Feature

Recount of FOURIER data finds higher mortality with evolocumab; trialists push back


 

FROM BMJ OPEN

Open access

Although the RIAT group has called for the public release of the FOURIER data, commercial and legal issues will complicate that process, Steven Grover, MD, professor of medicine and director of the comprehensive health improvement program at McGill University, Montreal, said in an interview. Amgen is back in court over patent protection, filing an appeal with the Supreme Court after losing in the lower courts in a protracted battle, Reuters reported.

“One thing that’s for sure after they’ve raised questions about the results of this study [is that] somebody needs to take a good hard look at the adjudicated results,” said Dr. Grover, who coauthored several iterations of the Canadian Cardiovascular Society dyslipidemia guidelines, including the latest in 2021.

“I think the thing that got so many of us back in 2017 when the study was first published is the mortality data stuck out like a sore thumb,” he said in an interview. “It didn’t have to be statistically significant, but it did need to move in the same direction as the nonfatal coronary events. That’s what we’ve seen happen time and again and, in this case, it was going in the opposite direction.”

Dr. Sabatine said he doesn’t know whether the data will be released but that the FOURIER trialists plan to submit a rebuttal to BMJ Open to the RIAT analysis, which has caused a stir on CardioTwitter. “Now that people live with tweets of information, it necessitates then dispelling the misinformation that comes out. So yes, we will draft a rebuttal pointing out all the flaws in this analysis.”

Dr. Kaul commented that the FDA’s response not to provide the data was “rather curious” and that Dr. Sabatine and colleagues had the opportunity to address the RIAT group’s concerns, but the paper notes they did not even bother to respond. “You can’t be holier than thou in medicine. You have to treat every question with respect and humility and can’t be dismissive. ... He could have nipped the evil in the bud, so to speak.”

The study was funded by a grant from the University of Maryland, Baltimore. The authors, Dr. Kaul, and Dr. Grover reported having no relevant financial relationships.

A version of this article first appeared on Medscape.com.

Pages

Recommended Reading

EHR alerts to both doc and patient may boost statin prescribing
MDedge Cardiology
Statins tied to lower ICH risk regardless of bleed location
MDedge Cardiology
Bempedoic acid cuts CV risk in the statin-intolerant: CLEAR top-line results
MDedge Cardiology
ADA issues 2023 ‘Standards of Care’ for diabetes: Focus on tight BP, lipids
MDedge Cardiology
New AHA statement on managing ACS in older adults 
MDedge Cardiology
The 'Plaque Hypothesis': Focus on vulnerable lesions to cut events
MDedge Cardiology
‘The Whale’: Is this new movie fat-phobic or fat-friendly?
MDedge Cardiology
High lipoprotein(a) levels plus hypertension add to CVD risk
MDedge Cardiology
Top cardiology societies call for revamp of clinical trials
MDedge Cardiology
FDA approves Wegovy (semaglutide) for obesity in teens 12 and up
MDedge Cardiology