Article Type
Changed
Mon, 02/06/2023 - 10:08
Display Headline
Janus Kinase Inhibitors: A Promising Therapeutic Option for Allergic Contact Dermatitis

Allergic contact dermatitis (ACD) is a delayed type IV hypersensitivity reaction that usually manifests with eczematous lesions within hours to days after exposure to a contact allergen. The primary treatment of ACD consists of allergen avoidance, but medications also may be necessary to manage symptoms, particularly in cases where avoidance alone does not lead to resolution of dermatitis. At present, no medical therapies are explicitly approved for use in the management of ACD. Janus kinase (JAK) inhibitors are a class of small molecule inhibitors that are used for the treatment of a range of inflammatory diseases, such as rheumatoid arthritis and psoriatic arthritis. Several oral and topical JAK inhibitors also have recently been approved by the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) for atopic dermatitis (AD). In this article, we discuss this important class of medications and the role that they may play in the off-label management of refractory ACD.

JAK/STAT Signaling Pathway

The JAK/signal transducer and activator of transcription (STAT) pathway plays a crucial role in many biologic processes. Notably, JAK/STAT signaling is involved in the development and regulation of the immune system.1 The cascade begins when a particular transmembrane receptor binds a ligand, such as an interferon or interleukin.2 Upon ligand binding, the receptor dimerizes or oligomerizes, bringing the relevant JAK proteins into close approximation to each other.3 This allows the JAK proteins to autophosphorylate or transphosphorylate.2-4 Phosphorylation activates the JAK proteins and increases their kinase activity.3 In humans, there are 4 JAK proteins: JAK1, JAK2, JAK3, and tyrosine kinase 2.4 When activated, the JAK proteins phosphorylate specific tyrosine residues on the receptor, which creates a docking site for STAT proteins. After binding, the STAT proteins then are phosphorylated, leading to their dimerization and translocation to the nucleus.2,3 Once in the nucleus, the STAT proteins act as transcription factors for target genes.3

JAK Inhibitors

Janus kinase inhibitors are immunomodulatory medications that work through inhibition of 1 or more of the JAK proteins in the JAK/STAT pathway. Through this mechanism, JAK inhibitors can impede the activity of proinflammatory cytokines and T cells.4 A brief overview of the commercially available JAK inhibitors in Europe, Japan, and the United States is provided in the Table.5-29

Summary of Approved JAK Inhibitors for Use in Humans

Of the approved JAK inhibitors, more than 40% are indicated for AD. The first JAK inhibitor to be approved in the topical form was delgocitinib in 2020 in Japan.5 In a phase 3 trial, delgocitinib demonstrated significant reductions in modified Eczema Area and Severity Index (EASI) score (P<.001) as well as Peak Pruritus Numerical Rating Scale (P<.001) when compared with vehicle.30 Topical ruxolitinib soon followed when its approval for AD was announced by the FDA in 2021.31 Results from 2 phase 3 trials found that significantly more patients achieved investigator global assessment (IGA) treatment success (P<.0001) and a significant reduction in itch as measured by the Peak Pruritus Numerical Rating Scale (P<.001) with topical ruxolitinib vs vehicle.32

The first oral JAK inhibitor to attain approval for AD was baricitinib in Europe and Japan, but it is not currently approved for this indication in the United States by the FDA.11,12,33 Consistent findings across phase 3 trials revealed that baricitinib was more effective at achieving IGA treatment success and improved EASI scores compared with placebo.33

Upadacitinib, another oral JAK inhibitor, was subsequently approved for AD in Europe and Japan in 2021 and in the United States in early 2022.5,9,26,27 Two replicate phase 3 trials demonstrated significant improvement in EASI score, itch, and quality of life with upadacitinib compared with placebo (P<.0001).34 Abrocitinib was granted FDA approval for AD in the same time period, with phase 3 trials exhibiting greater responses in IGA and EASI scores vs placebo.35

Potential for Use in ACD

Given the successful use of JAK inhibitors in the management of AD, there is optimism that these medications also may have potential application in ACD. Recent literature suggests that the 2 conditions may be more closely related mechanistically than previously understood. As a result, AD and ACD often are managed with the same therapeutic agents.36

 

 

Although the exact etiology of ACD is still being elucidated, activation of T cells and cytokines plays an important role.37 Notably, more than 40 cytokines exert their effects through the JAK/STAT signaling pathway, including IL-2, IL-6, IL-17, IL-22, and IFN-γ.37,38 A study on nickel contact allergy revealed that JAK/STAT activation may regulate the balance between IL-12 and IL-23 and increase type 1 T-helper (TH1) polarization.39 Skin inflammation and chronic pruritus, which are major components of ACD, also are thought to be mediated in part by JAK signaling.34,40

Animal studies have suggested that JAK inhibitors may show benefit in the management of ACD. Rats with oxazolone-induced ACD were found to have less swelling and epidermal thickening in the area of induced dermatitis after treatment with oral tofacitinib, comparable to the effects of cyclosporine. Tofacitinib was presumed to exert its effects through cytokine suppression, particularly that of IFN-γ, IL-22, and tumor necrosis factor α.41 In a separate study on mice with toluene-2,4-diisocyanate–induced ACD, both tofacitinib and another JAK inhibitor, oclacitinib, demonstrated inhibition of cytokine production, migration, and maturation of bone marrow–derived dendritic cells. Both topical and oral formulations of these 2 JAK inhibitors also were found to decrease scratching behavior; only the topicals improved ear thickness (used as a marker of skin inflammation), suggesting potential benefits to local application.42 In a murine model, oral delgocitinib also attenuated contact hypersensitivity via inhibition of antigen-specific T-cell proliferation and cytokine production.37 Finally, in a randomized clinical trial conducted on dogs with allergic dermatitis (of which 10% were presumed to be from contact allergy), oral oclacitinib significantly reduced pruritus and clinical severity scores vs placebo (P<.0001).43

There also are early clinical studies and case reports highlighting the effective use of JAK inhibitors in the management of ACD in humans. A 37-year-old man with occupational airborne ACD to Compositae saw full clearance of his dermatitis with daily oral abrocitinib after topical corticosteroids and dupilumab failed.44 Another patient, a 57-year-old woman, had near-complete resolution of chronic Parthenium-induced airborne ACD after starting twice-daily oral tofacitinib. Allergen avoidance, as well as multiple medications, including topical and oral corticosteroids, topical calcineurin inhibitors, and azathioprine, previously failed in this patient.45 Finally, a phase 2 study on patients with irritant and nonirritant chronic hand eczema found that significantly more patients achieved treatment success (as measured by the physician global assessment) with topical delgocitinib vs vehicle (P=.009).46 Chronic hand eczema may be due to a variety of causes, including AD, irritant contact dermatitis, and ACD. Thus, these studies begin to highlight the potential role for JAK inhibitors in the management of refractory ACD.

Side Effects of JAK Inhibitors

The safety profile of JAK inhibitors must be taken into consideration. In general, topical JAK inhibitors are safe and well tolerated, with the majority of adverse events (AEs) seen in clinical trials considered mild or unrelated to the medication.30,32 Nasopharyngitis, local skin infection, and acne were reported; a systematic review found no increased risk of AEs with topical JAK inhibitors compared with placebo.30,32,47 Application-site reactions, a common concern among the existing topical calcineurin and phosphodiesterase 4 inhibitors, were rare (approximately 2% of patients).47 The most frequent AEs seen in clinical trials of oral JAK inhibitors included acne, nasopharyngitis/upper respiratory tract infections, nausea, and headache.33-35 Herpes simplex virus infection and worsening of AD also were seen. Although elevations in creatine phosphokinase levels were reported, patients often were asymptomatic and elevations were related to exercise or resolved without treatment interruption.33-35

As a class, JAK inhibitors carry a boxed warning for serious infections, malignancy, major adverse cardiovascular events, thrombosis, and mortality. The FDA placed this label on JAK inhibitors because of the results of a randomized controlled trial of oral tofacitinib vs tumor necrosis factor α inhibitors in RA.48,49 Notably, participants in the trial had to be 50 years or older and have at least 1 additional cardiovascular risk factor. Postmarket safety data are still being collected for patients with AD and other dermatologic conditions, but the findings of safety analyses have been reassuring to date.50,51 Regular follow-up and routine laboratory monitoring are recommended for any patient started on an oral JAK inhibitor, which often includes monitoring of the complete blood cell count, comprehensive metabolic panel, and lipids, as well as baseline screening for tuberculosis and hepatitis.52,53 For topical JAK inhibitors, no specific laboratory monitoring is recommended.

