User login
medicine to treat cutaneous diseases, fevers, and rheumatism,as well as a variety of chronic inflammatory conditions.1,2 The Ayurvedic armamentarium is thought to be the most abundant source of botanically based drugs used to treat wounds.3 Unrelated to health concerns, with the possible exception of allergic reactions, C. dactylon – which originated in Africa, is widely dispersed in Europe, and became an invasive species in locations such as Bermuda – is also used on putting greens on golf courses in subtropical and tropical climates.4 This grass has been shown to be safe and effective for treating induced RA in rats.1,2 Recent findings are encouraging in the area of wound healing.
Chemical constituents
Among the numerous ingredients contained in C. dactylon are proteins, carbohydrates, minerals, terpenoids, vitamin C, palmitic acid, and alkaloids.3 Other key phytoconstituents known to impart beneficial health effects that are present in the plant include flavonoids (such as apigenin and luteolin), carotenoids (such as beta-carotene and neoxanthin), phenolics, phytosterols, glycosides, saponins, and volatile oils.3 Given such components, it should not be surprising that C. dactylon has demonstrated antioxidant activity by scavenging the 2,2-diphenyl-1-picrylhydrazyl radical.3
Wound healing
Given the reputation of C. dactylon as an effective compound used in traditional medicine for wound healing as a hemostatic agent, Biswas et al. set out in 2017 to determine if they could provide scientific validation of the botanical as a viable wound-healing option. The investigators first undertook to compare a 15% ointment of the extract with a placebo control and the standard framycetin on full-thickness punch wounds in Wistar rats. Across all parameters, results for the C. dactylon–treated group far exceeded the control group and were comparable with the framycetin group. Subsequently, in a pilot clinical study, the researchers assessed the botanical ointment in a small cohort (n = 12) of men and women aged 65-75 years (n = 12) with chronic and complicated wounds. Half were treated with a topical C. dactylon ointment and half were treated with a topical framycetin sulfate ointment. Comparable effects were seen across the groups, with significant contraction of wounds and wound area noted, along with significant development of granulation and epithelial tissues. Hematologic parameters indicating improvement were comparable between the groups. The investigators concluded that all patients treated with C. dactylon healed successfully. They added that the antioxidant activity of the constituent phenolic acids and flavonoids in C. dactylon likely play a key role in conferring potent wound-healing effects by promoting collagenesis.3
In 2018, Perumal et al. created a collagen-silica biocomposite enriched with C. dactylon extract and studied its wound-healing potential in vitro and in vivo in comparison with collagen as well as collagen-silica scaffold controls. The investigators found that the stability of the enriched product surpassed that of native collagen by virtue of the intermolecular interactions between the botanical ingredient and collagen. In a full-thickness excision wound model using Wistar rats, the biocomposite was associated with more rapid healing than wounds treated with collagen and the scaffold control.5
Arthritis
In 2009, Sindhu et al. orally administered C. dactylon to rats after intradermally inducing arthritis. The induction produced inflammation, and a marked rise in the levels of inflammatory mediators, C-reactive protein, myeloperoxidase, and nitrite. Resultant oxidative stress was noted with substantial declines in the activity of catalase, superoxide dismutase, and glutathione peroxidase, as well as levels of glutathione, vitamins C and E, and an increase in lipid peroxidation. Administration of C. dactylon yielded substantial changes, with mitigation of the inflammatory response and oxidative stress as well as diminution of the arthritic response nearly to the baseline condition. The investigators concluded that the botanical agent clearly demonstrates potential to protect against arthritis.2
A subsequent study in rats by Bhangale and Acharya supported the use of C. dactylon for RA, as its oral administration was found safe at all dose levels (100, 200 and 400 mg/kg), with 400 mg/kg as the most effective at ameliorating hemoglobin and red blood cell levels and C-reactive protein, as well as lowering tumor necrosis factor–alpha. The authors also noted that the ethanolic extract of C. dactylon contained alkaloids, flavonoids, and glycosides, all of which are known to confer health benefits.1
