Commentary

I’m getting old (and it’s costing me)

Author and Disclosure Information

 

References

The inevitable consequences of aging finally hit me last year, at age 64. Before then, I was a (reasonably) healthy, active person. I exercised a little, ate reasonably healthy meals, and took no medications. My only visits to my doctor were for annual (sort of) exams. That all changed when I began to have neurogenic claudication in both legs. I had no history of back injury but, with worsening pain, I sought the opinion of my physician.

I was told that my insurance premium would jump to more than 4 times the previous premium because of a CAC score of 22.

It turned out that I had a dynamic spondylolisthesis and disc herniation that could only be fixed with a single-level fusion. From a neurologic perspective, the procedure was an unequivocal success. However, my recovery (with lack of exercise) had the unintended “side effect” of a 25-pound weight gain. As a family doctor, I know that the best way to reverse this gain is by increasing my exercise. However, I also know that, at my age, many specialty organizations recommend a cardiac evaluation before beginning strenuous exercise.1

So, I set up a routine treadmill test. Although I exercised to a moderate level of intensity, the interpreting cardiologist was unwilling to call my test “totally normal” and recommended further evaluation. (One of the “unwritten rules” I’ve discovered during my career is that adverse outcomes are far more likely in medical personnel than in nonmedical personnel!)

He recommended undergoing coronary artery computed tomography angiography with coronary artery calcium (CAC) scoring. The result? A left anterior descending artery CAC score of 22, which placed me at a slightly increased risk of an adverse event over the next 10 years. (The benefit of exercise, however, far outweighed the risk.) I’m happy to report that I have lost five pounds with only mildly intensive exercise.

Along with facing the health aspects of aging, I am also faced with the economic realities. I have carried group term life insurance throughout my career. My 10-year term just happened to expire when I turned 65. I have always been insured as a “Tier 1” customer, meaning that I qualified for the best premiums due to my “healthy” ­status. That said, the transition to age 65 carries with it a significant premium increase.

Imagine my shock, though, when I was told that my premium would jump to MORE THAN 4 TIMES the previous premium for ONE-THIRD of my previous coverage! The culprit? The CAC score of 22!

It turns out that the insurance industry has adopted an underwriting standard that uses CAC—measured over a broad population, rather than a more age-confined one—to determine actuarial risk when rating life insurance policies.2 As a result, my underwriting profile went all the way to “Tier 3.”

Continue to: We're used to medical consequences...

Pages

Recommended Reading

Patients find CAC more persuasive than ASCVD risk score for statin decisions
MDedge Family Medicine
Sleep burden index predicts recurrent stroke
MDedge Family Medicine
FDA okays emergency use for Impella RP in COVID-19 right heart failure
MDedge Family Medicine
Deprescribing hypertension meds can be safe in older patients
MDedge Family Medicine
Ticagrelor gets FDA nod for DAPT in high-risk patients with CAD
MDedge Family Medicine
More fatalities in heart transplant patients with COVID-19
MDedge Family Medicine
RA raises cardiac risk even without CAD
MDedge Family Medicine
Lancet, NEJM retract studies on hydroxychloroquine for COVID-19
MDedge Family Medicine
Cardiology societies unite to denounce racist violence
MDedge Family Medicine
How old is too old for statins?
MDedge Family Medicine