On the other hand, ACEis/ARBs have been shown to reduce incidence of cardiovascular disease (CVD) in patients without CKD. It is widely known that patients with CKD have increased risk for CVD, though there is little data examining the effects of RAAS inhibitors on CVD in this population.¹ A recent study found a reduced risk for fatal CVD in peritoneal dialysis patients treated with ACEis.5 Another study reported improved renal outcomes in nondiabetic patients with advanced CKD who were treated with ACEis.6 The National Kidney Foundation/Kidney Disease Outcomes Quality Initiative Clinical Practice Guidelines on Hypertension currently state that with careful monitoring, most patients with advanced CKD can continue taking ACEis/ARBs.7
More studies are needed to confidently close this controversial debate. Fortunately, the STOP-ACEi study, a three-year trial that began in 2014 in the UK, is examining the effects of ACEi/ARB use in patients with advanced CKD. It aims to determine whether discontinuation of ACEis/ARBs in these patients can help to stabilize or improve renal function, compared to continued use. By maintaining good blood pressure control in these patients, the researchers hope to distinguish the antihypertensive effects from other potential benefits of the RAAS inhibitors.2 The results of this trial may provide additional clarity for making decisions about ACEi/ARB treatment in our patients with advanced CKD. —RVR, SMR
Rebecca V. Rokosky, MSN, APRN, FNP-BC
Sub Investigator in the Clinical Advancement Center, PPLC, San Antonio, Texas
Shannon M. Rice, MS, PA-C
Division of Nephrology and Hypertension, Department of Medicine, University of California, San Diego