Is it Alzheimer’s? How to pare down the possibilities

Article Type
Changed
Tue, 12/11/2018 - 15:07
Display Headline
Is it Alzheimer’s? How to pare down the possibilities

Accurate and early diagnosis of Alzheimer’s disease (AD) is evolving, and—although not yet definitive—is no longer one of exclusion. With a careful in-office work-up and routine assessment tools, you can accurately identify >90% of patients with late-onset AD.1

AD is by far the most common cause of dementia in older patients. To help you make the diagnosis, this state-of-the-art article discusses:

  • AD’s clinical presentation and course
  • the role of neuropsychological tests for assessing cognitive and functional status
  • neuropsychiatric and medical findings that differentiate AD from other dementia causes
  • indications for structural neuroimaging with CT or MRI.

Presentation and course

Variability. AD’s gradual onset and progression are characterized by prominent memory loss, anomia, constructional apraxia, anosognosia, and personality changes with affect deregulation, behavioral disturbance, and distorted perception.1 Amnesia—particularly deficits in anterograde episodic memory—is the most common presentation, but the disease course is heterogeneous and may be affected by:

  • patient age at onset
  • illness severity at diagnosis
  • comorbid medical and neuropsychiatric illnesses
  • premorbid cerebral reserves (amount of brain damage a person can sustain before reaching a threshold for the clinical expression of dementia).1-3
Box 1

Biomarkers show promise to improve AD diagnosis

Researchers are investigating surrogates for detecting Alzheimer’s disease (AD) and monitoring disease progression.5

Serum and CSF markers. AD is viewed as a series of sequential events, beginning with beta-amyloid (β-amyloid) accumulation and progressing through a pathophysiologic cascade to cell death, transmitter deficit, and dementia. A unique biomarker may be associated with each event, either in the primary disease process of β-amyloid production and accumulation or intermediate processes such as tau hyperphosphorylation, oxidation, and inflammation.5,6

These biochemical markers are found more consistently in cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) than peripherally. Lower CSF β-amyloid (especially β-amyloid 42) and higher CSF tau and tau-phosphorylated (p-tau) have been found in AD patients compared with normal and disease controls.7 Some overlap exists, however, among AD and other dementias. Other possible serum, CSF, and urine markers include isoprostanes, sulfatides, oxysterols, homocysteine, apolipoprotein E, alpha 1-antichymotrypsin, 3-nitrotyrosine, and more.8 No biomarkers are available or recommended for clinical use at this time.

Neuroimaging. Amyloid imaging tracers may increase the capacity of single photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) and positron emission tomography (PET) to detect AD pathology. These tracers have high binding affinity for amyloid and may enable PET/SPECT to detect amyloid deposits in vivo.

Amyloid radioligands are being developed and tested as potential clinical diagnostic tools and surrogate biomarkers of antiamyloid therapies. A radioligand that targets amyloid and neurofibrillary tangles in AD has been developed recently for use as a research tool.

Staging illness severity. AD has 3 clinical stages of cognitive dysfunction:

Mild AD. An individual or close companion may notice increased forgetfulness and word-finding difficulties, a tendency to lose or misplace things, repeated questioning, and some disorientation. Motor skills are intact.

Moderate AD. Cognitive decline continues, memory deteriorates, and self-care ability is markedly impaired. The individual may undergo personality changes, confuse time and place, have trouble communicating and recognizing family members or friends, develop agitation, begin to wander, and experience delusions and hallucinations.

Severe AD. An individual with late-stage disease has severe impairment and can be bedridden, incontinent, and unable to under-stand or speak. Full-time care is required.

Staging informs treatment. In clinical trials, patients with mild-to-moderate AD consistently show small improvements in cognitive and global function when treated with acetylcholinesterase inhibitors (AChEIs) such as donepezil, rivastigmine, and galantamine.4 Donepezil also is approved for use in severe AD.

Memantine is indicated for symptomatic treatment of moderate-to-severe AD. It differs in mechanism of action from the AChEIs and is thought to inhibit cytotoxic overstimulation of glutamatergic neurons.4 For moderately advanced AD, memantine appears to be beneficial alone or in combination with AChEIs.

Dementia assessment

Clinical assessment has low sensitivity for early-phase AD and compromised specificity in advanced stages, where all dementia subtypes are similar and comorbidities may confuse the picture. Promising surrogate biomarkers and other diagnostic tools are being developed (Box 1),5-8 but definitive AD diagnosis still requires post-mortem histopathologic examination of the cerebral cortex.

Box 2

Can your AD patient drive or live alone? Consider neuropsychological assessment

Neuropsychological tests disclose a degree of intellectual impairment that correlates with functional impairment and may be particularly useful for assessing:

  • mild cognitive impairment when diagnosis is doubtful
  • cases where major lifestyle changes may be required, such as driving cessation or assisted-living placement.

These tests can examine performance across different domains of cognitive function, including orientation, memory, attention, naming, comprehension, and praxis.

Limitations. Neuropsychological tests have limitations, including cost and administration time. Some older patients find the tests distressing or tiring, and those with severe dementia are incapable of participating. Patients’ anxiety about taking tests, poor test-taking skills, low motivation/effort, and language, cultural, and educational variables limit these tests’ usefulness and may influence results.

Interpret a neuropsychological evaluation in the context of other clinical data, such as informant-based history of cognitive decline, evidence of impairment in independent activities of daily living, educational background, depression assessment, sensory impairment, or factors other than dementia that may account for impaired performance.

Source: References 13,14

 

 

History and physical exam. Depending on the AD stage at presentation, patients might not be a reliable source of information. For a realistic and unbiased history and evaluation, assess the patient separately and obtain collateral information from reliable informants.

In typical cases, the history guides the physical/neurologic examination. Advancing age and family history are confirmed risk factors for AD; others may include:

  • female gender (after age 80)
  • cardiovascular disease (such as cerebral infarcts, hypertension, elevated cholesterol/homocysteine, smoking, and diabetes mellitus)
  • history of head trauma, especially with loss of consciousness.

Assess premorbid functioning and existing medical conditions. Apraxia, aphasia, and cortical visual impairment may reflect focal signs of atypical AD; consider other neurologic signs in the context of clinical data.

Early and accurate diagnosis of AD is challenging in patients with mixed dementias, comorbid neurologic diseases, or atypical features. Patients with these presentations may require referral to an expert clinician, extensive workup, or longitudinal follow-up before the diagnosis becomes clear.

Neuropsychological testing. Most mental status tests examine orientation, attention/concentration, learning, memory, language, and constructional praxis. The Folstein Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE)9 is the most widely used and well-validated mental status test. A score of 10 to 20 on the MMSE is generally considered as moderate AD, and 10 Other mental status testing options include:

  • Blessed Information-Memory-Concentration (BIMC)
  • Blessed Orientation-Memory-Concentration (BOMC)
  • Short Test of Mental Status (STMS)
  • Saint Louis University Mental Status (SLUMS).11,12
Neuropsychological tests have limitations, but they can supplement clinical cognitive assessment by detecting milder cases and may help answer questions about a patient’s ability to drive or live alone (Box 2).13,14

Reversible causes. If the patient is generally healthy, a core of laboratory tests is recommended in the diagnostic workup (Table 1).6,15 Other options include:

  • CSF examination for atypical presentations, such as unusually rapid symptom progression, altered consciousness, or other neurologic manifestations
  • EEG to differentiate delirium, seizure disorders, encephalopathies, or a rapidly progressing dementia such as CreutzfeldtJakob disease.

Only 1% of dementia causes are considered reversible,16 but keep them in mind in the AD differential diagnosis (Table 2). Depression, vitamin B12 deficiency, medication side effects, and hypothyroidism are common comorbidities in elderly patients, particularly in those with suspected dementia. Correcting these problems might or might not reverse the dementia.

Because delirium may be the initial presentation of AD or reversible causes, re-evaluate patients for dementia after delirium clears.

Neuroimaging. Structural neuroimaging with a noncontrast CT or MRI is appropriate in the initial evaluation of patients with dementia.17 More routinely, it is used to exclude rare but potentially correctable dementia causes, such as space-occupying lesions.18 Hippocampal and entorhinal volume are measured most often in discriminating AD from non-demented aging and other dementias.19

Positron emission tomography (PET) using fluorine-18-labeled deoxyglucose (FDG) may help differentiate characteristic patterns of cerebral hypometabolism in the temporoparietal lobes in AD from fronto-temporal dementia (FTD) and other less common dementias, particularly during the earliest stages of the disease.19 Medi-care reimbursement for brain PET is limited to differentiating FTD from AD.

