User login
Erythematous and Necrotic Papules in an Immunosuppressed Woman
The Diagnosis: Disseminated Fusariosis
Histologic evaluation of the punch biopsy demonstrated thrombosed vessels in the deep dermis and along fibrous septae of subcutaneous tissue, as well as delicate, thin-walled, branching hyphae with vesicular swellings (Figure). The hyphae were present within the vascular thrombi and extended into surrounding tissue. The fungal tissue culture eventually grew scant Fusarium. At the time of biopsy, there was a high index of suspicion for fungal infection, which supported the decision to empirically treat with anidulafungin and voriconazole.
Differentiating the diagnosis in this case was done primarily with histopathology. Although Aspergillus also has slender hyphae, it lacks the vesicular swellings characteristic of fusariosis. Disseminated candidiasis would demonstrate budding yeast and pseudohyphae in the dermis. Ecthyma gangrenosum histologically presents as necrotizing hemorrhagic vasculitis with gram-negative rods in the walls of deeper vessels, characteristically sparing the intima. Leukemia cutis histologically varies but would display a neoplastic infiltrate of atypical monocytoid cells with nuclear pleomorphism.
Our patient had been treated with palliative chemotherapy as a salvage regimen with idarubicin and cytarabine. She had persistent pancytopenia despite granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor therapy. The mortality rate for disseminated Fusarium infection approaches 100% when risk factors such as angiotropism and prolonged neutropenia are present.1,2 Additionally, our patient's susceptibility profile subsequently demonstrated an elevated minimum inhibitory concentration to amphotericin B, itraconazole, voriconazole, and posaconazole. The neutropenia and Fusarium infection were not responsive to treatment. She was discharged on palliative voriconazole with home hospice care.
Fusarium species are soil-dwelling saprophytes and important plant pathogens that have increasingly emerged as rare but notable causes of morbidity and mortality in immunocompromised patients.1-3 More specifically, Fusarium infection is most commonly observed in patients with hematologic malignancy complicated by persistent neutropenia. The 3 most frequently encountered Fusarium species in human disease are Fusarium solani, Fusarium oxysporum, and Fusarium moniliforme, with F solani being the most virulent.1,2 Infection with Fusarium may manifest as a broad range of presentations depending on the route of entry, such as endophthalmitis, sinusitis, pneumonia, and cutaneous lesions.1 Disseminated infection is marked by skin lesions or positive blood cultures for Fusarium.3 This fungus is notorious for its limited susceptibility profile.1 It requires systemic antifungal medications such as triazoles and amphotericin B. Fusarium is most susceptible in vitro to amphotericin B but often requires toxic dosages to be effective in decreasing fungal load.2,3 The high mortality rate of disseminated fusariosis further emphasizes that prevention is an important component to protecting high-risk patients. Keeping patients in rooms with high-efficiency particulate arresting filters and limiting exposure to unsanitized tap water faucets can help decrease exposure; however, reducing immunosuppression and improving neutropenia are the most effective ways to prevent fusariosis.1 Although skin breakdown can facilitate the spread of infection, it has been observed that immunosuppressed individuals do not necessarily have this finding.4
This case emphasizes the importance of considering disseminated fusariosis in patients with hematologic malignancy or other immunosuppressed conditions. The most important factors that should raise clinical suspicion are persistent neutropenia and recent corticosteroid therapy.1 A clinical picture that suggests fungal infection should warrant consideration of prophylactic treatment as well as tissue and blood cultures to determine species and susceptibility.
- Nucci M, Anaissie E. Fusarium infections in immunocompromised patients. Clin Microbiol Rev. 2007;20:695-704.
- Jossi M, Ambrosioni J, Macedo-Vinas M, et al. Invasive fusariosis with prolonged fungemia in a patient with acute lymphoblastic leukemia: case report and review of the literature. Int J Infect Dis. 2010;14:E354-E356.
- Tan R, Ng KP, Gan GG, et al. Fusarium sp. infection in a patient with Acute Lymphoblastic Leukaemia. Med J Malaysia. 2013;68:479-480.
- Nucci M, Anaissie E. Cutaneous infection by Fusarium species in healthy and immunocompromised hosts: implications for diagnosis and management. Clin Infect Dis. 2002;35:909-920.