Finally, it must be considered that the challenges of off-label prescribing combined with high costs may limit access to JAK inhibitors for use in ACD.

Final Interpretation

Early investigations, including studies on animals and humans, suggest that JAK inhibitors are a promising option in the management of treatment-refractory ACD. Patients and providers should be aware of both the benefits and known side effects of JAK inhibitors prior to treatment initiation.

References
  1. Ghoreschi K, Laurence A, O’Shea JJ. Janus kinases in immune cell signaling. Immunol Rev. 2009;228:273-287.
  2. Bousoik E, Montazeri Aliabadi H. “Do we know Jack” about JAK? a closer look at JAK/STAT signaling pathway. Front Oncol. 2018;8:287.
  3. Jatiani SS, Baker SJ, Silverman LR, et al. Jak/STAT pathways in cytokine signaling and myeloproliferative disorders: approaches for targeted therapies. Genes Cancer. 2010;1:979-993.
  4. Seif F, Khoshmirsafa M, Aazami H, et al. The role of JAK-STAT signaling pathway and its regulators in the fate of T helper cells. Cell Commun Signal. 2017;15:23.
  5. Traidl S, Freimooser S, Werfel T. Janus kinase inhibitors for the therapy of atopic dermatitis. Allergol Select. 2021;5:293-304.
  6. Opzelura (ruxolitinib) cream. Prescribing information. Incyte Corporation; 2022. Accessed January 20, 2023. https://www.accessdata.fda.gov/drugsatfda_docs/label/2022/215309s001lbl.pdf
  7. Cibinqo (abrocitinib) tablets. Prescribing information. Pfizer Labs; 2022. Accessed January 20, 2023. https://www.accessdata.fda.gov/drugsatfda_docs/label/2022/213871s000lbl.pdf
  8. Cibinqo. Product information. European Medicines Agency. Published December 17, 2021. Updated November 10, 2022. Accessed January 20, 2023. https://www.ema.europa.eu/en/medicines/human/EPAR/cibinqo
  9. New drugs approved in FY 2021. Pharmaceuticals and Medical Devices Agency. Accessed January 20, 2023. https://www.pmda.go.jp/files/000246734.pdf
  10. Olumiant (baricitinib) tablets. Prescribing information. Eli Lilly and Company; 2022. Accessed January 20, 2023. https://www.accessdata.fda.gov/drugsatfda_docs/label/2022/207924s007lbl.pdf
  11. Olumiant. Product information. European Medicines Agency. Published March 16, 2017. Updated June 29, 2022. Accessed January 20, 2023. https://www.ema.europa.eu/en/medicines/human/EPAR/olumiant
  12. Review report: Olumiant. Pharmaceuticals and Medical Devices Agency. April 21, 2021. Accessed January 20, 2023. https://www.pmda.go.jp/files/000243207.pdf
  13. Sotyktu (deucravacitinib) tablets. Prescribing information. Bristol-Myers Squibb Company; 2022. Accessed January 20, 2023.https://www.accessdata.fda.gov/drugsatfda_docs/label/2022/214958s000lbl.pdf
  14. Inrebic (fedratinib) capsules. Prescribing information. Celgene Corporation; 2019. Accessed January 20, 2023. https://www.accessdata.fda.gov/drugsatfda_docs/label/2019/212327s000lbl.pdf
  15. Inrebic. Product information. European Medicines Agency. Published March 3, 2021. Updated December 8, 2022. Accessed January 20, 2023. https://www.ema.europa.eu/en/medicines/human/EPAR/inrebic
  16. Jyseleca. Product information. European Medicines Agency. Published September 28, 2020. Updated November 9, 2022. Accessed January 20, 2023. https://www.ema.europa.eu/en/documents/product-information/jyseleca-epar-product-information_en.pdf
  17. Review report: Jyseleca. Pharmaceuticals and Medical Devices Agency. September 8, 2020. Accessed January 20, 2023. https://www.pmda.go.jp/files/000247830.pdf
  18. Vonjo (pacritinib) capsules. Prescribing information. CTI BioPharma Corp; 2022. Accessed January 20, 2023. https://www.accessdata.fda.gov/drugsatfda_docs/label/2022/208712s000lbl.pdf
  19. Review report: Smyraf. Pharmaceuticals and Medical Devices Agency. February 28, 2019. Accessed January 20, 2023. https://www.pmda.go.jp/files/000233074.pdf
  20. Jakafi (ruxolitinib) tablets. Prescribing information. Incyte Corporation; 2021. Accessed January 20, 2023. https://www.accessdata.fda.gov/drugsatfda_docs/label/2021/202192s023lbl.pdf
  21. Jakavi. Product information. European Medicines Agency. Published October 4, 2012. Updated May 18, 2022. Accessed January 20, 2023. https://www.ema.europa.eu/en/medicines/human/EPAR/jakavi
  22. New drugs approved in FY 2014. Pharmaceuticals and Medical Devices Agency. Accessed January 20, 2023. https://www.pmda.go.jp/files/000229076.pdf
  23. Xeljanz (tofacitinib). Prescribing information. Pfizer Labs; 2021. Accessed January 20, 2023. https://www.accessdata.fda.gov/drugsatfda_docs/label/2021/203214s028,208246s013,213082s003lbl.pdf
  24. Xeljanz. Product information. European Medicines Agency. Accessed January 20, 2023. https://www.ema.europa.eu/en/documents/product-information/xeljanz-epar-product-information_en.pdf
  25. Review report: Xeljanz. Pharmaceuticals and Medical Devices Agency. January 20, 2023. https://www.pmda.go.jp/files/000237584.pdf
  26. Rinvoq (upadacitinib) extended-release tablets. Prescribing information. AbbVie Inc; 2022. Accessed January 20, 2023. https://www.accessdata.fda.gov/drugsatfda_docs/label/2022/211675s003lbl.pdf
  27. Rinvoq. Product information. European Medicines Agency. Published December 18, 2019. Updated December 7, 2022. Accessed January 20, 2023. https://www.ema.europa.eu/en/medicines/human/EPAR/rinvoq
  28. New drugs approved in FY 2019. Pharmaceuticals and Medical Devices Agency. Accessed January 20, 2023. https://www.pmda.go.jp/files/000235289.pdfs
  29. New drugs approved in May 2022. Pharmaceuticals and Medical Devices Agency. Accessed January 20, 2023. https://www.pmda.go.jp/files/000248626.pdf
  30. Nakagawa H, Nemoto O, Igarashi A, et al. Delgocitinib ointment, a topical Janus kinase inhibitor, in adult patients with moderate to severe atopic dermatitis: a phase 3, randomized, double-blind, vehicle-controlled study and an open-label, long-term extension study. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2020;82:823-831. Erratum appears in J Am Acad Dermatol. 2021;85:1069.
  31. Sideris N, Paschou E, Bakirtzi K, et al. New and upcoming topical treatments for atopic dermatitis: a review of the literature. J Clin Med. 2022;11:4974.
  32. Papp K, Szepietowski JC, Kircik L, et al. Efficacy and safety of ruxolitinib cream for the treatment of atopic dermatitis: results from 2 phase 3, randomized, double-blind studies. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2021;85:863-872.
  33. Radi G, Simonetti O, Rizzetto G, et al. Baricitinib: the first Jak inhibitor approved in Europe for the treatment of moderate to severe atopic dermatitis in adult patients. Healthcare (Basel). 2021;9:1575.
  34. Guttman-Yassky E, Teixeira HD, Simpson EL, et al. Once-daily upadacitinib versus placebo in adolescents and adults with moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis (Measure Up 1 and Measure Up 2): results from two replicate double-blind, randomised controlled phase 3 trials. Lancet. 2021;397:2151-2168. Erratum appears in Lancet. 2021;397:2150.
  35. Bieber T, Simpson EL, Silverberg JI, et al. Abrocitinib versus placebo or dupilumab for atopic dermatitis. N Engl J Med. 2021;384:1101-1112.
  36. Johnson H, Novack DE, Adler BL, et al. Can atopic dermatitis and allergic contact dermatitis coexist? Cutis. 2022;110:139-142.
  37. Amano W, Nakajima S, Yamamoto Y, et al. JAK inhibitor JTE-052 regulates contact hypersensitivity by downmodulating T cell activation and differentiation. J Dermatol Sci. 2016;84:258-265.
  38. O’Shea JJ, Schwartz DM, Villarino AV, et al. The JAK-STAT pathway: impact on human disease and therapeutic intervention. Annu Rev Med. 2015;66:311-328.
  39. Bechara R, Antonios D, Azouri H, et al. Nickel sulfate promotes IL-17A producing CD4+ T cells by an IL-23-dependent mechanism regulated by TLR4 and JAK-STAT pathways. J Invest Dermatol. 2017;137:2140-2148.
  40. Oetjen LK, Mack MR, Feng J, et al. Sensory neurons co-opt classical immune signaling pathways to mediate chronic itch. Cell. 2017;171:217-228.e13.
  41. Fujii Y, Sengoku T. Effects of the Janus kinase inhibitor CP-690550 (tofacitinib) in a rat model of oxazolone-induced chronic dermatitis. Pharmacology. 2013;91:207-213.
  42. Fukuyama T, Ehling S, Cook E, et al. Topically administered Janus-kinase inhibitors tofacitinib and oclacitinib display impressive antipruritic and anti-inflammatory responses in a model of allergic dermatitis. J Pharmacol Exp Ther. 2015;354:394-405.
  43. Cosgrove SB, Wren JA, Cleaver DM, et al. Efficacy and safety of oclacitinib for the control of pruritus and associated skin lesions in dogs with canine allergic dermatitis. Vet Dermatol. 2013;24:479, E114.
  44. Baltazar D, Shinamoto SR, Hamann CP, et al. Occupational airborne allergic contact dermatitis to invasive Compositae species treated with abrocitinib: a case report. Contact Dermatitis. 2022;87:542-544.
  45. Muddebihal A, Sardana K, Sinha S, et al. Tofacitinib in refractory Parthenium-induced airborne allergic contact dermatitis [published online October 12, 2022]. Contact Dermatitis. doi:10.1111/cod.14234
  46. Worm M, Bauer A, Elsner P, et al. Efficacy and safety of topical delgocitinib in patients with chronic hand eczema: data from a randomized, double-blind, vehicle-controlled phase IIa study. Br J Dermatol. 2020;182:1103-1110.
  47. Chen J, Cheng J, Yang H, et al. The efficacy and safety of Janus kinase inhibitors in patients with atopic dermatitis: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2022;87:495-496.
  48. Ytterberg SR, Bhatt DL, Mikuls TR, et al. Cardiovascular and cancer risk with tofacitinib in rheumatoid arthritis. N Engl J Med. 2022;386:316-326.
  49. US Food and Drug Administration. FDA requires warnings about increased risk of serious heart-related events, cancer, blood clots, and death for JAK inhibitors that treat certain chronic inflammatory conditions. Updated December 7, 2021. Accessed January 20, 2023. https://www.fda.gov/drugs/drug-safety-and-availability/fda-requires-warnings-about-increased-risk-serious-heart-related-events-cancer-blood-clots-and-death
  50. Chen TL, Lee LL, Huang HK, et al. Association of risk of incident venous thromboembolism with atopic dermatitis and treatment with Janus kinase inhibitors: a systematic review and meta-analysis. JAMA Dermatol. 2022;158:1254-1261.
  51. King B, Maari C, Lain E, et al. Extended safety analysis of baricitinib 2 mg in adult patients with atopic dermatitis: an integrated analysis from eight randomized clinical trials. Am J Clin Dermatol. 2021;22:395-405.
  52. Nash P, Kerschbaumer A, Dörner T, et al. Points to consider for the treatment of immune-mediated inflammatory diseases with Janus kinase inhibitors: a consensus statement. Ann Rheum Dis. 2021;80:71-87.
  53. Narla S, Silverberg JI. The suitability of treating atopic dermatitis with Janus kinase inhibitors. Exp Rev Clin Immunol. 2022;18:439-459.
Article PDF
Author and Disclosure Information

