Bodybuilding’s dark side: Clues to anabolic steroid use

Article Type
Changed
Tue, 11/19/2019 - 09:32
Display Headline
Bodybuilding’s dark side: Clues to anabolic steroid use

Anabolic steroid use by athletes and body-builders has captured public attention but remains poorly understood by most physicians. This is not surprising because users of anabolic-androgenic steroids (AAS):

 

  • rarely seek treatment or disclose their drug use
  • frequently distrust professionals.

If you are a clinician who regularly sees male adolescents and young men, you need to become familiar with—and watch for—this often-secret form of substance abuse. This article provides the groundwork for that understanding, starting with the story of “Aaron”—a composite patient whose case represents experiences and verbatim quotes from AAS users known to the authors.

CASE REPORT: ‘I FEEL INVINCIBLE’

At his first visit, Aaron, age 18, told the psychiatrist he had no complaints but was coming to please his parents. “I have a lot of arguments with my Dad,” he said, “and they keep thinking something’s wrong with me.”

The patient was very muscular and dressed in baggy sweats that masked his body proportions. He was appropriately groomed and darkly tanned but displayed some acne. The clinician guessed he weighed about 175 lbs and stood at about 65 inches, with very low body fat. Although superficially confident, he seemed restless, somewhat anxious, and guarded as the interview progressed.

Aaron admitted he experienced prominent mood swings. During rage outbursts, he had damaged objects and put his fist through the wall. “There’s holes all over the wall of my room,” he joked.

He also had assaulted a motorist in a traffic altercation, then left the scene. “Did you hurt him?” the clinician asked. Somewhat sheepishly, Aaron responded, “Well, I bought the newspaper and kept checking the obituaries for about 2 weeks afterwards.”

He spoke with pride about his weightlifting, which was the focus of his life. He revealed that he was preparing for a body-building contest in 2 months. The psychiatrist asked him about use of supplements—protein shakes, creatine, and “andro” (androstenedione)—all of which Aaron acknowledged. The psychiatrist then gently asked about anabolic steroid use (Box 1).

Initially, Aaron strongly denied using AAS. The psychiatrist persisted, pointing out that no information would be disclosed to his parents, and asked again using colloquial terms from the AAS subculture: “Anybody who is prepping for an untested contest in a couple of months is going to be on a cycle. Come on, what are you taking?”

Box 1

 

What are anabolic-androgenic steroids?

Anabolic-androgenic steroids (AAS) are hormones that include testosterone—nature’s own AAS—and more than 100 synthetically developed testosterone relatives. All AAS possess anabolic (muscle-building) and androgenic (masculinizing) properties; no known compound can produce one of these effects without the other.

Because of their masculinizing effects, AAS are rarely used by women—and even then in much lower doses than those used by men. Thus, this article focuses on evaluating and treating male adolescents and men.

AAS are not:

 

  • Corticosteroids (such as cortisol) are often called “steroids” but possess no muscle-building properties. Corticosteroids’ prominent but idiosyncratic psychiatric effects are usually seen in consultation-liaison settings where patients have been prescribed these drugs, rather than among substance abusers.
  • Androstenedione (“andro”) and its relatives are adrenal steroids that are weakly metabolized into testosterone or other AAS. These substances were sold legally without prescription in the United States for many years but were banned by federal law in October 2004. Their anabolic and psychiatric effects are much weaker than those of AAS.
  • Athletic “supplements” with names designed to sound like AAS (such as beginning with “Ana…”) or supplements claimed to be “testosterone-releasers” or the like. If sold legally in supplement stores, an athletic supplement is not an AAS. Psychiatric effects are extremely unlikely.

Eventually it emerged that Aaron had taken five 8- to 20-week AAS “cycles” (courses), during which he had “stacked” (combined) various “injectables” such as IM testosterone and “orals” such as methyltestosterone (Table 1). His current cycle included:

 

  • a blend of testosterone esters (Sustanon), 500 mg IM once a week
  • boldenone (Equipoise), a veterinary AAS normally used for horses, 200 mg IM per week
  • oxymetholone (Anadrol), 50 mg orally per day.

Table 1

Commonly used anabolic-androgenic steroids

 

‘Injectables’ (usually administered only by injection)
Boldenone (Equipoise)*
Methenolone (Primobolan depot)
Nandrolone (Deca-Durabolin, Durabolin, Laurabolin, others)
Stanozolol (Winstrol-V)*
Testosterone esters (Depo-testosterone, Sten, Sustanon, others)
Trenbolone (Finajet, Parabolan)
‘Orals’
Methandienone (formerly called methandrostenolone) (Dianabol, others)
Methenolone (Primobolan)
Methyltestosterone (Android, others)
Mibolerone (Checque Drops)*
Oxandrolone (Anavar, Lipidex)
Oxmetholone (Anadrol, Anapolon)
Stanoxolol (Stromba, Winstrol)
Other anabolic substances sold on the ‘black market’
Human growth hormone (HGH)Possesses anabolic properties
Extremely expensive
Almost impossible to detect by testing
Lacks androgenic effects
Psychiatric effects appear negligible
Large doses can cause acromegaly
ClenbuterolBeta-adrenergic agonist with stimulant and anabolic properties
Used less commonly than AAS
Lacks androgenic effects and assists fat loss
Can produce psychiatric effects similar to those of amphetamine abuse (rare, in the authors’ experience)
Human chorionic gonadotropin (HCG)Stimulates testes to produce more testosterone, creating an AAS effect
Most commonly used near the end of an AAS “cycle” to “jump-start” the hypothalamic-pituitary-testicular axis and minimize AAS withdrawal
* Veterinary preparation
AAS: anabolic-androgenic steroid
 

 

His friends had taught him to self-inject AAS at age 15; he admitted that he was also occasionally self-injecting the opioid analgesic nalbuphine intravenously because of “pain in my ‘delts’ from military presses.”

During his cycles, Aaron experienced hypomanic symptoms, including euphoria, prominent irritability, increased libido, decreased need for sleep, and grandiosity. “I feel invincible,” he said. His aggressive outbursts had worsened with increasing AAS doses; in addition to attacking the motorist, he also had been physically violent with his girlfriend. “She’s scared of me when I’m on juice,” he conceded.

During the withdrawal phase after stopping each cycle, Aaron described prominent depression with anhedonia, hypersomnia, loss of libido, and suicidal ideation. “I once almost jumped off a bridge after my fourth cycle,” he admitted. “I couldn’t wait to get on my next cycle to feel good again.” His depressions were also characterized by body-image obsessions; he would regularly spend at least 1 hour a day examining his musculature in a mirror, and sometimes refused to go out in public because he “was getting too small.”

Perhaps most disturbing was his increasing use of opioids. In addition to self-injecting nalbuphine, he also ingested oral opioids such as oxycodone almost daily. He mentioned that several of his friends in the gym had progressed from injecting nalbuphine to injecting morphine or heroin, and he knew two bodybuilders who had died from apparently unintentional opioid overdoses.

Aaron said his parents, teachers, and non-bodybuilding friends were unaware of this history. He claimed his parents were proud that their son had apparently eschewed drugs and alcohol to pursue a healthy athletic lifestyle.

RECOGNIZING AAS USE

In our experience with treating substance abusers, we find that AAS users may be the least likely to disclose their drug use to clinicians. In a recent study,1 20 of 36 AAS users (56%) reported they had never revealed their AAS use to any physician. When asked to rate their trust in sources of information about AAS, 17 of 42 AAS users (40%) said they trusted information from their drug dealers at least as much as information from any physician they had seen.

Some expressed contempt for physicians as “geeks” or “pencil-necks” who could not comprehend the body-building lifestyle. They gave doctors high marks on knowledge of tobacco, alcohol, and ordinary “street drugs” but much lower ratings on AAS knowledge. Other investigators have shown that many clinicians are unfamiliar with AAS.2,3

AAS users embrace these beliefs for two other reasons. First, to admit to AAS use is to admit that one’s muscularity and physical prowess is the result of taking a drug; there is no comparable motivation to withhold information about, say, one’s use of marijuana or cocaine.

Second, AAS users are much less likely than other substance abusers to view their behavior as pathologic. We have argued that our culture is partially to blame.4 Americans pay to watch 300-lb football linemen and AAS-using movie stars. Makers of cars, computers, and electronics do not hesitate to advertise their products as “on steroids,” but they would never claim their products were “on cocaine.” In this climate, it is easy to forget that AAS use is an illicit substance abuse.

Box 2

 

How to calculate fat-free mass index (FFMI)

Formula: FFMI = (W x (100 - BF)/100)H2 + 6.1 x (1.8 - H)

W = weight in kilograms

BF = body fat percentage

H = height in meters

Obtain height in meters and weight in kilograms. Ideally, measure body fat using calipers, electrical impedance, or some other method. Alternately, estimate body fat by visual inspection:

 

  • 20% = average 30-year-old American man
  • 10% = quite lean
  • 5% = approaching lowest body fat normally attainable

FFMI values for American men:

20 = average

22 = visibly muscular

25 = approximate maximum attainable by a lean individual without using drugs

Example 1

Young male weightlifter is 69 inches tall, weighs 175 lbs, and is moderately lean, with body fat of 10%; he denies AAS use

H = 69 inches x .0254 meters/inch = 1.75 m

H2= 1.75 x 1.75 = 3.06 m2

W = 175 pounds x 0.454 kilograms/lb = 79.5 kg

Therefore, FFMI = (79.5 x (100-10)/100)/3.06 + 6.1 x (1.8 - 1.75) = 23.7

This degree of muscularity can be attained without using AAS

Example 2

Young male weightlifter is 66 inches tall, weighs 175 lbs, and is very lean, with body fat of 6%; he also denies AAS use

H = 66 inches x .0254 meters/inch = 1.68 m

H2= 1.68 x 1.68 = 2.82 m2

W = 175 pounds x 0.454 kilograms/lb = 79.5 kg

Therefore, FFMI = (79.5 x (100-6)/100)2.82 + 6.1 x (1.8 - 1.68) = 27.2

This level of muscularity is extremely unlikely without drugs. Patient is almost certainly lying and should be gently confronted, especially if other symptoms (Table 2) suggest AAS use

 

 

Table 2

Clues to possible AAS use in men

 

Muscularity
Estimated fat-free mass index (FFMI) >26 (see Box 2)
Recent rapid muscle gains (>8 lb/month)
Striae over pectoralis muscles caused by rapid hypertrophy of underlying muscle
Other physical signs
Acne
Gynecomastia
Testicular atrophy
Psychiatric signs
Uncharacteristically aggressive behavior
Uncharacteristic hypomanic symptoms
  • Grandiosity
  • Decreased sleep
  • Hypersexuality
  • Recklessness
Uncharacteristic depressive symptoms
  • Sudden depression onset
  • Anhedonia
  • Hypersomnia

To overcome these treatment obstacles, we recommend that you:

 

  • Become as knowledgeable about AAS use as you are about other forms of substance abuse (see Related resources).
  • Approach AAS users as you would any other substance abusers—as individuals at risk for potentially serious medical and psychiatric consequences.
  • Maintain a high index of suspicion when evaluating any muscular young male patient, even if he initially denies AAS use.

AAS use can often be suspected by looking at the patient as he walks in the door. Using what we call the “fat-free mass index” (FFMI) to calculate muscularity (Box 2), we have shown that a lean man can achieve only a certain amount of muscularity without using drugs.5 Although this finding needs to be replicated elsewhere, in our experience a man is almost certainly lying if he:

 

  • is relatively lean (with approximately 10% body fat)
  • displays an FFMI >26
  • and claims he has not used drugs.

If a patient has an elevated FFMI and other cues suggesting AAS use (Table 2), gently but persistently question him if he denies using these drugs.

TREATING AAS-ASSOCIATED SYNDROMES

When you have established a history of AAS use, you will be far better prepared to anticipate and possibly treat its associated syndromes. Discussion of these effects is beyond the scope of this paper; for details, see reviews of AAS-associated medical effects,3,6 psychiatric effects,6,7 and general treatment principles.8 We focus here on the four scenarios clinicians encounter most often in practice and offer some pragmatic suggestions.

Forensic cases. AAS users almost never voluntarily seek help to stop their drug use. Such a request would be somewhat analogous to a girl with anorexia nervosa voluntarily asking for help to gain weight. We are unaware of any rehabilitation centers, clinics, 12-step programs, or the like for AAS users—there is no demand for them.

Thus, an AAS user may first come to clinical attention through legal channels. For example, if an AAS user committed a violent crime while experiencing hypomanic effects from these drugs, he might be required to undergo random urine testing as a condition of probation. This may be reasonable, provided that the tests are unannounced and urine is always collected under direct observation.

Monitoring clinicians may serve as little better than policemen, although sometimes it is possible to forge an alliance with the patient.

Depression. Exogenous AAS administration suppresses endogenous testosterone production through feedback mechanisms involving the hypothalamic-pituitary-testicular axis.3,6 Thus, during a long cycle, the user’s testes may shrink to half their normal size and stop producing testosterone and spermatozoa.

If the user then stops AAS rapidly, he may plunge into a profoundly hypogonadal state associated with symptoms of major depression. In a field study of 77 steroid users (71 male and 6 female), 6 (7.8%) reported they attempted suicide during AAS withdrawal.9 Depression associated with AAS withdrawal may prompt users to resume AAS quickly, triggering a syndrome of AAS dependence.6,10,11

Fortunately, AAS-withdrawal depression is usually self-limited and responds—in our experience and that of others12—to standard antidepressants. We recommend aggressively treating such depressions, as doing so may prevent resumption of AAS use and eventual AAS dependence.

Body-image disorders. AAS users often report body-image disorders, especially muscle dysmorphia—a form of body dysmorphic disorder where individuals become preoccupied with the belief that they are not adequately muscular.13,14 Anxieties about muscularity are a risk factor for subsequent AAS use15 and a major contributor to AAS dependence.8,11

Body dysmorphic disorder responds to pharmacologic and cognitive-behavioral interventions.3,16 Young men showing pathologic concerns about their muscularity or displaying related body-image pathology may benefit from prompt treatment before they are tempted to use AAS.

Progression to opioid dependence. An ominous development among American17 and British18 AAS users is a growing tendency to use opioids. In two studies of individuals with opioid dependence,19,20 7% to 9% reported beginning as AAS users, then learning about opioids from fellow bodybuilders and often buying their first illicit opioids from the person who had sold them AAS. Most learned as teenagers to use needles to inject AAS intramuscularly, so beginning to using opioids intravenously was only a small step.

In the last 5 years, we have become anecdotally aware of numerous AAS users who developed heroin addiction requiring repeated inpatient detoxification or who died of unintentional opioid overdoses. We suspect this phenomenon is under-recognized and urge clinicians to watch for it.

 

 

Related resources

 

  • Pope HG Jr, Brower KJ. Anabolic-androgenic steroid abuse. In: Sadock BJ, Sadock VA (eds). Comprehensive textbook of psychiatry (8th ed). Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins (in press).
  • Yesalis CE (ed). Anabolic steroids in sport and exercise (2nd ed). Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics, 2000.
  • The Taylor Hooton Foundation. Started by the father of a high school athlete who committed suicide during a depressive episode apparently precipitated by AAS withdrawal. Includes links to related Web sites. http://www.taylorhooton.org/about.asp. Accessed Nov. 10, 2004.

Disclosure

The authors report no financial relationship with any company whose products are mentioned in this article or with manufacturers of competing products.

References

 

1. Pope HG, Jr, Kanayama G, Ionescu-Pioggia M, Hudson JI. Anabolic steroid users’ attitudes towards physicians. Addiction 2004;99:1189-94.

2. Dawson RT. Drugs in sport—the role of the physician. J Endocrinol 2001;170:55-61.

3. Kutscher EC, Lund BC, Perry PJ. Anabolic steroids: a review for the clinician. Sports Med 2002;32:285-96.

4. Pope HG, Jr, Phillips KA, Olivardia R. The Adonis complex: the secret crisis of male body obsession. New York: Free Press, 2000.

5. Kouri EM, Pope HG, Jr, Katz DL, Oliva PS. Fat-free mass index in users and non-users of anabolic-androgenic steroids. Clin J Sport Med 1995;5:223-8.

6. Brower KJ. Anabolic steroid abuse and dependence. Curr Psychiatry Rep 2002;4:377-83.

7. Pope HG, Jr, Katz DL. Psychiatric effects of exogenous anabolic-androgenic steroids. In: Wolkowitz OM, Rothschild AJ (eds). Psychoneuroendocrinology: the scientific basis of clinical practice. Washington. DC: American Psychiatric Publishing, 2003;331-58.

8. Pope HG, Jr, Brower KJ. Anabolic-androgenic steroids. In: Galanter M, Kleber HD (eds). American Psychiatric Publishing textbook of substance abuse treatment (3rd ed). Washington DC: American Psychiatric Publishing, 2004;257-64.

9. Malone DA, Jr, Dimeff R, Lombardo JA, Sample BRH. Psychiatric effects and psychoactive substance use in anabolic-androgenic steroid users. Clin J Sports Med 1995;5:25-31

10. Kashkin KB, Kleber HD. Hooked on hormones? An anabolic steroid addiction hypothesis. JAMA 1989;262:3166-70.

11. Brower KJ, Eliopulos GA, Blow FC, et al. Evidence for physical and psychological dependence on anabolic androgenic steroids in eight weight lifters. Am J Psychiatry. 1990;147(4):510-2.

12. Malone DA, Jr, Dimeff RJ. The use of fluoxetine in depression associated with anabolic steroid withdrawal: a case series. J Clin Psychiatry. 1992;53:130-2.

13. Pope HG, Jr, Gruber AJ, Choi PY. Muscle dysmorphia: an underrecognized form of body dysmorphic disorder. Psychosomatics 1997;38:548-57.

14. Olivardia R, Pope HG, Jr, Hudson JI. ‘Muscle dysmorphia’ in male weightlifters: a case-control study. Am J Psychiatry 2000;157:1291-6.

15. Kanayama G, Pope HG, Jr, Cohane G, Hudson JI. Risk factors for anabolic-androgenic steroid use among weightlifters: a case-control study. Drug Alcohol Depend 2003;71:77-86.

16. Phillips KA. Pharmacologic treatment of body dysmorphic disorder: a review of empirical data and a proposed treatment algorithm. Psychiatr Clin North Am 2000;7:59-82.

17. Wines JD, Jr, Gruber AJ, Pope HG, Jr, Lukas SE. Nalbuphine hydrochloride dependence in anabolic steroid users. Am J Addictions 1999;8:161-4.

18. McBride AJ, Williamson K, Petersen T. Three cases of nalbuphine hydrochloride dependence associated with anabolic steroid abuse. Br J Sports Med 1996;30:69-70.

19. Kanayama G, Cohane G, Weiss RD, Pope HG, Jr. Past anabolic-androgenic steroid use among men admitted for substance abuse treatment: an underrecognized problem? J Clin Psychiatry. 2003;64:156-60.

20. Arvary D, Pope HG, Jr. Anabolic steroids: a possible gateway to opioid dependence. N Engl J Med 2000;342:1532.-

Author and Disclosure Information

 

Harrison G. Pope, Jr, MD
Professor of psychiatry Harvard Medical School

Gen Kanayama, MD, PhD
Research fellow Harvard Medical School

Issue
Current Psychiatry - 03(12)
Publications
Topics
Page Number
12-20
Sections
Author and Disclosure Information

 

Harrison G. Pope, Jr, MD
Professor of psychiatry Harvard Medical School

Gen Kanayama, MD, PhD
Research fellow Harvard Medical School

Author and Disclosure Information

 

Harrison G. Pope, Jr, MD
Professor of psychiatry Harvard Medical School

Gen Kanayama, MD, PhD
Research fellow Harvard Medical School

Anabolic steroid use by athletes and body-builders has captured public attention but remains poorly understood by most physicians. This is not surprising because users of anabolic-androgenic steroids (AAS):

 

  • rarely seek treatment or disclose their drug use
  • frequently distrust professionals.

If you are a clinician who regularly sees male adolescents and young men, you need to become familiar with—and watch for—this often-secret form of substance abuse. This article provides the groundwork for that understanding, starting with the story of “Aaron”—a composite patient whose case represents experiences and verbatim quotes from AAS users known to the authors.

CASE REPORT: ‘I FEEL INVINCIBLE’

At his first visit, Aaron, age 18, told the psychiatrist he had no complaints but was coming to please his parents. “I have a lot of arguments with my Dad,” he said, “and they keep thinking something’s wrong with me.”

The patient was very muscular and dressed in baggy sweats that masked his body proportions. He was appropriately groomed and darkly tanned but displayed some acne. The clinician guessed he weighed about 175 lbs and stood at about 65 inches, with very low body fat. Although superficially confident, he seemed restless, somewhat anxious, and guarded as the interview progressed.

Aaron admitted he experienced prominent mood swings. During rage outbursts, he had damaged objects and put his fist through the wall. “There’s holes all over the wall of my room,” he joked.

He also had assaulted a motorist in a traffic altercation, then left the scene. “Did you hurt him?” the clinician asked. Somewhat sheepishly, Aaron responded, “Well, I bought the newspaper and kept checking the obituaries for about 2 weeks afterwards.”

He spoke with pride about his weightlifting, which was the focus of his life. He revealed that he was preparing for a body-building contest in 2 months. The psychiatrist asked him about use of supplements—protein shakes, creatine, and “andro” (androstenedione)—all of which Aaron acknowledged. The psychiatrist then gently asked about anabolic steroid use (Box 1).

Initially, Aaron strongly denied using AAS. The psychiatrist persisted, pointing out that no information would be disclosed to his parents, and asked again using colloquial terms from the AAS subculture: “Anybody who is prepping for an untested contest in a couple of months is going to be on a cycle. Come on, what are you taking?”

Box 1

 

What are anabolic-androgenic steroids?

Anabolic-androgenic steroids (AAS) are hormones that include testosterone—nature’s own AAS—and more than 100 synthetically developed testosterone relatives. All AAS possess anabolic (muscle-building) and androgenic (masculinizing) properties; no known compound can produce one of these effects without the other.

Because of their masculinizing effects, AAS are rarely used by women—and even then in much lower doses than those used by men. Thus, this article focuses on evaluating and treating male adolescents and men.

AAS are not:

 

  • Corticosteroids (such as cortisol) are often called “steroids” but possess no muscle-building properties. Corticosteroids’ prominent but idiosyncratic psychiatric effects are usually seen in consultation-liaison settings where patients have been prescribed these drugs, rather than among substance abusers.
  • Androstenedione (“andro”) and its relatives are adrenal steroids that are weakly metabolized into testosterone or other AAS. These substances were sold legally without prescription in the United States for many years but were banned by federal law in October 2004. Their anabolic and psychiatric effects are much weaker than those of AAS.
  • Athletic “supplements” with names designed to sound like AAS (such as beginning with “Ana…”) or supplements claimed to be “testosterone-releasers” or the like. If sold legally in supplement stores, an athletic supplement is not an AAS. Psychiatric effects are extremely unlikely.

Eventually it emerged that Aaron had taken five 8- to 20-week AAS “cycles” (courses), during which he had “stacked” (combined) various “injectables” such as IM testosterone and “orals” such as methyltestosterone (Table 1). His current cycle included:

 

  • a blend of testosterone esters (Sustanon), 500 mg IM once a week
  • boldenone (Equipoise), a veterinary AAS normally used for horses, 200 mg IM per week
  • oxymetholone (Anadrol), 50 mg orally per day.

Table 1

Commonly used anabolic-androgenic steroids

 

‘Injectables’ (usually administered only by injection)
Boldenone (Equipoise)*
Methenolone (Primobolan depot)
Nandrolone (Deca-Durabolin, Durabolin, Laurabolin, others)
Stanozolol (Winstrol-V)*
Testosterone esters (Depo-testosterone, Sten, Sustanon, others)
Trenbolone (Finajet, Parabolan)
‘Orals’
Methandienone (formerly called methandrostenolone) (Dianabol, others)
Methenolone (Primobolan)
Methyltestosterone (Android, others)
Mibolerone (Checque Drops)*
Oxandrolone (Anavar, Lipidex)
Oxmetholone (Anadrol, Anapolon)
Stanoxolol (Stromba, Winstrol)
Other anabolic substances sold on the ‘black market’
Human growth hormone (HGH)Possesses anabolic properties
Extremely expensive
Almost impossible to detect by testing
Lacks androgenic effects
Psychiatric effects appear negligible
Large doses can cause acromegaly
ClenbuterolBeta-adrenergic agonist with stimulant and anabolic properties
Used less commonly than AAS
Lacks androgenic effects and assists fat loss
Can produce psychiatric effects similar to those of amphetamine abuse (rare, in the authors’ experience)
Human chorionic gonadotropin (HCG)Stimulates testes to produce more testosterone, creating an AAS effect
Most commonly used near the end of an AAS “cycle” to “jump-start” the hypothalamic-pituitary-testicular axis and minimize AAS withdrawal
* Veterinary preparation
AAS: anabolic-androgenic steroid
 

 

His friends had taught him to self-inject AAS at age 15; he admitted that he was also occasionally self-injecting the opioid analgesic nalbuphine intravenously because of “pain in my ‘delts’ from military presses.”