The Diagnosis: Disseminated Fusariosis
Histologic evaluation of the punch biopsy demonstrated thrombosed vessels in the deep dermis and along fibrous septae of subcutaneous tissue, as well as delicate, thin-walled, branching hyphae with vesicular swellings (Figure). The hyphae were present within the vascular thrombi and extended into surrounding tissue. The fungal tissue culture eventually grew scant Fusarium. At the time of biopsy, there was a high index of suspicion for fungal infection, which supported the decision to empirically treat with anidulafungin and voriconazole.
Differentiating the diagnosis in this case was done primarily with histopathology. Although Aspergillus also has slender hyphae, it lacks the vesicular swellings characteristic of fusariosis. Disseminated candidiasis would demonstrate budding yeast and pseudohyphae in the dermis. Ecthyma gangrenosum histologically presents as necrotizing hemorrhagic vasculitis with gram-negative rods in the walls of deeper vessels, characteristically sparing the intima. Leukemia cutis histologically varies but would display a neoplastic infiltrate of atypical monocytoid cells with nuclear pleomorphism.
Our patient had been treated with palliative chemotherapy as a salvage regimen with idarubicin and cytarabine. She had persistent pancytopenia despite granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor therapy. The mortality rate for disseminated Fusarium infection approaches 100% when risk factors such as angiotropism and prolonged neutropenia are present.1,2 Additionally, our patient's susceptibility profile subsequently demonstrated an elevated minimum inhibitory concentration to amphotericin B, itraconazole, voriconazole, and posaconazole. The neutropenia and Fusarium infection were not responsive to treatment. She was discharged on palliative voriconazole with home hospice care.
Fusarium species are soil-dwelling saprophytes and important plant pathogens that have increasingly emerged as rare but notable causes of morbidity and mortality in immunocompromised patients.1-3 More specifically, Fusarium infection is most commonly observed in patients with hematologic malignancy complicated by persistent neutropenia. The 3 most frequently encountered Fusarium species in human disease are Fusarium solani, Fusarium oxysporum, and Fusarium moniliforme, with F solani being the most virulent.1,2 Infection with Fusarium may manifest as a broad range of presentations depending on the route of entry, such as endophthalmitis, sinusitis, pneumonia, and cutaneous lesions.1 Disseminated infection is marked by skin lesions or positive blood cultures for Fusarium.3 This fungus is notorious for its limited susceptibility profile.1 It requires systemic antifungal medications such as triazoles and amphotericin B. Fusarium is most susceptible in vitro to amphotericin B but often requires toxic dosages to be effective in decreasing fungal load.2,3 The high mortality rate of disseminated fusariosis further emphasizes that prevention is an important component to protecting high-risk patients. Keeping patients in rooms with high-efficiency particulate arresting filters and limiting exposure to unsanitized tap water faucets can help decrease exposure; however, reducing immunosuppression and improving neutropenia are the most effective ways to prevent fusariosis.1 Although skin breakdown can facilitate the spread of infection, it has been observed that immunosuppressed individuals do not necessarily have this finding.4
This case emphasizes the importance of considering disseminated fusariosis in patients with hematologic malignancy or other immunosuppressed conditions. The most important factors that should raise clinical suspicion are persistent neutropenia and recent corticosteroid therapy.1 A clinical picture that suggests fungal infection should warrant consideration of prophylactic treatment as well as tissue and blood cultures to determine species and susceptibility.
The Diagnosis: Disseminated Fusariosis
Histologic evaluation of the punch biopsy demonstrated thrombosed vessels in the deep dermis and along fibrous septae of subcutaneous tissue, as well as delicate, thin-walled, branching hyphae with vesicular swellings (Figure). The hyphae were present within the vascular thrombi and extended into surrounding tissue. The fungal tissue culture eventually grew scant Fusarium. At the time of biopsy, there was a high index of suspicion for fungal infection, which supported the decision to empirically treat with anidulafungin and voriconazole.
