Wax Stripping and Isotretinoin Treatment: A Warning Not to Be Missed

Article Type
Changed
Wed, 03/24/2021 - 11:43

 

To the Editor:

Oral isotretinoin is a widely used treatment modality in dermatologic practice that is highly effective for severe and recalcitrant acne vulgaris in addition to other conditions. Its use is accompanied by a variety of side effects that are mainly mucocutaneous. These dose-dependent side effects are experienced by almost all patients treated with this medication.1

A generally healthy 14-year-old adolescent girl presented with severe widespread erosions located in a linear pattern corresponding to areas of wax depilation on the shins and thighs (Figure). Approximately 5 months prior, the patient started oral isotretinoin 40 mg daily for severe and recalcitrant acne vulgaris. She was not taking other medications. After 4 months of treatment, during which the acne lesions improved and the patient experienced only mild xerosis and cheilitis, the dosage was increased to 60 mg daily. Three weeks later, the patient underwent wax depilation, which resulted in the erosions.

A and B, A 14-year-old adolescent girl with severe skin erosions on the posterior left shin and lateroanterior left thigh following wax depilation while taking isotretinoin.


Oral isotretinoin treatment leads to structural and functional changes to the skin, related to epidermal dyscohesion and sebo-suppression. Although these changes may not be clinically evident in all patients, they still make the skin much more sensitive to external mechanical stimuli.1 Wax depilation commonly is used for treating excess hair on the body. Because it exerts remarkable mechanical stress on the epidermis, it may lead to epidermal stripping in patients taking isotretinoin, manifesting as widespread erosions and resulting in notable patient distress.



Dermatologists typically advise patients to avoid wax epilation while being treated with isotretinoin; however, some patients do not adhere to this recommendation. Also, there are dermatologists who are not aware of this potential side effect. In one survey (N=54), only 4% of consulting dermatologists were aware of this complication.2 A PubMed search of articles indexed for MEDLINE using the terms isotretinoin and wax revealed that this severe side effect with isotretinoin has been reported only 4 times in the medical literature.2-5 The fact that wax epilation should be avoided during isotretinoin treatment previously was not included in the prescribing information. It currently is included in the isotretinoin prescribing information6 with an indication not to perform wax depilation for 6 months after stopping treatment. This case should serve as a reminder to avoid wax depilation during isotretinoin treatment.

References
  1. Del Rosso JQ. Clinical relevance of skin barrier changes associated with the use of oral isotretinoin: the importance of barrier repair therapy in patient management. J Drugs Dermatol. 2013;12:626-631.
  2. Woollons A, Price ML. Roaccutane and wax epilation: a cautionary tale. Br J Dermatol. 1997;137:839-840.
  3. Egido Romo M. Isotretinoin and wax epilation. Br J Dermatol. 1991;124:393.
  4. Holmes SC, Thomson J. Isotretinoin and skin fragility. Br J Dermatol. 1995;132:165.
  5. Turel-Ermertcan A, Sahin MT, Yurtman D, et al. Inappropriate treatments at beauty centers: a case report of burns caused by hot wax stripping. J Dermatol. 2004;31:854-855.
  6. Accutane. Package insert. Roche; 2008.
Article PDF
Author and Disclosure Information

From the Department of Dermatology, Hadassah Medical Center, Faculty of Medicine, Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Israel.

The authors report no conflict of interest.

Correspondence: Abraham Zlotogorski, MD, Department of Dermatology, Hadassah Hebrew University Medical Center, Jerusalem, 9112001, Israel (zloto@cc.huji.ac.il).

Issue
cutis - 107(3)
Publications
Topics
Page Number
E10-E11
Sections
Author and Disclosure Information

From the Department of Dermatology, Hadassah Medical Center, Faculty of Medicine, Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Israel.

The authors report no conflict of interest.

Correspondence: Abraham Zlotogorski, MD, Department of Dermatology, Hadassah Hebrew University Medical Center, Jerusalem, 9112001, Israel (zloto@cc.huji.ac.il).