Allergy
In 2016, López-Matas et al. studied the profiles of sensitization to C. dactylon (as well as Phragmites communis) in subjects sensitized to grasses and evaluated cross-reactivity between these grasses as well as temperate ones. Patients received skin prick tests with a grass mixture, and 24 patients (80%) were found to have had positive results for C. dactylon (and 90% to P. communis). The researchers concluded that sensitization to these species appears to be engendered by allergens other than those present in sweet grasses.6
Mehta et al. reported in 2018 on their investigation of common allergens in Ambala, India, using intradermal tests in patients with asthma, allergic rhinitis, and eczema. The study included 100 patients over an 8-year period, with 197 allergens (50 types of pollen, 19 fungi, 17 insects, 14 types of dust, 6 kinds of animal dander, 7 varieties of fabric and feathers, 82 foods, dust mites, and parthenium) tested. Pollens (51%) were the major allergens, followed by foods (28.9%), insects (26.9%), fungi (12.6%), and dusts (6.7%). C. dactylon (5%) was among two other species ranking fourth among pollen allergens.7
Also that year, Sánchez et al. investigated whether growing conditions (rural vs. urban) might influence the nasal inflammatory response to C. dactylon among patients with allergic rhinitis. They observed that the urban extract provoked larger wheals, and more patients with rhinitis experienced a positive nasal challenge test than those administered the rural extract. The skin and nasal tests did not elicit reactions in healthy controls. The researchers reached the conclusion that growth of C. dactylon in an urban setting can produce alterations in the protein extract, with potential clinical ramifications for patients who experience allergic rhinitis.8
Conclusion
Regular readers of this column know of my interest in botanically sourced topical products. Such ingredients with an extensive history of traditional medical use are particularly compelling. Many of these compounds are found in the modern medical and dermatologic armamentaria. C. dactylon does boast a track record of use in Ayurvedic medicine. However, there is a paucity of modern research at the present time. While there are concerns about its allergenicity, some encouraging results have been seen in relation to RA and wound healing. Much more research is needed, though, before this botanical agent can be included feasibly for standard skin care.
Dr. Baumann is a private practice dermatologist, researcher, author, and entrepreneur who practices in Miami. She founded the Cosmetic Dermatology Center at the University of Miami in 1997. Dr. Baumann wrote two textbooks, “Cosmetic Dermatology: Principles and Practice” (New York: McGraw-Hill, 2002) and “Cosmeceuticals and Cosmetic Ingredients” (New York: McGraw-Hill, 2014), as well as a New York Times Best Sellers book for consumers, “The Skin Type Solution” (New York: Bantam Dell, 2006). Dr. Baumann has received funding for advisory boards and/or clinical research trials from Allergan, Evolus, Galderma, and Revance. She is the founder and CEO of Skin Type Solutions Franchise Systems. Write to her at dermnews@mdedge.com.
References
1. Bhangale J, Acharya S. Pers. Indian J Exp Biol. 2014 Mar;52(3):215-22.
2. Sindhu G et al. Immunopharmacol Immunotoxicol. 2009;31(4):647-53.
3. Biswas TK et al. J Ethnopharmacol. 2017 Feb 2;197:128-37.
4. Reasor EH et al. Planta. 2016 Oct;244(4):761-73.
5. Perumal RK et al. Mater Sci Eng C Mater Biol Appl. 2018 Nov 1;92:297-306.
6. López-Matas MA et al. J Investig Allergol Clin Immunol. 2016;26(5):295-303.
7. Mehta D et al. Indian J Dermatol. 2018 Jul-Aug;63(4):311-6.
8. Sánchez J et al. Allergy Rhinol (Providence). 2018 Dec 17;9:2152656718815870.
medicine to treat cutaneous diseases, fevers, and rheumatism,as well as a variety of chronic inflammatory conditions.1,2 The Ayurvedic armamentarium is thought to be the most abundant source of botanically based drugs used to treat wounds.3 Unrelated to health concerns, with the possible exception of allergic reactions, C. dactylon – which originated in Africa, is widely dispersed in Europe, and became an invasive species in locations such as Bermuda – is also used on putting greens on golf courses in subtropical and tropical climates.4 This grass has been shown to be safe and effective for treating induced RA in rats.1,2 Recent findings are encouraging in the area of wound healing.
