ADHD. Psychiatry Res. 2010;177(3):299-304. doi:10.1016/j.psychres.2009.12.010

4. McGough JJ, Barkley RA. Diagnostic controversies in adult attention deficit hyperactivity disorder. Am J Psychiatry. 2004;161(11):1948-1956. doi:10.1176/appi.ajp.161.11.1948

5. Matte B, Anselmi L, Salum GA, et al. ADHD in DSM-5: a field trial in a large, representative sample of 18- to 19-year-old adults. Psychol Med. 2015;45(2):361-373. doi:10.1017/S0033291714001470

6. Chung W, Jiang SF, Paksarian D, et al. Trends in the prevalence and incidence of attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder among adults and children of different racial and ethnic groups. JAMA Netw Open. 2019;2(11):e1914344. doi:10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2019.14344

7. Guldberg-Kjär T, Johansson B. Old people reporting childhood AD/HD symptoms: retrospectively self-rated AD/HD symptoms in a population-based Swedish sample aged 65-80. Nord J Psychiatry. 2009;63(5):375-382. doi:10.1080/08039480902818238

8. Song P, Zha M, Yang Q, et al. The prevalence of adult attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder: a global systematic review and meta-analysis. J Glob Health. 2021;11:04009. doi:10.7189/jogh.11.04009

9. Russell AE, Ford T, Williams R, et al. The association between socioeconomic disadvantage and attention deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD): a systematic review. Child Psychiatry Hum Dev. 2016;47(3):440-458. doi:10.1007/s10578/-015-0578-3

10. Michielsen M, Semeijn E, Comijs HC, et al. Prevalence of attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder in older adults in The Netherlands. Br J Psychiatry. 2012;201(4):298-305. doi:10.1192/bjp.bp.111.101196

11. Sasaki H, Jono T, Fukuhara R, et al. Late-manifestation of attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder in older adults: an observational study. BMC Psychiatry. 2022;22(1):354. doi:10.1186/s12888-022-03978-0

12. Turgay A, Goodman DW, Asherson P, et al. Lifespan persistence of ADHD: the life transition model and its application. J Clin Psychiatry. 2012;73(2):192-201. doi:10.4088/JCP.10m06628

13. Brod M, Schmitt E, Goodwin M, et al. ADHD burden of illness in older adults: a life course perspective. Qual Life Res. 2012;21(5):795-799. doi:10.1007/s1136-011-9981-9

14. Thorell LB, Holst Y, Sjöwall D. Quality of life in older adults with ADHD: links to ADHD symptom levels and executive functioning deficits. Nord J Psychiatry. 2019;73(7):409-416. doi:10.1080/08039488.2019.1646804

15. Sibley MH. Diagnosing ADHD in older adults: critical next steps for research. Am J Geriatr Psychiatry. 2021;29(7):679-681. doi:10.1016/j.jagp.2020.11.012

16. Sibley MH, Rohde LA, Swanson JM, et al. Late-onset ADHD reconsidered with comprehensive repeated assessments between ages 10 and 25. Am J Psychiatry. 2018;175(2):140-149. doi:10.1176/appi.ajp.2017.17030298

17. Michielsen M, Comijs HC, Aartsen MJ, et al. The relationships between ADHD and social functioning and participation in older adults in a population-based study. J Atten Disord. 2015;19(5):368-379. doi:10.1177/1087054713515748

18. Michielsen M, de Kruif JTCM, Comijs HC, et al. The burden of ADHD in older adults: a qualitative study. J Atten Disord. 2018;22(6):591-600. doi:10.1177/1087054715610001

19. Lensing MB, Zeiner P, Sandvik L, et al. Quality of life in adults aged 50+ with ADHD. J Atten Disord. 2015;19(5):405-413. doi:10.1177/1087054713480035

20. Fischer BL, Gunter-Hunt G, Steinhafel CH, et al. The identification and assessment of late-life ADHD in memory clinics. J Atten Disord. 2012;16(4):333-338. doi:10.1177/1087054711398886

21. Goodman DW, Mitchell S, Rhodewalt L, et al. Clinical presentation, diagnosis and treatment of attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) in older adults: a review of the evidence and its implications for clinical care. Drugs Aging. 2016;33(1):27-36. doi:10.1007/s40266-015-0327-0

22. Kooij JJ, Michielsen M, Kruithof H, et al. ADHD in old age: a review of the literature and proposal for assessment and treatment. Expert Rev Neurother. 2016;16(12):1371-1381. doi:10.1080/14737175.2016.1204914

23. Torgersen T, Gjervan B, Lensing MB, et al. Optimal management of ADHD in older adults. Neuropsychiatr Dis Treat. 2016;12:79-87. doi:10.2147/NDT.S59271

24. Callahan BL, Bierstone D, Stuss DT, et al. Adult ADHD: risk factor for dementia or phenotypic mimic? Front Aging Neurosci. 2017;9:260. doi:10.3389/fnagi.2017.00260

25. Mendonca F, Sudo FK, Santiago-Bravo G, et al. Mild cognitive impairment or attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder in older adults? A cross sectional study. Front Psychiatry. 2021;12:737357. doi:10.3389/fpsyt.2021.737357

26. De Crescenzo F, Cortese S, Adamo N, et al. Pharmacological and non-pharmacological treatment of adults with ADHD: a meta-review. Evid Based Ment Health. 2017;20(1):4-11. doi:10.1136/eb-2016-102415

27. Katzman MA, Bilkey TS, Chokka PR, et al. Adult ADHD and comorbid disorders: clinical implications of a dimensional approach. BMC Psychiatry. 2017;17(1):302. doi:10.1186/s12888-017-1463-3

28. Klein M, Silva MA, Belizario GO, et al. Longitudinal neuropsychological assessment in two elderly adults with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder: case report. Front Psychol. 2019;10:1119. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2019.01119

29. Prentice JL, Schaeffer MJ, Wall AK, et al. A systematic review and comparison of neurocognitive features of late-life attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder and dementia with Lewy bodies. J Geriatr Psychiatry Neurol. 2021;34(5):466-481. doi:10.1177/0891988720944251

30. Callahan BL, Ramakrishnan N, Shammi P, et al. Cognitive and neuroimaging profiles of older adults with attention deficit/hyperactivity disorder presenting to a memory clinic. J Atten Disord. 2022;26(8):1118-1129. doi:10.1177/10870547211060546

31. Ramos-Quiroga, JA, Nasillo V, Fernández-Aranda, et al. Addressing the lack of studies in attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder in adults. Expert Rev Neurother. 2014;14(5):553-567. doi:10.1586/14737175.2014.908708

32. Stahl SM. Stahl’s Essential Psychopharmacology: Prescriber’s Guide. 6th ed. Cambridge University Press; 2017.

33. Latronica JR, Clegg TJ, Tuan WJ, et al. Are amphetamines associated with adverse cardiovascular events among elderly individuals? J Am Board Fam Med. 2021;34(6):1074-1081. doi:10.3122/jabfm.2021.06.210228

34. Garcia-Argibay M, du Rietz E, Lu Y, et al. The role of ADHD genetic risk in mid-to-late life somatic health conditions. Transl Psychiatry. 2022;12(1):152. doi:10.1038/s41398-022-01919-9

35. Jain R, Jain S, Montano CB, Addressing diagnosis and treatment gaps in adults with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder. Prim Care Companion CNS Disord. 2017;19(5):17nr02153. doi:10.4088/PCC.17nr02153

36. Sasaki H, Jono T, Fukuhara R, et al. Late-onset attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder as a differential diagnosis of dementia: a case report. BMC Psychiatry. 2020;20(1):550. doi:10.1186/s12888-020-02949-7

37. Surman CBH, Goodman DW. Is ADHD a valid diagnosis in older adults? Atten Defic Hyperact Disord. 2017;9(3):161-168. doi:10.1007/s12402-017-0217-x

38. Semeijn EJ, Michielsen M, Comijs HC, et al. Criterion validity of an attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) screening list for screening ADHD in older adults aged 60-94 years. Am J Geriatr Psychiatry. 2013;21(7):631-635. doi:10.1016/j.jagp.2012.08.003

39. Ramsay JR. Assessment and monitoring of treatment response in adult ADHD patients: current perspectives. Neuropsychiatr Dis Treat. 2017;13:221-232. doi:10.2147/NDT.S104706