During his cycles, Aaron experienced hypomanic symptoms, including euphoria, prominent irritability, increased libido, decreased need for sleep, and grandiosity. “I feel invincible,” he said. His aggressive outbursts had worsened with increasing AAS doses; in addition to attacking the motorist, he also had been physically violent with his girlfriend. “She’s scared of me when I’m on juice,” he conceded.

During the withdrawal phase after stopping each cycle, Aaron described prominent depression with anhedonia, hypersomnia, loss of libido, and suicidal ideation. “I once almost jumped off a bridge after my fourth cycle,” he admitted. “I couldn’t wait to get on my next cycle to feel good again.” His depressions were also characterized by body-image obsessions; he would regularly spend at least 1 hour a day examining his musculature in a mirror, and sometimes refused to go out in public because he “was getting too small.”

Perhaps most disturbing was his increasing use of opioids. In addition to self-injecting nalbuphine, he also ingested oral opioids such as oxycodone almost daily. He mentioned that several of his friends in the gym had progressed from injecting nalbuphine to injecting morphine or heroin, and he knew two bodybuilders who had died from apparently unintentional opioid overdoses.

Aaron said his parents, teachers, and non-bodybuilding friends were unaware of this history. He claimed his parents were proud that their son had apparently eschewed drugs and alcohol to pursue a healthy athletic lifestyle.

RECOGNIZING AAS USE

In our experience with treating substance abusers, we find that AAS users may be the least likely to disclose their drug use to clinicians. In a recent study,1 20 of 36 AAS users (56%) reported they had never revealed their AAS use to any physician. When asked to rate their trust in sources of information about AAS, 17 of 42 AAS users (40%) said they trusted information from their drug dealers at least as much as information from any physician they had seen.

Some expressed contempt for physicians as “geeks” or “pencil-necks” who could not comprehend the body-building lifestyle. They gave doctors high marks on knowledge of tobacco, alcohol, and ordinary “street drugs” but much lower ratings on AAS knowledge. Other investigators have shown that many clinicians are unfamiliar with AAS.2,3

AAS users embrace these beliefs for two other reasons. First, to admit to AAS use is to admit that one’s muscularity and physical prowess is the result of taking a drug; there is no comparable motivation to withhold information about, say, one’s use of marijuana or cocaine.

Second, AAS users are much less likely than other substance abusers to view their behavior as pathologic. We have argued that our culture is partially to blame.4 Americans pay to watch 300-lb football linemen and AAS-using movie stars. Makers of cars, computers, and electronics do not hesitate to advertise their products as “on steroids,” but they would never claim their products were “on cocaine.” In this climate, it is easy to forget that AAS use is an illicit substance abuse.

Box 2

 

How to calculate fat-free mass index (FFMI)

Formula: FFMI = (W x (100 - BF)/100)H2 + 6.1 x (1.8 - H)

W = weight in kilograms

BF = body fat percentage

H = height in meters

Obtain height in meters and weight in kilograms. Ideally, measure body fat using calipers, electrical impedance, or some other method. Alternately, estimate body fat by visual inspection:

 

  • 20% = average 30-year-old American man
  • 10% = quite lean
  • 5% = approaching lowest body fat normally attainable

FFMI values for American men:

20 = average

22 = visibly muscular

25 = approximate maximum attainable by a lean individual without using drugs

Example 1

Young male weightlifter is 69 inches tall, weighs 175 lbs, and is moderately lean, with body fat of 10%; he denies AAS use

H = 69 inches x .0254 meters/inch = 1.75 m

H2= 1.75 x 1.75 = 3.06 m2

W = 175 pounds x 0.454 kilograms/lb = 79.5 kg

Therefore, FFMI = (79.5 x (100-10)/100)/3.06 + 6.1 x (1.8 - 1.75) = 23.7

This degree of muscularity can be attained without using AAS

Example 2

Young male weightlifter is 66 inches tall, weighs 175 lbs, and is very lean, with body fat of 6%; he also denies AAS use

H = 66 inches x .0254 meters/inch = 1.68 m

H2= 1.68 x 1.68 = 2.82 m2

W = 175 pounds x 0.454 kilograms/lb = 79.5 kg

Therefore, FFMI = (79.5 x (100-6)/100)2.82 + 6.1 x (1.8 - 1.68) = 27.2

This level of muscularity is extremely unlikely without drugs. Patient is almost certainly lying and should be gently confronted, especially if other symptoms (Table 2) suggest AAS use

 

 

Table 2

Clues to possible AAS use in men

 

Muscularity
Estimated fat-free mass index (FFMI) >26 (see Box 2)
Recent rapid muscle gains (>8 lb/month)
Striae over pectoralis muscles caused by rapid hypertrophy of underlying muscle
Other physical signs
Acne
Gynecomastia
Testicular atrophy
Psychiatric signs
Uncharacteristically aggressive behavior
Uncharacteristic hypomanic symptoms
  • Grandiosity
  • Decreased sleep
  • Hypersexuality
  • Recklessness
Uncharacteristic depressive symptoms
  • Sudden depression onset
  • Anhedonia
  • Hypersomnia

To overcome these treatment obstacles, we recommend that you:

 

  • Become as knowledgeable about AAS use as you are about other forms of substance abuse (see Related resources).
  • Approach AAS users as you would any other substance abusers—as individuals at risk for potentially serious medical and psychiatric consequences.
  • Maintain a high index of suspicion when evaluating any muscular young male patient, even if he initially denies AAS use.

AAS use can often be suspected by looking at the patient as he walks in the door. Using what we call the “fat-free mass index” (FFMI) to calculate muscularity (Box 2), we have shown that a lean man can achieve only a certain amount of muscularity without using drugs.5 Although this finding needs to be replicated elsewhere, in our experience a man is almost certainly lying if he:

 

  • is relatively lean (with approximately 10% body fat)
  • displays an FFMI >26
  • and claims he has not used drugs.

If a patient has an elevated FFMI and other cues suggesting AAS use (Table 2), gently but persistently question him if he denies using these drugs.

TREATING AAS-ASSOCIATED SYNDROMES

When you have established a history of AAS use, you will be far better prepared to anticipate and possibly treat its associated syndromes. Discussion of these effects is beyond the scope of this paper; for details, see reviews of AAS-associated medical effects,3,6 psychiatric effects,6,7 and general treatment principles.8 We focus here on the four scenarios clinicians encounter most often in practice and offer some pragmatic suggestions.

Forensic cases. AAS users almost never voluntarily seek help to stop their drug use. Such a request would be somewhat analogous to a girl with anorexia nervosa voluntarily asking for help to gain weight. We are unaware of any rehabilitation centers, clinics, 12-step programs, or the like for AAS users—there is no demand for them.

Thus, an AAS user may first come to clinical attention through legal channels. For example, if an AAS user committed a violent crime while experiencing hypomanic effects from these drugs, he might be required to undergo random urine testing as a condition of probation. This may be reasonable, provided that the tests are unannounced and urine is always collected under direct observation.

Monitoring clinicians may serve as little better than policemen, although sometimes it is possible to forge an alliance with the patient.

Depression. Exogenous AAS administration suppresses endogenous testosterone production through feedback mechanisms involving the hypothalamic-pituitary-testicular axis.3,6 Thus, during a long cycle, the user’s testes may shrink to half their normal size and stop producing testosterone and spermatozoa.

If the user then stops AAS rapidly, he may plunge into a profoundly hypogonadal state associated with symptoms of major depression. In a field study of 77 steroid users (71 male and 6 female), 6 (7.8%) reported they attempted suicide during AAS withdrawal.9 Depression associated with AAS withdrawal may prompt users to resume AAS quickly, triggering a syndrome of AAS dependence.6,10,11

Fortunately, AAS-withdrawal depression is usually self-limited and responds—in our experience and that of others12—to standard antidepressants. We recommend aggressively treating such depressions, as doing so may prevent resumption of AAS use and eventual AAS dependence.

Body-image disorders. AAS users often report body-image disorders, especially muscle dysmorphia—a form of body dysmorphic disorder where individuals become preoccupied with the belief that they are not adequately muscular.13,14 Anxieties about muscularity are a risk factor for subsequent AAS use15 and a major contributor to AAS dependence.8,11

Body dysmorphic disorder responds to pharmacologic and cognitive-behavioral interventions.3,16 Young men showing pathologic concerns about their muscularity or displaying related body-image pathology may benefit from prompt treatment before they are tempted to use AAS.

Progression to opioid dependence. An ominous development among American17 and British18 AAS users is a growing tendency to use opioids. In two studies of individuals with opioid dependence,19,20 7% to 9% reported beginning as AAS users, then learning about opioids from fellow bodybuilders and often buying their first illicit opioids from the person who had sold them AAS. Most learned as teenagers to use needles to inject AAS intramuscularly, so beginning to using opioids intravenously was only a small step.

In the last 5 years, we have become anecdotally aware of numerous AAS users who developed heroin addiction requiring repeated inpatient detoxification or who died of unintentional opioid overdoses. We suspect this phenomenon is under-recognized and urge clinicians to watch for it.

 

 

Related resources

 

  • Pope HG Jr, Brower KJ. Anabolic-androgenic steroid abuse. In: Sadock BJ, Sadock VA (eds). Comprehensive textbook of psychiatry (8th ed). Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins (in press).
  • Yesalis CE (ed). Anabolic steroids in sport and exercise (2nd ed). Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics, 2000.
  • The Taylor Hooton Foundation. Started by the father of a high school athlete who committed suicide during a depressive episode apparently precipitated by AAS withdrawal. Includes links to related Web sites. http://www.taylorhooton.org/about.asp. Accessed Nov. 10, 2004.

Disclosure

The authors report no financial relationship with any company whose products are mentioned in this article or with manufacturers of competing products.

Anabolic steroid use by athletes and body-builders has captured public attention but remains poorly understood by most physicians. This is not surprising because users of anabolic-androgenic steroids (AAS):

 

  • rarely seek treatment or disclose their drug use
  • frequently distrust professionals.

If you are a clinician who regularly sees male adolescents and young men, you need to become familiar with—and watch for—this often-secret form of substance abuse. This article provides the groundwork for that understanding, starting with the story of “Aaron”—a composite patient whose case represents experiences and verbatim quotes from AAS users known to the authors.

CASE REPORT: ‘I FEEL INVINCIBLE’

At his first visit, Aaron, age 18, told the psychiatrist he had no complaints but was coming to please his parents. “I have a lot of arguments with my Dad,” he said, “and they keep thinking something’s wrong with me.”

The patient was very muscular and dressed in baggy sweats that masked his body proportions. He was appropriately groomed and darkly tanned but displayed some acne. The clinician guessed he weighed about 175 lbs and stood at about 65 inches, with very low body fat. Although superficially confident, he seemed restless, somewhat anxious, and guarded as the interview progressed.

Aaron admitted he experienced prominent mood swings. During rage outbursts, he had damaged objects and put his fist through the wall. “There’s holes all over the wall of my room,” he joked.

He also had assaulted a motorist in a traffic altercation, then left the scene. “Did you hurt him?” the clinician asked. Somewhat sheepishly, Aaron responded, “Well, I bought the newspaper and kept checking the obituaries for about 2 weeks afterwards.”

He spoke with pride about his weightlifting, which was the focus of his life. He revealed that he was preparing for a body-building contest in 2 months. The psychiatrist asked him about use of supplements—protein shakes, creatine, and “andro” (androstenedione)—all of which Aaron acknowledged. The psychiatrist then gently asked about anabolic steroid use (Box 1).

Initially, Aaron strongly denied using AAS. The psychiatrist persisted, pointing out that no information would be disclosed to his parents, and asked again using colloquial terms from the AAS subculture: “Anybody who is prepping for an untested contest in a couple of months is going to be on a cycle. Come on, what are you taking?”

Box 1

 

What are anabolic-androgenic steroids?

Anabolic-androgenic steroids (AAS) are hormones that include testosterone—nature’s own AAS—and more than 100 synthetically developed testosterone relatives. All AAS possess anabolic (muscle-building) and androgenic (masculinizing) properties; no known compound can produce one of these effects without the other.

Because of their masculinizing effects, AAS are rarely used by women—and even then in much lower doses than those used by men. Thus, this article focuses on evaluating and treating male adolescents and men.

AAS are not:

 

  • Corticosteroids (such as cortisol) are often called “steroids” but possess no muscle-building properties. Corticosteroids’ prominent but idiosyncratic psychiatric effects are usually seen in consultation-liaison settings where patients have been prescribed these drugs, rather than among substance abusers.
  • Androstenedione (“andro”) and its relatives are adrenal steroids that are weakly metabolized into testosterone or other AAS. These substances were sold legally without prescription in the United States for many years but were banned by federal law in October 2004. Their anabolic and psychiatric effects are much weaker than those of AAS.
  • Athletic “supplements” with names designed to sound like AAS (such as beginning with “Ana…”) or supplements claimed to be “testosterone-releasers” or the like. If sold legally in supplement stores, an athletic supplement is not an AAS. Psychiatric effects are extremely unlikely.

Eventually it emerged that Aaron had taken five 8- to 20-week AAS “cycles” (courses), during which he had “stacked” (combined) various “injectables” such as IM testosterone and “orals” such as methyltestosterone (Table 1). His current cycle included:

 

  • a blend of testosterone esters (Sustanon), 500 mg IM once a week
  • boldenone (Equipoise), a veterinary AAS normally used for horses, 200 mg IM per week
  • oxymetholone (Anadrol), 50 mg orally per day.

Table 1

Commonly used anabolic-androgenic steroids

 

‘Injectables’ (usually administered only by injection)
Boldenone (Equipoise)*
Methenolone (Primobolan depot)
Nandrolone (Deca-Durabolin, Durabolin, Laurabolin, others)
Stanozolol (Winstrol-V)*
Testosterone esters (Depo-testosterone, Sten, Sustanon, others)
Trenbolone (Finajet, Parabolan)
‘Orals’
Methandienone (formerly called methandrostenolone) (Dianabol, others)
Methenolone (Primobolan)
Methyltestosterone (Android, others)
Mibolerone (Checque Drops)*
Oxandrolone (Anavar, Lipidex)
Oxmetholone (Anadrol, Anapolon)
Stanoxolol (Stromba, Winstrol)
Other anabolic substances sold on the ‘black market’
Human growth hormone (HGH)Possesses anabolic properties
Extremely expensive
Almost impossible to detect by testing
Lacks androgenic effects
Psychiatric effects appear negligible
Large doses can cause acromegaly
ClenbuterolBeta-adrenergic agonist with stimulant and anabolic properties
Used less commonly than AAS
Lacks androgenic effects and assists fat loss
Can produce psychiatric effects similar to those of amphetamine abuse (rare, in the authors’ experience)
Human chorionic gonadotropin (HCG)Stimulates testes to produce more testosterone, creating an AAS effect
Most commonly used near the end of an AAS “cycle” to “jump-start” the hypothalamic-pituitary-testicular axis and minimize AAS withdrawal
* Veterinary preparation
AAS: anabolic-androgenic steroid
 

 

His friends had taught him to self-inject AAS at age 15; he admitted that he was also occasionally self-injecting the opioid analgesic nalbuphine intravenously because of “pain in my ‘delts’ from military presses.”

During his cycles, Aaron experienced hypomanic symptoms, including euphoria, prominent irritability, increased libido, decreased need for sleep, and grandiosity. “I feel invincible,” he said. His aggressive outbursts had worsened with increasing AAS doses; in addition to attacking the motorist, he also had been physically violent with his girlfriend. “She’s scared of me when I’m on juice,” he conceded.

During the withdrawal phase after stopping each cycle, Aaron described prominent depression with anhedonia, hypersomnia, loss of libido, and suicidal ideation. “I once almost jumped off a bridge after my fourth cycle,” he admitted. “I couldn’t wait to get on my next cycle to feel good again.” His depressions were also characterized by body-image obsessions; he would regularly spend at least 1 hour a day examining his musculature in a mirror, and sometimes refused to go out in public because he “was getting too small.”

Perhaps most disturbing was his increasing use of opioids. In addition to self-injecting nalbuphine, he also ingested oral opioids such as oxycodone almost daily. He mentioned that several of his friends in the gym had progressed from injecting nalbuphine to injecting morphine or heroin, and he knew two bodybuilders who had died from apparently unintentional opioid overdoses.

Aaron said his parents, teachers, and non-bodybuilding friends were unaware of this history. He claimed his parents were proud that their son had apparently eschewed drugs and alcohol to pursue a healthy athletic lifestyle.

RECOGNIZING AAS USE

In our experience with treating substance abusers, we find that AAS users may be the least likely to disclose their drug use to clinicians. In a recent study,1 20 of 36 AAS users (56%) reported they had never revealed their AAS use to any physician. When asked to rate their trust in sources of information about AAS, 17 of 42 AAS users (40%) said they trusted information from their drug dealers at least as much as information from any physician they had seen.

Some expressed contempt for physicians as “geeks” or “pencil-necks” who could not comprehend the body-building lifestyle. They gave doctors high marks on knowledge of tobacco, alcohol, and ordinary “street drugs” but much lower ratings on AAS knowledge. Other investigators have shown that many clinicians are unfamiliar with AAS.2,3

AAS users embrace these beliefs for two other reasons. First, to admit to AAS use is to admit that one’s muscularity and physical prowess is the result of taking a drug; there is no comparable motivation to withhold information about, say, one’s use of marijuana or cocaine.

Second, AAS users are much less likely than other substance abusers to view their behavior as pathologic. We have argued that our culture is partially to blame.4 Americans pay to watch 300-lb football linemen and AAS-using movie stars. Makers of cars, computers, and electronics do not hesitate to advertise their products as “on steroids,” but they would never claim their products were “on cocaine.” In this climate, it is easy to forget that AAS use is an illicit substance abuse.

Box 2

 

How to calculate fat-free mass index (FFMI)

Formula: FFMI = (W x (100 - BF)/100)H2 + 6.1 x (1.8 - H)

W = weight in kilograms

BF = body fat percentage

H = height in meters

Obtain height in meters and weight in kilograms. Ideally, measure body fat using calipers, electrical impedance, or some other method. Alternately, estimate body fat by visual inspection:

 

  • 20% = average 30-year-old American man
  • 10% = quite lean
  • 5% = approaching lowest body fat normally attainable

FFMI values for American men:

20 = average

22 = visibly muscular

25 = approximate maximum attainable by a lean individual without using drugs

Example 1

Young male weightlifter is 69 inches tall, weighs 175 lbs, and is moderately lean, with body fat of 10%; he denies AAS use

H = 69 inches x .0254 meters/inch = 1.75 m

H2= 1.75 x 1.75 = 3.06 m2

W = 175 pounds x 0.454 kilograms/lb = 79.5 kg

Therefore, FFMI = (79.5 x (100-10)/100)/3.06 + 6.1 x (1.8 - 1.75) = 23.7

This degree of muscularity can be attained without using AAS

Example 2

Young male weightlifter is 66 inches tall, weighs 175 lbs, and is very lean, with body fat of 6%; he also denies AAS use

H = 66 inches x .0254 meters/inch = 1.68 m

H2= 1.68 x 1.68 = 2.82 m2

W = 175 pounds x 0.454 kilograms/lb = 79.5 kg

Therefore, FFMI = (79.5 x (100-6)/100)2.82 + 6.1 x (1.8 - 1.68) = 27.2

This level of muscularity is extremely unlikely without drugs. Patient is almost certainly lying and should be gently confronted, especially if other symptoms (Table 2) suggest AAS use

 

 

Table 2

Clues to possible AAS use in men

 

Muscularity
Estimated fat-free mass index (FFMI) >26 (see Box 2)
Recent rapid muscle gains (>8 lb/month)
Striae over pectoralis muscles caused by rapid hypertrophy of underlying muscle
Other physical signs
Acne
Gynecomastia
Testicular atrophy
Psychiatric signs
Uncharacteristically aggressive behavior
Uncharacteristic hypomanic symptoms
  • Grandiosity
  • Decreased sleep
  • Hypersexuality
  • Recklessness
Uncharacteristic depressive symptoms
  • Sudden depression onset
  • Anhedonia
  • Hypersomnia

To overcome these treatment obstacles, we recommend that you:

 

  • Become as knowledgeable about AAS use as you are about other forms of substance abuse (see Related resources).
  • Approach AAS users as you would any other substance abusers—as individuals at risk for potentially serious medical and psychiatric consequences.
  • Maintain a high index of suspicion when evaluating any muscular young male patient, even if he initially denies AAS use.

AAS use can often be suspected by looking at the patient as he walks in the door. Using what we call the “fat-free mass index” (FFMI) to calculate muscularity (Box 2), we have shown that a lean man can achieve only a certain amount of muscularity without using drugs.5 Although this finding needs to be replicated elsewhere, in our experience a man is almost certainly lying if he:

 

  • is relatively lean (with approximately 10% body fat)
  • displays an FFMI >26
  • and claims he has not used drugs.

If a patient has an elevated FFMI and other cues suggesting AAS use (Table 2), gently but persistently question him if he denies using these drugs.

TREATING AAS-ASSOCIATED SYNDROMES

When you have established a history of AAS use, you will be far better prepared to anticipate and possibly treat its associated syndromes. Discussion of these effects is beyond the scope of this paper; for details, see reviews of AAS-associated medical effects,3,6 psychiatric effects,6,7 and general treatment principles.8 We focus here on the four scenarios clinicians encounter most often in practice and offer some pragmatic suggestions.

Forensic cases. AAS users almost never voluntarily seek help to stop their drug use. Such a request would be somewhat analogous to a girl with anorexia nervosa voluntarily asking for help to gain weight. We are unaware of any rehabilitation centers, clinics, 12-step programs, or the like for AAS users—there is no demand for them.

Thus, an AAS user may first come to clinical attention through legal channels. For example, if an AAS user committed a violent crime while experiencing hypomanic effects from these drugs, he might be required to undergo random urine testing as a condition of probation. This may be reasonable, provided that the tests are unannounced and urine is always collected under direct observation.

Monitoring clinicians may serve as little better than policemen, although sometimes it is possible to forge an alliance with the patient.

Depression. Exogenous AAS administration suppresses endogenous testosterone production through feedback mechanisms involving the hypothalamic-pituitary-testicular axis.3,6 Thus, during a long cycle, the user’s testes may shrink to half their normal size and stop producing testosterone and spermatozoa.

If the user then stops AAS rapidly, he may plunge into a profoundly hypogonadal state associated with symptoms of major depression. In a field study of 77 steroid users (71 male and 6 female), 6 (7.8%) reported they attempted suicide during AAS withdrawal.9 Depression associated with AAS withdrawal may prompt users to resume AAS quickly, triggering a syndrome of AAS dependence.6,10,11

Fortunately, AAS-withdrawal depression is usually self-limited and responds—in our experience and that of others12—to standard antidepressants. We recommend aggressively treating such depressions, as doing so may prevent resumption of AAS use and eventual AAS dependence.

Body-image disorders. AAS users often report body-image disorders, especially muscle dysmorphia—a form of body dysmorphic disorder where individuals become preoccupied with the belief that they are not adequately muscular.13,14 Anxieties about muscularity are a risk factor for subsequent AAS use15 and a major contributor to AAS dependence.8,11

Body dysmorphic disorder responds to pharmacologic and cognitive-behavioral interventions.3,16 Young men showing pathologic concerns about their muscularity or displaying related body-image pathology may benefit from prompt treatment before they are tempted to use AAS.

Progression to opioid dependence. An ominous development among American17 and British18 AAS users is a growing tendency to use opioids. In two studies of individuals with opioid dependence,19,20 7% to 9% reported beginning as AAS users, then learning about opioids from fellow bodybuilders and often buying their first illicit opioids from the person who had sold them AAS. Most learned as teenagers to use needles to inject AAS intramuscularly, so beginning to using opioids intravenously was only a small step.

In the last 5 years, we have become anecdotally aware of numerous AAS users who developed heroin addiction requiring repeated inpatient detoxification or who died of unintentional opioid overdoses. We suspect this phenomenon is under-recognized and urge clinicians to watch for it.

 

 

Related resources

 

  • Pope HG Jr, Brower KJ. Anabolic-androgenic steroid abuse. In: Sadock BJ, Sadock VA (eds). Comprehensive textbook of psychiatry (8th ed). Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins (in press).
  • Yesalis CE (ed). Anabolic steroids in sport and exercise (2nd ed). Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics, 2000.
  • The Taylor Hooton Foundation. Started by the father of a high school athlete who committed suicide during a depressive episode apparently precipitated by AAS withdrawal. Includes links to related Web sites. http://www.taylorhooton.org/about.asp. Accessed Nov. 10, 2004.

Disclosure

The authors report no financial relationship with any company whose products are mentioned in this article or with manufacturers of competing products.

References

 

1. Pope HG, Jr, Kanayama G, Ionescu-Pioggia M, Hudson JI. Anabolic steroid users’ attitudes towards physicians. Addiction 2004;99:1189-94.

2. Dawson RT. Drugs in sport—the role of the physician. J Endocrinol 2001;170:55-61.

3. Kutscher EC, Lund BC, Perry PJ. Anabolic steroids: a review for the clinician. Sports Med 2002;32:285-96.

4. Pope HG, Jr, Phillips KA, Olivardia R. The Adonis complex: the secret crisis of male body obsession. New York: Free Press, 2000.

