News

PCI in noninfarct coronaries helps STEMI patients

View on the News

Broadening scope of STEMI PCI holds promise

Based on this report from the PRAMI trial, we can no longer assume that secondary lesions in acute myocardial infarction are innocent until proven guilty.

It has been a core belief in interventional cardiology that percutaneous coronary intervention in noninfarct lesions does not prevent death and MI. Cardiologists have refrained from treating anything but the infarct lesion acutely, and they usually withhold further treatment unless a patient is symptomatic.

But patients with acute ST-segment elevation MI have a substantial risk for early, recurrent events, in contrast to patients with stable angina. Why? Coronary artery disease is accompanied by systemic abnormalities in coagulation, inflammation, and endothelial function, with multiple inflamed lesions. Patients with acute coronary syndrome have prominent, systemic derangements in these processes. The aggressive, acute treatment used in PRAMI may have stabilized these not-so-innocent lesions.

The PRAMI findings suggest that there are no healthy coronary arteries in a patient with acute STEMI. Does this mean that these patients need extensive revascularization? It is plausible that the risk from noninfarct lesions is independent of their hemodynamic severity.

The strategy employed in this study differs markedly from current practice. Guidelines have cautioned against treating multiple vessels during acute STEMI, particularly when the secondary sites are not clearly causing ongoing hemodynamic instability. The PRAMI results suggest that widening the scope of interventional therapy in acute STEMI patients is a promising new approach to management.

Dr. Laura Mauri is an interventional cardiologist at Brigham and Women’s Hospital, professor of medicine at Harvard University, and chief scientific officer of the Harvard Clinical Research Institute in Boston. She has been a consultant to Biotronik, has been on an advisory board of St. Jude, and she has received research grants from seven other drug or device-manufacturing companies. She made these comments in an editorial that accompanied the published version of the PRAMI report (N. Engl. J. Med. 2013 [doi:10.1056/NEJMe1309383]).


 

AT THE ESC CONGRESS 2013

The results were consistent with reports from two prior randomized trials that also assessed the value of preventive PCI in patients with acute STEMI, but in fewer patients. One of these prior studies involved a total of 69 patients (Int. J. Cardiovasc. Intervent. 2004;6:128-33), and the second enrolled a total of 214 patients (Heart 2010;96:662-7); both were limited by a lack of statistical power, and both relied on repeat revascularization as an endpoint, which may be subject to bias, Dr. Wald said.

Dr. Wald said that he a director for and shareholder in Polypill Ltd.

mzoler@frontlinemedcom.com

On Twitter @mitchelzoler

Pages

Recommended Reading

Cholinesterase inhibitors may protect the heart
MDedge Cardiology
FDA panels revisit rosiglitazone's cardiovascular safety
MDedge Cardiology
Hospital revenue generated by cardiologists continues to drop
MDedge Cardiology
Postop troponin elevation, MI impact 5-year survival
MDedge Cardiology
ACS stent thrombosis indication for rivaroxaban not approved, company says
MDedge Cardiology
Will a novel antibody fix the anticoagulant-bleeding problem?
MDedge Cardiology
Denervated myocardium predicts risk of sudden cardiac death
MDedge Cardiology
Vitamin C protects kidneys against angiography contrast
MDedge Cardiology
LV fibrosis predicts mortality in atrial fib patients
MDedge Cardiology
TASTE: Thrombus aspiration has no mortality benefit in STEMI
MDedge Cardiology