Top 50 Authors in Dermatology by Publication Rate (2017-2022)

Article Type
Changed
Thu, 07/20/2023 - 10:15
Display Headline
Top 50 Authors in Dermatology by Publication Rate (2017-2022)

To the Editor:

Citation number and Hirsch index (h-index) have long been employed as metrics of productivity for academic scholarship. The h-index is defined as the highest number of publications (the maximum h value) of an author who has published at least h papers, each cited by other authors at least h times.1 In a bibliometric analysis of the most frequently cited authors in dermatology from 1974 to 2019 (N=378,276), females comprised 12% of first and 11% of senior authors of the most cited publications, and 6 of the most cited authors in dermatology were women.2 In another study analyzing the most prolific dermatologic authors based on h-index, 0% from 1980 to 1989 and 19% from 2010 to 2019 were female (N=393,488).3 Because citation number and h-index favor longer-practicing dermatologists, we examined dermatology author productivity and gender trends by recent publication rates.

The Scopus database was searched for dermatology publications by using the field category “dermatology”from January 1, 2017, to October 7, 2022. Nondermatologists and authors with the same initials were excluded. Authors were ranked by number of publications, including original articles, case reports, letters, and reviews. Sex, degree, and years of experience were determined via a Google search of the author’s name. The h-index; number of citations; and percentages of first, middle, and last authorship were recorded.

Of the top 50 published dermatologists, 30% were female (n=15) and 56% (n=28) held both MD and PhD degrees (Table). The mean years of experience was 26.27 years (range, 6–44 years), with a mean of 29.23 years in females and 25.87 years in males. The mean h-index was 27.96 (range, 8–88), with 24.87 for females and 29.29 for males. The mean number of citations was 4032.64 (range, 235–36,908), with 2891.13 for females and 4521.86 for males. Thirty-one authors were most frequently middle authors, 18 were senior authors, and 1 was a first author. On average (SD), authors were senior or first author in 47.97% (20.08%) of their publications (range, 6.32%–94.93%).

Top 50 Dermatology Authors Ranked by Number of Publications (January 1, 2017, to October 7, 2022)

Top 50 Dermatology Authors Ranked by Number of Publications (January 1, 2017, to October 7, 2022)

Our study shows that females were more highly represented as top dermatology authors (30%) as measured by publication numbers from 2017 to 2022 than in studies measuring citation rate from 1974 to 2019 (12%)2 or h-index from 2010 to 2019 (19%).3 Similarly, in a study of dermatology authorship from 2009 to 2019, on average, females represented 51.06% first and 38.18% last authors.4

The proportion of females in the dermatology workforce has increased, with 3964 of 10,385 (38.2%) active dermatologists in 20075 being female vs 6372 of 12,505 (51.0%) in 2019.6 The lower proportion of practicing female dermatologists in earlier years likely accounts for the lower percentage of females in dermatology citations and h-index top lists during that time, given that citation and h-index metrics are biased to dermatologists with longer careers.

Although our data are encouraging, females still accounted for less than one-third of the top 50 authors by publication numbers. Gender inequalities persist, with only one-third of a total of 1292 National Institutes of Health dermatology grants and one-fourth of Research Project Grant Program (R01) grants being awarded to females in the years 2009 to 2014.7 Therefore, formal and informal mentorship, protected time for research, resources for childcare, and opportunities for funding will be critical in supporting female dermatologists to both publish highly impactful research and obtain research grants.

Limitations of our study include the omission of authors with identical initials and the inability to account for name changes. Furthermore, Scopus does not include all articles published by each author. Finally, publication number reflects quantity but may not reflect quality.

By quantitating dermatology author publication numbers, we found better representation of female authors compared with studies measuring citation number and h-index. With higher proportions of female dermatology trainees and efforts to increase mentorship and research support for female dermatologists, we expect improved equality in top lists of dermatology citations and h-index values.

References
  1. Dysart J. Measuring research impact and quality: h-index. Accessed July 11, 2023. https://libraryguides.missouri.edu/impact/hindex
  2. Maymone MBC, Laughter M, Vashi NA, et al. The most cited articles and authors in dermatology: a bibliometric analysis of 1974-2019. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2020;83:201-205. doi:10.1016/j.jaad.2019.06.1308
  3. Szeto MD, Presley CL, Maymone MBC, et al. Top authors in dermatology by h-index: a bibliometric analysis of 1980-2020. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2021;85:1573-1579. doi:10.1016/j.jaad.2020.10.087
  4. Laughter MR, Yemc MG, Presley CL, et al. Gender representation in the authorship of dermatology publications. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2022;86:698-700. doi:10.1016/j.jaad.2021.03.019
  5. Association of American Medical Colleges. 2008 physician specialty data report. Accessed July 11, 2023. https://www.aamc.org/media/33491/download
  6. Association of American Medical Colleges. 2019 physician specialty data report. Accessed July 11, 2023. https://www.aamc.org/data-reports/workforce/data/active-physicians-sex-and-specialty-2019
  7. Cheng MY, Sukhov A, Sultani H, et al. Trends in National Institutes of Health funding of principal investigators in dermatology research by academic degree and sex. JAMA Dermatol. 2016;152:883-888. doi:10.1001/jamadermatol.2016.0271
Article PDF
Author and Disclosure Information

