CE/CME

Low Back Pain: Evidence-based Diagnosis and Treatment

Author and Disclosure Information

Although accreditation for this CE/CME activity has expired, and the posttest is no longer available, you can still read the full article.

Expires April 30, 2017

Low back pain (LBP) is one of the most common reasons for an office visit, but most cases—at least 95%—have a benign underlying cause. Evaluation of LBP patients in the primary care setting, therefore, must focus on identifying “red flags” in the history and physical exam that suggest a significant underlying process requiring further work-up, including imaging. This evidence-based approach helps control costs and prevents the detrimental effects of unnecessary testing.


 

References


CE/CME No: CR-1605

PROGRAM OVERVIEW
Earn credit by reading this article and successfully completing the posttest and evaluation. Successful completion is defined as a cumulative score of at least 70% correct.

EDUCATIONAL OBJECTIVES
• Identify "red flag" items in the history and physical exam that make low back pain (LBP) "complicated."
• Stratify patients into three categories: simple back pain, complicated back pain, and back pain with sciatica.
• Discuss when appropriate additional testing/imaging is needed based on LBP categories.
• Discuss patient perceptions and costs associated with imaging and LBP.
• Describe basic treatment options for noncomplicated acute LBP.

FACULTY

Mike Roscoe is the PA Program Director at the University of Evansville, Indiana. Alyssa Nishihira is in her final year of the PA program at Butler University, Indianapolis; after graduation, she will be practicing at Advanced Neurosurgery in Reno, Nevada.
The authors have no financial relationships to disclose.

ACCREDITATION STATEMENT

This program has been reviewed and is approved for a maximum of 1.0 hour of American Academy of Physician Assistants (AAPA) Category 1 CME credit by the Physician Assistant Review Panel. [NPs: Both ANCC and the AANP Certification Program recognize AAPA as an approved provider of Category 1 credit.] Approval is valid for one year from the issue date of May 2016.

Article begins on next page >>

Pages

Recommended Reading

Reconfiguring Management of Patients With Osteoporosis
Clinician Reviews
Helmets for Positional Skull Deformities: A Good Idea or Not?
Clinician Reviews
Aromatase Inhibitors, Bisphosphonates Cut Postmenopausal Breast Cancer Recurrence
Clinician Reviews
Blood Cultures Contribute Little to Uncomplicated SSTI Treatment
Clinician Reviews
Osteoporosis Trends Collide for Mexican American Women
Clinician Reviews
Osteoporosis: What About Men?
Clinician Reviews
Psoriasis Cohort Reveals High Arthritis Risk
Clinician Reviews
‘Hot’ Joints May Predict RA Joint Damage
Clinician Reviews
Kidney Disease: Unexpected Consequences
Clinician Reviews
Kidney Disease: Surprising Patients
Clinician Reviews

Related Articles