Table 1

Recommended lab tests for Alzheimer’s disease workup

TestRationale
CBCAnemia and signs of infection
Vitamin B12Related to reversible dementia, anemia
FolateRelated to reversible dementia, anemia
HomocysteineMore accurate than individual B12/folate tests
C-reactive proteinOngoing inflamatory reaction
Thyroid functionHypothyroidism (reversible dementia)
Liver functionMetabolic causes of cognitive impairment
Renal functionUremia, metabolic causes of cognitive impairment
ElectrolytesHypo/hypernatremia as a cognitive impairment cause
GlucoseRecurrent hypoglycemia, diabetes mellitus
Lipid panelVascular dementia risk factor
Baseline ECGCardiac abnormalities as vascular risk factors
STS (optional)Neurosyphilis
CBC: complete blood count; ECG: electrocardiogram;
STS: serologic test for syphilis
Source: Adapted from references 6,15
Table 2

Detecting causes of potentially reversible cognitive impairment

CauseExamplesSuggested tests
Space-occupying lesionsSubdural hematoma, benign tumors, hydrocephalusCT/MRI without contrast
Infectious diseasesAIDS dementia complex, syphilis, Lyme diseaseSerologic tests
Endocrinopathies/ metabolic/autoimmune disordersHypothyroidism, Cushing’s disease, uremia, hepatic encephalopathy, Wilson’s disease, recurrent hypoglycemia, chronic hypocalcemia, multiple sclerosis, disseminated SLE, sarcoidosisThyroid panel, renal and liver function tests, electrolytes, slit lamp test, serum ceruloplasmin
PsychiatricDepression, alcohol dependenceGeriatric Depression Scale, assess vitamin deficiency states
Nutritional deficienciesVitamin B12, thiamine (Wernicke-Korsakoff syndrome), pyridoxine, niacin (pellagra)Vitamin B12, homocysteine
Medication effectsBenzodiazepines, barbiturates, anticholinergics, opioid analgesics, antihypertensives, antiarrhythmics, antidepressants, anticonvulsants, cardiac drugs such as digitalis and derivatives (among others)Review patients’ medications for drugs that can cause cognitive changes
OthersAutoimmune diseases, heavy metals, illicit drugs, obstructive sleep apneaDrug screens and specific tests

Diagnostic criteria

NINCDS-ADRDA. Neuropsychological AD assessment criteria developed by the National Institute of Neurological and Communicative Disorders and Stroke and Alzheimer’s Disease and Related Disorders Association (NINCDS-ADRDA) classify AD as probable, possible, or definite:

 

 

Possible AD is considered when a patient has an atypical onset, presentation, or course and other secondary illnesses capable of producing dementia are not believed to be the cause.

Probable AD is diagnosed when dementia is established by clinical exam and con- firmed with cognitive testing, where ≥2 cognitive domains are progressively affected; includes gradual memory loss not caused by another systemic or brain disease, with age of onset between 40 and 90 years.

Definite AD requires histopathologic evidence of AD in addition to fulfilling criteria for probable AD.20

DSM-IV-TR. Similar but broader DSM-IVTR criteria describe an insidious progressive cognitive decline that affects recent memory and ≥1 other cognitive domain (apraxia, aphasia, agnosia, or executive functioning). This cognitive decline impairs social and occupational function, represents a change from a higher level, and is not due to other causes such as delirium.21

NINCDS-ADRDA and DSM-IV-TR criteria have comparable sensitivity and specificity for clinical AD diagnosis. Neither requires neuropathologic or genetic assessment (Box 3).15,17,22-24 Neuroimaging and other tests may be required to rule out other brain diseases that may cause dementia.

Other causes of dementia

Mild cognitive impairment (MCI) may represent a prodromal state for the earliest clinical manifestations of dementia. Symptoms include memory complaints but generally preserved activities of daily living.

Originally introduced to define a progressive, single-symptom amnestic syndrome, MCI has evolved into a classification of amnestic and non-amnestic MCI with single or multiple domains.25 Amnestic MCI is the most specifically correlated with AD.26 Neurobiologic similarities between amnestic MCI and clinically diagnosed AD include:

  • neuropsychiatric symptoms, such as apathy, mood disturbance, irritability and anxiety
  • over-representation of the APOE ε4 allele
  • volumetric loss in the entorhinal cortex and hippocampus as measured by MRI
  • Glucose hypometabolism in AD-typical regions as measured by FDG-PET
  • neuronal loss in vulnerable brain regions.26
Most patients with MCI go on to meet AD criteria within 5 to 10 years, and approximately 80% of those originally diagnosed with MCI prove to have AD at post-mortem histopathologic examination.26,27

Dementia with Lewy bodies (DLB) is the second most common dementing disorder in late life—after Alzheimer’s dementia— and two-thirds of DLB cases overlap with AD. Core DLB clinical features include early recurrent visual hallucinations, fluctuating cognition, spontaneous parkinsonism, and sensitivity to conventional antipsychotics.15,28

Parkinson’s disease (PD) and DLB may represent a clinicopathologic continuum, and substantial overlap exists among AD, DLB, and PD in underlying disease process and clinical presentation.15,29 Hallucinations, depression, delusions, and delusional misidentification are seen more often in patients with DLB than AD.15

Vascular dementia (VaD) was once thought to account for 15% to 20% of dementing illnesses, but discrete VaD is now viewed as much less common. Whatever the underlying vasculopathy, vascular lesions often co-exist with other causes of dementia—usually AD (in 77% of presumed VaD cases).30

Compared with AD, patients with VaD have a more subcortical dementia with difficulty retrieving words, organizing and solving complex problems, “absent-mindedness,” and psychomotor slowing with relatively preserved language skills. VaD is thought to have a more abrupt onset than AD and “stepladder” deterioration.

Frontotemporal dementia (FTD)—such as Pick’s disease—is associated with focal atrophy of the frontal and/or temporal lobes. Mean onset is age 52 to 56, and FTD is less common than AD, VaD, or DLB.

FTD often presents with gradual personality changes (with inappropriate responses or activities) or language changes (with severe naming difficulty and problems with word meaning).31 Features that may help differentiate FTD from AD include:

  • disinhibition/apathy with personality change
  • affect disregulation
  • behavioral disturbance (frontal type) and expressive/receptive language changes (semantic or primary progressive aphasia) with relatively mild memory loss.32,33
Unlike AD, memory usually is unaffected in early FTD, with problems largely secondary to poor concentration and relating to difficulties with working (immediate) memory.

Other neurodegenerative diseases that might present with dementia include PD, Huntington’s disease, progressive supra-nuclear palsy, corticobasal degeneration, and Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease.33

Box 3

Genetic testing for Alzheimer’s?

Genetic testing may become important for high-risk patients or early-stage Alzheimer’s disease (AD) when preventive/ disease-modifying therapy becomes available. At this time, however, the clinical value and implications of genetic tests remain controversial.17,22

Apolipoprotein E (APOE). The APOE ε4 allele is an established risk factor for AD,23,24 but limitations of APOE testing include:

  • inability to predict with sufficient certainty whether or when a person might develop AD
  • risk of false alarm or false reassurance
  • no established treatment exists for a person with this genetic risk.

Amyloid precursor protein (APP), presenilin 1 (PS1), presenilin 2 (PS2). Age 15

  • Mutations are rare (~1% of AD cases).
  • Increased APP transcriptional activity is an AD risk factor; onset age correlates inversely with levels of APP expression.
  • PS1 mutation testing may benefit patients with early-onset familial AD. If this mutation is found, other presymptomatic at-risk family members may wish to be tested so they can make important life decisions based on the results.17,22 Careful pre- and post-test counseling is critical.
 

 

Related resources

  • Morris JC. Dementia update 2005. Alzheimer Dis Assoc Disord 2005;19:100-17.
  • Boeve BF. A review of the non-Alzheimer dementias. J Clin Psychiatry 2006;67(12)1985-2001.
  • Medscape. Alzheimer’s disease resource center. www.medscape.com/resource/alzheimers.
Drug brand names

  • Donepezil • Aricept
  • Memantine • Namenda
  • Galantamine • Razadyne
  • Rivastigmine • Exelon
Disclosure

Dr. Gebretsadik reports no financial relationship with any company whose products are mentioned in this article or with manufacturers of competing products.

Dr. Grossberg receives grant/research support from Abbott Laboratories, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Forest Laboratories, Eli Lilly and Company, Novartis, Pfizer Inc., Wyeth, Elan, Myriad, Ono Pharmaceutical, and the Alzheimer’s Disease Cooperative Study Consortium. He is a consultant to Bristol-Myers Squibb, Forest Laboratories, GlaxoSmithKline, Janssen Pharmaceutica, Novartis, AstraZeneca, Wyeth, Pfizer Inc., Takeda, and Sepracor.

References

1. Cummings JL. Clinical evaluation as a biomarker for Alzheimer’s disease. J Alzheimer’s Dis 2005;8:327-37.

2. Hodges JR. Alzheimer’s centennial legacy: origins, landmarks and the current status of knowledge concerning cognitive aspects. Brain 2006;129:2811-22.