Samantha Jo Albucker is from Tulane University School of Medicine, New Orleans, Louisiana. Jade Conway is from New York Medical College, Valhalla, New York. Jonathan Hwang is from Weill Cornell School of Medicine, New York, New York. Kelita Waterton is from SUNY Downstate Medical School, Brooklyn, New York. Dr. Lipner is from the Department of Dermatology, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, New York.

Samatha Jo Albucker, Jade Conway, Jonathan K. Hwang, and Kelita Waterton report no conflict of interest. Dr. Lipner has served as a consultant for BelleTorus Corporation, Hoth Therapeutics, Moberg Pharmaceuticals, and Ortho-Dermatologics.

Correspondence: Shari R. Lipner, MD, PhD, 1305 York Ave, New York, NY 10021 (shl9032@med.cornell.edu).

Issue
Cutis - 112(1)
Publications
Topics
Page Number
E20-E23
Sections
Author and Disclosure Information

Samantha Jo Albucker is from Tulane University School of Medicine, New Orleans, Louisiana. Jade Conway is from New York Medical College, Valhalla, New York. Jonathan Hwang is from Weill Cornell School of Medicine, New York, New York. Kelita Waterton is from SUNY Downstate Medical School, Brooklyn, New York. Dr. Lipner is from the Department of Dermatology, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, New York.

Samatha Jo Albucker, Jade Conway, Jonathan K. Hwang, and Kelita Waterton report no conflict of interest. Dr. Lipner has served as a consultant for BelleTorus Corporation, Hoth Therapeutics, Moberg Pharmaceuticals, and Ortho-Dermatologics.

Correspondence: Shari R. Lipner, MD, PhD, 1305 York Ave, New York, NY 10021 (shl9032@med.cornell.edu).

Author and Disclosure Information

Samantha Jo Albucker is from Tulane University School of Medicine, New Orleans, Louisiana. Jade Conway is from New York Medical College, Valhalla, New York. Jonathan Hwang is from Weill Cornell School of Medicine, New York, New York. Kelita Waterton is from SUNY Downstate Medical School, Brooklyn, New York. Dr. Lipner is from the Department of Dermatology, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, New York.

Samatha Jo Albucker, Jade Conway, Jonathan K. Hwang, and Kelita Waterton report no conflict of interest. Dr. Lipner has served as a consultant for BelleTorus Corporation, Hoth Therapeutics, Moberg Pharmaceuticals, and Ortho-Dermatologics.

Correspondence: Shari R. Lipner, MD, PhD, 1305 York Ave, New York, NY 10021 (shl9032@med.cornell.edu).

Article PDF
Article PDF

To the Editor:

Citation number and Hirsch index (h-index) have long been employed as metrics of productivity for academic scholarship. The h-index is defined as the highest number of publications (the maximum h value) of an author who has published at least h papers, each cited by other authors at least h times.1 In a bibliometric analysis of the most frequently cited authors in dermatology from 1974 to 2019 (N=378,276), females comprised 12% of first and 11% of senior authors of the most cited publications, and 6 of the most cited authors in dermatology were women.2 In another study analyzing the most prolific dermatologic authors based on h-index, 0% from 1980 to 1989 and 19% from 2010 to 2019 were female (N=393,488).3 Because citation number and h-index favor longer-practicing dermatologists, we examined dermatology author productivity and gender trends by recent publication rates.

The Scopus database was searched for dermatology publications by using the field category “dermatology”from January 1, 2017, to October 7, 2022. Nondermatologists and authors with the same initials were excluded. Authors were ranked by number of publications, including original articles, case reports, letters, and reviews. Sex, degree, and years of experience were determined via a Google search of the author’s name. The h-index; number of citations; and percentages of first, middle, and last authorship were recorded.

Of the top 50 published dermatologists, 30% were female (n=15) and 56% (n=28) held both MD and PhD degrees (Table). The mean years of experience was 26.27 years (range, 6–44 years), with a mean of 29.23 years in females and 25.87 years in males. The mean h-index was 27.96 (range, 8–88), with 24.87 for females and 29.29 for males. The mean number of citations was 4032.64 (range, 235–36,908), with 2891.13 for females and 4521.86 for males. Thirty-one authors were most frequently middle authors, 18 were senior authors, and 1 was a first author. On average (SD), authors were senior or first author in 47.97% (20.08%) of their publications (range, 6.32%–94.93%).