5. Kouri EM, Pope HG, Jr, Katz DL, Oliva PS. Fat-free mass index in users and non-users of anabolic-androgenic steroids. Clin J Sport Med 1995;5:223-8.

6. Brower KJ. Anabolic steroid abuse and dependence. Curr Psychiatry Rep 2002;4:377-83.

7. Pope HG, Jr, Katz DL. Psychiatric effects of exogenous anabolic-androgenic steroids. In: Wolkowitz OM, Rothschild AJ (eds). Psychoneuroendocrinology: the scientific basis of clinical practice. Washington. DC: American Psychiatric Publishing, 2003;331-58.

8. Pope HG, Jr, Brower KJ. Anabolic-androgenic steroids. In: Galanter M, Kleber HD (eds). American Psychiatric Publishing textbook of substance abuse treatment (3rd ed). Washington DC: American Psychiatric Publishing, 2004;257-64.

9. Malone DA, Jr, Dimeff R, Lombardo JA, Sample BRH. Psychiatric effects and psychoactive substance use in anabolic-androgenic steroid users. Clin J Sports Med 1995;5:25-31

10. Kashkin KB, Kleber HD. Hooked on hormones? An anabolic steroid addiction hypothesis. JAMA 1989;262:3166-70.

11. Brower KJ, Eliopulos GA, Blow FC, et al. Evidence for physical and psychological dependence on anabolic androgenic steroids in eight weight lifters. Am J Psychiatry. 1990;147(4):510-2.

12. Malone DA, Jr, Dimeff RJ. The use of fluoxetine in depression associated with anabolic steroid withdrawal: a case series. J Clin Psychiatry. 1992;53:130-2.

13. Pope HG, Jr, Gruber AJ, Choi PY. Muscle dysmorphia: an underrecognized form of body dysmorphic disorder. Psychosomatics 1997;38:548-57.

14. Olivardia R, Pope HG, Jr, Hudson JI. ‘Muscle dysmorphia’ in male weightlifters: a case-control study. Am J Psychiatry 2000;157:1291-6.

15. Kanayama G, Pope HG, Jr, Cohane G, Hudson JI. Risk factors for anabolic-androgenic steroid use among weightlifters: a case-control study. Drug Alcohol Depend 2003;71:77-86.

16. Phillips KA. Pharmacologic treatment of body dysmorphic disorder: a review of empirical data and a proposed treatment algorithm. Psychiatr Clin North Am 2000;7:59-82.

17. Wines JD, Jr, Gruber AJ, Pope HG, Jr, Lukas SE. Nalbuphine hydrochloride dependence in anabolic steroid users. Am J Addictions 1999;8:161-4.

18. McBride AJ, Williamson K, Petersen T. Three cases of nalbuphine hydrochloride dependence associated with anabolic steroid abuse. Br J Sports Med 1996;30:69-70.

19. Kanayama G, Cohane G, Weiss RD, Pope HG, Jr. Past anabolic-androgenic steroid use among men admitted for substance abuse treatment: an underrecognized problem? J Clin Psychiatry. 2003;64:156-60.

20. Arvary D, Pope HG, Jr. Anabolic steroids: a possible gateway to opioid dependence. N Engl J Med 2000;342:1532.-

References

 

1. Pope HG, Jr, Kanayama G, Ionescu-Pioggia M, Hudson JI. Anabolic steroid users’ attitudes towards physicians. Addiction 2004;99:1189-94.

2. Dawson RT. Drugs in sport—the role of the physician. J Endocrinol 2001;170:55-61.

3. Kutscher EC, Lund BC, Perry PJ. Anabolic steroids: a review for the clinician. Sports Med 2002;32:285-96.

4. Pope HG, Jr, Phillips KA, Olivardia R. The Adonis complex: the secret crisis of male body obsession. New York: Free Press, 2000.

5. Kouri EM, Pope HG, Jr, Katz DL, Oliva PS. Fat-free mass index in users and non-users of anabolic-androgenic steroids. Clin J Sport Med 1995;5:223-8.

6. Brower KJ. Anabolic steroid abuse and dependence. Curr Psychiatry Rep 2002;4:377-83.

7. Pope HG, Jr, Katz DL. Psychiatric effects of exogenous anabolic-androgenic steroids. In: Wolkowitz OM, Rothschild AJ (eds). Psychoneuroendocrinology: the scientific basis of clinical practice. Washington. DC: American Psychiatric Publishing, 2003;331-58.

8. Pope HG, Jr, Brower KJ. Anabolic-androgenic steroids. In: Galanter M, Kleber HD (eds). American Psychiatric Publishing textbook of substance abuse treatment (3rd ed). Washington DC: American Psychiatric Publishing, 2004;257-64.

9. Malone DA, Jr, Dimeff R, Lombardo JA, Sample BRH. Psychiatric effects and psychoactive substance use in anabolic-androgenic steroid users. Clin J Sports Med 1995;5:25-31

10. Kashkin KB, Kleber HD. Hooked on hormones? An anabolic steroid addiction hypothesis. JAMA 1989;262:3166-70.

11. Brower KJ, Eliopulos GA, Blow FC, et al. Evidence for physical and psychological dependence on anabolic androgenic steroids in eight weight lifters. Am J Psychiatry. 1990;147(4):510-2.

12. Malone DA, Jr, Dimeff RJ. The use of fluoxetine in depression associated with anabolic steroid withdrawal: a case series. J Clin Psychiatry. 1992;53:130-2.

13. Pope HG, Jr, Gruber AJ, Choi PY. Muscle dysmorphia: an underrecognized form of body dysmorphic disorder. Psychosomatics 1997;38:548-57.

14. Olivardia R, Pope HG, Jr, Hudson JI. ‘Muscle dysmorphia’ in male weightlifters: a case-control study. Am J Psychiatry 2000;157:1291-6.

15. Kanayama G, Pope HG, Jr, Cohane G, Hudson JI. Risk factors for anabolic-androgenic steroid use among weightlifters: a case-control study. Drug Alcohol Depend 2003;71:77-86.

16. Phillips KA. Pharmacologic treatment of body dysmorphic disorder: a review of empirical data and a proposed treatment algorithm. Psychiatr Clin North Am 2000;7:59-82.

17. Wines JD, Jr, Gruber AJ, Pope HG, Jr, Lukas SE. Nalbuphine hydrochloride dependence in anabolic steroid users. Am J Addictions 1999;8:161-4.

18. McBride AJ, Williamson K, Petersen T. Three cases of nalbuphine hydrochloride dependence associated with anabolic steroid abuse. Br J Sports Med 1996;30:69-70.

19. Kanayama G, Cohane G, Weiss RD, Pope HG, Jr. Past anabolic-androgenic steroid use among men admitted for substance abuse treatment: an underrecognized problem? J Clin Psychiatry. 2003;64:156-60.

20. Arvary D, Pope HG, Jr. Anabolic steroids: a possible gateway to opioid dependence. N Engl J Med 2000;342:1532.-

Issue
Current Psychiatry - 03(12)
Issue
Current Psychiatry - 03(12)
Page Number
12-20
Page Number
12-20
Publications
Publications
Topics
Article Type
Display Headline
Bodybuilding’s dark side: Clues to anabolic steroid use
Display Headline
Bodybuilding’s dark side: Clues to anabolic steroid use
Sections
PURLs Copyright

Disallow All Ads
Alternative CME
Use ProPublica
Hide sidebar & use full width
render the right sidebar.

Update on eating disorders Bulimia nervosa: Persistent disorder requires equally persistent treatment

Article Type
Changed
Tue, 12/11/2018 - 15:11
Display Headline
Update on eating disorders Bulimia nervosa: Persistent disorder requires equally persistent treatment

Thousands of scientific papers have been written about bulimia, but not all patients receive effective treatments that produce remission.

To set the record straight and help psychiatrists avoid undertreating bulimia, this article discusses:

  • evidence for using antidepressants, even when patients are not “depressed”
  • merits of psychotherapies, including those shown to work and those that can harm
  • augmentation therapies that can help increase response from partial to full remission.

Initial evaluation

Diagnosis. Bulimia nervosa is characterized by eating binges, followed by purging behaviors such as self-induced vomiting or laxative abuse1,2 (Table 1). It affects 1% to 3% of adolescent girls and young women and occurs in women 5 to 10 times more often than in men.

Bulimia is often persistent. About one-half of bulimic patients—including those who have been treated—continue to show eating disorder features on long-term follow-up.3,4

Psychiatric comorbidity. Most bulimic patients report a history of other psychiatric disorders, especially major depressive and bipolar disorders and anxiety disorders such as panic disorder, social phobia, and obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD).5 Because these psychiatric comorbidities may occur before, during, or after bulimia nervosa, one cannot assume that mood or anxiety disorders are a cause or consequence of bulimia. Instead, bulimia nervosa, mood disorders, and anxiety disorders may be different expressions of a shared etiologic abnormality.

Table 1

DSM-IV-TR diagnostic criteria for bulimia nervosa

  1. Recurrent episodes of binge eating, characterized by both of the following:
  2. Recurrent inappropriate compensatory behavior in order to prevent weight gain, such as self-induced vomiting; misuse of laxatives, diuretics, enemas, or other medications; fasting; or excessive exercise
  3. The binge eating and inappropriate compensatory behaviors both occur, on average, at least twice a week for 3 months
  4. Self-evaluation is unduly influenced by body shape and weight
  5. The disturbance does not occur exclusively during episodes of anorexia nervosa
Specify type:
Purging type: during the current episode of bulimia nervosa, the person has regularly engaged in self-induced vomiting or the misuse of laxatives, diuretics, or enemas
Non-purging type: during the current episode of bulimia nervosa, the person has used other inappropriate compensatory behaviors, such as fasting or excessive exercise but has not regularly engaged in self-induced vomiting or the misuse of laxatives, diuretics, or enemas
Source: Reprinted with permission from the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, 4th ed, text rev. Copyright 2000 American Psychiatric Association.

Evidence supporting this hypothesis comes from studies showing that these disorders:

  • respond to several chemically unrelated families of antidepressants6,7
  • frequently co-occur in individual patients5,7
  • frequently co-aggregate in families.7-9

We have published this evidence6,7 and proposed that bulimia nervosa may be one form of a larger underlying disorder, which we termed “affective spectrum disorder.”

Antidepressants are often rapidly effective in treating bulimic symptoms,10 regardless of whether patients exhibit depressive symptoms. Thus, there is no reason to withhold antidepressant therapy simply because a bulimic patient is not depressed. The term “antidepressant” may be a misnomer; these drugs are effective for numerous conditions, of which depression is only one.

Anorexic symptoms. Co-occurring depressive or anxiety disorders in a bulimic patient will not greatly alter treatment. The antidepressants and psychotherapies typically used to treat bulimia are often equally effective for affective disorders. Co-occurring anorexia nervosa, however, is a more serious concern.

Bulimic patients often display a history of anorexia nervosa; in many cases, the patient develops anorexia nervosa as a teenager and then progresses to bulimia nervosa across several years. Her prognosis is much better if her weight normalizes with the shift to bulimia nervosa, than if her weight remains well below normal for her height. It is unclear why medications and psychotherapy are much less effective in bulimic patients with anorexic symptoms than in those with bulimia alone. Watch for further details on anorexia nervosa as this series continues in future issues of.

Medical considerations. Potential medical complications—mostly consequences of vomiting or laxative use—are important to consider when you assess a bulimic patient:1

  • The acid in vomitus may gradually erode tooth enamel, requiring dental consultation.
  • Vomitus may inflame salivary gland ducts, though the swelling is usually benign.
  • Frequent vomiting may result in hypokalemia and alkalosis, although aggressive medical treatment usually is not needed.

Ask about ipecac use. To induce vomiting, some patients may abuse ipecac syrup, which can cause cardiomyopathy.11

Inpatient or outpatient? Unless the bulimic patient displays severe and medically dangerous anorexic symptoms, she can usually be treated as an outpatient. However, evaluate her carefully for suicidal ideation—which is not uncommon in bulimia nervosa—and consider inpatient treatment if necessary.

Medication vs. psychotherapy

The relative merits of medication versus psychotherapy in treating bulimia nervosa continue to be debated. The Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews includes meta-analyses of both drug therapy12 and psychotherapy13 for bulimia nervosa. The 2001 drug therapy review found that “the use of a single antidepressant agent was clinically effective,” with no one drug clearly superior to another. Notably, this review was published before recent findings on topiramate.

 

 

The corresponding 2002 review of psychotherapy concludes—somewhat more cautiously—that “there is a small body of evidence for the efficacy of cognitive-behavior therapy in bulimia nervosa and similar syndromes, but the quality of trials is very variable and sample sizes are often small.”

In bulimia nervosa and other psychiatric disorders, comparing psychotherapy with drug therapy is hazardous because several factors bias the comparison in favor of psychotherapy. These factors include an expectational effect, a responsibility effect, and differential generalizability of study results.

Expectational effect. Patients in clinical trials are aware that they are receiving psychotherapy and, presumably, that study investigators hope to demonstrate its efficacy. This might account for much of psychotherapy’s apparent effect, as even placebos can produce 30% to 50% improvement in bulimia.14

Responsibility effect. If a patient fails to improve in a drug study, she will conclude that the drug has failed. But if she fails to improve in a psychotherapy study, she may conclude that she has failed. Because psychological treatments generally require patients to work in therapy, the patient may feel partially responsible for the outcome. Thus, to avoid cognitive dissonance, she may consciously or unconsciously exaggerate her improvement, both in her own mind and when reporting to treaters.

Differential generalizability. Psychological study protocols, such as administering several months of a behavioral treatment, usually mimic clinical practice fairly well. This is not the case with drug study protocols.

No responsible clinician would inflexibly administer a single dosage of a single drug for a fixed period to every bulimic patient and then declare failure for all nonresponders, as is done in study protocols. In practice, the clinician can offer nonresponders augmentation strategies and additional drug trials. Thus, calculations of bulimia response rates in drug studies substantially understate response to drug therapy in clinical practice.

Table 2

How effective are medications in treating bulimia nervosa?

MedicationEvidence for efficacyRemarks
Antidepressants
Selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors+++Fluoxetine is only SSRI studied in controlled trials
Tricyclics+++Generally more side effects than SSRIs
Monoamine oxidase inhibitors++High rates of remission, but dietary restrictions
Trazodone++Only one controlled trial
Venlafaxine, mirtazapine, nefazodone?No controlled trials, but probably effective
Bupropion(++)Not recommended; caused seizures in bulimic patients
Anticonvulsants
Topiramate++Only one controlled trial, but substantial effect size
Phenytoin+Little efficacy in only controlled study
Carbamazepine+May be useful in bulimia with comorbid bipolar disorder
Valproate+May be useful in bulimia with comorbid bipolar disorder
Other agents
Liothyronine+Augmentation agent in patients with incomplete antidepressant response
Lithium+Ineffective in only controlled trial; possible augmentation strategy
Naltrexone0Ineffective in two controlled trials
Ondansetron+One controlled trial
0 No apparent efficacy
+ Occasional effect; limited evidence
++ Clear effect; good evidence from controlled trial(s)
+++ Strongly documented effect; evidence from multiple controlled trials.
( ) Negative effect

One also might note that psychological study findings have not “sold” well in the clinical practice marketplace. For example, in a recent survey of more than 220 bulimic women treated with psychotherapy, only 6.9% said they received a full course of cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT)14 —despite two decades of evidence of its efficacy. By contrast, untested, inefficacious, and possibly harmful psychotherapies for bulimia—including recovered-memory therapy—appear to be thriving.

Recommendation. Interpret with caution any head-to-head comparisons of psychological versus drug therapies—especially when clinical practice recommendations are made. Certain psychological therapies provided by specifically-trained individuals likely do help patients with bulimia nervosa. However, biases inherent to the studies may inflate psychological therapies’ efficacy when compared with that of drug therapy.

Therefore, for a psychiatrist who does not specialize in eating disorders to offer exclusively psychological therapy to a bulimic patient—while withholding or postponing drug therapy—may now be a questionable practice.

Choosing drug therapies

Although consensus is lacking on an optimal treatment trial sequence for bulimia nervosa, we suggest a rational approach based on the evidence and our experience (Algorithm).

First-line antidepressants. A selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor (SSRI) trial is usually the first choice (Table 2), and some data suggest that higher-than-usual dosages may be required. For example, in a large multicenter trial of fluoxetine in bulimia nervosa, 60 mg/d was considerably more effective than 20 mg/d for reducing binge eating behavior and vomiting frequency.15

Based on our observations, however, we believe that noncompliance or irregular compliance may account for this difference in response. Bulimic patients’ impulsive and obsessional behavior may keep them from taking their medications as prescribed. The higher fluoxetine dosage may therefore have been more effective simply because it ensured adequate plasma levels, even when patients missed or forgot multiple doses.

Augmenting agents. A first antidepressant trial rarely leads to complete remission of bulimic symptoms. This is not a serious concern, however, because many other options are available.

Liothyronine. Partial responders to SSRIs often become complete responders when we add a 10-day trial of liothyronine (T3), 25 μg/d. If this fails, we may try augmenting with lithium carbonate, although bulimic patients are often afraid of weight gain or lithium’s other side effects.

 

 

Topiramate. A newer augmentation strategy is to add the anticonvulsant topiramate. Used alone, topiramate demonstrated effectiveness for bulimia nervosa in one placebo-controlled, double-blind trial.16

Adding topiramate to an antidepressant regimen will likely reduce any remaining bulimic symptoms. In addition, topiramate often produces weight loss—a side effect that bulimic patients usually welcome. It remains unclear whether topiramate’s weight-loss effects might pose a hazard in patients with simultaneous bulimic and anorexic symptoms.

Other antidepressants. If the above strategies fail, other antidepressant options include venlafaxine, tricyclics, and monoamine oxidase inhibitors. Bupropion is not recommended in bulimia nervosa; one trial17 of this agent resulted in a much higher rate of grand mal seizures in bulimic patients than in patients taking bupropion for depression.

In bulimic patients with concomitant bipolar disorder, the anticonvulsants carbamazepine and valproate often reduce affective and bulimic symptoms. By contrast, the anticonvulsant phenytoin—once thought to be useful in bulimia nervosa10 —offers little benefit for either bulimic or affective symptoms.

Persistence is important when initial medication trials fail. One unblinded study followed 36 bulimic patients 9 to 19 months after they completed a controlled study with trazodone.18 Of the 26 patients who tried a second or third antidepressant, 17 (65%) achieved remission of bulimia on follow-up. Of the 10 patients who declined a second or third trial, only 1 (10%) attained remission.

Notably, these study results were obtained before the SSRIs and other newer antidepressants or topiramate became available. Cooperative patients using present-day medications might be able to achieve remission rates that exceed 65%.

Algorithm Proposed treatment approach to bulimia nervosa



Table 3

How effective are psychotherapies in treating bulimia nervosa?

PsychotherapyEvidence for efficacyRemarks
Cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT)+++Controlled evidence for efficacy in individual and group treatment
Interpersonal psychotherapy (IPT)++Effective, but slower than CBT
Exposure with response prevention+May be added to other behavioral techniques, though additive benefit questionable
Dialectical behavior therapy+Highly structured behavioral technique originally developed for borderline personality disorder
Self-help groups+Frequently considered very helpful by patients
Psychodynamic psychotherapy0“Recovered memory” approaches are frankly harmful
Eye movement desensitization and reprocessing (EMDR)0Dubious theoretical basis; no methodologically acceptable evidence for efficacy
0 No apparent efficacy
+ Occasional effect; limited evidence
++ Clear effect; good evidence from controlled trial(s)
+++ Strongly documented effect; evidence from multiple controlled trials.

Psychotherapy

Cognitive-behavioral therapy. CBT—given either individually or in groups—is the most effective psychotherapy for bulimia (Table 3).19 CBT typically involves 3 to 6 months of helping the patient focus on her bulimic behaviors and on specific attitudes—such as unrealistic preoccupations with being “too fat”—that perpetuate the behaviors.

In practice, unfortunately, few bulimic patients are offered CBT, perhaps because few clinicians are trained in the specific approach used for bulimia nervosa.19 If you are not trained in using CBT for bulimia and do not have access to colleagues who offer this treatment, you may begin with medication plus simple behavioral treatments, such as:

  • offering supportive therapy in the office
  • referring patients to self-help groups for persons with eating disorders.

If this strategy fails, encourage patients to consider CBT—even if they must travel some distance to obtain it.

Other specialized psychotherapies. Dialectical behavior therapy and interpersonal psychotherapy appear to be effective in bulimia. Again, however, clinicians who lack training in these techniques or access to local experts may be unable to offer them. Psychodynamic therapy does not appear to offer greater benefit in bulimia nervosa than ordinary supportive counseling.

Dubious therapies. One psychodynamic approach—regrettably still practiced—is “recovered memory therapy.” Therapists who use it claim that childhood sexual abuse or other trauma can cause bulimic symptoms but patients have repressed the memory of these events.20

No methodologically sound evidence has shown that childhood sexual abuse can cause bulimia nervosa years or decades later.21 Nor is there acceptable evidence that people can repress the memory of a traumatic experience.22 Therapists administering recovered memory therapy have been subjected to malpractice judgments totaling tens of millions of dollars from suits filed by patients who eventually realized that so-called “recovered” memories were false.23

Another dubious therapy—eye movement desensitization and reprocessing (EMDR)—also may involve attempts to “recover” memories of putative traumatic events.24 No methodologically sound evidence has shown that EMDR is effective in bulimic patients, and the technique’s theoretical basis is questionable.24,25

Related resources

Drug brand names

  • Bupropion • Wellbutrin
  • Citalopram • Celexa
  • Desipramine • Norpramin
  • Fluoxetine • Prozac
  • Lithium • Lithobid, Eskalith
  • Nortriptyline • Pamelor, Aventyl
  • Sertraline • Zoloft
  • Topiramate • Topamax
  • Trazodone • Desyrel
  • Liothyronine • Cytomel
  • Venlafaxine • Effexor

Disclosure

Dr. Pope receives research support from Ortho-McNeil Pharmaceuticals and is a consultant to Solvay Pharmaceuticals and Auxilium Pharmaceuticals.

 

 

Dr. Hudson receives research support from and is a consultant to Eli Lilly & Co. and Ortho-McNeil Pharmaceuticals.

References

1. Mehler PS. Clinical practice. Bulimia nervosa. N Engl J Med 2003;349(9):875-81.

2. American Psychiatric Association. Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (4th ed, text rev). Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Association,2000.

3. Fisher M. The course and outcome of eating disorders in adults and in adolescents: a review. Adolesc Med 2003;14(1):149-58.

4. Fairburn CG, Norman PA, Welch SL, et al. A prospective study of outcome in bulimia nervosa and the long-term effects of three psychological treatments. Arch Gen Psychiatry 1995;52(4):304-12.

5. Hudson JI, Pope HG, Jr, Yurgelun-Todd D, et al. A controlled study of lifetime prevalence of affective and other psychiatric disorders in bulimic outpatients. Am J Psychiatry 1987;144(10):1283-7.

6. Hudson JI, Pope HG, Jr. Affective spectrum disorder: does antidepressant response identify a family of disorders with a common pathophysiology? Am J Psychiatry 1990;147(5):552-64.

7. Hudson JI, Mangweth B, Pope HG, Jr, et al. Family study of affective spectrum disorder. Arch Gen Psychiatry 2003;60:170-7.

8. Hudson JI, Laird NM, Betensky RA, et al. Multivariate logistic regression for familial aggregation of two disorders: II. Analysis of studies of eating and mood disorders. Am J Epidemiology 2001;153(5):506-14.

9. Mangweth B, Hudson JI, Pope HG, Jr, et al. Family study of the aggregation of eating disorders and mood disorders. Psychol Med (in press).

10. Hudson JI, Pope HG, Jr, Carter WP. Pharmacologic therapy of bulimia nervosa. In: Goldstein D (ed). The management of eating disorders and obesity (2nd ed) Totowa, NJ: Humana Press, Inc.(in press).

11. Pope HG, Jr, Hudson JI, Nixon RA, Herridge PL. The epidemiology of ipecac abuse. N Engl J Med 1986;14(4):245-6.

12. Hay PJ, Bacaltchuk J. Psychotherapy for bulimia nervosa and binging. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2003;(1):CD000562.-

13. Bacaltchuk J, Hay P. Antidepressants versus placebo for people with bulimia nervosa. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2001;(4):CD003391.-

14. Crow S, Mussell MP, Peterson C, et al. Prior treatment received by patients with bulimia nervosa. Int J Eating Disord 1999;25(1):39-44.

15. Fluoxetine Bulimia Collaborative Study Group Fluoxetine in the treatment of bulimia nervosa: a multicenter placebo-controlled, double-blind trial. Arch Gen Psychiatry 1992;49:139-47.

16. Hoopes S, Reimherr F, Hedges D, et al. Part 1:Topiramate in the treatment of bulimia nervosa: a randomized, double-blind, placebocontrolled trial. J Clin Psychiatry (in press).

17. Horne RL, Ferguson JM, Pope HG, Jr, et al. Treatment of bulimia with bupropion: a controlled multi-center trial. J Clin Psychiatry 1988;49(7):262-6.