40. Das D, Cherbuin N, Easteal S, et al. Attention deficit/hyperactivity disorder symptoms and cognitive abilities in the late-life cohort of the PATH through life study. PLoS One. 2014;9(1):e86552. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0086552

41. Kaya D, Isik AT, Usarel C, et al. The Saint Louis University Mental Status Examination is better than the Mini-Mental State Examination to determine the cognitive impairment in Turkish elderly people. J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2016;17(4):370.e11-370.e3.7E15. doi:10.1016/j.jamda.2015.12.093

42. Michielsen M, Comijs HC, Semeijn EJ, et al. Attention deficit hyperactivity disorder and personality characteristics in older adults in the general Dutch population. Am J Geriatr Psychiatry. 2014;22(12):1623-1632. doi:10.1016/j.jagp.2014.02.005

43. Khoury R, Chakkamparambil B, Chibnall J, et al. Diagnostic accuracy of the SLU AMSAD scale for depression in older adults without dementia. J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2020;21(5):665-668. doi:10.1016/j.jamda.2019.09.011

44. Çavuşoğlu Ç, Demirkol ME, Tamam L. Attention deficit hyperactivity disorder in the elderly. Current Approaches in Psychiatry. 2020;12(2):182-194. doi:10.18863/pgy.548052

45. Klein M, Souza-Duran FL, Menezes AKPM, et al. Gray matter volume in elderly adults with ADHD: associations of symptoms and comorbidities with brain structures. J Atten Disord. 2021;25(6):829-838. doi:10.1177/1087054719855683

46. Michielsen M, Kleef D, Bijlenga D, et al. Response and side effects using stimulant medication in older adults with ADHD: an observational archive study. J Atten Disord. 2021;25(12):1712-1719. doi:10.1177/1087054720925884

47. Manor I, Rozen S, Zemishlani Z, et al. When does it end? Attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder in the middle aged and older populations. Clin Neuropharmacol, 2011;34(4):148-154. doi:10.1097/WNF.0b013e3182206dc1

48. Deshmukh P, Patel D. Attention deficit hyperactivity disorder and its treatment in geriatrics. Curr Dev Disord Rep. 2020;7(3):79-84.

49. Barkley RA. The important role of executive functioning and self-regulation in ADHD. 2010. Accessed August 10, 2023. https://www.russellbarkley.org/factsheets/ADHD_EF_and_SR.pdf

50. Corbisiero S, Bitto H, Newark P, et al. A comparison of cognitive-behavioral therapy and pharmacotherapy vs. pharmacotherapy alone in adults with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD)-a randomized controlled trial. Front Psychiatry. 2018;9:571. doi:10.3389/fpsyt.2018.00571

References

1. Sibley MH, Mitchell JT, Becker SP. Method of adult diagnosis influences estimated persistence of childhood ADHD: a systematic review of longitudinal studies. Lancet Psychiatry. 2016;3(12):1157-1165. doi:10.1016/S2215-0366(16)30190-0

2. Sharma MJ, Lavoie S, Callahan BL. A call for research on the validity of the age-of-onset criterion application in older adults being evaluated for ADHD: a review of the literature in clinical and cognitive psychology. Am J Geriatr Psychiatry. 2021;29(7):669-678. doi:10.1016/j.jagp.2020.10.016

3. Biederman J, Petty CR, Evans M, et al. How persistent is ADHD? A controlled 10-year follow-up study of boys with ADHD. Psychiatry Res. 2010;177(3):299-304. doi:10.1016/j.psychres.2009.12.010

4. McGough JJ, Barkley RA. Diagnostic controversies in adult attention deficit hyperactivity disorder. Am J Psychiatry. 2004;161(11):1948-1956. doi:10.1176/appi.ajp.161.11.1948

5. Matte B, Anselmi L, Salum GA, et al. ADHD in DSM-5: a field trial in a large, representative sample of 18- to 19-year-old adults. Psychol Med. 2015;45(2):361-373. doi:10.1017/S0033291714001470

6. Chung W, Jiang SF, Paksarian D, et al. Trends in the prevalence and incidence of attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder among adults and children of different racial and ethnic groups. JAMA Netw Open. 2019;2(11):e1914344. doi:10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2019.14344

7. Guldberg-Kjär T, Johansson B. Old people reporting childhood AD/HD symptoms: retrospectively self-rated AD/HD symptoms in a population-based Swedish sample aged 65-80. Nord J Psychiatry. 2009;63(5):375-382. doi:10.1080/08039480902818238

8. Song P, Zha M, Yang Q, et al. The prevalence of adult attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder: a global systematic review and meta-analysis. J Glob Health. 2021;11:04009. doi:10.7189/jogh.11.04009

9. Russell AE, Ford T, Williams R, et al. The association between socioeconomic disadvantage and attention deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD): a systematic review. Child Psychiatry Hum Dev. 2016;47(3):440-458. doi:10.1007/s10578/-015-0578-3

10. Michielsen M, Semeijn E, Comijs HC, et al. Prevalence of attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder in older adults in The Netherlands. Br J Psychiatry. 2012;201(4):298-305. doi:10.1192/bjp.bp.111.101196

11. Sasaki H, Jono T, Fukuhara R, et al. Late-manifestation of attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder in older adults: an observational study. BMC Psychiatry. 2022;22(1):354. doi:10.1186/s12888-022-03978-0

12. Turgay A, Goodman DW, Asherson P, et al. Lifespan persistence of ADHD: the life transition model and its application. J Clin Psychiatry. 2012;73(2):192-201. doi:10.4088/JCP.10m06628

13. Brod M, Schmitt E, Goodwin M, et al. ADHD burden of illness in older adults: a life course perspective. Qual Life Res. 2012;21(5):795-799. doi:10.1007/s1136-011-9981-9

14. Thorell LB, Holst Y, Sjöwall D. Quality of life in older adults with ADHD: links to ADHD symptom levels and executive functioning deficits. Nord J Psychiatry. 2019;73(7):409-416. doi:10.1080/08039488.2019.1646804

15. Sibley MH. Diagnosing ADHD in older adults: critical next steps for research. Am J Geriatr Psychiatry. 2021;29(7):679-681. doi:10.1016/j.jagp.2020.11.012

16. Sibley MH, Rohde LA, Swanson JM, et al. Late-onset ADHD reconsidered with comprehensive repeated assessments between ages 10 and 25. Am J Psychiatry. 2018;175(2):140-149. doi:10.1176/appi.ajp.2017.17030298

17. Michielsen M, Comijs HC, Aartsen MJ, et al. The relationships between ADHD and social functioning and participation in older adults in a population-based study. J Atten Disord. 2015;19(5):368-379. doi:10.1177/1087054713515748

18. Michielsen M, de Kruif JTCM, Comijs HC, et al. The burden of ADHD in older adults: a qualitative study. J Atten Disord. 2018;22(6):591-600. doi:10.1177/1087054715610001

19. Lensing MB, Zeiner P, Sandvik L, et al. Quality of life in adults aged 50+ with ADHD. J Atten Disord. 2015;19(5):405-413. doi:10.1177/1087054713480035

20. Fischer BL, Gunter-Hunt G, Steinhafel CH, et al. The identification and assessment of late-life ADHD in memory clinics. J Atten Disord. 2012;16(4):333-338. doi:10.1177/1087054711398886

21. Goodman DW, Mitchell S, Rhodewalt L, et al. Clinical presentation, diagnosis and treatment of attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) in older adults: a review of the evidence and its implications for clinical care. Drugs Aging. 2016;33(1):27-36. doi:10.1007/s40266-015-0327-0

22. Kooij JJ, Michielsen M, Kruithof H, et al. ADHD in old age: a review of the literature and proposal for assessment and treatment. Expert Rev Neurother. 2016;16(12):1371-1381. doi:10.1080/14737175.2016.1204914

23. Torgersen T, Gjervan B, Lensing MB, et al. Optimal management of ADHD in older adults. Neuropsychiatr Dis Treat. 2016;12:79-87. doi:10.2147/NDT.S59271

24. Callahan BL, Bierstone D, Stuss DT, et al. Adult ADHD: risk factor for dementia or phenotypic mimic? Front Aging Neurosci. 2017;9:260. doi:10.3389/fnagi.2017.00260