3. Stern Y. Cognitive reserve and Alzheimer disease. Alzheimer Dis Assoc Disord 2006;20:112-7.

4. Lleó A, Greenberg SM, Growdon JH. Current pharmacotherapy for Alzheimer’s disease. Annu Rev Med 2006;57:513-33.

5. Kennedy GJ, Golde TE, Tarriot PN, Cummings JL. Amyloid-based interventions in Alzheimer’s disease. CNS Spectr 2007;12: 1(suppl 1):1-14.

6. Van der Flier WM, Scheltens P. Use of laboratory and imaging investigations in dementia. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 2005;76:45-52.

7. Galasko D. Biomarkers for Alzheimer’s disease—clinical needs and application. J Alzheimer’s Dis 2005;8:339-46.

8. Sunderland T, Hampel H, Takeda M, et al. Biomarkers in the diagnosis of Alzheimer’s disease: are we ready? J Geriatr Psychiatry Neurol 2006;19:172-9.

9. Folstein MF, Folstein SE, McHugh PR. “Mini-mental state.” A practical method for grading the cognitive state of patients for the clinician. J Psychiatr Res 1975;12(3):189-98.

10. Perneczky R, Wagenpfeil S, Komossa K, et al. Mapping scores onto stages: Mini-Mental State Examination and Clinical Dementia Rating. Am J Geriatr Psychiatry 2006;14:139-44.

11. Tariq SH, Tumosa N, Chibnall JT, et al. Comparison of the Saint Louis University mental status examination and the Mini-Mental State Examination for detecting dementia and mild neurocognitive disorder—a pilot study. Am J Geriatr Psychiatry 2006;14(11):897-9.

12. Agency for Health Care Policy and Research Recognition and initial assessment of Alzheimer’s disease and related dementias. Comparison of mental and functional status tests according to three phases of discrimination difficulty. Available at:http://ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/bv.fcgi?rid=hstat6.table.31677. Accesssed November 6, 2007.

13. Sano M. Neuropsychological testing in the diagnosis of dementia. J Geriatr Psychiatry Neurol 2006;19:155-9.

14. Mohs RC. Neuropsychological assessment of patients with Alzheimer’s disease. In: Psychopharmacology—the fourth generation of progress American College of Neuropsychopharmacology. Available at: http://www.acnp.org/ g4/GN401000133/Default.htm. Accessed November 6, 2007.

15. Morris JC. Dementia update 2005. Alzheimer Dis Assoc Disord 2005;19:100-17.

16. Clarfield AM. Reversible dementia—the implications of a fall in prevalence. Age Ageing 2005;34:544-5.

17. Roberts JS, Cupples LA, Relkin NR, et al. Genetic risk assessment for adult children of people with Alzheimer’s disease: the Risk Evaluation and Education for AD (REVEAL) study. J Geriatr Psychiatry Neurol 2005;18:250-5.

18. Frisoni GB. Structural imaging in the clinical diagnosis of Alzheimer’s disease: problems and tools. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 2001;70:711-18.

19. Ramani A, Jensen JH, Helpern JA. Quantitative MR imaging in Alzheimer disease. Radiology 2006;241(1):26-44.

20. McKhann G, Drachman D, Folstein M, et al. Clinical diagnosis of Alzheimer’s disease: report of the NINCDS-ADRDA Work Group under the auspices of Department of Health and Human Services Task Force on Alzheimer’s Disease. Neurology 1984;34(7):939-44.

21. Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders 4th ed text rev. Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Association; 2000.

22. Roberts JS, Barber M, Brown T, et al. Who seeks genetic susceptibility testing for Alzheimer’s disease? Findings from a multi-site, randomized clinical trial. Genet Med 2004;6(4):197-203.

23. Van der Flier WM, Scheltens P. Epidemiology and risk factors of dementia. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 2005;76:2-7.

24. Blacker D, Lovestone S. Genetics and dementia nosology. J Geriatr Psychiatry Neurol 2006;19:186-91.

25. Busse A, Bischkopf J, Reidel-Heller SG, Angermeyer MS. Subclassifications for mild cognitive impairment: prevalence and predictive validity. Psychol Med 2003;33(6):1029-38.

26. Rasquin SM, Lodder J, Visser PJ, et al. Predictive accuracy of MCI subtypes for Alzheimer’s disease and vascular dementia in subjects with mild cognitive impairment: a 2-year followup study. Dement Geriatr Cogn Disord 2005;19(2-3):113-19.

27. Boyle PA, Wilson RS, Aggarwal NT, et al. Mild cognitive impairment: risk of Alzheimer disease and rate of cognitive decline. Neurology 2006;67:441-5.

28. Geser F, Wenning GK, Poewe W, McKeith I. How to diagnose dementia with Lewy bodies: state of the art. Mov Disord 2005;20(suppl 12):S11-S20.

29. Hardy J. The relationship between Lewy body disease, Parkinson’s disease, and Alzheimer’s disease. Ann NY Acad Sci 2003;991:167-70.

30. Jellinger KA. Vascular-ischemic dementia: an update. J Neural Transm 2002;62(suppl):1-23.

31. McKhann GM, Albert MS, Grossman M, et al. Clinical and pathological diagnosis of frontotemporal dementia: report of the Work Group on Frontotemporal Dementia and Pick’s Disease. Arch Neurol 2001;58:1803-9.

32. Boxer AL, Miller BL. Clinical features of frontotemporal dementia. Alzheimer Dis Assoc Disord 2005;19(suppl):S3-S6.

33. Boeve BF. A review of the non-Alzheimer dementias. J Clin Psychiatry 2006;67(12):1985-2001.

Article PDF
Author and Disclosure Information

Mehret Gebretsadik, MD
Chief resident

George T. Grossberg, MD
Samuel W. Fordyce
Professor Director, division of geriatric psychiatry
Department of neurology and psychiatry Saint Louis University School of Medicine

Issue
Current Psychiatry - 07(01)
Publications
Page Number
53-66
Legacy Keywords
Alzheimer’s disease; Alzheimer’s diagnosis; dementia causes; dementia assessment; acetylcholinesterase inhibitors; donepezil; rivastigmine; galantamine; memantine; Mehret Gebretsadik MD; George Grossberg MD
Sections
Author and Disclosure Information

Mehret Gebretsadik, MD
Chief resident

George T. Grossberg, MD
Samuel W. Fordyce
Professor Director, division of geriatric psychiatry
Department of neurology and psychiatry Saint Louis University School of Medicine

Author and Disclosure Information

Mehret Gebretsadik, MD
Chief resident

George T. Grossberg, MD
Samuel W. Fordyce
Professor Director, division of geriatric psychiatry
Department of neurology and psychiatry Saint Louis University School of Medicine

Article PDF
Article PDF

Accurate and early diagnosis of Alzheimer’s disease (AD) is evolving, and—although not yet definitive—is no longer one of exclusion. With a careful in-office work-up and routine assessment tools, you can accurately identify >90% of patients with late-onset AD.1

AD is by far the most common cause of dementia in older patients. To help you make the diagnosis, this state-of-the-art article discusses:

  • AD’s clinical presentation and course
  • the role of neuropsychological tests for assessing cognitive and functional status
  • neuropsychiatric and medical findings that differentiate AD from other dementia causes
  • indications for structural neuroimaging with CT or MRI.

Presentation and course

Variability. AD’s gradual onset and progression are characterized by prominent memory loss, anomia, constructional apraxia, anosognosia, and personality changes with affect deregulation, behavioral disturbance, and distorted perception.1 Amnesia—particularly deficits in anterograde episodic memory—is the most common presentation, but the disease course is heterogeneous and may be affected by:

  • patient age at onset
  • illness severity at diagnosis
  • comorbid medical and neuropsychiatric illnesses
  • premorbid cerebral reserves (amount of brain damage a person can sustain before reaching a threshold for the clinical expression of dementia).1-3
Box 1

Biomarkers show promise to improve AD diagnosis

Researchers are investigating surrogates for detecting Alzheimer’s disease (AD) and monitoring disease progression.5

Serum and CSF markers. AD is viewed as a series of sequential events, beginning with beta-amyloid (β-amyloid) accumulation and progressing through a pathophysiologic cascade to cell death, transmitter deficit, and dementia. A unique biomarker may be associated with each event, either in the primary disease process of β-amyloid production and accumulation or intermediate processes such as tau hyperphosphorylation, oxidation, and inflammation.5,6

These biochemical markers are found more consistently in cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) than peripherally. Lower CSF β-amyloid (especially β-amyloid 42) and higher CSF tau and tau-phosphorylated (p-tau) have been found in AD patients compared with normal and disease controls.7 Some overlap exists, however, among AD and other dementias. Other possible serum, CSF, and urine markers include isoprostanes, sulfatides, oxysterols, homocysteine, apolipoprotein E, alpha 1-antichymotrypsin, 3-nitrotyrosine, and more.8 No biomarkers are available or recommended for clinical use at this time.

Neuroimaging. Amyloid imaging tracers may increase the capacity of single photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) and positron emission tomography (PET) to detect AD pathology. These tracers have high binding affinity for amyloid and may enable PET/SPECT to detect amyloid deposits in vivo.