Author and Disclosure Information

From the Department of Dermatology, Hadassah Medical Center, Faculty of Medicine, Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Israel.

The authors report no conflict of interest.

Correspondence: Abraham Zlotogorski, MD, Department of Dermatology, Hadassah Hebrew University Medical Center, Jerusalem, 9112001, Israel (zloto@cc.huji.ac.il).

Article PDF
Article PDF

 

To the Editor:

Oral isotretinoin is a widely used treatment modality in dermatologic practice that is highly effective for severe and recalcitrant acne vulgaris in addition to other conditions. Its use is accompanied by a variety of side effects that are mainly mucocutaneous. These dose-dependent side effects are experienced by almost all patients treated with this medication.1

A generally healthy 14-year-old adolescent girl presented with severe widespread erosions located in a linear pattern corresponding to areas of wax depilation on the shins and thighs (Figure). Approximately 5 months prior, the patient started oral isotretinoin 40 mg daily for severe and recalcitrant acne vulgaris. She was not taking other medications. After 4 months of treatment, during which the acne lesions improved and the patient experienced only mild xerosis and cheilitis, the dosage was increased to 60 mg daily. Three weeks later, the patient underwent wax depilation, which resulted in the erosions.

A and B, A 14-year-old adolescent girl with severe skin erosions on the posterior left shin and lateroanterior left thigh following wax depilation while taking isotretinoin.


Oral isotretinoin treatment leads to structural and functional changes to the skin, related to epidermal dyscohesion and sebo-suppression. Although these changes may not be clinically evident in all patients, they still make the skin much more sensitive to external mechanical stimuli.1 Wax depilation commonly is used for treating excess hair on the body. Because it exerts remarkable mechanical stress on the epidermis, it may lead to epidermal stripping in patients taking isotretinoin, manifesting as widespread erosions and resulting in notable patient distress.



Dermatologists typically advise patients to avoid wax epilation while being treated with isotretinoin; however, some patients do not adhere to this recommendation. Also, there are dermatologists who are not aware of this potential side effect. In one survey (N=54), only 4% of consulting dermatologists were aware of this complication.2 A PubMed search of articles indexed for MEDLINE using the terms isotretinoin and wax revealed that this severe side effect with isotretinoin has been reported only 4 times in the medical literature.2-5 The fact that wax epilation should be avoided during isotretinoin treatment previously was not included in the prescribing information. It currently is included in the isotretinoin prescribing information6 with an indication not to perform wax depilation for 6 months after stopping treatment. This case should serve as a reminder to avoid wax depilation during isotretinoin treatment.

 

To the Editor:

Oral isotretinoin is a widely used treatment modality in dermatologic practice that is highly effective for severe and recalcitrant acne vulgaris in addition to other conditions. Its use is accompanied by a variety of side effects that are mainly mucocutaneous. These dose-dependent side effects are experienced by almost all patients treated with this medication.1

A generally healthy 14-year-old adolescent girl presented with severe widespread erosions located in a linear pattern corresponding to areas of wax depilation on the shins and thighs (Figure). Approximately 5 months prior, the patient started oral isotretinoin 40 mg daily for severe and recalcitrant acne vulgaris. She was not taking other medications. After 4 months of treatment, during which the acne lesions improved and the patient experienced only mild xerosis and cheilitis, the dosage was increased to 60 mg daily. Three weeks later, the patient underwent wax depilation, which resulted in the erosions.

A and B, A 14-year-old adolescent girl with severe skin erosions on the posterior left shin and lateroanterior left thigh following wax depilation while taking isotretinoin.


Oral isotretinoin treatment leads to structural and functional changes to the skin, related to epidermal dyscohesion and sebo-suppression. Although these changes may not be clinically evident in all patients, they still make the skin much more sensitive to external mechanical stimuli.1 Wax depilation commonly is used for treating excess hair on the body. Because it exerts remarkable mechanical stress on the epidermis, it may lead to epidermal stripping in patients taking isotretinoin, manifesting as widespread erosions and resulting in notable patient distress.