25. Mendonca F, Sudo FK, Santiago-Bravo G, et al. Mild cognitive impairment or attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder in older adults? A cross sectional study. Front Psychiatry. 2021;12:737357. doi:10.3389/fpsyt.2021.737357

26. De Crescenzo F, Cortese S, Adamo N, et al. Pharmacological and non-pharmacological treatment of adults with ADHD: a meta-review. Evid Based Ment Health. 2017;20(1):4-11. doi:10.1136/eb-2016-102415

27. Katzman MA, Bilkey TS, Chokka PR, et al. Adult ADHD and comorbid disorders: clinical implications of a dimensional approach. BMC Psychiatry. 2017;17(1):302. doi:10.1186/s12888-017-1463-3

28. Klein M, Silva MA, Belizario GO, et al. Longitudinal neuropsychological assessment in two elderly adults with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder: case report. Front Psychol. 2019;10:1119. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2019.01119

29. Prentice JL, Schaeffer MJ, Wall AK, et al. A systematic review and comparison of neurocognitive features of late-life attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder and dementia with Lewy bodies. J Geriatr Psychiatry Neurol. 2021;34(5):466-481. doi:10.1177/0891988720944251

30. Callahan BL, Ramakrishnan N, Shammi P, et al. Cognitive and neuroimaging profiles of older adults with attention deficit/hyperactivity disorder presenting to a memory clinic. J Atten Disord. 2022;26(8):1118-1129. doi:10.1177/10870547211060546

31. Ramos-Quiroga, JA, Nasillo V, Fernández-Aranda, et al. Addressing the lack of studies in attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder in adults. Expert Rev Neurother. 2014;14(5):553-567. doi:10.1586/14737175.2014.908708

32. Stahl SM. Stahl’s Essential Psychopharmacology: Prescriber’s Guide. 6th ed. Cambridge University Press; 2017.

33. Latronica JR, Clegg TJ, Tuan WJ, et al. Are amphetamines associated with adverse cardiovascular events among elderly individuals? J Am Board Fam Med. 2021;34(6):1074-1081. doi:10.3122/jabfm.2021.06.210228

34. Garcia-Argibay M, du Rietz E, Lu Y, et al. The role of ADHD genetic risk in mid-to-late life somatic health conditions. Transl Psychiatry. 2022;12(1):152. doi:10.1038/s41398-022-01919-9

35. Jain R, Jain S, Montano CB, Addressing diagnosis and treatment gaps in adults with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder. Prim Care Companion CNS Disord. 2017;19(5):17nr02153. doi:10.4088/PCC.17nr02153

36. Sasaki H, Jono T, Fukuhara R, et al. Late-onset attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder as a differential diagnosis of dementia: a case report. BMC Psychiatry. 2020;20(1):550. doi:10.1186/s12888-020-02949-7

37. Surman CBH, Goodman DW. Is ADHD a valid diagnosis in older adults? Atten Defic Hyperact Disord. 2017;9(3):161-168. doi:10.1007/s12402-017-0217-x

38. Semeijn EJ, Michielsen M, Comijs HC, et al. Criterion validity of an attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) screening list for screening ADHD in older adults aged 60-94 years. Am J Geriatr Psychiatry. 2013;21(7):631-635. doi:10.1016/j.jagp.2012.08.003

39. Ramsay JR. Assessment and monitoring of treatment response in adult ADHD patients: current perspectives. Neuropsychiatr Dis Treat. 2017;13:221-232. doi:10.2147/NDT.S104706

40. Das D, Cherbuin N, Easteal S, et al. Attention deficit/hyperactivity disorder symptoms and cognitive abilities in the late-life cohort of the PATH through life study. PLoS One. 2014;9(1):e86552. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0086552

41. Kaya D, Isik AT, Usarel C, et al. The Saint Louis University Mental Status Examination is better than the Mini-Mental State Examination to determine the cognitive impairment in Turkish elderly people. J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2016;17(4):370.e11-370.e3.7E15. doi:10.1016/j.jamda.2015.12.093

42. Michielsen M, Comijs HC, Semeijn EJ, et al. Attention deficit hyperactivity disorder and personality characteristics in older adults in the general Dutch population. Am J Geriatr Psychiatry. 2014;22(12):1623-1632. doi:10.1016/j.jagp.2014.02.005

43. Khoury R, Chakkamparambil B, Chibnall J, et al. Diagnostic accuracy of the SLU AMSAD scale for depression in older adults without dementia. J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2020;21(5):665-668. doi:10.1016/j.jamda.2019.09.011

44. Çavuşoğlu Ç, Demirkol ME, Tamam L. Attention deficit hyperactivity disorder in the elderly. Current Approaches in Psychiatry. 2020;12(2):182-194. doi:10.18863/pgy.548052

45. Klein M, Souza-Duran FL, Menezes AKPM, et al. Gray matter volume in elderly adults with ADHD: associations of symptoms and comorbidities with brain structures. J Atten Disord. 2021;25(6):829-838. doi:10.1177/1087054719855683

46. Michielsen M, Kleef D, Bijlenga D, et al. Response and side effects using stimulant medication in older adults with ADHD: an observational archive study. J Atten Disord. 2021;25(12):1712-1719. doi:10.1177/1087054720925884

47. Manor I, Rozen S, Zemishlani Z, et al. When does it end? Attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder in the middle aged and older populations. Clin Neuropharmacol, 2011;34(4):148-154. doi:10.1097/WNF.0b013e3182206dc1

48. Deshmukh P, Patel D. Attention deficit hyperactivity disorder and its treatment in geriatrics. Curr Dev Disord Rep. 2020;7(3):79-84.

49. Barkley RA. The important role of executive functioning and self-regulation in ADHD. 2010. Accessed August 10, 2023. https://www.russellbarkley.org/factsheets/ADHD_EF_and_SR.pdf

50. Corbisiero S, Bitto H, Newark P, et al. A comparison of cognitive-behavioral therapy and pharmacotherapy vs. pharmacotherapy alone in adults with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD)-a randomized controlled trial. Front Psychiatry. 2018;9:571. doi:10.3389/fpsyt.2018.00571

Issue
Current Psychiatry - 22(9)
Issue
Current Psychiatry - 22(9)
Page Number
18-28
Page Number
18-28
Publications
Publications
Topics
Article Type
Display Headline
ADHD in older adults: A closer look
Display Headline
ADHD in older adults: A closer look
Sections
Disallow All Ads
Content Gating
No Gating (article Unlocked/Free)
Alternative CME
Disqus Comments
Default
Use ProPublica
Hide sidebar & use full width
render the right sidebar.
Conference Recap Checkbox
Not Conference Recap
Clinical Edge
Display the Slideshow in this Article
Medscape Article
Display survey writer
Reuters content
Disable Inline Native ads
WebMD Article
Article PDF Media

Do biomarkers for Alzheimer’s disease have utility in everyday practice?

Article Type
Changed
Thu, 03/28/2019 - 15:45
Display Headline
Do biomarkers for Alzheimer’s disease have utility in everyday practice?

Guidelines for diagnosing Alzheimer’s disease (AD) are undergoing the first major changes since they were developed 30 years ago. The National Institute on Aging (NIA) and the Alzheimer’s Association (AA) have established workgroups to revise guidelines that were written in 1984.1

One of the major changes to these new guidelines is men­tion of research on biomarkers for diagnosing and monitoring progression of dementia in AD. This is an exciting and pro­vocative development, but the questions practitioners who diagnose and treat AD should be asking are whether such biomarkers have utility in clinical practice today, or whether their application is a distant promise of continuing research.

Principles put forward in the guidelines
The new AD guidelines set forth in 3 major papers by the workgroups created by the NIA and AA include a change in nomenclature of AD.2 The workgroups have sought to define AD with specific stages that include:
   • a preclinical/prodromal phase, in which the pathophysi­ology responsible for future cognitive changes is ongoing but lacks clinical manifestations3
   • mild cognitive impairment, now considered a distinct entity from dementia and diagnosed when a person has early signs of AD; manifestations of impaired cognition in early dis­ease are not significant enough to affect daily functioning.4

These newly formulated stages of AD rely on clinical judg­ment, and AD remains a clinical diagnosis. However, the new diagnostic guidelines include the use of biomarkers to mea­sure disease progression.


