From the Journals

Pericardial fat an independent risk factor for heart failure


 

A surprise finding

“The most surprising part of this study was that the risk for heart failure with increased pericardial fat does not seem to be explained by obesity and systemic inflammation alone,” Andreas P. Kalogeropoulos, MD, MPH, PhD, Stony Brook (N.Y.) University, said in an interview.

“If pericardial fat was merely a proxy for increased visceral fat, one would expect the association of pericardial fat with heart failure risk to go away after factoring in abdominal CT findings, which was not the case here. Also, accounting for inflammatory markers did not change things dramatically. However, we need to be careful here, as abdominal CT scans have not been done simultaneously with the pericardial fat scans in the study,” said Dr. Kalogeropoulos, who coauthored an accompanying editorial with Michael E. Hall, MD, University of Mississippi Medical Center, Jackson.

The other striking finding, although not entirely surprising, was the stronger association of pericardial fat with heart failure risk in women, he noted.

“Although several clues have been reported pointing to women being more sensitive to the adverse cardiac effects of pericardial fat, this is the first large prospective study to connect the dots and show much higher risk in women in a convincing way. For the record, this is the first prospective study to show the connection between pericardial fat and heart failure risk altogether,” Dr. Kalogeropoulos said.

“Obviously, we need to do more work to see how we can use the important findings of Kenchaiah and colleagues to reduce risk for heart failure among patients with increased pericardial fat, especially women. For starters, we would need a way to identify these patients,” he said. “In this aspect, it is encouraging that pericardial fat can be measured in low-radiation CT scans, similar to those used for coronary calcium, and that automation technology to speed up pericardial fat measurements is already in the pipeline.

“The next step would be to see what kind of interventions would reduce risk for heart failure in these patients,” he added. “Weight loss would be an obvious thing, but novel agents with favorable cardiometabolic effects, like newer antidiabetic medications, are intriguing options, too.”

The study was supported by the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute and the National Institutes of Health. Dr. Kenchaiah and Dr. Kalogeropoulos reported no relevant financial relationships.

A version of this article first appeared on Medscape.com.

Pages

Recommended Reading

FIDELIO-DKD: Finerenone cuts new-onset AFib in patients with type 2 diabetes and CKD
MDedge Cardiology
Underlying heart rhythm, not ICD shocks, drives mortality
MDedge Cardiology
Sotagliflozin’s HFpEF benefit confirmed by new analyses
MDedge Cardiology
GALACTIC-HF: Novel drug most effective in sickest HFrEF patients
MDedge Cardiology
AHA reassures myocarditis rare after COVID vaccination, benefits overwhelm risks
MDedge Cardiology
New AHA/ASA guideline on secondary stroke prevention
MDedge Cardiology
Heart benefits of DASH low-sodium diet ‘swift and direct’
MDedge Cardiology
Semaglutide boosts weight loss following endoscopic gastroplasty
MDedge Cardiology
Full 2-year follow-up vindicates EVOLUT Low-Risk TAVR data
MDedge Cardiology
PASCAL mitral valve repair shines at 2 years in CLASP
MDedge Cardiology