Dermatologists typically advise patients to avoid wax epilation while being treated with isotretinoin; however, some patients do not adhere to this recommendation. Also, there are dermatologists who are not aware of this potential side effect. In one survey (N=54), only 4% of consulting dermatologists were aware of this complication.2 A PubMed search of articles indexed for MEDLINE using the terms isotretinoin and wax revealed that this severe side effect with isotretinoin has been reported only 4 times in the medical literature.2-5 The fact that wax epilation should be avoided during isotretinoin treatment previously was not included in the prescribing information. It currently is included in the isotretinoin prescribing information6 with an indication not to perform wax depilation for 6 months after stopping treatment. This case should serve as a reminder to avoid wax depilation during isotretinoin treatment.

References
  1. Del Rosso JQ. Clinical relevance of skin barrier changes associated with the use of oral isotretinoin: the importance of barrier repair therapy in patient management. J Drugs Dermatol. 2013;12:626-631.
  2. Woollons A, Price ML. Roaccutane and wax epilation: a cautionary tale. Br J Dermatol. 1997;137:839-840.
  3. Egido Romo M. Isotretinoin and wax epilation. Br J Dermatol. 1991;124:393.
  4. Holmes SC, Thomson J. Isotretinoin and skin fragility. Br J Dermatol. 1995;132:165.
  5. Turel-Ermertcan A, Sahin MT, Yurtman D, et al. Inappropriate treatments at beauty centers: a case report of burns caused by hot wax stripping. J Dermatol. 2004;31:854-855.
  6. Accutane. Package insert. Roche; 2008.
References
  1. Del Rosso JQ. Clinical relevance of skin barrier changes associated with the use of oral isotretinoin: the importance of barrier repair therapy in patient management. J Drugs Dermatol. 2013;12:626-631.
  2. Woollons A, Price ML. Roaccutane and wax epilation: a cautionary tale. Br J Dermatol. 1997;137:839-840.
  3. Egido Romo M. Isotretinoin and wax epilation. Br J Dermatol. 1991;124:393.
  4. Holmes SC, Thomson J. Isotretinoin and skin fragility. Br J Dermatol. 1995;132:165.
  5. Turel-Ermertcan A, Sahin MT, Yurtman D, et al. Inappropriate treatments at beauty centers: a case report of burns caused by hot wax stripping. J Dermatol. 2004;31:854-855.
  6. Accutane. Package insert. Roche; 2008.
Issue
cutis - 107(3)
Issue
cutis - 107(3)
Page Number
E10-E11
Page Number
E10-E11
Publications
Publications
Topics
Article Type
Sections
Inside the Article

Practice Points

  • Oral isotretinoin treatment leads to structural and functional changes to the skin, making it much more sensitive to external mechanical stimuli.
  • Wax depilation may lead to epidermal stripping in patients taking isotretinoin and therefore should be avoided in these patients.
Disallow All Ads
Content Gating
No Gating (article Unlocked/Free)
Alternative CME
Disqus Comments
Default
Use ProPublica
Hide sidebar & use full width
render the right sidebar.
Conference Recap Checkbox
Not Conference Recap
Clinical Edge
Display the Slideshow in this Article
Medscape Article
Display survey writer
Reuters content
Article PDF Media

Solitary Angiokeratoma of the Vulva Mimicking Malignant Melanoma

Article Type
Changed
Thu, 01/10/2019 - 13:50
Display Headline
Solitary Angiokeratoma of the Vulva Mimicking Malignant Melanoma

To the Editor:

Angiokeratoma is a benign vascular tumor characterized by several dilated vessels in the superficial dermis accompanied by epidermal hyperplasia and hyperkeratosis.1 Angiokeratoma of the vulva is a rare clinical finding, usually involving multiple lesions as part of the Fordyce type.2 Solitary angiokeratoma occurs predominantly on the lower legs,3 and although other locations have been described, the presence of a solitary angiokeratoma on the vulva is rare.4 We report 2 cases of solitary angiokeratoma on the vulva that was misdiagnosed as malignant melanoma. Both patients were referred to our center for evaluation and excision.