Biomarkers of normal biologic function and pathology
The Biomarkers Definitions Working Group defines a biomarker as:
 
… a characteristic that is objectively measured and evaluated as an indica­tor of  normal biologic processes, patho­genic processes, or pharmacologic responses to a therapeutic intervention.5

These characteristics include imaging studies and body fluids, such as serum and cerebrospinal fluid (CSF).

In AD, biomarkers are meant to mea­sure the pathogenic processes of:
   • accumulation and deposition of amy­loid β _protein (Aβ42) plaques
   • neuronal degeneration characterized by an increase in phosphorylated tau protein and neurofibrillary tangles.6

The purpose of these biomarkers is to identify ongoing disease and help the cli­nician stage patients who display a spec­trum of symptoms.

Four classes of biomarkers (Table7)have been identified for use in the diagnosis of, and research on, AD:
   • neuroimaging
   • CSF
   • serum
   • genetic markers.



Neuroimaging
The basic purpose of CT and MRI of the head in the workup of cognitive impairment is to rule out a lesion in the brain, such as a tumor or hemorrhage, as the cause of, or contribu­tor to, the impairment. Several neuroimag­ing studies are available to aid in diagnosing AD and distinguishing it from other causes of dementia, including:
   • Fludeoxyglucose (FDG) positron-emission tomography (PET) scanning
   • MRI
   • Florbetapir F 18 Injection for PET.

FDG PET identifies areas of the brain in which glucose metabolism is decreased. This finding is thought to represent syn­aptic dysfunction.8 The true clinical utility of FDG PET appears to be as an aid in dis­tinguishing cases of AD from frontotem­poral dementia, by identifying regions of metabolic dysfunction.9 (Note: Medicare will reimburse for FDG PET only if 1) the patient has met diagnostic criteria for both AD and frontotemporal dementia for at least 6 months and 2) the cause of symp­toms is uncertain.10)

FDG PET also can be useful in patients with mild cognitive impairment by identi­fying hypometabolism in the temporal and parietal regions of the brain years before clin­ical AD develops.In addition to FDG, 2 other imag­ing probes—Pittsburgh compound and 2-(1-{6-[(2-[fluorine-18]fluoroethyl)(methyl) amino]-2-naphthyl}-ethylidene) malononi­trile (more commonly, FDDNP)—have been used with PET as research tools to demon­strate evidence of AD.11


MRI
has been used to measure hippocampal atrophy and cortical thinning that occurs as a patient progresses from normal cognitive function or mild cognitive impairment to full dementia.5 The degree of atrophy has not been well correlated with the degree of func­tional impairment.


Florbetapir F 18 Injection
was approved by the FDA in October 2013, under the brand name AMYViD, for measuring the quan­tity of Aβ42 deposition in the brain. When injected, this radiopharmaceutical binds to Aβ42 and can be detected on PET.12 Use cri­teria for AMYViD PET recently were devel­oped13; the technique is indicated as an additional diagnostic tool for ruling out AD.

A negative AMYViD scan indicates sparse or no Aβ42 plaques, and is inconsistent with AD. However, a positive AMYViD scan does not establish a diagnosis of AD or other cognitive disorder.14 This lack of specificity decreases the potential utility of the scan in clinical practice.

Use of AMYViD PET in general practice also is constrained by cost, which varies by location, based on the fee for the PET scan ($1,000 to $3,000)15; to that, add the cost of a dose of AMYViD ($1,600, wholesale).16 The technique is not reimbursable, and the total out-of-pocket expense can be as much as $5,000—making an AMYViD PET prohibitive.

 

 


Cerebrospinal fluid markers
CSF biomarkers used in the evaluation of AD are Aβ42, t-tau protein, and p-tau protein.6,17 It is generally thought that the level of Aβ42 in CSF decreases in AD—indicative of Aβ42 being deposited in the brain.8 Tau proteins are elevated in CSF as neurons are destroyed. P-tau is associated with the neurofibrillary tangles of AD; its presence in CSF is thought to represent an increase in those tangles. The combination of a low level of Aβ42 and an elevated level of p-tau in CSF is considered the signature CSF biomarker of AD.6


Serum markers

The search for reliable serum biomarkers of AD is the area of greatest research interest because a blood test is a less invasive form of screening. Regrettably, the utility of serum biomarkers for clinical practice has not been established.

Aβ42 can be measured in serum, but levels do not correlate well with CSF levels.18 Other serum markers that have been evaluated for clinical utility include measures of lipid metabolism, oxidation, and inflammation. With none of these is there clear correlation between the level of protein and AD.18


Fourth front: Genetics

Several alleles are associated with AD. Mutations in amyloid precursor protein, presenilin 1, and presenilin 2 have been shown to cause a change in the process­ing of Aβ42 and thus lead to AD.19 These mutations are inherited in an autosomal-dominant fashion and are detected in early-onset (age <65) AD.

Mutations in apolipoprotein 4-β4 also has been the subject of much research; this allele usually is associated with increased risk of the more common, later-onset AD.20 Some evidence suggests that apolipoprotein 4-β4 carriers who develop AD might be at risk of earlier onset of symptoms, compared to non­carriers,21 but the clinical significance of that increased risk has not been established.


What utility do biomarkers have?

As we said at the beginning of this article, the question that clinicians should be asking is: “What is the current clinical utility of these sophisticated biomarkers and genetic testing?”

The answer is “little utility.” Diagnosing AD is a clinical enterprise, with, as we’ve out­lined, specific and narrow exceptions.

Recently, researchers demonstrated bio­marker evidence of AD before symptom onset in patients who have known autosomal-dominant gene mutations for AD.19 There is no evidence, however, that these biomarkers are useful for screening the general popula­tion to identify people who 1) are at risk of, or who have, AD and 2) do not have AD.

That being said, CSF and imaging bio­markers of AD are being used in clinical settings in some European countries to aid investigation of cognitive decline.


In conclusion
Here are key points to take away from this discussion of biomarkers of AD:
   • The utility of these biomarkers today is in research—although some of them might, on occasion, be useful to distinguish demen­tia caused by AD from other dementias.
   • The ultimate goal of research is to uncover a serum biomarker that can iden­tify patients in the preclinical/prodromal stage of AD, so that disease-modifying therapies and preventive measures can be initiated before symptoms manifest.
   • Science is a long way from making this goal a reality, but recent changes in the diagnostic criteria for AD will encourage research in this area of study.


Bottom Line

Researchers are working to uncover biomarkers that will identify patients in the preclinical or prodromal stage of Alzheimer’s disease, but diagnosis remains clinical. Recent changes to diagnostic criteria will encourage research in this area.


Related Resources
• Blennow K, Dubois B, Fagan AM, et al. Clinical utility of cere­brospinal fluid biomarkers in the diagnosis of early Alzheimer’s disease [published online May 5, 2014]. Alzheimers Dement. doi: 10.1016/j.jalz.2014.02.004.
• Chase A. Alzheimer disease: Advances in imaging of AD biomarkers could aid early diagnosis. Nat Rev Neurol. 2014;10(5):239.
• De Riva V, Galloni E, Marcon M, et al. Analysis of combined CSF biomarkers in AD diagnosis. Clin Lab. 2014;60(4):629-634.
• Kristofikova Z, Ricny J, Kolarova M, et al. Interactions between amyloid-β and tau in cerebrospinal fluid of people with mild cognitive impairment and Alzheimer’s disease [pub­lished online March 26, 2014]. J Alzheimers Dis. doi: 10.3233/ JAD-132393.


Drug Brand Name

Florbetapir F 18 Injection • AMYViD

Disclosures
The authors report no financial relationship with any company whose products are mentioned in this article or with manufacturers of competing products.