Ms. Johnson is from the University of Minnesota Medical School, Minneapolis. Ms. Guenther is from the Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles. Dr. Adler is from the Department of Dermatology, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles. Dr. Yu is from the Department of Dermatology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston.

Ms. Johnson, Ms. Guenther, and Dr. Yu report no conflict of interest. Dr. Adler has served as a research investigator and/or consultant to AbbVie, American Contact Dermatitis Society, and Skin Research Institute, LLC, and has received research grants from AbbVie and American Contact Dermatitis Society.

Correspondence: JiaDe Yu, MD, Department of Dermatology, Massachusetts General Hospital, 50 Staniford St, Ste 200, Boston, MA 02114 (Jiadeyu@mgh.harvard.edu).

Issue
Cutis - 111(2)
Publications
Topics
Page Number
92-95,105
Sections
Author and Disclosure Information

Ms. Johnson is from the University of Minnesota Medical School, Minneapolis. Ms. Guenther is from the Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles. Dr. Adler is from the Department of Dermatology, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles. Dr. Yu is from the Department of Dermatology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston.

Ms. Johnson, Ms. Guenther, and Dr. Yu report no conflict of interest. Dr. Adler has served as a research investigator and/or consultant to AbbVie, American Contact Dermatitis Society, and Skin Research Institute, LLC, and has received research grants from AbbVie and American Contact Dermatitis Society.

Correspondence: JiaDe Yu, MD, Department of Dermatology, Massachusetts General Hospital, 50 Staniford St, Ste 200, Boston, MA 02114 (Jiadeyu@mgh.harvard.edu).

Author and Disclosure Information

Ms. Johnson is from the University of Minnesota Medical School, Minneapolis. Ms. Guenther is from the Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles. Dr. Adler is from the Department of Dermatology, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles. Dr. Yu is from the Department of Dermatology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston.

Ms. Johnson, Ms. Guenther, and Dr. Yu report no conflict of interest. Dr. Adler has served as a research investigator and/or consultant to AbbVie, American Contact Dermatitis Society, and Skin Research Institute, LLC, and has received research grants from AbbVie and American Contact Dermatitis Society.

Correspondence: JiaDe Yu, MD, Department of Dermatology, Massachusetts General Hospital, 50 Staniford St, Ste 200, Boston, MA 02114 (Jiadeyu@mgh.harvard.edu).

Article PDF
Article PDF

Allergic contact dermatitis (ACD) is a delayed type IV hypersensitivity reaction that usually manifests with eczematous lesions within hours to days after exposure to a contact allergen. The primary treatment of ACD consists of allergen avoidance, but medications also may be necessary to manage symptoms, particularly in cases where avoidance alone does not lead to resolution of dermatitis. At present, no medical therapies are explicitly approved for use in the management of ACD. Janus kinase (JAK) inhibitors are a class of small molecule inhibitors that are used for the treatment of a range of inflammatory diseases, such as rheumatoid arthritis and psoriatic arthritis. Several oral and topical JAK inhibitors also have recently been approved by the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) for atopic dermatitis (AD). In this article, we discuss this important class of medications and the role that they may play in the off-label management of refractory ACD.

