Clinical Review

2022 Update on pelvic floor dysfunction

Author and Disclosure Information

Updates on new data on alternative management options for urinary incontinence, medical optimization prior to prolapse surgery, and long-term outcomes for prolapse repair with transvaginal mesh


 

Knowledge of the latest evidence on the management of pelvic floor disorders is essential for all practicing ObGyns. In this Update, we review long-term outcomes for a polyacrylamide hydrogel urethral bulking agent for the treatment of stress urinary incontinence (SUI) that presents a viable alternative to the gold standard, midurethral sling. We review the new recommendations from the American Urogynecologic Society (AUGS) regarding the administration of anticholinergics, highlighting a paradigm shift in the management of overactive bladder (OAB). In addition, we present data on a proposed threshold glycosylated hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) level for patients undergoing pelvic organ prolapse (POP) surgery that may help reduce the risk of perioperative complications. Finally, we consider new evidence on the long-term efficacy and safety of transvaginal mesh for repair of POP.

Periurethral injection with polyacrylamide hydrogel is a long-term durable and safe option for women with SUI

Brosche T, Kuhn A, Lobodasch K, et al. Seven-year efficacy and safety outcomes of Bulkamid for the treatment of stress urinary incontinence. Neurourol Urodyn. 2021;40:502-508. doi:10.1002/nau.24589.

Urethral bulking agents are a less invasive management option for women with SUI compared with the gold standard, midurethral sling. Treatment with a polyacrylamide hydrogel (PAHG; Bulkamid)—a nonparticulate hydrogel bulking agent—showed long-term efficacy and a favorable safety profile at 7 years’ follow-up.

Study details

Brosche and colleagues conducted a retrospective cohort study that included women with SUI or stress-predominant mixed urinary incontinence (MUI) who underwent transurethral PAHG injections for primary treatment of their incontinence symptoms. The study objective was to evaluate the long-term efficacy of PAHG based on patient satisfaction. Treatment safety was a secondary outcome.

Pad counts and validated questionnaires were used to determine treatment effectiveness. Additional data on reinjection rates, perioperative complications, and postoperative complications also were collected.

Long-term outcomes favorable

During the study time period, 1,200 patients were treated with PAHG, and 7-year data were available for 553 women. Of the 553 patients, 67% reported improvement or cure of their SUI symptoms when PAHG was performed as a primary procedure, consistent with previously published 12-month data. There were no perioperative complications. Postoperative complications were transient. Short-term subjective prolonged bladder emptying was the most common complication and occurred in 15% of patients.

WHAT THIS EVIDENCE MEANS FOR PRACTICE
PAHG injection is a durable and safe alternative for the treatment of stress urinary incontinence in women who are not candidates for or who decline treatment with alternative methods, such as a midurethral sling.

Continue to: New society guidance...

Pages

Recommended Reading

Closing the racial gap in minimally invasive gyn hysterectomy and myomectomy
MDedge ObGyn
A multidisciplinary approach to gyn care: A single center’s experience
MDedge ObGyn
2021 Update on pelvic floor disorders
MDedge ObGyn
Pelvic floor dysfunction imaging: New guidelines provide recommendations
MDedge ObGyn
Women with recurrent UTIs express fear, frustration
MDedge ObGyn
Transvaginal mesh, native tissue repair have similar outcomes in 3-year trial
MDedge ObGyn
Surgeons may underestimate recovery from incontinence operation
MDedge ObGyn
Are single-incision mini-slings the new gold standard for stress urinary incontinence?
MDedge ObGyn
Is yoga the answer to pelvic floor woes?
MDedge ObGyn
Nonsurgical treatments for patients with urinary incontinence
MDedge ObGyn