References


1. Jack CR Jr, Albert MS, Knopman DS, et al. Introduction to the recommendations from the National Institute on Aging-Alzheimer’s Association workgroups on diagnostic guidelines for Alzheimer’s disease. Alzheimers Dement. 2011; 7(3):257-262.
2. McKhann GM, Knopman DS. Chertkow H, et al. The diagnosis of dementia due to Alzheimer’s disease: recommendations from the National Institute on Aging- Alzheimer’s Association workgroups on diagnostic guidelines for Alzheimer’s disease. Alzheimers Dement. 2011;7(3):263-269.
3. Sperling RA, Aisen PS, Beckett LA, et al. Toward defining the preclinical stages of Alzheimer’s disease: recommendations from the National Institute on Aging-Alzheimer’s Association workgroups on diagnostic guidelines for Alzheimer’s disease. Alzheimers Dement. 2011;7(3):280-292.
4. Albert MS, DeKosky ST, Dickson D, et al. The diagnosis of mild cognitive impairment due to Alzheimer’s disease: recommendations from the National Institute on Aging- Alzheimer’s Association workgroups on diagnostic guidelines for Alzheimer’s disease. Alzheimers Dement. 2011; 7(3):270-279.
5. Cummings JL. Biomarkers in Alzheimer’s disease– perspectives for the future. US Neurology. 2010;6(1):23-27.
6. Sperling R, Keith J. Biomarkers of Alzheimer disease: current and future applications to diagnostic criteria. Continuum (Minneap Minn). 2013;19(2 Dementia):325-338.
7. Craig-Shapiro R, Fagan AM, Holtzman DM. Biomarkers of Alzheimer’s disease. Neurobiol Dis. 2009;35(2):128-140.
8. Jack CR Jr, Knopman DS, Jagust WJ, et al. Hypothetical model of dynamic biomarkers of the Alzheimer’s pathological cascade. Lancet Neurol. 2010;9(1):119-128.
9. Foster NL, Heidebrink JL, Clark CM, et al. FDG-PET improves accuracy in distinguishing frontotemporal dementia and Alzheimer’s disease. Brain. 2007;130(pt 10):2616-2635.
10. National Coverage Determination (NCD) for FDG PET for Dementia and Neurodegenerative Diseases (220.6.13). Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services. http://www. cms.gov/medicare-coverage-database/details/ncd-details. aspx?NCDId=288&ncdver=3&bc=BAABAAAAAAAA&. Accessed May 9, 2014.
11. Small GW, Bookheimer SY, Thompson PM, et al. Current and future uses of neuroimaging for cognitively impaired patients. Lancet Neurol. 2008;7(2):161-172. 12. Clark CM, Schneider JA, Bedell BJ, et al. Use of florbetapir- PET for imaging beta-amyloid pathology. JAMA. 2011;305(3): 275-283.
13. Johnson KA, Minoshima S, Bohnen NI, et al. Update on appropriate use criteria for amyloid PET imaging: dementia experts, mild cognitive impairment, and education. Amyloid Imaging Task Force of the Alzheimer’s Association and Society for Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging. Alzheimers Dement. 2013;9(4):e106-e109.
14. AMYViD [package insert]. Indianapolis, IN: Eli Lilly & Co; 2012.
15. First guidelines published for brain amyloid imaging in Alzheimer’s. Alzheimer’s Association. http://www.alz.org/ news_and_events_60578.asp. Published January 28, 2013. Accessed May 9, 2014.
16. Zakaib GD. FDA approves Amyvid for clinical use. Alzforum. http://www.alzforum.org/news/research-news/ fda-approves-amyvid-clinical-use. Published April 9, 2012. Accessed May 16, 2014.
17. Skillbäck T, Zetterberg H, Blennow K, et al. Cerebrospinal fluid biomarkers for Alzheimer disease and subcortical axonal damage in 5,542 clinical samples. Alzheimers Res Ther. 2013;5(5):47.
18. Irizarry MC. Biomarkers of Alzheimer disease in plasma. NeuroRx. 2004;1(2):226-234.
19. Bateman RJ, Xiong C, Benzinger TL, et al. Clinical and biomarker changes in dominantly inherited Alzheimer’s disease. N Engl J Med. 2012;367(9):795-804.
20. Bertram L, McQueen MB, Mullin K, et al. Systematic meta-analyses of Alzheimer disease genetic association studies: the AlzGene database. Nature Genetics. 2007;39(1):17-23.
21. Strittmatter WJ, Roses AD. Apolipoprotein E and Alzheimer’s disease. Annu Rev Neurosci. 1996;19:53-77.

Article PDF
Author and Disclosure Information

Christina Molumby, MD
PGY-1 Internal Medicine Residency
University of Oklahoma
Tulsa School of Community Medicine
Tulsa, Oklahoma

George Grossberg, MD
Samuel W. Fordyce Professor
Director, Geriatric Psychiatry
Department of Neurology and Psychiatry
Saint Louis University School of Medicine
St. Louis, Missouri

Issue
Current Psychiatry - 13(6)
Publications
Topics
Page Number
57-60
Legacy Keywords
Alzheimer's disease, biomarkers, practice trends
Sections
Author and Disclosure Information

Christina Molumby, MD
PGY-1 Internal Medicine Residency
University of Oklahoma
Tulsa School of Community Medicine
Tulsa, Oklahoma

George Grossberg, MD
Samuel W. Fordyce Professor
Director, Geriatric Psychiatry
Department of Neurology and Psychiatry
Saint Louis University School of Medicine
St. Louis, Missouri

Author and Disclosure Information

Christina Molumby, MD
PGY-1 Internal Medicine Residency
University of Oklahoma
Tulsa School of Community Medicine
Tulsa, Oklahoma

George Grossberg, MD
Samuel W. Fordyce Professor
Director, Geriatric Psychiatry
Department of Neurology and Psychiatry
Saint Louis University School of Medicine
St. Louis, Missouri

Article PDF
Article PDF
Related Articles

Guidelines for diagnosing Alzheimer’s disease (AD) are undergoing the first major changes since they were developed 30 years ago. The National Institute on Aging (NIA) and the Alzheimer’s Association (AA) have established workgroups to revise guidelines that were written in 1984.1

One of the major changes to these new guidelines is men­tion of research on biomarkers for diagnosing and monitoring progression of dementia in AD. This is an exciting and pro­vocative development, but the questions practitioners who diagnose and treat AD should be asking are whether such biomarkers have utility in clinical practice today, or whether their application is a distant promise of continuing research.

Principles put forward in the guidelines
The new AD guidelines set forth in 3 major papers by the workgroups created by the NIA and AA include a change in nomenclature of AD.2 The workgroups have sought to define AD with specific stages that include:
   • a preclinical/prodromal phase, in which the pathophysi­ology responsible for future cognitive changes is ongoing but lacks clinical manifestations3
   • mild cognitive impairment, now considered a distinct entity from dementia and diagnosed when a person has early signs of AD; manifestations of impaired cognition in early dis­ease are not significant enough to affect daily functioning.4

These newly formulated stages of AD rely on clinical judg­ment, and AD remains a clinical diagnosis. However, the new diagnostic guidelines include the use of biomarkers to mea­sure disease progression.


Biomarkers of normal biologic function and pathology
The Biomarkers Definitions Working Group defines a biomarker as:
 
… a characteristic that is objectively measured and evaluated as an indica­tor of  normal biologic processes, patho­genic processes, or pharmacologic responses to a therapeutic intervention.5

These characteristics include imaging studies and body fluids, such as serum and cerebrospinal fluid (CSF).

In AD, biomarkers are meant to mea­sure the pathogenic processes of:
   • accumulation and deposition of amy­loid β _protein (Aβ42) plaques
   • neuronal degeneration characterized by an increase in phosphorylated tau protein and neurofibrillary tangles.6

The purpose of these biomarkers is to identify ongoing disease and help the cli­nician stage patients who display a spec­trum of symptoms.

Four classes of biomarkers (Table7)have been identified for use in the diagnosis of, and research on, AD:
   • neuroimaging
   • CSF
   • serum
   • genetic markers.



Neuroimaging
The basic purpose of CT and MRI of the head in the workup of cognitive impairment is to rule out a lesion in the brain, such as a tumor or hemorrhage, as the cause of, or contribu­tor to, the impairment. Several neuroimag­ing studies are available to aid in diagnosing AD and distinguishing it from other causes of dementia, including:
   • Fludeoxyglucose (FDG) positron-emission tomography (PET) scanning
   • MRI
   • Florbetapir F 18 Injection for PET.

