Conference Coverage

COORDINATEd effort boosts optimal therapy in patients with T2D and ASCVD


 

AT ACC 2023

Clinics in the usual care group were given current clinical practice guidelines.

The investigational intervention was, by design, “low-tech and designed to be scalable,” explained Dr. Pagidipati, and once the COVID pandemic started the intervention team shifted to a virtual consultation with participating practices that was mostly front-loaded, followed by monthly phone calls to give clinics feedback on their progress.

Among the most helpful aspects of the intervention was involving the entire clinic staff, including pharmacists, nurses, and advanced care practitioners; boosting familiarity with the relevant medications and their appropriate use; and advice on navigating insurance-coverage barriers such as prior authorizations.

“What was most critical was having a local champion who took on making this effort an important part” of what the clinic was trying to do, she explained. “All it takes is passion, and the tenacity of a bulldog,” Dr. Pagidipati said.

Research advances often don’t translate into management changes

“We don’t do a great job of translating findings from trials to patient care, so any method we can use to improve that will improve practice,” commented Kristen B. Campbell, PharmD, a clinical pharmacist at Duke who was not involved in the study.

“Although the trial was not powered to look at patient outcomes, we think that patients will benefit” because all the recommended medication uses have been proven to help patients in prior trials, Dr. Campbell noted.

Dr. Kristen B. Campbell, clinicial pharmacist, Duke University, Durham, N.C. Mitchel L. Zoler/MDedge News

Dr. Kristen B. Campbell

“A particular strength of this study was its simple design. All the interventions are low-tech and scalable.”

The low level of use of guideline-directed medical therapy in American adults with type 2 diabetes and atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease is “incredible,” said Christopher B. Granger, MD, a senior investigator on the study and a cardiologist and professor at Duke.

The researchers who ran the study are now focused on evaluating which cardiology clinics and patients had the most success from the intervention and are using that information to further refine implementation. They are also planning to encourage cardiology practices as well as other relevant medical groups to incorporate the intervention and implementation model used in the trial. The intervention program is detailed and available at no charge on the COORDINATE-Diabetes website.

COORDINATE-Diabetes received funding from Boehringer Ingelheim and Eli Lilly. Dr. Pagidipati has received personal fees from Boehringer Ingelheim, Lilly, AstraZeneca, Novartis, Novo Nordisk, Merck, and CRISPR Therapeutics, and she has received research grants from Amgen, Novartis, Novo Nordisk, and Eggland’s Best. Dr. Campbell had no disclosures. Dr. Granger has received personal fees and research funding from numerous companies.

Pages

Recommended Reading

How to get started with prescribing and advising on CGM
MDedge Cardiology
A purple warrior rises in the battle against diabetes
MDedge Cardiology
Therapy app cut A1c, drug intensification in T2D
MDedge Cardiology
Irregular sleep tied to markers of atherosclerosis
MDedge Cardiology
Toxic chemicals we consume without knowing it
MDedge Cardiology
Fewer than 10% of eligible type 2 diabetes patients get new, pricey drugs
MDedge Cardiology
Insomnia, short sleep linked to greater risk for MI
MDedge Cardiology
Old drug verapamil may have new use in type 1 diabetes
MDedge Cardiology
Lilly cuts insulin price by 70%, caps out-of-pocket cost
MDedge Cardiology
Biomarkers linked to elevated T2D MACE risk in DECLARE-TIMI 58
MDedge Cardiology