Amyloid radioligands are being developed and tested as potential clinical diagnostic tools and surrogate biomarkers of antiamyloid therapies. A radioligand that targets amyloid and neurofibrillary tangles in AD has been developed recently for use as a research tool.

Staging illness severity. AD has 3 clinical stages of cognitive dysfunction:

Mild AD. An individual or close companion may notice increased forgetfulness and word-finding difficulties, a tendency to lose or misplace things, repeated questioning, and some disorientation. Motor skills are intact.

Moderate AD. Cognitive decline continues, memory deteriorates, and self-care ability is markedly impaired. The individual may undergo personality changes, confuse time and place, have trouble communicating and recognizing family members or friends, develop agitation, begin to wander, and experience delusions and hallucinations.

Severe AD. An individual with late-stage disease has severe impairment and can be bedridden, incontinent, and unable to under-stand or speak. Full-time care is required.

Staging informs treatment. In clinical trials, patients with mild-to-moderate AD consistently show small improvements in cognitive and global function when treated with acetylcholinesterase inhibitors (AChEIs) such as donepezil, rivastigmine, and galantamine.4 Donepezil also is approved for use in severe AD.

Memantine is indicated for symptomatic treatment of moderate-to-severe AD. It differs in mechanism of action from the AChEIs and is thought to inhibit cytotoxic overstimulation of glutamatergic neurons.4 For moderately advanced AD, memantine appears to be beneficial alone or in combination with AChEIs.

Dementia assessment

Clinical assessment has low sensitivity for early-phase AD and compromised specificity in advanced stages, where all dementia subtypes are similar and comorbidities may confuse the picture. Promising surrogate biomarkers and other diagnostic tools are being developed (Box 1),5-8 but definitive AD diagnosis still requires post-mortem histopathologic examination of the cerebral cortex.

Box 2

Can your AD patient drive or live alone? Consider neuropsychological assessment

Neuropsychological tests disclose a degree of intellectual impairment that correlates with functional impairment and may be particularly useful for assessing:

  • mild cognitive impairment when diagnosis is doubtful
  • cases where major lifestyle changes may be required, such as driving cessation or assisted-living placement.

These tests can examine performance across different domains of cognitive function, including orientation, memory, attention, naming, comprehension, and praxis.

Limitations. Neuropsychological tests have limitations, including cost and administration time. Some older patients find the tests distressing or tiring, and those with severe dementia are incapable of participating. Patients’ anxiety about taking tests, poor test-taking skills, low motivation/effort, and language, cultural, and educational variables limit these tests’ usefulness and may influence results.

Interpret a neuropsychological evaluation in the context of other clinical data, such as informant-based history of cognitive decline, evidence of impairment in independent activities of daily living, educational background, depression assessment, sensory impairment, or factors other than dementia that may account for impaired performance.

Source: References 13,14

 

 

History and physical exam. Depending on the AD stage at presentation, patients might not be a reliable source of information. For a realistic and unbiased history and evaluation, assess the patient separately and obtain collateral information from reliable informants.

In typical cases, the history guides the physical/neurologic examination. Advancing age and family history are confirmed risk factors for AD; others may include:

  • female gender (after age 80)
  • cardiovascular disease (such as cerebral infarcts, hypertension, elevated cholesterol/homocysteine, smoking, and diabetes mellitus)
  • history of head trauma, especially with loss of consciousness.

Assess premorbid functioning and existing medical conditions. Apraxia, aphasia, and cortical visual impairment may reflect focal signs of atypical AD; consider other neurologic signs in the context of clinical data.

Early and accurate diagnosis of AD is challenging in patients with mixed dementias, comorbid neurologic diseases, or atypical features. Patients with these presentations may require referral to an expert clinician, extensive workup, or longitudinal follow-up before the diagnosis becomes clear.

Neuropsychological testing. Most mental status tests examine orientation, attention/concentration, learning, memory, language, and constructional praxis. The Folstein Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE)9 is the most widely used and well-validated mental status test. A score of 10 to 20 on the MMSE is generally considered as moderate AD, and 10 Other mental status testing options include:

  • Blessed Information-Memory-Concentration (BIMC)
  • Blessed Orientation-Memory-Concentration (BOMC)
  • Short Test of Mental Status (STMS)
  • Saint Louis University Mental Status (SLUMS).11,12
Neuropsychological tests have limitations, but they can supplement clinical cognitive assessment by detecting milder cases and may help answer questions about a patient’s ability to drive or live alone (Box 2).13,14

Reversible causes. If the patient is generally healthy, a core of laboratory tests is recommended in the diagnostic workup (Table 1).6,15 Other options include:

  • CSF examination for atypical presentations, such as unusually rapid symptom progression, altered consciousness, or other neurologic manifestations
  • EEG to differentiate delirium, seizure disorders, encephalopathies, or a rapidly progressing dementia such as CreutzfeldtJakob disease.

Only 1% of dementia causes are considered reversible,16 but keep them in mind in the AD differential diagnosis (Table 2). Depression, vitamin B12 deficiency, medication side effects, and hypothyroidism are common comorbidities in elderly patients, particularly in those with suspected dementia. Correcting these problems might or might not reverse the dementia.

Because delirium may be the initial presentation of AD or reversible causes, re-evaluate patients for dementia after delirium clears.

Neuroimaging. Structural neuroimaging with a noncontrast CT or MRI is appropriate in the initial evaluation of patients with dementia.17 More routinely, it is used to exclude rare but potentially correctable dementia causes, such as space-occupying lesions.18 Hippocampal and entorhinal volume are measured most often in discriminating AD from non-demented aging and other dementias.19

Positron emission tomography (PET) using fluorine-18-labeled deoxyglucose (FDG) may help differentiate characteristic patterns of cerebral hypometabolism in the temporoparietal lobes in AD from fronto-temporal dementia (FTD) and other less common dementias, particularly during the earliest stages of the disease.19 Medi-care reimbursement for brain PET is limited to differentiating FTD from AD.

Table 1

Recommended lab tests for Alzheimer’s disease workup

TestRationale
CBCAnemia and signs of infection
Vitamin B12Related to reversible dementia, anemia
FolateRelated to reversible dementia, anemia
HomocysteineMore accurate than individual B12/folate tests
C-reactive proteinOngoing inflamatory reaction
Thyroid functionHypothyroidism (reversible dementia)
Liver functionMetabolic causes of cognitive impairment
Renal functionUremia, metabolic causes of cognitive impairment
ElectrolytesHypo/hypernatremia as a cognitive impairment cause
GlucoseRecurrent hypoglycemia, diabetes mellitus
Lipid panelVascular dementia risk factor
Baseline ECGCardiac abnormalities as vascular risk factors
STS (optional)Neurosyphilis
CBC: complete blood count; ECG: electrocardiogram;
STS: serologic test for syphilis
Source: Adapted from references 6,15
Table 2

Detecting causes of potentially reversible cognitive impairment

CauseExamplesSuggested tests
Space-occupying lesionsSubdural hematoma, benign tumors, hydrocephalusCT/MRI without contrast
Infectious diseasesAIDS dementia complex, syphilis, Lyme diseaseSerologic tests
Endocrinopathies/ metabolic/autoimmune disordersHypothyroidism, Cushing’s disease, uremia, hepatic encephalopathy, Wilson’s disease, recurrent hypoglycemia, chronic hypocalcemia, multiple sclerosis, disseminated SLE, sarcoidosisThyroid panel, renal and liver function tests, electrolytes, slit lamp test, serum ceruloplasmin
PsychiatricDepression, alcohol dependenceGeriatric Depression Scale, assess vitamin deficiency states
Nutritional deficienciesVitamin B12, thiamine (Wernicke-Korsakoff syndrome), pyridoxine, niacin (pellagra)Vitamin B12, homocysteine
Medication effectsBenzodiazepines, barbiturates, anticholinergics, opioid analgesics, antihypertensives, antiarrhythmics, antidepressants, anticonvulsants, cardiac drugs such as digitalis and derivatives (among others)Review patients’ medications for drugs that can cause cognitive changes
OthersAutoimmune diseases, heavy metals, illicit drugs, obstructive sleep apneaDrug screens and specific tests

Diagnostic criteria

NINCDS-ADRDA. Neuropsychological AD assessment criteria developed by the National Institute of Neurological and Communicative Disorders and Stroke and Alzheimer’s Disease and Related Disorders Association (NINCDS-ADRDA) classify AD as probable, possible, or definite:

 

 

Possible AD is considered when a patient has an atypical onset, presentation, or course and other secondary illnesses capable of producing dementia are not believed to be the cause.

Probable AD is diagnosed when dementia is established by clinical exam and con- firmed with cognitive testing, where ≥2 cognitive domains are progressively affected; includes gradual memory loss not caused by another systemic or brain disease, with age of onset between 40 and 90 years.