FDG PET identifies areas of the brain in which glucose metabolism is decreased. This finding is thought to represent syn­aptic dysfunction.8 The true clinical utility of FDG PET appears to be as an aid in dis­tinguishing cases of AD from frontotem­poral dementia, by identifying regions of metabolic dysfunction.9 (Note: Medicare will reimburse for FDG PET only if 1) the patient has met diagnostic criteria for both AD and frontotemporal dementia for at least 6 months and 2) the cause of symp­toms is uncertain.10)

FDG PET also can be useful in patients with mild cognitive impairment by identi­fying hypometabolism in the temporal and parietal regions of the brain years before clin­ical AD develops.In addition to FDG, 2 other imag­ing probes—Pittsburgh compound and 2-(1-{6-[(2-[fluorine-18]fluoroethyl)(methyl) amino]-2-naphthyl}-ethylidene) malononi­trile (more commonly, FDDNP)—have been used with PET as research tools to demon­strate evidence of AD.11


MRI
has been used to measure hippocampal atrophy and cortical thinning that occurs as a patient progresses from normal cognitive function or mild cognitive impairment to full dementia.5 The degree of atrophy has not been well correlated with the degree of func­tional impairment.


Florbetapir F 18 Injection
was approved by the FDA in October 2013, under the brand name AMYViD, for measuring the quan­tity of Aβ42 deposition in the brain. When injected, this radiopharmaceutical binds to Aβ42 and can be detected on PET.12 Use cri­teria for AMYViD PET recently were devel­oped13; the technique is indicated as an additional diagnostic tool for ruling out AD.

A negative AMYViD scan indicates sparse or no Aβ42 plaques, and is inconsistent with AD. However, a positive AMYViD scan does not establish a diagnosis of AD or other cognitive disorder.14 This lack of specificity decreases the potential utility of the scan in clinical practice.

Use of AMYViD PET in general practice also is constrained by cost, which varies by location, based on the fee for the PET scan ($1,000 to $3,000)15; to that, add the cost of a dose of AMYViD ($1,600, wholesale).16 The technique is not reimbursable, and the total out-of-pocket expense can be as much as $5,000—making an AMYViD PET prohibitive.

 

 


Cerebrospinal fluid markers
CSF biomarkers used in the evaluation of AD are Aβ42, t-tau protein, and p-tau protein.6,17 It is generally thought that the level of Aβ42 in CSF decreases in AD—indicative of Aβ42 being deposited in the brain.8 Tau proteins are elevated in CSF as neurons are destroyed. P-tau is associated with the neurofibrillary tangles of AD; its presence in CSF is thought to represent an increase in those tangles. The combination of a low level of Aβ42 and an elevated level of p-tau in CSF is considered the signature CSF biomarker of AD.6


Serum markers

The search for reliable serum biomarkers of AD is the area of greatest research interest because a blood test is a less invasive form of screening. Regrettably, the utility of serum biomarkers for clinical practice has not been established.

Aβ42 can be measured in serum, but levels do not correlate well with CSF levels.18 Other serum markers that have been evaluated for clinical utility include measures of lipid metabolism, oxidation, and inflammation. With none of these is there clear correlation between the level of protein and AD.18


Fourth front: Genetics

Several alleles are associated with AD. Mutations in amyloid precursor protein, presenilin 1, and presenilin 2 have been shown to cause a change in the process­ing of Aβ42 and thus lead to AD.19 These mutations are inherited in an autosomal-dominant fashion and are detected in early-onset (age <65) AD.

Mutations in apolipoprotein 4-β4 also has been the subject of much research; this allele usually is associated with increased risk of the more common, later-onset AD.20 Some evidence suggests that apolipoprotein 4-β4 carriers who develop AD might be at risk of earlier onset of symptoms, compared to non­carriers,21 but the clinical significance of that increased risk has not been established.


What utility do biomarkers have?

As we said at the beginning of this article, the question that clinicians should be asking is: “What is the current clinical utility of these sophisticated biomarkers and genetic testing?”

The answer is “little utility.” Diagnosing AD is a clinical enterprise, with, as we’ve out­lined, specific and narrow exceptions.

Recently, researchers demonstrated bio­marker evidence of AD before symptom onset in patients who have known autosomal-dominant gene mutations for AD.19 There is no evidence, however, that these biomarkers are useful for screening the general popula­tion to identify people who 1) are at risk of, or who have, AD and 2) do not have AD.

That being said, CSF and imaging bio­markers of AD are being used in clinical settings in some European countries to aid investigation of cognitive decline.


In conclusion
Here are key points to take away from this discussion of biomarkers of AD:
   • The utility of these biomarkers today is in research—although some of them might, on occasion, be useful to distinguish demen­tia caused by AD from other dementias.
   • The ultimate goal of research is to uncover a serum biomarker that can iden­tify patients in the preclinical/prodromal stage of AD, so that disease-modifying therapies and preventive measures can be initiated before symptoms manifest.
   • Science is a long way from making this goal a reality, but recent changes in the diagnostic criteria for AD will encourage research in this area of study.


Bottom Line

Researchers are working to uncover biomarkers that will identify patients in the preclinical or prodromal stage of Alzheimer’s disease, but diagnosis remains clinical. Recent changes to diagnostic criteria will encourage research in this area.


Related Resources
• Blennow K, Dubois B, Fagan AM, et al. Clinical utility of cere­brospinal fluid biomarkers in the diagnosis of early Alzheimer’s disease [published online May 5, 2014]. Alzheimers Dement. doi: 10.1016/j.jalz.2014.02.004.
• Chase A. Alzheimer disease: Advances in imaging of AD biomarkers could aid early diagnosis. Nat Rev Neurol. 2014;10(5):239.
• De Riva V, Galloni E, Marcon M, et al. Analysis of combined CSF biomarkers in AD diagnosis. Clin Lab. 2014;60(4):629-634.
• Kristofikova Z, Ricny J, Kolarova M, et al. Interactions between amyloid-β and tau in cerebrospinal fluid of people with mild cognitive impairment and Alzheimer’s disease [pub­lished online March 26, 2014]. J Alzheimers Dis. doi: 10.3233/ JAD-132393.


Drug Brand Name

Florbetapir F 18 Injection • AMYViD

Disclosures
The authors report no financial relationship with any company whose products are mentioned in this article or with manufacturers of competing products.

Guidelines for diagnosing Alzheimer’s disease (AD) are undergoing the first major changes since they were developed 30 years ago. The National Institute on Aging (NIA) and the Alzheimer’s Association (AA) have established workgroups to revise guidelines that were written in 1984.1

One of the major changes to these new guidelines is men­tion of research on biomarkers for diagnosing and monitoring progression of dementia in AD. This is an exciting and pro­vocative development, but the questions practitioners who diagnose and treat AD should be asking are whether such biomarkers have utility in clinical practice today, or whether their application is a distant promise of continuing research.

Principles put forward in the guidelines
The new AD guidelines set forth in 3 major papers by the workgroups created by the NIA and AA include a change in nomenclature of AD.2 The workgroups have sought to define AD with specific stages that include:
   • a preclinical/prodromal phase, in which the pathophysi­ology responsible for future cognitive changes is ongoing but lacks clinical manifestations3
   • mild cognitive impairment, now considered a distinct entity from dementia and diagnosed when a person has early signs of AD; manifestations of impaired cognition in early dis­ease are not significant enough to affect daily functioning.4

These newly formulated stages of AD rely on clinical judg­ment, and AD remains a clinical diagnosis. However, the new diagnostic guidelines include the use of biomarkers to mea­sure disease progression.


Biomarkers of normal biologic function and pathology
The Biomarkers Definitions Working Group defines a biomarker as:
 
… a characteristic that is objectively measured and evaluated as an indica­tor of  normal biologic processes, patho­genic processes, or pharmacologic responses to a therapeutic intervention.5

These characteristics include imaging studies and body fluids, such as serum and cerebrospinal fluid (CSF).

In AD, biomarkers are meant to mea­sure the pathogenic processes of:
   • accumulation and deposition of amy­loid β _protein (Aβ42) plaques
   • neuronal degeneration characterized by an increase in phosphorylated tau protein and neurofibrillary tangles.6

The purpose of these biomarkers is to identify ongoing disease and help the cli­nician stage patients who display a spec­trum of symptoms.

Four classes of biomarkers (Table7)have been identified for use in the diagnosis of, and research on, AD:
   • neuroimaging
   • CSF
   • serum
   • genetic markers.



