Abatacept reduced infections in RA patients

Patients with RA who initiated abatacept had significantly lower risk of hospitalized infection, compared with those who initiated a tumor necrosis factor inhibitor (TNFi), based on data from more than 11,000 matched pairs of patients.

“Given similar efficacy between abatacept and TNFi as biologic therapies for treatment of RA, one of the main determinants in choosing between the medications is minimizing the risk of infection,” wrote Sarah K. Chen, MD, of Brigham and Women’s Hospital in Boston, and her colleagues.

In a study published in Arthritis Care & Research, the researchers identified 11,248 propensity score–matched pairs of RA patients aged 18 years and older with at least two RA diagnoses who initiated abatacept or a TNFi. The average age of the patients was 56 years; 83% were women. The primary outcome was hospitalized infection. Patients with conditions that might increase the risk of infection, such as malignancy, HIV/AIDS, renal dialysis, or a history of bone marrow transplant were excluded, as were patients who had used rituximab, tocilizumab, or tofacitinib before the start of the study.

Overall, the incidence rate for a hospitalized infection was 37 per 1,000 person-years among abatacept patients and 47 per 1,000 person-years among TNFi patients (hazard ratio, 0.78). In a subgroup analysis, the difference in infection rate remained significant between abatacept and infliximab (HR, 0.63), and no significant difference occurred between abatacept and etanercept.

The researchers also examined secondary outcomes including bacterial infection, herpes zoster, and infections of various organs. The risk of these was similar between abatacept and TNF inhibitors for all but pulmonary infections, which was lower for abatacept.

The study was supported by an investigator-sponsored research grant from Bristol-Myers Squibb. Dr. Chen had no financial conflicts to disclose.

SOURCE: Chen SK et al. Arthritis Care Res. 2018 Dec 20. doi: 10.1002/acr.23824.

Patients with RA who initiated abatacept had significantly lower risk of hospitalized infection, compared with those who initiated a tumor necrosis factor inhibitor (TNFi), based on data from more than 11,000 matched pairs of patients.

“Given similar efficacy between abatacept and TNFi as biologic therapies for treatment of RA, one of the main determinants in choosing between the medications is minimizing the risk of infection,” wrote Sarah K. Chen, MD, of Brigham and Women’s Hospital in Boston, and her colleagues.

In a study published in Arthritis Care & Research, the researchers identified 11,248 propensity score–matched pairs of RA patients aged 18 years and older with at least two RA diagnoses who initiated abatacept or a TNFi. The average age of the patients was 56 years; 83% were women. The primary outcome was hospitalized infection. Patients with conditions that might increase the risk of infection, such as malignancy, HIV/AIDS, renal dialysis, or a history of bone marrow transplant were excluded, as were patients who had used rituximab, tocilizumab, or tofacitinib before the start of the study.

Overall, the incidence rate for a hospitalized infection was 37 per 1,000 person-years among abatacept patients and 47 per 1,000 person-years among TNFi patients (hazard ratio, 0.78). In a subgroup analysis, the difference in infection rate remained significant between abatacept and infliximab (HR, 0.63), and no significant difference occurred between abatacept and etanercept.

The researchers also examined secondary outcomes including bacterial infection, herpes zoster, and infections of various organs. The risk of these was similar between abatacept and TNF inhibitors for all but pulmonary infections, which was lower for abatacept.

The study was supported by an investigator-sponsored research grant from Bristol-Myers Squibb. Dr. Chen had no financial conflicts to disclose.

SOURCE: Chen SK et al. Arthritis Care Res. 2018 Dec 20. doi: 10.1002/acr.23824.

Patients with RA who initiated abatacept had significantly lower risk of hospitalized infection, compared with those who initiated a tumor necrosis factor inhibitor (TNFi), based on data from more than 11,000 matched pairs of patients.

“Given similar efficacy between abatacept and TNFi as biologic therapies for treatment of RA, one of the main determinants in choosing between the medications is minimizing the risk of infection,” wrote Sarah K. Chen, MD, of Brigham and Women’s Hospital in Boston, and her colleagues.

In a study published in Arthritis Care & Research, the researchers identified 11,248 propensity score–matched pairs of RA patients aged 18 years and older with at least two RA diagnoses who initiated abatacept or a TNFi. The average age of the patients was 56 years; 83% were women. The primary outcome was hospitalized infection. Patients with conditions that might increase the risk of infection, such as malignancy, HIV/AIDS, renal dialysis, or a history of bone marrow transplant were excluded, as were patients who had used rituximab, tocilizumab, or tofacitinib before the start of the study.

Overall, the incidence rate for a hospitalized infection was 37 per 1,000 person-years among abatacept patients and 47 per 1,000 person-years among TNFi patients (hazard ratio, 0.78). In a subgroup analysis, the difference in infection rate remained significant between abatacept and infliximab (HR, 0.63), and no significant difference occurred between abatacept and etanercept.

The researchers also examined secondary outcomes including bacterial infection, herpes zoster, and infections of various organs. The risk of these was similar between abatacept and TNF inhibitors for all but pulmonary infections, which was lower for abatacept.

The study was supported by an investigator-sponsored research grant from Bristol-Myers Squibb. Dr. Chen had no financial conflicts to disclose.

SOURCE: Chen SK et al. Arthritis Care Res. 2018 Dec 20. doi: 10.1002/acr.23824.