JAK/STAT Signaling Pathway

The JAK/signal transducer and activator of transcription (STAT) pathway plays a crucial role in many biologic processes. Notably, JAK/STAT signaling is involved in the development and regulation of the immune system.1 The cascade begins when a particular transmembrane receptor binds a ligand, such as an interferon or interleukin.2 Upon ligand binding, the receptor dimerizes or oligomerizes, bringing the relevant JAK proteins into close approximation to each other.3 This allows the JAK proteins to autophosphorylate or transphosphorylate.2-4 Phosphorylation activates the JAK proteins and increases their kinase activity.3 In humans, there are 4 JAK proteins: JAK1, JAK2, JAK3, and tyrosine kinase 2.4 When activated, the JAK proteins phosphorylate specific tyrosine residues on the receptor, which creates a docking site for STAT proteins. After binding, the STAT proteins then are phosphorylated, leading to their dimerization and translocation to the nucleus.2,3 Once in the nucleus, the STAT proteins act as transcription factors for target genes.3

JAK Inhibitors

Janus kinase inhibitors are immunomodulatory medications that work through inhibition of 1 or more of the JAK proteins in the JAK/STAT pathway. Through this mechanism, JAK inhibitors can impede the activity of proinflammatory cytokines and T cells.4 A brief overview of the commercially available JAK inhibitors in Europe, Japan, and the United States is provided in the Table.5-29

Summary of Approved JAK Inhibitors for Use in Humans

Of the approved JAK inhibitors, more than 40% are indicated for AD. The first JAK inhibitor to be approved in the topical form was delgocitinib in 2020 in Japan.5 In a phase 3 trial, delgocitinib demonstrated significant reductions in modified Eczema Area and Severity Index (EASI) score (P<.001) as well as Peak Pruritus Numerical Rating Scale (P<.001) when compared with vehicle.30 Topical ruxolitinib soon followed when its approval for AD was announced by the FDA in 2021.31 Results from 2 phase 3 trials found that significantly more patients achieved investigator global assessment (IGA) treatment success (P<.0001) and a significant reduction in itch as measured by the Peak Pruritus Numerical Rating Scale (P<.001) with topical ruxolitinib vs vehicle.32

The first oral JAK inhibitor to attain approval for AD was baricitinib in Europe and Japan, but it is not currently approved for this indication in the United States by the FDA.11,12,33 Consistent findings across phase 3 trials revealed that baricitinib was more effective at achieving IGA treatment success and improved EASI scores compared with placebo.33

Upadacitinib, another oral JAK inhibitor, was subsequently approved for AD in Europe and Japan in 2021 and in the United States in early 2022.5,9,26,27 Two replicate phase 3 trials demonstrated significant improvement in EASI score, itch, and quality of life with upadacitinib compared with placebo (P<.0001).34 Abrocitinib was granted FDA approval for AD in the same time period, with phase 3 trials exhibiting greater responses in IGA and EASI scores vs placebo.35

Potential for Use in ACD

Given the successful use of JAK inhibitors in the management of AD, there is optimism that these medications also may have potential application in ACD. Recent literature suggests that the 2 conditions may be more closely related mechanistically than previously understood. As a result, AD and ACD often are managed with the same therapeutic agents.36

 

 

Although the exact etiology of ACD is still being elucidated, activation of T cells and cytokines plays an important role.37 Notably, more than 40 cytokines exert their effects through the JAK/STAT signaling pathway, including IL-2, IL-6, IL-17, IL-22, and IFN-γ.37,38 A study on nickel contact allergy revealed that JAK/STAT activation may regulate the balance between IL-12 and IL-23 and increase type 1 T-helper (TH1) polarization.39 Skin inflammation and chronic pruritus, which are major components of ACD, also are thought to be mediated in part by JAK signaling.34,40

Animal studies have suggested that JAK inhibitors may show benefit in the management of ACD. Rats with oxazolone-induced ACD were found to have less swelling and epidermal thickening in the area of induced dermatitis after treatment with oral tofacitinib, comparable to the effects of cyclosporine. Tofacitinib was presumed to exert its effects through cytokine suppression, particularly that of IFN-γ, IL-22, and tumor necrosis factor α.41 In a separate study on mice with toluene-2,4-diisocyanate–induced ACD, both tofacitinib and another JAK inhibitor, oclacitinib, demonstrated inhibition of cytokine production, migration, and maturation of bone marrow–derived dendritic cells. Both topical and oral formulations of these 2 JAK inhibitors also were found to decrease scratching behavior; only the topicals improved ear thickness (used as a marker of skin inflammation), suggesting potential benefits to local application.42 In a murine model, oral delgocitinib also attenuated contact hypersensitivity via inhibition of antigen-specific T-cell proliferation and cytokine production.37 Finally, in a randomized clinical trial conducted on dogs with allergic dermatitis (of which 10% were presumed to be from contact allergy), oral oclacitinib significantly reduced pruritus and clinical severity scores vs placebo (P<.0001).43

There also are early clinical studies and case reports highlighting the effective use of JAK inhibitors in the management of ACD in humans. A 37-year-old man with occupational airborne ACD to Compositae saw full clearance of his dermatitis with daily oral abrocitinib after topical corticosteroids and dupilumab failed.44 Another patient, a 57-year-old woman, had near-complete resolution of chronic Parthenium-induced airborne ACD after starting twice-daily oral tofacitinib. Allergen avoidance, as well as multiple medications, including topical and oral corticosteroids, topical calcineurin inhibitors, and azathioprine, previously failed in this patient.45 Finally, a phase 2 study on patients with irritant and nonirritant chronic hand eczema found that significantly more patients achieved treatment success (as measured by the physician global assessment) with topical delgocitinib vs vehicle (P=.009).46 Chronic hand eczema may be due to a variety of causes, including AD, irritant contact dermatitis, and ACD. Thus, these studies begin to highlight the potential role for JAK inhibitors in the management of refractory ACD.

Side Effects of JAK Inhibitors

The safety profile of JAK inhibitors must be taken into consideration. In general, topical JAK inhibitors are safe and well tolerated, with the majority of adverse events (AEs) seen in clinical trials considered mild or unrelated to the medication.30,32 Nasopharyngitis, local skin infection, and acne were reported; a systematic review found no increased risk of AEs with topical JAK inhibitors compared with placebo.30,32,47 Application-site reactions, a common concern among the existing topical calcineurin and phosphodiesterase 4 inhibitors, were rare (approximately 2% of patients).47 The most frequent AEs seen in clinical trials of oral JAK inhibitors included acne, nasopharyngitis/upper respiratory tract infections, nausea, and headache.33-35 Herpes simplex virus infection and worsening of AD also were seen. Although elevations in creatine phosphokinase levels were reported, patients often were asymptomatic and elevations were related to exercise or resolved without treatment interruption.33-35

As a class, JAK inhibitors carry a boxed warning for serious infections, malignancy, major adverse cardiovascular events, thrombosis, and mortality. The FDA placed this label on JAK inhibitors because of the results of a randomized controlled trial of oral tofacitinib vs tumor necrosis factor α inhibitors in RA.48,49 Notably, participants in the trial had to be 50 years or older and have at least 1 additional cardiovascular risk factor. Postmarket safety data are still being collected for patients with AD and other dermatologic conditions, but the findings of safety analyses have been reassuring to date.50,51 Regular follow-up and routine laboratory monitoring are recommended for any patient started on an oral JAK inhibitor, which often includes monitoring of the complete blood cell count, comprehensive metabolic panel, and lipids, as well as baseline screening for tuberculosis and hepatitis.52,53 For topical JAK inhibitors, no specific laboratory monitoring is recommended.

Finally, it must be considered that the challenges of off-label prescribing combined with high costs may limit access to JAK inhibitors for use in ACD.

Final Interpretation

Early investigations, including studies on animals and humans, suggest that JAK inhibitors are a promising option in the management of treatment-refractory ACD. Patients and providers should be aware of both the benefits and known side effects of JAK inhibitors prior to treatment initiation.

Allergic contact dermatitis (ACD) is a delayed type IV hypersensitivity reaction that usually manifests with eczematous lesions within hours to days after exposure to a contact allergen. The primary treatment of ACD consists of allergen avoidance, but medications also may be necessary to manage symptoms, particularly in cases where avoidance alone does not lead to resolution of dermatitis. At present, no medical therapies are explicitly approved for use in the management of ACD. Janus kinase (JAK) inhibitors are a class of small molecule inhibitors that are used for the treatment of a range of inflammatory diseases, such as rheumatoid arthritis and psoriatic arthritis. Several oral and topical JAK inhibitors also have recently been approved by the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) for atopic dermatitis (AD). In this article, we discuss this important class of medications and the role that they may play in the off-label management of refractory ACD.