Chemical constituents
Among the numerous ingredients contained in C. dactylon are proteins, carbohydrates, minerals, terpenoids, vitamin C, palmitic acid, and alkaloids.3 Other key phytoconstituents known to impart beneficial health effects that are present in the plant include flavonoids (such as apigenin and luteolin), carotenoids (such as beta-carotene and neoxanthin), phenolics, phytosterols, glycosides, saponins, and volatile oils.3 Given such components, it should not be surprising that C. dactylon has demonstrated antioxidant activity by scavenging the 2,2-diphenyl-1-picrylhydrazyl radical.3
Wound healing
Given the reputation of C. dactylon as an effective compound used in traditional medicine for wound healing as a hemostatic agent, Biswas et al. set out in 2017 to determine if they could provide scientific validation of the botanical as a viable wound-healing option. The investigators first undertook to compare a 15% ointment of the extract with a placebo control and the standard framycetin on full-thickness punch wounds in Wistar rats. Across all parameters, results for the C. dactylon–treated group far exceeded the control group and were comparable with the framycetin group. Subsequently, in a pilot clinical study, the researchers assessed the botanical ointment in a small cohort (n = 12) of men and women aged 65-75 years (n = 12) with chronic and complicated wounds. Half were treated with a topical C. dactylon ointment and half were treated with a topical framycetin sulfate ointment. Comparable effects were seen across the groups, with significant contraction of wounds and wound area noted, along with significant development of granulation and epithelial tissues. Hematologic parameters indicating improvement were comparable between the groups. The investigators concluded that all patients treated with C. dactylon healed successfully. They added that the antioxidant activity of the constituent phenolic acids and flavonoids in C. dactylon likely play a key role in conferring potent wound-healing effects by promoting collagenesis.3
In 2018, Perumal et al. created a collagen-silica biocomposite enriched with C. dactylon extract and studied its wound-healing potential in vitro and in vivo in comparison with collagen as well as collagen-silica scaffold controls. The investigators found that the stability of the enriched product surpassed that of native collagen by virtue of the intermolecular interactions between the botanical ingredient and collagen. In a full-thickness excision wound model using Wistar rats, the biocomposite was associated with more rapid healing than wounds treated with collagen and the scaffold control.5
Arthritis
In 2009, Sindhu et al. orally administered C. dactylon to rats after intradermally inducing arthritis. The induction produced inflammation, and a marked rise in the levels of inflammatory mediators, C-reactive protein, myeloperoxidase, and nitrite. Resultant oxidative stress was noted with substantial declines in the activity of catalase, superoxide dismutase, and glutathione peroxidase, as well as levels of glutathione, vitamins C and E, and an increase in lipid peroxidation. Administration of C. dactylon yielded substantial changes, with mitigation of the inflammatory response and oxidative stress as well as diminution of the arthritic response nearly to the baseline condition. The investigators concluded that the botanical agent clearly demonstrates potential to protect against arthritis.2
A subsequent study in rats by Bhangale and Acharya supported the use of C. dactylon for RA, as its oral administration was found safe at all dose levels (100, 200 and 400 mg/kg), with 400 mg/kg as the most effective at ameliorating hemoglobin and red blood cell levels and C-reactive protein, as well as lowering tumor necrosis factor–alpha. The authors also noted that the ethanolic extract of C. dactylon contained alkaloids, flavonoids, and glycosides, all of which are known to confer health benefits.1
Allergy
In 2016, López-Matas et al. studied the profiles of sensitization to C. dactylon (as well as Phragmites communis) in subjects sensitized to grasses and evaluated cross-reactivity between these grasses as well as temperate ones. Patients received skin prick tests with a grass mixture, and 24 patients (80%) were found to have had positive results for C. dactylon (and 90% to P. communis). The researchers concluded that sensitization to these species appears to be engendered by allergens other than those present in sweet grasses.6
Mehta et al. reported in 2018 on their investigation of common allergens in Ambala, India, using intradermal tests in patients with asthma, allergic rhinitis, and eczema. The study included 100 patients over an 8-year period, with 197 allergens (50 types of pollen, 19 fungi, 17 insects, 14 types of dust, 6 kinds of animal dander, 7 varieties of fabric and feathers, 82 foods, dust mites, and parthenium) tested. Pollens (51%) were the major allergens, followed by foods (28.9%), insects (26.9%), fungi (12.6%), and dusts (6.7%). C. dactylon (5%) was among two other species ranking fourth among pollen allergens.7
Also that year, Sánchez et al. investigated whether growing conditions (rural vs. urban) might influence the nasal inflammatory response to C. dactylon among patients with allergic rhinitis. They observed that the urban extract provoked larger wheals, and more patients with rhinitis experienced a positive nasal challenge test than those administered the rural extract. The skin and nasal tests did not elicit reactions in healthy controls. The researchers reached the conclusion that growth of C. dactylon in an urban setting can produce alterations in the protein extract, with potential clinical ramifications for patients who experience allergic rhinitis.8
Conclusion
Regular readers of this column know of my interest in botanically sourced topical products. Such ingredients with an extensive history of traditional medical use are particularly compelling. Many of these compounds are found in the modern medical and dermatologic armamentaria. C. dactylon does boast a track record of use in Ayurvedic medicine. However, there is a paucity of modern research at the present time. While there are concerns about its allergenicity, some encouraging results have been seen in relation to RA and wound healing. Much more research is needed, though, before this botanical agent can be included feasibly for standard skin care.