18. Pope HG, Jr, McElroy SL, Keck PE, Jr, Hudson JI. Long-term pharmacotherapy of bulimia nervosa. J Clin Psychopharmacol 1989;9(5):385-6.

19. Fairburn CG, Harrison PJ. Eating disorders. Lancet 2003;361(9355):407-16.

20. Pope HG, Jr, Hudson JI. “Recovered memory” therapy for eating disorders: implications of the Ramona verdict. Int J Eat Disord 1996;19(2):139-45.

21. Pope HG, Jr, Hudson JI. Does childhood sexual abuse cause adult psychiatric disorders? Essentials of methodology. J Psychiatry Law 1995;Fall:363-81.

22. Pope HG, Jr, Oliva PS, Hudson JI. Repressed memories. The scientific status of research on repressed memories. In: Faigman DL, Kaye DH, Saks MJ, Sanders J (eds). Science in the law: social and behavioral science issues St. Paul, MN: West Group, 2002;487-526.

23. Cannell J, Hudson JI, Pope HG, Jr. Standards for informed consent in recovered memory therapy. J Am Acad Psychiatry Law 2001;29(2):138-47.

24. Hudson JI, Chase EA, Pope HG, Jr. Eye movement desensitization and reprocessing in eating disorders: caution against premature acceptance. Int J Eat Disord 1998;23:1-5.

25. McNally RJ. EMDR and mesmerism: a comparative historical analysis. J Anxiety Disord 1999;13(1-2):225-36.

Article PDF
Author and Disclosure Information

Paul E. Keck, Jr, MD

Harrison G. Pope, Jr, MD
Professor of psychiatry Harvard Medical School, Boston Director, Biological Psychiatry Laboratory McLean Hospital, Belmont, MA

James I. Hudson, MD, ScD
Associate professor of psychiatry Harvard Medical School, Boston Director, Biological Psychiatry Laboratory McLean Hospital, Belmont, MA

Issue
Current Psychiatry - 03(01)
Publications
Topics
Page Number
12-22
Sections
Author and Disclosure Information

Paul E. Keck, Jr, MD

Harrison G. Pope, Jr, MD
Professor of psychiatry Harvard Medical School, Boston Director, Biological Psychiatry Laboratory McLean Hospital, Belmont, MA

James I. Hudson, MD, ScD
Associate professor of psychiatry Harvard Medical School, Boston Director, Biological Psychiatry Laboratory McLean Hospital, Belmont, MA

Author and Disclosure Information

Paul E. Keck, Jr, MD

Harrison G. Pope, Jr, MD
Professor of psychiatry Harvard Medical School, Boston Director, Biological Psychiatry Laboratory McLean Hospital, Belmont, MA

James I. Hudson, MD, ScD
Associate professor of psychiatry Harvard Medical School, Boston Director, Biological Psychiatry Laboratory McLean Hospital, Belmont, MA

Article PDF
Article PDF

Thousands of scientific papers have been written about bulimia, but not all patients receive effective treatments that produce remission.

To set the record straight and help psychiatrists avoid undertreating bulimia, this article discusses:

  • evidence for using antidepressants, even when patients are not “depressed”
  • merits of psychotherapies, including those shown to work and those that can harm
  • augmentation therapies that can help increase response from partial to full remission.

Initial evaluation

Diagnosis. Bulimia nervosa is characterized by eating binges, followed by purging behaviors such as self-induced vomiting or laxative abuse1,2 (Table 1). It affects 1% to 3% of adolescent girls and young women and occurs in women 5 to 10 times more often than in men.

Bulimia is often persistent. About one-half of bulimic patients—including those who have been treated—continue to show eating disorder features on long-term follow-up.3,4

Psychiatric comorbidity. Most bulimic patients report a history of other psychiatric disorders, especially major depressive and bipolar disorders and anxiety disorders such as panic disorder, social phobia, and obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD).5 Because these psychiatric comorbidities may occur before, during, or after bulimia nervosa, one cannot assume that mood or anxiety disorders are a cause or consequence of bulimia. Instead, bulimia nervosa, mood disorders, and anxiety disorders may be different expressions of a shared etiologic abnormality.

Table 1

DSM-IV-TR diagnostic criteria for bulimia nervosa

  1. Recurrent episodes of binge eating, characterized by both of the following:
  2. Recurrent inappropriate compensatory behavior in order to prevent weight gain, such as self-induced vomiting; misuse of laxatives, diuretics, enemas, or other medications; fasting; or excessive exercise
  3. The binge eating and inappropriate compensatory behaviors both occur, on average, at least twice a week for 3 months
  4. Self-evaluation is unduly influenced by body shape and weight
  5. The disturbance does not occur exclusively during episodes of anorexia nervosa
Specify type:
Purging type: during the current episode of bulimia nervosa, the person has regularly engaged in self-induced vomiting or the misuse of laxatives, diuretics, or enemas
Non-purging type: during the current episode of bulimia nervosa, the person has used other inappropriate compensatory behaviors, such as fasting or excessive exercise but has not regularly engaged in self-induced vomiting or the misuse of laxatives, diuretics, or enemas
Source: Reprinted with permission from the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, 4th ed, text rev. Copyright 2000 American Psychiatric Association.

Evidence supporting this hypothesis comes from studies showing that these disorders:

  • respond to several chemically unrelated families of antidepressants6,7
  • frequently co-occur in individual patients5,7
  • frequently co-aggregate in families.7-9

We have published this evidence6,7 and proposed that bulimia nervosa may be one form of a larger underlying disorder, which we termed “affective spectrum disorder.”

Antidepressants are often rapidly effective in treating bulimic symptoms,10 regardless of whether patients exhibit depressive symptoms. Thus, there is no reason to withhold antidepressant therapy simply because a bulimic patient is not depressed. The term “antidepressant” may be a misnomer; these drugs are effective for numerous conditions, of which depression is only one.

Anorexic symptoms. Co-occurring depressive or anxiety disorders in a bulimic patient will not greatly alter treatment. The antidepressants and psychotherapies typically used to treat bulimia are often equally effective for affective disorders. Co-occurring anorexia nervosa, however, is a more serious concern.

Bulimic patients often display a history of anorexia nervosa; in many cases, the patient develops anorexia nervosa as a teenager and then progresses to bulimia nervosa across several years. Her prognosis is much better if her weight normalizes with the shift to bulimia nervosa, than if her weight remains well below normal for her height. It is unclear why medications and psychotherapy are much less effective in bulimic patients with anorexic symptoms than in those with bulimia alone. Watch for further details on anorexia nervosa as this series continues in future issues of.

Medical considerations. Potential medical complications—mostly consequences of vomiting or laxative use—are important to consider when you assess a bulimic patient:1

  • The acid in vomitus may gradually erode tooth enamel, requiring dental consultation.
  • Vomitus may inflame salivary gland ducts, though the swelling is usually benign.
  • Frequent vomiting may result in hypokalemia and alkalosis, although aggressive medical treatment usually is not needed.

Ask about ipecac use. To induce vomiting, some patients may abuse ipecac syrup, which can cause cardiomyopathy.11

Inpatient or outpatient? Unless the bulimic patient displays severe and medically dangerous anorexic symptoms, she can usually be treated as an outpatient. However, evaluate her carefully for suicidal ideation—which is not uncommon in bulimia nervosa—and consider inpatient treatment if necessary.

Medication vs. psychotherapy

The relative merits of medication versus psychotherapy in treating bulimia nervosa continue to be debated. The Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews includes meta-analyses of both drug therapy12 and psychotherapy13 for bulimia nervosa. The 2001 drug therapy review found that “the use of a single antidepressant agent was clinically effective,” with no one drug clearly superior to another. Notably, this review was published before recent findings on topiramate.

 

 

The corresponding 2002 review of psychotherapy concludes—somewhat more cautiously—that “there is a small body of evidence for the efficacy of cognitive-behavior therapy in bulimia nervosa and similar syndromes, but the quality of trials is very variable and sample sizes are often small.”

In bulimia nervosa and other psychiatric disorders, comparing psychotherapy with drug therapy is hazardous because several factors bias the comparison in favor of psychotherapy. These factors include an expectational effect, a responsibility effect, and differential generalizability of study results.

Expectational effect. Patients in clinical trials are aware that they are receiving psychotherapy and, presumably, that study investigators hope to demonstrate its efficacy. This might account for much of psychotherapy’s apparent effect, as even placebos can produce 30% to 50% improvement in bulimia.14

Responsibility effect. If a patient fails to improve in a drug study, she will conclude that the drug has failed. But if she fails to improve in a psychotherapy study, she may conclude that she has failed. Because psychological treatments generally require patients to work in therapy, the patient may feel partially responsible for the outcome. Thus, to avoid cognitive dissonance, she may consciously or unconsciously exaggerate her improvement, both in her own mind and when reporting to treaters.

Differential generalizability. Psychological study protocols, such as administering several months of a behavioral treatment, usually mimic clinical practice fairly well. This is not the case with drug study protocols.

No responsible clinician would inflexibly administer a single dosage of a single drug for a fixed period to every bulimic patient and then declare failure for all nonresponders, as is done in study protocols. In practice, the clinician can offer nonresponders augmentation strategies and additional drug trials. Thus, calculations of bulimia response rates in drug studies substantially understate response to drug therapy in clinical practice.

Table 2

How effective are medications in treating bulimia nervosa?

MedicationEvidence for efficacyRemarks
Antidepressants
Selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors+++Fluoxetine is only SSRI studied in controlled trials
Tricyclics+++Generally more side effects than SSRIs
Monoamine oxidase inhibitors++High rates of remission, but dietary restrictions
Trazodone++Only one controlled trial
Venlafaxine, mirtazapine, nefazodone?No controlled trials, but probably effective
Bupropion(++)Not recommended; caused seizures in bulimic patients
Anticonvulsants
Topiramate++Only one controlled trial, but substantial effect size
Phenytoin+Little efficacy in only controlled study
Carbamazepine+May be useful in bulimia with comorbid bipolar disorder
Valproate+May be useful in bulimia with comorbid bipolar disorder
Other agents
Liothyronine+Augmentation agent in patients with incomplete antidepressant response
Lithium+Ineffective in only controlled trial; possible augmentation strategy
Naltrexone0Ineffective in two controlled trials
Ondansetron+One controlled trial
0 No apparent efficacy
+ Occasional effect; limited evidence
++ Clear effect; good evidence from controlled trial(s)
+++ Strongly documented effect; evidence from multiple controlled trials.
( ) Negative effect

One also might note that psychological study findings have not “sold” well in the clinical practice marketplace. For example, in a recent survey of more than 220 bulimic women treated with psychotherapy, only 6.9% said they received a full course of cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT)14 —despite two decades of evidence of its efficacy. By contrast, untested, inefficacious, and possibly harmful psychotherapies for bulimia—including recovered-memory therapy—appear to be thriving.

Recommendation. Interpret with caution any head-to-head comparisons of psychological versus drug therapies—especially when clinical practice recommendations are made. Certain psychological therapies provided by specifically-trained individuals likely do help patients with bulimia nervosa. However, biases inherent to the studies may inflate psychological therapies’ efficacy when compared with that of drug therapy.

Therefore, for a psychiatrist who does not specialize in eating disorders to offer exclusively psychological therapy to a bulimic patient—while withholding or postponing drug therapy—may now be a questionable practice.

Choosing drug therapies

Although consensus is lacking on an optimal treatment trial sequence for bulimia nervosa, we suggest a rational approach based on the evidence and our experience (Algorithm).

First-line antidepressants. A selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor (SSRI) trial is usually the first choice (Table 2), and some data suggest that higher-than-usual dosages may be required. For example, in a large multicenter trial of fluoxetine in bulimia nervosa, 60 mg/d was considerably more effective than 20 mg/d for reducing binge eating behavior and vomiting frequency.15

Based on our observations, however, we believe that noncompliance or irregular compliance may account for this difference in response. Bulimic patients’ impulsive and obsessional behavior may keep them from taking their medications as prescribed. The higher fluoxetine dosage may therefore have been more effective simply because it ensured adequate plasma levels, even when patients missed or forgot multiple doses.

Augmenting agents. A first antidepressant trial rarely leads to complete remission of bulimic symptoms. This is not a serious concern, however, because many other options are available.

Liothyronine. Partial responders to SSRIs often become complete responders when we add a 10-day trial of liothyronine (T3), 25 μg/d. If this fails, we may try augmenting with lithium carbonate, although bulimic patients are often afraid of weight gain or lithium’s other side effects.

 

 

Topiramate. A newer augmentation strategy is to add the anticonvulsant topiramate. Used alone, topiramate demonstrated effectiveness for bulimia nervosa in one placebo-controlled, double-blind trial.16

Adding topiramate to an antidepressant regimen will likely reduce any remaining bulimic symptoms. In addition, topiramate often produces weight loss—a side effect that bulimic patients usually welcome. It remains unclear whether topiramate’s weight-loss effects might pose a hazard in patients with simultaneous bulimic and anorexic symptoms.

Other antidepressants. If the above strategies fail, other antidepressant options include venlafaxine, tricyclics, and monoamine oxidase inhibitors. Bupropion is not recommended in bulimia nervosa; one trial17 of this agent resulted in a much higher rate of grand mal seizures in bulimic patients than in patients taking bupropion for depression.

In bulimic patients with concomitant bipolar disorder, the anticonvulsants carbamazepine and valproate often reduce affective and bulimic symptoms. By contrast, the anticonvulsant phenytoin—once thought to be useful in bulimia nervosa10 —offers little benefit for either bulimic or affective symptoms.

Persistence is important when initial medication trials fail. One unblinded study followed 36 bulimic patients 9 to 19 months after they completed a controlled study with trazodone.18 Of the 26 patients who tried a second or third antidepressant, 17 (65%) achieved remission of bulimia on follow-up. Of the 10 patients who declined a second or third trial, only 1 (10%) attained remission.

Notably, these study results were obtained before the SSRIs and other newer antidepressants or topiramate became available. Cooperative patients using present-day medications might be able to achieve remission rates that exceed 65%.

Algorithm Proposed treatment approach to bulimia nervosa



Table 3

How effective are psychotherapies in treating bulimia nervosa?

PsychotherapyEvidence for efficacyRemarks
Cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT)+++Controlled evidence for efficacy in individual and group treatment
Interpersonal psychotherapy (IPT)++Effective, but slower than CBT
Exposure with response prevention+May be added to other behavioral techniques, though additive benefit questionable
Dialectical behavior therapy+Highly structured behavioral technique originally developed for borderline personality disorder
Self-help groups+Frequently considered very helpful by patients
Psychodynamic psychotherapy0“Recovered memory” approaches are frankly harmful
Eye movement desensitization and reprocessing (EMDR)0Dubious theoretical basis; no methodologically acceptable evidence for efficacy
0 No apparent efficacy
+ Occasional effect; limited evidence
++ Clear effect; good evidence from controlled trial(s)
+++ Strongly documented effect; evidence from multiple controlled trials.

Psychotherapy

Cognitive-behavioral therapy. CBT—given either individually or in groups—is the most effective psychotherapy for bulimia (Table 3).19 CBT typically involves 3 to 6 months of helping the patient focus on her bulimic behaviors and on specific attitudes—such as unrealistic preoccupations with being “too fat”—that perpetuate the behaviors.

In practice, unfortunately, few bulimic patients are offered CBT, perhaps because few clinicians are trained in the specific approach used for bulimia nervosa.19 If you are not trained in using CBT for bulimia and do not have access to colleagues who offer this treatment, you may begin with medication plus simple behavioral treatments, such as:

  • offering supportive therapy in the office
  • referring patients to self-help groups for persons with eating disorders.

If this strategy fails, encourage patients to consider CBT—even if they must travel some distance to obtain it.

Other specialized psychotherapies. Dialectical behavior therapy and interpersonal psychotherapy appear to be effective in bulimia. Again, however, clinicians who lack training in these techniques or access to local experts may be unable to offer them. Psychodynamic therapy does not appear to offer greater benefit in bulimia nervosa than ordinary supportive counseling.

Dubious therapies. One psychodynamic approach—regrettably still practiced—is “recovered memory therapy.” Therapists who use it claim that childhood sexual abuse or other trauma can cause bulimic symptoms but patients have repressed the memory of these events.20

No methodologically sound evidence has shown that childhood sexual abuse can cause bulimia nervosa years or decades later.21 Nor is there acceptable evidence that people can repress the memory of a traumatic experience.22 Therapists administering recovered memory therapy have been subjected to malpractice judgments totaling tens of millions of dollars from suits filed by patients who eventually realized that so-called “recovered” memories were false.23

Another dubious therapy—eye movement desensitization and reprocessing (EMDR)—also may involve attempts to “recover” memories of putative traumatic events.24 No methodologically sound evidence has shown that EMDR is effective in bulimic patients, and the technique’s theoretical basis is questionable.24,25

Related resources

Drug brand names

  • Bupropion • Wellbutrin
  • Citalopram • Celexa
  • Desipramine • Norpramin
  • Fluoxetine • Prozac
  • Lithium • Lithobid, Eskalith
  • Nortriptyline • Pamelor, Aventyl
  • Sertraline • Zoloft
  • Topiramate • Topamax
  • Trazodone • Desyrel
  • Liothyronine • Cytomel
  • Venlafaxine • Effexor

Disclosure

Dr. Pope receives research support from Ortho-McNeil Pharmaceuticals and is a consultant to Solvay Pharmaceuticals and Auxilium Pharmaceuticals.

 

 

Dr. Hudson receives research support from and is a consultant to Eli Lilly & Co. and Ortho-McNeil Pharmaceuticals.

Thousands of scientific papers have been written about bulimia, but not all patients receive effective treatments that produce remission.

To set the record straight and help psychiatrists avoid undertreating bulimia, this article discusses:

  • evidence for using antidepressants, even when patients are not “depressed”
  • merits of psychotherapies, including those shown to work and those that can harm
  • augmentation therapies that can help increase response from partial to full remission.

Initial evaluation

Diagnosis. Bulimia nervosa is characterized by eating binges, followed by purging behaviors such as self-induced vomiting or laxative abuse1,2 (Table 1). It affects 1% to 3% of adolescent girls and young women and occurs in women 5 to 10 times more often than in men.

Bulimia is often persistent. About one-half of bulimic patients—including those who have been treated—continue to show eating disorder features on long-term follow-up.3,4

Psychiatric comorbidity. Most bulimic patients report a history of other psychiatric disorders, especially major depressive and bipolar disorders and anxiety disorders such as panic disorder, social phobia, and obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD).5 Because these psychiatric comorbidities may occur before, during, or after bulimia nervosa, one cannot assume that mood or anxiety disorders are a cause or consequence of bulimia. Instead, bulimia nervosa, mood disorders, and anxiety disorders may be different expressions of a shared etiologic abnormality.

Table 1

DSM-IV-TR diagnostic criteria for bulimia nervosa

  1. Recurrent episodes of binge eating, characterized by both of the following:
  2. Recurrent inappropriate compensatory behavior in order to prevent weight gain, such as self-induced vomiting; misuse of laxatives, diuretics, enemas, or other medications; fasting; or excessive exercise
  3. The binge eating and inappropriate compensatory behaviors both occur, on average, at least twice a week for 3 months
  4. Self-evaluation is unduly influenced by body shape and weight
  5. The disturbance does not occur exclusively during episodes of anorexia nervosa
Specify type:
Purging type: during the current episode of bulimia nervosa, the person has regularly engaged in self-induced vomiting or the misuse of laxatives, diuretics, or enemas
Non-purging type: during the current episode of bulimia nervosa, the person has used other inappropriate compensatory behaviors, such as fasting or excessive exercise but has not regularly engaged in self-induced vomiting or the misuse of laxatives, diuretics, or enemas
Source: Reprinted with permission from the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, 4th ed, text rev. Copyright 2000 American Psychiatric Association.

Evidence supporting this hypothesis comes from studies showing that these disorders:

  • respond to several chemically unrelated families of antidepressants6,7
  • frequently co-occur in individual patients5,7
  • frequently co-aggregate in families.7-9

We have published this evidence6,7 and proposed that bulimia nervosa may be one form of a larger underlying disorder, which we termed “affective spectrum disorder.”

Antidepressants are often rapidly effective in treating bulimic symptoms,10 regardless of whether patients exhibit depressive symptoms. Thus, there is no reason to withhold antidepressant therapy simply because a bulimic patient is not depressed. The term “antidepressant” may be a misnomer; these drugs are effective for numerous conditions, of which depression is only one.

Anorexic symptoms. Co-occurring depressive or anxiety disorders in a bulimic patient will not greatly alter treatment. The antidepressants and psychotherapies typically used to treat bulimia are often equally effective for affective disorders. Co-occurring anorexia nervosa, however, is a more serious concern.

Bulimic patients often display a history of anorexia nervosa; in many cases, the patient develops anorexia nervosa as a teenager and then progresses to bulimia nervosa across several years. Her prognosis is much better if her weight normalizes with the shift to bulimia nervosa, than if her weight remains well below normal for her height. It is unclear why medications and psychotherapy are much less effective in bulimic patients with anorexic symptoms than in those with bulimia alone. Watch for further details on anorexia nervosa as this series continues in future issues of.

Medical considerations. Potential medical complications—mostly consequences of vomiting or laxative use—are important to consider when you assess a bulimic patient:1

  • The acid in vomitus may gradually erode tooth enamel, requiring dental consultation.
  • Vomitus may inflame salivary gland ducts, though the swelling is usually benign.
  • Frequent vomiting may result in hypokalemia and alkalosis, although aggressive medical treatment usually is not needed.

Ask about ipecac use. To induce vomiting, some patients may abuse ipecac syrup, which can cause cardiomyopathy.11

Inpatient or outpatient? Unless the bulimic patient displays severe and medically dangerous anorexic symptoms, she can usually be treated as an outpatient. However, evaluate her carefully for suicidal ideation—which is not uncommon in bulimia nervosa—and consider inpatient treatment if necessary.

Medication vs. psychotherapy

The relative merits of medication versus psychotherapy in treating bulimia nervosa continue to be debated. The Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews includes meta-analyses of both drug therapy12 and psychotherapy13 for bulimia nervosa. The 2001 drug therapy review found that “the use of a single antidepressant agent was clinically effective,” with no one drug clearly superior to another. Notably, this review was published before recent findings on topiramate.

 

 

The corresponding 2002 review of psychotherapy concludes—somewhat more cautiously—that “there is a small body of evidence for the efficacy of cognitive-behavior therapy in bulimia nervosa and similar syndromes, but the quality of trials is very variable and sample sizes are often small.”

In bulimia nervosa and other psychiatric disorders, comparing psychotherapy with drug therapy is hazardous because several factors bias the comparison in favor of psychotherapy. These factors include an expectational effect, a responsibility effect, and differential generalizability of study results.

Expectational effect. Patients in clinical trials are aware that they are receiving psychotherapy and, presumably, that study investigators hope to demonstrate its efficacy. This might account for much of psychotherapy’s apparent effect, as even placebos can produce 30% to 50% improvement in bulimia.14

Responsibility effect. If a patient fails to improve in a drug study, she will conclude that the drug has failed. But if she fails to improve in a psychotherapy study, she may conclude that she has failed. Because psychological treatments generally require patients to work in therapy, the patient may feel partially responsible for the outcome. Thus, to avoid cognitive dissonance, she may consciously or unconsciously exaggerate her improvement, both in her own mind and when reporting to treaters.

Differential generalizability. Psychological study protocols, such as administering several months of a behavioral treatment, usually mimic clinical practice fairly well. This is not the case with drug study protocols.

No responsible clinician would inflexibly administer a single dosage of a single drug for a fixed period to every bulimic patient and then declare failure for all nonresponders, as is done in study protocols. In practice, the clinician can offer nonresponders augmentation strategies and additional drug trials. Thus, calculations of bulimia response rates in drug studies substantially understate response to drug therapy in clinical practice.

Table 2

How effective are medications in treating bulimia nervosa?

MedicationEvidence for efficacyRemarks
Antidepressants
Selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors+++Fluoxetine is only SSRI studied in controlled trials
Tricyclics+++Generally more side effects than SSRIs
Monoamine oxidase inhibitors++High rates of remission, but dietary restrictions
Trazodone++Only one controlled trial
Venlafaxine, mirtazapine, nefazodone?No controlled trials, but probably effective
Bupropion(++)Not recommended; caused seizures in bulimic patients
Anticonvulsants
Topiramate++Only one controlled trial, but substantial effect size
Phenytoin+Little efficacy in only controlled study
Carbamazepine+May be useful in bulimia with comorbid bipolar disorder
Valproate+May be useful in bulimia with comorbid bipolar disorder
Other agents
Liothyronine+Augmentation agent in patients with incomplete antidepressant response
Lithium+Ineffective in only controlled trial; possible augmentation strategy
Naltrexone0Ineffective in two controlled trials
Ondansetron+One controlled trial
0 No apparent efficacy
+ Occasional effect; limited evidence
++ Clear effect; good evidence from controlled trial(s)
+++ Strongly documented effect; evidence from multiple controlled trials.
( ) Negative effect

One also might note that psychological study findings have not “sold” well in the clinical practice marketplace. For example, in a recent survey of more than 220 bulimic women treated with psychotherapy, only 6.9% said they received a full course of cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT)14 —despite two decades of evidence of its efficacy. By contrast, untested, inefficacious, and possibly harmful psychotherapies for bulimia—including recovered-memory therapy—appear to be thriving.