Top 50 Dermatology Authors Ranked by Number of Publications (January 1, 2017, to October 7, 2022)

Top 50 Dermatology Authors Ranked by Number of Publications (January 1, 2017, to October 7, 2022)

Our study shows that females were more highly represented as top dermatology authors (30%) as measured by publication numbers from 2017 to 2022 than in studies measuring citation rate from 1974 to 2019 (12%)2 or h-index from 2010 to 2019 (19%).3 Similarly, in a study of dermatology authorship from 2009 to 2019, on average, females represented 51.06% first and 38.18% last authors.4

The proportion of females in the dermatology workforce has increased, with 3964 of 10,385 (38.2%) active dermatologists in 20075 being female vs 6372 of 12,505 (51.0%) in 2019.6 The lower proportion of practicing female dermatologists in earlier years likely accounts for the lower percentage of females in dermatology citations and h-index top lists during that time, given that citation and h-index metrics are biased to dermatologists with longer careers.

Although our data are encouraging, females still accounted for less than one-third of the top 50 authors by publication numbers. Gender inequalities persist, with only one-third of a total of 1292 National Institutes of Health dermatology grants and one-fourth of Research Project Grant Program (R01) grants being awarded to females in the years 2009 to 2014.7 Therefore, formal and informal mentorship, protected time for research, resources for childcare, and opportunities for funding will be critical in supporting female dermatologists to both publish highly impactful research and obtain research grants.

Limitations of our study include the omission of authors with identical initials and the inability to account for name changes. Furthermore, Scopus does not include all articles published by each author. Finally, publication number reflects quantity but may not reflect quality.

By quantitating dermatology author publication numbers, we found better representation of female authors compared with studies measuring citation number and h-index. With higher proportions of female dermatology trainees and efforts to increase mentorship and research support for female dermatologists, we expect improved equality in top lists of dermatology citations and h-index values.

To the Editor:

Citation number and Hirsch index (h-index) have long been employed as metrics of productivity for academic scholarship. The h-index is defined as the highest number of publications (the maximum h value) of an author who has published at least h papers, each cited by other authors at least h times.1 In a bibliometric analysis of the most frequently cited authors in dermatology from 1974 to 2019 (N=378,276), females comprised 12% of first and 11% of senior authors of the most cited publications, and 6 of the most cited authors in dermatology were women.2 In another study analyzing the most prolific dermatologic authors based on h-index, 0% from 1980 to 1989 and 19% from 2010 to 2019 were female (N=393,488).3 Because citation number and h-index favor longer-practicing dermatologists, we examined dermatology author productivity and gender trends by recent publication rates.

The Scopus database was searched for dermatology publications by using the field category “dermatology”from January 1, 2017, to October 7, 2022. Nondermatologists and authors with the same initials were excluded. Authors were ranked by number of publications, including original articles, case reports, letters, and reviews. Sex, degree, and years of experience were determined via a Google search of the author’s name. The h-index; number of citations; and percentages of first, middle, and last authorship were recorded.

Of the top 50 published dermatologists, 30% were female (n=15) and 56% (n=28) held both MD and PhD degrees (Table). The mean years of experience was 26.27 years (range, 6–44 years), with a mean of 29.23 years in females and 25.87 years in males. The mean h-index was 27.96 (range, 8–88), with 24.87 for females and 29.29 for males. The mean number of citations was 4032.64 (range, 235–36,908), with 2891.13 for females and 4521.86 for males. Thirty-one authors were most frequently middle authors, 18 were senior authors, and 1 was a first author. On average (SD), authors were senior or first author in 47.97% (20.08%) of their publications (range, 6.32%–94.93%).

Top 50 Dermatology Authors Ranked by Number of Publications (January 1, 2017, to October 7, 2022)

Top 50 Dermatology Authors Ranked by Number of Publications (January 1, 2017, to October 7, 2022)

Our study shows that females were more highly represented as top dermatology authors (30%) as measured by publication numbers from 2017 to 2022 than in studies measuring citation rate from 1974 to 2019 (12%)2 or h-index from 2010 to 2019 (19%).3 Similarly, in a study of dermatology authorship from 2009 to 2019, on average, females represented 51.06% first and 38.18% last authors.4

The proportion of females in the dermatology workforce has increased, with 3964 of 10,385 (38.2%) active dermatologists in 20075 being female vs 6372 of 12,505 (51.0%) in 2019.6 The lower proportion of practicing female dermatologists in earlier years likely accounts for the lower percentage of females in dermatology citations and h-index top lists during that time, given that citation and h-index metrics are biased to dermatologists with longer careers.