Neuroimaging
The basic purpose of CT and MRI of the head in the workup of cognitive impairment is to rule out a lesion in the brain, such as a tumor or hemorrhage, as the cause of, or contribu­tor to, the impairment. Several neuroimag­ing studies are available to aid in diagnosing AD and distinguishing it from other causes of dementia, including:
   • Fludeoxyglucose (FDG) positron-emission tomography (PET) scanning
   • MRI
   • Florbetapir F 18 Injection for PET.

FDG PET identifies areas of the brain in which glucose metabolism is decreased. This finding is thought to represent syn­aptic dysfunction.8 The true clinical utility of FDG PET appears to be as an aid in dis­tinguishing cases of AD from frontotem­poral dementia, by identifying regions of metabolic dysfunction.9 (Note: Medicare will reimburse for FDG PET only if 1) the patient has met diagnostic criteria for both AD and frontotemporal dementia for at least 6 months and 2) the cause of symp­toms is uncertain.10)

FDG PET also can be useful in patients with mild cognitive impairment by identi­fying hypometabolism in the temporal and parietal regions of the brain years before clin­ical AD develops.In addition to FDG, 2 other imag­ing probes—Pittsburgh compound and 2-(1-{6-[(2-[fluorine-18]fluoroethyl)(methyl) amino]-2-naphthyl}-ethylidene) malononi­trile (more commonly, FDDNP)—have been used with PET as research tools to demon­strate evidence of AD.11


MRI
has been used to measure hippocampal atrophy and cortical thinning that occurs as a patient progresses from normal cognitive function or mild cognitive impairment to full dementia.5 The degree of atrophy has not been well correlated with the degree of func­tional impairment.


Florbetapir F 18 Injection
was approved by the FDA in October 2013, under the brand name AMYViD, for measuring the quan­tity of Aβ42 deposition in the brain. When injected, this radiopharmaceutical binds to Aβ42 and can be detected on PET.12 Use cri­teria for AMYViD PET recently were devel­oped13; the technique is indicated as an additional diagnostic tool for ruling out AD.

A negative AMYViD scan indicates sparse or no Aβ42 plaques, and is inconsistent with AD. However, a positive AMYViD scan does not establish a diagnosis of AD or other cognitive disorder.14 This lack of specificity decreases the potential utility of the scan in clinical practice.

Use of AMYViD PET in general practice also is constrained by cost, which varies by location, based on the fee for the PET scan ($1,000 to $3,000)15; to that, add the cost of a dose of AMYViD ($1,600, wholesale).16 The technique is not reimbursable, and the total out-of-pocket expense can be as much as $5,000—making an AMYViD PET prohibitive.

 

 


Cerebrospinal fluid markers
CSF biomarkers used in the evaluation of AD are Aβ42, t-tau protein, and p-tau protein.6,17 It is generally thought that the level of Aβ42 in CSF decreases in AD—indicative of Aβ42 being deposited in the brain.8 Tau proteins are elevated in CSF as neurons are destroyed. P-tau is associated with the neurofibrillary tangles of AD; its presence in CSF is thought to represent an increase in those tangles. The combination of a low level of Aβ42 and an elevated level of p-tau in CSF is considered the signature CSF biomarker of AD.6


Serum markers

The search for reliable serum biomarkers of AD is the area of greatest research interest because a blood test is a less invasive form of screening. Regrettably, the utility of serum biomarkers for clinical practice has not been established.

Aβ42 can be measured in serum, but levels do not correlate well with CSF levels.18 Other serum markers that have been evaluated for clinical utility include measures of lipid metabolism, oxidation, and inflammation. With none of these is there clear correlation between the level of protein and AD.18


Fourth front: Genetics

Several alleles are associated with AD. Mutations in amyloid precursor protein, presenilin 1, and presenilin 2 have been shown to cause a change in the process­ing of Aβ42 and thus lead to AD.19 These mutations are inherited in an autosomal-dominant fashion and are detected in early-onset (age <65) AD.

Mutations in apolipoprotein 4-β4 also has been the subject of much research; this allele usually is associated with increased risk of the more common, later-onset AD.20 Some evidence suggests that apolipoprotein 4-β4 carriers who develop AD might be at risk of earlier onset of symptoms, compared to non­carriers,21 but the clinical significance of that increased risk has not been established.


What utility do biomarkers have?

As we said at the beginning of this article, the question that clinicians should be asking is: “What is the current clinical utility of these sophisticated biomarkers and genetic testing?”

The answer is “little utility.” Diagnosing AD is a clinical enterprise, with, as we’ve out­lined, specific and narrow exceptions.

Recently, researchers demonstrated bio­marker evidence of AD before symptom onset in patients who have known autosomal-dominant gene mutations for AD.19 There is no evidence, however, that these biomarkers are useful for screening the general popula­tion to identify people who 1) are at risk of, or who have, AD and 2) do not have AD.

That being said, CSF and imaging bio­markers of AD are being used in clinical settings in some European countries to aid investigation of cognitive decline.


In conclusion
Here are key points to take away from this discussion of biomarkers of AD:
   • The utility of these biomarkers today is in research—although some of them might, on occasion, be useful to distinguish demen­tia caused by AD from other dementias.
   • The ultimate goal of research is to uncover a serum biomarker that can iden­tify patients in the preclinical/prodromal stage of AD, so that disease-modifying therapies and preventive measures can be initiated before symptoms manifest.
   • Science is a long way from making this goal a reality, but recent changes in the diagnostic criteria for AD will encourage research in this area of study.


Bottom Line

Researchers are working to uncover biomarkers that will identify patients in the preclinical or prodromal stage of Alzheimer’s disease, but diagnosis remains clinical. Recent changes to diagnostic criteria will encourage research in this area.


Related Resources
• Blennow K, Dubois B, Fagan AM, et al. Clinical utility of cere­brospinal fluid biomarkers in the diagnosis of early Alzheimer’s disease [published online May 5, 2014]. Alzheimers Dement. doi: 10.1016/j.jalz.2014.02.004.
• Chase A. Alzheimer disease: Advances in imaging of AD biomarkers could aid early diagnosis. Nat Rev Neurol. 2014;10(5):239.
• De Riva V, Galloni E, Marcon M, et al. Analysis of combined CSF biomarkers in AD diagnosis. Clin Lab. 2014;60(4):629-634.
• Kristofikova Z, Ricny J, Kolarova M, et al. Interactions between amyloid-β and tau in cerebrospinal fluid of people with mild cognitive impairment and Alzheimer’s disease [pub­lished online March 26, 2014]. J Alzheimers Dis. doi: 10.3233/ JAD-132393.


Drug Brand Name

Florbetapir F 18 Injection • AMYViD

Disclosures
The authors report no financial relationship with any company whose products are mentioned in this article or with manufacturers of competing products.