Recommendation. Interpret with caution any head-to-head comparisons of psychological versus drug therapies—especially when clinical practice recommendations are made. Certain psychological therapies provided by specifically-trained individuals likely do help patients with bulimia nervosa. However, biases inherent to the studies may inflate psychological therapies’ efficacy when compared with that of drug therapy.

Therefore, for a psychiatrist who does not specialize in eating disorders to offer exclusively psychological therapy to a bulimic patient—while withholding or postponing drug therapy—may now be a questionable practice.

Choosing drug therapies

Although consensus is lacking on an optimal treatment trial sequence for bulimia nervosa, we suggest a rational approach based on the evidence and our experience (Algorithm).

First-line antidepressants. A selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor (SSRI) trial is usually the first choice (Table 2), and some data suggest that higher-than-usual dosages may be required. For example, in a large multicenter trial of fluoxetine in bulimia nervosa, 60 mg/d was considerably more effective than 20 mg/d for reducing binge eating behavior and vomiting frequency.15

Based on our observations, however, we believe that noncompliance or irregular compliance may account for this difference in response. Bulimic patients’ impulsive and obsessional behavior may keep them from taking their medications as prescribed. The higher fluoxetine dosage may therefore have been more effective simply because it ensured adequate plasma levels, even when patients missed or forgot multiple doses.

Augmenting agents. A first antidepressant trial rarely leads to complete remission of bulimic symptoms. This is not a serious concern, however, because many other options are available.

Liothyronine. Partial responders to SSRIs often become complete responders when we add a 10-day trial of liothyronine (T3), 25 μg/d. If this fails, we may try augmenting with lithium carbonate, although bulimic patients are often afraid of weight gain or lithium’s other side effects.

 

 

Topiramate. A newer augmentation strategy is to add the anticonvulsant topiramate. Used alone, topiramate demonstrated effectiveness for bulimia nervosa in one placebo-controlled, double-blind trial.16

Adding topiramate to an antidepressant regimen will likely reduce any remaining bulimic symptoms. In addition, topiramate often produces weight loss—a side effect that bulimic patients usually welcome. It remains unclear whether topiramate’s weight-loss effects might pose a hazard in patients with simultaneous bulimic and anorexic symptoms.

Other antidepressants. If the above strategies fail, other antidepressant options include venlafaxine, tricyclics, and monoamine oxidase inhibitors. Bupropion is not recommended in bulimia nervosa; one trial17 of this agent resulted in a much higher rate of grand mal seizures in bulimic patients than in patients taking bupropion for depression.

In bulimic patients with concomitant bipolar disorder, the anticonvulsants carbamazepine and valproate often reduce affective and bulimic symptoms. By contrast, the anticonvulsant phenytoin—once thought to be useful in bulimia nervosa10 —offers little benefit for either bulimic or affective symptoms.

Persistence is important when initial medication trials fail. One unblinded study followed 36 bulimic patients 9 to 19 months after they completed a controlled study with trazodone.18 Of the 26 patients who tried a second or third antidepressant, 17 (65%) achieved remission of bulimia on follow-up. Of the 10 patients who declined a second or third trial, only 1 (10%) attained remission.

Notably, these study results were obtained before the SSRIs and other newer antidepressants or topiramate became available. Cooperative patients using present-day medications might be able to achieve remission rates that exceed 65%.

Algorithm Proposed treatment approach to bulimia nervosa



Table 3

How effective are psychotherapies in treating bulimia nervosa?

PsychotherapyEvidence for efficacyRemarks
Cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT)+++Controlled evidence for efficacy in individual and group treatment
Interpersonal psychotherapy (IPT)++Effective, but slower than CBT
Exposure with response prevention+May be added to other behavioral techniques, though additive benefit questionable
Dialectical behavior therapy+Highly structured behavioral technique originally developed for borderline personality disorder
Self-help groups+Frequently considered very helpful by patients
Psychodynamic psychotherapy0“Recovered memory” approaches are frankly harmful
Eye movement desensitization and reprocessing (EMDR)0Dubious theoretical basis; no methodologically acceptable evidence for efficacy
0 No apparent efficacy
+ Occasional effect; limited evidence
++ Clear effect; good evidence from controlled trial(s)
+++ Strongly documented effect; evidence from multiple controlled trials.

Psychotherapy

Cognitive-behavioral therapy. CBT—given either individually or in groups—is the most effective psychotherapy for bulimia (Table 3).19 CBT typically involves 3 to 6 months of helping the patient focus on her bulimic behaviors and on specific attitudes—such as unrealistic preoccupations with being “too fat”—that perpetuate the behaviors.

In practice, unfortunately, few bulimic patients are offered CBT, perhaps because few clinicians are trained in the specific approach used for bulimia nervosa.19 If you are not trained in using CBT for bulimia and do not have access to colleagues who offer this treatment, you may begin with medication plus simple behavioral treatments, such as:

  • offering supportive therapy in the office
  • referring patients to self-help groups for persons with eating disorders.

If this strategy fails, encourage patients to consider CBT—even if they must travel some distance to obtain it.

Other specialized psychotherapies. Dialectical behavior therapy and interpersonal psychotherapy appear to be effective in bulimia. Again, however, clinicians who lack training in these techniques or access to local experts may be unable to offer them. Psychodynamic therapy does not appear to offer greater benefit in bulimia nervosa than ordinary supportive counseling.

Dubious therapies. One psychodynamic approach—regrettably still practiced—is “recovered memory therapy.” Therapists who use it claim that childhood sexual abuse or other trauma can cause bulimic symptoms but patients have repressed the memory of these events.20

No methodologically sound evidence has shown that childhood sexual abuse can cause bulimia nervosa years or decades later.21 Nor is there acceptable evidence that people can repress the memory of a traumatic experience.22 Therapists administering recovered memory therapy have been subjected to malpractice judgments totaling tens of millions of dollars from suits filed by patients who eventually realized that so-called “recovered” memories were false.23

Another dubious therapy—eye movement desensitization and reprocessing (EMDR)—also may involve attempts to “recover” memories of putative traumatic events.24 No methodologically sound evidence has shown that EMDR is effective in bulimic patients, and the technique’s theoretical basis is questionable.24,25

Related resources

Drug brand names

  • Bupropion • Wellbutrin
  • Citalopram • Celexa
  • Desipramine • Norpramin
  • Fluoxetine • Prozac
  • Lithium • Lithobid, Eskalith
  • Nortriptyline • Pamelor, Aventyl
  • Sertraline • Zoloft
  • Topiramate • Topamax
  • Trazodone • Desyrel
  • Liothyronine • Cytomel
  • Venlafaxine • Effexor

Disclosure

Dr. Pope receives research support from Ortho-McNeil Pharmaceuticals and is a consultant to Solvay Pharmaceuticals and Auxilium Pharmaceuticals.

 

 

Dr. Hudson receives research support from and is a consultant to Eli Lilly & Co. and Ortho-McNeil Pharmaceuticals.

References

1. Mehler PS. Clinical practice. Bulimia nervosa. N Engl J Med 2003;349(9):875-81.

2. American Psychiatric Association. Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (4th ed, text rev). Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Association,2000.

3. Fisher M. The course and outcome of eating disorders in adults and in adolescents: a review. Adolesc Med 2003;14(1):149-58.

4. Fairburn CG, Norman PA, Welch SL, et al. A prospective study of outcome in bulimia nervosa and the long-term effects of three psychological treatments. Arch Gen Psychiatry 1995;52(4):304-12.

5. Hudson JI, Pope HG, Jr, Yurgelun-Todd D, et al. A controlled study of lifetime prevalence of affective and other psychiatric disorders in bulimic outpatients. Am J Psychiatry 1987;144(10):1283-7.

6. Hudson JI, Pope HG, Jr. Affective spectrum disorder: does antidepressant response identify a family of disorders with a common pathophysiology? Am J Psychiatry 1990;147(5):552-64.

7. Hudson JI, Mangweth B, Pope HG, Jr, et al. Family study of affective spectrum disorder. Arch Gen Psychiatry 2003;60:170-7.

8. Hudson JI, Laird NM, Betensky RA, et al. Multivariate logistic regression for familial aggregation of two disorders: II. Analysis of studies of eating and mood disorders. Am J Epidemiology 2001;153(5):506-14.

9. Mangweth B, Hudson JI, Pope HG, Jr, et al. Family study of the aggregation of eating disorders and mood disorders. Psychol Med (in press).

10. Hudson JI, Pope HG, Jr, Carter WP. Pharmacologic therapy of bulimia nervosa. In: Goldstein D (ed). The management of eating disorders and obesity (2nd ed) Totowa, NJ: Humana Press, Inc.(in press).

11. Pope HG, Jr, Hudson JI, Nixon RA, Herridge PL. The epidemiology of ipecac abuse. N Engl J Med 1986;14(4):245-6.

12. Hay PJ, Bacaltchuk J. Psychotherapy for bulimia nervosa and binging. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2003;(1):CD000562.-

13. Bacaltchuk J, Hay P. Antidepressants versus placebo for people with bulimia nervosa. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2001;(4):CD003391.-

14. Crow S, Mussell MP, Peterson C, et al. Prior treatment received by patients with bulimia nervosa. Int J Eating Disord 1999;25(1):39-44.

15. Fluoxetine Bulimia Collaborative Study Group Fluoxetine in the treatment of bulimia nervosa: a multicenter placebo-controlled, double-blind trial. Arch Gen Psychiatry 1992;49:139-47.

16. Hoopes S, Reimherr F, Hedges D, et al. Part 1:Topiramate in the treatment of bulimia nervosa: a randomized, double-blind, placebocontrolled trial. J Clin Psychiatry (in press).

17. Horne RL, Ferguson JM, Pope HG, Jr, et al. Treatment of bulimia with bupropion: a controlled multi-center trial. J Clin Psychiatry 1988;49(7):262-6.

18. Pope HG, Jr, McElroy SL, Keck PE, Jr, Hudson JI. Long-term pharmacotherapy of bulimia nervosa. J Clin Psychopharmacol 1989;9(5):385-6.

19. Fairburn CG, Harrison PJ. Eating disorders. Lancet 2003;361(9355):407-16.

20. Pope HG, Jr, Hudson JI. “Recovered memory” therapy for eating disorders: implications of the Ramona verdict. Int J Eat Disord 1996;19(2):139-45.

21. Pope HG, Jr, Hudson JI. Does childhood sexual abuse cause adult psychiatric disorders? Essentials of methodology. J Psychiatry Law 1995;Fall:363-81.

22. Pope HG, Jr, Oliva PS, Hudson JI. Repressed memories. The scientific status of research on repressed memories. In: Faigman DL, Kaye DH, Saks MJ, Sanders J (eds). Science in the law: social and behavioral science issues St. Paul, MN: West Group, 2002;487-526.

23. Cannell J, Hudson JI, Pope HG, Jr. Standards for informed consent in recovered memory therapy. J Am Acad Psychiatry Law 2001;29(2):138-47.

24. Hudson JI, Chase EA, Pope HG, Jr. Eye movement desensitization and reprocessing in eating disorders: caution against premature acceptance. Int J Eat Disord 1998;23:1-5.

25. McNally RJ. EMDR and mesmerism: a comparative historical analysis. J Anxiety Disord 1999;13(1-2):225-36.

References

1. Mehler PS. Clinical practice. Bulimia nervosa. N Engl J Med 2003;349(9):875-81.

2. American Psychiatric Association. Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (4th ed, text rev). Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Association,2000.

3. Fisher M. The course and outcome of eating disorders in adults and in adolescents: a review. Adolesc Med 2003;14(1):149-58.

4. Fairburn CG, Norman PA, Welch SL, et al. A prospective study of outcome in bulimia nervosa and the long-term effects of three psychological treatments. Arch Gen Psychiatry 1995;52(4):304-12.

5. Hudson JI, Pope HG, Jr, Yurgelun-Todd D, et al. A controlled study of lifetime prevalence of affective and other psychiatric disorders in bulimic outpatients. Am J Psychiatry 1987;144(10):1283-7.

6. Hudson JI, Pope HG, Jr. Affective spectrum disorder: does antidepressant response identify a family of disorders with a common pathophysiology? Am J Psychiatry 1990;147(5):552-64.

7. Hudson JI, Mangweth B, Pope HG, Jr, et al. Family study of affective spectrum disorder. Arch Gen Psychiatry 2003;60:170-7.

8. Hudson JI, Laird NM, Betensky RA, et al. Multivariate logistic regression for familial aggregation of two disorders: II. Analysis of studies of eating and mood disorders. Am J Epidemiology 2001;153(5):506-14.

9. Mangweth B, Hudson JI, Pope HG, Jr, et al. Family study of the aggregation of eating disorders and mood disorders. Psychol Med (in press).

10. Hudson JI, Pope HG, Jr, Carter WP. Pharmacologic therapy of bulimia nervosa. In: Goldstein D (ed). The management of eating disorders and obesity (2nd ed) Totowa, NJ: Humana Press, Inc.(in press).

11. Pope HG, Jr, Hudson JI, Nixon RA, Herridge PL. The epidemiology of ipecac abuse. N Engl J Med 1986;14(4):245-6.

12. Hay PJ, Bacaltchuk J. Psychotherapy for bulimia nervosa and binging. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2003;(1):CD000562.-

13. Bacaltchuk J, Hay P. Antidepressants versus placebo for people with bulimia nervosa. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2001;(4):CD003391.-

14. Crow S, Mussell MP, Peterson C, et al. Prior treatment received by patients with bulimia nervosa. Int J Eating Disord 1999;25(1):39-44.

15. Fluoxetine Bulimia Collaborative Study Group Fluoxetine in the treatment of bulimia nervosa: a multicenter placebo-controlled, double-blind trial. Arch Gen Psychiatry 1992;49:139-47.

16. Hoopes S, Reimherr F, Hedges D, et al. Part 1:Topiramate in the treatment of bulimia nervosa: a randomized, double-blind, placebocontrolled trial. J Clin Psychiatry (in press).

17. Horne RL, Ferguson JM, Pope HG, Jr, et al. Treatment of bulimia with bupropion: a controlled multi-center trial. J Clin Psychiatry 1988;49(7):262-6.

18. Pope HG, Jr, McElroy SL, Keck PE, Jr, Hudson JI. Long-term pharmacotherapy of bulimia nervosa. J Clin Psychopharmacol 1989;9(5):385-6.

19. Fairburn CG, Harrison PJ. Eating disorders. Lancet 2003;361(9355):407-16.

20. Pope HG, Jr, Hudson JI. “Recovered memory” therapy for eating disorders: implications of the Ramona verdict. Int J Eat Disord 1996;19(2):139-45.

21. Pope HG, Jr, Hudson JI. Does childhood sexual abuse cause adult psychiatric disorders? Essentials of methodology. J Psychiatry Law 1995;Fall:363-81.

22. Pope HG, Jr, Oliva PS, Hudson JI. Repressed memories. The scientific status of research on repressed memories. In: Faigman DL, Kaye DH, Saks MJ, Sanders J (eds). Science in the law: social and behavioral science issues St. Paul, MN: West Group, 2002;487-526.

23. Cannell J, Hudson JI, Pope HG, Jr. Standards for informed consent in recovered memory therapy. J Am Acad Psychiatry Law 2001;29(2):138-47.

24. Hudson JI, Chase EA, Pope HG, Jr. Eye movement desensitization and reprocessing in eating disorders: caution against premature acceptance. Int J Eat Disord 1998;23:1-5.

25. McNally RJ. EMDR and mesmerism: a comparative historical analysis. J Anxiety Disord 1999;13(1-2):225-36.

Issue
Current Psychiatry - 03(01)
Issue
Current Psychiatry - 03(01)
Page Number
12-22
Page Number
12-22
Publications
Publications
Topics
Article Type
Display Headline
Update on eating disorders Bulimia nervosa: Persistent disorder requires equally persistent treatment
Display Headline
Update on eating disorders Bulimia nervosa: Persistent disorder requires equally persistent treatment
Sections
Article Source

PURLs Copyright

Inside the Article

Article PDF Media

Steroid abuse: a ‘hidden’ health hazard

Article Type
Changed
Tue, 12/11/2018 - 15:32
Display Headline
Steroid abuse: a ‘hidden’ health hazard

Initial visit: Road rage or ‘roid’ rage?

Mr. A, 25, was arrested after police interrupted an altercation between him and a senior citizen at a stoplight. He had emerged from his car, walked over to the older driver in front of him, ripped open the car door, and pulled the man out of the car and onto the street. He was still yelling at the victim when a passing officer intervened.

Mr. A was charged with assault. After a plea bargain, he was sentenced to probation and fined. He had been seeing his probation officer every 2 weeks, but his parents were worried about his erratic and sometimes defiant behavior and insisted he see a psychiatrist. He reluctantly agreed to one consultation, largely because his parents threatened to withhold financial support if he failed to do so.

The first thing the psychiatrist noticed was Mr. A’s striking muscular appearance. He was approximately 5 feet, 7 inches tall, weighed at least 200 pounds, and had a 30-inch waist and less than 10% body fat.

Dr. Carter’s and Pope’s observations

Mr. A’s diagnosis should be suspected immediately upon his entering the office. Extensive anabolic steroid use produces body changes that can be diagnosed almost at a glance. It is virtually impossible to achieve a level of muscle mass comparable to what Mr. A exhibited without the use of anabolic steroids.1

Remarkably, however, most people—including Mr. A’s parents, law enforcement personnel, and even some members of the treatment team—failed to diagnose Mr. A’s steroid use. He somehow convinced them that his extreme muscularity was the result of hard work, dedication, and scrupulous attention to diet. This suggests that steroid abuse cases involving serious violence—such as that of Mr. A—frequently go unreported and undiagnosed and are probably more common than we suspect.

Epidemiologic data suggest that clinicians should become familiar with the presentation of patients who are using anabolic steroids (Box).

Evaluation: ‘Stacking’ up

Mr. A at first vehemently denied that he had ever used anabolic steroids. After a more detailed conversation, during which the clinician demonstrated some knowledge of this area, Mr. A eventually conceded that he was taking a substantial weekly dose of the drugs at the time of the assault.

A subsequent clinical evaluation revealed that Mr. A had taken several ‘cycles’ (courses) of anabolic steroids over the last 2 to 3 years. Each cycle lasted 10 to 16 weeks and had been characterized by simultaneous use of two or more steroids, a practice known as ‘stacking.’

Mr. A started his first cycle with a modest ‘stack’ of drugs: testosterone cypionate, 200 mg twice a week, and stanozolol, 10 mg/d. Taken together, these dosages represented roughly 470 mg of testosterone equivalent per week—about 10 times the weekly secretion of testosterone in a normal male. He noticed no change in mood during this initial cycle.

With subsequent cycles, however, Mr. A became increasingly obsessed with his body image and used higher dosages. When the assault occurred, he was taking testosterone cypionate, 800 mg a week, nandrolone decanoate, 400 mg a week, and oxymetholone, 50 mg/d. With this regimen—the weekly equivalent of 1,550 mg of testosterone—Mr. A noticed prominent mood changes that met DSM-IV criteria for a manic episode. He experienced euphoria, dramatic irritability, limitless self-confidence, decreased need for sleep, distractibility, extreme recklessness (driving too fast, spending too freely), and some mildly paranoid ideation (without frank delusions). He admitted that he had twice assaulted his girlfriend and that he invariably became enraged at even the slightest annoyance when driving in traffic. He revealed that although the altercation with the older driver had led to his first arrest for ‘road rage,’ it was his third such incident.

The clinician warned Mr. A that continued steroid use could worsen his behavior—and lead to more serious trouble later on. Mr. A, however, said he was more afraid of losing muscle mass and becoming ‘small again.’ When the clinician mentioned that use of anabolic steroids without a prescription is illegal, Mr. A retorted that several of his friends had used the drugs without legal consequences.

Mr. A left the office showing no inclination to return for further treatment. The clinician could only offer to be available in the future.

Box

 

ANABOLIC STEROID ABUSE: BEYOND THE GYM

The National Household Survey on Drug Abuse, which last assessed anabolic steroid use in 1994, estimated that about 1 million Americans had used anabolic steroids at some point, with 30% of those reporting use within the previous year. Among subjects who reported use within the last 3 years, the ratio of males to females was about 13 to 1.2

Clearly, anabolic steroid abuse is no longer exclusive to professional football players and other elite male athletes. In fact, more people appear to be using anabolic steroids to improve their physiques, rather than to enhance athletic performance.3 Evidence points to increasing use by adolescents, with one survey reporting current or past use by 6.6% of male high school seniors.4

 

 

What medical sequelae await Mr. A if he continues to abuse steroids? How would you convince him to stay in treatment?

Dr. Carter’s and Pope’s observations

Mr. A’s path to mania has been well demonstrated in the literature. Hypomania or even frank manic syndromes, sometimes associated with violent behavior, are rare at weekly doses of 300 mg of testosterone equivalent. At weekly doses of >1,000 mg, psychiatric syndromes such as hypomania or mania may occur in almost one-half of cases.5

If he continues to abuse anabolic steroids, however, Mr. A could experience adverse physical reactions ranging from embarrassing acne and male-pattern baldness (Table 1) to rare and life-threatening hepatic effects such as cholestatic jaundice and peliosis hepatitis (blood-filled cysts in the liver).

Table 1

ANABOLIC STEROID ABUSE: COMMON PHYSICAL FINDINGS

 

  • Hypertrophic muscularity, disproportionately in upper torso
  • Acne on face, shoulders, and back
  • Male-pattern baldness
  • Testicular atrophy and gynecomastia in men
  • Clitoral enlargement, decreased breast size, hirsutism, and deepening of voice in women
Source: Adapted from Brower KJ. Anabolic steroid abuse and dependence. Curr Psychiatry Rep 2002;4:377-83.

The risk of atherosclerotic disease or prostate cancer later in life may also be greatly increased.

More common laboratory changes include:

 

  • increased red blood cell count, hemoglobin and hematocrit
  • elevated liver function readings (although these must not be confused with enzymes that originate from muscle tissue)
  • and unfavorable changes in triglycerides, total cholesterol, and HDL:LDL cholesterol ratios (Table 2).

Other potential laboratory changes with steroid abuse include decreased luteinizing hormone and follicle-stimulating hormone due to feedback inhibition. Feedback inhibition will also reduce testosterone and estradiol levels with use of anabolic steroids other than testosterone esters. These levels, however, would both be elevated with use of testosterone esters alone.

In men, testicular atrophy and decreased sperm count are generally reversible manifestations of steroid abuse, whereas gynecomastia may be irreversible and require surgical intervention in advanced cases.3,6 Women who use anabolic steroids (such as for body-building) are vulnerable to disrupted menstrual cycles, decreased breast size, and masculinizing effects including enlarged clitoris, hirsutism, and deepening of the voice.6

In adolescents, anabolic steroid use may cause premature closure of the epiphyses, leading to shortened stature.3

Unfortunately, warnings about these many adverse effects rarely deter anabolic steroid users such as Mr. A or persuade them to continue in treatment of any type. Most young anabolic steroid abusers report that they have never felt significant adverse effects from steroid use and know of no one who has experienced such effects. The dramatic muscle gains they have witnessed in themselves and in other users decisively outweigh what they perceive to be remote threats of adverse consequences.

Follow-up: Return to treatment

We didn’t hear from Mr. A until about 18 months later, when he unexpectedly requested a consultation.

Upon arrival, Mr. A exhibited major depression with prominent anhedonia, hypersomnia of 12 to 14 hours per night, loss of appetite, fatigue, prominent psychomotor retardation, feelings of guilt, difficulty concentrating, and suicidal thoughts (but without a frank plan). He also reported panic attacks that were randomly occurring each day, usually in public.

Mr. A conceded that he had experienced similar depressive episodes after stopping anabolic steroid use, but that they typically ran their course after 2 to 3 weeks. He said the present episode showed no sign of abating after nearly 2 months. He had attempted to ‘treat’ this episode by resuming anabolic steroid use, but he could not get an adequate supply from his dealer.

Mr. A’s total testosterone level, measured in the morning when it should be near its diurnal peak, was 127 ng/dl (normal range is 270 to 1,070 ng/dl). Physical examination revealed that his testicles had shrunk to the size of marbles (each approximately 5 mm in diameter). He was referred to an endocrinologist for evaluation and was simultaneously started on fluoxetine, 20 mg/d.

Table 2

LABORATORY ABNORMALITIES ASSOCIATED WITH ANABOLIC STEROID ABUSE

 

  • Elevated red blood cell count and hematocrit
  • Unfavorable lipid profile changes
  • Changes in LH, FSH, testosterone, and estradiol levels
  • Reduced sperm cell count
Source: Adapted from Brower KJ. Anabolic steroid abuse and dependence. Curr Psychiatry Rep 2002;4:377-83.

He returned 2 weeks later, exhibiting little improvement and wanting to resume steroids ‘because it was the only thing that really helped.’ Instead, he agreed to continue on fluoxetine and remain in follow-up. At 4 weeks, he noticed a decrease in panic attacks, return of normal mood, decreased anhedonia, and loss of suicidal ideation. He continued taking fluoxetine for another 3 months but then abruptly disappeared from treatment.