Definite AD requires histopathologic evidence of AD in addition to fulfilling criteria for probable AD.20

DSM-IV-TR. Similar but broader DSM-IVTR criteria describe an insidious progressive cognitive decline that affects recent memory and ≥1 other cognitive domain (apraxia, aphasia, agnosia, or executive functioning). This cognitive decline impairs social and occupational function, represents a change from a higher level, and is not due to other causes such as delirium.21

NINCDS-ADRDA and DSM-IV-TR criteria have comparable sensitivity and specificity for clinical AD diagnosis. Neither requires neuropathologic or genetic assessment (Box 3).15,17,22-24 Neuroimaging and other tests may be required to rule out other brain diseases that may cause dementia.

Other causes of dementia

Mild cognitive impairment (MCI) may represent a prodromal state for the earliest clinical manifestations of dementia. Symptoms include memory complaints but generally preserved activities of daily living.

Originally introduced to define a progressive, single-symptom amnestic syndrome, MCI has evolved into a classification of amnestic and non-amnestic MCI with single or multiple domains.25 Amnestic MCI is the most specifically correlated with AD.26 Neurobiologic similarities between amnestic MCI and clinically diagnosed AD include:

  • neuropsychiatric symptoms, such as apathy, mood disturbance, irritability and anxiety
  • over-representation of the APOE ε4 allele
  • volumetric loss in the entorhinal cortex and hippocampus as measured by MRI
  • Glucose hypometabolism in AD-typical regions as measured by FDG-PET
  • neuronal loss in vulnerable brain regions.26
Most patients with MCI go on to meet AD criteria within 5 to 10 years, and approximately 80% of those originally diagnosed with MCI prove to have AD at post-mortem histopathologic examination.26,27

Dementia with Lewy bodies (DLB) is the second most common dementing disorder in late life—after Alzheimer’s dementia— and two-thirds of DLB cases overlap with AD. Core DLB clinical features include early recurrent visual hallucinations, fluctuating cognition, spontaneous parkinsonism, and sensitivity to conventional antipsychotics.15,28

Parkinson’s disease (PD) and DLB may represent a clinicopathologic continuum, and substantial overlap exists among AD, DLB, and PD in underlying disease process and clinical presentation.15,29 Hallucinations, depression, delusions, and delusional misidentification are seen more often in patients with DLB than AD.15

Vascular dementia (VaD) was once thought to account for 15% to 20% of dementing illnesses, but discrete VaD is now viewed as much less common. Whatever the underlying vasculopathy, vascular lesions often co-exist with other causes of dementia—usually AD (in 77% of presumed VaD cases).30

Compared with AD, patients with VaD have a more subcortical dementia with difficulty retrieving words, organizing and solving complex problems, “absent-mindedness,” and psychomotor slowing with relatively preserved language skills. VaD is thought to have a more abrupt onset than AD and “stepladder” deterioration.

Frontotemporal dementia (FTD)—such as Pick’s disease—is associated with focal atrophy of the frontal and/or temporal lobes. Mean onset is age 52 to 56, and FTD is less common than AD, VaD, or DLB.

FTD often presents with gradual personality changes (with inappropriate responses or activities) or language changes (with severe naming difficulty and problems with word meaning).31 Features that may help differentiate FTD from AD include:

  • disinhibition/apathy with personality change
  • affect disregulation
  • behavioral disturbance (frontal type) and expressive/receptive language changes (semantic or primary progressive aphasia) with relatively mild memory loss.32,33
Unlike AD, memory usually is unaffected in early FTD, with problems largely secondary to poor concentration and relating to difficulties with working (immediate) memory.

Other neurodegenerative diseases that might present with dementia include PD, Huntington’s disease, progressive supra-nuclear palsy, corticobasal degeneration, and Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease.33

Box 3

Genetic testing for Alzheimer’s?

Genetic testing may become important for high-risk patients or early-stage Alzheimer’s disease (AD) when preventive/ disease-modifying therapy becomes available. At this time, however, the clinical value and implications of genetic tests remain controversial.17,22

Apolipoprotein E (APOE). The APOE ε4 allele is an established risk factor for AD,23,24 but limitations of APOE testing include:

  • inability to predict with sufficient certainty whether or when a person might develop AD
  • risk of false alarm or false reassurance
  • no established treatment exists for a person with this genetic risk.

Amyloid precursor protein (APP), presenilin 1 (PS1), presenilin 2 (PS2). Age 15

  • Mutations are rare (~1% of AD cases).
  • Increased APP transcriptional activity is an AD risk factor; onset age correlates inversely with levels of APP expression.
  • PS1 mutation testing may benefit patients with early-onset familial AD. If this mutation is found, other presymptomatic at-risk family members may wish to be tested so they can make important life decisions based on the results.17,22 Careful pre- and post-test counseling is critical.
 

 

Related resources

  • Morris JC. Dementia update 2005. Alzheimer Dis Assoc Disord 2005;19:100-17.
  • Boeve BF. A review of the non-Alzheimer dementias. J Clin Psychiatry 2006;67(12)1985-2001.
  • Medscape. Alzheimer’s disease resource center. www.medscape.com/resource/alzheimers.
Drug brand names

  • Donepezil • Aricept
  • Memantine • Namenda
  • Galantamine • Razadyne
  • Rivastigmine • Exelon
Disclosure

Dr. Gebretsadik reports no financial relationship with any company whose products are mentioned in this article or with manufacturers of competing products.

Dr. Grossberg receives grant/research support from Abbott Laboratories, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Forest Laboratories, Eli Lilly and Company, Novartis, Pfizer Inc., Wyeth, Elan, Myriad, Ono Pharmaceutical, and the Alzheimer’s Disease Cooperative Study Consortium. He is a consultant to Bristol-Myers Squibb, Forest Laboratories, GlaxoSmithKline, Janssen Pharmaceutica, Novartis, AstraZeneca, Wyeth, Pfizer Inc., Takeda, and Sepracor.

Accurate and early diagnosis of Alzheimer’s disease (AD) is evolving, and—although not yet definitive—is no longer one of exclusion. With a careful in-office work-up and routine assessment tools, you can accurately identify >90% of patients with late-onset AD.1

AD is by far the most common cause of dementia in older patients. To help you make the diagnosis, this state-of-the-art article discusses:

  • AD’s clinical presentation and course
  • the role of neuropsychological tests for assessing cognitive and functional status
  • neuropsychiatric and medical findings that differentiate AD from other dementia causes
  • indications for structural neuroimaging with CT or MRI.

Presentation and course

Variability. AD’s gradual onset and progression are characterized by prominent memory loss, anomia, constructional apraxia, anosognosia, and personality changes with affect deregulation, behavioral disturbance, and distorted perception.1 Amnesia—particularly deficits in anterograde episodic memory—is the most common presentation, but the disease course is heterogeneous and may be affected by:

  • patient age at onset
  • illness severity at diagnosis
  • comorbid medical and neuropsychiatric illnesses
  • premorbid cerebral reserves (amount of brain damage a person can sustain before reaching a threshold for the clinical expression of dementia).1-3
Box 1

Biomarkers show promise to improve AD diagnosis

Researchers are investigating surrogates for detecting Alzheimer’s disease (AD) and monitoring disease progression.5

Serum and CSF markers. AD is viewed as a series of sequential events, beginning with beta-amyloid (β-amyloid) accumulation and progressing through a pathophysiologic cascade to cell death, transmitter deficit, and dementia. A unique biomarker may be associated with each event, either in the primary disease process of β-amyloid production and accumulation or intermediate processes such as tau hyperphosphorylation, oxidation, and inflammation.5,6

These biochemical markers are found more consistently in cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) than peripherally. Lower CSF β-amyloid (especially β-amyloid 42) and higher CSF tau and tau-phosphorylated (p-tau) have been found in AD patients compared with normal and disease controls.7 Some overlap exists, however, among AD and other dementias. Other possible serum, CSF, and urine markers include isoprostanes, sulfatides, oxysterols, homocysteine, apolipoprotein E, alpha 1-antichymotrypsin, 3-nitrotyrosine, and more.8 No biomarkers are available or recommended for clinical use at this time.

Neuroimaging. Amyloid imaging tracers may increase the capacity of single photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) and positron emission tomography (PET) to detect AD pathology. These tracers have high binding affinity for amyloid and may enable PET/SPECT to detect amyloid deposits in vivo.

Amyloid radioligands are being developed and tested as potential clinical diagnostic tools and surrogate biomarkers of antiamyloid therapies. A radioligand that targets amyloid and neurofibrillary tangles in AD has been developed recently for use as a research tool.

Staging illness severity. AD has 3 clinical stages of cognitive dysfunction:

Mild AD. An individual or close companion may notice increased forgetfulness and word-finding difficulties, a tendency to lose or misplace things, repeated questioning, and some disorientation. Motor skills are intact.