A 65-year-old woman (patient 1) and a 67-year-old woman (patient 2) presented with a bluish black, growing, asymptomatic lesion on the right (Figure 1) and left labia majora, respectively. Both patients were referred by outside physicians for excision because of suspected malignant melanoma. Physical examinations revealed bluish black globular nodules that measured 0.5 and 0.3 cm in diameter, respectively. Dermoscopy (patient 1) revealed dark lacunae. Histopathologic examination of the vulvar lesion (patient 2) showed dilated, blood-filled, vascular spaces in the papillary dermis, accompanied by overlying acanthosis, hyperkeratosis, and papillomatosis that was consistent with angiokeratoma (Figure 2).

Figure 1. Angiokeratoma presenting as a bluish black granular nodule on the right labia majora (patient 1).

Figure 2. Histopathology of the vulvar lesion (patient 2) demonstrated dilated, blood-filled, vascular spaces in the papillary dermis, accompanied by overlying acanthosis, hyperkeratosis, and papillomatosis consistent with angiokeratoma (H&E, original magnification ×100).

Angiokeratoma, particularly the solitary type, often is misdiagnosed. Clinical differential diagnoses may include a wide range of pathologic conditions, including condyloma acuminata, basal cell carcinoma, pyogenic granuloma, lymphangioma, nevi, condyloma lata, nodular prurigo, seborrheic keratosis, granuloma inguinale, and deep fungal infection.2,5 However, due to its quickly growing nature and its dark complexion, malignant melanoma often is initially diagnosed. Because patients affected by angiokeratoma of the vulva usually are aged 20 to 40 years,5 and vulvar melanoma is typical for middle-aged women (median age, 68 years),6 this misdiagnosis is more likely in older patients. It should be noted that a high index of suspicion for melanoma often is present when examining the vulva, considering that this area is difficult to monitor, and there is an especially poor prognosis of vulvar melanoma due to its late detection.6,7

In the past, biopsy was considered mandatory for confirming the diagnosis of vulvar angiokeratoma.5,8,9 However, dermoscopy has emerged as a valuable tool for diagnosis of angiokeratoma10 and also was helpful as a diagnostic aid in one of our patients (patient 1). Therefore, we believe that dermoscopy should be performed prior to a biopsy of angiokeratomas of the vulva.

References
  1. Requena L, Sangueza OP. Cutaneous vascular anomalies. part I. hamartomas, malformations, and dilation of preexisting vessels. J Am Acad Dermatol. 1997;37:523-549.
  2. Schiller PI, Itin PH. Angiokeratomas: an update. Dermatology. 1996;193:275-282.
  3. Gomi H, Eriyama Y, Horikawa E, et al. Solitary angiokeratoma. J Dermatol. 1988;15:349-350.
  4. Yamazaki M, Hiruma M, Irie H, et al. Angiokeratoma of the clitoris: a subtype of angiokeratoma vulvae. J Dermatol. 1992;19:553-555.
  5. Cohen PR, Young AW Jr, Tovell HM. Angiokeratoma of the vulva: diagnosis and review of the literature. Obstet Gynecol Surv. 1989;44:339-346.
  6. Sugiyama VE, Chan JK, Shin JY, et al. Vulvar melanoma: a multivariable analysis of 644 patients. Obstet Gynecol. 2007;110:296-301.
  7. De Simone P, Silipo V, Buccini P, et al. Vulvar melanoma: a report of 10 cases and review of the literature. Melanoma Res. 2008;18:127-133.
  8. Novick NL. Angiokeratoma vulvae. J Am Acad Dermatol. 1985;12:561-563.
  9. Yigiter M, Arda IS, Tosun E, et al. Angiokeratoma of clitoris: a rare lesion in an adolescent girl. Urology. 2008;71:604-606.
  10. Zaballos P, Daufi C, Puig S, et al. Dermoscopy of solitary angiokeratomas: a morphological study. Arch Dermatol. 2007;143:318-325.
Article PDF
Author and Disclosure Information

From Hadassah-Hebrew University Medical Center, Jerusalem, Israel. Drs. Ramot, Tetro, and Zlotogorski are from the Department of Dermatology; Dr. Soteriou is from the Department of Plastic Surgery; and Drs. Doviner and Maly are from the Department of Pathology.