Mr. A resurfaced about 1 year later, revealing to the psychiatrist that he had taken yet another cycle of anabolic steroids, largely because he feared losing his muscle mass. His panic attacks had recurred almost immediately when he began tapering down from the peak of this cycle, and he agreed to resume taking fluoxetine.

 

 

A look at Mr. A’s extended history may provide clues to his persistent anabolic steroid abuse problem. He had displayed prominent symptoms of conduct disorder as a child. He had been truant from school, had occasionally run away from home, and had been involved in several misdemeanors. While in high school, he typically drank 10 to 12 beers over a weekend and had experimented with hallucinogenic mushrooms and 3,4-methylenedioxymethamphetamine (‘ecstasy’).

He started weightlifting while in high school and by age 17 was visiting the gym every day. He began college on a football scholarship but dropped out after 1 year. Starting in his early 20s, he competed in several bodybuilding contests.

Despite his impressive muscularity, Mr. A was anxious about his body appearance. He often would not take off his shirt—even when at the beach or a swimming pool—for fear that he would appear too small. He sometimes wore heavy sweatpants in the sweltering heat to conceal his legs. He also admitted spending as much as 2 hours a day examining himself in the mirror. ‘Sometimes when I get a bad (look at) myself, I will refuse to go out for the rest of the day,’ he said.

Mr. A has had a succession of girlfriends, but his rigid commitment to diet and exercise invariably ended these relationships.

At this point, would you first address Mr. A’s apparent substance use problem or the underlying body dysmorphic symptoms?

Dr. Carter’s and Pope’s observations

Two comorbidities noted here—substance abuse and body dysmorphic disorder—are common among anabolic steroid abusers. Addressing these problems, especially the body dysmorphic disorder, may sometimes help patients who are unwilling to address their steroid use directly. Body dysmorphic disorder may respond to selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors7 and cognitive-behavioral therapy.8

Anabolic steroids are not associated with immediate intoxicating effects, and ICD-10 categorizes them as substances not associated with dependence. After prolonged use at high doses, however, anabolic steroids are often associated with euphoria. Researchers also have found that some steroid abusers do meet DSM-IV criteria for substance dependence.6

Beyond the direct psychotropic effects of anabolic steroids, the depressive symptoms commonly seen during their withdrawal may perpetuate the dependence, as was the case with Mr. A. Most depressive symptoms that follow steroid cessation do not require drug therapy,3 but Mr. A developed severe and persistent depressive symptoms, complicated by panic disorder and body image concerns at a level diagnostic of body dysmorphic disorder. Such body image concerns often precipitate relapse into steroid use.

Conclusion: Another setback

As of this writing, Mr. A is again lost to follow-up. After taking fluoxetine and keeping monthly appointments for about 6 months, he failed to arrive for a visit and did not set another appointment. The patient may have once again stopped medication and embarked on yet another cycle of anabolic steroid use. If this is so, we can only hope that he returns to treatment before it is too late.

Related resource

  • Lukas SE. Steroids. Hillside, NJ: Enslow Publishers, 1994.

Drug brand names

 

  • Fluoxetine • Prozac
  • Nandrolone decanoate • Deca-Durabolin
  • Oxymetholone • Anadrol
  • Stanozolol • Winstrol

Disclosure

Dr. Carter reports that he receives research/grant support from or is a consultant to Eli Lilly and Co., Pfizer Inc., and Ortho-McNeil Pharmaceutical.

Dr. Pope reports no financial relationship with any company whose products are mentioned in this article, or with manufacturers of competing products.

References

 

1. Kouri E, Pope HG, Jr, Katz DL, Oliva P. Fat free mass index in users and non-users of anabolic-androgenic steroids. Clin J Sport Med 1995;5:223-8.

2. National Household Survey on Drug Abuse, 1994: http://www.icpsr.umich.edu.

3. Pope HG, Jr, Brower KJ. Anabolic-androgenic steroid abuse. In: Sadock BJ, Sadock VA (eds). Comprehensive textbook of psychiatry (7th ed). Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, 2000;1085-95.

4. Buckley WA, Yesalis CE, 3rd, Friedl KE, et al. Estimated prevalence of anabolic steroid use among male high school seniors. JAMA 1988;260(23):3441-5.

5. Pope HG, Jr, Katz DL. Psychiatric and medical effects of anabolic-androgenic steroid use. Arch Gen Psychiatry 1994;51:375-82.

6. Brower KJ. Anabolic steroid abuse and dependence. Curr Psychiatry Rep 2002;4:377-83.

7. Phillips KA. Pharmacologic treatment of body dysmorphic disorder: A review of empirical data and a proposed treatment algorithm. Psychiatr Clin North Am 2000;7:59-82.

8. Rosen JC, Reiter J, Orosan P. Cognitive/behavioral body image therapy for body dysmorphic disorder. J Consult Clin Psychol 1995;63:2639.-

Article PDF
Author and Disclosure Information

 

William P. Carter, MD
Instructor in psychiatry

Harrison G. Pope, Jr, MD
Professor of psychiatry

Harvard Medical School Boston, MA

Issue
Current Psychiatry - 02(02)
Publications
Topics
Page Number
65-71
Sections
Author and Disclosure Information

 

William P. Carter, MD
Instructor in psychiatry

Harrison G. Pope, Jr, MD
Professor of psychiatry

Harvard Medical School Boston, MA

Author and Disclosure Information

 

William P. Carter, MD
Instructor in psychiatry

Harrison G. Pope, Jr, MD
Professor of psychiatry

Harvard Medical School Boston, MA

Article PDF
Article PDF

Initial visit: Road rage or ‘roid’ rage?

Mr. A, 25, was arrested after police interrupted an altercation between him and a senior citizen at a stoplight. He had emerged from his car, walked over to the older driver in front of him, ripped open the car door, and pulled the man out of the car and onto the street. He was still yelling at the victim when a passing officer intervened.

Mr. A was charged with assault. After a plea bargain, he was sentenced to probation and fined. He had been seeing his probation officer every 2 weeks, but his parents were worried about his erratic and sometimes defiant behavior and insisted he see a psychiatrist. He reluctantly agreed to one consultation, largely because his parents threatened to withhold financial support if he failed to do so.

The first thing the psychiatrist noticed was Mr. A’s striking muscular appearance. He was approximately 5 feet, 7 inches tall, weighed at least 200 pounds, and had a 30-inch waist and less than 10% body fat.

Dr. Carter’s and Pope’s observations

Mr. A’s diagnosis should be suspected immediately upon his entering the office. Extensive anabolic steroid use produces body changes that can be diagnosed almost at a glance. It is virtually impossible to achieve a level of muscle mass comparable to what Mr. A exhibited without the use of anabolic steroids.1

Remarkably, however, most people—including Mr. A’s parents, law enforcement personnel, and even some members of the treatment team—failed to diagnose Mr. A’s steroid use. He somehow convinced them that his extreme muscularity was the result of hard work, dedication, and scrupulous attention to diet. This suggests that steroid abuse cases involving serious violence—such as that of Mr. A—frequently go unreported and undiagnosed and are probably more common than we suspect.

Epidemiologic data suggest that clinicians should become familiar with the presentation of patients who are using anabolic steroids (Box).

Evaluation: ‘Stacking’ up

Mr. A at first vehemently denied that he had ever used anabolic steroids. After a more detailed conversation, during which the clinician demonstrated some knowledge of this area, Mr. A eventually conceded that he was taking a substantial weekly dose of the drugs at the time of the assault.

A subsequent clinical evaluation revealed that Mr. A had taken several ‘cycles’ (courses) of anabolic steroids over the last 2 to 3 years. Each cycle lasted 10 to 16 weeks and had been characterized by simultaneous use of two or more steroids, a practice known as ‘stacking.’

Mr. A started his first cycle with a modest ‘stack’ of drugs: testosterone cypionate, 200 mg twice a week, and stanozolol, 10 mg/d. Taken together, these dosages represented roughly 470 mg of testosterone equivalent per week—about 10 times the weekly secretion of testosterone in a normal male. He noticed no change in mood during this initial cycle.

With subsequent cycles, however, Mr. A became increasingly obsessed with his body image and used higher dosages. When the assault occurred, he was taking testosterone cypionate, 800 mg a week, nandrolone decanoate, 400 mg a week, and oxymetholone, 50 mg/d. With this regimen—the weekly equivalent of 1,550 mg of testosterone—Mr. A noticed prominent mood changes that met DSM-IV criteria for a manic episode. He experienced euphoria, dramatic irritability, limitless self-confidence, decreased need for sleep, distractibility, extreme recklessness (driving too fast, spending too freely), and some mildly paranoid ideation (without frank delusions). He admitted that he had twice assaulted his girlfriend and that he invariably became enraged at even the slightest annoyance when driving in traffic. He revealed that although the altercation with the older driver had led to his first arrest for ‘road rage,’ it was his third such incident.

The clinician warned Mr. A that continued steroid use could worsen his behavior—and lead to more serious trouble later on. Mr. A, however, said he was more afraid of losing muscle mass and becoming ‘small again.’ When the clinician mentioned that use of anabolic steroids without a prescription is illegal, Mr. A retorted that several of his friends had used the drugs without legal consequences.

Mr. A left the office showing no inclination to return for further treatment. The clinician could only offer to be available in the future.

Box

 

ANABOLIC STEROID ABUSE: BEYOND THE GYM

The National Household Survey on Drug Abuse, which last assessed anabolic steroid use in 1994, estimated that about 1 million Americans had used anabolic steroids at some point, with 30% of those reporting use within the previous year. Among subjects who reported use within the last 3 years, the ratio of males to females was about 13 to 1.2

Clearly, anabolic steroid abuse is no longer exclusive to professional football players and other elite male athletes. In fact, more people appear to be using anabolic steroids to improve their physiques, rather than to enhance athletic performance.3 Evidence points to increasing use by adolescents, with one survey reporting current or past use by 6.6% of male high school seniors.4

 

 

What medical sequelae await Mr. A if he continues to abuse steroids? How would you convince him to stay in treatment?

Dr. Carter’s and Pope’s observations

Mr. A’s path to mania has been well demonstrated in the literature. Hypomania or even frank manic syndromes, sometimes associated with violent behavior, are rare at weekly doses of 300 mg of testosterone equivalent. At weekly doses of >1,000 mg, psychiatric syndromes such as hypomania or mania may occur in almost one-half of cases.5

If he continues to abuse anabolic steroids, however, Mr. A could experience adverse physical reactions ranging from embarrassing acne and male-pattern baldness (Table 1) to rare and life-threatening hepatic effects such as cholestatic jaundice and peliosis hepatitis (blood-filled cysts in the liver).

Table 1

ANABOLIC STEROID ABUSE: COMMON PHYSICAL FINDINGS

 

  • Hypertrophic muscularity, disproportionately in upper torso
  • Acne on face, shoulders, and back
  • Male-pattern baldness
  • Testicular atrophy and gynecomastia in men
  • Clitoral enlargement, decreased breast size, hirsutism, and deepening of voice in women
Source: Adapted from Brower KJ. Anabolic steroid abuse and dependence. Curr Psychiatry Rep 2002;4:377-83.

The risk of atherosclerotic disease or prostate cancer later in life may also be greatly increased.

More common laboratory changes include:

 

  • increased red blood cell count, hemoglobin and hematocrit
  • elevated liver function readings (although these must not be confused with enzymes that originate from muscle tissue)
  • and unfavorable changes in triglycerides, total cholesterol, and HDL:LDL cholesterol ratios (Table 2).

Other potential laboratory changes with steroid abuse include decreased luteinizing hormone and follicle-stimulating hormone due to feedback inhibition. Feedback inhibition will also reduce testosterone and estradiol levels with use of anabolic steroids other than testosterone esters. These levels, however, would both be elevated with use of testosterone esters alone.

In men, testicular atrophy and decreased sperm count are generally reversible manifestations of steroid abuse, whereas gynecomastia may be irreversible and require surgical intervention in advanced cases.3,6 Women who use anabolic steroids (such as for body-building) are vulnerable to disrupted menstrual cycles, decreased breast size, and masculinizing effects including enlarged clitoris, hirsutism, and deepening of the voice.6

In adolescents, anabolic steroid use may cause premature closure of the epiphyses, leading to shortened stature.3

Unfortunately, warnings about these many adverse effects rarely deter anabolic steroid users such as Mr. A or persuade them to continue in treatment of any type. Most young anabolic steroid abusers report that they have never felt significant adverse effects from steroid use and know of no one who has experienced such effects. The dramatic muscle gains they have witnessed in themselves and in other users decisively outweigh what they perceive to be remote threats of adverse consequences.

Follow-up: Return to treatment

We didn’t hear from Mr. A until about 18 months later, when he unexpectedly requested a consultation.

Upon arrival, Mr. A exhibited major depression with prominent anhedonia, hypersomnia of 12 to 14 hours per night, loss of appetite, fatigue, prominent psychomotor retardation, feelings of guilt, difficulty concentrating, and suicidal thoughts (but without a frank plan). He also reported panic attacks that were randomly occurring each day, usually in public.

Mr. A conceded that he had experienced similar depressive episodes after stopping anabolic steroid use, but that they typically ran their course after 2 to 3 weeks. He said the present episode showed no sign of abating after nearly 2 months. He had attempted to ‘treat’ this episode by resuming anabolic steroid use, but he could not get an adequate supply from his dealer.

Mr. A’s total testosterone level, measured in the morning when it should be near its diurnal peak, was 127 ng/dl (normal range is 270 to 1,070 ng/dl). Physical examination revealed that his testicles had shrunk to the size of marbles (each approximately 5 mm in diameter). He was referred to an endocrinologist for evaluation and was simultaneously started on fluoxetine, 20 mg/d.

Table 2

LABORATORY ABNORMALITIES ASSOCIATED WITH ANABOLIC STEROID ABUSE

 

  • Elevated red blood cell count and hematocrit
  • Unfavorable lipid profile changes
  • Changes in LH, FSH, testosterone, and estradiol levels
  • Reduced sperm cell count
Source: Adapted from Brower KJ. Anabolic steroid abuse and dependence. Curr Psychiatry Rep 2002;4:377-83.

He returned 2 weeks later, exhibiting little improvement and wanting to resume steroids ‘because it was the only thing that really helped.’ Instead, he agreed to continue on fluoxetine and remain in follow-up. At 4 weeks, he noticed a decrease in panic attacks, return of normal mood, decreased anhedonia, and loss of suicidal ideation. He continued taking fluoxetine for another 3 months but then abruptly disappeared from treatment.

Mr. A resurfaced about 1 year later, revealing to the psychiatrist that he had taken yet another cycle of anabolic steroids, largely because he feared losing his muscle mass. His panic attacks had recurred almost immediately when he began tapering down from the peak of this cycle, and he agreed to resume taking fluoxetine.

 

 

A look at Mr. A’s extended history may provide clues to his persistent anabolic steroid abuse problem. He had displayed prominent symptoms of conduct disorder as a child. He had been truant from school, had occasionally run away from home, and had been involved in several misdemeanors. While in high school, he typically drank 10 to 12 beers over a weekend and had experimented with hallucinogenic mushrooms and 3,4-methylenedioxymethamphetamine (‘ecstasy’).

He started weightlifting while in high school and by age 17 was visiting the gym every day. He began college on a football scholarship but dropped out after 1 year. Starting in his early 20s, he competed in several bodybuilding contests.

Despite his impressive muscularity, Mr. A was anxious about his body appearance. He often would not take off his shirt—even when at the beach or a swimming pool—for fear that he would appear too small. He sometimes wore heavy sweatpants in the sweltering heat to conceal his legs. He also admitted spending as much as 2 hours a day examining himself in the mirror. ‘Sometimes when I get a bad (look at) myself, I will refuse to go out for the rest of the day,’ he said.

Mr. A has had a succession of girlfriends, but his rigid commitment to diet and exercise invariably ended these relationships.

At this point, would you first address Mr. A’s apparent substance use problem or the underlying body dysmorphic symptoms?

Dr. Carter’s and Pope’s observations

Two comorbidities noted here—substance abuse and body dysmorphic disorder—are common among anabolic steroid abusers. Addressing these problems, especially the body dysmorphic disorder, may sometimes help patients who are unwilling to address their steroid use directly. Body dysmorphic disorder may respond to selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors7 and cognitive-behavioral therapy.8

Anabolic steroids are not associated with immediate intoxicating effects, and ICD-10 categorizes them as substances not associated with dependence. After prolonged use at high doses, however, anabolic steroids are often associated with euphoria. Researchers also have found that some steroid abusers do meet DSM-IV criteria for substance dependence.6

Beyond the direct psychotropic effects of anabolic steroids, the depressive symptoms commonly seen during their withdrawal may perpetuate the dependence, as was the case with Mr. A. Most depressive symptoms that follow steroid cessation do not require drug therapy,3 but Mr. A developed severe and persistent depressive symptoms, complicated by panic disorder and body image concerns at a level diagnostic of body dysmorphic disorder. Such body image concerns often precipitate relapse into steroid use.

Conclusion: Another setback

As of this writing, Mr. A is again lost to follow-up. After taking fluoxetine and keeping monthly appointments for about 6 months, he failed to arrive for a visit and did not set another appointment. The patient may have once again stopped medication and embarked on yet another cycle of anabolic steroid use. If this is so, we can only hope that he returns to treatment before it is too late.

Related resource

  • Lukas SE. Steroids. Hillside, NJ: Enslow Publishers, 1994.

Drug brand names

 

  • Fluoxetine • Prozac
  • Nandrolone decanoate • Deca-Durabolin
  • Oxymetholone • Anadrol
  • Stanozolol • Winstrol

Disclosure

Dr. Carter reports that he receives research/grant support from or is a consultant to Eli Lilly and Co., Pfizer Inc., and Ortho-McNeil Pharmaceutical.

Dr. Pope reports no financial relationship with any company whose products are mentioned in this article, or with manufacturers of competing products.

Initial visit: Road rage or ‘roid’ rage?

Mr. A, 25, was arrested after police interrupted an altercation between him and a senior citizen at a stoplight. He had emerged from his car, walked over to the older driver in front of him, ripped open the car door, and pulled the man out of the car and onto the street. He was still yelling at the victim when a passing officer intervened.

Mr. A was charged with assault. After a plea bargain, he was sentenced to probation and fined. He had been seeing his probation officer every 2 weeks, but his parents were worried about his erratic and sometimes defiant behavior and insisted he see a psychiatrist. He reluctantly agreed to one consultation, largely because his parents threatened to withhold financial support if he failed to do so.

The first thing the psychiatrist noticed was Mr. A’s striking muscular appearance. He was approximately 5 feet, 7 inches tall, weighed at least 200 pounds, and had a 30-inch waist and less than 10% body fat.

Dr. Carter’s and Pope’s observations

Mr. A’s diagnosis should be suspected immediately upon his entering the office. Extensive anabolic steroid use produces body changes that can be diagnosed almost at a glance. It is virtually impossible to achieve a level of muscle mass comparable to what Mr. A exhibited without the use of anabolic steroids.1

Remarkably, however, most people—including Mr. A’s parents, law enforcement personnel, and even some members of the treatment team—failed to diagnose Mr. A’s steroid use. He somehow convinced them that his extreme muscularity was the result of hard work, dedication, and scrupulous attention to diet. This suggests that steroid abuse cases involving serious violence—such as that of Mr. A—frequently go unreported and undiagnosed and are probably more common than we suspect.

Epidemiologic data suggest that clinicians should become familiar with the presentation of patients who are using anabolic steroids (Box).

Evaluation: ‘Stacking’ up

Mr. A at first vehemently denied that he had ever used anabolic steroids. After a more detailed conversation, during which the clinician demonstrated some knowledge of this area, Mr. A eventually conceded that he was taking a substantial weekly dose of the drugs at the time of the assault.

A subsequent clinical evaluation revealed that Mr. A had taken several ‘cycles’ (courses) of anabolic steroids over the last 2 to 3 years. Each cycle lasted 10 to 16 weeks and had been characterized by simultaneous use of two or more steroids, a practice known as ‘stacking.’

Mr. A started his first cycle with a modest ‘stack’ of drugs: testosterone cypionate, 200 mg twice a week, and stanozolol, 10 mg/d. Taken together, these dosages represented roughly 470 mg of testosterone equivalent per week—about 10 times the weekly secretion of testosterone in a normal male. He noticed no change in mood during this initial cycle.

With subsequent cycles, however, Mr. A became increasingly obsessed with his body image and used higher dosages. When the assault occurred, he was taking testosterone cypionate, 800 mg a week, nandrolone decanoate, 400 mg a week, and oxymetholone, 50 mg/d. With this regimen—the weekly equivalent of 1,550 mg of testosterone—Mr. A noticed prominent mood changes that met DSM-IV criteria for a manic episode. He experienced euphoria, dramatic irritability, limitless self-confidence, decreased need for sleep, distractibility, extreme recklessness (driving too fast, spending too freely), and some mildly paranoid ideation (without frank delusions). He admitted that he had twice assaulted his girlfriend and that he invariably became enraged at even the slightest annoyance when driving in traffic. He revealed that although the altercation with the older driver had led to his first arrest for ‘road rage,’ it was his third such incident.

The clinician warned Mr. A that continued steroid use could worsen his behavior—and lead to more serious trouble later on. Mr. A, however, said he was more afraid of losing muscle mass and becoming ‘small again.’ When the clinician mentioned that use of anabolic steroids without a prescription is illegal, Mr. A retorted that several of his friends had used the drugs without legal consequences.

Mr. A left the office showing no inclination to return for further treatment. The clinician could only offer to be available in the future.

Box

 

ANABOLIC STEROID ABUSE: BEYOND THE GYM

The National Household Survey on Drug Abuse, which last assessed anabolic steroid use in 1994, estimated that about 1 million Americans had used anabolic steroids at some point, with 30% of those reporting use within the previous year. Among subjects who reported use within the last 3 years, the ratio of males to females was about 13 to 1.2

Clearly, anabolic steroid abuse is no longer exclusive to professional football players and other elite male athletes. In fact, more people appear to be using anabolic steroids to improve their physiques, rather than to enhance athletic performance.3 Evidence points to increasing use by adolescents, with one survey reporting current or past use by 6.6% of male high school seniors.4

 

 

What medical sequelae await Mr. A if he continues to abuse steroids? How would you convince him to stay in treatment?

Dr. Carter’s and Pope’s observations

Mr. A’s path to mania has been well demonstrated in the literature. Hypomania or even frank manic syndromes, sometimes associated with violent behavior, are rare at weekly doses of 300 mg of testosterone equivalent. At weekly doses of >1,000 mg, psychiatric syndromes such as hypomania or mania may occur in almost one-half of cases.5

If he continues to abuse anabolic steroids, however, Mr. A could experience adverse physical reactions ranging from embarrassing acne and male-pattern baldness (Table 1) to rare and life-threatening hepatic effects such as cholestatic jaundice and peliosis hepatitis (blood-filled cysts in the liver).

Table 1

ANABOLIC STEROID ABUSE: COMMON PHYSICAL FINDINGS

 

  • Hypertrophic muscularity, disproportionately in upper torso
  • Acne on face, shoulders, and back
  • Male-pattern baldness
  • Testicular atrophy and gynecomastia in men
  • Clitoral enlargement, decreased breast size, hirsutism, and deepening of voice in women
Source: Adapted from Brower KJ. Anabolic steroid abuse and dependence. Curr Psychiatry Rep 2002;4:377-83.

The risk of atherosclerotic disease or prostate cancer later in life may also be greatly increased.

More common laboratory changes include:

 

  • increased red blood cell count, hemoglobin and hematocrit
  • elevated liver function readings (although these must not be confused with enzymes that originate from muscle tissue)
  • and unfavorable changes in triglycerides, total cholesterol, and HDL:LDL cholesterol ratios (Table 2).

Other potential laboratory changes with steroid abuse include decreased luteinizing hormone and follicle-stimulating hormone due to feedback inhibition. Feedback inhibition will also reduce testosterone and estradiol levels with use of anabolic steroids other than testosterone esters. These levels, however, would both be elevated with use of testosterone esters alone.

In men, testicular atrophy and decreased sperm count are generally reversible manifestations of steroid abuse, whereas gynecomastia may be irreversible and require surgical intervention in advanced cases.3,6 Women who use anabolic steroids (such as for body-building) are vulnerable to disrupted menstrual cycles, decreased breast size, and masculinizing effects including enlarged clitoris, hirsutism, and deepening of the voice.6

In adolescents, anabolic steroid use may cause premature closure of the epiphyses, leading to shortened stature.3

Unfortunately, warnings about these many adverse effects rarely deter anabolic steroid users such as Mr. A or persuade them to continue in treatment of any type. Most young anabolic steroid abusers report that they have never felt significant adverse effects from steroid use and know of no one who has experienced such effects. The dramatic muscle gains they have witnessed in themselves and in other users decisively outweigh what they perceive to be remote threats of adverse consequences.

Follow-up: Return to treatment

We didn’t hear from Mr. A until about 18 months later, when he unexpectedly requested a consultation.