Moderate AD. Cognitive decline continues, memory deteriorates, and self-care ability is markedly impaired. The individual may undergo personality changes, confuse time and place, have trouble communicating and recognizing family members or friends, develop agitation, begin to wander, and experience delusions and hallucinations.

Severe AD. An individual with late-stage disease has severe impairment and can be bedridden, incontinent, and unable to under-stand or speak. Full-time care is required.

Staging informs treatment. In clinical trials, patients with mild-to-moderate AD consistently show small improvements in cognitive and global function when treated with acetylcholinesterase inhibitors (AChEIs) such as donepezil, rivastigmine, and galantamine.4 Donepezil also is approved for use in severe AD.

Memantine is indicated for symptomatic treatment of moderate-to-severe AD. It differs in mechanism of action from the AChEIs and is thought to inhibit cytotoxic overstimulation of glutamatergic neurons.4 For moderately advanced AD, memantine appears to be beneficial alone or in combination with AChEIs.

Dementia assessment

Clinical assessment has low sensitivity for early-phase AD and compromised specificity in advanced stages, where all dementia subtypes are similar and comorbidities may confuse the picture. Promising surrogate biomarkers and other diagnostic tools are being developed (Box 1),5-8 but definitive AD diagnosis still requires post-mortem histopathologic examination of the cerebral cortex.

Box 2

Can your AD patient drive or live alone? Consider neuropsychological assessment

Neuropsychological tests disclose a degree of intellectual impairment that correlates with functional impairment and may be particularly useful for assessing:

  • mild cognitive impairment when diagnosis is doubtful
  • cases where major lifestyle changes may be required, such as driving cessation or assisted-living placement.

These tests can examine performance across different domains of cognitive function, including orientation, memory, attention, naming, comprehension, and praxis.

Limitations. Neuropsychological tests have limitations, including cost and administration time. Some older patients find the tests distressing or tiring, and those with severe dementia are incapable of participating. Patients’ anxiety about taking tests, poor test-taking skills, low motivation/effort, and language, cultural, and educational variables limit these tests’ usefulness and may influence results.

Interpret a neuropsychological evaluation in the context of other clinical data, such as informant-based history of cognitive decline, evidence of impairment in independent activities of daily living, educational background, depression assessment, sensory impairment, or factors other than dementia that may account for impaired performance.

Source: References 13,14

 

 

History and physical exam. Depending on the AD stage at presentation, patients might not be a reliable source of information. For a realistic and unbiased history and evaluation, assess the patient separately and obtain collateral information from reliable informants.

In typical cases, the history guides the physical/neurologic examination. Advancing age and family history are confirmed risk factors for AD; others may include:

  • female gender (after age 80)
  • cardiovascular disease (such as cerebral infarcts, hypertension, elevated cholesterol/homocysteine, smoking, and diabetes mellitus)
  • history of head trauma, especially with loss of consciousness.

Assess premorbid functioning and existing medical conditions. Apraxia, aphasia, and cortical visual impairment may reflect focal signs of atypical AD; consider other neurologic signs in the context of clinical data.

Early and accurate diagnosis of AD is challenging in patients with mixed dementias, comorbid neurologic diseases, or atypical features. Patients with these presentations may require referral to an expert clinician, extensive workup, or longitudinal follow-up before the diagnosis becomes clear.

Neuropsychological testing. Most mental status tests examine orientation, attention/concentration, learning, memory, language, and constructional praxis. The Folstein Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE)9 is the most widely used and well-validated mental status test. A score of 10 to 20 on the MMSE is generally considered as moderate AD, and 10 Other mental status testing options include:

  • Blessed Information-Memory-Concentration (BIMC)
  • Blessed Orientation-Memory-Concentration (BOMC)
  • Short Test of Mental Status (STMS)
  • Saint Louis University Mental Status (SLUMS).11,12
Neuropsychological tests have limitations, but they can supplement clinical cognitive assessment by detecting milder cases and may help answer questions about a patient’s ability to drive or live alone (Box 2).13,14

Reversible causes. If the patient is generally healthy, a core of laboratory tests is recommended in the diagnostic workup (Table 1).6,15 Other options include:

  • CSF examination for atypical presentations, such as unusually rapid symptom progression, altered consciousness, or other neurologic manifestations
  • EEG to differentiate delirium, seizure disorders, encephalopathies, or a rapidly progressing dementia such as CreutzfeldtJakob disease.

Only 1% of dementia causes are considered reversible,16 but keep them in mind in the AD differential diagnosis (Table 2). Depression, vitamin B12 deficiency, medication side effects, and hypothyroidism are common comorbidities in elderly patients, particularly in those with suspected dementia. Correcting these problems might or might not reverse the dementia.

Because delirium may be the initial presentation of AD or reversible causes, re-evaluate patients for dementia after delirium clears.

Neuroimaging. Structural neuroimaging with a noncontrast CT or MRI is appropriate in the initial evaluation of patients with dementia.17 More routinely, it is used to exclude rare but potentially correctable dementia causes, such as space-occupying lesions.18 Hippocampal and entorhinal volume are measured most often in discriminating AD from non-demented aging and other dementias.19

Positron emission tomography (PET) using fluorine-18-labeled deoxyglucose (FDG) may help differentiate characteristic patterns of cerebral hypometabolism in the temporoparietal lobes in AD from fronto-temporal dementia (FTD) and other less common dementias, particularly during the earliest stages of the disease.19 Medi-care reimbursement for brain PET is limited to differentiating FTD from AD.

Table 1

Recommended lab tests for Alzheimer’s disease workup

TestRationale
CBCAnemia and signs of infection
Vitamin B12Related to reversible dementia, anemia
FolateRelated to reversible dementia, anemia
HomocysteineMore accurate than individual B12/folate tests
C-reactive proteinOngoing inflamatory reaction
Thyroid functionHypothyroidism (reversible dementia)
Liver functionMetabolic causes of cognitive impairment
Renal functionUremia, metabolic causes of cognitive impairment
ElectrolytesHypo/hypernatremia as a cognitive impairment cause
GlucoseRecurrent hypoglycemia, diabetes mellitus
Lipid panelVascular dementia risk factor
Baseline ECGCardiac abnormalities as vascular risk factors
STS (optional)Neurosyphilis
CBC: complete blood count; ECG: electrocardiogram;
STS: serologic test for syphilis
Source: Adapted from references 6,15
Table 2

Detecting causes of potentially reversible cognitive impairment

CauseExamplesSuggested tests
Space-occupying lesionsSubdural hematoma, benign tumors, hydrocephalusCT/MRI without contrast
Infectious diseasesAIDS dementia complex, syphilis, Lyme diseaseSerologic tests
Endocrinopathies/ metabolic/autoimmune disordersHypothyroidism, Cushing’s disease, uremia, hepatic encephalopathy, Wilson’s disease, recurrent hypoglycemia, chronic hypocalcemia, multiple sclerosis, disseminated SLE, sarcoidosisThyroid panel, renal and liver function tests, electrolytes, slit lamp test, serum ceruloplasmin
PsychiatricDepression, alcohol dependenceGeriatric Depression Scale, assess vitamin deficiency states
Nutritional deficienciesVitamin B12, thiamine (Wernicke-Korsakoff syndrome), pyridoxine, niacin (pellagra)Vitamin B12, homocysteine
Medication effectsBenzodiazepines, barbiturates, anticholinergics, opioid analgesics, antihypertensives, antiarrhythmics, antidepressants, anticonvulsants, cardiac drugs such as digitalis and derivatives (among others)Review patients’ medications for drugs that can cause cognitive changes
OthersAutoimmune diseases, heavy metals, illicit drugs, obstructive sleep apneaDrug screens and specific tests

Diagnostic criteria

NINCDS-ADRDA. Neuropsychological AD assessment criteria developed by the National Institute of Neurological and Communicative Disorders and Stroke and Alzheimer’s Disease and Related Disorders Association (NINCDS-ADRDA) classify AD as probable, possible, or definite:

 

 

Possible AD is considered when a patient has an atypical onset, presentation, or course and other secondary illnesses capable of producing dementia are not believed to be the cause.

Probable AD is diagnosed when dementia is established by clinical exam and con- firmed with cognitive testing, where ≥2 cognitive domains are progressively affected; includes gradual memory loss not caused by another systemic or brain disease, with age of onset between 40 and 90 years.

Definite AD requires histopathologic evidence of AD in addition to fulfilling criteria for probable AD.20

DSM-IV-TR. Similar but broader DSM-IVTR criteria describe an insidious progressive cognitive decline that affects recent memory and ≥1 other cognitive domain (apraxia, aphasia, agnosia, or executive functioning). This cognitive decline impairs social and occupational function, represents a change from a higher level, and is not due to other causes such as delirium.21

NINCDS-ADRDA and DSM-IV-TR criteria have comparable sensitivity and specificity for clinical AD diagnosis. Neither requires neuropathologic or genetic assessment (Box 3).15,17,22-24 Neuroimaging and other tests may be required to rule out other brain diseases that may cause dementia.