Although our data are encouraging, females still accounted for less than one-third of the top 50 authors by publication numbers. Gender inequalities persist, with only one-third of a total of 1292 National Institutes of Health dermatology grants and one-fourth of Research Project Grant Program (R01) grants being awarded to females in the years 2009 to 2014.7 Therefore, formal and informal mentorship, protected time for research, resources for childcare, and opportunities for funding will be critical in supporting female dermatologists to both publish highly impactful research and obtain research grants.

Limitations of our study include the omission of authors with identical initials and the inability to account for name changes. Furthermore, Scopus does not include all articles published by each author. Finally, publication number reflects quantity but may not reflect quality.

By quantitating dermatology author publication numbers, we found better representation of female authors compared with studies measuring citation number and h-index. With higher proportions of female dermatology trainees and efforts to increase mentorship and research support for female dermatologists, we expect improved equality in top lists of dermatology citations and h-index values.

References
  1. Dysart J. Measuring research impact and quality: h-index. Accessed July 11, 2023. https://libraryguides.missouri.edu/impact/hindex
  2. Maymone MBC, Laughter M, Vashi NA, et al. The most cited articles and authors in dermatology: a bibliometric analysis of 1974-2019. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2020;83:201-205. doi:10.1016/j.jaad.2019.06.1308
  3. Szeto MD, Presley CL, Maymone MBC, et al. Top authors in dermatology by h-index: a bibliometric analysis of 1980-2020. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2021;85:1573-1579. doi:10.1016/j.jaad.2020.10.087
  4. Laughter MR, Yemc MG, Presley CL, et al. Gender representation in the authorship of dermatology publications. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2022;86:698-700. doi:10.1016/j.jaad.2021.03.019
  5. Association of American Medical Colleges. 2008 physician specialty data report. Accessed July 11, 2023. https://www.aamc.org/media/33491/download
  6. Association of American Medical Colleges. 2019 physician specialty data report. Accessed July 11, 2023. https://www.aamc.org/data-reports/workforce/data/active-physicians-sex-and-specialty-2019
  7. Cheng MY, Sukhov A, Sultani H, et al. Trends in National Institutes of Health funding of principal investigators in dermatology research by academic degree and sex. JAMA Dermatol. 2016;152:883-888. doi:10.1001/jamadermatol.2016.0271
References
  1. Dysart J. Measuring research impact and quality: h-index. Accessed July 11, 2023. https://libraryguides.missouri.edu/impact/hindex
  2. Maymone MBC, Laughter M, Vashi NA, et al. The most cited articles and authors in dermatology: a bibliometric analysis of 1974-2019. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2020;83:201-205. doi:10.1016/j.jaad.2019.06.1308
  3. Szeto MD, Presley CL, Maymone MBC, et al. Top authors in dermatology by h-index: a bibliometric analysis of 1980-2020. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2021;85:1573-1579. doi:10.1016/j.jaad.2020.10.087
  4. Laughter MR, Yemc MG, Presley CL, et al. Gender representation in the authorship of dermatology publications. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2022;86:698-700. doi:10.1016/j.jaad.2021.03.019
  5. Association of American Medical Colleges. 2008 physician specialty data report. Accessed July 11, 2023. https://www.aamc.org/media/33491/download
  6. Association of American Medical Colleges. 2019 physician specialty data report. Accessed July 11, 2023. https://www.aamc.org/data-reports/workforce/data/active-physicians-sex-and-specialty-2019
  7. Cheng MY, Sukhov A, Sultani H, et al. Trends in National Institutes of Health funding of principal investigators in dermatology research by academic degree and sex. JAMA Dermatol. 2016;152:883-888. doi:10.1001/jamadermatol.2016.0271
Issue
Cutis - 112(1)
Issue
Cutis - 112(1)
Page Number
E20-E23
Page Number
E20-E23
Publications
Publications
Topics
Article Type
Display Headline
Top 50 Authors in Dermatology by Publication Rate (2017-2022)
Display Headline
Top 50 Authors in Dermatology by Publication Rate (2017-2022)
Sections
Inside the Article

Practice Points

  • Academic scholarship often is measured by number of citations and h-index. Using these measures, female dermatologists are infrequently represented on top author lists.
  • Using the Scopus database to search for the 50 most published dermatology authors from January 1, 2017, to October 7, 2022, 30% were female.
  • Higher proportions of female dermatology trainees as well as efforts to increase mentorship and research support for female dermatologists may improve equality in top lists of dermatology citations and h-index values.
Disallow All Ads
Content Gating
No Gating (article Unlocked/Free)
Alternative CME
Disqus Comments
Default
Use ProPublica
Hide sidebar & use full width
render the right sidebar.
Conference Recap Checkbox
Not Conference Recap
Clinical Edge
Display the Slideshow in this Article
Medscape Article
Display survey writer
Reuters content
Disable Inline Native ads
WebMD Article
Article PDF Media