Upon arrival, Mr. A exhibited major depression with prominent anhedonia, hypersomnia of 12 to 14 hours per night, loss of appetite, fatigue, prominent psychomotor retardation, feelings of guilt, difficulty concentrating, and suicidal thoughts (but without a frank plan). He also reported panic attacks that were randomly occurring each day, usually in public.

Mr. A conceded that he had experienced similar depressive episodes after stopping anabolic steroid use, but that they typically ran their course after 2 to 3 weeks. He said the present episode showed no sign of abating after nearly 2 months. He had attempted to ‘treat’ this episode by resuming anabolic steroid use, but he could not get an adequate supply from his dealer.

Mr. A’s total testosterone level, measured in the morning when it should be near its diurnal peak, was 127 ng/dl (normal range is 270 to 1,070 ng/dl). Physical examination revealed that his testicles had shrunk to the size of marbles (each approximately 5 mm in diameter). He was referred to an endocrinologist for evaluation and was simultaneously started on fluoxetine, 20 mg/d.

Table 2

LABORATORY ABNORMALITIES ASSOCIATED WITH ANABOLIC STEROID ABUSE

 

  • Elevated red blood cell count and hematocrit
  • Unfavorable lipid profile changes
  • Changes in LH, FSH, testosterone, and estradiol levels
  • Reduced sperm cell count
Source: Adapted from Brower KJ. Anabolic steroid abuse and dependence. Curr Psychiatry Rep 2002;4:377-83.

He returned 2 weeks later, exhibiting little improvement and wanting to resume steroids ‘because it was the only thing that really helped.’ Instead, he agreed to continue on fluoxetine and remain in follow-up. At 4 weeks, he noticed a decrease in panic attacks, return of normal mood, decreased anhedonia, and loss of suicidal ideation. He continued taking fluoxetine for another 3 months but then abruptly disappeared from treatment.

Mr. A resurfaced about 1 year later, revealing to the psychiatrist that he had taken yet another cycle of anabolic steroids, largely because he feared losing his muscle mass. His panic attacks had recurred almost immediately when he began tapering down from the peak of this cycle, and he agreed to resume taking fluoxetine.

 

 

A look at Mr. A’s extended history may provide clues to his persistent anabolic steroid abuse problem. He had displayed prominent symptoms of conduct disorder as a child. He had been truant from school, had occasionally run away from home, and had been involved in several misdemeanors. While in high school, he typically drank 10 to 12 beers over a weekend and had experimented with hallucinogenic mushrooms and 3,4-methylenedioxymethamphetamine (‘ecstasy’).

He started weightlifting while in high school and by age 17 was visiting the gym every day. He began college on a football scholarship but dropped out after 1 year. Starting in his early 20s, he competed in several bodybuilding contests.

Despite his impressive muscularity, Mr. A was anxious about his body appearance. He often would not take off his shirt—even when at the beach or a swimming pool—for fear that he would appear too small. He sometimes wore heavy sweatpants in the sweltering heat to conceal his legs. He also admitted spending as much as 2 hours a day examining himself in the mirror. ‘Sometimes when I get a bad (look at) myself, I will refuse to go out for the rest of the day,’ he said.

Mr. A has had a succession of girlfriends, but his rigid commitment to diet and exercise invariably ended these relationships.

At this point, would you first address Mr. A’s apparent substance use problem or the underlying body dysmorphic symptoms?

Dr. Carter’s and Pope’s observations

Two comorbidities noted here—substance abuse and body dysmorphic disorder—are common among anabolic steroid abusers. Addressing these problems, especially the body dysmorphic disorder, may sometimes help patients who are unwilling to address their steroid use directly. Body dysmorphic disorder may respond to selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors7 and cognitive-behavioral therapy.8

Anabolic steroids are not associated with immediate intoxicating effects, and ICD-10 categorizes them as substances not associated with dependence. After prolonged use at high doses, however, anabolic steroids are often associated with euphoria. Researchers also have found that some steroid abusers do meet DSM-IV criteria for substance dependence.6

Beyond the direct psychotropic effects of anabolic steroids, the depressive symptoms commonly seen during their withdrawal may perpetuate the dependence, as was the case with Mr. A. Most depressive symptoms that follow steroid cessation do not require drug therapy,3 but Mr. A developed severe and persistent depressive symptoms, complicated by panic disorder and body image concerns at a level diagnostic of body dysmorphic disorder. Such body image concerns often precipitate relapse into steroid use.

Conclusion: Another setback

As of this writing, Mr. A is again lost to follow-up. After taking fluoxetine and keeping monthly appointments for about 6 months, he failed to arrive for a visit and did not set another appointment. The patient may have once again stopped medication and embarked on yet another cycle of anabolic steroid use. If this is so, we can only hope that he returns to treatment before it is too late.

Related resource

  • Lukas SE. Steroids. Hillside, NJ: Enslow Publishers, 1994.

Drug brand names

 

  • Fluoxetine • Prozac
  • Nandrolone decanoate • Deca-Durabolin
  • Oxymetholone • Anadrol
  • Stanozolol • Winstrol

Disclosure

Dr. Carter reports that he receives research/grant support from or is a consultant to Eli Lilly and Co., Pfizer Inc., and Ortho-McNeil Pharmaceutical.

Dr. Pope reports no financial relationship with any company whose products are mentioned in this article, or with manufacturers of competing products.

References

 

1. Kouri E, Pope HG, Jr, Katz DL, Oliva P. Fat free mass index in users and non-users of anabolic-androgenic steroids. Clin J Sport Med 1995;5:223-8.

2. National Household Survey on Drug Abuse, 1994: http://www.icpsr.umich.edu.

3. Pope HG, Jr, Brower KJ. Anabolic-androgenic steroid abuse. In: Sadock BJ, Sadock VA (eds). Comprehensive textbook of psychiatry (7th ed). Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, 2000;1085-95.

4. Buckley WA, Yesalis CE, 3rd, Friedl KE, et al. Estimated prevalence of anabolic steroid use among male high school seniors. JAMA 1988;260(23):3441-5.

5. Pope HG, Jr, Katz DL. Psychiatric and medical effects of anabolic-androgenic steroid use. Arch Gen Psychiatry 1994;51:375-82.

6. Brower KJ. Anabolic steroid abuse and dependence. Curr Psychiatry Rep 2002;4:377-83.

7. Phillips KA. Pharmacologic treatment of body dysmorphic disorder: A review of empirical data and a proposed treatment algorithm. Psychiatr Clin North Am 2000;7:59-82.

8. Rosen JC, Reiter J, Orosan P. Cognitive/behavioral body image therapy for body dysmorphic disorder. J Consult Clin Psychol 1995;63:2639.-

References

 

1. Kouri E, Pope HG, Jr, Katz DL, Oliva P. Fat free mass index in users and non-users of anabolic-androgenic steroids. Clin J Sport Med 1995;5:223-8.

2. National Household Survey on Drug Abuse, 1994: http://www.icpsr.umich.edu.

3. Pope HG, Jr, Brower KJ. Anabolic-androgenic steroid abuse. In: Sadock BJ, Sadock VA (eds). Comprehensive textbook of psychiatry (7th ed). Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, 2000;1085-95.

4. Buckley WA, Yesalis CE, 3rd, Friedl KE, et al. Estimated prevalence of anabolic steroid use among male high school seniors. JAMA 1988;260(23):3441-5.

5. Pope HG, Jr, Katz DL. Psychiatric and medical effects of anabolic-androgenic steroid use. Arch Gen Psychiatry 1994;51:375-82.

6. Brower KJ. Anabolic steroid abuse and dependence. Curr Psychiatry Rep 2002;4:377-83.

7. Phillips KA. Pharmacologic treatment of body dysmorphic disorder: A review of empirical data and a proposed treatment algorithm. Psychiatr Clin North Am 2000;7:59-82.

8. Rosen JC, Reiter J, Orosan P. Cognitive/behavioral body image therapy for body dysmorphic disorder. J Consult Clin Psychol 1995;63:2639.-

Issue
Current Psychiatry - 02(02)
Issue
Current Psychiatry - 02(02)
Page Number
65-71
Page Number
65-71
Publications
Publications
Topics
Article Type
Display Headline
Steroid abuse: a ‘hidden’ health hazard
Display Headline
Steroid abuse: a ‘hidden’ health hazard
Sections
PURLs Copyright

Disallow All Ads
Alternative CME
Use ProPublica
Article PDF Media

Steroid abuse: a ‘hidden’ health hazard

Article Type
Changed
Tue, 12/11/2018 - 15:32
Display Headline
Steroid abuse: a ‘hidden’ health hazard

Initial visit: Road rage or ‘roid’ rage?

Mr. A, 25, was arrested after police interrupted an altercation between him and a senior citizen at a stoplight. He had emerged from his car, walked over to the older driver in front of him, ripped open the car door, and pulled the man out of the car and onto the street. He was still yelling at the victim when a passing officer intervened.

Mr. A was charged with assault. After a plea bargain, he was sentenced to probation and fined. He had been seeing his probation officer every 2 weeks, but his parents were worried about his erratic and sometimes defiant behavior and insisted he see a psychiatrist. He reluctantly agreed to one consultation, largely because his parents threatened to withhold financial support if he failed to do so.

The first thing the psychiatrist noticed was Mr. A’s striking muscular appearance. He was approximately 5 feet, 7 inches tall, weighed at least 200 pounds, and had a 30-inch waist and less than 10% body fat.

Dr. Carter’s and Pope’s observations

Mr. A’s diagnosis should be suspected immediately upon his entering the office. Extensive anabolic steroid use produces body changes that can be diagnosed almost at a glance. It is virtually impossible to achieve a level of muscle mass comparable to what Mr. A exhibited without the use of anabolic steroids.1

Remarkably, however, most people—including Mr. A’s parents, law enforcement personnel, and even some members of the treatment team—failed to diagnose Mr. A’s steroid use. He somehow convinced them that his extreme muscularity was the result of hard work, dedication, and scrupulous attention to diet. This suggests that steroid abuse cases involving serious violence—such as that of Mr. A—frequently go unreported and undiagnosed and are probably more common than we suspect.

Epidemiologic data suggest that clinicians should become familiar with the presentation of patients who are using anabolic steroids (Box).

Evaluation: ‘Stacking’ up

Mr. A at first vehemently denied that he had ever used anabolic steroids. After a more detailed conversation, during which the clinician demonstrated some knowledge of this area, Mr. A eventually conceded that he was taking a substantial weekly dose of the drugs at the time of the assault.

A subsequent clinical evaluation revealed that Mr. A had taken several ‘cycles’ (courses) of anabolic steroids over the last 2 to 3 years. Each cycle lasted 10 to 16 weeks and had been characterized by simultaneous use of two or more steroids, a practice known as ‘stacking.’

Mr. A started his first cycle with a modest ‘stack’ of drugs: testosterone cypionate, 200 mg twice a week, and stanozolol, 10 mg/d. Taken together, these dosages represented roughly 470 mg of testosterone equivalent per week—about 10 times the weekly secretion of testosterone in a normal male. He noticed no change in mood during this initial cycle.

With subsequent cycles, however, Mr. A became increasingly obsessed with his body image and used higher dosages. When the assault occurred, he was taking testosterone cypionate, 800 mg a week, nandrolone decanoate, 400 mg a week, and oxymetholone, 50 mg/d. With this regimen—the weekly equivalent of 1,550 mg of testosterone—Mr. A noticed prominent mood changes that met DSM-IV criteria for a manic episode. He experienced euphoria, dramatic irritability, limitless self-confidence, decreased need for sleep, distractibility, extreme recklessness (driving too fast, spending too freely), and some mildly paranoid ideation (without frank delusions). He admitted that he had twice assaulted his girlfriend and that he invariably became enraged at even the slightest annoyance when driving in traffic. He revealed that although the altercation with the older driver had led to his first arrest for ‘road rage,’ it was his third such incident.

The clinician warned Mr. A that continued steroid use could worsen his behavior—and lead to more serious trouble later on. Mr. A, however, said he was more afraid of losing muscle mass and becoming ‘small again.’ When the clinician mentioned that use of anabolic steroids without a prescription is illegal, Mr. A retorted that several of his friends had used the drugs without legal consequences.

Mr. A left the office showing no inclination to return for further treatment. The clinician could only offer to be available in the future.

Box

 

ANABOLIC STEROID ABUSE: BEYOND THE GYM

The National Household Survey on Drug Abuse, which last assessed anabolic steroid use in 1994, estimated that about 1 million Americans had used anabolic steroids at some point, with 30% of those reporting use within the previous year. Among subjects who reported use within the last 3 years, the ratio of males to females was about 13 to 1.2

Clearly, anabolic steroid abuse is no longer exclusive to professional football players and other elite male athletes. In fact, more people appear to be using anabolic steroids to improve their physiques, rather than to enhance athletic performance.3 Evidence points to increasing use by adolescents, with one survey reporting current or past use by 6.6% of male high school seniors.4

 

 

What medical sequelae await Mr. A if he continues to abuse steroids? How would you convince him to stay in treatment?

Dr. Carter’s and Pope’s observations

Mr. A’s path to mania has been well demonstrated in the literature. Hypomania or even frank manic syndromes, sometimes associated with violent behavior, are rare at weekly doses of 300 mg of testosterone equivalent. At weekly doses of >1,000 mg, psychiatric syndromes such as hypomania or mania may occur in almost one-half of cases.5

If he continues to abuse anabolic steroids, however, Mr. A could experience adverse physical reactions ranging from embarrassing acne and male-pattern baldness (Table 1) to rare and life-threatening hepatic effects such as cholestatic jaundice and peliosis hepatitis (blood-filled cysts in the liver).

Table 1

ANABOLIC STEROID ABUSE: COMMON PHYSICAL FINDINGS

 

  • Hypertrophic muscularity, disproportionately in upper torso
  • Acne on face, shoulders, and back
  • Male-pattern baldness
  • Testicular atrophy and gynecomastia in men
  • Clitoral enlargement, decreased breast size, hirsutism, and deepening of voice in women
Source: Adapted from Brower KJ. Anabolic steroid abuse and dependence. Curr Psychiatry Rep 2002;4:377-83.

The risk of atherosclerotic disease or prostate cancer later in life may also be greatly increased.

More common laboratory changes include:

 

  • increased red blood cell count, hemoglobin and hematocrit
  • elevated liver function readings (although these must not be confused with enzymes that originate from muscle tissue)
  • and unfavorable changes in triglycerides, total cholesterol, and HDL:LDL cholesterol ratios (Table 2).

Other potential laboratory changes with steroid abuse include decreased luteinizing hormone and follicle-stimulating hormone due to feedback inhibition. Feedback inhibition will also reduce testosterone and estradiol levels with use of anabolic steroids other than testosterone esters. These levels, however, would both be elevated with use of testosterone esters alone.

In men, testicular atrophy and decreased sperm count are generally reversible manifestations of steroid abuse, whereas gynecomastia may be irreversible and require surgical intervention in advanced cases.3,6 Women who use anabolic steroids (such as for body-building) are vulnerable to disrupted menstrual cycles, decreased breast size, and masculinizing effects including enlarged clitoris, hirsutism, and deepening of the voice.6

In adolescents, anabolic steroid use may cause premature closure of the epiphyses, leading to shortened stature.3

Unfortunately, warnings about these many adverse effects rarely deter anabolic steroid users such as Mr. A or persuade them to continue in treatment of any type. Most young anabolic steroid abusers report that they have never felt significant adverse effects from steroid use and know of no one who has experienced such effects. The dramatic muscle gains they have witnessed in themselves and in other users decisively outweigh what they perceive to be remote threats of adverse consequences.

Follow-up: Return to treatment

We didn’t hear from Mr. A until about 18 months later, when he unexpectedly requested a consultation.

Upon arrival, Mr. A exhibited major depression with prominent anhedonia, hypersomnia of 12 to 14 hours per night, loss of appetite, fatigue, prominent psychomotor retardation, feelings of guilt, difficulty concentrating, and suicidal thoughts (but without a frank plan). He also reported panic attacks that were randomly occurring each day, usually in public.

Mr. A conceded that he had experienced similar depressive episodes after stopping anabolic steroid use, but that they typically ran their course after 2 to 3 weeks. He said the present episode showed no sign of abating after nearly 2 months. He had attempted to ‘treat’ this episode by resuming anabolic steroid use, but he could not get an adequate supply from his dealer.

Mr. A’s total testosterone level, measured in the morning when it should be near its diurnal peak, was 127 ng/dl (normal range is 270 to 1,070 ng/dl). Physical examination revealed that his testicles had shrunk to the size of marbles (each approximately 5 mm in diameter). He was referred to an endocrinologist for evaluation and was simultaneously started on fluoxetine, 20 mg/d.

Table 2

LABORATORY ABNORMALITIES ASSOCIATED WITH ANABOLIC STEROID ABUSE

 

  • Elevated red blood cell count and hematocrit
  • Unfavorable lipid profile changes
  • Changes in LH, FSH, testosterone, and estradiol levels
  • Reduced sperm cell count
Source: Adapted from Brower KJ. Anabolic steroid abuse and dependence. Curr Psychiatry Rep 2002;4:377-83.

He returned 2 weeks later, exhibiting little improvement and wanting to resume steroids ‘because it was the only thing that really helped.’ Instead, he agreed to continue on fluoxetine and remain in follow-up. At 4 weeks, he noticed a decrease in panic attacks, return of normal mood, decreased anhedonia, and loss of suicidal ideation. He continued taking fluoxetine for another 3 months but then abruptly disappeared from treatment.

Mr. A resurfaced about 1 year later, revealing to the psychiatrist that he had taken yet another cycle of anabolic steroids, largely because he feared losing his muscle mass. His panic attacks had recurred almost immediately when he began tapering down from the peak of this cycle, and he agreed to resume taking fluoxetine.

 

 

A look at Mr. A’s extended history may provide clues to his persistent anabolic steroid abuse problem. He had displayed prominent symptoms of conduct disorder as a child. He had been truant from school, had occasionally run away from home, and had been involved in several misdemeanors. While in high school, he typically drank 10 to 12 beers over a weekend and had experimented with hallucinogenic mushrooms and 3,4-methylenedioxymethamphetamine (‘ecstasy’).

He started weightlifting while in high school and by age 17 was visiting the gym every day. He began college on a football scholarship but dropped out after 1 year. Starting in his early 20s, he competed in several bodybuilding contests.

Despite his impressive muscularity, Mr. A was anxious about his body appearance. He often would not take off his shirt—even when at the beach or a swimming pool—for fear that he would appear too small. He sometimes wore heavy sweatpants in the sweltering heat to conceal his legs. He also admitted spending as much as 2 hours a day examining himself in the mirror. ‘Sometimes when I get a bad (look at) myself, I will refuse to go out for the rest of the day,’ he said.

Mr. A has had a succession of girlfriends, but his rigid commitment to diet and exercise invariably ended these relationships.

At this point, would you first address Mr. A’s apparent substance use problem or the underlying body dysmorphic symptoms?

Dr. Carter’s and Pope’s observations

Two comorbidities noted here—substance abuse and body dysmorphic disorder—are common among anabolic steroid abusers. Addressing these problems, especially the body dysmorphic disorder, may sometimes help patients who are unwilling to address their steroid use directly. Body dysmorphic disorder may respond to selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors7 and cognitive-behavioral therapy.8

Anabolic steroids are not associated with immediate intoxicating effects, and ICD-10 categorizes them as substances not associated with dependence. After prolonged use at high doses, however, anabolic steroids are often associated with euphoria. Researchers also have found that some steroid abusers do meet DSM-IV criteria for substance dependence.6

Beyond the direct psychotropic effects of anabolic steroids, the depressive symptoms commonly seen during their withdrawal may perpetuate the dependence, as was the case with Mr. A. Most depressive symptoms that follow steroid cessation do not require drug therapy,3 but Mr. A developed severe and persistent depressive symptoms, complicated by panic disorder and body image concerns at a level diagnostic of body dysmorphic disorder. Such body image concerns often precipitate relapse into steroid use.

Conclusion: Another setback

As of this writing, Mr. A is again lost to follow-up. After taking fluoxetine and keeping monthly appointments for about 6 months, he failed to arrive for a visit and did not set another appointment. The patient may have once again stopped medication and embarked on yet another cycle of anabolic steroid use. If this is so, we can only hope that he returns to treatment before it is too late.

Related resources

Drug brand names

 

  • Fluoxetine • Prozac
  • Nandrolone decanoate • Deca-Durabolin
  • Oxymetholone • Anadrol
  • Stanozolol • Winstrol

Disclosure

Dr. Carter reports that he receives research/grant support from or is a consultant to Eli Lilly and Co., Pfizer Inc., and Ortho-McNeil Pharmaceutical.

Dr. Pope reports no financial relationship with any company whose products are mentioned in this article, or with manufacturers of competing products.

References

 

1. Kouri E, Pope HG, Jr, Katz DL, Oliva P. Fat free mass index in users and non-users of anabolic-androgenic steroids. Clin J Sport Med 1995;5:223-8.

2. National Household Survey on Drug Abuse, 1994: http://www.icpsr.umich.edu.

3. Pope HG, Jr, Brower KJ. Anabolic-androgenic steroid abuse. In: Sadock BJ, Sadock VA (eds). Comprehensive textbook of psychiatry (7th ed). Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, 2000;1085-95.

4. Buckley WA, Yesalis CE, 3rd, Friedl KE, et al. Estimated prevalence of anabolic steroid use among male high school seniors. JAMA 1988;260(23):3441-5.

5. Pope HG, Jr, Katz DL. Psychiatric and medical effects of anabolic-androgenic steroid use. Arch Gen Psychiatry 1994;51:375-82.

6. Brower KJ. Anabolic steroid abuse and dependence. Curr Psychiatry Rep 2002;4:377-83.

7. Phillips KA. Pharmacologic treatment of body dysmorphic disorder: A review of empirical data and a proposed treatment algorithm. Psychiatr Clin North Am 2000;7:59-82.

8. Rosen JC, Reiter J, Orosan P. Cognitive/behavioral body image therapy for body dysmorphic disorder. J Consult Clin Psychol 1995;63:2639.-

Article PDF
Author and Disclosure Information

 

William P. Carter, MD
Instructor in psychiatry

Harrison G. Pope, Jr, MD
Professor of psychiatry

Harvard Medical School Boston, MA

Issue
Current Psychiatry - 02(02)
Publications
Topics
Page Number
65-71
Sections
Author and Disclosure Information

 

William P. Carter, MD
Instructor in psychiatry

Harrison G. Pope, Jr, MD
Professor of psychiatry

Harvard Medical School Boston, MA

Author and Disclosure Information

 

William P. Carter, MD
Instructor in psychiatry

Harrison G. Pope, Jr, MD
Professor of psychiatry

Harvard Medical School Boston, MA

Article PDF
Article PDF

Initial visit: Road rage or ‘roid’ rage?

Mr. A, 25, was arrested after police interrupted an altercation between him and a senior citizen at a stoplight. He had emerged from his car, walked over to the older driver in front of him, ripped open the car door, and pulled the man out of the car and onto the street. He was still yelling at the victim when a passing officer intervened.

Mr. A was charged with assault. After a plea bargain, he was sentenced to probation and fined. He had been seeing his probation officer every 2 weeks, but his parents were worried about his erratic and sometimes defiant behavior and insisted he see a psychiatrist. He reluctantly agreed to one consultation, largely because his parents threatened to withhold financial support if he failed to do so.

The first thing the psychiatrist noticed was Mr. A’s striking muscular appearance. He was approximately 5 feet, 7 inches tall, weighed at least 200 pounds, and had a 30-inch waist and less than 10% body fat.

Dr. Carter’s and Pope’s observations

Mr. A’s diagnosis should be suspected immediately upon his entering the office. Extensive anabolic steroid use produces body changes that can be diagnosed almost at a glance. It is virtually impossible to achieve a level of muscle mass comparable to what Mr. A exhibited without the use of anabolic steroids.1

Remarkably, however, most people—including Mr. A’s parents, law enforcement personnel, and even some members of the treatment team—failed to diagnose Mr. A’s steroid use. He somehow convinced them that his extreme muscularity was the result of hard work, dedication, and scrupulous attention to diet. This suggests that steroid abuse cases involving serious violence—such as that of Mr. A—frequently go unreported and undiagnosed and are probably more common than we suspect.

Epidemiologic data suggest that clinicians should become familiar with the presentation of patients who are using anabolic steroids (Box).

Evaluation: ‘Stacking’ up

Mr. A at first vehemently denied that he had ever used anabolic steroids. After a more detailed conversation, during which the clinician demonstrated some knowledge of this area, Mr. A eventually conceded that he was taking a substantial weekly dose of the drugs at the time of the assault.

A subsequent clinical evaluation revealed that Mr. A had taken several ‘cycles’ (courses) of anabolic steroids over the last 2 to 3 years. Each cycle lasted 10 to 16 weeks and had been characterized by simultaneous use of two or more steroids, a practice known as ‘stacking.’

Mr. A started his first cycle with a modest ‘stack’ of drugs: testosterone cypionate, 200 mg twice a week, and stanozolol, 10 mg/d. Taken together, these dosages represented roughly 470 mg of testosterone equivalent per week—about 10 times the weekly secretion of testosterone in a normal male. He noticed no change in mood during this initial cycle.