JAK/STAT Signaling Pathway

The JAK/signal transducer and activator of transcription (STAT) pathway plays a crucial role in many biologic processes. Notably, JAK/STAT signaling is involved in the development and regulation of the immune system.1 The cascade begins when a particular transmembrane receptor binds a ligand, such as an interferon or interleukin.2 Upon ligand binding, the receptor dimerizes or oligomerizes, bringing the relevant JAK proteins into close approximation to each other.3 This allows the JAK proteins to autophosphorylate or transphosphorylate.2-4 Phosphorylation activates the JAK proteins and increases their kinase activity.3 In humans, there are 4 JAK proteins: JAK1, JAK2, JAK3, and tyrosine kinase 2.4 When activated, the JAK proteins phosphorylate specific tyrosine residues on the receptor, which creates a docking site for STAT proteins. After binding, the STAT proteins then are phosphorylated, leading to their dimerization and translocation to the nucleus.2,3 Once in the nucleus, the STAT proteins act as transcription factors for target genes.3

JAK Inhibitors

Janus kinase inhibitors are immunomodulatory medications that work through inhibition of 1 or more of the JAK proteins in the JAK/STAT pathway. Through this mechanism, JAK inhibitors can impede the activity of proinflammatory cytokines and T cells.4 A brief overview of the commercially available JAK inhibitors in Europe, Japan, and the United States is provided in the Table.5-29

Summary of Approved JAK Inhibitors for Use in Humans

Of the approved JAK inhibitors, more than 40% are indicated for AD. The first JAK inhibitor to be approved in the topical form was delgocitinib in 2020 in Japan.5 In a phase 3 trial, delgocitinib demonstrated significant reductions in modified Eczema Area and Severity Index (EASI) score (P<.001) as well as Peak Pruritus Numerical Rating Scale (P<.001) when compared with vehicle.30 Topical ruxolitinib soon followed when its approval for AD was announced by the FDA in 2021.31 Results from 2 phase 3 trials found that significantly more patients achieved investigator global assessment (IGA) treatment success (P<.0001) and a significant reduction in itch as measured by the Peak Pruritus Numerical Rating Scale (P<.001) with topical ruxolitinib vs vehicle.32

The first oral JAK inhibitor to attain approval for AD was baricitinib in Europe and Japan, but it is not currently approved for this indication in the United States by the FDA.11,12,33 Consistent findings across phase 3 trials revealed that baricitinib was more effective at achieving IGA treatment success and improved EASI scores compared with placebo.33

Upadacitinib, another oral JAK inhibitor, was subsequently approved for AD in Europe and Japan in 2021 and in the United States in early 2022.5,9,26,27 Two replicate phase 3 trials demonstrated significant improvement in EASI score, itch, and quality of life with upadacitinib compared with placebo (P<.0001).34 Abrocitinib was granted FDA approval for AD in the same time period, with phase 3 trials exhibiting greater responses in IGA and EASI scores vs placebo.35

Potential for Use in ACD

Given the successful use of JAK inhibitors in the management of AD, there is optimism that these medications also may have potential application in ACD. Recent literature suggests that the 2 conditions may be more closely related mechanistically than previously understood. As a result, AD and ACD often are managed with the same therapeutic agents.36

 

 

Although the exact etiology of ACD is still being elucidated, activation of T cells and cytokines plays an important role.37 Notably, more than 40 cytokines exert their effects through the JAK/STAT signaling pathway, including IL-2, IL-6, IL-17, IL-22, and IFN-γ.37,38 A study on nickel contact allergy revealed that JAK/STAT activation may regulate the balance between IL-12 and IL-23 and increase type 1 T-helper (TH1) polarization.39 Skin inflammation and chronic pruritus, which are major components of ACD, also are thought to be mediated in part by JAK signaling.34,40

Animal studies have suggested that JAK inhibitors may show benefit in the management of ACD. Rats with oxazolone-induced ACD were found to have less swelling and epidermal thickening in the area of induced dermatitis after treatment with oral tofacitinib, comparable to the effects of cyclosporine. Tofacitinib was presumed to exert its effects through cytokine suppression, particularly that of IFN-γ, IL-22, and tumor necrosis factor α.41 In a separate study on mice with toluene-2,4-diisocyanate–induced ACD, both tofacitinib and another JAK inhibitor, oclacitinib, demonstrated inhibition of cytokine production, migration, and maturation of bone marrow–derived dendritic cells. Both topical and oral formulations of these 2 JAK inhibitors also were found to decrease scratching behavior; only the topicals improved ear thickness (used as a marker of skin inflammation), suggesting potential benefits to local application.42 In a murine model, oral delgocitinib also attenuated contact hypersensitivity via inhibition of antigen-specific T-cell proliferation and cytokine production.37 Finally, in a randomized clinical trial conducted on dogs with allergic dermatitis (of which 10% were presumed to be from contact allergy), oral oclacitinib significantly reduced pruritus and clinical severity scores vs placebo (P<.0001).43

There also are early clinical studies and case reports highlighting the effective use of JAK inhibitors in the management of ACD in humans. A 37-year-old man with occupational airborne ACD to Compositae saw full clearance of his dermatitis with daily oral abrocitinib after topical corticosteroids and dupilumab failed.44 Another patient, a 57-year-old woman, had near-complete resolution of chronic Parthenium-induced airborne ACD after starting twice-daily oral tofacitinib. Allergen avoidance, as well as multiple medications, including topical and oral corticosteroids, topical calcineurin inhibitors, and azathioprine, previously failed in this patient.45 Finally, a phase 2 study on patients with irritant and nonirritant chronic hand eczema found that significantly more patients achieved treatment success (as measured by the physician global assessment) with topical delgocitinib vs vehicle (P=.009).46 Chronic hand eczema may be due to a variety of causes, including AD, irritant contact dermatitis, and ACD. Thus, these studies begin to highlight the potential role for JAK inhibitors in the management of refractory ACD.

Side Effects of JAK Inhibitors

The safety profile of JAK inhibitors must be taken into consideration. In general, topical JAK inhibitors are safe and well tolerated, with the majority of adverse events (AEs) seen in clinical trials considered mild or unrelated to the medication.30,32 Nasopharyngitis, local skin infection, and acne were reported; a systematic review found no increased risk of AEs with topical JAK inhibitors compared with placebo.30,32,47 Application-site reactions, a common concern among the existing topical calcineurin and phosphodiesterase 4 inhibitors, were rare (approximately 2% of patients).47 The most frequent AEs seen in clinical trials of oral JAK inhibitors included acne, nasopharyngitis/upper respiratory tract infections, nausea, and headache.33-35 Herpes simplex virus infection and worsening of AD also were seen. Although elevations in creatine phosphokinase levels were reported, patients often were asymptomatic and elevations were related to exercise or resolved without treatment interruption.33-35

As a class, JAK inhibitors carry a boxed warning for serious infections, malignancy, major adverse cardiovascular events, thrombosis, and mortality. The FDA placed this label on JAK inhibitors because of the results of a randomized controlled trial of oral tofacitinib vs tumor necrosis factor α inhibitors in RA.48,49 Notably, participants in the trial had to be 50 years or older and have at least 1 additional cardiovascular risk factor. Postmarket safety data are still being collected for patients with AD and other dermatologic conditions, but the findings of safety analyses have been reassuring to date.50,51 Regular follow-up and routine laboratory monitoring are recommended for any patient started on an oral JAK inhibitor, which often includes monitoring of the complete blood cell count, comprehensive metabolic panel, and lipids, as well as baseline screening for tuberculosis and hepatitis.52,53 For topical JAK inhibitors, no specific laboratory monitoring is recommended.

Finally, it must be considered that the challenges of off-label prescribing combined with high costs may limit access to JAK inhibitors for use in ACD.

Final Interpretation

Early investigations, including studies on animals and humans, suggest that JAK inhibitors are a promising option in the management of treatment-refractory ACD. Patients and providers should be aware of both the benefits and known side effects of JAK inhibitors prior to treatment initiation.