Other causes of dementia

Mild cognitive impairment (MCI) may represent a prodromal state for the earliest clinical manifestations of dementia. Symptoms include memory complaints but generally preserved activities of daily living.

Originally introduced to define a progressive, single-symptom amnestic syndrome, MCI has evolved into a classification of amnestic and non-amnestic MCI with single or multiple domains.25 Amnestic MCI is the most specifically correlated with AD.26 Neurobiologic similarities between amnestic MCI and clinically diagnosed AD include:

  • neuropsychiatric symptoms, such as apathy, mood disturbance, irritability and anxiety
  • over-representation of the APOE ε4 allele
  • volumetric loss in the entorhinal cortex and hippocampus as measured by MRI
  • Glucose hypometabolism in AD-typical regions as measured by FDG-PET
  • neuronal loss in vulnerable brain regions.26
Most patients with MCI go on to meet AD criteria within 5 to 10 years, and approximately 80% of those originally diagnosed with MCI prove to have AD at post-mortem histopathologic examination.26,27

Dementia with Lewy bodies (DLB) is the second most common dementing disorder in late life—after Alzheimer’s dementia— and two-thirds of DLB cases overlap with AD. Core DLB clinical features include early recurrent visual hallucinations, fluctuating cognition, spontaneous parkinsonism, and sensitivity to conventional antipsychotics.15,28

Parkinson’s disease (PD) and DLB may represent a clinicopathologic continuum, and substantial overlap exists among AD, DLB, and PD in underlying disease process and clinical presentation.15,29 Hallucinations, depression, delusions, and delusional misidentification are seen more often in patients with DLB than AD.15

Vascular dementia (VaD) was once thought to account for 15% to 20% of dementing illnesses, but discrete VaD is now viewed as much less common. Whatever the underlying vasculopathy, vascular lesions often co-exist with other causes of dementia—usually AD (in 77% of presumed VaD cases).30

Compared with AD, patients with VaD have a more subcortical dementia with difficulty retrieving words, organizing and solving complex problems, “absent-mindedness,” and psychomotor slowing with relatively preserved language skills. VaD is thought to have a more abrupt onset than AD and “stepladder” deterioration.

Frontotemporal dementia (FTD)—such as Pick’s disease—is associated with focal atrophy of the frontal and/or temporal lobes. Mean onset is age 52 to 56, and FTD is less common than AD, VaD, or DLB.

FTD often presents with gradual personality changes (with inappropriate responses or activities) or language changes (with severe naming difficulty and problems with word meaning).31 Features that may help differentiate FTD from AD include:

  • disinhibition/apathy with personality change
  • affect disregulation
  • behavioral disturbance (frontal type) and expressive/receptive language changes (semantic or primary progressive aphasia) with relatively mild memory loss.32,33
Unlike AD, memory usually is unaffected in early FTD, with problems largely secondary to poor concentration and relating to difficulties with working (immediate) memory.

Other neurodegenerative diseases that might present with dementia include PD, Huntington’s disease, progressive supra-nuclear palsy, corticobasal degeneration, and Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease.33

Box 3

Genetic testing for Alzheimer’s?

Genetic testing may become important for high-risk patients or early-stage Alzheimer’s disease (AD) when preventive/ disease-modifying therapy becomes available. At this time, however, the clinical value and implications of genetic tests remain controversial.17,22

Apolipoprotein E (APOE). The APOE ε4 allele is an established risk factor for AD,23,24 but limitations of APOE testing include:

  • inability to predict with sufficient certainty whether or when a person might develop AD
  • risk of false alarm or false reassurance
  • no established treatment exists for a person with this genetic risk.

Amyloid precursor protein (APP), presenilin 1 (PS1), presenilin 2 (PS2). Age 15

  • Mutations are rare (~1% of AD cases).
  • Increased APP transcriptional activity is an AD risk factor; onset age correlates inversely with levels of APP expression.
  • PS1 mutation testing may benefit patients with early-onset familial AD. If this mutation is found, other presymptomatic at-risk family members may wish to be tested so they can make important life decisions based on the results.17,22 Careful pre- and post-test counseling is critical.
 

 

Related resources

  • Morris JC. Dementia update 2005. Alzheimer Dis Assoc Disord 2005;19:100-17.
  • Boeve BF. A review of the non-Alzheimer dementias. J Clin Psychiatry 2006;67(12)1985-2001.
  • Medscape. Alzheimer’s disease resource center. www.medscape.com/resource/alzheimers.
Drug brand names

  • Donepezil • Aricept
  • Memantine • Namenda
  • Galantamine • Razadyne
  • Rivastigmine • Exelon
Disclosure

Dr. Gebretsadik reports no financial relationship with any company whose products are mentioned in this article or with manufacturers of competing products.

Dr. Grossberg receives grant/research support from Abbott Laboratories, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Forest Laboratories, Eli Lilly and Company, Novartis, Pfizer Inc., Wyeth, Elan, Myriad, Ono Pharmaceutical, and the Alzheimer’s Disease Cooperative Study Consortium. He is a consultant to Bristol-Myers Squibb, Forest Laboratories, GlaxoSmithKline, Janssen Pharmaceutica, Novartis, AstraZeneca, Wyeth, Pfizer Inc., Takeda, and Sepracor.

References

1. Cummings JL. Clinical evaluation as a biomarker for Alzheimer’s disease. J Alzheimer’s Dis 2005;8:327-37.

2. Hodges JR. Alzheimer’s centennial legacy: origins, landmarks and the current status of knowledge concerning cognitive aspects. Brain 2006;129:2811-22.

3. Stern Y. Cognitive reserve and Alzheimer disease. Alzheimer Dis Assoc Disord 2006;20:112-7.

4. Lleó A, Greenberg SM, Growdon JH. Current pharmacotherapy for Alzheimer’s disease. Annu Rev Med 2006;57:513-33.

5. Kennedy GJ, Golde TE, Tarriot PN, Cummings JL. Amyloid-based interventions in Alzheimer’s disease. CNS Spectr 2007;12: 1(suppl 1):1-14.

6. Van der Flier WM, Scheltens P. Use of laboratory and imaging investigations in dementia. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 2005;76:45-52.

7. Galasko D. Biomarkers for Alzheimer’s disease—clinical needs and application. J Alzheimer’s Dis 2005;8:339-46.

8. Sunderland T, Hampel H, Takeda M, et al. Biomarkers in the diagnosis of Alzheimer’s disease: are we ready? J Geriatr Psychiatry Neurol 2006;19:172-9.

9. Folstein MF, Folstein SE, McHugh PR. “Mini-mental state.” A practical method for grading the cognitive state of patients for the clinician. J Psychiatr Res 1975;12(3):189-98.

10. Perneczky R, Wagenpfeil S, Komossa K, et al. Mapping scores onto stages: Mini-Mental State Examination and Clinical Dementia Rating. Am J Geriatr Psychiatry 2006;14:139-44.

11. Tariq SH, Tumosa N, Chibnall JT, et al. Comparison of the Saint Louis University mental status examination and the Mini-Mental State Examination for detecting dementia and mild neurocognitive disorder—a pilot study. Am J Geriatr Psychiatry 2006;14(11):897-9.

12. Agency for Health Care Policy and Research Recognition and initial assessment of Alzheimer’s disease and related dementias. Comparison of mental and functional status tests according to three phases of discrimination difficulty. Available at:http://ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/bv.fcgi?rid=hstat6.table.31677. Accesssed November 6, 2007.

13. Sano M. Neuropsychological testing in the diagnosis of dementia. J Geriatr Psychiatry Neurol 2006;19:155-9.

14. Mohs RC. Neuropsychological assessment of patients with Alzheimer’s disease. In: Psychopharmacology—the fourth generation of progress American College of Neuropsychopharmacology. Available at: http://www.acnp.org/ g4/GN401000133/Default.htm. Accessed November 6, 2007.

15. Morris JC. Dementia update 2005. Alzheimer Dis Assoc Disord 2005;19:100-17.

16. Clarfield AM. Reversible dementia—the implications of a fall in prevalence. Age Ageing 2005;34:544-5.

17. Roberts JS, Cupples LA, Relkin NR, et al. Genetic risk assessment for adult children of people with Alzheimer’s disease: the Risk Evaluation and Education for AD (REVEAL) study. J Geriatr Psychiatry Neurol 2005;18:250-5.

18. Frisoni GB. Structural imaging in the clinical diagnosis of Alzheimer’s disease: problems and tools. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 2001;70:711-18.

19. Ramani A, Jensen JH, Helpern JA. Quantitative MR imaging in Alzheimer disease. Radiology 2006;241(1):26-44.

20. McKhann G, Drachman D, Folstein M, et al. Clinical diagnosis of Alzheimer’s disease: report of the NINCDS-ADRDA Work Group under the auspices of Department of Health and Human Services Task Force on Alzheimer’s Disease. Neurology 1984;34(7):939-44.

21. Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders 4th ed text rev. Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Association; 2000.