With subsequent cycles, however, Mr. A became increasingly obsessed with his body image and used higher dosages. When the assault occurred, he was taking testosterone cypionate, 800 mg a week, nandrolone decanoate, 400 mg a week, and oxymetholone, 50 mg/d. With this regimen—the weekly equivalent of 1,550 mg of testosterone—Mr. A noticed prominent mood changes that met DSM-IV criteria for a manic episode. He experienced euphoria, dramatic irritability, limitless self-confidence, decreased need for sleep, distractibility, extreme recklessness (driving too fast, spending too freely), and some mildly paranoid ideation (without frank delusions). He admitted that he had twice assaulted his girlfriend and that he invariably became enraged at even the slightest annoyance when driving in traffic. He revealed that although the altercation with the older driver had led to his first arrest for ‘road rage,’ it was his third such incident.

The clinician warned Mr. A that continued steroid use could worsen his behavior—and lead to more serious trouble later on. Mr. A, however, said he was more afraid of losing muscle mass and becoming ‘small again.’ When the clinician mentioned that use of anabolic steroids without a prescription is illegal, Mr. A retorted that several of his friends had used the drugs without legal consequences.

Mr. A left the office showing no inclination to return for further treatment. The clinician could only offer to be available in the future.

Box

 

ANABOLIC STEROID ABUSE: BEYOND THE GYM

The National Household Survey on Drug Abuse, which last assessed anabolic steroid use in 1994, estimated that about 1 million Americans had used anabolic steroids at some point, with 30% of those reporting use within the previous year. Among subjects who reported use within the last 3 years, the ratio of males to females was about 13 to 1.2

Clearly, anabolic steroid abuse is no longer exclusive to professional football players and other elite male athletes. In fact, more people appear to be using anabolic steroids to improve their physiques, rather than to enhance athletic performance.3 Evidence points to increasing use by adolescents, with one survey reporting current or past use by 6.6% of male high school seniors.4

 

 

What medical sequelae await Mr. A if he continues to abuse steroids? How would you convince him to stay in treatment?

Dr. Carter’s and Pope’s observations

Mr. A’s path to mania has been well demonstrated in the literature. Hypomania or even frank manic syndromes, sometimes associated with violent behavior, are rare at weekly doses of 300 mg of testosterone equivalent. At weekly doses of >1,000 mg, psychiatric syndromes such as hypomania or mania may occur in almost one-half of cases.5

If he continues to abuse anabolic steroids, however, Mr. A could experience adverse physical reactions ranging from embarrassing acne and male-pattern baldness (Table 1) to rare and life-threatening hepatic effects such as cholestatic jaundice and peliosis hepatitis (blood-filled cysts in the liver).

Table 1

ANABOLIC STEROID ABUSE: COMMON PHYSICAL FINDINGS

 

  • Hypertrophic muscularity, disproportionately in upper torso
  • Acne on face, shoulders, and back
  • Male-pattern baldness
  • Testicular atrophy and gynecomastia in men
  • Clitoral enlargement, decreased breast size, hirsutism, and deepening of voice in women
Source: Adapted from Brower KJ. Anabolic steroid abuse and dependence. Curr Psychiatry Rep 2002;4:377-83.

The risk of atherosclerotic disease or prostate cancer later in life may also be greatly increased.

More common laboratory changes include:

 

  • increased red blood cell count, hemoglobin and hematocrit
  • elevated liver function readings (although these must not be confused with enzymes that originate from muscle tissue)
  • and unfavorable changes in triglycerides, total cholesterol, and HDL:LDL cholesterol ratios (Table 2).

Other potential laboratory changes with steroid abuse include decreased luteinizing hormone and follicle-stimulating hormone due to feedback inhibition. Feedback inhibition will also reduce testosterone and estradiol levels with use of anabolic steroids other than testosterone esters. These levels, however, would both be elevated with use of testosterone esters alone.

In men, testicular atrophy and decreased sperm count are generally reversible manifestations of steroid abuse, whereas gynecomastia may be irreversible and require surgical intervention in advanced cases.3,6 Women who use anabolic steroids (such as for body-building) are vulnerable to disrupted menstrual cycles, decreased breast size, and masculinizing effects including enlarged clitoris, hirsutism, and deepening of the voice.6

In adolescents, anabolic steroid use may cause premature closure of the epiphyses, leading to shortened stature.3

Unfortunately, warnings about these many adverse effects rarely deter anabolic steroid users such as Mr. A or persuade them to continue in treatment of any type. Most young anabolic steroid abusers report that they have never felt significant adverse effects from steroid use and know of no one who has experienced such effects. The dramatic muscle gains they have witnessed in themselves and in other users decisively outweigh what they perceive to be remote threats of adverse consequences.

Follow-up: Return to treatment

We didn’t hear from Mr. A until about 18 months later, when he unexpectedly requested a consultation.

Upon arrival, Mr. A exhibited major depression with prominent anhedonia, hypersomnia of 12 to 14 hours per night, loss of appetite, fatigue, prominent psychomotor retardation, feelings of guilt, difficulty concentrating, and suicidal thoughts (but without a frank plan). He also reported panic attacks that were randomly occurring each day, usually in public.

Mr. A conceded that he had experienced similar depressive episodes after stopping anabolic steroid use, but that they typically ran their course after 2 to 3 weeks. He said the present episode showed no sign of abating after nearly 2 months. He had attempted to ‘treat’ this episode by resuming anabolic steroid use, but he could not get an adequate supply from his dealer.

Mr. A’s total testosterone level, measured in the morning when it should be near its diurnal peak, was 127 ng/dl (normal range is 270 to 1,070 ng/dl). Physical examination revealed that his testicles had shrunk to the size of marbles (each approximately 5 mm in diameter). He was referred to an endocrinologist for evaluation and was simultaneously started on fluoxetine, 20 mg/d.

Table 2

LABORATORY ABNORMALITIES ASSOCIATED WITH ANABOLIC STEROID ABUSE

 

  • Elevated red blood cell count and hematocrit
  • Unfavorable lipid profile changes
  • Changes in LH, FSH, testosterone, and estradiol levels
  • Reduced sperm cell count
Source: Adapted from Brower KJ. Anabolic steroid abuse and dependence. Curr Psychiatry Rep 2002;4:377-83.

He returned 2 weeks later, exhibiting little improvement and wanting to resume steroids ‘because it was the only thing that really helped.’ Instead, he agreed to continue on fluoxetine and remain in follow-up. At 4 weeks, he noticed a decrease in panic attacks, return of normal mood, decreased anhedonia, and loss of suicidal ideation. He continued taking fluoxetine for another 3 months but then abruptly disappeared from treatment.

Mr. A resurfaced about 1 year later, revealing to the psychiatrist that he had taken yet another cycle of anabolic steroids, largely because he feared losing his muscle mass. His panic attacks had recurred almost immediately when he began tapering down from the peak of this cycle, and he agreed to resume taking fluoxetine.

 

 

A look at Mr. A’s extended history may provide clues to his persistent anabolic steroid abuse problem. He had displayed prominent symptoms of conduct disorder as a child. He had been truant from school, had occasionally run away from home, and had been involved in several misdemeanors. While in high school, he typically drank 10 to 12 beers over a weekend and had experimented with hallucinogenic mushrooms and 3,4-methylenedioxymethamphetamine (‘ecstasy’).

He started weightlifting while in high school and by age 17 was visiting the gym every day. He began college on a football scholarship but dropped out after 1 year. Starting in his early 20s, he competed in several bodybuilding contests.

Despite his impressive muscularity, Mr. A was anxious about his body appearance. He often would not take off his shirt—even when at the beach or a swimming pool—for fear that he would appear too small. He sometimes wore heavy sweatpants in the sweltering heat to conceal his legs. He also admitted spending as much as 2 hours a day examining himself in the mirror. ‘Sometimes when I get a bad (look at) myself, I will refuse to go out for the rest of the day,’ he said.

Mr. A has had a succession of girlfriends, but his rigid commitment to diet and exercise invariably ended these relationships.

At this point, would you first address Mr. A’s apparent substance use problem or the underlying body dysmorphic symptoms?

Dr. Carter’s and Pope’s observations

Two comorbidities noted here—substance abuse and body dysmorphic disorder—are common among anabolic steroid abusers. Addressing these problems, especially the body dysmorphic disorder, may sometimes help patients who are unwilling to address their steroid use directly. Body dysmorphic disorder may respond to selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors7 and cognitive-behavioral therapy.8

Anabolic steroids are not associated with immediate intoxicating effects, and ICD-10 categorizes them as substances not associated with dependence. After prolonged use at high doses, however, anabolic steroids are often associated with euphoria. Researchers also have found that some steroid abusers do meet DSM-IV criteria for substance dependence.6

Beyond the direct psychotropic effects of anabolic steroids, the depressive symptoms commonly seen during their withdrawal may perpetuate the dependence, as was the case with Mr. A. Most depressive symptoms that follow steroid cessation do not require drug therapy,3 but Mr. A developed severe and persistent depressive symptoms, complicated by panic disorder and body image concerns at a level diagnostic of body dysmorphic disorder. Such body image concerns often precipitate relapse into steroid use.

Conclusion: Another setback

As of this writing, Mr. A is again lost to follow-up. After taking fluoxetine and keeping monthly appointments for about 6 months, he failed to arrive for a visit and did not set another appointment. The patient may have once again stopped medication and embarked on yet another cycle of anabolic steroid use. If this is so, we can only hope that he returns to treatment before it is too late.

Related resources

Drug brand names

 

  • Fluoxetine • Prozac
  • Nandrolone decanoate • Deca-Durabolin
  • Oxymetholone • Anadrol
  • Stanozolol • Winstrol

Disclosure

Dr. Carter reports that he receives research/grant support from or is a consultant to Eli Lilly and Co., Pfizer Inc., and Ortho-McNeil Pharmaceutical.

Dr. Pope reports no financial relationship with any company whose products are mentioned in this article, or with manufacturers of competing products.

Initial visit: Road rage or ‘roid’ rage?

Mr. A, 25, was arrested after police interrupted an altercation between him and a senior citizen at a stoplight. He had emerged from his car, walked over to the older driver in front of him, ripped open the car door, and pulled the man out of the car and onto the street. He was still yelling at the victim when a passing officer intervened.

Mr. A was charged with assault. After a plea bargain, he was sentenced to probation and fined. He had been seeing his probation officer every 2 weeks, but his parents were worried about his erratic and sometimes defiant behavior and insisted he see a psychiatrist. He reluctantly agreed to one consultation, largely because his parents threatened to withhold financial support if he failed to do so.

The first thing the psychiatrist noticed was Mr. A’s striking muscular appearance. He was approximately 5 feet, 7 inches tall, weighed at least 200 pounds, and had a 30-inch waist and less than 10% body fat.

Dr. Carter’s and Pope’s observations

Mr. A’s diagnosis should be suspected immediately upon his entering the office. Extensive anabolic steroid use produces body changes that can be diagnosed almost at a glance. It is virtually impossible to achieve a level of muscle mass comparable to what Mr. A exhibited without the use of anabolic steroids.1

Remarkably, however, most people—including Mr. A’s parents, law enforcement personnel, and even some members of the treatment team—failed to diagnose Mr. A’s steroid use. He somehow convinced them that his extreme muscularity was the result of hard work, dedication, and scrupulous attention to diet. This suggests that steroid abuse cases involving serious violence—such as that of Mr. A—frequently go unreported and undiagnosed and are probably more common than we suspect.

Epidemiologic data suggest that clinicians should become familiar with the presentation of patients who are using anabolic steroids (Box).

Evaluation: ‘Stacking’ up

Mr. A at first vehemently denied that he had ever used anabolic steroids. After a more detailed conversation, during which the clinician demonstrated some knowledge of this area, Mr. A eventually conceded that he was taking a substantial weekly dose of the drugs at the time of the assault.

A subsequent clinical evaluation revealed that Mr. A had taken several ‘cycles’ (courses) of anabolic steroids over the last 2 to 3 years. Each cycle lasted 10 to 16 weeks and had been characterized by simultaneous use of two or more steroids, a practice known as ‘stacking.’

Mr. A started his first cycle with a modest ‘stack’ of drugs: testosterone cypionate, 200 mg twice a week, and stanozolol, 10 mg/d. Taken together, these dosages represented roughly 470 mg of testosterone equivalent per week—about 10 times the weekly secretion of testosterone in a normal male. He noticed no change in mood during this initial cycle.

With subsequent cycles, however, Mr. A became increasingly obsessed with his body image and used higher dosages. When the assault occurred, he was taking testosterone cypionate, 800 mg a week, nandrolone decanoate, 400 mg a week, and oxymetholone, 50 mg/d. With this regimen—the weekly equivalent of 1,550 mg of testosterone—Mr. A noticed prominent mood changes that met DSM-IV criteria for a manic episode. He experienced euphoria, dramatic irritability, limitless self-confidence, decreased need for sleep, distractibility, extreme recklessness (driving too fast, spending too freely), and some mildly paranoid ideation (without frank delusions). He admitted that he had twice assaulted his girlfriend and that he invariably became enraged at even the slightest annoyance when driving in traffic. He revealed that although the altercation with the older driver had led to his first arrest for ‘road rage,’ it was his third such incident.

The clinician warned Mr. A that continued steroid use could worsen his behavior—and lead to more serious trouble later on. Mr. A, however, said he was more afraid of losing muscle mass and becoming ‘small again.’ When the clinician mentioned that use of anabolic steroids without a prescription is illegal, Mr. A retorted that several of his friends had used the drugs without legal consequences.

Mr. A left the office showing no inclination to return for further treatment. The clinician could only offer to be available in the future.

Box

 

ANABOLIC STEROID ABUSE: BEYOND THE GYM

The National Household Survey on Drug Abuse, which last assessed anabolic steroid use in 1994, estimated that about 1 million Americans had used anabolic steroids at some point, with 30% of those reporting use within the previous year. Among subjects who reported use within the last 3 years, the ratio of males to females was about 13 to 1.2

Clearly, anabolic steroid abuse is no longer exclusive to professional football players and other elite male athletes. In fact, more people appear to be using anabolic steroids to improve their physiques, rather than to enhance athletic performance.3 Evidence points to increasing use by adolescents, with one survey reporting current or past use by 6.6% of male high school seniors.4

 

 

What medical sequelae await Mr. A if he continues to abuse steroids? How would you convince him to stay in treatment?

Dr. Carter’s and Pope’s observations

Mr. A’s path to mania has been well demonstrated in the literature. Hypomania or even frank manic syndromes, sometimes associated with violent behavior, are rare at weekly doses of 300 mg of testosterone equivalent. At weekly doses of >1,000 mg, psychiatric syndromes such as hypomania or mania may occur in almost one-half of cases.5

If he continues to abuse anabolic steroids, however, Mr. A could experience adverse physical reactions ranging from embarrassing acne and male-pattern baldness (Table 1) to rare and life-threatening hepatic effects such as cholestatic jaundice and peliosis hepatitis (blood-filled cysts in the liver).

Table 1

ANABOLIC STEROID ABUSE: COMMON PHYSICAL FINDINGS

 

  • Hypertrophic muscularity, disproportionately in upper torso
  • Acne on face, shoulders, and back
  • Male-pattern baldness
  • Testicular atrophy and gynecomastia in men
  • Clitoral enlargement, decreased breast size, hirsutism, and deepening of voice in women
Source: Adapted from Brower KJ. Anabolic steroid abuse and dependence. Curr Psychiatry Rep 2002;4:377-83.

The risk of atherosclerotic disease or prostate cancer later in life may also be greatly increased.

More common laboratory changes include:

 

  • increased red blood cell count, hemoglobin and hematocrit
  • elevated liver function readings (although these must not be confused with enzymes that originate from muscle tissue)
  • and unfavorable changes in triglycerides, total cholesterol, and HDL:LDL cholesterol ratios (Table 2).

Other potential laboratory changes with steroid abuse include decreased luteinizing hormone and follicle-stimulating hormone due to feedback inhibition. Feedback inhibition will also reduce testosterone and estradiol levels with use of anabolic steroids other than testosterone esters. These levels, however, would both be elevated with use of testosterone esters alone.

In men, testicular atrophy and decreased sperm count are generally reversible manifestations of steroid abuse, whereas gynecomastia may be irreversible and require surgical intervention in advanced cases.3,6 Women who use anabolic steroids (such as for body-building) are vulnerable to disrupted menstrual cycles, decreased breast size, and masculinizing effects including enlarged clitoris, hirsutism, and deepening of the voice.6

In adolescents, anabolic steroid use may cause premature closure of the epiphyses, leading to shortened stature.3

Unfortunately, warnings about these many adverse effects rarely deter anabolic steroid users such as Mr. A or persuade them to continue in treatment of any type. Most young anabolic steroid abusers report that they have never felt significant adverse effects from steroid use and know of no one who has experienced such effects. The dramatic muscle gains they have witnessed in themselves and in other users decisively outweigh what they perceive to be remote threats of adverse consequences.

Follow-up: Return to treatment

We didn’t hear from Mr. A until about 18 months later, when he unexpectedly requested a consultation.

Upon arrival, Mr. A exhibited major depression with prominent anhedonia, hypersomnia of 12 to 14 hours per night, loss of appetite, fatigue, prominent psychomotor retardation, feelings of guilt, difficulty concentrating, and suicidal thoughts (but without a frank plan). He also reported panic attacks that were randomly occurring each day, usually in public.

Mr. A conceded that he had experienced similar depressive episodes after stopping anabolic steroid use, but that they typically ran their course after 2 to 3 weeks. He said the present episode showed no sign of abating after nearly 2 months. He had attempted to ‘treat’ this episode by resuming anabolic steroid use, but he could not get an adequate supply from his dealer.

Mr. A’s total testosterone level, measured in the morning when it should be near its diurnal peak, was 127 ng/dl (normal range is 270 to 1,070 ng/dl). Physical examination revealed that his testicles had shrunk to the size of marbles (each approximately 5 mm in diameter). He was referred to an endocrinologist for evaluation and was simultaneously started on fluoxetine, 20 mg/d.

Table 2

LABORATORY ABNORMALITIES ASSOCIATED WITH ANABOLIC STEROID ABUSE

 

  • Elevated red blood cell count and hematocrit
  • Unfavorable lipid profile changes
  • Changes in LH, FSH, testosterone, and estradiol levels
  • Reduced sperm cell count
Source: Adapted from Brower KJ. Anabolic steroid abuse and dependence. Curr Psychiatry Rep 2002;4:377-83.

He returned 2 weeks later, exhibiting little improvement and wanting to resume steroids ‘because it was the only thing that really helped.’ Instead, he agreed to continue on fluoxetine and remain in follow-up. At 4 weeks, he noticed a decrease in panic attacks, return of normal mood, decreased anhedonia, and loss of suicidal ideation. He continued taking fluoxetine for another 3 months but then abruptly disappeared from treatment.

Mr. A resurfaced about 1 year later, revealing to the psychiatrist that he had taken yet another cycle of anabolic steroids, largely because he feared losing his muscle mass. His panic attacks had recurred almost immediately when he began tapering down from the peak of this cycle, and he agreed to resume taking fluoxetine.

 

 

A look at Mr. A’s extended history may provide clues to his persistent anabolic steroid abuse problem. He had displayed prominent symptoms of conduct disorder as a child. He had been truant from school, had occasionally run away from home, and had been involved in several misdemeanors. While in high school, he typically drank 10 to 12 beers over a weekend and had experimented with hallucinogenic mushrooms and 3,4-methylenedioxymethamphetamine (‘ecstasy’).

He started weightlifting while in high school and by age 17 was visiting the gym every day. He began college on a football scholarship but dropped out after 1 year. Starting in his early 20s, he competed in several bodybuilding contests.

Despite his impressive muscularity, Mr. A was anxious about his body appearance. He often would not take off his shirt—even when at the beach or a swimming pool—for fear that he would appear too small. He sometimes wore heavy sweatpants in the sweltering heat to conceal his legs. He also admitted spending as much as 2 hours a day examining himself in the mirror. ‘Sometimes when I get a bad (look at) myself, I will refuse to go out for the rest of the day,’ he said.

Mr. A has had a succession of girlfriends, but his rigid commitment to diet and exercise invariably ended these relationships.

At this point, would you first address Mr. A’s apparent substance use problem or the underlying body dysmorphic symptoms?

Dr. Carter’s and Pope’s observations

Two comorbidities noted here—substance abuse and body dysmorphic disorder—are common among anabolic steroid abusers. Addressing these problems, especially the body dysmorphic disorder, may sometimes help patients who are unwilling to address their steroid use directly. Body dysmorphic disorder may respond to selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors7 and cognitive-behavioral therapy.8

Anabolic steroids are not associated with immediate intoxicating effects, and ICD-10 categorizes them as substances not associated with dependence. After prolonged use at high doses, however, anabolic steroids are often associated with euphoria. Researchers also have found that some steroid abusers do meet DSM-IV criteria for substance dependence.6

Beyond the direct psychotropic effects of anabolic steroids, the depressive symptoms commonly seen during their withdrawal may perpetuate the dependence, as was the case with Mr. A. Most depressive symptoms that follow steroid cessation do not require drug therapy,3 but Mr. A developed severe and persistent depressive symptoms, complicated by panic disorder and body image concerns at a level diagnostic of body dysmorphic disorder. Such body image concerns often precipitate relapse into steroid use.

Conclusion: Another setback

As of this writing, Mr. A is again lost to follow-up. After taking fluoxetine and keeping monthly appointments for about 6 months, he failed to arrive for a visit and did not set another appointment. The patient may have once again stopped medication and embarked on yet another cycle of anabolic steroid use. If this is so, we can only hope that he returns to treatment before it is too late.

Related resources

Drug brand names

 

  • Fluoxetine • Prozac
  • Nandrolone decanoate • Deca-Durabolin
  • Oxymetholone • Anadrol
  • Stanozolol • Winstrol

Disclosure

Dr. Carter reports that he receives research/grant support from or is a consultant to Eli Lilly and Co., Pfizer Inc., and Ortho-McNeil Pharmaceutical.

Dr. Pope reports no financial relationship with any company whose products are mentioned in this article, or with manufacturers of competing products.

References

 

1. Kouri E, Pope HG, Jr, Katz DL, Oliva P. Fat free mass index in users and non-users of anabolic-androgenic steroids. Clin J Sport Med 1995;5:223-8.

2. National Household Survey on Drug Abuse, 1994: http://www.icpsr.umich.edu.

3. Pope HG, Jr, Brower KJ. Anabolic-androgenic steroid abuse. In: Sadock BJ, Sadock VA (eds). Comprehensive textbook of psychiatry (7th ed). Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, 2000;1085-95.

4. Buckley WA, Yesalis CE, 3rd, Friedl KE, et al. Estimated prevalence of anabolic steroid use among male high school seniors. JAMA 1988;260(23):3441-5.

5. Pope HG, Jr, Katz DL. Psychiatric and medical effects of anabolic-androgenic steroid use. Arch Gen Psychiatry 1994;51:375-82.

6. Brower KJ. Anabolic steroid abuse and dependence. Curr Psychiatry Rep 2002;4:377-83.

7. Phillips KA. Pharmacologic treatment of body dysmorphic disorder: A review of empirical data and a proposed treatment algorithm. Psychiatr Clin North Am 2000;7:59-82.

8. Rosen JC, Reiter J, Orosan P. Cognitive/behavioral body image therapy for body dysmorphic disorder. J Consult Clin Psychol 1995;63:2639.-

References

 

1. Kouri E, Pope HG, Jr, Katz DL, Oliva P. Fat free mass index in users and non-users of anabolic-androgenic steroids. Clin J Sport Med 1995;5:223-8.

2. National Household Survey on Drug Abuse, 1994: http://www.icpsr.umich.edu.

3. Pope HG, Jr, Brower KJ. Anabolic-androgenic steroid abuse. In: Sadock BJ, Sadock VA (eds). Comprehensive textbook of psychiatry (7th ed). Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, 2000;1085-95.

4. Buckley WA, Yesalis CE, 3rd, Friedl KE, et al. Estimated prevalence of anabolic steroid use among male high school seniors. JAMA 1988;260(23):3441-5.

5. Pope HG, Jr, Katz DL. Psychiatric and medical effects of anabolic-androgenic steroid use. Arch Gen Psychiatry 1994;51:375-82.

6. Brower KJ. Anabolic steroid abuse and dependence. Curr Psychiatry Rep 2002;4:377-83.

7. Phillips KA. Pharmacologic treatment of body dysmorphic disorder: A review of empirical data and a proposed treatment algorithm. Psychiatr Clin North Am 2000;7:59-82.

8. Rosen JC, Reiter J, Orosan P. Cognitive/behavioral body image therapy for body dysmorphic disorder. J Consult Clin Psychol 1995;63:2639.-

Issue
Current Psychiatry - 02(02)
Issue
Current Psychiatry - 02(02)
Page Number
65-71
Page Number
65-71
Publications
Publications
Topics
Article Type
Display Headline
Steroid abuse: a ‘hidden’ health hazard
Display Headline
Steroid abuse: a ‘hidden’ health hazard
Sections
PURLs Copyright

Disallow All Ads
Alternative CME
Use ProPublica
Article PDF Media