Latest News

Communicating Bad News to Patients


 

Clinical Practice Guidelines

The demand for telemedicine, including the disclosure of bad news, is growing despite the limited knowledge of potential adverse effects. The results of existing studies suggest that the mode of disclosure may play a secondary role, and the manner in which bad news is communicated may be more important.

Therefore, it is paramount to prepare patients or their families for the possibility of receiving bad news well in advance and, during the conversation, to ensure first and foremost that they are in an appropriate environment. The structure and content of the conversation may be relevant, and adhering to dedicated communication strategies can be a wise choice for the physician and the interlocutor.

This story was translated from Univadis Italy, which is part of the Medscape professional network, using several editorial tools, including AI, as part of the process. Human editors reviewed this content before publication. A version of this article appeared on Medscape.com.

Pages

Recommended Reading

CV admissions on the rise in Americans with cancer
MDedge Cardiology
Racial disparities in cardiotoxicity after chemotherapy
MDedge Cardiology
Expert discusses which diets are best, based on the evidence
MDedge Cardiology
No safe dose of cardiac radiation in children?
MDedge Cardiology
AHA statement addresses equity in cardio-oncology care
MDedge Cardiology
Medicare announces 10 drugs targeted for price cuts in 2026
MDedge Cardiology
Longer edoxaban may benefit cancer patients with distal DVT
MDedge Cardiology
‘Left in the Dark’: Prior Authorization Erodes Trust, Costs More
MDedge Cardiology
Oncologists Sound the Alarm About Rise of White Bagging
MDedge Cardiology
Dana-Farber Moves to Retract, Correct Dozens of Cancer Papers Amid Allegations
MDedge Cardiology