The authors report no conflict of interest.

Correspondence: Abraham Zlotogorski, MD, Department of Dermatology, Hadassah-Hebrew University Medical Center, PO Box 12000, Jerusalem 9112001, Israel (zloto@cc.huji.ac.il).

Issue
Cutis - 101(5)
Publications
Topics
Page Number
E6-E7
Sections
Author and Disclosure Information

From Hadassah-Hebrew University Medical Center, Jerusalem, Israel. Drs. Ramot, Tetro, and Zlotogorski are from the Department of Dermatology; Dr. Soteriou is from the Department of Plastic Surgery; and Drs. Doviner and Maly are from the Department of Pathology.

The authors report no conflict of interest.

Correspondence: Abraham Zlotogorski, MD, Department of Dermatology, Hadassah-Hebrew University Medical Center, PO Box 12000, Jerusalem 9112001, Israel (zloto@cc.huji.ac.il).

Author and Disclosure Information

From Hadassah-Hebrew University Medical Center, Jerusalem, Israel. Drs. Ramot, Tetro, and Zlotogorski are from the Department of Dermatology; Dr. Soteriou is from the Department of Plastic Surgery; and Drs. Doviner and Maly are from the Department of Pathology.

The authors report no conflict of interest.

Correspondence: Abraham Zlotogorski, MD, Department of Dermatology, Hadassah-Hebrew University Medical Center, PO Box 12000, Jerusalem 9112001, Israel (zloto@cc.huji.ac.il).

Article PDF
Article PDF

To the Editor:

Angiokeratoma is a benign vascular tumor characterized by several dilated vessels in the superficial dermis accompanied by epidermal hyperplasia and hyperkeratosis.1 Angiokeratoma of the vulva is a rare clinical finding, usually involving multiple lesions as part of the Fordyce type.2 Solitary angiokeratoma occurs predominantly on the lower legs,3 and although other locations have been described, the presence of a solitary angiokeratoma on the vulva is rare.4 We report 2 cases of solitary angiokeratoma on the vulva that was misdiagnosed as malignant melanoma. Both patients were referred to our center for evaluation and excision.

A 65-year-old woman (patient 1) and a 67-year-old woman (patient 2) presented with a bluish black, growing, asymptomatic lesion on the right (Figure 1) and left labia majora, respectively. Both patients were referred by outside physicians for excision because of suspected malignant melanoma. Physical examinations revealed bluish black globular nodules that measured 0.5 and 0.3 cm in diameter, respectively. Dermoscopy (patient 1) revealed dark lacunae. Histopathologic examination of the vulvar lesion (patient 2) showed dilated, blood-filled, vascular spaces in the papillary dermis, accompanied by overlying acanthosis, hyperkeratosis, and papillomatosis that was consistent with angiokeratoma (Figure 2).

Figure 1. Angiokeratoma presenting as a bluish black granular nodule on the right labia majora (patient 1).

Figure 2. Histopathology of the vulvar lesion (patient 2) demonstrated dilated, blood-filled, vascular spaces in the papillary dermis, accompanied by overlying acanthosis, hyperkeratosis, and papillomatosis consistent with angiokeratoma (H&E, original magnification ×100).