Differentiating the diagnosis in this case was done primarily with histopathology. Although Aspergillus also has slender hyphae, it lacks the vesicular swellings characteristic of fusariosis. Disseminated candidiasis would demonstrate budding yeast and pseudohyphae in the dermis. Ecthyma gangrenosum histologically presents as necrotizing hemorrhagic vasculitis with gram-negative rods in the walls of deeper vessels, characteristically sparing the intima. Leukemia cutis histologically varies but would display a neoplastic infiltrate of atypical monocytoid cells with nuclear pleomorphism.
Our patient had been treated with palliative chemotherapy as a salvage regimen with idarubicin and cytarabine. She had persistent pancytopenia despite granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor therapy. The mortality rate for disseminated Fusarium infection approaches 100% when risk factors such as angiotropism and prolonged neutropenia are present.1,2 Additionally, our patient's susceptibility profile subsequently demonstrated an elevated minimum inhibitory concentration to amphotericin B, itraconazole, voriconazole, and posaconazole. The neutropenia and Fusarium infection were not responsive to treatment. She was discharged on palliative voriconazole with home hospice care.
Fusarium species are soil-dwelling saprophytes and important plant pathogens that have increasingly emerged as rare but notable causes of morbidity and mortality in immunocompromised patients.1-3 More specifically, Fusarium infection is most commonly observed in patients with hematologic malignancy complicated by persistent neutropenia. The 3 most frequently encountered Fusarium species in human disease are Fusarium solani, Fusarium oxysporum, and Fusarium moniliforme, with F solani being the most virulent.1,2 Infection with Fusarium may manifest as a broad range of presentations depending on the route of entry, such as endophthalmitis, sinusitis, pneumonia, and cutaneous lesions.1 Disseminated infection is marked by skin lesions or positive blood cultures for Fusarium.3 This fungus is notorious for its limited susceptibility profile.1 It requires systemic antifungal medications such as triazoles and amphotericin B. Fusarium is most susceptible in vitro to amphotericin B but often requires toxic dosages to be effective in decreasing fungal load.2,3 The high mortality rate of disseminated fusariosis further emphasizes that prevention is an important component to protecting high-risk patients. Keeping patients in rooms with high-efficiency particulate arresting filters and limiting exposure to unsanitized tap water faucets can help decrease exposure; however, reducing immunosuppression and improving neutropenia are the most effective ways to prevent fusariosis.1 Although skin breakdown can facilitate the spread of infection, it has been observed that immunosuppressed individuals do not necessarily have this finding.4
This case emphasizes the importance of considering disseminated fusariosis in patients with hematologic malignancy or other immunosuppressed conditions. The most important factors that should raise clinical suspicion are persistent neutropenia and recent corticosteroid therapy.1 A clinical picture that suggests fungal infection should warrant consideration of prophylactic treatment as well as tissue and blood cultures to determine species and susceptibility.
- Nucci M, Anaissie E. Fusarium infections in immunocompromised patients. Clin Microbiol Rev. 2007;20:695-704.
- Jossi M, Ambrosioni J, Macedo-Vinas M, et al. Invasive fusariosis with prolonged fungemia in a patient with acute lymphoblastic leukemia: case report and review of the literature. Int J Infect Dis. 2010;14:E354-E356.
- Tan R, Ng KP, Gan GG, et al. Fusarium sp. infection in a patient with Acute Lymphoblastic Leukaemia. Med J Malaysia. 2013;68:479-480.
- Nucci M, Anaissie E. Cutaneous infection by Fusarium species in healthy and immunocompromised hosts: implications for diagnosis and management. Clin Infect Dis. 2002;35:909-920.
- Nucci M, Anaissie E. Fusarium infections in immunocompromised patients. Clin Microbiol Rev. 2007;20:695-704.
- Jossi M, Ambrosioni J, Macedo-Vinas M, et al. Invasive fusariosis with prolonged fungemia in a patient with acute lymphoblastic leukemia: case report and review of the literature. Int J Infect Dis. 2010;14:E354-E356.
- Tan R, Ng KP, Gan GG, et al. Fusarium sp. infection in a patient with Acute Lymphoblastic Leukaemia. Med J Malaysia. 2013;68:479-480.
- Nucci M, Anaissie E. Cutaneous infection by Fusarium species in healthy and immunocompromised hosts: implications for diagnosis and management. Clin Infect Dis. 2002;35:909-920.