References


1. Jack CR Jr, Albert MS, Knopman DS, et al. Introduction to the recommendations from the National Institute on Aging-Alzheimer’s Association workgroups on diagnostic guidelines for Alzheimer’s disease. Alzheimers Dement. 2011; 7(3):257-262.
2. McKhann GM, Knopman DS. Chertkow H, et al. The diagnosis of dementia due to Alzheimer’s disease: recommendations from the National Institute on Aging- Alzheimer’s Association workgroups on diagnostic guidelines for Alzheimer’s disease. Alzheimers Dement. 2011;7(3):263-269.
3. Sperling RA, Aisen PS, Beckett LA, et al. Toward defining the preclinical stages of Alzheimer’s disease: recommendations from the National Institute on Aging-Alzheimer’s Association workgroups on diagnostic guidelines for Alzheimer’s disease. Alzheimers Dement. 2011;7(3):280-292.
4. Albert MS, DeKosky ST, Dickson D, et al. The diagnosis of mild cognitive impairment due to Alzheimer’s disease: recommendations from the National Institute on Aging- Alzheimer’s Association workgroups on diagnostic guidelines for Alzheimer’s disease. Alzheimers Dement. 2011; 7(3):270-279.
5. Cummings JL. Biomarkers in Alzheimer’s disease– perspectives for the future. US Neurology. 2010;6(1):23-27.
6. Sperling R, Keith J. Biomarkers of Alzheimer disease: current and future applications to diagnostic criteria. Continuum (Minneap Minn). 2013;19(2 Dementia):325-338.
7. Craig-Shapiro R, Fagan AM, Holtzman DM. Biomarkers of Alzheimer’s disease. Neurobiol Dis. 2009;35(2):128-140.
8. Jack CR Jr, Knopman DS, Jagust WJ, et al. Hypothetical model of dynamic biomarkers of the Alzheimer’s pathological cascade. Lancet Neurol. 2010;9(1):119-128.
9. Foster NL, Heidebrink JL, Clark CM, et al. FDG-PET improves accuracy in distinguishing frontotemporal dementia and Alzheimer’s disease. Brain. 2007;130(pt 10):2616-2635.
10. National Coverage Determination (NCD) for FDG PET for Dementia and Neurodegenerative Diseases (220.6.13). Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services. http://www. cms.gov/medicare-coverage-database/details/ncd-details. aspx?NCDId=288&ncdver=3&bc=BAABAAAAAAAA&. Accessed May 9, 2014.
11. Small GW, Bookheimer SY, Thompson PM, et al. Current and future uses of neuroimaging for cognitively impaired patients. Lancet Neurol. 2008;7(2):161-172. 12. Clark CM, Schneider JA, Bedell BJ, et al. Use of florbetapir- PET for imaging beta-amyloid pathology. JAMA. 2011;305(3): 275-283.
13. Johnson KA, Minoshima S, Bohnen NI, et al. Update on appropriate use criteria for amyloid PET imaging: dementia experts, mild cognitive impairment, and education. Amyloid Imaging Task Force of the Alzheimer’s Association and Society for Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging. Alzheimers Dement. 2013;9(4):e106-e109.
14. AMYViD [package insert]. Indianapolis, IN: Eli Lilly & Co; 2012.
15. First guidelines published for brain amyloid imaging in Alzheimer’s. Alzheimer’s Association. http://www.alz.org/ news_and_events_60578.asp. Published January 28, 2013. Accessed May 9, 2014.
16. Zakaib GD. FDA approves Amyvid for clinical use. Alzforum. http://www.alzforum.org/news/research-news/ fda-approves-amyvid-clinical-use. Published April 9, 2012. Accessed May 16, 2014.
17. Skillbäck T, Zetterberg H, Blennow K, et al. Cerebrospinal fluid biomarkers for Alzheimer disease and subcortical axonal damage in 5,542 clinical samples. Alzheimers Res Ther. 2013;5(5):47.
18. Irizarry MC. Biomarkers of Alzheimer disease in plasma. NeuroRx. 2004;1(2):226-234.
19. Bateman RJ, Xiong C, Benzinger TL, et al. Clinical and biomarker changes in dominantly inherited Alzheimer’s disease. N Engl J Med. 2012;367(9):795-804.
20. Bertram L, McQueen MB, Mullin K, et al. Systematic meta-analyses of Alzheimer disease genetic association studies: the AlzGene database. Nature Genetics. 2007;39(1):17-23.
21. Strittmatter WJ, Roses AD. Apolipoprotein E and Alzheimer’s disease. Annu Rev Neurosci. 1996;19:53-77.

References


1. Jack CR Jr, Albert MS, Knopman DS, et al. Introduction to the recommendations from the National Institute on Aging-Alzheimer’s Association workgroups on diagnostic guidelines for Alzheimer’s disease. Alzheimers Dement. 2011; 7(3):257-262.
2. McKhann GM, Knopman DS. Chertkow H, et al. The diagnosis of dementia due to Alzheimer’s disease: recommendations from the National Institute on Aging- Alzheimer’s Association workgroups on diagnostic guidelines for Alzheimer’s disease. Alzheimers Dement. 2011;7(3):263-269.
3. Sperling RA, Aisen PS, Beckett LA, et al. Toward defining the preclinical stages of Alzheimer’s disease: recommendations from the National Institute on Aging-Alzheimer’s Association workgroups on diagnostic guidelines for Alzheimer’s disease. Alzheimers Dement. 2011;7(3):280-292.
4. Albert MS, DeKosky ST, Dickson D, et al. The diagnosis of mild cognitive impairment due to Alzheimer’s disease: recommendations from the National Institute on Aging- Alzheimer’s Association workgroups on diagnostic guidelines for Alzheimer’s disease. Alzheimers Dement. 2011; 7(3):270-279.
5. Cummings JL. Biomarkers in Alzheimer’s disease– perspectives for the future. US Neurology. 2010;6(1):23-27.
6. Sperling R, Keith J. Biomarkers of Alzheimer disease: current and future applications to diagnostic criteria. Continuum (Minneap Minn). 2013;19(2 Dementia):325-338.
7. Craig-Shapiro R, Fagan AM, Holtzman DM. Biomarkers of Alzheimer’s disease. Neurobiol Dis. 2009;35(2):128-140.
8. Jack CR Jr, Knopman DS, Jagust WJ, et al. Hypothetical model of dynamic biomarkers of the Alzheimer’s pathological cascade. Lancet Neurol. 2010;9(1):119-128.
9. Foster NL, Heidebrink JL, Clark CM, et al. FDG-PET improves accuracy in distinguishing frontotemporal dementia and Alzheimer’s disease. Brain. 2007;130(pt 10):2616-2635.
10. National Coverage Determination (NCD) for FDG PET for Dementia and Neurodegenerative Diseases (220.6.13). Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services. http://www. cms.gov/medicare-coverage-database/details/ncd-details. aspx?NCDId=288&ncdver=3&bc=BAABAAAAAAAA&. Accessed May 9, 2014.
11. Small GW, Bookheimer SY, Thompson PM, et al. Current and future uses of neuroimaging for cognitively impaired patients. Lancet Neurol. 2008;7(2):161-172. 12. Clark CM, Schneider JA, Bedell BJ, et al. Use of florbetapir- PET for imaging beta-amyloid pathology. JAMA. 2011;305(3): 275-283.
13. Johnson KA, Minoshima S, Bohnen NI, et al. Update on appropriate use criteria for amyloid PET imaging: dementia experts, mild cognitive impairment, and education. Amyloid Imaging Task Force of the Alzheimer’s Association and Society for Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging. Alzheimers Dement. 2013;9(4):e106-e109.
14. AMYViD [package insert]. Indianapolis, IN: Eli Lilly & Co; 2012.
15. First guidelines published for brain amyloid imaging in Alzheimer’s. Alzheimer’s Association. http://www.alz.org/ news_and_events_60578.asp. Published January 28, 2013. Accessed May 9, 2014.
16. Zakaib GD. FDA approves Amyvid for clinical use. Alzforum. http://www.alzforum.org/news/research-news/ fda-approves-amyvid-clinical-use. Published April 9, 2012. Accessed May 16, 2014.
17. Skillbäck T, Zetterberg H, Blennow K, et al. Cerebrospinal fluid biomarkers for Alzheimer disease and subcortical axonal damage in 5,542 clinical samples. Alzheimers Res Ther. 2013;5(5):47.
18. Irizarry MC. Biomarkers of Alzheimer disease in plasma. NeuroRx. 2004;1(2):226-234.
19. Bateman RJ, Xiong C, Benzinger TL, et al. Clinical and biomarker changes in dominantly inherited Alzheimer’s disease. N Engl J Med. 2012;367(9):795-804.
20. Bertram L, McQueen MB, Mullin K, et al. Systematic meta-analyses of Alzheimer disease genetic association studies: the AlzGene database. Nature Genetics. 2007;39(1):17-23.
21. Strittmatter WJ, Roses AD. Apolipoprotein E and Alzheimer’s disease. Annu Rev Neurosci. 1996;19:53-77.

Issue
Current Psychiatry - 13(6)
Issue
Current Psychiatry - 13(6)
Page Number
57-60
Page Number
57-60
Publications
Publications
Topics
Article Type
Display Headline
Do biomarkers for Alzheimer’s disease have utility in everyday practice?
Display Headline
Do biomarkers for Alzheimer’s disease have utility in everyday practice?
Legacy Keywords
Alzheimer's disease, biomarkers, practice trends
Legacy Keywords
Alzheimer's disease, biomarkers, practice trends
Sections
Article Source

PURLs Copyright

Inside the Article

Article PDF Media