Dr. Baumann is a private practice dermatologist, researcher, author, and entrepreneur who practices in Miami. She founded the Cosmetic Dermatology Center at the University of Miami in 1997. Dr. Baumann wrote two textbooks, “Cosmetic Dermatology: Principles and Practice” (New York: McGraw-Hill, 2002) and “Cosmeceuticals and Cosmetic Ingredients” (New York: McGraw-Hill, 2014), as well as a New York Times Best Sellers book for consumers, “The Skin Type Solution” (New York: Bantam Dell, 2006). Dr. Baumann has received funding for advisory boards and/or clinical research trials from Allergan, Evolus, Galderma, and Revance. She is the founder and CEO of Skin Type Solutions Franchise Systems. Write to her at dermnews@mdedge.com.
References
1. Bhangale J, Acharya S. Pers. Indian J Exp Biol. 2014 Mar;52(3):215-22.
2. Sindhu G et al. Immunopharmacol Immunotoxicol. 2009;31(4):647-53.
3. Biswas TK et al. J Ethnopharmacol. 2017 Feb 2;197:128-37.
4. Reasor EH et al. Planta. 2016 Oct;244(4):761-73.
5. Perumal RK et al. Mater Sci Eng C Mater Biol Appl. 2018 Nov 1;92:297-306.
6. López-Matas MA et al. J Investig Allergol Clin Immunol. 2016;26(5):295-303.
7. Mehta D et al. Indian J Dermatol. 2018 Jul-Aug;63(4):311-6.
8. Sánchez J et al. Allergy Rhinol (Providence). 2018 Dec 17;9:2152656718815870.
medicine to treat cutaneous diseases, fevers, and rheumatism,as well as a variety of chronic inflammatory conditions.1,2 The Ayurvedic armamentarium is thought to be the most abundant source of botanically based drugs used to treat wounds.3 Unrelated to health concerns, with the possible exception of allergic reactions, C. dactylon – which originated in Africa, is widely dispersed in Europe, and became an invasive species in locations such as Bermuda – is also used on putting greens on golf courses in subtropical and tropical climates.4 This grass has been shown to be safe and effective for treating induced RA in rats.1,2 Recent findings are encouraging in the area of wound healing.
Chemical constituents
Among the numerous ingredients contained in C. dactylon are proteins, carbohydrates, minerals, terpenoids, vitamin C, palmitic acid, and alkaloids.3 Other key phytoconstituents known to impart beneficial health effects that are present in the plant include flavonoids (such as apigenin and luteolin), carotenoids (such as beta-carotene and neoxanthin), phenolics, phytosterols, glycosides, saponins, and volatile oils.3 Given such components, it should not be surprising that C. dactylon has demonstrated antioxidant activity by scavenging the 2,2-diphenyl-1-picrylhydrazyl radical.3
Wound healing
Given the reputation of C. dactylon as an effective compound used in traditional medicine for wound healing as a hemostatic agent, Biswas et al. set out in 2017 to determine if they could provide scientific validation of the botanical as a viable wound-healing option. The investigators first undertook to compare a 15% ointment of the extract with a placebo control and the standard framycetin on full-thickness punch wounds in Wistar rats. Across all parameters, results for the C. dactylon–treated group far exceeded the control group and were comparable with the framycetin group. Subsequently, in a pilot clinical study, the researchers assessed the botanical ointment in a small cohort (n = 12) of men and women aged 65-75 years (n = 12) with chronic and complicated wounds. Half were treated with a topical C. dactylon ointment and half were treated with a topical framycetin sulfate ointment. Comparable effects were seen across the groups, with significant contraction of wounds and wound area noted, along with significant development of granulation and epithelial tissues. Hematologic parameters indicating improvement were comparable between the groups. The investigators concluded that all patients treated with C. dactylon healed successfully. They added that the antioxidant activity of the constituent phenolic acids and flavonoids in C. dactylon likely play a key role in conferring potent wound-healing effects by promoting collagenesis.3
In 2018, Perumal et al. created a collagen-silica biocomposite enriched with C. dactylon extract and studied its wound-healing potential in vitro and in vivo in comparison with collagen as well as collagen-silica scaffold controls. The investigators found that the stability of the enriched product surpassed that of native collagen by virtue of the intermolecular interactions between the botanical ingredient and collagen. In a full-thickness excision wound model using Wistar rats, the biocomposite was associated with more rapid healing than wounds treated with collagen and the scaffold control.5
Arthritis
