Law & Medicine

Shinal v. Toms: It’s Now Harder to Get Informed Consent


 

Dr. Tan is emeritus professor of medicine and former adjunct professor of law at the University of Hawaii, Honolulu. This article is meant to be educational and does not constitute medical, ethical, or legal advice. For additional information, readers may contact the author at siang@hawaii.edu.

References

1. Shinal v. Toms, J-106-2016, Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, Decided: June 20, 2017.

2. Valles v. Albert Einstein Medical Center, 805 A.2d (PA, 2002).

3. Informed-consent ruling may have “far-reaching, negative impact.” AMA Wire, Aug 8, 2017.

Pages

Recommended Reading

Insurance coverage gainers outnumber coverage losers
MDedge Cardiology
Safety issues not that unusual in medical offices
MDedge Cardiology
Fixing the ACA: 11 practical solutions
MDedge Cardiology
Five outside-the-box ideas for fixing the individual insurance market
MDedge Cardiology
Young adults lead the ranks of recently insured
MDedge Cardiology
Medicare fee schedule: Proposed pay bump falls short of promise
MDedge Cardiology
Trump administration ends DACA program, stranding medical students
MDedge Cardiology
Hurricane Harvey tests Houston physicians’ mettle
MDedge Cardiology
Sen. Alexander seeks quick, passable steps to stabilize individual markets
MDedge Cardiology
Florida health officials prepare for Hurricane Irma
MDedge Cardiology