Conference Coverage

Trial Confirms Treating Gout Based on Uric Acid Level, Not Symptoms


 

FROM EULAR 2024

Nonspecialists Should Heed the Results

According to Yael Klionsky, MD, a clinical assistant professor of rheumatology and immunology at Wake Forest University School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, North Carolina, these data are not a surprise.

Even before this trial was completed, the message for clinicians is that they “should be focused on maintaining serum uric acid levels below physiological levels to improve outcomes” in patients with recurrent flares, said Klionsky, citing the validated EULAR and ACR guidelines.

While the ACP does still consider T2S acceptable as a strategy for chronic gout management, Klionsky pointed out that those guidelines have not been updated recently. Specialists in the treatment of gout do not need any more evidence that the T2T approach leads to better outcomes.

However, she agreed with the principle that non-rheumatologists need to be reached with better guidance in regard to gout management. While she expects the ACP to endorse T2T the next time their guidelines are updated, she hopes that primary care physicians recognize that T2T should now be a standard.

“In a 10- to 20-minute visit, managing multiple chronic conditions can be a challenge in primary care,” Klionsky said. “Many clinicians rely on guidelines so it is important to have consistent and accurate information.”

There is currently some distance between specialists and primary care physicians regarding the goals of gout management, according to a study that Klionsky presented at EULAR 2024. In a survey, nonspecialists and specialists did not perceive treatment priorities in the same way.

In this survey, which elicited responses from 151 rheumatologists, 150 nephrologists, and 102 primary care physicians, there was general agreement that preventing flares is a priority, but only 30% of primary care physicians and 35% of nephrologists vs 64% of rheumatologists identified the T2T target of < 0.36 mmol/L as a key step in reaching this goal.


Conversely, 58% of primary care physicians and 42% of nephrologists vs only 34% of rheumatologists considered absence of gout pain to be in the top three criteria.

In addition to the fact that primary care physicians differ from specialists in their goals for gout treatment, these data “highlight the need for the importance of a standardized definition of gout remission that includes serum uric acid control,” Dr. Klionsky said. She further thinks that this type of guidance should be disseminated to nonspecialists.

Dr. Moses reported no potential conflicts of interest. Dr. Klionsky reported financial relationships with Amgen, AstraZeneca, Eli Lilly, and MedIQ.

A version of this article appeared on Medscape.com.

Pages

Recommended Reading

Diabetes drug class appears to reduce recurrent gout flares
Clinician Reviews
Colchicine still needed to prevent gout flares in allopurinol ‘start-low, go-slow’ strategy
Clinician Reviews
Adverse event rates compared for colchicine, NSAIDs when starting allopurinol for gout
Clinician Reviews
Approximately 20% of U.S. adults are diagnosed with arthritis
Clinician Reviews
CPPD nomenclature is sore subject for gout group
Clinician Reviews
Evidence Grows for SGLT2 Inhibitors in Rheumatology
Clinician Reviews
Dieting and Gout: Intensive Weight Loss Not Especially Helpful for Symptoms
Clinician Reviews
Preventing Gout Flares and Hospitalizations Means Targeting These Serum Urate Levels
Clinician Reviews
Gout Increases the Risk for a Wide Range of Cardiovascular Diseases
Clinician Reviews
Optimized Hospital Care for Gout Improves Uptake of Urate-Lowering Therapy
Clinician Reviews