In 2009, Sindhu et al. orally administered C. dactylon to rats after intradermally inducing arthritis. The induction produced inflammation, and a marked rise in the levels of inflammatory mediators, C-reactive protein, myeloperoxidase, and nitrite. Resultant oxidative stress was noted with substantial declines in the activity of catalase, superoxide dismutase, and glutathione peroxidase, as well as levels of glutathione, vitamins C and E, and an increase in lipid peroxidation. Administration of C. dactylon yielded substantial changes, with mitigation of the inflammatory response and oxidative stress as well as diminution of the arthritic response nearly to the baseline condition. The investigators concluded that the botanical agent clearly demonstrates potential to protect against arthritis.2
A subsequent study in rats by Bhangale and Acharya supported the use of C. dactylon for RA, as its oral administration was found safe at all dose levels (100, 200 and 400 mg/kg), with 400 mg/kg as the most effective at ameliorating hemoglobin and red blood cell levels and C-reactive protein, as well as lowering tumor necrosis factor–alpha. The authors also noted that the ethanolic extract of C. dactylon contained alkaloids, flavonoids, and glycosides, all of which are known to confer health benefits.1
Allergy
In 2016, López-Matas et al. studied the profiles of sensitization to C. dactylon (as well as Phragmites communis) in subjects sensitized to grasses and evaluated cross-reactivity between these grasses as well as temperate ones. Patients received skin prick tests with a grass mixture, and 24 patients (80%) were found to have had positive results for C. dactylon (and 90% to P. communis). The researchers concluded that sensitization to these species appears to be engendered by allergens other than those present in sweet grasses.6
Mehta et al. reported in 2018 on their investigation of common allergens in Ambala, India, using intradermal tests in patients with asthma, allergic rhinitis, and eczema. The study included 100 patients over an 8-year period, with 197 allergens (50 types of pollen, 19 fungi, 17 insects, 14 types of dust, 6 kinds of animal dander, 7 varieties of fabric and feathers, 82 foods, dust mites, and parthenium) tested. Pollens (51%) were the major allergens, followed by foods (28.9%), insects (26.9%), fungi (12.6%), and dusts (6.7%). C. dactylon (5%) was among two other species ranking fourth among pollen allergens.7
Also that year, Sánchez et al. investigated whether growing conditions (rural vs. urban) might influence the nasal inflammatory response to C. dactylon among patients with allergic rhinitis. They observed that the urban extract provoked larger wheals, and more patients with rhinitis experienced a positive nasal challenge test than those administered the rural extract. The skin and nasal tests did not elicit reactions in healthy controls. The researchers reached the conclusion that growth of C. dactylon in an urban setting can produce alterations in the protein extract, with potential clinical ramifications for patients who experience allergic rhinitis.8
Conclusion
Regular readers of this column know of my interest in botanically sourced topical products. Such ingredients with an extensive history of traditional medical use are particularly compelling. Many of these compounds are found in the modern medical and dermatologic armamentaria. C. dactylon does boast a track record of use in Ayurvedic medicine. However, there is a paucity of modern research at the present time. While there are concerns about its allergenicity, some encouraging results have been seen in relation to RA and wound healing. Much more research is needed, though, before this botanical agent can be included feasibly for standard skin care.
Dr. Baumann is a private practice dermatologist, researcher, author, and entrepreneur who practices in Miami. She founded the Cosmetic Dermatology Center at the University of Miami in 1997. Dr. Baumann wrote two textbooks, “Cosmetic Dermatology: Principles and Practice” (New York: McGraw-Hill, 2002) and “Cosmeceuticals and Cosmetic Ingredients” (New York: McGraw-Hill, 2014), as well as a New York Times Best Sellers book for consumers, “The Skin Type Solution” (New York: Bantam Dell, 2006). Dr. Baumann has received funding for advisory boards and/or clinical research trials from Allergan, Evolus, Galderma, and Revance. She is the founder and CEO of Skin Type Solutions Franchise Systems. Write to her at dermnews@mdedge.com.
References
1. Bhangale J, Acharya S. Pers. Indian J Exp Biol. 2014 Mar;52(3):215-22.
2. Sindhu G et al. Immunopharmacol Immunotoxicol. 2009;31(4):647-53.
3. Biswas TK et al. J Ethnopharmacol. 2017 Feb 2;197:128-37.
4. Reasor EH et al. Planta. 2016 Oct;244(4):761-73.
5. Perumal RK et al. Mater Sci Eng C Mater Biol Appl. 2018 Nov 1;92:297-306.
6. López-Matas MA et al. J Investig Allergol Clin Immunol. 2016;26(5):295-303.
7. Mehta D et al. Indian J Dermatol. 2018 Jul-Aug;63(4):311-6.
8. Sánchez J et al. Allergy Rhinol (Providence). 2018 Dec 17;9:2152656718815870.