Angiokeratoma, particularly the solitary type, often is misdiagnosed. Clinical differential diagnoses may include a wide range of pathologic conditions, including condyloma acuminata, basal cell carcinoma, pyogenic granuloma, lymphangioma, nevi, condyloma lata, nodular prurigo, seborrheic keratosis, granuloma inguinale, and deep fungal infection.2,5 However, due to its quickly growing nature and its dark complexion, malignant melanoma often is initially diagnosed. Because patients affected by angiokeratoma of the vulva usually are aged 20 to 40 years,5 and vulvar melanoma is typical for middle-aged women (median age, 68 years),6 this misdiagnosis is more likely in older patients. It should be noted that a high index of suspicion for melanoma often is present when examining the vulva, considering that this area is difficult to monitor, and there is an especially poor prognosis of vulvar melanoma due to its late detection.6,7

In the past, biopsy was considered mandatory for confirming the diagnosis of vulvar angiokeratoma.5,8,9 However, dermoscopy has emerged as a valuable tool for diagnosis of angiokeratoma10 and also was helpful as a diagnostic aid in one of our patients (patient 1). Therefore, we believe that dermoscopy should be performed prior to a biopsy of angiokeratomas of the vulva.

To the Editor:

Angiokeratoma is a benign vascular tumor characterized by several dilated vessels in the superficial dermis accompanied by epidermal hyperplasia and hyperkeratosis.1 Angiokeratoma of the vulva is a rare clinical finding, usually involving multiple lesions as part of the Fordyce type.2 Solitary angiokeratoma occurs predominantly on the lower legs,3 and although other locations have been described, the presence of a solitary angiokeratoma on the vulva is rare.4 We report 2 cases of solitary angiokeratoma on the vulva that was misdiagnosed as malignant melanoma. Both patients were referred to our center for evaluation and excision.

A 65-year-old woman (patient 1) and a 67-year-old woman (patient 2) presented with a bluish black, growing, asymptomatic lesion on the right (Figure 1) and left labia majora, respectively. Both patients were referred by outside physicians for excision because of suspected malignant melanoma. Physical examinations revealed bluish black globular nodules that measured 0.5 and 0.3 cm in diameter, respectively. Dermoscopy (patient 1) revealed dark lacunae. Histopathologic examination of the vulvar lesion (patient 2) showed dilated, blood-filled, vascular spaces in the papillary dermis, accompanied by overlying acanthosis, hyperkeratosis, and papillomatosis that was consistent with angiokeratoma (Figure 2).

Figure 1. Angiokeratoma presenting as a bluish black granular nodule on the right labia majora (patient 1).

Figure 2. Histopathology of the vulvar lesion (patient 2) demonstrated dilated, blood-filled, vascular spaces in the papillary dermis, accompanied by overlying acanthosis, hyperkeratosis, and papillomatosis consistent with angiokeratoma (H&E, original magnification ×100).

Angiokeratoma, particularly the solitary type, often is misdiagnosed. Clinical differential diagnoses may include a wide range of pathologic conditions, including condyloma acuminata, basal cell carcinoma, pyogenic granuloma, lymphangioma, nevi, condyloma lata, nodular prurigo, seborrheic keratosis, granuloma inguinale, and deep fungal infection.2,5 However, due to its quickly growing nature and its dark complexion, malignant melanoma often is initially diagnosed. Because patients affected by angiokeratoma of the vulva usually are aged 20 to 40 years,5 and vulvar melanoma is typical for middle-aged women (median age, 68 years),6 this misdiagnosis is more likely in older patients. It should be noted that a high index of suspicion for melanoma often is present when examining the vulva, considering that this area is difficult to monitor, and there is an especially poor prognosis of vulvar melanoma due to its late detection.6,7

In the past, biopsy was considered mandatory for confirming the diagnosis of vulvar angiokeratoma.5,8,9 However, dermoscopy has emerged as a valuable tool for diagnosis of angiokeratoma10 and also was helpful as a diagnostic aid in one of our patients (patient 1). Therefore, we believe that dermoscopy should be performed prior to a biopsy of angiokeratomas of the vulva.