References
  1. Ghoreschi K, Laurence A, O’Shea JJ. Janus kinases in immune cell signaling. Immunol Rev. 2009;228:273-287.
  2. Bousoik E, Montazeri Aliabadi H. “Do we know Jack” about JAK? a closer look at JAK/STAT signaling pathway. Front Oncol. 2018;8:287.
  3. Jatiani SS, Baker SJ, Silverman LR, et al. Jak/STAT pathways in cytokine signaling and myeloproliferative disorders: approaches for targeted therapies. Genes Cancer. 2010;1:979-993.
  4. Seif F, Khoshmirsafa M, Aazami H, et al. The role of JAK-STAT signaling pathway and its regulators in the fate of T helper cells. Cell Commun Signal. 2017;15:23.
  5. Traidl S, Freimooser S, Werfel T. Janus kinase inhibitors for the therapy of atopic dermatitis. Allergol Select. 2021;5:293-304.
  6. Opzelura (ruxolitinib) cream. Prescribing information. Incyte Corporation; 2022. Accessed January 20, 2023. https://www.accessdata.fda.gov/drugsatfda_docs/label/2022/215309s001lbl.pdf
  7. Cibinqo (abrocitinib) tablets. Prescribing information. Pfizer Labs; 2022. Accessed January 20, 2023. https://www.accessdata.fda.gov/drugsatfda_docs/label/2022/213871s000lbl.pdf
  8. Cibinqo. Product information. European Medicines Agency. Published December 17, 2021. Updated November 10, 2022. Accessed January 20, 2023. https://www.ema.europa.eu/en/medicines/human/EPAR/cibinqo
  9. New drugs approved in FY 2021. Pharmaceuticals and Medical Devices Agency. Accessed January 20, 2023. https://www.pmda.go.jp/files/000246734.pdf
  10. Olumiant (baricitinib) tablets. Prescribing information. Eli Lilly and Company; 2022. Accessed January 20, 2023. https://www.accessdata.fda.gov/drugsatfda_docs/label/2022/207924s007lbl.pdf
  11. Olumiant. Product information. European Medicines Agency. Published March 16, 2017. Updated June 29, 2022. Accessed January 20, 2023. https://www.ema.europa.eu/en/medicines/human/EPAR/olumiant
  12. Review report: Olumiant. Pharmaceuticals and Medical Devices Agency. April 21, 2021. Accessed January 20, 2023. https://www.pmda.go.jp/files/000243207.pdf
  13. Sotyktu (deucravacitinib) tablets. Prescribing information. Bristol-Myers Squibb Company; 2022. Accessed January 20, 2023.https://www.accessdata.fda.gov/drugsatfda_docs/label/2022/214958s000lbl.pdf
  14. Inrebic (fedratinib) capsules. Prescribing information. Celgene Corporation; 2019. Accessed January 20, 2023. https://www.accessdata.fda.gov/drugsatfda_docs/label/2019/212327s000lbl.pdf
  15. Inrebic. Product information. European Medicines Agency. Published March 3, 2021. Updated December 8, 2022. Accessed January 20, 2023. https://www.ema.europa.eu/en/medicines/human/EPAR/inrebic
  16. Jyseleca. Product information. European Medicines Agency. Published September 28, 2020. Updated November 9, 2022. Accessed January 20, 2023. https://www.ema.europa.eu/en/documents/product-information/jyseleca-epar-product-information_en.pdf
  17. Review report: Jyseleca. Pharmaceuticals and Medical Devices Agency. September 8, 2020. Accessed January 20, 2023. https://www.pmda.go.jp/files/000247830.pdf
  18. Vonjo (pacritinib) capsules. Prescribing information. CTI BioPharma Corp; 2022. Accessed January 20, 2023. https://www.accessdata.fda.gov/drugsatfda_docs/label/2022/208712s000lbl.pdf
  19. Review report: Smyraf. Pharmaceuticals and Medical Devices Agency. February 28, 2019. Accessed January 20, 2023. https://www.pmda.go.jp/files/000233074.pdf
  20. Jakafi (ruxolitinib) tablets. Prescribing information. Incyte Corporation; 2021. Accessed January 20, 2023. https://www.accessdata.fda.gov/drugsatfda_docs/label/2021/202192s023lbl.pdf
  21. Jakavi. Product information. European Medicines Agency. Published October 4, 2012. Updated May 18, 2022. Accessed January 20, 2023. https://www.ema.europa.eu/en/medicines/human/EPAR/jakavi
  22. New drugs approved in FY 2014. Pharmaceuticals and Medical Devices Agency. Accessed January 20, 2023. https://www.pmda.go.jp/files/000229076.pdf
  23. Xeljanz (tofacitinib). Prescribing information. Pfizer Labs; 2021. Accessed January 20, 2023. https://www.accessdata.fda.gov/drugsatfda_docs/label/2021/203214s028,208246s013,213082s003lbl.pdf
  24. Xeljanz. Product information. European Medicines Agency. Accessed January 20, 2023. https://www.ema.europa.eu/en/documents/product-information/xeljanz-epar-product-information_en.pdf
  25. Review report: Xeljanz. Pharmaceuticals and Medical Devices Agency. January 20, 2023. https://www.pmda.go.jp/files/000237584.pdf
  26. Rinvoq (upadacitinib) extended-release tablets. Prescribing information. AbbVie Inc; 2022. Accessed January 20, 2023. https://www.accessdata.fda.gov/drugsatfda_docs/label/2022/211675s003lbl.pdf
  27. Rinvoq. Product information. European Medicines Agency. Published December 18, 2019. Updated December 7, 2022. Accessed January 20, 2023. https://www.ema.europa.eu/en/medicines/human/EPAR/rinvoq
  28. New drugs approved in FY 2019. Pharmaceuticals and Medical Devices Agency. Accessed January 20, 2023. https://www.pmda.go.jp/files/000235289.pdfs
  29. New drugs approved in May 2022. Pharmaceuticals and Medical Devices Agency. Accessed January 20, 2023. https://www.pmda.go.jp/files/000248626.pdf
  30. Nakagawa H, Nemoto O, Igarashi A, et al. Delgocitinib ointment, a topical Janus kinase inhibitor, in adult patients with moderate to severe atopic dermatitis: a phase 3, randomized, double-blind, vehicle-controlled study and an open-label, long-term extension study. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2020;82:823-831. Erratum appears in J Am Acad Dermatol. 2021;85:1069.
  31. Sideris N, Paschou E, Bakirtzi K, et al. New and upcoming topical treatments for atopic dermatitis: a review of the literature. J Clin Med. 2022;11:4974.
  32. Papp K, Szepietowski JC, Kircik L, et al. Efficacy and safety of ruxolitinib cream for the treatment of atopic dermatitis: results from 2 phase 3, randomized, double-blind studies. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2021;85:863-872.
  33. Radi G, Simonetti O, Rizzetto G, et al. Baricitinib: the first Jak inhibitor approved in Europe for the treatment of moderate to severe atopic dermatitis in adult patients. Healthcare (Basel). 2021;9:1575.
  34. Guttman-Yassky E, Teixeira HD, Simpson EL, et al. Once-daily upadacitinib versus placebo in adolescents and adults with moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis (Measure Up 1 and Measure Up 2): results from two replicate double-blind, randomised controlled phase 3 trials. Lancet. 2021;397:2151-2168. Erratum appears in Lancet. 2021;397:2150.
  35. Bieber T, Simpson EL, Silverberg JI, et al. Abrocitinib versus placebo or dupilumab for atopic dermatitis. N Engl J Med. 2021;384:1101-1112.
  36. Johnson H, Novack DE, Adler BL, et al. Can atopic dermatitis and allergic contact dermatitis coexist? Cutis. 2022;110:139-142.
  37. Amano W, Nakajima S, Yamamoto Y, et al. JAK inhibitor JTE-052 regulates contact hypersensitivity by downmodulating T cell activation and differentiation. J Dermatol Sci. 2016;84:258-265.
  38. O’Shea JJ, Schwartz DM, Villarino AV, et al. The JAK-STAT pathway: impact on human disease and therapeutic intervention. Annu Rev Med. 2015;66:311-328.
  39. Bechara R, Antonios D, Azouri H, et al. Nickel sulfate promotes IL-17A producing CD4+ T cells by an IL-23-dependent mechanism regulated by TLR4 and JAK-STAT pathways. J Invest Dermatol. 2017;137:2140-2148.