22. Roberts JS, Barber M, Brown T, et al. Who seeks genetic susceptibility testing for Alzheimer’s disease? Findings from a multi-site, randomized clinical trial. Genet Med 2004;6(4):197-203.

23. Van der Flier WM, Scheltens P. Epidemiology and risk factors of dementia. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 2005;76:2-7.

24. Blacker D, Lovestone S. Genetics and dementia nosology. J Geriatr Psychiatry Neurol 2006;19:186-91.

25. Busse A, Bischkopf J, Reidel-Heller SG, Angermeyer MS. Subclassifications for mild cognitive impairment: prevalence and predictive validity. Psychol Med 2003;33(6):1029-38.

26. Rasquin SM, Lodder J, Visser PJ, et al. Predictive accuracy of MCI subtypes for Alzheimer’s disease and vascular dementia in subjects with mild cognitive impairment: a 2-year followup study. Dement Geriatr Cogn Disord 2005;19(2-3):113-19.

27. Boyle PA, Wilson RS, Aggarwal NT, et al. Mild cognitive impairment: risk of Alzheimer disease and rate of cognitive decline. Neurology 2006;67:441-5.

28. Geser F, Wenning GK, Poewe W, McKeith I. How to diagnose dementia with Lewy bodies: state of the art. Mov Disord 2005;20(suppl 12):S11-S20.

29. Hardy J. The relationship between Lewy body disease, Parkinson’s disease, and Alzheimer’s disease. Ann NY Acad Sci 2003;991:167-70.

30. Jellinger KA. Vascular-ischemic dementia: an update. J Neural Transm 2002;62(suppl):1-23.

31. McKhann GM, Albert MS, Grossman M, et al. Clinical and pathological diagnosis of frontotemporal dementia: report of the Work Group on Frontotemporal Dementia and Pick’s Disease. Arch Neurol 2001;58:1803-9.

32. Boxer AL, Miller BL. Clinical features of frontotemporal dementia. Alzheimer Dis Assoc Disord 2005;19(suppl):S3-S6.

33. Boeve BF. A review of the non-Alzheimer dementias. J Clin Psychiatry 2006;67(12):1985-2001.

References

1. Cummings JL. Clinical evaluation as a biomarker for Alzheimer’s disease. J Alzheimer’s Dis 2005;8:327-37.

2. Hodges JR. Alzheimer’s centennial legacy: origins, landmarks and the current status of knowledge concerning cognitive aspects. Brain 2006;129:2811-22.

3. Stern Y. Cognitive reserve and Alzheimer disease. Alzheimer Dis Assoc Disord 2006;20:112-7.

4. Lleó A, Greenberg SM, Growdon JH. Current pharmacotherapy for Alzheimer’s disease. Annu Rev Med 2006;57:513-33.

5. Kennedy GJ, Golde TE, Tarriot PN, Cummings JL. Amyloid-based interventions in Alzheimer’s disease. CNS Spectr 2007;12: 1(suppl 1):1-14.

6. Van der Flier WM, Scheltens P. Use of laboratory and imaging investigations in dementia. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 2005;76:45-52.

7. Galasko D. Biomarkers for Alzheimer’s disease—clinical needs and application. J Alzheimer’s Dis 2005;8:339-46.

8. Sunderland T, Hampel H, Takeda M, et al. Biomarkers in the diagnosis of Alzheimer’s disease: are we ready? J Geriatr Psychiatry Neurol 2006;19:172-9.

9. Folstein MF, Folstein SE, McHugh PR. “Mini-mental state.” A practical method for grading the cognitive state of patients for the clinician. J Psychiatr Res 1975;12(3):189-98.

10. Perneczky R, Wagenpfeil S, Komossa K, et al. Mapping scores onto stages: Mini-Mental State Examination and Clinical Dementia Rating. Am J Geriatr Psychiatry 2006;14:139-44.

11. Tariq SH, Tumosa N, Chibnall JT, et al. Comparison of the Saint Louis University mental status examination and the Mini-Mental State Examination for detecting dementia and mild neurocognitive disorder—a pilot study. Am J Geriatr Psychiatry 2006;14(11):897-9.

12. Agency for Health Care Policy and Research Recognition and initial assessment of Alzheimer’s disease and related dementias. Comparison of mental and functional status tests according to three phases of discrimination difficulty. Available at:http://ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/bv.fcgi?rid=hstat6.table.31677. Accesssed November 6, 2007.

13. Sano M. Neuropsychological testing in the diagnosis of dementia. J Geriatr Psychiatry Neurol 2006;19:155-9.

14. Mohs RC. Neuropsychological assessment of patients with Alzheimer’s disease. In: Psychopharmacology—the fourth generation of progress American College of Neuropsychopharmacology. Available at: http://www.acnp.org/ g4/GN401000133/Default.htm. Accessed November 6, 2007.

15. Morris JC. Dementia update 2005. Alzheimer Dis Assoc Disord 2005;19:100-17.

16. Clarfield AM. Reversible dementia—the implications of a fall in prevalence. Age Ageing 2005;34:544-5.

17. Roberts JS, Cupples LA, Relkin NR, et al. Genetic risk assessment for adult children of people with Alzheimer’s disease: the Risk Evaluation and Education for AD (REVEAL) study. J Geriatr Psychiatry Neurol 2005;18:250-5.

18. Frisoni GB. Structural imaging in the clinical diagnosis of Alzheimer’s disease: problems and tools. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 2001;70:711-18.

19. Ramani A, Jensen JH, Helpern JA. Quantitative MR imaging in Alzheimer disease. Radiology 2006;241(1):26-44.

20. McKhann G, Drachman D, Folstein M, et al. Clinical diagnosis of Alzheimer’s disease: report of the NINCDS-ADRDA Work Group under the auspices of Department of Health and Human Services Task Force on Alzheimer’s Disease. Neurology 1984;34(7):939-44.

21. Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders 4th ed text rev. Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Association; 2000.

22. Roberts JS, Barber M, Brown T, et al. Who seeks genetic susceptibility testing for Alzheimer’s disease? Findings from a multi-site, randomized clinical trial. Genet Med 2004;6(4):197-203.

23. Van der Flier WM, Scheltens P. Epidemiology and risk factors of dementia. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 2005;76:2-7.

24. Blacker D, Lovestone S. Genetics and dementia nosology. J Geriatr Psychiatry Neurol 2006;19:186-91.

25. Busse A, Bischkopf J, Reidel-Heller SG, Angermeyer MS. Subclassifications for mild cognitive impairment: prevalence and predictive validity. Psychol Med 2003;33(6):1029-38.

26. Rasquin SM, Lodder J, Visser PJ, et al. Predictive accuracy of MCI subtypes for Alzheimer’s disease and vascular dementia in subjects with mild cognitive impairment: a 2-year followup study. Dement Geriatr Cogn Disord 2005;19(2-3):113-19.

27. Boyle PA, Wilson RS, Aggarwal NT, et al. Mild cognitive impairment: risk of Alzheimer disease and rate of cognitive decline. Neurology 2006;67:441-5.

28. Geser F, Wenning GK, Poewe W, McKeith I. How to diagnose dementia with Lewy bodies: state of the art. Mov Disord 2005;20(suppl 12):S11-S20.

29. Hardy J. The relationship between Lewy body disease, Parkinson’s disease, and Alzheimer’s disease. Ann NY Acad Sci 2003;991:167-70.

30. Jellinger KA. Vascular-ischemic dementia: an update. J Neural Transm 2002;62(suppl):1-23.

31. McKhann GM, Albert MS, Grossman M, et al. Clinical and pathological diagnosis of frontotemporal dementia: report of the Work Group on Frontotemporal Dementia and Pick’s Disease. Arch Neurol 2001;58:1803-9.

32. Boxer AL, Miller BL. Clinical features of frontotemporal dementia. Alzheimer Dis Assoc Disord 2005;19(suppl):S3-S6.

33. Boeve BF. A review of the non-Alzheimer dementias. J Clin Psychiatry 2006;67(12):1985-2001.

Issue
Current Psychiatry - 07(01)
Issue
Current Psychiatry - 07(01)
Page Number
53-66
Page Number
53-66
Publications
Publications
Article Type
Display Headline
Is it Alzheimer’s? How to pare down the possibilities
Display Headline
Is it Alzheimer’s? How to pare down the possibilities
Legacy Keywords
Alzheimer’s disease; Alzheimer’s diagnosis; dementia causes; dementia assessment; acetylcholinesterase inhibitors; donepezil; rivastigmine; galantamine; memantine; Mehret Gebretsadik MD; George Grossberg MD
Legacy Keywords
Alzheimer’s disease; Alzheimer’s diagnosis; dementia causes; dementia assessment; acetylcholinesterase inhibitors; donepezil; rivastigmine; galantamine; memantine; Mehret Gebretsadik MD; George Grossberg MD
Sections
Article Source

PURLs Copyright

Inside the Article

Article PDF Media