References
  1. Requena L, Sangueza OP. Cutaneous vascular anomalies. part I. hamartomas, malformations, and dilation of preexisting vessels. J Am Acad Dermatol. 1997;37:523-549.
  2. Schiller PI, Itin PH. Angiokeratomas: an update. Dermatology. 1996;193:275-282.
  3. Gomi H, Eriyama Y, Horikawa E, et al. Solitary angiokeratoma. J Dermatol. 1988;15:349-350.
  4. Yamazaki M, Hiruma M, Irie H, et al. Angiokeratoma of the clitoris: a subtype of angiokeratoma vulvae. J Dermatol. 1992;19:553-555.
  5. Cohen PR, Young AW Jr, Tovell HM. Angiokeratoma of the vulva: diagnosis and review of the literature. Obstet Gynecol Surv. 1989;44:339-346.
  6. Sugiyama VE, Chan JK, Shin JY, et al. Vulvar melanoma: a multivariable analysis of 644 patients. Obstet Gynecol. 2007;110:296-301.
  7. De Simone P, Silipo V, Buccini P, et al. Vulvar melanoma: a report of 10 cases and review of the literature. Melanoma Res. 2008;18:127-133.
  8. Novick NL. Angiokeratoma vulvae. J Am Acad Dermatol. 1985;12:561-563.
  9. Yigiter M, Arda IS, Tosun E, et al. Angiokeratoma of clitoris: a rare lesion in an adolescent girl. Urology. 2008;71:604-606.
  10. Zaballos P, Daufi C, Puig S, et al. Dermoscopy of solitary angiokeratomas: a morphological study. Arch Dermatol. 2007;143:318-325.
References
  1. Requena L, Sangueza OP. Cutaneous vascular anomalies. part I. hamartomas, malformations, and dilation of preexisting vessels. J Am Acad Dermatol. 1997;37:523-549.
  2. Schiller PI, Itin PH. Angiokeratomas: an update. Dermatology. 1996;193:275-282.
  3. Gomi H, Eriyama Y, Horikawa E, et al. Solitary angiokeratoma. J Dermatol. 1988;15:349-350.
  4. Yamazaki M, Hiruma M, Irie H, et al. Angiokeratoma of the clitoris: a subtype of angiokeratoma vulvae. J Dermatol. 1992;19:553-555.
  5. Cohen PR, Young AW Jr, Tovell HM. Angiokeratoma of the vulva: diagnosis and review of the literature. Obstet Gynecol Surv. 1989;44:339-346.
  6. Sugiyama VE, Chan JK, Shin JY, et al. Vulvar melanoma: a multivariable analysis of 644 patients. Obstet Gynecol. 2007;110:296-301.
  7. De Simone P, Silipo V, Buccini P, et al. Vulvar melanoma: a report of 10 cases and review of the literature. Melanoma Res. 2008;18:127-133.
  8. Novick NL. Angiokeratoma vulvae. J Am Acad Dermatol. 1985;12:561-563.
  9. Yigiter M, Arda IS, Tosun E, et al. Angiokeratoma of clitoris: a rare lesion in an adolescent girl. Urology. 2008;71:604-606.
  10. Zaballos P, Daufi C, Puig S, et al. Dermoscopy of solitary angiokeratomas: a morphological study. Arch Dermatol. 2007;143:318-325.
Issue
Cutis - 101(5)
Issue
Cutis - 101(5)
Page Number
E6-E7
Page Number
E6-E7
Publications
Publications
Topics
Article Type
Display Headline
Solitary Angiokeratoma of the Vulva Mimicking Malignant Melanoma
Display Headline
Solitary Angiokeratoma of the Vulva Mimicking Malignant Melanoma
Sections
Inside the Article

Practice Points

  • Solitary angiokeratoma of the vulva often is misdiagnosed as malignant melanoma due to its rapid growth and dark color.
  • Dermoscopy is a valuable tool for diagnosing vulvar angiokeratoma to avoid unnecessary excisions.
Disallow All Ads
Content Gating
No Gating (article Unlocked/Free)
Alternative CME
Disqus Comments
Default
Use ProPublica
Article PDF Media