  40. Oetjen LK, Mack MR, Feng J, et al. Sensory neurons co-opt classical immune signaling pathways to mediate chronic itch. Cell. 2017;171:217-228.e13.
  41. Fujii Y, Sengoku T. Effects of the Janus kinase inhibitor CP-690550 (tofacitinib) in a rat model of oxazolone-induced chronic dermatitis. Pharmacology. 2013;91:207-213.
  42. Fukuyama T, Ehling S, Cook E, et al. Topically administered Janus-kinase inhibitors tofacitinib and oclacitinib display impressive antipruritic and anti-inflammatory responses in a model of allergic dermatitis. J Pharmacol Exp Ther. 2015;354:394-405.
  43. Cosgrove SB, Wren JA, Cleaver DM, et al. Efficacy and safety of oclacitinib for the control of pruritus and associated skin lesions in dogs with canine allergic dermatitis. Vet Dermatol. 2013;24:479, E114.
  44. Baltazar D, Shinamoto SR, Hamann CP, et al. Occupational airborne allergic contact dermatitis to invasive Compositae species treated with abrocitinib: a case report. Contact Dermatitis. 2022;87:542-544.
  45. Muddebihal A, Sardana K, Sinha S, et al. Tofacitinib in refractory Parthenium-induced airborne allergic contact dermatitis [published online October 12, 2022]. Contact Dermatitis. doi:10.1111/cod.14234
  46. Worm M, Bauer A, Elsner P, et al. Efficacy and safety of topical delgocitinib in patients with chronic hand eczema: data from a randomized, double-blind, vehicle-controlled phase IIa study. Br J Dermatol. 2020;182:1103-1110.
  47. Chen J, Cheng J, Yang H, et al. The efficacy and safety of Janus kinase inhibitors in patients with atopic dermatitis: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2022;87:495-496.
  48. Ytterberg SR, Bhatt DL, Mikuls TR, et al. Cardiovascular and cancer risk with tofacitinib in rheumatoid arthritis. N Engl J Med. 2022;386:316-326.
  49. US Food and Drug Administration. FDA requires warnings about increased risk of serious heart-related events, cancer, blood clots, and death for JAK inhibitors that treat certain chronic inflammatory conditions. Updated December 7, 2021. Accessed January 20, 2023. https://www.fda.gov/drugs/drug-safety-and-availability/fda-requires-warnings-about-increased-risk-serious-heart-related-events-cancer-blood-clots-and-death
  50. Chen TL, Lee LL, Huang HK, et al. Association of risk of incident venous thromboembolism with atopic dermatitis and treatment with Janus kinase inhibitors: a systematic review and meta-analysis. JAMA Dermatol. 2022;158:1254-1261.
  51. King B, Maari C, Lain E, et al. Extended safety analysis of baricitinib 2 mg in adult patients with atopic dermatitis: an integrated analysis from eight randomized clinical trials. Am J Clin Dermatol. 2021;22:395-405.
  52. Nash P, Kerschbaumer A, Dörner T, et al. Points to consider for the treatment of immune-mediated inflammatory diseases with Janus kinase inhibitors: a consensus statement. Ann Rheum Dis. 2021;80:71-87.
  53. Narla S, Silverberg JI. The suitability of treating atopic dermatitis with Janus kinase inhibitors. Exp Rev Clin Immunol. 2022;18:439-459.
References
  1. Ghoreschi K, Laurence A, O’Shea JJ. Janus kinases in immune cell signaling. Immunol Rev. 2009;228:273-287.
  2. Bousoik E, Montazeri Aliabadi H. “Do we know Jack” about JAK? a closer look at JAK/STAT signaling pathway. Front Oncol. 2018;8:287.
  3. Jatiani SS, Baker SJ, Silverman LR, et al. Jak/STAT pathways in cytokine signaling and myeloproliferative disorders: approaches for targeted therapies. Genes Cancer. 2010;1:979-993.
  4. Seif F, Khoshmirsafa M, Aazami H, et al. The role of JAK-STAT signaling pathway and its regulators in the fate of T helper cells. Cell Commun Signal. 2017;15:23.
  5. Traidl S, Freimooser S, Werfel T. Janus kinase inhibitors for the therapy of atopic dermatitis. Allergol Select. 2021;5:293-304.
  6. Opzelura (ruxolitinib) cream. Prescribing information. Incyte Corporation; 2022. Accessed January 20, 2023. https://www.accessdata.fda.gov/drugsatfda_docs/label/2022/215309s001lbl.pdf
  7. Cibinqo (abrocitinib) tablets. Prescribing information. Pfizer Labs; 2022. Accessed January 20, 2023. https://www.accessdata.fda.gov/drugsatfda_docs/label/2022/213871s000lbl.pdf
  8. Cibinqo. Product information. European Medicines Agency. Published December 17, 2021. Updated November 10, 2022. Accessed January 20, 2023. https://www.ema.europa.eu/en/medicines/human/EPAR/cibinqo
  9. New drugs approved in FY 2021. Pharmaceuticals and Medical Devices Agency. Accessed January 20, 2023. https://www.pmda.go.jp/files/000246734.pdf
  10. Olumiant (baricitinib) tablets. Prescribing information. Eli Lilly and Company; 2022. Accessed January 20, 2023. https://www.accessdata.fda.gov/drugsatfda_docs/label/2022/207924s007lbl.pdf
  11. Olumiant. Product information. European Medicines Agency. Published March 16, 2017. Updated June 29, 2022. Accessed January 20, 2023. https://www.ema.europa.eu/en/medicines/human/EPAR/olumiant
  12. Review report: Olumiant. Pharmaceuticals and Medical Devices Agency. April 21, 2021. Accessed January 20, 2023. https://www.pmda.go.jp/files/000243207.pdf
  13. Sotyktu (deucravacitinib) tablets. Prescribing information. Bristol-Myers Squibb Company; 2022. Accessed January 20, 2023.https://www.accessdata.fda.gov/drugsatfda_docs/label/2022/214958s000lbl.pdf
  14. Inrebic (fedratinib) capsules. Prescribing information. Celgene Corporation; 2019. Accessed January 20, 2023. https://www.accessdata.fda.gov/drugsatfda_docs/label/2019/212327s000lbl.pdf
  15. Inrebic. Product information. European Medicines Agency. Published March 3, 2021. Updated December 8, 2022. Accessed January 20, 2023. https://www.ema.europa.eu/en/medicines/human/EPAR/inrebic
  16. Jyseleca. Product information. European Medicines Agency. Published September 28, 2020. Updated November 9, 2022. Accessed January 20, 2023. https://www.ema.europa.eu/en/documents/product-information/jyseleca-epar-product-information_en.pdf
  17. Review report: Jyseleca. Pharmaceuticals and Medical Devices Agency. September 8, 2020. Accessed January 20, 2023. https://www.pmda.go.jp/files/000247830.pdf
  18. Vonjo (pacritinib) capsules. Prescribing information. CTI BioPharma Corp; 2022. Accessed January 20, 2023. https://www.accessdata.fda.gov/drugsatfda_docs/label/2022/208712s000lbl.pdf
  19. Review report: Smyraf. Pharmaceuticals and Medical Devices Agency. February 28, 2019. Accessed January 20, 2023. https://www.pmda.go.jp/files/000233074.pdf
  20. Jakafi (ruxolitinib) tablets. Prescribing information. Incyte Corporation; 2021. Accessed January 20, 2023. https://www.accessdata.fda.gov/drugsatfda_docs/label/2021/202192s023lbl.pdf
  21. Jakavi. Product information. European Medicines Agency. Published October 4, 2012. Updated May 18, 2022. Accessed January 20, 2023. https://www.ema.europa.eu/en/medicines/human/EPAR/jakavi
  22. New drugs approved in FY 2014. Pharmaceuticals and Medical Devices Agency. Accessed January 20, 2023. https://www.pmda.go.jp/files/000229076.pdf
  23. Xeljanz (tofacitinib). Prescribing information. Pfizer Labs; 2021. Accessed January 20, 2023. https://www.accessdata.fda.gov/drugsatfda_docs/label/2021/203214s028,208246s013,213082s003lbl.pdf
  24. Xeljanz. Product information. European Medicines Agency. Accessed January 20, 2023. https://www.ema.europa.eu/en/documents/product-information/xeljanz-epar-product-information_en.pdf
  25. Review report: Xeljanz. Pharmaceuticals and Medical Devices Agency. January 20, 2023. https://www.pmda.go.jp/files/000237584.pdf
  26. Rinvoq (upadacitinib) extended-release tablets. Prescribing information. AbbVie Inc; 2022. Accessed January 20, 2023. https://www.accessdata.fda.gov/drugsatfda_docs/label/2022/211675s003lbl.pdf
  27. Rinvoq. Product information. European Medicines Agency. Published December 18, 2019. Updated December 7, 2022. Accessed January 20, 2023. https://www.ema.europa.eu/en/medicines/human/EPAR/rinvoq
  28. New drugs approved in FY 2019. Pharmaceuticals and Medical Devices Agency. Accessed January 20, 2023. https://www.pmda.go.jp/files/000235289.pdfs
  29. New drugs approved in May 2022. Pharmaceuticals and Medical Devices Agency. Accessed January 20, 2023. https://www.pmda.go.jp/files/000248626.pdf
  30. Nakagawa H, Nemoto O, Igarashi A, et al. Delgocitinib ointment, a topical Janus kinase inhibitor, in adult patients with moderate to severe atopic dermatitis: a phase 3, randomized, double-blind, vehicle-controlled study and an open-label, long-term extension study. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2020;82:823-831. Erratum appears in J Am Acad Dermatol. 2021;85:1069.
  31. Sideris N, Paschou E, Bakirtzi K, et al. New and upcoming topical treatments for atopic dermatitis: a review of the literature. J Clin Med. 2022;11:4974.
  32. Papp K, Szepietowski JC, Kircik L, et al. Efficacy and safety of ruxolitinib cream for the treatment of atopic dermatitis: results from 2 phase 3, randomized, double-blind studies. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2021;85:863-872.
  33. Radi G, Simonetti O, Rizzetto G, et al. Baricitinib: the first Jak inhibitor approved in Europe for the treatment of moderate to severe atopic dermatitis in adult patients. Healthcare (Basel). 2021;9:1575.
  34. Guttman-Yassky E, Teixeira HD, Simpson EL, et al. Once-daily upadacitinib versus placebo in adolescents and adults with moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis (Measure Up 1 and Measure Up 2): results from two replicate double-blind, randomised controlled phase 3 trials. Lancet. 2021;397:2151-2168. Erratum appears in Lancet. 2021;397:2150.
  35. Bieber T, Simpson EL, Silverberg JI, et al. Abrocitinib versus placebo or dupilumab for atopic dermatitis. N Engl J Med. 2021;384:1101-1112.
  36. Johnson H, Novack DE, Adler BL, et al. Can atopic dermatitis and allergic contact dermatitis coexist? Cutis. 2022;110:139-142.
  37. Amano W, Nakajima S, Yamamoto Y, et al. JAK inhibitor JTE-052 regulates contact hypersensitivity by downmodulating T cell activation and differentiation. J Dermatol Sci. 2016;84:258-265.
  38. O’Shea JJ, Schwartz DM, Villarino AV, et al. The JAK-STAT pathway: impact on human disease and therapeutic intervention. Annu Rev Med. 2015;66:311-328.
  39. Bechara R, Antonios D, Azouri H, et al. Nickel sulfate promotes IL-17A producing CD4+ T cells by an IL-23-dependent mechanism regulated by TLR4 and JAK-STAT pathways. J Invest Dermatol. 2017;137:2140-2148.
  40. Oetjen LK, Mack MR, Feng J, et al. Sensory neurons co-opt classical immune signaling pathways to mediate chronic itch. Cell. 2017;171:217-228.e13.
  41. Fujii Y, Sengoku T. Effects of the Janus kinase inhibitor CP-690550 (tofacitinib) in a rat model of oxazolone-induced chronic dermatitis. Pharmacology. 2013;91:207-213.
  42. Fukuyama T, Ehling S, Cook E, et al. Topically administered Janus-kinase inhibitors tofacitinib and oclacitinib display impressive antipruritic and anti-inflammatory responses in a model of allergic dermatitis. J Pharmacol Exp Ther. 2015;354:394-405.
  43. Cosgrove SB, Wren JA, Cleaver DM, et al. Efficacy and safety of oclacitinib for the control of pruritus and associated skin lesions in dogs with canine allergic dermatitis. Vet Dermatol. 2013;24:479, E114.
  44. Baltazar D, Shinamoto SR, Hamann CP, et al. Occupational airborne allergic contact dermatitis to invasive Compositae species treated with abrocitinib: a case report. Contact Dermatitis. 2022;87:542-544.
  45. Muddebihal A, Sardana K, Sinha S, et al. Tofacitinib in refractory Parthenium-induced airborne allergic contact dermatitis [published online October 12, 2022]. Contact Dermatitis. doi:10.1111/cod.14234
  46. Worm M, Bauer A, Elsner P, et al. Efficacy and safety of topical delgocitinib in patients with chronic hand eczema: data from a randomized, double-blind, vehicle-controlled phase IIa study. Br J Dermatol. 2020;182:1103-1110.
  47. Chen J, Cheng J, Yang H, et al. The efficacy and safety of Janus kinase inhibitors in patients with atopic dermatitis: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2022;87:495-496.
  48. Ytterberg SR, Bhatt DL, Mikuls TR, et al. Cardiovascular and cancer risk with tofacitinib in rheumatoid arthritis. N Engl J Med. 2022;386:316-326.
  49. US Food and Drug Administration. FDA requires warnings about increased risk of serious heart-related events, cancer, blood clots, and death for JAK inhibitors that treat certain chronic inflammatory conditions. Updated December 7, 2021. Accessed January 20, 2023. https://www.fda.gov/drugs/drug-safety-and-availability/fda-requires-warnings-about-increased-risk-serious-heart-related-events-cancer-blood-clots-and-death
  50. Chen TL, Lee LL, Huang HK, et al. Association of risk of incident venous thromboembolism with atopic dermatitis and treatment with Janus kinase inhibitors: a systematic review and meta-analysis. JAMA Dermatol. 2022;158:1254-1261.
  51. King B, Maari C, Lain E, et al. Extended safety analysis of baricitinib 2 mg in adult patients with atopic dermatitis: an integrated analysis from eight randomized clinical trials. Am J Clin Dermatol. 2021;22:395-405.
  52. Nash P, Kerschbaumer A, Dörner T, et al. Points to consider for the treatment of immune-mediated inflammatory diseases with Janus kinase inhibitors: a consensus statement. Ann Rheum Dis. 2021;80:71-87.
  53. Narla S, Silverberg JI. The suitability of treating atopic dermatitis with Janus kinase inhibitors. Exp Rev Clin Immunol. 2022;18:439-459.
Issue
Cutis - 111(2)
Issue
Cutis - 111(2)
Page Number
92-95,105
Page Number
92-95,105
Publications
Publications
Topics
Article Type
Display Headline
Janus Kinase Inhibitors: A Promising Therapeutic Option for Allergic Contact Dermatitis
Display Headline
Janus Kinase Inhibitors: A Promising Therapeutic Option for Allergic Contact Dermatitis
Sections
Inside the Article

PRACTICE POINTS

  • Janus kinase (JAK) inhibitors are a novel class of small molecule inhibitors that modulate the JAK/signal transducer and activator of transcription signaling pathway.
  • Select JAK inhibitors have been approved by the US Food and Drug Administration for the management of atopic dermatitis. Their use in allergic contact dermatitis is under active investigation.
  • Regular follow-up and laboratory monitoring for patients on oral JAK inhibitors is recommended, given the potential for treatment-related adverse effects.
Disallow All Ads
Content Gating
No Gating (article Unlocked/Free)
Alternative CME
Disqus Comments
Default
Use ProPublica
Hide sidebar & use full width
render the right sidebar.
Conference Recap Checkbox
Not Conference Recap
Clinical Edge
Display the Slideshow in this Article
Medscape Article
Display survey writer
Reuters content
Disable Inline Native ads
WebMD Article
Article PDF Media